<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-14031-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Is the recovery of stratospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> speeding up in the Southern
Hemisphere? An evaluation from the first IASI decadal record (2008–2017)</article-title><alt-title>Is the recovery of stratospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> speeding up in the Southern Hemisphere?</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Is the recovery of stratospheric O${}_{{3}}$ speeding up in the Southern Hemisphere?}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. Wespes et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wespes</surname><given-names>Catherine</given-names></name>
          <email>cwespes@ulb.ac.be</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hurtmans</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Chabrillat</surname><given-names>Simon</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-1567</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ronsmans</surname><given-names>Gaétane</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff1">
          <name><surname>Clerbaux</surname><given-names>Cathy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Coheur</surname><given-names>Pierre-François</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Faculté des Sciences,
Chimie Quantique et Photophysique, Bruxelles, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>LATMOS/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UVSQ, CNRS, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Catherine Wespes (cwespes@ulb.ac.be)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>14031</fpage><lpage>14056</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Catherine Wespes et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e157">In this paper, we present the global fingerprint of recent changes in
middle–upper stratosphere (MUSt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa) ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
comparison with lower stratosphere (LSt; 150–25 hPa) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived
from the first 10 years of the IASI/Metop-A satellite measurements (January 2008–December 2017). The IASI instrument provides vertically resolved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles with very high spatial and temporal (twice daily)
samplings, allowing  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes to be monitored in these two regions of the
stratosphere. By applying multivariate regression models with adapted
geophysical proxies on daily mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series, we discriminate
anthropogenic trends from various modes of natural variability, such as the
El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The representativeness of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to its natural drivers is first examined. One important
finding relies on a pronounced contrast between a positive LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
response to ENSO in the extratropics and a negative one in the tropics,
with a delay of 3 months, which supports a stratospheric pathway for the
ENSO influence on lower stratospheric and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In terms of
trends, we find an unequivocal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery from the available period of
measurements in winter–spring at middle to high latitudes for the two
stratospheric layers sounded by IASI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–S in the MUSt and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in the LSt) as well as in the total columns at southern latitudes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) where the increase reaches
its maximum. These results confirm the effectiveness of the Montreal
Protocol and its amendments and represent the first detection of a
significant recovery of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concurrently in the lower, in the middle–upper
stratosphere and in the total column from one single satellite dataset. A
significant decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at northern mid-latitudes in the LSt is also
detected, especially in winter–spring of the Northern Hemisphere. Given
counteracting trends in the LSt and MUSt at these latitudes, the decline is not
categorical in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When freezing the regression coefficients
determined for each natural driver over the whole IASI period but adjusting
a trend, we calculate a significant speeding up in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to
the decline of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleting substances (ODSs) in the total column, in
the LSt and, to a lesser extent, in the MUSt, at high southern latitudes
over the year. Results also show a small significant acceleration of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline at northern mid-latitudes in the LSt and in the total column
over the last few years. That, specifically, needs urgent investigation to
identify its exact origin and apprehend its impact on climate change.
Additional years of IASI measurements would, however, be required to confirm
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change rates observed in the stratospheric layers over the last few
years.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e418">Ozone is a key radiatively active gas of the Earth's atmosphere, in both the
troposphere and the stratosphere. While in the troposphere <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acts as
a strong pollutant and an important greenhouse gas, in the stratosphere and,
more particularly, in the middle–low stratosphere, it forms a protective
layer for life on Earth against harmful solar radiation. In the<?pagebreak page14032?> 1980s, the
scientific community motivated decision-makers to regulate the use of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), after the unexpected discovery of the springtime
Antarctic ozone hole (Chubachi, 1984; Farman et al., 1985) that was
suspected to be induced by continued use of CFCs (Molina and Rowland, 1974;
Crutzen, 1974). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion was later verified from measurements
at other Antarctic sites (e.g. Farmer et al., 1987) and from satellite
observations (Stolarski et al., 1986) and explained by the role of CFCs on
the massive destruction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> following heterogeneous reactions on the
surface of polar stratospheric clouds (Solomon, 1999; Solomon et al., 1986, and references
therein). The world's nations reacted to that human-caused worldwide problem
by ratifying the International Vienna Convention for the Protection of the
Ozone Layer in 1985 and the Montreal Protocol in 1987 with its later
amendments, which forced the progressive banning of these ozone-depleting
substances (ODSs) in industrial applications by the early 1990s with a total
phase-out of the most harmful CFCs by the year 2000.</p>
      <p id="d1e454">A recovery from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion is expected in response to the Montreal
Protocol and its amendments, but with a delayed period due to the long
residence time of halocarbons in the atmosphere (Hofmann et al., 1997;
Dhomse el al., 2006; WMO, 2007, 2011). The decline of CFCs in the
stratosphere was only initiated about 10 years after their phasing out
(Anderson et al., 2000; Newman et al., 2006; Solomon et al., 2006;
Mäder et al., 2010; WMO, 2011, 2014). The early signs of ozone response
to that decline were identified in several studies that reported first a
slowdown in stratospheric ozone depletion (e.g. Newchurch et al., 2003; Yang
et al., 2008), followed by a leveling off of upper stratospheric (e.g. WMO,
2007) and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. WMO, 2011; Shepherd et al., 2014) depletion
since the 2000s. A significant onset of recovery was identified later for
upper stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. WMO, 2014, 2018; Harris et al., 2015).
Only a few studies have shown evidence for increasing total column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in polar regions during springtime (e.g. Salby et al., 2011; Kuttippurath et
al., 2013; Shepherd et al., 2014; Solomon et al., 2016). Statistically
significant long-term recovery in the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column (TOC) on a global
scale has not yet been observed, likely because of counteracting trends in
the different vertical atmospheric layers. Ball et al. (2018) have found
that a continuing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline has prevailed in the lower stratosphere since
1998, leading to a slower increase in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than expected from the
effective equivalent stratospheric chlorine (EESC) decrease. However, the
reported decline is not reproduced by the state-of-the-art models and its
exact reasons are still unknown (Ball et al., 2018). Wargan et al. (2018)
and Galytska et al. (2019) recently reported that the decline in the
extratropical lower stratosphere and tropical mid-stratosphere is
dynamically controlled by variations in the tropical upwelling.</p>
      <p id="d1e535">Although recent papers based on observational datasets and statistical
approaches agree that we are currently progressing towards an emergence into ozone
recovery (e.g. Pawson et al., 2014; Harris et al., 2015; Steinbrecht et al.,
2017; Sofieva et al., 2017; Ball et al., 2018; Weber et al., 2018), trend
magnitude and trend significance over the whole stratosphere substantially
differ from one study to another and, consequently, they are still subject
to uncertainty (Keeble et al., 2018). A clear identification of the onset of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery is very difficult due to concurrent sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluctuations (e.g. Reinsel et al., 2005; WMO, 2007, 2011). They include
changes in solar ultraviolet irradiance, in atmospheric circulation patterns
such as the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO; Baldwin et al., 2001) and the
El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO; e.g. Randel et al., 2009), in
temperature, in ODS emissions, and in volcanic eruptions (e.g. Mt Pinatubo in
1991 and Calbuco in 2015) with their feedbacks on stratospheric temperature
and dynamics (e.g. Jonsson et al., 2004). Furthermore, the differences in
vertical and spatial resolution and in retrieval methodologies (inducing
biases), possible instrumental degradations (inducing drifts), and use of
merged datasets into composites likely explain part of the trend divergence
between various studies. If merging performed on deseasonalized anomalies
offers the advantage of removing instrumental biases between the individual
data records (Sofieva et al., 2017), large differences remain in
anomaly values between the independent datasets, as well as large
instrumental drifts and drift uncertainty estimates that prevent
statistically accurate trends from being derived (Harris et al., 2015; Hubert et al., 2016). In
this context, there is a pressing need for a long-duration, high-density and
homogenized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile dataset to assess significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes in
different parts of the stratosphere and their contributions to the total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e593">In this paper, we exploit the high frequency (daily) and spatial coverage of
the IASI satellite dataset over the first decade of the mission (January 2008–December 2017) to determine global patterns of reliable trends in
the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records, separately in the middle–upper stratosphere (MUSt) and the lower stratosphere (LSt). This study is built on previous
analysis of stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends from IASI, estimated on latitudinal
averages over a shorter period (2008–2013) (Wespes et al., 2016). A
multivariate linear regression (MLR) model (annual and seasonal
formulations) that is similar to that previously used for tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> studies from IASI (Wespes et al., 2017, 2018), but adapted here for
the stratosphere with appropriate drivers, is applied to gridded daily mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series in the MUSt and the LSt. The MLR model is evaluated in
terms of its performance and its ability to capture the observed variability
in Sect. 2, in terms of representativeness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drivers in Sect. 3
and in terms of adjusted trends in Sect. 4. The minimum number of years
of IASI measurements that is required to indeed detect the adjusted trends
from MLR in the two layers is also estimated in Sect. 4, which ends with an
evaluation of the trends detectable in polar winter and spring and with an
evaluation of a speeding up in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page14033?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Dataset and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{IASI {$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$} data}?><title>IASI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data</title>
      <p id="d1e690">The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) is a nadir-viewing
Fourier transform spectrometer designed to measure the thermal infrared
emission of the Earth–atmosphere system between 645 and 2760 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Measurements are taken from the polar sun-synchronous orbiting
meteorological Metop series of satellites, every 50 km along the track of
the satellite at nadir and over a swath of 2200 km across the track. With more
than 14 orbits a day and a field of view of four simultaneous footprints of
12 km at nadir, IASI provides global coverage of the Earth twice a day at
about 09:30 and 21:30 mean local solar time.</p>
      <p id="d1e705">The Metop program consists of a series of three identical satellites
successively launched to ensure homogenous measurements of atmospheric
parameters covering more than 15 years. Metop-A and -B were
successively launched in October 2006 and September 2012, respectively. The
third and last satellite was launched in November 2018 on board Metop-C. In
addition to its exceptional spatio-temporal coverage, IASI also provides
good spectral resolution and low radiometric noise, which allows the
measurement of a series of gas-phase species and aerosols globally (e.g.
Clerbaux et al., 2009; Hilton et al., 2012; Clarisse et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e708">In this study, we use the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles retrieved by the Fast Optimal
Retrievals on Layers for IASI (FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; version 20151001) near-real
time processing chain set up at ULB (see Hurtmans et al., 2012, for a
description of the retrieval parameters and the FORLI performances). The
FORLI algorithm relies on a fast radiative transfer and a retrieval
methodology based on the optimal estimation method (Rodgers, 2000), which
requires a priori information (a priori profile and associated
variance–covariance matrix). The FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a priori information consists of one
single profile and one covariance matrix built from the global
Logan–Labow–McPeters climatology (McPeters et al., 2007). The profiles are
retrieved on a uniform 1 km vertical grid on 41 layers from surface to 40 km
with an extra layer from 40 km to the top of the atmosphere considered at 60 km. Previous characterization of the FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles (Wespes et al.,
2016) have demonstrated a good vertical sensitivity of IASI to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurement, with up to four independent levels of information on the vertical
profile in the troposphere and the stratosphere (MUSt; LSt; upper
troposphere-lower stratosphere – UTLS – 300–150 hPa; middle-low
troposphere – MLT – below 300 hPa). The two stratospheric layers that
show distinctive patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions over the IASI decade
(Fig. 1a) are characterized by high sensitivity (degree of freedom for signal – DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.85;
Fig. 1b) and low total retrieval errors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; see Hurtmans et
al., 2012, and Wespes et al., 2016). The decorrelation between the MUSt and the
LSt is further evidenced in Fig. 1d, which shows low correlation coefficients
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the mean absolute deseasonalized anomalies (as
calculated in Wespes et al., 2017) in the two layers (Fig. 1c). Note that
the highest correlation coefficients over the Antarctic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are due to the smaller vertical sensitivity of the IASI measurements
over cold surfaces (Clerbaux et al., 2009). The latest validation exercises
for the FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product have demonstrated a high degree of precision
with excellent consistency between the measurements taken from the two IASI
instruments on Metop-A and -B, as well as a good degree of accuracy with
biases lower than 20 % in the stratospheric layers (Boynard et al., 2018;
Keppens et al., 2018). Thanks to these good IASI-FORLI performances,
large-scale dynamical modes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations and long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
changes can be differentiated in the four retrieved layers (Wespes et al.,
2016). The recent validations have, however, reported a drift in the MUSt
FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series from comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sondes in the
Northern Hemisphere (NH) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU decade<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average over 2008–2016; Boynard et al., 2018) that was
suggested to result from a pronounced discontinuity (“jump”) rather than
from a progressive change. Further comparisons with CTM simulations from the
Belgian Assimilation System for Chemical ObsErvations (BASCOE; Chabrillat et
al., 2018; Errera et al., 2019) confirm this jump that occurred on 15 September 2010 over all latitudes (see Fig. S1 of the Supplement). The discontinuity is suspected to result from updates in level-2
temperature data from Eumetsat that are used as inputs into FORLI (see
Hurtmans et al., 2012). Hence, the apparent drift reported by Boynard et al. (2018) likely results from the jump rather than from a progressive
“instrumental” drift. This is verified by the absence of drift in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series after the jump (non-significant drift of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU decade<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average over October 2010–May 2017; adapted from
Boynard et al., 2018). This is in line with the excellent stability of the
IASI Level-1 radiances over the full IASI period (Buffet et al., 2016). From
the IASI-BASCOE comparisons, the amplitude of the jump has been estimated as
lower than 2.0 DU in the 55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude band and
4.0 DU in the 55–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude band of each
hemisphere. The estimated amplitude of the jump is found to be relatively
small in comparison to that of the decadal trends derived in Sect. 4;
hence, it cannot explain the trend observed in the IASI dataset. Therefore,
the jump is not taken into account in the MLR. The jump values will be,
however, considered in the discussion of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends (Sect. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e977">Global distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (in Dobson units –
DU), <bold>(b)</bold> associated DOFS, <bold>(c)</bold> absolute deseasonalized anomalies (in percentage)
averaged over January 2008–December 2017 in the MUSt (middle–upper stratosphere: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa; left panels) and in the LSt (lower
stratosphere: 150–25 hPa; right panels). Panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows the correlation
coefficients between the daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deseasonalized anomalies in the MUSt
and in the LSt. Note that the scales are different between MUSt and LSt.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1031">Finally, the present study only uses the daytime measurements (defined with
a solar zenith angle to the sun <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the IASI-A
(aboard Metop-A) instrument, which fully covers the first decade of the IASI
mission. The daytime measurements are characterized by a higher vertical
sensitivity (e.g. Clerbaux et al., 2009). Quality flags developed in
previous IASI studies (e.g. Boynard et al., 2018) were applied a posteriori
to exclude data with a poor spectral fit, with less reliability or with
cloud contamination.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page14034?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Multivariate regression model</title>
      <p id="d1e1060">In an effort to unambiguously discriminate anthropogenic trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels from the various modes of natural variability (illustrated globally
in Fig. 1c as deseasonalized anomalies), we have applied to the
2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded daily MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time
series a MLR model that is similar to that previously developed for
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> studies from IASI (see Wespes et al., 2017, 2018) but
is here adapted to fit the stratospheric variations:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cst</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of days, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the trend coefficient in the data,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the regression
coefficients of the seasonal and non-seasonal variables, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the residual variation (assumed to be autoregressive with time lag of 1 d). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> chosen explanatory variables, commonly called
“proxies”, which are normalized over the study period (2008–2017) with the following:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M94" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">median</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In addition to harmonic terms that represent the 1-year and 6-month
variations, the MLR model includes the anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response
through a linear trend (LT) term and a set of proxies to parameterize the
geophysical processes influencing the abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
stratosphere. The MLR uses an iterative stepwise backward elimination
approach to retain, at the end of the iterations, the most relevant proxies
(within a 95 % confidence level) explaining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations (e.g.
Mäder et al., 2007). Table 1 lists the selected proxies, their sources
and their temporal resolutions. The proxies describe the influence of the
Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO;<?pagebreak page14035?> visible from the deseasonalized anomaly
maps in Fig. 1c with a typical band-like pattern around the Equator) at 10
and 30 hPa, of the North Atlantic and the Antarctic Oscillations (NAO
and AAO), of the ENSO, of the volcanic
aerosols (AERO) injected into the stratosphere, of the strength of the
Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC) with the Eliassen–Palm flux (EPF), of the
polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss driven by the volume of polar stratospheric clouds
(VPSC), of the tropopause height variation with the geopotential height
(GEO), and of the mixing of tropospheric and stratospheric air masses with
the potential vorticity (PV). The main proxies in terms of their influence
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the period of the IASI mission are illustrated in Fig. 2.
The construction of the EPF, VPSC and AERO proxies, which are specifically
used in this study, is explained hereafter, while the description of the
other proxies can be found in previous IASI studies (Wespes et al., 2016, 2017).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1528">List of the explanatory variables used in the multi-linear
regression model applied on IASI stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, their temporal
resolution and their sources.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.94}[.94]?><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="128.037402pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="312.980315pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Proxy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description (<italic>resolution</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sources (last access: 2 November 2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The 10.7 cm solar radio flux (<italic>daily</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NOAA National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <uri>ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-radio/noontime-flux/penticton/penticton_adjusted/listings/listing_drao_noontime-flux-adjusted_daily.txt</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">QBO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>QBO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Quasi-Biennial Oscillation index at 10  and 30 hPa (<italic>monthly</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Free University of Berlin: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <uri>https://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/en/met/ag/strat/produkte/qbo/</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EPF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Vertical component of Eliassen–Palm flux crossing 100 hPa, averaged over 45–75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for each hemisphere and accumulated over the last 3 or 12 months depending on the time period and the latitude (see text for more details) (<italic>daily</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Calculated at ULB from the NCEP/NCAR gridded reanalysis: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.html</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AERO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stratospheric volcanic aerosols; vertically integrated sulfuric acid extinction coefficient at 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m over 150–25 and 25–2 hPa, averaged over the tropics and the extratropics north and south (see text for more details) (<italic>monthly</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Extinction coefficients processed at the Institute for Atmosphere and Climate (ETH Zurich, Switzerland; Thomason et al., 2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VPSC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume of polar stratospheric clouds for the NH and the SH multiplied by the equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC) and accumulated over the last 3 or 12 months (see text for details) (<italic>daily</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Processed at the Alfred Wagner Institute (AWI, Postdam, Germany; Ingo Wohltmann, personal communication, 2018) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>EESC taken from the Goddard Space Flight Center: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <uri>https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/automailer/index.html</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ENSO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Multivariate El Niño–Southern Oscillation Index (MEI) (<italic>2-monthly averages</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NOAA National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/mei/</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NAO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Atlantic Oscillation index for the NH (<italic>daily</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/norm.daily.nao.index.b500101.current.ascii</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AAO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Antarctic Oscillation index for the SH (<italic>daily</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/norm.daily.aao.index.b790101.current.ascii</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GEO <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>PV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Geopotential height at 200 hPa<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded) (<italic>daily</italic>) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Potential vorticity at 200 hPa<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded) (<italic>daily</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><uri>http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/interim-full-daily/?levtype=pl</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1833">Normalized proxies as a function of time for the period covering
January 2008 to December 2017 for <bold>(a)</bold> the F10.7 cm solar radio flux (SF) and
the equatorial winds at 10 (QBO10) and 30 hPa (QBO30), respectively; <bold>(b)</bold> the
upward components of the EP flux crossing 100 hPa accumulated over time and
averaged over the 45–75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude band for each
hemispheres (EPF-N and EPF-S); <bold>(c)</bold> the extinction coefficients at 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m vertically integrated over the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column (from
150–2 hPa) and averaged over the extratropics north and south
(22.5–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–S; AERO-N and AERO-S) and over the tropics
(22.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–22.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; AERO-EQ) (the main volcanic eruptions
are indicated); <bold>(d)</bold> the volume of polar stratospheric clouds multiplied by
the equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC) and accumulated over
time for the Northern and Southern Hemispheres (VPSC-N and VPSC-S); and <bold>(e)</bold> the El
Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), North Atlantic (NAO) and Antarctic (AAO)
oscillations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1914">The EPF proxy consists of the normalized upward component of the EP flux
crossing 100 hPa and spatially averaged over the 45–75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude band for each hemisphere. The fluxes are calculated
from the NCEP/NCAR 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded daily reanalysis
(Kalnay et al., 1996) over the IASI decade. The VPSC proxy is based on the
potential volume of PSCs given by the volume of air below the formation
temperature of nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) over 60–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> north and south and calculated from the ERA-Interim
reanalysis and from the MLS climatology of nitric acid (Ingo Wohltmann,
personal communication, 2018; Wohltmann et al., 2007; and references therein). The
PSC volume is multiplied by the EESC to account for the changes in the
amount of inorganic stratospheric chlorine that activates the polar ozone
loss. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> build-up and the polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss are highly correlated
with wintertime accumulated EP flux and PSC volume, respectively (Fusco and
Salby, 1999; Randel et al., 2002; Fioletov and Shepherd, 2003; Rex et
al., 2004). These cumulative EP flux and PSC effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are
taken into account by integrating the EPF and VPSC proxies over time with a
specific exponential decay time according to the formalism of Brunner et al. (2006; see Eq. 4). We set the relaxation timescale to 3 months everywhere,
except during the wintertime build-up phase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the extratropics
(from October to March in the NH and from April to September in the
Southern Hemisphere – SH) when it is set to 12 months. For EPF, it
accounts for the slower relaxation time of extratropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter
due to its longer photochemical lifetime. For VPSC, the 12-month relaxation
time accounts for a stronger effect of stratospheric chorine on spring
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels: the maximum of the accumulated VPSC (Fig. 2) coincides with
the maximum extent of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hole that develops during springtime and that
lasts until November. Note that correlations between VPSC and EPF are
possible since the same method is used to build these cumulative proxies.
VPSC and EPF are also dynamically anti-correlated to some extent since a
strong BDC is connected with warm polar stratospheric temperatures and,
hence, reduced PSC volume (e.g. Wohltmann et al., 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e2039">The AERO proxy is derived from the aerosol optical depth (AOD) of sulfuric acid
only. That proxy consists of latitudinally averaged (22.5–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N: AERO-N; 22.5–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S: AERO-S; and
22.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–22.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N: AERO-Eq) extinction coefficients at
12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m calculated from merged aerosol datasets (SAGE, SAM, CALIPSO,
OSIRIS, 2-D model simulation and Photometer; Thomason et al., 2018) and
vertically integrated over the two IASI stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
(AERO-MUSt and AERO-LSt). Figure 2 shows the AERO proxies (AERO-N, AERO-S and
AERO-Eq) corresponding to the AOD over the whole stratosphere (150–2 hPa),
while Fig. 3 represents the latitudinal distribution of the volcanic sulfuric
acid extinction coefficients integrated over the whole stratosphere (a) and, separately, over the MUSt (b) and the LSt (c) from 2005 to 2017. The AOD distributions indicate the need for
considering one specific AERO proxy for each latitudinal band (AERO-N,
AERO-S and AERO-Eq) and for each vertical layer (AERO-MUSt and AERO-LSt).
Note that, as an alternative proxy to AERO, the surface area density of
ambient aerosol, which represents the aerosol surface available for chemical
reactions, has been tested, giving similar results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2100">Latitudinal distribution of volcanic sulfuric acid extinction
coefficient at 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m integrated <bold>(a)</bold> over the stratosphere, <bold>(b)</bold> over the middle stratosphere and <bold>(c)</bold> over the lower stratosphere, as a function of time from 2005 to 2017. The dataset consists
of monthly mean aerosol data merged from SAGE, SAM, CALIPSO, OSIRIS,
2-D model simulation and Photometer (processed at NASA Langley Research
Center, USA, and ETH Zurich, Switzerland).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2126">Note also that, similarly to what has already been found for tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from IASI (Wespes et al., 2016), several time lags for ENSO (1-, 3-
and 5-month lags; namely, ENSO-lag1, ENSO-lag3 and ENSO-lag5) are also
included in the MLR model to account for a possible delay in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
response to ENSO at high latitudes.</p>
      <p id="d1e2151">Finally, autocorrelation in the noise residual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Eq. 1 in Wespes et
al., 2016) is accounted for in the MLR analysis with time lag of one day to
yield the correct estimated standard errors for the regression coefficients.
They are estimated from the covariance matrix of the regression coefficients
and corrected at the end of the iterative process by the autocorrelation of
the noise residual. The regression coefficients are considered significant
if they fall in the 95 % confidence level (defined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level).</p>
      <p id="d1e2179">In the seasonal formulation of the MLR model, the main proxies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the regression coefficient, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the normalized proxy) are split into four seasonal functions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spr</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sum</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sum</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fall</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fall</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wint</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">norm</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wint</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that are independently and simultaneously adjusted for each
grid cell (Wespes et al., 2017). Hence, the seasonal MLR adjusts four
coefficients (instead of one in the annual MLR) to account for the seasonal
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to changes in the proxy. If that method avoids over-constraining the adjustment by the year-round proxies and, hence, reduces
the systematic errors, the smaller daily data points covered by the seasonal
proxies translate to a lower significance of these proxies. This is
particularly true for EPF and VPSC, which compensate each other by
construction. As a consequence, the annual MLR is performed first in this
study and then complemented with the seasonal one when it is found helpful
for further interpreting the observations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14037?><p id="d1e2313">Figure 4 shows the latitudinal distributions of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in the
two stratospheric layers over the IASI decade (first panels in Fig. 4a and
b), as well as those simulated by the annual MLR regression model (second
panels) along with the regression residuals (third panels). The root mean
square error (RMSE) of the regression residual and the contribution of the MLR
model to the IASI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations (calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fitted</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation relative to
the regression model and to the IASI time series; bottom panels) are also
represented (bottom panels). The results indicate that the model reproduces
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %–85 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %–95 % of the daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations captured by IASI in the MUSt and the LSt, respectively, with the
best representation in the tropics and the worst around the SH polar
vortex, and that the residual errors are generally lower than 10 %
everywhere for the two layers, except for the spring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hole region in
the LSt. The RMSE relative to the IASI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series are lower than 15
and 20 DU at global scale in the MUSt and the LSt, respectively, except
around the SH polar vortex in the LSt (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU). On a
seasonal basis (figure not shown), the results are only slightly improved:
the model explains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %–90 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 %–95 % of the annual variations and the RMSEs are lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU everywhere, in the MUSt and the LSt,
respectively. These results verify that the MLR models (annual and seasonal)
reproduce well the time evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the IASI decade in the two
stratospheric layers and, hence, that they can be used to identify and
quantify the main <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drivers in these two layers (see Sect. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2508">Latitudinal distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> MUSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column and <bold>(b)</bold> LSt
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns as a function of time observed from IASI (in DU; top
panels), simulated by the annual regression model (in DU, second panels) and
of the regression residuals (in percentage; third panels). Global distribution of
RMSE of the regression residual (in DU) and fraction of the variation in IASI
data explained by the regression model calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fitted</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in percentage; fourth panels).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2598">The MLR model has also been tested on nighttime FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements
only and simultaneously with daytime measurements, but this resulted in a
lower-quality fit, especially in the MUSt over the polar regions. This is
due to the smaller vertical sensitivity of IASI during nighttime
measurements, especially over cold surfaces, which causes larger correlations
between stratospheric and tropospheric layers (e.g. 40 %–60 % at high
northern latitudes versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %–20 % for daytime measurements
based on deseasonalized anomalies) and, hence, which mixes counteracting
processes from these two layers. For this reason, only the results for the
MLR performed on daytime measurements are presented in this paper.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Drivers of {$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$} natural variations}?><title>Drivers of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> natural variations</title>
      <p id="d1e2640">Ascribing a recovery in stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to a decline in stratospheric
halogen species requires first identifying and quantifying natural cycles
that may produce trend-like segments in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series, in order to
prevent any misinterpretation of those segments as signs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
recovery. The MLR analysis performed in Sect. 2.2 that was found to give a
good representation of the MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records shows distinctive
relevant patterns for the individual proxies retained in the regression
procedure, as represented in Fig. 5. The fitted drivers are characterized by
significant regional differences in their regression coefficients with
regions of in-phase relation (positive coefficients) or out-of-phase
relation (negative coefficients) with respect to the IASI stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies. The areas of significant drivers (in the 95 %
confidence limit) are surrounded by non-significant cells when accounting
for the autocorrelation in the noise residual. Figure 6a and b,
respectively, represent the<?pagebreak page14038?> latitudinal averages of the fitted regression
coefficients for the significant proxies showing latitudinal variation only
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response (namely, QBO, EPF, VPSC, AERO and ENSO) and of the
contribution of these drivers to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability (calculated as
the product of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability of each proxy by its corresponding
fitted coefficient, i.e. the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability of the reconstructed
proxies). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in the IASI measurements and in
the fitted MLR model are also represented (black and grey lines,
respectively). Figure 7 displays the same results as Fig. 6b but for the
austral spring and winter periods only (using the seasonal MLR).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2764">Global distribution of the annual regression coefficient estimates
(in DU) for the main <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drivers in <bold>(a)</bold> MUSt and in <bold>(b)</bold> LSt: QBO10,
QBO30, SF, EPF, VPSC, AERO, NAO, AAO and ENSO (ENSO-lag3 for both LSt and
MUSt). Grey areas and crosses refer to non-significant grid cells within the
95 % confidence limit. Note that the scales differ among the drivers.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2793">Latitudinal distributions <bold>(a)</bold> of fitting regression coefficients for
various <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drivers (QBO10, QBO30, EPF, VPSC, AERO, AAO and ENSO-lag3;
in DU) and <bold>(b)</bold> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability due to variations in those
drivers (in DU) from the annual MLR in MUSt and LSt (left and right panels
respectively). Vertical bars correspond <bold>(a)</bold> to the uncertainty of fitting
coefficients at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level and <bold>(b)</bold> to the corresponding error
contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation. Note that the scales are different.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2870">Same as Fig. 6b but for <bold>(a)</bold> the austral winter and <bold>(b)</bold> the austral
spring periods (JJA and SON, respectively) from the seasonal MLR. Note that
the scales are different.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2885">The PV and GEO proxies are generally minor components (not shown here) with
relative contributions smaller than 10 % and large standard errors
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), except in the tropics where the contribution for GEO
reaches 40 % in the LSt due to the tropopause height variation. Each other
adjusted proxy (QBO, SF, EPF, VPSC, AERO, ENSO, NAO and AAO) is an important
contributor to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, depending on the layer, region, and
season as described next:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2911"><italic>QBO.</italic> The QBO at 10 and 30 hPa are important contributors around the Equator for the two stratospheric layers. It shows up as a typical band-like
pattern of high positive coefficients confined equatorward of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–S where the QBO is known to be a dominant
dynamical modulation force associated with strong convective anomalies (e.g.
Randel and Wu, 1996; Tian et al., 2006; Witte et al., 2008). In that
latitude band, QBO10 and QBO30 explain up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU, respectively, of the MUSt and LSt yearly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations (see Figs. 5 and 6b; i.e. relative contributions up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for QBO10/30 in MUSt and
LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). The QBO is also influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations
poleward of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–S with a weaker correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
equatorial wind anomalies as well as in the sub-tropics with an out-of-phase
transition. That pole-to-pole QBO influence results from the QBO modulation
of extratropical waves and its interaction with the BDC (e.g. Fusco and
Salby, 1999). A pronounced seasonal dependence is observed in the
out-of-phase sub-tropical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies in the MUSt, with the highest
amplitude oscillating between the hemispheres in their respective winter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations explained by QBO10/30 at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S during JJA and at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N during DJF; see Fig. 7b for the JJA period in the MUSt; the
DJF period is not shown), which is in agreement with Randel and Wu (1996).
The amplitude of the QBO signal is found to be stronger for QBO30 than for
QBO10 in the LSt, which is in good agreement with studies from other
instruments for the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. Baldwin et al., 2001; Steinbrecht et
al., 2006; Frossard et al., 2013; Coldewey-Egbers et al., 2014) and from
IASI in the troposphere (Wespes et al., 2017). The smaller amplitude of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to QBO10 in the LSt compared to the MUSt is again in
agreement with previous studies that reported changes in the phase of the QBO10
response as a function of altitude with a positive response in the upper
stratosphere and destructive interference in the middle–low stratosphere
(Chipperfield et al., 1994; Brunner et al., 2006).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page14041?><p id="d1e3119"><italic>SF.</italic> In the MUSt layer, the solar cycle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response is one of the
strongest contributors and explains globally between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
15 DU of in-phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations (i.e. higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values during
maximum solar irradiance) with the largest amplitude over the highest
latitude regions (see Fig. 5; relative contribution up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The solar influence in the LSt is more complex with regions of in-phase
and out-of-phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations. The impact of solar variability on
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance is due to a combination of processes: a
modification in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates in the upper stratosphere
induced by changes in spectral solar irradiance (e.g. Brasseur,
1993), the transport of solar proton event-produced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
mesosphere down to the middle to low stratosphere where it decreases active
chlorine and bromine and, hence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction (e.g. Jackman et al.,
2000; Hood and Soukharev, 2006; and references therein) while it enhances
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction in the MUSt through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> catalysed cycles, and
its impact on the lower stratospheric dynamics including the QBO (e.g. Hood
et al., 1997; Zerefos et al., 1997; Kodera and Kuroda, 2002; Hood and
Soukharev, 2003; Soukharev and Hood, 2006). As for the QBO, the strong SF
dependence at polar latitudes in the LSt with zonal asymmetry in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
response reflects the influence of the polar vortex strength and of
stratospheric warmings and is in good agreement with previous results
(e.g. Hood et al., 1997; Zerefos et al., 1997; Labitzke and van Loon, 2000;
Steinbrecht et al., 2003; Coldewey-Egbers et al., 2014). It is also worth
noting that because only one solar cycle is covered, the QBO and SF effects
could not be completely separated because of their strong interaction (e.g.
McCormack et al., 2007; Roscoe and Haigh, 2007; Kuttippurath et al., 2013).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3268"><italic>EPF.</italic> The vertical component of the planetary wave Eliassen–Palm flux
entering the lower stratosphere corresponds to the divergence of the wave
momentum that drives the meridional residual Brewer–Dobson circulation. In
agreement with previous studies (e.g. Fusco and Salby, 1999; Randel et al.,
2002; Brunner et al., 2006; Weber et al., 2011), fluctuations in the BDC are
shown to cause changes to stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution observed from
IASI: EPF largely positively contributes to the LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations at
high latitudes of both hemispheres, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is accumulated because of
its<?pagebreak page14042?> long chemical lifetime, with amplitude ranging between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 100 DU (see Figs. 5 and 6; i.e. relative contribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %–150 %). The influence of the EPF decreases at lower
latitudes where a stronger circulation induces more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transported from
the tropics to middle and high latitudes and, hence, a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels, particularly below 20 km (Brunner et al., 2006). The influence of EP
fluxes in the Arctic is the smallest in summer (see Fig. 7; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU in fall; the two other seasons
are not shown) due to the later <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> build-up in polar vortices. In the
SH, because of the formation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hole, the EP influence is
smaller than in the NH and the seasonal variations are less marked. In the
MUSt, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response attributed to variations in EPF is positive in
both hemispheres, with a much lower amplitude than in the LSt (up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–35 DU). The region of out-of-phase relation with negative
EPF coefficients over the high southern latitudes (Fig. 5b) is likely
attributable to the influence of VPSC that has correlations with EPF by
construction (see Sect. 2.2). Furthermore, given the annual oscillations
in EPF, compensation by the 1-year harmonic term (Eq. 1, Sect. 2) is found,
but it remains weaker than the EPF contribution (data not shown), in
particular at high latitudes where the EPF contribution is the largest.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3413"><italic>VPSC.</italic> Identically to EPF, VPSC is shown to mainly contribute to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations in the LSt over the polar regions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU or 40 % in
the NH vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU or 85 % in the SH on a longitudinal
average; see Fig. 6b) but with an opposite phase (Figs. 5 and 6a). The
amplitude of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to VPSC reaches its maximum over the
southern latitudes during the spring (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU; see Fig. 7a for
the austral spring period), which is consistent with the role of PSCs on the
polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion when there is sufficient sunlight. The strong VPSC
influence found at high northern latitudes in fall (Fig. 7a) are due to
compensation effects with EPF as pointed out above and verified from
sensitivity tests (not shown). Note also that the VPSC contribution to
MUSt reflects the larger correlation between the two stratospheric layers
over the southern polar region (Sect. 2.1, Fig. 1d).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3483"><italic>AERO.</italic> Five important volcanic eruptions with stratospheric impact occurred during the IASI mission<?pagebreak page14043?> (Kasatochi in 2008, Sarychev in 2009, Nabro in 2011,
Sinabung in 2014 and Calbuco in 2015; see Fig. 3). The two major eruptions of
the last decades, El Chichon (1982) and Mt Pinatubo (1991), have injected
sulfur gases into the stratosphere. They have been shown to enhance PSC
particle abundances (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15–25 km altitude), to remove <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(through reaction with the surface of the sulfuric aerosol to form nitric
acid) and, hence, to make the ozone layer more sensitive to active chlorine
(e.g. Hofmann and Solomon, 1989; Hofmann and Oltmans, 1993; Portmann et al., 1996;
Solomon et al., 2016). Besides this chemical effect, the volcanic aerosols
also warm the stratosphere at lower latitudes through scattering and
absorption of solar radiation, which further induces indirect dynamical
effects (Dhomse et al., 2015; Revell et al., 2017). Even though the recent
eruptions have been of smaller magnitude than El Chichon and Mt Pinatubo,
they produced sulfur ejection through the tropopause into the stratosphere
(see Sect. 2.2, Figs. 2 and 3), as seen with AOD reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
over the stratosphere (150–2 hPa), especially following the eruptions of
Nabro (13.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 41.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Sinabung (3.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
98.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and Calbuco (41.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 72.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). In
the LSt, the regression supports an enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion over the
Antarctic in the presence of sulfur gases with a significantly negative annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU (i.e. relative contribution
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation; see Fig. 5b). On the
contrary, enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in response to sulfuric acid are found in
the MUSt with a maximum impact of up to 10 DU (i.e. relative contribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % into the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation; see Fig. 5a) over the
Antarctic. The change in phase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to AERO between the
LSt (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15–25 km) and the MUSt (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25–40 km) over
the Antarctic, as well as between polar and lower latitudes in the LSt (see
Figs. 5 and 6a), agrees well with the heterogeneous reactions on sulfuric
aerosol surface, which reduce the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form nitric
acid, leading to enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels above 25 km but leading to
decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels due to chlorine activation below 25 km (e.g.
Solomon et al., 1996). On a seasonal basis, the depletion due to the
presence of sulfur gases reaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU on a longitudinal
average, over the SH polar region during the austral spring (see Fig. 7a),
highlighting the link between volcanic gases converted to sulfate aerosols
and heterogeneous polar halogen chemistry.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3736"><italic>NAO.</italic> The NAO is an important mode of global climate variability,
particularly in northern winter. It describes large-scale anomalies in sea
level pressure systems between the sub-tropical Atlantic (Azores; high
pressure system) and sub-polar (Iceland; low pressure system) regions
(Hurrell, 1995). It disturbs the location and intensity of the North
Atlantic jet stream that separates these two regions depending on the phase
of NAO. The positive (negative) phase of the NAO corresponds to larger
(weaker) pressure difference between the two regions, leading to stronger
westerlies (easterlies) across the mid-latitudes (Barnston and Livezey,
1987). The two pressure system regions are clearly identified in the
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to NAO, particularly in the LSt, with
positive regression coefficients above the Labrador–Greenland region and
negative coefficients above the Euro-Atlantic region (Fig. 5b). Above these
two sectors, the positive phase induces, respectively, an increase and a
decrease in LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. The negative phase is characterized by the
opposite behaviour. That NAO pattern is in line with previous studies
(Rieder et al., 2013) and was also observed from IASI in tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wespes et al., 2017). The magnitude of annual LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes
attributed to NAO variations reaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU over the in-phase
Labrador region (i.e. contribution of 25 % relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations), while a much lower contribution is found for the MUSt
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The NAO coeffficient in
the LSt also shows that the influence of the NAO extends further into
northern Asia in the case of prolonged NAO phases. The NAO has also been
shown to influence the propagation of waves into the stratosphere and, hence,
the BDC and the strength of the polar vortex in the NH mid-winter
(Thompson and Wallace, 2000; Schnadt and Dameris, 2003; Rind et al., 2005).
That connection between the NAO and the BDC might explain the negative
anomaly in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to EPF in the LSt over northern Asia that
matches the region of negative response to the NAO.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3839"><italic>AAO.</italic> The extratropical circulation of the SH is driven by the Antarctic
oscillation that is characterized by geopotential height anomalies south of
20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, with high anomalies of one sign centered in the polar
region and weaker anomalies of the opposing sign north of 55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
(Thompson and Wallace, 2000). This corresponds well to the two band-like
regions of opposite signs found for the regression coefficients of adjusted
AAO in the LSt (negative coefficients centered in Antarctica and positive
coefficient north of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S; see Fig. 5b). Similarly
to the NAO, the strength of the residual mean circulation and of the polar
vortex in the SH are modulated by the AAO through the atmospheric wave
activity (Thompson and Wallace, 2000; Thompson and Solomon, 2002). During
the positive (negative) phase of the AAO, the BDC is weaker (stronger),
leading to less (more) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transported from the tropics into the
southern polar region, and the polar vortex is stronger (weaker), leading to
more (less) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion inside. This likely explains both the positive
AAO coefficients in the region north of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
(contribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and
the negative coefficients around and over the Antarctic (contribution
reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; exception is<?pagebreak page14044?> found
with positive coefficients over the western Antarctic). The dependence of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations to the AAO in the MUSt is lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU
(or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3996"><italic>ENSO.</italic> Besides the NAO and the AAO, the El Niño–Southern Oscillation is another dominant mode of global climate variability. This coupled
ocean-atmosphere phenomenon is governed by sea surface temperature (SST)
differences between high tropical and low extratropical Pacific regions
(Harrison and Larkin, 1998). Domeisen et al. (2019) have recently reviewed
the possible mechanisms connecting the ENSO to the stratosphere in the
tropics and the extratropics of both hemispheres. The ozone response to ENSO
is represented in Fig. 5 only for the ENSO-lag3 proxy which is found to be
the main ENSO proxy contributing to the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations. While
in the troposphere, previous works have shown that the ENSO influence mainly
results in a high contrast of the regression coefficients between the western
Pacific, Indonesian, and northern Australian region and the central and eastern Pacific region caused
by reduced rainfall and enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor emissions above the western
Pacific (called the “chemical effect”) (e.g. Oman et al., 2013; Valks et
al., 2014; Ziemke et al., 2015; Wespes et al., 2016, and references
therein), the LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to ENSO is shown here to translate into a
strong tropical–extratropical gradient in the regression coefficients with a
negative response in the tropics and a positive response at higher latitudes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU
longitudinal averages, respectively,; see Fig. 6a). In the MUSt, ENSO is globally a smaller
out-of-phase driver of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations (response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU). The decrease in LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the warm ENSO phase in the tropics
(characterized by a negative ENSO lag-3 coefficient reaching 7 DU, or
35 % in the LSt; see Fig. 5) is consistent with the
ENSO-modulated upwelling via deep convection in the tropical lower
stratosphere and, hence, increased BD circulation (e.g. Randel et al.,
2009). The in-phase accumulation of LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the extratropics
(contribution reaching 15 DU or 20 %; see Fig. 5) is also consistent with
enhanced extratropical planetary waves that propagate into the stratosphere
during the warm ENSO phase, resulting in sudden stratospheric warmings and,
hence, in enhanced BDC and weaker polar vortices (e.g. Brönnimann et
al., 2004; Manzini et al., 2006; Cagnazzo et al., 2009). The very pronounced
link between stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the ENSO-related dynamical pathways
with a time lag of about 3 months is one key finding of the present work.
Indeed, the influence of ENSO on stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements has
already been reported in earlier studies (Randel and Cobb, 1994;
Brönnimann et al., 2004; Randel et al., 2009; Randel and Thompson, 2011;
Oman et al., 2013; Manatsa and Mukwada, 2017; Tweedy et al., 2018), but it
is the first time that a delayed stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response is
investigated in MLR studies. A 4- to 6-month time lag in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to
ENSO has similarly been identified from IASI in the troposphere (Wespes et
al., 2017), where it was explained not only by a tropospheric pathway but
also by a specific stratospheric pathway similar to that modulating
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but with further impact downward onto tropospheric
circulation (Butler et al., 2014; Domeisen et al., 2019). Furthermore, the
3-month lag identified in the LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response is fully consistent with
the modelling work of Cagnazzo et al. (2009), which reports a warming of the
polar vortex in February–March following a strong ENSO event (peak activity
in November–December) associated with a positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ENSO anomaly reaching
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU in the Arctic and a negative anomaly of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6–7 DU in the Tropics. We find that the tropical–extratropical gradient in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to ENSO-lag3 is indeed much stronger in spring with
contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20–30 DU (see Fig. 7a for the austral spring
period vs. winter).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e4212">Overall, although the annual MLR model underestimates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variability at high latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–S) by up to 5 DU, particularly in the MUSt (see Fig. 6b), we conclude that it gives a good
overall representation of the sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in the two
stratospheric layers sounded by IASI. This is particularly true for the
spring period (see Fig. 7) which was studied in several earlier works to
reveal the onset of Antarctic total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery (Salby et al., 2011;
Kuttippurath et al., 2013; Shepherd et al., 2014; Solomon et al., 2016;
Weber et al., 2018), despite the large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability due to the hole
formation during that period (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU; see Fig. 7a, LSt panel).
It is also interesting to see from Fig. 7 that the broad <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion
over Antarctica in the LSt is attributed by the MLR to VPSC (up to 60 DU of
explained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability on a latitudinal average). Following these
promising results, below we further analyze the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in
response to anthropogenic perturbations, assumed in the MLR model by the
linear trend term, with a focus over the polar regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Trend analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>10-year trend detection in stratospheric layers</title>
      <p id="d1e4336">The distributions of the linear trend estimated by the annual regression are
represented in Fig. 8a for the MUSt and the LSt (left and right panels, respectively). In
agreement with the early signs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery reported for the
extratropical middle–upper stratosphere above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25–10 hPa
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25–30 km; Pawson et al., 2014; Harris et al., 2015;
Steinbrecht et al., 2017; Sofieva et al., 2017; Ball et al., 2018), the MUSt
shows significant positive trends larger than 1 DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> poleward of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–S (except over Antarctica). The
corresponding decadal trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU decade<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are much larger
than the discontinuity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–4 DU encountered in the MUSt
record<?pagebreak page14045?> on 15 September 2010 and discussed in Sect. 2.1. The tropical MUSt
also shows positive trends but they are weaker (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) or not
significant. The largest increase is observed in polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
amplitudes reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mid-latitudes also show
significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement, which can be attributed to air mass mixing
after the disruption of the polar vortex (Knudsen and Grooss, 2000; Fioletov
and Shepherd, 2005; Dhomse et al., 2006; Nair et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4493">Global distribution <bold>(a)</bold> of the estimated annual trends (in DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
grey areas and crosses refer to non-significant grid cells within the 95 %
confidence limit), <bold>(b)</bold> of the IASI sensitivity to trends calculated as the
differences between the RMSE of the annual MLR fits with and without a linear
trend term [(RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">with</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">with</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100] (in percentage), <bold>(c)</bold> of the estimated year for a significant detection (with a
probability of 90 %) of a given trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
starting in January 2008 in MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (left and right
panels, respectively). Note that the scales are different for the two
layers.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4633">As in the MUSt, the LSt is characterized in the southern polar latitudes by
significantly positive and large trends (between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.5 DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the mid-latitudes, the lower stratospheric trends are
significantly negative, i.e. opposite to those obtained in the MUSt. This
highlights the independence between the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layers sounded by IASI
in the stratosphere. Poleward of 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N the negative LSt trends
range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Negative trends in lower
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have already been reported in extra-polar regions from
other space-based measurements (Kyrölä et al., 2013; Gebhardt et
al., 2014; Sioris et al., 2014; Harris et al., 2015; Nair et al., 2015;
Vigouroux et al., 2015; Wespes et al., 2016; Steinbrecht et al., 2017; Ball
et al., 2018) and may be due to changes in stratospheric dynamics at the
decadal timescale (Galytska et al., 2019). These previous studies, which
were characterized by large uncertainties or resulted from composite-data
merging techniques, are confirmed here using a single dataset. The negative
trends which are observed at lower stratospheric middle latitudes are
difficult to explain with chemistry-climate models (Ball et al., 2018). It
is also worth noting that the significant MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are of
the same order as those previously estimated from IASI over a shorter period
(from 2008 to 2013) and latitudinal averages (see Wespes et al., 2016). This
suggests that the trends are not very sensitive to the natural variability
in the IASI time series, hence supporting the significance of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
trends presented here.</p>
      <p id="d1e4747">The sensitivity of IASI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the estimated trend from MLR is further
verified in Fig. 8b, which represents the global distributions of relative
differences in the RMSE of the regression residuals obtained with and without a
linear trend term included in the MLR model ((RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">with</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>RMSE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">with</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100; in percentage). An increase of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 %–4.0 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 %–2.0 % in the RMSE is
indeed observed for both the MUSt and the LSt, respectively, in regions of
significant trend contribution (Fig. 8a), when the trend is excluded. This
demonstrates the significance of the trend in improving the performance of
the regression. Another statistical method that can be used for evaluating
the possibility to infer, from the IASI time period, the significant
positive or negative trends in the MUSt and the LSt, respectively, consists
of determining the expected year when these specified trends would be
detectable from the available measurements (with a probability of 90 %) by
taking into account the variance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the
autocorrelation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the noise residual according to the formalism
of Tiao et al. (1990) and Weatherhead et al. (1998). The 95 % confidence
interval for that expected trend detection year can also be determined. Such
a method has already been used for evaluating the trends derived from IASI
in the troposphere (Wespes et al., 2018). It represents a more drastic and
conservative method than the standard MLR. The results are displayed in Fig. 8c for an assumed specified trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
corresponds to a medium amplitude of trends derived here above from the MLR
over the mid-polar regions (Fig. 8a). In the MUSt, we find that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3 additional years of IASI measurements would be required
to unequivocally detect a trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (with
probability 0.90) over high latitudes (detectable from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2020–2022 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6–12 months), whereas it should already be detectable over
the middle and lower latitudes (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–6 months).
In the LSt, an additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–2 years) of
IASI measurements would be required to categorically identify the probable
decline derived from the MLR in northern mid-latitudes, and even more to
measure the enhancement in the southern polar latitudes. The longer required
measurement period at high latitudes is due to the larger noise residuals in
the regression fits (i.e. largest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at these
latitudes (see Fig. 4a and b). Note that a larger specified trend amplitude
would obviously require a shorter period of IASI measurement. We find that
only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> additional years would be required to detect a
specified trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> which characterizes the LSt at
high latitudes (data not shown).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Stratospheric contributions to total {$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$} trend}?><title>Stratospheric contributions to total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend</title>
      <p id="d1e5040">The effect on total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the counteracting trends in the northern
mid-latitudes and of the constructive trends in the southern polar latitudes
in the two stratospheric layers sounded by IASI is now investigated.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14046?><p id="d1e5054">Figure 9 represents the global distributions of the contribution of the MUSt
and the LSt into the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (Fig. 9a; in percentage), of the
adjusted trends for the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9b in DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of the
estimated year for a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> trend detection with a
probability of 90 % (Fig. 9c). While no significant change or slightly
positive trends in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the inflection point in 1997 have
been reported on an annual basis (e.g. Weber et al., 2018), Fig. 9b shows
clear significant changes: a negative trend at northern mid-latitudes and high
latitudes (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> north of 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and
positive trend over the southern polar region (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> south of 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S). Although counteracting trends between lower
and upper stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been pointed out in the recent study of
Ball et al. (2018) to explain the non-significant recovery in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
we find from IASI a dominance of the LSt decline that translates to negative
trends over some regions of the NH mid-latitudes and high latitudes in TOC (Fig. 9b). This is explained by the contributions of 45 %–55 % from the LSt to the
total column, vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %–40 % from the MUSt (Fig. 9a) in the mid-latitude and polar regions over the whole year. In addition, the increase in total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at high southern latitudes is dominated by the LSt, although both
layers positively contribute around Antarctica, compared to the trend
distributions in Fig. 8. Note that most previous ozone trends studies,
including Ball et al. (2018), excluded the polar regions due to limited
latitude coverage of some instruments merged in the data composites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5232">Global distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> the contribution (in percentage) of MUSt and LSt
into the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (left and right panels respectively) averaged over
January 2008–December 2017, <bold>(b)</bold> fitted trends in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
the grey areas and crosses refer to the non-significant grid cells in the
95 % confidence limit) and <bold>(c)</bold> estimated year for the detection of a
significant trend in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with a probability of 90 %) for a
given trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> starting on January 2008.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5321">While the annual MLR shows a significant dominance of LSt trends over MUSt
trends in the northern mid-latitudes and significant constructive trends in
the southern latitudes, total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are not ascribed with complete
confidence according to the formalism of Tiao et al. (1990) and Weatherhead
et al. (1998) discussed in Sect. 4.1. The detectability of a specified
trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9c), which corresponds to the
medium trend derived from MLR in middle and high latitudes of both hemispheres
(Fig. 9b), would need several years of additional measurements to be
unequivocal from IASI on an annual basis (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2022–2024
over the mid-latitudes and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2035</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the polar
regions). A higher trend amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the MLR would be observable from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2020–2025 (figure not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e5410">The use of the annual MLR could translate to large systematic uncertainties
on trends (implying large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which induces a longer
measurement period required to yield significant trends. These uncertainties
could be reduced on a seasonal basis, by attributing different weights to
the seasons, which would help in the categorical detection of a specified
trend. This is investigated in the subsection below by focusing on the
winter and the spring periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Trends in spring and winter</title>
      <p id="d1e5432">The reports on early signs of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery (Salby et al., 2011;
Kuttippurath et al., 2013; Shepherd et al., 2014; Solomon et al., 2016;
Kuttippurath and Nair, 2017; Weber et al., 2018) have all focused on the
Antarctic region during spring–summer, when the ozone hole area is at its
maximum extent, i.e. the LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels at minimum values. Kuttippurath
et al. (2018) have, in particular, reported a significant reduction in
Antarctic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss saturation occurrences during spring. Here we
investigate the respective contributions of<?pagebreak page14047?> the LSt and the MUSt to the TOC
recovery over the southern latitudes during spring and also during winter
when the minima in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels occur in the MUSt (down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU in polar regions), in comparison with the northern latitudes. Figures 10 and 11, respectively, show the SH and the NH distributions of the
estimated trends from seasonal MLR (left panels) and of the corresponding
year required for a significant detection of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU
increase per year (right panels) during their respective winter (JJA and
DJF; Figs. 10a and 11a) and spring (SON and MAM; Figs. 10b and 11b) for the
total, MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (top, middle and bottom panels, respectively).
Figure 10a and b clearly show significant positive trends over Antarctica and
the southernmost latitudes of the Atlantic and Indian oceans, with
amplitudes ranging between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 and 5 DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over latitudes south of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in total, MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>: spatial averages over JJA and SON for the three
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns, respectively). These trends over 10 years are much larger than the
amplitude of the discontinuity in the MUSt time series (Sect. 2.1) and
than the trends estimated in Sect. 4.1 (see Fig. 8 for the MUSt and the
LSt) and 4.2 (see Fig. 9 for TOC) over the whole year. In MUSt, significant
positive trends are observed during each season over the mid-latitudes and polar
latitudes of both hemispheres (Figs. 10 and 11 for the winter and spring
periods; the other seasons are not shown here) but more particularly in
winter and in spring, where the increase reaches a maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the LSt, the distributions are more complex: the trends are
significantly negative in the mid-latitudes of both hemispheres, especially
in winter and in spring of the NH, while in spring of the SH, some
mid-latitude regions also show near-zero or even positive trends. The
southern polar region shows high significant positive trends in
winter–spring (see Fig. 10). For the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at middle to high latitudes,
given the mostly counteracting trends detected in the LSt and in the MUSt
and the dominance of the LSt over the MUSt (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 %–55 % from
the LSt vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %–40 % from the MUSt into total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over
the whole year), these latitudes are governed by negative trends,
especially in spring of the NH. High significant increases are detected
over polar regions in winter–spring of both hemispheres but more
particularly in the SH where the LSt and MUSt trends are both of positive
sign.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e5729">Hemispheric distribution <bold>(a)</bold> in austral winter (JJA) and <bold>(b)</bold> in
austral spring (SON) of the estimated trends in total, MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns (left panels: top, middle and bottom, respectively; in DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; the
grey areas and crosses refer to the non-significant grid cells within the 95 %
confidence limit) and of the corresponding estimated year for a significant
trend detection (with a probability of 90 %) of a given trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> starting at January 2008 (right panels: top, middle and
bottom, respectively).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e5794">Same as Fig. 10 but <bold>(a)</bold> for the winter (DJF) and <bold>(b)</bold> for the spring
(MAM) of the Northern Hemisphere.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5810">The substantial winter–spring positive trends observed in MUSt, LSt and
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels at high latitudes of the SH (and of the NH for the
MUSt) are furthermore demonstrated to be detectable from the available IASI
measurement period (see Fig. 10, right panels: an assumed increase of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is detectable from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2016</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months and from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2018</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> year in the MUSt and the LSt, respectively). The positive
trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in polar total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
winter–spring would be observable from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2018–2020 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–2 years and the decline of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter–spring of the
NH in the LSt would be detectable from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2018–2020 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months (not shown here). Note that the higher negative trends found above
the Pacific at the highest latitudes (see Fig. 10) correspond to the regions
with longest required measurement period for significant trend detection
and, hence, point to poor regression residuals. About <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the springtime MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations, respectively, are due to anthropogenic factors (estimated by
VPSC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EESC proxy and linear trends in MLR models). This suggests
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes, especially in the LSt, are mainly governed by dynamics,
which contributes to a later projected trend-detection year in comparison
with the MUSt (Figs. 10 and 11) and which may hinder the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery
process.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14049?><p id="d1e6023">Overall, the large positive trends estimated concurrently in the LSt, MUSt and
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Antarctic region in winter–spring likely reflect the
healing of the ozone layer with a decrease in polar ozone depletion (Solomon
et al., 2016) and, hence, demonstrate the efficiency of the Montreal
Protocol. To the best of our knowledge, these results represent the first
detection of a significant recovery in the stratospheric and the total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns over the Antarctic from one single satellite dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Speeding up in {$\protect\chem{O_{3}}$} changes}?><title>Speeding up in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes</title>
      <p id="d1e6068">Positive trends in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Antarctica were already determined earlier by
Solomon et al. (2016) and by Weber et al. (2018) during
September over earlier periods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
2000–2014 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % per decade over 2000–2016, respectively). The
larger trends derived from the IASI records (see Fig. 10b; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % per decade on average
in TOC during SON) suggest that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response could be speeding up
due to the accelerating decline of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleting substances (ODSs)
resulting from the Montreal Protocol. This has been investigated here by
estimating the change in trend in MUSt, LSt and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the IASI
mission. Knowing that the length of the measurement period is an important
criterion for reducing systematic errors in the trend coefficient
determination (i.e. the specific length of natural mode cycles should be
covered to avoid any possible compensation effect between the covariates),
the ozone response to each natural driver (including VPSC) taken from their
adjustment over the whole IASI period (2008–2017; Sect. 3, Fig. 5) is kept
fixed. The linear trend term only is adjusted over variable measurement
periods that all end in December 2017, by using a single linear iteratively
reweighted least squares regression applied on gridded daily IASI time
series, after all the sources of natural variability fitted over the full
IASI period are removed (typical examples of linear trend adjustment can be
found in Fig. S2 of the Supplement). The discontinuity found in
the MUSt IASI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records on September 2010 (see Sect. 2.1) is not
taken into account in the regression; hence, it might over-represent the
trends estimated over periods that start before the jump (i.e. 2008–2017,
2009–2017, 2010–2017). The zonally averaged results are displayed in Fig. 12
for the statistically significant total, MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends and
their associated uncertainty (accounting for the autocorrelation in the
noise residuals; within the 95 % confidence level) estimated from an annual
regression. Note that the results are only shown for periods starting before 2015, given that considering shorter periods induces larger standard errors associated with the trends. In the LSt, a
clear speeding up in the southern polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery is observed, with
amplitudes ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2008–2017
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2015–2017 on zonal averages.
Similarly, a speeding up of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline at northern mid-latitudes is
found with values ranging between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
2008–2017 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2015–2017. In the
MUSt, a weaker increase is observed over the year around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude of the SH (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2008–2017 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
2015–2017). Given the positive acceleration in both LSt and MUSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the SH, this is where the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> record is characterized by the
largest significant recovery (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
2008–2017 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2015–2017).
Surprisingly, the speeding up in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline in the NH is more
pronounced in the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
over 2008–2017 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2015–2017)
compared to the LSt, despite the opposite trend in MUSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This could
reflect the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline observed in the northern latitudes in the
troposphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2008–2016; see Wespes et al.,
2018), which is included in the total column.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e6622">Evolution of estimated linear trend (DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and associated
uncertainty accounting for the autocorrelation in the noise residuals
(DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; within the 95 % confidence level) in <bold>(a)</bold> total, <bold>(b)</bold> MUSt and <bold>(c)</bold> LSt
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns, as a function of the covered IASI measurement period ending
in December 2017, with all natural contributions estimated from the whole
IASI period (2008–2017; date format in the figure is yyyyddmm). Note that the scales are different between the
columns.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/14031/2019/acp-19-14031-2019-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6676">Overall, the larger annual significant trend amplitudes derived over the
last few years of total, MUSt and LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, compared with
those derived from the whole studied period (Sect. 4.1 and 4.2) and from
earlier studies, translate to trends that remain detectable over the
increasing uncertainty associated with the shorter and shorter time segments
(see Fig. S3 of the Supplement), especially in both LSt and
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SH. This demonstrates that we progress towards a
significant emergence and speeding up of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery process in the
stratosphere over the whole year. Nevertheless, we calculated that
additional years of IASI measurements would help in confirming the changes
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery and decline over the IASI period (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
additional years are required to verify the trends calculated over the
2015–2017 segment in the highest latitudes in the LSt). In addition, a longer
measurement period would be useful to derive trends over successive segments
of the same length that are long enough to reduce the uncertainty, in order to
make the trend and its associated uncertainty more comparable across the
fit.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e6743">In this study, we have analysed the changes in stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels
sounded by IASI-A by examining the global pictures of natural and
anthropogenic sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes independently in the lower (150–25 hPa) and in the middle–upper stratosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa). We have exploited to that end a multi-linear regression model that has been specifically
developed for the analysis of stratospheric processes by including a series
of drivers known to have a causal relationship to natural stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, namely SF, QBO-10, QBO-30, NAO, AAO, ENSO, AERO, EPF and
VPSC. We have first verified the representativeness of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response
to each of these natural drivers and found for most of them characteristic
patterns that are in line with the current knowledge of their dynamical
influence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations. One of the most important findings related
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> driver analysis relied on the detection of a very clear time
lag of 3 months in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to ENSO in the LSt, with a
pronounced contrast between an in-phase response in the extratropics and an
out-of-phase response in the tropics, which is consistent with the
ENSO-modulated dynamic. The 3-month lag observed in the lower stratosphere
is also coherent with the 4-to-6-month<?pagebreak page14050?> lag detected from a previous study
in the troposphere (Wespes et al., 2017) and further supports the
stratospheric pathway suggested in Butler et al. (2014) to explain an ENSO
influence over a long distance. The representativeness of the influence of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drivers was also confirmed on a seasonal basis (e.g. high
ENSO-lag3 effect in spring, strong VPSC and AERO influences during the
austral spring). These results have verified the performance
of the regression models (annual and seasonal) to properly discriminate
between natural and anthropogenic drivers of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes. The
anthropogenic influence has been evaluated with the linear trend adjustment
in the MLR. The main results are summarized as follows.</p>
      <p id="d1e6856">A highly probable (within 95 %) recovery process is derived from the
annual MLR at high southern latitudes in the two stratospheric layers and,
therefore, in the total column. It is also derived at high northern
latitudes in the MUSt. However, a longer period of IASI measurements is
needed to unequivocally demonstrate a positive trend on an annual basis in the
IASI record. Only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–3 additional years of IASI measurements
are required in the MUSt.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14051?><p id="d1e6866">A likely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline (within 95 %) is measured in the lower
stratosphere at mid-latitudes, specifically, of the NH, but it would
require an additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years of IASI measurements to be
categorically confirmed. Given the large contribution from the LSt to the
total column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 %–50 % from LSt vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %
from the MUSt to TOCs), the decline is also calculated in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4–6 years of additional measurements for the trend to
be unequivocal.</p>
      <p id="d1e6923">A significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery is categorically found in the two
stratospheric layers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–S in the
MUSt and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in the LSt) as well as
in the total column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) during
the winter–spring period, which confirms previous studies that showed
healing in the Antarctic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hole with a decrease in its areal extent.
These results verify the efficacy of the ban on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleting substances
imposed by the Montreal Protocol and its amendments, throughout the
stratosphere and in the total column, from only one single satellite dataset
for the first time.</p>
      <p id="d1e7021">The decline observed in LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at northern mid-latitudes is unequivocal
over the available IASI measurements in winter–spring of the NH. The exact
reasons for that decline are still unknown but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes in the LSt
are estimated to be mainly attributable to dynamics, which likely perturbs
the healing of LSt and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the NH.</p>
      <p id="d1e7057">A significant speeding up (within 95 %) in that decline is measured in LSt
and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the last 10 years (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2008–2017 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
2015–2017 in LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on zonal averages). Even if the acceleration cannot
be categorically confirmed yet, it is of particular urgency to understand
its causes for apprehending its possible impact on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer and on
future climate changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e7160">A clear and significant speeding up (within 95 %) in stratospheric and
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery is measured at southern latitudes (e.g. from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2008–2017 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DU yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 2015–2017 in the LSt), which translates to trend
values that would be categorically detectable in the next few years on an
annual basis. It demonstrates that we are currently progressing towards a
substantial emergence in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> healing in the stratosphere over the whole
year in the SH.</p>
      <p id="d1e7238">Additional years of IASI measurements that will be provided by the in-flight
operational IASI-C (2018) and the upcoming IASI-Next Generation
(IASI-NG) instrument on board the Metop Second Generation (Metop-SG) series
of satellites would be of particular interest to confirm and monitor, in the
near future and over a longer period, the speeding up in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> healing
of the SH as well as in the LSt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline measured at mid-latitudes
of the NH. IASI-NG/Metop-SG is expected to extend the data record much
further in the future (Clerbaux and Crevoisier, 2013; Crevoisier et al.,
2014).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e7267">The IASI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data processed with FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> v0151001 can be
downloaded from the Aeris portal at <uri>http://iasi.aeris-data.fr/O3/</uri> (last
access: 13 September 2019).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e7295">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14031-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14031-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e7304">CW performed the analysis, wrote the paper and prepared the figures.
DH was responsible for the retrieval algorithm development and the
processing of the IASI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset. All co-authors contributed to the
analysis and reviewed the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e7321">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7327">IASI has been developed and built under the responsibility of the Centre
National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES, France). It is flown on board the Metop
satellites as part of the EUMETSAT Polar System. The IASI L1 data are
received through the EUMETCast near real time data distribution service. We
acknowledge the financial support from the ESA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-CCI and Copernicus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-C3S projects. FORLI-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is being implemented at Eumetsat with
the support of the AC SAF project. The research in Belgium is also funded by
the Belgian State Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural
Affairs and the European Space Agency (ESA Prodex IASI Flow and B-AC SAF).
We acknowledge Ingo Wohltmann (Alfred Wagner Institute, Postdam, Germany) as
well as Beiping Luo (Institute for Atmosphere and Climate, ETH Zurich,
Switzerland) and Larry Thomason (NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton,
USA), for processing and providing datasets of volume of polar stratospheric
clouds and of sulfuric acid extinction coefficients, respectively. We are
also grateful to Maxime Prignon (Université de Liège, Liège,
Belgium) for providing several years of BASCOE simulations.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7365">This paper was edited by Jayanarayanan Kuttippurath and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, J., Russell, J. M., Solomon, S., and Deaver, L. E.: Halogen
Occultation Experiment confirmation of stratospheric chlorine decreases in
accordance with the Montreal Protocol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105,
4483–4490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD901075</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baldwin, M. P., Gray, L. J., Dunkerton, T. J., Hamilton, K.,  Haynes, P. H.,
Randel, W. J., Holton, J. R., Alexander, M. J., Hirota, I., Horinouchi, T.,  Jones, D. B. A.,
Kinnersley, J. S., Marquardt, C., Sato, K., and Takahashi, M.: The quasi-biennial
oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 39, 179–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999RG000073</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14052?><ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Mortlock, D. J., Staehelin, J., Haigh, J. D., Peter, T., Tummon, F., Stübi, R., Stenke, A., Anderson, J., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Frith, S., Froidevaux, L., Roth, C., Sofieva, V., Wang, R., Wild, J., Yu, P., Ziemke, J. R., and Rozanov, E. V.: Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1379–1394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Barnston, A. G. and Livezey, R. E.: Classification, seasonality and
persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns, Mon. Weather
Rev., 115, 1083–1126, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boynard, A., Hurtmans, D., Garane, K., Goutail, F., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Koukouli, M. E., Wespes, C., Vigouroux, C., Keppens, A., Pommereau, J.-P., Pazmino, A., Balis, D., Loyola, D., Valks, P., Sussmann, R., Smale, D., Coheur, P.-F., and Clerbaux, C.: Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5125–5152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brasseur, G.: The response of the middle atmosphere to long-term and
short-term solar variability: A two-dimensional model, J. Geophys. Res., 98,
23079–23090, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brönnimann, S., Luterbacher, J., Staehelin, J., Svendby, T. M., Hansen,
G., and Svenøe, T.: Extreme climate of the global troposphere and
stratosphere 1940–1942 related to El Nino, Nature, 431, 971–974, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Maeder, J. A., Wohltmann, I., and Bodeker, G. E.: Variability and trends in total and vertically resolved stratospheric ozone based on the CATO ozone data set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4985–5008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4985-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4985-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buffet, L., Villaret, C., Jacquette, E., Vandermarcq, O., Astruc, P., and
Anstötz, S.: Status of IASI instruments onboard Metop-A and Metop-B
satellites, 4th IASI International Conference, Antibes Juan-Les-Pins,
France, 11–15 April 2016, available at:
<uri>https://iasi.cnes.fr/sites/default/files/drupal/201612/default/bpc_iasi-conference4-1_02_instruments_buffet.pdf</uri> (last access: 30 August 2018), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Butler, A. H., Polvani, M., and Deser, C.: Separating the stratospheric and
tropospheric pathways of El Niño–Southern Oscillation teleconnections,
Environ. Res. Lett., 9,  024014, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cagnazzo, C., Manzini, E., Calvo, N., Douglass, A., Akiyoshi, H., Bekki, S., Chipperfield, M., Dameris, M., Deushi, M., Fischer, A. M., Garny, H., Gettelman, A., Giorgetta, M. A., Plummer, D., Rozanov, E., Shepherd, T. G., Shibata, K., Stenke, A., Struthers, H., and Tian, W.: Northern winter stratospheric temperature and ozone responses to ENSO inferred from an ensemble of Chemistry Climate Models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8935–8948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8935-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8935-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chabrillat, S., Vigouroux, C., Christophe, Y., Engel, A., Errera, Q., Minganti, D., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Segers, A., and Mahieu, E.: Comparison of mean age of air in five reanalyses using the BASCOE transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14715–14735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14715-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14715-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chipperfield, M. P., Kinnersley, J. S., and Zawodny, J.: A twodimensional
model study of the QBO signal in SAGE II <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 21, 589–592, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chubachi, S.: Preliminary results of ozone observations at Syowa Station
from February 1982 to January 1983, in: Proc. Sixth Symposium on Polar
Meteorology and Glaciology, edited by: Kusunoki, K., Vol. 34 of Mem.
National Institute of Polar Research Special Issue, 13–19, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Franco, B., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Whitburn, S.,
Kopp, A. K., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.: A decadal data set of global
atmospheric dust retrieved from IASI satellite measurements, J. Geophys.
Res., 124, 1618–1647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029701" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029701</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coldewey-Egbers, M., Loyola R., D. G., Braesicke, P., Dameris, M., van
Roozendael, M., Lerot, C., and Zimmer, W.: A new health check of the ozone layer
at global and regional scales, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4363–4372,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060212" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL060212</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Clerbaux, C. and Crevoisier, C.: New Directions: Infrared remote sensing of
the troposphere from satellite: Less, but better, Atmos. Environ., 72,
24–26, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clerbaux, C., Boynard, A., Clarisse, L., George, M., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Herbin, H., Hurtmans, D., Pommier, M., Razavi, A., Turquety, S., Wespes, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Monitoring of atmospheric composition using the thermal infrared IASI/MetOp sounder, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6041–6054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crevoisier, C., Clerbaux, C., Guidard, V., Phulpin, T., Armante, R., Barret, B., Camy-Peyret, C., Chaboureau, J.-P., Coheur, P.-F., Crépeau, L., Dufour, G., Labonnote, L., Lavanant, L., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Herbin, H., Jacquinet-Husson, N., Payan, S., Péquignot, E., Pierangelo, C., Sellitto, P., and Stubenrauch, C.: Towards IASI-New Generation (IASI-NG): impact of improved spectral resolution and radiometric noise on the retrieval of thermodynamic, chemistry and climate variables, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4367–4385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4367-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-4367-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: Estimates of possible future ozone reductions from continued
use of fluoro-chloro-methanes (CF2Cl2, CFCl3), Geophys. Res. Lett., 1,
205–208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL001i005p00205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL001i005p00205</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dhomse, S., Weber, M., Wohltmann, I., Rex, M., and Burrows, J. P.: On the possible causes of recent increases in northern hemispheric total ozone from a statistical analysis of satellite data from 1979 to 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1165–1180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1165-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1165-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, P., Feng, W., Hossaini, R., Mann G. W., and
Santee, M. L.: Revisiting the hemispheric asymmetry in midlatitude ozone
changes following the Mount Pinatubo eruption: A 3-D model study, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 42, 3038–3047, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Domeisen, D. I., Garfinkel, C. I., and Butler, A. H.: The teleconnection of
El Niño Southern Oscillation to the stratosphere, Rev. Geophys.,
57, 5–47,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000596" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018RG000596</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Errera, Q., Chabrillat, S., Christophe, Y., Debosscher, J., Hubert, D., Lahoz, W., Santee, M. L., Shiotani, M., Skachko, S., von Clarmann, T., and Walker, K.: Technical note: Reanalysis of Aura MLS Chemical Observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2019-530</ext-link>, in review, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G., and Shanklin, J. D.: Large losses of total
ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ClO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interaction, Nature, 315,
207–210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/315207a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/315207a0</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Farmer, C. B., Toon, G. C., Shaper, P. W.,  Blavier, J. F., and Lowes, L. L.:
Stratospheric trace gases in the spring 1986 Antarctic atmosphere, Nature,
329, 126–130, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fioletov, V. E. and Shepherd, T. G.: Seasonal persistence of midlatitude
total ozone anomalies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1417,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016739</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14053?><ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fioletov, V. E. and Shepherd, T. G.: Summertime total ozone variations over
middle and polar latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett, 32, 4807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022080" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL022080</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frossard, L., Rieder, H. E., Ribatet, M., Staehelin, J., Maeder, J. A., Di Rocco, S., Davison, A. C., and Peter, T.: On the relationship between total ozone and atmospheric dynamics and chemistry at mid-latitudes – Part 1: Statistical models and spatial fingerprints of atmospheric dynamics and chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 147–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-147-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-147-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fusco, A. C. and Salby, M. L.: Interannual variations of total ozone and
their relationship to variations of planetary wave activity, J. Climate, 12,
1619–1629, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galytska, E., Rozanov, A., Chipperfield, M. P., Dhomse, Sandip. S., Weber, M., Arosio, C., Feng, W., and Burrows, J. P.: Dynamically controlled ozone decline in the tropical mid-stratosphere observed by SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 767–783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-767-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-767-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gebhardt, C., Rozanov, A., Hommel, R., Weber, M., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Degenstein, D., Froidevaux, L., and Thompson, A. M.: Stratospheric ozone trends and variability as seen by SCIAMACHY from 2002 to 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 831–846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-831-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-831-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harris, N. R. P., Hassler, B., Tummon, F., Bodeker, G. E., Hubert, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Steinbrecht, W., Anderson, J., Bhartia, P. K., Boone, C. D., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Delcloo, A., Frith, S. M., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Jones, N., Kurylo, M. J., Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Leblanc, S. T., Lambert, J.-C., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Maycock, A., de Mazière, M., Parrish, A., Querel, R., Rosenlof, K. H., Roth, C., Sioris, C., Staehelin, J., Stolarski, R. S., Stübi, R., Tamminen, J., Vigouroux, C., Walker, K. A., Wang, H. J., Wild, J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9965–9982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, D. E.  and Larkin, N. K.: El Niño-Southern Oscillation sea
surface temperature and wind anomalies, 1946–1993, Rev. Geophys., 36,
353–399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG00715" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98RG00715</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hilton, F., Armante, R., August, T., Barnet, C., Bouchard, A., Camy-Peyret, C., Capelle, V., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P., Collard, A., Crevoisier, C., Dufour, G., Edwards, D., Faijan, F., Fourrié, N., Gambacorta, A., Goldberg, M., Guidard, V., Hurtmans, D., Illingworth, S., Jacquinet-Husson, N., Kerzenmacher, T., Klaes, D., Lavanant, L., Masiello, G., Matricardi, M., McNally, A., Newman, S., Pavelin, E., Payan, S., Péquignot, E., Peyridieu, S., Phulpin, T., Remedios, J., Schlüssel, P., Serio, C., Strow, L., Stubenrauch, C., Taylor, J., Tobin, D., Wolf, W., and Zhou, D.: Hyperspectral Earth Observation from IASI: Five Years of Accomplishments, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 347–370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00027.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00027.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hofmann, D. J. and Oltmans, S. J.: Antarctic ozone during 1992: Evidence for
Pinatubo volcanic aerosol effects, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 18555–18561,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD02092</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hofmann, D. J. and Solomon, S.: Ozone destruction through heterogeneous
chemistry following the eruption of El Chichón, J. Geophys. Res., 94,
5029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD04p05029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD094iD04p05029</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hofmann, D. J., Oltmans, S. J., Harris, J. M., Johnson, B. J., and
Lathrop, J. A.: Ten years of ozonesonde measurements at the south pole:
Implications for recovery of springtime Antarctic ozone, J. Geophys. Res.,
102, 8931–8943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03749" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD03749</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hood, L. L. and Soukharev, B. E.: Quasi-decadal variability of the tropical
lower stratosphere: The role of extratropical wave forcing, J. Atmos. Sci.,
60, 2389–2403, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hood, L. L. and Soukharev, B. E.: Solar induced variations of odd nitrogen:
Multiple regression analysis of UARS HALOE data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L22805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028122</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hood, L. L., McCormick, J. P., and Labitzke, K.: An investigation of
dynamical contributions to midlatitude ozone trends in winter, J. Geophys.
Res., 102, 13079–13093, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hubert, D., Lambert, J.-C., Verhoelst, T., Granville, J., Keppens, A., Baray, J.-L., Bourassa, A. E., Cortesi, U., Degenstein, D. A., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hoppel, K. W., Johnson, B. J., Kyrölä, E., Leblanc, T., Lichtenberg, G., Marchand, M., McElroy, C. T., Murtagh, D., Nakane, H., Portafaix, T., Querel, R., Russell III, J. M., Salvador, J., Smit, H. G. J., Stebel, K., Steinbrecht, W., Strawbridge, K. B., Stübi, R., Swart, D. P. J., Taha, G., Tarasick, D. W., Thompson, A. M., Urban, J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Van Malderen, R., von der Gathen, P., Walker, K. A., Wolfram, E., and Zawodny, J. M.: Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of 14 limb and occultation ozone profile data records, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2497–2534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2497-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-2497-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hurrell, J. W.: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation regional
temperatures and precipitation, Science, 269, 676–679, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hurtmans, D., Coheur, P., Wespes, C., Clarisse, L., Scharf, O., Clerbaux, C.,
Hadji-Lazaro, J., George, M., and Turquety, S.: FORLI radiative transfer and
retrieval code for IASI, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 113, 1391–1408, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jackman, C., Fleming,  E., and Vitt,  F.: Influence of extremely large solar
proton events in a changing stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11659–11670, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jonsson, A. I., de Grandpré, J., Fomichev, V. I., McConnell, J. C., and
Beagley, S. R.: Doubled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced cooling in the middle atmosphere:
photochemical analysis of the ozone radiative feedback, J. Geophys. Res.,
109, D24103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005093</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins,
W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis
Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keeble, J., Brown, H., Abraham, N. L., Harris, N. R. P., and Pyle, J. A.: On ozone trend detection: using coupled chemistry–climate simulations to investigate early signs of total column ozone recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7625–7637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7625-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7625-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keppens, A., Lambert, J.-C., Granville, J., Hubert, D., Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Latter, B., Kerridge, B., Siddans, R., Boynard, A., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Clerbaux, C., Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D. R., Coheur, P.-F., van Peet, J. C. A., van der A, R. J., Garane, K., Koukouli, M. E., Balis, D. S., Delcloo, A., Kivi, R., Stübi, R., Godin-Beekmann, S., Van Roozendael, M., and Zehner, C.: Quality assessment of the Ozone_cci Climate Research Dat<?pagebreak page14054?>a Package (release 2017) – Part 2: Ground-based validation of nadir ozone profile data products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3769–3800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3769-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-3769-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Knudsen, B. M. and Grooss, J.: Northern midlatitude stratospheric ozone
dilution in spring modeled with simulated mixing, J. Geophys. Res., 105,
6885–6890, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kodera, K. and Kuroda, Y.: Dynamical response to the solar cycle: Winter
stratopause and lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4749,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002224</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuttippurath, J. and Nair, P. J.: The signs of Antarctic ozone hole recovery
2017, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00722-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-00722-7</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuttippurath, J., Lefèvre, F., Pommereau, J.-P., Roscoe, H. K., Goutail, F., Pazmiño, A., and Shanklin, J. D.: Antarctic ozone loss in 1979–2010: first sign of ozone recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1625–1635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1625-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1625-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuttippurath, J., Kumar, P., Nair, P. J., and Pandey, P. C.: Emergence of ozone
recovery evidenced by reduction in the occurrence of Antarctic ozone loss
saturation, Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 2397–3722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0052-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0052-6</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Sofieva, V., Tamminen, J., Päivärinta, S.-M., Tukiainen, S., Zawodny, J., and Thomason, L.: Combined SAGE II–GOMOS ozone profile data set for 1984–2011 and trend analysis of the vertical distribution of ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10645–10658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Labitzke, K. and van Loon, H.: The QBO effect on the solar signal in the
global stratosphere in the winter of the Northern Hemisphere, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phy., 62, 621–628, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mäder, J. A., Staehelin, J., Brunner, D.,  Stahel, W. A., Wohltmann, I., and
Peter, T.: Statistical modelling of total ozone: Selection of appropriate
explanatory variables, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11108,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007694" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007694</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mäder, J. A., Staehelin, J., Peter, T., Brunner, D., Rieder, H. E., and Stahel, W. A.: Evidence for the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol to protect the ozone layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 12161–12171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12161-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-12161-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manatsa, D. and Mukwada, G.: A connection from stratospheric ozone to El
Niño-Southern Oscillation, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 5558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05111-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-05111-8</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Manzini, E., Giorgetta, M. A., Esch, M., Kornblueh, L., and Roeckner, E.:
The influence of sea surface temperatures on the northern winter
stratosphere: Ensemble simulations with the MAECHAM5 model, J. Climate, 19,
3863–3881, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McCormack, J. P., Siskind, D. E., and Hood, L. L.: Solar-QBO interaction and
its impact on stratospheric ozone in a zonally averaged photochemical
transport model of the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16109,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008369</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McPeters, R. D., Labow, G. J., and Logan, J. A.: Ozone climatological profiles
for satellite retrieval algorithms, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D05308,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006823</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Molina, M. J. and Rowland, F. S.: Stratospheric sink for
chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone, Nature,
249, 810–812, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nair, P. J., Froidevaux, L., Kuttippurath, J., Zawodny, J. M., Russell, J.
M., Steinbrecht, W., Claude, H., Leblanc, T., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Johnson,
B., Swart, D. P. J., Thomas, A., Querel, R., Wang, R., and Anderson, J.:
Subtropical and midlatitude ozone trends in the stratosphere: Implications
for recovery, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7247–7257,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022371" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022371</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Newchurch, M. J., Yang, E.-S., Cunnold, D. M., Reinsel, G. C., Zawodny, J.
M., and Russell III, J. M.: Evidence for slowdown in stratospheric ozone
loss: First stage of ozone recovery, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4507,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003471" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003471</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Newman, P. A., Nash, E. R., Kawa, S. R., Montzka, S. A., and Schauffler, S.
M.: When will the Antarctic ozone hole recover?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L12814, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025232</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Rodriguez, J. M., Waugh, D. W.,
and Nielsen, J. E.: The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite
measurements and a chemistry–climate simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 965–976, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pawson, S., Steinbrecht, W., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Fujiwara, M., Karpechko, A.
Y., Petropavlovskikh, I., Urban, J., and Weber, M.: Update on Global Ozone:
Past, Present, and Future, in: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:
2014, World Meteorological Organization, Global Ozone Research and
Monitoring Project – Report No. 55, chap. 2, World Meteorological
Organization/UNEP, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Portmann, R. W., Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R., Thomason, L. W., Poole, L. R., and McCormick, M.
P.: Role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion in
the polar regions, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 22991–23006,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02608" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD02608</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J. and Cobb, J. B.: Coherent variations of monthly mean total
ozone and lower stratospheric temperature, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99,
5433–5447, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J.  and Thompson, A. M.: Interannual variability and trends in
tropical ozone derived from SAGE II satellite data and SHADOZ ozonesondes,
J. Geophys. Res., 116, D07303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015195</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J. and Wu, F.: Isolation of the ozone QBO in SAGE II data by
singular-value decomposition, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 2546–2559, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J., Wu, F., and Stolarski, R.: Changes in column ozone correlated
with the stratospheric EP flux, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 80, 849–862, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J., Garcia, R. R., Calvo, N., and Marsh, D.: ENSO influence on
zonal mean temperature and ozone in the tropical lower stratosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL039343</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reinsel, G. C., Miller, A. J., Weatherhead, E. C., Flynn, L. E., Nagatani,
R. M., Tiao, G. C., and Wuebbles, D. J.: Trend analysis of total ozone data
for turnaround and dynamical contributions, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D16306,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004662" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004662</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Revell, L. E., Stenke, A., Luo, B., Kremser, S., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T., and Peter, T.: Impacts of Mt Pinatubo volcanic aerosol on the tropical stratosphere in chemistry–climate model simulations using CCMI and CMIP<?pagebreak page14055?>6 stratospheric aerosol data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13139–13150, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13139-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-13139-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rex, M., Salawitch, R. J., von der Gathen, P., Harris, N. R. P.,
Chipperfield, M. P., and Naujokat, B.: Arctic ozone loss and climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L04116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018844</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rieder, H. E., Frossard, L., Ribatet, M., Staehelin, J., Maeder, J. A., Di Rocco, S., Davison, A. C., Peter, T., Weihs, P., and Holawe, F.: On the relationship between total ozone and atmospheric dynamics and chemistry at mid-latitudes – Part 2: The effects of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation, volcanic eruptions and contributions of atmospheric dynamics and chemistry to long-term total ozone changes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 165–179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-165-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-165-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rind, D., Perlwitz, J., and Lonergan, P.: AO/NAO response to climate change:
1. Respective influences of stratospheric and tropospheric climate changes,
J. Geophys. Res., 110, D12107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005103</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and
Practice, World Scientific, Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary
Physics, 2, Hackensack, N.J., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Roscoe, H. K. and Haigh, J. D.: Influences of ozone depletion, the solar
cycle and the QBO on the Southern Annular Mode, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133,
1855–1864, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Salby, M., Titova, E., and Deschamps, L.: Rebound of Antarctic ozone,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L09702, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047266</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schnadt, C. and Dameris, M.: Relationship between North Atlantic Oscillation
changes and stratospheric ozone recovery in the Northern Hemisphere in a
chemistry-climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 30, 1487,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017006</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shepherd, T. G., Plummer, D. A., Scinocca, J. F., Hegglin, M. I., Fioletov,
V. E., Reader, M. C., Remsberg, E., von Clarmann, T., and Wang, H. J.:
Reconciliation of halogen-induced ozone loss
with the total-column ozone record, Nat. Geosci., 7, 443–449,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2155</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sioris, C. E., McLinden, C. A., Fioletov, V. E., Adams, C., Zawodny, J. M., Bourassa, A. E., Roth, C. Z., and Degenstein, D. A.: Trend and variability in ozone in the tropical lower stratosphere over 2.5 solar cycles observed by SAGE II and OSIRIS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3479–3496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3479-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3479-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sofieva, V. F., Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Tamminen, J., Degenstein, D.,
Bourassa, A., Roth, C., Zawada, D., Weber, M., Rozanov, A., Rahpoe, N.,
Stiller, G., Laeng, A., von Clarmann, T., Walker, K. A., Sheese, P., Hubert,
D., van Roozendael, M., Zehner, C., Damadeo, R., Zawodny, J., Kramarova, N.,
and Bhartia, P. K.: Merged SAGE II, Ozone_cci and OMPS ozone
profile dataset and evaluation of ozone trends in the stratosphere, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 17, 12533–12552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12533-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12533-2017</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Solomon, P., Barrett, J., Mooney, T., Connor, B., Parrish, A., and Siskind,
D. E.: Rise and decline of active chlorine in the stratosphere, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L18807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL027029</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and
history, Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999RG900008</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R.,  Rowland, F. S., and Wuebbles, D. J.: On the
depletion of Antarctic zone, Nature, 321, 755–758, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Portman, R. W., Garcia, R. R., Thomason, L. W., Poole, L. R.,
and McCormack, M. P.: The role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone
depletion at northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 6713–6727, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Ivy, D. J., Kinnison, D., Mills, M. J., Neely, R. R., and
Schmidt, A.: Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer, Science,
353, 269–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aae0061</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Soukharev, B. E. and Hood, L. L.: Solar cycle variation of stratospheric
ozone: Multiple regression analysis of long-term satellite data sets and
comparisons with models, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20314,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007107</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stolarski, R. S., Krueger, A. J., Schoeberl, M. R., Mc-Peters, R. D.,
Newman, P. A., and Alpert, J. C.: Nimbus 7 satellite measurements of the springtime
Antarctic ozone decrease, Nature, 322, 808–811, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steinbrecht, W., Hassler, B., Claude, H., Winkler, P., and Stolarski, R. S.: Global distribution of total ozone and lower stratospheric temperature variations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1421–1438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1421-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1421-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steinbrecht, W., Haßler, B., Brühl, C., Dameris, M., Giorgetta, M. A., Grewe, V., Manzini, E., Matthes, S., Schnadt, C., Steil, B., and Winkler, P.: Interannual variation patterns of total ozone and lower stratospheric temperature in observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 349–374, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-349-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-349-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steinbrecht, W., Froidevaux, L., Fuller, R., Wang, R., Anderson, J., Roth, C., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D., Damadeo, R., Zawodny, J., Frith, S., McPeters, R., Bhartia, P., Wild, J., Long, C., Davis, S., Rosenlof, K., Sofieva, V., Walker, K., Rahpoe, N., Rozanov, A., Weber, M., Laeng, A., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G., Kramarova, N., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., Querel, R., Swart, D., Boyd, I., Hocke, K., Kämpfer, N., Maillard Barras, E., Moreira, L., Nedoluha, G., Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Schneider, M., García, O., Jones, N., Mahieu, E., Smale, D., Kotkamp, M., Robinson, J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Harris, N., Hassler, B., Hubert, D., and Tummon, F.: An update on ozone profile trends for the period 2000 to 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10675–10690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thomason, L. W., Ernest, N., Millán, L., Rieger, L., Bourassa, A., Vernier, J.-P., Manney, G., Luo, B., Arfeuille, F., and Peter, T.: A global space-based stratospheric aerosol climatology: 1979–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 469–492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-469-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-469-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J. and Solomon, S.: Interpretation of Recent Southern
Hemisphere Climate Change, Science, 296, 895–899, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J. and  Wallace, J. M.: Annular modes in the extratropical
circulation. Part I: month-to-month variability, J. Climate, 13, 1000–1016,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tian, W., Chipperfield, M. P., Gray, L. J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Quasi-biennial
oscillation and tracer distributions in a coupled chemistry-climate model,
J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006871" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006871</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tiao, G. C., Reinsel, G. C., Xu, D., Pedrick, J. H., Zhu, X., Miller, A. J.,  DeLuisi, J.
J., Mateer, C. L., and Wuebbles, D. J.: Effects of autocorrelation and
temporal sampling schemes on estimates o<?pagebreak page14056?>f trend and spatial correlation, J.
Geophys Res., 95, 20507–20517, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tweedy, O. V., Waugh, D. W., Randel, W. J., Abalos, M., Oman, L. D., and
Kinnison, D. E.: The impact of boreal summer ENSO events on tropical lower
stratospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 9843–9857,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029020</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Valks, P., Hao, N., Gimeno Garcia, S., Loyola, D., Dameris, M., Jöckel, P., and Delcloo, A.: Tropical tropospheric ozone column retrieval for GOME-2, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2513–2530, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2513-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-2513-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Coffey, M., Errera, Q., García, O., Jones, N. B., Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Mellqvist, J., Notholt, J., Palm, M., Persson, G., Schneider, M., Servais, C., Smale, D., Thölix, L., and De Mazière, M.: Trends of ozone total columns and vertical distribution from FTIR observations at eight NDACC stations around the globe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2915–2933, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wargan, K., Orbe, C., Pawson, S., Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Olsen, M. A., Coy, L., and Knowland,  K. E.: Recent Decline in Extratropical Lower Stratospheric Ozone Attributed to Circulation Changes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,  5166,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL077406</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Weatherhead, E. C., Reinsel, G. C., Tiao, G. C., Meng, X.-L., Choi, D.,
Cheang, W.-K., Keller, T., DeLuisi, J., Wuebbles, D. J., Kerr, J. B., Miller, A. J., Oltmans, S.
J., and Frederick, J. E.: Factors affecting the detection of trends:
Statistical considerations and applications to environmental data, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 17149–17161, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weber, M., Dikty, S., Burrows, J. P., Garny, H., Dameris, M., Kubin, A., Abalichin, J., and Langematz, U.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation and total ozone from seasonal to decadal time scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11221–11235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11221-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11221-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weber, M., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Fioletov, V. E., Frith, S. M., Wild, J. D., Burrows, J. P., Long, C. S., and Loyola, D.: Total ozone trends from 1979 to 2016 derived from five merged observational datasets – the emergence into ozone recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2097–2117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2097-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2097-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D., Emmons, L. K., Safieddine, S., Clerbaux, C., Edwards, D. P., and Coheur, P.-F.: Ozone variability in the troposphere and the stratosphere from the first 6 years of IASI observations (2008–2013), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5721–5743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5721-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5721-2016</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability
in the troposphere as observed by IASI over 2008–2016 – Contribution of
atmospheric chemistry and dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
2429–2451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025875" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025875</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., Boynard, A., and Coheur, P.-F.: Decrease in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the Northern Hemisphere observed by IASI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6867–6885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6867-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6867-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Witte, J. C., Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., and Thompson, A. M.: The Quasi-biennial Oscillation and annual variations in tropical ozone from SHADOZ and HALOE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3929–3936, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3929-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3929-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2006, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
50, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
52, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2014, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
55, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2018, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
58, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wohltmann, I., Lehmann, R.,  Rex, M., Brunner, D., and Maeder, J. A.: A
process-oriented regression model for column ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007573</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, E.-S., Cunnold, D. M., Newchurch, M. J., Salawitch, R. J.,
McCormick, M. P., Russell III, J. M., Zawodny, J. M., and Oltmans, S. J.: First stage of
Antarctic ozone recovery, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20308,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009675" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009675</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zerefos, C. S., Tourpali, K., Bojkov, R., Balis, D., Rognerund, B., and
Isaksen, I.: Solar acticity – total ozone relationships: observations and
model studies with heterogeneous chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
1561–1569, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Douglass, A. R., Oman, L. D., Strahan, S. E., and Duncan, B. N.: Tropospheric ozone variability in the tropics from ENSO to MJO and shorter timescales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8037–8049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Is the recovery of stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> speeding up in the Southern Hemisphere? An evaluation from the first IASI decadal record (2008–2017)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>In this paper, we present the global fingerprint of recent changes in
middle–upper stratosphere (MUSt;  &lt; 25&thinsp;hPa) ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) in
comparison with lower stratosphere (LSt; 150–25&thinsp;hPa) O<sub>3</sub> derived
from the first 10 years of the IASI/Metop-A satellite measurements (January 2008–December 2017). The IASI instrument provides vertically resolved
O<sub>3</sub> profiles with very high spatial and temporal (twice daily)
samplings, allowing  O<sub>3</sub> changes to be monitored in these two regions of the
stratosphere. By applying multivariate regression models with adapted
geophysical proxies on daily mean O<sub>3</sub> time series, we discriminate
anthropogenic trends from various modes of natural variability, such as the
El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The representativeness of the
O<sub>3</sub> response to its natural drivers is first examined. One important
finding relies on a pronounced contrast between a positive LSt O<sub>3</sub>
response to ENSO in the extratropics and a negative one in the tropics,
with a delay of 3 months, which supports a stratospheric pathway for the
ENSO influence on lower stratospheric and tropospheric O<sub>3</sub>. In terms of
trends, we find an unequivocal O<sub>3</sub> recovery from the available period of
measurements in winter–spring at middle to high latitudes for the two
stratospheric layers sounded by IASI ( &gt;  ∼ 35°&thinsp;N–S in the MUSt and  &gt;  ∼ 45°&thinsp;S in the LSt) as well as in the total columns at southern latitudes
( &gt;  ∼ 45°&thinsp;S) where the increase reaches
its maximum. These results confirm the effectiveness of the Montreal
Protocol and its amendments and represent the first detection of a
significant recovery of O<sub>3</sub> concurrently in the lower, in the middle–upper
stratosphere and in the total column from one single satellite dataset. A
significant decline in O<sub>3</sub> at northern mid-latitudes in the LSt is also
detected, especially in winter–spring of the Northern Hemisphere. Given
counteracting trends in the LSt and MUSt at these latitudes, the decline is not
categorical in total O<sub>3</sub>. When freezing the regression coefficients
determined for each natural driver over the whole IASI period but adjusting
a trend, we calculate a significant speeding up in the O<sub>3</sub> response to
the decline of O<sub>3</sub>-depleting substances (ODSs) in the total column, in
the LSt and, to a lesser extent, in the MUSt, at high southern latitudes
over the year. Results also show a small significant acceleration of the
O<sub>3</sub> decline at northern mid-latitudes in the LSt and in the total column
over the last few years. That, specifically, needs urgent investigation to
identify its exact origin and apprehend its impact on climate change.
Additional years of IASI measurements would, however, be required to confirm
the O<sub>3</sub> change rates observed in the stratospheric layers over the last few
years.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, J., Russell, J. M., Solomon, S., and Deaver, L. E.: Halogen
Occultation Experiment confirmation of stratospheric chlorine decreases in
accordance with the Montreal Protocol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105,
4483–4490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901075</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baldwin, M. P., Gray, L. J., Dunkerton, T. J., Hamilton, K.,  Haynes, P. H.,
Randel, W. J., Holton, J. R., Alexander, M. J., Hirota, I., Horinouchi, T.,  Jones, D. B. A.,
Kinnersley, J. S., Marquardt, C., Sato, K., and Takahashi, M.: The quasi-biennial
oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 39, 179–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000073</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Mortlock, D. J., Staehelin, J., Haigh, J. D., Peter, T., Tummon, F., Stübi, R., Stenke, A., Anderson, J., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Frith, S., Froidevaux, L., Roth, C., Sofieva, V., Wang, R., Wild, J., Yu, P., Ziemke, J. R., and Rozanov, E. V.: Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1379–1394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Barnston, A. G. and Livezey, R. E.: Classification, seasonality and
persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns, Mon. Weather
Rev., 115, 1083–1126, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Boynard, A., Hurtmans, D., Garane, K., Goutail, F., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Koukouli, M. E., Wespes, C., Vigouroux, C., Keppens, A., Pommereau, J.-P., Pazmino, A., Balis, D., Loyola, D., Valks, P., Sussmann, R., Smale, D., Coheur, P.-F., and Clerbaux, C.: Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5125–5152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brasseur, G.: The response of the middle atmosphere to long-term and
short-term solar variability: A two-dimensional model, J. Geophys. Res., 98,
23079–23090, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brönnimann, S., Luterbacher, J., Staehelin, J., Svendby, T. M., Hansen,
G., and Svenøe, T.: Extreme climate of the global troposphere and
stratosphere 1940–1942 related to El Nino, Nature, 431, 971–974, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Maeder, J. A., Wohltmann, I., and Bodeker, G. E.: Variability and trends in total and vertically resolved stratospheric ozone based on the CATO ozone data set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4985–5008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4985-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4985-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Buffet, L., Villaret, C., Jacquette, E., Vandermarcq, O., Astruc, P., and
Anstötz, S.: Status of IASI instruments onboard Metop-A and Metop-B
satellites, 4th IASI International Conference, Antibes Juan-Les-Pins,
France, 11–15 April 2016, available at:
<a href="https://iasi.cnes.fr/sites/default/files/drupal/201612/default/bpc_iasi-conference4-1_02_instruments_buffet.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 August 2018), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Butler, A. H., Polvani, M., and Deser, C.: Separating the stratospheric and
tropospheric pathways of El Niño–Southern Oscillation teleconnections,
Environ. Res. Lett., 9,  024014, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cagnazzo, C., Manzini, E., Calvo, N., Douglass, A., Akiyoshi, H., Bekki, S., Chipperfield, M., Dameris, M., Deushi, M., Fischer, A. M., Garny, H., Gettelman, A., Giorgetta, M. A., Plummer, D., Rozanov, E., Shepherd, T. G., Shibata, K., Stenke, A., Struthers, H., and Tian, W.: Northern winter stratospheric temperature and ozone responses to ENSO inferred from an ensemble of Chemistry Climate Models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8935–8948, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8935-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8935-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chabrillat, S., Vigouroux, C., Christophe, Y., Engel, A., Errera, Q., Minganti, D., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Segers, A., and Mahieu, E.: Comparison of mean age of air in five reanalyses using the BASCOE transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14715–14735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14715-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14715-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chipperfield, M. P., Kinnersley, J. S., and Zawodny, J.: A twodimensional
model study of the QBO signal in SAGE II NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 21, 589–592, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chubachi, S.: Preliminary results of ozone observations at Syowa Station
from February 1982 to January 1983, in: Proc. Sixth Symposium on Polar
Meteorology and Glaciology, edited by: Kusunoki, K., Vol. 34 of Mem.
National Institute of Polar Research Special Issue, 13–19, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Franco, B., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Whitburn, S.,
Kopp, A. K., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.: A decadal data set of global
atmospheric dust retrieved from IASI satellite measurements, J. Geophys.
Res., 124, 1618–1647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029701" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029701</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Coldewey-Egbers, M., Loyola R., D. G., Braesicke, P., Dameris, M., van
Roozendael, M., Lerot, C., and Zimmer, W.: A new health check of the ozone layer
at global and regional scales, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4363–4372,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060212" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060212</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Clerbaux, C. and Crevoisier, C.: New Directions: Infrared remote sensing of
the troposphere from satellite: Less, but better, Atmos. Environ., 72,
24–26, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Clerbaux, C., Boynard, A., Clarisse, L., George, M., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Herbin, H., Hurtmans, D., Pommier, M., Razavi, A., Turquety, S., Wespes, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Monitoring of atmospheric composition using the thermal infrared IASI/MetOp sounder, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6041–6054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Crevoisier, C., Clerbaux, C., Guidard, V., Phulpin, T., Armante, R., Barret, B., Camy-Peyret, C., Chaboureau, J.-P., Coheur, P.-F., Crépeau, L., Dufour, G., Labonnote, L., Lavanant, L., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Herbin, H., Jacquinet-Husson, N., Payan, S., Péquignot, E., Pierangelo, C., Sellitto, P., and Stubenrauch, C.: Towards IASI-New Generation (IASI-NG): impact of improved spectral resolution and radiometric noise on the retrieval of thermodynamic, chemistry and climate variables, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4367–4385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4367-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4367-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Crutzen, P. J.: Estimates of possible future ozone reductions from continued
use of fluoro-chloro-methanes (CF2Cl2, CFCl3), Geophys. Res. Lett., 1,
205–208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL001i005p00205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL001i005p00205</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Dhomse, S., Weber, M., Wohltmann, I., Rex, M., and Burrows, J. P.: On the possible causes of recent increases in northern hemispheric total ozone from a statistical analysis of satellite data from 1979 to 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1165–1180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1165-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1165-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, P., Feng, W., Hossaini, R., Mann G. W., and
Santee, M. L.: Revisiting the hemispheric asymmetry in midlatitude ozone
changes following the Mount Pinatubo eruption: A 3-D model study, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 42, 3038–3047, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Domeisen, D. I., Garfinkel, C. I., and Butler, A. H.: The teleconnection of
El Niño Southern Oscillation to the stratosphere, Rev. Geophys.,
57, 5–47,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000596" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000596</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Errera, Q., Chabrillat, S., Christophe, Y., Debosscher, J., Hubert, D., Lahoz, W., Santee, M. L., Shiotani, M., Skachko, S., von Clarmann, T., and Walker, K.: Technical note: Reanalysis of Aura MLS Chemical Observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-530</a>, in review, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G., and Shanklin, J. D.: Large losses of total
ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClO<sub><i>x</i></sub>∕NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> interaction, Nature, 315,
207–210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/315207a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/315207a0</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Farmer, C. B., Toon, G. C., Shaper, P. W.,  Blavier, J. F., and Lowes, L. L.:
Stratospheric trace gases in the spring 1986 Antarctic atmosphere, Nature,
329, 126–130, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fioletov, V. E. and Shepherd, T. G.: Seasonal persistence of midlatitude
total ozone anomalies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1417,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016739</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fioletov, V. E. and Shepherd, T. G.: Summertime total ozone variations over
middle and polar latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett, 32, 4807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022080" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022080</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, L., Rieder, H. E., Ribatet, M., Staehelin, J., Maeder, J. A., Di Rocco, S., Davison, A. C., and Peter, T.: On the relationship between total ozone and atmospheric dynamics and chemistry at mid-latitudes – Part 1: Statistical models and spatial fingerprints of atmospheric dynamics and chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 147–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-147-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-147-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fusco, A. C. and Salby, M. L.: Interannual variations of total ozone and
their relationship to variations of planetary wave activity, J. Climate, 12,
1619–1629, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Galytska, E., Rozanov, A., Chipperfield, M. P., Dhomse, Sandip. S., Weber, M., Arosio, C., Feng, W., and Burrows, J. P.: Dynamically controlled ozone decline in the tropical mid-stratosphere observed by SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 767–783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-767-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-767-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gebhardt, C., Rozanov, A., Hommel, R., Weber, M., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Degenstein, D., Froidevaux, L., and Thompson, A. M.: Stratospheric ozone trends and variability as seen by SCIAMACHY from 2002 to 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 831–846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-831-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-831-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, N. R. P., Hassler, B., Tummon, F., Bodeker, G. E., Hubert, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Steinbrecht, W., Anderson, J., Bhartia, P. K., Boone, C. D., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Delcloo, A., Frith, S. M., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Jones, N., Kurylo, M. J., Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Leblanc, S. T., Lambert, J.-C., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Maycock, A., de Mazière, M., Parrish, A., Querel, R., Rosenlof, K. H., Roth, C., Sioris, C., Staehelin, J., Stolarski, R. S., Stübi, R., Tamminen, J., Vigouroux, C., Walker, K. A., Wang, H. J., Wild, J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9965–9982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, D. E.  and Larkin, N. K.: El Niño-Southern Oscillation sea
surface temperature and wind anomalies, 1946–1993, Rev. Geophys., 36,
353–399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG00715" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG00715</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hilton, F., Armante, R., August, T., Barnet, C., Bouchard, A., Camy-Peyret, C., Capelle, V., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P., Collard, A., Crevoisier, C., Dufour, G., Edwards, D., Faijan, F., Fourrié, N., Gambacorta, A., Goldberg, M., Guidard, V., Hurtmans, D., Illingworth, S., Jacquinet-Husson, N., Kerzenmacher, T., Klaes, D., Lavanant, L., Masiello, G., Matricardi, M., McNally, A., Newman, S., Pavelin, E., Payan, S., Péquignot, E., Peyridieu, S., Phulpin, T., Remedios, J., Schlüssel, P., Serio, C., Strow, L., Stubenrauch, C., Taylor, J., Tobin, D., Wolf, W., and Zhou, D.: Hyperspectral Earth Observation from IASI: Five Years of Accomplishments, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 347–370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00027.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00027.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hofmann, D. J. and Oltmans, S. J.: Antarctic ozone during 1992: Evidence for
Pinatubo volcanic aerosol effects, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 18555–18561,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02092</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hofmann, D. J. and Solomon, S.: Ozone destruction through heterogeneous
chemistry following the eruption of El Chichón, J. Geophys. Res., 94,
5029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD04p05029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD04p05029</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hofmann, D. J., Oltmans, S. J., Harris, J. M., Johnson, B. J., and
Lathrop, J. A.: Ten years of ozonesonde measurements at the south pole:
Implications for recovery of springtime Antarctic ozone, J. Geophys. Res.,
102, 8931–8943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03749" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03749</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hood, L. L. and Soukharev, B. E.: Quasi-decadal variability of the tropical
lower stratosphere: The role of extratropical wave forcing, J. Atmos. Sci.,
60, 2389–2403, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Hood, L. L. and Soukharev, B. E.: Solar induced variations of odd nitrogen:
Multiple regression analysis of UARS HALOE data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L22805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028122</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Hood, L. L., McCormick, J. P., and Labitzke, K.: An investigation of
dynamical contributions to midlatitude ozone trends in winter, J. Geophys.
Res., 102, 13079–13093, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hubert, D., Lambert, J.-C., Verhoelst, T., Granville, J., Keppens, A., Baray, J.-L., Bourassa, A. E., Cortesi, U., Degenstein, D. A., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hoppel, K. W., Johnson, B. J., Kyrölä, E., Leblanc, T., Lichtenberg, G., Marchand, M., McElroy, C. T., Murtagh, D., Nakane, H., Portafaix, T., Querel, R., Russell III, J. M., Salvador, J., Smit, H. G. J., Stebel, K., Steinbrecht, W., Strawbridge, K. B., Stübi, R., Swart, D. P. J., Taha, G., Tarasick, D. W., Thompson, A. M., Urban, J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Van Malderen, R., von der Gathen, P., Walker, K. A., Wolfram, E., and Zawodny, J. M.: Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of 14 limb and occultation ozone profile data records, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2497–2534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2497-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2497-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Hurrell, J. W.: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation regional
temperatures and precipitation, Science, 269, 676–679, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hurtmans, D., Coheur, P., Wespes, C., Clarisse, L., Scharf, O., Clerbaux, C.,
Hadji-Lazaro, J., George, M., and Turquety, S.: FORLI radiative transfer and
retrieval code for IASI, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 113, 1391–1408, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Jackman, C., Fleming,  E., and Vitt,  F.: Influence of extremely large solar
proton events in a changing stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11659–11670, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jonsson, A. I., de Grandpré, J., Fomichev, V. I., McConnell, J. C., and
Beagley, S. R.: Doubled CO<sub>2</sub>-induced cooling in the middle atmosphere:
photochemical analysis of the ozone radiative feedback, J. Geophys. Res.,
109, D24103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005093</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins,
W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis
Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Keeble, J., Brown, H., Abraham, N. L., Harris, N. R. P., and Pyle, J. A.: On ozone trend detection: using coupled chemistry–climate simulations to investigate early signs of total column ozone recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7625–7637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7625-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7625-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Keppens, A., Lambert, J.-C., Granville, J., Hubert, D., Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Latter, B., Kerridge, B., Siddans, R., Boynard, A., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Clerbaux, C., Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D. R., Coheur, P.-F., van Peet, J. C. A., van der A, R. J., Garane, K., Koukouli, M. E., Balis, D. S., Delcloo, A., Kivi, R., Stübi, R., Godin-Beekmann, S., Van Roozendael, M., and Zehner, C.: Quality assessment of the Ozone_cci Climate Research Data Package (release 2017) – Part 2: Ground-based validation of nadir ozone profile data products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3769–3800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3769-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3769-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Knudsen, B. M. and Grooss, J.: Northern midlatitude stratospheric ozone
dilution in spring modeled with simulated mixing, J. Geophys. Res., 105,
6885–6890, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kodera, K. and Kuroda, Y.: Dynamical response to the solar cycle: Winter
stratopause and lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4749,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002224</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kuttippurath, J. and Nair, P. J.: The signs of Antarctic ozone hole recovery
2017, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00722-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00722-7</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Kuttippurath, J., Lefèvre, F., Pommereau, J.-P., Roscoe, H. K., Goutail, F., Pazmiño, A., and Shanklin, J. D.: Antarctic ozone loss in 1979–2010: first sign of ozone recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1625–1635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1625-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1625-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Kuttippurath, J., Kumar, P., Nair, P. J., and Pandey, P. C.: Emergence of ozone
recovery evidenced by reduction in the occurrence of Antarctic ozone loss
saturation, Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 2397–3722, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0052-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0052-6</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Sofieva, V., Tamminen, J., Päivärinta, S.-M., Tukiainen, S., Zawodny, J., and Thomason, L.: Combined SAGE II–GOMOS ozone profile data set for 1984–2011 and trend analysis of the vertical distribution of ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10645–10658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Labitzke, K. and van Loon, H.: The QBO effect on the solar signal in the
global stratosphere in the winter of the Northern Hemisphere, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phy., 62, 621–628, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Mäder, J. A., Staehelin, J., Brunner, D.,  Stahel, W. A., Wohltmann, I., and
Peter, T.: Statistical modelling of total ozone: Selection of appropriate
explanatory variables, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007694" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007694</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Mäder, J. A., Staehelin, J., Peter, T., Brunner, D., Rieder, H. E., and Stahel, W. A.: Evidence for the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol to protect the ozone layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 12161–12171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12161-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12161-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Manatsa, D. and Mukwada, G.: A connection from stratospheric ozone to El
Niño-Southern Oscillation, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 5558, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05111-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05111-8</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Manzini, E., Giorgetta, M. A., Esch, M., Kornblueh, L., and Roeckner, E.:
The influence of sea surface temperatures on the northern winter
stratosphere: Ensemble simulations with the MAECHAM5 model, J. Climate, 19,
3863–3881, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
McCormack, J. P., Siskind, D. E., and Hood, L. L.: Solar-QBO interaction and
its impact on stratospheric ozone in a zonally averaged photochemical
transport model of the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16109,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008369</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
McPeters, R. D., Labow, G. J., and Logan, J. A.: Ozone climatological profiles
for satellite retrieval algorithms, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D05308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006823</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Molina, M. J. and Rowland, F. S.: Stratospheric sink for
chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone, Nature,
249, 810–812, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, P. J., Froidevaux, L., Kuttippurath, J., Zawodny, J. M., Russell, J.
M., Steinbrecht, W., Claude, H., Leblanc, T., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Johnson,
B., Swart, D. P. J., Thomas, A., Querel, R., Wang, R., and Anderson, J.:
Subtropical and midlatitude ozone trends in the stratosphere: Implications
for recovery, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7247–7257,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022371" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022371</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Newchurch, M. J., Yang, E.-S., Cunnold, D. M., Reinsel, G. C., Zawodny, J.
M., and Russell III, J. M.: Evidence for slowdown in stratospheric ozone
loss: First stage of ozone recovery, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003471" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003471</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Newman, P. A., Nash, E. R., Kawa, S. R., Montzka, S. A., and Schauffler, S.
M.: When will the Antarctic ozone hole recover?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L12814, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025232</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Rodriguez, J. M., Waugh, D. W.,
and Nielsen, J. E.: The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite
measurements and a chemistry–climate simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 965–976, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Pawson, S., Steinbrecht, W., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Fujiwara, M., Karpechko, A.
Y., Petropavlovskikh, I., Urban, J., and Weber, M.: Update on Global Ozone:
Past, Present, and Future, in: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:
2014, World Meteorological Organization, Global Ozone Research and
Monitoring Project – Report No. 55, chap. 2, World Meteorological
Organization/UNEP, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Portmann, R. W., Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R., Thomason, L. W., Poole, L. R., and McCormick, M.
P.: Role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion in
the polar regions, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 22991–23006,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02608" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02608</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J. and Cobb, J. B.: Coherent variations of monthly mean total
ozone and lower stratospheric temperature, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99,
5433–5447, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J.  and Thompson, A. M.: Interannual variability and trends in
tropical ozone derived from SAGE II satellite data and SHADOZ ozonesondes,
J. Geophys. Res., 116, D07303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015195" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015195</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J. and Wu, F.: Isolation of the ozone QBO in SAGE II data by
singular-value decomposition, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 2546–2559, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J., Wu, F., and Stolarski, R.: Changes in column ozone correlated
with the stratospheric EP flux, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 80, 849–862, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J., Garcia, R. R., Calvo, N., and Marsh, D.: ENSO influence on
zonal mean temperature and ozone in the tropical lower stratosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039343</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Reinsel, G. C., Miller, A. J., Weatherhead, E. C., Flynn, L. E., Nagatani,
R. M., Tiao, G. C., and Wuebbles, D. J.: Trend analysis of total ozone data
for turnaround and dynamical contributions, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D16306,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004662" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004662</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Revell, L. E., Stenke, A., Luo, B., Kremser, S., Rozanov, E., Sukhodolov, T., and Peter, T.: Impacts of Mt Pinatubo volcanic aerosol on the tropical stratosphere in chemistry–climate model simulations using CCMI and CMIP6 stratospheric aerosol data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13139–13150, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13139-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13139-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Rex, M., Salawitch, R. J., von der Gathen, P., Harris, N. R. P.,
Chipperfield, M. P., and Naujokat, B.: Arctic ozone loss and climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L04116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018844</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Rieder, H. E., Frossard, L., Ribatet, M., Staehelin, J., Maeder, J. A., Di Rocco, S., Davison, A. C., Peter, T., Weihs, P., and Holawe, F.: On the relationship between total ozone and atmospheric dynamics and chemistry at mid-latitudes – Part 2: The effects of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation, volcanic eruptions and contributions of atmospheric dynamics and chemistry to long-term total ozone changes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 165–179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-165-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-165-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Rind, D., Perlwitz, J., and Lonergan, P.: AO/NAO response to climate change:
1. Respective influences of stratospheric and tropospheric climate changes,
J. Geophys. Res., 110, D12107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005103</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and
Practice, World Scientific, Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary
Physics, 2, Hackensack, N.J., 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Roscoe, H. K. and Haigh, J. D.: Influences of ozone depletion, the solar
cycle and the QBO on the Southern Annular Mode, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133,
1855–1864, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Salby, M., Titova, E., and Deschamps, L.: Rebound of Antarctic ozone,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L09702, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047266</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Schnadt, C. and Dameris, M.: Relationship between North Atlantic Oscillation
changes and stratospheric ozone recovery in the Northern Hemisphere in a
chemistry-climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 30, 1487,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017006</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Shepherd, T. G., Plummer, D. A., Scinocca, J. F., Hegglin, M. I., Fioletov,
V. E., Reader, M. C., Remsberg, E., von Clarmann, T., and Wang, H. J.:
Reconciliation of halogen-induced ozone loss
with the total-column ozone record, Nat. Geosci., 7, 443–449,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2155</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Sioris, C. E., McLinden, C. A., Fioletov, V. E., Adams, C., Zawodny, J. M., Bourassa, A. E., Roth, C. Z., and Degenstein, D. A.: Trend and variability in ozone in the tropical lower stratosphere over 2.5 solar cycles observed by SAGE II and OSIRIS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3479–3496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3479-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3479-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Sofieva, V. F., Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Tamminen, J., Degenstein, D.,
Bourassa, A., Roth, C., Zawada, D., Weber, M., Rozanov, A., Rahpoe, N.,
Stiller, G., Laeng, A., von Clarmann, T., Walker, K. A., Sheese, P., Hubert,
D., van Roozendael, M., Zehner, C., Damadeo, R., Zawodny, J., Kramarova, N.,
and Bhartia, P. K.: Merged SAGE II, Ozone_cci and OMPS ozone
profile dataset and evaluation of ozone trends in the stratosphere, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 17, 12533–12552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12533-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12533-2017</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, P., Barrett, J., Mooney, T., Connor, B., Parrish, A., and Siskind,
D. E.: Rise and decline of active chlorine in the stratosphere, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L18807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027029</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and
history, Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R.,  Rowland, F. S., and Wuebbles, D. J.: On the
depletion of Antarctic zone, Nature, 321, 755–758, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Portman, R. W., Garcia, R. R., Thomason, L. W., Poole, L. R.,
and McCormack, M. P.: The role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone
depletion at northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 6713–6727, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Ivy, D. J., Kinnison, D., Mills, M. J., Neely, R. R., and
Schmidt, A.: Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer, Science,
353, 269–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0061</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Soukharev, B. E. and Hood, L. L.: Solar cycle variation of stratospheric
ozone: Multiple regression analysis of long-term satellite data sets and
comparisons with models, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20314,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007107</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Stolarski, R. S., Krueger, A. J., Schoeberl, M. R., Mc-Peters, R. D.,
Newman, P. A., and Alpert, J. C.: Nimbus 7 satellite measurements of the springtime
Antarctic ozone decrease, Nature, 322, 808–811, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Steinbrecht, W., Hassler, B., Claude, H., Winkler, P., and Stolarski, R. S.: Global distribution of total ozone and lower stratospheric temperature variations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1421–1438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1421-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1421-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Steinbrecht, W., Haßler, B., Brühl, C., Dameris, M., Giorgetta, M. A., Grewe, V., Manzini, E., Matthes, S., Schnadt, C., Steil, B., and Winkler, P.: Interannual variation patterns of total ozone and lower stratospheric temperature in observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 349–374, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-349-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-349-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Steinbrecht, W., Froidevaux, L., Fuller, R., Wang, R., Anderson, J., Roth, C., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D., Damadeo, R., Zawodny, J., Frith, S., McPeters, R., Bhartia, P., Wild, J., Long, C., Davis, S., Rosenlof, K., Sofieva, V., Walker, K., Rahpoe, N., Rozanov, A., Weber, M., Laeng, A., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G., Kramarova, N., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., Querel, R., Swart, D., Boyd, I., Hocke, K., Kämpfer, N., Maillard Barras, E., Moreira, L., Nedoluha, G., Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Schneider, M., García, O., Jones, N., Mahieu, E., Smale, D., Kotkamp, M., Robinson, J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Harris, N., Hassler, B., Hubert, D., and Tummon, F.: An update on ozone profile trends for the period 2000 to 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10675–10690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Thomason, L. W., Ernest, N., Millán, L., Rieger, L., Bourassa, A., Vernier, J.-P., Manney, G., Luo, B., Arfeuille, F., and Peter, T.: A global space-based stratospheric aerosol climatology: 1979–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 469–492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-469-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-469-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J. and Solomon, S.: Interpretation of Recent Southern
Hemisphere Climate Change, Science, 296, 895–899, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J. and  Wallace, J. M.: Annular modes in the extratropical
circulation. Part I: month-to-month variability, J. Climate, 13, 1000–1016,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, W., Chipperfield, M. P., Gray, L. J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Quasi-biennial
oscillation and tracer distributions in a coupled chemistry-climate model,
J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006871" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006871</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Tiao, G. C., Reinsel, G. C., Xu, D., Pedrick, J. H., Zhu, X., Miller, A. J.,  DeLuisi, J.
J., Mateer, C. L., and Wuebbles, D. J.: Effects of autocorrelation and
temporal sampling schemes on estimates of trend and spatial correlation, J.
Geophys Res., 95, 20507–20517, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Tweedy, O. V., Waugh, D. W., Randel, W. J., Abalos, M., Oman, L. D., and
Kinnison, D. E.: The impact of boreal summer ENSO events on tropical lower
stratospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 9843–9857,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029020</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Valks, P., Hao, N., Gimeno Garcia, S., Loyola, D., Dameris, M., Jöckel, P., and Delcloo, A.: Tropical tropospheric ozone column retrieval for GOME-2, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2513–2530, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2513-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2513-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Coffey, M., Errera, Q., García, O., Jones, N. B., Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Mellqvist, J., Notholt, J., Palm, M., Persson, G., Schneider, M., Servais, C., Smale, D., Thölix, L., and De Mazière, M.: Trends of ozone total columns and vertical distribution from FTIR observations at eight NDACC stations around the globe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2915–2933, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Wargan, K., Orbe, C., Pawson, S., Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Olsen, M. A., Coy, L., and Knowland,  K. E.: Recent Decline in Extratropical Lower Stratospheric Ozone Attributed to Circulation Changes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,  5166,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077406" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077406</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Weatherhead, E. C., Reinsel, G. C., Tiao, G. C., Meng, X.-L., Choi, D.,
Cheang, W.-K., Keller, T., DeLuisi, J., Wuebbles, D. J., Kerr, J. B., Miller, A. J., Oltmans, S.
J., and Frederick, J. E.: Factors affecting the detection of trends:
Statistical considerations and applications to environmental data, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 17149–17161, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, M., Dikty, S., Burrows, J. P., Garny, H., Dameris, M., Kubin, A., Abalichin, J., and Langematz, U.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation and total ozone from seasonal to decadal time scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11221–11235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11221-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11221-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, M., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Fioletov, V. E., Frith, S. M., Wild, J. D., Burrows, J. P., Long, C. S., and Loyola, D.: Total ozone trends from 1979 to 2016 derived from five merged observational datasets – the emergence into ozone recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2097–2117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2097-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2097-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D., Emmons, L. K., Safieddine, S., Clerbaux, C., Edwards, D. P., and Coheur, P.-F.: Ozone variability in the troposphere and the stratosphere from the first 6 years of IASI observations (2008–2013), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5721–5743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5721-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5721-2016</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: O<sub>3</sub> variability
in the troposphere as observed by IASI over 2008–2016 – Contribution of
atmospheric chemistry and dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
2429–2451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025875" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025875</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., Boynard, A., and Coheur, P.-F.: Decrease in tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> levels in the Northern Hemisphere observed by IASI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6867–6885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6867-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6867-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Witte, J. C., Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., and Thompson, A. M.: The Quasi-biennial Oscillation and annual variations in tropical ozone from SHADOZ and HALOE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3929–3936, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3929-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3929-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2006, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
50, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
52, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2014, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
55, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
WMO (World Meterological Organization): Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion: 2018, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No.
58, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Wohltmann, I., Lehmann, R.,  Rex, M., Brunner, D., and Maeder, J. A.: A
process-oriented regression model for column ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007573" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007573</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, E.-S., Cunnold, D. M., Newchurch, M. J., Salawitch, R. J.,
McCormick, M. P., Russell III, J. M., Zawodny, J. M., and Oltmans, S. J.: First stage of
Antarctic ozone recovery, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009675" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009675</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Zerefos, C. S., Tourpali, K., Bojkov, R., Balis, D., Rognerund, B., and
Isaksen, I.: Solar acticity – total ozone relationships: observations and
model studies with heterogeneous chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
1561–1569, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemke, J. R., Douglass, A. R., Oman, L. D., Strahan, S. E., and Duncan, B. N.: Tropospheric ozone variability in the tropics from ENSO to MJO and shorter timescales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8037–8049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
