<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-19-11669-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Light absorption properties and potential sources of particulate brown
carbon in the Pearl River Delta region of China</article-title><alt-title>BrC light absorption properties and sources in the PRD, China</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{BrC light absorption properties and sources in the PRD, China}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z. Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff7">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Zhujie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>Haobo</given-names></name>
          <email>hbtan@gd121.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
          <email>zheng.jun@nuist.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6225-6130</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff8">
          <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>Yiming</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Nan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Fei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7950-7044</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yongjie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-9136</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Mingfu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Yan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>Chak K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-8771</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and
Equipment Technology, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Nanjing University of Information Science and
Technology, Nanjing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Regional Numerical Weather Prediction, Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration,
Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Foshan Meteorological Service of Guangdong, Foshan 528010, Guangdong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Science, Sun yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Macau SAR, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>a</label><institution>Now at Emergency Early Warning Release and Weather Modification Center of Guangdong, Guangzhou 510080, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>b</label><institution>Now at School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Haobo Tan (hbtan@gd121.cn) and Jun Zheng (zheng.jun@nuist.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>11669</fpage><lpage>11685</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e226">Brown carbon (BrC) is a special type of organic aerosol (OA), capable of
absorbing solar radiation from near-ultraviolet (UV) to visible wavelengths,
which may lead to an increased aerosol radiative effect in the atmosphere.
While high concentrations of OAs have been observed in the Pearl River Delta
(PRD) region of China, the optical properties and corresponding radiative
forcing of BrC in the PRD are still not well understood. In this work, we
conducted a set of comprehensive measurements of atmospheric particulate
matter from 29 November 2014 to 2 January 2015 to investigate aerosol
compositions, optical properties, source origins, and radiative forcing
effects at a suburban station in Guangzhou. The particle absorption
Ångström exponent (AAE) was deduced and utilized to distinguish
light absorption by BrC from that by black carbon (BC). The results showed
that the average absorption contributions of BrC were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at
370 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at 470 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at 520 nm,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at 590 nm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at 660 nm. A
sensitivity analysis of the evaluation of the absorption Ångström
exponent of BC (AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was conducted based on the Mie theory
calculation assuming that the BC-containing aerosol was mixed with the
core–shell and external configurations. The corresponding uncertainty in
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was acquired. We found that variations in the imaginary
refractive index (RI) of the BC core can significantly affect the estimation
of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was relatively less sensitive to the real
part of the RI of the BC core and was least sensitive to the real part of
the RI of the non-light-absorbing shell. BrC absorption was closely related
to aerosol potassium cation content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a common tracer of biomass
burning emissions, which was most likely associated with straw burning in
the rural area of the western PRD. Diurnal variation in BrC absorption
revealed that primary organic aerosols had a larger BrC absorption capacity
than secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). Radiative transfer simulations
showed that BrC absorption may cause <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> radiative
forcing at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and contribute to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the aerosol warming effect. A chart was constructed to
conveniently assess the BrC radiative forcing efficiency in the studied area
with reference to certain aerosol single-scattering albedo (SSA) and BrC
absorption contributions at various wavelengths. Evidently, the BrC
radiative forcing efficiency was higher at shorter wavelengths.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page11670?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e388">Black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC) are dominant carbonaceous aerosol
components that mainly originate from biomass burning on a global scale
(Bond et al., 2004) and have caused great environmental concern in
rapidly developing regions. Carbonaceous aerosols can not only exert adverse
impacts on public health, similar to other particulate matters, but also
significantly affect the terrestrial radiation balance with enormous
uncertainties. In previous studies, BC was often considered to be the only
light-absorbing species  (Andreae and Gelencser, 2006), and OC was
believed to only be able to scatter light, i.e., causing a cooling effect
(Bond et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it has been reported that
a fraction of organic aerosols (OAs) may also specifically contribute to
light absorption from the near-ultraviolet (UV) to visible wavelength range,
which is referred to as brown carbon (BrC) (Kirchstetter et al.,
2004). BrC optical properties are strongly affected by its chemical
composition and physical structure, which are related to different BrC
sources. BrC can originate not only from direct emissions, including
smoldering, biomass burning, or any type of incomplete fuel combustion
process  (Cheng et al., 2011; T. C. Bond et al., 1999), but also from
secondary organic aerosol formation processes, such as aqueous phase
reactions in acidic solutions  (Desyaterik et al., 2013) or volatile
organic compound (VOC) oxidation  (Laskin et al., 2015; Sareen et al.,
2010). In addition, BrC could have a complicated molecular composition and
intermix with other substances, such as BC, non-absorbing OAs, and other
inorganic materials, making it complicated to investigate BrC optical
properties.</p>
      <p id="d1e391">BC absorption is commonly assumed to cover the full wavelength range.
However, the light absorption property of BrC is believed to be more
wavelength-dependent, which can be represented by distinct absorption
Ångström exponent (AAE) values, i.e., the power exponent of the
light absorption coefficient. A typical threshold for the AAE of BC
(AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.6 has been recommended to distinguish BrC from BC
(Lack and Cappa, 2010), and the AAE of BrC has been reported as
having a wider range (2 to 7)  (Hoffer et al., 2006). Based on the
difference in the wavelength dependence of light absorption between BC and
BrC, previous studies have applied the AAE method to differentiate light
absorption by BrC through multiwavelength optical measuring apparatus, such
as a three-wavelength photoacoustic soot spectrometer (PASS-3)  (Lack and
Langridge, 2013) and a multiwavelength Aethalometer (Olson et al., 2015). Based on the AAE method, the BrC absorption contribution has been
estimated to be approximately 6 % to 41 % of total aerosol light absorption
at short wavelengths, e.g., at 370 and 405 nm  (Washenfelder et
al., 2015). A uniform AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm  (Moosmüller et al., 2011) is commonly
used when evaluating the BrC absorption contribution using the AAE method.
However, it has been reported that the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be influenced by the
mixing state, BC core size, and morphology  (Lack and Cappa, 2010).
The lensing effect of the coating shell may enhance BC light absorption, the
magnitude of which may also depend on wavelength and can alter the value of
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Liu et al., 2018). Moreover, different values of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
have been found in the near-infrared and UV ranges (Wang et al., 2018).
Therefore, using the default value of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may lead to
uncertainty in BrC absorption coefficient estimation.</p>
      <p id="d1e477">Quantifying BrC optical absorption accurately is essential to interpret
aerosol optical depth (AOD), and the corresponding aerosol direct radiative
forcing (DRF) on the atmosphere can also be evaluated if the
single-scattering albedo (SSA) and extinction coefficient of aerosols are
known. The estimation of the DRF of BrC has shown a distinct seasonal
variation, indicating the influence of different absorption properties of
BrC  (Arola et al., 2015). A global simulation study
indicated that the average warming effect at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) caused by BrC
absorption can be up to 0.11 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of that predicted from BC absorption only  (Feng et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e502">During the last 3 decades, rapid economic development has led to severe
air pollution problems in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region  (Chan and Yao, 2008).
With rapid increases in the automobile population and factories, high
loadings of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) have often been observed (Tan et al.,
2016b). Biofuel usage may also play a significant role during wintertime air
pollution events in the PRD, indicating that the contribution from BrC light
absorption cannot be ignored  (Wu et al., 2018). Recently, BrC light
absorption has been quantified by  Qin et al. (2018) using the AAE
method in the PRD region. OA chemical composition was simultaneously
measured by a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer, and
it was found that organic aerosols originating from biomass burning
possessed the most intense absorption capability and were largely
responsible for BrC absorption.  Qin et al. (2018) also suggested that
correlations between OA chemical compositions and BrC absorption were
wavelength-dependent.</p>
      <p id="d1e506">In this paper, we applied the homologous AAE differentiation method to
quantify the fraction of aerosol light absorption by BrC using the
measurements from a seven-wavelength Aethalometer. The potential error
incurred with this methodology was determined using Mie theory simulations,
especially for various complex refractive indexes of the BC core and the
coating material. The correlation between BrC light absorption and
water-soluble ions, which is used as the source tracer, was employed to
identify potential BrC sources. An atmospheric radiative transfer model has
also been applied to evaluate the impact of BrC on direct radiative forcing
using surface-based aerosol optical properties and satellite-based
surface-albedo data. The magnitudes of aerosol radiative forcing at the top
of the atmosphere due to BC and BrC were also individually quantified.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page11671?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling site</title>
      <p id="d1e524">Field observations were conducted at the Panyu station (23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 113<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), which is a
monitoring site of the Chinese Meteorological Administration (CMA)
Atmospheric Watch Network (CAWNET) that is located on the summit of
Dazhengang Mountain (approximately 150 m above sea level) in Guangzhou,
China. Figure 1 shows the location of the Panyu site, which is situated at
the center of the PRD and is separated from residential areas by at least
500 m. Some agricultural fields can be found to the west of the site.
Although there were no significant pollution sources nearby, this suburban
site was strongly affected by pollutants transported from the urban area of
Guangzhou and crop residual fires transported from the rural area of the
PRD. The field campaign was conducted from 29 November 2014 to 2 January 2015. During the measurement period, aerosol light scattering and
extinction, BC concentration, particle number size distribution (PNSD), OC
concentration, and the water-soluble ion concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
continuously monitored.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e574">The location of Panyu station (CAWNET) in the PRD region
(indicated by the red dot). The plain areas within the yellow circles are
the main rural areas of the western PRD. © Google Earth.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Measurements and data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e591">All instruments were housed inside the second-floor measurement room of a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m tall, two-story building. The ambient sample was taken on
the roof by a 2 m long, 12.7 mm OD stainless steel inlet, and a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
cyclone sampler was also used. The metal tubing was thermally insulated and
maintained at a constant temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. A
diffusion drier was also used in-line to dry the relative humidity (RH) of
the air sample to below 30 % before further analysis.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Measurements of relevant species</title>
      <p id="d1e640">A TSI-3936 scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and a TSI-3321
aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) were utilized to measure the 10 to 500 nm
mobility diameter and 0.5 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m aerodynamic diameter of the PNSD, respectively. The aerodynamic diameters of the APS data were converted into
mobility diameters using a material density of 1.7 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A detailed
data merging method has been described by Cheng et al. (2006).
Furthermore, the pipe diffusion loss of SMPS has been corrected using the
empirical formula proposed by  Kulkarni et al. (1996).</p>
      <p id="d1e663">An AE-33 Aethalometer (Magee Scientific Inc.) was utilized for BC mass
concentration measurement, which was derived from optical attenuation using
a mass absorption cross section (MAC) of 7.77 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 880 nm.
The sensitivity of AE-33 was approximately 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for a 1 min
time resolution and a 5.0 liter per minute (L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) sample flow rate.</p>
      <p id="d1e719">The PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration was measured by an environmental dust
monitor (model EDM180, GRIMM Inc.), which monitored the mass concentration
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simultaneously.</p>
      <p id="d1e749">Water-soluble ions (potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), calcium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), magnesium
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured with the
Monitor for AeRosols and Gases in Air (MARGA) (Model ADI2080, Metrohm Inc.),
which is an online analyzer for semicontinuous measurements of gases and
water-soluble ions in aerosols  (Li et al., 2010). The MARGA was
automatically calibrated with standard internal solutions during field
measurement. The MARGA utilized its own PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling system provided
by the manufacturer.</p>
      <p id="d1e855">The OC and elemental carbon (EC) were measured by a Sunset online OC/EC analyzer (Model RT-4) with a laser transmittance-based charring correction  (Wu
et al., 2018, 2019). The sample flow rate of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer
was maintained at 8 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each measurement cycle (1 h), samples were
collected onto a quartz filter within the first 45 min and then
thermal–optically analyzed during the remaining 15 min. First, OC was
completely volatized in oxygen-free helium with a temperature ramped stepwise (600 and 840 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). In the second stage,
the temperature was reduced to 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and then EC and pyrolyzed
carbon (PC) were combusted in an oxidizing atmosphere (10 % oxygen in
helium), while the temperature was increased up to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C step by
step. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converted from all of the carbon components was then
quantified by a nondispersive infrared absorption <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor
(Lin et al., 2009). An internal calibration peak made by 5 %
methane in helium was applied to quantify OC and EC. To correct the PC
converted from OC to EC, a tunable pulsed diode laser beam was used to
monitor the laser transmittance through the quartz filter throughout the
thermal–optical analysis  (Bauer et al., 2012).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page11672?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Measurements of optical properties</title>
      <p id="d1e941">Light extinction by aerosols at 532 nm was detected using a cavity ring-down
aerosol extinction spectrometer (CRDS) (Model XG-1000, Hexin Inc.) by
measuring the decay times of laser intensity through the aerosol-containing
sample and the filtered background air sample under the same conditions. The
extinction coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated using the
procedure described by  Khalizov et al. (2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e957">Aerosol total scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured by a TSI-3563
integrated nephelometer at three wavelengths (i.e., 450, 550, and 700 nm) and was calibrated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> following the manual instructions.
Particle-free air was used to check the nephelometer background signal once
every 2 h. The scattering coefficients at other wavelengths were
extrapolated using the following equations:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ln</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm is for wavelengths less than 550 nm and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm is for wavelengths greater than 550 nm. The
corresponding time series of extinction coefficients, scattering
coefficients, and SSA at 532 nm are displayed in Fig. S1 in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e1145">The Aethalometer was also used for multi-wavelength light absorption
measurements in this study. The seven-wavelength aerosol light attenuation
coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were converted into aerosol light
absorption coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>)
(Coen et al., 2010), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the parameter that accounts
for the loading effect, ATN is the light attenuation through the filter with
sample loading, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a fixed multiple scattering parameter.
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M69" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATN</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The real-time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value was retrieved using the dual-spot loading correction
algorithm developed by  Drinovec et al. (2015). The
detailed formula of ATN can also be found in Drinovec et al. (2015). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is considered a constant that strongly depends on the
filter matrix effect. However, some studies have suggested that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may
vary with wavelength (Arnott et al., 2005; Segura et al., 2014). For
internal combustion engines and biomass burning, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370 nm was
expected to be approximately 12 % and 18 % less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 532 nm
for the aerosol component, respectively (Schmid et al., 2006). Different ambient
observations also showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may have regional specificity, even
though it was retrieved by the same methodology  (Coen et
al., 2010). In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) at each
wavelength, and this value was derived from the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured by the Aethalometer vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was deduced from
the CRDS and nephelometer measurements. This <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also very similar
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 3.48 determined from an intercomparison study between an
Aethalometer and a photoacoustic soot spectrometer during a field campaign
conducted in the PRD region in 2004  (Wu et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e1368">The BC light absorption at certain wavelengths was derived from the
absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to Beer–Lambert's law,
and its variation between different pairs of wavelengths (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is denoted by the absorption AAE equation developed by  Ångström (1929):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M83" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            It has been suggested that the AAE of BC may vary between short and long
wavelength ranges  (Lack and Cappa, 2010); hence, applying a
wavelength-independent AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may lead to uncertainties in the BC
absorption calculation from one wavelength to another. In this work, the
light absorptions of BC at various wavelengths were retrieved by a modified
wavelength-dependent AAE differentiation method conducted by Wang et al. (2018):</p>
      <p id="d1e1481"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5.1</label><mml:math id="M85" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>5.2</label><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the absorption coefficient
due to only BC greater than 520 nm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents the absorption coefficient of BC less than 520 nm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2, and 3) represents the AAE of BC
between a longer and shorter wavelength at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 520, and
370 nm and was calculated as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ln</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ln</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ln</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Accordingly, BrC absorption at a certain wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was equal to the value of total aerosol
absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minus BC absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The light absorption data at 880 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were selected
to represent BC absorption  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which should not be
affected by BrC  (Drinovec et al., 2015). It has been
reported that the dust-related contributions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were normally
less than 5 % in wintertime in Guangzhou; therefore, the influence from
dust could be negligible in this study  (Huang et al., 2014).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page11673?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Estimation of AAE${}_{\mathrm{BC}}$}?><title>Estimation of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e2104">Traditionally, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was believed to be close to 1.0 (Bodhaine,
1995), which has been commonly used for BC measurements  (Olson et
al., 2015). However, studies have demonstrated that AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
affected by the refractive index of coating materials, mixing state,
morphology, and BC core size   (Liu et al., 2015). Therefore, using the
default AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may lead to uncertainty in BrC absorption
estimation. To obtain the correct AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, a series of Mie theory
calculations were conducted using a simplified core–shell model  (Bohren
and Huffman, 1983; Wang et al., 2018). We used a modified BHCOAT code and
BHMIE code to calculate the aerosol optical properties of the core–shell and
external mixture at different wavelengths  (Cheng et al., 2006). In
the Mie theory, a particle is taken as a perfect homogeneous sphere, and its
extinction and scattering efficiencies, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, are expressed as  (Mie, 1908;
Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998)

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M108" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Re</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the size parameter; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are functions of the complex refractive index (RI) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Riccati–Bessel form, respectively. Re in Eq. (8) denotes that only
the real part of RI is taken. The absorption efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is thus the difference between the extinction and scattering
efficiencies:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Then, the absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained
by the following  (Bricaud and Morel, 1986):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the PNSD function. A two-component parameterization
of dry particles, i.e., the BC core and the non-light-absorbing species, was
applied to calculate aerosol optical properties here  (Wex et al., 2002).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the RI of the BC core, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents the RI of non-light-absorbing particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e2650">In a realistic atmosphere, some non-light-absorbing particles may exist
independently without BC (Liu et al., 2013; Cheung et al., 2016). In this
work, the portion of non-light-absorbing particles at a certain size
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined by our previous measurements at the same site using
a volatility tandem differential mobility analyzer (V-TDMA), during which
completely vaporized (CV) particles at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C were referred to as
non-light-absorbing particles that externally mixed with other BC-containing
particles. Thus, the PNSD of CV particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
BC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be given by the following
equations:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M124" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measure</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>13</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measure</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measure</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the PNSD of the measured particles from
SMPS and APS. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the number fraction of CV
particles in different size bins.</p>
      <p id="d1e2915">A previous study applied three kinds of BC mixture models to calculate the
aerosol optical properties, including external, homogeneously internal, and
core–shell mixtures  (Bohren and Huffman, 2007; Seinfeld and
Pandis, 1998). To quantify the mixing state of BC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was defined as
the mass fraction of externally mixed BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in total BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M130" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Tan et al. (2016a) suggested that two extreme conditions of external and
core–shell mixtures comprised the actual mixing state of BC in the PRD.
Hence, we simply divided the PNSD of BC into the PNSD from an external
mixture of BC and a core–shell mixture of BC. The PNSDs of externally mixed
BC particles and core–shell mixed BC particles were referred to by the
following equations with a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E16"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>15</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E17"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>16</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>core–shell</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was defined as the BC volume fraction in the BC-containing particle
volume, which can be converted from the BC mass concentration:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of BC and is assumed to be 1.5 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Ma et al., 2012);
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the BC mass concentration derived from the multi-angle absorption
photometer (MAAP), which was obtained by an empirical formula from the
Aethalometer that measured the BC concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as proposed by
Wu et al. (2009):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E19" content-type="numbered"><label>18</label><mml:math id="M139" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.897</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.062</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The PNSDs of externally mixed non-light-absorbing particles and externally
mixed BC particles were input into the BHMIE code, and the PNSD of the
core–shell mixed particles was imported into the BHCOAT code. Another
critical parameter for the core–shell model was the diameter of the BC core.
For the simplified core–shell model we applied, the visualization was that a
homogeneous BC core sphere was encapsulated in a shell of non-absorbing
coating  (Bohren and Huffman, 2007). Without size-resolved coating
thickness measurements, core–shell mixed particles simply assumed<?pagebreak page11674?> that cores
with the same diameter had the same coating thickness. Therefore, the
diameter of the BC core was calculated as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E20" content-type="numbered"><label>19</label><mml:math id="M140" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are inputted as parameters into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, which was described by Bohren and Huffman (2007).
The corresponding time series of size distribution of the derived external
BC and internal BC core are illustrated in Fig. S2. Thus, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of all six wavelengths were calculated
through the Mie model, and then the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of those five
wavelengths were obtained using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>). The performance of this empirically
determined calculation method has been compared with other possible BC
mixing schemes in detail (see Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3456">Intercomparison of the performance of various Mie-calculation
schemes. Base Case is based on the empirical distribution function and
mixing states of BC particles obtained from previous field measurements at
the same site. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the portion of non-BC particles, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass portion of externally mixed BC with respect to total
BC. AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorption Ångström exponent of BC, and the
subscript represents the wavelength range. Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> % and
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> % are the BrC absorption contributions at 370 and 520 nm, respectively. Calcabs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the calculated absorption at 880 nm
using the Mie model. Measabs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured absorption by an
Aethalometer at 880 nm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intercept of the regression analysis
between Measabs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Calcabs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., Calcabs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
Measabs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the correlation coefficient of the equation. The
refractive index of BC core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and non-light-absorbing
particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to be 1.80–0.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.55–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively  (Tan et al., 2016a).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.83}[.83]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case no.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Scheme</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AAE <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AAE <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Calc <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Meas <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Base</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1"><?xmltex \igopts{width=28.452756pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-g01.png"/></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.384 to</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">0.58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">0.723</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">0.962</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="1">34.13 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">15.96 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9" morerows="1">21.869</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11" morerows="1">1.019</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12" morerows="1">0.979</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">0.137</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><?xmltex \igopts{width=28.452756pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-g02.png"/></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.331</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.626</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">51.64 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">29.57 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">15.832</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">0.747</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12">0.968</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><?xmltex \igopts{width=28.452756pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-g03.png"/></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.856</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">1.128</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">24.76 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">8.28 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">27.827</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">1.295</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12">0.976</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><?xmltex \igopts{width=28.452756pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-g04.png"/></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.745</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.974</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">33.22 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">15.46 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">21.936</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21.199</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">1.029</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12">0.979</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1"><?xmltex \igopts{width=28.452756pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-g05.png"/></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.384 to</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">0.835</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">1.111</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="1">26.01 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">9.14 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9" morerows="1">27.302</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11" morerows="1">1.269</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12" morerows="1">0.975</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">0.137</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><?xmltex \igopts{width=28.452756pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-g06.png"/></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.778</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">1.043</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">29.96 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">12.30 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">24.921</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">1.150</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12">0.968</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><?xmltex \igopts{width=28.452756pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-g07.png"/></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.674</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.928</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.39 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.49 %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">20.897</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.977</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.975</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>2.2.4</label><title>Atmospheric radiative transfer model</title>
      <p id="d1e4213">In this work, the Santa Barbara DISORT Atmospheric Radiative Transfer
(SBDART) model was employed to estimate the DRF of BrC absorption, i.e., its
effects on the downward and upward fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in  W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of solar
radiation at the TOA. SBDART is a software tool that can be used to compute
plane-parallel radiative transfer under both clear and cloudy conditions
within the atmosphere. More details about this model are found in Ricchiazzi et al. (1998). Both ground measurements and remote-sensing data were used in the simulation. The surface albedo was derived from a 500 m resolution Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) albedo model parameter product (MCD43A3, daily). The MCD43A3 products are the total shortwave broadband black-sky
albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and white-sky albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
the actual surface albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was computed from a linear combination
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were weighted by the
diffuse ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and direct ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E21" content-type="numbered"><label>20</label><mml:math id="M183" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained from an exponential fit of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E22"/>) based on empirical
observations  (Roesch, 2004; Stokes and Schwartz, 1994):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E22" content-type="numbered"><label>21</label><mml:math id="M185" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.122</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cosine of the zenith angle, which is calculated by
the model for any specified date, time, and latitude and longitude of the
site. The surface-based aerosol optical properties, including the aerosol
light absorption coefficients of both BC and BrC, i.e., differentiated from
each other under the assumption of uniform AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, along with the
nephelometer-measured aerosol scattering coefficients, were used to
calculate the SSA at different wavelengths according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E23"/>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E23" content-type="numbered"><label>22</label><mml:math id="M188" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            This was then used in the model calculation. Finally, the AOD and asymmetry
factor (ASY) at 440, 675, and 870 nm were derived from the Aerosol Robotic
Network (AERONET) measurements at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University site
(Holben et al., 1998), which is approximately 115 km to
the southeast of the Panyu site. The tropical atmospheric profile was used
in the SBDART model based on the prevailing weather conditions in the PRD.
The aerosol DRF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated as the difference between the
downward and upward radiation fluxes:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E24" content-type="numbered"><label>23</label><mml:math id="M190" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Aerosol light absorption</title>
      <p id="d1e4578">The AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is widely defined as the uniform representation of the
wavelength dependence of a BC particle (Olson et al., 2015). In
reality, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may vary significantly with BC-containing aerosols of
different sizes, mixing states, and morphologies  (Lack and
Langridge, 2013; Scarnato et al., 2013). In fact, some studies showed that
the AAE of a large size, pure BC core may be less than 1.0  (Liu et al.,
2018) and that the AAE of BC coated with a non-absorbing shell may be larger
than that under uniformity  (Lack and Cappa, 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e4599">It has been suggested that a significant fraction of smaller size particles
is non-BC-containing (Cheung et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2017). BC and
non-BC materials can also be externally or internally mixed. Although size-resolved BC measurements were not available during this work, we conducted size-resolved V-TDMA measurements at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 40, 80, 110, 150, 200, and 300 nm during an earlier field campaign (February 2014) at the same
site as in this work. At 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, all non-BC particles will be
completely vaporized (CV), and thus the portion of non-BC particles at such
size, denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be determined. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were 0.384, 0.181, 0.180, 0.158, 0.143, and 0.137,
corresponding to 40, 80, 110, 150, 200, and 300 nm (see Fig. S3),
respectively  (Cheung et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2016a). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for other sizes were interpolated linearly from these six
diameters. For particle sizes larger than 300 nm and less than 40 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were set to 0.137 and 0.384, respectively. Accordingly,
the complete distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the whole PNSD was
obtained. The mixing states of BC particles were also estimated here, i.e.,
the mass portion of externally mixed BC with respect to total BC, denoted as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was taken as 0.58, which was obtained
using an optical closure method during a previous field experiment at this
site  (Tan et al., 2016a). During the following Mie theory
calculation, a fixed refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was adopted for the whole size range.
Accordingly, the calculated BC absorption at 880 nm (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 21.869 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is reasonably close to the measured mean value of 21.199 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To further validate our calculation scheme (Base Case), we have
considered several extreme cases.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4820">Case 1: BC is completely externally mixed
with non-BC particles, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4859">Case 2: BC is present in every size bin and BC is completely internally
mixed with non-BC material, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4898">Case 3: BC is both internally and externally mixed, but there are no non-BC-containing particles, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4937">Case 4: BC is internally mixed with non-BC material and there are
non-BC particles present, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 0.384 to 0.137
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e4972">Case 5: the same as Case 4 except assuming a fixed
non-BC to BC ratio of 0.5, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</p></list-item><list-item><label> </label>
      <p id="d1e5011">Case 6: the same as Case 5 except that some externally mixed BC is also
present, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list>
The calculation
results are listed in Table 1. Evidently, Case 1 (completely externally mixed)
will significantly underestimate the measured Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that
most BC particles were not likely externally mixed at the Panyu site.
The complete internal mixing state (Cases 2, 4, and 5), by contrast, would
substantially overestimate the BC absorption regardless of the form of the BC core
distribution function. However, when the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was considered (Base Case, Case 3, and Case 6), the calculated Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were all very close to
the measured value, especially the Base Case.</p>
      <p id="d1e5080">When the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was assumed to be uniform, the campaign-averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370 nm,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 470 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 520 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 590 nm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 660 nm. At the corresponding wavelengths, BrC absorption
contributed 26.2 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5 %, 20.0 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 %, 14.3 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5 %,
11.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.3 %, and 7.8 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1 % to the total aerosol absorptions. When the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was applied as the result of the Mie model
calculation, the corrected campaign-averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 470 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 520 nm,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 590 nm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
660 nm. At the corresponding wavelengths, BrC absorption contributed
34.1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 %, 23.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 %, 16.0 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7 %, 13.0 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.4 %, and 8.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3 % to the total aerosol absorption (see Fig. 2). Evidently, aerosol light absorption was predominantly due
to BC; however, BrC also played a significant role, especially at shorter
wavelengths. Table 2 shows the intercomparison of BrC light absorption in
the near UV range between this work and other studies in the East Asian
region. Clearly, the reported values vary substantially, and our result is
toward the lower end of values. Figure S4 displays the time series of
particle AAE measured by the Aethalometer, and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was derived from
Mie model calculation. The AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was almost always<?pagebreak page11676?> lower than AAE,
indicating appreciable BrC light absorption at the Panyu site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e5465"><bold>(a)</bold> BC and BrC particle average light absorption coefficients at
different wavelengths under different AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> assumptions; the whiskers
represent an error of 1 standard deviation. <bold>(b)</bold> Contributions of BC and
BrC to the total light absorption coefficient at different wavelengths under
different AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> assumptions; the whiskers represent an error of 1 standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e5500">Observational studies of the BrC light absorption coefficient and
contribution in the near-ultraviolet wavelength range in East Asia.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.96}[.96]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean BrC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mean BrC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">absorption</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">absorption</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Periods</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coefficient</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">contribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Instrumentation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nov 2014–Jan 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Guangzhou <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(China)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.6 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.2 % (AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Aethalometer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.5 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.1 % (corrected)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AE-33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jan 2014–Feb 2014;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shenzhen <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(China)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">405</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.7 % (winter)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PASS-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yuan et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sep 2014–Oct 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.3 % (fall)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nov 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Heshan <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(China)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">405</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PASS-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yuan et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nov 2016–Dec 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beijing <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(China)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">106.4 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46 % (at the ground)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Aethalometer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Xie et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">93.8 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48 % (at 260 m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AE-33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jun 2013–May 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nanjing (China)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.8 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.7 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Aethalometer <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>AE-31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Wang et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jan 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nagoya (Japan)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">405</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Not detected</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 % (300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Thermodenuder</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Nakayama et</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 % (400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PASS-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Uncertainty in BC and BrC optical differentiation</title>
      <p id="d1e5972">Theoretically, the magnitude of BC absorptions can be affected by both parts
of the complex RIs; thus, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may also vary with
the RIs of both the BC core and coating shell. In fact, RI was also one of
the least known properties of BC and other coating materials with negligible
absorbing capabilities. The refractive index of the BC core
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> displays a wide range of variations (Liu et al.,
2018). Typically, the real and imaginary parts of the RI can vary from 1.5
to 2.0 and 0.5 to 1.1, respectively. In addition, the shell was assumed to
consist of non-absorbing material in the core–shell model; i.e., its
imaginary RI was set to be close to zero (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The real part of the
non-absorbing material RI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may vary from 1.35 to 1.6 due
to the presence of OA  (Redmond and Thompson, 2011; Zhang et al., 2018)
and inorganic salts  (Erlick et al., 2011). Hence, it is necessary to
investigate the uncertainties associated with the variations in AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
by varying the RIs of both the BC core and the non-absorbing materials.</p>
      <p id="d1e6040">Figure 3 shows the impacts of RI on the evaluations of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> based on
core–shell and external configuration, where the RI of the BC core was set
to be constant, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the real part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 1.35 to 1.6 at an interval of 0.05, with the
imaginary part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> set at 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As shown in Fig. 3a,
the calculated AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the core–shell model was higher than 1.0 at longer wavelengths (520 to 880 nm) and lower than 1.0 at shorter wavelengths
(370 to 520 nm) (the red line in Fig. 3 denotes AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
averaged AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.84 to 0.87, and the
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 1.07 to 1.15, indicating that the
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> appeared to be more sensitive to the shell's real part
than AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Even if the shell material was assumed to be
non-absorbing, the variation in the real RI of the shell, which was referred
to as the real part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, still led to changes in the
shell's refractivity and correspondingly altered its lensing effect, causing
a change in AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Meanwhile, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generally increased with an increasing real part of the
shell. In Fig. 3b, under the externally mixed conditions,
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were both less than 1.0. The
average AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.33, and the average AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was 0.63. These values were far less than the values under core–shell
mixture conditions. In the external mixture model, the BC core and
non-light-absorbing materials were assumed to exist dependently, and then the
optical properties of these two components were considered separately.
Therefore, altering the real part of the externally mixed non-absorbing
material would not affect the light absorption property of the BC core or AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e6387">Influence of the wavelength-independent refractive index of the
non-absorbing materials on the <bold>(a)</bold> AAEs of the core–shell mixture and <bold>(b)</bold> AAEs of the external mixture with a constant BC core refractive index
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The imaginary part of the
non(less)-absorbing shell was set to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the real part varied
from 1.35 to 1.60. In each panel, the boundaries of the box represent the
75th and 25th percentiles; the whiskers above and below each box indicate an
error of 1 standard deviation; the black lines in the boxes denote the
average values. In panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, the red line indicates where
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6461">The impacts of the BC core on AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 4, where the
refractive index of non-light-absorbing materials was assumed to be
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5510</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">non</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was wavelength-independent. Figure 4 was obtained with a
core–shell mixture model (Fig. 4a and b) and an external mixture model
(Fig. 4c and d) by varying the real part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1.5 to
2.0 with a step of 0.05 and varying the imaginary part of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.4 to 1.0 with a step of 0.05. As
shown in Fig. 4a and b, for the core–shell mixture, the averaged
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.55 to 0.99 and the averaged
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.84 to 1.27. The AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at a certain
wavelength generally increased when increasing the real part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but decreased when increasing the imaginary part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> appeared to be more sensitive to the
imaginary part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the real part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because the imaginary part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
directly related to the light-absorbing properties of particles. In Fig. 4c
and d, for the external mixture, the averaged AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged
from 0.04 to 0.45 and the averaged AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.28 to
0.79, while the averaged AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
both less than 1.0. Similar to the core–shell mixture, the
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased when increasing the real part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but decreased when increasing the imaginary part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the variation patterns of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
were different from those of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values were not changed by altering the real part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
within the low imaginary part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values still increased when increasing the real part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the high imaginary part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A
possible explanation was that the externally mixed BC core had weak light
absorption within the low imaginary part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, causing the
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values to be insensitive to the real part of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were higher than the
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values regardless of whether they were for the
core–shell mixture or the external mixture. In addition, the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values
conducted by the core–shell mixture were higher than those conducted by the
external mixture.</p>
      <p id="d1e7049">Figure 4 demonstrated that the variation in the imaginary RI of the BC core
had the most significant impact on the estimated AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that
the chemical component of<?pagebreak page11677?> BC emitted from different sources led to a large
uncertainty in AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimation. At the same time, the influence
arising from varying the real RI of the BC core was relatively moderate.
Nevertheless, Fig. 3 shows that change in the real RI of the non-absorbing
materials caused the least or no impact compared to the
variations in the complex RI of the BC core.</p>
      <p id="d1e7070">It should be pointed out that most BC-containing particles are often
observed as being fractal rather than spherical in shape  (Katrinak et al.,
1993). Because the Mie model assumes that all particles are spherical, it
may lead to potential uncertainty for the estimation of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BrC
absorption contributions. Moreover, the externally mixed soot aggregates
were “chain-like” or “puff-like” in the PRD dry season  (Feng et
al., 2010), in which the fractal dimension (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was between 1.5 and
2.0. Coating soot aggregates were likely spheres (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches 3) from
the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements
taken in Hong Kong  (Zhou et al., 2014). A soot aggregate
sensitivity study with the superposition T-matrix method indicated that
using the assumption of volume-equivalent spheres for the soot aggregates
may result in an overestimation of approximately up to 15 % and an
underestimation of approximately up to 50 % in the predicted 870 nm light
absorption when the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is between 1.5 and 3.0 (Liu et
al., 2008). However, it should be recognized that the complex shapes or
positions of the BC core inside the particle make it impractical to be
numerically simulated in the exact details. By far the Mie model with a
core–shell configuration would be the most practical and effective
simulation scheme for BC particle optical property simulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e7117">Furthermore, we have performed Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the
uncertainties of the Mie calculation performed during this work. In the
simulation, a sequence of random numbers or errors were applied to the input
parameters, and then the corresponding uncertainties of particle light
absorption and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were computed using the Mie model. Five hundred reiterations were conducted during the simulation such that the random errors
will be normally distributed. The standard deviations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all
input parameters are listed in Table S1. In order to cover the effect of
extreme value, we used a range of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or a confidence<?pagebreak page11678?> level
of 99 %, in the Monte Carlo simulation. Table S2 lists the Monte Carlo
simulation results, i.e., the average relative standard deviations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the calculated BC light absorption at 880 nm (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The uncertainties of the
calculated Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at two
times of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mie</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., at a confidence level of 95 %, were
approximately  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
respectively. Figure S5a shows the time series of the uncertainties of
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from a Monte Carlo
simulation for the campaign period. These uncertainties will certainly be
propagated into the calculated BrC absorption contributions, too. Hence, we
also estimated the corresponding uncertainties in the BrC absorption
contribution results, as shown in Fig. S5b. Accordingly, the averaged lower
limits of BrC absorption contributions were 26.8 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.1 % at 370
nm, 17.5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 % at 470 nm, 10.1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 % at 520 nm,
8.5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.8 % at 590 nm, and 5.3 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 % at 660 nm, and the averaged upper limits of BrC absorption contribution
ratios were 40.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2 % at 370 nm, 29.5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7 % at
470 nm, 21.1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2 % at 520 nm, 17.3 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2 % at 590 nm,
and 12.0 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1 % at 660 nm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e7419">Influence of the wavelength-independent refractive index of the BC
core on AAEs with a constant shell refractive index
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A core–shell mixture was used for
panels a and b, and an external mixture was used for panels c and d. The
real part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 1.5 to 2.0, with a step of 0.05,
and the imaginary part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>varied from 0.4 to 1.0, with a
step of 0.05.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Characteristics of BrC light absorption, water-soluble ions, and OC concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e7496">Globally, BrC has been observed to be highly correlated with biomass and
biofuel burning emissions  (Laskin et al., 2015). Since
large quantities of sylvite are present in biomass burning particles, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance has often been used as a biomass burning tracer
(Levine, 1991). Figure 5 presents the time series of the OC mass
concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, and BrC absorption from 29 November 2014 to 2 January 2015 at the Panyu site. The range of the OC concentrations
obtained from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> online analyzer was from 1.5 to 65.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the campaign average was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The BrC absorption hourly mean data were between 0.2 and 123.2 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the campaign average was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the other hand,
the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(ranging from 0 to 5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Clearly, similar trends among OC,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BrC absorption can be seen during this field campaign (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e7703">Time series of the OC aerosol mass concentration (green line),
water-soluble <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration (blue line), and BrC light
absorption (red line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7723">To investigate the origins of these observed OC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BrC, wind rose plots (as shown in Fig. 6) were generated for OC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BrC
absorption, respectively. All three panels of Fig. 6 consistently show that
the three substances were associated with the same wind pattern. For the
entire campaign period, the highest values of OC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were mostly associated with southwesterly winds with a relatively low wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relatively
higher OC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were highly related to the seasonal
straw burning in the countryside of the PRD located to the west of the Panyu
station. In contrast, OC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during periods with
easterly winds were substantially lower than those during periods with
westerly winds. The wind rose plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Fig. 6c. Similar to OC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed
higher values under weak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> westerly winds and lower
values from the north and south, indicating that BrC absorption was likely
attributed to local sources and was accumulated under calm wind conditions.
Figure S6 shows the 3 d backward trajectory and the fire counts for 5 to
7 (Fig. S6a), 12 to 14 (Fig. S6b), and 24 to 26 (Fig. S6c) in November 2014,
representing low-loading, moderate-loading, and high-loading period. Clearly,
the high-loading period concurred with stagnant air movement and higher fire
counts, indicating the contribution from open fire burning sources. However,
there was a detectable difference among the three rose plots of Fig. 6 in
the maximum concentration direction. A possible explanation was that
although biomass burning emissions were believed to be the dominant and
primary source of OC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BrC, their emission ratios were highly
variable and may change with<?pagebreak page11679?> the type of biofuel and burning condition and
may even vary during different stages of burning  (Burling et al., 2012).
Although biomass burning emissions contain substantial light-absorbing BrC,
further atmospheric aging processes may significantly reduce its
light-absorbing capability (Satish et al., 2017).
Moreover, secondary formation may also lead to BrC formation inside these
primary aerosols, such as humic-like substances formed through aqueous-phase
reactions, which have been suggested to be an important component of BrC
(Andreae and Gelencser, 2006).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e7927">Wind rose plots of OC <bold>(a)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>. In each panel, the black solid lines denote the
frequency of the wind direction. The shaded contour represents the average
values of the corresponding species for that wind speed (radial length) and
wind direction (transverse direction) in polar coordinates.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7979">To further explore the possible sources of BrC optical absorption, the
diurnal variations in OC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/OC values are plotted in Fig. 7. The diurnal
variation in OC at the Panyu site appeared to be dominated by the
development of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) height; i.e., primary
emissions accumulated at night and were swiftly diluted by vertical mixing
in the morning. The slight increase in OC in the afternoon indicated that
photochemistry may have still weakly contributed to SOA formation. Figure 7b
shows the diurnal variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Unlike OC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a small
peak at approximately 06:00, which was consistent with breakfast time and was
very likely due to cooking activities using biofuel. No lunch and dinnertime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks were observed. The most likely explanation is that the
boundary layer height is much higher during lunch and dinnertime than in
the early morning, providing a much better atmospheric diffusion condition
for air pollutants. It is still a common practice to collect straw as
biofuel in local rural areas, which can be visually spotted but is not
heavily utilized in the region. However, the diurnal profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 7c) shows the combined features of OC and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since both primary and secondary processes affect its intensity. The
nighttime increasing trend was most likely attributed to straw burning
activities in early winter in nearby rural areas that continued to
accumulate within the shallow PBL  (Jiang et al., 2013). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/OC, i.e., the mass absorption coefficient of BrC
(MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7d), showed a relatively flat pattern, with a pronounced
dip in the afternoon and higher values at nighttime, which was likely due to
enhanced primary emissions and stable stratification at nighttime. Declining
trends during the late morning and afternoon hours indicated that the aging
process and photochemical production may reduce the light-absorbing capacity
of BrC  (Qin et al., 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e8143">Box–whisker plots of diurnal trends in the OC concentration <bold>(a)</bold>,
water-soluble K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration <bold>(b)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/OC <bold>(d)</bold>. The red traces represent the variation
in the average value. The upper and lower boundaries of the box represent
the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; the whiskers above and below
each box represent an error of 1 standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e8218">Furthermore, Fig. 8 shows the linear regression analysis results used to
evaluate the correlations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the OC,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The best correlations can be found
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6148</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed
by those between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4514</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4224</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4656</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Source apportionment analysis of OA and BrC absorption in Beijing and
Guangzhou illustrated that biomass burning organic aerosols (BBOAs)
correlated well with BrC light absorption  (Qin et al., 2018; Xie et al.,
2019). Thus, the significant correlation between BrC absorption and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reaffirmed that biomass burning was the crucial emission source of BrC
observed in this work. Although the geographic location of the observation
site was situated in a coastal area and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could also be found in sea
salt   (Pio et al., 2008), it should be noted that the
prevailing wind direction during winter was from the north (see Fig. S6),
which drives maritime air parcels away from the site. Hence, the effect of
sea salt and crustal materials to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was slight, which was demonstrated
in the Supplement as shown in Fig. S7. Other earlier studies
also suggested that the sea salt contribution to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was trivial in the PRD region during the winter
(Lai et al., 2007). Another possible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source was coal
combustion. The coal consumption in the PRD region was dominated by
coal-fired power plants. The emission from power plants was<?pagebreak page11680?> usually very
steady and was less likely to affect the diurnal correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and BrC absorption. As shown in Fig. S8, the ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
vary approximately from 0.015 and 0.020 and the diurnal profile of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows very little variation.  Yu et al. (2018)
have suggested that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> usually accounted for 2.34 %–5.49 % of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the laboratory biomass burning study. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
normally lower than 1 % of coal combustion PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the
ratio range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in this work likely indicated
aged biomass burning particles. Both nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ammonia
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be found in biomass burning plumes  (Andreae and
Merlet, 2001). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrate can be
converted from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through atmospheric reactions, and ammonium may
originate from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, similar to the diurnal variation in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, diurnal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also increased in the afternoon and appeared at nighttime in
Fig. S8. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reached their peaks at noon, indicating that ammonium nitrate formed from
the secondary reaction at this time. Along with the reduced boundary layer
height and ambient temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was accumulated until the
photochemical reaction stopped at night. The diurnal variation in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was similar to that in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the acid–base
neutralization reaction. The overlapping of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal variations would lead to a
significant correlation between BrC absorption and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. High concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are often
found in dust-related aerosols  (Lee et al., 1999). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed poor correlations with both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that dust-related aerosol components contribute
insignificantly to the total aerosol mass loading and, thus, dust may not
affect the AAE differentiation method used in this work. Although sulfur
dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) may also be emitted by biomass burning, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is often believed to be secondary in nature, and the presence of other
intense <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources (e.g., automobile and industrial emissions) further
reduces the correlation between BrC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
include both combustion and sea salt spray (Waldman et al., 1991). Although the prevailing
wintertime wind direction was from the north, sea salt can still be carried
to the site by a weak sea breeze, and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may not show
considerable correlation with BrC.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e9090">Correlations of the BrC absorption coefficient at 370 nm with OC,
water-soluble <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol concentrations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>BrC radiative forcing efficiency</title>
      <p id="d1e9200">The radiative effects of aerosol scattering, BrC absorption, and BC
absorption were investigated by the SBDART model. For each investigated
variable under cloud-free conditions, we run the model twice to calculate
the DRF at the TOA with and without the investigated variable. Accordingly,
the difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two simulations was considered as
the radiative effect of the investigated variable. The results showed that
the average radiative forcings at the TOA by scattering, BrC absorption, and
BC absorption were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Furthermore, BrC absorption
was attributed to 15.8 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4 % of the warming effect caused by
aerosol light absorption, demonstrating the nonnegligible role of BrC in
radiative forcing evaluation.</p>
      <p id="d1e9295">We also calculated the BrC radiative forcing efficiency (RFE) under various
SSAs (ranging from 0.70 to 0.99) at three wavelengths, i.e., 440, 675, and
870 nm. The RFE was denoted as the radiative forcing normalized by the AOD.
The average AOD and ASY at the three wavelengths were 0.365 and 0.691 at 440 nm, 0.212 and 0.632 at 675 nm, and 0.154 and 0.619 at 870 nm.
A solar zenith angle of 55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and an average shortwave broadband
surface albedo (0.119) were used in the calculation. The results were
plotted as a set of RFE lookup charts as a function of the surface BrC
absorption contribution (see Fig. 9).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e9309">BrC radiative forcing efficiencies, which are defined as the BrC
TOA direct radiative forcing divided by the AOD, as a function of the BrC-to-total-aerosol absorption ratio and SSA measured at the surface. The average AOD of the
three wavelengths, the average ASY of the three wavelengths, a solar zenith
angle of 55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and average shortwave broadband surface albedo were
used in the calculation. The red star corresponds to the average SSA and BrC
absorption contributions determined from this campaign.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/11669/2019/acp-19-11669-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9328">In general, for any wavelength, the RFE increased with increasing BrC
absorption contribution for a certain SSA, indicating that BrC was a more
efficient radiative forcing agent due to the preferential absorbance of BrC
in a shorter wavelength range. However, for a certain BrC absorption
contribution, the RFE increased with decreasing SSA; i.e., a higher portion of
light-absorbing aerosol components can lead to more efficient radiative
forcing. The trend among panels (a), (b), and (c) in Fig. 9 demonstrated
that the effect of BrC absorption contribution on RFE was
wavelength-dependent; i.e., BrC was a weaker radiative forcing agent at
longer wavelengths, which is also consistent with the wavelength-dependent
light-absorbing property of BrC. The red stars in Fig. 9 denote the average
SSA and BrC absorption contribution conditions during this campaign, i.e.,
0.029 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per unit AOD at 440 nm (Fig. 9a), 0.007 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per unit
AOD at 675 nm (Fig. 9b), and 0.0002 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per unit AOD at 870 nm (Fig. 9c). These results suggested that the average value of RFE decreased
distinctly from 440 to 870 nm not only because of the lower BrC
absorption contribution but also because of the wavelength dependence of the
BrC RFE. It should also be noted that the simulations were based on SSA
measured under dry conditions. Under the typical ambient conditions of the
PRD, the SSA might be markedly enhanced by aerosol water uptake
(Jung et al., 2009), and then the BrC radiative forcing
efficiency might be less. Moreover, Fig. 9 also serves as a lookup table to
conveniently assess the BrC radiative forcing efficiency at different
wavelengths with different BrC absorption contributions for a certain SSA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e9377">In this work, light absorption due to BrC in the PRD region of China was
quantitatively deduced during the winter season of 2014. The AAEs of ambient
particles and BC core were derived from the measurements. For ambient
particles, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.81 to 2.31
and 0.91 to 2.13, respectively. In the case of BC, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.59 to 0.98 and 0.82 to 1.15,
respectively. Using the absorption<?pagebreak page11681?> coefficients of BC calculated according
to the Mie theory and the observed total aerosol absorption coefficients, we
estimated the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence the BrC absorption contribution for the
optically equivalent mixture configuration. The average BrC light absorption
contribution ranged from 8.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3 % at 660 nm up to 34.1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 % at 370 nm when AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was set as uniform. The sensitivity of
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimation associated with different RI and mixing state
assumptions was further investigated. The results showed that variations in
the real RI of the non-absorbing material (1.35 to 1.6) may increase
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.84 to 0.87 and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1.07 to
1.15 for core–shell mixtures, with an AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.33 and
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.63 for external mixtures. Variations in the core's
real RI (1.5 to 2.0) and imaginary RI (1.0 to 0.4) may increase
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.55 to 0.99 and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.84 to
1.27 for the core–shell mixture and increase AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.04
to 0.45 and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.28 to 0.79 for the external mixture.
These results indicate that the optical properties of the BC core and
non-absorbing material can significantly affect the accuracy of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and corresponding BrC absorption contribution estimations. Compared to the
values of BrC light absorption coefficient and BrC light absorption
contribution from other similar studies conducted in the East Asia region,
the BrC measured in this work showed relatively lower values of light
absorption coefficient but was found to be responsible for relatively higher
portion of light absorption. It should be noted that the calculated BrC
light absorption may vary exponentially with the value of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
According to Monte Carlo simulations under 95 % confidence level, we found
that BrC light absorption contribution ratios in this work can range roughly
from 18 % to 48 % at 370 nm, 10 % to 37 % at 470 nm, 3 % to 27 %
at 520 nm, 3 % to 22 % at 590 nm, and 1 % to 16 % at 660 nm. Therefore, proper values of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have to be carefully
obtained for a particular study area, especially needing to be constrained by
the BC mass concentration, size distribution, and mixing state measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e9695">Additionally, the measurements of major water-soluble inorganic ions
(including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and particulate OC
showed consistent features with those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
implying that BrC was associated with biomass burning<?pagebreak page11682?> emissions from nearby
rural areas. Moreover, the diurnal trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OC indicated that primary biomass burning emissions can produce intense
light-absorbing BrC, while the photochemical aging process may weaken the
light-absorbing capability of BrC.</p>
      <p id="d1e9787">Using a radiative transfer model (i.e., SBDART), we estimated the BrC
effects on aerosol radiative forcing. The average shortwave aerosol direct
radiative forcings due to scattering, BrC absorption, and BC absorption at
the TOA were evaluated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. BrC absorption
accounted for 15.8 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4 % of the total shortwave solar absorption
warming effect at the TOA, indicating that BrC might be an important climate
forcing agent, which is largely neglected in current climate models. To
facilitate the estimation of the climate effects of BrC, a set of lookup
charts was constructed for the investigated area based on the default
tropical atmosphere profile, average surface albedo, average asymmetry
factor, and surface-measured aerosol properties (i.e., BrC absorption
contribution, SSA, and AOD). Therefore, the role of the BrC radiative forcing
efficiency at three wavelengths can be conveniently assessed for certain
SSA and BrC absorption contributions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e9876">The field observation data and modeling parameters used in this study have been given as tables and time series plots in the Supplement. The sun photometer measurement data were acquired from the website of AERONET (<uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 3 August 2018; Nichol and Wong, 2005) and the surface albedo data were acquired from the website of MODIS (<uri>https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/</uri>,  last access: 23 August 2018; LP DAAC, 2000).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e9885">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11669-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11669-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e9894">HT, JZ, YM, and CC designed the experiments, and ZL, LL, YQ, NW, FL, YL, and
MC carried out the field measurements and data analysis. ZL and YQ performed
Mie theory simulation. ZL, JZ, and HT prepared the paper with comments
from all coauthors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e9900">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9906">This article is part of the special issue “Multiphase chemistry of secondary aerosol formation under severe haze”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9912">This work is supported by the National Key Project of MOST (2016YFC0201901,
2016YFC0203305, and 2016YFC0202401), the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (41575122 and 41730106), and the National Research Program for Key
Issues in Air Pollution Control (no. DQGG0103). We are also deeply thankful
for Cheng Wu and the staff at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University site of
AERONET.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e9917">This research has been supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (grant nos. 2016YFC0201901, 2016YFC0203305, and 2016YFC0202401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41575122 and 41730106), and the National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control (no. DQGG0103).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9923">This paper was edited by Jingkun Jiang and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.  and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from
biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ångström, A.: On the Atmospheric Transmission of Sun Radiation and
on Dust in the Air, Geograf. Annal., 11, 156–166, 1929.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arnott, W. P., Hamasha, K., Moosmüller, H., Sheridan, P. J., and Ogren,
J. A.: Towards Aerosol Light-Absorption Measurements with a 7-Wavelength
Aethalometer: Evaluation with a Photoacoustic Instrument and 3-Wavelength
Nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39, 17–29,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901972" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290901972</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arola, A., Schuster, G. L., Pitkänen, M. R. A., Dubovik, O., Kokkola, H., Lindfors, A. V., Mielonen, T., Raatikainen, T., Romakkaniemi, S., Tripathi, S. N., and Lihavainen, H.: Direct radiative effect by brown carbon over the Indo-Gangetic Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12731–12740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12731-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12731-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bauer, J. J., Yu, X.-Y., Cary, R., Laulainen, N., and Berkowitz, C.:
Characterization of the Sunset Semi-Continuous Carbon Aerosol Analyzer,
J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 59, 826–833,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.7.826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3155/1047-3289.59.7.826</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bodhaine, B. A.: Aerosol absorption measurements at Barrow, Mauna Loa and
the south pole, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
8967–8975, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Wiley: Absorption and Scattering of Light
by Small Particles – Craig F. Bohren, Donald R. Huffman, Optics &amp; Laser
Technology, 31, 328–328, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by
Small Particles, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co, KGaA, 328–328 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page11683?><ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Bussemer,  M., Wehner, B., Keller, S., Charlson, R. J.,
A., and Heintzenberg, J.: Light Absorption by Primary
Particle Emissions from a Lignite Burning Plant, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 33, 3887–3891, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Nelson, S. M., Woo, J. H., and
Klimont, Z.: A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon
emissions from combustion, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 43,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003697</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Zarzycki, C., Flanner, M. G., and Koch, D. M.: Quantifying immediate radiative forcing by black carbon and organic matter with the Specific Forcing Pulse, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1505–1525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1505-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1505-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bricaud, A.  and Morel, A.: Light attenuation and scattering by
phytoplanktonic cells: a theoretical modeling, Appl. Opt., 25, 571,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.25.000571" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.25.000571</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Burling, I. R., Yokelson, R. J., Akagi, S. K., Urbanski, S. P., Wold, C. E., Griffith, D. W. T., Johnson, T. J., Reardon, J., and Weise, D. R.: Corrigendum to “Airborne and ground-based measurements of the trace gases and particles emitted by prescribed fires in the United States” published in Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12197–12216, 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 103–103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-103-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-103-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chan, C. K. and Yao, X.: Air pollution in mega cities in China, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Zheng, M., Duan, F.-K., Du, Z.-Y., Ma, Y.-L., Tan, J.-H., Yang, F.-M., Liu, J.-M., Zhang, X.-L., Weber, R. J., Bergin, M. H., and Russell, A. G.: Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11497–11510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y. F., Eichler, H., Wiedensohler, A., Heintzenberg, J., Zhang, Y. H.,
Hu, M., Herrmann, H., Zeng, L. M., Liu, S., Gnauk, T., Brüggemann, E.,
and He, L. Y.: Mixing state of elemental carbon and non-light-absorbing
aerosol components derived from in situ particle optical properties at
Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006929</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cheung, H. H. Y., Tan, H., Xu, H., Li, F., Wu, C., Yu, J. Z., and Chan, C. K.: Measurements of non-volatile aerosols with a VTDMA and their correlations with carbonaceous aerosols in Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8431–8446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8431-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8431-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50561</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Mocnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Erlick, C., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Rudich, Y.: How Different Calculations of
the Refractive Index Affect Estimates of the Radiative Forcing Efficiency of
Ammonium Sulfate Aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 68,
1845–1852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jas3721.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2011jas3721.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, X., Dang, Z., Huang, W., Shao, L., and Li, W.: Microscopic morphology
and size distribution of particles in PM2.5 of Guangzhou City, J.
Atmos. Chem., 64, 37–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-010-9169-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-010-9169-7</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer,
A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., and Nakajima, T.:
AERONET – A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol
Characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G.,
Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J.,
Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and
Prevot, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate
pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jiang, D., Wang, C., Wu, D., Deng, X., Huang, X., Tan, H., Li, F., and Deng,
T.: Diurnal variation of atmospheric boundary layer over Wushan station,
Guangzhou using wind profiler radar (in Chinese), J. Trop.
Meteorol., 29, 129–135, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jung, J., Lee, H., Kim, Y. J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Gu, J., and Fan, S.:
Aerosol chemistry and the effect of aerosol water content on visibility
impairment and radiative forcing in Guangzhou during the 2006 Pearl River
Delta campaign, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 3231–3244,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.021</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Katrinak, K. A., Rez, P., Perkes, P. R., and Buseck, P. R.: Fractal geometry
of carbonaceous aggregates from an urban aerosol, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 27, 225–238, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khalizov, A. F., Xue, H., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R.: Enhanced light
absorption and scattering by carbon soot aerosol internally mixed with
sulfuric acid, The J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 1066–1074,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807531n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp807531n</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kulkarni, P., Baron, P. A., and Willeke, K.: Aerosol measurement :
principles, techniques, and applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 807–808
pp., 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page11684?><ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Cappa, C. D.: Impact of brown and clear carbon on light absorption enhancement, single scatter albedo and absorption wavelength dependence of black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4207–4220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lai, S.-C., Zou, S.-C., Cao, J.-J., Lee, S.-C., and Ho, K.-F.:
Characterizing ionic species in PM2.5 and PM10 in four Pearl River Delta
cities, South China, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 939–947,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60155-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60155-7</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, E., Chan, C. K., and Paatero, P.: Application of positive matrix
factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong
Kong, Atmos. Environ., 33, 3201–3212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00113-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00113-2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Levine, J.: Biomass Burning Aerosols in a Savanna Region of the Ivory Coast,
French Forum, 235–236, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, H., Han, Z., Cheng, T., Du, H., Kong, L., Chen, J., Zhang, R., and Wang,
W.: Agricultural Fire Impacts on the Air Quality of Shanghai during Summer
Harvesttime, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 10, 95–101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2009.08.0049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2009.08.0049</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Hu, M., Deng, Z., Slanina, J., Han, S., Kondo, Y., Takegawa, N.,
Miyazaki, Y., Zhao, Y., and Sugimoto, N.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of
organic carbon in PM2.5 in Beijing and the estimation of secondary organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00G11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010902</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, C., Chung, C. E., Yin, Y., and Schnaiter, M.: The absorption Ångström exponent of black carbon: from numerical aspects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6259–6273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2015–2029, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Young, D. E., Flynn, M. J., Coe, H., and Allan, J.
D.: The effect of complex black carbon microphysics on the determination of
the optical properties of brown carbon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
613–619, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, L., Mishchenko, M. I., and Patrick Arnott, W.: A study of radiative
properties of fractal soot aggregates using the superposition T-matrix
method, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra. Transf., 109,
2656–2663, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2008.05.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2008.05.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>LP DAAC: MODIS/surface albedo daily 500 m, February 2000 to Present, available at: <uri>https://developers.google.cn/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/MODIS_006_MCD43A3</uri> (last access: 3 August 2018), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, N., Zhao, C. S., Müller, T., Cheng, Y. F., Liu, P. F., Deng, Z. Z., Xu, W. Y., Ran, L., Nekat, B., van Pinxteren, D., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Herrmann, H., Yan, P., Zhou, X. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: A new method to determine the mixing state of light absorbing carbonaceous using the measured aerosol optical properties and number size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2381–2397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, Y., Li, S. Z., Zheng, J., Khalizov, A., Wang, X., Wang, Z., and Zhou, Y.
Y.: Size-resolved measurements of mixing state and cloud-nucleating ability
of aerosols in Nanjing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9430–9450,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd026583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017jd026583</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mie, G.: Beitrage Zur Optik Truber Medien, Speziell Kolloidaler
Metallosungen, Ann. Phys., 25, 377, 1908.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R. K., Ehlers, K. M., and Arnott, W. P.: Absorption Ångström coefficient, brown carbon, and aerosols: basic concepts, bulk matter, and spherical particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1217–1225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1217-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1217-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nakayama, T., Ikeda, Y., Sawada, Y., Setoguchi, Y., Ogawa, S., Kawana, K.,
Mochida, M., Ikemori, F., Matsumoto, K., and Matsumi, Y.: Properties of
light-absorbing aerosols in the Nagoya urban area, Japan, in August 2011
and January 2012: Contributions of brown carbon and lensing effect, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12721–712739, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nichol, J. E. and Wong, M.-S.: AERONET/aerosol optical depth measurements at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, November 2005 to September 2019, available at: <uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/photo_db/Hong_Kong_PolyU.html</uri> (last access: 23 August 2018), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Olson, M. R., Victoria Garcia, M., Robinson, M. A., Van Rooy, P.,
Dietenberger, M. A., Bergin, M., and Schauer, J. J.: Investigation of black
and brown carbon multiple-wavelength-dependent light absorption from biomass
and fossil fuel combustion source emissions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 6682–6697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd022970</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pio, C. A., Legrand, M., Alves, C. A., Oliveira, T., Afonso, J., Caseiro,
A., Puxbaum, H., Sanchez-Ochoa, A., and Gelencsér, A.: Chemical
composition of atmospheric aerosols during the 2003 summer intense forest
fire period, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7530–7543, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qin, Y. M., Tan, H. B., Li, Y. J., Li, Z. J., Schurman, M. I., Liu, L., Wu, C., and Chan, C. K.: Chemical characteristics of brown carbon in atmospheric particles at a suburban site near Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16409–16418, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Redmond, H.  and Thompson, J. E.: Evaluation of a quantitative
structure-property relationship (QSPR) for predicting mid-visible refractive
index of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 13, 6872–6882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02270e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c0cp02270e</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ricchiazzi, P., Yang, S., Gautier, C., and Sowle, D.: SBDART: A Research and
Teaching Software Tool for Plane-Parallel Radiative Transfer in the Earth's
Atmosphere, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 2101–2114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:Sarats&gt;2.0.Co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:Sarats&gt;2.0.Co;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roesch, A.: Use of Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
bidirectional reflectance distribution function products to enhance
simulated surface albedos, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D12105,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004552</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sareen, N., Schwier, A. N., Shapiro, E. L., Mitroo, D., and McNeill, V. F.: Secondary organic material formed by methylglyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 997–1016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-997-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-997-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Satish, R., Shamjad, P., Thamban, N., Tripathi, S., and Rastogi, N.:
Temporal Characteristics of Brown Carbon over th<?pagebreak page11685?>e Central Indo-Gangetic
Plain, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6765–6772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00734" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00734</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Scarnato, B. V., Vahidinia, S., Richard, D. T., and Kirchstetter, T. W.: Effects of internal mixing and aggregate morphology on optical properties of black carbon using a discrete dipole approximation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5089–5101, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5089-2013, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmid, O., Artaxo, P., Arnott, W. P., Chand, D., Gatti, L. V., Frank, G. P., Hoffer, A., Schnaiter, M., and Andreae, M. O.: Spectral light absorption by ambient aerosols influenced by biomass burning in the Amazon Basin. I: Comparison and field calibration of absorption measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3443–3462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Segura, S., Estellés, V., Titos, G., Lyamani, H., Utrillas, M. P., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Močnik, G., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Martínez-Lozano, J. A.: Determination and analysis of in situ spectral aerosol optical properties by a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2373–2387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2373-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-2373-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H.  and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, John
Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc, New York, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stokes, G. M.  and Schwartz, S. E.: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement
(ARM) Program: Programmatic Background and Design of the Cloud and Radiation
Test Bed, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 75, 1201–1221,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tan, H., Liu, L., Fan, S., Li, F., Yin, Y., Cai, M., and Chan, P. W.:
Aerosol optical properties and mixing state of black carbon in the Pearl
River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 196–208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tan, H., Yin, Y., Li, F., Liu, X., Chan, P. W., Deng, T., Deng, X., Wan, Q.,
and Wu, D.: Measurements of particle number size distributions and new
particle formations events during winter in the Pearl River Delta region,
China, J. Trop. Meteorol., 22, 191–199,
10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Waldman, J. M., Lioy, P. J., Zelenka, M., Jing, L., Lin, Y. N., He, Q. C.,
Qian, Z. M., Chapman, R., and Wilson, W. E.: Wintertime measurements of
aerosol acidity and trace elements in Wuhan, a city in central China,
Atmos. Environ. Part B., 25, 113–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-1272(91)90045-G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0957-1272(91)90045-G</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Nie, W., Cheng, Y., Shen, Y., Chi, X., Wang, J., Huang, X., Xie, Y., Sun, P., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Su, H., and Ding, A.: Light absorption of brown carbon in eastern China based on 3-year multi-wavelength aerosol optical property observations and an improved absorption Ångström exponent segregation method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9061–9074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018</ext-link>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber,
R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., and Baumann, K.: Biomass
burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural southeastern United
States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wex, H., Neusüß, C., Wendisch, M., Stratmann, F., Koziar, C., Keil,
A., Wiedensohler, A., and Ebert, M.: Particle scattering, backscattering,
and absorption coefficients: An in situ closure and sensitivity study,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, LAC-1–LAC4-18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000234" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000234</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Wu, D., and Yu, J. Z.: Quantifying black carbon light absorption enhancement with a novel statistical approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 289–309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-289-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-289-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Wu, D., and Yu, J.: Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis of Secondary
Organic Carbon Using One-Year of Hourly Organic and Elemental Carbon Data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 2774–2795,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029290</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, D., Mao, J., Deng, X., Tie, X., Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Li, F., Tan, H.,
Bi, X., Huang, X., Chen, J., and Deng, T.: Black carbon aerosols and their
radiative properties in the Pearl River Delta region, Sci. China D, 52, 1152–1163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Liu, D., Tang, G., Chen, P., Du, W., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Han, T., Bian, Q., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Ge, X., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Vertical characterization of aerosol optical properties and brown carbon in winter in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 165–179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-165-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-165-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, J., Yan, C., Liu, Y., Li, X., Zhou, T., and Zheng, M.: Potassium: A
Tracer for Biomass Burning in Beijing?, Aerosol  Air Qual. Res.,
18, 2447–2459, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0536" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0536</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yuan, J.-F., Huang, X.-F., Cao, L.-M., Cui, J., Zhu, Q., Huang, C.-N., Lan, Z.-J., and He, L.-Y.: Light absorption of brown carbon aerosol in the PRD region of China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1433–1443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1433-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1433-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Sun, Y., Lv, Y., and Xie, Y.: Estimation of atmospheric
columnar organic matter (OM) mass concentration from remote sensing
measurements of aerosol spectral refractive indices, Atmo.
Environ., 179, 107–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.010</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, S., Wang, T., Wang, Z., Li, W., Xu, Z., Wang, X., Yuan, C., Poon, C.
N., Louie, P. K. K., Luk, C. W. Y., and Wang, W.: Photochemical evolution of
organic aerosols observed in urban plumes from Hong Kong and the Pearl River
Delta of China, Atmos. Environ., 88, 219–229,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Light absorption properties and potential sources of particulate brown carbon in the Pearl River Delta region of China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Brown carbon (BrC) is a special type of organic aerosol (OA), capable of
absorbing solar radiation from near-ultraviolet (UV) to visible wavelengths,
which may lead to an increased aerosol radiative effect in the atmosphere.
While high concentrations of OAs have been observed in the Pearl River Delta
(PRD) region of China, the optical properties and corresponding radiative
forcing of BrC in the PRD are still not well understood. In this work, we
conducted a set of comprehensive measurements of atmospheric particulate
matter from 29 November 2014 to 2 January 2015 to investigate aerosol
compositions, optical properties, source origins, and radiative forcing
effects at a suburban station in Guangzhou. The particle absorption
Ångström exponent (AAE) was deduced and utilized to distinguish
light absorption by BrC from that by black carbon (BC). The results showed
that the average absorption contributions of BrC were 34.1±8.0&thinsp;% at
370&thinsp;nm, 23.7±7.3&thinsp;% at 470&thinsp;nm, 16.0±6.7&thinsp;% at 520&thinsp;nm,
13.0±5.4&thinsp;% at 590&thinsp;nm, and 8.7±4.3&thinsp;% at 660&thinsp;nm. A
sensitivity analysis of the evaluation of the absorption Ångström
exponent of BC (AAE<sub>BC</sub>) was conducted based on the Mie theory
calculation assuming that the BC-containing aerosol was mixed with the
core–shell and external configurations. The corresponding uncertainty in
AAE<sub>BC</sub> was acquired. We found that variations in the imaginary
refractive index (RI) of the BC core can significantly affect the estimation
of AAE<sub>BC</sub>. However, AAE<sub>BC</sub> was relatively less sensitive to the real
part of the RI of the BC core and was least sensitive to the real part of
the RI of the non-light-absorbing shell. BrC absorption was closely related
to aerosol potassium cation content (K<sup>+</sup>), a common tracer of biomass
burning emissions, which was most likely associated with straw burning in
the rural area of the western PRD. Diurnal variation in BrC absorption
revealed that primary organic aerosols had a larger BrC absorption capacity
than secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). Radiative transfer simulations
showed that BrC absorption may cause 2.3±1.8&thinsp;W&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup> radiative
forcing at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and contribute to 15.8±4.4&thinsp;% of the aerosol warming effect. A chart was constructed to
conveniently assess the BrC radiative forcing efficiency in the studied area
with reference to certain aerosol single-scattering albedo (SSA) and BrC
absorption contributions at various wavelengths. Evidently, the BrC
radiative forcing efficiency was higher at shorter wavelengths.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.  and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from
biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Ångström, A.: On the Atmospheric Transmission of Sun Radiation and
on Dust in the Air, Geograf. Annal., 11, 156–166, 1929.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arnott, W. P., Hamasha, K., Moosmüller, H., Sheridan, P. J., and Ogren,
J. A.: Towards Aerosol Light-Absorption Measurements with a 7-Wavelength
Aethalometer: Evaluation with a Photoacoustic Instrument and 3-Wavelength
Nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39, 17–29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901972" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901972</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arola, A., Schuster, G. L., Pitkänen, M. R. A., Dubovik, O., Kokkola, H., Lindfors, A. V., Mielonen, T., Raatikainen, T., Romakkaniemi, S., Tripathi, S. N., and Lihavainen, H.: Direct radiative effect by brown carbon over the Indo-Gangetic Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12731–12740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12731-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12731-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, J. J., Yu, X.-Y., Cary, R., Laulainen, N., and Berkowitz, C.:
Characterization of the Sunset Semi-Continuous Carbon Aerosol Analyzer,
J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 59, 826–833,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.7.826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.7.826</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bodhaine, B. A.: Aerosol absorption measurements at Barrow, Mauna Loa and
the south pole, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
8967–8975, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Wiley: Absorption and Scattering of Light
by Small Particles – Craig F. Bohren, Donald R. Huffman, Optics &amp; Laser
Technology, 31, 328–328, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by
Small Particles, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co, KGaA, 328–328 pp., 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Bussemer,  M., Wehner, B., Keller, S., Charlson, R. J.,
A., and Heintzenberg, J.: Light Absorption by Primary
Particle Emissions from a Lignite Burning Plant, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 33, 3887–3891, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Nelson, S. M., Woo, J. H., and
Klimont, Z.: A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon
emissions from combustion, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003697</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Zarzycki, C., Flanner, M. G., and Koch, D. M.: Quantifying immediate radiative forcing by black carbon and organic matter with the Specific Forcing Pulse, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1505–1525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1505-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1505-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bricaud, A.  and Morel, A.: Light attenuation and scattering by
phytoplanktonic cells: a theoretical modeling, Appl. Opt., 25, 571,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.25.000571" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.25.000571</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Burling, I. R., Yokelson, R. J., Akagi, S. K., Urbanski, S. P., Wold, C. E., Griffith, D. W. T., Johnson, T. J., Reardon, J., and Weise, D. R.: Corrigendum to “Airborne and ground-based measurements of the trace gases and particles emitted by prescribed fires in the United States” published in Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12197–12216, 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 103–103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-103-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-103-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, C. K. and Yao, X.: Air pollution in mega cities in China, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Zheng, M., Duan, F.-K., Du, Z.-Y., Ma, Y.-L., Tan, J.-H., Yang, F.-M., Liu, J.-M., Zhang, X.-L., Weber, R. J., Bergin, M. H., and Russell, A. G.: Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11497–11510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y. F., Eichler, H., Wiedensohler, A., Heintzenberg, J., Zhang, Y. H.,
Hu, M., Herrmann, H., Zeng, L. M., Liu, S., Gnauk, T., Brüggemann, E.,
and He, L. Y.: Mixing state of elemental carbon and non-light-absorbing
aerosol components derived from in situ particle optical properties at
Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006929" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006929</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cheung, H. H. Y., Tan, H., Xu, H., Li, F., Wu, C., Yu, J. Z., and Chan, C. K.: Measurements of non-volatile aerosols with a VTDMA and their correlations with carbonaceous aerosols in Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8431–8446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8431-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8431-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Drinovec, L., Mocnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Erlick, C., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Rudich, Y.: How Different Calculations of
the Refractive Index Affect Estimates of the Radiative Forcing Efficiency of
Ammonium Sulfate Aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 68,
1845–1852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jas3721.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jas3721.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, X., Dang, Z., Huang, W., Shao, L., and Li, W.: Microscopic morphology
and size distribution of particles in PM2.5 of Guangzhou City, J.
Atmos. Chem., 64, 37–51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-010-9169-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-010-9169-7</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer,
A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., and Nakajima, T.:
AERONET – A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol
Characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G.,
Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J.,
Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and
Prevot, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate
pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, D., Wang, C., Wu, D., Deng, X., Huang, X., Tan, H., Li, F., and Deng,
T.: Diurnal variation of atmospheric boundary layer over Wushan station,
Guangzhou using wind profiler radar (in Chinese), J. Trop.
Meteorol., 29, 129–135, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, J., Lee, H., Kim, Y. J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Gu, J., and Fan, S.:
Aerosol chemistry and the effect of aerosol water content on visibility
impairment and radiative forcing in Guangzhou during the 2006 Pearl River
Delta campaign, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 3231–3244,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.021</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Katrinak, K. A., Rez, P., Perkes, P. R., and Buseck, P. R.: Fractal geometry
of carbonaceous aggregates from an urban aerosol, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 27, 225–238, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Khalizov, A. F., Xue, H., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R.: Enhanced light
absorption and scattering by carbon soot aerosol internally mixed with
sulfuric acid, The J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 1066–1074,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807531n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807531n</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kulkarni, P., Baron, P. A., and Willeke, K.: Aerosol measurement :
principles, techniques, and applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 807–808
pp., 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A. and Cappa, C. D.: Impact of brown and clear carbon on light absorption enhancement, single scatter albedo and absorption wavelength dependence of black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4207–4220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lai, S.-C., Zou, S.-C., Cao, J.-J., Lee, S.-C., and Ho, K.-F.:
Characterizing ionic species in PM2.5 and PM10 in four Pearl River Delta
cities, South China, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 939–947,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60155-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60155-7</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, E., Chan, C. K., and Paatero, P.: Application of positive matrix
factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong
Kong, Atmos. Environ., 33, 3201–3212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00113-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00113-2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Levine, J.: Biomass Burning Aerosols in a Savanna Region of the Ivory Coast,
French Forum, 235–236, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Han, Z., Cheng, T., Du, H., Kong, L., Chen, J., Zhang, R., and Wang,
W.: Agricultural Fire Impacts on the Air Quality of Shanghai during Summer
Harvesttime, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 10, 95–101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2009.08.0049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2009.08.0049</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Hu, M., Deng, Z., Slanina, J., Han, S., Kondo, Y., Takegawa, N.,
Miyazaki, Y., Zhao, Y., and Sugimoto, N.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of
organic carbon in PM2.5 in Beijing and the estimation of secondary organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00G11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010902</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, C., Chung, C. E., Yin, Y., and Schnaiter, M.: The absorption Ångström exponent of black carbon: from numerical aspects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6259–6273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2015–2029, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Young, D. E., Flynn, M. J., Coe, H., and Allan, J.
D.: The effect of complex black carbon microphysics on the determination of
the optical properties of brown carbon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
613–619, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, L., Mishchenko, M. I., and Patrick Arnott, W.: A study of radiative
properties of fractal soot aggregates using the superposition T-matrix
method, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra. Transf., 109,
2656–2663, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2008.05.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2008.05.001</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
LP DAAC: MODIS/surface albedo daily 500 m, February 2000 to Present, available at: <a href="https://developers.google.cn/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/MODIS_006_MCD43A3" target="_blank">https://developers.google.cn/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/MODIS_006_MCD43A3</a> (last access: 3 August 2018), 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, N., Zhao, C. S., Müller, T., Cheng, Y. F., Liu, P. F., Deng, Z. Z., Xu, W. Y., Ran, L., Nekat, B., van Pinxteren, D., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Herrmann, H., Yan, P., Zhou, X. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: A new method to determine the mixing state of light absorbing carbonaceous using the measured aerosol optical properties and number size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2381–2397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, Y., Li, S. Z., Zheng, J., Khalizov, A., Wang, X., Wang, Z., and Zhou, Y.
Y.: Size-resolved measurements of mixing state and cloud-nucleating ability
of aerosols in Nanjing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9430–9450,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd026583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd026583</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mie, G.: Beitrage Zur Optik Truber Medien, Speziell Kolloidaler
Metallosungen, Ann. Phys., 25, 377, 1908.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R. K., Ehlers, K. M., and Arnott, W. P.: Absorption Ångström coefficient, brown carbon, and aerosols: basic concepts, bulk matter, and spherical particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1217–1225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1217-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1217-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nakayama, T., Ikeda, Y., Sawada, Y., Setoguchi, Y., Ogawa, S., Kawana, K.,
Mochida, M., Ikemori, F., Matsumoto, K., and Matsumi, Y.: Properties of
light-absorbing aerosols in the Nagoya urban area, Japan, in August 2011
and January 2012: Contributions of brown carbon and lensing effect, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12721–712739, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Nichol, J. E. and Wong, M.-S.: AERONET/aerosol optical depth measurements at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, November 2005 to September 2019, available at: <a href="https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/photo_db/Hong_Kong_PolyU.html" target="_blank">https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/photo_db/Hong_Kong_PolyU.html</a> (last access: 23 August 2018), 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Olson, M. R., Victoria Garcia, M., Robinson, M. A., Van Rooy, P.,
Dietenberger, M. A., Bergin, M., and Schauer, J. J.: Investigation of black
and brown carbon multiple-wavelength-dependent light absorption from biomass
and fossil fuel combustion source emissions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 6682–6697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022970</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Pio, C. A., Legrand, M., Alves, C. A., Oliveira, T., Afonso, J., Caseiro,
A., Puxbaum, H., Sanchez-Ochoa, A., and Gelencsér, A.: Chemical
composition of atmospheric aerosols during the 2003 summer intense forest
fire period, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7530–7543, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, Y. M., Tan, H. B., Li, Y. J., Li, Z. J., Schurman, M. I., Liu, L., Wu, C., and Chan, C. K.: Chemical characteristics of brown carbon in atmospheric particles at a suburban site near Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16409–16418, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16409-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Redmond, H.  and Thompson, J. E.: Evaluation of a quantitative
structure-property relationship (QSPR) for predicting mid-visible refractive
index of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 13, 6872–6882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02270e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02270e</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Ricchiazzi, P., Yang, S., Gautier, C., and Sowle, D.: SBDART: A Research and
Teaching Software Tool for Plane-Parallel Radiative Transfer in the Earth's
Atmosphere, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 2101–2114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:Sarats&gt;2.0.Co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:Sarats&gt;2.0.Co;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Roesch, A.: Use of Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
bidirectional reflectance distribution function products to enhance
simulated surface albedos, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D12105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004552</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Sareen, N., Schwier, A. N., Shapiro, E. L., Mitroo, D., and McNeill, V. F.: Secondary organic material formed by methylglyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 997–1016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-997-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-997-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Satish, R., Shamjad, P., Thamban, N., Tripathi, S., and Rastogi, N.:
Temporal Characteristics of Brown Carbon over the Central Indo-Gangetic
Plain, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6765–6772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00734" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00734</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Scarnato, B. V., Vahidinia, S., Richard, D. T., and Kirchstetter, T. W.: Effects of internal mixing and aggregate morphology on optical properties of black carbon using a discrete dipole approximation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5089–5101, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5089-2013, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, O., Artaxo, P., Arnott, W. P., Chand, D., Gatti, L. V., Frank, G. P., Hoffer, A., Schnaiter, M., and Andreae, M. O.: Spectral light absorption by ambient aerosols influenced by biomass burning in the Amazon Basin. I: Comparison and field calibration of absorption measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3443–3462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Segura, S., Estellés, V., Titos, G., Lyamani, H., Utrillas, M. P., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Močnik, G., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Martínez-Lozano, J. A.: Determination and analysis of in situ spectral aerosol optical properties by a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2373–2387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2373-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2373-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H.  and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, John
Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc, New York, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, G. M.  and Schwartz, S. E.: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement
(ARM) Program: Programmatic Background and Design of the Cloud and Radiation
Test Bed, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 75, 1201–1221,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, H., Liu, L., Fan, S., Li, F., Yin, Y., Cai, M., and Chan, P. W.:
Aerosol optical properties and mixing state of black carbon in the Pearl
River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 196–208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.003</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, H., Yin, Y., Li, F., Liu, X., Chan, P. W., Deng, T., Deng, X., Wan, Q.,
and Wu, D.: Measurements of particle number size distributions and new
particle formations events during winter in the Pearl River Delta region,
China, J. Trop. Meteorol., 22, 191–199,
10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Waldman, J. M., Lioy, P. J., Zelenka, M., Jing, L., Lin, Y. N., He, Q. C.,
Qian, Z. M., Chapman, R., and Wilson, W. E.: Wintertime measurements of
aerosol acidity and trace elements in Wuhan, a city in central China,
Atmos. Environ. Part B., 25, 113–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-1272(91)90045-G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-1272(91)90045-G</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Nie, W., Cheng, Y., Shen, Y., Chi, X., Wang, J., Huang, X., Xie, Y., Sun, P., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Su, H., and Ding, A.: Light absorption of brown carbon in eastern China based on 3-year multi-wavelength aerosol optical property observations and an improved absorption Ångström exponent segregation method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9061–9074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018</a>, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber,
R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., and Baumann, K.: Biomass
burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural southeastern United
States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wex, H., Neusüß, C., Wendisch, M., Stratmann, F., Koziar, C., Keil,
A., Wiedensohler, A., and Ebert, M.: Particle scattering, backscattering,
and absorption coefficients: An in situ closure and sensitivity study,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, LAC-1–LAC4-18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000234" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000234</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, C., Wu, D., and Yu, J. Z.: Quantifying black carbon light absorption enhancement with a novel statistical approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 289–309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-289-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-289-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, C., Wu, D., and Yu, J.: Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis of Secondary
Organic Carbon Using One-Year of Hourly Organic and Elemental Carbon Data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 2774–2795,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029290</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, D., Mao, J., Deng, X., Tie, X., Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Li, F., Tan, H.,
Bi, X., Huang, X., Chen, J., and Deng, T.: Black carbon aerosols and their
radiative properties in the Pearl River Delta region, Sci. China D, 52, 1152–1163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0115-y</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Liu, D., Tang, G., Chen, P., Du, W., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Han, T., Bian, Q., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Ge, X., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Vertical characterization of aerosol optical properties and brown carbon in winter in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 165–179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-165-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-165-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J., Yan, C., Liu, Y., Li, X., Zhou, T., and Zheng, M.: Potassium: A
Tracer for Biomass Burning in Beijing?, Aerosol  Air Qual. Res.,
18, 2447–2459, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0536" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0536</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, J.-F., Huang, X.-F., Cao, L.-M., Cui, J., Zhu, Q., Huang, C.-N., Lan, Z.-J., and He, L.-Y.: Light absorption of brown carbon aerosol in the PRD region of China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1433–1443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1433-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1433-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Sun, Y., Lv, Y., and Xie, Y.: Estimation of atmospheric
columnar organic matter (OM) mass concentration from remote sensing
measurements of aerosol spectral refractive indices, Atmo.
Environ., 179, 107–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.010</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Wang, T., Wang, Z., Li, W., Xu, Z., Wang, X., Yuan, C., Poon, C.
N., Louie, P. K. K., Luk, C. W. Y., and Wang, W.: Photochemical evolution of
organic aerosols observed in urban plumes from Hong Kong and the Pearl River
Delta of China, Atmos. Environ., 88, 219–229,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.032</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
