<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-8995-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties during the spring 2016
ARIAs airborne campaign in the North China Plain</article-title><alt-title>Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F. Wang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Fei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Zhanqing</given-names></name>
          <email>zli@atmos.umd.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-382X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4 aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Xinrong</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-1666</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Qi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Hao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-9603</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Dickerson</surname><given-names>Russell R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-3083</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Xiaobo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Global Change and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Earth System Science,
Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Key Laboratory for Cloud Physics, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Air Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>National Meteorological Center, Beijing, 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Weather Modification Office of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, 050021, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Zhanqing Li (zli@atmos.umd.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>8995</fpage><lpage>9010</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e195">Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties derived from
measurements made during 11 aircraft flights over the North China Plain (NCP)
in May–June 2016 during the Air Chemistry Research In Asia (ARIAs) were
analyzed. Aerosol optical data from in situ aircraft measurements show good
correlation with ground-based measurements. The regional variability of
aerosol optical profiles such as aerosol scattering and backscattering,
absorption, extinction, single scattering albedo (SSA), and the
Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are thoroughly
characterized for the first time over the NCP. The SSA at 550 nm showed a regional mean value of
0.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 with moderate to strong absorption and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged
from 0.49 to 2.53 (median 1.53), indicating both mineral dust and
accumulation-mode aerosols. Most of the aerosol particles were located in the lowest 2 km
of the atmosphere. We describe three typical planetary boundary layer (PBL)
scenarios and associated transport pathways as well as the correlation
between aerosol scattering coefficients and relative humidity (RH). Aerosol
scattering coefficients decreased slowly with height in the clean PBL
condition, but decreased sharply above the PBL under polluted conditions,
which showed a strong correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78) with ambient RH.
Back-trajectory analysis shows that clean air masses generally originated
from the distant northwestern part of China, while most of the polluted air
masses were from the heavily polluted interior and coastal areas near the
campaign region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e246">Aerosol loading in eastern China has become exceptionally heavy and highly
variable due to drastic increases in the emissions of pollutants during the
last several decades. Changes in air quality and climate are strongly
coupled (Li et al., 2016), and both have tremendous impacts on the public
health of the densely populated region (Kan et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e249">Aerosol particles are considered to be an important radiative forcing agent
in the climate system, but the detailed effects remain uncertain (Stocker et
al., 2013). Aerosols modify the local and regional radiation budget and
climate by absorbing and scattering solar radiation through the aerosol
direct effect (Charlson and Hofmann, 1992) and impact photochemistry
(Dickerson et al., 1997). Aerosols can also affect cloud–precipitation
processes and aerosol–cryosphere interactions through indirect and
semi-direct effects (Twomey, 1974; Lohmann and Feichter, 2005; Andreae and
Rosenfeld, 2008; Nair et al., 2013). Several recent studies have shown<?pagebreak page8996?> that
the magnitude of precipitation is strongly correlated to aerosol
concentration (Zhao et al., 2006; Li et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2012),
through various mechanisms as summarized most recently in Li et al. (2017b).
Precipitation frequency and intensity are also altered by the long-term
impacts of aerosols (Guo et al., 2016, 2017). Much of the uncertainty in
aerosol radiative forcing comes from the variability of optical properties
in anthropogenic aerosol such as scattering, absorption, backscatter,
Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and aerosol optical depth (AOD).
These properties depend strongly on particle size distribution, chemical
composition, and the ambient relative humidity (Anderson et al., 2003). The
spatial and temporal variations of these properties, especially horizontal
and vertical distributions, are essential factors in the effects of aerosols
on both climate and the environment (Haywood and Boucher, 2000).</p>
      <p id="d1e259">Aerosol scattering and absorption coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) are important parameters related to
atmospheric characteristics such as visibility and air quality. Observed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally distinct within
versus above the planetary boundary layer (PBL). The structure of the PBL, in part determined by the vertical
distribution of the aerosol extinction coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
sum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), is a crucial factor in
estimating aerosol pollution conditions (Yu et al., 2002; Dong et al.,
2017), partially due to their strong interactions/coupling (Li et al.,
2017a). Given the variability of PBL structure and its interaction with
aerosols, the transport of pollutants is yet to be fully understood.
Distinguishing between local air pollutants and pollutants transported from
other source regions and identification of transport patterns under different
atmospheric circulation conditions also need to be addressed. Dust aerosols
can be lifted into the free troposphere, i.e., above the PBL, and
transported over a long distance, altering aerosol vertical distributions
over remote areas (Han et al., 2008). Topographically generated local
circulations can carry high concentrations of surface air pollutants and
change the PBL structure (Chen et al., 2009). Such variable aerosol vertical
distributions can alter the optical properties of aerosols such as AOD, thus
affecting the regional radiation balance (Liu et al., 2012) and even the
global radiative forcing estimation (Zhang et al., 2013). A number of field
programs have been carried out to measure the vertical distribution of dust
or biomass burning aerosols with airborne and surface-based instruments
(Johnson et al., 2008). The observations, combined with a radiative transfer
model, allow the accurate calculation of radiative effects including aerosol
optical properties (Gadhavi and Jayaraman, 2006) and absorption of solar
radiation at the top of the atmosphere (Meloni et al., 2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e340">Three-dimensional information about aerosol optical properties (especially
vertical distributions) is of importance, but such measurements are scant
(Kahn et al., 2017). Given the potential impact of aerosols on climate,
additional accurate measurements of the vertical profiles of aerosol optical
properties are needed. These data can be obtained directly or indirectly
from platforms such as meteorological towers (Zhao et al., 2017), tethered
balloons (Stratmann et al., 2003; Ferrero et al., 2010), and unmanned aerial
vehicles (Corrigan et al., 2008). Although limited in terms of temporal and
geographic coverage, airborne sensing provides direct, high-resolution, in
situ aerosol vertical profiles, used to evaluate numerical models and
satellite retrievals (Chazette and Liousse, 2001).</p>
      <p id="d1e344">Airborne instruments have been used to characterize aerosol properties in the
lower troposphere around the world (Wandinger et al., 2002; Haywood et al.,
2003a; Taubman et al., 2004, 2006; Hains et al., 2008; Ferrero et al., 2011;
Ryder et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2015; Schwarz et al., 2016; Babu et al.,
2016), as well as in China, e.g., in Beijing (Zhang et al., 2006, 2009, 2011;
Liu et al., 2009), Dongbei (Dickerson et al., 2007), Hebei (Sun et al.,
2013), and Shanxi (Li et al., 2015a, b). Most of the measurements were made
for parameters such as aerosol number concentration or size distribution.</p>
      <p id="d1e347">In May–June 2016, a comprehensive joint ground and airborne experiment was
conducted in the North China Plain (NCP). The study described here aimed to
examine the consistency of airborne and surface-based measurements and to
evaluate aerosol radiative characteristics and the distribution and
transport of air pollutants both horizontally and vertically. It is an
integral part of, also a foundation for, a series of studies on
aerosol–cloud–climate interactions in a densely populated and rapidly
developing region of China (Li et al., 2017a).</p>
      <p id="d1e350">A twin-engine, turboprop airplane was deployed to measure trace gases and
aerosol optical properties in the lower atmosphere, in coordination with
ground-based in situ and remote measurements at the Xingtai supersite. The
airplane flew ascents and descents in the boundary layer and the lower free
troposphere to obtain vertical profiles of aerosol optical properties.
High-resolution aircraft measurements of aerosol optical properties give
detailed information about the occurrence, extent, and evolution of aerosol
vertical distributions. Aerosol optical properties such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, backscattering, extinction, single scattering albedo (SSA), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and AOD
from the airborne measurements are presented and discussed.</p>
      <p id="d1e382">Details about the field experiment and the instruments used are given in
Sect. 2. The vertical and regional distributions of aerosol optical
properties are presented in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, the structure of the
PBL under both clean and polluted conditions, the correlation between
vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relative humidity (RH), and back-trajectory
analyses are discussed. Section 5 summarizes the major conclusions from this
study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e398">Map of the geographic location of the North China Plain and the Xingtai
supersite <bold>(a)</bold>, and the flight tracks of the 11 research flights
conducted over Hebei Province during May–June 2016 <bold>(b)</bold>. The orange shaded area denotes the North China Plain.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page8997?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sites and flight information</title>
      <p id="d1e424">The Aerosol Atmosphere Boundary-Layer Cloud (A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>BC) campaign took place
in Hebei Province of the NCP, about 300 km south of Beijing, from May to
December 2016. An intensive observation period (IOP) was from May to June
when airborne observations were conducted using two airplanes to measure
aerosol and cloud properties, respectively. A supersite was established in
Xingtai (XT; 114.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 37.18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 182 m above sea level,
or a.s.l.). The National Science Foundation supported the project “Air
chemistry Research In Asia” (ARIAs), with the goal of integrating in situ
observations, satellite remote sensing, and chemical transport models to
characterize and quantify tropospheric chemistry and composition over the NCP
and to improve modeling tools used to eventually evaluate the effectiveness
of air pollutant reduction policies. NASA's Korean US Air Quality (KORUS-AQ)
experiment was conducted at roughly the same time in the downwind region. One
of the airplanes (Y-12), which was based at Luancheng Airport (LC;
114.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 37.91<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 58 m a.s.l.), located in the
southeast of Shijiazhuang, the capital of Hebei Province, measured aerosol
properties. The airplane was flown to three locations in the area to conduct
spirals from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 km, as shown in Fig. 1. These
locations include XT, Julu (JL; 115.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 37.22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N;
30 m a.s.l.), and Quzhou (QZ; 114.96<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 36.76<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N;
40 m a.s.l.). All four sites are located to the east of the Taihang
Mountains, with XT right at the foothill of the mountain range. A total of
11 flights were conducted during the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>BC and
ARIAs IOP (Table 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e533">Comprehensive measurements of aerosol optical properties were made during
the field campaign using the instrumented turboprop Y-12 airplane operated
by the Weather Modification Office of Hebei Meteorological Bureau. The
typical speed of the aircraft is 60–70 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with ascent/descent rates
of 2–5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aircraft was equipped with multiple aerosol and gas
measurement instruments, and was rigorously tested and calibrated during a
ground-based campaign to optimize instrument performance. Table 2 summarizes
the instruments deployed on the plane and ground.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Aircraft instruments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Nephelometer</title>
      <p id="d1e571">Measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Y-12 aircraft were made using an
integrating nephelometer (TSI, model 3565) at three wavelengths: blue (450 nm), green (550 nm), and red (700 nm). Details about the instrument
calibration and uncertainties have been described elsewhere (Anderson and
Ogren, 1998; Anderson et al., 2009). The nephelometer was calibrated prior
to the field campaign using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas and filtered zero air as described
in the instrument manual. It aspirates air at a flow rate of 30 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
through a forward-facing air inlet. Data were recorded at a frequency of 1 Hz.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e611">Flight summary.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Flight number,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Profile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Vertical height,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(UTC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">a.s.l. (m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF1, 20160508</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:30–06:32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JL, QZ, XT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3751</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF2, 20160515</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">04:17–07:04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JL, QZ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3679</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF3, 20160516</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">07:03–07:54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–467</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF4, 20160517</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">01:21–03:13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JL, QZ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–2924</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF5, 20160519</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">07:42–09:09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3733</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF6, 20160521</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">03:57–06:41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">QZ, XT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3242</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF7, 20160528</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:16–05:26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JL, XT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3101</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF8, 20160528</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">08:29–10:24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">XT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3130</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF9, 20160602</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">05:47–06:53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3591</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF10, 20160606</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:09–04:02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3178</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RF11, 20160611</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:52–05:45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LC, XT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58–3203</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e614">JL: Julu. LC: Luancheng Airport. QZ: Quzhou.
XT: Xingtai.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e835">Instruments used in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Instrument</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Parameter used in</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Accuracy</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">this study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Airborne platform</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nephelometer, TSI Model 3565, USA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PSAP, Radiance Research Inc., USA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CWIP, Rain Dynamics, USA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Position</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xingtai supersite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAPS, Aerodyne Res. Inc., USA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&lt; 2 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radiosondes, Graw Model DFM-09, Germany</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pressure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 hPa</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CIMEL, CE-318, France</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hourly</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1161">The conical double diffuser aerosol inlet, designed for a Twin Otter, was
installed on the Y-12. This inlet system was manufactured by Droplet
Measurements Technologies (MP-1806-A and MP-1807-A, Boulder, CO, USA) (Hegg et
al., 2005). It has been used extensively on the University of Maryland's
Cessna 402 (Brent et al., 2015). The passing<?pagebreak page8998?> efficiency is expected to be
near 100 % for particle diameters up to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and near 50 % for
particles between 3 and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Huebert et al., 2004; McNaughton et al.,
2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e1178">The actual range of total scattering angles captured by the nephelometer is
less than the ideal range of 0 to 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To correct the biases, we
adjusted them with empirically derived angular truncation correction factors using the
calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Anderson and Ogren, 1998). To account for the
hygroscopic growth of aerosols, the scattering values were adjusted using a
correction factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) (Anderson et al., 2003; Shinozuka et al., 2007),
calculated as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M52" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">neph</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">amb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">adj</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">neph</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the internal nephelometer RH, RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">amb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ambient
RH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is an experimentally determined dry versus humid factor of the
hygroscopicity (Beyersdorf et al., 2016), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">adj</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the adjusted scattering coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
measured scattering coefficient, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the angular truncation factor.
During the study period, the relative uncertainty after calibration was
around a few percent (evaluated from the reproducibility of laboratory
measurements).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>PSAP</title>
      <p id="d1e1367">A particle soot absorption photometer (PSAP, Radiance Research, 565 nm)
provides highly sensitive absorption measurements without interference by
scattering signals. Its observation principle and uncertainties have been well documented (Bond et al., 1999;
Sheridan et al., 2005; Virkkula et al., 2005; Chaudhry et al., 2007). To ensure a steady sample flow during
flights, we monitored the total flow and PSAP flow rates to enhance the
accuracy of measurements. The instrument operates at a flow rate of
2 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when 1 min measurement averages are used. The raw
absorption coefficients from the PSAP, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">565</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were corrected to 550 nm using Eq. (3):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">565</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">565</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th wavelength. Ideally,
for this calculation, the absorption coefficient would also be measured
under ambient conditions, but it is somewhat less dependent on
humidification than scattering is (Schafer et al., 2014). Therefore, such
calibrated measurement was not done during the field campaign.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Meteorological instruments</title>
      <p id="d1e1482">A cloud water inertial probe (CWIP, Rain Dynamics) measuring pressure,
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and RH was installed on the Y-12 aircraft. It was
calibrated prior to the deployment and synchronized with the global
positioning system (GPS) time and geolocation of the scientific data, dually
calibrated by the GPS and the compass navigation satellite system (CNSS).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Instrumentation at the Xingtai supersite</title>
      <p id="d1e1499">A full suite of instruments to measure aerosol and meteorological parameters
was deployed at the Xingtai surface supersite. Those of concern to this
study include aerosol optical remote sensing observations (CIMEL radiometer),
in situ particle light extinction measurements (cavity attenuated phase shift
spectroscopy (CAPS) particle light extinction monitor), and radiosondes for meteorological
parameters.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>CAPS</title>
      <p id="d1e1507">We present field measurements of the ambient aerosol extinction coefficient
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by using a CAPS instrument with a time resolution of
1 s at the Xingtai supersite. This technique has advantages such as high
sensitivity, cost efficiency, easy control, and a long effective absorption
optical path. The CAPS instrument measures the phase shift of a<?pagebreak page8999?> distorted
waveform of the modulated light from a light emitting diode (LED) in a sample
cell with two high reflectivity mirrors (Sun et al., 2014). It has a
demonstrated sensitivity of less than 2 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1 s sampling periods.
A method description, including results from laboratory characterization and
field deployment, has been reported previously (Massoli et al., 2010). The
CAPS extinction and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by the combination of
the nephelometer and the PSAP showed a good correlation in both
laboratory-generated test particles and ambient aerosols (Petzold et al.,
2013). The detailed principles of the CAPS technology, optical path
adjustment process, and calibration method can be found in previous studies
(Kebabian et al., 2008; Kebabian and Freedman, 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Radiosondes</title>
      <p id="d1e1550">For comparisons with airborne measurements, radiosondes (Model DFM-09, Graw
Radiosonde GmbH &amp; Co. KG, Germany) were launched from the Xingtai
supersite during the IOP. The DFM-09 radiosonde is a lightweight weather
radiosonde that measures temperature (at a resolution of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with
an accuracy of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), pressure (at a resolution of 0.1 hPa with
an accuracy of 0.5 hPa), RH (at a resolution of 1 % with an accuracy of
2 %), and wind speed (accuracy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  0.2 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Navas-Guzmán
et al., 2014). RH is measured by a thin-film capacitance sensor, and its
uncertainties and errors depend on temperature and GPS location (Steinke et
al., 2015). Data acquisition and processing were performed at the Graw ground
station located at the Xingtai supersite using the Grawmet software.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>CIMEL automatic Sun–sky radiometer</title>
      <p id="d1e1596">To obtain an optical characterization of aerosol vertical distribution and
to complement airborne measurements, we deployed a CIMEL sun photometer, the
standard instrument used in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The CIMEL
(CE-318) used at the Xingtai AERONET site is a two-detector eight-channel
(340, 380, 440, 500, 675, 870, 940, and 1020 nm) radiometer designed to
make, automatically track, and measure direct solar and sky radiances with a field
of view of approximately 1.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. AOD and SSA are computed at each
wavelength except the 940 nm channel, used to retrieve total column water
vapor. The measurement uncertainty for field instruments, primarily due to
calibration uncertainty, is spectrally dependent, with higher errors in the
UV (Eck et al., 1999). The details of the CIMEL radiometer operating
principles and network are described by Holben et al. (1998).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Vertical and regional distributions of aerosol optical properties</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Comparison between aircraft and ground-based measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1622">Ground-based measurements collected at XT were matched in time and space
with airborne measurements over the site. Figure 2 shows the vertical profiles
of RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the sounding done at 05:55 coordinated universal time (UTC,
13:55 local time) on 8 May 2016 and from aircraft measurements made over the
site before the radiosonde launch (04:40–05:40 UTC, one descent spiral and
two ascent spirals). Both RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from sounding data and measured
from the aircraft follow the same general trends, with inversions near 800
and 2400 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e1639">For a final evaluation of the performance of the airborne instruments in
measuring ambient aerosol characteristics, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by the
nephelometer/PSAP on board the aircraft and by the ground-based CAPS
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during research flight (RF) 6 (RF6; 21 May), RF7 (28 May), RF8 (28 May), and RF11 (11 June) is shown in Fig. 3. CAPS-measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collected during the spiralling part of the flight was averaged
and all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data were adjusted to a wavelength of 550 nm. In
general, mean values of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were consistent with
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 % smaller than) the corresponding aircraft-measured
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> located at the bottom of the profiles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e1716">Vertical profiles of
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>a</bold>) and relative humidity (RH, <bold>b</bold>) from
radiosonde and airborne measurements made on 8 May 2016 over the Xingtai
supersite. Horizontal bars represented standard deviations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1741">Aircraft-measured vertical profiles (colored circles) and surface
CAPS-measured (colored plus symbols) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm on
<bold>(a)</bold> 21 May (RF6, panels <bold>a</bold>, <bold>b</bold>, and <bold>c</bold>
represent spiral up/down), <bold>(b)</bold> 28 May (RF7), <bold>(c)</bold> 28 May
(RF8), and <bold>(d)</bold> 11 June (RF11).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1783">There is an expected comparability of retrieval parameters (e.g., SSA)
between ground-based observations and aircraft measurements. For example, the
SSA values, derived from AERONET in Baltimore–Washington, DC, United States,
were on average 0.011 lower than the values derived from aircraft profile
measurements (Schafer et al., 2014). For aircraft–AERONET (based on the
nephelometer combined with the PSAP, also used in this study) comparisons
with<?pagebreak page9000?> ground-based AERONET at multiple sites over southern Africa, the SSA with a mean
difference of 0.01 (rms: 0.03) in biomass burning aerosol measurements (Leahy
et al., 2007). There is also a small difference between aircraft in situ
(0.87) and CIMEL (0.85) measurements of SSA on a day with both an upper-level
smoke aerosol layer and low-level dust layer in the Banizoumbou (Johnson et
al., 2010). For this study, retrievals from a ground-based CIMEL automatic
Sun-sky radiometer (CE-318) were compared with aircraft in situ measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e1786">We calculated the columnar SSA from airborne measurements and its
uncertainties following Leahy et al. (2007) and Schafer et al. (2014). The
sampled SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by a nephelometer and a PSAP, respectively. We
assumed that in situ SSA measured between the minimum and maximum flight levels
represents the entire column. In order to produce a column mean SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">column</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and compare it with that retrieved from AERONET data, the SSA
values were averaged for the duration of the profile after weighting the
values according to aerosol loading. The columnar SSA was calculated with
the same method for different types of aerosol layers in the vertical.
Considering the vertical distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the SSA measured at higher altitudes (lower aerosol loading) is
substantially lower than in the lower troposphere or the aerosol enrichment
layer. Thus, the weighted mean is better than a simple average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which would overestimate the absorption features of aerosol
that has a negligible effect on radiation at the surface where the CIMEL
radiometer is located.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1870">Comparison of AERONET-retrieved and in situ aircraft-measured
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from this and other studies.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AERONET</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Aircraft in situ (Neph</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(CE-318)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TSI-3536; PSAP)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Northeastern United States</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Summer 2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.979</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Schafer et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">August to September 2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Leahy et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">West Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19 January 2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Johnson et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 May 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This work</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2025">Aerosol loading, denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and the profiles were
limited to samples collected at the lower level below 400 m and at the higher level
greater than 2000 m to adequately represent the entire column. For every
profile, weighting factors for each SSA measurement were generated that
corresponded to the normalized magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The measured
SSA values were scaled proportionally to the aerosol loading at the altitude
of the observation as in the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M96" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">column</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">profile</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mean</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equals the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the profile.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2138">Means and standard deviations of aerosol optical properties over LC,
JL, QZ, and XT during the experiment.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">QZ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">XT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (500 nm) (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">57.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">95.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 106.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">75.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 84.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (500 nm) (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (500 nm) (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (500 nm) (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">74.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 77.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">103.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 109.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">89.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 91.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (500 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (450–700 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (500 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2141">JL:Julu. LC: Luancheng Airport. QZ: Quzhou.
XT: Xingtai.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2617">The SSA at 550 nm retrieved from the CIMEL (0.93) agreed well with airborne
measurements (0.94) on 28 May (Table 3). The well-matched vertical profiles
and ground-based data present a more complete profile of aerosol optical
information in the lower atmosphere, demonstrating the high credibility
and quality of airborne measurements. These SSA values obtained in the NCP
are lower than those observed in Africa, and in the northeastern United States. The
reason for the difference is probably due to different types of aerosols in
these different locations: primarily mineral dust aerosols in Africa and
secondary aerosols in the northeastern United States, and a mix of these two types of
aerosols in the NCP.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Statistics of aerosol optical properties</title>
      <p id="d1e2626">A statistical summary of aerosol optical properties retrieved from aircraft
measurements over the four target areas (LC, JL, QZ, and XT) is given in
Table 4. Aerosol scattering coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
backscattering coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are directly obtained from
the nephelometer. The truncation correction was applied and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were corrected for the ambient RH. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at
550 nm measured at LC, JL, QZ, and XT were 57.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67.71, 95.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 106.61, 87.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100.43, and 75.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 84.58 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
and the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bsca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value in each target area was 7.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6,
9.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.19, 11.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.51, and 9.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.6 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. Aerosol absorption properties at LC and XT were stronger than
those at JL and QZ. Note that each variable has a large standard deviation,
and there were large variations associated with these aerosol optical
properties.</p>
      <p id="d1e2766">Mean vertical distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
550 nm derived from aircraft measurements made over the four target<?pagebreak page9001?> areas
are shown in rows 3 and 4 of Fig. 4. In general, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease with altitude. Peaks in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles at certain heights are seen at JL, QZ, and XT. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile at LC changes little below 3000 m. Compared with
the other target areas, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at JL are relatively lower
near the ground and gradually decrease with height, which suggests that
there were fewer light-absorbing and more scattering aerosols in this area.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2849">Mean vertical distributions of (from the top row to the bottom row)
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), relative humidity (%), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
550 nm (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), SSA at
550 nm, Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
550 nm over LC, JL, QZ, and XT (from the left column to the right column,
respectively). Black and red lines represent the mean and the median,
respectively, and horizontal bars are standard deviations at every 150 m
level. The colored shaded areas represent the 10th and 90th percentiles of
the data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=321.516142pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2932">Based on measurements of aerosol scattering and absorption coefficients,
the aerosol extinction coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the sum of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the
ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated at 550 nm
following Eq. (5):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M173" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The small mismatch in calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was corrected by linearly
extrapolating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to the wavelengths of the
scattering measurements as defined. Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are
considered to be primary determinants for the direct radiative effect of
aerosols. The vertical profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> closely follows that of
aerosol mass concentration (Kim et al., 2015). SSA was described as an
important factor in controlling whether an aerosol layer has a cooling or
warming effect; it can also be used for studying the radiative forcing at
the top of the atmosphere (Bergstrom and Russell, 1999). In this study, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range 0.68–0.99 with a mean value
of 0.85 indicates the importance of absorbing aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d1e3139">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated using Eq. (6) where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the scattering coefficient at a given reference wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:</p>
      <p id="d1e3172"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M183" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In this study, we used two wavelengths, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e3289">An analogous expression can be written for the wavelength dependence of
absorption. In general, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a basic measure of the aerosol size
distribution. It is related to the ratio of fine to coarse particles, with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 1 for coarse-mode aerosol such as dust particles and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 for very fine-mode aerosol such as smoke
particles (Hamonou et al., 1999). Vertical profiles of the median values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in rows 5 and 6 of Fig. 4. The
profiles were generated by calculating the median value at each altitude
layer from all the measured profiles. The variations seen may reflect
changes in the origin of aerosol particles and transport routes (Léon et
al., 2009), although the values fall well within the range of the standard
deviations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page9003?><p id="d1e3339">Angular-corrected data from the nephelometer is the scattered light
intensity in the backward hemisphere of the particle (90–180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The backscattering fraction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is the
ratio of the backscattering coefficient over the total scattering
coefficient at a given wavelength (Garland et al., 2009). The ratio of
forward scattering to backscattering varies with the particle size parameter
and reflects the angular characteristics of particle scattering and the
proportion of fine particles (diameters &lt; 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). During the
field campaign, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained at low values below 2000 m. Mean
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in the four target areas were
0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003, 0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005, 0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003, and 0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006. Fluctuations above 2000 m suggest that particle sizes changed
quickly, due presumably to different air masses transported from different
directions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3420">During the experiment period, the majority of aerosol layers were well
characterized by the sampled vertical profiles, and most aerosols resided
below the maximum flight levels. Mie theory was applied to calculate the
extinction profiles and the AOD and to estimate the impact of different
aerosol vertical distributions on these optical properties. The AOD was
calculated by integrating the extinction coefficient over height as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M201" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOD</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the extinction coefficient at a height of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is above most of the aerosol. Figure 5 shows the mean AOD at 550 nm for different altitude ranges. The regional mean AOD in each altitude
range (&lt; 1, 1–2, and 2–3 km) was 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08,
0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07, and 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, respectively. Standard deviations
are greater than 50 % of the mean, suggesting that AODs varied greatly
within an altitude range. The magnitude of AOD generally decreased with
altitude. The effect of the transport of atmospheric pollutants is evident
at QZ, where the largest AOD values were found in the 1–2 km layer instead
of at the surface.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{PBL structure and aerosol $\sigma _{\mathrm{sca}}$ as a function of RH}?><title>PBL structure and aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of RH</title>
      <p id="d1e3558">The vertical distribution of aerosol particles is important for determining
radiative effects, especially in the presence of clouds. During haze
episodes, the vertical profiles of CO, the aerosol concentration, and the
scattering coefficient have been found to be well correlated (Haywood et
al., 2003b). Formenti et al. (2003a, b) presented a full analysis of the
correlations among these variables. Examples of typical vertical profiles of
aerosol scattering and RH, and transport pathways over the target areas are
presented here.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Clean PBL</title>
      <p id="d1e3566">Generally driven by the weather conditions at flight time, a clean PBL is
defined by a mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 100 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in every
100 m layer (except that adjacent to the surface layer). Figure 6a and c show the
vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ambient RH, retrieved from
airborne measurements made under clean PBL conditions. Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the surface ranged from 11.7 to 84.5 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an
average value of 48.5 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In general, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slowly
decreased with height, which suggests that the atmosphere was relatively
clean, with no distinct aerosol layer identified. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile decreases approximately exponentially with height, expressed as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M217" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close="" open="{"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at the
surface, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the altitude above sea level, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerosol
scale height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the height where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of its surface value); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a relative
stable layer near the surface where the vertical variation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was insignificant. In the cases of a clean PBL,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">124</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1146</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">837</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. A linear regression analysis shows the correlation
coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ambient RH under clean PBL conditions was
divided into two groups: dry (RH: 27.4–36.8 %) and humid (RH:
53.1–83.6 %). Under dry conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ambient RH
showed a good correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 8a), while under humid
conditions, the correlation was low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). To understand the sources
and transport pathways of aerosols over the target areas during the field
campaign, we calculated isentropic air mass back trajectories for 72 h using
the NOAA Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT)
model (Draxler and Hess, 1997; Stein et al., 2016) at 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 km
above mean sea level. The HYSPLIT model
(<uri>http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri>, last access: 6 June 2018) was
used along with the National Center for Environmental Prediction's Global
Data Assimilation System 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> meteorological
database to calculate backward trajectories terminated at the Xingtai
supersite. Figure 9a shows 72 h air mass back trajectories under clean PBL
conditions during the field campaign. Air masses most commonly originated
from the northwestern region of the study area. Some of the trajectories can
be traced back as far as Mongolia and Siberia, passing over the arid areas to
the west of southern Hebei. Some clean and moist air masses originating from
the less polluted southern and local areas were also seen.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e4044">Mean AOD at 550 nm at LC, JL, QZ, and XT, and overall mean AOD (RM)
at 550 nm for different altitude ranges (&lt; 1, 1–2, and 2–3 km).
Standard deviations are also shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4055">Mean vertical distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm (in
Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and relative humidity (%) during the flight campaign for those
cases of <bold>(a, c)</bold> clean PBL and <bold>(b, d)</bold> pollution in the lower
layer of the PBL where PBL heights have been normalized to the same altitude.
Grey dashed lines represent mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical profiles, the
light pink and blue dots represent 1 s nephelometer-measured
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, under dry or humid conditions, respectively. Thick lines
show the calculated fitting curves of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles (see
Eqs. 8 and 9). Magenta and blue lines represent RH data collected under dry
or humid conditions <bold>(c, d)</bold>. The horizontal error bars represent the
standard deviations at every 100 m level.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Pollution in the lower layer of the PBL</title>
      <p id="d1e4136">The vertical distribution of air pollutants varied greatly from case to case
due to a variety of influences. One of the crucial factors was PBL structure,
which determines the vertical profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Fig. 6b.
The corresponding ambient RH profiles (Fig. 6d), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a
function of RH (Eq. 9), and the<?pagebreak page9004?> back-trajectory analysis (Fig. 9b) are also
shown. The PBL height is determined by the shapes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
vertical profiles. When pollution is confined primarily to the lower layer of
the troposphere, the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased slightly
with height up to an altitude where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased sharply.
In this study, the mean rate of decrease was about 0.81 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We defined the bottom of this layer as PBL height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PBL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We
normalized the curves by the shapes of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical profiles, and the PBL heights of different
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ambient RH profiles were adjusted to the same level
to show the similarity of the shapes. The PBL heights, as determined by
vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranged from 900 to 2000 m with
an average value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1400 m. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile was determined as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M256" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PBL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PBL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PBL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PBL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the normalized altitude of PBL height, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
aerosol scale height in the free troposphere, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the changing rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PBL. In these cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">171</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">216</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9394</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 6d shows the ambient RH profiles under dry and humid
conditions. The shapes of dry and humid RH profiles were similar in the PBL,
but at the top of the PBL, the RH_dry profiles decreased
dramatically, and the RH_humid profiles changed only
slightly. Linear fits were made to determine the correlation between RH and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Under dry conditions, there was a pronounced correlation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between RH_dry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles. But under humid conditions, the correlation coefficient was only
0.12, suggesting little impact of RH on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4617"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Most back trajectories under polluted conditions originated from the heavily
populated and industrialized interior and coastal areas south of the study
area (Fig. 9b). Some drier air masses (corresponding to RH_dry) were traced back to southern and local areas just as in the case of
clean air masses. Moist air masses originated from the clean marine
atmosphere to the southeast, then passed over the densely populated
eastern/southeastern regions in the free troposphere before reaching the
observation site. This analysis of both dry and moist air masses with
aerosols in the lowest layer of the PBL shows that heavy local/regional
pollution dominated during the field campaign and that the long-range
transport of aerosols was less significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Pollution in the middle and upper layers of the PBL</title>
      <?pagebreak page9005?><p id="d1e4627">In addition to high aerosol concentrations in the lower PBL, upper-layer
(referred to as the type A case, an example of which occurred on 2 June 2016)
and multi-layer (referred to as the type B case, an example of which occurred
on 6 June 2016) aerosol vertical distributions were also observed. In the
type A case (Fig. 7a), the vertical profile of aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieved from airborne measurements shows a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near
the surface of about 45 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and little variation below 1 km. A sharp
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed above with a peak value of
200 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> occurring around 2–3 km, and aloft the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile decreased exponentially with height. For the type B case (Fig. 7b),
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied greatly with height, which suggests that
multiple layers of aerosol particles were present in the PBL. The vertically
inhomogeneous distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that aerosol
particles in the PBL might be significantly affected by the long-range
transport of air pollutants or local emissions in the study area. The
profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ambient RH for type A and type B cases
have similar shapes with a correlation coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91 and 0.59,
respectively (Fig. 8c and d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e4752">Vertical distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm (red) and
relative humidity (RH, blue) for the enrichment of aerosols in the upper
layer of the PBL on 2 June in LC <bold>(a)</bold> and in multiple layers of the
PBL on 6 June in JL <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4778">As shown in Fig. 9c, back trajectories for the type A case originated from
less polluted regions in northeastern China which then moved toward the
marine atmosphere over Bohai Bay and the densely populated region east of
the study area. The aerosol enrichment in the upper layer of the PBL was
probably due to regional transport and mixture of anthropogenic and sea-salt
aerosols into the free troposphere. The back trajectories ending at 0.5,
1.5, and 2.5 km over the observation site for the type B case (Fig. 9d) show
that air masses originated from the clean marine environment to the
southeast, from the polluted environment to the southwest, and from the
eastern coastal region. This could explain the strata, i.e., the
multi-layered vertical distribution, of aerosols in the PBL.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e4784"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 500 nm as a function of relative humidity
(RH, in %) for those cases when the PBL was <bold>(a)</bold> clean and dry,
<bold>(b)</bold> polluted in the lower PBL and dry, <bold>(c)</bold> polluted in the
upper PBL in the flight on 2 June, and <bold>(d)</bold> polluted in multiple
layers of the PBL in the flight on 6 June. The linear regression best-fit
lines through the data are shown (dashed lines). The regression relationships
and coefficients of determination are given in each panel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4817">72 h HYSPLIT back trajectories for the cases when the PBL was
<bold>(a)</bold> clean, <bold>(b)</bold> polluted in the lower PBL,
<bold>(c)</bold> polluted in the upper PBL in the flight on 2 June, and
<bold>(d)</bold> polluted in multiple layers of the PBL in the flight on 6 June.
Trajectories at different levels under dry (solid lines) and humid (dashed
lines) conditions are shown: 500 m (red), 1500 m (blue), and 2500 m
(green) above mean sea level.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8995/2018/acp-18-8995-2018-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4845">Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties were characterized using
extensive measurements made by airborne and ground-based instruments during a
field experiment in May and June of 2016 in the heavily industrialized North
China Plain around Xingtai, Hebei Province. During the field campaign, a
total of 11 research fights (about 25 flight hours in total) were made as a
part of the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>BC and ARIAs experiment. Measurements used in this study include aerosol scattering and
backscattering, absorption, extinction, single scattering albedo,
Ångström exponent, and AOD. The vertical and regional characteristics
of the PBL structure were characterized to better understand their impact on
air quality and climate.</p>
      <p id="d1e4857">Statistical summaries of the vertical distributions of aerosol optical
properties focused on four target areas in the NCP region. A total of 38 profiles were compiled and analyzed. Ground-based CAPS and CIMEL retrievals
and meteorological soundings were made at the same time as the airborne
measurements to ensure data comparability. Aircraft measurements agree
generally well with independent measurements made by radiosondes of
temperature and humidity, and with aerosol extinction from CAPS, and aerosol
single scattering albedo from the CIMEL sun photometer. While aerosol
scattering and extinction coefficients generally decreased with height,
there were distinct patterns of profiles for clean and polluted episodes.
Profiles over the target area showed relatively high values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that there were higher
concentrations of light-absorbing and scattering pollutants in this region.
Mean SSA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranged from 0.83 to 0.87 over the
four regions, suggesting that moderately strong-absorbing aerosols are present
in the region. The regional mean AOD in each altitude range (&lt; 1,
1–2, and 2–3 km) was 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08, 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07, and
0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, respectively. Most of the total aerosol concentration in
the lower troposphere was found below 2 km during the aircraft campaign.</p>
      <p id="d1e4915">Three typical PBL structures were identified, with distinct air mass transport
pathways and correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH. In the clean
PBL, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strong near the surface and slowly weakens with
height. The correlation coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ambient RH
under relatively dry conditions was 0.62. Clean air masses most commonly
originated from the northwest, which is far from the study area.</p>
      <?pagebreak page9006?><p id="d1e4951"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>When there was pollution in the lower PBL, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased
slightly with height, then sharply decreased at the top of the PBL. Aerosol
scattering and relative humidity showed a good correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the PBL. Most trajectories of this type originated from the heavily
polluted interior and coastal areas south and east of the study area. When
there was a pollution layer higher in the PBL or multiple layers of
pollution, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ambient RH profiles had similar shapes,
and the PBL structure could be explained by the source and transmission process
of air masses.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4996">The field experiment data used in this study can be
downloaded from <uri>ftp://210.73.20.4</uri> (last access: 12 June 2018). Registration
information is available upon request (please contact Fei Wang at feiwang@cma.gov.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e5005">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5011">This work was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (grant no. 91544217), National Key Research and Development
Program of China (grant no. 2017YFC1501702), the National Science Foundation of the
United States (grant no. 1558259), and the National Basic Research Programs of China
(grant nos. 2017YFC1501702 and 2013CB955804). We also thank all of the A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>BC and ARIAs research team,
especially the flight crew of Hebei Weather Modification Office's Y-12
airplane. The flight campaign was conducted in association with the NASA's KORUS-AQ.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Qiang Fu<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties
Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 29, 57–69,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Masonis, S. J., Covert, D. S., Ahlquist, N. C., Howell, S.
G., Clarke, A. D., and Mcnaughton, C. S.: Variability of aerosol optical
properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE-Asia, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003247</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R.
J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., and Quant, F. R.:
Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total
Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 967–986, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions.
Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89,
13–41, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Babu, S. S., Nair, V. S., Gogoi, M. M., and Moorthy, K. K.: Seasonal
variation of vertical distribution of aerosol single scattering albedo over
Indian sub-continent: RAWEX aircraft observations, Atmos. Environ., 125,
312–323, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergstrom, R. W. and Russell, P. B.: Estimation of aerosol direct radiative
effects over the mid-latitude North Atlantic from satellite and in situ
measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1731–1734, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., Chen, G., Corr, C. A., Crawford, J. H.,
Diskin, G. S., Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., and Anderson,
B. E.: The impacts of aerosol loading, composition, and water uptake on
aerosol extinction variability in the Baltimore–Washington, D.C. region,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1003–1015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1003-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1003-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., and Campbell, D.: Calibration and
Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by
Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 582–600, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Brent, L., Thorn, W., Gupta, M., Leen, B., Stehr, J., He, H., Arkinson, H.,
Weinheimer, A., Garland, C., and Pusede, S.: Evaluation of the use of a
commercially available cavity ringdown absorption spectrometer for measuring
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in flight, and observations over the Mid-Atlantic States,
during DISCOVER-AQ, J. Atmos. Chem., 72, 503–521, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J. and Hofmann, D. J.: Climate forcing by anthropogenic
aerosols, Science, 255, 423–430, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chaudhry, Z., Martins, J. V., Li, Z., Tsay, S. C., Chen, H., Wang, P., Wen,
T., Li, C., and Dickerson, R. R.: In situ measurements of aerosol mass
concentration and radiative properties in Xianghe, southeast of Beijing, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 6033–6044, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chazette, P. and Liousse, C.: A case study of optical and chemical ground
apportionment for urban aerosols in Thessaloniki, Atmos. Environ., 35,
2497–2506, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Zhang, Q., Deng, Z., Huang, M., and Ma, X.: Aircraft
study of Mountain Chimney Effect of Beijing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, 1–10, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Corrigan, C. E., Roberts, G. C., Ramana, M. V., Kim, D., and Ramanathan, V.:
Capturing vertical profiles of aerosols and black carbon over the Indian
Ocean using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
737–747, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-737-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-737-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dickerson, R., Kondragunta, S., Stenchikov, G., Civerolo, K., Doddridge, B.,
and Holben, B.: The impact of aerosols on solar ultraviolet radiation and
photochemical smog, Science, 278, 827–830, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dickerson, R. R., Li, C., Li, Z., Marufu, L. T., Stehr, J. W., Mcclure, B.,
Krotkov, N., Chen, H., Wang, P., and Xia, X.: Aircraft observations of dust
and pollutants over northeast China: Insight into the meteorological
mechanisms of transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 177–180, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dong, Z., Li, Z., Yu, X., Cribb, M., Li, X., and Dai, J.: Opposite long-term
trends in aerosols between low and high altitudes: a testimony to the
aerosol–PBL feedback, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7997–8009,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7997-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7997-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: Description of the HYSPLIT_4 modelling
system, National Oceanic &amp; Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum
Erl Arl, available at:
<uri>http://www.arl.noaa.gov/data/web/models/hysplit4/win95/arl-224.pdf</uri>
(last access: 16 April 2018), 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., O'Neill, N.
T., Slutsker, I., and Kinne, S.: Wavelength dependence of the optical depth
of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
104, 333–331, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Ferrero, L., Perrone, M. G., Petraccone, S., Sangiorgi, G., Ferrini, B. S.,
Lo Porto, C., Lazzati, Z., Cocchi, D., Bruno, F., Greco, F., Riccio, A., and
Bolzacchini, E.: Vertically-resolved particle size distribution within and
above the mixing layer over the Milan metropolitan area, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
10, 3915–3932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3915-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3915-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Ferrero, L., Mocnik, G., Ferrini, B. S., Perrone, M. G., Sangiorgi, G., and
Bolzacchini, E.: Vertical profiles of aerosol absorption coefficient from
micro-Aethalometer data and Mie calculation over Milan, Sci. Total Environ.,
409, 2824–2837, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Elbert, W., Maenhaut, W., Haywood, J., and Andreae, M. O.:
Chemical composition of mineral dust aerosol during the Saharan Dust
Experiment (SHADE) airborne campaign in the Cape Verde region, September
2000, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 1409–1419, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Elbert, W., Maenhaut, W., Haywood, J., Osborne, S., and
Andreae, M. O.: Inorganic and carbonaceous aerosols during the Southern
African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI 2000) experiment: Chemical
characteristics, physical properties, and emission data for smoke from
African biomass burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 335–346, 2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gadhavi, H. and Jayaraman, A.: Airborne lidar study of the vertical
distribution of aerosols over Hyderabad, an urban site in central India, and
its implication for radiative forcing calculations, Ann. Geophys., 24,
2461–2470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-2461-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-24-2461-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Garland, R. M., Schmid, O., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Gunthe,
S. S., Takegawa, N., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., and Hu, M.: Aerosol optical
properties observed during Campaign of Air Quality Research in Beijing 2006
(CAREBeijing-2006): Characteristic differences between the inflow and outflow
of Beijing city air, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1065–1066, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, J., Deng, M., Lee, S. S., Wang, F., Li, Z., Zhai, P., Liu, H., Lv, W.,
Yao, W., and Li, X.: Delaying Precipitation and Lightning by Air Pollution
over the Pearl River Delta. Part I: Observational Analyses, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 6472–6488, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, J., Su, T., Li, Z., Miao, Y., Li, J., Liu, H., Xu, H., Maureen, C., and
Zhai, P.: Declining frequency of summertime local-scale precipitation over
eastern China from 1970–2010 and its potential link to aerosols, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 44, 5700–5708, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hains, J. C., Taubman, B. F., Thompson, A. M., Stehr, J. W., Marufu, L. T.,
Doddridge, B. G., and Dickerson, R. R.: Origins of chemical pollution derived
from Mid-Atlantic aircraft profiles using a clustering technique, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1727–1741, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hamonou, E., Chazette, P., Balis, D., Dulac, F., Schneider, X., Galani, E.,
Ancellet, G., and Papayannis, A.: Characterization of the vertical structure
of Saharan dust export to the Mediterranean basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
104, 22257–22270, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page9008?><ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Han, Y., Fang, X., Zhao, T., and Kang, S.: Long range trans-Pacific transport
and deposition of Asian dust aerosols, J. Environ. Sci., 20, 424–428, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J. and Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative
forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J., Francis, P., Dubovik, O., Glew, M., and Holben, B.: Comparison
of aerosol size distributions, radiative properties, and optical depths
determined by aircraft observations and Sun photometers during SAFARI 2000,
J. Geophys. Res., 108, 225–231, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J. M., Osborne, S. R., Francis, P. N., Keil, A., Formenti, P.,
Andreae, M. O., and Kaye, P. H.: The mean physical and optical properties of
regional haze dominated by biomass burning aerosol measured from the C-130
aircraft during SAFARI 2000, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 225–231, 2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hegg, D. A., Covert, D. S., Jonsson, H., and Covert, P. A.: Determination of
the transmission efficiency of an aircraft aerosol inlet, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
39, 966–971, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer,
A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., and Nakajima, T.: AERONET –
A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol Characterization,
Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Huebert, B., Bertram, T., Kline, J., Howell, S., Eatough, D., and Blomquist,
B.: Measurements of organic and elemental carbon in Asian outflow during
ACE-Asia from the NSF/NCAR C-130, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D19S11,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004700" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004700</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, B., Heese, B., McFarlane, S. A., Chazette, P., Jones, A., and
Bellouin, N.: Vertical distribution and radiative effects of mineral dust and
biomass burning aerosol over West Africa during DABEX, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D00C12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009848</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, B. T., Christopher, S., Haywood, J. M., Osborne, S. R., Mcfarlane,
S., Hsu, C., Salustro, C., and Kahn, R.: Measurements of aerosol properties
from aircraft, satellite and ground-based remote sensing: a case-study from
the Dust and Biomass-burning Experiment (DABEX), Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
135, 922–934, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kahn, R. A., Berkoff, T. A., Brock, C., Chen, G., Ferrare, R. A., Ghan, S.,
Hansico, T. F., Hegg, D. A., Martins, J. V., and Mcnaughton, C. S.: SAM-CAAM:
A Concept for Acquiring Systematic Aircraft Measurements to Characterize
Aerosol Air Masses, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 2215–2228,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0003.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0003.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kan, H., Chen, R., and Tong, S.: Ambient air pollution, climate change, and
population health in China, Environ. Int., 42, 10–19, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kebabian, P. L. and Freedman, A.: System and Method for Trace Species
Detection Using Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift Spectroscopy with an Incoherent
Light Source, U.S. Patent No. 7301639, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kebabian, P. L., Wood, E. C., Herndon, S. C., and Freedman, A.: A practical
alternative to chemiluminescence-based detection of nitrogen dioxide: cavity
attenuated phase shift spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 6040–6045,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Zhu, L.,
Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Jimenez, J. L., and Campuzano-Jost, P.:
Sources, seasonality, and trends of Southeast US aerosol: an integrated
analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem
chemical transport model, Working Paper, 15, 17651–17709, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Leahy, L. V., Anderson, T. L., Eck, T. F., and Bergstrom, R. W.: A synthesis
of single scattering albedo of biomass burning aerosol over southern Africa
during SAFARI 2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 261–263, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Léon, J.-F., Derimian, Y., Chiapello, I., Tanré, D., Podvin, T.,
Chatenet, B., Diallo, A., and Deroo, C.: Aerosol vertical distribution and
optical properties over M'Bour (16.96<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W; 14.39<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N),
Senegal from 2006 to 2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9249–9261,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9249-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9249-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Liu, X., Yuan, L., Yin, Y., Li, Z., Li, P., Ren, G., Jin, L., Li, R.,
and Dong, Z.: Vertical distribution of aerosol optical properties based on
aircraft measurements over the Loess Plateau in China, J. Environ. Sci., 34,
44–56, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Yin, Y., Li, P., Li, Z., Li, R., Cribb, M., Dong, Z., Zhang, F., Li,
J., and Ren, G.: Aircraft measurements of the vertical distribution and
activation property of aerosol particles over the Loess Plateau in China,
Atmos. Res., 155, 73–86, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Niu, F., Fan, J., Liu, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Ding, Y.: Long-term
impacts of aerosols on the vertical development of clouds and precipitation,
Nat. Geosci., 4, 888–894, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Lau, W. K. M., Ramanathan, V., Wu, G., Ding, Y., Manoj, M. G., Liu,
J., Qian, Y., Li, J., and Zhou, T.: Aerosol and monsoon climate interactions
over Asia, Rev. Geophys., 54, 866–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015RG000500</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Guo, J., Ding, A., Liao, H., Liu, J., Sun, Y., Wang, T., Xue, H.,
Zhang, H., and Zhu, B.: Aerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact on
air quality, Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 810–833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwx117</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Rosenfeld, D., and Fan, J.: Aerosols and their Impact on Radiation,
Clouds, Precipitation &amp; Severe Weather Events, Pacific Northwest National
Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA, USA, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Zheng, Y., Li, Z., Connor, F., and Maureen, C.: Seasonal variations
of aerosol optical properties, vertical distribution and associated
radiative effects in the Yangtze Delta region of China, Medicină
Internă, 13, 933–945, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P., Zhao, C., Zhang, Q., Deng, Z., Huang, M., Xincheng, M. A., and Tie,
X.: Aircraft study of aerosol vertical distributions over Beijing and their
optical properties, Tellus B, 61, 756–767, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.:
Aerosol Light Extinction Measurements by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS)
Spectroscopy: Laboratory Validation and Field Deployment of a Compact Aerosol
Particle Extinction Monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 428–435, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
McNaughton, C. S., Clarke, A. D., Howell, S. G., Pinkerton, M., Anderson, B.,
Thornhill, L., Hudgins, C., Winstead, E., Dibb, J. E., and Scheuer, E.:
Results from the DC-8 Inlet Characterization Experiment (DICE): Airborne
versus surface sampling of mineral dust and sea salt aerosols, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 41, 136–159, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Meloni, D., Di Sarra, A., Di Iorio, T., and Fiocco, G.: Influence of the
vertical profile of Saharan dust on the visible direct radiative forcing, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 93, 397–413, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page9009?><ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Sharma, A. K., Marinoni, A., and
Ajai: Black carbon aerosols over the Himalayas: Direct and surface albedo
forcing, Tellus B, 65, 129–133, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Navas-Guzmán, F., Fernández-Gálvez, J., Granados-Muñoz, M.
J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., and Alados-Arboledas, L.:
Tropospheric water vapour and relative humidity profiles from lidar and
microwave radiometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1201–1211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Onasch, T., Kebabian, P., and Freedman, A.: Intercomparison of a
Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift-based extinction monitor (CAPS PMex) with an
integrating nephelometer and a filter-based absorption monitor, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 6, 1141–1151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1141-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-1141-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Ryder, C. L., Highwood, E. J., Rosenberg, P. D., Trembath, J., Brooke, J. K.,
Bart, M., Dean, A., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J., Brindley, H., Banks, J.,
Marsham, J. H., McQuaid, J. B., Sodemann, H., and Washington, R.: Optical
properties of Saharan dust aerosol and contribution from the coarse mode as
measured during the Fennec 2011 aircraft campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
303–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-303-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-303-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schafer, J. S., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Thornhill, K. L., Anderson, B. E.,
Sinyuk, A., Giles, D. M., Winstead, E. L., Ziemba, L. D., and Beyersdorf, A.
J.: Intercomparison of aerosol single-scattering albedo derived from AERONET
surface radiometers and LARGE in situ aircraft profiles during the 2011
DRAGON-MD and DISCOVER-AQ experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
7439–7452, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Weinzierl, B., Samset, B. H., Dollner, M., Heimerl, K.,
Markovic, M. Z., Perring, A. E., and Ziemba, L.: Aircraft Measurements of
Black Carbon Vertical Profiles Show Upper Tropospheric Variability and
Stability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1132–1140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071241" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071241</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sheridan, P. J., Arnott, W. P., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Atkinson, D. B.,
Covert, D. S., Moosmüller, H., Petzold, A., Schmid, B., and Strawa, A.
W.: The Reno Aerosol Optics Study: An Evaluation of Aerosol Absorption
Measurement Methods, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 1–16, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., Howell, S. G., Kapustin, V. N., Mcnaughton, C.
S., Zhou, J., and Anderson, B. E.: Aircraft profiles of aerosol microphysics
and optical properties over North America: Aerosol optical depth and its
association with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and water uptake, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
1037–1044, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Steinke, S., Eikenberg, S., Löhnert, U., Dick, G., Klocke, D., Di
Girolamo, P., and Crewell, S.: Assessment of small-scale integrated water
vapour variability during HOPE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2675–2692,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2675-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2675-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung,
J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., and Bex, V.: The physical science basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Computational Geometry, 18,
95–123, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Stratmann, F., Siebert, H., Spindler, G., Wehner, B., Althausen, D.,
Heintzenberg, J., Hellmuth, O., Rinke, R., Schmieder, U., Seidel, C., Tuch,
T., Uhrner, U., Wiedensohler, A., Wandinger, U., Wendisch, M., Schell, D.,
and Stohl, A.: New-particle formation events in a continental boundary layer:
first results from the SATURN experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1445–1459,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1445-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1445-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, X., Yin, Y., Sun, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, W., and Han, Y.: Seasonal and
vertical variations in aerosol distribution over Shijiazhuang, China, Atmos.
Environ., 81, 245–252, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, W. K., Chen, J. P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of aerosols
on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50, 1–62, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Taubman, B. F., Marufu, L. T., Piety, C. A., Doddridge, B. G., Stehr, J. W.,
and Dickerson, R. R.: Airborne Characterization of the Chemical, Optical, and
Meteorological Properties, and Origins of a Combined Ozone-Haze Episode over
the Eastern United States, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1781–1793,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1781:acotco&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1781:acotco&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Taubman, B. F., Hains, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Marufu, L. T., Doddridge, B.
G., Stehr, J. W., Piety, C. A., and Dickerson, R. R.: Aircraft vertical
profiles of trace gas and aerosol pollution over the mid-Atlantic United
States: Statistics and meteorological cluster analysis, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 111, 10–17, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8,
1251–1256, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Wandinger, U., Muller, D., Bockmann, C., Althausen, D., Matthias, V.,
Bosenberg, J., Weiss, V., Fiebig, M., Wendisch, M., Stohl, A., and Ansmann,
A.: Optical and microphysical characterization of biomass-burning and
industrial-pollution aerosols from multiwavelength lidar and aircraft
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 8125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000202</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Virkkula, A., Ahlquist, N. C., Covert, D. S., Arnott, W. P., Sheridan, P. J.,
Quinn, P. K., and Coffman, D. J.: Modification, Calibration and a Field Test
of an Instrument for Measuring Light Absorption by Particles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 39, 68–83, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Liu, S. C., and Dickinson, R. E.: Radiative effects of aerosols on
the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 4142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000754" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000754</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Li, Q. B., Gu, Y., Liou, K. N., and Meland, B.: Dust vertical
profile impact on global radiative forcing estimation using a coupled
chemical-transport–radiative-transfer model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7097–7114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7097-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7097-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Zhao, C., Tie, X., Wei, Q., Huang, M., Li, G., Ying, Z., and Li,
C.: Characterizations of aerosols over the Beijing region: A case study of
aircraft measurements, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4513–4527,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.032</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page9010?><ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Ma, X., Tie, X., Huang, M., and Zhao, C.: Vertical distributions
of aerosols under different weather conditions: Analysis of in-situ aircraft
measurements in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5526–5535,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.037</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Quan, J., Tie, X., Huang, M., and Ma, X.: Impact of aerosol
particles on cloud formation: Aircraft measurements in China, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 665–672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.025</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, C., Tie, X., and Lin, Y.: A possible positive feedback of reduction of
precipitation and increase in aerosols over eastern central China,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 229–239, 2006.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, J., Du, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Xu, W., Han, T., Wang, Y.,
Fu, P., Wang, Z., Li, Z., and Sun, Y.: Insights into aerosol chemistry during
the 2015 China Victory Day parade: results from simultaneous measurements at
ground level and 260 m in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3215–3232,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3215-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3215-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties during the spring 2016 ARIAs airborne campaign in the North China Plain</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties derived from
measurements made during 11 aircraft flights over the North China Plain (NCP)
in May–June 2016 during the Air Chemistry Research In Asia (ARIAs) were
analyzed. Aerosol optical data from in situ aircraft measurements show good
correlation with ground-based measurements. The regional variability of
aerosol optical profiles such as aerosol scattering and backscattering,
absorption, extinction, single scattering albedo (SSA), and the
Ångström exponent (<i>α</i>) are thoroughly
characterized for the first time over the NCP. The SSA at 550&thinsp;nm showed a regional mean value of
0.85&thinsp;±&thinsp;0.02 with moderate to strong absorption and the <i>α</i> ranged
from 0.49 to 2.53 (median 1.53), indicating both mineral dust and
accumulation-mode aerosols. Most of the aerosol particles were located in the lowest 2&thinsp;km
of the atmosphere. We describe three typical planetary boundary layer (PBL)
scenarios and associated transport pathways as well as the correlation
between aerosol scattering coefficients and relative humidity (RH). Aerosol
scattering coefficients decreased slowly with height in the clean PBL
condition, but decreased sharply above the PBL under polluted conditions,
which showed a strong correlation (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>&thinsp; ≥ &thinsp;0.78) with ambient RH.
Back-trajectory analysis shows that clean air masses generally originated
from the distant northwestern part of China, while most of the polluted air
masses were from the heavily polluted interior and coastal areas near the
campaign region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties
Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 29, 57–69,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L., Masonis, S. J., Covert, D. S., Ahlquist, N. C., Howell, S.
G., Clarke, A. D., and Mcnaughton, C. S.: Variability of aerosol optical
properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE-Asia, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003247</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R.
J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., and Quant, F. R.:
Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total
Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 967–986, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions.
Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89,
13–41, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Babu, S. S., Nair, V. S., Gogoi, M. M., and Moorthy, K. K.: Seasonal
variation of vertical distribution of aerosol single scattering albedo over
Indian sub-continent: RAWEX aircraft observations, Atmos. Environ., 125,
312–323, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergstrom, R. W. and Russell, P. B.: Estimation of aerosol direct radiative
effects over the mid-latitude North Atlantic from satellite and in situ
measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1731–1734, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., Chen, G., Corr, C. A., Crawford, J. H.,
Diskin, G. S., Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., and Anderson,
B. E.: The impacts of aerosol loading, composition, and water uptake on
aerosol extinction variability in the Baltimore–Washington, D.C. region,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1003–1015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1003-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1003-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., and Campbell, D.: Calibration and
Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by
Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 582–600, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brent, L., Thorn, W., Gupta, M., Leen, B., Stehr, J., He, H., Arkinson, H.,
Weinheimer, A., Garland, C., and Pusede, S.: Evaluation of the use of a
commercially available cavity ringdown absorption spectrometer for measuring
NO<sub>2</sub> in flight, and observations over the Mid-Atlantic States,
during DISCOVER-AQ, J. Atmos. Chem., 72, 503–521, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J. and Hofmann, D. J.: Climate forcing by anthropogenic
aerosols, Science, 255, 423–430, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chaudhry, Z., Martins, J. V., Li, Z., Tsay, S. C., Chen, H., Wang, P., Wen,
T., Li, C., and Dickerson, R. R.: In situ measurements of aerosol mass
concentration and radiative properties in Xianghe, southeast of Beijing, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 6033–6044, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chazette, P. and Liousse, C.: A case study of optical and chemical ground
apportionment for urban aerosols in Thessaloniki, Atmos. Environ., 35,
2497–2506, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Zhang, Q., Deng, Z., Huang, M., and Ma, X.: Aircraft
study of Mountain Chimney Effect of Beijing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, 1–10, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Corrigan, C. E., Roberts, G. C., Ramana, M. V., Kim, D., and Ramanathan, V.:
Capturing vertical profiles of aerosols and black carbon over the Indian
Ocean using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
737–747, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-737-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-737-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dickerson, R., Kondragunta, S., Stenchikov, G., Civerolo, K., Doddridge, B.,
and Holben, B.: The impact of aerosols on solar ultraviolet radiation and
photochemical smog, Science, 278, 827–830, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dickerson, R. R., Li, C., Li, Z., Marufu, L. T., Stehr, J. W., Mcclure, B.,
Krotkov, N., Chen, H., Wang, P., and Xia, X.: Aircraft observations of dust
and pollutants over northeast China: Insight into the meteorological
mechanisms of transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 177–180, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dong, Z., Li, Z., Yu, X., Cribb, M., Li, X., and Dai, J.: Opposite long-term
trends in aerosols between low and high altitudes: a testimony to the
aerosol–PBL feedback, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7997–8009,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7997-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7997-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: Description of the HYSPLIT_4 modelling
system, National Oceanic &amp; Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum
Erl Arl, available at:
<a href="http://www.arl.noaa.gov/data/web/models/hysplit4/win95/arl-224.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.arl.noaa.gov/data/web/models/hysplit4/win95/arl-224.pdf</a>
(last access: 16 April 2018), 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., O'Neill, N.
T., Slutsker, I., and Kinne, S.: Wavelength dependence of the optical depth
of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
104, 333–331, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ferrero, L., Perrone, M. G., Petraccone, S., Sangiorgi, G., Ferrini, B. S.,
Lo Porto, C., Lazzati, Z., Cocchi, D., Bruno, F., Greco, F., Riccio, A., and
Bolzacchini, E.: Vertically-resolved particle size distribution within and
above the mixing layer over the Milan metropolitan area, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
10, 3915–3932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3915-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3915-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Ferrero, L., Mocnik, G., Ferrini, B. S., Perrone, M. G., Sangiorgi, G., and
Bolzacchini, E.: Vertical profiles of aerosol absorption coefficient from
micro-Aethalometer data and Mie calculation over Milan, Sci. Total Environ.,
409, 2824–2837, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Elbert, W., Maenhaut, W., Haywood, J., and Andreae, M. O.:
Chemical composition of mineral dust aerosol during the Saharan Dust
Experiment (SHADE) airborne campaign in the Cape Verde region, September
2000, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 1409–1419, 2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Elbert, W., Maenhaut, W., Haywood, J., Osborne, S., and
Andreae, M. O.: Inorganic and carbonaceous aerosols during the Southern
African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI 2000) experiment: Chemical
characteristics, physical properties, and emission data for smoke from
African biomass burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 335–346, 2003b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gadhavi, H. and Jayaraman, A.: Airborne lidar study of the vertical
distribution of aerosols over Hyderabad, an urban site in central India, and
its implication for radiative forcing calculations, Ann. Geophys., 24,
2461–2470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-2461-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-2461-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Garland, R. M., Schmid, O., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Gunthe,
S. S., Takegawa, N., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., and Hu, M.: Aerosol optical
properties observed during Campaign of Air Quality Research in Beijing 2006
(CAREBeijing-2006): Characteristic differences between the inflow and outflow
of Beijing city air, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1065–1066, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, J., Deng, M., Lee, S. S., Wang, F., Li, Z., Zhai, P., Liu, H., Lv, W.,
Yao, W., and Li, X.: Delaying Precipitation and Lightning by Air Pollution
over the Pearl River Delta. Part I: Observational Analyses, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 6472–6488, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, J., Su, T., Li, Z., Miao, Y., Li, J., Liu, H., Xu, H., Maureen, C., and
Zhai, P.: Declining frequency of summertime local-scale precipitation over
eastern China from 1970–2010 and its potential link to aerosols, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 44, 5700–5708, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hains, J. C., Taubman, B. F., Thompson, A. M., Stehr, J. W., Marufu, L. T.,
Doddridge, B. G., and Dickerson, R. R.: Origins of chemical pollution derived
from Mid-Atlantic aircraft profiles using a clustering technique, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1727–1741, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hamonou, E., Chazette, P., Balis, D., Dulac, F., Schneider, X., Galani, E.,
Ancellet, G., and Papayannis, A.: Characterization of the vertical structure
of Saharan dust export to the Mediterranean basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
104, 22257–22270, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Han, Y., Fang, X., Zhao, T., and Kang, S.: Long range trans-Pacific transport
and deposition of Asian dust aerosols, J. Environ. Sci., 20, 424–428, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J. and Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative
forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J., Francis, P., Dubovik, O., Glew, M., and Holben, B.: Comparison
of aerosol size distributions, radiative properties, and optical depths
determined by aircraft observations and Sun photometers during SAFARI 2000,
J. Geophys. Res., 108, 225–231, 2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J. M., Osborne, S. R., Francis, P. N., Keil, A., Formenti, P.,
Andreae, M. O., and Kaye, P. H.: The mean physical and optical properties of
regional haze dominated by biomass burning aerosol measured from the C-130
aircraft during SAFARI 2000, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 225–231, 2003b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hegg, D. A., Covert, D. S., Jonsson, H., and Covert, P. A.: Determination of
the transmission efficiency of an aircraft aerosol inlet, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
39, 966–971, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer,
A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., and Nakajima, T.: AERONET –
A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol Characterization,
Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Huebert, B., Bertram, T., Kline, J., Howell, S., Eatough, D., and Blomquist,
B.: Measurements of organic and elemental carbon in Asian outflow during
ACE-Asia from the NSF/NCAR C-130, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D19S11,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004700" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004700</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, B., Heese, B., McFarlane, S. A., Chazette, P., Jones, A., and
Bellouin, N.: Vertical distribution and radiative effects of mineral dust and
biomass burning aerosol over West Africa during DABEX, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D00C12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009848</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, B. T., Christopher, S., Haywood, J. M., Osborne, S. R., Mcfarlane,
S., Hsu, C., Salustro, C., and Kahn, R.: Measurements of aerosol properties
from aircraft, satellite and ground-based remote sensing: a case-study from
the Dust and Biomass-burning Experiment (DABEX), Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
135, 922–934, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kahn, R. A., Berkoff, T. A., Brock, C., Chen, G., Ferrare, R. A., Ghan, S.,
Hansico, T. F., Hegg, D. A., Martins, J. V., and Mcnaughton, C. S.: SAM-CAAM:
A Concept for Acquiring Systematic Aircraft Measurements to Characterize
Aerosol Air Masses, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 2215–2228,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0003.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0003.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kan, H., Chen, R., and Tong, S.: Ambient air pollution, climate change, and
population health in China, Environ. Int., 42, 10–19, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kebabian, P. L. and Freedman, A.: System and Method for Trace Species
Detection Using Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift Spectroscopy with an Incoherent
Light Source, U.S. Patent No. 7301639, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kebabian, P. L., Wood, E. C., Herndon, S. C., and Freedman, A.: A practical
alternative to chemiluminescence-based detection of nitrogen dioxide: cavity
attenuated phase shift spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 6040–6045,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Zhu, L.,
Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Jimenez, J. L., and Campuzano-Jost, P.:
Sources, seasonality, and trends of Southeast US aerosol: an integrated
analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem
chemical transport model, Working Paper, 15, 17651–17709, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Leahy, L. V., Anderson, T. L., Eck, T. F., and Bergstrom, R. W.: A synthesis
of single scattering albedo of biomass burning aerosol over southern Africa
during SAFARI 2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 261–263, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Léon, J.-F., Derimian, Y., Chiapello, I., Tanré, D., Podvin, T.,
Chatenet, B., Diallo, A., and Deroo, C.: Aerosol vertical distribution and
optical properties over M'Bour (16.96°&thinsp;W; 14.39°&thinsp;N),
Senegal from 2006 to 2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9249–9261,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9249-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9249-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Liu, X., Yuan, L., Yin, Y., Li, Z., Li, P., Ren, G., Jin, L., Li, R.,
and Dong, Z.: Vertical distribution of aerosol optical properties based on
aircraft measurements over the Loess Plateau in China, J. Environ. Sci., 34,
44–56, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Yin, Y., Li, P., Li, Z., Li, R., Cribb, M., Dong, Z., Zhang, F., Li,
J., and Ren, G.: Aircraft measurements of the vertical distribution and
activation property of aerosol particles over the Loess Plateau in China,
Atmos. Res., 155, 73–86, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Niu, F., Fan, J., Liu, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Ding, Y.: Long-term
impacts of aerosols on the vertical development of clouds and precipitation,
Nat. Geosci., 4, 888–894, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Lau, W. K. M., Ramanathan, V., Wu, G., Ding, Y., Manoj, M. G., Liu,
J., Qian, Y., Li, J., and Zhou, T.: Aerosol and monsoon climate interactions
over Asia, Rev. Geophys., 54, 866–929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000500</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Guo, J., Ding, A., Liao, H., Liu, J., Sun, Y., Wang, T., Xue, H.,
Zhang, H., and Zhu, B.: Aerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact on
air quality, Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 810–833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx117</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Rosenfeld, D., and Fan, J.: Aerosols and their Impact on Radiation,
Clouds, Precipitation &amp; Severe Weather Events, Pacific Northwest National
Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA, USA, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Zheng, Y., Li, Z., Connor, F., and Maureen, C.: Seasonal variations
of aerosol optical properties, vertical distribution and associated
radiative effects in the Yangtze Delta region of China, Medicină
Internă, 13, 933–945, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P., Zhao, C., Zhang, Q., Deng, Z., Huang, M., Xincheng, M. A., and Tie,
X.: Aircraft study of aerosol vertical distributions over Beijing and their
optical properties, Tellus B, 61, 756–767, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.:
Aerosol Light Extinction Measurements by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS)
Spectroscopy: Laboratory Validation and Field Deployment of a Compact Aerosol
Particle Extinction Monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 428–435, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
McNaughton, C. S., Clarke, A. D., Howell, S. G., Pinkerton, M., Anderson, B.,
Thornhill, L., Hudgins, C., Winstead, E., Dibb, J. E., and Scheuer, E.:
Results from the DC-8 Inlet Characterization Experiment (DICE): Airborne
versus surface sampling of mineral dust and sea salt aerosols, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 41, 136–159, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Meloni, D., Di Sarra, A., Di Iorio, T., and Fiocco, G.: Influence of the
vertical profile of Saharan dust on the visible direct radiative forcing, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 93, 397–413, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Sharma, A. K., Marinoni, A., and
Ajai: Black carbon aerosols over the Himalayas: Direct and surface albedo
forcing, Tellus B, 65, 129–133, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Navas-Guzmán, F., Fernández-Gálvez, J., Granados-Muñoz, M.
J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., and Alados-Arboledas, L.:
Tropospheric water vapour and relative humidity profiles from lidar and
microwave radiometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1201–1211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A., Onasch, T., Kebabian, P., and Freedman, A.: Intercomparison of a
Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift-based extinction monitor (CAPS PMex) with an
integrating nephelometer and a filter-based absorption monitor, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 6, 1141–1151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1141-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1141-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Ryder, C. L., Highwood, E. J., Rosenberg, P. D., Trembath, J., Brooke, J. K.,
Bart, M., Dean, A., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J., Brindley, H., Banks, J.,
Marsham, J. H., McQuaid, J. B., Sodemann, H., and Washington, R.: Optical
properties of Saharan dust aerosol and contribution from the coarse mode as
measured during the Fennec 2011 aircraft campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
303–325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-303-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-303-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schafer, J. S., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Thornhill, K. L., Anderson, B. E.,
Sinyuk, A., Giles, D. M., Winstead, E. L., Ziemba, L. D., and Beyersdorf, A.
J.: Intercomparison of aerosol single-scattering albedo derived from AERONET
surface radiometers and LARGE in situ aircraft profiles during the 2011
DRAGON-MD and DISCOVER-AQ experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
7439–7452, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarz, J. P., Weinzierl, B., Samset, B. H., Dollner, M., Heimerl, K.,
Markovic, M. Z., Perring, A. E., and Ziemba, L.: Aircraft Measurements of
Black Carbon Vertical Profiles Show Upper Tropospheric Variability and
Stability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1132–1140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071241" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071241</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sheridan, P. J., Arnott, W. P., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Atkinson, D. B.,
Covert, D. S., Moosmüller, H., Petzold, A., Schmid, B., and Strawa, A.
W.: The Reno Aerosol Optics Study: An Evaluation of Aerosol Absorption
Measurement Methods, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 1–16, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., Howell, S. G., Kapustin, V. N., Mcnaughton, C.
S., Zhou, J., and Anderson, B. E.: Aircraft profiles of aerosol microphysics
and optical properties over North America: Aerosol optical depth and its
association with PM<sub>2.5</sub> and water uptake, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
1037–1044, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Steinke, S., Eikenberg, S., Löhnert, U., Dick, G., Klocke, D., Di
Girolamo, P., and Crewell, S.: Assessment of small-scale integrated water
vapour variability during HOPE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2675–2692,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2675-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2675-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung,
J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., and Bex, V.: The physical science basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Computational Geometry, 18,
95–123, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Stratmann, F., Siebert, H., Spindler, G., Wehner, B., Althausen, D.,
Heintzenberg, J., Hellmuth, O., Rinke, R., Schmieder, U., Seidel, C., Tuch,
T., Uhrner, U., Wiedensohler, A., Wandinger, U., Wendisch, M., Schell, D.,
and Stohl, A.: New-particle formation events in a continental boundary layer:
first results from the SATURN experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1445–1459,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1445-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1445-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, X., Yin, Y., Sun, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, W., and Han, Y.: Seasonal and
vertical variations in aerosol distribution over Shijiazhuang, China, Atmos.
Environ., 81, 245–252, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, W. K., Chen, J. P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of aerosols
on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50, 1–62, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Taubman, B. F., Marufu, L. T., Piety, C. A., Doddridge, B. G., Stehr, J. W.,
and Dickerson, R. R.: Airborne Characterization of the Chemical, Optical, and
Meteorological Properties, and Origins of a Combined Ozone-Haze Episode over
the Eastern United States, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1781–1793,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1781:acotco&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;1781:acotco&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Taubman, B. F., Hains, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Marufu, L. T., Doddridge, B.
G., Stehr, J. W., Piety, C. A., and Dickerson, R. R.: Aircraft vertical
profiles of trace gas and aerosol pollution over the mid-Atlantic United
States: Statistics and meteorological cluster analysis, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 111, 10–17, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8,
1251–1256, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wandinger, U., Muller, D., Bockmann, C., Althausen, D., Matthias, V.,
Bosenberg, J., Weiss, V., Fiebig, M., Wendisch, M., Stohl, A., and Ansmann,
A.: Optical and microphysical characterization of biomass-burning and
industrial-pollution aerosols from multiwavelength lidar and aircraft
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 8125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000202</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Virkkula, A., Ahlquist, N. C., Covert, D. S., Arnott, W. P., Sheridan, P. J.,
Quinn, P. K., and Coffman, D. J.: Modification, Calibration and a Field Test
of an Instrument for Measuring Light Absorption by Particles, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 39, 68–83, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Liu, S. C., and Dickinson, R. E.: Radiative effects of aerosols on
the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
107, 4142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000754" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000754</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Li, Q. B., Gu, Y., Liou, K. N., and Meland, B.: Dust vertical
profile impact on global radiative forcing estimation using a coupled
chemical-transport–radiative-transfer model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7097–7114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7097-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7097-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Zhao, C., Tie, X., Wei, Q., Huang, M., Li, G., Ying, Z., and Li,
C.: Characterizations of aerosols over the Beijing region: A case study of
aircraft measurements, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4513–4527,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.032</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Ma, X., Tie, X., Huang, M., and Zhao, C.: Vertical distributions
of aerosols under different weather conditions: Analysis of in-situ aircraft
measurements in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5526–5535,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.037</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Quan, J., Tie, X., Huang, M., and Ma, X.: Impact of aerosol
particles on cloud formation: Aircraft measurements in China, Atmos.
Environ., 45, 665–672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.025</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, C., Tie, X., and Lin, Y.: A possible positive feedback of reduction of
precipitation and increase in aerosols over eastern central China,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 229–239, 2006.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Du, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Xu, W., Han, T., Wang, Y.,
Fu, P., Wang, Z., Li, Z., and Sun, Y.: Insights into aerosol chemistry during
the 2015 China Victory Day parade: results from simultaneous measurements at
ground level and 260&thinsp;m in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3215–3232,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3215-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3215-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
