<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-13189-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Composition and origin of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol particles in the upper Rhine valley in summer</article-title><alt-title>Composition and origin of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol particles in the upper Rhine valley</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Composition and origin of PM${}_{{2.5}}$ aerosol particles in the upper Rhine valley}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{X. Shen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Xiaoli</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vogel</surname><given-names>Heike</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vogel</surname><given-names>Bernhard</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-2117</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mohr</surname><given-names>Claudia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-9295</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Ramisetty</surname><given-names>Ramakrishna</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Leisner</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Prévôt</surname><given-names>André S. H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Saathoff</surname><given-names>Harald</given-names></name>
          <email>harald.saathoff@kit.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 76344 Eggenstein–Leopoldshafen,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Working Group for Environmental Mineralogy and Environmental System Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry,
Stockholm University, Stockholm, 11418, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Physics, University Heidelberg, In
Neuenheimer Feld 229, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI),
5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>a</label><institution>now at: TSI Instruments India Private Limited, Bangalore, 560102,
India</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Harald Saathoff (harald.saathoff@kit.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>13189</fpage><lpage>13208</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Xiaoli Shen et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e208">We conducted a 6-week measurement campaign in summer 2016 at a
rural site about 11 km north of the city of Karlsruhe in southwest Germany
in order to study the chemical composition and origin of aerosols in the
upper Rhine valley. In particular, we deployed a single-particle mass
spectrometer (LAAPTOF) and an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) to provide
complementary chemical information on aerosol particles smaller than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. For the entire measurement period, the total aerosol particle
mass was dominated by sodium salts, contributing on average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % to the total single particles measured by the LAAPTOF. The total
particulate organic compounds, sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium contributed on
average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, and
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % to the total non-refractory particle mass measured by the
AMS. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis for the AMS data suggests
that the total organic aerosol (OA) consisted of five components, including
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA), (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %
semi-volatile oxygenated OA (SV-OOA), and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %
low-volatility oxygenated OA (LV-OOA). The regional transport model
COSMO-ART was applied for source apportionment and to achieve a better
understanding of the impact of complex transport patterns on the field
observations. Combining field observations and model simulations, we
attributed high particle numbers and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations observed at
this rural site to industrial emissions from power plants and a refinery in
Karlsruhe. In addition, two characteristic episodes with aerosol particle
mass dominated by sodium salts particles comprising (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %
of the total single particles and organic compounds accounting
for (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of total non-refractory species, respectively, were
investigated in detail. For the first episode, we identified relatively
fresh and aged sea salt particles originating from the Atlantic Ocean more
than 800 km away. These particles showed markers like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating the influence of anthropogenic
emissions modifying their composition, e.g. from chloride to nitrate salts
during the long-range transport. For a 3 d episode including high organic
mass concentrations, model simulations show that on average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of the particulate organics at this site were of biogenic origin.
Detailed model analysis allowed us to find out that three subsequent peaks
of high organic mass concentrations originated from different sources,
including local emissions from the city and industrial area of Karlsruhe,
regional transport from the city of Stuttgart (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km away),
and potential local night-time formation and growth. Biogenic (forest) and
anthropogenic (urban) emissions were mixed during transport and contributed
to the formation of organic particles. In addition, topography, temperature
inversion, and stagnant meteorological conditions also played a role in the
build-up<?pagebreak page13190?> of higher organic particle mass concentrations. Furthermore, the
model was evaluated using field observations and corresponding
sensitivity tests. The model results show good agreement with trends and
concentrations observed for several trace gases (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and aerosol particle compounds (e.g. ammonium and nitrate).
However, the model underestimates the number of particles by an order of
magnitude and underestimates the mass of organic particles by a factor of
2.3. The discrepancy was expected for particle number since the model does
not include all nucleation processes. The missing organic mass indicates
either an underestimated regional background or missing sources and/or
mechanisms in the model, like night-time chemistry. This study demonstrates
the potential of combining comprehensive field observations with dedicated
transport modelling to understand the chemical composition and complex
origin of aerosols.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e452">Aerosols are ubiquitous in the atmosphere and play a crucial role in air
quality, human health, the ecosystem, and climate change. In particular, aerosol
particles modify atmospheric radiative fluxes and can serve as cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN) and/or be activated as ice nuclei (IN), which
influences cloud formation, properties (albedo), and precipitation, thus
having a further impact on weather and climate change (Fuzzi et al., 2015;
Pöschl, 2005; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). Such indirect impacts of
aerosols on climate are still related to large uncertainties and low
confidence levels (IPCC, 2013). There are various types of
atmospheric aerosol particles, such as mineral dust, sea salt, soot, and
organic aerosol particles, originating from biogenic and/or anthropogenic
emission sources, as well as secondary formation from precursors within the
atmosphere (Tsigaridis et al., 2006). Aerosol particles are not typically
purely inorganic or organic; instead, they are often composed of different
inorganic and organic species. Diverse origins and atmospheric ageing
cause the complexity of the aerosol particle mixtures.</p>
      <p id="d1e455">Real-time mass spectrometry is widely used to measure size and chemical
composition of aerosol particles with high temporal resolution. Two major
instrument types are the single-particle mass spectrometer (singe-particle MS)
and aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS). The single-particle MS is sensitive to
both non-refractory and refractory species and to the mixing state of
individual particles; it thus identifies particle types (Murphy,
2007), while the AMS can quantify mass concentrations of non-refractory
particulate compounds in bulk samples (Canagaratna et al., 2007).
Complementary data from single-particle MS and AMS allow for the quantitative
interpretation of the internal and external mixing state of the aerosol
(Gemayel et al., 2017; Gunsch et al., 2018; Healy et al., 2013; Jeong et
al., 2011; Shen et al., 2019a; Zhou et al., 2016). The mixing state of
aerosol particles can reflect their evolution, e.g. caused by chemical
reactions, leading to changing compositions or coatings
(Reitz et al., 2016). A good example is the ageing of sea
salt particles: chloride replacement by nitrate on sea salt particles can be
well identified by single-particle MS (Gard et al., 1998).</p>
      <p id="d1e458">The large diversity of aerosols, containing hundreds of gaseous and
particulate components, makes it difficult to trace their sources.
Therefore, several source apportionment methods have been developed with the
common aim of reducing the complexity of aerosol particle mixtures and
thus helping to identify the major particle types in the atmosphere.
Clustering algorithms have been commonly used for single-particle MS
data analysis (Reitz et al., 2016), while positive matrix
factorization (PMF; Paatero, 1997; Paatero and Tapper, 1994) is commonly
applied for AMS data analysis (Canonaco et al., 2013,
2015; Crippa et al., 2014; DeCarlo et al., 2010; Mohr et al., 2012; Ulbrich
et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2011). According to PMF analysis, organic
aerosol (OA) can be separated into e.g. hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA),
cooking-related OA (COA), nitrogen-enriched OA (NOA), biomass burning OA
(BBOA), semi-volatile oxygenated OA (SV-OOA), and low-volatility
oxygenated OA (LV-OOA). This information can give valuable hints regarding OA ageing
and potential sources. However, these methods can only provide indirect
source information. The application of a transport model gives additional
information. It can predict the state of the atmosphere based on detailed
meteorology, emission data, and conversions of reactive species and
thus allows for the study of aerosol evolution from emission to a site of
interest.</p>
      <p id="d1e461">There are a variety of so-called online coupled chemical transport
models. A recent review is given by Baklanov et al. (2014). Such models
are important tools to better understand aerosol particle sources and
ageing processes, as well as their impact on particles' climate-relevant properties,
such as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity, optical properties, and
hygroscopicity (Fierce et al., 2017). Models can be improved with
a good process understanding, e.g. emissions, transport, and deposition, as well as
corresponding parameterizations obtained from dedicated laboratory studies
(Burkholder et al., 2017). They are often used to predict the evolution
of atmospheric composition on different spatial scales, which can be
evaluated by comparison with field measurements. Comparisons
between model simulations and field observations also help to validate the
model or to identify weaknesses like poorly represented chemistry and missing
sources or mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e465">For comparison with measurements at a single location, regional-scale models
with small grid sizes (down to a few kilometres) are required. In addition,
phenomena such as mountain and valley winds, land–sea breezes, or lee waves
become important, which requires a non-hydrostatic formulation of the model
equations. In this study we use the regional-scale model system COSMO-ART
(Consortium for<?pagebreak page13191?> small-scale modelling – aerosols and reactive trace
gases; Vogel et al., 2009). The part of the model describing aerosols and
reactive trace gases was developed at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
(<uri>http://www.imk-tro.kit.edu/english/3509.php</uri>, last access: 17 October 2019). It extends the
operational weather forecast model COSMO of the German Weather Service
(DWD), and it allows for the study of the feedback processes between aerosol
particles and the state of the atmosphere covering the continental to the
regional scale.</p>
      <p id="d1e471">Mobile particle measurements on a tramline intersecting the city of
Karlsruhe in southwest Germany and in the upper Rhine valley showed
particle number concentrations in the rural area north of the city almost as
high as in downtown (particle size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; mean value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, maximum values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Hagemann et al., 2014). The Rhine valley provides a
well-known wind channel of large-scale flow. This results in faster
transport of pollutants along the valley axis, e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and particles (Gross and Wippermann,
1987; Hagemann et al., 2014; Kalthoff and Vogel, 1992; Vogel et al., 1986).
According to data from the local air quality monitoring administration
(LUBW; <uri>https://www.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/luft</uri>, last access: 17 October 2019) from 2016
to 2018, the annual averaged mass concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and soot are 20, 2, 16, and 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
They were measured at the Eggenstein monitoring station (3.3 km south of the
measurement site used in this study and about 9 km north of the city of
Karlsruhe). Specifically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are about half of the
values measured in downtown Karlsruhe, but they exhibit comparably peak
values (around 50–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels at Eggenstein are
the second highest in the state of Baden-Württemberg (from the available
data from 2016 to 2018), and maximum hourly values can reach up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e691">In order to understand the sources of high local particle concentrations as
well as the chemical nature and mass concentrations of aerosol types
prevailing in the upper Rhine valley in summertime, we combine comprehensive
aerosol information from point measurements with a regional transport model.
Besides a better understanding of the origin of the aerosol in that region,
we want to validate the capabilities of our transport model to predict
characteristic air quality parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Measurement site and instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e709">The measurement site (49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>26.07<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)
is in the upper Rhine valley 175 m north of the village of Leopoldshafen and
10 m east of the tramline no. S1/11 described by Hagemann et al. (2014)
(marked with a star in Fig. 1). The Rhine valley often acts as a wind
channel, leading to wind directions mainly from southwest or northeast. As
shown in Fig. 1, the measurement site is located <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km north
of downtown Karlsruhe and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 15 km northeast of an
industrial area, including a refinery with 15.5 Mt yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> capacity, a 1450 MW
hard-coal-fired power plant, and a 365 MW gas-fired power plant
(Hagemann et al., 2014). Therefore, the measurement site is potentially
subject to urban and industrial emissions, especially for southerly wind
directions. Apart from that, there are several nearby biogenic emission
sources, e.g., forests, sunflower fields, and other agricultural
areas (Hagemann et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2019). Local traffic
emissions from the minor road near the measurement site were identified by
measurements with high time resolution. Its contributions to the aerosol
load are small due to the generally low traffic.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e807">Measurement location and topography <bold>(a)</bold>; nearby peak emission
sites and wind rose for the complete measurement campaign in summer 2016 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e822">The instrumentation for this campaign has been described in detail in
previous publications (Huang et al., 2019; Shen et
al., 2019a). Briefly, the data we use here are from the 6-week (26 July to 31 August 2016) deployment of a laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight
mass spectrometer (LAAPTOF; AeroMegt GmbH) and a high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS; Aerodyne Inc.;
hereafter AMS). These instruments were used to provide real-time information
on size and chemical composition for individual particles and bulk samples,
respectively. The LAAPTOF is a commercially available single-particle mass
spectrometer and has been well described in recent publications (Gemayel
et al., 2016; Marsden et al., 2016; Ramisetty et al., 2018; Shen et al.,
2018). In brief, aerosol particles with a size range of 70 nm to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in
vacuum aerodynamic diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are sampled with a flow rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, then focused and accelerated via an
aerodynamic lens (ADL). Afterwards, the particles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 nm
to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be detected with two laser diodes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">405</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) mounted in the particle time-of-flight (PTOF) chamber. Once a
single particle is detected successively by both of the detection lasers,
its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from the time of flight and an excimer laser
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">193</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) is triggered to desorb and ionize the refractory and
non-refractory species of the particle. The resulting cations and anions are
analysed with a bipolar ToF mass spectrometer. The AMS measures the particle
size-resolved bulk chemical composition, e.g. organic compounds, ammonium,
nitrate, sulfate, and chloride, in mass concentrations with high time
resolution and sensitivity (DeCarlo et al., 2006). Similarly as the
LAAPTOF, aerosols are sampled with a flow rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> via a similar ADL (Peck et al., 2016) in the size range 70 nm
to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then pass through a PTOF chamber. At the end
of the PTOF chamber, particles encounter a 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C heater
that vaporizes the non-refractory species. The corresponding vapours are
ionized by electron impact with high energy of 70 eV, generating positive
ions that are analysed with a ToF mass spectrometer.</p>
      <?pagebreak page13192?><p id="d1e995">All sampling inlets (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and total suspended
particulates) were positioned at the top of a measurement container (3.7 m
above ground level, a.g.l.). Particle number (size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; CPC3776 and CPC 3022A, TSI Inc.), particle mass
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and total suspended particulates; FIDAS, PALAS
GmbH), black carbon (AE33-7 Aethalometer, Magee Scientific Co.), and the trace
gases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (O341M, Environment SA), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (AF22M, Environment SA),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (AS32M, Environment SA), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NGA2000, Rosemont Inc.) were
measured. The meteorological parameters temperature, relative humidity, solar
radiation, wind direction, and wind speed (WS700, Luft GmbH) were measured 10 m a.g.l. and complemented by meteorological data from a 200 m tower located at
the KIT campus north, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km east of the measurement site
(49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>43.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>46.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Mass spectrometer data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1178">Single-particle data were analysed by using the Igor LAAPTOF data analysis
software (version 1.0.2, AeroMegt GmbH). The corresponding basic procedures
(e.g. mass calibration and fuzzy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering) and particle mass
quantification method have been described in detail in our previous studies
(Shen et al., 2018, 2019a). The AMS data analysis was done with the
standard software written for Igor, including SQUIRREL (version 1.60C) and
PIKA (version 1.20C). To account for a particle bouncing effect, we applied
a composition-dependent collection efficiency (CE, the product of net
particle transmission and detection efficiency) to the entire AMS dataset
(Canagaratna et al., 2007; Middlebrook et al., 2012). In order to
investigate the potential sources of organic aerosols, we have done a
positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis for AMS high-resolution (HR)
spectra of organic compounds by using the PMF Evaluation Tool (PET version
3.00D) (Ulbrich et al., 2009). Detailed protocols were
reported by Ulbrich et al. (2009) and DeCarlo et al. (2010). In brief, the HR input matrices without isotopes were created using
PIKA. A five-factor PMF solution with FPEAK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 was chosen according to the
following criteria, including least residuals (unexplained data),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the quality-of-fit parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sum of the
squares of the scaled residuals; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the expected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
distinguishable features (e.g. spectra and diurnal patterns) of the
components. It should be noted again that although fuzzy clustering and PMF
analyses are commonly used methods in source apportionment, they cannot
provide information on aerosol origin and the interaction between
aerosol transport and transformation processes, which can be studied with
aerosol transport models.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Regional transport model COSMO-ART</title>
      <p id="d1e1248">The regional transport model COSMO-ART is used in this study to simulate an
episode with a high mass concentration of organics (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by AMS). Detailed model descriptions can be
found in previous studies (Bangert et al., 2011; Knote et al., 2011;
Stanelle et al., 2010; Vogel et al., 2009). Therefore, we will only give a
brief review here. COSMO-ART is a fully online coupled model system, which
uses the same spatial and temporal resolution for all scalars, such as
temperature, gas, and aerosol particle concentrations. The meteorological
module is based on the operational weather forecast model COSMO of the
German Weather Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst, DWD). When atmospheric
chemistry and aerosol dynamics are coupled to<?pagebreak page13193?> COSMO, it allows for the online
calculation of the transport of reactive trace gases and aerosol particles
as well as their interaction with the state of the atmosphere. Physical
processes, e.g. nucleation, coagulation, condensation, and sedimentation, are
included in the model. The aerosol particles are represented by five
interactive lognormal modes representing particles consisting of internally
mixed sulfate, ammonium, nitrate and organic compounds, pure soot, and internal mixtures of them all. The hourly biogenic emissions are
calculated online according to land use data, the simulated
temperatures, and radiative fluxes (Vogel et al., 1995). Anthropogenic emissions, including traffic emissions, large point sources, and area
sources such as industrial and household areas, were precalculated by Johannes Bieser at the Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht (Backes et al., 2016; Bieser et
al., 2011). In our study, the simulation domain is covered by a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">350</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">330</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid with a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 50 vertical atmospheric layers (nonlinear increase up to 22 km a.g.l.). Most of the simulation results shown in this paper correspond to
the lowest atmospheric level (10 m a.g.l.) and we indicate if results are
from higher levels. The hourly emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and primary
organic aerosols (POA) were precalculated. As shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, VOCs,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and POA are mainly emitted at a lower atmospheric level in urban
areas, such as the cities of Karlsruhe, Stuttgart, Mannheim, and Strasburg,
as well as the corresponding highways. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hot spots typically
correspond to the stack heights of the power plants emitting, such as the
one in the western part of Karlsruhe.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1379">In the first section (Sect. 3.1), we give an overview of the meteorological
conditions, the trace gases, and particles measured during the whole
measurement campaign and will then give an example for source identification
using the transport model in Sect. 3.2. In the following two sections (Sect. 3.3
and 3.4), we discuss two selected episodes in more detail, which are
dominated by aged sea salt particles and relatively high organic particle
mass concentrations, respectively.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview of the field observations</title>
      <p id="d1e1389">Table 1 and Fig. S2 give an overview of meteorological conditions, trace
gases, and particle concentrations for the entire measurement campaign. In
summer 2016, the major wind direction was southwest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">174</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the average wind speed was (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the measurement site in the upper Rhine valley. This wind speed allows
trace gases and particles to be transported over a distance of 10 km within
2 h, e.g. from the city of Karlsruhe to the measurement site. During the
measurement time sunrise and sunset were at around 06:30 and 20:30 CEST (Central European Summer Time),
respectively. Temperature and relative humidity (RH) showed relatively
stable anti-correlated diurnal patterns. Given the frequent clear nights,
night-time temperature inversions occurred for 32 out of 37 nights during
the entire measurement period (Fig. S3). Among the trace gases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed clear diurnal patterns, with ozone peaking in the
afternoon. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were higher in the morning hours and in
the late evenings and were generally anti-correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and particle number showed spikes at similar times (more frequently
during the daytime), mainly due to local emissions from nearby road
traffic. The averaged particle number concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for particles larger than 2.5 nm measured by
CPC3776 in this study is comparable with that observed at the same site in
previous tram-based measurements (Hagemann et al., 2014). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations showed peaks with low frequency (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb)
but only when the wind was coming from the direction of the industrial area
in the southwest. As shown in Fig. S2, these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks correspond to
higher particle number concentrations at around noontime when the wind
speed is higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and vertical mixing
intensified. This is in agreement with the downward mixing of stack emissions
from industrial sources, which can be validated by model calculations using
COSMO-ART (refer to Sect. 3.2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1586">Mean values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD) of characteristic parameters for the
entire measurement period.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind direction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">174.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4">Particulate compounds measured by AMS </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind speed (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">294.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative humidity (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4">Seven particle classes measured by LAAPTOF </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C1: Calcium–soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">446.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C2: Aged soot (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle number (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C3: Sodium salts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle number (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C4: Secondary inorganics–amine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(size: 2.5 to 7 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C5: Biomass burning–soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C6: Biomass burning–organosulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C7: Mixed/aged dust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1596">Note that the full names of the seven particle classes are as follows. C1: calcium-rich and
soil-dust-like particles; C2: aged-soot-like particles; C3: sodium-salt-like
particles; C4: secondary-inorganic-rich and amine-containing particles;
C5: aged-biomass-burning and soil-dust-like particles; C6:
aged-biomass-burning and organosulfate-containing particles; C7: mixed/aged
and dust-like particles.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2511">In the entire measurement period, the total organic compounds, sulfate,
nitrate, and ammonium were analysed to contribute on average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % to
the total non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass measured by AMS, respectively.
Given the AMS-PMF results shown in Fig. S4, five OA factors (components)
were determined with characteristic mass spectra, corresponding elemental
ratios (O : C and H : C), and distinct temporal variations. These were (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % HOA, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % SV-OOA, and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %
LV-OOA, i.e. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % LV-OOA1, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % LV-OOA2,
and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % LV-OOA3, contributing to the OA mass. The HOA and
OOA are linked to primary and secondary organic aerosol (POA and SOA),
respectively (Ulbrich et al., 2009). Thus, SOA dominated the OA mass at
this measurement site. Further descriptions of PMF results can be found in
the Supplement (Fig. S4) and more discussions are given in Sect. 3.4.2,
especially regarding the organic compounds.</p>
      <?pagebreak page13194?><p id="d1e2645">In a previous publication (Shen et al., 2019a), we could
identify seven major particle classes at the measurement site among
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> single particles with sizes between
200 nm and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In brief, class 1 is identified as calcium-rich and
soil-dust-like particles (calcium–soil) with marker peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaOH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and 112 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This particle class shows a good correlation
(Pearson's correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the laboratory-derived reference spectra of soil dust particles. Class 2 is identified as aged-soot-like
particles (aged soot) with characteristic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns and is
mixed with sulfate and nitrate. Class 3 is identified as sodium-salt-like particles
(sodium salts) with marker peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
139 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 141 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 165 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 131
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 147 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Class 4 includes
secondary-inorganic-rich and amine-containing particles (secondary
inorganic–amine) with prominent ammonium, nitrate and sulfate markers, and amine marker peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NHCH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 59
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NCH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 88
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 118
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NCH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Class 5, aged-biomass-burning and
soil-dust-like particles (biomass burning–soil), has aged-biomass-burning
marker peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 213 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 46
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 97 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as peaks related to
aromatic compounds (50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 77
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 95
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 104 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Furthermore, class 5 shows a strong correlation with reference spectra of
soil dust particles. The representative spectra of class 6,
aged-biomass-burning and organosulfate-containing particles (biomass
burning–organosulfate), also features aged-biomass-burning particles and
has organosulfate marker peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 141 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
155 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 215
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Class 7 particles contain all the marker
peaks from the other six classes and show a good correlation with the
reference spectra of mineral and soil dust particles; they are consequently
labelled as “mixed/aged dust” (short for mixed/aged and dust-like
particles). These particle types were not always present in similar
fractions but showed distinct periods with one or two types dominating the
particle mass (Shen et al., 2019a). Here, we will mainly
discuss two particle classes that dominated the total particle mass, i.e.
sodium salts and biomass burning–soil particles, contributing on average
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % to the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
measured by the LAAPTOF, respectively. We will also discuss one
characteristic particle class, i.e. secondary inorganic–amine particles,
which showed relatively intensive and distinct peaks three times during this
campaign (Fig. S2) as well as several weaker peaks.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3499">Diurnal pattern <bold>(a, b)</bold> and wind-direction-resolved particle
class masses <bold>(c, d)</bold> measured by LAAPTOF. The data are averaged over the
entire campaign. In total 4842 time points of 10 min averaged data were
analysed for these plots. The total particle mass concentration for each
hour of the day is on average 4.3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and for each wind direction is on average 4.5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the dominating classes the average mass concentrations are
1.3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 1.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
class 3, 0.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 0.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for class 4, and 1.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 1.6
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for class 5 in panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>.
It is worthy to note that particle mass quantification is one of the most
challenging issues in single-particle mass spectrometry (Shen et al., 2019a,
and the references therein). There are several assumptions mainly regarding
particle shape and density in our particle mass quantification method,
leading to potential uncertainties of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.
Despite such large uncertainty, the estimated total particle mass has good
correlation with the total mass measured by the AMS, covering
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the measurement time (Shen et al., 2019a).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3731">As shown in Fig. 2a, total particle mass concentrations have clear
diurnal patterns (the data are averaged over the entire campaign), showing
higher night-time values and a peak during the morning rush hour
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 09:00 local time). Higher particle mass values mainly
correspond to southern wind directions, with one exception of extremely high
masses associated with northwesterly winds (Fig. 2c). Specifically, sodium-salt-containing particles have higher fractions during daytime and
correspond to southwesterly wind directions (Fig. 2b). Such wind was
observed mainly during daytime and with higher wind speeds than at night.
Biomass burning–soil particles enrich during night-time and mainly
correspond to southeast wind (Fig. 2d). Secondary inorganic–amine particles
typically rise in the morning and correspond to south and southwest wind
directions (Fig. 2). When we compare weekdays (Monday to Friday) and
weekends (Saturday and Sunday) in Fig. S5, the sodium salt particles were
always correlated with southwest wind directions. Obvious differences can be
found for secondary inorganic–amine and biomass burning–soil. Secondary inorganic–amine-type particles were
mainly advected by south and southwest wind during weekdays. However, they
were much less abundant during weekends and did not show a clear
relationship with wind directions (only a small peak for northwest). For
biomass burning–soil particles the observations are a bit more complex.</p>
      <p id="d1e3741">The biomass burning–soil particles measured during weekdays were correlated
with south and southwest wind<?pagebreak page13195?> as well, indicating potential sources from the
city of Karlsruhe and its industrial area. Please note that the
representative spectra of these particles show aromatic ion peaks, which may
arise from aromatic compounds such as toluene and xylene due to motor
vehicle emissions. This type of particle also contains some metals
such as barium and lead that are related to coal combustion from industry
(Hudson et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2018). These features correspond to
urban and industrial sources. During the weekends, biomass burning–soil
particles had higher mass concentrations than during weekdays and were
correlated with wind directions from the east, southeast, and northwest, where
there are mainly forests and agricultural areas. Therefore, we can infer that
there were various sources for biomass burning–soil particles and these
sources differed between weekdays and weekends. This could be e.g. barbecue
fires during weekends, while the weekday source is likely to be associated
with that for secondary inorganic–amine particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e3744">In order to refine this type of particle, we compared them with black
carbon particles measured by an Aethalometer (AE33-7). The equivalent black
carbon concentration was calculated by the mass absorption cross-sectional
value of 11.7 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Herich et al., 2011). They seem
to show a similar trend in the time series with a triplet of peaks from
25 to 28 August  (refer to Figs. S2 and S6). We found that
biomass burning–soil and black carbon concentrations are well correlated
only for the weekends, with Pearson's correlation coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S6b), and poorly correlated for weekdays (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This points to different major sources for weekdays and
weekends. In addition, the black carbon instrument measuring the light
absorption at different wavelengths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be used to determine
the absorption Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Drinovec et al.,
2015). For the entire campaign, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
calculated by using a pair of wavelengths and their corresponding mass
absorption cross sections (MAC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.7 and 23.6 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">950</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 470 nm, respectively; Herich et al., 2011). Herich et
al. (2011) and Zotter et al. (2017) have assigned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to BC from road traffic emissions, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values for wood-burning BC were typically higher at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Zotter et al., 2017).<?pagebreak page13196?> Our measurements indicate that traffic was the
dominating source of BC. Considering the good correlation between BC and
biomass burning–soil particles during the weekend, we could infer the
corresponding traffic emissions that contributed to biomass burning–soil
particles. All observations support the conclusion that this particle class
has significant anthropogenic sources, which may vary between weekends and
weekdays. It should be noted that there were no significant biomass burning
organic aerosols (BBOAs) identified by AMS-PMF for the entire measurement
period. The marker f60 (the mass fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 to the total organics)
of BBOA is very close to the background fraction of 0.003 (Crippa et
al., 2014; Cubison et al., 2011). In addition to biomass burning, other
potential sources for potassium- and sulfate-rich particles detected by
LAAPTOF must also be taken into consideration, such as coal combustion (Xu et
al., 2018). Therefore, further analysis is required to identify the
different sources contributing to this particle class.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3913">Time series of particulate organic mass measured by the AMS (AMS
org in panel <bold>a</bold>), the particle acidity indicator (the lower the value
the more acidic, <bold>b</bold>), and the particle class number classified by
LAAPTOF (colour code, <bold>a</bold>). The seven classes are as follows. Class 1:
calcium–soil; class 2: aged soot; class 3: sodium salts; class 4: secondary
inorganics–amine; class 5: biomass burning–soil; class 6: biomass
burning organosulfate; and class 7: mixed/aged dust. The first (blue) and
second (green) shaded areas mark the sodium-chloride-rich and organic-rich
episodes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3931">As mentioned before, the dominating particle classes varied for different
time periods (Shen et al., 2019a). In the following we focus on an episode
with particles rich in sodium salts to find out if sea salt particles can
significantly influence the aerosol particle composition at this central
European location about 800 km inland. Furthermore, we discuss another
episode with relatively high organic mass concentrations to find out how
these mass loads could form and exist for a relatively long time period.
Both episodes are easily recognized from the time series of particles
measured by LAAPTOF and the organic compounds measured by AMS (Figs. S2 and
3; see also Fig. 4 in Shen et al., 2019a), as well as the time series of
OOA, in particular for SV-OOA, LV-OOA1, and LV-OOA2 (Fig. S4). Apart from the
difference of dominating particle classes and particulate organics, the
particle acidity indicator value, organonitrate fraction, and organic carbon
oxidation state, as well as meteorological conditions were quite different
between these two episodes. For particle acidity, the molar ratio of
measured to predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from AMS measurement is commonly used as
an indicator (Zhang et al., 2007). The predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is
the mass concentration required to fully neutralize sulfate, nitrate, and
chloride measured by AMS. A lower ratio value represents higher acidity under
certain conditions, i.e. inorganic species are dominating the particle mass
and crustal elements have relatively low concentrations (Zhang et al.,
2007). It should be noted that organic acids and crustal elements such
as sodium can bias the results (Hennigan et al., 2015, and the references
therein). Despite the large uncertainty for indicating acidity, we can still
use such ratios to indicate special events, e.g. sodium-nitrate-rich
particles will provide nitrate, leading to lower values. As shown in Fig. 3,
this ratio reaches the lowest value during the sodium-salt-rich episode, while
the value in the organic-rich episode is at the average level. If we assume
the organic acids only have a minor influence on the particle acidity, the
anti-correlation between the acidity indicator value and organic concentrations
may be related to acid-catalysed organic particle formation. For the
fraction of organonitrates, the AMS-derived ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is commonly used as an indicator (Farmer et al., 2010; Kiendler-Scharr
et al., 2016). In the episode rich in sodium salts, particles contain the
highest organonitrate fraction, while the particles in the organic-rich
episode contain the lowest fraction (refer to Fig. S7). It should be noted
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can also result in higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
(5 to 7; Allan et al., 2004) than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.3 in our
calibration). However, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values here are much
higher (see Fig. S7) and thus we can expect a major contribution by
organonitrates. Higher fractions of organonitrates suggest a stronger
influence of anthropogenic emissions on the sodium-rich aerosol. The
averaged carbon oxidation state (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the organic compounds
is a robust metric of its degree of oxidation or processing (Canagaratna
et al., 2015; Kroll et al., 2011). It turns out that the organics were more
oxidized in the organic-rich episode, with relatively higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value and less variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), than that for the entire
campaign (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (refer to Fig. S7 and Table 2). In addition,
the major wind with higher speeds was from the southwest in the episode rich in
sodium salt particles, and we will show in Sect. 3.3 that this is related
to the long-range transport of sea salt particles. For the organic-rich episode,
the wind speeds were lower most of the time. The different features of
these two episodes are summarized in Table 2. We will discuss the episodes
in more detail in Sect. 3.3 and 3.4, but we first demonstrate the
usefulness of the transport model to identify an industrial point source.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4107">Features and mean values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD) of characteristic
parameters for the two selected episodes.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sodium-chloride-rich episode</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Organic-rich episode</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Instrument</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date (mmdd) and time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0820 noon to 0823 noon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0825 midnight to 0828 midnight</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sodium salts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LAAPTOF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Higher</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lower</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biomass burning–soil</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LAAPTOF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lower</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Higher</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">HR-ToF-AMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lowest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Highest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle acidity indicator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">HR-ToF-AMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured to predicted</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lowest value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Average value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Anti-correlated with org</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organonitrate fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">HR-ToF-AMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">indicator <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Highest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lowest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxidation state (Osc)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">HR-ToF-AMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(anti-correlated with org)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Less oxidized</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">More oxidized</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Strongest variability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Least variability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind direction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Southwest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Varying</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Meteorology sensor</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind speed (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(WS700, Luft GmbH)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Identification of an industrial point source</title>
      <?pagebreak page13198?><p id="d1e4658">As shown in Fig. 4, we have modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
particle number for the organic-rich episode with COSMO-ART. Model
simulations show comparable results and/or trends with field observations.
For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, there is a modelled peak at 10:00 CEST on 26 August. As
mentioned above, in the upwind direction of our measurement site is a coal-fired power plant, from which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is emitted from a stack at 230 m a.g.l.
Therefore, we compared <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in an area including the
power plant and our measurement site (refer to Fig. 5a1 and a2), as well as
time series of their vertical profile at the measurement site (Fig. 5b). The
model results show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions  started at 02:00 CEST from the
stack of the power plant, continuously transported by southwest wind (from
06:00 CEST; not shown here). Around noon, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was transported downward
due to enhanced vertical mixing. Similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we found corresponding
vertical transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and primary particles (refer to Fig. 5c and
d), as well as secondary inorganic particles, which will be discussed in
Sect. 3.3.3. In addition to the power plant emissions, particle emissions
from the Karlsruhe refinery (e.g. around 08:00 CEST at 122 m a.g.l.) and downtown
Karlsruhe (at 10 m a.g.l.) were observed in the model results, which are
visualized via videos of the evolution of particle number at these two
altitudes (refer to the Video Supplement). Given these findings, we have
verified industrial contributions to the particles measured at this rural
site. However, the particle numbers calculated by the model are 10 times
lower than the measured values. In this context, it should be noted that
the observations relate to particles larger than 2.5 and 7 nm. The modelled particles include Aitken- and accumulation-mode
particles with median diameters at around 30–80 and 300–400 nm,
respectively. The model does not represent the ultrafine particles to their
full extent, especially e.g. the contribution of organic compounds or
ammonia to nucleation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4774">Comparison between observations and model results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and particle number in the organic-rich episode. The
modelled particles do not represent the ultrafine particles to their full
extent, especially for the particles in the nucleation mode.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4818">Modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at 02:00 CEST <bold>(a1)</bold> and 10:00 CEST <bold>(a2)</bold> on
26 August at 10 m a.g.l. Panels <bold>(b)</bold> to <bold>(d)</bold> are time series of
vertical profiles above the measurement site for simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and total particle number.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Aged sea salt in central Europe</title>
      <p id="d1e4881">Sodium salt particles accounted on average for (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of
the particle mass measured by LAAPTOF during the whole campaign, and they
dominated several time periods (refer to Fig. S2). However, not all the peak
events were the same. We chose a unique episode when sodium chloride
signatures, e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, showed the strongest
signal, as plotted in Fig. 6a. In this episode, the sodium salts
accounted for (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of the total mass of the single particles. To
study the origin of these particles, we used the Hybrid Single-Particle
Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT; Stein et al., 2015) on the
READY website (<uri>http://www.ready.noaa.gov</uri>, last access: 17 October 2019; Rolph et al.,
2017) for back-trajectory analysis. The corresponding results suggest that
these particles came from the Atlantic Ocean, which is more than 800 km west of our measurement site (refer to Fig. S8a). Therefore, we can
constrain the type of sodium salt particles as sea salts with an age of
about 1.5 to 3 d.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4941"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of sodium chloride and nitrate signatures in seven
particle classes. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is the normalized ion intensity (each ion peak
intensity is normalized to the sum of all ion signals; positive and negative
ions were analysed separately). The seven classes are as follows. Class 1: calcium–soil;
class 2: aged soot; class 3: sodium salts; class 4: secondary
inorganics–amine; class 5: biomass burning–soil; class 6: biomass
burning organosulfate; and class 7: mixed/aged dust. Obvious sodium chloride
and nitrate signatures are mainly found in class 3 labelled in blue.
<bold>(b)</bold> Size distributions of NaCl-rich (young sea salt) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich
(aged sea salt) particles. Gaussian fit NaCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1211</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">352</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1697</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">946</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. <bold>(c)</bold> Spectra
difference between aged and young sea salt particles (aged – young). The blue
band marks the sodium-chloride-rich episode.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5035">In this episode, sea salt particles retained strong chloride signatures in
spite of the long-range transport due to relatively high wind speeds (e.g.
the average wind speed was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ocean to
our measurement site at noontime on 21 and 22 August based on
a 72 h back-trajectory analysis). Therefore, we interpret them as relatively
fresh sea salt, which is the first subclass of sodium salt particles
identified with the fuzzy clustering analysis of the single-particle mass
spectra. As shown in Fig. 6a, there is an obvious decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 81
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end of this episode, while the sodium nitrate
signature at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 108 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. Such trends can also
be found in similar but much less prominent sodium-chloride-rich episodes
(see the red guiding arrows in Fig. 6a). This indicates the ageing process of
sea salt particles, namely heterogeneous replacement of chloride by nitrate
on sea salt particles (Gard et al.,
1998). We assigned the second subclass of sodium salts to more aged sea
salt particles, which are bigger than the relatively young sea salt (Fig. 6b). A 72 h back-trajectory analysis suggests that these particles came
from the Atlantic Ocean and were carried with southwesterly wind of
relatively lower speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to reach our
measurement site on 23 August, thus they spent more time
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d) over the continent and are more aged. The
representative spectra of sodium salt particles and the averaged spectra of
their subclasses can be found in Fig. S9. The signal difference between
aged and young sea salt spectra (aged – young) is shown in Fig. 6c,
highlighting their signatures. Similar relationships as for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 81
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 108 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can also be found for the
other signature peaks (refer to Fig. S10). It is worth noting that there are
also nitrate-related peaks in young sea salt, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 104
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaClNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, verifying that these young sea salts were not fresh. In
addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 131 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase earlier than 108 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 147 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We can therefore infer the ageing degree from a
series of signature peaks in LAAPTOF spectra: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">104</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaClNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 147 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from relatively fresh to more aged, corresponding
to chloride to nitrite to nitrate salts). However, this requires further
systematic studies to be validated.</p>
      <p id="d1e5426">For sodium salt particles, a weak but characteristic peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is likely to be an organonitrate signature
(Shen et al., 2019a). As shown in Fig. S10, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a similar trend as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 131
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and it is more pronounced in the LAAPTOF spectra of
aged sea salt. In the sodium-chloride-rich episode, in general <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a similar trend as organonitrate mass
concentrations estimated by AMS results and the results of a molecular
analysis using FIGAERO-HR-ToF-CIMS (a filter inlet for gases and
aerosols coupled to a high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization
mass spectrometer) in a companion study by Huang et al. (2019).
The method for organonitrate estimation can be found in Farmer et al. (2010) and the parameters used here are the same as those used by
Huang et al. (2019). We have briefly described this method in the
Supplement after the caption for Fig. S10. In addition, our simulation
chamber study has shown that this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> arises from the recombination of inorganic nitrate<?pagebreak page13199?> and organics due to the
laser desorption and ionization (LDI) matrix effect in single-particle MS
(Murphy, 2007; Reilly et al., 2000; Reinard and Johnston, 2008; Zenobi and
Knochenmuss, 1998). It is even stronger when it arises from organonitrates
formed under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich conditions (refer to Fig. S11). Taken together,
we can conclude that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal
mainly results from organonitrates, but we still cannot rule out the LDI
effect. Furthermore, our simulation chamber studies also revealed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in LAAPTOF spectra could be a
signature for anthropogenic sources (refer to Fig. S11 and the corresponding
detailed description in the Supplement). Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on sea salt particles indicates interactions
between natural sea salt and anthropogenic emissions. It is worth noting
that another weak but characteristic peak was observed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 165
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This signature peak for sea salt sulfate can be
found with a stronger signal in young sea salt than in aged sea salt
(Gard et al., 1998).</p>
      <?pagebreak page13200?><p id="d1e5748">Apart from that, in high-resolution AMS spectra we have observed the peak at
78.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the marker for methanesulfonic acid
(MSA) from marine or coastal areas (Huang et al., 2015),
although other sources cannot be excluded (Daellenbach et al., 2017).
Based on the method developed by Huang et al. (2015), we have also estimated
the MSA fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, signal fraction of MSA to total organics and
sulfate) and mass concentrations for the entire campaign (refer to Fig. S12). It turns out that during the sodium-chloride-rich episode, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is enhanced compared to the other low-sodium-salt time period,
such as the organic-rich episode. This also supports the fact that sodium salt particles
measured by the LAAPTOF had a sea salt origin.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Origin of the aerosol particles during the organic-rich episode</title>
      <p id="d1e5800">At the end of the measurement period, we observed three subsequent organic
peaks (see Figs. 3, S2, and S7): one peak on Friday 26 August
during daytime and two peaks during the following two nights. Organics
measured in this episode exhibited the highest mass concentrations of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which accounted for (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of
the total non-refractory particle mass and is almost 3 times more than
organic masses measured in other periods of the entire AMS measurement
period. Please note that some secondary inorganic components were also measured
in this episode, showing some peaks at similar times as the high organic
peaks. As for the sodium-chloride-rich episode, we have also done a HYSPLIT
back-trajectory analysis for the organic-rich episode. Figure S8b shows
these results: the air mass was coming from the continent during this
episode.</p>
      <p id="d1e5847">In order to better interpret the measurements and to understand the impact
of transport processes for the particles measured in the organic-rich
episode, we have done COSMO-ART simulations covering the time period from
25 to 28 August 2016. Figure 7 shows the particulate organic
compounds, the secondary inorganics (ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate)
measured by AMS, and the result calculated using COSMO-ART (panels d to g).
The corresponding meteorological conditions measured are shown in Fig. 7a
to c. In general, the trends and also the amplitudes of the
model<?pagebreak page13201?> results compare quite well with the observations. In the following, we
will combine field observation and transport model simulation results to
address these questions: (1) were the organic-rich aerosols due to local
formation, regional transport, or vertical mixing? (2) Were all three organic
peaks due to the same factors? (3) Did the secondary inorganics
originate from the same sources as the organics? We will start the
discussion with the inorganics; we will then go to the organics and end
with a typical particle type in this episode.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e5852">Comparison between observations and model simulations for the
organic-rich episode. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> are wind conditions measured 10 m a.g.l. at our measurement site (purple and light grey dots for wind
direction and speed, respectively) and complementary KIT tower
data (dark grey dots). Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the temperature data from the KIT tower.
Panels <bold>(d)</bold> to <bold>(g)</bold> are the particulate organic compounds (with green arrows
pointing out the high organic peaks), ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate
measured by AMS and simulated by COSMO-ART. The simulation results are at
the lowest atmospheric level in the model, namely 10 m a.g.l.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>3.4.1</label><title>Secondary inorganic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e5884">As shown in Fig. 7e to g, observations and model results for secondary
inorganic compounds show comparable diurnal cycles and even the
concentration levels match quite well. While ammonium and nitrate have a
similar trend most of the time, the trend for sulfate seems to be
somewhat different. The major peaks of ammonium and nitrate appear at
similar times as the high organic peaks. As will be shown in the following
section, these compounds originated from anthropogenic sources in the urban
and industrial area of Karlsruhe and from the city of Stuttgart. There is
only one instance when all the measured secondary inorganics show
peaks together: the inorganics peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10:00 CEST on
26 August when high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were also observed (see
Fig. 4), which were due to emissions from a power plant located in the upwind
direction. To verify this, we can refer to the time series of vertical
profiles for the simulated secondary inorganics (Fig. S13b to d). Despite
similar spatial distributions of nitrate, ammonium, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from 02:00 to 12:00 CEST (see Fig. 5) the measured sulfate peak for that time is
missing in the model output. The reason for this is still unclear. It should
be noted that, compared to the sulfate peak observed, the companion ammonium
and nitrate peaks are much broader and attributed to additional anthropogenic
sources from the city and refinery rather than only the power plant.</p>
      <p id="d1e5927">Some of the differences between the model result and observation, such as that
on 25 August or e.g. for sharper peaks, may be explained by
missing (point) sources in the emission data and/or the limited spatial
resolution. The general agreement is, however, quite good, also for some
point sources like the largest power plant in Karlsruhe. Some of the
differences in the trends of nitrate and sulfate may be caused by the
different nature of the sources of their precursor gases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is emitted in this area mainly from a few point
sources, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is emitted from various sources over a larger area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>3.4.2</label><title>Organic compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e5982">The dominating OA components in this episode were LV-OOA1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % and LV-OOA2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, which are surrogates for more aged
SOA (Zhang et al., 2011). It should be noted that LV-OOA1 has a strong
correlation with SV-OOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is a surrogate for local
(less aged) SOA (Zhang et al., 2011). As shown in Fig. S4 (the insert in
panel d), they both peak at a similar time during the night with
broader peaks for LV-OOA1. This indicates that the LV-OOA1 might have a
similar origin as the SV-OOA (more related to local biogenic sources).
However, it can also be influenced by regional transport. For example, the
first LV-OOA1 peak has two sub-peaks: the first one appears during the
night, e.g. related to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation (strong correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between LV-OOA1 and the CHO1N family has been found here; refer to
their time series in Fig. S4b), and the second sub-peak appears in the
morning rush hour and corresponds to south and southwest wind directions,
indicating potential transport from the urban and industrial area of
Karlsruhe. The more oxidized LV-OOA2 peaks during daytime and shows a
negative correlation with SV-OOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), possibly due to
photochemical ageing of SV-OOA. Therefore, we conclude that the SOA measured
in this study was likely due to both local formation and regional transport.</p>
      <p id="d1e6057">For the field and model comparison, the general temporal development of
organics is represented well by the model,<?pagebreak page13202?> showing similar trends as
measured by AMS, but it underestimates the mass concentrations by a factor of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the averaged model result is (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the observed was (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Potential reasons for this discrepancy will be discussed in light of
sensitivity tests at the end of this section.</p>
      <p id="d1e6135">As mentioned above, the organics shows a peak on Friday 26 August
during daytime (peak 1) and two more during the following nights of the
weekend (peak 2 and 3) in the organic-rich episode. Model results cover peak 1 and 2, as well as the first part of peak 3. Analysis of the model
results shows that the three peaks were caused by different factors
including meteorological conditions, regional transport, and local or
in situ new particle formation and growth (such as night-time
new particle formation; Huang et al., 2019). As shown in Fig. 7a and d, peak 1 corresponds to south and southwest wind, indicating that the air masses
came from the urban and industrial area of Karlsruhe. This is illustrated
very well in a video showing the transmission of particulate organics
leading to peak 1 (refer to the Video Supplement). The most intensive peak in
organic particle mass (peak 2) starts from 26 August 20:30 CEST (Figs. 3
and S2) when the wind direction shifts from northwest to east
(northeast, straight east, and southeast), the wind speed decreases to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the night-time temperature inversion starts.
Such stagnant conditions limit aerosol mixing and support the build-up aerosols
and their growth. During the entire campaign, the strongest temperature
inversion was observed during this night from 26 to 27 August
(peak inversion at 02:40 CEST on 27 August; Fig. S3). In spite of the stagnant
conditions and rather low wind speeds, regional transport still plays an
important role. The model results for this time show the transport of organic
aerosol particles from the city of Stuttgart (southeast of the measurement
site) over forested areas into the Rhine valley. This is clearly visible in
a corresponding video of the model results for particulate organics and wind
directions (refer to the Video Supplement). Furthermore, we investigate the
relative contribution of biogenic and anthropogenic emissions and their
interactions for this episode by comparing the model results with and
without biogenic emissions. It turns out that the corresponding air masses
originating from anthropogenic emissions in the Stuttgart area were
transported to the measurement site by southeasterly winds via forested
hills. During this transport, the organic particle mass concentrations
increased while being mixed with biogenic emissions from the forest. The
resulting air mass finally reaching the measurement site therefore consisted
of anthropogenic and biogenic organics. For peak 3, we can also find the impact
of transport as illustrated in another video of particulate organic mass
evolution (refer to the Video Supplement). However, the origin of this peak is
more complex and is most likely more influenced by local particle formation
and growth. After the night-time peak 2, from 12:00 CEST on 27 August the air
mass exhibited back-and-forth movements in west–east directions, showing a
strong concentration gradient (west–east). Such conditions lead to high
uncertainty of the model results for one point. Hence, although we observed
quite similar particle compositions in these three subsequent peaks with
high organic mass concentrations for similar meteorological conditions with
low wind speeds, all three peaks were caused by air masses of different
origin.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e6163">Particulate organic concentrations calculated by COSMO-ART for
three different time points <bold>(a–c)</bold> during the night from 26 to 27 August
for 10 m a.g.l.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6175">As mentioned above, the model underestimates the organic aerosol mass on
average by a factor of 2.3. In order to better understand this discrepancy,
we have done three sensitivity tests: one without biogenic emissions (test
01), one with doubled biogenic emissions (test 02), and one with boundary
values or regional background values (outside the model domain) of
particulate organic compounds increased by a factor of 10 (test 03). The
results of test 01 suggest that (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of the organic mass
calculated resulted from biogenic sources for the peak 1 time period,
corresponding to the air masses coming from Karlsruhe. Regarding the time
period of peak 2, there was a sharp drop in the biogenic contribution from
88 % to 68 %, corresponding to 26 August 23:00 to 27 August
02:00 CEST when the air mass was coming from the direction of Stuttgart (see
Fig. 8). Hence, we can infer that the anthropogenic contribution to the air
mass that originated from Stuttgart was somewhat larger than that originating
from Karlsruhe. Over the entire organic-rich episode, on average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of the organic mass was contributed by biogenic sources. To test if
missing emissions of biogenic precursors can explain the underestimated
organic particulate masses we doubled this major (biogenic) source for
organics (test 02). As shown in Fig. 9, doubling biogenic emissions makes
some of the peaks in organic mass fit the observations better, but the
concentrations before and between the peak values are still
underestimated. Another potential reason for the discrepancy could be
boundary values that are too low (regional background); therefore, we increased them by a
factor of 10 (test 03). This elevates the overall simulated concentration
levels, leading to an overestimation, especially of the first peak. These
tests demonstrate the potential role of precursor emissions and the regional
transport of organic aerosol particles in the model results. There seems to
be evidence that the model underestimates the regional background of organic
aerosol particles. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that underestimated
sources of VOCs or weaknesses in the SOA formation mechanism may also contribute
to the underestimation of the organic aerosol particle mass. For example,
night-time new particle formation mechanisms are not included in the
current model version.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e6204">Modelled organic mass concentrations (lines) compared to measured
values (grey area). The green line is the same as in Fig. 7, the red line
was calculated for a 10-fold-enhanced regional background in organics, and
the blue was calculated for doubled biogenic emissions in COSMO-ART.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13189/2019/acp-19-13189-2019-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d1e6223">High particle number concentrations have been observed at a rural site in
the upper Rhine valley by measurements on a tramline (Hagemann et al.,
2014). In order to study the nature of the aerosols in the same region, we
conducted a 6-week<?pagebreak page13203?> stationary field measurement campaign at a rural site
next to the tramline in summer 2016 and applied a regional transport model,
COSMO-ART, to analyse the origin of the aerosols. Comparing the field
observations and model calculations, we have verified that industrial
emissions contribute to the high particle number concentrations at this
rural site.</p>
      <p id="d1e6226">For the whole measurement period, the particles that dominate the mass are
sodium salts, which contributed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % to the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
measured by the LAAPTOF. According to the AMS measurements, organics,
sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium contributed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) %, and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % to the total
non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass, respectively. AMS-PMF results suggest the
organic aerosols (OA) consisted of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % HOA, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % SV-OOA, and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % LV-OOA with three subtypes (LV-OOA1,
LV-OOA2, and LV-OOA3). Furthermore, we have investigated two episodes dominated by aged sea salt and organics, which show characteristic
features such as higher particle acidities and carbon oxidation states,
respectively. Both episodes selected were dominated by particles formed
from the interaction of natural and anthropogenic or of biogenic and anthropogenic and emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e6344">For the sodium-chloride-rich episode, sodium salt particles accounted for
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of total mass of the single particles. We could show
that the dominating particles were originally sea salt from the Atlantic
Ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km away from the measurement site). These
particles consisted of two classes with different ageing stages. After
1.5–3 d of transport, the original sea salt particles retained strong
chloride signatures, while after 3.5–4 d of transport over the continent
aged sea salt with stronger nitrate signatures and larger size arrived at
the measurement location. In addition, the organonitrate signature peaks at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were stronger for the aged sea salt
particles. According to chamber experiments on OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and/or toluene in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on sodium nitrate seed
particles, we have evidence that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a
signature peak for anthropogenic organics in single-particle mass spectra.
Hence, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 129 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed on sea salt
particles in this study is another indicator for the interaction of
anthropogenic emissions with sea salt particles. Some other
signature peaks, such as 81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 108
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 104 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaClNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 131 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 147 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, have the potential to indicate the degree of
ageing of sea salt particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e6599">For the organic-rich episode, the particulate organic compounds accounted
for (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of total non-refractory particle mass measured by
the AMS. AMS-PMF analysis suggests the dominating OA components were LV-OOA1
and LV-OOA2, contributing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % to
the total OA mass in this episode. LV-OOA1 and LV-OOA2 had positive (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and negative (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) correlations with SV-OOA,
respectively, indicating their local formation. In order to investigate
origin of the aerosols and their transport and transformation processes, we
applied a regional transport model, COSMO-ART. Transport model results
suggest that (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) % of the particulate organic mass calculated
was related to biogenic emissions. With the combination of mass<?pagebreak page13204?> spectrometry
and COSMO-ART modelling, we can confirm that during Friday 26 August, air masses came from an industrial area and the city of Karlsruhe, leading
to high particle numbers (including all the particles with size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm), high particulate organics and secondary inorganics, and high
fractions of aged-biomass-burning and soil-dust-like particles. During
night-time on 26 August, southeasterly winds transported air masses
from Stuttgart via forested areas to the measurement site, resulting in
particles formed by the interaction of anthropogenic and biogenic
precursors. Such air masses flowed into the Rhine valley and also contributed
to the high organic aerosol mass concentrations during the night from
27 to 28 August. In addition, low wind speeds and
temperature inversion limited mixing and supported new particle formation
and growth, partially contributing to higher organic particle masses.</p>
      <p id="d1e6688">Comparing comprehensive field observations with the COSMO-ART model results
showed quite good agreement for trends and most concentration levels for
several aerosol particle compounds and trace gases, even if not all details
could be reproduced by the model. However, the simulated particle numbers
are 10 times less than the observed values. This is mainly due to the fact
that not all new particle formation processes (nucleation mode) are included
in the model (e.g. night-time chemistry and the role of organics or
ammonia). Furthermore, the model underestimates particulate organics by a
factor of 2.3. This discrepancy may be partly explained by an underestimated
regional background, missing sources, or incomplete SOA formation and
growth mechanisms in the current model version. Such field–model
comparisons and corresponding sensitivity tests are useful for targeting
missing sources and mechanisms in the current model and thus help its
development such that the model can be improved to become better predictive,
which is useful for e.g. legislation and the implementation of policies against
air pollution. Consequently, model systems suitable for a reasonable
environmental policy should be validated by comprehensive field studies with
state-of-the-art aerosol analytics and meteorological parameters.</p>
      <p id="d1e6691">As discussed above, we can conclude that factors related to topography,
metrological conditions, local emissions, in situ formation and growth,
regional transport, and the interaction of biogenic and anthropogenic
compounds need to be considered for a comprehensive understanding of aerosol
composition and processing in this region. Our results show how closely the
physical and chemical nature of aerosols is related to emission sources,
transformation processes, and complex transport patterns. The method of
combining field measurement and model calculation in this study can be
widely used in other places in the world in order to investigate the origin
of aerosols and their interaction between transport and transformation: for
example, in some pollution hot spots like the Po Valley, and some other places
which are subject to both biogenic and anthropogenic emissions. It
is also not limited to the summertime during which we studied. Overall, this
study provides good insight into the chemical nature and complex origin of
aerosols in the upper Rhine valley, achieved by combining complementary mass
spectrometry and transport modelling.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="videosupplement"><title>Video supplement</title>

      <p id="d1e6699">Five supporting videos (.gif files) are available at KIT as open data
(<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000094401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5445/IR/1000094401</ext-link>; Shen et al., 2019b).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6705">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13189-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13189-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6714">XS operated LAAPTOF and AMS during the whole field campaign, did the
LAAPTOF data analysis, did COSMO-ART model runs and model output data
analysis, did HYSPLIT back-trajectory analysis, did further analysis for AMS
data, produced all figures, and wrote the paper. HS organized the
campaign, provided trace gas, meteorology, and particle measurements, and provided suggestions for the data analysis, interpretation, and discussion. HV
and BV provided the input data for the COSMO-ART model and provided suggestions
for the model simulation, the model data analysis, interpretation, and
discussion. WH operated AMS during the whole campaign and did basic AMS
data analysis as well as PMF analysis. CM helped to operate the
instruments, did black carbon data analysis, and provided suggestions for
the data analysis, interpretation, and discussion. RR helped to operate
LAAPTOF. ASHP gave comments for the interpretation of black carbon data.
TL gave general advice and comments for this paper. All authors
contributed to the final text.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6720">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6726">The authors gratefully thank the IMK-AAF AIDA staff and IMK-TRO modellers at
KIT for helpful discussions and technical support, as well as the China Scholarship
Council (CSC) for financial support of Xiaoli Shen and Wei Huang. Special
thanks go to
the Albtal-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft (AVG) for providing power and the
measurement location near the tramline and to Norbert Kalthoff's group for
providing tower data. In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge the NOAA
Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for provision of the HYSPLIT transport and
dispersion model and the READY website (<uri>http://www.ready.noaa.gov</uri>).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6734">The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by a Research Centre of the Helmholtz Association.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6740">This paper was edited by Eleanor Browne and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Bower, K. N., Coe, H., Boudries, H., Jayne, J. T.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Millet, D. B., Goldstein, A. H., Quinn, P. K., Weber, R.
J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Submicron aerosol composition at Trinidad Head,
California, during ITCT 2K2: Its relationship with gas phase volatile
organic carbon and assessment of instrument performance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D23S24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004208</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Backes, A., Aulinger, A., Bieser, J., Matthias, V., and Quante, M.: Ammonia
emissions in Europe, part I: Development of a dynamical ammonia emission
inventory, Atmos. Environ., 131, 55–66, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baklanov, A., Schlünzen, K., Suppan, P., Baldasano, J., Brunner, D., Aksoyoglu, S., Carmichael, G., Douros, J., Flemming, J., Forkel, R., Galmarini, S., Gauss, M., Grell, G., Hirtl, M., Joffre, S., Jorba, O., Kaas, E., Kaasik, M., Kallos, G., Kong, X., Korsholm, U., Kurganskiy, A., Kushta, J., Lohmann, U., Mahura, A., Manders-Groot, A., Maurizi, A., Moussiopoulos, N., Rao, S. T., Savage, N., Seigneur, C., Sokhi, R. S., Solazzo, E., Solomos, S., Sørensen, B., Tsegas, G., Vignati, E., Vogel, B., and Zhang, Y.: Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current status and prospects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 317–398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-317-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-317-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bangert, M., Kottmeier, C., Vogel, B., and Vogel, H.: Regional scale effects of the aerosol cloud interaction simulated with an online coupled comprehensive chemistry model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4411–4423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4411-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4411-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bieser, J., Aulinger, A., Matthias, V., Quante, M., and Builtjes, P.: SMOKE for Europe – adaptation, modification and evaluation of a comprehensive emission model for Europe, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 47–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-47-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-47-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Burkholder, J. B., Abbate, J. P. D., Barnes, I., Roberts, J. M., Melamed, M.
L., Ammann, M., Bertram, A. K., Cappa, C. D., Carlton, A. G., Carpenter, L.
J., Crowley, J. N., Dubowski, Y., Georges, C., Heard, D. E., Herrmann, H.,
Keutsch, F. N., Kroll, J. H., McNeill, V. F., Ng, N. L., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
Orlando, J. J., Percival, C. J., Picquet-Varrault, B., Rudich, Y., Seakins,
P. W., Surratt, J. D., Tanimoto, H., Thornton, J. A., Tong, Z., Tyndall, G.
S., Wahner, A., Weschler, C. J., Wilson, K. R., and Ziemann, P. J.: The
Essential Role for Laboratory Studies in Atmospheric Chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2519–2528, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia,
A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb,
C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical
characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3649–3661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6993–7002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D., Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo, P. F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R., Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski, S., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25 AMS data sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source apportionment approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner, M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E., Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W., Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Daellenbach, K. R., Stefenelli, G., Bozzetti, C., Vlachou, A., Fermo, P., Gonzalez, R., Piazzalunga, A., Colombi, C., Canonaco, F., Hueglin, C., Kasper-Giebl, A., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Bianchi, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Long-term chemical analysis and organic aerosol source apportionment at nine sites in central Europe: source identification and uncertainty assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13265–13282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13265-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-13265-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J., Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J.
H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass
spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfate<?pagebreak page13206?>s and implications for
atmospheric chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward reduced representation of
mixing state for simulating aerosol effects on climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
98, 971–980, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fuzzi, S., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K., Decesari, S., Denier van der Gon, H., Facchini, M. C., Fowler, D., Koren, I., Langford, B., Lohmann, U., Nemitz, E., Pandis, S., Riipinen, I., Rudich, Y., Schaap, M., Slowik, J. G., Spracklen, D. V., Vignati, E., Wild, M., Williams, M., and Gilardoni, S.: Particulate matter, air quality and climate: lessons learned and future needs, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8217–8299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8217-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8217-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gard, E. E., Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O.,
Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Dienes, T., Galli, M. E., Johnson, R. J.,
Cass, G. R., and Prather, K. A.: Direct observation of heterogeneous
chemistry in the atmosphere, Science, 279, 1184–1187, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gemayel, R., Hellebust, S., Temime-Roussel, B., Hayeck, N., Van Elteren, J. T., Wortham, H., and Gligorovski, S.: The performance and the characterization of laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LAAP-ToF-MS), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1947–1959, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gemayel, R., Temime-Roussel, B., Hayeck, N., Gandolfo, A., Hellebust, S.,
Gligorovski, S., and Wortham, H.: Development of an analytical methodology
for obtaining quantitative mass concentrations from LAAP-ToF-MS
measurements, Talanta, 174, 715–724, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gross, G. and Wippermann, F.: Channeling and Countercurrent in the Upper
Rhine Valley – Numerical Simulations, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 26, 1293–1304,
1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gunsch, M. J., May, N. W., Wen, M., Bottenus, C. L. H., Gardner, D. J., VanReken, T. M., Bertman, S. B., Hopke, P. K., Ault, A. P., and Pratt, K. A.: Ubiquitous influence of wildfire emissions and secondary organic aerosol on summertime atmospheric aerosol in the forested Great Lakes region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3701–3715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3701-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3701-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hagemann, R., Corsmeier, U., Kottmeier, C., Rinke, R., Wieser, A., and
Vogel, B.: Spatial variability of particle number concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the Karlsruhe (Germany) area obtained with the mobile laboratory
“AERO-TRAM”, Atmos. Environ., 94, 341–352, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Healy, R. M., Sciare, J., Poulain, L., Crippa, M., Wiedensohler, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., Sarda-Estève, R., McGuire, M. L., Jeong, C.-H., McGillicuddy, E., O'Connor, I. P., Sodeau, J. R., Evans, G. J., and Wenger, J. C.: Quantitative determination of carbonaceous particle mixing state in Paris using single-particle mass spectrometer and aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9479–9496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9479-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9479-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Herich, H., Hueglin, C., and Buchmann, B.: A 2.5 year's source apportionment study of black carbon from wood burning and fossil fuel combustion at urban and rural sites in Switzerland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1409–1420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1409-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1409-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Huang, D. D., Li, Y. J., Lee, B. P., and Chan, C. K.: Analysis of Organic
Sulfur Compounds in Atmospheric Aerosols at the HKUST Supersite in Hong Kong
Using HR-ToF-AMS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3672–3679, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X. L., Ramakrishna, R., Leisner, T., and
Mohr, C.: Chemical characterization of highly functionalized organonitrates
contributing to high night-time organic aerosol mass loadings and particle
growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1165–1174, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hudson, P. K., Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Warneke, C., Holloway, J., Jost, J. R., and Hubler, G.: Biomass-burning
particle measurements: Characteristic composition and chemical processing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D23S27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004398</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.
K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jeong, C.-H., McGuire, M. L., Godri, K. J., Slowik, J. G., Rehbein, P. J. G., and Evans, G. J.: Quantification of aerosol chemical composition using continuous single particle measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7027–7044, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7027-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7027-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kalthoff, N. and Vogel, B.: Countercurrent and Channeling Effect under
Stable Stratification in the Area of Karlsruhe, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 45,
113–126, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mensah, A. A., Friese, E., Topping, D., Nemitz, E.,
Prevot, A. S. H., Aijala, M., Allan, J., Canonaco, F., Canagaratna, M.,
Carbone, S., Crippa, M., Dall Osto, M., Day, D. A., De Carlo, P., Di Marco,
C. F., Elbern, H., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hao, L., Herrmann, H.,
Hildebrandt, L., Hillamo, R., Jimenez, J. L., Laaksonen, A., McFiggans, G.,
Mohr, C., O'Dowd, C., Otjes, R., Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Poulain,
L., Schlag, P., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Vermeulen, A.,
Wahner, A., Worsnop, D., and Wu, H. C.: Ubiquity of organic nitrates from
nighttime chemistry in the European submicron aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
7735–7744, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knote, C., Brunner, D., Vogel, H., Allan, J., Asmi, A., Äijälä, M., Carbone, S., van der Gon, H. D., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mohr, C., Poulain, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Swietlicki, E., and Vogel, B.: Towards an online-coupled chemistry-climate model: evaluation of trace gases and aerosols in COSMO-ART, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 1077–1102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1077-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-1077-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marsden, N., Flynn, M. J., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage geometry on optical detection efficiency in <?pagebreak page13207?>a single-particle mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6051–6068, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies for the aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer using field data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Slowik, J. G., Richter, R., Reche, C., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Seco, R., Peñuelas, J., Jiménez, J. L., Crippa, M., Zimmermann, R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification and quantification of organic aerosol from cooking and other sources in Barcelona using aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1649–1665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M.: The design of single particle laser mass spectrometers, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 150–165, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P.: Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor
analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 37, 23–35, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive Matrix Factorization – a Nonnegative
Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error-Estimates of Data Values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peck, J., Gonzalez, L. A., Williams, L. R., Xu, W., Croteau, P. L., Timko,
M. T., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Miake-Lye, R. C., and Smith, K. A.:
Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer lens system for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 781–789, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric aerosols: Composition, transformation, climate
and health effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 44, 7520–7540, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramisetty, R., Abdelmonem, A., Shen, X., Saathoff, H., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.: Exploring femtosecond laser ablation in single-particle aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4345–4360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4345-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-4345-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reilly, P. T. A., Lazar, A. C., Gieray, R. A., Whitten, W. B., and Ramsey, J. M.: The elucidation of charge-transfer-induced matrix effects in environmental aerosols via real-time aerosol mass spectral analysis of individual airborne particles, Aerosol. Sci. Tech., 33, 135–152, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V.: Ion formation mechanism in laser desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles, J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectr., 19, 389–399, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reitz, P., Zorn, S. R., Trimborn, S. H., and Trimborn, A. M.: A new,
powerful technique to analyze single particle aerosol mass spectra using a
combination of OPTICS and the fuzzy c-means algorithm, J. Aerosol Sci., 98,
1–14, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications
and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Modell. Softw., 95, 210–228, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From
air pollution to climate change, Wiley, J &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New
Jersey, USA, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Mohr, C., Huang, W., Leisner, T., and Saathoff, H.: Laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LAAPTOF): performance, reference spectra and classification of atmospheric samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2325–2343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shen, X., Saathoff, H., Huang, W., Mohr, C., Ramisetty, R., and Leisner, T.: Understanding atmospheric aerosol particles with improved particle identification and quantification by single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2219–2240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2219-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-2219-2019</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shen, X., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., and Saathoff, H.: Modelling Aerosols in the upper Rhine valley for August 2016, KITopen, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000094401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5445/IR/1000094401</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stanelle, T., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Bäumer, D., and Kottmeier, C.: Feedback between dust particles and atmospheric processes over West Africa during dust episodes in March 2006 and June 2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10771–10788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10771-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10771-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: Noaa's Hysplit Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tsigaridis, K., Krol, M., Dentener, F. J., Balkanski, Y., Lathière, J., Metzger, S., Hauglustaine, D. A., and Kanakidou, M.: Change in global aerosol composition since preindustrial times, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5143–5162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5143-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5143-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Gross, B., and Wippermann, F.: Mesoklip (1st Special Observation
Period) – Observations and Numerical-Simulation – a Comparison, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 35, 83–102, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Fiedler, F., and Vogel, H.: Influence of Topography and Biogenic
Volatile Organic-Compounds Emission in the State of Baden-Wurttemberg on
Ozone Concentrations during Episodes of High Air Temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 22907–22928, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Bäumer, D., Bangert, M., Lundgren, K., Rinke, R., and Stanelle, T.: The comprehensive model system COSMO-ART – Radiative impact of aerosol on the state of the atmosphere on the regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8661–8680, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Wang, H. T., Li, X. J., Li, Y., Wen, J., Zhang, J. S., Shi, X. R.,
Li, M., Wang, W., Shi, G. L., and Feng, Y. C.: Refined source apportionment
of coal combustion sources by using single particle mass spectrometry, Sci. Total Environ., 627, 633–646, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zenobi, R. and Knochenmuss, R.: Ion formation in MALDI mass spectrometry, Mass. Spectrom. Rev., 17, 337–366, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case study
of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3213–3219, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y. L.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols
via factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401, 3045–3067, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y., Huang, X. H. H., Griffith, S. M., Li, M., Li, L., Zhou, Z., Wu,
C., Meng, J. W., Chan, C. K., Louie, P. K. K., and Yu, J. Z.: A field
measurement based scaling approach for quantification of major ions, organic
carbon, and elemental carbon using a single particle aerosol mass
spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 143, 300–312, 2016.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zotter, P., Herich, H., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., Zhang, Y., Močnik, G., Hüglin, C., Baltensperger, U., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Evaluation of the absorption Ångström exponents for traffic and wood burning in the Aethalometer-based source apportionment using radiocarbon measurements of ambient aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4229–4249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Composition and origin of PM<sub>2.5</sub> aerosol particles in the upper Rhine valley in summer</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>We conducted a 6-week measurement campaign in summer 2016 at a
rural site about 11&thinsp;km north of the city of Karlsruhe in southwest Germany
in order to study the chemical composition and origin of aerosols in the
upper Rhine valley. In particular, we deployed a single-particle mass
spectrometer (LAAPTOF) and an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) to provide
complementary chemical information on aerosol particles smaller than 2.5&thinsp;µm. For the entire measurement period, the total aerosol particle
mass was dominated by sodium salts, contributing on average (36±27)&thinsp;% to the total single particles measured by the LAAPTOF. The total
particulate organic compounds, sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium contributed on
average (58±12)&thinsp;%, (22±7)&thinsp;%, (10±1)&thinsp;%, and
(9±3)&thinsp;% to the total non-refractory particle mass measured by the
AMS. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis for the AMS data suggests
that the total organic aerosol (OA) consisted of five components, including
(9±7)&thinsp;% hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA), (16±11)&thinsp;%
semi-volatile oxygenated OA (SV-OOA), and (75±15)&thinsp;%
low-volatility oxygenated OA (LV-OOA). The regional transport model
COSMO-ART was applied for source apportionment and to achieve a better
understanding of the impact of complex transport patterns on the field
observations. Combining field observations and model simulations, we
attributed high particle numbers and SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations observed at
this rural site to industrial emissions from power plants and a refinery in
Karlsruhe. In addition, two characteristic episodes with aerosol particle
mass dominated by sodium salts particles comprising (70±24)&thinsp;%
of the total single particles and organic compounds accounting
for (77±6)&thinsp;% of total non-refractory species, respectively, were
investigated in detail. For the first episode, we identified relatively
fresh and aged sea salt particles originating from the Atlantic Ocean more
than 800&thinsp;km away. These particles showed markers like <i>m</i>∕<i>z</i> 129
C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>7</sub>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup>, indicating the influence of anthropogenic
emissions modifying their composition, e.g. from chloride to nitrate salts
during the long-range transport. For a 3&thinsp;d episode including high organic
mass concentrations, model simulations show that on average (74±7)&thinsp;% of the particulate organics at this site were of biogenic origin.
Detailed model analysis allowed us to find out that three subsequent peaks
of high organic mass concentrations originated from different sources,
including local emissions from the city and industrial area of Karlsruhe,
regional transport from the city of Stuttgart ( ∼ 64&thinsp;km away),
and potential local night-time formation and growth. Biogenic (forest) and
anthropogenic (urban) emissions were mixed during transport and contributed
to the formation of organic particles. In addition, topography, temperature
inversion, and stagnant meteorological conditions also played a role in the
build-up of higher organic particle mass concentrations. Furthermore, the
model was evaluated using field observations and corresponding
sensitivity tests. The model results show good agreement with trends and
concentrations observed for several trace gases (e.g. O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>,
and SO<sub>2</sub>) and aerosol particle compounds (e.g. ammonium and nitrate).
However, the model underestimates the number of particles by an order of
magnitude and underestimates the mass of organic particles by a factor of
2.3. The discrepancy was expected for particle number since the model does
not include all nucleation processes. The missing organic mass indicates
either an underestimated regional background or missing sources and/or
mechanisms in the model, like night-time chemistry. This study demonstrates
the potential of combining comprehensive field observations with dedicated
transport modelling to understand the chemical composition and complex
origin of aerosols.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Bower, K. N., Coe, H., Boudries, H., Jayne, J. T.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Millet, D. B., Goldstein, A. H., Quinn, P. K., Weber, R.
J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Submicron aerosol composition at Trinidad Head,
California, during ITCT 2K2: Its relationship with gas phase volatile
organic carbon and assessment of instrument performance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D23S24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004208</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Backes, A., Aulinger, A., Bieser, J., Matthias, V., and Quante, M.: Ammonia
emissions in Europe, part I: Development of a dynamical ammonia emission
inventory, Atmos. Environ., 131, 55–66, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baklanov, A., Schlünzen, K., Suppan, P., Baldasano, J., Brunner, D., Aksoyoglu, S., Carmichael, G., Douros, J., Flemming, J., Forkel, R., Galmarini, S., Gauss, M., Grell, G., Hirtl, M., Joffre, S., Jorba, O., Kaas, E., Kaasik, M., Kallos, G., Kong, X., Korsholm, U., Kurganskiy, A., Kushta, J., Lohmann, U., Mahura, A., Manders-Groot, A., Maurizi, A., Moussiopoulos, N., Rao, S. T., Savage, N., Seigneur, C., Sokhi, R. S., Solazzo, E., Solomos, S., Sørensen, B., Tsegas, G., Vignati, E., Vogel, B., and Zhang, Y.: Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current status and prospects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 317–398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-317-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-317-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bangert, M., Kottmeier, C., Vogel, B., and Vogel, H.: Regional scale effects of the aerosol cloud interaction simulated with an online coupled comprehensive chemistry model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4411–4423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4411-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4411-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bieser, J., Aulinger, A., Matthias, V., Quante, M., and Builtjes, P.: SMOKE for Europe – adaptation, modification and evaluation of a comprehensive emission model for Europe, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 47–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-47-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-47-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Burkholder, J. B., Abbate, J. P. D., Barnes, I., Roberts, J. M., Melamed, M.
L., Ammann, M., Bertram, A. K., Cappa, C. D., Carlton, A. G., Carpenter, L.
J., Crowley, J. N., Dubowski, Y., Georges, C., Heard, D. E., Herrmann, H.,
Keutsch, F. N., Kroll, J. H., McNeill, V. F., Ng, N. L., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
Orlando, J. J., Percival, C. J., Picquet-Varrault, B., Rudich, Y., Seakins,
P. W., Surratt, J. D., Tanimoto, H., Thornton, J. A., Tong, Z., Tyndall, G.
S., Wahner, A., Weschler, C. J., Wilson, K. R., and Ziemann, P. J.: The
Essential Role for Laboratory Studies in Atmospheric Chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2519–2528, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia,
A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb,
C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical
characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3649–3661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6993–7002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D., Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo, P. F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R., Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski, S., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25 AMS data sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source apportionment approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner, M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E., Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W., Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Daellenbach, K. R., Stefenelli, G., Bozzetti, C., Vlachou, A., Fermo, P., Gonzalez, R., Piazzalunga, A., Colombi, C., Canonaco, F., Hueglin, C., Kasper-Giebl, A., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Bianchi, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Long-term chemical analysis and organic aerosol source apportionment at nine sites in central Europe: source identification and uncertainty assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13265–13282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13265-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13265-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J., Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J.
H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass
spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for
atmospheric chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward reduced representation of
mixing state for simulating aerosol effects on climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
98, 971–980, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fuzzi, S., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K., Decesari, S., Denier van der Gon, H., Facchini, M. C., Fowler, D., Koren, I., Langford, B., Lohmann, U., Nemitz, E., Pandis, S., Riipinen, I., Rudich, Y., Schaap, M., Slowik, J. G., Spracklen, D. V., Vignati, E., Wild, M., Williams, M., and Gilardoni, S.: Particulate matter, air quality and climate: lessons learned and future needs, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8217–8299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8217-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8217-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gard, E. E., Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O.,
Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Dienes, T., Galli, M. E., Johnson, R. J.,
Cass, G. R., and Prather, K. A.: Direct observation of heterogeneous
chemistry in the atmosphere, Science, 279, 1184–1187, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gemayel, R., Hellebust, S., Temime-Roussel, B., Hayeck, N., Van Elteren, J. T., Wortham, H., and Gligorovski, S.: The performance and the characterization of laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LAAP-ToF-MS), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1947–1959, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gemayel, R., Temime-Roussel, B., Hayeck, N., Gandolfo, A., Hellebust, S.,
Gligorovski, S., and Wortham, H.: Development of an analytical methodology
for obtaining quantitative mass concentrations from LAAP-ToF-MS
measurements, Talanta, 174, 715–724, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gross, G. and Wippermann, F.: Channeling and Countercurrent in the Upper
Rhine Valley – Numerical Simulations, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 26, 1293–1304,
1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gunsch, M. J., May, N. W., Wen, M., Bottenus, C. L. H., Gardner, D. J., VanReken, T. M., Bertman, S. B., Hopke, P. K., Ault, A. P., and Pratt, K. A.: Ubiquitous influence of wildfire emissions and secondary organic aerosol on summertime atmospheric aerosol in the forested Great Lakes region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3701–3715, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3701-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3701-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hagemann, R., Corsmeier, U., Kottmeier, C., Rinke, R., Wieser, A., and
Vogel, B.: Spatial variability of particle number concentrations and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in
the Karlsruhe (Germany) area obtained with the mobile laboratory
“AERO-TRAM”, Atmos. Environ., 94, 341–352, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Healy, R. M., Sciare, J., Poulain, L., Crippa, M., Wiedensohler, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., Sarda-Estève, R., McGuire, M. L., Jeong, C.-H., McGillicuddy, E., O'Connor, I. P., Sodeau, J. R., Evans, G. J., and Wenger, J. C.: Quantitative determination of carbonaceous particle mixing state in Paris using single-particle mass spectrometer and aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9479–9496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9479-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9479-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Herich, H., Hueglin, C., and Buchmann, B.: A 2.5 year's source apportionment study of black carbon from wood burning and fossil fuel combustion at urban and rural sites in Switzerland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1409–1420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1409-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1409-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, D. D., Li, Y. J., Lee, B. P., and Chan, C. K.: Analysis of Organic
Sulfur Compounds in Atmospheric Aerosols at the HKUST Supersite in Hong Kong
Using HR-ToF-AMS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3672–3679, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X. L., Ramakrishna, R., Leisner, T., and
Mohr, C.: Chemical characterization of highly functionalized organonitrates
contributing to high night-time organic aerosol mass loadings and particle
growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1165–1174, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, P. K., Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Warneke, C., Holloway, J., Jost, J. R., and Hubler, G.: Biomass-burning
particle measurements: Characteristic composition and chemical processing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D23S27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004398</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.
K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, C.-H., McGuire, M. L., Godri, K. J., Slowik, J. G., Rehbein, P. J. G., and Evans, G. J.: Quantification of aerosol chemical composition using continuous single particle measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7027–7044, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7027-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7027-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kalthoff, N. and Vogel, B.: Countercurrent and Channeling Effect under
Stable Stratification in the Area of Karlsruhe, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 45,
113–126, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mensah, A. A., Friese, E., Topping, D., Nemitz, E.,
Prevot, A. S. H., Aijala, M., Allan, J., Canonaco, F., Canagaratna, M.,
Carbone, S., Crippa, M., Dall Osto, M., Day, D. A., De Carlo, P., Di Marco,
C. F., Elbern, H., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hao, L., Herrmann, H.,
Hildebrandt, L., Hillamo, R., Jimenez, J. L., Laaksonen, A., McFiggans, G.,
Mohr, C., O'Dowd, C., Otjes, R., Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Poulain,
L., Schlag, P., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Vermeulen, A.,
Wahner, A., Worsnop, D., and Wu, H. C.: Ubiquity of organic nitrates from
nighttime chemistry in the European submicron aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
7735–7744, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Knote, C., Brunner, D., Vogel, H., Allan, J., Asmi, A., Äijälä, M., Carbone, S., van der Gon, H. D., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mohr, C., Poulain, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Swietlicki, E., and Vogel, B.: Towards an online-coupled chemistry-climate model: evaluation of trace gases and aerosols in COSMO-ART, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 1077–1102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1077-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1077-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Marsden, N., Flynn, M. J., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.: Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage geometry on optical detection efficiency in a single-particle mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6051–6068, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies for the aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer using field data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Slowik, J. G., Richter, R., Reche, C., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Seco, R., Peñuelas, J., Jiménez, J. L., Crippa, M., Zimmermann, R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification and quantification of organic aerosol from cooking and other sources in Barcelona using aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1649–1665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M.: The design of single particle laser mass spectrometers, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 150–165, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P.: Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor
analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 37, 23–35, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive Matrix Factorization – a Nonnegative
Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error-Estimates of Data Values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Peck, J., Gonzalez, L. A., Williams, L. R., Xu, W., Croteau, P. L., Timko,
M. T., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Miake-Lye, R. C., and Smith, K. A.:
Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer lens system for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 781–789, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric aerosols: Composition, transformation, climate
and health effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 44, 7520–7540, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Ramisetty, R., Abdelmonem, A., Shen, X., Saathoff, H., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.: Exploring femtosecond laser ablation in single-particle aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4345–4360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4345-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4345-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Reilly, P. T. A., Lazar, A. C., Gieray, R. A., Whitten, W. B., and Ramsey, J. M.: The elucidation of charge-transfer-induced matrix effects in environmental aerosols via real-time aerosol mass spectral analysis of individual airborne particles, Aerosol. Sci. Tech., 33, 135–152, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V.: Ion formation mechanism in laser desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles, J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectr., 19, 389–399, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Reitz, P., Zorn, S. R., Trimborn, S. H., and Trimborn, A. M.: A new,
powerful technique to analyze single particle aerosol mass spectra using a
combination of OPTICS and the fuzzy c-means algorithm, J. Aerosol Sci., 98,
1–14, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications
and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Modell. Softw., 95, 210–228, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From
air pollution to climate change, Wiley, J &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New
Jersey, USA, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Mohr, C., Huang, W., Leisner, T., and Saathoff, H.: Laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LAAPTOF): performance, reference spectra and classification of atmospheric samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2325–2343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2325-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, X., Saathoff, H., Huang, W., Mohr, C., Ramisetty, R., and Leisner, T.: Understanding atmospheric aerosol particles with improved particle identification and quantification by single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2219–2240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2219-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2219-2019</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, X., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., and Saathoff, H.: Modelling Aerosols in the upper Rhine valley for August 2016, KITopen, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000094401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000094401</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Stanelle, T., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Bäumer, D., and Kottmeier, C.: Feedback between dust particles and atmospheric processes over West Africa during dust episodes in March 2006 and June 2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10771–10788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10771-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10771-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: Noaa's Hysplit Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Tsigaridis, K., Krol, M., Dentener, F. J., Balkanski, Y., Lathière, J., Metzger, S., Hauglustaine, D. A., and Kanakidou, M.: Change in global aerosol composition since preindustrial times, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5143–5162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5143-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5143-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Gross, B., and Wippermann, F.: Mesoklip (1st Special Observation
Period) – Observations and Numerical-Simulation – a Comparison, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 35, 83–102, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Fiedler, F., and Vogel, H.: Influence of Topography and Biogenic
Volatile Organic-Compounds Emission in the State of Baden-Wurttemberg on
Ozone Concentrations during Episodes of High Air Temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 22907–22928, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Bäumer, D., Bangert, M., Lundgren, K., Rinke, R., and Stanelle, T.: The comprehensive model system COSMO-ART – Radiative impact of aerosol on the state of the atmosphere on the regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8661–8680, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Wang, H. T., Li, X. J., Li, Y., Wen, J., Zhang, J. S., Shi, X. R.,
Li, M., Wang, W., Shi, G. L., and Feng, Y. C.: Refined source apportionment
of coal combustion sources by using single particle mass spectrometry, Sci. Total Environ., 627, 633–646, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Zenobi, R. and Knochenmuss, R.: Ion formation in MALDI mass spectrometry, Mass. Spectrom. Rev., 17, 337–366, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case study
of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3213–3219, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y. L.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols
via factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401, 3045–3067, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y., Huang, X. H. H., Griffith, S. M., Li, M., Li, L., Zhou, Z., Wu,
C., Meng, J. W., Chan, C. K., Louie, P. K. K., and Yu, J. Z.: A field
measurement based scaling approach for quantification of major ions, organic
carbon, and elemental carbon using a single particle aerosol mass
spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 143, 300–312, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zotter, P., Herich, H., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., Zhang, Y., Močnik, G., Hüglin, C., Baltensperger, U., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Evaluation of the absorption Ångström exponents for traffic and wood burning in the Aethalometer-based source apportionment using radiocarbon measurements of ambient aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4229–4249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4229-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
