<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-757-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Assessing the role of anthropogenic and biogenic sources on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over
southern West Africa using aircraft measurements</article-title><alt-title>Assessing the role of anthropogenic and biogenic sources on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Assessing the role of anthropogenic and biogenic sources on PM${}_{{1}}$}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Brito et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Brito</surname><given-names>Joel</given-names></name>
          <email>joel.brito@uca.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-9442</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Freney</surname><given-names>Evelyn</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-9115</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Dominutti</surname><given-names>Pamela</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9876-6383</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Borbon</surname><given-names>Agnes</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Haslett</surname><given-names>Sophie L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2985-4846</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Batenburg</surname><given-names>Anneke M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3405-6593</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Colomb</surname><given-names>Aurelie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2595-3911</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dupuy</surname><given-names>Regis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Denjean</surname><given-names>Cyrielle</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Burnet</surname><given-names>Frederic</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Bourriane</surname><given-names>Thierry</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Deroubaix</surname><given-names>Adrien</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-7802</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sellegri</surname><given-names>Karine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Borrmann</surname><given-names>Stephan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-9380</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Coe</surname><given-names>Hugh</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-1713</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Flamant</surname><given-names>Cyrille</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-6495</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Knippertz</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-619X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schwarzenboeck</surname><given-names>Alfons</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, Université Clermont
Auvergne, Aubière, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciencias Atmosfericas,
Universidade de Sao Paulo (IAG/USP), Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Centre of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth and Environmental
Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Particle Chemistry Department, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz/Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>55128 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>CNRM UMR3589 Météo France/CNRS, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Ecole Polytechnique,
IPSL Research University, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université
Paris-Saclay, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, 91128
Palaiseau, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>LATMOS/IPSL, UPMC Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS
and UVSQ, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>UMR 8190 LATMOS, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Joel Brito (joel.brito@uca.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>757</fpage><lpage>772</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e305">As part of the Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa
(DACCIWA) project, an airborne campaign was designed to measure a large range
of atmospheric constituents, focusing on the effect of anthropogenic
emissions on regional climate. The presented study details results of the
French ATR42 research aircraft, which aimed to characterize gas-phase,
aerosol and cloud properties in the region during the field campaign carried
out in June/July 2016 in combination with the German Falcon 20 and the
British Twin Otter aircraft. The aircraft flight paths covered large areas of
Benin, Togo, Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire, focusing on emissions from large urban
conurbations such as Abidjan, Accra and Lomé, as well as remote
continental areas and the Gulf of Guinea. This paper focuses on aerosol
particle measurements within the boundary layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m), in
particular their sources and chemical composition in view of the complex mix
of both biogenic and anthropogenic emissions, based on measurements from a
compact time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (C-ToF-AMS) and ancillary
instrumentation.</p>
    <p id="d1e318">Background concentrations (i.e. outside urban plumes) observed from the ATR42
indicate a fairly polluted region during the time of the campaign, with
average concentrations of carbon monoxide of 131 ppb, ozone of 32 ppb, and
aerosol particle number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 nm) of 735 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> stp.
Regarding submicron aerosol composition (considering non-refractory species
and black carbon, BC), organic aerosol (OA) is the most abundant species
contributing 53 %, followed by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (27 %), NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (11 %),
BC (6 %), NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (2 %) and minor contribution of Cl
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 %). Average background PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the region was
5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> stp. During measurements of urban pollution
plumes, mainly focusing on the outflow of Abidjan, Accra and Lomé,
pollutants are significantly enhanced (e.g. average concentration of CO of
176 ppb, and aerosol particle number concentration of 6500 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> stp),
as well as PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> stp).</p>
    <?pagebreak page758?><p id="d1e444">Two classes of organic aerosols were estimated based on C-ToF-AMS:
particulate organic nitrates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ONs) and isoprene epoxydiols secondary
organic aerosols (IEPOX–SOA). Both classes are usually associated with the
formation of particulate matter through complex interactions of anthropogenic
and biogenic sources. During DACCIWA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ONs have a fairly small contribution
to OA (around 5 %) and are more associated with long-range transport from
central Africa than local formation. Conversely, IEPOX–SOA provides a
significant contribution to OA (around 24 and 28 % under background and
in-plume conditions). Furthermore, the fractional contribution of IEPOX–SOA
is largely unaffected by changes in the aerosol composition (particularly the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration), which suggests that IEPOX–SOA concentration is
mainly driven by pre-existing aerosol surface, instead of aerosol chemical
properties. At times of large in-plume SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements (above
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fractional contribution of IEPOX–SOA to OA
increases above 50 %, suggesting only then a change in the IEPOX–SOA-controlling mechanism. It is important to note that IEPOX–SOA constitutes a
lower limit to the contribution of biogenic OA, given that other processes
(e.g. non-IEPOX isoprene, monoterpene SOA) are likely in the region. Given
the significant contribution to aerosol concentration, it is crucial that
such complex biogenic–anthropogenic interactions are taken into account in
both present-day and future scenario models of this fast-changing, highly
sensitive region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e509">Currently about 350 million people live in southern West Africa (SWA) and the
population is projected to reach 800 million people by the middle of the
century (Knippertz et al., 2015b), making it undoubtedly one of the least
studied, most highly populated regions of the world with regard to the
effects of anthropogenic activities on air quality and regional climate
(Knippertz et al., 2015a). Moreover, emissions in the region from the
combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels and refuse, which are already
significant, are projected to rise strongly in the near future following
fast-paced urbanization and population growth (Liousse et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e512">The DACCIWA (Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa)
project aims to investigate the relationship between weather, climate and air
pollution in SWA (Knippertz et al., 2015a). The project brings together ground-based, aircraft and space-borne
observations, as well as
modelling and climate impact research. From June to July 2016 a large field
campaign took place that included three inland ground supersites (Savé in
Benin, Kumasi in Ghana, Ile-Ife in Nigeria), urban sites (Cotonou in Benin,
Abidjan in Côte d'Ivoire), radiosondes and three research aircraft stationed in
Lomé (Togo). Details of the field activities are given in Flamant et
al. (2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e515">The atmospheric composition over SWA is known to be the result of a highly
complex mix of sources. Besides the increasingly large urban emissions, the
region is impacted by sea salt and oceanic compounds brought from the south
by monsoon winds; Saharan dust from the north; at times large biomass-burning
plumes advected from the Southern Hemisphere; and power plants,
shipping emissions and oil extraction and refining platforms (Knippertz et
al., 2015a; Mari et al., 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e518">In addition to the sources described above, there is about 230 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
of tropical forest across SWA mixed with largely deforested patches. The
forest in the region emits large quantities of biogenic volatile organic
compounds (BVOCs), such as isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Ferreira et al., 2010; Murphy et al., 2010; Reeves et al., 2010), which can
lead to a significant effect on atmospheric oxidative capacity (Lelieveld et
al., 2008) and the formation of particulate matter (PM) (Claeys et al., 2004;
Hallquist et al., 2009). Ten years prior to the DACCIWA field campaign, a
large programme entitled African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA)
carried out several aircraft measurements in the West African region, mainly
focusing on Sahelian convection (Lebel et al., 2010) and the mesoscale
convective systems of the West African monsoon (Frey et al., 2011).
Nonetheless, it allowed a significant characterization of BVOC emission in
the region (Bechara et al., 2010; Murphy et al., 2010) including an estimate
of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from biogenic precursors (Capes
et al., 2009). By discriminating between high and low isoprene air masses,
Capes et al. estimated biogenic SOA (BSOA) of remote forested areas
over West Africa to be of the order of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, though the
observations were close to the detection limit of the instrument. In more
recent years, the identification of a range of PM formation processes from
isoprene (or more generally from BVOCs) has greatly advanced (e.g. Allan et
al., 2014; Liu et al., 2013; Robinson et al., 2011; Surratt et al., 2010)
though there have been no recent observations over the SWA. Therefore, the
large dataset gathered during the DACCIWA aircraft field campaign allows for
unprecedented characterization of the aerosol population, comprising insights
on the complex interplay between anthropogenic and biogenic sources on this
highly sensitive, understudied and rapidly changing environment. In this
paper, two important processes that lead to the formation of BSOA from
BVOCs are discussed. These processes are briefly outlined here.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>IEPOX–SOA</title>
      <p id="d1e576">During daytime, isoprene reacts with hydroxyl radicals (OH) and molecular
oxygen to produce isoprene hydroxyl radicals (ISOPOO). It is currently known
that these radicals can react with hydroperoxyl radicals (HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
predominantly produce hydroxyhydroperoxides (ISOPOOH;
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), or with nitric oxide (NO) to largely produce methyl
vinyl ketone (MVK, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and methacrolein (MACR, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)
(Liu et al., 2013). Nitric oxide, largely emitted by urban sources, can
almost entirely shift the isoprene oxidation away from the ISOPOOH pathway
(Liu et al., 2016a).</p>
      <p id="d1e652">The second-generation products through the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pathway (i.e. to ISOPOOH)
form isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX)<?pagebreak page759?> or other hydroperoxides, which in turn can
undergo reactive uptake to particles, effectively leads to particulate matter
formation (Surratt et al., 2010). After reactive uptake of IEPOX,
particle-phase reactions can produce several different families of species
collectively labelled “IEPOX–SOA”. It is important to note that the NO
pathway also has a minor channel allowing the formation of IEPOX, although
much less efficiently (Jacobs et al., 2014). Furthermore, non-IEPOX PM
production is also possible, for example through the formation of methacrylic
acid epoxide (MAE) and hydroxymethylmethyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-lactone (HMML)
(Kjaergaard et al., 2012; Nguyen et al., 2015), through ISOPOOH pathway but
directly forming low-volatility compounds (Krechmer et al., 2015) or via
glyoxal (Ervens and Volkamer, 2010), though in lower yields.</p>
      <p id="d1e671">It is understood that the uptake of gas-phase IEPOX into the particle-phase
depends on available pre-existing aerosol surface, but is also impacted by
aerosol composition, which in turn affects its acidity, particle water, and
nucleophilic effects. (e.g. Lin et al., 2013; Marais et al., 2016; de Sá
et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2015). In regions strongly impacted by isoprene
emissions, IEPOX–SOA contributes to about a third of the observed organic
aerosol (Hu et al., 2015). In order to correctly represent numerically
ambient aerosol loadings, and furthermore, develop efficient abatement
strategies, an understanding of the regulating mechanisms for this important
class of organic aerosol is crucial.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <title>Particulate organic nitrates</title>
      <p id="d1e680">The nitrate radical (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), arising from the oxidation of nitrogen
dioxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) by ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), is an important atmospheric radical,
acting mainly at nighttime due to its rapid photolysis in sunlight and its
reaction with NO (Brown and Stutz, 2012). Given its formation process
originating from NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the nitrate radical is directly linked
to anthropogenic activities. Several BVOCs are particularly susceptible to
oxidation by NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to one or more unsaturated functionalities, leading
to the formation of organonitrates
(ONs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RONO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The addition of a nitrate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ONO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) functional group to a hydrocarbon is estimated to lower the
equilibrium saturation vapour pressure by 2.5–3 orders of magnitude (Capouet
and Müller, 2006), leading to potentially significant increase in
particle-phase partitioning of semi-volatile species, thus contributing to PM
formation (Fry et al., 2014; Nah et al., 2016; Ng et al., 2017; Perraud et
al., 2012). Recent studies have identified that nighttime chemistry,
particularly through the attack of BVOCs by NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> leading to formation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON, is an important source of PM over the southeastern United States (Xu et
al., 2015a) as well as over Europe (Kiendler-Scharr et al., 2016).
Nonetheless, it is currently understood that both the formation and the
lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON depends strongly on its molecular structure (Hinks et al.,
2016; Nah et al., 2016), which in turn represents a highly challenging type
of OA to represent numerically (Shrivastava et al., 2017). Unquestionably,
observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON concentrations over a wide range of locations are
crucial to better constrain the formation and impact of this highly uncertain
aerosol type.</p>
      <p id="d1e826">The two types of SOA described above, IEPOX–SOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON, are typically
formed through a complex series of reactions involving both anthropogenic and
biogenic compounds. The aerosol population over SWA is expected to be
impacted by both types of sources, both from the mixing of emissions from its
large urban conglomerates and forested areas, as well as unclear influence
from other sources such as oceanic emissions, Saharan dust, advection of
biomass burning and so forth. Therefore, this paper focuses on both
quantifying submicrometric (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) aerosol particle composition during
low-level flights and, as well as assessing the contribution of IEPOX–SOA and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON to the aerosol burden in the region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e859">Measurements reported here were performed aboard the ATR42, a French national
research aircraft operated by SAFIRE (French aircraft service for
environmental research). The aircraft was equipped to perform measurements of
particles and gas-phase species as well as cloud droplet size distribution.
Aerosol particle species were sampled through a forward-facing isokinetic and
isoaxial inlet with a 100 % sampling efficiency for sub-micron particles
and 50 % sampling efficiency for particles with a diameter of
4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Instrumentation</title>
      <?pagebreak page760?><p id="d1e874">The chemical composition and mass concentration of the non-refractory
submicron particulate matter (NR-PM1) was measured with an Aerodyne compact
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (C-ToF-AMS) with a time resolution
typically of 10 or 20 s without particle sizing information. Less often,
measurements were carried out at 40 s time resolution with sizing
information (PTOF); however, these will not be discussed here. Before aerosol
particles were sampled by the C-ToF-AMS, they passed through a pressure-controlled inlet (PCI), regulated at about 400 hPa, avoiding pressure
changes to the aerodynamic inlet of the instrument during airborne sampling
(Bahreini et al., 2008; Freney et al., 2014). In order to extract chemically
resolved mass concentrations of individual species, the C-ToF-AMS raw data
were evaluated using the standard fragmentation table (Allan et al., 2004).
Adjustments to the fragmentation table were made based on particle-free
measurement periods that were performed during each flight. The resolved mass
concentrations included nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonium
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), organics (Org) and chloride (Cl) species. The collection
efficiency was calculated according to Middlebrook et al. (2012), usually
yielding 0.5. The detection limits, considering 10 s integration time, were
calculated at 5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 35 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
Cl, 45 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Org and 52 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Drewnick et
al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e980">Ionization efficiency calibrations, using size-selected ammonium nitrate
aerosols, were carried out three times during the field campaign. Aerosol
loadings from the C-ToF-AMS were compared against volume integration using a
scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and black carbon (BC) from a single-particle soot photometer (SP2), yielding good agreement (slope: 0.87; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
0.83; Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The density used for each species was 1.78,
1.72, 1.72, 1.52 and 1.77 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for sulfate, nitrate, ammonium,
chloride and BC, respectively (Lide, 1991; Park et al., 2004).
The density of organics was estimated based on the oxygen-to-carbon (O : C)
and hydrogen-to-carbon (H : C) ratios (Canagaratna et al., 2015; Kuwata et
al., 2012), yielding a campaign average of 1.67 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerosol
loadings from the C-ToF-AMS were also compared with measurements of C-ToF-AMS
from the two other aircraft that took part in the campaign, the German DLR
Falcon and the British Twin Otter (TO). For this, data were selected around
take-off and landing at Lomé airport. Results between the instrument used
here (ATR42) and the TO were generally in good agreement. The AMS on board of
the Falcon showed considerably lower mass concentrations, an issue currently
attributed to losses at the Falcon AMS pressure-controlled inlet, which is
based on a different design principle than the ATR42 inlet.</p>
      <p id="d1e1018">Aerosol particle number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 nm) were measured using an
adapted TSI condensational particle counter model 3010. Aerosol mass and
number concentrations are corrected for standard temperature and pressure
(used here 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 950 hPa). Trace gases were measured by the
ATR42 core chemistry instrumentation. Nitrogen oxides
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured by a TEi42 chemiluminescence
detector with a blue light photolytic converter instrument (TEi42 CLT-BLC,
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Franklin, MA) with a time resolution of 1 s. The
quantification of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained directly from converting into NO using
a light source emitting diode from the blue light converter (BLC). The
CLT-BLC measures NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> directly and NO indirectly after photolytic
conversion by the CLT detector. The conversion efficiency adopted was
21 %. Carbon monoxide (CO) measurements were performed using the
near-infrared cavity ring-down spectroscopy technique (G2401, Picarro Inc.,
Santa Clara, CA, USA), with a time resolution of 5 s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization</title>
      <p id="d1e1093">Positive matrix factorization (PMF) is a statistical model that uses weighted
least-squares fitting for factor analysis (Paatero and Tapper, 1994) for
explaining the variability of the organic mass spectral data as linear
combination of static factor profiles and their time-dependent contributions
(e.g. Ulbrich et al., 2009). The PMF evaluation tool kit (PET v2.04) (Ulbrich
et al., 2009) was used to prepare the data and error estimates, execute PMF
and evaluate the results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Particulate organic nitrate</title>
      <p id="d1e1102">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON can be distinguished from inorganic nitrate by AMS technology
through the fragmentation ratio of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions. The
methodology applied  to quantify <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON has been detailed elsewhere
(Farmer et al., 2010; Kiendler-Scharr et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2015b) and
thus is presented only briefly here. The mass concentration of the nitrate
functionality of organic nitrates is calculated by Eq. (2), based on the
fraction of organic nitrates relative to total measured nitrate (Eq. 1),  according to the following equations:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M83" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calib</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calib</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mass</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions (or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 46 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 for unit mass resolution systems, such as used here), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calib</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio associated with inorganic nitrates during
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calibrations (0.445 here). The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
has been observed to show some dependence on the molecular formula of the
organic nitrate, which is unknown here, and therefore was set as 0.1
similarly as by Kiendler-Scharr et al. (2016). This method is considered
reliable for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mass</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, considering
an uncertainty of 20 % (Bruns et al., 2010; Kiendler-Scharr et al., 2016)
and thus such limits were considered here. Also,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OrgNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mass</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relates to the nitrate functionality of
organic nitrates only. To account for the total particulate organic nitrate
mass (here termed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON), a molar mass of 200 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> will be
assumed (Kiendler-Scharr et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Isoprene epoxydiols secondary organic aerosol</title>
      <?pagebreak page761?><p id="d1e1490">Isoprene epoxydiol SOAs (IEPOX–SOA) have previously been identified from AMS
spectra through an enhanced signal at ion C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 82
in unit mass resolution systems (Allan et al., 2014; Budisulistiorini et al.,
2015; Robinson et al., 2011; de Sá et al., 2017). More recently, Hu et
al. (2015) proposed a diagnostic tracer for IEPOX–SOA based on datasets from
a wide range of environments, such as biomass-burning, urban or monoterpene-impacted areas, for high or unit mass resolution instruments. Results
have shown that the relative contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 82 to total organic
aerosol concentration, i.e.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is a
suitable tracer, with uncertainties up to 30 %. Furthermore, Hu et
al. (2015) proposed an estimation of IEPOX–SOA taking into account mass
concentration at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 82 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), total OA concentration (OA), a
reference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value for IEPOX–SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and a background value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BK</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M113" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BK</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BK</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>in</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The background values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BK</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been observed
by Hu et al. (2015) to range from 3 to 6 ‰ depending on the type of
dominant OA source (e.g. urban, biomass burning) or air mass age, and for
regions impacted by urban or biomass-burning emissions is calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BK</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1833">ATR42 trajectories (in red) during DACCIWA for altitudes below 2000 m
overlaid the forest cover (in green), non-forested areas (black) and water
surface (blue). Forest cover data are from Hansen et al. (2013).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/757/2018/acp-18-757-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1844">Spatial distribution of CO, aerosol number concentration, OA,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for flight trajectories below 2000 m.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/757/2018/acp-18-757-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1887">The DACCIWA aircraft field campaign was carried out from 27 June to
16 July 2016, during the so-called post-onset period (Phase 2 in Knippertz et
al., 2017), characterized by relatively undisturbed monsoon conditions.
Figure 1 depicts the ATR42 flight trajectories below 2000 m overlaid on the
forest cover in the region. Urban plumes have been mostly sampled following a
northeastward direction, following  the predominant direction of the
low-level winds over the area. The spatial distribution of CO, aerosol number
concentration and some aerosol species are depicted in Fig. 2, showing a
significant enhancement of aerosol (mass and number) downwind of the cities
of Abidjan, Accra, Lomé and Cotonou. Some species (OA and CO) also show
some enhancement over the Gulf of Guinea, and is most likely associated with
long-range transport of biomass-burning pollution from central Africa
(Knippertz et al., 2017).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e1891">In order to evaluate the sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over SWA, firstly a PMF analysis
on the OA spectra was  carried out, and this is described in Sect. 3.1. A
study on the impact of urban emission on aerosol composition is detailed
in Sect. 3.2, based on a case study from flights 24/25 on 6 July 2016.
Finally, Sect. 3.3 describes the results of a systematic identification of
in-plume and regional background measurements, providing an overview of the
level of different species within urban plumes and in comparison to the
regional background of SWA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e1905">Mass spectra in fraction of signal of PMF factors, fresh urban, aged
urban and OOA.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/757/2018/acp-18-757-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Factor analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1919">The PMF analysis of the organic spectra was carried out using data from all
ATR42 DACCIWA flights, filtered for in-cloud measurement points and limited
to an altitude below 2000 m to limit the impact of free-tropospheric biomass
burning layers (Flamant et al., 2018), outside the scope of this work. The
analysis identified three components of OA (Fig. 3) – two linked with urban
emissions (termed fresh and aged) and one regional component, termed
oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA), following the usual nomenclature (Ulbrich
et al., 2009), which is usually associated with highly aged or secondary OA
(e.g. Zhang et al., 2011). It is interesting to note that the fresh urban
component of OA combines tracers of traffic emission (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43, 55 and
91), typical of many urban environments (e.g. Ng et al., 2010) but also
includes tracers of fresh biomass burning (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60) (Cubison et al., 2011).
This result sheds light on the important role that biomass-burning sources
within the city limits have on aerosol composition. This burning is thought
to be mainly associated with the use of biomass as fuel, for cooking for
example, or by the combustion of refuse. Given the high toxicity associated
with biomass-burning emissions (de Oliveira Alves et al., 2017; Verma et al.,
2015), the extensive biomass burning within city limits is likely to have an
important detrimental health effect on local urban population.</p>
      <p id="d1e1946">Figure 4 depicts the spatial distribution of the factors, showing localized
enhancements of fresh and aged urban plumes in the outflows of the cities, as
well as a more regionally homogeneous distribution of the OOA factor. The
latter depicts an enhancement in regions impacted by urban outflows, but also
above the Gulf of Guinea, which is associated with biomass-burning plumes
advected from central Africa (Flamant et al., 2018). Given the processing
that has taken place during long-range transport, the mass spectrum of OA no
longer carries a signature of fresh biomass-burning emission (e.g. Brito et
al., 2014; Cubison et al., 2011), and therefore has been grouped to the OOA
component by PMF analysis, typical of aged/processed air masses.</p>
      <p id="d1e1949">Despite the complex mixture of sources impacting OA concentration in the
region, such as locally emitted biomass-burning, biogenic and urban
emissions, the PMF analysis has not been able to further
resolve OA sources of interest (such as IEPOX–SOA), or even to separate local
fires from<?pagebreak page762?> the urban factor. This is strongly associated with the fact that
the dataset originates from airborne measurements and therefore (i) the
dataset has a somewhat limited temporal coverage (about 70 h in total,
compared to weeks/months/years of ground-based campaigns); (ii) the dataset
lacks diurnal variation, as most of the flights were either carried out
during morning or afternoon hours; and (iii) the aircraft samples air masses
with large co-variability (e.g. biomass-burning emissions from within the
city itself along traffic emissions, as discussed above). The outcomes of PMF
results are twofold: the different components of OA obtained from the use of
PMF will be used in a systematic identification of in-plume and background
measurements, and the identification of processes of interest (IEPOX–SOA and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON) shall be carried out using the diagnostic tracers detailed in
Sect. 2.3 and 2.4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e1961">Spatial distribution of OA concentration associated with three PMF
factors: fresh urban, aged urban and oxygenated organic aerosol.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/757/2018/acp-18-757-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Case study: the Abidjan plume of 6 July 2016</title>
      <p id="d1e1977">On 6 July 2016, the ATR42 conducted flights in the environs of Abidjan, a
city of over 4.5 million inhabitants. These flights provide an interesting
case study of the effects of SWA emissions on aerosol properties, including
the atmospheric concentration of IEPOX–SOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON. Figure 5 shows three
transects of interest, upwind of Abidjan<?pagebreak page763?> (transect 1), within the Abidjan plume
(transect 2) and sampling a regional continental air mass outside of large
city plumes (transect 3). Table 1 compares mean concentrations (and
5–95 % confidence interval of the mean, CI) for several species of
interest. Some species had concentration values significantly lower in the
advecting air mass than over continental background, such as aerosol particle
number concentration, CO, OA, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and IEPOX–SOA (Table 1). In
fact, upwind Abidjan IEPOX–SOA has a CI of the mean which encompasses zero, and
therefore is considered negligible in this transect. The significant
difference between transects 1 and 3 for typical tracers of urban emissions
such as aerosol number concentration and CO, and, furthermore, the lack of
IEPOX–SOA in transect 1, leads to the interpretation that upwind Abidjan air
masses are mostly impacted by long-range transport and not local
recirculation. This interpretation is also corroborated by aircraft wind
measurements (grey arrows in Fig. 5) and back-trajectory calculations
(Fig. S5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e2007">Map <bold>(a)</bold> and plume analysis <bold>(b)</bold> for upwind of
Abidjan (rectangle 1, yellow), within the plume (rectangle 2, green) and
sampling regional aerosol (rectangle 3, white). Processing time is calculated
based on integrated wind speed and distance from Abidjan. Aircraft
measurements were carried out first sampling Abidjan plume around 09:30,
upwind of Abidjan around 10:00, and regional aerosol at 13:30 UTC (identical
to local time).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/757/2018/acp-18-757-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2025">Mean and lower and upper 95 % confidence interval of mean for
different species at the flight transects shown in Fig. 5.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species (unit)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Advecting air mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Abidjan plume</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Continental</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">113 [112–114]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">150 [147–154]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">125 [124–126]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol concentration (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">575 [523–622]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 340 [5140–5550]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1350 [1290–1420]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.37 [0.31–0.43]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.50 [0.43–0.56]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33 [0.32–0.35]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.96 [1.82–2.09]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.90 [5.45–6.35]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.91 [2.72–3.10]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IEPOX–SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.56]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.14 [2.61–3.67]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.71 [0.55–0.86]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19 [0.15–0.23]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33 [0.27–0.39]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18 [0.17–0.21]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.39 [1.32–1.47]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.23 [5.75–6.71]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.42 [1.36–1.47]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10 [0.08–0.13]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.54 [0.45–0.64]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17 [0.15–0.18]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.33 [0.24–0.42]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.50 [2.27–2.73]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.21 [0.18–0.24]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2404">In contrast to the species discussed above, BC, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON did not
show a significant enhancement over the continental region when compared to
the advecting air mass, which suggests that the regional concentrations are
not being largely impacted by local emission/formation. Taken together, the
changes in concentration of IEPOX–SOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON indicate that the former is
formed locally, whether the latter is mostly advected into the region,
possibly from<?pagebreak page764?> biomass burning, an association reported previously elsewhere
(e.g. Dzepina et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016). Furthermore, IEPOX–SOA
contributes significantly to OA concentration (mean of 27 %, CI of
21–33 %), whereas the contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON is minor (mean of 7 %,
CI of 6–9 %). It is also interesting to note that the difference in OA
concentration between continental and upwind Abidjan air masses
(0.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be almost exclusively explained by the
formation of IEPOX–SOA (0.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Interestingly, previous
estimates of biogenic SOA over West Africa, by contrasting OA concentration
in high and low isoprene air masses, has a general agreement with our
results, of the order of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Capes et al., 2009).
Back-trajectory analysis of transect 3 indicates a steady transport from the
south, over land for about 6 h prior to sampling.</p>
      <p id="d1e2498">When analysing the air mass in the outflow of Abidjan there is, as expected,
a significant concentration enhancement for several of the species discussed
here. Aerosol number concentration, for example, increases by over an order
of magnitude (Table 1), whereas OA and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase by nearly 3-fold,
and BC nearly 2-fold. The evolution of the Abidjan plume has also been
analysed according to the plume age, calculated taking into account wind
speed measured from the aircraft, and extrapolated according to the distance
from the city centre. When first crossing the Abidjan plume, at estimated
3 h  processing time, OA and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> already depict large
concentration enhancements relative to upwind Abidjan (Fig. 5a). The estimate
of IEPOX–SOA also depicts a strong increase, up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
explaining almost 60 % of OA mass at plume age of about 3.5 h.
Conversely, both NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON depict a smaller contribution to aerosol
concentration, with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depicting a mean concentration of
0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON of 0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inside
the plume.</p>
      <p id="d1e2610">As the plume evolves, overall concentration of OA and IEPOX–SOA tends to
decrease, in contrast to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> which peaks at plume age of 5.5 h. To
account for dilution with plume age, the enhancement ratio (ER) has been
calculated, i.e.  the variation of the species of interest normalized by the
enhancement of CO above the background (Fig. 5b). The background value of CO
was chosen here to be 113 ppb, the median value upwind of Abidjan. The
ER<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to increases with plume age, indicating a net
production of organic matter through this pathway. Conversely,
ER<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is fairly constant with plume processing, which suggests
that the increase in IEPOX–SOA is compensated by a loss process, such as
evaporation of semi-volatile species. The ER<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
follows a similar pattern as its concentration, depicting a marked peak at
about 5.5 h.</p>
      <p id="d1e2653">Figure 5c shows some of the diagnostic tracers of OA, namely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cubison et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2015).
Their variability mainly follows the aged signature from the arriving air
mass (high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in transect 1), an increasing tendency for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (particularly the former) with plume age, leading to observed values
of transect 3. Typical oxygen-to-carbon ratios of OA ranged from 1.43
(transect 1), 0.69 (transect 2) and 1.07 (transect 3).</p>
      <p id="d1e2734">In the following, a systematic analysis of plume identification through the
entire dataset is described, assessing changes in aerosol properties inside
and outside urban plumes within SWA.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2741">Mean and lower and upper 95 % confidence interval of mean for
different species under background and in-plume conditions for ATR42 flight
trajectories below 2000 m.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species (unit)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Background</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">In-plume</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">131 [130–132]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">176 [170–181]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32 [0.28–0.34]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.72 [1.84–3.60]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31.9 [31.7–32.1]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.2 [30.5–32.0]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol concentration (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">735 [725–745]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 480 [6025–6930]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.34 [0.33–0.35]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.68 [0.64–0.72]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.06 [3.00–3.13]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.56 [6.24–6.88]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IEPOX–SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.89 [0.74–1.04]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.80 [1.66–1.93]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.17 [0.16–0.18]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.36 [0.33–0.39]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.67 [1.64–1.70]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.86 [2.70–3.03]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.12 [0.11–0.12]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.53 [0.49–0.57]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.66 [0.63–0.68]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.29 [1.20–1.38]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>In-plume enhancements and regional background levels</title>
      <p id="d1e3124">A systematic identification of in-plume and background air masses during
DACCIWA was developed. The method is based on PMF OA apportionment, aerosol
particles number concentration and a measurement location. In-plume air
mass criteria were (i) aerosol particle number concentration is above the
campaign-wide 75th percentile, namely 2500 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; (ii) the urban factors
from the PMF analysis (see Sect. 3.1) explain more than 70 % of OA mass
concentration; and (iii) the distance between measurement location and the
emitting city was below 110 km. Criteria (i) and (ii) were devised based on
optimizing data statistics while being able to unambiguously identify the
urban conurbation of origin. The distance of 110 km applied in
criterion (iii) was defined based on the distance between Accra and Lomé,
to avoid emissions from the latter interfering in the plume analysis
of the former. Figure S7 shows the location of the measurements<?pagebreak page765?> identified as
in-plume. From the in-plume identification analysis described above,
pollution outflow from three cities were clearly identified – Lomé,
Abidjan and Accra, representing 50, 35 and 15 % of the in-plume dataset.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e3141">Regional background (marked in yellow) and in-plume concentrations
for CO and aerosol concentration <bold>(a)</bold>; OA, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
IEPOX–SOA <bold>(b)</bold>; and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON, and BC <bold>(c)</bold>. The boxplot is
the interquartile and vertical lines the 10th and 90th percentiles. The plume
data show median values (line) and interquartile (shaded area) for 20 km
distance bins.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/757/2018/acp-18-757-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3185">The identification of continental background air masses was performed by
filtering aerosol number concentration below the 50th percentile and
selecting urban factors explaining less than 70 % of OA. Sensitivity
studies have identified that lowering these limits tended to reduce data
statistics without significantly altering median values. The selection of
aerosol number concentration below 50th or 30th percentile led to a decrease
in background data points from 623 to 267, whereas median CO concentration
remained unchanged at 129 ppb. Similarly as the data described in the
previous sections, data points used in the in-plume and regional background
identification are limited to altitudes below 2000 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e3188">Figure 6 and Table 2 show the mean and CI of concentrations of a range of
species considered here. Regional background concentrations were elevated,
with average concentration of CO of 131 ppb, ozone of 32 ppb and aerosol
particle number concentration of 735 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Regarding PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
composition, OA was the most abundant species, contributing 54 %,
followed by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (24 %), NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (11 %), BC (6 %), NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(4 %) and minor contribution of Cl (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5%). Average background
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the region was 6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3276">During in-plume measurements there was a marked enhancement of pollutant
levels, e.g. aerosol concentration (6500 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), CO (176 ppb), NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(2.72 ppb) as well as PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (12.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Despite the significant enhancement in the species observed here, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
aerosol composition is strikingly similar between background and in-plume
measurements (i.e. 56 % OA, 23 % SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 11 % NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 6 %
BC, and 4 % NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corroborating the major role that these urban
conglomerate emissions have on the regional aerosol population. The analysis
according to distance shown in Fig. 6 depicts the clear decreasing trend for
some species (e.g. aerosol number concentration and BC), whereas others have
a less clear trend with ageing.</p>
      <p id="d1e3371">Generally, the levels of OA and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed here for both background
and in-plume are well within those of other aircraft field campaigns around
the world that were classified as “polluted” (i.e. non-biomass burning), as
described by Heald et al. (2011). Furthermore, measurements here can be
compared to an aircraft campaign carried out more recently downwind of Paris
(Freney et al., 2014). Although background levels over SWA are somewhat
comparable with outside plume measurements in the environs of Paris (OA:
3.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over SWA and 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around
Paris; SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over SWA and
1.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around Paris), it is clear that in-plume
concentration increases relative to the<?pagebreak page766?> outside are more important within SWA
(114 and 71 % for OA and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) than around Paris (36
and 2 % for OA and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). In the Rome metropolitan
area, slightly higher levels were observed (4.5 and
1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OA and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), albeit with
strong enhancements in these species when Saharan dust was present
(Struckmeier et al., 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e3518">Scatterplot between IEPOX–SOA concentration and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Black line
and grey area represents mean and 5 and 95 % confidence intervals of the
mean, respectively. Red and green markers are mean NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and range bars represent 5 and 95 %
confidence intervals of the mean. The data shown here include all ATR42
measurements at altitudes below 2000 m.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/757/2018/acp-18-757-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3556">As for IEPOX–SOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON, although their concentration is also enhanced
within the urban plumes relative to background levels, on average their
relative contribution to OA remains fairly constant (IEPOX–SOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OA is 0.32 and
0.28 for background and in-plume, respectively, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OA is 0.06 for
both cases). It is important to note that the contribution of the IEPOX–SOA
to OA represents a lower limit to biogenic OA. Other processes, such as
non-IEPOX isoprene SOA or monoterpene SOA, cannot be quantified under ambient
measurements due to the lack of diagnostic tracers with the AMS technology.
The next section presents an analysis of the variability of IEPOX–SOA in
regard to other species in the SWA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>IEPOX–SOA over SWA</title>
      <p id="d1e3593">As discussed in Sect. 1.1, IEPOX–SOA concentration tends to increase with
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and decrease with NO, as observed in a number of laboratory studies
(Kuwata et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016b, 2013; Riva et al., 2016; Surratt et
al., 2010). As both species, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO, originate from urban sources,
the forming potential of IEPOX–SOA is the result of a complex interplay which
will depend on emission strengths of each species, atmospheric chemical
background (including isoprene concentration) and pre-existing aerosol
properties (e.g. Marais et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e3614">In a somewhat similar setting to that presented here, i.e. a large urban
conurbation emitting pollutants over tropical forested areas, the Manaus city
plume over the Amazon rainforest has been observed to cause a net reduction
of IEPOX–SOA (de Sá et al., 2017). The general interpretation for the net
reduction effect in the Amazon is that although SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is
enhanced by Manaus emissions, its background levels from in- and out-of-basin
sources can exceed the plume enhancement itself, and thus have a stronger
controlling effect over the IEPOX–SOA forming potential. Conversely, the
concentration of NO is unambiguously modulated by the Manaus emission and
thus the net decreasing effect over IEPOX–SOA.</p>
      <p id="d1e3626">The southeast US is also significantly impacted by IEPOX–SOA formation, where
it explains about one-third of ambient OA in urban and rural areas
(Budisulistiorini et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015). Typically, measurements in
the region have found a strong correlation of IEPOX–SOA and sulfate (e.g. Hu
et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015), and the latter has been previously
hypothesized to drive IEPOX–SOA formation through nucleophilic addition
leading to organosulfates (Xu et al., 2015). More recently, detailed
aqueous-phase IEPOX–SOA simulation in the region has proposed that the latter
is a less efficient pathway, and sulfate would be in fact enhancing
IEPOX–SOA formation by increasing the aqueous aerosol volume and acidity
(Marais et al., 2016). Furthermore, an important outcome has been that
further reducing SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in the region is expected to lead to a
significant reduction in aerosol mass concentration via both sulfate and
IEPOX–SOA (Budisulistiorini et al., 2017; Marais et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e3638">Although we show in the previous sections a significant enhancement of
IEPOX–SOA within urban plumes (particularly during the Abidjan flight
described in Sect. 3.1), it is unclear how its regional concentration
responds to different SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OA and NO concentrations. To assess the
general variability throughout the region, the concentration of IEPOX–SOA,
its fractional contribution to OA (termed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are analysed as a function of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(Fig. 7). Although NO would be the species expected to modulate the early
stages of IEPOX formation (Sect. 1.1), NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been chosen for this
analysis due to its longer lifetime –  thus being considered more representative
of aerosol chemical history.</p>
      <p id="d1e3689">Interestingly, IEPOX–SOA concentrations show a significant, steady increase
with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the concentration range observed during DACCIWA,
seemingly unaffected by the concomitant NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variation (which increases
from 0.3 to 5.3 ppb). A linear fit between SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and IEPOX–SOA yields a
correlation coefficient of 0.42, comparable to the Southeast US (0.58; Marais
et al., 2016) and Amazonia (0.61; de Sá et al., 2017), despite large
differences in atmospheric background, pollution sources and sampling
platform (aircraft/ground-based measurements). Despite the linear increase in
IEPOX–SOA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows, however, a fairly small dependence
on SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with mean values
around 0.23 and, above this SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level, a sharp increase to 0.56.
Although a detailed analysis of the factors controlling IEPOX–SOA
concentration (e.g. acidity, particle<?pagebreak page767?> water, aerosol surface) is
outside the scope of this work, the fact that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
constant despite significant changes in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over a wide range of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an indication
that neither NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are alone controlling the concentration of
IEPOX–SOA in the region. We speculate thus that it is mainly driven by the
amount of pre-existing aerosol surface (e.g. Xu et al., 2016),
instead of aerosol intrinsic chemical composition. Correspondingly, the sharp
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the high
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range can then be interpreted as a
change of driving mechanism in IEPOX–SOA formation, with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> taking a
leading role in IEPOX–SOA formation. The overall conclusion is that under
background and most of the in-plume atmospheric conditions, IEPOX–SOA
contributes to about 25–30 % of OA, although if SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> eventually has a
larger contribution to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, so will IEPOX–SOA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3919">As part of the DACCIWA project, aircraft measurements were conducted over SWA
during June–July 2016 with a broad objective of assessing the role of
anthropogenic emissions on regional climate. Understanding the aerosol
sources in the region is the first step in being able to both represent
current and future scenarios in the state-of-the-art chemistry numerical
models and to develop efficient abatement strategies. This study
focuses on aerosol sources within the atmospheric boundary layer
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m), particularly the coupling of emissions from large urban
conglomerates with local biogenic emissions. PMF analysis of OA mass spectra
has identified three factors, from which two are linked to urban emissions
(fresh and aged) and another, more regionally homogeneous highly oxygenated
(OOA factor). The latter is often important, if not dominating, with
background median contribution to OA of 67 %, and in-plume of 38 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e3929">The analysis of a case study has allowed the direct and regional impacts of
SWA emissions on the aerosol composition of an advecting air mass from the
Gulf of Guinea to be inferred. Results show that a significant formation of
IEPOX–SOA occurs within the Abidjan urban plume
(2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where it explains the majority of OA mass.
When considering observations conducted outside of the Abidjan plume, i.e.
over large, mainly forested areas (representative of so-called background
continental areas), IEPOX–SOA explained about 25 % of the OA mass, namely
0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is interesting to note that the increase in OA
over the forested areas in comparison to the advecting air mass can be almost
entirely explained by the formation of IEPOX–SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A similar analysis for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON has
identified no quantifiable change between incoming oceanic (upwind Abidjan)
and continental air masses (0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to the
conclusion that this species is not locally formed, but mostly advected into
the region.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e4040">A systematic analysis of in-plume and regional background air masses has been
carried out using the ATR42 dataset below 2000 m. Regional background
concentrations are fairly polluted, with average concentration of CO of
131 ppb, ozone of 32 ppb and aerosol number concentration of
735 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Regarding PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> composition, OA was the most abundant
species, contributing 54 %, followed by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (24 %) and minor
contribution of other species. Mean background PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the region was
5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. During in-plume measurements there was a marked
enhancement of pollutant levels, e.g. aerosol particles number concentration
(6500 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO (176 ppb) and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.72 ppb), as well as
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (12.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerosol chemical
composition is comparable between background and in-plume, likely the result
of a significant impact of anthropogenic emissions scattered through the
region even under the so-called background conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4157">The concentration of IEPOX–SOA has been studied according to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, in order to assess how these species might impact IEPOX–SOA
concentration. Interestingly, the fractional contribution of IEPOX–SOA to OA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is fairly constant (25–30 %) for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration from 0.5 up to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> average
variability between 0.5 and 2 ppb). This contribution of IEPOX–SOA to OA is
considered a lower limit for biogenic OA, as other species such as non-IEPOX
isoprene SOA and monoterpene SOA cannot be quantified independently by the
techniques employed here. For higher concentrations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IEPOX–SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sharply increases up
to 55 %. Put together, we interpret that for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
below 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, neither NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nor SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seems to be
significantly affecting the concentration of IEPOX–SOA in the region, and
above this threshold, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> takes a leading role on IEPOX–SOA formation.
Such PM-forming mechanisms must be considered in present and future
scenarios, as gains from reducing primary OA emissions (such as reduction of
waste burning) without reducing SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions might lead to enhanced
IEPOX–SOA formation, thus cancelling out possible gain in terms of PM levels.
As it stands, the results presented here from the DACCIWA aircraft campaign
warrants systematic long-term measurements in carefully selected areas
throughout SWA to assess with high degree of certainty how changes in the
anthropogenic emissions profile shall impact aerosol burden in this
fast-changing, highly sensitive region.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4349">The data used here can be accessed using the DACCIWA
database at <uri>http://baobab.sedoo.fr/DACCIWA/</uri>.  An embargo period of
2 years after the upload applies. After that, external users can access the
data in the same way as DACCIWA participants before that time. Before
the end of the embargo period, external users can request the release of
individual datasets. It is planned for DACCIWA data to get DOIs, but this
has not been realized for all datasets yet.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4355">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-757-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-757-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4364">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e4370">This article is part of the special issue “Results of the
project `Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa'
(DACCIWA) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a
conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4376">The research leading to these results has received funding from the European
Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement
no. 603502. The authors would also like to extend special thanks to the
pilots and flight crew from SAFIRE for all their enthusiasm and support
during the measurement campaign aboard the ATR42 aircraft. The authors
acknowledge Christiane Schulz and Johannes Schneider for the scientific input
and text revision. Pamela Dominutti thanks the CNPq and PVE-CAPES programme for
financial support during her international exchange. Cyrielle Denjean thanks the
Centre National des Etudes Spatiales (CNES) for financial support.
Anneke M. Batenburg acknowledges internal funds of the Max Planck Institute for
Chemistry in Mainz as well.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:
Dominick Spracklen<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfarra, M. R. R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna,
M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: A generalised method for the
extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Morgan, W. T., Darbyshire, E., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I.,
Oram, D. E., Artaxo, P., Brito, J., Lee, J. D., and Coe, H.: Airborne
observations of IEPOX-derived isoprene SOA in the Amazon during SAMBBA,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11393–11407,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bahreini, R., Dunlea, E. J., Matthew, B. M., Simons, C., Docherty, K. S.,
DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Design
and Operation of a Pressure-Controlled Inlet for Airborne Sampling with an
Aerodynamic Aerosol Lens, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 42, 465–471,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802178514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802178514</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bechara, J., Borbon, A., Jambert, C., Colomb, A., and Perros, P. E.: Evidence
of the impact of deep convection on reactive Volatile Organic Compounds in
the upper tropical troposphere during the AMMA experiment in West Africa,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10321–10334,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10321-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10321-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brito, J., Rizzo, L. V., Morgan, W. T., Coe, H., Johnson, B., Haywood, J.,
Longo, K., Freitas, S., Andreae, M. O., and Artaxo, P.: Ground-based aerosol
characterization during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA)
field experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12069–12083,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S. S. and Stutz, J.: Nighttime radical observations and chemistry,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6405–6447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35181a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35181a</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., Perraud, V., Zelenyuk, A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu,
Y., Imre, D., Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., and Alexander, M. L.: Comparison of
FTIR and particle mass spectrometry for the measurement of particulate
organic nitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1056–1061,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es9029864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es9029864</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y.
J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A.,
Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic
emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the
2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee
ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Capes, G., Murphy, J. G., Reeves, C. E., McQuaid, J. B., Hamilton, J. F.,
Hopkins, J. R., Crosier, J., Williams, P. I., and Coe, H.: Secondary organic
aerosol from biogenic VOCs over West Africa during AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 3841–3850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3841-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3841-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Capouet, M. and Müller, J.-F.: A group contribution method for estimating
the vapour pressures of a-pinene oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
1455–1467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1455-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1455-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173–1176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092805" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092805</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>de Oliveira Alves, N., Vessoni, A. T., Quinet, A., Fortunato, R. S.,
Kajitani, G. S., Peixoto, M. S., Hacon, S. de S., Artaxo, P., Saldiva, P.,
Menck, C. F. M., and Batistuzzo de Medeiros, S. R.: Biomass burning in the
Amazon region causes DNA damage and cell death in human lung cells, Sci.
Rep., 7, 10937, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11024-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-11024-3</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page769?><ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Newburn, M.
K., Hu, W., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Thalman, R., Brito, J.,
Carbone, S., Artaxo, P., Goldstein, A. H., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F.,
Mei, F., Shilling, J. E., Springston, S. R., Wang, J., Surratt, J. D.,
Alexander, M. L., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Influence of urban
pollution on the production of organic particulate matter from isoprene
epoxydiols in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6611–6629,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Drewnick, F., Hings, S. S., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., and Borrmann,
S.: Aerosol quantification with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer:
detection limits and ionizer background effects, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2,
33–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-33-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-33-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dzepina, K., Mazzoleni, C., Fialho, P., China, S., Zhang, B., Owen, R. C.,
Helmig, D., Hueber, J., Kumar, S., Perlinger, J. A., Kramer, L. J., Dziobak,
M. P., Ampadu, M. T., Olsen, S., Wuebbles, D. J., and Mazzoleni, L. R.:
Molecular characterization of free tropospheric aerosol collected at the Pico
Mountain Observatory: a case study with a long-range transported biomass
burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5047–5068,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B. and Volkamer, R.: Glyoxal processing by aerosol multiphase
chemistry: towards a kinetic modeling framework of secondary organic aerosol
formation in aqueous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8219–8244,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J.
H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass
spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for
atmospheric chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912340107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0912340107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Ferreira, J., Reeves, C. E., Murphy, J. G., Garcia-Carreras, L., Parker, D.
J., and Oram, D. E.: Isoprene emissions modelling for West Africa: MEGAN
model evaluation and sensitivity analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8453–8467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Flamant, C., Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Akpo, A., Brooks, B., Chiu, C. J.,
Coe, H., Danuor, S., Evans, M., Jegede, O., Kalthoff, N., Konaré, A.,
Liousse, C., Lohou, F., Mari, C., Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., Adler,
B., Amekudzi, L., Aryee, J., Ayoola, M., Batenburg, A. M., Bessardon, G.,
Borrmann, S., Brito, J., Bower, K., Burnet, F., Catoire, V., Colomb, A.,
Denjean, C., Fosu-Amankwah, K., Hill, P. G., Lee, J., Lothon, M., Maranan,
M., Marsham, J., Meynadier, R., Ngamini, J., Rosenberg, P., Sauer, D., Smith,
V., Stratmann, G., Taylor, J. W., Voigt, C., and Yoboué, V.: The
Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa field campaign:
Overview and research highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 83–104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Freney, E. J., Sellegri, K., Canonaco, F., Colomb, A., Borbon, A., Michoud,
V., Doussin, J.-F., Crumeyrolle, S., Amarouche, N., Pichon, J.-M., Bourianne,
T., Gomes, L., Prevot, A. S. H., Beekmann, M., and Schwarzenböeck, A.:
Characterizing the impact of urban emissions on regional aerosol particles:
airborne measurements during the MEGAPOLI experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1397–1412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1397-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1397-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Frey, W., Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., de Reus, M., Schlager, H.,
Roiger, A., Voigt, C., Hoor, P., Curtius, J., Krämer, M., Schiller, C.,
Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Fierli, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Ulanovsky, A.,
Ravegnani, F., Sitnikov, N. M., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Shur, G. N.,
Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: In situ measurements of tropical
cloud properties in the West African Monsoon: upper tropospheric ice clouds,
Mesoscale Convective System outflow, and subvisual cirrus, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 5569–5590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Draper, D. C., Barsanti, K. C., Smith, J. N., Ortega, J.,
Winkler, P. M., Lawler, M. J., Brown, S. S., Edwards, P. M., Cohen, R. C.,
and Lee, L.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation and Organic Nitrate Yield
from NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Oxidation of Biogenic Hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11944–11953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502204x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502204x</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A.,
Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R.,
Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., and Townshend, J. R.
G.: High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change, Science,
342, 850–853, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1244693</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Coe, H., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Bahreini, R.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Russell, L. M., Jolleys, M., Fu, T.-M., Allan, J. D.,
Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Morgan, W. T., Robinson, N. H.,
Williams, P. I., Cubison, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., and Dunlea, E. J.: Exploring
the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft
field campaigns with a global model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12673–12696,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hinks, M. L., Brady, M. V, Lignell, H., Song, M., Grayson, J. W., Bertram, A.
K., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Effect of
viscosity on photodegradation rates in complex secondary organic aerosol
materials, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 8785–8793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05226B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP05226B</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes,
P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S.,
McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M.,
Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D.,
Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss,
A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A.,
Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a
real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol
(IEPOX–SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 11807–11833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page770?><ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Jacobs, M. I., Burke, W. J., and Elrod, M. J.: Kinetics of the reactions of
isoprene-derived hydroxynitrates: gas phase epoxide formation and solution
phase hydrolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8933–8946,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mensah, A. A., Friese, E., Topping, D., Nemitz, E.,
Prevot, A. S. H., Äijälä, M., Allan, J., Canonaco, F.,
Canagaratna, M., Carbone, S., Crippa, M., Dall Osto, M., Day, D. A., De
Carlo, P., Di Marco, C. F., Elbern, H., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hao, L.,
Herrmann, H., Hildebrandt, L., Hillamo, R., Jimenez, J. L., Laaksonen, A.,
McFiggans, G., Mohr, C., O'Dowd, C., Otjes, R., Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S.
N., Poulain, L., Schlag, P., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P.,
Vermeulen, A., Wahner, A., Worsnop, D., and Wu, H.-C.: Ubiquity of organic
nitrates from nighttime chemistry in the European submicron aerosol, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 43, 7735–7744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069239</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kjaergaard, H. G., Knap, H. C., Ørnsø, K. B., Jørgensen, S.,
Crounse, J. D., Paulot, F., and Wennberg, P. O.: Atmospheric fate of
methacrolein, 2. Formation of lactone and implications for organic aerosol
production, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 5763–5768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp210853h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp210853h</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Coe, H., Chiu, J. C., Evans, M. J., Fink, A. H., Kalthoff, N.,
Liousse, C., Mari, C., Allan, R. P., Brooks, B., Danour, S., Flamant, C.,
Jegede, O. O., Lohou, F., and Marsham, J. H.: The dacciwa project:
Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1451–1460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00108.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00108.1</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Evans, M. J., Field, P. R., Fink, A. H., Liousse, C., and
Marsham, J. H.: The possible role of local air pollution in climate change in
West Africa, Nat. Clim. Chang., 5, 815–822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2727</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Deroubaix, A., Morris, E., Tocquer, F., Evans, M.
J., Flamant, C., Gaetani, M., Lavaysse, C., Mari, C., Marsham, J. H.,
Meynadier, R., Affo-Dogo, A., Bahaga, T., Brosse, F., Deetz, K., Guebsi, R.,
Latifou, I., Maranan, M., Rosenberg, P. D., and Schlueter, A.: A
meteorological and chemical overview of the DACCIWA field campaign in West
Africa in June–July 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10893–10918,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Krechmer, J. E., Coggon, M. M., Massoli, P., Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D.,
Hu, W., Day, D. A., Tyndall, G. S., Henze, D. K., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Nowak,
J. B., Kimmel, J. R., Mauldin, R. L., Stark, H., Jayne, J. T., Sipilä,
M., Junninen, H., Clair, J. M. St., Zhang, X., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L.,
Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., Keutsch, F. N., Wennberg, P. O., Seinfeld, J.
H., Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Formation of Low
Volatility Organic Compounds and Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene
Hydroxyhydroperoxide Low-NO Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
10330–10339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02031</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using Elemental Ratios to Predict
the Density of Organic Material Composed of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202525q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202525q</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Liu, Y., McKinney, K., and Martin, S. T.: Physical state and
acidity of inorganic sulfate can regulate the production of secondary organic
material from isoprene photooxidation products, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17,
5670–5678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP04942J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C4CP04942J</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lebel, T., Parker, D. J., Flamant, C., Bourlès, B., Marticorena, B.,
Mougin, E., Peugeot, C., Diedhiou, A., Haywood, J. M., Ngamini, J. B.,
Polcher, J., Redelsperger, J. L., and Thorncroft, C. D.: The AMMA field
campaigns: Multiscale and multidisciplinary observations in the West African
region, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 8–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.486</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lee, B. H., Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Lee,
L., Romer, P., Cohen, R. C., Iyer, S., Kurten, T., Hu, W., Day, D. A.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Guo, H., Weber, R. J.,
Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Koss, A., de Gouw, J., Olson, K., Goldstein, A.
H., Seco, R., Kim, S., McAvey, K., Shepson, P. B., Starn, T., Baumann, K.,
Edgerton, E. S., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Miller, D. O., Brune, W.,
Schobesberger, S., D'Ambro, E. L., and Thornton, J. A.: Highly functionalized
organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution to secondary
organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
1516–1521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1508108113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H.,
Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D.,
and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical
forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06870</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lide, D. R. (Ed.): CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics. A ready-reference book of chemical and physical
data, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 72nd edn., ISBN: 0849304725,
2486 pp., 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y.-H., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S., Shaw, S. L., and Surratt, J.
D.: Investigating the influences of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels on
isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation using conditional
sampling approaches, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8457–8470,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8457-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8457-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Liousse, C., Assamoi, E., Criqui, P., Granier, C., and Rosset, R.: Explosive
growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 35003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Brito, J., Dorris, M. R., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Seco, R., Bates, K.
H., Artaxo, P., Duvoisin, S., Keutsch, F. N., Kim, S., Goldstein, A. H.,
Guenther, A. B., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F., Springston, S. R., Watson, T.
B., McKinney, K. A., and Martin, S. T.: Isoprene photochemistry over the
Amazon rainforest, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 6125–6130,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524136113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1524136113</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Kuwata, M., McKinney, K. A., and Martin, S. T.: Uptake and release
of gaseous species accompanying the reactions of isoprene photo-oxidation
products with sulfate particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 1595–1600,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP04551G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP04551G</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y. J., Herdlinger-Blatt, I., McKinney, K. A., and Martin, S. T.:
Production of methyl vinyl ketone and methacrolein via the hydroperoxyl
pathway of isoprene oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5715–5730,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5715-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5715-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page771?><ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A.,
Hu, W., Krechmer, J., Zhu, L., Kim, P. S., Miller, C. C., Fisher, J. A.,
Travis, K., Yu, K., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Arkinson, H. L., Pye, H. O.
T., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., and McNeill, V. F.: Aqueous-phase mechanism for
secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the
southeast United States and co-benefit of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission controls, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 1603–1618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Mari, C. H., Cailley, G., Corre, L., Saunois, M., Attié, J. L., Thouret,
V., and Stohl, A.: Tracing biomass burning plumes from the Southern
Hemisphere during the AMMA 2006 wet season experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
3951–3961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3951-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3951-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46,
258–271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, J. G., Oram, D. E., and Reeves, C. E.: Measurements of volatile
organic compounds over West Africa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5281–5294,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Nah, T., Sanchez, J., Boyd, C. M., and Ng, N. L.: Photochemical Aging of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene Secondary Organic Aerosol formed from
Nitrate Radical Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 222–231,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04594" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b04594</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D.
R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Brown, S. S., Archibald, A. T., Atlas, E., Cohen, R. C., Crowley,
J. N., Day, D. A., Donahue, N. M., Fry, J. L., Fuchs, H., Griffin, R. J.,
Guzman, M. I., Herrmann, H., Hodzic, A., Iinuma, Y., Jimenez, J. L.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Lee, B. H., Luecken, D. J., Mao, J., McLaren, R.,
Mutzel, A., Osthoff, H. D., Ouyang, B., Picquet-Varrault, B., Platt, U., Pye,
H. O. T., Rudich, Y., Schwantes, R. H., Shiraiwa, M., Stutz, J., Thornton, J.
A., Tilgner, A., Williams, B. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Nitrate radicals and
biogenic volatile organic compounds: oxidation, mechanisms, and organic
aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2103–2162,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2103-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2103-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl
peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP02001H</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/env.3170050203</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D. B., Zachariah, M. R., and Mcmurry, P. H.: Measurement
of inherent material density of nanoparticle agglomerates, J. Nanoparticle
Res., 6, 267–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu, Y., Alexander, M.
L., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Chang, W. L., Dabdub, D., Pankow, J. F., and
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol
formation and growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 109, 2836–2841,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119909109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1119909109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Reeves, C. E., Formenti, P., Afif, C., Ancellet, G., Attié, J.-L.,
Bechara, J., Borbon, A., Cairo, F., Coe, H., Crumeyrolle, S., Fierli, F.,
Flamant, C., Gomes, L., Hamburger, T., Jambert, C., Law, K. S., Mari, C.,
Jones, R. L., Matsuki, A., Mead, M. I., Methven, J., Mills, G. P., Minikin,
A., Murphy, J. G., Nielsen, J. K., Oram, D. E., Parker, D. J., Richter, A.,
Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., and Thouret, V.: Chemical and aerosol
characterisation of the troposphere over West Africa during the monsoon
period as part of AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7575–7601,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., D'Ambro, E. L.,
Zhang, X., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Thornton, J. A., Canagaratna, M. R., and
Surratt, J. D.: Chemical characterization of secondary organic aerosol from
oxidation of isoprene hydroxyhydroperoxides, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
9889–9899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02511</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, N. H., Hamilton, J. F., Allan, J. D., Langford, B., Oram, D. E.,
Chen, Q., Docherty, K., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J. L., Ward, M. W., Hewitt,
C. N., Barley, M. H., Jenkin, M. E., Rickard, A. R., Martin, S. T.,
McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Evidence for a significant proportion of
Secondary Organic Aerosol from isoprene above a maritime tropical forest,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1039–1050, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1039-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1039-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T.,
Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J.,
Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R.,
Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding
secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev.
Geophys., 55, 509–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000540</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Struckmeier, C., Drewnick, F., Fachinger, F., Gobbi, G. P., and Borrmann, S.:
Atmospheric aerosols in Rome, Italy: sources, dynamics and spatial variations
during two seasons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15277–15299,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15277-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15277-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M., Loza, C. L.,
Kwan, A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911114107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Verma, S. K., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Fu, P., and Zhu, C.: Thirteen years of
observations on biomass burning organic tracers over Chichijima Island in the
western North Pacific: An outflow region of Asian aerosols, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 4155–4168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022224</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol
characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution
aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol
composition and sources with a<?pagebreak page772?> focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 7307–7336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Guo, H., Boyd, C. M., Klein, M., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M.,
Hite, J. R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Kreisberg, N. M., Knote, C., Olson, K.,
Koss, A., Goldstein, A. H., Hering, S. V., de Gouw, J., Baumann, K., Lee,
S.-H., Nenes, A., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Effects of anthropogenic
emissions on aerosol formation from isoprene and monoterpenes in the
southeastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 37–42,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417609112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1417609112</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Middlebrook, A. M., Liao, J., de Gouw, J. A., Guo, H., Weber, R. J.,
Nenes, A., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lee, B. H., Thornton, J. A., Brock, C. A.,
Neuman, J. A., Nowak, J. B., Pollack, I. B., Welti, A., Graus, M., Warneke,
C., and Ng, N. L.: Enhanced formation of isoprene-derived organic aerosol in
sulfur-rich power plant plumes during Southeast Nexus, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 11137–11153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025156</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. K., Cheng, M. T., Ji, D. S., Liu, Z. R., Hu, B., Sun, Y., and Wang,
Y. S.: Characterization of submicron particles during biomass burning and
coal combustion periods in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 562,
812–821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.015</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: A review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Assessing the role of anthropogenic and biogenic sources on PM<sub>1</sub> over southern West Africa using aircraft measurements</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>As part of the Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa
(DACCIWA) project, an airborne campaign was designed to measure a large range
of atmospheric constituents, focusing on the effect of anthropogenic
emissions on regional climate. The presented study details results of the
French ATR42 research aircraft, which aimed to characterize gas-phase,
aerosol and cloud properties in the region during the field campaign carried
out in June/July 2016 in combination with the German Falcon 20 and the
British Twin Otter aircraft. The aircraft flight paths covered large areas of
Benin, Togo, Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire, focusing on emissions from large urban
conurbations such as Abidjan, Accra and Lomé, as well as remote
continental areas and the Gulf of Guinea. This paper focuses on aerosol
particle measurements within the boundary layer ( &lt; &thinsp;2000&thinsp;m), in
particular their sources and chemical composition in view of the complex mix
of both biogenic and anthropogenic emissions, based on measurements from a
compact time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (C-ToF-AMS) and ancillary
instrumentation.</p><p>Background concentrations (i.e. outside urban plumes) observed from the ATR42
indicate a fairly polluted region during the time of the campaign, with
average concentrations of carbon monoxide of 131&thinsp;ppb, ozone of 32&thinsp;ppb, and
aerosol particle number concentration ( &gt; &thinsp;15&thinsp;nm) of 735&thinsp;cm<sup>−3</sup>&thinsp;stp.
Regarding submicron aerosol composition (considering non-refractory species
and black carbon, BC), organic aerosol (OA) is the most abundant species
contributing 53&thinsp;%, followed by SO<sub>4</sub> (27&thinsp;%), NH<sub>4</sub> (11&thinsp;%),
BC (6&thinsp;%), NO<sub>3</sub> (2&thinsp;%) and minor contribution of Cl
( &lt; &thinsp;0.5&thinsp;%). Average background PM<sub>1</sub> in the region was
5.9&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>&thinsp;stp. During measurements of urban pollution
plumes, mainly focusing on the outflow of Abidjan, Accra and Lomé,
pollutants are significantly enhanced (e.g. average concentration of CO of
176&thinsp;ppb, and aerosol particle number concentration of 6500&thinsp;cm<sup>−3</sup>&thinsp;stp),
as well as PM<sub>1</sub> concentration (11.9&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>&thinsp;stp).</p><p>Two classes of organic aerosols were estimated based on C-ToF-AMS:
particulate organic nitrates (<i>p</i>ONs) and isoprene epoxydiols secondary
organic aerosols (IEPOX–SOA). Both classes are usually associated with the
formation of particulate matter through complex interactions of anthropogenic
and biogenic sources. During DACCIWA, <i>p</i>ONs have a fairly small contribution
to OA (around 5&thinsp;%) and are more associated with long-range transport from
central Africa than local formation. Conversely, IEPOX–SOA provides a
significant contribution to OA (around 24 and 28&thinsp;% under background and
in-plume conditions). Furthermore, the fractional contribution of IEPOX–SOA
is largely unaffected by changes in the aerosol composition (particularly the
SO<sub>4</sub> concentration), which suggests that IEPOX–SOA concentration is
mainly driven by pre-existing aerosol surface, instead of aerosol chemical
properties. At times of large in-plume SO<sub>4</sub> enhancements (above
5&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>), the fractional contribution of IEPOX–SOA to OA
increases above 50&thinsp;%, suggesting only then a change in the IEPOX–SOA-controlling mechanism. It is important to note that IEPOX–SOA constitutes a
lower limit to the contribution of biogenic OA, given that other processes
(e.g. non-IEPOX isoprene, monoterpene SOA) are likely in the region. Given
the significant contribution to aerosol concentration, it is crucial that
such complex biogenic–anthropogenic interactions are taken into account in
both present-day and future scenario models of this fast-changing, highly
sensitive region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Delia, A. E., Coe, H., Bower, K. N., Alfarra, M. R. R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Middlebrook, A. M., Drewnick, F., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna,
M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: A generalised method for the
extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer data, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 909–922,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.007</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Morgan, W. T., Darbyshire, E., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I.,
Oram, D. E., Artaxo, P., Brito, J., Lee, J. D., and Coe, H.: Airborne
observations of IEPOX-derived isoprene SOA in the Amazon during SAMBBA,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11393–11407,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bahreini, R., Dunlea, E. J., Matthew, B. M., Simons, C., Docherty, K. S.,
DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Design
and Operation of a Pressure-Controlled Inlet for Airborne Sampling with an
Aerodynamic Aerosol Lens, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 42, 465–471,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802178514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802178514</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bechara, J., Borbon, A., Jambert, C., Colomb, A., and Perros, P. E.: Evidence
of the impact of deep convection on reactive Volatile Organic Compounds in
the upper tropical troposphere during the AMMA experiment in West Africa,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10321–10334,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10321-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10321-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brito, J., Rizzo, L. V., Morgan, W. T., Coe, H., Johnson, B., Haywood, J.,
Longo, K., Freitas, S., Andreae, M. O., and Artaxo, P.: Ground-based aerosol
characterization during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA)
field experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12069–12083,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, S. S. and Stutz, J.: Nighttime radical observations and chemistry,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6405–6447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35181a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35181a</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bruns, E. A., Perraud, V., Zelenyuk, A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu,
Y., Imre, D., Finlayson-Pitts, B. J., and Alexander, M. L.: Comparison of
FTIR and particle mass spectrometry for the measurement of particulate
organic nitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1056–1061,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es9029864" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es9029864</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y.
J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A.,
Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic
emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the
2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee
ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Capes, G., Murphy, J. G., Reeves, C. E., McQuaid, J. B., Hamilton, J. F.,
Hopkins, J. R., Crosier, J., Williams, P. I., and Coe, H.: Secondary organic
aerosol from biogenic VOCs over West Africa during AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 3841–3850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3841-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3841-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Capouet, M. and Müller, J.-F.: A group contribution method for estimating
the vapour pressures of a-pinene oxidation products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
1455–1467, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1455-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1455-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173–1176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092805" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092805</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
de Oliveira Alves, N., Vessoni, A. T., Quinet, A., Fortunato, R. S.,
Kajitani, G. S., Peixoto, M. S., Hacon, S. de S., Artaxo, P., Saldiva, P.,
Menck, C. F. M., and Batistuzzo de Medeiros, S. R.: Biomass burning in the
Amazon region causes DNA damage and cell death in human lung cells, Sci.
Rep., 7, 10937, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11024-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11024-3</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Newburn, M.
K., Hu, W., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Thalman, R., Brito, J.,
Carbone, S., Artaxo, P., Goldstein, A. H., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F.,
Mei, F., Shilling, J. E., Springston, S. R., Wang, J., Surratt, J. D.,
Alexander, M. L., Jimenez, J. L., and Martin, S. T.: Influence of urban
pollution on the production of organic particulate matter from isoprene
epoxydiols in central Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6611–6629,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6611-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Drewnick, F., Hings, S. S., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., and Borrmann,
S.: Aerosol quantification with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer:
detection limits and ionizer background effects, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2,
33–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-33-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-33-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dzepina, K., Mazzoleni, C., Fialho, P., China, S., Zhang, B., Owen, R. C.,
Helmig, D., Hueber, J., Kumar, S., Perlinger, J. A., Kramer, L. J., Dziobak,
M. P., Ampadu, M. T., Olsen, S., Wuebbles, D. J., and Mazzoleni, L. R.:
Molecular characterization of free tropospheric aerosol collected at the Pico
Mountain Observatory: a case study with a long-range transported biomass
burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5047–5068,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B. and Volkamer, R.: Glyoxal processing by aerosol multiphase
chemistry: towards a kinetic modeling framework of secondary organic aerosol
formation in aqueous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8219–8244,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J.
H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass
spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for
atmospheric chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912340107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912340107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ferreira, J., Reeves, C. E., Murphy, J. G., Garcia-Carreras, L., Parker, D.
J., and Oram, D. E.: Isoprene emissions modelling for West Africa: MEGAN
model evaluation and sensitivity analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8453–8467, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Flamant, C., Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Akpo, A., Brooks, B., Chiu, C. J.,
Coe, H., Danuor, S., Evans, M., Jegede, O., Kalthoff, N., Konaré, A.,
Liousse, C., Lohou, F., Mari, C., Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., Adler,
B., Amekudzi, L., Aryee, J., Ayoola, M., Batenburg, A. M., Bessardon, G.,
Borrmann, S., Brito, J., Bower, K., Burnet, F., Catoire, V., Colomb, A.,
Denjean, C., Fosu-Amankwah, K., Hill, P. G., Lee, J., Lothon, M., Maranan,
M., Marsham, J., Meynadier, R., Ngamini, J., Rosenberg, P., Sauer, D., Smith,
V., Stratmann, G., Taylor, J. W., Voigt, C., and Yoboué, V.: The
Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa field campaign:
Overview and research highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 83–104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Freney, E. J., Sellegri, K., Canonaco, F., Colomb, A., Borbon, A., Michoud,
V., Doussin, J.-F., Crumeyrolle, S., Amarouche, N., Pichon, J.-M., Bourianne,
T., Gomes, L., Prevot, A. S. H., Beekmann, M., and Schwarzenböeck, A.:
Characterizing the impact of urban emissions on regional aerosol particles:
airborne measurements during the MEGAPOLI experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1397–1412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1397-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1397-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, W., Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., de Reus, M., Schlager, H.,
Roiger, A., Voigt, C., Hoor, P., Curtius, J., Krämer, M., Schiller, C.,
Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Fierli, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Ulanovsky, A.,
Ravegnani, F., Sitnikov, N. M., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Shur, G. N.,
Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: In situ measurements of tropical
cloud properties in the West African Monsoon: upper tropospheric ice clouds,
Mesoscale Convective System outflow, and subvisual cirrus, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 5569–5590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fry, J. L., Draper, D. C., Barsanti, K. C., Smith, J. N., Ortega, J.,
Winkler, P. M., Lawler, M. J., Brown, S. S., Edwards, P. M., Cohen, R. C.,
and Lee, L.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation and Organic Nitrate Yield
from NO<sub>3</sub> Oxidation of Biogenic Hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11944–11953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502204x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502204x</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A.,
Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R.,
Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., and Townshend, J. R.
G.: High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change, Science,
342, 850–853, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Coe, H., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Bahreini, R.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Russell, L. M., Jolleys, M., Fu, T.-M., Allan, J. D.,
Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Morgan, W. T., Robinson, N. H.,
Williams, P. I., Cubison, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., and Dunlea, E. J.: Exploring
the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft
field campaigns with a global model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12673–12696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hinks, M. L., Brady, M. V, Lignell, H., Song, M., Grayson, J. W., Bertram, A.
K., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Effect of
viscosity on photodegradation rates in complex secondary organic aerosol
materials, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 8785–8793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05226B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05226B</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes,
P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S.,
McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M.,
Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D.,
Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss,
A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A.,
Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a
real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol
(IEPOX–SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 11807–11833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobs, M. I., Burke, W. J., and Elrod, M. J.: Kinetics of the reactions of
isoprene-derived hydroxynitrates: gas phase epoxide formation and solution
phase hydrolysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8933–8946,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8933-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mensah, A. A., Friese, E., Topping, D., Nemitz, E.,
Prevot, A. S. H., Äijälä, M., Allan, J., Canonaco, F.,
Canagaratna, M., Carbone, S., Crippa, M., Dall Osto, M., Day, D. A., De
Carlo, P., Di Marco, C. F., Elbern, H., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hao, L.,
Herrmann, H., Hildebrandt, L., Hillamo, R., Jimenez, J. L., Laaksonen, A.,
McFiggans, G., Mohr, C., O'Dowd, C., Otjes, R., Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S.
N., Poulain, L., Schlag, P., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P.,
Vermeulen, A., Wahner, A., Worsnop, D., and Wu, H.-C.: Ubiquity of organic
nitrates from nighttime chemistry in the European submicron aerosol, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 43, 7735–7744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069239</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kjaergaard, H. G., Knap, H. C., Ørnsø, K. B., Jørgensen, S.,
Crounse, J. D., Paulot, F., and Wennberg, P. O.: Atmospheric fate of
methacrolein, 2. Formation of lactone and implications for organic aerosol
production, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 5763–5768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp210853h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp210853h</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Knippertz, P., Coe, H., Chiu, J. C., Evans, M. J., Fink, A. H., Kalthoff, N.,
Liousse, C., Mari, C., Allan, R. P., Brooks, B., Danour, S., Flamant, C.,
Jegede, O. O., Lohou, F., and Marsham, J. H.: The dacciwa project:
Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1451–1460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00108.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00108.1</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Knippertz, P., Evans, M. J., Field, P. R., Fink, A. H., Liousse, C., and
Marsham, J. H.: The possible role of local air pollution in climate change in
West Africa, Nat. Clim. Chang., 5, 815–822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2727</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Deroubaix, A., Morris, E., Tocquer, F., Evans, M.
J., Flamant, C., Gaetani, M., Lavaysse, C., Mari, C., Marsham, J. H.,
Meynadier, R., Affo-Dogo, A., Bahaga, T., Brosse, F., Deetz, K., Guebsi, R.,
Latifou, I., Maranan, M., Rosenberg, P. D., and Schlueter, A.: A
meteorological and chemical overview of the DACCIWA field campaign in West
Africa in June–July 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10893–10918,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Krechmer, J. E., Coggon, M. M., Massoli, P., Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D.,
Hu, W., Day, D. A., Tyndall, G. S., Henze, D. K., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Nowak,
J. B., Kimmel, J. R., Mauldin, R. L., Stark, H., Jayne, J. T., Sipilä,
M., Junninen, H., Clair, J. M. St., Zhang, X., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L.,
Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., Keutsch, F. N., Wennberg, P. O., Seinfeld, J.
H., Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Formation of Low
Volatility Organic Compounds and Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene
Hydroxyhydroperoxide Low-NO Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
10330–10339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02031</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using Elemental Ratios to Predict
the Density of Organic Material Composed of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202525q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202525q</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kuwata, M., Liu, Y., McKinney, K., and Martin, S. T.: Physical state and
acidity of inorganic sulfate can regulate the production of secondary organic
material from isoprene photooxidation products, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17,
5670–5678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP04942J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP04942J</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lebel, T., Parker, D. J., Flamant, C., Bourlès, B., Marticorena, B.,
Mougin, E., Peugeot, C., Diedhiou, A., Haywood, J. M., Ngamini, J. B.,
Polcher, J., Redelsperger, J. L., and Thorncroft, C. D.: The AMMA field
campaigns: Multiscale and multidisciplinary observations in the West African
region, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 8–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.486</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, B. H., Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Lee,
L., Romer, P., Cohen, R. C., Iyer, S., Kurten, T., Hu, W., Day, D. A.,
Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Guo, H., Weber, R. J.,
Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Koss, A., de Gouw, J., Olson, K., Goldstein, A.
H., Seco, R., Kim, S., McAvey, K., Shepson, P. B., Starn, T., Baumann, K.,
Edgerton, E. S., Liu, J., Shilling, J. E., Miller, D. O., Brune, W.,
Schobesberger, S., D'Ambro, E. L., and Thornton, J. A.: Highly functionalized
organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution to secondary
organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
1516–1521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508108113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H.,
Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D.,
and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical
forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lide, D. R. (Ed.): CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics. A ready-reference book of chemical and physical
data, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 72nd edn., ISBN: 0849304725,
2486 pp., 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y.-H., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S., Shaw, S. L., and Surratt, J.
D.: Investigating the influences of SO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> levels on
isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation using conditional
sampling approaches, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8457–8470,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8457-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8457-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Liousse, C., Assamoi, E., Criqui, P., Granier, C., and Rosset, R.: Explosive
growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 35003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Brito, J., Dorris, M. R., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Seco, R., Bates, K.
H., Artaxo, P., Duvoisin, S., Keutsch, F. N., Kim, S., Goldstein, A. H.,
Guenther, A. B., Manzi, A. O., Souza, R. A. F., Springston, S. R., Watson, T.
B., McKinney, K. A., and Martin, S. T.: Isoprene photochemistry over the
Amazon rainforest, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 6125–6130,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524136113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524136113</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Kuwata, M., McKinney, K. A., and Martin, S. T.: Uptake and release
of gaseous species accompanying the reactions of isoprene photo-oxidation
products with sulfate particles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 1595–1600,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP04551G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP04551G</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y. J., Herdlinger-Blatt, I., McKinney, K. A., and Martin, S. T.:
Production of methyl vinyl ketone and methacrolein via the hydroperoxyl
pathway of isoprene oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5715–5730,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5715-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5715-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A.,
Hu, W., Krechmer, J., Zhu, L., Kim, P. S., Miller, C. C., Fisher, J. A.,
Travis, K., Yu, K., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Arkinson, H. L., Pye, H. O.
T., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., and McNeill, V. F.: Aqueous-phase mechanism for
secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the
southeast United States and co-benefit of SO<sub>2</sub> emission controls, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 1603–1618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mari, C. H., Cailley, G., Corre, L., Saunois, M., Attié, J. L., Thouret,
V., and Stohl, A.: Tracing biomass burning plumes from the Southern
Hemisphere during the AMMA 2006 wet season experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
3951–3961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3951-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3951-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46,
258–271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, J. G., Oram, D. E., and Reeves, C. E.: Measurements of volatile
organic compounds over West Africa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5281–5294,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Nah, T., Sanchez, J., Boyd, C. M., and Ng, N. L.: Photochemical Aging of
<i>α</i>-pinene and <i>β</i>-pinene Secondary Organic Aerosol formed from
Nitrate Radical Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 222–231,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04594" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04594</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D.
R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Brown, S. S., Archibald, A. T., Atlas, E., Cohen, R. C., Crowley,
J. N., Day, D. A., Donahue, N. M., Fry, J. L., Fuchs, H., Griffin, R. J.,
Guzman, M. I., Herrmann, H., Hodzic, A., Iinuma, Y., Jimenez, J. L.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., Lee, B. H., Luecken, D. J., Mao, J., McLaren, R.,
Mutzel, A., Osthoff, H. D., Ouyang, B., Picquet-Varrault, B., Platt, U., Pye,
H. O. T., Rudich, Y., Schwantes, R. H., Shiraiwa, M., Stutz, J., Thornton, J.
A., Tilgner, A., Williams, B. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Nitrate radicals and
biogenic volatile organic compounds: oxidation, mechanisms, and organic
aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2103–2162,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2103-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2103-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and
Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl
peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Park, K., Kittelson, D. B., Zachariah, M. R., and Mcmurry, P. H.: Measurement
of inherent material density of nanoparticle agglomerates, J. Nanoparticle
Res., 6, 267–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu, Y., Alexander, M.
L., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Chang, W. L., Dabdub, D., Pankow, J. F., and
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol
formation and growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 109, 2836–2841,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119909109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119909109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Reeves, C. E., Formenti, P., Afif, C., Ancellet, G., Attié, J.-L.,
Bechara, J., Borbon, A., Cairo, F., Coe, H., Crumeyrolle, S., Fierli, F.,
Flamant, C., Gomes, L., Hamburger, T., Jambert, C., Law, K. S., Mari, C.,
Jones, R. L., Matsuki, A., Mead, M. I., Methven, J., Mills, G. P., Minikin,
A., Murphy, J. G., Nielsen, J. K., Oram, D. E., Parker, D. J., Richter, A.,
Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., and Thouret, V.: Chemical and aerosol
characterisation of the troposphere over West Africa during the monsoon
period as part of AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7575–7601,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Riva, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., D'Ambro, E. L.,
Zhang, X., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Thornton, J. A., Canagaratna, M. R., and
Surratt, J. D.: Chemical characterization of secondary organic aerosol from
oxidation of isoprene hydroxyhydroperoxides, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
9889–9899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02511</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, N. H., Hamilton, J. F., Allan, J. D., Langford, B., Oram, D. E.,
Chen, Q., Docherty, K., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J. L., Ward, M. W., Hewitt,
C. N., Barley, M. H., Jenkin, M. E., Rickard, A. R., Martin, S. T.,
McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Evidence for a significant proportion of
Secondary Organic Aerosol from isoprene above a maritime tropical forest,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1039–1050, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1039-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1039-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T.,
Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J.,
Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R.,
Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding
secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev.
Geophys., 55, 509–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Struckmeier, C., Drewnick, F., Fachinger, F., Gobbi, G. P., and Borrmann, S.:
Atmospheric aerosols in Rome, Italy: sources, dynamics and spatial variations
during two seasons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15277–15299,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15277-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15277-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M., Loza, C. L.,
Kwan, A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Verma, S. K., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Fu, P., and Zhu, C.: Thirteen years of
observations on biomass burning organic tracers over Chichijima Island in the
western North Pacific: An outflow region of Asian aerosols, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 4155–4168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022224</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol
characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution
aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol
composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 7307–7336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Guo, H., Boyd, C. M., Klein, M., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M.,
Hite, J. R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Kreisberg, N. M., Knote, C., Olson, K.,
Koss, A., Goldstein, A. H., Hering, S. V., de Gouw, J., Baumann, K., Lee,
S.-H., Nenes, A., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Effects of anthropogenic
emissions on aerosol formation from isoprene and monoterpenes in the
southeastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 37–42,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417609112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417609112</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Middlebrook, A. M., Liao, J., de Gouw, J. A., Guo, H., Weber, R. J.,
Nenes, A., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Lee, B. H., Thornton, J. A., Brock, C. A.,
Neuman, J. A., Nowak, J. B., Pollack, I. B., Welti, A., Graus, M., Warneke,
C., and Ng, N. L.: Enhanced formation of isoprene-derived organic aerosol in
sulfur-rich power plant plumes during Southeast Nexus, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 11137–11153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025156</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J. K., Cheng, M. T., Ji, D. S., Liu, Z. R., Hu, B., Sun, Y., and Wang,
Y. S.: Characterization of submicron particles during biomass burning and
coal combustion periods in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 562,
812–821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.015</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: A review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
