<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Photomineralization mechanism changes the ability of dissolved organic
matter to activate cloud droplets and to nucleate ice crystals</article-title><alt-title>Photomineralization changes the ability of DOM to act as CCN and INP</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Photomineralization changes the ability of DOM to act as CCN and INP}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{N. Borduas-Dedekind et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Borduas-Dedekind</surname><given-names>Nadine</given-names></name>
          <email>nadine.borduas@usys.ethz.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-368X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ossola</surname><given-names>Rachele</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4648-5958</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>David</surname><given-names>Robert O.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8509-0513</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Boynton</surname><given-names>Lin S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Weichlinger</surname><given-names>Vera</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kanji</surname><given-names>Zamin A.</given-names></name>
          <email>zamin.kanji@env.ethz.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-3921</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>McNeill</surname><given-names>Kristopher</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich,
Zurich, 8092, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich,
8092, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nadine Borduas-Dedekind (nadine.borduas@usys.ethz.ch) and
Zamin A. Kanji (zamin.kanji@env.ethz.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>12397</fpage><lpage>12412</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>3</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e143">An organic aerosol particle has a lifetime of approximately 1 week in the
atmosphere during which it will be exposed to sunlight. However, the effect of
photochemistry on the propensity of organic matter to participate in the
initial cloud-forming steps is difficult to predict. In this study, we
quantify on a molecular scale the effect of photochemical exposure of
naturally occurring dissolved organic matter (DOM) and of a fulvic acid
standard on its cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nucleation (IN)
activity. We find that photochemical processing, equivalent to 4.6 d in
the atmosphere, of DOM increases its ability to form cloud droplets by up to
a factor of 2.5 but decreases its ability to form ice crystals at a loss
rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of sunlight at ground level.
In other words, the ice nucleation activity of photooxidized DOM can require
up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C colder temperatures for 50 % of the droplets to activate
as ice crystals under immersion freezing conditions. This temperature change
could impact the ratio of ice to water droplets within a mixed-phase
cloud by delaying the onset of glaciation and by increasing the supercooled
liquid fraction of the cloud, thereby modifying the radiative properties and
the lifetime of the cloud. Concurrently, a photomineralization mechanism was
quantified by monitoring the loss of organic carbon and the simultaneous
production of organic acids, such as formic, acetic, oxalic and pyruvic
acids, CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This mechanism explains and predicts the observed
increase in CCN and decrease in IN efficiencies. Indeed, we show that
photochemical processing can be a dominant atmospheric ageing process,
impacting CCN and IN efficiencies and concentrations. Photomineralization
can thus alter the aerosol–cloud radiative effects of organic matter by
modifying the supercooled-liquid-water-to-ice-crystal ratio in mixed-phase
clouds with implications for cloud lifetime, precipitation patterns and the
hydrological cycle.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><bold>Highlights.</bold>
During atmospheric transport, dissolved organic matter (DOM) within aqueous
aerosols undergoes photochemistry. We find that photochemical processing of
DOM increases its ability to form cloud droplets but decreases its ability
to form ice crystals over a simulated 4.6 d in the atmosphere. A
photomineralization mechanism involving the loss of organic carbon and the
production of organic acids, CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> explains the observed changes
and affects the liquid-water-to-ice ratio in clouds.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e237">Aerosol–cloud interactions play a key role in the earth's energy budget yet
contribute to the largest uncertainty in radiative forcing in climate model
estimates (Boucher et al.,
2013). Mixed-phase clouds are particularly interesting because of their
predominant role in global precipitation and their unstable microphysics due
to the coexistence of liquid water and ice. The presence of liquid water in
mixed-phase clouds is due to the ability of an aerosol particle to activate
into a cloud droplet in the presence of high relative humidity, as predicted
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory (Farmer et al., 2015;
Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007). First the size and second the chemical
composition of aerosol particles are the key factors controlling their
ability to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
(Dusek et al., 2006; Köhler, 1936). The
initial<?pagebreak page12398?> formation of ice crystals in mixed-phase clouds is due to the
ability of an ice-nucleating particle (INP) to induce freezing in a
supercooled liquid droplet via heterogeneous ice nucleation predominantly
through the immersion freezing mechanism (Knopf et al., 2018;
Vali, 2014). Furthermore, ice crystals grow at the expense of water droplets
in mixed-phase clouds because the saturation water vapour pressure is lower
over ice than over water  (Korolev, 2007). In this
study, we chose to combine cloud condensation and ice nucleation (IN)
experiments on the same particle type to elucidate effects on mixed-phase
clouds with implications for the subtle balance existing between supercooled
water droplets and ice crystals.</p>
      <p id="d1e247">This study focuses on the impact of atmospheric photochemical processing
during the 1-week lifetime equivalent of an organic aerosol particle.
Indeed, in the time interval between where organic aerosols are emitted
and/or formed and where they act as CCN and INPs, they will undoubtedly be
exposed to sunlight and thus undergo atmospheric processing through
photochemistry (George
et al., 2015; Laskin et al., 2015). This atmospheric ageing process modifies
the physical and chemical properties of organic aerosols and subsequently
affects their cloud-forming ability. In fact, atmospheric photochemical
processing of organic aerosols has been shown to increase CCN ability (Slade
et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2011). However, the effect of photochemical
processing of organic matter on ice nucleation is unknown, although recent
work on pollen in deposition freezing mode suggests a decrease in ice
activity  (Gute and Abbatt, 2018). Our study links a
photochemical mechanism with CCN and with IN efficiencies applicable for an
atmospheric organic aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e250">Aquatic dissolved organic matter (DOM) is known to be highly photoreactive
by direct and indirect photochemical processes (McNeill
and Canonica, 2016; Rosario-Ortiz and Canonica, 2016; Sharpless et al.,
2014; Wenk et al., 2013). DOM therefore allows us to probe the impact of
photochemistry on the cloud-forming properties of organic matter, while
taking advantage of its known photochemical processes in aquatic
environments. Furthermore, both DOM and organic aerosols possess absorbing
molecules in the visible spectrum, often termed brown carbon
(Laskin et al., 2015). Both materials are also naturally
occurring and contain complex organic molecules, with DOM having more
chemical function group diversity (Graber
and Rudich, 2006; Kristensen et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample description and storage</title>
      <p id="d1e268">The DOM samples were collected from the Great Dismal Swamp, in Virginia,
USA, and from the Suwannee River, in Florida, USA. The Great Dismal Swamp
was sampled in Suffolk (36.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 76.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) in 2014
(Sun et al., 2014) and from Jericho Ditch
(36.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 76.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) in 2016
(Lin et al., 2017). Suwannee River water
was collected in 2017 close to the collection site of the International
Humic Standard Society (IHSS) (30.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 82.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). The
Great Dismal Swamp and the Suwannee River samples were filtered through a
pre-cleaned 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m capsule filter (Polycap TC, Whatman) on-site
following collection and kept refrigerated until use. The samples were never
frozen to avoid potential freeze–thaw cycle artefacts. Experimental
solutions with concentrations of approximately 20 mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were
prepared upon dilution of the field-collected waters in nanopure water.
The Suwannee River Fulvic Acid Standard II (2S101F) was purchased from the IHSS
and dissolved in nanopure water with concentrations of approximately 20 mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The inorganic ions present in Great Dismal Swamp water have been previously reported (Johannesson et al., 2004), and anionic ion chromatography confirmed similar concentrations.
Indeed, DS2014 had concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a total of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M, which we can approximate to 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M of ions assuming charge balance. These ion concentrations suggest
that the ratio of organic to inorganic ions is typically less than 10 % by
molar concentration.</p>
      <p id="d1e426">In addition, the DOM sampled for this study was bulk water-collected and
therefore represents an alternative sampling procedure to access organic
carbon compared to impacting particular matter on filters. Indeed, DOM was
not extracted from a filter or from an impinger but rather directly
collected in the field. Ultimately, the photochemical mechanisms identified
in this study are expected to be similar between DOM and organic aerosols,
thereby bridging the fields of aquatic and atmospheric chemistry of organic
matter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Photochemical setup</title>
      <p id="d1e437">Photolysis experiments were conducted in a commercial photoreactor (Rayonet,
Southern New England Ultraviolet Co.) equipped with a motorized turntable
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm light bulbs (UVB – 3000 Å from Southern New
England Ultraviolet Co.). These UVB bulbs have a relative light intensity as
a function of wavelength shown in Fig. S2. A total of 9 mL of a 20 mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> DOM or
IHSS isolate solution was pipetted into cork-capped 10 mL borosilicate test
tubes (Pyrex, 15 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 mm, disposable) and irradiated for up to 25 h. During this period, the temperature inside the photoreactor was held at
30–32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the reactor was turned on prior to the beginning of
the experiment to ensure a constant temperate exposure. At each time point,
a test tube was removed from the photoreactor, and the solution was directly
used for either CCN (9–18 mL), INP (9–18 mL), total organic carbon (TOC; 7 mL), ion chromatography
(1 mL) or conductivity (0.1 mL) measurements.</p>
      <?pagebreak page12399?><p id="d1e480">A slightly different experimental setup was used for the CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements. In order to avoid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning to the gas phase, the
borosilicate test tubes were prepared headspace-free using rubber septa. At
each time point, a test tube was withdrawn from the photoreactor and 6 mL of
the experimental solution was transferred to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-flushed 20 mL serum
vial containing 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L HCl 1 N. The serum vial was briefly shaken and
stored no longer than a week in the fridge until headspace analysis on the
gas
chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Photochemical control experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e532">Control experiments were conducted to unambiguously attribute the change in
CCN and INPs to photochemistry. Importantly, the photomineralization
mechanism could have led to the accumulation of carbonate ions in solution
and thus increase the CCN ability of the material with UVB exposure time. As
a control, inorganic carbon measurements by the Shimadzu TOC analyser showed
no increasing IC fraction with irradiation. In addition, control experiments
where the DOM solutions were purged with argon showed no difference in CCN
activity, indicating no contribution to accumulating dissolved carbonate in
solution.</p>
      <p id="d1e535">To address the issue of the potential impact of a 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C heat
exposure on CCN and INPs during the photochemical experiment, foil-covered
test tubes were placed inside the photoreactor alongside non-covered test
tubes. Indeed, the non-irradiated sample that would have experienced the
same temperature elevation from room temperature to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C did
not show any change in hygroscopicity, INP activity, organic carbon or
production of photochemical adducts.</p>
      <p id="d1e556">Control experiments involving Ar-purged solutions further emphasize that
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is necessary for photomineralization, consistent with
previous reports  (Schmitt-Kopplin et al.,
1998). In an atmospheric context, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be readily available to the
aqueous aerosol phase, and we expect in situ aqueous photomineralization of
organic aerosols. Furthermore, as confirmed by dark control experiments,
exposure to light was necessary to drive the chemical, cloud droplet
formation and ice nucleation changes observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Actinometry experiments for relating UVB exposure to sunlight</title>
      <p id="d1e589">The light intensity inside the photoreactor was monitored with the chemical
actinometer pyridine/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nitroanisole (PNA)
(Laszakovits et al., 2017).
Briefly, a solution containing 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M of recrystallized PNA and 0.25 mM of pyridine in nanopure water was irradiated for 5 h in the experimental
conditions described above. Then, the PNA and pyridine were quantified via
ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography (Waters Acquity) equipped with a
C18 column (BEH130 C18, 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m; 2.1 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 mm) and a
photodiode array detector. The analyses were performed using a 40 : 60 A : B
eluent mixture of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade solvent (A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % (acetate buffer pH 6) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % acetonitrile; B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 % acetonitrile), 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L injection
volume and 0.2 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> flow rate. At these conditions, PNA was eluted at 4.2 min (detection at 310 nm) and pyridine at 2.7 min (detection at 250 nm).</p>
      <p id="d1e664">The absolute spectral irradiance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was obtained according to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (J nm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the spectral irradiance
measured in the photoreactor with a calibrated Jaz spectrophotometer (Ocean
Optics) using 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 nm bulbs (Fig. S2). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also
corrected for the absorption of the borosilicate glass occurring between
280 and 300 nm. The scaling factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated according to Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
pseudo-first-order PNA degradation rate constant measured with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm bulbs, [PNA]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M is the starting
PNA concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.076</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the direct
photolysis quantum yield calculated according to
Laszakovits et al. (2017),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorptivity of the starting PNA solution, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the path length (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, [PNA]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the average values
measured for different days. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the fraction
of light absorbed by the PNA starting solution, and it was calculated
according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar
extinction coefficient of PNA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PNA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorbance.
This calculation provided an integrated irradiance (280–400 nm) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm bulbs. The
photoreactor-to-sunlight conversion factor, that is the irradiation time in
the photoreactor equivalent to 1 h in natural sunlight, was obtained as
the ratio of the rates of light absorption of a given DOM for the two
different light sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">photoreactor</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">solar</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
according to Eq. (2).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M78" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">conversion</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">factor</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">photoreactor</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">solar</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In order to get <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">solar</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we simulated a solar spectrum (global horizontal irradiance, 300–400 nm, integrated irradiance of 59.2 J s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) using SMARTS 2.9.5 (NREL) for a generic point at mid-latitudes (45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in summer (1 June, from 05:00 a.m. to 07:00 p.m.).
Using the daily average value of 2.2 during daytime, 25 h of irradiation
in the photoreactor with six UVB bulbs corresponds to 55 h of sunlight
irradiation, which is equivalent to 4.6 d in the environment (assuming
12 daily hours of light on a clear day). The actinometry experiments are
independent of temperature, as they depend on photon flux.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Analytical chemistry instruments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>2.5.1</label><title>TOC analyser</title>
      <p id="d1e1335">The total organic carbon, specifically the non-purgeable organic carbon
(NPOC), and the total inorganic carbon (IC,<?pagebreak page12400?> carbonates) were quantified
using a total organic carbon (TOC) analyser (Shimadzu, model TOC-L CSH). The
NPOC method used 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L injections for a minimum of triplicate
measurements and reports concentrations in milligrams of carbon per litre (mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with standard
deviations from the average. The method purge time and gas flow were 1.5 min
and 80 mL, respectively. NPOC calibrations were done with recrystallized
potassium phthalate. The IC calibration was done with potassium carbonate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) solutions, and the IC method also used 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L
injections for a minimum of triplicate measurements. To confidently
attribute the decreasing TOC value observed during irradiation to the
formation of gaseous products (CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we ran solutions containing
formaldehyde, formic acid, acetone and urea with the NPOC method, and we
confirmed that those compounds were not removed from the solutions during
the purging time within the TOC instrument.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>2.5.2</label><title>Conductivity measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1401">Conductivity measurements were made using a portable Horiba Scientific
LAQUAtwin model B-771 conductivity kit. The conductivity probe was
calibrated with the manufacturer's standard solution at 1.41 mS cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS3">
  <label>2.5.3</label><title>GC-FID measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1424">CO and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> headspace concentrations were quantified by a gas
chromatograph (GC) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a
methanizer (model 8610, SRI instruments, Menlo Park, CA). The methanizer
ensures high sensitivity following separation over a 2.7 m HayeSep D column
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> carrier gas. Column and detector temperatures were 40
and 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively. Under these conditions,
CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> eluted at 1.82 and 4.27 min, respectively. From the
headspace concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where A is CO or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
the aqueous-phase concentration in the photolysis test tube
([A]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated with Eq. (3).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M96" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of liquid in the 20 mL serum vial, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the moles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the aqueous phase and in the headspace, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was calculated from the measured headspace vapour pressure
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) via Henry's law, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also
obtained from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the ideal gas law and Eq. (4).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M105" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is Henry's constant corrected for the temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the time of the measurement (Fry et al., 1995), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas constant and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the headspace
volume corrected for the vial overpressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total gas pressure in
the vial before the GC measurement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS4">
  <label>2.5.4</label><title>Low-molecular-weight organic acid analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1829">Acetic acid, formic acid, oxalic acid and pyruvic acid were quantified via
ion chromatography (DX-320, Thermo Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The
instrument was equipped with an EG40 eluent gradient generator, a Dionex IonPac AG11-HC RFIC 4 mm column and guard column, a Dionex AERS 500 4 mm
electric suppressor and an electrical conductivity detector. Injection
volume and flow rate were 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L and 1.5 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
The following KOH gradient was used: 0–11 min, 1 mmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 11–37 min, 1 mmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 40 mmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 37 to 38 min, 40 mmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 38
to 41 min, 1 mmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In these conditions, acetic acid, formic acid,
pyruvic acid and oxalic acid were eluted at 9.4, 11.9, 13.0 and 24.9 min,
respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Cloud chamber instruments and techniques</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS1">
  <label>2.6.1</label><title>Cloud condensation nuclei counter setup</title>
      <?pagebreak page12401?><p id="d1e1929">The DOM samples were atomized by a home-made atomizer (based on a TSI
aerosol generator) from a heart-shaped glass flask to minimize the amount
of solution required for efficient aerosolization. The generated flow of
polydispersed wet aerosols was then dried through orange silica gel and 4 Å molecular sieves; the exiting flow had a relative humidity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. The polydisperse flow of dry aerosols was used to generate a
monodisperse flow with a TSI differential mobility analyser (DMA; TSI model
3082) operating with a sheath-to-sample flow ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
monodispersed dry aerosol flow was subsequently split in two and sampled by
a TSI condensation particle counter (CPC-3772) and a Droplet Measurement Technologies cloud condensation
nuclei chamber (CCNC-100) (Roberts
and Nenes, 2005; Rose et al., 2008). The CCNC operated with a total flow of
0.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to a high RH exposure time of approximately 10 s for
the aerosols. We do not expect dynamic surface tension changes on this timescale (Nozière et al., 2014). The number of
activated droplets measured by the CCNC is then divided by the total number
of particles measured by the CPC to yield the activated fraction and
supersaturation (SS) curves. Specifically, the CCNC was operated by
generating aerosol particles of a fixed dry diameter (80 nm) while changing
supersaturations (SS) (0.2 % to 1.0 %) as well as using a fixed SS
(0.40 %) while changing diameters (20  to 120 nm) to ensure
reproducible measurements. Both methods were used to quantify the ability of
DOM to act as a CCN by determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(Fig. 1). The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were used for
the variance depicted in Fig. 1, as triplicates
were not conducted for every single time point because of limited samples.
From Eq. (5) of the supercritical saturation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the hygroscopicity
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained following Eq. (6) (Petters
and Kreidenweis, 2007; Ruehl et al., 2016):
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M126" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the supercritical saturation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wet diameter (fitted
parameter when using Eq. 6, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dry diameter (measured in this
work by the DMA), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the hygroscopicity parameter (unitless),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface tension of water (0.072 J m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molecular weight of water (18 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
universal gas constant (8.314 J K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature
of the inlet flow (298 K) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of water
(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Petters and
Kreidenweis, 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e2333">The mass of the DOM samples is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % organic carbon by molar
concentration, and thus phase separation between inorganic ions and the
organic phase is not likely occurring during aerosolization of the DOM. In
other words, there is no thin film being generated, and thus the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter, or the thickness of the organic film surrounding an
inorganic core, is not calculated.</p>
      <p id="d1e2357">Two CCN and INP experiments performed 1 year apart showed reproducible
data, indicating little degradation of the cloud droplet and ice-nucleating
activity due to storage.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS2">
  <label>2.6.2</label><title>Ice nucleation setup</title>
      <p id="d1e2368">The DRoplet Ice Nuclei Counter Zurich (DRINCZ) is a custom-built instrument
that enables the quantification of heterogeneous ice nucleation through
immersion freezing (David et
al., 2019). Briefly, DRINCZ is an immersion freezing technique with an
optical detection employed in a cooling bath (Lauda Proline RP 845,
Lauda-Königshofen, Germany), a visible light camera
(Microsoft Lifecam HD-3000), and a 96-well sterilized and sealed plate (PCR
tray, 732-2386, VWR, USA). Each well of the plate is filled with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of the DOM solution using a multi-pipette with disposable tips. Above the
cooling bath, a custom-machined aluminium plate holder keeps the plate in
place so that the liquid in the wells is exactly level with the ethanol
coolant. Additionally, a solenoid valve, triggered by a fluid level sensor,
allows for additional ethanol, pre-cooled to 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, to be poured
into the bath to compensate for the solvent's changing density with cooling
and to ensure a constant ethanol level submerging the plate. A thick acrylic
plate on top of the well plate weighs it down and prevents buckling of the
plate to ensure that all the wells are immersed equally and experience the
same temperature. The bath temperature is cooled at a rate of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A diffuse LED array submerged at the bottom of the ethanol
bath illuminates the plate from below and does not interfere with the
coolant flow. The camera is mounted above the plate and captures the light
transmission through the wells every 15 s. The position of each well on the
image is later automatically obtained using image recognition code in
MATLAB, and the change in light intensity for each well is obtained per
image. Freezing fractions are then obtained for each well by taking the
temperature at the time the image was taken and the instant when 60 %, of
greatest change in light intensity occurred.</p>
      <p id="d1e2409">The DRINCZ measurement technique is limited to samples that freeze at
temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, since 50 % of the wells of
the background molecular biology reagent water (89079-460, Sigma-Aldrich,
USA) freeze at that temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). This
detection limit of homogeneous freezing is largely due to well plate
characteristics, which do not change for different well volumes; to water
quality (Polen et al., 2018); and to a sterile
working environment. While others have noted degradation of INP activity
with sample storage (Stopelli et al.,
2014), we did not observe a storage effect on the INP properties, likely
because our DOM samples were filtered on-site to 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m using sterile
filters and stored at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Following repeated Sigma-Aldrich
water runs on DRINCZ, a master water background curve was generated.
Specifically, 10 curves were used to generated the background in
Fig. 2a and lead to an average standard deviation
in the freezing temperature detection of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The background
was corrected following  (Vali, 1971,
2019), where the nucleus concentration, Nuc(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), of the background is
subtracted from that of the sample and then inverted to reconstruct the
corrected frozen fraction (FF) following Eq. (7) (David et al., 2019).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M156" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nuc</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">well</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">well</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aliquot volume of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
change in temperature between each recorded image, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of
unfrozen aliquots at the beginning of a temperature step, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
number of aliquots that freeze during the temperature step and, in DRINCZ's
case, between recorded images. All reported FF curves have been background
corrected.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2606">The CCN ability of DOM and of Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA) increases as a function of
irradiation. The experimental conditions are equivalent to up to 25 h of UVB
exposure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h of sunlight in the atmosphere). The
colours indicate different source material (DS 2014 in red, DS 2016 in
purple, SR 2017 in blue and SRFA in black), and the symbols indicate the
material was field-collected (circles) or commercially available (squares).
The instrumental uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To show the
spread of the measurements, the variance from multiple independent
experiments are illustrated as bars. The variance was used since not every
point had triplicates for standard deviations to be calculated.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/12397/2019/acp-19-12397-2019-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2642">DOM is IN active. <bold>(a)</bold> The frozen fractions (FFs) as a function of
temperature are displayed for field-collected DOM from the Great Dismal Swamp,
Virginia, USA, in 2014 (DS 2014, red) and in 2016 (DS 2016, purple); from the
Suwannee River, Florida, USA, in 2017 (SR 2017, blue); and for the reference
material Suwannee River fulvic acid (SR fulvic acid, black). The solid
50 % frozen fraction line is used to determine the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
temperature at which 50 % of the droplets are frozen. Specifically, DS
2014, DS 2016, SR 2017 and SRFA showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively. The black
line represents the water background FF curve with standard deviation (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from 10 different water backgrounds run over a period of 6 months.
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of UVB exposure for all DOM samples is shown. All
samples exhibit a decrease in IN activity upon 25 h of UVB exposure
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h of sunlight in the atmosphere). The lines are
linear fits to the data to quantify the slope and the rate loss of IN
activity. The slopes are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.054</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.145</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.066</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for DS 2014,
DS 2016, SR 2017 and SRFA, respectively. <bold>(c)</bold> The shaded regions in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> space correspond to the extent of change in IN activity due to
photochemistry from the mean values at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. Note that
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were determined by accounting for the change in organic
carbon content measured by TOC analysed and depicted in
Fig. 4. The Wilson 2015 parameterization for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of INPs in the sea surface microlayer is also shown for comparison
(Wilson et al., 2015).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/12397/2019/acp-19-12397-2019-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2875">The INP per milligram of carbon is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value and was calculated following the
quantitative analysis Eq. (8) according to Vali (1971).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M184" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">well</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where FF is the frozen fraction (value between 0 and 1), TOC is the
concentration of non-purgeable organic carbon (mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">well</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the aliquot volume (50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L). The data analysis was coded in MATLAB and in Igor Pro.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Photochemical ageing of DOM</title>
      <p id="d1e2977">To study the effect of photochemistry on CCN and INPs, we sampled naturally
occurring DOM from surface waters<?pagebreak page12402?> from the Great Dismal Swamp in Virginia, USA, in
2014 and in 2016 and at the Suwannee River, Florida, USA, in 2017. The
natural DOM sampled from freshwater bodies is representative of a fraction
of atmospheric organic aerosols directly relevant to lake spray aerosols and
potentially prevalent in the aerosol phase over large freshwater bodies
such as the Laurentian Great Lakes
(Axson
et al., 2016; Slade et al., 2010), the African Great Lakes and Lake Baikal.
Furthermore, we used commercially available Suwannee River fulvic acid
(SRFA), an established standard for complex organic matter and humic-like
substances in both aquatic
(Cory
et al., 2009; Guerard et al., 2009) and atmospheric chemistry experiments
(Chen and Valsaraj, 2007; Dinar et al., 2006; Frosch et al., 2011; Kessler et al.,
2012; Ladino et al., 2016; Slade et al., 2017; Svenningsson et al., 2006;
Wang and Knopf, 2011; Zelenay et al., 2011). To further bridge the gaps of
aquatic and atmospheric chemistry, we used the same concentrations typically
found in rivers and in cloud water, that is 20 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Cook
et al., 2017; Johannesson et al., 2004). Organic aerosols containing
humic-like substances may have lower average molecular weights and a lower
aromatic moiety content than SRFA standards
(Graber and Rudich, 2006), yet we
complement our study with real surface-collected waters to circumvent IHSS
extraction and processing of DOM. Ultimately, we argue that our DOM samples
are naturally occurring in freshwater bodies and are adequate and alternative
proxies for visualizing the photomineralization mechanism identified in this
study.</p>
      <p id="d1e2992">Bulk DOM samples were irradiated for 25 h with UVB light in a photoreactor
in order to simulate the photooxidation processes occurring in the
atmosphere. Using a combination of chemical actinometry and radiometry
measurements, we estimate that our 25 h exposure experiments in the
photoreactor are equivalent to approximately 55 h of sunlight
irradiation, which is further equivalent to 4.6 d in the environment. However, all
experiments were conducted at 30–32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and an extrapolation
to colder and more relevant atmospheric temperatures would slow the rates of
reactions of photochemical processes but would not affect the photon flux.
Many photochemical processes have weak temperature dependences, and for
instance hydrogen peroxide quantum yields are affected by a factor of 1.8
per 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Kieber et al., 2014). Thus, the
exposure time corrected for lower temperature is relevant in the context of
an approximately 1-week aerosol lifetime in the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e3013">The bulk solutions of irradiated DOM were subsequently analysed for CCN and
INP activity. In all of our experiments, we employed concentrations between
14 and 20 mg of carbon per litre (mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), equivalent to 1160 to 1670 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M of organic carbon, which represents typical aquatic DOM conditions
(Johannesson et
al., 2004) as well as typical concentrations found in cloud water
(Cook et al., 2017). An important
caveat to highlight here is that our photochemical experiments were
conducted in bulk. It is thus likely that the effect quantified does not
necessarily equate to identical processes in the droplet and/or in the
organic aerosol phase. However, we expect the photoproducts and mechanisms
within the bulk to be occurring within an aerosol droplet, potentially at
faster rates because of higher organic concentrations in the aqueous aerosol
versus in the bulk. In addition, organic aerosols can also exist under
different mixing states, phases and morphologies likely leading to matrix
effects which were not captured in this work
(Lignell et al., 2014; McDow et
al., 1996).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Photochemistry affects the hygroscopicity of DOM</title>
      <p id="d1e3044">To assess the ability of DOM to act as CCN, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of each
irradiated DOM sample were calculated, where higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate
a more effective CCN. During irradiation, we observed a clear increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, up to 2.5 times higher than the non-irradiated samples
(Fig. 1). The change in CCN activity with increased
UVB exposure was systematically observed across all of the naturally
occurring samples tested, including the SRFA standard. In this study,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for photochemically exposed DOM ranged between 0.12 and
0.45 with an instrumental error of 0.01 and an experimental uncertainty of
less than 15 %. These values compare to global ambient organic aerosol
which has <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values between 0.15 and 0.30
(Schmale et al., 2017). We further note the seemingly
large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for organic matter, specifically for<?pagebreak page12403?> the irradiated
field-collected samples DS 2014, DS 2016 and SR 2017
(Fig. 1). We suggest that as the organic matter is
photomineralized, the organic-to-inorganic ratio decreases, increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Organic acids are also being formed and can contribute to
increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (see further discussion in Sect. 3.4.2).
According to
Mikhailov et al. (2013), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is inversely proportional to molar mass, and, at equal particle density and at unity van't Hoff factor, a decrease in molar
mass would lead to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3118">In particular, SRFA's CCN activity has been reported to have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of 0.06–0.08
(Dinar et al.,
2006; Slade et al., 2017). In our experimental setup, SRFA has a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and we attribute part of this discrepancy to the lower
concentrations and the complete solubility of 20 mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of SRFA used
in our experiments. Concentrations above 5000 mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were previously
used, and such concentrations form a suspension rather than a homogeneously
dissolved solution potentially leading to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Dinar et al.,
2006; Slade et al., 2017). This possible concentration effect on CCN
activity could arise from the interfacial molecular arrangement of the
organic polymeric material (Ruehl et
al., 2016), which leads to changes in surface tension and thus to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values (Nozière et al., 2014;
Ovadnevaite et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Photochemistry affects the ice-nucleating ability of DOM</title>
      <?pagebreak page12404?><p id="d1e3194">To probe the impact of photochemistry on ice nucleation, the field-collected
DOM and SRFA were measured in our home-built DRoplet Ice Nuclei Counter
Zurich (DRINCZ) (David et al.,
2019). We report median freezing temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values which
correspond to the temperature at which 50 % of the wells filled with a
DOM solution froze (Fig. 2a). The natural DOM
samples from different locations and different years show frozen fractions (FFs) significantly above the background ultra-pure water, demonstrating ice
nucleation activity (Fig. 2a). Specifically, DS
2014, DS 2016, SR 2017 and SRFA showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively, which is
well above the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of ultra-pure water in DRINCZ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The steep curve of the FF curves exhibited by the samples suggests that the nature of the ice-nucleating material or active site is
relatively homogeneous. These freezing temperatures are consistent with
recently identified river nanoscale INPs
(Knackstedt
et al., 2018; Moffett et al., 2018). The FFs were then normalized by the
organic carbon concentration in the solution measured by a TOC analyser to
yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a function of temperature (Fig. S1). These
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values physically describe the ice nucleation active mass in units of
number per milligram of carbon. We compare our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values with those of the
Wilson 2015 parameterization which represents the ice-nucleating ability in
the immersion freezing mode of primarily organic material in the sea surface
microlayer (Wilson et al., 2015) (Figs. 2c and S1).
This comparison suggests that our DOM samples, which are smaller than 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, could be accounting for a subset of the IN activity previously
observed in the sea surface microlayer
(Irish et al., 2019; McCluskey et al., 2018; Wilson et al., 2015). Furthermore, sea
spray aerosols have recently been shown to be effective INPs when enriched
in organics (DeMott
et al., 2016; Ladino et al., 2016; Si et al., 2018; Wilson et al., 2015),
consistent with our results. Soil organic matter, also containing humic-like
substances, is also able to act as INPs in the immersion freezing mode
(Hill
et al., 2016; O'Sullivan et al., 2014). The SRFA was observed to have lower
IN activity than the collected DOM samples, despite SR 2017 having been
collected near the IHSS collection point at Suwannee River. This result
suggests that extraction and processing of Suwannee River DOM to yield its
fulvic acid component reduces its IN activity, potentially related to
differences in organic carbon content
(Botero et al., 2018). In
other words, the fulvic acid is not as good as an INP compared to other components
within DOM. Our results for SRFA are consistent with heterogeneous ice
nucleation studies which used aerosolized SRFA in deposition freezing mode
and found the organic material to be active
(Wang and Knopf, 2011). Ultimately, DOM
has the potential to nucleate ice at low to moderate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) droplet supercooling through immersion freezing.</p>
      <p id="d1e3386">The DOM samples were then subjected to photochemical exposure in an
identical setup to the CCN experiments, and the irradiated samples were
measured on DRINCZ. Photochemistry decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a function of
UVB irradiation, with an important impact on corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(Fig. 2). Indeed, the 2 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C change
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature observed in Fig. 2b
leads to corresponding changes of up to 2 orders of magnitude in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values between the 0 and the 25 h time points in
Fig. 2c. In particular, for an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 100 ice
nucleation sites per milligram of carbon, DS 2016 experienced a suppression in IN
activity of up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 2c). The
irradiated DOM samples led to different spreads of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, indicating
DOM's composition-specific photochemistry response on immersion freezing, and
warrants further study. Furthermore, the rate loss of IN activity measured
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be quantified as a function of hours of UVB exposure. The
slopes for photochemically exposed DS 2014, DS 2016, SR 2017 and SRFA were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.054</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.145</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.066</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively (Fig. 2b). The average decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for irradiated DOM samples is thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of UVB light and equates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of sunlight at ground level in mid-latitudes (see methods for
conversion of photochemical reactor exposure to sunlight exposure). These
values could be useful to the atmospheric modelling community to investigate
a lifetime-dependent IN activity of organic matter such as DOM or sea spray
aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d1e3661">Although our study is the first to quantify the effect of photomineralization on the ice-nucleating ability of organic matter, others have identified
specific organic molecules and components that could help explain the IN
ability of DOM. Wilson et al. parameterized the ice-nucleating ability of
sea surface microlayer samples using TOC and temperature
(Wilson et al., 2015). However, this
parameterization leads to higher estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than obtained for our
DOM samples (Fig. 2c). This result suggests that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not efficiently constrain the IN activity of DOM. McCluskey et
al. (2018) arrived at a similar conclusion for the IN activity of sea spray aerosol.
The INPs measured in this study were soluble with an operational definition
of passing through a 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m filter and could account for a subset of
INPs identified in marine samples. In addition, soluble INPs have been shown
to contain extracts from plant-based material, including cellulose
(Hiranuma et al., 2015) and
proteinaceous material
(Augustin
et al., 2013; Dreischmeier et al., 2017; Koop and Zobrist, 2009; O'Sullivan
et al., 2015; Pummer et al., 2012, 2015; Wilson et al., 2015), which we know
are present within our DOM samples. Finally, Gute and Abbatt observed that
OH radical oxidation of pollen in deposition freezing required higher
supersaturation ratio with respect to ice (Gute and
Abbatt, 2018). Our results nicely corroborate with this observation and
further suggest that not only OH radicals but photochemical processes in
general are able to decrease the ice nucleation ability of organics,
including pollen, in more than one freezing mode.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Chemical changes occur due to photochemistry</title>
      <p id="d1e3702">To understand the molecular origin of the observed photochemical impacts of
DOM on cloud droplet (Fig. 1) and ice nucleation
(Fig. 2), we tracked total carbon, absorbance,
conductivity, pH, organic acids, CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during irradiation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3718">Photooxidation products are formed from DOM. This graph depicts
data from <bold>(a)</bold> DS 2014 and SRFA and from <bold>(b)</bold> DS 2016 and SR 2017. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and CO were quantified via GC-FID, whereas formic, acetic, oxalic and
pyruvic acids were quantified by ion chromatography. Pyruvic acid for SRFA
was below detection limits. Note that the concentrations are expressed per
moles of carbon, and so organic acids with multiple carbon atoms have been
normalized.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/12397/2019/acp-19-12397-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>3.4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{CO and {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$}}?><title>CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page12405?><p id="d1e3762">The photooxidation products CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were quantified by gas
chromatography with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) equipped with a
methanizer between the GC column and the FID detector. The major and final
product was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accounting for 50 % to 100 % of dissolved organic
carbon mass loss (Fig. 3). On the other hand, CO
accounted for no more than 0.1 % mass yield, indicating that the original
organic carbon content of DOM is removed primarily by photomineralization to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 25 h of UVB irradiation (Fig. 3). It
must be noted that the CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations reported here
represent a lower limit, as these particular irradiation experiments needed
to be performed in a headspace-free setting to limit analyte loss. This
setup consequently limits dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability, potentially
limiting the extent of oxidation. However, this limitation is not expected
to occur in liquid atmospheric aerosols. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields presented in
this study serve as experimental evidence for the ultimate fate of the
organic carbon aerosol pool: the production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>3.4.2</label><title>Organic acids and pH</title>
      <p id="d1e3852">Formic, acetic, oxalic and pyruvic acid are known DOM photooxidation
products (Moran and Zepp, 1997)
and have been previously quantified in organic aerosols, further supporting
their identification as tracers for photooxidation
(Boreddy et al., 2017; Pillar and Guzman, 2017; Zhang et al., 2016). All four organic
acids were produced during the photooxidation of all the DOM samples
(Fig. 3). In addition, oxalate has been recently
quantified to be a major photoproduct of dissolved organic carbon from
primary wildfire emissions
(Tomaz et al., 2018).
Formic acid and acetic acid concentrations increase continuously, but oxalic
acid and pyruvic acid concentrations show a growth-and-decay profile
(Fig. 3). Indeed, pyruvic acid is a known
intermediate photoproduct on the pathway to the mineralization products of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Griffith et al.,
2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e3866">The quantified production of formic, acetic, oxalic and pyruvic acids
supports the changing chemistry observed during aqueous photooxidation
related to the changes in CCN; a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio leads to higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values. It is clear that the same oxidation products are produced, and thus
the same photomineralization mechanism is operating in all DOM samples,
albeit to different extents. This difference is attributed to the ability of
the DOM samples to absorb irradiation and to generate different amounts of
reactive oxygen species. These acids also do not appear to increase the
efficiency of DOM to act as an INP, suggesting a significant role of the
larger molecules within DOM to nucleate ice by immersion freezing.</p>
      <p id="d1e3888"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In addition, the pH of the solutions was measured to be approximately five
at each time point for the field-collected DOM samples and remained
unchanged throughout the irradiation period. The pH values further support
the absence of carbonate anions in solution. We further hypothesize that DOM
has a high enough buffering capacity to prevent weak acids from decreasing
the pH during photomineralization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>3.4.3</label><title>Total carbon and conductivity</title>
      <p id="d1e3900">All DOM solutions reproducibly lost organic carbon during UVB exposure
(Fig. 4). The organic carbon loss was dependent on
the DOM sample and ranged between 15 % (SRFA) and 63 % (DS 2014) over
the course of 25 h of UVB exposure, representing 230 to 740 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M of
carbon loss (Fig. 4). Specifically, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
value of SRFA upon 25 h of UVB exposure increased the least compared to the
natural DOM sample and can be explained by changes in TOC. Furthermore, the
inorganic carbon fraction was quantified and found to be consistently below
0.3 mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating no accumulation of carbonate in solution. The
conductivity of the DOM samples remained constant over UVB exposure at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for DS 2014, DS 2016, SR 2017 and
SRFA, respectively, indicating no meaningful change in ionic species
concentration. The conductivity measurements rule out the hypothesis that
the increase in CCN and the decrease in INP during irradiation is due to the
production of ionic species.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3989">Decrease in the dissolved organic carbon (in both mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M) present in DOM upon UVB irradiation. Both the organic (as
non-purgeable organic carbon) and inorganic carbon (as carbonates) were
quantified by a TOC analyser, which was calibrated using standard solutions
of terephthalic acid and carbonate, respectively. Note that dissolved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not quantified by TOC analysis. The inorganic carbon is averaged
for all samples with the standard deviation in grey. The percentage values
indicate the conversions of original organic matter into photoproducts.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/12397/2019/acp-19-12397-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4029">In our DOM samples, there are insufficient inorganic ions for the organic
matter to act as an organic film when aerosolized. However, photomineralization
leads to a decrease in the organic carbon and a decrease in the
organic-to-inorganic ratio (Fig. 5). The decreasing
organic carbon<?pagebreak page12406?> concentrations at the surface of the droplet may be
increasing the surface tension of the particle, bringing it closer to the
surface tension of water (Kristensen
et al., 2014; Petters and Petters, 2016). Remarkably, decreases in organic
carbon affect all DOM in the exact same way, which is evidenced by the identical
slopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (per mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. organic carbon in
Fig. 5. This result supports the notion that the
change in CCN activity is dependent on the decrease in organic carbon
content. Furthermore, the smallest change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited by SRFA is
correlated to the smallest change in its organic carbon content in
comparison to the natural DOM samples, indicating a non-negligible impact of
processing on the commercial sample.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4071">CCN abilities and IN abilities of DOM as a function of organic
carbon. Slopes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. organic carbon are all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, the slopes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. organic carbon are different for
different DOM: 0.17, 0.66, 0.34 and 0.81 for DS 2014, DS 2016, SR 2017 and
SRFA, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/12397/2019/acp-19-12397-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4114">Finally, the change in CCN and INPs was correlated with organic carbon
content (Fig. 5). The decrease in INP ability due
to photochemistry (Fig. 5) suggests that the
organic carbon is likely the source of ice nucleation activity. In contrast
to the changes in CCN ability, which all demonstrated identical dependence
on TOC (see Fig. 5), the INP ability dependence on
TOC was variable. Interestingly, Great Dismal Swamp DOM 2014 experienced the
highest organic carbon conversion (Fig. 4), yet its
decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values led to a negligible impact on its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(Fig. 2c). Although chromophoric species appear
to be key INP contributors, we conclude that the chromophoric species alone
in this specific DOM sample were not solely responsible for the IN activity.
Specific structures or chemical moieties of the organic content responsible
for the ice nucleation activity still elude us
(Knopf et al., 2018). On the other hand, the
irradiated Great Dismal Swamp DOM 2016 sample experienced the most pronounced
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and an intermediate change in organic carbon
content which also led to a large decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.
Figure 5 highlights the different linear slopes
observed between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and organic carbon and suggests that total
organic carbon alone is not an accurate parameter for predicting INPs.
Rather, the organic carbon is photomineralized but the ice-active component
of the DOM is being affected to different extents within the different
samples. This result suggests that specific chemical moieties could be
responsible for the immersion freezing activity.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4174">DOM absorbance decreases as a function of irradiation. Absorbance
of a 14 mg C L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of Great Dismal Swamp 2014 (DS 2014) as a function of UVB
exposure leads to photobleaching of the DOM.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=165.025984pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/12397/2019/acp-19-12397-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4197">Overview of the impacts of the photomineralization mechanism on
photochemical changes in DOM and on DOM–cloud interactions. After field-collected DOM and SRFA were exposed to the equivalent of 4.5 d of
sunlight, the TOC concentrations decreased between 15 % and 63 % conversion,
while the production of CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and organic acids, including formic
acid, acetic acid, oxalic acid and pyruvic acid, increased, with yields
reported in molar carbon. In addition, the absorbance of the material
decreased with photooxidation leading to photobleaching. These
physicochemical changes are linked to a decrease in IN ability and an
increase in CCN ability.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/12397/2019/acp-19-12397-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS4">
  <label>3.4.4</label><title>Absorbance and photobleaching</title>
      <p id="d1e4225">The DOM material is coloured due to the presence of chromophoric components
within the natural samples. Upon<?pagebreak page12407?> photooxidation, the sample absorbance
decreases as a function of UVB exposure, and photobleaching is observed at
all wavelengths (Fig. 6). This photobleaching
process has also been experimentally characterized for aerosol probe
molecules (Zhao et
al., 2015), for biomass burning aerosols  (Wong
et al., 2017) and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic aerosols
(Walhout et al., 2019). We show here that
photobleaching is concurrent with a gain in CCN, a loss in IN activity and a
loss in organic carbon. These results indicate that the chromophoric species
within all the DOM samples are being photomineralized with UVB exposure, and
this mechanism is expected to take place within the organic aerosol 1-week
lifetime in the atmosphere. Our experimental results are further
corroborated by a recent modelling study which proposes an ageing scheme for
photobleaching of organic aerosols to further increase the correlation
between modelled and observed brown carbon absorption
(Wang et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS5">
  <label>3.4.5</label><title>Photochemistry and the photomineralization mechanism</title>
      <p id="d1e4243">Upon irradiation of DOM, reactive intermediates such as triplet state DOM,
OH radicals, singlet oxygen <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and peroxides can be formed (Manfrin
et al., 2019; McNeill and Canonica, 2016; Rosario-Ortiz and Canonica, 2016).
The reactive oxygen species are produced as a result of indirect
photochemical processes involving the chromophoric components of DOM, which
act as photosensitizers within organic aerosols (Arangio
et al., 2016; Corral Arroyo et al., 2018; Kaur and Anastasio, 2018; Laskin
et al., 2015). The combination of both direct photodegradation and oxidation
by reactive intermediates leads to the photomineralization of the organic
carbon present in DOM (Fig. 7). This process is
ubiquitous in natural aquatic systems, and it represents a competitive form
of dissolved organic carbon processing in surface environments such as
arctic lakes and rivers along with microbial processing
(Miller and Zepp, 1995). It is therefore reasonable to assume
that this process is operating in the photochemical ageing of aqueous organic
aerosols. Nevertheless, a detailed, arrow-pushing chemical mechanism from
complex organic matter to organic acids to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains elusive.</p>
      <p id="d1e4272">These photochemical processes are occurring in situ and are not due to
external heterogeneous oxidation. In fact, SRFA heterogeneous oxidation by
OH radicals in a flow tube experiment does not lead to substantial organic
carbon mass loss  (Kessler et al.,
2012), indicating the significance of in situ photochemistry compared to
external gas-phase heterogeneous oxidation. Indeed, we show that
photochemical processing can be a dominant atmospheric ageing process,
impacting CCN and INP efficiencies (Fig. 7).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d1e4285">Models of cloud microphysics often use ground-based CCN and INP measurements
for validation studies. Regional models and global climate models which contain prescribed
CCN concentrations may be underestimating their contribution to clouds if
the input is based on data collected and measured at ground level close to
emission sources. The global average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated to be 0.3
based on a recently harmonized CCN worldwide dataset
(Schmale et al., 2017). If the CCN activity of the
organic fraction of the aerosol population were to increase with altitude
due to longer photochemical exposure, one should expect a higher CCN
activity of the aerosol population (Fig. 7). A
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 0.15 to 0.35, as observed in our own results
for DOM, for a simulated particle<?pagebreak page12408?> of a 100 nm dry diameter, could change the
supercritical saturation conditions for the 50 % CCN activated fraction from
0.30 SS % to 0.20 SS % (above 100 %). The impact of photochemical
ageing would then depend on the aerosol size distribution, but, with a
typical accumulation mode distribution reported by Paramonov et al. (2015), a decrease in the required critical supersaturation from 0.30 SS % to 0.20 SS % to activate the same population of aerosols could
increase the activated fraction from 0.3 to 0.4. This change would lead to
an earlier onset and a higher concentration of cloud droplets in a lifting
air mass, thus forming clouds at lower altitudes with potential effects on
the brightness and optical depth of the cloud. Changes in particle size
during photochemistry could in turn affect the CCN activation conditions;
however, only small reductions in particle diameter have been previously
reported (up to 4 %) for chemical ageing reactions relevant to the
atmosphere (George et al.,
2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e4302">Whether it is a dust particle covered in an organic coating, a bioaerosol
or a secondary organic aerosol, many INPs contain organic carbon material (Knopf
et al., 2018; Schmidt et al., 2017) and would thus be prone to
photomineralization once in a droplet. The decrease in INP concentrations
with photochemical processing results in a change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C over a 25 h UVB exposure corresponding to a simulated exposure
time of 55 sunlight hours (Fig. 7). This temperature
change could impact the ratio of ice to water droplets within a
mixed-phase cloud by delaying the onset of glaciation and increasing the
supercooled liquid fraction of the cloud due to the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
temperatures, thus modifying the radiative properties and the lifetime of
the cloud. If the decrease in IN activity due to photochemical ageing is
omitted from models, ice formation may occur at higher temperatures,
leading to an earlier more effective glaciation of mixed-phase clouds than
in reality, which has been reported to occur in models
(Lohmann and Neubauer, 2018). Earlier
glaciation has implications for cloud lifetime and precipitation, leading to
an underestimation of the importance of the cloud-phase feedback in
anthropogenic climate change  (Tan and
Storelvmo, 2015). Indeed, it has been shown that accurate representation of
supercooled liquid fraction is crucial to predicting climate sensitivity in
a future warming climate (Tan et
al., 2016).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4341">Datasets S1, S2, S3 and S4 corresponding to data presented in Figs. 1, 2a, 2b, and 2c, respectively, are deposited in the ETH Research Collection data repository at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000342107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-b-000342107</ext-link> (Borduas-Dedekind, 2019).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4347">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4356">NBD, ZAK and KM designed the experiments with contributions from ROD and RO.
NBD, RO, LSB, ROD and VW conducted the experiments and collected data. NBD
analysed the data. The manuscript was written by NBD with contributions from
ZAK, RO, ROD and KM.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4362">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4368">We acknowledge Kenneth Mopper, Vivian Lin and Paul Erickson
for the field collection of the dissolved organic matter water in 2014, 2016
and 2017, respectively. We acknowledge technical help from Björn Studer and Martin Schroth with the TOC analyser and the GC-FID,
respectively.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4373">This research was supported by ETH Zurich and by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 200020_159809). Nadine Borduas-Dedekind was supported by an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4379">This paper was edited by Alexander Laskin and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arangio, A. M., Tong, H., Socorro, J., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Quantification of environmentally persistent free radicals and reactive oxygen species in atmospheric aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13105–13119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Augustin, S., Wex, H., Niedermeier, D., Pummer, B., Grothe, H., Hartmann, S., Tomsche, L., Clauss, T., Voigtländer, J., Ignatius, K., and Stratmann, F.: Immersion freezing of birch pollen washing water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10989–11003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10989-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10989-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Axson, J. L., May, N. W., Colón-Bernal, I. D., Pratt, K. A., and Ault, A.
P.: Lake spray aerosol: A chemical signature from individual ambient
particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9835–9845,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01661</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Photomineralization mechanism changes the ability of dissolved organic matter to activate cloud droplets and to nucleate ice crystals, ETH Zürich, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000342107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-b-000342107</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boreddy, S. K. R., Kawamura, K., and Tachibana, E.: Long-term (2001–2013)
observations of water-soluble dicarboxylic acids and related compounds over
the western North Pacific: trends, seasonality and source apportionment,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 8518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08745-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-08745-w</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page12409?><ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Botero, W. G., Pineau, M., Janot, N., Domingos, R. F., Mariano, J., Rocha,
L. S., Groenenberg, J. E., Benedetti, M. F., and Pinheiro, J. P.: Isolation
and purification treatments change the metal-binding properties of humic
acids: effect of HF/HCl treatment, Environ. Chem., 14, 417–424,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN17129" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN17129</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V. M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhan, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, UK and New York, NY,
USA, available at:
<uri>http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter07_FINAL.pdf</uri> (last access: 19 October 2017), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, J. and Valsaraj, K. T.: Uptake and UV-Photooxidation of Gas-Phase
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons on the Surface of Atmospheric Water Films. 2.
Effects of Dissolved Surfactants on Naphthalene Photooxidation, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 111, 4289–4296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp068394p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp068394p</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cook, R. D., Lin, Y.-H., Peng, Z., Boone, E., Chu, R. K., Dukett, J. E., Gunsch, M. J., Zhang, W., Tolic, N., Laskin, A., and Pratt, K. A.: Biogenic, urban, and wildfire influences on the molecular composition of dissolved organic compounds in cloud water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15167–15180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Corral Arroyo, P., Bartels-Rausch, T., Alpert, P. A., Dumas, S., Perrier,
S., George, C., and Ammann, M.: Particle-phase photosensitized radical
production and aerosol aging, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7680–7688,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00329" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b00329</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M., Cotner, J. B., and McNeill, K.: Quantifying interactions between
singlet oxygen and aquatic fulvic acids, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43,
718–723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es801847g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es801847g</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>David, R. O., Cascajo Castresana, M., Brennan, K. P., Rösch, M., Els, N., Werz, J., Weichlinger, V., Boynton, L. S., Bogler, S., Borduas-Dedekind, N., Marcolli, C., and Kanji, Z. A.: Development of the DRoplet Ice Nuclei Counter Zürich (DRINCZ): Validation and application to field collected snow samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2019-213</ext-link>, in review, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D.
B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T.,
Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S.,
Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault,
A. P., Axson, J. L., Martinez, M. D., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G.,
Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram,
T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as
a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
113, 5797–5803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1514034112</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E. R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T., Mentel, T. F., and Rudich, Y.: Cloud Condensation Nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2465–2482, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2465-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-2465-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dreischmeier, K., Budke, C., Wiehemeier, L., Kottke, T., and Koop, T.: Boreal
pollen contain ice-nucleating as well as ice-binding “antifreeze”
polysaccharides, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 41890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41890" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep41890</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J.,
Walter, S., Chand, D., Drewnick, F., Hings, S., Jung, D., Borrmann, S., and
Andreae, M. O.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating
ability of aerosol particles, Science, 312, 1375–1378,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1125261</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Farmer, D. K., Cappa, C. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Atmospheric processes
and their controlling influence on cloud condensation nuclei activity, Chem.
Rev., 115, 4199–4217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006292</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frosch, M., Prisle, N. L., Bilde, M., Varga, Z., and Kiss, G.: Joint effect of organic acids and inorganic salts on cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3895–3911, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3895-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3895-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fry, V. A., Istok, J. D., Semprini, L., O'Reilly, K. T., and Buscheck, T. E.:
Retardation of dissolved oxygen due to a trapped gas phase in porous media,
Ground Water, 33, 391–398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00295.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00295.x</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>George, C., Ammann, M., D'Anna, B., Donaldson, D. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Heterogeneous photochemistry in the atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 115,
4218–4258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500648z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>George, I. J., Vlasenko, A., Slowik, J. G., Broekhuizen, K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of saturated organic aerosols by hydroxyl radicals: uptake kinetics, condensed-phase products, and particle size change, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4187–4201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Griffith, E. C., Carpenter, B. K., Shoemaker, R. K., and Vaida, V.:
Photochemistry of aqueous pyruvic acid, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
110, 11714–11719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303206110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1303206110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guerard, J. J., Miller, P. L., Trouts, T. D., and Chin, Y.-P.: The role of
fulvic acid composition in the photosensitized degradation of aquatic
contaminants, Aquat. Sci., 71, 160–169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-9192-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00027-009-9192-4</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gute, E. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidative Processing Lowers the Ice
Nucleation Activity of Birch and Alder Pollen, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
45, 1647–1653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076357</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Moffett, B. F., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7195–7211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiranuma, N., Möhler, O., Yamashita, K., Tajiri, T., Saito, A., Kiselev,
A., Hoffmann, N., Hoose, C., Jantsch, E., Koop, T., and Murakami, M.: Ice
nucleation by cellulose and its potential contribution to ice formation in
clouds, Nat. Geosci., 8, 273–277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2374</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Irish, V. E., Hanna, S. J., Xi, Y., Boyer, M., Polishchuk, E., Ahmed, M., Chen, J., Abbatt, J. P. D., Gosselin, M., Chang, R., Miller, L. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Revisiting properties and concentrations of ice-nucleating particles in the sea surface microlayer and bulk seawater in the Canadian Arctic during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7775–7787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page12410?><ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Johannesson, K. H., Tang, J., Daniels, J. M., Bounds, W. J., and Burdige, D.
J.: Rare earth element concentrations and speciation in organic-rich
blackwaters of the Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia, USA, Chem. Geol., 209,
271–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.012</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaur, R. and Anastasio, C.: First Measurements of Organic Triplet Excited
States in Atmospheric Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 5218–5226,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06699" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b06699</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kessler, S. H., Nah, T., Daumit, K. E., Smith, J. D., Leone, S. R., Kolb, C.
E., Worsnop, D. R., Wilson, K. R., and Kroll, J. H.: OH-initiated
heterogeneous aging of highly oxidized organic aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A,
116, 6358–6365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212131m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp212131m</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kieber, D. J., Miller, G. W., Neale, P. J., and Mopper, K.: Wavelength and
temperature-dependent apparent quantum yields for photochemical formation of
hydrogen peroxide in seawater, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 16,
777–791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00036F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C4EM00036F</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knackstedt, K., Moffett, B. F., Hartmann, S., Wex, H., Hill, T. C. J.,
Glasgo, E., Reitz, L., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Beall, B., Bullerjahn, G. S.,
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Grawe, S., Lubitz, J., Stratmann, F., and McKay,
R. M.: A terrestrial origin for abundant riverine nanoscale ice-nucleating
particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 12358–12367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b03881</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., and Wang, B.: The role of organic aerosol in
atmospheric ice nucleation: A review, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 168–202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Köhler, H.: The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets,
T. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152–1161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/TF9363201152</ext-link>, 1936.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koop, T. and Zobrist, B.: Parameterizations for ice nucleation in biological
and atmospheric systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 10839–10850,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b914289d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b914289d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Korolev, A.: Limitations of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen mechanism in the
evolution of mixed-phase clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3372–3375,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS4035.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS4035.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kristensen, T. B., Prisle, N. L., and Bilde, M.: Cloud droplet activation of
mixed model HULIS and NaCl particles: Experimental results and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory, Atmos. Res., 137, 167–175,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.09.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.09.017</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kristensen, T. B., Du, L., Nguyen, Q. T., Nøjgaard, J. K., Koch, C. B.,
Nielsen, O. F., Hallar, A. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Nekat, B., Pinxteren, D.
van, Herrmann, H., Glasius, M., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Bilde, M.: Chemical
properties of HULIS from three different environments, J. Atmos. Chem.,
72, 65–80, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9302-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-015-9302-8</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li,
J., Miller, L. A., Schiller, C. L., Huffman, J. A., Aller, J. Y., Knopf, D.
A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating
abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and
field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laszakovits, J. R., Berg, S. M., Anderson, B. G., O'Brien, J. E., Wammer, K.
H., and Sharpless, C. M.: p-Nitroanisole/pyridine and
p-nitroacetophenone/pyridine actinometers revisited: Quantum yield in
comparison to ferrioxalate, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 4, 11–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00422" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00422</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lignell, H., Hinks, M. L., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Exploring matrix effects on
photochemistry of organic aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 13780–13785,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322106111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1322106111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, V. S., Grandbois, M., and McNeill, K.: Fluorescent molecular probes for
detection of one-electron oxidants photochemically generated by dissolved
organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 9033–9041,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02138</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Neubauer, D.: The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8807–8828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manfrin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., Malecha, K. T., Getzinger, G. J., McNeill,
K., and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Reactive Oxygen Species Production from
Secondary Organic Aerosols: The Importance of Singlet Oxygen, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 53, 8553–8562, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01609" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b01609</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McCluskey, C. S., Ovadnevaite, J., Rinaldi, M., Atkinson, J., Belosi, F.,
Ceburnis, D., Marullo, S., Hill, T. C. J., Lohmann, U., Kanji, Z. A.,
O'Dowd, C., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Marine and terrestrial
organic ice-nucleating particles in pristine marine to continentally
influenced Northeast Atlantic air masses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
6196–6212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JD028033</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McDow, S. R., Jang, M., Hong, Y., and Kamens, R. M.: An approach to studying
the effect of organic composition on atmospheric aerosol photochemistry,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19593–19600,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD01881</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McNeill, K. and Canonica, S.: Triplet state dissolved organic matter in
aquatic photochemistry: reaction mechanisms, substrate scope, and
photophysical properties, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 18,
1381–1399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EM00408C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C6EM00408C</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Rose, D., and Pöschl, U.: Mass-based hygroscopicity parameter interaction model and measurement of atmospheric aerosol water uptake, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 717–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-717-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-717-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miller, W. L. and Zepp, R. G.: Photochemical production of dissolved
inorganic carbon from terrestrial organic matter: Significance to the
oceanic organic carbon cycle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 417–420,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL03344" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94GL03344</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moffett, B., Hill, T., DeMott, P., Moffett, B. F., Hill, T. C. J., and
DeMott, P. J.: Abundance of biological ice nucleating particles in the
Mississippi and its major tributaries, Atmosphere, 9, 307,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos9080307</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moran, M. A. and Zepp, R. G.: Role of photoreactions in the formation of
biologically labile compounds from dissolved organic matter, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 42, 1307–1316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1307</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nozière, B., Baduel, C., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: The dynamic surface tension
of atmospheric aerosol surfactants reveals new aspects of cloud activation,
Nat. Commun., 5, 3335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms4335</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page12411?><ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Malkin, T. L., Whale, T. F., Umo, N. S., Atkinson, J. D., Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., Browse, J., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by fertile soil dusts: relative importance of mineral and biogenic components, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1853–1867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Ross, J. F., Whale, T. F., Price, H. C.,
Atkinson, J. D., Umo, N. S., and Webb, M. E.: The relevance of nanoscale
biological fragments for ice nucleation in clouds, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 8082,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep08082</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G.,
Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and O' Dowd, C.: Surface tension prevails over solute effect
in organic-influenced cloud droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637–641,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature22806</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paramonov, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Gysel, M., Aalto, P. P., Andreae, M. O., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Bougiatioti, A., Brus, D., Frank, G. P., Good, N., Gunthe, S. S., Hao, L., Irwin, M., Jaatinen, A., Jurányi, Z., King, S. M., Kortelainen, A., Kristensson, A., Lihavainen, H., Kulmala, M., Lohmann, U., Martin, S. T., McFiggans, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Nenes, A., O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petäjä, T., Pöschl, U., Roberts, G. C., Rose, D., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Weingartner, E., Whitehead, J., Wiedensohler, A., Wittbom, C., and Sierau, B.: A synthesis of cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNC) measurements within the EUCAARI network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12211–12229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12211-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12211-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petters, S. S. and Petters, M. D.: Surfactant effect on cloud condensation
nuclei for two-component internally mixed aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 1878–1895, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024090</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pillar, E. A. and Guzman, M. I.: Oxidation of substituted catechols at the
air–water interface: Production of carboxylic acids, quinones, and
polyphenols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4951–4959,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00232</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Polen, M., Brubaker, T., Somers, J., and Sullivan, R. C.: Cleaning up our water: reducing interferences from nonhomogeneous freezing of “pure” water in droplet freezing assays of ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5315–5334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5315-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-5315-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pummer, B. G., Bauer, H., Bernardi, J., Bleicher, S., and Grothe, H.: Suspendable macromolecules are responsible for ice nucleation activity of birch and conifer pollen, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2541–2550, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2541-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2541-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pummer, B. G., Budke, C., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Niedermeier, D., Felgitsch, L., Kampf, C. J., Huber, R. G., Liedl, K. R., Loerting, T., Moschen, T., Schauperl, M., Tollinger, M., Morris, C. E., Wex, H., Grothe, H., Pöschl, U., Koop, T., and Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.: Ice nucleation by water-soluble macromolecules, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4077–4091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A Continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient
CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
206–221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290913988" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290913988</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. and Canonica, S.: Probe compounds to assess the
photochemical activity of dissolved organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 12532–12547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02776</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Mikhailov, E., Frank, G. P., Dusek, U., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Calibration and measurement uncertainties of a continuous-flow cloud condensation nuclei counter (DMT-CCNC): CCN activation of ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in theory and experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1153–1179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ruehl, C. R., Davies, J. F., and Wilson, K. R.: An interfacial mechanism for
cloud droplet formation on organic aerosols, Science, 351, 1447–1450,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad4889" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aad4889</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmale, J., Henning, S., Henzing, B., Keskinen, H., Sellegri, K.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Jefferson,
A., Park, M., Schlag, P., Kristensson, A., Iwamoto, Y., Pringle, K.,
Reddington, C., Aalto, P., Äijälä, M., Baltensperger, U.,
Bialek, J., Birmili, W., Bukowiecki, N., Ehn, M., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig,
M., Frank, G., Fröhlich, R., Frumau, A., Furuya, M., Hammer, E.,
Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, E., Holzinger, R., Hyono, H., Kanakidou, M.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kinouchi, K., Kos, G., Kulmala, M., Mihalopoulos, N.,
Motos, G., Nenes, A., O'Dowd, C., Paramonov, M., Petäjä, T., Picard,
D., Poulain, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Slowik, J., Sonntag, A.,
Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Tsurumaru, H., Wiedensohler, A., Wittbom,
C., Ogren, J. A., Matsuki, A., Yum, S. S., Myhre, C. L., Carslaw, K.,
Stratmann, F., and Gysel, M.: Collocated observations of cloud condensation
nuclei, particle size distributions, and chemical composition, Sci. Data, 4,
170003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/sdata.2017.3</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmidt, S., Schneider, J., Klimach, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L. P., Kupiszewski, P., Curtius, J., and Borrmann, S.: Online single particle analysis of ice particle residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase clouds using laboratory derived particle type assignment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 575–594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-575-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Hertkorn, N., Schulten, H.-R., and Kettrup, A.:
Structural changes in a dissolved soil humic acid during photochemical
degradation processes under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
32, 2531–2541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es970636z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es970636z</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharpless, C. M., Aeschbacher, M., Page, S. E., Wenk, J., Sander, M., and
McNeill, K.: Photooxidation-induced changes in optical, electrochemical, and
photochemical properties of humic substances, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
2688–2696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es403925g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es403925g</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Si, M., Irish, V. E., Mason, R. H., Vergara-Temprado, J., Hanna, S. J., Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Schiller, C. L., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J. P. D., Carslaw, K. S., Murray, B. J., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice-nucleating ability of aerosol particles and possible sources at three coastal marine sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15669–15685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15669-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15669-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H., VanReken, T. M., Mwaniki, G. R., Bertman, S., Stirm, B., and
Shepson, P. B.: Aerosol production from the surface of the Great Lakes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L18807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043852" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL043852</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page12412?><ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H., Shiraiwa, M., Arangio, A., Su, H., Pöschl, U., Wang, J.,
and Knopf, D. A.: Cloud droplet activation through oxidation of organic
aerosol influenced by temperature and particle phase state, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 44, 2016GL072424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072424" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL072424</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stopelli, E., Conen, F., Zimmermann, L., Alewell, C., and Morris, C. E.: Freezing nucleation apparatus puts new slant on study of biological ice nucleators in precipitation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 129–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-129-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-129-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, L., Chen, H., Abdulla, H. A., and Mopper, K.: Estimating hydroxyl
radical photochemical formation rates in natural waters during long-term
laboratory irradiation experiments, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 16,
757–763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00587A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3EM00587A</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Svenningsson, B., Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Mircea, M., Bilde, M., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Zhou, J., Mønster, J., and Rosenørn, T.: Hygroscopic growth and critical supersaturations for mixed aerosol particles of inorganic and organic compounds of atmospheric relevance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1937–1952, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1937-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1937-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tan, I. and Storelvmo, T.: Sensitivity study on the influence of cloud
microphysical parameters on mixed-phase cloud thermodynamic phase
partitioning in CAM5, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 709–728,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0152.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-15-0152.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tan, I., Storelvmo, T., and Zelinka, M. D.: Observational constraints on
mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity, Science, 352,
224–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aad5300</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tomaz, S., Cui, T., Chen, Y., Sexton, K. G., Roberts, J. M., Warneke, C.,
Yokelson, R. J., Surratt, J. D., and Turpin, B. J.: Photochemical cloud
processing of primary wildfire emissions as a potential source of secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 11027–11037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b03293</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vali, G.: Quantitative evaluation of experimental results an the
heterogeneous freezing nucleation of supercooled liquids, J. Atmos. Sci.,
28, 402–409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;0402:QEOERA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;0402:QEOERA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vali, G.: Interpretation of freezing nucleation experiments: singular and stochastic; sites and surfaces, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5271–5294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vali, G.: Revisiting the differential freezing nucleus spectra derived from drop-freezing experiments: methods of calculation, applications, and confidence limits, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1219–1231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1219-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-1219-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walhout, E. Q., Yu, H., Thrasher, C., Shusterman, J. M., and O'Brien, R. E.:
Effects of Photolysis on the Chemical and Optical Properties of Secondary
Organic Material Over Extended Time Scales, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3,
1226–1236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00109</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, B. and Knopf, D. A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on particles
composed of humic-like substances impacted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
D03205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014964</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Schwarz, J. P., and Perring, A. E.: Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 635–653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-635-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wenk, J., Eustis, S. N., McNeill, K., and Canonica, S.: Quenching of excited
triplet states by dissolved natural organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 12802–12810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402668h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es402668h</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M.,
Browse, J., Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffman, J. A., Judd, C.,
Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., McFiggans, G., Miller, L. A., Najera, J. J.,
Polishchuk, E., Rae, S., Schiller, C. L., Si, M., Temprado, J. V., Whale, T.
F., Wong, J. P. S., Wurl, O., Yakobi-Hancock, J., Abbatt, J. P. D., Aller,
J. Y., Bertram, A. K., Knopf, D. A., and Murray, B. J.: A marine biogenic
source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Nature, 525, 234–238,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Lee, A. K. Y., Slowik, J. G., Cziczo, D. J., Leaitch, W. R.,
Macdonald, A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of ambient biogenic secondary
organic aerosol by hydroxyl radicals: Effects on cloud condensation nuclei
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L22805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049351</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in light absorptivity of
molecular weight separated brown carbon due to photolytic aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zelenay, V., Huthwelker, T., Křepelová, A., Rudich, Y., and Ammann,
M.: Humidity driven nanoscale chemical separation in complex organic matter,
Environ. Chem., 8, 450–460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN11047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN11047</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y.-L., Kawamura, K., Cao, F., and Lee, M.: Stable carbon isotopic
compositions of low-molecular-weight dicarboxylic acids, oxocarboxylic
acids, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls, and fatty acids: Implications for atmospheric
processing of organic aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3707–3717,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024081</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Huang, L., Li, X., Yang, F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Photochemical processing of aqueous atmospheric brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6087–6100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Photomineralization mechanism changes the ability of dissolved organic matter to activate cloud droplets and to nucleate ice crystals</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>An organic aerosol particle has a lifetime of approximately 1 week in the
atmosphere during which it will be exposed to sunlight. However, the effect of
photochemistry on the propensity of organic matter to participate in the
initial cloud-forming steps is difficult to predict. In this study, we
quantify on a molecular scale the effect of photochemical exposure of
naturally occurring dissolved organic matter (DOM) and of a fulvic acid
standard on its cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nucleation (IN)
activity. We find that photochemical processing, equivalent to 4.6&thinsp;d in
the atmosphere, of DOM increases its ability to form cloud droplets by up to
a factor of 2.5 but decreases its ability to form ice crystals at a loss
rate of −0.04&thinsp;°C<sub><i>T</i><sub>50</sub></sub>&thinsp;h<sup>−1</sup> of sunlight at ground level.
In other words, the ice nucleation activity of photooxidized DOM can require
up to 4&thinsp;°C colder temperatures for 50&thinsp;% of the droplets to activate
as ice crystals under immersion freezing conditions. This temperature change
could impact the ratio of ice to water droplets within a mixed-phase
cloud by delaying the onset of glaciation and by increasing the supercooled
liquid fraction of the cloud, thereby modifying the radiative properties and
the lifetime of the cloud. Concurrently, a photomineralization mechanism was
quantified by monitoring the loss of organic carbon and the simultaneous
production of organic acids, such as formic, acetic, oxalic and pyruvic
acids, CO and CO<sub>2</sub>. This mechanism explains and predicts the observed
increase in CCN and decrease in IN efficiencies. Indeed, we show that
photochemical processing can be a dominant atmospheric ageing process,
impacting CCN and IN efficiencies and concentrations. Photomineralization
can thus alter the aerosol–cloud radiative effects of organic matter by
modifying the supercooled-liquid-water-to-ice-crystal ratio in mixed-phase
clouds with implications for cloud lifetime, precipitation patterns and the
hydrological cycle.<strong>Highlights.</strong>
During atmospheric transport, dissolved organic matter (DOM) within aqueous
aerosols undergoes photochemistry. We find that photochemical processing of
DOM increases its ability to form cloud droplets but decreases its ability
to form ice crystals over a simulated 4.6&thinsp;d in the atmosphere. A
photomineralization mechanism involving the loss of organic carbon and the
production of organic acids, CO and CO<sub>2</sub> explains the observed changes
and affects the liquid-water-to-ice ratio in clouds.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arangio, A. M., Tong, H., Socorro, J., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Quantification of environmentally persistent free radicals and reactive oxygen species in atmospheric aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13105–13119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13105-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Augustin, S., Wex, H., Niedermeier, D., Pummer, B., Grothe, H., Hartmann, S., Tomsche, L., Clauss, T., Voigtländer, J., Ignatius, K., and Stratmann, F.: Immersion freezing of birch pollen washing water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10989–11003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10989-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10989-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Axson, J. L., May, N. W., Colón-Bernal, I. D., Pratt, K. A., and Ault, A.
P.: Lake spray aerosol: A chemical signature from individual ambient
particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9835–9845,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01661</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Photomineralization mechanism changes the ability of dissolved organic matter to activate cloud droplets and to nucleate ice crystals, ETH Zürich, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000342107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000342107</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Boreddy, S. K. R., Kawamura, K., and Tachibana, E.: Long-term (2001–2013)
observations of water-soluble dicarboxylic acids and related compounds over
the western North Pacific: trends, seasonality and source apportionment,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 8518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08745-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08745-w</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Botero, W. G., Pineau, M., Janot, N., Domingos, R. F., Mariano, J., Rocha,
L. S., Groenenberg, J. E., Benedetti, M. F., and Pinheiro, J. P.: Isolation
and purification treatments change the metal-binding properties of humic
acids: effect of HF/HCl treatment, Environ. Chem., 14, 417–424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN17129" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN17129</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V. M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhan, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, UK and New York, NY,
USA, available at:
<a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter07_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter07_FINAL.pdf</a> (last access: 19 October 2017), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J. and Valsaraj, K. T.: Uptake and UV-Photooxidation of Gas-Phase
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons on the Surface of Atmospheric Water Films. 2.
Effects of Dissolved Surfactants on Naphthalene Photooxidation, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 111, 4289–4296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp068394p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp068394p</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, R. D., Lin, Y.-H., Peng, Z., Boone, E., Chu, R. K., Dukett, J. E., Gunsch, M. J., Zhang, W., Tolic, N., Laskin, A., and Pratt, K. A.: Biogenic, urban, and wildfire influences on the molecular composition of dissolved organic compounds in cloud water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15167–15180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Corral Arroyo, P., Bartels-Rausch, T., Alpert, P. A., Dumas, S., Perrier,
S., George, C., and Ammann, M.: Particle-phase photosensitized radical
production and aerosol aging, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7680–7688,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00329" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00329</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M., Cotner, J. B., and McNeill, K.: Quantifying interactions between
singlet oxygen and aquatic fulvic acids, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43,
718–723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es801847g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es801847g</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
David, R. O., Cascajo Castresana, M., Brennan, K. P., Rösch, M., Els, N., Werz, J., Weichlinger, V., Boynton, L. S., Bogler, S., Borduas-Dedekind, N., Marcolli, C., and Kanji, Z. A.: Development of the DRoplet Ice Nuclei Counter Zürich (DRINCZ): Validation and application to field collected snow samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-213</a>, in review, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D.
B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T.,
Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S.,
Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault,
A. P., Axson, J. L., Martinez, M. D., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G.,
Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram,
T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as
a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
113, 5797–5803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E. R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T., Mentel, T. F., and Rudich, Y.: Cloud Condensation Nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2465–2482, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2465-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2465-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dreischmeier, K., Budke, C., Wiehemeier, L., Kottke, T., and Koop, T.: Boreal
pollen contain ice-nucleating as well as ice-binding “antifreeze”
polysaccharides, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 41890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41890" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41890</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J.,
Walter, S., Chand, D., Drewnick, F., Hings, S., Jung, D., Borrmann, S., and
Andreae, M. O.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating
ability of aerosol particles, Science, 312, 1375–1378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Farmer, D. K., Cappa, C. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Atmospheric processes
and their controlling influence on cloud condensation nuclei activity, Chem.
Rev., 115, 4199–4217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Frosch, M., Prisle, N. L., Bilde, M., Varga, Z., and Kiss, G.: Joint effect of organic acids and inorganic salts on cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3895–3911, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3895-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3895-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fry, V. A., Istok, J. D., Semprini, L., O'Reilly, K. T., and Buscheck, T. E.:
Retardation of dissolved oxygen due to a trapped gas phase in porous media,
Ground Water, 33, 391–398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00295.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00295.x</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
George, C., Ammann, M., D'Anna, B., Donaldson, D. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Heterogeneous photochemistry in the atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 115,
4218–4258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
George, I. J., Vlasenko, A., Slowik, J. G., Broekhuizen, K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of saturated organic aerosols by hydroxyl radicals: uptake kinetics, condensed-phase products, and particle size change, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4187–4201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4187-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Griffith, E. C., Carpenter, B. K., Shoemaker, R. K., and Vaida, V.:
Photochemistry of aqueous pyruvic acid, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
110, 11714–11719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303206110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303206110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Guerard, J. J., Miller, P. L., Trouts, T. D., and Chin, Y.-P.: The role of
fulvic acid composition in the photosensitized degradation of aquatic
contaminants, Aquat. Sci., 71, 160–169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-9192-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-9192-4</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Gute, E. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidative Processing Lowers the Ice
Nucleation Activity of Birch and Alder Pollen, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
45, 1647–1653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076357</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Moffett, B. F., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7195–7211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hiranuma, N., Möhler, O., Yamashita, K., Tajiri, T., Saito, A., Kiselev,
A., Hoffmann, N., Hoose, C., Jantsch, E., Koop, T., and Murakami, M.: Ice
nucleation by cellulose and its potential contribution to ice formation in
clouds, Nat. Geosci., 8, 273–277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2374</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Irish, V. E., Hanna, S. J., Xi, Y., Boyer, M., Polishchuk, E., Ahmed, M., Chen, J., Abbatt, J. P. D., Gosselin, M., Chang, R., Miller, L. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Revisiting properties and concentrations of ice-nucleating particles in the sea surface microlayer and bulk seawater in the Canadian Arctic during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7775–7787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7775-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Johannesson, K. H., Tang, J., Daniels, J. M., Bounds, W. J., and Burdige, D.
J.: Rare earth element concentrations and speciation in organic-rich
blackwaters of the Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia, USA, Chem. Geol., 209,
271–294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.012</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kaur, R. and Anastasio, C.: First Measurements of Organic Triplet Excited
States in Atmospheric Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 5218–5226,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06699" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06699</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, S. H., Nah, T., Daumit, K. E., Smith, J. D., Leone, S. R., Kolb, C.
E., Worsnop, D. R., Wilson, K. R., and Kroll, J. H.: OH-initiated
heterogeneous aging of highly oxidized organic aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A,
116, 6358–6365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212131m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212131m</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kieber, D. J., Miller, G. W., Neale, P. J., and Mopper, K.: Wavelength and
temperature-dependent apparent quantum yields for photochemical formation of
hydrogen peroxide in seawater, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 16,
777–791, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00036F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00036F</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Knackstedt, K., Moffett, B. F., Hartmann, S., Wex, H., Hill, T. C. J.,
Glasgo, E., Reitz, L., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Beall, B., Bullerjahn, G. S.,
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Grawe, S., Lubitz, J., Stratmann, F., and McKay,
R. M.: A terrestrial origin for abundant riverine nanoscale ice-nucleating
particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 12358–12367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03881</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., and Wang, B.: The role of organic aerosol in
atmospheric ice nucleation: A review, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 168–202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Köhler, H.: The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets,
T. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152–1161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152</a>, 1936.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T. and Zobrist, B.: Parameterizations for ice nucleation in biological
and atmospheric systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 10839–10850,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b914289d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b914289d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Korolev, A.: Limitations of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen mechanism in the
evolution of mixed-phase clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3372–3375,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS4035.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS4035.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, T. B., Prisle, N. L., and Bilde, M.: Cloud droplet activation of
mixed model HULIS and NaCl particles: Experimental results and <i>κ</i>-Köhler theory, Atmos. Res., 137, 167–175,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.09.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.09.017</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, T. B., Du, L., Nguyen, Q. T., Nøjgaard, J. K., Koch, C. B.,
Nielsen, O. F., Hallar, A. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Nekat, B., Pinxteren, D.
van, Herrmann, H., Glasius, M., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Bilde, M.: Chemical
properties of HULIS from three different environments, J. Atmos. Chem.,
72, 65–80, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9302-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9302-8</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li,
J., Miller, L. A., Schiller, C. L., Huffman, J. A., Aller, J. Y., Knopf, D.
A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating
abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and
field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Laszakovits, J. R., Berg, S. M., Anderson, B. G., O'Brien, J. E., Wammer, K.
H., and Sharpless, C. M.: p-Nitroanisole/pyridine and
p-nitroacetophenone/pyridine actinometers revisited: Quantum yield in
comparison to ferrioxalate, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 4, 11–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00422" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00422</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lignell, H., Hinks, M. L., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Exploring matrix effects on
photochemistry of organic aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 13780–13785,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322106111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322106111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, V. S., Grandbois, M., and McNeill, K.: Fluorescent molecular probes for
detection of one-electron oxidants photochemically generated by dissolved
organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 9033–9041,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02138</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Neubauer, D.: The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8807–8828, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Manfrin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., Malecha, K. T., Getzinger, G. J., McNeill,
K., and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Reactive Oxygen Species Production from
Secondary Organic Aerosols: The Importance of Singlet Oxygen, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 53, 8553–8562, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01609" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01609</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
McCluskey, C. S., Ovadnevaite, J., Rinaldi, M., Atkinson, J., Belosi, F.,
Ceburnis, D., Marullo, S., Hill, T. C. J., Lohmann, U., Kanji, Z. A.,
O'Dowd, C., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: Marine and terrestrial
organic ice-nucleating particles in pristine marine to continentally
influenced Northeast Atlantic air masses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
6196–6212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028033</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
McDow, S. R., Jang, M., Hong, Y., and Kamens, R. M.: An approach to studying
the effect of organic composition on atmospheric aerosol photochemistry,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19593–19600,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01881</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
McNeill, K. and Canonica, S.: Triplet state dissolved organic matter in
aquatic photochemistry: reaction mechanisms, substrate scope, and
photophysical properties, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 18,
1381–1399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EM00408C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EM00408C</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Rose, D., and Pöschl, U.: Mass-based hygroscopicity parameter interaction model and measurement of atmospheric aerosol water uptake, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 717–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-717-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-717-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, W. L. and Zepp, R. G.: Photochemical production of dissolved
inorganic carbon from terrestrial organic matter: Significance to the
oceanic organic carbon cycle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 417–420,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL03344" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL03344</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Moffett, B., Hill, T., DeMott, P., Moffett, B. F., Hill, T. C. J., and
DeMott, P. J.: Abundance of biological ice nucleating particles in the
Mississippi and its major tributaries, Atmosphere, 9, 307,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080307</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Moran, M. A. and Zepp, R. G.: Role of photoreactions in the formation of
biologically labile compounds from dissolved organic matter, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 42, 1307–1316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1307</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nozière, B., Baduel, C., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: The dynamic surface tension
of atmospheric aerosol surfactants reveals new aspects of cloud activation,
Nat. Commun., 5, 3335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4335" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4335</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Malkin, T. L., Whale, T. F., Umo, N. S., Atkinson, J. D., Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., Browse, J., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by fertile soil dusts: relative importance of mineral and biogenic components, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1853–1867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Ross, J. F., Whale, T. F., Price, H. C.,
Atkinson, J. D., Umo, N. S., and Webb, M. E.: The relevance of nanoscale
biological fragments for ice nucleation in clouds, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 8082,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08082</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G.,
Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C.,
Seinfeld, J. H., and O' Dowd, C.: Surface tension prevails over solute effect
in organic-influenced cloud droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637–641,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22806</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Paramonov, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Gysel, M., Aalto, P. P., Andreae, M. O., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Bougiatioti, A., Brus, D., Frank, G. P., Good, N., Gunthe, S. S., Hao, L., Irwin, M., Jaatinen, A., Jurányi, Z., King, S. M., Kortelainen, A., Kristensson, A., Lihavainen, H., Kulmala, M., Lohmann, U., Martin, S. T., McFiggans, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Nenes, A., O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petäjä, T., Pöschl, U., Roberts, G. C., Rose, D., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Weingartner, E., Whitehead, J., Wiedensohler, A., Wittbom, C., and Sierau, B.: A synthesis of cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNC) measurements within the EUCAARI network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12211–12229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12211-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12211-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, S. S. and Petters, M. D.: Surfactant effect on cloud condensation
nuclei for two-component internally mixed aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 1878–1895, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024090</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Pillar, E. A. and Guzman, M. I.: Oxidation of substituted catechols at the
air–water interface: Production of carboxylic acids, quinones, and
polyphenols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4951–4959,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00232</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Polen, M., Brubaker, T., Somers, J., and Sullivan, R. C.: Cleaning up our water: reducing interferences from nonhomogeneous freezing of “pure” water in droplet freezing assays of ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5315–5334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5315-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5315-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Pummer, B. G., Bauer, H., Bernardi, J., Bleicher, S., and Grothe, H.: Suspendable macromolecules are responsible for ice nucleation activity of birch and conifer pollen, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2541–2550, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2541-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2541-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Pummer, B. G., Budke, C., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Niedermeier, D., Felgitsch, L., Kampf, C. J., Huber, R. G., Liedl, K. R., Loerting, T., Moschen, T., Schauperl, M., Tollinger, M., Morris, C. E., Wex, H., Grothe, H., Pöschl, U., Koop, T., and Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.: Ice nucleation by water-soluble macromolecules, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4077–4091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A Continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient
CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
206–221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290913988" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290913988</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Rosario-Ortiz, F. L. and Canonica, S.: Probe compounds to assess the
photochemical activity of dissolved organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 12532–12547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02776</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Mikhailov, E., Frank, G. P., Dusek, U., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Calibration and measurement uncertainties of a continuous-flow cloud condensation nuclei counter (DMT-CCNC): CCN activation of ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in theory and experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1153–1179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Ruehl, C. R., Davies, J. F., and Wilson, K. R.: An interfacial mechanism for
cloud droplet formation on organic aerosols, Science, 351, 1447–1450,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad4889" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad4889</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Schmale, J., Henning, S., Henzing, B., Keskinen, H., Sellegri, K.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Jefferson,
A., Park, M., Schlag, P., Kristensson, A., Iwamoto, Y., Pringle, K.,
Reddington, C., Aalto, P., Äijälä, M., Baltensperger, U.,
Bialek, J., Birmili, W., Bukowiecki, N., Ehn, M., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig,
M., Frank, G., Fröhlich, R., Frumau, A., Furuya, M., Hammer, E.,
Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, E., Holzinger, R., Hyono, H., Kanakidou, M.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kinouchi, K., Kos, G., Kulmala, M., Mihalopoulos, N.,
Motos, G., Nenes, A., O'Dowd, C., Paramonov, M., Petäjä, T., Picard,
D., Poulain, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Slowik, J., Sonntag, A.,
Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Tsurumaru, H., Wiedensohler, A., Wittbom,
C., Ogren, J. A., Matsuki, A., Yum, S. S., Myhre, C. L., Carslaw, K.,
Stratmann, F., and Gysel, M.: Collocated observations of cloud condensation
nuclei, particle size distributions, and chemical composition, Sci. Data, 4,
170003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.3</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, S., Schneider, J., Klimach, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L. P., Kupiszewski, P., Curtius, J., and Borrmann, S.: Online single particle analysis of ice particle residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase clouds using laboratory derived particle type assignment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 575–594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Hertkorn, N., Schulten, H.-R., and Kettrup, A.:
Structural changes in a dissolved soil humic acid during photochemical
degradation processes under O<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
32, 2531–2541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es970636z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es970636z</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Sharpless, C. M., Aeschbacher, M., Page, S. E., Wenk, J., Sander, M., and
McNeill, K.: Photooxidation-induced changes in optical, electrochemical, and
photochemical properties of humic substances, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
2688–2696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es403925g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es403925g</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Si, M., Irish, V. E., Mason, R. H., Vergara-Temprado, J., Hanna, S. J., Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Schiller, C. L., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J. P. D., Carslaw, K. S., Murray, B. J., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice-nucleating ability of aerosol particles and possible sources at three coastal marine sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15669–15685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15669-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15669-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H., VanReken, T. M., Mwaniki, G. R., Bertman, S., Stirm, B., and
Shepson, P. B.: Aerosol production from the surface of the Great Lakes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L18807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043852" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043852</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H., Shiraiwa, M., Arangio, A., Su, H., Pöschl, U., Wang, J.,
and Knopf, D. A.: Cloud droplet activation through oxidation of organic
aerosol influenced by temperature and particle phase state, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 44, 2016GL072424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072424" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072424</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Stopelli, E., Conen, F., Zimmermann, L., Alewell, C., and Morris, C. E.: Freezing nucleation apparatus puts new slant on study of biological ice nucleators in precipitation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 129–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-129-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-129-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, L., Chen, H., Abdulla, H. A., and Mopper, K.: Estimating hydroxyl
radical photochemical formation rates in natural waters during long-term
laboratory irradiation experiments, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 16,
757–763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00587A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00587A</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Svenningsson, B., Rissler, J., Swietlicki, E., Mircea, M., Bilde, M., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Zhou, J., Mønster, J., and Rosenørn, T.: Hygroscopic growth and critical supersaturations for mixed aerosol particles of inorganic and organic compounds of atmospheric relevance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1937–1952, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1937-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1937-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, I. and Storelvmo, T.: Sensitivity study on the influence of cloud
microphysical parameters on mixed-phase cloud thermodynamic phase
partitioning in CAM5, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 709–728,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0152.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0152.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, I., Storelvmo, T., and Zelinka, M. D.: Observational constraints on
mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity, Science, 352,
224–227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5300</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Tomaz, S., Cui, T., Chen, Y., Sexton, K. G., Roberts, J. M., Warneke, C.,
Yokelson, R. J., Surratt, J. D., and Turpin, B. J.: Photochemical cloud
processing of primary wildfire emissions as a potential source of secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 11027–11037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03293</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Vali, G.: Quantitative evaluation of experimental results an the
heterogeneous freezing nucleation of supercooled liquids, J. Atmos. Sci.,
28, 402–409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;0402:QEOERA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;0402:QEOERA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Vali, G.: Interpretation of freezing nucleation experiments: singular and stochastic; sites and surfaces, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5271–5294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Vali, G.: Revisiting the differential freezing nucleus spectra derived from drop-freezing experiments: methods of calculation, applications, and confidence limits, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1219–1231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1219-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1219-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Walhout, E. Q., Yu, H., Thrasher, C., Shusterman, J. M., and O'Brien, R. E.:
Effects of Photolysis on the Chemical and Optical Properties of Secondary
Organic Material Over Extended Time Scales, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3,
1226–1236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00109</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, B. and Knopf, D. A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on particles
composed of humic-like substances impacted by O<sub>3</sub>, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
D03205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014964</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Schwarz, J. P., and Perring, A. E.: Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 635–653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wenk, J., Eustis, S. N., McNeill, K., and Canonica, S.: Quenching of excited
triplet states by dissolved natural organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 12802–12810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402668h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es402668h</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M.,
Browse, J., Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffman, J. A., Judd, C.,
Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., McFiggans, G., Miller, L. A., Najera, J. J.,
Polishchuk, E., Rae, S., Schiller, C. L., Si, M., Temprado, J. V., Whale, T.
F., Wong, J. P. S., Wurl, O., Yakobi-Hancock, J., Abbatt, J. P. D., Aller,
J. Y., Bertram, A. K., Knopf, D. A., and Murray, B. J.: A marine biogenic
source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Nature, 525, 234–238,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Lee, A. K. Y., Slowik, J. G., Cziczo, D. J., Leaitch, W. R.,
Macdonald, A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of ambient biogenic secondary
organic aerosol by hydroxyl radicals: Effects on cloud condensation nuclei
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L22805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049351</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Changes in light absorptivity of
molecular weight separated brown carbon due to photolytic aging, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 51, 8414–8421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01739</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zelenay, V., Huthwelker, T., Křepelová, A., Rudich, Y., and Ammann,
M.: Humidity driven nanoscale chemical separation in complex organic matter,
Environ. Chem., 8, 450–460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN11047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN11047</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y.-L., Kawamura, K., Cao, F., and Lee, M.: Stable carbon isotopic
compositions of low-molecular-weight dicarboxylic acids, oxocarboxylic
acids, <i>α</i>-dicarbonyls, and fatty acids: Implications for atmospheric
processing of organic aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3707–3717,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024081</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Huang, L., Li, X., Yang, F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Photochemical processing of aqueous atmospheric brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6087–6100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
