<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-139-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Dynamic changes in optical and chemical properties of tar ball aerosols by
atmospheric photochemical aging</article-title><alt-title>Dynamic changes in tar ball aerosols by
photochemical aging</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Dynamic changes in tar ball aerosols by
photochemical aging}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~Li et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Chunlin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Quanfu</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-8206</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Schade</surname><given-names>Julian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-6744</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Passig</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3876-1716</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zimmermann</surname><given-names>Ralf</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Meidan</surname><given-names>Daphne</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Laskin</surname><given-names>Alexander</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7836-8417</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rudich</surname><given-names>Yinon</given-names></name>
          <email>yinon.rudich@weizmann.ac.il</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3149-0201</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of
Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre,
University of Rostock, Dr.-Lorenz-Weg 2, 18059 Rostock, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre, Cooperation Group “Comprehensive
Molecular Analytics” (CMA), <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Helmholtz Zentrum München,
Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
47907, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yinon Rudich (yinon.rudich@weizmann.ac.il)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>139</fpage><lpage>163</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e166">Following wood pyrolysis, tar ball aerosols were laboratory generated from
wood tar separated into polar and nonpolar phases. Chemical information of
fresh tar balls was obtained from a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol
mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) and single-particle laser desorption/resonance
enhanced multiphoton ionization mass spectrometry (SP-LD-REMPI-MS). Their
continuous refractive index (RI) between 365 and 425 nm was retrieved using
a broadband cavity enhanced spectroscopy (BBCES). Dynamic changes in the
optical and chemical properties for the nonpolar tar ball aerosols in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent photochemical process were investigated in an
oxidation flow reactor (OFR). Distinct differences in the chemical
composition of the fresh polar and nonpolar tar aerosols were identified.
Nonpolar tar aerosols contain predominantly high-molecular weight
unsubstituted and alkyl-substituted polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
while polar tar aerosols consist of a high number of oxidized aromatic
substances (e.g., methoxy-phenols, benzenediol) with higher O : C ratios
and carbon oxidation states. Fresh tar balls have light absorption
characteristics similar to atmospheric brown carbon (BrC) aerosol with higher
absorption efficiency towards the UV wavelengths. The average retrieved RI is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.661</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.020</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.635</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the nonpolar and polar tar aerosols,
respectively, with an absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) between 5.7
and 7.8 in the detected wavelength range. The RI fits a volume mixing rule
for internally mixed nonpolar/polar tar balls. The RI of the tar ball
aerosols decreased with increasing wavelength under photochemical oxidation.
Photolysis by UV light (254 nm), without strong oxidants in the system,
slightly decreased the RI and increased the oxidation state of the tar balls.
Oxidation under varying OH exposure levels and in the absence of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diminished the absorption (bleaching) and increased the
O : C ratio of the tar balls. The photobleaching via OH radical initiated
oxidation is mainly attributed to decomposition of chromophoric aromatics,
nitrogen-containing organics, and high-molecular weight components in the
aged particles. Photolysis of nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used to
simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent photochemical aging of tar balls in
the OFR. Under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions with similar OH exposure,
photochemical aging led to the formation of organic nitrates, and increased
both oxidation degree and light absorption for the aged tar ball aerosols.
These observations suggest that secondary organic nitrate formation
counteracts the bleaching by OH radical photooxidation to eventually regain
some absorption of the aged tar ball aerosols. The atmospheric implication
and climate effects from tar balls upon various oxidation processes are
briefly discussed.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page140?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e265">Organic aerosol (OA), which represent a ubiquitous and dominant burden of the
tropospheric particulate pollutants, play important roles in atmospheric
chemistry and balance of regional and global radiation (Jimenez et al., 2009;
Kanakidou et al., 2005; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016; Shrivastava et al., 2017).
An indirect climate influence of OA relies on their interaction with water,
thus acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) that may alter the
hydrological cycle (cloud formation and perception) and modify Earth's albedo
(Forster and Taylor, 2006; IPCC, 2013; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). The direct
climate effect of OA is through extinction of incoming solar radiation and
outgoing longwave radiation. Of particular importance is the warming effect
due to light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosol commonly termed brown carbon
(BrC) (Andreae and Gelencsér, 2006). BrC is an important yet poorly
understood OA component due to its complex physical properties, undefined
chemical composition, and dynamic evolution under atmospheric processes
(Adler et al., 2010; Moise et al., 2015; Laskin et al., 2015). It has been
estimated that BrC accounts for 10 %–40 % of the total light
absorption in the atmosphere and when deposited on snowpack (Bahadur et al.,
2012; Park et al., 2010), and contributes a global forcing of
0.10–0.25 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with even higher values on regional scales (Feng et
al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e280">The origin of BrC can be either primary (i.e., directly emitted) or secondary
(i.e., generated by reactions of aromatic or carbonyl compounds in clouds or
particles) (Laskin et al., 2015). On a global scale, biomass burning releases
over two-thirds of primary BrC and also contributes substantially to overall
secondary OA formation (Jacobson, 2014; Jo et al., 2016). Better
understanding of the optical properties of biomass burning BrC aerosols is
crucial for constraining its atmospheric and climatic implications and
Earth's energy balance. Unlike black carbon that absorbs light strongly
throughout the entire UV–visible range, different chromophores that may also
be coupled via charge transfer complexes enable BrC absorption in a much more
pronounced and complicated wavelength-dependence manner (Phillips and Smith,
2004; Reid et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2016, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e283">Tar balls are a specific type of particle produced from wood combustion
(especially from biomass smoldering burning) which is abundant in the
troposphere (Pósfai et al., 2004; Hand et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2017).
Tar ball particles have been collected and identified in many biomass burning
plumes (Pósfai et al., 2004; Fu et al., 2012; Li et al., 2017).
Microanalysis has found that tar balls are homogeneous spherical carbonaceous
particles with sizes ranging from tens to hundreds of nanometers. These
particles contribute a considerable fraction of the biomass burning BrC
(Pósfai et al., 2004; Hand et al., 2005; Li et al., 2017). The estimated
burden of tar balls on regional and global climatic forcing has been
emphasized (Chung et al., 2012; Jacobson, 2012, 2014). Tar balls from
different burning conditions and bio-fuels coexist with many other types of
particles (e.g., inorganic salts, soot, and other carbonaceous aerosols in
the form of internal or external mixing), and these smoke particles undergo
rapid atmospheric processing once they are released from the fire (Pósfai
et al., 2004; Hand et al., 2005; Li et al., 2015, 2017). However, in situ
determination of the optical properties of these particles during their
lifetimes in the air has seldom been reported due to inherent difficulty in
selective tar ball sampling out of complex particle ensembles typical of
field burning emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e286">The complex refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are real and
imaginary parts, corresponding to scattering and absorption, respectively) is
an intrinsic optical property of aerosols. Quantifying the RI of OA is highly
needed for evaluating the related radiative forcing influence (Moise et al.,
2015). Recently, several studies have investigated the optical properties of
tar ball particles (Chakrabarty et al., 2010; Hoffer et al., 2016;
Sedlacek et al., 2018). The optical measurements reported for tar balls or
other biomass burning BrC were discrete over several wavelengths that were
constrained by instruments measuring particle light coefficients, or
indirectly inferred from calculations based on their electron energy-loss
spectra or from UV–visible absorption of solutions containing dissolved tar
balls (Alexander et al., 2008). Hand et al. (2005) measured light scattering
coefficients of tar ball-dominated fire plumes using a nephelometer, and
reconstructed the scattering coefficients with simplified organic carbon (OC)
and elemental carbon (EC) data to get an average RI of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tar
balls at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">632</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. Chakrabarty et al. (2010) measured the RI of
tar ball particles from smoldering biomass combustion at 405, 532, and
780 nm; they observed a clear wavelength-, biofuel-, and even burning
condition-dependent RI. The light absorption by tar balls was similar to
humic-like substance (HULIS) with an imaginary part (0.002–0.015) that
increased exponentially towards the near-UV wavelengths. Recently, Hoffer et
al. (2016) generated tar ball particles from flameless wood pyrolysis in the
laboratory. They reported a higher RI value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm, which
fell closer to RI of soot than to that of HULIS. Large discrepancies reside
in these results and discrete RI values make it difficult to decipher the
complicated wavelength-dependence character of tar ball optical properties,
which finally constrains the assessment of its radiative forcing effect.</p>
      <p id="d1e363">Freshly emitted smoke BrC contains chromophores with diverse chemical
structures, polarity, and volatility (Lin et al., 2016, 2017). After emission
into the atmosphere, smoke particles undergo dynamic changes as a result of
dilution, precipitation, and chemical processing on scales of seconds to
days, which eventually affect the physiochemical properties of BrC particles
during their lifetimes in the atmosphere (Reid et al., 2005; Li et al., 2015;
Laskin et al., 2015). Sumlin et al. (2017) simulated atmospheric
photooxidation of biomass burning BrC and reported that<?pagebreak page141?> photooxidation
diminishes their light absorption. Zhong and Jang (2014) investigated the
influence of humidity and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> presence in photochemical
aging of biomass burning BrC. They found that sunlight faded the color of BrC
and humidity facilitated the decay of light absorption by BrC, while the
presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> delayed the fading. Overall, they concluded
that light absorption by BrC is governed by chromophore formation and
bleaching by sunlight in the atmosphere. Therefore, evaluating the climatic
impacts of tar ball particles requires more extensive investigation of its
optical properties and understanding of the dynamic transformations of the
optical properties during atmospheric aging.</p>
      <p id="d1e388">In this study, we generated proxies for tar ball particles by flameless wood
pyrolysis (Tóth et al., 2014; Hoffer et al., 2016). This method allows
consistent and continuous generation of tar ball proxy aerosols for studying
their properties and processes. The RI of the tar aerosols as a function of
wavelength in the ultraviolet–short visible region (365–425 nm, 0.5 nm
resolution) was determined using a broadband cavity enhanced spectrometer
(BBCES). A high-resolution time of flight aerosol mass spectrometer
(HR-ToF-AMS) and a single-particle mass spectrometer applying laser
desorption/resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization (SP-LD-REMPI-MS) were
used for probing the chemical profile of tar ball aerosols under
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent multiple-day photochemical oxidation.
Specifically, the dynamic changes in their optical properties in correlation
with their chemical composition were investigated. The atmospheric
implications and climate forcing due to atmospheric aging of tar aerosols and
evolution of their optical properties were also explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experiment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Tar ball particle generation</title>
      <p id="d1e413">Following the formation mechanism in biomass burning process, polydisperse
tar ball particles were generated from droplets of wood tar in the laboratory
(Tóth et al., 2014; Hoffer et al., 2016). In this study, a similar
procedure was applied for producing tar ball aerosols. In brief, commercial
wood pellets (Hallingdal Trepellets, water content of 6.55 wt %, size of
2–3 cm in length, 0.2–0.3 cm in diameter) were smashed, heated and
dry-distilled in the absence of air (25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increase to
530 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from room temperature, and held for 20 min at
530 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) to produce liquid tar-water emulsions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL per
hundred grams of used wood pellets). The emulsions were filtrated using
0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size filters (PTFE membrane, diameter 47 mm, Pall
Corp.) to remove particulate matter or solid precipitation. After overnight
static stabilization, the wood tar solution was phase-separated into water
soluble and non-soluble oily phases at an initial 3 : 1 volume ratio.
Herein, we will term these two fractions as “polar” and “nonpolar”
phases, respectively. The phase-separated solution was further concentrated
using a heating plate at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> purge flow to
prevent oxidation. A final 1 : 1 volume ratio of polar to nonpolar phase
was obtained; then the concentrated solutions were sealed and stored in the
dark under 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for following experiments. With respect to their
potential reactivity and instability, the distillation products were used
within a few days.</p>
      <p id="d1e502">For particle optical measurement, tar balls were produced from aerosolization
of above predefined wood tar diluted in methanol (Gradient grade for HPLC,
purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.9 wt %, Merck) using a constant output atomizer (Model
3076, TSI) with high-purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a carrier gas. As the actual
fractions of the polar and nonpolar compounds contributing to the mass of
ambient tar ball or biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) can vary with
biofuel sources, burning condition, atmospheric process, and also
method/efficiency to classify the polar and nonpolar materials from the
sample (Sengupta et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2017, 2018; Chen and Bond, 2010;
Rajput et al., 2014), tar ball aerosols in this study were generated from
polar, nonpolar, and mixtures of these two phase tar solutions at volume
mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Activated charcoal
denuders and quartz heating tube (150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>s
for particles at a nitrogen flow of 1.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were used after the
atomizer to outgas the methanol from the gaseous and particulate phases. Mesh
filters (TSI) downstream were used to filter out some ultrafine (less than
100 nm) particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e593">Experimental setup for laboratory generation and aging of tar ball
aerosol, including generation setup, OFR photochemical aging,
gaseous–particulate chemical monitoring, particle size distribution and
optical property measurements.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{NO${}_{{x}}$-dependent OH oxidation of tar ball aerosols}?><title>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent OH oxidation of tar ball aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e618">Heterogeneous oxidation of tar ball aerosols was simulated using an oxidation
flow reactor (OFR), shown schematically in Fig. 1. The OFR has been
characterized (Kang et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2015, 2016) and the
operational procedures have been described previously (He et al., 2018).
Briefly, the OFR consists of a horizontal 13.3 L aluminum cylindrical
chamber (46 cm long <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 cm ID) operating in continuous flow mode.
The chamber is equipped with two power-controllable ozone-free mercury lamps
with peak emission at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">254</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (82-934-08, BHK Inc., CA, USA). The
two UV lamps are surrounded by Pyrex sheath tubes that are continuously
purged with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to cool the lamps and remove outgassing compounds.
OH radicals in the OFR are produced through photolysis of externally
introduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under 254 nm illumination and further reaction of
singlet oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with water vapor: 

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">254</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            External <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was produced by irradiation of
0.2 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> high-purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a mercury lamp (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">185</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, 78-2046-07, BHK Inc., CA). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
downstream of the OFR was measured by an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> monitor (2B
Technology). A Nafion membrane humidifier (Perma Pure LIC, NJ) was used<?pagebreak page142?> to
supply water vapor to the OFR. Tar ball aerosols carried by
1.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flow from the atomizer were introduced into OFR. The initial
aerosol concentrations in the OFR were mediated by controlling the
concentration of the wood tar solution to be atomized until the number of
350 nm particles was above 100 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Fig. S1 in the
Supplement of tar ball aerosol size distribution. Finally, a total flow of
5.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with 36 %–38 % RH, initial 27–28 ppm
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 200–250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> tar ball particles
(assuming material density of 1.0 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was maintained, with a
corresponding plug flow residence time (RT) of 144 s for aerosols in the
OFR.</p>
      <p id="d1e931">The extent of simulated daytime oxidation by OH exposure was varied by
changing the UV light intensity. Here, OH exposures in the OFR were inferred
by measuring the decay of added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (monitored by Thermo
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer, model 43i) due to reaction with OH radicals at
specific UV lamp intensity. A low concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb) of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to minimize its influence on the OH radical
reactivity. Typical total OH exposures ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s or 0.5–7
equivalent daytime atmospheric oxidation days (EAD) were maintained, taking
typical ambient average OH concentration as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kang et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2015, 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1063">In addition to reactions with oxidants, organic aerosols may change their
chemical and physical properties by photolysis (Epstein et al., 2014; Lee et
al., 2014; Wong et al., 2014). Therefore, the influence of light irradiation
during tar ball photochemical aging was assessed at the short exposure time
in the OFR. Here, tar ball aging was repeated at the same conditions (e.g.,
RT, RH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> / <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flow, tar ball concentration, UV lamp
power) without <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply in the OFR. The 254 nm photon flux at
specific to maximal UV lamp power was calculated by fitting the OH exposure
estimated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decay and by the Aerodyne OFR Exposure Estimator
(v3.1,
<uri>https://sites.google.com/site/pamwiki/hardware/estimation-equations</uri>,
last access: 20 December 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1113">Under polluted conditions, nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are often
involved in the atmospheric transformations of organic aerosol and alter
their physiochemical properties (Rollins et al., 2012; Ng et al., 2007; Lin
et al., 2015). Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influence on tar ball aerosol
aging was also investigated. Due to rapid conversion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) into nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH concentrations, simple addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
into OFR cannot sustain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels that compete with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in the reaction with organic proxy (ROO).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generated via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
has been modeled and tested to suit the characterization of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent SOA formation pathways using OFR (Peng et al.,
2017; Lambe et al., 2017). In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (99.999 %)
addition of 0.5 % vol and 2.0 % vol were used during tar ball aerosol
photochemical oxidation in the OFR, and equivalent OH exposure of about 4.0
 EAD was maintained. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
concentrations downstream of the OFR was measured using a
NO / <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer (Ecotech, Serinus 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Experimental parameters including initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, moisture ratio, maintained OH exposures
and the corresponding photon flux at 254 nm are presented in Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1369">Experimental conditions for tar ball particles photochemical
oxidation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Endpoint <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Water mixing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">Exposure </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(ppm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">OH radical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">photon flux</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(photons cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0126</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0130</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O_0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O_1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0122</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O_3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0115</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O_6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0116</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N_0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">96.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N_2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">528.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0116</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1372">Note: P1–P3 mean photolysis test, O_0.7–O_6.7 correspond to
the photochemical oxidation experiment from equivalent 0.7 to 6.7 days'
ageing, and N_0.5 and N_2.0 indicate photochemical oxidation with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition at 0.5 % vol and 2 % vol mixing ratios (standard
deviation for the parameters was not given in above table).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Online optical and chemical characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e2001">Prior to the optical and chemical measurements, excess ozone and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were removed from the sample air stream following the
OFR using two diffusion denuders packed with Carulite (Carus Corporation,
Peru, IL) and one activated charcoal tube. The streamflow was further
dehydrated with two silica gel diffusion dryers. Afterward, the tar ball
aerosols were characterized by a combination of online chemical and optical
instruments.</p>
      <p id="d1e2015">Bulk chemical fragments and organic elemental ratios of tar ball aerosols
were monitored in real time by the HR-ToF-AMS (Aerodyne Research Inc.,
Billerica, MA, USA) in alternating high-sensitivity V and high-resolution W
modes. The working principles of the AMS have been described in detail
elsewhere (DeCarlo et al., 2006). In short, aerosol particles are separated
from the gas phase through an aerodynamic lens system and then transferred
into the<?pagebreak page143?> vacuum system, where they are impacted onto a vaporizer at about
600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, thus vaporizing the particles. The analyte vapors are
ionized with 70 eV electron impact ionization (EI). A time-of-flight mass
spectrometer is used for high-resolution analysis of the ions. SQUIRREL v1.16
and PIKA v1.57 codes
(<uri>http://cires.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/ToFAMSResources/ToFSoftware/</uri>,
last access: 24 November 2016) were used to process the collected AMS data.
Four ion groups were classified as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(i0,
p1) based on fragment features. The ions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were included in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, as
concentrations of these species were calculated from the organic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion abundance using the method in Aiken et al. (2008). The
ambient improved (AI) atomic ratios of oxygen to carbon (O : C), hydrogen
to carbon (H : C), nitrogen to carbon (N : C), and organic mass to
organic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were generated from the measured ion
fragments.</p>
      <p id="d1e2280">Particle-bound organic molecules were measured using a custom
single-particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer. This instrument features
laser desorption and resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization
(SP-LD-REMPI-ToF-MS), allowing for the detection of aromatic substances on
individual particles. Detailed description and application of the instrument
in LD-REMPI ionization mode is given by Bente et al. (2008) and Passig et al. (2017). Briefly, aerodynamically accelerated particles are individually
sized using laser velocimetry, and heated by a pulsed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> infrared
laser (10.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) to desorb organic molecules. Aromatic substances in the
gas plume are selectively ionized via REMPI by a KrF-excimer laser pulse
(248 nm) and detected in the positive MS flight tube. The REMPI-MS technique
is very sensitive and selective for aromatic substances (Boesl et al., 1978;
Grotemeyer et al., 1986; Rettner and Brophy, 1981) and suitable for studies
on pyrolysis and (wood) combustion processes (Heger et al., 1999; Czech et
al., 2017). For the tar ball aerosols it provides complementary information
to the HR-ToF-AMS spectra. A custom software on LabView basis records and
calculates the aerodynamic size and individual mass spectra of the
particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e2301">For optical measurements, tar ball aerosols were size-selected using an
Aerosol Aerodynamic Classifier (AAC, Cambustion, UK). AAC has significant
advantages over the commonly used Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA)
classifier. The AAC classifies particles based on the aerodynamic size
without charging and hence it avoids the contribution of multiply charged
particles, thus generating real monodisperse size-selected particles
distribution, reducing the errors associated with multiply charged large
particles. In addition, the AAC has higher particle transmission efficiency
at the relevant size range  (Tavakoli and Olfert, 2013, 2014). Aerodynamic
size-classified particles after the AAC were further scanned by a scanning
mobility particle sizer (SMPS, classifier Model 3080, DMA Model 3081, CPC
model 3775, TSI) to derive their mobility size distribution. The effective
density of tar balls can be estimated from Eq. (1) with assumptions of
homogeneous composition and particle shape factor of 1.0, which was verified
later in this study:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aero</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an effective density, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aero</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are aerodynamic and mobility diameters, respectively.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unit density of 1.0 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page144?><p id="d1e2397">Based on the derived effective density, size-specific tar ball aerosols
covering mobility diameters between 175 to 350 nm with an interval of 25 nm
were size-selected via AAC, and monodisperse tar balls were introduced into
a dual-channel broad-band cavity enhanced spectrometer (BBCES) for light
extinction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements in the wavelength of
360–395 and 385–435 nm (at resolution 0.5 nm). A detailed description of the instrument can be found elsewhere
(Washenfelder et al., 2013; Flores et al., 2014a, b). With the
combination of a condensation particle counter (CPC, Model 3575, TSI) to
measure particle concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in series, size-specific particle
extinction cross section (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be calculated by Eq. (2):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M147" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength of incidence light and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the particle mobility diameter.</p>
      <p id="d1e2521">Using the Mie–Lorenz scattering theory, the wavelength-dependent complex
refractive index of spherical homogeneous particles was derived (Pettersson
et al., 2004; Abo Riziq et al., 2007). The retrieval algorithm was limited to
search for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as their physical boundaries. Thereafter, spectral
dependent extinction, scattering, and absorption cross sections (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
calculated from the complex RI at a specific particle size. Using these
parameters, the single scattering albedo, indicating the scattering fraction
of light extinction (SSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was
calculated.</p>
      <p id="d1e2600">The absorption and extinction Ångström exponents
(Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describe the spectral
dependence of aerosol light properties, and are widely used in climate
modeling (Russell et al., 2010). It is customary to extrapolate the optical
spectral absorption and extinction fitting to the range of wavelengths using
a power law <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Å</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Å</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. In this work, we
determined Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with a linear
regression of ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against
ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the range of 365 to 425 nm:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M165" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Å</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Å</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SSA were calculated for tar ball
aerosols with a median diameter of 150 nm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Offline optical characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e2816">In addition to the in situ measurements, tar ball particles were also
collected quantitatively onto Teflon filters (47 mm diameter,
0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity, Pall Corp.) at a sampling flow rate of
2 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and then extracted using methanol (HPLC grade, purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, Merck) for offline UV–visible absorption measurement (Cary 60
UV-VIS spectroscopy, Agilent). Methanol extraction of organic compounds has
been commonly performed in various studies (Hoffer et al., 2006; Laskin et
al., 2009; Yee et al., 2013; Finewax et al., 2018; Xie et al., 2017). Here we
verified the completeness of the extraction by extracting each filter twice
with methanol. Moreover, vortex shaking (Vortex Genie-2, Scientific
Industries) rather than sonication was applied to avoid chemical degradation
of the extracts upon ultrasonic irradiation (Miljevic et al., 2014; Mutzel et
al., 2013). The methanol extractable BrC mass absorption cross section
(MAC, m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and refractive imaginary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the tar balls were
estimated based on the following relations (Chen and Bond, 2010; Laskin et
al., 2015):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M174" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Abs</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the base-10 absorbance result from
UV–visible spectroscopy (unitless), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the optical length of the solution (1 cm), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the extracted
organic carbon mass concentration in solvent (g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be
determined directly by normalizing the extract concentration and OC mass
fraction for tar balls as OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OM obtained from AMS data, as no other
refractory elemental carbon (EC) content was detected in our samples (see
details in the Supplement). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the incident light wavelength, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the material density (g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, the derived effective
density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used. The absorption Ångström
exponent based on MAC was also derived as Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UV</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Vis</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over
the 365–425 nm spectral range.</p>
      <p id="d1e3090">In addition, particles were impacted at a flow of 2.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> onto
cyclopore track-etched polycarbonate membrane (47 mm, 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
porosity, Whatman Inc.) to investigate the morphology of tar balls using
scanning electronic microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7000F).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Radiative impacts of tar ball aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e3119">To assess the climatic influence of tar ball aerosols, a
wavelength-dependent direct shortwave aerosol simple radiative forcing
efficiency (SRF, W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated using the clear sky air mass
global horizonal solar spectrum (AM1GH), assuming that tar ball aerosols
form a uniform, optically thin aerosol layer at the lower troposphere or on
ground  (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Levinson et al., 2010):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M188" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dSRF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close=""><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sfc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sfc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solar irradiance
(photons s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the atmospheric
transmission (taking 0.79 for simple calculation), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
cloud fraction (approximately 0.6), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sfc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface albedo
(approximately 0.19 for urban area ground and 0.8 for snow) (Chen and Bond,
2010), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average up-scatter fraction (the fraction of scattered
sunlight that is scattered into the upward hemisphere), and MSC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
the wavelength-dependent mass scattering cross section, respectively. We
simply calculated radiative forcing of particles with an atmospheric-relevant
size of 50 to 500 nm, and SRF was estimated and integrated over the measured
range of 365–425 nm. The actinic flux over 365–425 nm was obtained from
the “Quick TUV Calculator”, available at
<uri>http://cprm.acom.ucar.edu/Models/TUV/Interactive_TUV/</uri> (last<?pagebreak page145?> access:
15 May 2018) using the following parameters: SZA (solar zenith angle) of
0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, noon time, 30 June 2000, 300 Dobson overhead ozone column,
surface albedo of 0.19 for urban area and 0.8 for snow, and 0 km altitude.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3391">High-resolution AMS mass spectra of fresh polar and nonpolar tar
ball particles. Four ion groups are grouped for clarity as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (purple),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (violet), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(i0, p1) (light blue). The mass fractions of the four fragment groups are
presented by pie charts.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Chemical composition and optical properties of fresh tar ball
aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e3557">Negligible fractions of inorganics (e.g., sulfate, nitrate, chloride, and
ammonium) in tar balls are obtained from AMS measurement as shown in Fig. S2,
and these results confirm again that tar ball aerosols contain dominated
carbonaceous compounds with minor amounts of N, S, and Cl (Pósfai et al.,
2004; Hand et al., 2005; Adachi and Buseck, 2011). Thereafter, only organics
in tar balls are considered, and the high-resolution bulk organic mass
spectra for polar and nonpolar tar ball particles are given in Fig. 2. The
mass spectra features and particle effective densities are summarized and
compared in Table S1 in the Supplement. Distinct differences in the chemical
composition were observed between polar and nonpolar tar ball aerosols. The
alkyl fragments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) dominate
the signals for nonpolar particles (accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the
total fragments), implying that the nonpolar tar balls have compositional
similarity to common hydrocarbon organic aerosol (HOA). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments are the primary
ions for the polar tar balls, contributing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of their mass
spectrum, suggesting that most of the organic constituents in the polar tar
balls are substantially oxygenated. Both spectra exhibit significant
intensity at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 28 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating the presence of
carbonyl ions. The strong signal at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 31 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
results from methoxy species that preferably partition into the polar tar
fraction. In addition, the significant signals at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50–52
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 65 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 77–78 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 81
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which are characteristic of aromatic compounds, indicate that tar balls,
especially from the nonpolar phase, contain a considerable amount of aromatic
organics or present high aromaticity. Ion peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 77–78, 81, and 91
are typical of monocyclic aromatics such as alkyl-substituted benzene (for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 77–78, 91) and heterocyclic aromatics (for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 81) (Li et al.,
2012), while the relatively higher signal at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 128
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the nonpolar tar ball mass spectra can be
assigned to the molecular ion of naphthalene (Herring et al., 2015).
Moreover, signals at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 and 57 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are signature fragments of aliphatic
and non-acid oxygenated organics that are used to trace cooking emissions (He
et al., 2010), and these two fragments were also observed in the tar ball
aerosols. Similar to ambient biomass burning emissions,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 73), two characteristic
fragments from levoglucosan and similar cellulose pyrolyzed species (e.g.,
mannosan, galactosan) were detected in all the tar ball aerosols, and these
fragments were more prominent in the polar aerosols due to the solubility of
levoglucosan and analogs in water. Weimer et al. (2008) reported the
percentage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 and 73 for the burning of various woods to be
0.6 %–4.1 % and 0.1 %–2.0 %, respectively. The percentages
of these two fragments in our tar ball aerosols (0.7 %–1.6 % for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 and 0.5 %–0.9 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 73) are comparable to the
literature data, although the fuel and the pyrolysis procedure are different.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 137 peak is dominated by fragments of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and these fragments have been
determined in biomass burning emissions and were assigned to lignin-related
ions with methoxy-phenolic structures (Li et al., 2012, 2014). Phenols and
methoxy phenols are prominent compounds, accounting for 41 % of the
identified organic species in primary BBOA (Schauer et al., 2001). The signal
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 137 is much higher in the nonpolar-phase tar ball aerosols
(1.0 % and 0.5 % for nonpolar and polar tar balls, respectively), and
the fraction of fragment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 137 is consistent with reference values of
0.3 %–2.0 % (Li et al., 2012). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a
marker fragment of carboxylic acids, has been parameterized as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(fraction of a mass spectrum signal at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44) to present the oxidation
degree of organic aerosols (Aiken et al., 2008; Ng et al., 2010). Higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate more oxidized OA (OOA), while less oxidized OA is
characterized by lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schauer et al., 2001). Peroxides can also
produce a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal via extensive fragmentation in the AMS
(Aiken et al., 2008). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has also been shown to be linearly correlated
with the elemental O : C ratio of OA (Aiken et al., 2008). In this study,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the nonpolar and polar tar ball aerosols are 1.9 % and
2.4 %, and the corresponding O : C ratios are 0.25 and 0.44. The higher
O : C and H : C ratios explain the polarity of the polar tar ball
aerosols. The simplified average carbon oxidation state
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSc</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O : C–H : C) describes the oxidation
level of particulate complex organic mixtures (Kroll et al., 2011). The
calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSc</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the tar ball aerosols are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.76, which agrees well with reference values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.7 for
primary BBOA (Kroll et al., 2011). These values are in the broad range of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.6 for HOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0 for semivolatile OOA (Aiken et al., 2008).
In addition, a small fraction of nitrogen-containing organic compounds (NOCs)
was detected, with the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
group contributing 1.6 %–3.6 % of the tar ball mass spectra with an
estimated N : C ratio below 0.01, which agrees with previously reported
N : C values of 0.008–0.018 for biomass burning emissions (He et al.,
2010). Biomass burning is an important source of NOCs in the atmosphere, and
alkaloid and nitro-aromatic constituents were detected to be abundant
constituents of the NOCs (Laskin et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2017).
Nitroaromatic compounds were also identified in urban fire emissions
(Bluvshtein et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2017). Although these compounds
constitute a small fraction of the BBOA mass, these chromophoric NOC species
accounted for 50 %–80 % of the<?pagebreak page146?> total visible light absorption by the
extractable BrC (Lin et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4649">Fragments larger than 100 amu (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) contribute a large
fraction of the total organic signals for tar ball aerosols, consistent with
biomass burning emissions that contain a large fraction of high-molecular
weight compounds (Ge et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
32 % for the nonpolar tar ball aerosols, which is higher than that of the
polar particles (15 %), demonstrating that the nonpolar tar balls consist
of more high-molecular weight organics. The measured effective densities for
polar and nonpolar tar balls are 1.33 and 1.24 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Chemical
characteristics from AMS and densities for internal mixture tar balls follow
the volume-linear mixing of polar and nonpolar tar solutions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4710">LD-REMPI mass spectra of exemplary single tar ball particles; some
feature peaks were identified and labeled. <bold>(a)</bold> Nonpolar tar ball
spectra show predominantly alkyl-substituted and unsubstituted
PAHs. <bold>(b)</bold> Polar tar ball spectra reveal many oxidized aromatics,
e.g., methoxy-phenol and benzenediol. Note the softwood combustion marker
retene at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 234, its characteristic fragments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 203, 204, 205,
219), and possible retene derivatives (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 248, 250).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4767">A considerable aromatic fraction in the tar ball aerosols was confirmed by
the LD-REMPI-MS measurement. Fig. 3 presents the mass spectra of aromatic
substances obtained for one exemplary polar and one nonpolar particle,
respectively. Aerodynamic size distributions for the detected tar ball
aerosols are given in Fig. S3, and substances identified in the mass spectra
are listed in Table S2. The features in the mass spectra are consistent with
the polarity of examined tar ball aerosols and ambient BBOA (Lin et al.,
2018). The complex REMPI spectrum shows rows of intense unsubstituted and
partially alkylated PAH peaks in the nonpolar tar balls, including
naphthalene, acenaphthylene, phenanthrene, pyrene, and, in particular, the
softwood combustion marker retene at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 234 and some possible derivatives
(oxidized retene at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 with one oxygen addition, methyl retene at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 248 with one methyl addition) (McDonald et al., 2000; Shen et al.,
2012). Retene and some of the aforementioned PAHs are also observed in the
polar tar ball aerosols' mass spectra with lower intensities. In contrast,
the polar tar ball REMPI mass spectra show strong peaks from oxidized
aromatics, more specifically, benzenediol and methoxy-phenols (e.g.,
catechol, guaiacol, acetovanillone, syringaldehyde, conifery aldehyde). These
results are also verified in ambient BBOA, of which the nonpolar BrC consists
of primary unsubstituted PAHs, while the polar fraction includes major
aromatic acids and phenols (Lin et al., 2018). The REMPI mass spectra
correspond to the large fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments and high O : C ratios observed for the
polar tar aerosols via HR-ToF-AMS, and remain consistent with the strong
signals of typical aromatic fragments observed in the nonpolar tar aerosols
in Fig. 2. The dominance of aromatic compounds in tar ball chemical
composition agrees well with previous work on BBOA (Schauer et al., 2001; Wei
et al., 2015; Bente et al., 2008, 2009; Czech et al., 2017). Biomass burning
is a major source of environmental PAHs (alkylated PAHs, oxygenated PAHs,
phenols, nitrogen-substituted PAHs, etc.) in both particulate and gaseous
phases, and extensive emissions of PAHs from incomplete combustion pose a
great threat to ecosystem and human health due to their carcinogenic toxicity
(Li et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2013; Sigsgaard et al., 2015; Shrivastava et
al., 2017). Moreover, the primary PAHs can act as precursors that
substantially contribute to ambient SOA or BrC aerosol when involved in
atmospheric photochemical aging,<?pagebreak page147?> leading to profound climatic influence (Yee
et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4841">Wavelength-dependent RI and SSA for tar ball particles generated
from polar, nonpolar and a mixture of the two-phase tarry solutions (only
retrieval for a mixture of 1 : 1 in vol is shown for clarity; optical
results for the other two mixtures can be found in the supporting materials).
The shaded areas indicate the upper and lower limits of the imaginary part
calculated from UV–visible spectra of methanol extracts from the
corresponding tar ball particle samples: <bold>(a)</bold> real
part, <bold>(b)</bold> imaginary part, and <bold>(c)</bold> SSA calculated for
150 nm particles. Overlaid in green symbols are previous
measurements of biomass burning from the literature.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4859">The complex refractive index (RI) of tar ball aerosols was retrieved under
the assumption that the particles have similar chemical composition and a
spherical shape. The SEM images shown in Fig. S4 confirm the spherical
morphology and homogeneous composition of the tar ball particles generated in
this study. Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) spectra indicates that
the tar ball particles contain major C and minor O, which fits the AMS result
and previous work (Pósfai et al., 2004; Chakrabarty et al., 2010).
Continuous spectral-dependent RI and SSA for tar balls were derived and are
presented in Fig. 4, RI results for tar ball aerosol at mixing ratio of
2 : 1 and 1 : 2 are presented in Fig. S5. Although scattering dominates
the light extinction, absorption in the UV and in the visible ranges was
unambiguously identified for the tar ball aerosols, with characteristic
absorption similar to atmospheric BrC and HULIS (Hoffer et al., 2006;
Bluvshtein et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2017). The imaginary part, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
increases towards the UV range, presenting 0.02–0.03 difference over the
measured spectra range. The real part, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the nonpolar tar balls
decreased from 1.673 at 365 nm to 1.647 at 425 nm, which is almost parallel
to the descending <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the polar tar balls ranging from 1.651 at 365 nm
to 1.625 at 425 nm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.029–0.013 for the nonpolar tar ball over light
wavelength of 365–425 nm, while the imaginary part for nonpolar aerosols is
0.007 at 365 nm and zero at wavelength longer than 410 nm, indicating that
there is no detectable absorption or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower than our detection limit.
The overwhelming imaginary part for the nonpolar tar aerosol agrees with many
reports that nonpolar or less polar organics have higher absorption compared
with the polar BrC in BBOA (Lin et al., 2018; Sengupta et al., 2018). The
stronger absorption and relatively higher scattering abilities resulted in a
lower SSA compared with the polar tar ball aerosols. The SSA increases
towards the visible wavelength from 0.86 at 365 nm to 0.90 at 425 nm for
nonpolar tar ball, and the corresponding values are 0.95 to 1.0 for the polar
tar balls.</p>
      <p id="d1e4897">The optical properties of aerosols relate to their chemical composition.
Evidently, most of the PAHs identified in the tar ball aerosols with high
intensity have strong absorption between 350 and 450 nm (Samburova et al.,
2016; Lin et al., 2018), as shown in Fig. S6, which coincide with the range
of tar ball absorption measured here, implying that PAHs could be a dominant
contributor to the absorption of fresh tar balls. Higher imaginary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
explained partly by the larger proportion of PAHs as well as more
high-molecular-weight organics present in the nonpolar tar ball particles, as
conjugated aromatic rings and phenols contribute to the major chromophores in
the wood smoke (Laskin et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2017, 2018). High-molecular
weight organics may resemble HULIS that can form charge transfer complexes
(Phillips and Smith, 2004), and that can absorb light at a longer wavelength
range. The result is consistent with the finding that higher molecular weight
and aromaticity result in<?pagebreak page148?> stronger absorption for atmospheric BrC (Dinar et
al., 2008). Moreover, the higher NOC content may also contribute to the
chromophores in the nonpolar tar aerosols (Lin et al., 2017, 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e4907">The average RIs at 375 and 405 nm are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.671</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.659</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for nonpolar tar ball aerosols. The corresponding RIs are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.647</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.635</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the polar tar ball aerosols. The imaginary part <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieved from the BBCES data, though low, agrees well with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
calculated from UV–visible absorption of the bulk solution. The MAC for the
methanol-extracted BrC in tar ball aerosol is shown in Fig. S7. The
absorption may be different for complex materials in the particulate and
aqueous phases since parameters such as shape factor and mixing state
together with artifacts from the optical instruments' detection and data
retrieval methods can all affect the final optical results, while
solvent-dependent extraction/dissolving efficiency of chromophores or the
solvent effect (e.g., pH in water solution) may impact the solution
absorption coefficient
(Huang et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2017). The light absorption
coefficient of particulate BrC has been reported to be 0.7–2.0 times that of bulk BrC extracts by Liu et al. (2013).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e4984">Comparison of tar ball particle optical properties with reference
values of BBOA (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.80}[.80]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BrC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1">Complex refractive index </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVVIS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">375 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">405 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nonpolar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.661</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.020</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.671</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.659</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.011</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">This work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mixture (2 : 1 in vol)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.670</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.682</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.021</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.668</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.013</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mixture (1 : 1 in vol)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.694</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.011</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.013</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.703</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.689</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.011</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.009</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mixture (1 : 2 in vol)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.672</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.011</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.683</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.667</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.635</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.009</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.647</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.635</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.28</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.590</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.029</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–375 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.570</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–405 nm (IPN) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.4–7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Sumlin et al. (2017, 2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.590</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–405 nm (IPN) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Flowers et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.009–404 nm (CRDS-PAS) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Lack et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tar ball</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0086</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–405 nm (IPN) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.2–6.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Chakrabarty et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tar ball</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–405 nm (CRDS-UVVIS) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Hand et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (WELAS, open fire), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (WELAS, smoldering) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Adler et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–405 nm (BBCES-Neph) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4–6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2–3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Bluvshtein et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA_HULIS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.653</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.685</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–532 nm(Nep-PAS) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6–7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Hoffer et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA_HULIS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.616</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–390 nm(CRDS) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Dinar et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.550</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–365 nm (BBCES) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Washenfelder et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.9–11.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Chen and Bond (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.3–8.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Xie et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient SOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.0–6.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Huang et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient SOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.046</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–365 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.039</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–405 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.036</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–420 nm (LWCC) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Shamjad et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e4994">Note: Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
calculated from tar ball particles with a median diameter of 150 nm in this
study. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Regressed over a wavelength range of 365–400 nm; no
absorption detected over 410 nm using the BBCES system.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Regressed over a wavelength range of 300–650 nm for bulk fire
plume emissions. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UVVIS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of methanol
extracts over the whole range from 300/360 to 600 nm. Instrument: IPN
(integrated photoacoustic nephelometer),<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>CRDS (cavity ring-down
spectrometer), PAS (photoacoustic absorption spectrometer), WELAS (white
light optical particle counter), LWCC (liquid waveguide capillary cell).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6369">The absorption Ångström exponent (Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is often used
to describe the wavelength dependence of aerosol light absorption, with a
value of nearly 1 for BC particles and values substantially larger than 1
indicating the contribution from BrC (Reid et al., 2005; Chen and Bond,
2010). In this work, Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the nonpolar and polar tar ball
particles ranges from 5.9 to 6.8 between 365 and 425 nm, which is consistent
with values of 5.7–7.8 calculated from the bulk absorption in solution. The
nonpolar tar balls have a lower Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The difference in
Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects the different chemical composition of
chromophores in the particles, as inferred also from the AMS data. Bluvshtein
et al. (2017) reported relatively low values of Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (2–3)
and Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (4–6) over 300–650 nm for ambient fire plume,
which are likely affected by BC in the smoke aerosol and are also due to
lower wavelength dependence of aerosol absorption and scattering over the
longwave visible range. Overall, the broadband optical results for fresh tar
ball aerosols are consistent with limited discrete measurements of
atmospheric BBOA as<?pagebreak page149?> summarized in Table 2. It has also been found that the
biomass fuel type, combustion conditions, and atmospheric processing
eventually affect the optical properties of BBOA. Lack et al. (2012) modeled
core-shell absorption for primary organic matter (POM) and BC from biomass
burning. They found that the imaginary part of the RI and BrC MAC of POM at
404 nm were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. Chakrabarty et al. (2010) compared the optical properties of
tar balls from smoldering combustion of different biomass. Fuel-dependent
imaginary RI for tar ball at 405 nm was 0.008–0.015 and
Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over 405–532 nm was 4.2–6.4, which is in line with
the Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 6–7 reported for BBOA derived HULIS
(Hoffer et al., 2006). Sedlacek et al. (2018) observed a weak absorption for
wildfire produced tar balls with RI of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sumlin et al. (2018)
simulated BrC formation under different pyrolysis temperatures. The BrC
produced from over 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C combustion has imaginary part <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
0.05–0.09 and real part <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.59–1.68 at 375 nm, and RI at 405 nm is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponded Å<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over 375–405 nm is
6.4–7.4.</p>
      <p id="d1e6555">Optical mixing rules can be used to estimate or explain the refractive
indices of internally mixed substances, and three mixing rules are commonly
applied in climate models: molar refraction of absorption (Jacobson, 2002),
volume-weighted linear average of the refractive indices (d'Almeida et al.,
1991), and the Maxwell–Garnett rule (Chýlek et al.,
2000). The “linear mixing rule” and molar refraction mixing rules were
tested in this work for mixtures of tar ball particles against the retrieved
optical data. Relevant data analysis details are provided in the supporting
materials (Tables S3–S4, Figs. S8–S12). It was found that both mixing rules
can predict the index of refraction for the polar/nonpolar tar balls, and
values calculated based on the “linear mixing rule” fit better with the
experimental data. As mentioned above, the real fractions for polar and
nonpolar BrC contributing to the mass/absorption of BBOA are undefined, some
investigations reporting the dynamic polar BrC dominating in mass loading
(50 %–85 %) but contributing less to the absorption in BBOA (less
than 40 %) (Asa-Awuku et al., 2008; Bluvshtein et al., 2017; Lin et al.,
2017, 2018; Rajput et al., 2014; Sengupta et al., 2018). The “linear mixing
rule” confirmed in this study should be helpful in the mathematical modeling
to assess climatic impacts of biomass burning related BrC aerosol, when their
chemical composition is classified.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6560">Evolution of the retrieved wavelength-dependent complex RI and SSA
as a function of O : C ratio for tar ball particles upon OH photochemical
oxidation: <bold>(a)</bold> real part, <bold>(b)</bold> imaginary part,
and <bold>(c)</bold> SSA calculated for 150 nm particles. The color scale shows
the span in the RI for the wavelengths measured from 365 to 425 nm. For
clarity, error bars for O : C ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), RI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for real
part, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for imaginary part on average), and SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
are not shown. Two dashed lines trace the RI and SSA at 375 nm (purple) and
405 nm (green). O_0.7–O_6.7 represent equivalent atmospheric
photochemical oxidation for 0.7 and up to 6.7 days.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Photooxidation of tar ball particles</title>
      <p id="d1e6625">Aerosols have a wide range of atmospheric lifetimes from hours to days,
during which they are involved in various atmospheric processes, resulting in
changes in properties (Reid et al., 2005; Rudich et al., 2007; Jimenez et
al., 2009). Therefore, we studied the effects of photochemical oxidation of
the nonpolar wood-pyrolyzed tar ball aerosols to investigate the
physiochemical changes that can occur during tar balls' atmospheric lifetime.
Figure 5 presents the evolution<?pagebreak page150?> of the wavelength-dependent RI and SSA as a
function of the aerosols' O : C ratio following <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free
photochemical aging in the OFR. The oxidation covers 0.7–6.7 EAD.
Substantial decrease in the RI and an increase in the SSA are correlated with
an increase in the O : C ratio; these specific parameters are summarized in
Table S5. Light scattering as well as the absorption by the tar ball aerosol
decrease with increasing OH oxidation. The tar aerosols lose their scattering
and absorption significantly up to 3.9 EAD aging. The average RI decreased
from initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.661</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.020</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.632</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the corresponding average
SSA increased from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then, the RI by tar
balls persisted with enhanced oxidation, so that the MAC values remained
stable after 3.9 days' oxidation (Fig. S13), suggesting that all the
photochemical–labile chromophores were largely eliminated, while the
remaining fraction still presented some light absorption. Forrister et
al. (2015) also observed a stable fraction of biomass burning BrC that had
persistent absorption even after a long photochemical evolution time in the
ambient environment. They suggested that the remaining persistent fraction
determines the background BrC levels. In our study, the O : C ratio for tar
ball aerosols increased continuously with photochemical oxidation, implying
production of oxygenated constituents (carboxylic, carbonyl compounds, etc.)
and the interaction between these increasingly oxidized species coupled with
the relatively stable intrinsic chromophoric structures (e.g., fused aromatic
rings in Fig. 3) in some supermolecular structure that may explain the
persistent absorption for aged tar ball aerosols (Dewar and Lepley, 1961;
Desyaterik et al., 2013; Samburova et al., 2016). In addition, a balance
between photobleaching of intrinsic chromophores and photochemical formation
of BrC via gas-particle transfer, as well as dynamic gas-particle
partitioning of chromophores and products of their photo-degradation, should
also be considered in the overall absorption behavior for BBOA during
photochemical processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e6691">The observed photooxidation bleaching is consistent with previous studies on
atmospheric processes of BrC. Sumlin et al. (2017) conducted multiple-day
photochemical oxidation on primary biomass burning BrC aerosols and observed
that BrC loses its light absorption and scattering in the near-UV wavelengths
by aging. Their derived RI at 375 nm decreased from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for fresh
emission to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 4.5 EAD oxidation with a corresponding
O : C ratio increase<?pagebreak page151?> from 0.34 to 0.40. Decrease in the overall BBOA
absorption and scattering was also detected in situ following a 1-day
evolution by Adler et al. (2011). They monitored an average RI of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aerosols dominated by open fire and
smoldering emissions, respectively, while the RI decreased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
the aged aerosols during the following day. Zhong and Jang (2014) reported
that light absorption of wood smoke BrC was modified by the photochemical
process, owing to the production of BrC from SOA formation and loss of BrC
from photochemical bleaching of the chromophores. The total MAC for the BrC
eventually decreased by 19 %–68 % within 1 day of aging. They
proposed that bleaching occurred by excitation of electrons through the
absorption of sunlight via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (UV and near UV illumination) or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (visible wavelengths irradiation) transitions. Then, the excited
electrons disrupted the conjugated structure of chromophores, leading to the
fading of wood smoke color.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6795">Dynamic changes for the chemical characteristics of tar ball
particle under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free OH photochemical
oxidation: <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, H : C ratio, particle density,
and average carbon oxidation state (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSc</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) changes as a
function of O : C ratio; <bold>(b)</bold> mass spectra evolution with oxidation
times in term of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fragment groups.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6977">When tar ball aerosols were illuminated merely by 254 nm UV light at a
residence time of 144 s, photolysis occurred and weakly diminished their
light absorption, in line with the extent of photon flux exposure. UV
irradiation similar to the O_3.9 condition slightly decreased the average RI
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.649</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that photolysis played a minor role in tar
ball aerosol bleaching and contributed less than 15 % of imaginary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free photochemical aging process. Even at
full power of UV lamps in the OFR, the average RI decreased by 0.012 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for maximum photolyzed tar balls (Tables S6–S7, Figs. S14–S17). As
we also did not observe detectable optical changes in blank tests upon
exposure to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the dark (Figs. S18–S19), the bleaching of the
tar balls in the OFR is mainly attributed to OH-initiated chromophore
decomposition via heterogeneous reactions, rather than to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation or photolysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e7046">These results indicate a fundamental relationship between photochemical
processes and impairment of light absorbing and scattering abilities in tar
ball aerosols. The optical behaviors of tar balls are a consequence of their
chemical composition changes, which are very sensitive to photochemical
processes, and one daytime atmospheric aging even resulted in significant
oxidation and bleaching of tar balls. In Fig. 6a, the H : C,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSc</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, and particle effective density
versus O : C ratios are shown. Figure 6b presents the contributions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
groups to the tar balls' composition under a range of OH exposure conditions.
Mass spectra features and densities of the tar ball aerosols under various
oxidation processes are summarized in Table S8. Increasing the OH exposure
leads to continuous increase in O : C and H : C ratios, leading to higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSc</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the tar ball aerosols. This result is
consistent with Sumlin et al. (2017), who reported that the O : C and
H : C for BBOA increased by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 4.5 EAD
photochemical oxidation, respectively. In this work, the measured O : C
ratio increased from 0.25 to 0.38 after maximum aging, while the H : C
ratio increased by 0.07 from an initial value of 1.55.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7237">Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from ambient data sets (Ng et
al., 2010) and values from ambient biomass burning organic aerosol.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7266">Other previous studies also depicted a dynamic change in elemental ratios for
SOA upon aging (Aiken et al., 2008). The H : C ratio may either increase or
decrease, depending on the precursor type and oxidation conditions. Overall,
O : C and H : C ratio changes relate to specific chemical processes
or/and to gas-particle mass transfer during aging of aerosols (Heald et al.,
2010; Kim et al., 2014). The tar ball aerosols consist of mostly reduced
species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSc</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0), which can be oxidized
primarily via oxidative formation of polar functional groups to the carbon
skeletons. In OH-initiated oxidation, functionalization includes OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OOH
function group addition and COOH : carbonyl group formation that increase
the net oxygen content in SOA (Kroll et al., 2011). Hydration or polar
functional group addition to unsaturated C–C bonds may also increase the
H : C ratio. Moreover, fragmentation or evaporation also mediates the
O : C and H : C ratios of SOA in further aging (Zhang and Seinfeld, 2013;
Kim et al., 2014). We attribute the increase in the H : C ratio to such
oxidation mechanisms that involve bulk species in the particles. As shown in
Table S8, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased monotonically with aging. After
6.7 EAD photooxidation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contributed only 21 % of the
total organic signals. The decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that
fragmentation reactions are involved in the photochemical evolution, and
decomposition of high-molecular weight compounds, thereby, reduced the size
of the conjugated molecular system. The persistent high value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 6.7 EAD photooxidation implies that some
high-molecular weight compounds remained in the tar ball aerosols and
continue to contribute to light absorption either as individual chromophores
or as charge transfer complexes. From Fig. 6b,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments deplete with OH
exposure, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments
increase, implying the formation of oxygenated moieties in the tar ball
aerosols. In addition, a decrease in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fraction was measured from initial 3.6 % to 1.9 % after the maximum
oxidation. Ng et al. (2010) suggested using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) vs.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) triangle space as an indication of OA
sources and for estimation of their degree of oxidation and volatility. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (less oxidized fragments) is an
indicative fragment from aldehydes or ketones. A high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
indicates low volatility and a high oxidation level of SOA. Moreover, high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O : C ratios are associated with increased hygroscopicity
and possible CCN activity of OA (Hennigan et al., 2011; Lambe et al., 2011).
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study varied with photochemical aging and fell
within the expected range for ambient OOA, as shown in Fig. 7. Increase in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio with OH oxidation in Fig. 6b depicted the increase in
carboxylic and/or peroxide compounds compared to carbonyl species in the tar
balls, which is consistent with the atmospheric evolution of ambient biomass
burning plumes (Hennigan et al., 2011; Canonaco et al., 2015).</p>
      <?pagebreak page152?><p id="d1e7666">To infer the possible chemical processes, detailed mass spectra were compared
between fresh and 6.7 EAD photochemical oxidized tar balls (Fig. S20). We
found that decrease in alkyl/alkenyl chains (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and aromatic ring structure fragments (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) contributed the
prominent changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group,
and a relatively higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increment relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> explained the increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The decrease in the abundance of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 73) is consistent with recent
studies that levoglucosan or similar species can decay in the atmosphere due
to photochemical oxidation (Hennigan et al., 2010). The pronounced decrease
in intensity at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 137 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) suggests that the methoxy-phenol
components were dissipated substantially in the aged tar balls.</p>
      <p id="d1e8014">In summary, photochemical oxidation by OH radicals destructed the aromatic
rings and methoxy phenolic structures, which are expected to be the primary
chromophores in the tar balls. The NOC content and high-molecular weight
species were also depleted via OH oxidation. These chemical changes upon OH
oxidation may explain the observed diminishing in light scattering and
absorption upon photochemical aging.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e8020">Dynamic changes for chemical characteristics of tar ball aerosols
under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent OH photochemical
oxidation: <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, O : C, H : C, and particle
density changes; <bold>(b)</bold> mass spectra changes with different oxidation
conditions in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fragment groups.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
include all nitrogen-containing fragments (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ON</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>);
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> include <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. O_3.9
represents 3.9 days' equivalent atmospheric photochemical aging in the
absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; N_0.5 and N_2.0 indicate photochemical
oxidation with 0.5 % vol and 2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days' atmospheric oxidation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{NO${}_{{x}}$-dependent tar ball particles oxidation}?><title>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent tar ball particles oxidation</title>
      <p id="d1e8429"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was recently introduced for simulating
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent SOA formation pathways in OFR under
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions
can be applied to systematically vary the branching ratio of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO reactions relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions over a range of conditions
relevant to atmospheric SOA formation (Lambe et al., 2017). Here we
introduced 0.5 % vol and 2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to investigate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-involved daytime aging of tar ball aerosols in the OFR.
The OH exposures were maintained for all these tests at about 4 EAD. The
corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations downstream of the OFR were
measured to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">528.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv. The concentration of
static NO can be neglected under these severe oxidation conditions. Figure 8
shows the mass spectrum features for fresh and aged tar balls reacted in the
absence/presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Parameters including organic
elemental ratios and densities are summarized in Table S8. In general, tar
balls oxidized under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition exhibit higher O : C and
relatively lower H : C ratios. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) signals appear in the mass spectra and the intensities of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> display a positive trend with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, together with an increase in oxygenated fragments
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a decrease
in hydrocarbon fragments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
signal ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 46) is
used to distinguish organic nitrate from inorganic nitrate. The signal from
standard inorganic nitrate (e.g., NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a typical
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.485 obtained from our AMS
data (detailed mass spectra are shown in Fig. S21). The ratio and standard
mass spectra are similar to previous studies (Zhou et al., 2017). The
fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
signals in the aged tar balls increased from 0 % to 0.7 % and
1.5 % at 0.5 % vol and 2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> additions,
respectively. The corresponding values of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio are 0.162 and 0.174, which are
much lower than that for inorganic nitrates. Furthermore, the contribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fragments increased from 1.9 % to 4.4 % and 4.5 % over the course
of aging. Therefore, we can conclude that NOC rather than inorganic nitrate
formed in the<?pagebreak page153?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent photooxidation process,
resulting in an overall increase in the N : C ratio from 0.010 to 0.012 and
0.015. Additionally, the density of tar balls slightly increased from 1.24
for the fresh tar balls to 1.26 for the one aged in the presence of
2 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9061">Detailed changes in the mass spectra over the course of the experiment are
shown in Fig. S22. Indicative ions of cyclolakyl fragments (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreased, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition
increased the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intensities relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio.
Ng et al. (2007) observed a similar change for photooxidation of terpenes in
the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Changes in AMS spectra with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition may mark differences between the dominating
reaction pathways in tar ball photooxidation as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NO
versus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9311">Changes in retrieved spectrum-dependent RI as a function of O : C
ratio for tar ball particles upon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent
photochemical oxidation: <bold>(a)</bold> real part, <bold>(b)</bold> imaginary part,
and <bold>(c)</bold> SSA calculated from 150 nm particles. For clarity, error
bars for O : C ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), RI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for real part, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for imaginary part on average), and SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are not shown.
O_3.9 represents 3.9-day equivalent atmospheric photochemical aging in the
absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N_0.5 and N_2.0 indicate photochemical
oxidation with 0.5 and 2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days' atmospheric oxidation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9416">Photochemical oxidation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition enhances the
oxidation level and increases both the absorption and scattering of tar ball
aerosols. Dynamic changes in the complex RI are shown in Fig. 9 and
summarized in Table S5. The RI of tar ball aerosols increased from an average
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.632</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for pure OH-initiated photooxidation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.635</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
the addition of 0.5 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a greater increase up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.648</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.019</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with 2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The increase in RI is
therefore primarily attributed to NOC formation. Zhong and Jang (2014)
observed that a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level slowed photo-bleaching of
wood smoke BrC, and they suggested that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-modified
reaction pathways produce secondary NOC chromophores (i.e., nitro-phenols).
Liu et al. (2016) simulated daytime chemistry of various VOCs in the presence
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and found that light absorption of produced SOA,
especially aromatic ones, increased with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration.
These findings were also corroborated by the experimental study of Lin et
al. (2015), where the chemical composition and the light absorption
properties of laboratory-generated toluene SOA were reported to have a strong
positive dependence on the presence of nitro-phenols formed at
high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x<?pagebreak page154?></mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation conditions. The color of the BrC
diminished with photolysis, correlated with a decline of the NOC fraction.
Nitration of aromatic species via
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been
proposed as one of the main mechanisms to produce secondary BrC in the
atmosphere (Lu et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2015, 2017; Bluvshtein et al.,
2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e9607">The imaginary part at 2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition was almost
comparable with that of the fresh tar ball aerosols (average value:
RI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.661</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.020</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although the real part was lower, suggesting that
photooxidation in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> promotes the formation
of N-containing chromophores via secondary processes. In our experiments,
formation of the N-containing chromophores overweighed the bleaching from OH
photooxidation to eventually regain the absorption of the aged tar balls. The
average SSA calculated for 150 nm particles decreased from 0.96 to 0.91 and
0.89 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition. Absorption enhancement with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
addition for tar balls upon photooxidation can also be seen in the MAC
changes shown in Fig. S23, where MAC at 375 nm for fresh tar balls was
0.854 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; it decreased to 0.416 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> via OH
photo-bleaching, and then MAC increased to 0.459 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
0.5 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition, and up to 0.598 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition due to chromophore formation.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page155?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Atmospheric and climate implication</title>
      <p id="d1e9794">Atmospheric aging alters the RI of SOA, and the dynamic changes in RI depend
on complicated reaction pathways (Liu et al., 2016). OH-initiated
photochemical oxidation and photolysis decrease the RI of laboratory proxies
of tar balls under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free conditions, while photooxidation
under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has an opposite effect on the RI of tar
balls. We investigated the relationship between the dynamic RI values of tar
ball particles and their possible climatic implications, including the change
in light extinction/absorption efficiency and the clear-sky direct radiative
forcing. For clarity, light extinction/absorption efficiencies were
calculated and compared at wavelengths of 375 and 405 nm, while radiative
forcing was estimated over all the measured wavelengths from 365 to 425 nm.
Atmospheric and climatic implications were assessed for fresh and oxidized
tar balls upon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> EAD photooxidation
(O_3.9, N_0.5, and N_2.0), in which fresh tar balls were taken as a
reference.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9842">Size-resolved light extinction and absorption efficiency ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent photooxidized tar balls compared to the fresh
tar ball particles: <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> extinction ratios at 375
and 405 nm; <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> absorption ratios at 375 and
405 nm. O_3.9 represents 3.9 days' equivalent atmospheric photochemical
aging in the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; N_0.5 and N_2.0 indicate
photochemical oxidation with 0.5 % vol and 2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
addition at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days' atmospheric oxidation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page156?><p id="d1e9909">As shown in Fig. 10, photochemical oxidation under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free
condition (O_3.9) diminished light extinction and absorption efficiency of
tar ball aerosols in the atmospheric relevant size of 50–300 nm, causing
about 5 %–40 % decrease in extinction at 375 and 405 nm wavelength.
For aerosols larger than 400 nm, the extinction efficiency of tar ball
aerosols increased instead after photochemical aging. The light extinction
efficiency presented higher size-dependence than absorption, and extinction
changes were more sensitive to particle size, especially in the smaller
sizes. The decreased absorption was more pronounced, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
decrease at 375 nm and over 75 % at 405 nm. Previous studies have
confirmed the relationship between biomass burning emissions and acute
regional visibility deterioration (Huang et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2017).
Our results demonstrate that OH radical initiated daytime aging may play an
important role in improving visibility degradation caused by primary biomass
BrC. However, photochemical evolution under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions may compensate effects of the photooxidation bleaching of tar ball
aerosols via the formation of NOC chromophores. At N_0.5 conditions, the
light extinction decreased by 4 % to 20 % at 375 nm and 5 % to
24 % at 405 nm, respectively. The corresponding absorption decrease was
20 %–27 % at both wavelengths. With more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition,
formation of secondary N-containing chromophores almost completely offsets
light extinction/absorption decrease caused by photooxidation. Under the
N_2.0 conditions, enhancement of light absorption efficiency for tar ball
was about 0 %–9 % at 405 nm in the entire size range of
50–500 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e9957">Radiative forcing from aerosols over both ground and snow is vital to
climate models (Barnett et al., 2005; Kanakidou et al., 2005). Integrated
radiative forcing for tar ball aerosols as a function of particle size under
various oxidation conditions is shown in Fig. 11. Size-/wavelength-resolved
SRF are also shown in Figs. S24 and S25. Integrated SRF over ground has
negative values for tar balls over almost all the atmospheric relevant
sizes, indicating a radiative cooling effect by tar ball aerosols except at
195–210 nm, where fresh tar ball particles present warming
effect with SRF up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In practical fire
emissions, the size of tar balls depends on the burning and environment
conditions and biomass fuel types with typical values between tens to
hundreds of nanometers (Reid et al., 2005; Pósfai et al., 2004). The
complicated size-dependence character of SRF makes it difficult to assess
the real climatic effect of tar ball particles without extensive
calculations. Figure 11a suggests fresh tar balls have SRF values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 150 nm and 0.45 W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 nm, respectively. The SRF
decreased for all size ranges due to photochemical oxidation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 150 nm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 nm for tar ball aerosols
under O_3.9 condition. At N_0.5 conditions,
SRF was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 150 nm and 0.16 W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 nm, and the
corresponding values at N_2.0 conditions increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 150 nm and 0.31 W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 nm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p id="d1e10133">Calculated size-resolved simple radiative forcing (SRF, W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by tar ball aerosols, integrated over 365–425 nm incident solar irradiation
for fresh and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent photooxidized tar
balls: <bold>(a)</bold> ground-based radiative forcing, <bold>(b)</bold> snow-based
radiative forcing.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/139/2019/acp-19-139-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e10174">In contrast, tar ball particles contributed to positive forcing (warming
effect) over the bright terrain throughout the atmospheric aging, as shown in
Fig. 11b. Radiative forcing over the snow showed a simple increasing trend
with particle size, indicating that larger BrC aerosol with identical<?pagebreak page157?> mass
loading in the air have a higher warming effect. The changes in snow-based
radiative forcing upon photochemical aging followed the same trends as in the
ground-based cases. Fresh tar ball at size of 200 nm has SRF of
20.12 W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the incident solar wavelength of 365–425 nm on the
snow terrain. With photochemical oxidation under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free
condition, radiative forcing decreased significantly. After 3.9 EAD
atmospheric aging, snow-based radiative forcing for tar ball decreased by
65 %–73 % over the size range of 50–500 nm, the value of 200 nm
tar ball became 6.99 W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was involved in
the photochemical oxidation of tar balls, the decrement of radiative forcing
was weakened. At N_0.5, SRF for 200 nm tar ball was 14.01 W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
while at N_2.0 condition, size-dependent SRF from the aged tar ball was
almost comparable with that from fresh tar ball, and SRF for 200 nm tar ball
was 18.56 W g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10248">Although less than 10 % of the solar spectrum's energy is distributed
between 365 and 425 nm, the radiative forcing over this range represents a
significant warming or cooling potential over the arctic terrain. In
conclusion, photochemical oxidation under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free conditions can
decrease radiative forcing of tar ball aerosols, resulting in enhancement in
the cooling effect over ground and decreased in warming effect over the
snow. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> involvement in photooxidation inhibits the decrease in
radiative forcing of tar ball aerosols. Overall, the complex changes in
optical properties of tar balls at long aging times impose great
uncertainties in traditional model-based estimation of BBOA. Our study
emphasizes the importance of taking this atmospheric process into
consideration to refine the understanding of the climatic and atmospheric
influences from these aerosols.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e10281">In this study, proxies for tar ball aerosols were generated in the laboratory
following a flameless wood pyrolysis process. The optical and chemical
properties of the generated tar balls were constrained using BBCES and
HR-Tof-AMS/SP-LD-REMPI-MS and were shown to have many similarities to ambient
biomass burning aerosols. Laboratory-generated fresh tar ball aerosols have
light absorption characteristics similar to atmospheric BrC with higher
absorption efficiency towards the UV. The average complex refractive indices
between 365 and 425 nm are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.661</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.020</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.635</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for nonpolar
and polar tar ball aerosols, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e10312">Atmospheric evolution for tar ball aerosols was experimentally simulated
using an oxidation flow reactor. The study focused on dynamic changes in the
optical and chemical properties due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent
photochemical oxidation. Furthermore, the relationship between oxidation
level and the resulting RI of the tar ball aerosols was explored. We found a
substantial decrease in the scattering and absorption properties of tar
balls, with a corresponding increase in SSA with OH oxidation in the absence
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A correlation between the RI decrease and increase
in the O : C and H : C ratios was observed. The decrease in light
scattering and absorption is attributed to the destruction of
aromatic/phenolic/NOC and high-molecular weight species chromophores via
OH-initiated photooxidation of tar balls. Over longer aging times, the
average RI of the tar ball aerosols decreased from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.661</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.020</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.632</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon atmospheric equivalent to 3.9 days' aging, and the
corresponding O : C and H : C ratio increased from an initial 0.25 and
1.55 to 0.35 and 1.59, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e10365">Our results suggest that OH oxidation rather than photolysis or ozone
reactions plays the dominant role that determines the optical and chemical
properties in tar ball aging. The observed decrease in absorption results
from depletion of chromophores such as aromatic rings, phenolic compounds and
high-molecular weight species.</p>
      <p id="d1e10368">Simulations under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> environments enhanced the aerosol
oxidation state and increased the scattering and absorption of tar ball
aerosols relative to OH photooxidation in the absence of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> EAD, addition of 0.5 % vol and
2.0 % vol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased the organic elemental ratios (O : C,
H : C, and N : C ratios) and doubled the organic nitrate fraction in the
particles from 1.9 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. The formation of NOC
chromophores overweighs the intrinsic depletion of chromophores, leading to a
higher RI of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.635</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.648</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.019</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10456">The atmospheric and climatic implications from tar ball aerosols under
various oxidation conditions were assessed using a simple radiative forcing
model in terms of extinction/absorption efficiency changes and
ground-/snow-based radiative forcing. These results demonstrate that the
optical and chemical properties of tar ball particles are dynamically related
to atmospheric aging, and optical changes are governed by both photobleaching
and secondary chromophore formation. Therefore, the atmospheric process
should be emphasized in model predictions for evaluating biomass burning BrC
aerosol radiative forcing as well as climate change.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e10463">Data are publicly available from the public
website of the Weizmann Institute of Science
(<uri>https://weizmann.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/972WIS_INST/1245276980003596</uri>,
Rudich, 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e10469">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e10478">YR was the project leader. YR, CL, and QF
designed the experiment, and CL and QF conducted the experiment. JS, JP, and RZ
contributed the REMPI-MS measurement and revised related paragraphs in the
manuscript. DM improved the code in the SRF calculation. CL wrote the manuscript with
the contribution and help of LA.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e10484">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e10490">This research was partially supported by research grants from US–Israel
Binational Science Foundation (BSF) grant no. 2016093 and the Israel Ministry
of Science, Maimonide program. Chunlin Li acknowledges support from the
Planning &amp; Budgeting Committee, Israel (2018/19). Julian Schade,
Johannes Passig, and Ralf Zimmermann
gratefully acknowledge financial support from the German Research Foundation,
project number ZI 764/6-1, and Photonion GmbH, Schwerin,
Germany.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Ryan Sullivan
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abo Riziq, A., Erlick, C., Dinar, E., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of
absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols retrieved by cavity ring down (CRD)
spectroscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1523–1536,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K. and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls from biomass burning in
Mexico, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D05204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015102</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Adler, G., Riziq, A. A., Erlick, C., and Rudich, Y.: Effect of intrinsic
organic carbon on the optical properties of fresh diesel soot, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6699–6704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903311106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0903311106</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Adler, G., Flores, J. M., Abo Riziq, A., Borrmann, S., and Rudich, Y.:
Chemical, physical, and optical evolution of biomass burning aerosols: a case
study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1491–1503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., Decarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., and Sueper, D.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient
organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4478–4485,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, D. T., Crozier, P. A., and Anderson, J. R.: Brown carbon spheres
in East Asian outflow and their optical properties, Science, 321, 833–836,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1155296</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature
of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Asa-Awuku, A., Sullivan, A. P., Hennigan, C. J., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.:
Investigation of molar volume and surfactant characteristics of water-soluble
organic compounds in biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
799–812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-799-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-799-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bahadur, R., Praveen, P. S., Xu, Y., and Ramanathan, V.: Solar absorption by
elemental and brown carbon determined from spectral observations, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 17366–17371, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205910109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1205910109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a
warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438,
303–309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04141</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bente, M., Sklorz, M., Streibel, T., and Zimmermann, R.: Online laser
desorption-multiphoton postionization mass spectrometry of individual aerosol
particles: molecular source indicators for particles emitted from different
traffic-related and wood combustion sources, Anal. Chem., 80, 8991–9004,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801295f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac801295f</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bente, M., Sklorz, M., Streibel, T., and Zimmermann, R.: Thermal
desorption-multiphoton ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of
individual aerosol particles: A simplified approach for online
single-particle analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and their
derivatives, Anal. Chem., 81, 2525–2536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac802296f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac802296f</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Bluvshtein, N., Lin, P., Flores, J. M., Segev, L., Mazar, Y., Tas, E.,
Snider, G., Weagle, C., Brown, S. S., and Laskin, A.: Broadband optical
properties of biomass-burning aerosol and identification of brown carbon
chromophores, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 122, 5441–5456,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026230" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026230</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Boesl, U., Neusser, H., and Schlag, E.: Two-photon ionization of polyatomic
molecules in a mass spectrometer, Z. Naturforsch. A, 33, 1546–1548,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1978-1218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1515/zna-1978-1218</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous particles:
An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.:
Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications
for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6993–7002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott, W.
P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Kreidenweis, S.
M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass combustion, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S.,
Hao, J., Zhang, H., and He, C.: A review of biomass burning: Emissions and
impacts on air quality, health and climate in China, Sci. Total Environ.,
579, 1000–1034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Chung, C. E.,  Ramanathan,  V.,  and  Decremer, D.: Observationally constrained
estimates of carbonaceous aerosol radiative forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA,, 109, 11624–11629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203707109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1203707109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Chýlek, P., Videen, G., Geldart, D., Dobbie, J. S., and Tso, H.:
Effective medium approximations for heterogeneous particles, Light scattering
by nonspherical particles: theory, measurements, and applications, 273–308,
edited by: Mishchenko, M. I., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D., Academic
Press, San Diego, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Czech, H., Pieber, S. M., Tiitta, P., Sippula, O., Kortelainen, M., Lamberg,
H., Grigonyte, J., Streibel, T., Prévôt, A. S., and Jokiniemi, J.:
Time-resolved analysis of primary volatile emissions and secondary aerosol
formation potential from a small-scale pellet boiler, Atmos. Environ., 158,
236–245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.040</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page159?><ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
d'Almeida, G. A., Koepke, P., and Shettle, E. P.: Atmospheric aerosols:
global climatology and radiative characteristics, A. Deepak Publishing,
Hampton, Va, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., and Docherty, K. S.:
Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer,
Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac061249n</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by agricultural
biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50561</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Dewar, M. J. and Lepley, A. R.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Complexes. I. Charge Transfer Spectra
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Complexes Formed by Trinitrobenzene with Polycyclic Aromatic
Compounds, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 4560–4563, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Dinar, E., Riziq, A. A., Spindler, C., Erlick, C., Kiss, G., and Rudich, Y.:
The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like substances
(HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer (CRD-AS),
Faraday Discuss., 137, 279–295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B703111D</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Epstein, S. A., Blair, S. L., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Direct photolysis of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis secondary organic aerosol: effect on particle
mass and peroxide content, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11251–11258,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502350u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502350u</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant
atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Finewax, Z., de Gouw, J. A., and Ziemann, P. J.: Identification and
quantification of 4-Nitrocatechol formed from OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
radical-initiated reactions of catechol in air in the presence of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: Implications for secondary organic aerosol formation
from biomass burning, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 1981–1989,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05864</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Flores, J. M., Zhao, D. F., Segev, L., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A.,
Fuchs, H., Watne, Å. K., Bluvshtein, N., Mentel, Th. F., Hallquist, M.,
and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index in the UV spectral
region in ageing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
5793–5806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Flores, J. M., Washenfelder, R., Adler, G., Lee, H., Segev, L., Laskin, J.,
Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S., Brown, S., and Rudich, Y.: Complex refractive
indices in the near-ultraviolet spectral region of biogenic secondary organic
aerosol aged with ammonia, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 10629–10642,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP01009D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C4CP01009D</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Flowers, B. A., Dubey, M. K., Mazzoleni, C., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J.,
Kim, S.-W., and Yoon, S. C.: Optical-chemical-microphysical relationships and
closure studies for mixed carbonaceous aerosols observed at Jeju Island;
3-laser photoacoustic spectrometer, particle sizing, and filter analysis,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10387–10398,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Forrister, H., Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Ziemba, L., Thornhill, K. L.,
Anderson, B., Diskin, G., Perring, A. E., and Schwarz, J. P.: Evolution of
brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623–4630,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063897" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063897</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Forster, P. M. F. and Taylor, K. E.: Climate forcings and climate
sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations, J. Climate,
19, 6181–6194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3974.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3974.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Fu, H., Zhang, M., Li, W., Chen, J., Wang, L., Quan, X., and Wang, W.:
Morphology, composition and mixing state of individual carbonaceous aerosol
in urban Shanghai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 693–707,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-693-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-693-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Ge, X., Setyan, A., Sun, Y., and Zhang, Q.: Primary and secondary organic
aerosols in Fresno, California during wintertime: Results from high
resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D19301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018026</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Grotemeyer, J., Boesl, U., Walter, K., and Schlag, E. W.: A general soft
ionization method for mass spectrometry: Resonance-enhanced multi-photon
ionization of biomolecules, Org. Mass. Spectrom., 21, 645–653,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210211008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/oms.1210211008</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Malm, W., Laskin, A., Day, D., Lee, T. B., Wang, C., Carrico,
C., Carrillo, J., Cowin, J. P., and Collett, J.: Optical, physical, and
chemical properties of tar balls observed during the Yosemite Aerosol
Characterization Study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005728" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005728</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>He, L.-Y., Lin, Y., Huang, X.-F., Guo, S., Xue, L., Su, Q., Hu, M., Luan,
S.-J., and Zhang, Y.-H.: Characterization of high-resolution aerosol mass
spectra of primary organic aerosol emissions from Chinese cooking and biomass
burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11535–11543,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>He, Q., Bluvshtein, N., Segev, L., Meidan, D., Flores, J. M., Brown, S. S.,
Brune, W., and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index of
secondary organic aerosols during atmospheric aging, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 3456–3465, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b05742</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C., Kroll, J., Jimenez, J., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P., Aiken, A.,
Chen, Q., Martin, S., Farmer, D., and Artaxo, P.: A simplified description of
the evolution of organic aerosol composition in the atmosphere, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 37, L08803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL042737</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Collett Jr., J. L., and Robinson, A. L.:
Levoglucosan stability in biomass burning particles exposed to hydroxyl
radicals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL043088</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Engelhart, G. J., May, A. A., Presto, A.
A., Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., McMeeking, G. R., Coe, H., Wold, C. E., Hao,
W.-M., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J., Schichtel, B. A., Collett
Jr., J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Chemical and physical
transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass
burning emissions in an environmental chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
7669–7686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Heger, H. J., Zimmermann, R., Dorfner, R., Beckmann, M., Griebel, H.,
Kettrup, A., and Boesl, U.: On-line emission analysis of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons down to pptv concentration levels in the flue gas of an
incineration pilot<?pagebreak page160?> plant with a mobile resonance-enhanced multiphoton
ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 71, 46–57,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac980611y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac980611y</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Herring, C. L., Faiola, C. L., Massoli, P., Sueper, D., Erickson, M. H.,
McDonald, J. D., Simpson, C. D., Yost, M. G., Jobson, B. T., and VanReken, T.
M.: New methodology for quantifying polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49,
1131–1148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1101050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2015.1101050</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P.,
Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances
(HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Tóth, A., Nyiro-Kósa, I., Pósfai, M., and Gelencsér, A.:
Light absorption properties of laboratory-generated tar ball particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 239–246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-239-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-239-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Fu, J. S., Wang, Q., Liu, T., Zhang, R.,
Jiang, Y., Deng, C., Fu, Q., Hsu, N. C., and Cao, B.: Typical types and
formation mechanisms of haze in an Eastern Asia megacity, Shanghai, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 105–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-105-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-105-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R. J., Yang, L., Cao, J. J., Chen, Y., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Duan, J.,
Zhu, C., Dai, W., and Wang, K.: Brown carbon aerosol in Urban Xi'an,
Northwest China: the composition and light absorption properties, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 52, 6825–6833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b02386</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of
working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel
on climate change, Cambridge, and New York, NY, Cambridge University Press,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Analysis of aerosol interactions with numerical techniques
for solving coagulation, nucleation, condensation, dissolution, and
reversible chemistry among multiple size distributions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 107, 4366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD002044</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Investigating cloud absorption effects: Global absorption
properties of black carbon, tar balls, and soil dust in clouds and aerosols,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017218</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Effects of biomass burning on climate, accounting for heat
and moisture fluxes, black and brown carbon, and cloud absorption effects, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 8980–9002, doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021861, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J., Canagaratna, M., Donahue, N., Prevot, A., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J.
H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., and Ng, N.: Evolution of organic
aerosols in the atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global
simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct
radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Kang, E., Root, M. J., Toohey, D. W., and Brune, W. H.: Introducing the
concept of Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5727–5744,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Liu, S., Russell, L. M., and Paulson, S. E.: Dependence of real
refractive indices on O : C, H : C and mass fragments of secondary
organic aerosol generated from ozonolysis and photooxidation of limonene and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 498–507,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.893278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.893278</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., and
Bluhm, H.: Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NCHEM.948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NCHEM.948</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A.
M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning
particles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1206575109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P.,
Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Worsnop, D. R., Brune, W. H., and Davidovits,
P.: Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized primary
organic aerosol (OPOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8913–8928,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A., Massoli, P., Zhang, X., Canagaratna, M., Nowak, J., Daube, C.,
Yan, C., Nie, W., Onasch, T., Jayne, J., Kolb, C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop,
D., and Brune, W.: Controlled nitric oxide production via
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions for use in oxidation flow
reactor studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2283–2298,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2283-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-2283-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Smith, J. S., and Laskin, J.: Molecular characterization of
nitrogen-containing organic compounds in biomass burning aerosols using
high-resolution mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3764–3771,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803456n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803456n</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Lee, H. J., Aiona, P. K., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of solar radiation on the optical properties and molecular composition
of laboratory proxies of atmospheric brown carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 10217–10226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502515r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502515r</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Levinson, R., Akbari, H., and Berdahl, P.: Measuring solar reflectance-Part
I: Defining a metric that accurately predicts solar heat gain, Sol. Energy,
84, 1717–1744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.018</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Wang, X., Ye, X., Wang, L., Yang, X., Kan, H.,
Donaldson, D., and Mellouki, A.: Evolution of biomass burning smoke particles
in the dark, Atmos. Environ., 120, 244–252,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Hu, Y., Zhang, F., Chen, J., Ma, Z., Ye, X., Yang, X., Wang, L.,
Tang, X., Zhang, R., Mu, M., Wang, G., Kan, H., Wang, X., and Mellouki, A.:
Multi-pollutant emissions from the burning of major agricultural residues in
China and the related<?pagebreak page161?> health-economic effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
4957–4988, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y. J., Yeung, J. W., Leung, T. P., Lau, A. P., and Chan, C. K.:
Characterization of organic particles from incense burning using an aerodyne
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
46, 654–665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.653017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.653017</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y. J., Huang, D. D., Cheung, H. Y., Lee, A. K. Y., and Chan, C. K.:
Aqueous-phase photochemical oxidation and direct photolysis of vanillin – a
model compound of methoxy phenols from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 2871–2885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2871-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2871-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Kathmann, S. M., Laskin, J., and Laskin,
A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon (BrC) chromophores in
secondary organic aerosol generated from photo-oxidation of toluene, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 23312–23325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP02563J</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon in biomass burning
aerosol particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Fleming, L. T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.:
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Brown Carbon by High
Resolution Mass Spectrometry with Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure
Photoionization, Anal. Chem., 90, 12493–12502,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber,
R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol
extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light
absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Kathmann, S. M., Wise, M., Caylor,
R., Imholt, F., Selimovic, V., and Shilling, J. E.: Optical properties and
aging of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
12815–12827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Lu, J. W., Flores, J. M., Lavi, A., Abo-Riziq, A., and Rudich, Y.: Changes in
the optical properties of benzo[a] pyrene-coated aerosols upon heterogeneous
reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13,
6484–6492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02114H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C0CP02114H</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>McDonald, J. D., Zielinska, B., Fujita, E. M., Sagebiel, J. C., Chow, J. C.,
and Watson, J. G.: Fine particle and gaseous emission rates from residential
wood combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 2080–2091,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es9909632" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es9909632</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Miljevic, B., Hedayat, F., Stevanovic, S., Fairfull-Smith, K. E., Bottle, S.,
and Ristovski, Z.: To sonicate or not to sonicate PM filters: reactive oxygen
species generation upon ultrasonic irradiation, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48,
1276–1284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.981330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.981330</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of secondary
organic aerosols and their changes by chemical processes, Chem. Rev., 115,
4400–4439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005259</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Mutzel, A., Rodigast, M., Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., and Herrmann, H.: An
improved method for the quantification of SOA bound peroxides, Atmos.
Environ., 67, 365–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.012</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Kroll, J. H.,
Kwan, A. J., McCabe, D. C., Wennberg, P. O., Sorooshian, A., Murphy, S. M.,
Dalleska, N. F., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of NOx level on
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from the photooxidation of
terpenes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5159–5174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5159-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5159-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D.
R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Park, R. J., Kim, M. J., Jeong, J. I., Youn, D., and Kim, S.: A contribution
of brown carbon aerosol to the aerosol light absorption and its radiative
forcing in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1414–1421,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Passig, J., Schade, J., Oster, M., Fuchs, M., Ehlert, S., Jäger, C.,
Sklorz, M., and Zimmermann, R.: Aerosol mass spectrometer for simultaneous
detection of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and inorganic components from
individual particles, Anal. Chem., 89, 6341–6345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01207</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Z. and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling of the chemistry in oxidation flow
reactors with high initial NO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11991–12010,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11991-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11991-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Stark, H., Li, R., Lee-Taylor, J., Palm, B. B., Brune,
W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical chemistry in
oxidation flow reactors with low-pressure mercury lamps systematically
examined by modeling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4863–4890,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Stark, H., Li, R.,
Tsigaridis, K., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Non-OH chemistry in
oxidation flow reactors for the study of atmospheric chemistry systematically
examined by modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4283–4305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Pettersson, A., Lovejoy, E. R., Brock, C. A., Brown, S. S., and Ravishankara,
A.: Measurement of aerosol optical extinction at 532 nm with pulsed cavity
ring down spectroscopy, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 995–1011,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.008</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Phillips, S. M. and Smith, G. D.: Light absorption by charge transfer
complexes in brown carbon aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 1,
382–386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500263j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ez500263j</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page162?><ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Pósfai, M., Gelencsér, A., Simonics, R., Arató, K., Li, J.,
Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls: Particles from
biomass and biofuel burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D06213,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004169</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Rajput, P. and Sarin, M.: Polar and non-polar organic aerosols from
large-scale agricultural-waste burning emissions in Northern India:
implications to organic mass-to-organic carbon ratio, Chemosphere, 103,
74–79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.028</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Eck, T. F., Christopher, S. A., Koppmann, R., Dubovik, O.,
Eleuterio, D. P., Holben, B. N., Reid, E. A., and Zhang, J.: A review of
biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass
burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 827–849,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-827-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-827-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Rettner, C. T. and Brophy, J. H.: Resonance enhanced laser ionisation mass
spectrometry of four aromatic molecules, Chem. Phys., 56, 53–61,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(81)85099-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0301-0104(81)85099-9</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Rollins, A. W., Browne, E. C., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J.,
Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., and Russell, L. M.:
Evidence for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> control over nighttime SOA formation,
Science, 337, 1210–1212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1221520</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Rudich, Y.: Data from: Dynamic changes of optical and chemical properties of
tar ball aerosols by atmospheric photochemical aging
[electronic resource],  Weizmann Institute of Science, available at:
<uri>https://weizmann.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/972WIS_INST/1245276980003596</uri>,
last access: 25 December 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Rudich, Y., Donahue, N. M., and Mentel, T. F.: Aging of organic aerosol:
Bridging the gap between laboratory and field studies, Annu. Rev. Phys.
Chem., 58, 321–352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104432</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Russell, P. B., Bergstrom, R. W., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., DeCarlo, P.
F., Jimenez, J. L., Livingston, J. M., Redemann, J., Dubovik, O., and Strawa,
A.: Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator
of aerosol composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1155–1169,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Samburova, V., Connolly, J., Gyawali, M., Yatavelli, R. L., Watts, A. C.,
Chakrabarty, R. K., Zielinska, B., Moosmüller, H., and Khlystov, A.:
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biomass-burning emissions and their
contribution to light absorption and aerosol toxicity, Sci. Total Environ.,
568, 391–401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.026</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Schauer, J. J., Kleeman, M. J., Cass, G. R., and Simoneit, B. R.: Measurement
of emissions from air pollution sources. 3. C1-C29 organic compounds from
fireplace combustion of wood, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1716–1728,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es001331e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es001331e</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Sedlacek III, A. J., Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Onasch, T. B., Springston, S.
R., and Kleinman, L.: Formation and evolution of tar balls from northwestern
US wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11289–11301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, 3rd edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.,
Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Sengupta, D., Samburova, V., Bhattarai, C., Kirillova, E., Mazzoleni, L.,
Iaukea-Lum, M., Watts, A., Moosmüller, H., and Khlystov, A.: Light
absorption by polar and non-polar aerosol compounds from laboratory biomass
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10849–10867,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Shamjad, P. M., Satish, R. V., Thamban, N. M., Rastogi, N., and Tripathi, S.:
Absorbing refractive index and direct radiative forcing of atmospheric Brown
Carbon over Gangetic Plain, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 31–37,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00074</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Shen, G., Tao, S., Wei, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Wang, B., Li, W., Shen, H.,
Huang, Y., and Yang, Y.: Retene emission from residential solid fuels in
China and evaluation of retene as a unique marker for soft wood combustion,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4666–4672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300144m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es300144m</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Shen, H., Huang, Y., Wang, R., Zhu, D., Li, W., Shen, G., Wang, B., Zhang,
Y., Chen, Y., and Lu, Y.: Global atmospheric emissions of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons from 1960 to 2008 and future predictions, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 6415–6424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400857z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400857z</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., and Ng, N. L.: Recent
advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global
climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000540</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Sigsgaard, T., Forsberg, B., Annesi-Maesano, I., Blomberg, A., Bølling,
A., Boman, C., Bønløkke, J., Brauer, M., Bruce, N., and Héroux, M.
E.: Health impacts of anthropogenic biomass burning in the developed world,
Eur. Respir. J., 46, 1577–1588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01865-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1183/13993003.01865-2014</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Sumlin, B. J., Pandey, A., Walker, M. J., Pattison, R. S., Williams, B. J.,
and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Atmospheric Photooxidation Diminishes Light
Absorption by Primary Brown Carbon Aerosol from Biomass Burning, Environ.
Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 540–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Sumlin, B. J., Oxford, C. R., Seo, B., Pattison, R. R., Williams, B. J., and
Chakrabarty, R. K.: Density and homogeneous internal composition of primary
brown carbon aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 3982–3989,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b00093</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Takahama, S., Johnson, A., Morales, J. G., Russell, L. M., Duran, R.,
Rodriguez, G., Zheng, J., Zhang, R., Toom-Sauntry, D., and Leaitch, W. R.:
Submicron organic aerosol in Tijuana, Mexico, from local and Southern
California sources during the CalMex campaign, Atmos. Environ., 70, 500–512,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.057</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Tavakoli, F. and Olfert, J.: An instrument for the classification of aerosols
by particle relaxation time: theoretical models of the aerodynamic aerosol
classifier, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 916–926,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.802761" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.802761</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Tavakoli, F. and Olfert, J. S.: Determination of particle mass, effective
density, mass-mobility exponent, and dynamic shape factor using an
aerodynamic aerosol classifier and a differential mobility analyzer in
tandem, J. Aerosol Sci., 75, 35–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.04.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.04.010</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Tóth, A., Hoffer, A., Nyiro-Kósa, I., Pósfai, M., and Gelencsér, A.:
Atmospheric tar balls: aged primary droplets<?pagebreak page163?> from biomass burning?, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 6669–6675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6669-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6669-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Flores, J. M., Brock, C. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich,
Y.: Broadband measurements of aerosol extinction in the ultraviolet spectral
region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 861–877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-861-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-861-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R., Attwood, A., Brock, C., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber, R., Ng, N.,
Allen, H., Ayres, B., and Baumann, K.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon
absorption in the rural southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
653–664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062444</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>Wei, C., Bandowe, B. A. M., Han, Y., Cao, J., Zhan, C., and Wilcke, W.:
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their derivatives (alkyl-PAHs,
oxygenated-PAHs, nitrated-PAHs and azaarenes) in urban road dusts from Xi'an,
Central China, Chemosphere, 134, 512–520,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.052</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>Weimer, S., Alfarra, M., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., Prévôt, A., and
Baltensperger, U.: Organic aerosol mass spectral signatures from wood-burning
emissions: Influence of burning conditions and wood type, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D10304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009309" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009309</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P., Zhou, S., and Abbatt, J. P.: Changes in secondary organic
aerosol composition and mass due to photolysis: relative humidity dependence,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4309–4316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp506898c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp506898c</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Light-absorbing organic carbon from
prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions,
Sci. Rep. UK, 7, 7318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Yee, L. D., Kautzman, K. E., Loza, C. L., Schilling, K. A., Coggon, M. M.,
Chhabra, P. S., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P., Crounse, J. D.,
Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic
aerosol formation from biomass burning intermediates: phenol and
methoxyphenols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8019–8043,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Yu, L., Smith, J., Laskin, A., Anastasio, C., Laskin, J., and Zhang, Q.:
Chemical characterization of SOA formed from aqueous-phase reactions of
phenols with the triplet excited state of carbonyl and hydroxyl radical,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13801–13816,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H. and Ying, Q.: Secondary organic aerosol from polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in Southeast Texas, Atmos. Environ., 55, 279–287,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.043</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. and Seinfeld, J. H.: A functional group oxidation model (FGOM) for
SOA formation and aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5907–5926,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5907-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5907-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Zhong, M. and Jang, M.: Dynamic light absorption of biomass-burning organic
carbon photochemically aged under natural sunlight, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1517–1525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, S., Collier, S., Jaffe, D. A., Briggs, N. L., Hee, J., Sedlacek III, A.
J., Kleinman, L., Onasch, T. B., and Zhang, Q.: Regional influence of
wildfires on aerosol chemistry in the western US and insights into
atmospheric aging of biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
2477–2493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Dynamic changes in optical and chemical properties of tar ball aerosols by atmospheric photochemical aging</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Following wood pyrolysis, tar ball aerosols were laboratory generated from
wood tar separated into polar and nonpolar phases. Chemical information of
fresh tar balls was obtained from a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol
mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) and single-particle laser desorption/resonance
enhanced multiphoton ionization mass spectrometry (SP-LD-REMPI-MS). Their
continuous refractive index (RI) between 365 and 425&thinsp;nm was retrieved using
a broadband cavity enhanced spectroscopy (BBCES). Dynamic changes in the
optical and chemical properties for the nonpolar tar ball aerosols in
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-dependent photochemical process were investigated in an
oxidation flow reactor (OFR). Distinct differences in the chemical
composition of the fresh polar and nonpolar tar aerosols were identified.
Nonpolar tar aerosols contain predominantly high-molecular weight
unsubstituted and alkyl-substituted polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
while polar tar aerosols consist of a high number of oxidized aromatic
substances (e.g., methoxy-phenols, benzenediol) with higher O&thinsp;:&thinsp;C ratios
and carbon oxidation states. Fresh tar balls have light absorption
characteristics similar to atmospheric brown carbon (BrC) aerosol with higher
absorption efficiency towards the UV wavelengths. The average retrieved RI is
1.661+0.020<i>i</i> and 1.635+0.003<i>i</i> for the nonpolar and polar tar aerosols,
respectively, with an absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) between 5.7
and 7.8 in the detected wavelength range. The RI fits a volume mixing rule
for internally mixed nonpolar/polar tar balls. The RI of the tar ball
aerosols decreased with increasing wavelength under photochemical oxidation.
Photolysis by UV light (254&thinsp;nm), without strong oxidants in the system,
slightly decreased the RI and increased the oxidation state of the tar balls.
Oxidation under varying OH exposure levels and in the absence of
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> diminished the absorption (bleaching) and increased the
O&thinsp;:&thinsp;C ratio of the tar balls. The photobleaching via OH radical initiated
oxidation is mainly attributed to decomposition of chromophoric aromatics,
nitrogen-containing organics, and high-molecular weight components in the
aged particles. Photolysis of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) was used to
simulate NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-dependent photochemical aging of tar balls in
the OFR. Under high-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> conditions with similar OH exposure,
photochemical aging led to the formation of organic nitrates, and increased
both oxidation degree and light absorption for the aged tar ball aerosols.
These observations suggest that secondary organic nitrate formation
counteracts the bleaching by OH radical photooxidation to eventually regain
some absorption of the aged tar ball aerosols. The atmospheric implication
and climate effects from tar balls upon various oxidation processes are
briefly discussed.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abo Riziq, A., Erlick, C., Dinar, E., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of
absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols retrieved by cavity ring down (CRD)
spectroscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1523–1536,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1523-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adachi, K. and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls from biomass burning in
Mexico, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D05204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015102</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, G., Riziq, A. A., Erlick, C., and Rudich, Y.: Effect of intrinsic
organic carbon on the optical properties of fresh diesel soot, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6699–6704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903311106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903311106</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, G., Flores, J. M., Abo Riziq, A., Borrmann, S., and Rudich, Y.:
Chemical, physical, and optical evolution of biomass burning aerosols: a case
study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1491–1503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Decarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., and Sueper, D.:
O ∕ C and OM ∕ OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient
organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4478–4485,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Alexander, D. T., Crozier, P. A., and Anderson, J. R.: Brown carbon spheres
in East Asian outflow and their optical properties, Science, 321, 833–836,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155296</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature
of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Asa-Awuku, A., Sullivan, A. P., Hennigan, C. J., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.:
Investigation of molar volume and surfactant characteristics of water-soluble
organic compounds in biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
799–812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-799-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-799-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bahadur, R., Praveen, P. S., Xu, Y., and Ramanathan, V.: Solar absorption by
elemental and brown carbon determined from spectral observations, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 17366–17371, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205910109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205910109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a
warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438,
303–309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bente, M., Sklorz, M., Streibel, T., and Zimmermann, R.: Online laser
desorption-multiphoton postionization mass spectrometry of individual aerosol
particles: molecular source indicators for particles emitted from different
traffic-related and wood combustion sources, Anal. Chem., 80, 8991–9004,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801295f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac801295f</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bente, M., Sklorz, M., Streibel, T., and Zimmermann, R.: Thermal
desorption-multiphoton ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of
individual aerosol particles: A simplified approach for online
single-particle analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and their
derivatives, Anal. Chem., 81, 2525–2536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac802296f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac802296f</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bluvshtein, N., Lin, P., Flores, J. M., Segev, L., Mazar, Y., Tas, E.,
Snider, G., Weagle, C., Brown, S. S., and Laskin, A.: Broadband optical
properties of biomass-burning aerosol and identification of brown carbon
chromophores, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 122, 5441–5456,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026230" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026230</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Boesl, U., Neusser, H., and Schlag, E.: Two-photon ionization of polyatomic
molecules in a mass spectrometer, Z. Naturforsch. A, 33, 1546–1548,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1978-1218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1978-1218</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous particles:
An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.:
Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications
for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6993–7002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott, W.
P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Kreidenweis, S.
M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass combustion, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S.,
Hao, J., Zhang, H., and He, C.: A review of biomass burning: Emissions and
impacts on air quality, health and climate in China, Sci. Total Environ.,
579, 1000–1034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Chung, C. E.,  Ramanathan,  V.,  and  Decremer, D.: Observationally constrained
estimates of carbonaceous aerosol radiative forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA,, 109, 11624–11629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203707109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203707109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Chýlek, P., Videen, G., Geldart, D., Dobbie, J. S., and Tso, H.:
Effective medium approximations for heterogeneous particles, Light scattering
by nonspherical particles: theory, measurements, and applications, 273–308,
edited by: Mishchenko, M. I., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D., Academic
Press, San Diego, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Czech, H., Pieber, S. M., Tiitta, P., Sippula, O., Kortelainen, M., Lamberg,
H., Grigonyte, J., Streibel, T., Prévôt, A. S., and Jokiniemi, J.:
Time-resolved analysis of primary volatile emissions and secondary aerosol
formation potential from a small-scale pellet boiler, Atmos. Environ., 158,
236–245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.040</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
d'Almeida, G. A., Koepke, P., and Shettle, E. P.: Atmospheric aerosols:
global climatology and radiative characteristics, A. Deepak Publishing,
Hampton, Va, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., and Docherty, K. S.:
Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer,
Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by agricultural
biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Dewar, M. J. and Lepley, A. R.: <i>π</i>-Complexes. I. Charge Transfer Spectra
of <i>π</i>-Complexes Formed by Trinitrobenzene with Polycyclic Aromatic
Compounds, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83, 4560–4563, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Dinar, E., Riziq, A. A., Spindler, C., Erlick, C., Kiss, G., and Rudich, Y.:
The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like substances
(HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer (CRD-AS),
Faraday Discuss., 137, 279–295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B703111D</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Epstein, S. A., Blair, S. L., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Direct photolysis of
<i>α</i>-pinene ozonolysis secondary organic aerosol: effect on particle
mass and peroxide content, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11251–11258,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502350u" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502350u</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant
atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Finewax, Z., de Gouw, J. A., and Ziemann, P. J.: Identification and
quantification of 4-Nitrocatechol formed from OH and NO<sub>3</sub>
radical-initiated reactions of catechol in air in the presence of
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>: Implications for secondary organic aerosol formation
from biomass burning, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 1981–1989,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05864" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05864</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Flores, J. M., Zhao, D. F., Segev, L., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A.,
Fuchs, H., Watne, Å. K., Bluvshtein, N., Mentel, Th. F., Hallquist, M.,
and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index in the UV spectral
region in ageing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
5793–5806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5793-2014</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Flores, J. M., Washenfelder, R., Adler, G., Lee, H., Segev, L., Laskin, J.,
Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S., Brown, S., and Rudich, Y.: Complex refractive
indices in the near-ultraviolet spectral region of biogenic secondary organic
aerosol aged with ammonia, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 10629–10642,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP01009D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP01009D</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Flowers, B. A., Dubey, M. K., Mazzoleni, C., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J.,
Kim, S.-W., and Yoon, S. C.: Optical-chemical-microphysical relationships and
closure studies for mixed carbonaceous aerosols observed at Jeju Island;
3-laser photoacoustic spectrometer, particle sizing, and filter analysis,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10387–10398,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Forrister, H., Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Ziemba, L., Thornhill, K. L.,
Anderson, B., Diskin, G., Perring, A. E., and Schwarz, J. P.: Evolution of
brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623–4630,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063897" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063897</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Forster, P. M. F. and Taylor, K. E.: Climate forcings and climate
sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations, J. Climate,
19, 6181–6194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3974.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3974.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, H., Zhang, M., Li, W., Chen, J., Wang, L., Quan, X., and Wang, W.:
Morphology, composition and mixing state of individual carbonaceous aerosol
in urban Shanghai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 693–707,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-693-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-693-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, X., Setyan, A., Sun, Y., and Zhang, Q.: Primary and secondary organic
aerosols in Fresno, California during wintertime: Results from high
resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D19301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018026</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Grotemeyer, J., Boesl, U., Walter, K., and Schlag, E. W.: A general soft
ionization method for mass spectrometry: Resonance-enhanced multi-photon
ionization of biomolecules, Org. Mass. Spectrom., 21, 645–653,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210211008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210211008</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hand, J. L., Malm, W., Laskin, A., Day, D., Lee, T. B., Wang, C., Carrico,
C., Carrillo, J., Cowin, J. P., and Collett, J.: Optical, physical, and
chemical properties of tar balls observed during the Yosemite Aerosol
Characterization Study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005728" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005728</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
He, L.-Y., Lin, Y., Huang, X.-F., Guo, S., Xue, L., Su, Q., Hu, M., Luan,
S.-J., and Zhang, Y.-H.: Characterization of high-resolution aerosol mass
spectra of primary organic aerosol emissions from Chinese cooking and biomass
burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11535–11543,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
He, Q., Bluvshtein, N., Segev, L., Meidan, D., Flores, J. M., Brown, S. S.,
Brune, W., and Rudich, Y.: Evolution of the complex refractive index of
secondary organic aerosols during atmospheric aging, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 3456–3465, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05742</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C., Kroll, J., Jimenez, J., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P., Aiken, A.,
Chen, Q., Martin, S., Farmer, D., and Artaxo, P.: A simplified description of
the evolution of organic aerosol composition in the atmosphere, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 37, L08803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042737</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Collett Jr., J. L., and Robinson, A. L.:
Levoglucosan stability in biomass burning particles exposed to hydroxyl
radicals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043088</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Engelhart, G. J., May, A. A., Presto, A.
A., Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., McMeeking, G. R., Coe, H., Wold, C. E., Hao,
W.-M., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J., Schichtel, B. A., Collett
Jr., J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Chemical and physical
transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass
burning emissions in an environmental chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
7669–7686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Heger, H. J., Zimmermann, R., Dorfner, R., Beckmann, M., Griebel, H.,
Kettrup, A., and Boesl, U.: On-line emission analysis of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons down to pptv concentration levels in the flue gas of an
incineration pilot plant with a mobile resonance-enhanced multiphoton
ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 71, 46–57,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac980611y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac980611y</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Herring, C. L., Faiola, C. L., Massoli, P., Sueper, D., Erickson, M. H.,
McDonald, J. D., Simpson, C. D., Yost, M. G., Jobson, B. T., and VanReken, T.
M.: New methodology for quantifying polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49,
1131–1148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1101050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1101050</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P.,
Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances
(HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Tóth, A., Nyiro-Kósa, I., Pósfai, M., and Gelencsér, A.:
Light absorption properties of laboratory-generated tar ball particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 239–246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-239-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-239-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Fu, J. S., Wang, Q., Liu, T., Zhang, R.,
Jiang, Y., Deng, C., Fu, Q., Hsu, N. C., and Cao, B.: Typical types and
formation mechanisms of haze in an Eastern Asia megacity, Shanghai, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 105–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-105-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-105-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R. J., Yang, L., Cao, J. J., Chen, Y., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Duan, J.,
Zhu, C., Dai, W., and Wang, K.: Brown carbon aerosol in Urban Xi'an,
Northwest China: the composition and light absorption properties, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 52, 6825–6833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02386</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of
working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel
on climate change, Cambridge, and New York, NY, Cambridge University Press,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Analysis of aerosol interactions with numerical techniques
for solving coagulation, nucleation, condensation, dissolution, and
reversible chemistry among multiple size distributions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 107, 4366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002044</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Investigating cloud absorption effects: Global absorption
properties of black carbon, tar balls, and soil dust in clouds and aerosols,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Effects of biomass burning on climate, accounting for heat
and moisture fluxes, black and brown carbon, and cloud absorption effects, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 8980–9002, doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021861, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J., Canagaratna, M., Donahue, N., Prevot, A., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J.
H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., and Ng, N.: Evolution of organic
aerosols in the atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global
simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct
radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, E., Root, M. J., Toohey, D. W., and Brune, W. H.: Introducing the
concept of Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5727–5744,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, H., Liu, S., Russell, L. M., and Paulson, S. E.: Dependence of real
refractive indices on O&thinsp;:&thinsp;C, H&thinsp;:&thinsp;C and mass fragments of secondary
organic aerosol generated from ozonolysis and photooxidation of limonene and
<i>α</i>-pinene, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 498–507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.893278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.893278</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., and
Bluhm, H.: Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NCHEM.948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NCHEM.948</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A.
M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning
particles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P.,
Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Worsnop, D. R., Brune, W. H., and Davidovits,
P.: Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized primary
organic aerosol (OPOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8913–8928,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A., Massoli, P., Zhang, X., Canagaratna, M., Nowak, J., Daube, C.,
Yan, C., Nie, W., Onasch, T., Jayne, J., Kolb, C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop,
D., and Brune, W.: Controlled nitric oxide production via
O(<sup>1</sup>D)&thinsp;+&thinsp;N<sub>2</sub>O reactions for use in oxidation flow
reactor studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2283–2298,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2283-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2283-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Smith, J. S., and Laskin, J.: Molecular characterization of
nitrogen-containing organic compounds in biomass burning aerosols using
high-resolution mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3764–3771,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803456n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803456n</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H. J., Aiona, P. K., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of solar radiation on the optical properties and molecular composition
of laboratory proxies of atmospheric brown carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 10217–10226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502515r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502515r</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Levinson, R., Akbari, H., and Berdahl, P.: Measuring solar reflectance-Part
I: Defining a metric that accurately predicts solar heat gain, Sol. Energy,
84, 1717–1744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.018</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Wang, X., Ye, X., Wang, L., Yang, X., Kan, H.,
Donaldson, D., and Mellouki, A.: Evolution of biomass burning smoke particles
in the dark, Atmos. Environ., 120, 244–252,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Hu, Y., Zhang, F., Chen, J., Ma, Z., Ye, X., Yang, X., Wang, L.,
Tang, X., Zhang, R., Mu, M., Wang, G., Kan, H., Wang, X., and Mellouki, A.:
Multi-pollutant emissions from the burning of major agricultural residues in
China and the related health-economic effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
4957–4988, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Yeung, J. W., Leung, T. P., Lau, A. P., and Chan, C. K.:
Characterization of organic particles from incense burning using an aerodyne
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
46, 654–665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.653017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.653017</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Huang, D. D., Cheung, H. Y., Lee, A. K. Y., and Chan, C. K.:
Aqueous-phase photochemical oxidation and direct photolysis of vanillin – a
model compound of methoxy phenols from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 2871–2885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2871-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2871-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Kathmann, S. M., Laskin, J., and Laskin,
A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon (BrC) chromophores in
secondary organic aerosol generated from photo-oxidation of toluene, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 23312–23325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon in biomass burning
aerosol particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Fleming, L. T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.:
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Brown Carbon by High
Resolution Mass Spectrometry with Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure
Photoionization, Anal. Chem., 90, 12493–12502,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02177</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber,
R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol
extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light
absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Kathmann, S. M., Wise, M., Caylor,
R., Imholt, F., Selimovic, V., and Shilling, J. E.: Optical properties and
aging of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
12815–12827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, J. W., Flores, J. M., Lavi, A., Abo-Riziq, A., and Rudich, Y.: Changes in
the optical properties of benzo[a] pyrene-coated aerosols upon heterogeneous
reactions with NO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>3</sub>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13,
6484–6492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02114H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CP02114H</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
McDonald, J. D., Zielinska, B., Fujita, E. M., Sagebiel, J. C., Chow, J. C.,
and Watson, J. G.: Fine particle and gaseous emission rates from residential
wood combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 2080–2091,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es9909632" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es9909632</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Miljevic, B., Hedayat, F., Stevanovic, S., Fairfull-Smith, K. E., Bottle, S.,
and Ristovski, Z.: To sonicate or not to sonicate PM filters: reactive oxygen
species generation upon ultrasonic irradiation, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48,
1276–1284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.981330" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.981330</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical properties of secondary
organic aerosols and their changes by chemical processes, Chem. Rev., 115,
4400–4439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Mutzel, A., Rodigast, M., Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., and Herrmann, H.: An
improved method for the quantification of SOA bound peroxides, Atmos.
Environ., 67, 365–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.012</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Kroll, J. H.,
Kwan, A. J., McCabe, D. C., Wennberg, P. O., Sorooshian, A., Murphy, S. M.,
Dalleska, N. F., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of NOx level on
secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from the photooxidation of
terpenes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5159–5174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5159-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5159-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D.
R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Park, R. J., Kim, M. J., Jeong, J. I., Youn, D., and Kim, S.: A contribution
of brown carbon aerosol to the aerosol light absorption and its radiative
forcing in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1414–1421,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Passig, J., Schade, J., Oster, M., Fuchs, M., Ehlert, S., Jäger, C.,
Sklorz, M., and Zimmermann, R.: Aerosol mass spectrometer for simultaneous
detection of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and inorganic components from
individual particles, Anal. Chem., 89, 6341–6345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01207</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, Z. and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling of the chemistry in oxidation flow
reactors with high initial NO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11991–12010,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11991-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11991-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Stark, H., Li, R., Lee-Taylor, J., Palm, B. B., Brune,
W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radical chemistry in
oxidation flow reactors with low-pressure mercury lamps systematically
examined by modeling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4863–4890,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Stark, H., Li, R.,
Tsigaridis, K., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Non-OH chemistry in
oxidation flow reactors for the study of atmospheric chemistry systematically
examined by modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4283–4305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Pettersson, A., Lovejoy, E. R., Brock, C. A., Brown, S. S., and Ravishankara,
A.: Measurement of aerosol optical extinction at 532&thinsp;nm with pulsed cavity
ring down spectroscopy, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 995–1011,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.008</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, S. M. and Smith, G. D.: Light absorption by charge transfer
complexes in brown carbon aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 1,
382–386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500263j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500263j</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Pósfai, M., Gelencsér, A., Simonics, R., Arató, K., Li, J.,
Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls: Particles from
biomass and biofuel burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D06213,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Rajput, P. and Sarin, M.: Polar and non-polar organic aerosols from
large-scale agricultural-waste burning emissions in Northern India:
implications to organic mass-to-organic carbon ratio, Chemosphere, 103,
74–79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.028</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, J. S., Eck, T. F., Christopher, S. A., Koppmann, R., Dubovik, O.,
Eleuterio, D. P., Holben, B. N., Reid, E. A., and Zhang, J.: A review of
biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass
burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 827–849,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-827-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-827-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Rettner, C. T. and Brophy, J. H.: Resonance enhanced laser ionisation mass
spectrometry of four aromatic molecules, Chem. Phys., 56, 53–61,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(81)85099-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(81)85099-9</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Rollins, A. W., Browne, E. C., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J.,
Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., and Russell, L. M.:
Evidence for NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> control over nighttime SOA formation,
Science, 337, 1210–1212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221520</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Rudich, Y.: Data from: Dynamic changes of optical and chemical properties of
tar ball aerosols by atmospheric photochemical aging
[electronic resource],  Weizmann Institute of Science, available at:
<a href="https://weizmann.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/972WIS_INST/1245276980003596" target="_blank">https://weizmann.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/972WIS_INST/1245276980003596</a>,
last access: 25 December 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Rudich, Y., Donahue, N. M., and Mentel, T. F.: Aging of organic aerosol:
Bridging the gap between laboratory and field studies, Annu. Rev. Phys.
Chem., 58, 321–352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104432" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104432</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, P. B., Bergstrom, R. W., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., DeCarlo, P.
F., Jimenez, J. L., Livingston, J. M., Redemann, J., Dubovik, O., and Strawa,
A.: Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator
of aerosol composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1155–1169,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Samburova, V., Connolly, J., Gyawali, M., Yatavelli, R. L., Watts, A. C.,
Chakrabarty, R. K., Zielinska, B., Moosmüller, H., and Khlystov, A.:
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biomass-burning emissions and their
contribution to light absorption and aerosol toxicity, Sci. Total Environ.,
568, 391–401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.026</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Schauer, J. J., Kleeman, M. J., Cass, G. R., and Simoneit, B. R.: Measurement
of emissions from air pollution sources. 3. C1-C29 organic compounds from
fireplace combustion of wood, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1716–1728,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es001331e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es001331e</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Sedlacek III, A. J., Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Onasch, T. B., Springston, S.
R., and Kleinman, L.: Formation and evolution of tar balls from northwestern
US wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11289–11301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, 3rd edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.,
Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Sengupta, D., Samburova, V., Bhattarai, C., Kirillova, E., Mazzoleni, L.,
Iaukea-Lum, M., Watts, A., Moosmüller, H., and Khlystov, A.: Light
absorption by polar and non-polar aerosol compounds from laboratory biomass
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10849–10867,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Shamjad, P. M., Satish, R. V., Thamban, N. M., Rastogi, N., and Tripathi, S.:
Absorbing refractive index and direct radiative forcing of atmospheric Brown
Carbon over Gangetic Plain, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 31–37,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00074</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, G., Tao, S., Wei, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Wang, B., Li, W., Shen, H.,
Huang, Y., and Yang, Y.: Retene emission from residential solid fuels in
China and evaluation of retene as a unique marker for soft wood combustion,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4666–4672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300144m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es300144m</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, H., Huang, Y., Wang, R., Zhu, D., Li, W., Shen, G., Wang, B., Zhang,
Y., Chen, Y., and Lu, Y.: Global atmospheric emissions of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons from 1960 to 2008 and future predictions, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 6415–6424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400857z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400857z</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., and Ng, N. L.: Recent
advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global
climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Sigsgaard, T., Forsberg, B., Annesi-Maesano, I., Blomberg, A., Bølling,
A., Boman, C., Bønløkke, J., Brauer, M., Bruce, N., and Héroux, M.
E.: Health impacts of anthropogenic biomass burning in the developed world,
Eur. Respir. J., 46, 1577–1588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01865-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01865-2014</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Sumlin, B. J., Pandey, A., Walker, M. J., Pattison, R. S., Williams, B. J.,
and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Atmospheric Photooxidation Diminishes Light
Absorption by Primary Brown Carbon Aerosol from Biomass Burning, Environ.
Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 540–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Sumlin, B. J., Oxford, C. R., Seo, B., Pattison, R. R., Williams, B. J., and
Chakrabarty, R. K.: Density and homogeneous internal composition of primary
brown carbon aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 3982–3989,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00093</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Takahama, S., Johnson, A., Morales, J. G., Russell, L. M., Duran, R.,
Rodriguez, G., Zheng, J., Zhang, R., Toom-Sauntry, D., and Leaitch, W. R.:
Submicron organic aerosol in Tijuana, Mexico, from local and Southern
California sources during the CalMex campaign, Atmos. Environ., 70, 500–512,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.057</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Tavakoli, F. and Olfert, J.: An instrument for the classification of aerosols
by particle relaxation time: theoretical models of the aerodynamic aerosol
classifier, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 916–926,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.802761" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.802761</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Tavakoli, F. and Olfert, J. S.: Determination of particle mass, effective
density, mass-mobility exponent, and dynamic shape factor using an
aerodynamic aerosol classifier and a differential mobility analyzer in
tandem, J. Aerosol Sci., 75, 35–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.04.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.04.010</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Tóth, A., Hoffer, A., Nyiro-Kósa, I., Pósfai, M., and Gelencsér, A.:
Atmospheric tar balls: aged primary droplets from biomass burning?, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 6669–6675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6669-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6669-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Flores, J. M., Brock, C. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich,
Y.: Broadband measurements of aerosol extinction in the ultraviolet spectral
region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 861–877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-861-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-861-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R., Attwood, A., Brock, C., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber, R., Ng, N.,
Allen, H., Ayres, B., and Baumann, K.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon
absorption in the rural southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
653–664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, C., Bandowe, B. A. M., Han, Y., Cao, J., Zhan, C., and Wilcke, W.:
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their derivatives (alkyl-PAHs,
oxygenated-PAHs, nitrated-PAHs and azaarenes) in urban road dusts from Xi'an,
Central China, Chemosphere, 134, 512–520,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.052</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Weimer, S., Alfarra, M., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., Prévôt, A., and
Baltensperger, U.: Organic aerosol mass spectral signatures from wood-burning
emissions: Influence of burning conditions and wood type, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D10304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009309" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009309</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P., Zhou, S., and Abbatt, J. P.: Changes in secondary organic
aerosol composition and mass due to photolysis: relative humidity dependence,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4309–4316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp506898c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp506898c</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, M., Hays, M. D., and Holder, A. L.: Light-absorbing organic carbon from
prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions,
Sci. Rep. UK, 7, 7318, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Yee, L. D., Kautzman, K. E., Loza, C. L., Schilling, K. A., Coggon, M. M.,
Chhabra, P. S., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P., Crounse, J. D.,
Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic
aerosol formation from biomass burning intermediates: phenol and
methoxyphenols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8019–8043,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, L., Smith, J., Laskin, A., Anastasio, C., Laskin, J., and Zhang, Q.:
Chemical characterization of SOA formed from aqueous-phase reactions of
phenols with the triplet excited state of carbonyl and hydroxyl radical,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13801–13816,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H. and Ying, Q.: Secondary organic aerosol from polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in Southeast Texas, Atmos. Environ., 55, 279–287,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.043</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. and Seinfeld, J. H.: A functional group oxidation model (FGOM) for
SOA formation and aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5907–5926,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5907-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5907-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Zhong, M. and Jang, M.: Dynamic light absorption of biomass-burning organic
carbon photochemically aged under natural sunlight, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1517–1525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1517-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Collier, S., Jaffe, D. A., Briggs, N. L., Hee, J., Sedlacek III, A.
J., Kleinman, L., Onasch, T. B., and Zhang, Q.: Regional influence of
wildfires on aerosol chemistry in the western US and insights into
atmospheric aging of biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
2477–2493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
