<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-13053-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Chemical composition of ultrafine aerosol particles in central Amazonia
during the wet season</article-title><alt-title>Ultrafine particle composition in central Amazonia</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ultrafine particle composition in central Amazonia}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H. S. Glicker et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Glicker</surname><given-names>Hayley S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lawler</surname><given-names>Michael J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-6629</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ortega</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>de Sá</surname><given-names>Suzane S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Scot T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Artaxo</surname><given-names>Paulo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-3036</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Vega Bustillos</surname><given-names>Oscar</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>de Souza</surname><given-names>Rodrigo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0838-3723</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Tota</surname><given-names>Julio</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Carlton</surname><given-names>Annmarie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8574-1507</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>James N.</given-names></name>
          <email>jimsmith@uci.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4677-8224</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão
1371, 05508-090, São Paulo, SP, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Chemistry and Environment Center, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, 05508-000, São Paulo, SP,
Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Meteorology Department, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, 69050-020, Manaus, AM, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Institute of Engineering and Geoscience, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, 68035-110, Santarém, PA, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">James N. Smith (jimsmith@uci.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>13053</fpage><lpage>13066</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e213">Central Amazonia serves as an ideal location to study
atmospheric particle formation, since it often represents nearly natural,
pre-industrial conditions but can also experience periods of anthropogenic
influence due to the presence of emissions from large metropolitan areas
like Manaus, Brazil. Ultrafine (sub-100 nm diameter) particles are often
observed in this region, although new particle formation events seldom occur
near the ground despite being readily observed in other forested regions
with similar emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This study focuses on
identifying the chemical composition of ultrafine particles as a means of
determining the chemical species and mechanisms that may be responsible for
new particle formation and growth in the region. These measurements were
performed during the wet season as part of the Observations and
Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5) field campaign
at a site located 70 km southwest of Manaus. A thermal desorption chemical
ionization mass spectrometer (TDCIMS) characterized the most abundant
compounds detected in ultrafine particles. Two time periods representing
distinct influences on aerosol composition, which we label as
“anthropogenic” and “background” periods, were studied as part of a
larger 10 d period of analysis. Higher particle number concentrations
were measured during the anthropogenic period, and modeled back-trajectory
frequencies indicate transport of emissions from the Manaus metropolitan
area. During the background period there were much lower number
concentrations, and back-trajectory frequencies showed that air masses
arrived at the site predominantly from the forested regions to the north and
northeast. TDCIMS-measured constituents also show distinct differences
between the two observational periods. Although bisulfate was detected in
particles throughout the 10 d period, the anthropogenic period had higher
levels of particulate bisulfate overall. Ammonium and trimethyl ammonium
were positively correlated with bisulfate. The background period had
distinct diurnal patterns of particulate cyanate and acetate, while oxalate
remained relatively constant during the 10 d period. 3-Methylfuran, a
thermal decomposition product of a particulate-phase isoprene epoxydiol
(IEPOX), was the dominant species measured in the positive-ion mode.
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the TDCIMS-measured ion
abundance and aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) mass concentration data. Two
different hierarchical clusters representing unique influences arise: one
comprising ultrafine particulate acetate, hydrogen oxalate, cyanate,
trimethyl ammonium and 3-methylfuran and another made up of ultrafine
particulate bisulfate, chloride, ammonium and potassium. A third cluster
separated AMS-measured species from the two TDCIMS-derived clusters,
indicating different sources or processes in ultrafine aerosol<?pagebreak page13054?> particle
formation compared to larger submicron-sized particles.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e225">Atmospheric aerosols are ubiquitous in the troposphere, and organics
contribute a large fraction to their chemical composition (Jimenez
et al., 2009). Models continue to have difficulty estimating the organic
contribution to aerosols in regions with both biogenic and anthropogenic
influence (Shrivastava et
al., 2017). Anthropogenic emissions have increased with global population,
and the resulting influences of such emissions on secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) formation continue to be assessed (Hofmann, 2015). The
reactive chemistry of organics in the presence of different regulating
species from urban sources, like sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and oxides of
nitrogen, remains uncertain (Shrivastava et al., 2017),
although recent efforts have successfully incorporated this chemistry into
air quality models simulated for the southeastern United States
(Carlton et al., 2018). Models are
unable to predict the relationships between particle physicochemical
properties and cloud formation and precipitation (IPCC,
2013). Reducing this uncertainty requires an understanding of the mechanisms
by which particles form and grow in the atmosphere, which mostly determine
the potential of these particles to serve as cloud condensation nuclei
(CCN).</p>
      <p id="d1e239">The Amazon Basin is an ideal location to study how biogenic emissions,
anthropogenic trace gases and oxidants, and biomass burning impact the
number and composition of atmospheric aerosol particles. The Amazon Basin is
one of the few remaining tropical regions on Earth in which near-natural
conditions, free of direct anthropogenic influence, can be found. It has
been referred to as the “Green Ocean”, since particle concentrations can
be as low as those seen over the ocean, and, like the marine atmosphere, small
changes in particle properties can have a major impact on clouds and climate
(Andreae et al., 2004). While
isoprene is the most abundantly emitted biogenic volatile organic compound
(BVOC), monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes are observed in amounts potentially
sufficient for influencing particle composition (Alves
et al., 2016; Jardine et al., 2011, 2015; Yáñez-Serrano et al.,
2015; Yee et al., 2018). While on an annual basis, aerosol particle sources
in the Amazon Basin are dominated by the oxidation of BVOCs by OH and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in many parts of the Amazon, anthropogenic emissions of trace gases
and oxidants, as well as human-caused biomass burning, can have a
significant impact on shorter timescales (Martin
et al., 2010; de Sá et al., 2017, 2019). Biomass-burning events, both
for land clearing as well as pasture and cropland maintenance, can produce
particles at high number and mass concentrations. Increased urbanization in
the Amazon, for example in the city of Manaus, Brazil, with a 2017 population
of 2.1 million, represents a large emission source of both gases and
particles and has led to increased regional transportation infrastructure
and resulting increases in oxides of nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; IBGE, 2017).
The latter will have important implications on the reactive pathways of
BVOCs and the formation of SOA (de Sá et al.,
2018). With the opportunity to observe aerosol particles under pristine
conditions, combined with the presence of growing urban centers and
increased land use change that represent significant regional sources of
oxidants and other key trace gases, this region presents opportunities for
understanding both past and future drivers of atmospheric chemistry and
climate.</p>
      <p id="d1e264">Aerosol properties in the Amazon Basin show a seasonal dependence,
reflecting seasonal variability in emissions and deposition. During the wet
season (December through March), the region is dominated by natural
emissions, as accumulation-mode (particle diameters between 0.1 and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and coarse-mode (diameters above 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) particles tend to
be lower in concentration due to wet deposition (Andreae, 2009). In the wet
season, ambient particle number concentrations often represent pristine,
near-natural concentrations and are in the range of 300–600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Zhou et al., 2002). Previous
measurements of particle number-size distributions in Amazonia during the
wet season show that ultrafine particles are present intermittently, most likely
linked to times of local pollution events, while both Aitken and
the accumulation mode are continuously present (Zhou et al., 2002). While the wet
season episodically experiences high particle number concentrations, the dry
season (June through September) experiences higher number concentrations
most of the time, which can alter cloud microphysics, radiative effects and
the hydrological cycle (Andreae
et al., 2002, 2004; Rcia et al., 2000). While it was previously thought that
particle composition during the dry period is dominated by biomass burning,
recent measurements of submicron particle (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) composition show a
larger influence from BVOCs due to decreased wet deposition, resulting in
positive feedbacks on oxidants and emissions (de Sá et al., 2019).
Seasonal variations in isoprene, sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes have been
measured, with higher mixing ratios in the dry season (Alves
et al., 2016). Additionally, with the lack of rainfall, in-basin pollution
may be more prevalent, especially in areas downwind of cities and
settlements (Martin et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e304">Unlike in other forested regions, particles with a diameter smaller than 30 nm are rarely observed over the Amazon Basin, suggesting that new particle
formation events seldom occur near the ground (Martin et al., 2010). In other regions,
new particle formation has been seen to occur during the daytime under sunny
conditions, suggesting that both boundary layer dynamics and photochemistry
are important factors (Bzdek et al.,
2011). Varanda Rizzo et al. (2018)
recently analyzed 4 years of particle size distributions acquired at the
TT34 tower site located 60 km northwest of Manaus. Regional new particle
formation and growth events were detected in only 3 % of total days
observed, whereas bursts of<?pagebreak page13055?> ultrafine particles that lasted as least an hour
occurred on 28 % of the days. Those “burst events” were equally
likely to occur during the daytime as during the night, and the authors
hypothesized that daytime events were caused by interrupted photochemical
new particle formation, whereas nocturnal events might be due to emissions
and/or fragmentation of primary biological particles. Recent airborne
observations in the Amazon suggest that particle nucleation and growth can
be initiated in the upper troposphere, with upwelling air masses
transporting reactants into the free troposphere and downwelling air masses
transporting aerosol particles and condensable compounds back into the
boundary layer, where particles can continue to grow via condensation and
coagulation (Andreae
et al., 2018; Fan et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2016). Once formed, ultrafine
particles can be key participants in a variety of atmospheric processes. One
example of this is the subject of a recent study by Fan et al. (2018), who have suggested that ultrafine
particles can increase the convective intensity of deep convective clouds.
High concentrations of ultrafine particles, when present with high water
vapor concentrations that are typical in the Amazon atmosphere, can form
high concentrations of small cloud droplets that release latent heat and
thereby result in more powerful updraft velocities.</p>
      <p id="d1e308">While recent research provides some clarity on the origin, transport
and climate impacts of ultrafine particles in the Amazon, very little is
known about the chemical composition of these particles. Globally,
measurements show that a major component of atmospheric ultrafine aerosol is
organic compounds produced from BVOC oxidation (Bzdek
et al., 2011; Riipinen et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2008). Many of these direct measurements of the composition of atmospheric
ultrafine particles have been performed using the thermal desorption
chemical ionization mass spectrometer (TDCIMS; Voisin et al., 2003). For example,
TDCIMS measurements performed outside of Mexico City attribute about 90 %
of the growth of freshly nucleated particles to oxidized organics
(Smith et al., 2008). In the boreal
forest of Finland, the contribution of oxidized organics is close to 100 %,
and an analysis of composition suggests that marine emissions can play an
important role in that process (Lawler et al.,
2018). For the smallest particles measurable by TDCIMS, with diameters from
8 to 10 nm, between 23 % and 47 % of the constituents may be derived from
organic salt formation, a reactive uptake mechanism that requires the
presence of strong bases such as gas-phase amines
(Smith et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e311">Similar to other parts of the world, particles in the Amazon Basin are
typically composed of 70 %–80 % organics by mass in both the fine and coarse
size ranges (Graham et
al., 2003). The composition of ultrafine particles has not been directly
measured, although one study has proposed that the major component could be
oxidized organics that have condensed onto potassium salt-rich primary
particles emitted from active biota (Pöhlker et al., 2012). An understanding
of the origin and chemical composition of ultrafine particles in the Amazon
gives insight into their formation and growth processes. To improve on
modeling the coupling of chemistry and climate in this sensitive region,
incorporating accurate representations of particle formation and growth
processes is required.</p>
      <p id="d1e314">The most recent, and currently the largest, field campaign for studying the
Amazon atmospheric chemistry and cloud processes was the Observations and
Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5) experiment, which took place
outside of Manaus from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015 (Martin et al., 2016). Two
intensive observational periods (IOPs) were carried out during
GoAmazon2014/5, corresponding to wet and dry seasons in 2014. This
paper explores the chemical composition of ultrafine particles observed
by TDCIMS during IOP1, which took place from 1 February to 31 March 2014. Specifically, we focus on 10 consecutive days that experienced air
masses from both remote, primarily forested regions and the
large metropolitan region of Manaus. This study investigates the influence
of anthropogenic and biogenic emissions on the chemical composition of
ultrafine particles in this region, from which one can infer the chemical
processes that led to the formation and growth of ambient ultrafine
particles in this region. The time evolution of select compounds in ambient
ultrafine particles is analyzed, and compared to AMS measurements, using
principal component analysis (PCA) in order to gain additional insights
into the contribution of various emission sources to ultrafine-particle
composition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>T3 site description</title>
      <p id="d1e332">All data presented were collected at the T3 site (3.2133<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 60.5987<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), located 70 km west of Manaus, Brazil, during the GoAmazon2014/5
campaign (Martin et al.,
2016). The T3 site is located within pasture land located 10 km northeast of
Manacapuru, Brazil. The site included the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement
(ARM) Mobile Facility no. 1 (AMF-1), the ARM Mobile Aerosol Observing System
(MAOS), and four modified shipping container laboratories containing
instruments deployed by universities and other research organizations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Thermal desorption chemical ionization mass spectrometry</title>
      <p id="d1e361">Ambient ultrafine-particle composition was characterized using TDCIMS.
TDCIMS is an instrument designed specifically for the measurement of the
molecular composition of size-resolved ultrafine aerosol particles (Smith
et al., 2004; Voisin et al., 2003). In brief, sampled atmospheric particles
are charged by a unipolar charger and are collected via electrostatic
deposition on a platinum (Pt) filament over varying collection times. During
this campaign, collection times were<?pagebreak page13056?> either for 1 h or 30 min,
depending on the anticipated sample mass. A typical sample mass collected on
the filament ranged from 10 to 100 ng. After collection, the filament was
moved into an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source region and
resistively heated to desorb the particulate-phase components. These
desorbed components were chemically ionized and detected using a quadrupole
mass spectrometer (Extrel Corp.). A zero-air generator (Parker Hannifin,
model HPZA-3500) provided the source of reagent ions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3); TDCIMS operation with these ion
chemistries is referred to as either the positive- or negative-ion mode,
respectively. Complete mass spectra of desorbed compounds were obtained at
the beginning of IOP1 (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) to determine ions with the highest ion
abundances. These ions were then measured for the duration of the campaign
by operating the quadrupole mass spectrometer in “selected-ion mode”, in
which the quadrupole mass spectrometer rapidly switched among approximately
12 ions to optimize sensitivity with high temporal resolution.</p>
      <p id="d1e428">Both positive- and negative-ion-mode chemical analyses were performed during
the two IOPs and are publicly available on the campaign data archive
(Smith, 2016). During IOP1, several days of measurements
were impacted by intermittent power outages and brownouts. IOP2 was
characterized by comparatively lower concentrations of ultrafine particles,
which is consistent with prior observations (Martin
et al., 2010; Varanda Rizzo et al., 2018). Because of this, we focus our analysis on
10 consecutive days during IOP1 when instruments were operating
consistently. This period also happened to coincide with the arrival of two
distinct and consecutive air masses, which allows for more accurate
side-by-side comparison of aerosol properties during these periods.</p>
      <p id="d1e431">Ambient particles were sampled through 3 m of Cu tubing with a 0.63 cm inside diameter. The inlet extended 0.5 m above the roof of the
laboratory and was curved downward and covered with a screen to prevent rain
and insects from entering. Ambient particles during GoAmazon2014/5 were not
size-selected prior to collection on the filament because of low ambient
concentrations. The collection process, however, is inherently dependent on
particle mobility (McMurry et al., 2009). In order to
determine the size-dependent collection efficiency, tests were run at the
start of the campaign by generating and collecting ammonium sulfate
particles in the diameter range of 8–90 nm. The size-dependent TDCIMS
sampling collection efficiencies were used to determine the volume mean
diameter and estimated mass of each sample, as described in Smith et al. (2004).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Meteorological data and complementary datasets</title>
      <p id="d1e442">To complement the TDCIMS dataset, high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol
mass spectrometry (AMS; Aerodyne, Inc.) was used to characterize
non-refractory compounds in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the T3 site (ARM, 2018a; de
Sá et al., 2018). A seven-wavelength aethalometer was located at MAOS and
measured black-carbon mass concentration (ARM, 2018b). The
planetary boundary layer height (ARM, 2018c),
determined using the Heffter number method (Heffter, 1980), was
measured at MAOS. A scanning mobility particle sizer (ARM,
2018d) determined the number-size distributions spanning the mobility
diameter range of 10–460 nm. Wind direction, wind speed, relative
humidity, temperature and rainfall were measured at AMF-1 (ARM,
2018e). Six hour back-trajectory frequency simulations were determined for
the time period of interest using the NOAA HYSPLIT transport model, which uses the
GDAS 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> meteorology (Rolph
et al., 2017; Stein et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e471">PCA was performed using the “princomp”
function of the R statistical software package
(R, 2011). A hierarchical cluster analysis was
performed using Ward's averaging method in the “hclust” function in R.
Ward's minimum variance method of hierarchical clustering was used, which
groups species within the same cluster to minimize the total variance
(Wilks, 2011). The purpose of this
analysis is to identify species or groups of species that may have unique
sources, trajectories or other physicochemical characteristics. Cluster
analysis was done for the following TDCIMS negative- and positive-ion-mode
species: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 97), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 and 37), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HC</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 and 41),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 98) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 125). Cluster analysis was also done for
the following AMS species: organic, ammonium, nitrate, sulfate and chloride.
A separate cluster analysis was performed for quality assurance and
demonstrated that the three clusters presented in Sect. 3.3 are
statistically significant and different from one another.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e818">Meteorological data from the T3 site, showing planetary boundary layer height (green), rainfall
(light blue), relative humidity (dark blue), temperature (red), wind direction (purple), wind speed (black)
and total number concentration of sub-100 nm particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; dark green). The highlighted yellow bars
signify daylight hours (10:00–22:00 UTC). The particle number-size distribution contour plot shows
size distribution function (molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for particle sizes between 10  and 400 nm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13053/2019/acp-19-13053-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Meteorological data and classification of air masses</title>
      <p id="d1e866">The 10 consecutive days that are the focus of this study can be
characterized by two distinct air mass types, as determined from
meteorological data and AMS-derived positive matrix factorization (PMF) factors (de Sá et al.,
2018). The first period, referred to as the anthropogenic period, was
from 14 March to mid-morning on 19 March, and the second period, the
background period, was from mid-morning on 19 March to 24 March. The
AMS-derived biomass-burning factor (BBOA), associated with levoglucosan, and
the anthropogenically dominated factor (ADOA), associated with mass fragment 91 or
“91fac” (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), were as much as 3 times larger during
the anthropogenic period than background period (de Sá et al.,
2018). Anthropogenic<?pagebreak page13057?> influence during this campaign, as determined using
ADOA, most strongly resembled cooking emissions. Correlations between
ADOA; cooking emissions; aromatics like benzene, toluene and xylene;
and increased particle counts verify the link to anthropogenic influence
from Manaus (de
Sá et al., 2018). The particle number-size distribution, shown in Fig. 1, for the anthropogenic period saw higher number concentrations of
particles over the diameter range of 10–100 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Particle size
distributions for the background period were comparable to previous
measurements in the Amazon Basin, featuring a bimodal distribution with
peaks at roughly 50 and 150 nm and peak concentrations of approximately
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> particles cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S2; Artaxo
et al., 2013; Gunthe et al., 2009; Pöhlker et al., 2016; Varanda Rizzo et al.,
2018). The average total mass concentration as determined by AMS for the
anthropogenic period was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The T3 site
experienced approximately 4 h of rain on 19 March, ending at about
noon UTC (all times are presented as UTC time, which is 4 h ahead of
local time), and the first and only new particle formation event of this
10 d period was observed. After this event on 19 March, number
concentrations of particles were, on average, much lower than the prior
period. The average total mass
concentration for the background period was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A similar trend in total mass concentration between
background and polluted conditions was observed during the Southern Oxidant
and Aerosol Study (SOAS), where larger particle mass concentrations were
observed during times with polluted air mass influence and, when followed by
a period of rainfall, smaller mass concentrations were observed
(Liu and Russell, 2017). Occasional rainfall was seen
during the background period, resulting in wet deposition of aerosol
particles. Additionally, a back-trajectory analysis, presented next, provides
a more likely reason for these two distinct periods.</p>
      <p id="d1e984">Wind direction data shown in Fig. 1, as well as NOAA HYSPLIT data shown in
Fig. 2, suggest a reason for the two distinct periods. Back trajectories
show that air masses during the anthropogenic period either pass through
Manaus or south of Manaus prior to arrival at the T3 site. During this
period, air masses most frequently passed over the main roadway that
connects Manaus with Manacapuru, a neighboring city with a population of
93 000. Along this<?pagebreak page13058?> roadside are homes, agriculture and brick kilns, all of
which contribute to local gas and particle emissions. In contrast, during
the background period, air masses arrived at the T3 site most frequently
from the northeast and west. Air
masses that were measured at the site typically originated from densely
forested regions northeast to west of Manaus. Less frequent were periods
where air masses reaching the site originated from the east and were influenced
by the Manaus metropolitan area. For example, during the evening of 21 March
there was a period of increased number concentration, and as winds were
quite stagnant at night, it is possible that a local emission source could
have impacted the site during that period. Wind direction on this day
corresponded with air masses arriving to the T3 site from the Manaus area.</p>
      <p id="d1e987">Estimated masses of ultrafine particles sampled by <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>TDCIMS<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> were
determined and compared for the two periods (Fig. S3). During the
anthropogenic period there was no distinct diurnal pattern observed, with an
average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 ng per sample. This lack of a diurnal pattern in
the sampled particles suggests that sources or processes that are
responsible for these particles could have persisted throughout the day and
night or could be from different processes that persisted both day and
night. In contrast to this, the background period has a diurnal peak in
estimated mass collected between 18:00 and 22:00 UTC, with sampled masses of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng per sample. The minimum sample sizes occurred in the early
morning, when averages reached as low as 16 ng per sample. Peaks in collected
mass during the early afternoon could be linked to photochemically produced
sources and appear to be unique to the background period. Assuming that the
background contribution to the mass of particles remains constant between
each time period, the average mass loading of ultrafine particles increased
by a factor of 3 due to anthropogenic influence (Fig. S3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1014">Back-trajectory frequencies performed using HYSPLIT, showing the different air masses that travel to the
T3 site during the anthropogenic period and background period. For each period, 20 trajectories were used to
determine integrated frequencies spanning the 5 d of each period (14–19 March for the anthropogenic and 20–25 March for the background period). Each trajectory duration was 72 h. The color scale indicates the
frequency of which air masses pass over that area, with the warmer color indicating that the area is more frequently passed over.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13053/2019/acp-19-13053-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Ultrafine-particle chemical composition</title>
      <p id="d1e1031">The five most abundant negative ions, as observed in full mass spectra (Fig. S1) taken at the start of the wet season campaign, are attributed to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNO</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cyanate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (acetate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (bisulfate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 97), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (chloride, isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 and 37)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HC</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hydrogen oxalate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89). The six most abundant
positive ions measured were attributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ammonium hydrate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (potassium, isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 and 41),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (trimethyl ammonium, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(protonated 3-methylfuran, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 98) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 125). We will refer to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 98) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 125)
collectively as “other” in our positive-ion-mode analysis, as these were
minor components. The major isotopes of chloride were measured in order to
understand the role chloride may have had on particle formation, with
potential influence from marine aerosol and fungal spores
(Pöhlker et al., 2012). Potassium
(isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 and 41) was measured during positive-ion-mode analysis to
determine the potential influence of potassium-rich primary biological
particles (China
et al., 2016; Pöhlker et al., 2012). Additionally, potassium-rich
particles have been linked to biomass burning, as potassium is found to be
associated with soot carbon (Andreae, 1983; Pósfai et
al., 2004). Mass-normalized ion abundances, defined as ion abundance divided
by the collected sample mass, for the five most abundant negative ions displayed
similar diurnal patterns within each period. During the anthropogenic
period, peaks in mass-normalized ion abundance were observed for all
measured species between 06:00 and 08:00 and 16:00 and 18:00. For the background
period, there was no sharp peak observed between 16:00 and 18:00 for any of the
five measured species, but there was a peak in the diurnal pattern between 06:00 and 08:00 for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 (Fig. S4). Diurnal trends in mass-normalized ion abundances
give little insight, per se, into sources of individual ions, but it is
interesting to note that ion abundances are typically the lowest when the sample
mass is largest. A potential reason for this is that TDCIMS is not sensitive
to the specific compounds present in these ultrafine particles when the mass
loading is highest. This could be true, for example, if refractory black
carbon is the main constituent during the period of the highest sampled mass, as
chemical ionization would be unable to detect these compounds. Since the
diurnal patterns of all individual ions are similar, a comparison of ion
fractions, defined as ion abundance divided by the sum of the total ion
abundances measured at the time of analysis, provides a measurement of ion
concentration in collected particles and shows distinct differences between
the background and anthropogenic periods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1486"><bold>(a)</bold> The negative-ion fraction and positive-ion fraction shown over the 10 d period of interest. <bold>(b)</bold> Diel
patterns of the five measured negative ions shown and of the four major positive ions; “other” refers to sum of
fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 125 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 98. The crosses are average values, the boxes show 25th and 75th percentiles as well
as medians, and the whiskers show maximum and minimum values. Signals are averaged between the 2 h
time blocks noted. Highlighted region denotes daylight hours.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13053/2019/acp-19-13053-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1524">Figure 3a shows the trend in ion fraction for the five most abundant negative
ions and four most abundant positive ions during the 10 d period of
analysis. During the anthropogenic period, the observed bisulfate ion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 97) fraction
was larger than during the background period. Of the ions measured,
bisulfate is the predominant indicator of urban influence. The bisulfate
anion has been previously noted in TDCIMS analysis as a stable ion formed
from the thermal desorption of particulate sulfate (Voisin et al., 2003), and it is
likely that emissions from Manaus could serve as the major source for
sulfate found at the T3 site. Thus as air masses during the anthropogenic
period primarily traveled from, or to the south of, Manaus, bisulfate is expected to have a higher measured
ion fraction. Additionally, in-basin emissions of various gaseous precursors
like dimethyl sulfide and hydrogen sulfide could contribute to particulate
sulfate of non-anthropogenic origin, as bisulfate was measured during the
whole 10 d period of interest, even without observed direct influence
from Manaus. When the bisulfate ion was the largest of the negative ions,
the largest fractions of ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36) and trimethyl ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60) in the
positive-ion mode were observed as well. Additionally, the largest chloride
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 35) signal was observed at the beginning of this period, reaching a
maximum<?pagebreak page13059?> of about 10 % of the total ion fraction on 14 March. During the
background period, the ion fraction of hydrogen oxalate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89) remained
relatively constant, averaging 31 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % of the total ion
fraction. Diurnal patterns of these ion fractions, shown in Fig. 3b, show
small diurnal variations for most of the observed ions. The diurnal pattern
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 (cyanate) peaks between 10:00 and noon and both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 show
slight decreases between 10:00 and
noon as well. Roughly 70 % of measurements over both periods had
potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 and 41) ion fractions less than or equal to 20 % of the
total positive-ion fraction, with few “potassium episodes” of higher
abundance observed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1644">Interestingly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 was the most abundant ion present in TDCIMS spectra. Due
to its even mass-to-charge ratio, this ion almost certainly contains
nitrogen. This ion distinguishes itself from other detected compounds by a
peak in ion fraction during the morning (Fig. 3b). Prior TDCIMS
measurements during the 2006 MILAGRO campaign in the Mexico City
metropolitan area detected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 as a major ion fragment in sub-20 nm
diameter particles; that ion was identified as cyanate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNO</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which
may be linked to isocyanic acid from biomass burning or industrial processes
(Smith et al., 2008). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 fragment
observed in this study is not likely of anthropogenic origin, since this ion
was observed during very clean periods when we expect anthropogenic
emissions and biomass burning to be low. In addition, TDCIMS-measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42
during the dry season did not show an increase in ion intensity relative to
the wet season (Smith, 2016), which one might expect if
this ion were sourced to biomass burning. We hypothesize that this ion is
cyanate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNO</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which we associate with organic nitrogen related to
aerosol formation from biogenic emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Natural emissions of
amino acids, water-soluble organic species and other proteinaceous biogenic
materials have been measured in the gas phase, particle phase and
precipitation across the globe and have been estimated to account for as
much as half or more of the bulk aerosol composition over the Amazon Basin (Artaxo
et al., 1988, 1990; Kourtchev et al., 2016; Mace et al., 2003; Zhang and
Anastasio, 2003). While all prior field measurements in the Amazon Basin
have been made on particles larger than those measured in this study,
similar sources may influence ultrafine-particle composition. If true, these
observations suggest that organic nitrogen compounds play a crucial role in
both ultrafine-particle formation as well as growth to large particles,
which make this mechanism for particle growth climatologically important in
this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e1718">Of the measured positive-ion species, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83, linked to 3-methylfuran or other
C5 oxidized volatile organic compounds, dominated the ion fraction in
ultrafine particles. Methylfuran has been observed to be produced as a
thermal decomposition product of isoprene-derived SOA via AMS measurements
(Allan et al., 2014), a process that
would likely also occur during TDCIMS analysis. Airborne observations in the
Amazon suggest that isoprene SOA can be formed in the boundary layer under
certain conditions, which is confirmed by these observations
(Allan et al., 2014). Since this ion is
a marker of isoprene epoxydiol (IEPOX) species present in the particle
phase, this confirms a role for isoprene and isoprene derivatives in the
growth of ultrafine particles. Little variability in the diel pattern for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83 is observed, similar to other particle-phase measurements of IEPOX
derivatives reported for the GoAmazon2014/5 campaign by Isaacman-Vanwertz
et al. (2016). In that study, weak diurnal
patterns for particle-phase isoprene oxidation products were also observed
even while gas-phase concentrations of these species increased in the
afternoon. It is important to note that this ion dominates the positive-ion
fraction during both the anthropogenically influenced and background-influenced periods.
Times that experienced lower fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83 had increased fractions of
ammonium and trimethyl ammonium, which also coincided at times with larger
amounts of measured bisulfate in the negative ions. The presence of larger
fractions of particulate ammonia and amines at times with less influence
from isoprene-derived species could indicate that both organic salt
formation and uptake of isoprene-derived products are possible mechanisms of
ultrafine-particle growth. The importance of organic salt formation in
growth is consistent with prior TDCIMS measurements
(Smith et al., 2010), although a quantitative
comparison cannot be made, since this current study focuses on sub-100 nm
diameter particles, whereas the<?pagebreak page13061?> prior study focused on size-resolved sub-15 nm ambient particles. One period of an elevated potassium ion ratio was
observed at the end of the day on 22 March. To differentiate between
potential sources of potassium in these ultrafine particles, whether they be
of primary biological or biomass-burning influence, mass concentrations of
black carbon during this 10 d period of interest were used to examine the
extent of influence of biomass burning on the presence of potassium (Fig. S5). During the anthropogenic period, with significantly elevated
concentrations of black carbon, a minimal potassium fraction was measured. At
times of low black-carbon mass concentrations during the background period,
like on 20 March, there was some fraction of potassium observed. During the
period of the highest fraction observed on the night of 22 March, there were
slightly elevated mass concentrations of black carbon. While partially
elevated black-carbon mass concentrations on 22 March may be connected to
the large potassium ion fraction, at times with even more significant
biomass-burning influence, there was minimal potassium. The larger fraction
of potassium observed during the background period, as opposed to the
anthropogenic period, may be connected to potassium-rich biological
particles or the rupturing of biological spores (China
et al., 2016; Pöhlker et al., 2012). Of all wet season TDCIMS
measurements during GoAmazon2014/5, roughly 14 % of measurements had
potassium fractions greater than 0.1 (Fig. S6). Air masses on the evening of
22 March were traveling steadily from the Manaus area and coincided with
about 5 mm of rain. High ambient concentrations of biological particles that
could be sources of potassium are often associated with rainfall events
(China et al., 2016).
Rupturing of fungal spores, leading to the production of sub-100 nm
fragments, was observed to occur after long exposures (above 10 h) of
high relative humidity and subsequent drying, which are similar conditions to those on
22 March.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Multivariate analysis of TDCIMS and AMS data</title>
      <p id="d1e1765">PCA was performed on TDCIMS and AMS
measurements to provide insights into the possible drivers for ultrafine-particle formation. Figure 4 shows the results of this analysis. In these
plots, positive correlations are shown in blue, while negative correlations
are shown in red. The intensity of the color and eccentricity of the ellipse
are an indication of the degree of correlation. Pale-colored circles
(eccentricity approximately zero) show little to no correlation, narrow
ellipses with a positive slope and darker blue color illustrate strong
positive correlation, and narrow ellipses with a negative slope and darker
red color show strong negative correlation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1770">Principal component analysis (PCA) of TDCIMS and AMS data. Refer to text for details on the
interpretation of these plots. Shown are PCA results in which species are grouped into hierarchical clusters, with clusters
outlined by weighted black lines. Species are ordered by decreasing correlation to the first principal component,
from the top to bottom. TDCIMS chemical assignments for fragments are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 (hydrogen oxalate), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59
(acetate), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 (cyanate), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 (trimethyl ammonium), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83 (3-methylfuran), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36 (ammonium hydrate),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 97 (bisulfate), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 (chloride) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 (potassium).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/13053/2019/acp-19-13053-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1888">Hierarchical clustering of these measurements results in three main clusters
of related particle constituents. This represents a series of clusters where
the species within each cluster covary, therefore being indicative, in this work,
of similar particle characteristics, processes or sources. The first cluster,
labeled “Cluster 1” in Fig. 4, grouped TDCIMS-derived cyanate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42),
acetate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59), hydrogen oxalate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89), trimethyl ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60) and
3-methylfuran (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83); the second, labeled “Cluster 2”, clustered well-known
covarying AMS derived constituents (Ulbrich et al.,
2009); and the third, labeled “Cluster 3”, associated AMS-derived chloride with
TDCIMS-derived chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 35), bisulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 97), ammonium hydrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36) and
potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39). The hierarchical cluster approach independently grouped
and separated AMS measurements from TDCIMS measurements. While both
represent composition measurements of the aerosol population, the
differences between the size ranges of particles measured by AMS and TDCIMS
techniques would lead to the anticipated differences in clustering.
Comparing mass distributions estimated by size distribution measurements,
the presence of particles larger than 100 nm would have a more significant
contribution to the measured mass concentrations by AMS. In contrast,
TDCIMS only measures sub-100 nm particles, representing a minor contribution
to the total mass concentration. This observed separation between the
clustering of AMS and TDCIMS measurements reinforces the importance of
direct measurements of ultrafine particles, as opposed to bulk<?pagebreak page13062?> composition,
in accessing the species and mechanisms responsible for new particle
formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2001">With respect to PCA performed on the two datasets, Cluster 1, which includes
TDCIMS fragments typically linked to organic species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59, 89 and 83) and
nitrogen species discussed previously (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 and 60), explains most of the
variance and has the highest correlation with the first principal component.
These species' high correlation with each other indicate similar sources,
most of which can be associated with BVOC emissions. A prior TDCIMS
laboratory study linked the acetate ion fragment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59) to particulate
carboxylic and dicarboxylic acids (Smith and Rathbone, 2008),
which have been linked to the photochemical oxidation of both biogenic and
anthropogenic compounds (Winkler et al., 2012).
During the wet season in the Amazon Basin, specific dicarboxylic acids and
tricarboxylic acids have been identified and proposed to have been formed
from the oxidation of semi-volatile fatty acids and terpenes
(Kubátová et al., 2000).
Hydrogen oxalate, measured as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 89, was one of the two most abundant organic
ions measured in ultrafine particles at both an urban and rural site in
Helsinki, Finland (Pakkanen et al., 2000).
Hydrogen oxalate was noted to have relatively constant concentrations in
ultrafine particles, similar to observations seen during the 10 d period
of analysis for this study (Fig. 3). While Helsinki and the Amazon
experience different conditions and meteorology, oxalate has been observed
in both environments, possibly due to the heavy BVOC influence in both
locales. In the positive-ion mode, 3-methylfuran, measured as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83, has
significant correlation to background linked negative ions. These species
seem to be generally linked to the oxidation of various BVOCs, whether
isoprene, for 3-methylfuran, or other terpenes
(Allan et al., 2014). Finally, it
should be noted that the clustering of the cyanate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42) with these organic
ions provides further evidence that the source of this ion is likely clean,
background chemistry rather than biomass burning. Additionally,
TDCIMS-measured cyanate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42) is weakly and negatively correlated to
AMS-measured nitrate. During the anthropogenic period (14 March through
mid-morning 19 March), higher levels of inorganic nitrate were observed by
AMS compared to the organic form (de Sá et al.,
2018). This higher mass concentration of nitrate, attributed to inorganic
nitrate as opposed to organic nitrate which would be more similar to
TDCIMS-measured cyanate, should explain the slight negative correlation
between the two.</p>
      <p id="d1e2089">Hierarchical clustering separates TDCIMS-measured ions into two clusters,
with Cluster 3 including TDCIMS-derived bisulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 97), chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 and
37), ammonium hydrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36) and potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 and 41). The separation of
this cluster suggests that these constituents are linked to different
sources or atmospheric processes compared to those in Cluster 1, potentially
with an anthropogenic origin, as both chloride and potassium and bisulfate have
been linked previously to biomass burning and anthropogenic emissions,
respectively (Allen
and Miguel, 1995; Martin et al., 2010). As noted
previously, the bisulfate anion is a stable ion formed from the thermal
desorption of particulate sulfate (Voisin et al., 2003), and it is
likely present in ultrafine particles via pollution emissions from Manaus.
However, in-basin emissions of gaseous sulfate precursors, like dimethyl
sulfide and hydrogen sulfide, could be linked to the measured bisulfate
fraction during the entire 10 d period, with anthropogenic sources of
sulfate increasing this background level during the anthropogenic period.
In-basin chloride emissions could come from both biomass burning of common
regional vegetation and long-range transport of marine ultrafine particles
from the Atlantic Ocean under the influence of the trade winds
(Allen and Miguel, 1995; Martin et
al., 2010). The clustering of AMS chloride with TDCIMS species in Cluster 3
might suggest similar sources of chloride in both ultrafine particles and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, it is worth noting that AMS chloride also very weakly
correlated with the other species measured by AMS. For this reason, its
inclusion in this cluster indicates that AMS chloride is similar to
TDCIMS-derived Cluster 3 species and also different enough so as not to cluster
with the other AMS species. The production of potassium, which is
potentially linked to rupturing of fungal spores and biomass burning, would
have little correlation to other measured TDCIMS species, as the mechanism
for the production of potassium is independent of SOA formation mechanisms.
This ion is not generally associated to constant background sources, like
TDCIMS species observed in Cluster 1, and may be associated with potential
anthropogenic sources, like the bisulfate and chloride seen in Cluster 3. The
clustering of TDCIMS ion abundances into two clusters suggests different
sources and processes for these species, as there is little correlation
between the species present in Cluster 1 to those present in Cluster 3.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2158">The chemical composition of ultrafine particles in the Amazon Basin, as
measured during the GoAmazon2014/5, has two distinct influences: sources and
processes linked to anthropogenic origin and those related to more natural
sources and processes. During periods of heavier anthropogenic influence,
higher number concentrations of sub-100 nm particles were observed (Fig. 1). HYSPLIT back trajectories during the anthropogenic period (Fig. 2) not
only intersect with the Manaus metropolitan area but also with the main roadway
that connects Manaus with the city of Manacapuru. Influence from
anthropogenic sources, which during the study period is primarily linked to
Manaus metropolitan area emissions, may continuously affect the composition
of ultrafine particles observed at the T3 measurement site. Particulate
sulfate, measured as the bisulfate ion, was an important and dominant
contributor to the TDCIMS ion fraction during the anthropogenic period (Fig. 3) but was still measured, to a lesser extent, in the background period,
suggesting an<?pagebreak page13063?> omnipresent influence. The most abundant negative-ion species
measured during this campaign, likely related to organic nitrogen species at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 42, displayed a consistent morning diurnal peak and was an equally abundant
constituent during both the anthropogenic and background periods. The
dominance of this ion during both this study and the 2006 MILAGRO campaign in
the Mexico City metropolitan area emphasizes the potential role of organic
nitrogen in ultrafine aerosol particle formation and underscores the need
for further research into the chemical processes and precursors that are
responsible for this ion. 3-Methylfuran, measured as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 83, was the most
dominant fraction observed in the positive-ion mode and is likely associated
with IEPOX derivatives present in ultrafine particles. The presence of these
species emphasizes the importance of isoprene oxidation to particle formation
in this region. The two different clusters of TDCIMS-derived ions that arise
through PCA analysis, of which Cluster 1 explains most of the variance, give
additional insight into the sources and processes that influence the
ultrafine-particle population in this part of the Amazon Basin. As
hierarchical clustering separates TDCIMS-derived organic species from
TDCIMS-derived sulfate and chloride, this suggests that these species are present
in the particle from different sources and/or processes. A third cluster
separates AMS-measured compounds from those detected by TDCIMS, which
emphasizes the unique characteristics of ultrafine particles compared to
bulk aerosol particles. The lack of correlation between the two
TDCIMS-derived clusters supports the observation that anthropogenic
emissions and processes each have a unique role to play in ultrafine-particle formation and growth in the Amazon Basin.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2190">Campaign datasets for Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon) are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5439/1346559" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5439/1346559</ext-link> (ARM, 2019).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2196">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13053-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13053-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2205">JNS, PA, STM, OVB, RdS and JT designed the measurement campaign, and JNS,
MJL, JO and SSdS carried out measurements. HSG performed data analysis,
assisted by JNS and AC. HSG prepared the paper, with contributions from
all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2211">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2217">This article is part of the special issue “Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5) (ACP/AMT/GI/GMD inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2223">Institutional support was provided by the Central Office of the Large Scale
Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA), the National Institute of
Amazonian Research (INPA), and Amazonas State University (UEA) and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM). We acknowledge support from
the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility, a
user facility of the United States Department of Energy, Office of Science,
sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and
support from the Atmospheric System Research (ASR; DE-SC0011122 and
DE-SC0011115) program of that office. James N. Smith acknowledges support from a
Brazilian Science Mobility Program (Programa Ciência sem Fronteiras)
Special Visiting Researcher scholarship. Paulo Artaxo acknowledges funding from FAPESP
– Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo,
grant numbers 2017/17047-0, 2013/05014-0 and 2014/50848-9.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2228">This research has been supported by the DOE Atmospheric System Research (grant nos. DE-SC0011122 and DE-SC0011115).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2234">This paper was edited by Lynn M. Russell and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Agência de Notícias: IBGE releases population estimates for municipalities in 2017, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Morgan, W. T., Darbyshire, E., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Oram, D. E., Artaxo, P., Brito, J., Lee, J. D., and Coe, H.: Airborne observations of IEPOX-derived isoprene SOA in the Amazon during SAMBBA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11393–11407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, A. G. and Miguel, A. H.: Biomass Burning in the Amazon:
Characterization of the ionic component of aerosols generated from flaming
and smouldering rainforest and savannah, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29,
486–493, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alves, E. G., Jardine, K., Tota, J., Jardine, A., Yãnez-Serrano, A. M., Karl, T., Tavares, J., Nelson, B., Gu, D., Stavrakou, T., Martin, S., Artaxo, P., Manzi, A., and Guenther, A.: Seasonality of isoprenoid emissions from a primary rainforest in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3903–3925, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3903-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3903-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O.: Soot Carbon and Excess Fine Potassium: Long-Range Transport
of Combustion-Derived, available at:
<uri>https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1689884.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:2b4c5237f67577ae4569eb0de4192412</uri>
(last access: 23 July 2019), 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 543–556, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-543-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Brandão, C., Carswell, F. E., Ciccioli, P.,
Costa, A. L. da, Culf, A. D., Esteves, J. L., Gash, J. H. C., Grace, J.,
Kabat, P., Lelieveld, J., Malhi, Y., Manzi, A. O., Meixner, F. X., Nobre, A.
D., Nobre, C., Ruivo, M. D. L. P., Silva-Dias, M. A., Stefani, P.,
Valentini, R., von Jouanne, J., and Waterloo, M. J.: Biogeochemical cycling
of carbon, water, energy, trace gases, and aerosols in Amazonia: The
LBA-EUSTACH experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8066,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000524</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P.,
Longo, K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking Rain Clouds over the Amazon,
Science, 303, 1337–1342, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Afchine, A., Albrecht, R., Holanda, B. A., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Borrmann, S., Cecchini, M. A., Costa, A., Dollner, M., Fütterer, D., Järvinen, E., Jurkat, T., Klimach, T., Konemann, T., Knote, C., Krämer, M., Krisna, T., Machado, L. A. T., Mertes, S., Minikin, A., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., Rosenfeld, D., Sauer, D., Schlager, H., Schnaiter, M., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Spanu, A., Sperling, V. B., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Wang, J., Weinzierl, B., Wendisch, M., and Ziereis, H.: Aerosol characteristics and particle production in the upper troposphere over the Amazon Basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 921–961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-921-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-921-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ARM: Aerosol Mass Spectrometer Particle Composition measurements during
GoAmazon2014/5, data portal, available at:
<uri>https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/alexander-ams/</uri>
(last access: 27 June 2018), 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ARM: Aethalometer measurements during GoAmazon2014/5, data portal, available at:
<uri>https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/sedlacek-aeth</uri> (last
access: 30 June 2019), 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
ARM: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility.
2013, updated hourly, Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLHTSONDE1MCFARL),
2014-03-10 to 2014-03-10, ARM Mobile Facility (MAO) Manacapuru, Amazonas,
Brazil; AMF1 (M1), Compiled by C. Sivar, 2018c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
ARM: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement ARM Climate Research Facility, 2014,
updated hourly, Scanning mobility particle sizer (AOSSMPS). 2014-03-13 to
2014-03-24, ARM Mobile Facility (MAO) Manacapuru, Amazonas, 2018d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ARM: Wind speed, wind direction, temperature, precipitation and relative
humidity during GoAmazon2014/5, data portal,
available at: <uri>https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/springston-met/</uri>
(last access: 27 June 2018), 2018e.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ARM: Campaign Datasets for Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5439/1346559" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5439/1346559</ext-link>, last access: 10 October 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Artaxo, P., Storms, H., Bruynseels, F., Grieken, R. V., and Maenhaut, W.:
Composition and Sources of Aerosols From the Amazon Basin, J. Geophys. Res.,
93, 1605–1615, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Artaxo, P., Maenhaut, W., Storms, H., and Van Grieken, R.: Aerosol
characteristics and sources for the Amazon Basin during the wet season, J.
Geophys. Res., 95, 16971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD10p16971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD095iD10p16971</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Brito, J. F., Barbosa, H. M. J., Arana, A., Sena,
E. T., Cirino, G. G., Bastos, W., Martin, S. T., and Andreae, M. O.:
Atmospheric aerosols in Amazonia and land use change: from natural biogenic
to biomass burning conditions, Faraday Discuss., 165, 203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00052d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3fd00052d</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bzdek, B. R., Zordan, C. A., Luther III, G. W., Johnston, M. V., and Luther,
G. W.: Nanoparticle Chemical Composition During New Particle Formation,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.580392" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.580392</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Pye, H. O. T., Baker, K. R., and Hennigan, C. J.: Additional
Benefits of Federal Air-Quality Rules: Model Estimates of Controllable
Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 9254–9265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b01869</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>China, S., Wang, B., Weis, J., Rizzo, L., Brito, J., Cirino, G. G., Kovarik,
L., Artaxo, P., Gilles, M. K., and Laskin, A.: Rupturing of Biological Spores
As a Source of Secondary Particles in Amazonia, Environ. Sci. Technol, 50,
12179–12186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02896</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Newburn, M. K., Hu, W., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Thalman, R., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Artaxo, P., Goldstein, A. H., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F., Mei, F., Shilling, J. E., Springston, S. R., Wang, J., Surratt, J. D., Alexander, M. L., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Influence of urban pollution on the production of organic particulate matter from isoprene epoxydiols in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6611–6629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Hu, W., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Ribeiro, I. O., Cirino, G. G., Liu, Y., Thalman, R., Sedlacek, A., Funk, A., Schumacher, C., Shilling, J. E., Schneider, J., Artaxo, P., Goldstein, A. H., Souza, R. A. F., Wang, J., McKinney, K. A., Barbosa, H., Alexander, M. L., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Urban influence on the concentration and composition of submicron particulate matter in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12185–12206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12185-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12185-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Sá, S. S., Rizzo, L. V., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Yee, L. D., Wernis, R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Liu, Y. J., Sedlacek, A., Springston, S., Goldstein, A. H., Barbosa, H. M. J., Alexander, M. L., Artaxo, P., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Contributions of biomass-burning, urban, and biogenic emissions to the concentrations and light-absorbing properties of particulate matter in central Amazonia during the dry season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7973–8001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Zhang, Y., Giangrande, S. E., Li, Z., Machado, L. A.
T., Martin, S. T., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Braga,
R. C., Comstock, J. M., Feng, Z., Gao, W., Gomes, H. B., Mei, F.,
Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., and De Souza, R. A. F.:
Substantial convection and precipitation enhancements by ultrafine aerosol
particles, Science, 359, 411–418,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aan8461</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Graham, B., Guyon, P., Maenhaut, W., Taylor, P. E., Ebert, M.,
Matthias-Maser, S., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Godoi, R. H. M., Artaxo, P.,
Meixner, F. X., Moura, M. A. L., Rocha, C. H. E. D., Grieken, R. Van,
Glovsky, M. M., Flagan, R. C., and Andreae, M. O.: Composition and diurnal
variability of the natural Amazonian aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
108, n/a-n/a, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004049</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page13065?><ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gunthe, S. S., King, S. M., Rose, D., Chen, Q., Roldin, P., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J. L., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Martin, S. T., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in pristine tropical rainforest air of Amazonia: size-resolved measurements and modeling of atmospheric aerosol composition and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7551–7575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heffter, J. L.: Transport Layer Depth Calculations, in Second Joint
Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology,  New Orleans,
Louisiana, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hofmann, D. J.: Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols, Science,
255, 423–430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5043.423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.255.5043.423</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Climate Change 2013: The Physical
Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fifths Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Isaacman-Vanwertz, G., Yee, L. D., Kreisberg, N. M., Wernis, R., Moss, J.
A., Hering, S. V, De Saì, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander,  M. L.,
Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Riva,
M., Surratt, J. D., Viegas, J., Manzi, A., Edgerton, E., Baumann, K., Souza,
R., Artaxo, P. and Goldstein, A. H.: Ambient Gas-Particle Partitioning of
Tracers for Biogenic Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9952–9962, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01674</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jardine, A. B., Jardine, K. J., Fuentes, J. D., Martin, S. T., Martins, G.,
Durgante, F., Carneiro, V., Higuchi, N., Manzi, A. O., and Chambers, J. Q.:
Highly reactive light-dependent monoterpenes in the Amazon, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 1576–1583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062573</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jardine, K., Yañez Serrano, A., Arneth, A., Abrell, L., Jardine, A., Van
Haren, J., Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Ishida, F. Y., Karl, T., Kesselmeier,
J., Saleska, S., and Huxman, T.: Within-canopy sesquiterpene ozonolysis in
Amazonia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016243</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., S., A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel,
J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams,
L. R., Wood, C., E., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kourtchev, I., Godoi, R. H. M., Connors, S., Levine, J. G., Archibald, A. T., Godoi, A. F. L., Paralovo, S. L., Barbosa, C. G. G., Souza, R. A. F., Manzi, A. O., Seco, R., Sjostedt, S., Park, J.-H., Guenther, A., Kim, S., Smith, J., Martin, S. T., and Kalberer, M.: Molecular composition of organic aerosols in central Amazonia: an ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11899–11913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11899-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11899-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kubátová, A., Vermeylen, R., Claeys, M., Cafmeyer, J., Maenhaut, W.,
Roberts, G., and Artaxo, P.: Carbonaceous aerosol characterization in the
Amazon basin, Brazil: Novel dicarboxylic acids and related compounds,
Atmos. Environ.,  34,  5037–5051, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawler, M. J., Rissanen, M. P., Ehn, M., Mauldin, R. L., Sarnela, N.,
Sipilä, M., and Smith, J. N.: Evidence for Diverse Biogeochemical Drivers
of Boreal Forest New Particle Formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
2038–2046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076394</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, J. and Russell, L. M.: Observational evidence for pollution-influenced
selectiveuptake contributing to biogenic secondary organicaerosols in the
southeastern U.S., Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 8056–8064, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mace, K. A., Artaxo, P., and Duce, R. A.: Water-soluble organic nitrogen in
Amazon Basin aerosols during the dry (biomass burning) and wet seasons, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003557</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Baumgardner, D., Chen, Q.,
Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A., Heald, C. L., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., McMurry,
P. H., Pauliquevis, T., Pöschl, U., Prather, K. A., Roberts, G. C., Saleska,
S. R., Silva Dias, M. A., Spracklen, D. V., Swietlicki, E., and Trebs, I.:
Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles, Rev. Geophys., 48, 1–42,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008RG000280</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martin, S. T., Artaxo, P., Machado, L. A. T., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F., Schumacher, C., Wang, J., Andreae, M. O., Barbosa, H. M. J., Fan, J., Fisch, G., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A., Jimenez, J. L., Pöschl, U., Silva Dias, M. A., Smith, J. N., and Wendisch, M.: Introduction: Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4785–4797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4785-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4785-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McMurry, P. H., Ghimire, A., Ahn, H.-K., Sakurai, H., Moore, K.,
Stolzenburg, M., and Smith, J. N.: Sampling Nanoparticles for Chemical
Analysis by Low Resolution Electrical Mobility Classification, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 4653–4658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8029335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es8029335</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pakkanen, T. A., Korhonen, C. H., Hillamo, R. E., Aurela, M., Aarnio, P.,
Koskentalo, T., and Maenhaut, W.: Ultrafine particles (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Helsinki
area, J. Aerosol Sci., 31, 522–523,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(00)90535-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(00)90535-4</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pöhlker, C., Wiedemann, T., Sinha, B., Shiraiwa, M., Gunthe, S., Smith,
M., Su, H., Artaxo, P., Chen, Q., Cheng, Y., Elbert, W., Gilles, M.,
Kilcoyn, A., Moffet, R., Weigand, M., Martin, S., Pöschl, U., and
Andreae, M.: Biogenic Potassium Salt Particles as Seeds for Secondary
Organic Aerosol in the Amazon, Science, 337, 1075–1078,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Ditas, F., Klimach, T., Hrabe de Angelis, I., Araújo, A., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chi, X., Ditz, R., Gunthe, S. S., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Lavrič, J. V., Martin, S. T., Mikhailov, E., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Rose, D., Saturno, J., Su, H., Thalman, R., Walter, D., Wang, J., Wolff, S., Barbosa, H. M. J., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Long-term observations of cloud condensation nuclei in the Amazon rain forest – Part 1: Aerosol size distribution, hygroscopicity, and new model parametrizations for CCN prediction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15709–15740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15709-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15709-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pósfai, M., Gelencsér, A., Simonics, R., Arató, K., Li, J., and
Hobbs, P. V: Atmospheric tar balls: Particles from biomas<?pagebreak page13066?>s and biofuel
burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D06213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004169</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>R:  A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R
Found. Stat. Comput., 1, 409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rcia, M., Yamasoe, A., Artaxo, P., Miguel, A. H., and Allen, A. G.: Chemical
composition of aerosol particles from direct emissions of vegetation in the
Amazon Basin: water-soluble species and trace elements, Atmos. Environ., 34,
1641–1653, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riipinen, I., Yli-Juuti, T., Pierce, J. R., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D.
R., Kulmala, M., and Donahue, N. M.: The contribution of organics to
atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nat. Publ. Gr., 5, 453–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1499</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications
and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Model. Softw., 95, 210–228,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T.,
Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J.,
Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R.,
Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding
secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev.
Geophys., 55, 509–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000540</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. N.: Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry
during GoAmazon2014/5, data portal,
available at: <uri>https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/smith-tdcims</uri> (last access: 10 October 2019), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. N. and Rathbone, G. J.: Carboxylic acid characterization in
nanoparticles by thermal desorption chemical ionization mass spectrometry,
Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 274, 8–13, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. N., Moore, K. F., McMurry, P. H., and Eisele, F. L.: Atmospheric
Measurements of Sub-20 nm Diameter Particle Chemical Composition by Thermal
Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Technol.,
38, 100–110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490249036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820490249036</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. N., Dunn, M. J., VanReken, T. M., Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M. R.,
McMurry, P. H., and Huey, L. G.: Chemical composition of atmospheric
nanoparticles formed from nucleation in Tecamac, Mexico: Evidence for an
important role for organic species in nanoparticle growth, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, 2–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032523</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. N., Barsanti, K. C., Friedli, H. R., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M.,
Collins, D. R., Scheckman, J. H., Williams, B. J., and McMurry, P. H.:
Observations of aminium salts in atmospheric nanoparticles and possible
climatic implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6634–6639,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912127107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0912127107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: Noaa's hysplit atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Varanda Rizzo, L., Roldin, P., Brito, J., Backman, J., Swietlicki, E., Krejci, R., Tunved, P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Artaxo, P.: Multi-year statistical and modeling analysis of submicrometer aerosol number size distributions at a rain forest site in Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10255–10274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10255-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10255-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Voisin, D., Smith, J. N., Sakurai, H., Mcmurry, P. H., and Eisele, F. L.:
Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer for Ultrafine
Particle Chemical Composition, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 37, 471–475,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5439/1562451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5439/1562451</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Krejci, R., Giangrande, S., Kuang, C., Barbosa, H. M. J., Brito,
J., Carbone, S., Chi, X., Comstock, J., Ditas, F., Lavric, J., Manninen, H.
E., Mei, F., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L.,
Saturno, J., Schmid, B., Souza, R. A. F., Springston, S. R., Tomlinson, J.
M., Toto, T., Walter, D., Wimmer, D., Smith, J. N., Kulmala, M., Machado, L.
A. T., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Petäjä, T., and Martin, S. T.:
Amazon boundary layer aerosol concentration sustained by vertical transport
during rainfall, Nat. Publ. Gr., 539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19819" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature19819</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wilks, D. S.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences,
Elsevier/Academic Press, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Winkler, P. M., Ortega, J., Karl, T., Cappellin, L., Friedli, H. R.,
Barsanti, K., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Identification of the
biogenic compounds responsible for size-dependent nanoparticle growth,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053253</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Wolff, S., Alves, E., Martins, G. A., Bourtsoukidis, E., Brito, J., Jardine, K., Artaxo, P., and Kesselmeier, J.: Diel and seasonal changes of biogenic volatile organic compounds within and above an Amazonian rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3359–3378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yee, L. D., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Wernis, R. A., Meng, M., Rivera, V., Kreisberg, N. M., Hering, S. V., Bering, M. S., Glasius, M., Upshur, M. A., Gray Bé, A., Thomson, R. J., Geiger, F. M., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Kourtchev, I., Kalberer, M., de Sá, S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Liu, Y., McKinney, K. A., Artaxo, P., Viegas, J., Manzi, A., Oliveira, M. B., de Souza, R., Machado, L. A. T., Longo, K., and Goldstein, A. H.: Observations of sesquiterpenes and their oxidation products in central Amazonia during the wet and dry seasons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10433–10457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10433-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10433-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q. and Anastasio, C.: Free and combined amino compounds in
atmospheric fine particles (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and fog waters from Northern
California, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2247–2258,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00127-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00127-4</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, J., Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H. C., and Artaxo, P.: Submicrometer
aerosol particle size distribution and hygroscopic growth measured in the
Amazon rain forest during the wet season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 22-1–22-10 <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000203</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Chemical composition of ultrafine aerosol particles in central Amazonia during the wet season</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Central Amazonia serves as an ideal location to study
atmospheric particle formation, since it often represents nearly natural,
pre-industrial conditions but can also experience periods of anthropogenic
influence due to the presence of emissions from large metropolitan areas
like Manaus, Brazil. Ultrafine (sub-100&thinsp;nm diameter) particles are often
observed in this region, although new particle formation events seldom occur
near the ground despite being readily observed in other forested regions
with similar emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This study focuses on
identifying the chemical composition of ultrafine particles as a means of
determining the chemical species and mechanisms that may be responsible for
new particle formation and growth in the region. These measurements were
performed during the wet season as part of the Observations and
Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5) field campaign
at a site located 70&thinsp;km southwest of Manaus. A thermal desorption chemical
ionization mass spectrometer (TDCIMS) characterized the most abundant
compounds detected in ultrafine particles. Two time periods representing
distinct influences on aerosol composition, which we label as
<q>anthropogenic</q> and <q>background</q> periods, were studied as part of a
larger 10&thinsp;d period of analysis. Higher particle number concentrations
were measured during the anthropogenic period, and modeled back-trajectory
frequencies indicate transport of emissions from the Manaus metropolitan
area. During the background period there were much lower number
concentrations, and back-trajectory frequencies showed that air masses
arrived at the site predominantly from the forested regions to the north and
northeast. TDCIMS-measured constituents also show distinct differences
between the two observational periods. Although bisulfate was detected in
particles throughout the 10&thinsp;d period, the anthropogenic period had higher
levels of particulate bisulfate overall. Ammonium and trimethyl ammonium
were positively correlated with bisulfate. The background period had
distinct diurnal patterns of particulate cyanate and acetate, while oxalate
remained relatively constant during the 10&thinsp;d period. 3-Methylfuran, a
thermal decomposition product of a particulate-phase isoprene epoxydiol
(IEPOX), was the dominant species measured in the positive-ion mode.
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the TDCIMS-measured ion
abundance and aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) mass concentration data. Two
different hierarchical clusters representing unique influences arise: one
comprising ultrafine particulate acetate, hydrogen oxalate, cyanate,
trimethyl ammonium and 3-methylfuran and another made up of ultrafine
particulate bisulfate, chloride, ammonium and potassium. A third cluster
separated AMS-measured species from the two TDCIMS-derived clusters,
indicating different sources or processes in ultrafine aerosol particle
formation compared to larger submicron-sized particles.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agência de Notícias: IBGE releases population estimates for municipalities in 2017, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Morgan, W. T., Darbyshire, E., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Oram, D. E., Artaxo, P., Brito, J., Lee, J. D., and Coe, H.: Airborne observations of IEPOX-derived isoprene SOA in the Amazon during SAMBBA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11393–11407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, A. G. and Miguel, A. H.: Biomass Burning in the Amazon:
Characterization of the ionic component of aerosols generated from flaming
and smouldering rainforest and savannah, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29,
486–493, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Alves, E. G., Jardine, K., Tota, J., Jardine, A., Yãnez-Serrano, A. M., Karl, T., Tavares, J., Nelson, B., Gu, D., Stavrakou, T., Martin, S., Artaxo, P., Manzi, A., and Guenther, A.: Seasonality of isoprenoid emissions from a primary rainforest in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3903–3925, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3903-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3903-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.: Soot Carbon and Excess Fine Potassium: Long-Range Transport
of Combustion-Derived, available at:
<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1689884.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:2b4c5237f67577ae4569eb0de4192412" target="_blank">https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1689884.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:2b4c5237f67577ae4569eb0de4192412</a>
(last access: 23 July 2019), 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 543–556, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Brandão, C., Carswell, F. E., Ciccioli, P.,
Costa, A. L. da, Culf, A. D., Esteves, J. L., Gash, J. H. C., Grace, J.,
Kabat, P., Lelieveld, J., Malhi, Y., Manzi, A. O., Meixner, F. X., Nobre, A.
D., Nobre, C., Ruivo, M. D. L. P., Silva-Dias, M. A., Stefani, P.,
Valentini, R., von Jouanne, J., and Waterloo, M. J.: Biogeochemical cycling
of carbon, water, energy, trace gases, and aerosols in Amazonia: The
LBA-EUSTACH experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8066,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000524</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P.,
Longo, K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking Rain Clouds over the Amazon,
Science, 303, 1337–1342, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Afchine, A., Albrecht, R., Holanda, B. A., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Borrmann, S., Cecchini, M. A., Costa, A., Dollner, M., Fütterer, D., Järvinen, E., Jurkat, T., Klimach, T., Konemann, T., Knote, C., Krämer, M., Krisna, T., Machado, L. A. T., Mertes, S., Minikin, A., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., Rosenfeld, D., Sauer, D., Schlager, H., Schnaiter, M., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Spanu, A., Sperling, V. B., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Wang, J., Weinzierl, B., Wendisch, M., and Ziereis, H.: Aerosol characteristics and particle production in the upper troposphere over the Amazon Basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 921–961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-921-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-921-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
ARM: Aerosol Mass Spectrometer Particle Composition measurements during
GoAmazon2014/5, data portal, available at:
<a href="https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/alexander-ams/" target="_blank">https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/alexander-ams/</a>
(last access: 27 June 2018), 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
ARM: Aethalometer measurements during GoAmazon2014/5, data portal, available at:
<a href="https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/sedlacek-aeth" target="_blank">https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/sedlacek-aeth</a> (last
access: 30 June 2019), 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
ARM: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility.
2013, updated hourly, Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLHTSONDE1MCFARL),
2014-03-10 to 2014-03-10, ARM Mobile Facility (MAO) Manacapuru, Amazonas,
Brazil; AMF1 (M1), Compiled by C. Sivar, 2018c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
ARM: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement ARM Climate Research Facility, 2014,
updated hourly, Scanning mobility particle sizer (AOSSMPS). 2014-03-13 to
2014-03-24, ARM Mobile Facility (MAO) Manacapuru, Amazonas, 2018d.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
ARM: Wind speed, wind direction, temperature, precipitation and relative
humidity during GoAmazon2014/5, data portal,
available at: <a href="https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/springston-met/" target="_blank">https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/springston-met/</a>
(last access: 27 June 2018), 2018e.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
ARM: Campaign Datasets for Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon), <a href="https://doi.org/10.5439/1346559" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5439/1346559</a>, last access: 10 October 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Artaxo, P., Storms, H., Bruynseels, F., Grieken, R. V., and Maenhaut, W.:
Composition and Sources of Aerosols From the Amazon Basin, J. Geophys. Res.,
93, 1605–1615, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Artaxo, P., Maenhaut, W., Storms, H., and Van Grieken, R.: Aerosol
characteristics and sources for the Amazon Basin during the wet season, J.
Geophys. Res., 95, 16971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD10p16971" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD10p16971</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Brito, J. F., Barbosa, H. M. J., Arana, A., Sena,
E. T., Cirino, G. G., Bastos, W., Martin, S. T., and Andreae, M. O.:
Atmospheric aerosols in Amazonia and land use change: from natural biogenic
to biomass burning conditions, Faraday Discuss., 165, 203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00052d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00052d</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Bzdek, B. R., Zordan, C. A., Luther III, G. W., Johnston, M. V., and Luther,
G. W.: Nanoparticle Chemical Composition During New Particle Formation,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.580392" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.580392</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Pye, H. O. T., Baker, K. R., and Hennigan, C. J.: Additional
Benefits of Federal Air-Quality Rules: Model Estimates of Controllable
Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 9254–9265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01869</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
China, S., Wang, B., Weis, J., Rizzo, L., Brito, J., Cirino, G. G., Kovarik,
L., Artaxo, P., Gilles, M. K., and Laskin, A.: Rupturing of Biological Spores
As a Source of Secondary Particles in Amazonia, Environ. Sci. Technol, 50,
12179–12186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02896" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02896</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Newburn, M. K., Hu, W., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Thalman, R., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Artaxo, P., Goldstein, A. H., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F., Mei, F., Shilling, J. E., Springston, S. R., Wang, J., Surratt, J. D., Alexander, M. L., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Influence of urban pollution on the production of organic particulate matter from isoprene epoxydiols in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6611–6629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Hu, W., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Ribeiro, I. O., Cirino, G. G., Liu, Y., Thalman, R., Sedlacek, A., Funk, A., Schumacher, C., Shilling, J. E., Schneider, J., Artaxo, P., Goldstein, A. H., Souza, R. A. F., Wang, J., McKinney, K. A., Barbosa, H., Alexander, M. L., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Urban influence on the concentration and composition of submicron particulate matter in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12185–12206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12185-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12185-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
de Sá, S. S., Rizzo, L. V., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Yee, L. D., Wernis, R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Liu, Y. J., Sedlacek, A., Springston, S., Goldstein, A. H., Barbosa, H. M. J., Alexander, M. L., Artaxo, P., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Contributions of biomass-burning, urban, and biogenic emissions to the concentrations and light-absorbing properties of particulate matter in central Amazonia during the dry season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7973–8001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7973-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Zhang, Y., Giangrande, S. E., Li, Z., Machado, L. A.
T., Martin, S. T., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Braga,
R. C., Comstock, J. M., Feng, Z., Gao, W., Gomes, H. B., Mei, F.,
Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., and De Souza, R. A. F.:
Substantial convection and precipitation enhancements by ultrafine aerosol
particles, Science, 359, 411–418,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, B., Guyon, P., Maenhaut, W., Taylor, P. E., Ebert, M.,
Matthias-Maser, S., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Godoi, R. H. M., Artaxo, P.,
Meixner, F. X., Moura, M. A. L., Rocha, C. H. E. D., Grieken, R. Van,
Glovsky, M. M., Flagan, R. C., and Andreae, M. O.: Composition and diurnal
variability of the natural Amazonian aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
108, n/a-n/a, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004049</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gunthe, S. S., King, S. M., Rose, D., Chen, Q., Roldin, P., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J. L., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Martin, S. T., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in pristine tropical rainforest air of Amazonia: size-resolved measurements and modeling of atmospheric aerosol composition and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7551–7575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7551-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Heffter, J. L.: Transport Layer Depth Calculations, in Second Joint
Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology,  New Orleans,
Louisiana, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hofmann, D. J.: Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols, Science,
255, 423–430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5043.423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5043.423</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Climate Change 2013: The Physical
Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fifths Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Isaacman-Vanwertz, G., Yee, L. D., Kreisberg, N. M., Wernis, R., Moss, J.
A., Hering, S. V, De Saì, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander,  M. L.,
Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Riva,
M., Surratt, J. D., Viegas, J., Manzi, A., Edgerton, E., Baumann, K., Souza,
R., Artaxo, P. and Goldstein, A. H.: Ambient Gas-Particle Partitioning of
Tracers for Biogenic Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9952–9962, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01674" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01674</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jardine, A. B., Jardine, K. J., Fuentes, J. D., Martin, S. T., Martins, G.,
Durgante, F., Carneiro, V., Higuchi, N., Manzi, A. O., and Chambers, J. Q.:
Highly reactive light-dependent monoterpenes in the Amazon, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 1576–1583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062573" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062573</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jardine, K., Yañez Serrano, A., Arneth, A., Abrell, L., Jardine, A., Van
Haren, J., Artaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Ishida, F. Y., Karl, T., Kesselmeier,
J., Saleska, S., and Huxman, T.: Within-canopy sesquiterpene ozonolysis in
Amazonia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016243</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., S., A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel,
J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams,
L. R., Wood, C., E., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kourtchev, I., Godoi, R. H. M., Connors, S., Levine, J. G., Archibald, A. T., Godoi, A. F. L., Paralovo, S. L., Barbosa, C. G. G., Souza, R. A. F., Manzi, A. O., Seco, R., Sjostedt, S., Park, J.-H., Guenther, A., Kim, S., Smith, J., Martin, S. T., and Kalberer, M.: Molecular composition of organic aerosols in central Amazonia: an ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11899–11913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11899-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11899-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kubátová, A., Vermeylen, R., Claeys, M., Cafmeyer, J., Maenhaut, W.,
Roberts, G., and Artaxo, P.: Carbonaceous aerosol characterization in the
Amazon basin, Brazil: Novel dicarboxylic acids and related compounds,
Atmos. Environ.,  34,  5037–5051, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lawler, M. J., Rissanen, M. P., Ehn, M., Mauldin, R. L., Sarnela, N.,
Sipilä, M., and Smith, J. N.: Evidence for Diverse Biogeochemical Drivers
of Boreal Forest New Particle Formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
2038–2046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076394</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J. and Russell, L. M.: Observational evidence for pollution-influenced
selectiveuptake contributing to biogenic secondary organicaerosols in the
southeastern U.S., Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 8056–8064, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mace, K. A., Artaxo, P., and Duce, R. A.: Water-soluble organic nitrogen in
Amazon Basin aerosols during the dry (biomass burning) and wet seasons, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003557</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, S. T., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Baumgardner, D., Chen, Q.,
Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A., Heald, C. L., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., McMurry,
P. H., Pauliquevis, T., Pöschl, U., Prather, K. A., Roberts, G. C., Saleska,
S. R., Silva Dias, M. A., Spracklen, D. V., Swietlicki, E., and Trebs, I.:
Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles, Rev. Geophys., 48, 1–42,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000280</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, S. T., Artaxo, P., Machado, L. A. T., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F., Schumacher, C., Wang, J., Andreae, M. O., Barbosa, H. M. J., Fan, J., Fisch, G., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A., Jimenez, J. L., Pöschl, U., Silva Dias, M. A., Smith, J. N., and Wendisch, M.: Introduction: Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4785–4797, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4785-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4785-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
McMurry, P. H., Ghimire, A., Ahn, H.-K., Sakurai, H., Moore, K.,
Stolzenburg, M., and Smith, J. N.: Sampling Nanoparticles for Chemical
Analysis by Low Resolution Electrical Mobility Classification, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 4653–4658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8029335" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es8029335</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pakkanen, T. A., Korhonen, C. H., Hillamo, R. E., Aurela, M., Aarnio, P.,
Koskentalo, T., and Maenhaut, W.: Ultrafine particles (PM<sub>0.1</sub>) in the Helsinki
area, J. Aerosol Sci., 31, 522–523,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(00)90535-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(00)90535-4</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Pöhlker, C., Wiedemann, T., Sinha, B., Shiraiwa, M., Gunthe, S., Smith,
M., Su, H., Artaxo, P., Chen, Q., Cheng, Y., Elbert, W., Gilles, M.,
Kilcoyn, A., Moffet, R., Weigand, M., Martin, S., Pöschl, U., and
Andreae, M.: Biogenic Potassium Salt Particles as Seeds for Secondary
Organic Aerosol in the Amazon, Science, 337, 1075–1078,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Ditas, F., Klimach, T., Hrabe de Angelis, I., Araújo, A., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chi, X., Ditz, R., Gunthe, S. S., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Lavrič, J. V., Martin, S. T., Mikhailov, E., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Rose, D., Saturno, J., Su, H., Thalman, R., Walter, D., Wang, J., Wolff, S., Barbosa, H. M. J., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Long-term observations of cloud condensation nuclei in the Amazon rain forest – Part 1: Aerosol size distribution, hygroscopicity, and new model parametrizations for CCN prediction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15709–15740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15709-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15709-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pósfai, M., Gelencsér, A., Simonics, R., Arató, K., Li, J., and
Hobbs, P. V: Atmospheric tar balls: Particles from biomass and biofuel
burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D06213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
R:  A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R
Found. Stat. Comput., 1, 409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rcia, M., Yamasoe, A., Artaxo, P., Miguel, A. H., and Allen, A. G.: Chemical
composition of aerosol particles from direct emissions of vegetation in the
Amazon Basin: water-soluble species and trace elements, Atmos. Environ., 34,
1641–1653, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Riipinen, I., Yli-Juuti, T., Pierce, J. R., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D.
R., Kulmala, M., and Donahue, N. M.: The contribution of organics to
atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nat. Publ. Gr., 5, 453–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1499</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications
and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Model. Softw., 95, 210–228,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T.,
Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J.,
Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R.,
Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding
secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev.
Geophys., 55, 509–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. N.: Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry
during GoAmazon2014/5, data portal,
available at: <a href="https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/smith-tdcims" target="_blank">https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2014/mao/goamazon/T3/smith-tdcims</a> (last access: 10 October 2019), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. N. and Rathbone, G. J.: Carboxylic acid characterization in
nanoparticles by thermal desorption chemical ionization mass spectrometry,
Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 274, 8–13, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. N., Moore, K. F., McMurry, P. H., and Eisele, F. L.: Atmospheric
Measurements of Sub-20&thinsp;nm Diameter Particle Chemical Composition by Thermal
Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Technol.,
38, 100–110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490249036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490249036</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. N., Dunn, M. J., VanReken, T. M., Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M. R.,
McMurry, P. H., and Huey, L. G.: Chemical composition of atmospheric
nanoparticles formed from nucleation in Tecamac, Mexico: Evidence for an
important role for organic species in nanoparticle growth, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, 2–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032523</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. N., Barsanti, K. C., Friedli, H. R., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M.,
Collins, D. R., Scheckman, J. H., Williams, B. J., and McMurry, P. H.:
Observations of aminium salts in atmospheric nanoparticles and possible
climatic implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6634–6639,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912127107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912127107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: Noaa's hysplit atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Varanda Rizzo, L., Roldin, P., Brito, J., Backman, J., Swietlicki, E., Krejci, R., Tunved, P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Artaxo, P.: Multi-year statistical and modeling analysis of submicrometer aerosol number size distributions at a rain forest site in Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10255–10274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10255-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10255-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Voisin, D., Smith, J. N., Sakurai, H., Mcmurry, P. H., and Eisele, F. L.:
Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer for Ultrafine
Particle Chemical Composition, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 37, 471–475,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5439/1562451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5439/1562451</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Krejci, R., Giangrande, S., Kuang, C., Barbosa, H. M. J., Brito,
J., Carbone, S., Chi, X., Comstock, J., Ditas, F., Lavric, J., Manninen, H.
E., Mei, F., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L.,
Saturno, J., Schmid, B., Souza, R. A. F., Springston, S. R., Tomlinson, J.
M., Toto, T., Walter, D., Wimmer, D., Smith, J. N., Kulmala, M., Machado, L.
A. T., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Petäjä, T., and Martin, S. T.:
Amazon boundary layer aerosol concentration sustained by vertical transport
during rainfall, Nat. Publ. Gr., 539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19819" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19819</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wilks, D. S.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences,
Elsevier/Academic Press, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Winkler, P. M., Ortega, J., Karl, T., Cappellin, L., Friedli, H. R.,
Barsanti, K., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Identification of the
biogenic compounds responsible for size-dependent nanoparticle growth,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053253" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053253</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Wolff, S., Alves, E., Martins, G. A., Bourtsoukidis, E., Brito, J., Jardine, K., Artaxo, P., and Kesselmeier, J.: Diel and seasonal changes of biogenic volatile organic compounds within and above an Amazonian rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3359–3378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Yee, L. D., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Wernis, R. A., Meng, M., Rivera, V., Kreisberg, N. M., Hering, S. V., Bering, M. S., Glasius, M., Upshur, M. A., Gray Bé, A., Thomson, R. J., Geiger, F. M., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Kourtchev, I., Kalberer, M., de Sá, S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Liu, Y., McKinney, K. A., Artaxo, P., Viegas, J., Manzi, A., Oliveira, M. B., de Souza, R., Machado, L. A. T., Longo, K., and Goldstein, A. H.: Observations of sesquiterpenes and their oxidation products in central Amazonia during the wet and dry seasons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10433–10457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10433-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10433-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q. and Anastasio, C.: Free and combined amino compounds in
atmospheric fine particles (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and fog waters from Northern
California, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2247–2258,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00127-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00127-4</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, J., Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H. C., and Artaxo, P.: Submicrometer
aerosol particle size distribution and hygroscopic growth measured in the
Amazon rain forest during the wet season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 22-1–22-10 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000203</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
