<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-8137-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Different roles of water in secondary organic aerosol formation<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> from toluene
and isoprene</article-title><alt-title>Different roles of water in SOA formation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Different roles of water in SOA formation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L.~Jia and Y.~F.~Xu}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Long</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>YongFu</given-names></name>
          <email>xyf@mail.iap.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Chemistry and Environmental Sciences,
College of Earth Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">YongFu Xu (xyf@mail.iap.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>8137</fpage><lpage>8154</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e97">Roles of water in the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the
irradiations of toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
investigated in a smog chamber. Experimental results show that the yield of
SOA from toluene almost doubled as relative humidity increased from 5 to
85 %, whereas the yield of SOA from isoprene under humid conditions
decreased by 2.6 times as compared to that under dry conditions. The distinct
difference of RH effects on SOA formation from toluene and isoprene is well
explained with our experiments and model simulations. The increased SOA from
humid toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations is mainly contributed by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing products such as polyalcohols formed from
aqueous reactions. The major chemical components of SOA in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations are oligomers formed from the gas phase.
SOA formation from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations is controlled by stable
Criegee intermediates (SCIs) that are greatly influenced by water. As a
result, high RH can obstruct the oligomerization reaction of SCIs to form
SOA.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e179">Water is an important environmental factor that can influence
the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) through the physical or
chemical processes, and is often represented with relative humidity (RH) or
liquid water content (LWC). Toluene and isoprene are two important precursors
of SOA, which are representatives of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
anthropogenic and biogenic sources. Both toluene and isoprene can produce
glyoxal during their oxidation processes in the atmosphere. As widely
reported, glyoxal is a typical precursor of SOA formed in the aqueous phase
(Volkamer et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2010, 2013; Ervens et al., 2011; Shen et
al., 016). The difference is that toluene contains an aromatic ring, which is
mainly oxidized by OH radicals, while isoprene contains two
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bonds, which can also be oxidized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
addition to OH. Thus, toluene and isoprene can provide insight into the roles
of water in SOA formation from different kinds of VOCs.</p>
      <p id="d1e216">Sadezky et al. (2006, 2008) reported that stable Criegee intermediates (SCIs)
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) play a
central role in SOA formation from the ozonolysis of ethyl butenyl ether,
trans-3-hexene, 2, 3-dimethyl-2-butene, and trans-4-octene. They further
suggested that SCI-derived oligomers are formed by the reactions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with SCIs. Sakamoto et al. (2013) showed that the reactions of
SCIs with hydroperoxides from ethylene can form SOA. Inomata et al. (2014)
and Riva et al. (2017) showed that the reaction of an SCI with carboxylic
acids or hydroperoxides can contribute to SOA formation from the ozonolysis
of isoprene. Zhao et al. (2015, 2016) also showed that the SOA generated from
the ozonolysis of trans-3-hexene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene is primarily composed
of oligomers formed from the addition of SCIs to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals.
Although these studies have demonstrated the importance of SCI-derived
oligomers in SOA formation from the ozonolysis of alkenes, the role of SCIs
in SOA formation from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations has not been
reported.</p>
      <?pagebreak page8138?><p id="d1e327">RH has a positive correlation with the mass yield of SOA from aromatics, such
as p-xylene  (Healy et al., 2009), toluene (Kamens et
al., 2011; White et al., 2014), o-, p-xylene (Zhou et al., 2011), benzene and
ethylebenzene (Jia and Xu, 2014). This has been mainly attributed to
aqueous-phase reactions, such as active uptake of glyoxal in particle water.
An exception is from the study of Cocker et al. (2001), who found that the
yield of SOA from m-xylene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene in the presence of
propene was unaffected by RH (5 and 50 %). This is probably due to the
presence of propene in their reaction systems, which can reduce the OH
radicals, leading to the decrease in the yield of SOA (Song et al., 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e330">SOA from isoprene has been widely studied, as summarized by Carlton et
al. (2009). An earlier study from Dommen et al. (2006) showed that RH had
little effect on the SOA yield from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
irradiations in the absence of seed particles at 2 and 84 % RH. A study
from Zhang et al. (2011) showed that RH had a negative effect on SOA
formation from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations with seed particles of
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under two RH conditions (15–40 and 40–90 %) and
ascribed the rise of SOA yield under lower RH to the enhancement of
2-methylglyceric acid (2-MG) and its corresponding oligomers. Nguyen et
al. (2011b) found that RH did not affect the yields of SOA from isoprene in
their isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations without seed
particles under dry (2 %) and humid (90 %) conditions, but they
observed enhancement of 2-MG-derived oligomers under low RH, which is
consistent with Zhang et al. (2011). Zhang et al. (2012) studied SOA
formation from methacrolein (MACR, one of major products from isoprene) under
different ratios of MACR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO. Their results showed that the effect of RH
on formation of SOA depended on the yields of SOA precursors (e.g.,
methacryloyl peroxynitrate, MPAN). In addition, isoprene-derived
organosulfates (Zhang et al., 2011, 2012) and isoprene epoxydiols
(IEPOX)-derived products (Nguyen et al., 2014) are enhanced under higher RH.
A recent study from Lewandowski et al. (2015) showed that the aerosol yield
from isoprene-NO irradiations decreased with increasing RH (9 to 49 %).
The role of water in SOA formation is so complex that more research is still
required to understand mechanisms of SOA formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e441">MPAN is one of key precursors of SOA from isoprene under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions (Surratt et al., 2010), which can react with OH to produce
epoxides (methacrylic acid epoxide, MAE, hydroxymethyl-methyl-a-lactone,
HMML). Lin et al. (2013) reported that MAE was an important precursor to
2-MG, a tracer of isoprene-derived SOA. Nguyen et al. (2015) showed that HMML
could form SOA. Since SCIs, IEPOX, MPAN, HMML, and MAE co-exist in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, there are cross-reactions in the system.
Thus, the study is still needed to demonstrate the role of these precursors
in oligomer formation from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations.</p>
      <p id="d1e482">Both toluene and isoprene can produce glyoxal during their oxidation
processes. Why was the positive effect of RH on the SOA yield of isoprene
not observed? We consider that different chemical processes are likely
responsible for the different effects of RH on the SOA yields from toluene
and isoprene. One of the most important differences between isoprene and
toluene reaction systems is oxidation pathways. To clarify the different
mechanisms of SOA formed under different humid conditions, this paper
presents the experimental results of mass yields and chemical components of
SOA from toluene and isoprene under controlled RH conditions, as well as the
explanation of the mechanism of SOA formation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental section</title>
      <p id="d1e491">All the experiments were carried out in a 1.3 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> FEP reactor (DuPont
500A, USA). The equipment and experimental procedures were similar to our
previous works (Jia and Xu, 2014, 2016; Ge et al., 2017). Thus, only a brief
introduction is given here. Two ionizing air blowers were around the reactor
to remove the electric charge on the surface of the reactor. A light source
was provided by black lamps (F40BL, GE, USA), with a center wavelength of
365 nm. The photolysis rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined to be
0.35 min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inside the reactor. The humidity was controlled by bubbling
the high pure water (18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
Millipore/Direct-Q3). NaCl seed particles were prepared by a constant output
atomizer (Model 3076, TSI, USA).</p>
      <p id="d1e542">Background air was prepared by a Zero Air Supply (model 111 and model 1150,
Thermo Scientific, USA) with three additional VOC traps (BHT-4, Agilent).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured by corresponding
analyzers of Thermo model 42C, model 49C, and model 45i (trace level). The
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in background air
were determined to be less than 1 ppb. The particles in background air could
not be detected with SMPS in the absence of irradiations, but the particle
number concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained at an irradiation
time of about 5 h. From some experiments and model simulations the particles
were considered to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which was formed from oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by OH radicals.</p>
      <p id="d1e690">Gas-phase organics were measured with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer
(GC-MS: Agilent model 7890A GC and Agilent model 5975C mass selective
detector, USA), which was equipped with a thermal desorber (Master TD, Dani,
Italy). Particle number and mass concentrations were determined by SMPS (TSI
model 3936, composed of DMS TSI 3080 and CPC TSI 3776). LWC was determined
following the method of the reduced Dry-Ambient Aerosol Size Spectrometer
(DAASS) (Engelhart et al., 2011). During the dry mode, the SMPS was modified
by adding a large diameter Nafion dryer (Permapure MD-700-48F-3; the RH of
the sample air can be reduced from 85 to 3.5 %) to the sampling inlet and
a multi-tube Nafion dryer (Permapure PD-200T-24E-M; the RH of sheath can be
reduced from 85 to 7 %) to sheath flow.<?pagebreak page8139?> During the humid mode, the humid
air in SMPS was quickly replaced by humid air in the chamber by venting the
sheath air at 10 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and then the humid aerosol was measured by
SMPS. As a result, the LWC was determined by the difference of the particle
mass concentrations between dry and humid modes.</p>
      <p id="d1e705">To analyze the chemical components of SOA, the particles that ranged from
100 to 650 nm were collected on a 25 mm disk using a Dekati low-pressure
impactor (DLPI, Dekati Ltd., Finland) at 10 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Organic
functional groups of SOA were measured by a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
spectrometer (Nicolet iS10, Thermo Scientific, USA). The mass spectra of SOA
were measured by an electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometer
(ESI-HRMS, Exactive-Orbitrap mass spectrometer, Thermo Scientific, USA). The
average molecular size information of the humic-like substances (HULIS)
present in SOA was determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Lambda 25,
Perkin–Elmer, USA) based on the ratio of E2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> E3, in which E2 and E3
denote the absorbance at 250 and 365 nm, respectively (Peuravuori and
Pihlaja, 1997; Duarte et al., 2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e728">The liquid reactants of toluene (99.8 % purity, Xilong Chemical Co.,
Ltd.), isoprene (99.9 % purity, Alfa Aesar), or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 weight
% in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were injected into the airline and were evaporated with
background air. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (520 ppm in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Beijing Huayuan Gas
Company) was injected into the reactor directly. For the experiments of the
oxidation of isoprene by OH, OH radicals were generated from the photolysis
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by UV lights (UVA-340, Q-Lab Corporation, USA). For the
experiments of isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dark reaction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was produced by
an ozone generator with pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (99.995 %). N-hexane
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 97 % purity, Beijing Tongguang Fine Chemicals Company) was used as
an OH scavenger in the ozonolysis of isoprene. To evaluate the possible
contributions of SOA from n-hexane in the ozonolysis of isoprene with
n-hexane, two experiments of the irradiations of hexane-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
performed for 6 h, in which no SOA was observed by SMPS under both dry and
humid conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e855">The initial conditions and purposes for the experiments are listed in
Table 1, most of which are the irradiations of toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The initial concentrations of isoprene and toluene were
about 0.90 and 0.85 ppm, respectively, and initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were about 320 ppb. At the end of each experiment, isoprene
was almost completely consumed after 6 h reactions, and about 400 ppb of
toluene was reacted at the end of 7 h reactions. The RH was controlled to be
dry (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % RH) or humid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % RH) conditions
for different experiments. Two sets of experiments with artificially added
NaCl seeds (about 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were performed to quantify the
role of particle water in SOA formation in humid toluene and isoprene
reactions. To find out how RH affects the oxidation pathways of isoprene by
OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, additional
experiments of isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations and isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reactions were carried out. The initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were around 5 and 1.5 ppm, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1016">To evaluate the potential contribution of SOA precursors (e.g., glyoxal,
IEPOX, MPAN, HMML, MAE, and SCIs) from toluene and isoprene reaction systems,
a model of the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM v3.3.1, website:
<uri>http://mcm.leeds.ac.uk/MCM</uri>, last access: 1 May 2016, Jenkin et
al., 2015) was used, which includes the chamber-dependent reactions. To
examine the influence of RH on oligomer formation from SCIs, the reactions of
SCIs with carbonyls were added to MCM, which were expressed with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SCI</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–10 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents carbonyls. The
rate constant for these reactions was set to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Vereecken et al., 2012).
Since most of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was consumed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SCI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions were not included in our model. The carbonyls
were chosen based on the results of mass spectra data from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations shown in Sect. 3.4. A set of ordinary
differential equations was built and solved using Matlab.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1247">Experimental conditions of toluene and isoprene irradiations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VOCs</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> / K</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RH / %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">VOC / ppm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NO / ppb</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> / ppb</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Aim</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="12">Toluene</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.915</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">307.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">85</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.804</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">303.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">84</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.933</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">293.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SOA size and yield</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.037</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">323.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">302</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.879</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">328.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.917</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">326.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">FTIR</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.846</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">301.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.930</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">325.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">FTIR with NaCl seeds</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.906</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">334.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.914</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">386.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">UV/Vis</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.910</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">364.1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">305</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.927</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">288.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LWC by FTIR</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">305</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.918</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">294.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LWC by SMPS</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="15">Isoprene</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">302</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.896</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">353.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="3">size and yield</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">302</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">85</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.804</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">364.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">301</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.850</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">311.7</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">302</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.844</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">308.5</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.901</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">299.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="3">FTIR</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.799</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">270.2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">302</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.828</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">273.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">301</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.790</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">283.1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.873</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">301.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">FTIR with NaCl seeds</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.827</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">325.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.823</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">332.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">UV/Vis</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.877</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">363.0</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">305</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.831</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">288.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LWC by FTIR</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">304</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.823</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">313.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LWC by SMPS</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.810</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">295.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8" morerows="1">ESI-HRMS</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">303</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">85</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.804</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">290.2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>RH effects on SOA yields</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Determination of LWC</title>
      <p id="d1e2033">The LWC in particles makes up a great percentage under humid conditions (as
shown in Fig. 1). To calculate the yield of SOA, the LWC has to be excluded.
On the other hand, since LWC was only measured at the end of the reaction, to
obtain the time evolution of SOA concentrations we needed to deduct LWC
during the whole reaction period. The value of LWC depends on chemical
components of particles and environmental conditions (temperature and
humidity). The volume growth factor (VGF) was used to estimate the
contributions of LWC in particles, which was defined by Engelhart et
al. (2011) as the ratio of the particle volume at humid air to the particle
volume at dry air. Assuming that all the particles are spheres and have the
same growth factor, the VGF is equal to the growth factor (GF) cubed as

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M94" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>VGF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hydrated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dried</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hydrated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dried</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>GF</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hydrated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dried</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the total measured
volumes of hydrated or dried particles, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hydrated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dried</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the diameter of hydrated or dried particles,
respectively, calculated from their volumes.</p>
      <p id="d1e2134">VGF is determined to be 1.28 (GF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.09, RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 78 %) for the
particles from toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, 1.18 (GF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.06,
RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 %) from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, 1.40
(GF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.12, RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 77 %) from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations,
and 1.30 (GF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.09, RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88 %) from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction
systems. There have been many studies about the<?pagebreak page8140?> growth factor of SOA. Aklilu
and Mozurkewich (2004) gave a GF range of 1.05–1.12 for atmospheric organic
particles (79 % RH). Stroud et al. (2004) predicted a GF of 1.1 for the
organic aerosols from toluene-NO-isopropyl nitrite irradiations at 79 %
RH. Prenni et al. (2007) reported the GF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.065</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 85 % RH
for SOA formed from toluene. Jimenez et al. (2009) obtained
GF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.057</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 95 % RH for SOA from isoprene. In general,
our results of GF are in good agreement with previous estimates, indicating
that the LWC measured by our modified SMPS is reliable.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2275">Mass concentration distributions of both dried and hydrated
particles from both toluene and isoprene systems at 3 h after the initiation
of reaction.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2287">Mass concentration time profiles of SOA from different toluene and
isoprene reaction systems under dry and humid conditions. An SOA density of
1.4 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was used and applied to the SMPS mass correction (Dommen et
al., 2006; Sato et al., 2007). The blue square markers are the number
concentration of SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations at 6 % RH.
The wall loss rate constant of particles was less dependent on RH conditions,
so an average value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to correct
the SOA formation.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>SOA yields</title>
      <p id="d1e2360">We assumed that the VGF did not change during the reaction course. Thus, the
LWC from toluene and isoprene under humid conditions can be determined by
VGF. Figure 2 shows that in touene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, the mass
concentrations of SOA at 81 % RH are much larger than those at 10 %
RH, with a ratio of maximum mass concentration of SOA at 81 % RH to that
at 10 % being 2.2. However, in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, the
mass concentrations of SOA at 80 % RH are much lower than those at
7 % RH, with the ratio of maximum mass concentration of SOA being 0.57,
which is almost the same as that from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions (the
ratio is 0.45). For isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, the mass
concentrations of SOA from humid conditions are generally larger than those
under dry conditions. Nevertheless, the maximum mass concentration of SOA
from humid conditions is 177.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the ratio is 1.01),
which is close to that from dry conditions.</p>
      <?pagebreak page8142?><p id="d1e2431">The mass yield of SOA generally increases with time. The maximum yields
during the experimental course were used for the following discussion. The
mean maximum yields of SOA from toluene were obtained to be
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.58</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (dry) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.97</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (humid),
respectively (Fig. 3). Our results are within the range obtained by other
investigators (Kamens et al., 2011; Odum et al., 1997; Ng et al., 2007).
Previous studies (Kamens et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2011; Jia and Xu 2014;
Wang et al., 2016) mainly ascribed the positive effect of RH on SOA yields
from aromatics to LWC, which can enhance the formation of SOA by aqueous
reactions, such as reactive uptake of glyoxal in aerosol water. Our yields of
SOA from toluene are smaller than those from Ng et al. (2007) (around
11 % at 4 % RH) and Hildebrandt et al. (2009) (11–17 % at
21 % RH), which is probably due to the additional and excessive OH
radical sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) used in their experiments. In
addition, the temperature in this study is higher than the previous studies,
which may be another reason accounting for the lower SOA yields in this work.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e2488">Maximum yields of SOA from toluene and isoprene under dry (red
color) and humid (black color) conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>:
toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">△</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋆</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>: isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>: isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2605">A negative effect of RH on SOA yields was observed in the systems of
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mean maximum yields
from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations are reduced from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.14</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (dry) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.19</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (humid) (Fig. 3).
This negative RH effect is in good agreement with the corresponding results
from Zhang et al. (2011) and Lewandowski et al. (2015). The yields of SOA
from our isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions are 3.00 % (dry) and 1.40 %
(humid), which are quite close to the results from the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
system, while RH has a very weak effect on the SOA yields from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations in our study. The maximum yields of SOA
were determined to be 7.7 % (dry) and 7.8 % (humid) from
photooxidation of isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are in good agreement with
the results (around 8 %) of isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations under dry
conditions from Clark et al. (2016). A similar yield (7 %) of SOA from
photooxidation of isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also obtained in
the results from Nguyen et al. (2011b). Based on the experimental conditions
in Nguyen et al. (2011b), we estimated that for their reaction system over
99 % of isoprene was oxidized by OH and the remaining 1 % by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by using simulations based on the MCM. Thus, the reaction system
by Nguyen et al. (2011b) can be considered to be closer to the
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system. In addition, some other previous studies
(Gaston et al., 2014; Riedel et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2018) showed that RH
had a negative effect on the formation of SOA from isoprene-OH systems due to
an acid dilution effect. In these studies, acidic sulfate seed particles were
used and the acid-catalyzed effect was very obvious. Thus, higher RH can
reduce the acidity of the seed particles by particle water. In our study
acidic seed particles were from a little amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed from
the gas-phase reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH. It was estimated that the mass
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles was less than
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When liquid water content increased from
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the maximum 54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under humid
conditions, the pH value was estimated to be in the range of 2 to 3.7,
indicating that the pH variation was small in our experimental conditions.
Therefore, compared with previous studies, the acid dilution effect was not
remarkable in our work. These results show that high RH can reduce the
maximum yields of SOA from the reaction channel of isoprene with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel) and that RH has little effect on the maximum yields from
the reaction channel of isoprene with OH (OH channel) without sufficiently
high mass concentrations of acid particles. Thus, it shows that the
ozonolysis of isoprene is probably a key pathway influencing SOA formation in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations in our experimental conditions, which will
be further discussed in a later section.</p>
      <p id="d1e2946">In our isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, based on the MCM simulation (Exp.
25), the amount of isoprene oxidized by OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
59, 25, and 16 % at the end of reactions, respectively. There are
cross-reactions when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are both present. Thus, we
cannot deduce SOA contribution simply by initial ratios of isoprene oxidized
by OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since SOA is mainly formed by the secondary or later
generation products, we can evaluate the contribution of reaction pathways to
the formation of SOA in terms of SOA precursors from different channels. As
described previously, SCIs can be taken as the SOA precursors from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel, while IEPOX, MPAN, HMML, and MAE can be used as SOA
precursors from the OH channel. The MCM simulations show that the total yield
of SCIs was dominant as compared to OH channel precursors such as IEPOX,
MPAN, HMML, and MAE. The former accounts for 70 % of total concentrations
(ppb) of SOA precursors, and the latter (IEPOX <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MPAN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE)
30 % at the end of reaction in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations.
Therefore, even though 59 % of isoprene was consumed by OH and only
25 % by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the formation of SOA in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
mainly from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel. For these three oxidation channels, RH
has little effect on SOA yields from OH channel oxidization. Previous studies
have shown that humidity has little effect on SOA formation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation of alkenes (Bonn and Moorgat, 2002; Fry et al., 2009; Boyd et
al., 2015). Thus, only the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel is greatly influenced by RH.
The maximum possibility is that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel can produce SCIs that
can be consumed by water. Thus, although most of the isoprene was oxidized by
OH and the SOA yield from the OH channel was over 2 (5) times greater than
that from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel under dry (humid) conditions, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
channel was still a major pathway influenced by water vapor in the
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system, which will be discussed in the following
section.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e3162">UV-Vis spectra of SOA from toluene <bold>(a)</bold> and
isoprene <bold>(b)</bold> photooxidations under dry and humid conditions.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>UV-Vis spectra of SOA</title>
      <p id="d1e3184">The molecular sizes of SOA can reveal the degree of oligomerization
reactions. Larger molecules displayed higher absorbance in longer wavelength
regions as surmised by Mostafa et al. (2014). Thus, we used the UV-Vis
spectra<?pagebreak page8143?> to determine the molecular size information of SOA, which can provide
information about the oligomerization degree of molecular size through the ratio of
E2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> E3 (absorbance at 250 nm divided by absorbance at 365 nm)
indirectly. Lower E2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> E3 ratios are associated with higher molecular
weight (Peuravuori and Pihlaja, 1997; Duarte et al., 2005). All the spectra
are characterized by a continuous absorption that increases with decreasing
wavelength from 200 nm up to about 1100 nm (Fig. 4), which indicates the
presence of conjugated double bond molecules (such as oligomers). The ratios
of E2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> E3 are 1.27 (1.53), 1.29 (2.25), 1.69 (1.97), and
1.55 (1.73) under dry (humid) conditions from our systems of
toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The E2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> E3 ratios show that high
RH can indeed reduce molecular sizes of SOA and suppress the oligomerization
reactions. Zhang et al. (2011) and Nguyen et al. (2011b) both reported that
oligomers were greatly reduced under humid conditions, and considered that
high RH suppressed the oligomerization reactions with water as a product.
Nevertheless, if the suppression of the oligomerization reactions under humid
conditions is the main reason for the decrease in SOA yield from isoprene,
why is the maximum yield from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations unchanged
under humid conditions? Besides the weak acid dilution effect in our
experimental conditions, there must be an intrinsic mechanism regarding the
influences of RH on the SOA yield from isoprene. In addition, oligomers have
also been identified as important products of SOA from aromatics, and water
is a byproduct during the oligomerization process (Kalberer et al., 2004; Lim
et al., 2010; Gaston et al., 2014). However, a negative effect of RH on SOA
yield from aromatics has never been observed. This is because there are
likely competing processes that are responsible for SOA formation from
aromatics under humid conditions. Oligomers are generally inhibited by higher
RH, while the organics formed by aqueous reactions are enhanced.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e3283">Infrared spectra of SOA from toluene irradiations under
humid <bold>(a)</bold> and dry <bold>(b)</bold> conditions. The infrared spectrum
of <bold>(c)</bold> was obtained after evaporation of SOA from <bold>(a)</bold> for
15 min at 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; the difference spectrum between <bold>(a)</bold> and
<bold>(c)</bold> is in the blue area <bold>(d)</bold>; the infrared spectrum of
<bold>(e)</bold> is with extra LWC by NaCl seeds. The main bands are the hydrogen
bonded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stretch in alcohols or acids
(2400–3700 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the carbonyl (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) band at
1727 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the organonitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) bands at 1636, 1278, and
855 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> band at 1423 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stretch at 1080 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>IR spectra of SOA</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Toluene</title>
      <p id="d1e3482">Figure 5a and b show the typical infrared spectra of SOA from the
irradiations of toluene under both dry and humid conditions. The prominent
features on SOA spectra are the board hydrogen bonded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
stretching, the carbonyl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stretching, the organic
nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) bands, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands of alcohols or
polyalcohol. The bands all greatly increase by over 2 times as RH increases
from 10 to 81 %.<?pagebreak page8144?> These changes in band strength with RH are quite similar
to the changes in the SOA mass yield with RH.</p>
      <p id="d1e3552">To further reveal the chemical properties of the increased products formed
from humid conditions, the SOA sample from humid conditions was evaporated.
First, we found that the IR spectrum of SOA almost did not change after being
heated at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 15 min. Then the sample was further evaporated
at 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 15 min. After the evaporation at 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the
major absorption bands were considerably changed. As a result, the spectrum
is almost the same as the spectrum of SOA collected under dry conditions
(Fig. 5c). The major reduced absorptions are from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands (Fig. 5d). These bands are assigned to hydrates of
glyoxal and other water-soluble compounds in SOA (Volkamer et al., 2009; Lim
et al., 2010; Kamens et al., 2011; Jia and Xu, 2014; Wang et al., 2016).
Therefore, alcohols (such as hydrates) are considered major contributors to
toluene SOA under humid conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3615">LWC is an important factor that can greatly influence the contribution of SOA
from aqueous reactions. The maximum LWC was measured to be about
44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from humid toleuene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. To
determine the role of LWC in SOA formation, extra LWC was introduced into the
reaction system by adding 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of NaCl particles. The
initial LWC was determined to be 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and maximum LWC
was 74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during 6 h of reaction. The SOA mass
concentration was obtained by subtracting the mass concentrations of NaCl,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and LWC from total mass concentration of particles. Compared
with the experiment without NaCl, the SOA mass concentrations increased by
16 % in the experiment with NaCl, and all the bands assigned to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
enhanced by 50, 29, and 35 %, respectively (Fig. 5e). This demonstrates
that the increase in LWC can greatly enhance the formation of SOA from
hydration of glyoxal. Therefore, it is concluded from our study that the
formation of SOA from toluene is controlled by LWC under humid conditions,
and that most SOA is formed by aqueous reactions in touene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
irradiations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e3786">Infrared spectra of SOA from isoprene irradiations under dry and
humid conditions. The bands at 1636, 1282, and 855 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The bands at 1170 and 1121 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are assigned to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in oligomers or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in carboxylic
acids, and the band at 1055 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is from alcohols. The absorption
shoulder from 927 to 1080 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is assigned to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the peroxide group (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Pretsch et al., 2009).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Isoprene</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Isoprene-{$\chem{NO_{2}}$} system}?><title>Isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system</title>
      <p id="d1e3976">The spectra of SOA from the irradiations of isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
characterized by the high abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups (Fig. 6). There are three bands assigned to different
kinds of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups in the
region of 927–1243 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under dry conditions (Pretsch et al., 2009).
These bands are indicators of alcohols and polymeric structures (Czoschke et
al., 2003). Thus, oligomers and organic nitrates are dominant species in SOA.
Under humid conditions, the absorption intensities of the bands
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are all reduced by 2
times. The tert-nitrate can hydrolyze in particle water by the replacement of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with the
-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group (Liu et al., 2012). Because such replacement hardly
changes the vapor pressure of corresponding species (Pankow and Asher, 2008),
newly formed alcohols should remain in the aerosol phase. We also did extra
experiments to test the hydrolysis of organic nitrates. After the SOA sample
from dry isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation was exposed to humid air (90 %
RH) for 1 h, we did not find any apparent change in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group.
Meanwhile, the peak height ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from SOA are almost the same under dry and humid conditions. Thus, the
hydrolysis of nitrates is not the major reason for the decrease in
particle-phase organic nitrates. It also indicates that aerosol phase
oligomers can hardly be influenced by RH. Then, high RH likely inhibited the
formation of particle-phase organics by reducing the oligomerizations in the
gas phase (e.g., SCI-derived oligomers).</p>
      <?pagebreak page8145?><p id="d1e4254">RH generally enhances SOA formation by the aqueous reactions. Similarly, the
aqueous reactions also exist in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. However,
the maximum LWC from humid isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations was measured to
be 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end of reaction, which is much smaller as
compared to 44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in toluene irradiations. Taking glyoxal
as an example, although the maximum concentrations of glyoxal were simulated
to be 39 ppb in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, which is only 60 % of
its maximum concentration of 65 ppb from toluene irradiations, due to the
limitation of LWC, the SOA from the aqueous reactions was significantly
reduced in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. To further confirm the role of
LWC, we did an additional experiment with NaCl seeds (initial LWC of
30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. The results
show that the absorptions of the bands from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase by 20 to 30 % as compared to those without
additional LWC (Fig. 6). It is true that increasing LWC can indeed enhance
SOA formation in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations; however, the absorptions
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from dry
conditions are still 2 times larger than those from the experiment with extra
LWC. This demonstrates that the increase in SOA through aqueous reactions is
far less than the decrease due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related reactions under humid
conditions. Thus, high water vapor can probably inhibit some key processes
responsible for SOA formation from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, which
will be discussed in the following contents.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Isoprene-{$\chem{H_{2}O_{2}}$} and isoprene-{$\chem{O_{3}}$} systems}?><title>Isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems</title>
      <p id="d1e4523">To determine which process responds to the decrease in SOA under humid conditions from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, IR spectra of SOA from the OH and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channels were studied, respectively. Since isoprene is the chain
unit of terpenes, the abundance of functional groups in oxidation products
from isoprene and terpenes is expected to be close.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing products from terpene are 10
times more
enriched from the OH channel oxidation than from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> one
(Calogirou et al., 1999). Our extra experiments show the similar
characteristics of IR spectra of SOA from both isoprene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
(figure not shown). The peak height ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.24 in the SOA from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system, while it is as high as 2.19 in the SOA
from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-OH system. Here the absorption ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to examine the
difference between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH oxidation channels.</p>
      <p id="d1e4706">The IR spectra of SOA from the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system are
characterized by strong absorptions of both hydrogen bonded
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and by weak absorption of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under both dry and humid conditions (Fig. 7, top),
with the peak height ratios of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being 1.63 (dry) and 1.45
(humid), which strongly supports the claim that alcohols or polyalcohols are
major components of SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. Under humid
conditions, the peak at 1090 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> assigned to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group from esters is slightly decreased, while
the band at around 3200 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption is
broadened as compared to the dry condition. It indicates that esters (e.g.,
oligomers) decrease while the compounds containing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increase under humid conditions. Nevertheless, the relative abundances of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups
are almost the same between dry and humid conditions, which shows a weak
effect of RH on SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations as compared to
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. In the OH channel, isoprene can be
oxidized to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOPO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). If there is no NO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOPO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be further oxidized to isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) by OH
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals. IEPOX are key intermediates of SOA in isoprene-OH
reactions (Surratt et al., 2010). Under dry conditions, IEPOX can be adsorbed
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds to form polyalcohols (e.g., 2-methyltetrols) through
acid-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions, which can further form oligomers by
esterification (Lin et al., 2012). Under humid conditions, IEPOX can be
absorbed into particle water to produce polyalcohols (Nguyen et al., 2014).
In addition, the decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group indicates
that the formation of oligomers is inhibited by the abundance of particle
water as discussed in Sect. 3.2, which is in agreement with the result of Lin
et al.  (2014). Because polyalcohols (dominant) and IEPOX-derived oligomers
are all in the aerosol phase, the total mass concentration of SOA does not
change much under humid conditions in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. In
other words, RH does not change the partition of IEPOX in our experimental
conditions. This is consistent with the result of Riva et al. (2016) that
water has a weaker impact on IEPOX-derived SOA yield.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e5113">Infrared spectra of SOA from isoprene with different oxidants under
dry and humid conditions. The bands at 1051 and 960 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are assigned
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups in peroxide
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pretsch et al., 2009).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page8146?><p id="d1e5192">In the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems, if the bands from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
excluded, both the shape and band intensities of IR spectra of SOA are quite
similar to those of SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. All the bands
assigned to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reduced by over 2 times under humid conditions (bottom
panel of Fig. 7). The ratios of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 0.36 (0.44) under dry
(humid) conditions. The results are consistent with our expectation that
lower ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should be in
SOA from the ozonolysis of isoprene. Since OH radicals were well removed in
our experiments, SCIs became the key intermediates of SOA. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group is an indicator of the participation of
SCIs in SOA from the ozonolysis of isoprene. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
group is very apparent under dry conditions, which decreases by 60 %
under humid condition. Oligomer products in SOA have been found to be formed
by the reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–10) SCIs with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
ozonolysis of small enol ethers and trans-3-hexene (Sadezky et al., 2008;
Zhao et al., 2015). Thus, SCI-derived oligomers are also deduced to be the
key components in SOA from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel of isoprene. The
model-simulated results show that when RH increases from 10 to 88 %, the
consumption of SCIs by water increases from 13 to 58 %, while the
SCI-derived oligomers decrease from 87 to 42 %. The reaction products of
SCIs with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have relatively high vapor pressures as compared to
oligomers, so they are mainly in the gas phase. Therefore, humid conditions
can reduce the SOA formed by SCI-related reactions in the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
systems.</p>
      <p id="d1e5492">In isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, the ratios of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 0.35 (0.36) under dry
(humid) conditions, which are almost the same as the corresponding values in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but totally different from the values in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The yields IR spectra (ratios of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the influence of RH on
SOA production from the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system is almost the same as
those from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. In isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
irradiations, even though 60 % of isoprene was oxidized by OH, because of
the presence of NO, most of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOPO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from oxidation of OH could be
quickly consumed by NO to form MPAN (around 15 ppb under both dry and humid
conditions) and other products, leading to the decrease in IEPOX from
224.0 ppb (in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 41.2 ppb (in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The yield of MACR is generally greater in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations and isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems than that
in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. MACR can react to form MPAN in the
presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be oxidized by OH to form SOA precursors
of epoxides (e.g., HMML, MAE), such as in the Nguyen et al. (2011b) work.
Epoxides can further be oxidized to produce 2-MG and related oligomers
(Surratt et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2015). 2-MG-derived
oligomers can be enhanced under lower RH (Zhang et al., 2011). Both the
results from Nguyen et al. (2014) and MCM simulations further show that if
there are enough OH radicals, most MPAN can be further oxidized by OH to
produce epoxides. However, since there were no extra OH sources in our
systems, MCM simulations show that only 12 % (24 %) of MPAN under dry
(humid) conditions was oxidized by OH to produce HMML and MAE. The maximum
concentrations of HMML and MAE were only 6.8 and 2.7 ppb under dry
conditions (Fig. 13), which is too small to explain the yields of SOA in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. If we simply assume that the
concentrations of SOA were proportional to the IEPOX concentration as in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, over 70 % of SOA should come from
IEPOX in dry or humid isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. However, the IR
spectra of SOA from dry or humid isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are totally different
from those in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. In contrast, they are
similar to those from the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system. Thus, IEPOX is not the
major contributor to SOA in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems. On the other hand,
similar to the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system, SCI-related reactions in the
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system were probably key pathways.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e5861">Positive ion mode ESI-Orbitrap mass spectra of SOA from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations under dry <bold>(a)</bold> and
humid <bold>(b)</bold> conditions.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Mass spectra of isoprene SOA</title>
      <p id="d1e5894">To further determine whether SCI-derived oligomers are the major components
of SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, the high-resolution mass
spectra of SOA under dry and humid conditions were obtained with ESI-HRMS
(Fig. 8). The mean molecular size of SOA was reduced from 352 under dry
conditions to 295 under humid conditions, which is in good agreement with the
results by UV/Vis spectra. The peaks on the spectrum show highly regular mass
differences, especially in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a
typical structure for polymers or oligomers (Kalberer et al., 2004). The
total intensity of peaks in the range of 300 to 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under humid
conditions is reduced by 75 % as compared to that under dry conditions.
This demonstrates that oligomers are probably a major component of SOA from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, which are greatly reduced under humid
conditions. The mass spectrum of SOA from the ozonolysis of isoprene is
similar to the one from the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system. The spectrum of SOA
from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9) shows a very different feature from that
of the SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It does not reveal obviously regular
structures of the peaks for oligomers.</p>
      <p id="d1e5996">To further characterize whether SCIs are the major building blocks of the
oligomers in SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, a Kendrick mass
defect (KMD) analysis was used. The KMD analysis is a standard method to
visualize the complex organic mass spectra (Kendrick, 1963). The Kendrick
mass (KM) is converted from the IUPAC mass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by multiplying a factor of
NM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., the factor is
14.00000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.01565 for the base unit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using Eq. (2).
NM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the exact mass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rounded to the nearest
integer. KMD is calculated as the difference between the nominal KM (NKM) and
KM using Eq. (3). The basic principle of the KMD method is that a homologous
series of compounds differing only by a number of base units have identical
KMD<?pagebreak page8147?> values. Thus, the KMD analysis allows for the rapid identification
oligomers by a plot of KMD vs. KM, in which homologous compounds can line up
in the horizontal direction. Since the KMD analysis has a great advantage to
clearly determine the molecular composition of hundreds of individual
compounds in SOA samples, it has been applied extensively for complex SOA
sample analyses using HR-MS (Reinhardt et al., 2007; Walser et al., 2008;
Nguyen et al., 2010, 2011a; Nizkorodov et al., 2011). In addition, since
different series of homologous oligomers may have similar KMD values, the KMD
data need to be pre-sorted by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value which is calculated by
Eq. (4) (Hsu et al., 1992).

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M464" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>KM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NM</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>KMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NKM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>KM</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>modulo</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>NM</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NM</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NM</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">base</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e6173">Positive ion mode ESI-Orbitrap mass spectra of SOA from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations under dry conditions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e6201">The correlation of yields of the top five SCIs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MACROO and MVKOO, MGLOO, and GLYOO) and the ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based oligomers to
total mass under dry and humid conditions from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
irradiations. Only the oligomers that belong to families (M-[SCI]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were taken into consideration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Base units of oligomers: SCIs</title>
      <?pagebreak page8148?><p id="d1e6368">There are 16 kinds of SCIs produced in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations
based on MCM v3.3.1 simulation, in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
a yield of 50.1 %), MACROO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 18.3 %), MVKOO
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 12.2 %), MGLOO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 11.3 %), and
GLYOO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.6 %) account for 95 % of total SCIs. To
explain that these SCIs exist in SOA as base units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a wide set of other
base units (OH, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">COO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are also included for KMD analysis. The ratio of oligomers with a
given base unit to total mass is defined to characterize the contribution of
different base units to SOA. It should be pointed out that large
uncertainties exist in the estimate of relative contributions of different
units because of the poor quantification performance using ESI-MS techniques.
Due to the cross containing of units in oligomer molecules, the sum of the
ratios is larger than 100 %. The oligomers with the same base unit
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-[base unit]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that contains at least three
compounds are considered one class of oligomers. The results show that only
the ratios of oligomers with the base units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are proportional to
the yields of corresponding SCIs from the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system.
Figure 10 displays the correlation diagram between the ratios of oligomers
(with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as repeating units) to total mass and the top five SCI
yields (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MACROO, MVKOO, MGLOO, and GLYOO). It shows that the
ratios linearly increase with increasing yields under both dry and humid
conditions. Thus, this demonstrates that the oligomers with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> repeat units are
from contributions of these SCIs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MACROO (and MVKOO), MGLOO,
and GLYOO in the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system. Therefore, these five SCIs are
chosen as the base units for KMD analysis, which shows that the ratios of
compounds containing SCI units are reduced by 45 % on average as RH
increases from 7 to 85 %. This is also in good agreement with MCM
simulation of decrease in SCI-derived oligomers by 44 % and with the
decrease in intensity of peroxide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption in
FTIR (Fig. 6). In addition, the KMD analysis is also used to determine the
components of oligomers in SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All the above
base units are tested, and the results show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing
oligomers are the major products in SOA, and the chain lengths of oligomers
are much shorter than those from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum repeat
unit number of n is less than 3 in most families of oligomers in SOA from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By contrast, the maximum value of n is larger than 5
in oligomer families of SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This indicates that
SCIs incline to produce long chain oligomers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Base unit of {$\chem{CH_{2}OO}$}}?><title>Base unit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e7072">It has been considered that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical can serve as an
oligomer unit in SOA from the ozonolysis of ethylene (Sakamoto et al., 2013).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the highest yield (50.1 %) of all the SCIs from
isoprene. The KMD analysis shows that the masses of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing
oligomers account for 46.2 % (29.4 %) of the total mass on the MS
under dry (humid) conditions. Figure 11 displays the selected mass spectra of
oligomers with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as chain units and their corresponding KMD plots
under dry and humid conditions, which shows that both the length of oligomer
chains and the number of oligomers are greatly reduced under humid
conditions. The number of oligomers under humid conditions is reduced by
64 % as compared to dry conditions. Another feature of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based oligomers is that the sizes of their end groups are larger than 300 (C14–C17), which probably come from other
oligomers formed during reactions. This indicates that most
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based oligomers are formed in the particle phase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p id="d1e7156">Positive mode mass spectra of oligomers with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as chain
units in SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irritations under dry and humid
conditions <bold>(a)</bold> and corresponding plots of KMD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) vs.
nominal KM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(b)</bold>. The horizontal lines connect the
family of compounds with an equal elemental composition differing only by
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) groups.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p id="d1e7272">Mass spectra of oligomers with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MACROO and MVKOO)
as the repeating unit and their Kendrick plots using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the
Kendrick base. Species separated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups fall on the
horizontal lines.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS3">
  <title>Base units of MACROO and MVKOO</title>
      <p id="d1e7350">Figure 12 shows the mass spectra and KMD plot of oligomers with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MACROO and MVKOO) as base units. The KMD analysis results
show that the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based oligomers to total compounds is 39.7 % (17.2 %)
under dry (humid) conditions. In addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MACROO and MVKOO
based oligomers have the second highest contribution to SOA among all the
SCIs. Similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the maximum number of chain units is 6 in
oligomers from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the size of
end groups is much smaller than that
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The most frequent end group is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown in Fig. 12. Based on the Chemspider
database and MCM simulation, we deduced that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is from
hydroxyacetone (ACETOL), which is the most abundant carbonyl-containing
products in the isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction system. The maximum
concentration of ACETOL is over 90 ppb based on our experimental conditions.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is deduced to be glyoxylic acid that is one of products from
isoprene irradiation. SCIs can react with carbonyl and alcohol products
(e.g., ACETOL), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Calvert et al., 2000; Chao et
al., 2015; Tobias and Ziemann, 2001). However, different from the
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system, MCM simulations show that most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
consumed by NO in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. Thus carbonyl and
alcohol products become the major initiators of SCI oligomerizations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7594">List of major base units and their corresponding ratios of oligomers
to total mass from SOA in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.96}[.96]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Base unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unit name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SCI yields by MCM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col6" align="center">Ratio of oligomers to total mass </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Dry/%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Humid/%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Delta/%</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MACROO and MVKOO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MGLOO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">80.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GLYOO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">80.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">dehydrated 2-MG (or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(1.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">67.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page8149?><p id="d1e7965">An addition of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group can change the vapor
pressure of oligomers (containing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> SCI units) by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pankow and Asher, 2008). The vapor pressures of SCI-derived
oligomers (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are estimated to be
less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
compounds can self-nucleate as their vapor pressures are less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atm (Kamens et al., 1999). It indicates that the initial particles
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation channel of isoprene are formed by the
self-nucleation of oligomers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The oligomers with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
probably further condensed on these particles. Thus, MACROO- or MVKOO-based
oligomers can be formed in the gas phase (e.g., Reactions R1 and R2). With
the increase in chain units, these oligomers can either self-nucleate or
further oligomerize in the aerosol phase.


                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M576" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><mml:mstyle background="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-g01.pdf"/></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><mml:mstyle background="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-g02.pdf"/></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS4">
  <title>Other base units of oligomers</title>
      <p id="d1e8206">It is worth noticing that the yield of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is only 1.4 % based on the MCM simulation. However,
the contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to oligomers is as high as 25.3 %
(9.0 %) under dry (humid) conditions (Table 2). Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
not totally from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. 2-MG usually serves as molecular
tracers for isoprene SOA (Kleindienst et al., 2007). As reported by Zhang et
al. (2011) and Nguyen et al. (2011b), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the repeated unit
of 2-MG's corresponding oligomers in SOA from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
irradiations. Lin et al. (2013) reported that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was from MAE
in MACR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is probably
formed from dehydration of 2-MG and MAE in oligomers. Considering the low
yield of MAE in our system, we considered that most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based
oligomers are probably contributed by 2-MG in our work. The ratios of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MACROO, and MVKOO based oligomers are almost 2 times larger
than that from 2-MG under both dry and humid conditions. Thus, even though
the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based oligomers was decreased by 65 % as RH
increased from 7 to 85 %, 2-MG derived oligomers would not be the major
reason for the decrease in SOA yield from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations.
In addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based
oligomeric compounds also have high ratios in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems,
which have been also reported as the most prominent units in SOA products
from the ozonolysis of isoprene in the Nguyen et al. (2010) study under dry
conditions. However, different from SCI based oligomers, the ratios of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based oligomers decreased by 18 and 14 % as
RH increased from 7 to 85 %, respectively. Thus, the reduction of SCI
based oligomers is the major reason for the decrease in SOA yields from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photooxidations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Mechanisms for the different roles of water in isoprene-{$\chem{NO_{2}}$}
systems}?><title>Mechanisms for the different roles of water in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
systems</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Vapor wall loss vs. SCI--{$\chem{H_{2}O}$} reaction}?><title>Vapor wall loss vs. SCI–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction</title>
      <p id="d1e8612">It is noted that the wall loss of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) can
lead to the underestimation of the yield of SOA (Matsunaga and Ziemann, 2010;
Loza et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2014; Yeh and Ziemann, 2015; Ye et
al., 2016; Palm et al., 2016; Krechmer et al., 2016; La et al., 2016; Nah et
al., 2017). Since SCI-derived oligomers are the major products of SOA from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, a question arises about which process is
dominant for the reduction of SOA production under humid condition, wall loss
of SCI related oligomers (in gas phase), or the reaction between SCI and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The MCM simulation shows that SCIs are so reactive that most of
them are consumed by reactions before they are lost to the wall (Fig. 14).
The percentage of the SCIs consumed by H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O was increased from 6 to
46 % as RH increased from 5 to 85 % due to the extremely high
concentration of gas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The removal of SCIs by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(85 % RH) can lead to a decrease in SCI-derived oligomers by 43 % as
compared to 5 % RH. The result is comparable with the decrease in SOA
yields of 62 % from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. Meanwhile, as
discussed in the previous section, the vapor pressures of<?pagebreak page8150?> SCI-derived
oligomers were so low that they were ready to condense on particles. The
upper limit of the wall loss rate constant of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for SVOC was calculated from the equation
given by McMurry and Grosjean (1985), while the condensation rate constant of
SVOC to the particles was calculated to be over 0.65 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in our study
based on the equation from La et al. (2016). This indicates that the
condensation rate of gas-phase oligomers to particles is much faster than
that to the wall. Therefore, the reactions between SCIs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
rather than the wall loss of SVOC are the major cause of the decrease in SOA
formation from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations in this work.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p id="d1e8756">MCM-simulated time profiles of SOA precursors in
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations. SCI-derived oligomers were from the
reactions of SCIs with glyoxylic acid and ACETOL (solid lines for dry
conditions, dashed lines for humid conditions).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=179.252362pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effects of water on SOA formation: {$\chem{O_{3}}$} vs. OH}?><title>Effects of water on SOA formation: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. OH</title>
      <p id="d1e8794">To quantify the RH effect of SOA and relatively possible contribution of
SCI-derived oligomers from isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, the reactions
of SCIs with formic acid, glyoxylic acid, and ACETOL were added into MCM, in
which the reaction of SCIs with formic acid does not form oligomers.
Simulations show that the total mass concentration of oligomers from these
reactions was 558.4 (271.2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 7 % (80 %) RH,
and the mass concentrations from other SOA precursors
IEPOX, MPAN, HMML, and MAE were 182.8 (167.0), 27.4 (28.9), 28.1 (27.4), and
11.2 (10.9) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 7 % (80 %) RH (Fig. 13). It is
obvious that the mass concentrations of SCI-derived oligomers reduced by
51 % as RH increased from 7 to 80 %, while the concentrations of
other precursors had little change under different RH conditions. Thus,
SCI-derived oligomers should have a great potential for formation of SOA,
compared to other precursors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><caption><p id="d1e8848">Wall losses vs. gas-phase reactions between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SCIs.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{!h}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><caption><p id="d1e8872">Mechanisms for SOA formation from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH oxidation
channels of isoprene.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/8137/2018/acp-18-8137-2018-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e8893">Our results clearly show that the different effects of RH on SOA yields
originate from the oxidation channels (Fig. 15). Both the OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
channels can well explain the differences in results of isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
irradiations from the Zhang et al. (2011) and Nguyen et al. (2011b) studies.
In the Zhang et al. (2011) study, there were no additional OH radical sources
in their systems. Thus, the SOA was mainly from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel.
Similar to our isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems, a negative effect of humidity on
SOA yield was observed in their work. In the Nguyen et al. (2011b) work, due
to sufficient OH radical source, over 99 % of isoprene was oxidized by
OH, and SCI concentrations were very low. Even though high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was used, most MPAN could be further oxidized by OH to produce epoxides.
Therefore, SOA was mainly from the OH channel in Nguyen et al. (2011b)'s
work. This is why the yield of SOA in their work was not influenced by RH.
Our results obviously show that SOA is formed by<?pagebreak page8151?> reactive uptake of SOA
precursors (e.g., IEPOX) in the OH channel, and by the condensation of
SCI-derived oligomers in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel. In the presence of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the formation of SOA is also controlled by the SCI-related
reactions without extra OH sources. However, the SCI-related reactions
(SCI-derived oligomers) can be inhibited by high water vapor. In previous
studies, SOA was usually modeled based on the vapor pressures of SVOC, which
only considers the effect of temperature. Our study strongly suggests that RH
is also a key factor in SOA formation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e8987">Opposite effects of RH on SOA formation from the
irradiations of toluene and isoprene have been elucidated in our work.
Different influences of RH on both SOA yields and mean molecule size
demonstrate the different mechanisms related to SOA formation from the
irradiations of toluene and isoprene. High RH can greatly enhance the SOA
formation in the toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system, so that the maximum yields of
SOA from toluene increased from 5.58 % (dry) to 8.97 % (humid). FTIR
spectra show that the increased part of SOA under humid conditions was mainly
contributed by aqueous reactions of water-soluble products (e.g., glyoxal).
Different from toluene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiations, water has a complex role in
isoprene systems. In isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation systems, RH has no
remarkable effects on SOA yields. FTIR spectra show that water can inhibit
the oligomerization reactions from polyalcohols; however, polyalcohols were
still the major products in both dry and humid conditions from
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation, which was mainly from the reactive uptake
of IEPOX in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles from background gas. In
isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation systems, high RH has
a negative effect on SOA yields, which decreased from 3.14 % (dry) to
1.19 % (humid). According to the FTIR, ESI-HRMS, KMD analysis and MCM
simulations, the oligomers with SCIs as base units were considered to be the
major products of SOA in isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems and isoprene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
irradiation systems. Under humid conditions, the SCIs can be consumed by
water in the gas phase, leading to the decrease in the formation of oligomers
from SCIs.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e9110">Data are available by contacting the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e9116">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9122">This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(no. 41375129) and the National Key R&amp;D Program of China (2017YFC0210005).
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by:  Jason Surratt<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aklilu, Y. A. and Mozurkewich, M.: Determination of external and internal
mixing of organic and inorganic aerosol components from hygroscopic
properties of submicrometer particles during a field study in the lower
fraser valley, Aerosol Sci. Techn., 38, 140–154,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490251367" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820490251367</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bonn, B. and Moorgat, G. K.: New particle formation during <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene oxidation by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the influence
of water vapour: particle size distribution studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2,
183–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2-183-2002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2-183-2002</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Boyd, C. M., Sanchez, J., Xu, L., Eugene, A. J., Nah, T., Tuet, W. Y.,
Guzman, M. I., and Ng, N. L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system: effect of humidity and peroxy radical
fate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7497–7522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Calogirou, A., Larsen, B. R., and Kotzias, D.: Gas-phase terpene oxidation
products: A review, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1423–1439,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00277-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00277-5</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G., Atkinson, R., Kerr, J. A., Madronich, S., Moortgat, G. K.,
Wallington, T. J., and Yarwood, G.: The mechanisms of atmospheric oxidation
of the alkenes, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chao, W., Hsieh, J. T., Chang, C. H., and Lin, J. J. M.: Direct kinetic
measurement of the reaction of the simplest Criegee intermediate with water
vapor, Science, 347, 751–754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1261549</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Clark, C. H., Kacarab, M., Nakao, S., Asa-Awuku, A., Sato, K., and Cocker, D.
R.: Temperature effects on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the dark
ozonolysis and photo-oxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
5564–5571, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b05524</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cocker, D. R., Mader, B. T., Kalberer, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: The effect of water on gas-particle partitioning of secondary organic
aerosol: II. m-xylene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene photooxidation systems,
Atmos. Environ., 35, 6073–6085, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00405-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00405-8</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Czoschke, N. M., Jang, M., and Kamens, R. M.: Effect of acidic seed on
biogenic secondary organic aerosol growth, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4287–4299,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00511-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00511-9</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dommen, J., Metzger, A., Duplissy, J., Kalberer, M., Alfarra, M. R., Gascho,
A., Weingartner, E., Prevot, A. S. H., Verheggen, B., and Baltensperger, U.:
Laboratory observation of oligomers in the aerosol from
isoprene/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photooxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026523</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Duarte, R. M. B. O., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.: Spectroscopic study of
the water-soluble organic matter isolated from atmospheric aerosols collected
under<?pagebreak page8152?> different atmospheric conditions, Anal. Chim. Acta, 530, 7–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Engelhart, G. J., Hildebrandt, L., Kostenidou, E., Mihalopoulos, N., Donahue,
N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: Water content of aged aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 911–920, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-911-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-911-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Rollins, A. W., Wooldridge, P. J., Brown, S.
S., Fuchs, H., Dubé, W., Mensah, A., dal Maso, M., Tillmann, R., Dorn,
H.-P., Brauers, T., and Cohen, R. C.: Organic nitrate and secondary organic
aerosol yield from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene evaluated using a
gas-phase kinetics/aerosol partitioning model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1431–1449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gaston, C. J., Riedel, T. P., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., and
Thornton, J. A.: Reactive uptake of an isoprene-derived epoxydiol to
submicron aerosol particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11178–11186,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5034266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5034266</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Ge, S. S., Xu, Y. F., and Jia, L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from
propylene irradiations in a chamber study, Atmos. Environ., 157, 146–155,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Healy, R. M., Temime, B., Kuprovskyte, K., and Wenger, J. C.: Effect of
relative humidity on gas/particle partitioning and aerosol mass yield in the
photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1884–1889,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es802404z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es802404z</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: High formation of
secondary organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of toluene, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2973–2986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hsu, C. S., Qian, K., and Chen, Y. C.: An innovative approach to data
analysis in hydrocarbon characterization by on-line liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta, 264, 79–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(92)85299-L" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0003-2670(92)85299-L</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Inomata, S., Sato, K., Hirokawa, J., Sakamoto, Y., Tanimoto, H., Okumura, M.,
Tohno, S., and Imamura, T.: Analysis of secondary organic aerosols from
ozonolysis of isoprene by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry, Atmos.
Environ., 97, 397–405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.045</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The MCM v3.3.1 degradation
scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11433–11459,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Jia, L. and Xu, Y. F.: Effects of relative humidity on ozone and secondary
organic aerosol formation from the photooxidation of benzene and
ethylbenzene, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.847269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.847269</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Jia, L. and Xu, Y. F.: Ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation from
Ethylene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-NaCl irradiations under different relative humidity
conditions, J. Atmos. Chem., 73, 81–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K.,
Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A.
S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., Zenobi, R. and
Baltensperger, U.: Identification of polymers as major components of
atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092185</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kamens, R., Jang, M., Chien, C. J., and Leach, K.: Aerosol formation from the
reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and ozone using a gas-phase kinetics-aerosol
partitioning model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1430–1438,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es980725r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es980725r</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kamens, R. M., Zhang, H. F., Chen, E. H., Zhou, Y., Parikh, H. M., Wilson, R.
L., Galloway, K. E., and Rosen, E. P.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from toluene in an atmospheric hydrocarbon mixture: Water and particle seed
effects, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2324–2334,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.007</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kendrick, E.: A mass scale based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.0000 for high
resolution mass spectrometry of organic compounds, Anal. Chem., 35,
2146–2154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60206a048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac60206a048</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Krechmer, J. E., Pagonis, D., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Quantification of gas-wall partitioning in teflon environmental chambers
using rapid bursts of low-volatility oxidized species generated in situ,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5757–5765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b00606</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>La, Y. S., Camredon, M., Ziemann, P. J., Valorso, R., Matsunaga, A.,
Lannuque, V., Lee-Taylor, J., Hodzic, A., Madronich, S., and Aumont, B.:
Impact of chamber wall loss of gaseous organic compounds on secondary organic
aerosol formation: explicit modeling of SOA formation from alkane and alkene
oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1417–1431,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1417-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1417-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Krug, J. D., and Kleindienst,
T. E.: Atmospheric oxidation of isoprene and 1,3-butadiene: influence of
aerosol acidity and relative humidity on secondary organic aerosol, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 3773–3783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3773-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3773-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., Perri, M. J., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10521–10539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., and Turpin, B. J.: Chemical insights, explicit
chemistry, and yields of secondary organic aerosol from OH radical oxidation
of methylglyoxal and glyoxal in the aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8651–8667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y. H., Zhang, Z. F., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H. F., Budisulistiorini, S.
H., Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping,<?pagebreak page8153?> E. M., Edgerton, E. S.,
Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene epoxydiols as
precursors to secondary organic aerosol formation: Acid-catalyzed reactive
uptake studies with authentic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
250–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202554c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y. H., Zhang, H. F., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Z. F., Marth, W. J., Park,
S., Arashiro, M., Cui, T., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Sexton, K. G., Vizuete,
W., Xie, Y., Luecken, D. J., Piletic, I. R., Edney, E. O., Bartolotti, L. J.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic
aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen
oxides, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 6718–6723,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1221150110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y. H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chu, K., Siejack, R. A., Zhang, H. F.,
Riva, M., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Kautzman, K. E., and Surratt, J. D.:
Light-absorbing oligomer formation in secondary organic aerosol from reactive
uptake of isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12012–12021,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es503142b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es503142b</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Shilling, J. E., Song, C., Hiranuma, N., Zaveri, R. A., and Russell,
L. M.: Hydrolysis of organonitrate functional groups in aerosol particles,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46, 1359–1369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.716175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.716175</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Loza, C. L., Chan, A. W. H., Galloway, M. M., Keutsch, F. N., Flagan, R. C.,
and Seinfeld, J. H.: Characterization of vapor wall loss in laboratory
chambers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5074–5078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es100727v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es100727v</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Matsunaga, A. and Ziemann, P. J.: Gas-wall partitioning of organic compounds
in a teflon film chamber and potential effects on reaction product and
aerosol yield measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 881–892,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.501044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.501044</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mostafa, S., Korak, J. A., Shimabuku, K., Glover, C. M., and Rosario-Ortiz,
F. L.: Relation between optical properties and formation of reactive
intermediates from different size fractions of organic matter, ACS Symposium
Series, 1160, 159–179, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Nah, T., McVay, R. C., Pierce, J. R., Seinfeld, J. H., and Ng, N. L.:
Constraining uncertainties in particle-wall deposition correction during SOA
formation in chamber experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2297–2310,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from m-xylene, toluene,
and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3909–3922,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Bateman, A. P., Bones, D. L., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J.,
and Laskin, A.: High-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of secondary
organic aerosol generated by ozonolysis of isoprene, Atmos. Environ., 44,
1032–1042, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.019</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Nitrogen-containing organic compounds and oligomers in secondary organic
aerosol formed by photooxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45,
6908–6918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es201611n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es201611n</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Roach, P. J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of humidity on the composition of isoprene photooxidation secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6931–6944,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Coggon, M. M., Bates, K. H., Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H.,
Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the reactive uptake of isoprene
epoxydiols (IEPOX) onto non-acidified inorganic seeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 3497–3510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl
peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP02001H</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.: Molecular chemistry of organic
aerosols through the application of high resolution mass spectrometry, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 3612–3629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02032j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c0cp02032j</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Jungkamp, T. P. W., Griffin, R. J., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: The atmospheric aerosol-forming potential of whole gasoline vapor,
Science, 276, 96–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.96" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.276.5309.96</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Kaser, L., Jud,
W., Karl, T., Hansel, A., Hunter, J. F., Cross, E. S., Kroll, J. H., Peng,
Z., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: In situ secondary organic aerosol
formation from ambient pine forest air using an oxidation flow reactor,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2943–2970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method
for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of
multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Peuravuori, J. and Pihlaja, K.: Molecular size distribution and spectroscopic
properties of aquatic humic substances, Anal. Chim. Acta, 337, 133–149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00412-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00412-6</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Prenni, A. J., Petters, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., DeMott, P. J., and
Ziemann, P. J.: Cloud droplet activation of secondary organic aerosol,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007963</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pretsch, E., Buhlmann, P., and Badertscher, M.: Structure determination of
organic compounds, 4th Edn., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,
291 pp., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Reinhardt, A., Emmenegger, C., Gerrits, B., Panse, C., Dommen, J.,
Baltensperger, U., Zenobi, R., and Kalberer, M.: Ultrahigh mass resolution
and accurate mass measurements as a tool to characterize oligomers in
secondary organic aerosols, Anal. Chem., 79, 4074–4082,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac062425v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac062425v</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Riedel, T. P., Lin, Y. H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Gaston, C. J., Thornton,
J. A., Zhang, Z. F., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Heterogeneous
reactions of isoprene-derived epoxides: Reaction probabilities and molar
secondary organic aerosol yield estimates, Environ. Sci. Technol. Let., 2,
38–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500406f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ez500406f</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Bell, D. M., Hansen, A.-M. K., Drozd, G. T., Zhang, Z. F., Gold,
A., Imre, D., Surratt, J. D., Glasius, M., and Zelenyuk, A.: Effect of
organic coatings, humidity and aerosol acidity on multiphase chemistry of
isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5580–5588,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b06050</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page8154?><ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Thornton, J. A.,
Turpin, B. J., and Surratt, J. D.: Multiphase reactivity of gaseous
hydroperoxide oligomers produced from isoprene ozonolysis in the presence of
acidified aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 152, 314–322,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.040</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Sadezky, A., Chaimbault, P., Mellouki, A., Römpp, A., Winterhalter, R.,
Le Bras, G., and Moortgat, G. K.: Formation of secondary organic aerosol and
oligomers from the ozonolysis of enol ethers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
5009–5024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5009-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5009-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Sadezky, A., Winterhalter, R., Kanawati, B., Römpp, A., Spengler, B.,
Mellouki, A., Le Bras, G., Chaimbault, P., and Moortgat, G. K.: Oligomer
formation during gas-phase ozonolysis of small alkenes and enol ethers: new
evidence for the central role of the Criegee Intermediate as oligomer chain
unit, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2667–2699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Sakamoto, Y., Inomata, S., and Hirokawa, J.: Oligomerization reaction of the
criegee intermediate leads to secondary organic aerosol formation in ethylene
ozonolysis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 12912–12921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408672m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp408672m</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Shen, X. L., Wu, H. H., Zhao, Y., Huang, D., Huang, L. B., and Chen, Z. M.:
Heterogeneous reactions of glyoxal on mineral particles: A new avenue for
oligomers and organosulfate formation, Atmos. Environ., 131, 133–140,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.048</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Song, C., Na, K., Warren, B., Malloy, Q., and Cocker, D. R.: Impact of
propene on secondary organic aerosol formation from m-Xylene, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 41, 6990–6995, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062279a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es062279a</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Stroud, C. A., Makar, P. A., Michelangeli, D. V., Mozurkewich, M., Hastie, D.
R., Barbu, A., and Humble, J.: Simulating organic aerosol formation during
the photooxidation of toluene/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixtures: comparing the
equilibrium and kinetic assumption, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1471–1479,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es030546w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es030546w</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M. N., Loza, C. L.,
Kwan, A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911114107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Tobias, H. J. and Ziemann, P. J.: Kinetics of the gas-phase reactions of
alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and water with the C13 stabilized
criegee intermediate formed from ozonolysis of 1-tetradecene, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 105, 6129–6135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp004631r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp004631r</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Vereecken, L., Harder, H., and Novelli, A.: The reaction of Criegee
intermediates with NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and their fate in the
atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 14, 14682–14695,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp42300f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cp42300f</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Ziemann, P. J., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary Organic Aerosol
Formation from Acetylene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): seed effect on SOA yields due to
organic photochemistry in the aerosol aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1907–1928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Walser, M. L., Desyaterik, Y., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
High-resolution mass spectrometric analysis of secondary organic aerosol
produced by ozonation of limonene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 1009–1022,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B712620D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B712620D</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. J., Luo, H., Jia, L., and Ge, S. S.: Effect of particle water on
ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation from benzene-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NaCl
irradiations, Atmos. Environ., 140, 386–394,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>White, S. J., Jamie, I. M., and Angove, D. E.: Chemical characterisation of
semi-volatile and aerosol compounds from the photooxidation of toluene and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ., 83, 237–244,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.023</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Ye, P. L., Ding, X., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Robinson, E. S., and Donahue,
N. M.: Vapor wall loss of semi-volatile organic compounds in a Teflon
chamber, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 822–834,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1195905" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1195905</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Yeh, G. K. and Ziemann, P. J.: Gas-wall partitioning of oxygenated organic
compounds: measurements, structure–activity relationships, and correlation
with gas chromatographic retention factor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49, 727–738,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1068427" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2015.1068427</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Surratt, J. D., Lin, Y. H., Bapat, J., and Kamens, R. M.: Effect
of relative humidity on SOA formation from isoprene/NO photooxidation:
enhancement of 2-methylglyceric acid and its corresponding oligoesters under
dry conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6411–6424,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H. F., Lin, Y. H., Zhang, Z. F., Zhang, X. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping,
E. M., Weber, R. J., Gold, A., Kamens, R. M., and Surratt, J. D.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from methacrolein photooxidation: Roles of NOx
level, relative humidity and aerosol acidity, Environ. Chem., 9, 247–262,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN12004</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman, M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in
laboratory chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 111, 5802–5807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1404727111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Chen, Y. Z., Lambe, A. T., Olson, N. E., Lei, Z. Y., Craig, R. L.,
Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Gaston,
C. J., Thornton, J. A., Vizuete, W., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Effect
of the aerosol-phase state on secondary organic aerosol formation from the
reactive uptake of isoprene-derived epoxydiols (IEPOX), Environ. Sci.
Technol. Let., 5, acs.estlett.8b00044, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Wingen, L. M., Perraud, V., Greaves, J., and Finlayson-Pitts, B.
J.: Role of the reaction of stabilized Criegee intermediates with peroxy
radicals in particle formation and growth in air, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
17, 12500–12514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP01171J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP01171J</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Wingen, L. M., Perraud, V., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Phase,
composition, and growth mechanism for secondary organic aerosol from the
ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-cedrene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3245–3264,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3245-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3245-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y., Zhang, H. F., Parikh, H. M., Chen, E. H., Rattanavaraha, W., Rosen,
E. P., Wang, W. X., and Kamens, R. M.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from xylenes and mixtures of toluene and xylenes in an atmospheric urban
hydrocarbon mixture: Water<?pagebreak page8155?> and particle seed effects (II), Atmos. Environ.,
45, 3882–3890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.048</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Different roles of water in secondary organic aerosol formation from toluene and isoprene</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Roles of water in the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the
irradiations of toluene-NO<sub>2</sub> and isoprene-NO<sub>2</sub> were
investigated in a smog chamber. Experimental results show that the yield of
SOA from toluene almost doubled as relative humidity increased from 5 to
85 %, whereas the yield of SOA from isoprene under humid conditions
decreased by 2.6 times as compared to that under dry conditions. The distinct
difference of RH effects on SOA formation from toluene and isoprene is well
explained with our experiments and model simulations. The increased SOA from
humid toluene-NO<sub>2</sub> irradiations is mainly contributed by
O–H-containing products such as polyalcohols formed from
aqueous reactions. The major chemical components of SOA in
isoprene-NO<sub>2</sub> irradiations are oligomers formed from the gas phase.
SOA formation from isoprene-NO<sub>2</sub> irradiations is controlled by stable
Criegee intermediates (SCIs) that are greatly influenced by water. As a
result, high RH can obstruct the oligomerization reaction of SCIs to form
SOA.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aklilu, Y. A. and Mozurkewich, M.: Determination of external and internal
mixing of organic and inorganic aerosol components from hygroscopic
properties of submicrometer particles during a field study in the lower
fraser valley, Aerosol Sci. Techn., 38, 140–154,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490251367" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490251367</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bonn, B. and Moorgat, G. K.: New particle formation during <i>α</i>- and
<i>β</i>-pinene oxidation by O<sub>3</sub>, OH and NO<sub>3</sub>, and the influence
of water vapour: particle size distribution studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2,
183–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2-183-2002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2-183-2002</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, C. M., Sanchez, J., Xu, L., Eugene, A. J., Nah, T., Tuet, W. Y.,
Guzman, M. I., and Ng, N. L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from the
<i>β</i>-pinene + NO<sub>3</sub> system: effect of humidity and peroxy radical
fate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7497–7522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7497-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Calogirou, A., Larsen, B. R., and Kotzias, D.: Gas-phase terpene oxidation
products: A review, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1423–1439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00277-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00277-5</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G., Atkinson, R., Kerr, J. A., Madronich, S., Moortgat, G. K.,
Wallington, T. J., and Yarwood, G.: The mechanisms of atmospheric oxidation
of the alkenes, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chao, W., Hsieh, J. T., Chang, C. H., and Lin, J. J. M.: Direct kinetic
measurement of the reaction of the simplest Criegee intermediate with water
vapor, Science, 347, 751–754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261549</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, C. H., Kacarab, M., Nakao, S., Asa-Awuku, A., Sato, K., and Cocker, D.
R.: Temperature effects on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from the dark
ozonolysis and photo-oxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
5564–5571, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05524</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cocker, D. R., Mader, B. T., Kalberer, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: The effect of water on gas-particle partitioning of secondary organic
aerosol: II. m-xylene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene photooxidation systems,
Atmos. Environ., 35, 6073–6085, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00405-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00405-8</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Czoschke, N. M., Jang, M., and Kamens, R. M.: Effect of acidic seed on
biogenic secondary organic aerosol growth, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4287–4299,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00511-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00511-9</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dommen, J., Metzger, A., Duplissy, J., Kalberer, M., Alfarra, M. R., Gascho,
A., Weingartner, E., Prevot, A. S. H., Verheggen, B., and Baltensperger, U.:
Laboratory observation of oligomers in the aerosol from
isoprene/NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> photooxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026523</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, R. M. B. O., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.: Spectroscopic study of
the water-soluble organic matter isolated from atmospheric aerosols collected
under different atmospheric conditions, Anal. Chim. Acta, 530, 7–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Engelhart, G. J., Hildebrandt, L., Kostenidou, E., Mihalopoulos, N., Donahue,
N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: Water content of aged aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 911–920, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-911-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-911-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fry, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Rollins, A. W., Wooldridge, P. J., Brown, S.
S., Fuchs, H., Dubé, W., Mensah, A., dal Maso, M., Tillmann, R., Dorn,
H.-P., Brauers, T., and Cohen, R. C.: Organic nitrate and secondary organic
aerosol yield from NO<sub>3</sub> oxidation of <i>β</i>-pinene evaluated using a
gas-phase kinetics/aerosol partitioning model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1431–1449, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1431-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gaston, C. J., Riedel, T. P., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., and
Thornton, J. A.: Reactive uptake of an isoprene-derived epoxydiol to
submicron aerosol particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11178–11186,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5034266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5034266</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, S. S., Xu, Y. F., and Jia, L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from
propylene irradiations in a chamber study, Atmos. Environ., 157, 146–155,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Healy, R. M., Temime, B., Kuprovskyte, K., and Wenger, J. C.: Effect of
relative humidity on gas/particle partitioning and aerosol mass yield in the
photooxidation of <i>p</i>-xylene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1884–1889,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es802404z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es802404z</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: High formation of
secondary organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of toluene, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2973–2986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, C. S., Qian, K., and Chen, Y. C.: An innovative approach to data
analysis in hydrocarbon characterization by on-line liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta, 264, 79–89,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(92)85299-L" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(92)85299-L</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Inomata, S., Sato, K., Hirokawa, J., Sakamoto, Y., Tanimoto, H., Okumura, M.,
Tohno, S., and Imamura, T.: Analysis of secondary organic aerosols from
ozonolysis of isoprene by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry, Atmos.
Environ., 97, 397–405, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.045</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The MCM v3.3.1 degradation
scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11433–11459,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, L. and Xu, Y. F.: Effects of relative humidity on ozone and secondary
organic aerosol formation from the photooxidation of benzene and
ethylbenzene, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.847269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.847269</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, L. and Xu, Y. F.: Ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation from
Ethylene-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-NaCl irradiations under different relative humidity
conditions, J. Atmos. Chem., 73, 81–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K.,
Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A.
S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., Zenobi, R. and
Baltensperger, U.: Identification of polymers as major components of
atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kamens, R., Jang, M., Chien, C. J., and Leach, K.: Aerosol formation from the
reaction of <i>α</i>-pinene and ozone using a gas-phase kinetics-aerosol
partitioning model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1430–1438,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es980725r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es980725r</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kamens, R. M., Zhang, H. F., Chen, E. H., Zhou, Y., Parikh, H. M., Wilson, R.
L., Galloway, K. E., and Rosen, E. P.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from toluene in an atmospheric hydrocarbon mixture: Water and particle seed
effects, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2324–2334,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.007</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kendrick, E.: A mass scale based on CH<sub>2</sub>  =  14.0000 for high
resolution mass spectrometry of organic compounds, Anal. Chem., 35,
2146–2154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60206a048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60206a048</a>, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Krechmer, J. E., Pagonis, D., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Quantification of gas-wall partitioning in teflon environmental chambers
using rapid bursts of low-volatility oxidized species generated in situ,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5757–5765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00606</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
La, Y. S., Camredon, M., Ziemann, P. J., Valorso, R., Matsunaga, A.,
Lannuque, V., Lee-Taylor, J., Hodzic, A., Madronich, S., and Aumont, B.:
Impact of chamber wall loss of gaseous organic compounds on secondary organic
aerosol formation: explicit modeling of SOA formation from alkane and alkene
oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1417–1431,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1417-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1417-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Krug, J. D., and Kleindienst,
T. E.: Atmospheric oxidation of isoprene and 1,3-butadiene: influence of
aerosol acidity and relative humidity on secondary organic aerosol, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 3773–3783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3773-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3773-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., Perri, M. J., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10521–10539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., and Turpin, B. J.: Chemical insights, explicit
chemistry, and yields of secondary organic aerosol from OH radical oxidation
of methylglyoxal and glyoxal in the aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8651–8667, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y. H., Zhang, Z. F., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H. F., Budisulistiorini, S.
H., Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S.,
Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene epoxydiols as
precursors to secondary organic aerosol formation: Acid-catalyzed reactive
uptake studies with authentic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
250–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y. H., Zhang, H. F., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Z. F., Marth, W. J., Park,
S., Arashiro, M., Cui, T., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Sexton, K. G., Vizuete,
W., Xie, Y., Luecken, D. J., Piletic, I. R., Edney, E. O., Bartolotti, L. J.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic
aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen
oxides, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 6718–6723,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y. H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chu, K., Siejack, R. A., Zhang, H. F.,
Riva, M., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Kautzman, K. E., and Surratt, J. D.:
Light-absorbing oligomer formation in secondary organic aerosol from reactive
uptake of isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12012–12021,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es503142b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es503142b</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S., Shilling, J. E., Song, C., Hiranuma, N., Zaveri, R. A., and Russell,
L. M.: Hydrolysis of organonitrate functional groups in aerosol particles,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46, 1359–1369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.716175" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.716175</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Loza, C. L., Chan, A. W. H., Galloway, M. M., Keutsch, F. N., Flagan, R. C.,
and Seinfeld, J. H.: Characterization of vapor wall loss in laboratory
chambers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5074–5078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es100727v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es100727v</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Matsunaga, A. and Ziemann, P. J.: Gas-wall partitioning of organic compounds
in a teflon film chamber and potential effects on reaction product and
aerosol yield measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 881–892,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.501044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.501044</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mostafa, S., Korak, J. A., Shimabuku, K., Glover, C. M., and Rosario-Ortiz,
F. L.: Relation between optical properties and formation of reactive
intermediates from different size fractions of organic matter, ACS Symposium
Series, 1160, 159–179, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Nah, T., McVay, R. C., Pierce, J. R., Seinfeld, J. H., and Ng, N. L.:
Constraining uncertainties in particle-wall deposition correction during SOA
formation in chamber experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2297–2310,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2297-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from m-xylene, toluene,
and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3909–3922,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Bateman, A. P., Bones, D. L., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J.,
and Laskin, A.: High-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of secondary
organic aerosol generated by ozonolysis of isoprene, Atmos. Environ., 44,
1032–1042, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.019</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Nitrogen-containing organic compounds and oligomers in secondary organic
aerosol formed by photooxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45,
6908–6918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es201611n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es201611n</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Roach, P. J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of humidity on the composition of isoprene photooxidation secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6931–6944,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Coggon, M. M., Bates, K. H., Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H.,
Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the reactive uptake of isoprene
epoxydiols (IEPOX) onto non-acidified inorganic seeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 3497–3510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl
peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.: Molecular chemistry of organic
aerosols through the application of high resolution mass spectrometry, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 3612–3629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02032j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02032j</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Odum, J. R., Jungkamp, T. P. W., Griffin, R. J., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: The atmospheric aerosol-forming potential of whole gasoline vapor,
Science, 276, 96–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.96" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.96</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Kaser, L., Jud,
W., Karl, T., Hansel, A., Hunter, J. F., Cross, E. S., Kroll, J. H., Peng,
Z., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: In situ secondary organic aerosol
formation from ambient pine forest air using an oxidation flow reactor,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2943–2970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method
for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of
multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Peuravuori, J. and Pihlaja, K.: Molecular size distribution and spectroscopic
properties of aquatic humic substances, Anal. Chim. Acta, 337, 133–149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00412-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00412-6</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Prenni, A. J., Petters, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., DeMott, P. J., and
Ziemann, P. J.: Cloud droplet activation of secondary organic aerosol,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007963" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007963</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pretsch, E., Buhlmann, P., and Badertscher, M.: Structure determination of
organic compounds, 4th Edn., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,
291 pp., 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Reinhardt, A., Emmenegger, C., Gerrits, B., Panse, C., Dommen, J.,
Baltensperger, U., Zenobi, R., and Kalberer, M.: Ultrahigh mass resolution
and accurate mass measurements as a tool to characterize oligomers in
secondary organic aerosols, Anal. Chem., 79, 4074–4082,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac062425v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac062425v</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Riedel, T. P., Lin, Y. H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Gaston, C. J., Thornton,
J. A., Zhang, Z. F., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Heterogeneous
reactions of isoprene-derived epoxides: Reaction probabilities and molar
secondary organic aerosol yield estimates, Environ. Sci. Technol. Let., 2,
38–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500406f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500406f</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Riva, M., Bell, D. M., Hansen, A.-M. K., Drozd, G. T., Zhang, Z. F., Gold,
A., Imre, D., Surratt, J. D., Glasius, M., and Zelenyuk, A.: Effect of
organic coatings, humidity and aerosol acidity on multiphase chemistry of
isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5580–5588,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06050</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Riva, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Thornton, J. A.,
Turpin, B. J., and Surratt, J. D.: Multiphase reactivity of gaseous
hydroperoxide oligomers produced from isoprene ozonolysis in the presence of
acidified aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 152, 314–322,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.040</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sadezky, A., Chaimbault, P., Mellouki, A., Römpp, A., Winterhalter, R.,
Le Bras, G., and Moortgat, G. K.: Formation of secondary organic aerosol and
oligomers from the ozonolysis of enol ethers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
5009–5024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5009-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5009-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Sadezky, A., Winterhalter, R., Kanawati, B., Römpp, A., Spengler, B.,
Mellouki, A., Le Bras, G., Chaimbault, P., and Moortgat, G. K.: Oligomer
formation during gas-phase ozonolysis of small alkenes and enol ethers: new
evidence for the central role of the Criegee Intermediate as oligomer chain
unit, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2667–2699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2667-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Sakamoto, Y., Inomata, S., and Hirokawa, J.: Oligomerization reaction of the
criegee intermediate leads to secondary organic aerosol formation in ethylene
ozonolysis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 12912–12921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408672m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408672m</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, X. L., Wu, H. H., Zhao, Y., Huang, D., Huang, L. B., and Chen, Z. M.:
Heterogeneous reactions of glyoxal on mineral particles: A new avenue for
oligomers and organosulfate formation, Atmos. Environ., 131, 133–140,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.048</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Song, C., Na, K., Warren, B., Malloy, Q., and Cocker, D. R.: Impact of
propene on secondary organic aerosol formation from m-Xylene, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 41, 6990–6995, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062279a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es062279a</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Stroud, C. A., Makar, P. A., Michelangeli, D. V., Mozurkewich, M., Hastie, D.
R., Barbu, A., and Humble, J.: Simulating organic aerosol formation during
the photooxidation of toluene/NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> mixtures: comparing the
equilibrium and kinetic assumption, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1471–1479,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es030546w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es030546w</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M. N., Loza, C. L.,
Kwan, A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Tobias, H. J. and Ziemann, P. J.: Kinetics of the gas-phase reactions of
alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and water with the C13 stabilized
criegee intermediate formed from ozonolysis of 1-tetradecene, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 105, 6129–6135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp004631r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp004631r</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Vereecken, L., Harder, H., and Novelli, A.: The reaction of Criegee
intermediates with NO, RO<sub>2</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub>, and their fate in the
atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 14, 14682–14695,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp42300f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp42300f</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Ziemann, P. J., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary Organic Aerosol
Formation from Acetylene (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>): seed effect on SOA yields due to
organic photochemistry in the aerosol aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1907–1928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Walser, M. L., Desyaterik, Y., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
High-resolution mass spectrometric analysis of secondary organic aerosol
produced by ozonation of limonene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 1009–1022,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B712620D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B712620D</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. J., Luo, H., Jia, L., and Ge, S. S.: Effect of particle water on
ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation from benzene-NO<sub>2</sub>-NaCl
irradiations, Atmos. Environ., 140, 386–394,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.022</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
White, S. J., Jamie, I. M., and Angove, D. E.: Chemical characterisation of
semi-volatile and aerosol compounds from the photooxidation of toluene and
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos. Environ., 83, 237–244,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.023</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, P. L., Ding, X., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Robinson, E. S., and Donahue,
N. M.: Vapor wall loss of semi-volatile organic compounds in a Teflon
chamber, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 822–834,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1195905" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1195905</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yeh, G. K. and Ziemann, P. J.: Gas-wall partitioning of oxygenated organic
compounds: measurements, structure–activity relationships, and correlation
with gas chromatographic retention factor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49, 727–738,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1068427" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1068427</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Surratt, J. D., Lin, Y. H., Bapat, J., and Kamens, R. M.: Effect
of relative humidity on SOA formation from isoprene/NO photooxidation:
enhancement of 2-methylglyceric acid and its corresponding oligoesters under
dry conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6411–6424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6411-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H. F., Lin, Y. H., Zhang, Z. F., Zhang, X. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping,
E. M., Weber, R. J., Gold, A., Kamens, R. M., and Surratt, J. D.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from methacrolein photooxidation: Roles of NOx
level, relative humidity and aerosol acidity, Environ. Chem., 9, 247–262,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12004</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman, M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in
laboratory chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 111, 5802–5807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y. Z., Lambe, A. T., Olson, N. E., Lei, Z. Y., Craig, R. L.,
Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Gaston,
C. J., Thornton, J. A., Vizuete, W., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Effect
of the aerosol-phase state on secondary organic aerosol formation from the
reactive uptake of isoprene-derived epoxydiols (IEPOX), Environ. Sci.
Technol. Let., 5, acs.estlett.8b00044, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Wingen, L. M., Perraud, V., Greaves, J., and Finlayson-Pitts, B.
J.: Role of the reaction of stabilized Criegee intermediates with peroxy
radicals in particle formation and growth in air, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
17, 12500–12514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP01171J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP01171J</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Wingen, L. M., Perraud, V., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Phase,
composition, and growth mechanism for secondary organic aerosol from the
ozonolysis of <i>α</i>-cedrene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3245–3264,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3245-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3245-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y., Zhang, H. F., Parikh, H. M., Chen, E. H., Rattanavaraha, W., Rosen,
E. P., Wang, W. X., and Kamens, R. M.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from xylenes and mixtures of toluene and xylenes in an atmospheric urban
hydrocarbon mixture: Water and particle seed effects (II), Atmos. Environ.,
45, 3882–3890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.048</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
