<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-9161-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Comparison of polycyclic aromatic compounds in air measured by conventional
passive air samplers and passive dry deposition samplers and contributions from petcoke
and oil sands ore</article-title><alt-title>Comparison of polycyclic aromatic compounds</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Comparison of polycyclic aromatic compounds}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{N.~Jariyasopit et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jariyasopit</surname><given-names>Narumol</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yifeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Jonathan W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Harner</surname><given-names>Tom</given-names></name>
          <email>tom.harner@canada.ca</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Air Quality Processes Research Section, Environment and Climate Change
Canada, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Tom Harner (tom.harner@canada.ca)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>9161</fpage><lpage>9171</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e113">Conventional passive air samplers (PAS) and passive dry deposition
samplers (PAS-DD) were deployed along a 90 km south–north transect at five sites in
the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR) during October to November 2015. The purpose
was to compare and characterize the performance of the two passive sampling
methods for targeted compounds across a range of site types. Samples were
analyzed for polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs), nitrated polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (NPAHs), and oxygenated PAHs (OPAHs). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PAC and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAH concentrations were highest in PAS and PAS-DD samplers at site
AMS5, which is the closest sampling site to surface mining and upgrading
facilities. The OPAHs were elevated at site AMS6, which is located in the
town of Fort McMurray, approximately 30 km south of the main mining area.
PAS-DD was enriched relative to PAS in particle-associated target
chemicals, which is consistent with the relatively more open design of
PAS-DD intended to capture particle-phase (and gas-phase) deposition. Petroleum
coke (petcoke) (i.e., the carbonaceous byproduct of bitumen upgrading) and
oil sands ore (i.e., the material mined in open-pit mines from which bitumen
is extracted) were assessed for their potential to be a source of PACs to
air in the oil sands region. The ore samples contained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8
times and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 times higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs concentrations (dry
weight basis) than delayed and fluid petcoke, respectively. The residue
analysis of ore and petcoke samples also revealed that the chemical
4-nitrobiphenyl (4-NBP) can be used to track gas-phase emissions to air. A
comparison of chemical residues in ore, petcoke, and air samples revealed
that the ore is likely a major contributor to volatile PACs present in air
and that both ore and petcoke are contributing to the particle-associated
PACs in air near open-pit mining areas. The contribution of petcoke
particles in passive air samples was also confirmed qualitatively using
scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (SEM-EDS).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e158">Application of passive air sampling techniques has become widespread due to
their simplicity, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. It enables us to
routinely monitor air pollutants at a larger scale and to extend air
monitoring networks to strategic sites that are not feasible for active air
sampler installation. Illustrated in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, conventional double-domed
polyurethane foam (PUF) disk passive air samplers (PAS) have been commonly
used in several air monitoring programs, including the Athabasca oil sands
air monitoring network, which uses the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling
(GAPS) Network-type sampler (Harner et al., 2006; Pozo et al., 2004;
Klánová et al., 2006; Jaward et al., 2004;
Schuster et al., 2015). A recent
study demonstrated that the GAPS-type polyurethane foam (PUF)-PAS
was capable of accumulating particles, ranging in size from 250 to 4140 nm,
with no discrimination compared to conventional PS-1-type active air
samplers (Markovic et al., 2015). The geometry of the PUF-PAS allows it to
capture fine particles (aerodynamic diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in
addition to gas-phase compounds, which makes it suitable for investigating
semi-volatile organic compounds (Deng et al., 2007; Albinet et<?pagebreak page9162?> al., 2008b;
Chrysikou et al., 2009). However, coarse particles (aerodynamic diameter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) are excluded from collection since the
overlapping double-dome design of the PUF-PAS does not allow direct flow of
bulk air through the sampler (Thomas et al., 2006). The coarse particle
component is the major contributor to the particle deposition flux,
particularly in the settling zone near emission sources (Holsen and Noll,
1992). As such, a prototype passive dry deposition sampler (PAS-DD) was
introduced in our recent study to assess dry deposition of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and related compounds (Eng et al., 2013). The
design of PAS-DD, which incorporates a PUF disk as the collection
substrate, positioned between two open parallel flat plates that are
shielded above, allows for dry particle deposition from bulk air as well as
dry gas-phase deposition (Fig. S1).</p>
      <p id="d1e189">Starting in October 2015, PAS-DD were co-deployed with PAS at five sampling
sites in the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR) in order to compare the
performance of the two samplers. These sampling sites are part of a larger
16-site passive air monitoring network that has been operating since 2010
(Schuster et al., 2015) under the Canada–Alberta Oil Sands Monitoring (OSM)
plan and reporting on polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) (i.e., parent and
alkylated PAHs; dibenzothiophene, DBT; alkylated DBTs; retene, RET); PAH
derivatives, including nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (NPAHs) and
oxygenated PAHs (OPAHs); and an
assessment of the toxicity potential of the chemical mixture (Schuster et
al., 2015; Jariyasopit et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e192">As a result of an increase in oil sands production, there has been growing
concern over impacts of organic constituents in air, their transport and
deposition, and the associated impact on the health of the environment and
on humans. One of the important classes of organic pollutants in this
context is the PACs. PACs are emitted from a variety of sources such as
combustion processes (e.g., forest fires, trash burning) and also petrogenic
sources; they are present in the bitumen-containing ore that is mined in the
AOSR (Yang et al., 2011). Information on PAC sources can be obtained from
the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and environmental impact
assessment (EIA), but these are limited to PACs which do not account for
compounds produced by transformation reactions (NPRI,
<uri>http://ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/donnees-data/index.cfm?lang=En</uri>, last access: 30 May 2017; Government of
Alberta, <uri>https://exts2.aep.alberta.ca/DocArc/EIA/Pages/default.aspx</uri>, last access: 17 March 2017). The
major mining-related sources of PACs include stacks, mining fleet vehicles,
open mine pits, exposed ore deposits, and fugitive dusts such as petroleum
coke (petcoke) (Zhang et al., 2016). Secondary and evaporative sources of
PACs (e.g., tailings ponds) have also been suggested through measurements and
models (Galarneau et al., 2014; Parajulee  and Wania, 2014). The atmospheric
deposition of PACs across the oil sands region has also been investigated
using snow and lichens and estimated through modeling (Zhang et al., 2015;
Studabaker et al., 2012; Kelly et al., 2009). Zhang et al. (2016) have also
investigated the role of petcoke particle deposition to snow as a mechanism
of the transport and deposition of PACs to terrestrial surfaces.</p>
      <p id="d1e201">Petcoke is a solid residue and is a byproduct of the upgrading of bitumen
after lighter hydrocarbon molecules have been fractionated. There are two
major types of coking in the AOSR referred to as “delayed” and “fluid”
coking processes (Anthony, 1995). Both coking processes involve
thermal cracking of the feedstock to extract lighter products and leave
behind petcoke. In the delayed coking process, the cracking process
continues, after a short thermal cracking in a furnace, in coke drums where
solid coke is produced. In the fluid coking process, the coke produced in a
heated reactor is circulated between the reactor and a burner to transfer
heat. The delayed coking process occurs at lower temperature than the fluid
coking process; therefore, the delayed petcoke contains more volatiles and
potentially more PACs than the fluid petcoke.</p>
      <p id="d1e205">The majority of petcoke produced in the AOSR has been stockpiled while only a
small percentage is reused on-site as fuel (Alberta Energy Regulator,
2018). Recently petcoke has
been used for capping decommissioned tailings ponds, which greatly enhances
its surface area available for erosion and evaporation (Alberta Energy
Regulator, 2018). We hypothesize that secondary emissions to air
of PACs from oil sands ore (open-pit mines) and/or petcoke stockpiles, either
through evaporation or particle suspension in air (e.g., wind transport),
contribute substantially to PAC burdens in air, especially in nearby source
areas. Therefore, in addition to comparing the performance of PUF-PAS and
PAS-DD samplers, a secondary objective of this study is to assess the extent
to which oil sands ore and petcoke contribute to the PAC burden of air in the
AOSR.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e221">Passive sampling site map (110 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 180 km). AMS5 –
Mannix, AMS6 – Fort McMurray, AMS9 – Barge landing, AMS13 – Syncrude,
AMS14 – Anzac. <bold>(a)</bold> Conventional PUF disk passive air samplers (PAS) and <bold>(b)</bold> passive dry deposition sampler (PAS-DD).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e243">Five   sampling sites (Fig. 1) are part of the passive air monitoring network
in the AOSR. Details regarding site locations, sampling media preparation,
and sample deployment have been previously described (Schuster et al.,
2015). The samplers were mounted approximately 3 m above the ground. In
brief, PUF disks were pre-cleaned with accelerated solvent extraction
(Dionex ASE 350) using acetone, petroleum ether, and acetonitrile, prior to
use. Since October 2015, PAS-DD have been deployed alongside
PAS at a subset of five sites (Figs. 1 and  S1). PAS-DD was previously demonstrated to collect gas-phase PAHs (i.e., dry
gas-phase deposition) at similar rates as PAS (Eng et al.,
2013). A sampling rate of about 5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was derived previously
using co-located PAS and high-volume samplers for the gas- and
particle-phase PACs (Harner et al., 2013). Concentrations measured by PAS-DD
were expressed as ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for<?pagebreak page9163?> comparison with PAS, using
the PAS effective air sample volume, corrected for reduced exposure
surface of PAS-DD (Shoeib and Harner, 2002). Two field blanks
were included in the sampling. Oil sands ore was collected from an open-pit
mine and provided through the cooperation of Canada's Oil Sands Innovation
Alliance (COSIA) and samples of delayed and fluid petcoke were obtained from
the University of Alberta and were the same samples previously characterized
and reported by Zhang et al. (2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chemicals and materials</title>
      <p id="d1e285">The monitored PACs, NPAHs, and OPAHs are listed in Table S1 in the Supplement. Standards for
the target analytes were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Labs (Andover,
MA), Chiron (Trondheim, Norway), and AccuStandard (New Haven, CT).
Deuterium-labeled recovery and internal standards were purchased from
Cambridge Isotope Labs (Andover, MA) and CDN Isotopes (Point-Claire, Québec,
Canada). The deuterated recovery surrogates included
2,6-dimethylnaphthalene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, acenaphthene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
anthracene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)-thiophene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
1-nitronaphthalene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2-methyl-1-nitronaphthalene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
5-nitroacenaphthene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 9-nitroanthracene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
3-nitrofluoranthene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,1-nitropyrene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
6-nitrochrysene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The deuterated internal standards included
fluorine-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and benz(a)anthracene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2-nitrobiphenyl-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and 2-nitrofluorene-d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. PUF disks (TE-1014, 14 cm diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.35 cm
thick) were purchased from Tisch Environmental (Village of Cleves,
OH).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Sample preparation and analyses</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Chemical analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e443">PUF disk, fluid petcoke (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 g), delayed petcoke (0.2 g),
and oil sands ore (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 g) samples were spiked with the
labeled recovery PAC and NPAH surrogates (250 ng) prior to extraction by
accelerated solvent extraction (Dionex ASE 350) using petroleum ether and
acetone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 2 cycles). For the passive air and petcoke samples, the
extracts were purified using 5 g silica columns (Mega BE-SI, Agilent
Technologies, New Castle, DE), eluted with dichloromethane. The oil sands
ore samples were purified using 20 g silica columns (Mega BE-SI, Agilent
Technologies, New Castle, DE), eluted with dichloromethane. Following
solvent reduction under a purified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stream with a TurboVap II
(Biotage, NC), the sample extracts were spiked with the labeled PAC (100 ng) and
NPAH (250 ng)<?pagebreak page9164?> internal standards. PAC analysis was carried out using gas
chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS, Agilent 6890 coupled with an
Agilent 5975 MSD), by electron impact ionization in selected ion monitoring
mode, on a DB-XLB column (30 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m film
thickness, Agilent Technologies). NPAH and OPAH analysis was conducted using
a GC-MS (Agilent 7890A coupled with an Agilent 7000 MSD), in electron
capture negative ionization (ECNI), on a DB-5 column (30 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
film thickness, Agilent Technologies) (Jariyasopit et
al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Scanning electron microscopy</title>
      <p id="d1e530">Analysis using scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (SEM-EDS; Zeiss Sigma 300 VP-FESEM) was carried out at the
University of Alberta Earth and Atmospheric Sciences SEM lab. A pie-shaped
wedge section of the PUF disk (2 cm base) was used for the SEM-EDS analysis.
Particles entrained in the PUF wedges were removed by ultrasonication in
dichloromethane, which was subsequently dried by nitrogen gas. A portion of
the dried particles was transferred to double-sided adhesive conductive tape
for SEM-EDS analysis. The EDS spectra were acquired by a Bruker energy EDS
system with dual silicon drift detectors, each with an area of 60 mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and a resolution of 123 eV. Additional details on the SEM-EDS approach are
provided in Zhang et al. (2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Quality assurance and quality control</title>
      <p id="d1e548">Results were corrected to account for the wedge portion removed for the SEM
analysis and also for the area of the PUF disk covered by the open plate and
perforated support that holds the PUF in place (representing about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36 % of the PUF area). All data were recovery and blank
corrected. Average surrogate recoveries for PACs and PAC derivatives were
80 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 %) and 65 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15), respectively. The
instrumental and method detection limits (IDL and MDL) are given in Table
S1. Values below MDL were replaced by two-thirds of MDL for statistical purposes
(Schuster et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Ambient concentrations of PACs, NPAHs, and OPAHs</title>
      <p id="d1e585">The highest
concentrations in air for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PAS-DD</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 58 and 150 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively
(Table S2), and observed at site AMS5, which is in close proximity to
upgrading facilities. The lowest concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PAS-DD</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
were 14 and 24 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and were observed at AMS14, which
is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 km southeast of Fort McMurray and adjacent to a
near-lake residential settlement (Anzac) that is well removed from the
open-pit mining (Table S2) but within several kilometers of a bitumen
upgrading facility. For all the sites, the PAS and PAS-DD samples exhibited
similar relative PAC compositions, with C1 phenanthrenes and anthracenes
(C1-PHEs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ANTs) and PHE being the most abundant alk-PAH and parent PAH,
respectively (Fig. S2). For both PAS and PAS-DD samplers, the PAC chemical
compositions were dominated by the 2–3-ring PAHs and 2–3-ring alk-PAHs,
which accounted for 77–87 % of the sum of all target compounds (Fig. 2). Residential sites (AMS6 and AMS14) were characterized by lower
concentrations in air of dibenzothiophene (DBT) and alk-DBTs (compounds that
are enriched in bitumen) but higher retene (RET) concentrations (a marker of
wood combustion) (Ramdahl, 1983), compared to other sampling sites
that are closer to the main oil sands activities. This suggests reduced
influence of petrogenic sources and an increased contribution from wood
combustion at sites AMS6 and AMS14, which is consistent with their greater
distance from open mining areas and greater proximity to residential area
where wood is burned for heating and recreational activities. However, it
should be noted that RET does not solely originate from wood burning and has
also been reported for stack emissions in the oil sands region during the
winter period, which challenges the explanation above (Watson et al., 2013).
It is also possible that the small (relative to main mining area) upgrading
facility, which is several kilometers southeast of AMS14, may play a role.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e694">Composition of target compounds in air samples from five sites in
the oil sands region, collected using the conventional passive sampler (PAS)
and the passive dry deposition sampler (PAS-DD), collected during October to
November 2015. “PAC” includes parent PAHs and alk-PAHs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e703">For all the sites, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PAS-DD</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were dominated by 2-ring NPAHs, (Table S2).
Concentrations in air of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PAS-DD</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were highest at AMS5 (152 and 170 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) and lowest at AMS14 (8.42
and 14.2 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). At AMS5,
1-methyl-5-nitronaphthalene/2-methyl-1-nitronaphthalene (1M5NN/2M1NN) was the most abundant
NPAH in the PAS sample, whereas 4-nitrobiphenyl (4-NBP) was the most
abundant NPAH in the PAS-DD sample. The nitromethylnaphthalenes are known
products of the gas-phase OH- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-radical-initiated reactions with
methylnaphthalenes (Reisen and Arey, 2004), while 4-NBP emission sources are
not well understood and are usually not included in air monitoring
campaigns. Past studies reported that ambient 4-NBP concentrations were low
or below detection even in urban areas (Crimmins and Baker, 2006; Wang et al., 2011). A study reported an average 4-NBP concentration
in air of 45 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Texas, at a sampling site close to petrochemical
manufacturing plants and oil refineries (Wilson et al., 1995). Previous
chamber reaction experiments demonstrated that 3-nitrobiphenyl (3-NBP) was
the only nitro product formed by the OH-radical-initiated chamber reaction
of biphenyl and that no nitro products were observed from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-radical-initiated chamber reaction (Atkinson and Arey, 1994). In
this study, 3-NBP was below the detection limit at all the sites, while
4-NBP was detected only at AMS5 and AMS9. It should be noted that, in the
same sampling period, the 4-NBP concentration measured in a PAS sample at
site AMS11 (data not shown), designated as the main oil<?pagebreak page9165?> sands source region
(Jariyasopit et al., 2016), was a factor of 5 higher than that observed
at AMS5, suggesting that airborne 4-NBP is closely linked to oil sands
industrial activities. However, according to our previous study, 4-NBP was
below the detection limit at all 15 passive sampling sites during the
reporting period April to May 2014 (Jariyasopit et al., 2016). Long-term
monitoring of NPAHs could provide insight into seasonal and temporal trends
of NPAHs in air in the AOSR and improve understanding of their formation and
sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e830">NPAHs have been previously measured in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released from stacks
emissions in the AOSR (Watson et al., 2013). The majority of NPAH target
compounds were below detection limits in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> collected from
stacks in the oil sands region, with the exception of 9-nitroanthracene
(9-NAN) (Watson et al., 2013). In general, 9-NAN was the dominant NPAH in urban
areas and present at approximately as high concentrations as
2-nitrofluoranthene (2-NF), which is the major particle-associated NPAH known
to be formed by atmospheric OH- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-radical-initiated reactions
(Wang   et al., 2011; Bamford and Baker, 2003; Albinet et al.,
2007). In this study site, AMS5, which is close to upgrading facilities,
exhibited the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAHs concentration; however, 9-NAN was below
detection limits. This result suggests that stack emissions were not a major
PM source contributing to NPAH concentrations measured by passive samplers.</p>
      <p id="d1e870">For OPAHs, the highest concentration was found at AMS6 which is located in the
town of Fort McMurray, approximately 30 km south of the main mining area.
This is consistent with our previous study. The elevated OPAHs at this site
are due to local primary combustion sources (e.g., vehicular exhausts) as
well as the enhanced atmospheric transformation process which is dependent on
gaseous oxidants emitted from the combustion sources (Jariyasopit et al.,
2016). The highest concentrations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PAS-DD</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 753 and 1480 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The lowest concentrations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OPAHs_<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>PAS-DD</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 213
and 352 pg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and were observed at
AMS13. The dominant contributor was 2–3-ring OPAHs (Table S2). For both
sampler types 9-fluorenone (FLO) was the dominant OPAH at all sites.
Different target OPAHs have been reported by various air monitoring
campaigns, making it challenging to compare the OPAH air concentrations in
the AOSR to data available in the literature. On average, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OPAHs
concentrations derived from PAS and PAS-DD samplers in this study were
comparable to or lower than concentrations measured at urban sites (Wang et
al., 2011; Ahmed et al.,
2015; Albinet et al., 2008a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>PUF-PAS versus PAS-DD</title>
      <p id="d1e975">A key aspect of the study was to compare
the performance of PAS and PAS-DD to capture PACs, NPAHs, and
OPAHs. Their relative performance can be illustrated using the enhancement
ratio which is defined as the ratio of the concentration of an analyte in
PAS-DD to that in PAS. A value close to 1 indicates
comparable ability of the two sampler types for capturing an analyte. Figure 3
shows enhancement ratios for PACs for all the sampling sites. Average
ratios for 2–3-ring, 4-ring, and 5–6-ring PACs were 2.3, 2.8, and 3.6
respectively. Similarly, the enhancement ratio increased with molecular
weight for the NPAHs (Fig. S3) up to an average value of about 4. Comparison
of the enhancement ratios of PACs among the sites indicates that the ratio is
partly dependent on particle loadings. This is evident from higher
enhancement ratios of higher-ring PACs, except for BghiP (Benzo(ghi)perylene), observed in AMS5, which is the near-source site where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAHs, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OPAHs concentrations were highest. This
finding illustrates the enhanced ability of PAS-DD to capture more of the
higher-molecular-weight target compounds that are associated with the larger
depositing particles in air, whereas the PUF-PAS preferentially samples the
smaller airborne particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e1001">Enhancement ratios (expressed as a ratio of the concentration of
an analyte in PAS-DD to that in PAS) for <bold>(a)</bold>
alk-PAHs and alk-DBTs and <bold>(b)</bold> parent PAHs, DBT, and RET during October to
November 2015 across five sites in the oil sands region.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1016">The enhancement ratios for the NPAHs and OPAHs were considerably more
variable among sites compared to the patterns observed for the PACs (Fig. S3).
This may be due to<?pagebreak page9166?> multiple factors contributing to their presence in
air, which can be by direct emission from primary sources as well as
production in air through transformation processes. Transformation reaction
rates will vary among NPAH and OPAH compounds and also spatially, depending
on atmospheric conditions and oxidant concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Chemical compositions of petcoke and oil sands ore</title>
      <p id="d1e1025">The composition of
PACs, NPAHs, and OPAHs in petcoke and oil sands ore samples was investigated
in order to assess if these compositions are reflected in the passive air
samplers, thereby indicating potential contributions. Results of residue
analysis are discussed below and summarized in Table 1. Individual PAC
concentrations and composition are given in Table S3 and Fig. S4.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e1031">Concentrations of parent PAHs, dibenzothiophene (DBT), alk-PAHs,
retene (RET), alk-DBTs, NPAHs, OPAHs, and potential NPAH markers in fluid petcoke,
delayed petcoke, oil sands ore (ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on a dry weight basis), and air
samples (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, PAS and PAS-DD).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.83}[.83]?><oasis:tgroup cols="17">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Parent PAHs </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">DBT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Alk-PAHs </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">RET</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Alk-DBTs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">PACs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center" colsep="1">NPAHs </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col12" nameend="col13" align="center" colsep="1">OPAHs </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col14" nameend="col17" align="center">Potential markers </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–3 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4–6 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2–3 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4–6 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2–3 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4–6 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2–3 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4–6 ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">4-NBP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">2-NP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">1,6-DNP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">6-NBaP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fluid petcoke</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">416</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">184</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4290</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16 700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.514</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">60.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.742</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">N.D.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Delayed petcoke</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2148</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16 900</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">872</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21 500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32 800</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11 100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">85 300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">180</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">274</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">363</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">26.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">41.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">139</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oil sands ore</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17 015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6910</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">514</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">455 000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">85 000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">115 000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">680 000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">31.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">228</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">52.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">N.D.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAS <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(mean of five sites)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.264</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.738</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">32.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.0828</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.443</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.0315</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.0223</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">N.D.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAS-DD <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(mean of five sites)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.542</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">76.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.119</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.820</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.0809</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.0602</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">N.D.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">N.D.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1058">N.D.: non-detect.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>PACs</title>
      <?pagebreak page9167?><p id="d1e1946">The levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs (dry weight basis) were approximately
5 times higher in the delayed petcoke (85 300 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to the
fluid petcoke (16 700 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table 1). The greater abundance of
PACs in delayed petcoke (vs. fluid petcoke) is likely due to the lower
temperatures involved in the delayed coking process (Anthony, 1995),
resulting in reduced losses of PACs due to degradation and volatilization,
leaving PACs more concentrated in the residue. Furthermore, the residues of
2–3-ring alk-PAHs and 4–6-ring alk-PAHs were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 times and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2
times higher than their parent PACs (Table 1). DBT and alk-DBTs
concentrations in the delayed petcoke were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 times higher than the
concentrations in the fluid petcoke. Despite the difference in absolute
residue concentrations of PACs, the PAC profiles were similar in delayed and
fluid petcoke: 4–6-ring compounds accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs (Figs. 4 and S4), of which 4–6-ring alk-PAHs were the dominant
group. It is also noteworthy that chrysene (CHR) and the sum of
alk-benzo(a)anthracenes, alk-triphenylenes, and alk-chrysenes (alk-BTCs) were
major components of petcoke (Table S3 and Fig. S4). The oil sands ore residue
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs (dry weight basis) was 680 000 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 times higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs determined
in the fluid and delayed petcoke, respectively (Tables 1 and S3). The oil
sands ore had the highest residue concentrations of 2–3-ring parent PAHs,
alk-PAHs, RET, and alk-DBTs; however, the delayed petcoke had the greatest
residue concentrations of 4–6-ring parent PAHs and DBT (Table 1). In
contrast to the PAC compositions of the fluid and delayed petcoke, 2–3-ring
PACs were the major component in the oil sands ore accounting for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs (Table 1 and Fig. 4). A past study
reported percent contribution of 2–3-ring PACs in oil sands samples ranging
from 79 to 94 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs
(Yang et al., 2011). Variability in percent contribution was caused by
the degree of biodegradation in the samples, with greater biodegradation
leading to reductions in 2–3-ring alkylated PAHs (Yang et al., 2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2080">PAC compositions of fluid petcoke, delayed petcoke, oil sands ore,
and air samples (PAS and PAS-DD). PAC compositions of air samples are
averages of five sites. The number at the top of each bar represents the
total residue concentration (ng mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, dry weight basis) or
concentration in air (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for PAS and PAS-DD air samples.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>NPAH and OPAH</title>
      <p id="d1e2123">For the petcoke and oil sands ore samples, residues of the sum of NPAH and OPAH concentrations
were 2 to 4 orders of magnitude lower than the PAC concentrations. Similar to the results for PACs in petcoke samples, the oil
sands ore exhibited higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NPAHs (332 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which were 1.6 times and 178 times higher,
respectively, than in the delayed (208 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and fluid petcoke
(1.91 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table S3). However, the delayed petcoke was the most
enriched in 4–6-ring NPAHs. The most abundant NPAHs in the delayed petcoke
were 6-nitrobenzo(a)pyrene (6-NBaP) (138 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the most
abundant in the ore was 4-NBP (228 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The presence and absence
of these compounds in the various source samples present an opportunity to
use these as markers to evaluate emission sources to air. Figure 5 summarizes
the occurrence of the various NPAH marker compounds by showing extracted ion
chromatograms for samples of delayed and fluid petcoke, ore, and two passive
air samples. In the following section of the discussion, we consider the
implication of these profiles for indicating potential contributions to air
of petcoke and ore particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2196">GC-MS extracted ion chromatograms of 4-nitrobiphenyl (4-NBP),
2-nitropyrene (2-NP), 1,6-dinitropyrene (1,6-NP), and 6-nitrobenzo(a)pyrene
(6-NBaP) in a selection of samples including delayed petcoke, fluid petcoke,
oil sands ore, passive dry deposition sample at AMS5, passive dry deposition
sample at AMS14, and air sample collected from the ore–air partitioning
study. The phase distribution of each marker is also indicated as gas phase
or particle phase.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2205">The delayed petcoke exhibited higher
residues of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OPAHs compared to fluid petcoke and ore – approximately
10 times and 3 times higher, respectively (Tables 1 and S3). The most
abundant OPAHs in fluid petcoke, delayed petcoke, and ore were
9,10-anthraquinone (ANQ, 31 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), benzo(a)fluorenone (BaFL,
180 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and FLO (113 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. All individual
OPAH concentrations measured in the delayed petcoke were higher than those
measured in the fluid petcoke and the oil sands ore except for FLO, which was
highest in the ore. The fluid petcoke and ore were enriched in lower-ring
OPAHs; however, the delayed petcoke was enriched in higher-ring OPAHs. OPAHs
have been identified as transformation products of biological and chemical
processes and reported to be abundant in soils from PAH-contaminated sites in
Sweden and thought to be formed through PAH remediation processes including
bioremediation and Fenton oxidation (Lundstedt et al., 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Contribution of petcoke and oil sands ore to PAC burdens in air</title>
      <p id="d1e2257">Comparisons of PAC compositions for the delayed petcoke, fluid petcoke, and
oil sands ore versus the PUF-PAS, and PAS-DD air samples revealed interesting
differences as shown in Figs. 4 and S4. For instance, the petcoke particles
exhibited enrichment in the higher-molecular-weight, semi-volatile, and
particulate-associated parent PAHs and alk-PAHs, while the oil sands ore and
passive air samples were dominated by lower-molecular-weight and
more-volatile alk-PAHs. DBT makes up a small proportion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1–1 %)
in all the samples. Alk-DBTs comprise 13 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs in the
delayed and fluid petcoke but were 17 % in the oil sands ore (Table S3),
whereas small compositions of alk-DBTs were observed in the PAS and PAS-DD
air samples (mean of 6–7 %) (Table S4). RET accounted for 1–3 % of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PACs in the oil sands ore, PAS, and PAS-DD but it accounted for much
smaller proportions in the fluid petcoke and delayed petcoke. Furthermore, as
illustrated in Fig. S4, individual 2–3-ring PACs in the oil sands ore and
passive air samples make up similar proportions of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>PAC burden.
Given the relatively higher volatility of these 2–3-ring PACs, this suggests
that oil sands ore is contributing substantially to these<?pagebreak page9168?> gas-phase PACs in
air, most likely through volatilization from open mine faces.</p>
      <p id="d1e2288">To assess the potential contributions of particle-associated PACs in air,
stemming potentially from either petcoke or the exposed ore from open-pit
mines, we focus on the higher-molecular-weight compounds which exist
primarily in the particle phase. These compounds dominate the PAC composition
of petcoke (Fig. S4), since the more-volatile, lower-molecular-weight
compounds are depleted during the high temperature coking process. If petcoke
and/or ore particles represent an important contributor to PACs present in
air, then their compositions should be reflected in PAS and especially the
PAS-DD samples. The compositions of the 4–6-ring PACs in delayed petcoke,
fluid petcoke, oil sands ore, and passive air samples are compared in
Fig. S5. The parent 4–6-ring PAH composition of the passive air samples did
not match the 4–6-ring PAH compositions of the petcoke and ore, suggesting a
minimal contribution of these sources to parent PAH burdens in air. This
implies that other sources of parent PAHs (e.g., combustion, vehicle
emissions) were more dominant, whereas the 4–6-ring alk-PAH compositions for
all samples were more similar, suggesting some contribution of petcoke and
oil sands ore particles in the passive air samples. However, these findings
for parent PAHs and alk-PAHs are somewhat contradictory. If petcoke particles
had contributed substantially to alk-PAHs in air, then the parent PAHs
contained in these same particles (and making up <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % of the PAC
residue, Table S3) should have also been important contributors, especially
since concentrations in air of parent PAHs are much lower and therefore more
sensitive to the petcoke contribution. The results are less contradictory in
the case of ore since ore residues are dominated by alk-PAHs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 %,
Table S3). In other words, ore particles could be contributing substantially
to the alk-PAHs present in air but not substantially to parent PAHs in air,
which is consistent with Figs. S4 and S5. In fact, the relative proportions
of alk-PAHs to parent PAHs in ore are consistent with the relative
proportions observed in air, with a dominance of the alk-PAHs (Fig. 4,
Table S2).</p>
      <?pagebreak page9169?><p id="d1e2305">In the case of NPAHs and OPAHs, their relatively low residue concentrations
in petcoke and ore samples complicate the assessment of potential
contributions of these particles to air samples. As shown in Fig. 5, the high
molecular weight and particle-associated NPAH marker compounds, 2-NP,
1,6-DNP, and 6-NBaP are detected in various petcoke and ore samples but not
reflected in air. However, the gas-phase marker compound 4-NBP  which is
present in the delayed petcoke and the oil sands ore, is also captured at site AMS5 and AMS9
(Table S2).
These two sites are the closest to open-pit mines, which points to the
potential importance of volatilization from open-pit mines as a source to
air of 4-NBP and other volatile PACs. This finding is supported by the
results of a simple ore–air partitioning experiment showing that 4-NBP was
in fact detected in air that has equilibrated with ore. Details of the
experimental setups which are based on Francisco et al. (2017) are provided
in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e2308">We conclude that oil sands ore is contributing substantially to burdens of
PACs in air near mining areas but not at sites further removed from open
mines. This finding is consistent with air and snow monitoring studies that
indicate that most of the deposition of mining-related particles and
associated chemicals occurs within the first several kilometers of mining
areas (Schuster et al., 2015; Kelly et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>Qualitative SEM-EDS analysis of PUF disks</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e2319">Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and energy
dispersive X-ray (EDS) spectra of <bold>(a)</bold> authentic delayed petcoke
particles and <bold>(b)</bold> a petcoke particle found in a PAS-DD sample
collected at AMS5. Al, aluminum; Si, silicon; S, sulfur.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/9161/2018/acp-18-9161-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2334">In this aspect of the study,
passive air samples were screened for petcoke particles using scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
Petcoke particles can be distinguished from ore and other particle types by
their unique morphology (using SEM) and elemental composition (based on EDS
spectra). An image and EDS spectrum of an authentic delayed petcoke particle
is shown in Fig. 6a, demonstrating the unique relative elemental abundance
(excluding carbon) as S (sulfur) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Si (silicon) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Al (aluminum),
whereas ore particles have different relative elemental abundance (i.e., Si
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Al) (Zhang et al., 2016). Based on their morphology and elemental
composition, petcoke particles were screened for and identified in all of the
passive air samples. It should be noted that the elemental composition of
delayed and fluid petcoke particles are indistinguishable; however, they can
be distinguished from each other by morphology at 1000<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> magnification
(Zhang et al., 2016). Figure 6b shows an image of petcoke-like particle in
PAS-DD PUF deployed at AMS5, as well as the elemental profile with the
dominance of sulfur. The results of the particle screening exercise carried
out on all of the PAS and PAS-DD samples confirmed the presence of petcoke
particles in PUFs collected at AMS5, AMS9, and AMS13, which are the sampling
sites closest to mining activities (Fig. 1).
This indicates that surface-derived particles such as petcoke and ore
particles can be suspended in air and transported away from mining areas,
albeit over relatively short distances. Because volatile PAC residues in ore
particles are much greater than in petcoke particles (Table S3), it is also
very likely that ore makes a larger contribution to air burdens of PACs,
which is consistent with the earlier discussion related to marker compounds
and chemical profiles.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d1e2379">In summary, this study demonstrated the performance of PAS-DD in capturing
depositing particles that are enriched with the higher-molecular-weight PACs
and PAC derivatives. Due to the design of PAS-DD where the PUF disk is
shielded from precipitation and direct sunlight by a cover plate, PACs
captured by PAS-DD reflect dry deposition of PACs that have been protected
from photolytic degradation. Alternatively, environmental passive samplers
such as peat and moss have been used to collect wet and dry depositions
(Zhang et al., 2016). These environmental passive samplers are exposed to
direct sunlight but potentially collect more of the dry deposited fraction,
especially the very large particles which may be excluded by PAS-DD due to
the top cover plate. The environmental samplers also accumulate PACs
deposited in precipitation. Therefore, we consider PAS-DD, peat, and moss as
complementary tools for assessing ecosystem impacts through atmospheric
deposition. The comparisons of chemical composition of PACs in passive air
samples with petcoke and oil sands ore samples demonstrated an important
contribution of oil sands ore to PAC concentrations in air for sites that
were closer to open-pit mining areas. Further characterization of ore–air
partitioning is identified as a topic for future experimental work and
modeling. Lastly, in<?pagebreak page9170?> this study we identify 4-NBP (4-nitrobiphenyl) as a
potential marker chemical of oil sands ore and delayed petcoke.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e2387">Data used in this study are provided in the
Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2390">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9161-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9161-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e2399">NJ was responsible for the study design and conducting
PUF-PAS and PAS-DD sample preparation, sample analysis, data analysis and
preparation of the manuscript; YZ and JM contributed to the analysis and
interpretation of the petcoke samples and XRF analysis; TH was the study lead
and contributed to the study design and data interpretation and
reporting.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e2405">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e2411">This article is part of the special issue “Atmospheric emissions from oil sands development
and their transport, transformation and deposition (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”.
It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2417">This project was jointly supported by the Climate Change and Air Quality
Program of Environment and Climate Change Canada and the Joint Oil Sands
Monitoring program. The Wood Buffalo Environmental Association (WBEA) is
acknowledged for their support in passive air sample collection.
Yifeng Zhang acknowledges financial support from Alberta Innovates. We thank thank Eftade Gaga, Jasmin
Schuster, and Elisabeth Galarneau for their comments on the
manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: Jennifer G. Murphy
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmed, T. M., Ahmed, B., Aziz, B. K., Bergvall, C., and  Westerholm, R.: Native
and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air particulate
matter from the city of Sulaimaniyah in Iraq, Atmos. Environ., 116, 44–50,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., and  Villenave, E.: Polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrated PAHs and oxygenated PAHs in ambient
air of the Marseilles area (South of France): Concentrations and sources,
Sci. Total Environ., 384, 280–292, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., Villenave, E., and Jaffrezo, J.
L.: Nitrated and oxygenated derivatives of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
in the ambient air of two French alpine valleys: Part 1: Concentrations,
sources and gas/particle partitioning, Atmos. Environ., 42, 43–54, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., Villenave, E., and Jaffrezo,
J.-L.: Nitrated and oxygenated derivatives of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in the ambient air of two French alpine valleys Part 2:
Particle size distribution, Atmos. Environ., 42, 55–64, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Anthony, E.: Fluidized bed combustion of alternative solid fuels; status,
successes and problems of the technology, Prog. Energ. Combust., 21,
239–268, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric Chemistry of Gas-Phase Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Formation of Atmospheric Mutagens, Environ. Health
Persp., 102, 117–126, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bamford, H. A. and  Baker, J. E.: Nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
concentrations and sources in urban and suburban atmospheres of the
Mid-Atlantic region, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2077–2091, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chrysikou, L. P., Gemenetzis, P. G., and  Samara, C. A.: Wintertime size
distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in the urban
environment: Street-vs rooftop-level measurements, Atmos. Environ., 43,
290–300, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Crimmins, B. S. and  Baker, J. E.: Improved GC/MS methods for measuring hourly
PAH and nitro-PAH concentrations in urban particulate matter, Atmos.
Environ., 40, 6764–6779, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Deng, W., Zheng, J., Bi, X., Fu, J., and Wong, M.: Distribution of PBDEs in air
particles from an electronic waste recycling site compared with Guangzhou
and Hong Kong, South China, Environ. Int., 33, 1063–1069, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Eng, A., Harner, T., and Pozo, K.: A prototype passive air sampler for measuring
dry deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Tech.
Let., 1, 77–81, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Francisco, A. P., Harner, T., and Eng, A.: Measurement of polyurethane foam –
air partition coefficients for semivolatile organic compounds as a function
of temperature: Application to passive air sampler monitoring, Chemosphere,
174, 638–642, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Galarneau, E., Hollebone, B. P., Yang, Z., and  Schuster, J.: Preliminary
measurement-based estimates of PAH emissions from oil sands tailings ponds,
Atmos. Environ., 97, 332–335, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Harner, T., Bartkow, M., Holoubek, I., Klanova, J., Wania, F., Gioia, R.,
Moeckel, C., Sweetman, A. J., and Jones, K. C.: Passive air sampling for
persistent organic pollutants: Introductory remarks to the special issue,
Environ. Pollut., 144, 361–364, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Harner, T., Su, K., Genualdi, S., Karpowicz, J., Ahrens, L., Mihele, C.,
Schuster, J., Charland, J.-P., and  Narayan, J.: Calibration and application of
PUF disk passive air samplers for tracking polycyclic aromatic compounds
(PACs), Atmos. Environ., 75, 123–128, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Holsen, T. M. and  Noll, K. E.: Dry deposition of atmospheric particles:
application of current models to ambient data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26,
1807–1815, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Jariyasopit, N., Harner, T., Wu, D., Williams, A., Halappanavar, S., and Su, K.:
Mapping Indicators of Toxicity for Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds in the
Atmosphere of the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
11282–11291, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Jaward, F. M., Farrar, N. J., Harner, T., Sweetman, A. J., and Jones, K. C.:
Passive air sampling of PCBs, PBDEs, and<?pagebreak page9171?> organochlorine pesticides across
Europe, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 34–41, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, E. N., Short, J. W., Schindler, D. W., Hodson, P. V., Ma, M., Kwan,
A. K., and Fortin, B. L.: Oil sands development contributes polycyclic aromatic
compounds to the Athabasca River and its tributaries, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 106, 22346–22351, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Klánová, J., Kohoutek, J., Hamplová, L., Urbanová, P.,
and Holoubek, I.: Passive air sampler as a tool for long-term air pollution
monitoring: Part 1. Performance assessment for seasonal and spatial
variations, Environ. Pollut., 144, 393–405, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Lundstedt, S., White, P. A., Lemieux, C. L., Lynes, K. D., Lambert, I. B.,
Öberg, L., Haglund, P., and  Tysklind, M.: Sources, Fate, and Toxic Hazards
of Oxygenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) at PAH- contaminated
Sites, Ambio, 36, 475–485, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Markovic, M. Z., Prokop, S., Staebler, R. M., Liggio, J., and Harner, T.:
Evaluation of the particle infiltration efficiency of three passive samplers
and the PS-1 active air sampler, Atmos. Environ., 112, 289–293, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Parajulee, A. and  Wania, F.: Evaluating officially reported polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon emissions in the Athabasca oil sands region with a multimedia
fate model, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3344–3349, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Pozo, K., Harner, T., Shoeib, M., Urrutia, R., Barra, R., Parra, O.,
and Focardi, S.: Passive-Sampler Derived Air Concentrations of Persistent
Organic Pollutants on a North–South Transect in Chile, Environ. Sci.
Technol.,   38, 6529–6537, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ramdahl, T.: Retene – a molecular marker of wood combustion in ambient air,
Nature, 306, 580–582, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Reisen, F. and  Arey, J.: Atmospheric Reactions Influence Seasonal PAH and
Nitro-PAH Concentrations in the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
39, 64–73, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Schuster, J. K., Harner, T., Su, K., Mihele, C., and Eng, A.: First Results from
the Oil Sands Passive Air Monitoring Network for Polycyclic Aromatic
Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 2991–2998, 2015.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Shoeib, M. and Harner, T.: Characterization and comparison of three passive
air samplers for persistent organic pollutants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
4142–4151, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Studabaker, W., Krupa, S., Jayanty, R., and Raymer, J.: Measurement
of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in epiphytic lichens for receptor modeling
in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR): A pilot study, in:
Developments in Environmental Science, Elsevier, 391–425, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, J., Holsen, T. M., and Dhaniyala, S.: Computational fluid dynamic
modeling of two passive samplers, Environ. Pollut., 144, 384–392, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Jariyasopit, N., Schrlau, J., Jia, Y., Tao, S., Yu, T.-W.,
Dashwood, R. H., Zhang, W., Wang, X., and Simonich, S. L. M.: Concentration and
Photochemistry of PAHs, NPAHs, and OPAHs and Toxicity of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
Beijing Olympic Games, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6887–6895, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Watson, J., Chow, J., Wang, X., Kohl, S., and Sodeman, D.: Measurement of
real-world stack emissions in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region with a dilution
sampling system during March, 2011, Renov. NV, Desert Research Institute,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, N. K., McCurdy, T. R., and Chuang, J. C.: Concentrations and phase
distributions of nitrated and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in
ambient air, Atmos. Environ., 29, 2575–2584, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Yang, C., Wang, Z., Yang, Z., Hollebone, B., Brown, C. E., Landriault, M.,
and Fieldhouse, B.: Chemical fingerprints of Alberta oil sands and related
petroleum products, Environ. Forensics, 12, 173–188, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Cheng, I., Muir, D., and Charland, J.-P.: Scavenging ratios of polycyclic aromatic compounds in rain and
snow in the Athabasca oil sands region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1421–1434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1421-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1421-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Shotyk, W., Zaccone, C., Noernberg, T., Pelletier, R., Bicalho,
B., Froese, D. G., Davies, L., and Martin, J. W.: Airborne petcoke dust is a
major source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Athabasca Oil Sands
Region, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1711–1720, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Comparison of polycyclic aromatic compounds in air measured by conventional passive air samplers and passive dry deposition samplers and contributions from petcoke and oil sands ore</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Conventional passive air samplers (PAS) and passive dry deposition
samplers (PAS-DD) were deployed along a 90&thinsp;km south–north transect at five sites in
the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR) during October to November 2015. The purpose
was to compare and characterize the performance of the two passive sampling
methods for targeted compounds across a range of site types. Samples were
analyzed for polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs), nitrated polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (NPAHs), and oxygenated PAHs (OPAHs). ΣPAC and
ΣNPAH concentrations were highest in PAS and PAS-DD samplers at site
AMS5, which is the closest sampling site to surface mining and upgrading
facilities. The OPAHs were elevated at site AMS6, which is located in the
town of Fort McMurray, approximately 30&thinsp;km south of the main mining area.
PAS-DD was enriched relative to PAS in particle-associated target
chemicals, which is consistent with the relatively more open design of
PAS-DD intended to capture particle-phase (and gas-phase) deposition. Petroleum
coke (petcoke) (i.e., the carbonaceous byproduct of bitumen upgrading) and
oil sands ore (i.e., the material mined in open-pit mines from which bitumen
is extracted) were assessed for their potential to be a source of PACs to
air in the oil sands region. The ore samples contained  ∼ &thinsp;8
times and  ∼ &thinsp;40 times higher ΣPACs concentrations (dry
weight basis) than delayed and fluid petcoke, respectively. The residue
analysis of ore and petcoke samples also revealed that the chemical
4-nitrobiphenyl (4-NBP) can be used to track gas-phase emissions to air. A
comparison of chemical residues in ore, petcoke, and air samples revealed
that the ore is likely a major contributor to volatile PACs present in air
and that both ore and petcoke are contributing to the particle-associated
PACs in air near open-pit mining areas. The contribution of petcoke
particles in passive air samples was also confirmed qualitatively using
scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (SEM-EDS).</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmed, T. M., Ahmed, B., Aziz, B. K., Bergvall, C., and  Westerholm, R.: Native
and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air particulate
matter from the city of Sulaimaniyah in Iraq, Atmos. Environ., 116, 44–50,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., and  Villenave, E.: Polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrated PAHs and oxygenated PAHs in ambient
air of the Marseilles area (South of France): Concentrations and sources,
Sci. Total Environ., 384, 280–292, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., Villenave, E., and Jaffrezo, J.
L.: Nitrated and oxygenated derivatives of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
in the ambient air of two French alpine valleys: Part 1: Concentrations,
sources and gas/particle partitioning, Atmos. Environ., 42, 43–54, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., Villenave, E., and Jaffrezo,
J.-L.: Nitrated and oxygenated derivatives of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in the ambient air of two French alpine valleys Part 2:
Particle size distribution, Atmos. Environ., 42, 55–64, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Anthony, E.: Fluidized bed combustion of alternative solid fuels; status,
successes and problems of the technology, Prog. Energ. Combust., 21,
239–268, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric Chemistry of Gas-Phase Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Formation of Atmospheric Mutagens, Environ. Health
Persp., 102, 117–126, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bamford, H. A. and  Baker, J. E.: Nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
concentrations and sources in urban and suburban atmospheres of the
Mid-Atlantic region, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2077–2091, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chrysikou, L. P., Gemenetzis, P. G., and  Samara, C. A.: Wintertime size
distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in the urban
environment: Street-vs rooftop-level measurements, Atmos. Environ., 43,
290–300, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Crimmins, B. S. and  Baker, J. E.: Improved GC/MS methods for measuring hourly
PAH and nitro-PAH concentrations in urban particulate matter, Atmos.
Environ., 40, 6764–6779, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Deng, W., Zheng, J., Bi, X., Fu, J., and Wong, M.: Distribution of PBDEs in air
particles from an electronic waste recycling site compared with Guangzhou
and Hong Kong, South China, Environ. Int., 33, 1063–1069, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Eng, A., Harner, T., and Pozo, K.: A prototype passive air sampler for measuring
dry deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Tech.
Let., 1, 77–81, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Francisco, A. P., Harner, T., and Eng, A.: Measurement of polyurethane foam –
air partition coefficients for semivolatile organic compounds as a function
of temperature: Application to passive air sampler monitoring, Chemosphere,
174, 638–642, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Galarneau, E., Hollebone, B. P., Yang, Z., and  Schuster, J.: Preliminary
measurement-based estimates of PAH emissions from oil sands tailings ponds,
Atmos. Environ., 97, 332–335, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Harner, T., Bartkow, M., Holoubek, I., Klanova, J., Wania, F., Gioia, R.,
Moeckel, C., Sweetman, A. J., and Jones, K. C.: Passive air sampling for
persistent organic pollutants: Introductory remarks to the special issue,
Environ. Pollut., 144, 361–364, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Harner, T., Su, K., Genualdi, S., Karpowicz, J., Ahrens, L., Mihele, C.,
Schuster, J., Charland, J.-P., and  Narayan, J.: Calibration and application of
PUF disk passive air samplers for tracking polycyclic aromatic compounds
(PACs), Atmos. Environ., 75, 123–128, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Holsen, T. M. and  Noll, K. E.: Dry deposition of atmospheric particles:
application of current models to ambient data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26,
1807–1815, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Jariyasopit, N., Harner, T., Wu, D., Williams, A., Halappanavar, S., and Su, K.:
Mapping Indicators of Toxicity for Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds in the
Atmosphere of the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
11282–11291, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Jaward, F. M., Farrar, N. J., Harner, T., Sweetman, A. J., and Jones, K. C.:
Passive air sampling of PCBs, PBDEs, and organochlorine pesticides across
Europe, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 34–41, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, E. N., Short, J. W., Schindler, D. W., Hodson, P. V., Ma, M., Kwan,
A. K., and Fortin, B. L.: Oil sands development contributes polycyclic aromatic
compounds to the Athabasca River and its tributaries, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 106, 22346–22351, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Klánová, J., Kohoutek, J., Hamplová, L., Urbanová, P.,
and Holoubek, I.: Passive air sampler as a tool for long-term air pollution
monitoring: Part 1. Performance assessment for seasonal and spatial
variations, Environ. Pollut., 144, 393–405, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Lundstedt, S., White, P. A., Lemieux, C. L., Lynes, K. D., Lambert, I. B.,
Öberg, L., Haglund, P., and  Tysklind, M.: Sources, Fate, and Toxic Hazards
of Oxygenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) at PAH- contaminated
Sites, Ambio, 36, 475–485, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Markovic, M. Z., Prokop, S., Staebler, R. M., Liggio, J., and Harner, T.:
Evaluation of the particle infiltration efficiency of three passive samplers
and the PS-1 active air sampler, Atmos. Environ., 112, 289–293, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Parajulee, A. and  Wania, F.: Evaluating officially reported polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon emissions in the Athabasca oil sands region with a multimedia
fate model, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3344–3349, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Pozo, K., Harner, T., Shoeib, M., Urrutia, R., Barra, R., Parra, O.,
and Focardi, S.: Passive-Sampler Derived Air Concentrations of Persistent
Organic Pollutants on a North–South Transect in Chile, Environ. Sci.
Technol.,   38, 6529–6537, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ramdahl, T.: Retene – a molecular marker of wood combustion in ambient air,
Nature, 306, 580–582, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Reisen, F. and  Arey, J.: Atmospheric Reactions Influence Seasonal PAH and
Nitro-PAH Concentrations in the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
39, 64–73, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Schuster, J. K., Harner, T., Su, K., Mihele, C., and Eng, A.: First Results from
the Oil Sands Passive Air Monitoring Network for Polycyclic Aromatic
Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 2991–2998, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Shoeib, M. and Harner, T.: Characterization and comparison of three passive
air samplers for persistent organic pollutants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
4142–4151, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Studabaker, W., Krupa, S., Jayanty, R., and Raymer, J.: Measurement
of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in epiphytic lichens for receptor modeling
in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR): A pilot study, in:
Developments in Environmental Science, Elsevier, 391–425, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, J., Holsen, T. M., and Dhaniyala, S.: Computational fluid dynamic
modeling of two passive samplers, Environ. Pollut., 144, 384–392, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Jariyasopit, N., Schrlau, J., Jia, Y., Tao, S., Yu, T.-W.,
Dashwood, R. H., Zhang, W., Wang, X., and Simonich, S. L. M.: Concentration and
Photochemistry of PAHs, NPAHs, and OPAHs and Toxicity of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the
Beijing Olympic Games, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6887–6895, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Watson, J., Chow, J., Wang, X., Kohl, S., and Sodeman, D.: Measurement of
real-world stack emissions in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region with a dilution
sampling system during March, 2011, Renov. NV, Desert Research Institute,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, N. K., McCurdy, T. R., and Chuang, J. C.: Concentrations and phase
distributions of nitrated and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in
ambient air, Atmos. Environ., 29, 2575–2584, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Yang, C., Wang, Z., Yang, Z., Hollebone, B., Brown, C. E., Landriault, M.,
and Fieldhouse, B.: Chemical fingerprints of Alberta oil sands and related
petroleum products, Environ. Forensics, 12, 173–188, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Cheng, I., Muir, D., and Charland, J.-P.: Scavenging ratios of polycyclic aromatic compounds in rain and
snow in the Athabasca oil sands region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1421–1434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1421-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1421-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Shotyk, W., Zaccone, C., Noernberg, T., Pelletier, R., Bicalho,
B., Froese, D. G., Davies, L., and Martin, J. W.: Airborne petcoke dust is a
major source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Athabasca Oil Sands
Region, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1711–1720, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
