<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-705-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Drivers for spatial, temporal and long-term trends in atmospheric ammonia
and ammonium in the UK</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Drivers for spatial, temporal and long-term trends}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y.~S.~Tang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Yuk S.</given-names></name>
          <email>yst@ceh.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-3998</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Braban</surname><given-names>Christine F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4275-0152</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dragosits</surname><given-names>Ulrike</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dore</surname><given-names>Anthony J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Simmons</surname><given-names>Ivan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>van Dijk</surname><given-names>Netty</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Poskitt</surname><given-names>Janet</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Dos Santos Pereira</surname><given-names>Gloria</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-0019</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Keenan</surname><given-names>Patrick O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Conolly</surname><given-names>Christopher</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Vincent</surname><given-names>Keith</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Rognvald I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Heal</surname><given-names>Mathew R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5539-7293</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sutton</surname><given-names>Mark A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>CEH, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QB, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CEH, Lancaster Environment Centre, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Ricardo Energy &amp; Environment, Gemini Building, Fermi Avenue,
Harwell, Oxon OX11 0QR, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, David Brewster Road,
Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yuk S. Tang (yst@ceh.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>705</fpage><lpage>733</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e217">A unique long-term dataset from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network
(NAMN) is used here to assess spatial, seasonal and long-term variability in
atmospheric ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 1998–2014) and particulate ammonium
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 1999–2014) across the UK. Extensive spatial heterogeneity in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is observed, with lowest annual mean concentrations
at remote sites (&lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and highest in the
areas with intensive agriculture (up to 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), while
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations show less spatial variability (e.g. range of 0.14
to 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> annual mean in 2005). Temporally, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are influenced by environmental conditions and local emission
sources. In particular, peak NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are observed in summer
at background sites (defined by 5 km grid average NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
&lt; 1 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and in areas dominated by sheep
farming, driven by increased volatilization of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in warmer summer
temperatures. In areas where cattle, pig and poultry farming is dominant, the
largest NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are in spring and autumn, matching periods of
manure application to fields. By contrast, peak concentrations of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol occur in spring, associated with long-range
transboundary sources. An estimated decrease in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions by
16 % between 1998 and 2014 was reported by the UK National Atmospheric
Emissions Inventory. Annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data from NAMN sites
operational over the same period (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59) show an indicative downward
trend, although the reduction in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is smaller and
non-significant: Mann–Kendall (MK), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 %; linear regression (LR),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1 %. In areas dominated by pig and poultry farming, a significant
reduction in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations between 1998 and 2014 (MK: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 %;
LR: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 %, annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with, but not as
large as the decrease in estimated NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this sector over
the same period (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39 %). By contrast, in cattle-dominated areas there
is a slight upward trend (non-significant) in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (MK:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 %; LR: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.6 %, annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, despite the
estimated decline in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this sector since 1998
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 %). At background and sheep-dominated sites, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations increased over the monitoring period. These increases
(non-significant) at background (MK: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 %; LR: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 %, annually
averaged data) and sheep-dominated sites (MK: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 %; LR: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 %,
annually averaged data) would be consistent with the concomitant reduction in
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the same period, leading to a longer atmospheric
lifetime of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby increasing NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in remote
areas. The observations for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations not decreasing as fast as
estimated emission trends are consistent with a larger downward trend in
annual particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (1999–2014: MK: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 %;
LR: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>49 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 23), associated with a
lower formation of particulate
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere from gas phase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e711">Atmospheric ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas is assuming increasing importance in the
global pollution climate, with effects on local to international
(transboundary) scales (Fowler et al., 2016). While substantial reductions in
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and limited reductions in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions have been
achieved in Europe and North America following legislation designed to
improve air quality, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, primarily from the agricultural
sectors (94 % of total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in Europe in 2014) have seen
much smaller reductions (EEA, 2016). In the period 2000–2014, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions are estimated to have decreased in the EU-28 (28 member states of
the European Union) by only 8 % from 4.3 to 3.9 million tonnes, with the
UK contributing 7.2 % in 2014 (EEA, 2016). SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are
estimated to have declined by 69 % and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by 39 % across the
EU-28 over the same period.</p>
      <p id="d1e790">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is known to contribute significantly to total nitrogen (N)
deposition to the environment, and causes harmful effects through
eutrophication and acidification of land and freshwaters. This can lead to a
reduction in both soil and water quality, loss of biodiversity and ecosystem
change (e.g. Pitcairn et al., 1998; Sheppard et al., 2011). In the
atmosphere, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the major base for neutralization of atmospheric acid
gases, such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted from combustion processes
(vehicular and industrial) and from natural sources, to form
ammonium-containing particulate matter (PM): primarily ammonium sulfate
((NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ammonium nitrate (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
secondary PM is mainly in the “fine” mode with diameters of less than
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (i.e. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction) (Vieno et al., 2014). The effects
of PM on atmospheric visibility, radiative scattering, cloud formation (and
resultant climate effects) and on human health (bronchitis, asthma, coughing)
are well documented (e.g. Kim et al., 2015; Brunekreef et al., 2015). Inputs
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (collectively termed NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the dominant
drivers of ecological effects of deposited N, compared with wet deposited
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in rain (UNECE, 2016), and the importance of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
expected to increase further, relative to oxidized N, as NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
have been decreasing faster than NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Reis et al., 2012; EEA,
2016; EU, 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e967">In gaseous form, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has a short atmospheric lifetime of about 24 h
(Wichink Kruit et al., 2012). It is primarily emitted at ground level in the
rural environment, and is associated with large dry deposition velocities to
vegetation (Sutton and Fowler, 2002). High NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations can lead
to acute problems at a local scale, for example, at nature reserves located
in intensive agricultural landscapes (Sutton et al., 1998; Cape et al.,
2009a; Hallsworth et al., 2010; Vogt et al., 2013). The NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> remaining in
the atmosphere generally partitions to PM where the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can have a
lifetime of several days (Vieno et al., 2014). Although NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry
deposits at the surface, the primary removal mechanism for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
thought to be through scavenging of PM by cloud and rain, leading to wet
deposition of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Smith et al., 2000). Characterizing the
relationship between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and the formation of PM is, however,
not straightforward; an increase in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions does not automatically
translate into a proportionate increase in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bleeker et al.,
2009). The relationship depends on climate and meteorology as well as the
concentration of other precursors to PM formation such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fowler et al., 2009). Since UK particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is generally
dominated by NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see e.g. Twigg et
al., 2016; Malley et al., 2016) and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas is present in excess, then
gas-particle transfer of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dominant pathway for
forming NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM. While it is clear that reductions in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions will lead to reductions in overall NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(Vieno et al., 2016), the relative changes in gaseous NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles remains poorly quantified.</p>
      <p id="d1e1235">International targets have been agreed to reduce NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions to move
towards protection against its harmful effects. These include the UNECE
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) Gothenburg
Protocol and the recently revised EU National Emission Ceilings Directive
(NECD 2016/2284) (EU, 2016). The 1999 UNECE Gothenburg Protocol is a
multi-pollutant protocol to reduce acidification, eutrophication and
ground-level ozone by setting emissions ceilings for sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds and ammonia, which are to be met
by 2020. Revised in 2012, the protocol requires national parties to jointly
reduce emissions of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the case of the EU-28 by 6 % between
2005 and 2020 (Reis et al., 2012). Under the revised NECD (EU, 2016), the EU
is also committed to reduction of 6 % for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (but by a later date
of 2029), as well as an additional 13 % reduction in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
beyond 2030 compared with a 2005 baseline.</p>
      <p id="d1e1275">Although this demonstrates that there is currently no strong commitment to
reduce NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions compared with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, other
supporting measures should also be noted including the Industrial Emissions
Directive 2010/75/EU (IED), which requires pig and poultry farms (above
stated size thresholds) to reduce emissions using Best Available Techniques.
The IED applies to around 70 % of the European poultry industry and
around 25 % of the pig industry (UNECE, 2010). In tandem, revised UNECE
“Critical Levels” (CLe) of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations to protect sensitive
vegetation and ecosystems were adopted in 2007 (UNECE, 2007). These set
limits of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations to 1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
annual mean for the protection of lichens–bryophytes and other vegetation,
respectively (Cape et al., 2009b). The new CLes replaced the previous single
value of 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (annual mean) and have since been
adopted as part of the revised Gothenburg Protocol. Such CLes for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
are widely exceeded, including over the areas designated as Special Areas of
Conservation (SAC) under the Habitats Directive,  indicating a significant
threat to the Natura 2000 network established by that directive (Bleeker et
al., 2009; Hallsworth et al., 2010; van Zanten et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1390">Few countries have established systematic networks to measure NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
across their domains. In the Netherlands, a continuous wet annular denuder
method (AMOR, replaced by the DOAS (differential optical absorption
spectroscopy) device in 2015) has been used at eight stations in the Dutch
National Air Quality Monitoring Network (Van Pul et al., 2004; van Zanten et
al., 2017). The Ammonia in Nature (MAN) network established in 2005 in the
Netherlands monitors NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with passive diffusion tubes in Natura 2000
areas (Lolkema et al., 2015). In the USA, the Ambient Ammonia Monitoring
Network (AMoN) has been using passive (Radiello) samplers at 50 sites since
Oct 2010 (Puchalski et al., 2011). Hungary (Horvath et al., 2009), Belgium
(den Bril et al., 2011), Switzerland (Thöni et al., 2004), West Africa
(Senegal and Mali under the Pollution of African Capitals programme; Adon et
al., 2016) and China (Xu et al., 2016) also have long-term NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurement campaigns (see review by Bleeker et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e1420">In the UK, the National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) was established in
September 1996 with the aim of establishing long-term continuous monthly
measurements of atmospheric NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas (Sutton et al., 2001a). Particulate
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were added in 1999, since this was expected to
exhibit different spatial patterns and temporal trends to gaseous NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Sutton et al., 2001b). The NAMN thus provides a unique and important
long-term record for examining responses to changing agricultural practice
and allows assessment of the compliance of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions with targets
established by international policies on emissions abatement. Measurements
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the NAMN also address spatial patterns,
covering both source and sink areas to test performance of atmospheric
transport models, to support estimation of dry deposition of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, to
improve estimation of the UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget (Fowler et al., 1998; Smith et
al., 2000; Sutton et al., 2001b) and to assist with the assessment of
exceedance of critical loads and critical levels (UNECE, 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e1502">This paper provides an analysis on the state of atmospheric concentrations
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UK from 1998 to 2014 and their spatial
and temporal trends. Overall, 17 years of continuous long-term NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurement data and 16 years of continuous long-term NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurement data from the NAMN are analysed to assess trends in
concentrations in relation to estimated changes in emissions. The long-term
measurement dataset is also used to explore spatial and temporal patterns in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the UK in relation to regional
variability in emission source sectors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Network structure and site requirements</title>
      <p id="d1e1580">The design strategy for NAMN was to sample at a large number of sites
(&gt; 70) using low-frequency (monthly) sampling for cost-efficient
assessment of temporal patterns and long-term trends. The network covers a
wide distribution of monitoring sites with measurements in both agricultural
and semi-natural areas. Monitoring locations are sited away from point
sources (&gt; 150 m) such as farm buildings, which avoids
overestimating NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations compared with the grid square, since
the aim is to provide meso-scale and regional patterns. In addition, where
sampling is carried out in woodland areas, it is made in clearings. It was
also recognized that the location of the network sites needed to consider the
extent of sub-grid variability and the representativeness of sampling points.
Spatially detailed local-scale NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> monitoring was therefore also carried
out at a sub-1 km level to assess the extent to which a monitoring location
is representative (Tang et al., 2001b). The NAMN started with 70 sites. Over
time, new sites were added to fill gaps in the map, some sites were closed
following reviews and some sites had to be relocated due to local reasons,
for example land ownership changes or site re-development. The number of
sites peaked at 93 in 2000, but since 2009 has been stable at 85 sites. The
locations of the NAMN sites for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2012 are shown
in Fig. 1a, b.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1624">Maps of modelled annual mean concentrations of <bold>(a)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <bold>(b)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 5 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 km grid resolution from
the FRAME atmospheric transport model using 2012 UK emissions data, based on
Dore et al. (2008), overlaid with the National Ammonia Monitoring Network
(NAMN) measurement sites, and frequency distributions of the modelled
concentrations of <bold>(c)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(d)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
FRAME 5 km grid squares containing a NAMN site (85 and 30 sites,
respectively, in 2012) and for all model grid squares over the UK.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1695">The selection of NAMN sites to provide a representative concentration field
across the UK was aided by the availability of an estimated UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration field at a 5 km by 5 km grid resolution provided by the Fine
Resolution Atmospheric Multi-pollutant Exchange (FRAME) model (Singles et
al., 1998; Fournier et al., 2002). A comparison of FRAME-modelled NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations for NAMN sites with FRAME-modelled concentrations for the
whole of the UK shows that the network has a good representation in the
middle air concentration classes of 0.5–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (33 %
of NAMN sites, compared with 29 % of all FRAME 5 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 km
grid squares) and 1.5–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (32 % of NAMN sites,
compared with 39 % of all FRAME 5 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 km grid squares), but
with an over-representation at high concentrations and under-representation
at low concentrations (Fig. 1c). Since air concentrations are more variable
in high-concentration areas, a larger number of monitoring sites were located
in these areas than in remote low-concentration areas where air
concentrations are more homogeneous. Similarly, the monitoring sites were
strategically selected to cover source areas of expected high concentrations
and variability on the basis of the FRAME model NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
estimates (Fig. 1a, b), and this approach was expected to provide additional
evidence to test the performance of atmospheric dispersion models (Fournier
et al., 2005; Dore et al., 2015). When compared with other atmospheric
chemistry transport models, FRAME was found to correlate well with measured
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Dore et al. 2015). The NAMN sites were also
similarly checked for representativeness of particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
comparing FRAME-modelled NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at NAMN sites with
modelled concentrations for the whole of the UK, which demonstrates a good
representation across the range of expected concentrations (Fig. 1d).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Atmospheric NH${}_{{3}}$ and NH${}_{{4}}{}^{{+}}$ measurements}?><title>Atmospheric NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1840">Monthly time-integrated measurements of atmospheric NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are made in the
NAMN using a combination of passive samplers (Sutton et al., 2001a; Tang et
al., 2001a) and an active diffusion denuder method referred to as the DEnuder
for Long Term Atmospheric (DELTA) sampler (Sutton et al., 2001a, c). In terms
of passive samplers, membrane diffusion tubes (3.5 cm long) with a limit of
detection (LOD) around 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sutton et al.,
2001a) were used in the first 4 years (September 1996–April 2000). These
were replaced in May 2000 with the more sensitive Adapted Low-cost, Passive
High Absorption (ALPHA, LOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
diffusive samplers (Tang et al., 2001a; Tang and Sutton, 2003), following a
period of parallel testing (Sutton et al., 2001c).</p>
      <p id="d1e1919">Particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement was added to the NAMN in 1999 at all
DELTA sites (50) in the first 2 years (1999 and 2000). Following this initial
period, the sampling density was reduced during early 2001 to 37 sites and
has been stable at 30 sites since 2006. Although not presented in this paper,
the DELTA samplers additionally provide concentrations of acid gases
(HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl) and aerosols (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the UK Acid
Gases and Aerosols Monitoring Network (AGANet) at a subset of NAMN DELTA sites (Tang et al., 2015; Conolly et al.,
2016). Measurement data from the AGANet (Tang et al., 2017) are used to aid
interpretation of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in Sect. 3.5.6.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>DELTA method</title>
      <p id="d1e2051">The DELTA method uses a small pump to sample air (0.2 to 0.4 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in combination with a high-sensitivity gas meter to record sampled volume
(Sutton et al., 2001c). Two citric acid coated denuders (10 cm long
borosilicate glass tubes) in series are used to collect NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas and to
check the collection efficiency. A collection efficiency correction is
applied to the measurement (Sutton et al., 2001d). The corrected air
concentration  is determined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M180" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corrected</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Denuder</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Denuder</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Denuder</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2152">Typically, denuder collection efficiency is better than 90 % (Conolly et
al., 2016). At 90 % collection efficiency, the correction represents
1 % of the corrected air concentration. Individual measurements with
collection efficiency &lt; 75 % (correction amounts to 11 % of
the total at 75 %) are flagged as valid, but less certain (Tang and
Sutton, 2003). Where less than 60 % of the total capture is recorded in
the first denuder, the correction factor amounts to greater than 50 % and
is not applied. The air concentration of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
then determined as the sum of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in denuders 1 and 2:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M184" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Denuder</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Denuder</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2225">At sites where particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also sampled, a 25 mm filter pack
with a citric acid impregnated cellulose filter is added after the denuders
to capture the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The calculated air concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is corrected for incomplete capture
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by the double denuder. The corrected air concentration
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M191" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corrected</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Υ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="2em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">[</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corrected</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="2em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Denuder</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="2em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Denuder</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">]</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              For NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling, loss of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to volatilization of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the acid impregnated filter has been investigated, by
adding a third citric acid coated denuder after the filter pack, which was
found to be negligible. At DELTA sites where additional simultaneous sampling
of acid gases and particulate phase components are made for AGANet, ion
balance checks between anions and cations in the particulate phase are
performed to provide an indication of the quality of the particulate
measurements. For the acid and base particulate components, close coupling is
expected between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the sum of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
as NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is neutralized by HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to form
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Conolly et al.,
2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e2617">At the Bush OTC site in Scotland (UK-AIR ID <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> UKA00128), duplicate DELTA
measurements are made to assess the reproducibility of the method. For
continuous monthly measurements between 1999 and 2014, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between
the duplicate systems was 0.96 for both NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Supplement
Fig. S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Passive methods</title>
      <p id="d1e2665">The NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> membrane diffusion tubes deployed in the NAMN from 1996 to 2000
are hollow cylindrical tubes (FEP, 3.5 cm long). A cap at the top end holds
in place two stainless steel grids coated with sulfuric acid. The lower
air-inlet end of the tube is capped with a gas-permeable membrane (Sutton et
al., 2001a; Tang et al., 2001a; Thijsse, 1996). In comparison, the ALPHA
passive sampler is a badge-type high-sensitivity sampler with an uptake rate
that is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 times faster than the diffusion tube. It consists of a
cylindrical low-density polyethylene body. An internal ridge supports a
cellulose filter coated with citric acid, which is held in place with a
polyethylene ring. The open end is capped with a PTFE membrane, providing a
diffusion path length of 6 mm between the membrane and absorbent surface
(Tang et al., 2001a).</p>
      <p id="d1e2684">Triplicate passive samplers are deployed for every measurement in the NAMN.
Where the % coefficient of variation (CV) of the triplicate samplers is
greater than 30 % for the diffusion tubes or greater than 15 % for
the ALPHA samplers, the sample run is classed as failing the quality control
test. Large discrepancies are most likely due to contamination of samples, and
data from contaminated samples are excluded from the assessment in this
paper.</p>
      <p id="d1e2687">The passive methods are calibrated against the DELTA method in the NAMN by
ongoing comparison at several sites representing a wide range of ambient
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (see Sect. 2.2.4). Since 2009, the number of
inter-comparison sites has been nine. These are Auchencorth (UKA00451), Bush
OTC (UKA00128), Glensaugh (UKA00348), Lagganlia (UKA00290), Llynclys Common
(UKA00270), Moorhouse (UKA00357), Rothamsted (UKA00275), Sourhope (UKA00347)
and Stoke Ferry (UKA00317). The inter-comparison is used to establish a
regression between the active and passive methods, with the DELTA samplers as
the reference system, since the air volume sampled is accurately measured
with high-sensitivity gas meters. The calibration is necessary to account for
the fact that the sampling path length in the passive samplers is longer than
the distance between the membrane and adsorbent, due to the additional
resistance to molecular diffusion imposed by the turbulence damping membrane
at the inlet and the presence of a laminar boundary layer of air on the
outside of the sampler (Tang et al., 2001a). In addition, parallel
measurements were made at a high NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration farm site
(1998–2007) to extend the calibration range, and to ascertain linearity of
response to high concentrations. To ensure that no bias is introduced in the
sampling and to maintain the validity of long-term trends, the calibration is
evaluated on an annual basis (Tang and Sutton, 2003; Conolly et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e2708">For the period up to 2000 when the diffusion tubes were implemented in the
NAMN, their calibration (at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amounts to an average
of 1.5 % compared with the DELTA system. The mean ALPHA sampler
calibration (at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared with the DELTA system,
amounts to a correction of 10 % (ALP1: prototype 1, 1998–2000), 15 %
(ALP2: injection mould 1, 2001–2005), 17 % (ALP3: injection mould 2,
2006), 34 % (ALP4: injection mould 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> new membrane, 2007–2008) and
40 % (ALP5: injection mould 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> new membrane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> new lab/instrument
FloRRia, 2010–2014), respectively. The new PTFE membrane (5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
pore size) is supported on a regular polypropylene grid and is thicker
(305 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) than the earlier PTFE membrane (also 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore
size, but 265 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m thickness) used, which was supported instead on a
randomly arranged polypropylene support material. The difference in
calibration was therefore due to the extra resistance to gas diffusion
imposed by the new thicker membrane. The annual calibration of the methods
shows both high precision and constancy between years (Fig. 2), which is
important to support the detection of temporal trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations. There is no systematic trend over time in either of the
passive method calibrations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2818">Comparison of annual empirical calibration curves for the passive
samplers against the reference estimates from DELTA sampling at more than
9 sites in the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN). <bold>(a)</bold>
DT, diffusion tubes. <bold>(b)</bold> ALP, ALPHA samplers; ALP1 is prototype 1
(1998–2000), ALP2 (2001–2005) and ALP3–ALP5 were manufactured from
injection moulds 1 and 2, respectively. ALP4 and ALP5 have new inlet PTFE
membrane (Swiftlab 07-OPM-027, 305 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, regular polypropylene grid
support material) that replaced the previous TE38 PTFE membrane
(265 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, randomly arranged polypropylene support material). ALP5:
at new laboratory with analysis on FloRRia (previously on AMFIA).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2847">The comparison of monthly measurement data between the DELTA and calibrated
passive measurements demonstrated a close agreement (Fig. 3). The correlation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between DELTA and calibrated diffusion tubes was 0.91 (Fig. 3a),
while the correlation between DELTA and calibrated ALPHA samplers was 0.92
(Fig. 3b). From the calibrated results, the intercept for the diffusion tubes
was 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while that for the ALPHA samplers
was 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, demonstrating the improvement in
sensitivity with the ALPHA samplers compared with the diffusion tubes
(Fig. 3). In the present case the value of the intercepts, even for diffusion
tubes, is much less than typical NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air concentrations (see Sect. 3).
However, this cannot be assumed to be the case in other implementations of
the same methods. Experience from other studies using the lower sensitivity
diffusion tubes indicates a tendency to overestimate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
under clean conditions (RGAR, 1990; Thijsse et al., 1996; Tang et al., 2001a;
Lolkema et al., 2015). This observation points to the need for any
application of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> passive sampling for ambient monitoring to be
accompanied by testing and calibration against a verified active sampling
method. In independent assessments, for example in the USA (Puchalski et al.,
2011), the ALPHA samplers performed well against a reference annular denuder
method with a median relative percent difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Chemical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2961">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas captured on the acid coating of the denuder (DELTA), grid
(diffusion tubes) or filter paper (ALPHA), and particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
captured on the DELTA aerosol filter, are extracted into deionized water and
analysed for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on an ammonia flow injection analysis system. The
analytical instrument has changed over the network's operational period from
the AMFIA (ECN, NL) to the FloRRIA (Mechatronics, NL), an updated model based
on AMFIA (Conolly et al., 2016). The principles of operation of both
instruments are the same and are based on selective diffusion of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
across a PTFE membrane at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. pH 13 into a counter-flow of deionized water,
allowing selective detection of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by conductivity (Wyers et al.,
1993). The extracted samples were analysed for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against a series
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standards and quality controls. Parallel analysis of
laboratory and field blank (unexposed) samples were used to determine the
amounts of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
atmosphere during transport and storage. The limit of detection (LOD)
calculation of the ALPHA and DELTA methodologies are determined as 3 times the standard deviations of the laboratory blanks. For the DELTA method,
the LODs were 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for gaseous NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the ALPHA
method, the LOD was determined as 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3168">Regression of passive samplers vs. DELTA measurements at more than
9 sites in the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN), showing results
for <bold>(a)</bold> diffusion tubes (DT), used during the early years of the
network (1998–2000), and <bold>(b)</bold> for ALPHA samplers (results shown are
for 2009–2014 where all analyses were carried out at a new laboratory). All
passive data shown are the monthly measured concentrations for each site
using the calibrated data for the respective passive methods.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Data quality control</title>
      <p id="d1e3189">Measurement data are checked and screened, based on the quality management
system applied in the UK air monitoring networks (Tang and Sutton, 2003).
Data quality is assessed against the following set quality control criteria:
(a) DELTA system: monitoring of the air flow rate and the use of two denuders
in every sample to assess capture efficiency for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (b) passive
samplers: use of triplicate samplers for monitoring NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
at every site, to allow an assessment of sampling precision, and (c) ongoing
calibration of passive samplers against the DELTA. Data flags are applied to
the dataset; a full list of these is available from the EMEP website
(<uri>http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/flags/index.html</uri>). Following the
quality control checks and data flagging on the collected dataset, the
annually ratified data from the NAMN are made publicly available on the
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) UK-AIR website
(<uri>https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/</uri>; Tang et al., 2017) and are also in the
process of being made available on the EMEP website
(<uri>http://ebas.nilu.no/</uri>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3219">An inter-comparison of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements by the RIVM AMOR system (hourly,
Wyers et al., 1993) and the DELTA sampling system (monthly) have been carried
out at the Zegweld site (ID 633) in the Dutch National Air Quality Monitoring
Network (van Zanten et al., 2017) since July 2003. Since September 2012,
ALPHA measurements have also been included. To compare results, monthly mean
concentrations were derived from the average of hourly AMOR data for the
corresponding DELTA and ALPHA monthly sampling periods with good agreement
(Fig. S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>Trend analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e3237">Statistical trend analysis was conducted on the long-term dataset from the UK
NAMN to identify trends (univariate monotonic, see e.g. Hirsch et al., 1991),
estimate the rate of change and to address the question of whether trends in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (if any) are consistent with the changes
in estimated UK annual NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (data downloaded from:
<uri>http://naei.beis.gov.uk/data/data-selector-results?q=101505</uri>). The
dataset is sufficiently long term (i.e. gaseous NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 17 years and
particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 16 years) and collected by consistent methods to allow
for effective statistical trend analyses to be carried out. Trend analyses
were carried out using (i) linear regression (LR), (ii) the Mann–Kendall
(MK) test (Gilbert, 1987) on annually averaged and monthly mean data, and
(iii) the seasonal Mann–Kendall (SMK) test (Hirsch et al., 1982) on monthly
data only. MK tests were performed using the “Kendall” package (McLeod,
2015) in the R software. Computation of the Sen slope and confidence interval
(for non-seasonal Sen slope only) of the linear trend were performed using
the R “Trend” package (Pohlert, 2016). Since concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> show
strong seasonality, the SMK test was applied to identify the months that are
driving the long-term trends in data. The SMK test (Hirsch et al., 1982)
takes into account a 12-month seasonality in the time series data by
computing the MK test on each of monthly “seasons” separately, and then
combining the results. So for monthly “seasons”, January data are compared
only with January, February only with February, etc. No comparisons are made
across season boundaries.</p>
      <p id="d1e3304">The Sen slope is the fitted median slope of a linear regression joining all
pairs of observations. For the SMK, an estimate of the seasonal Sen trend
slope over time is computed as the median of all slopes between data pairs
within the same season (i.e. January compared only with January etc.).
Therefore, no cross-season slopes contribute to the overall estimate of the
SMK trend slope. Parametric LR analysis are simple and straightforward to use
and interpret monotonic trend assessment in environmental data (e.g.
Kindzierski et al., 2009; Meals et al., 2011), but they require assumptions
about normality of data and homogeneity of variance of data. The MK approach
on the other hand is widely used in environmental time series assessments,
e.g. long-term trends in precipitation (Serrano et al., 1999) and long-term
trends in European air quality (Colette et al., 2016; Torseth et al., 2012).
The main advantages, as discussed in the literature, of the MK approach over
linear regression for trend assessments are that (i) it does not require
normally distributed data, (ii) it is not affected by outliers, and (iii) it
removes the effect of temporal auto-correlation in the data. However,
linear trend assessment has been used in UK air quality monitoring network
reports (e.g. Conolly et al., 2016). Therefore, both approaches were used in
this paper, primarily as a quality assurance check.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3309">Measured annual mean concentrations from the UK National Ammonia
Monitoring Network (NAMN) for 2005 for <bold>(a)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold>
particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and maps at 5 km by 5 km grid resolution for 2005
of <bold>(c)</bold> the estimated annual NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Dragosits et al.,
2005) and <bold>(d)</bold> the dominant NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission source category (based
on Hellsten et al., 2008), indicating the relationships between measured air
concentrations and spatial variability in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources. The
measurements show a broad pattern of small air concentrations across NW
Scotland. Conversely, the largest concentrations occur in areas with
intensive cattle, pig and poultry farming with high NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions – e.g.
East Anglia in SE England.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3396">In order to summarize and discuss the NAMN dataset, the spatial patterns in
the measurements of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered in Sect. 3.1
(comparison with emission estimates) and Sect. 3.2 (comparison with modelled
concentration estimates). Seasonal patterns are discussed in Sect. 3.3, and
long-term trends across the UK in Sect. 3.4.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Spatial variability in NH${}_{{3}}$ and NH${}_{{4}}{}^{{+}}$ concentrations in
relation to estimated emissions}?><title>Spatial variability in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
relation to estimated emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e3447">As a primary pollutant emitted from ground-level sources, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits
high spatial variability in concentrations (Sutton et al., 2001b; Hellsten et
al., 2008; Vogt et al., 2013), confirmed by NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the NAMN (e.g.
range of 0.06–8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> annual mean in 2005) (Fig. 4a). The
observed variability is consistent with the large regional variability in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and sources (Fig. 4c, d). With agriculture being the main
source of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, Fig. 4a shows the largest concentrations of
measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in parts of the UK with the highest livestock emissions,
such as eastern England (East Anglia), northwest England (Eden Valley,
Cumbria) and the border area between England and Wales (Shropshire)
(Fig. 4d). By contrast, the lowest NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measured concentrations are found
in the northwest Scottish Highlands (&lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which is consistent with the emissions map (Fig. 4c). The 2005 data show
exceedance of the Critical Levels for annual mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of
1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the protection of
lichens–bryophytes and vegetation, respectively (UNECE, 2007) at many of the
sites (53 % &gt; 1 and
13 % &gt; 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In 2014,
exceedance of the 1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> CLe increased to 60
and 16 %, respectively. The widespread exceedance of the CLe for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations across the UK thus represents an ongoing threat to the
integrity of sites designated under the Habitats Directive, as well as
nationally designated Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and other
sensitive habitats.</p>
      <p id="d1e3650">Concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are less spatially heterogeneous than those of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on data from 30 sites (e.g. range of 0.14 to
1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> annual mean in 2005) with a more coherent pattern
of variation across the country, reflecting regional differences in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (Fig. 4b). Thus there is a general decreasing gradient from
the southeast to the northwest of the UK, due to both NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources in
England and import of particulate matter from Europe (Vieno et al., 2014;
Dore et al., 2015). The limited variation across the UK for the annual
average NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations can be attributed to the atmospheric
formation process (providing a diffuse source) and its longer atmospheric
lifetime.</p>
      <p id="d1e3724">A similar picture is reported by the Dutch National Air Quality Monitoring
Network (van Zanten et al., 2017), with large spatial variability of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (2–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the country and
a more homogeneous distribution of particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014), although the number of
Dutch monitoring sites reported there is much smaller, with only eight stations
providing continuous measurements.  Both NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were correlated with emission density, but the correlation was
smaller for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> because of the larger contribution
to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from long-range transport in the Netherlands.</p>
      <p id="d1e3866">The UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions inventory is calculated and spatially distributed
annually. Agricultural sources at a 5 km by 5 km grid resolution are
combined with a large number of non-agricultural sources (Sutton et al.,
2000; Tsagatakis et al., 2016) at a 1 or 5 km resolution to produce the
annual NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions data, and maps at a 1 km by 1 km grid resolution
are reported by the official UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory
(NAEI; <uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/data/mapping</uri>). In the UK, agriculture
accounts for &gt; 80 % of total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and is
estimated by the National Ammonia Reduction Strategy Evaluation System
(NARSES) model (Webb &amp; Misselbrook 2004; Misselbrook et al., 2015). For
the agricultural NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission maps, parish statistics on livestock
numbers and crop areas are combined with satellite-based land cover data to
model emissions at a 1 km resolution, using the AENEID model (Dragosits et
al., 1998; Hellsten et al., 2007). For reasons of data confidentiality, the
1 km data need to be aggregated to produce annual agricultural NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions maps at a 5 km by 5 km grid resolution. National emission
estimates for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are submitted to both the European Commission under
the NECD (2001/81/EC) and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
(UN/ECE) under the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
(CLRTAP).</p>
      <p id="d1e3928">The AENEID approach (Dragosits et al., 1998) can further be used to classify
each 5 km by 5 km grid square in the UK into dominant NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
source categories (Fig. 4d), following the method of Hellsten et al. (2008),
where grid squares with &gt; 45 % from a given category are
referred to as dominated by that source. The seven categories are: cattle,
pigs &amp; poultry (combined for data disclosivity reasons), sheep, fertilizer
application to crops and grassland, non-agricultural sources, as well as a
mixed category where no single source dominates, and background. Background
grid squares are defined by very low NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions of
&lt; 1 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3973">Using the dominant emission sources map, each site in the NAMN is classified
to one of the seven categories just described. This provides information of
the main emission source type expected in the 5 km by 5 km grid square
containing the monitoring site and is useful for assessing whether the
network has a good representation of key emission source categories
(Fig. S3a, b). Over the period since the NAMN was established, from 1996 to
present, there have been substantial changes in emissions estimated for the
different source sectors. For analysis in this paper, the dominant sources
map for 2005 emission year was used as representing the mid-point of the data
series (1998–2014) and compared with the classification from other years for
consistency. This categorization of sites is used further in the
interpretation of the monitored NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and
their long-term trends in the next sections.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3999">Comparison of 2012 annual mean concentrations of <bold>(a)</bold>
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> modelled using the FRAME atmospheric
model with 2012 measurements from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network
(NAMN) for all sites according to dominant emission source classification.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e4037">Comparison of 2012 annual mean concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
output of the FRAME atmospheric model with measurements from the UK National
Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for a subset of sites classified as located
in semi-natural or forest locations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Spatial variability in NH${}_{{3}}$ and NH${}_{{4}}{}^{{+}}$ concentrations in
relation to modelled concentrations}?><title>Spatial variability in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
relation to modelled concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e4083">The comparison of NAMN NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements with modelled NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from the FRAME model in this
paper is made for an example year of 2012. This updates an earlier
inter-comparison assessment carried out by Dore et al. (2007) for the year
2002, In the comparison of the FRAME model estimates (based on 2012 UK AENEID
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission data) with the NAMN measurement results for 2012 (Fig. 5),
the network annual mean concentrations for each site are compared against the
model estimate for the 5 km grid square in which it occurs. Each point is
also colour-coded according to the estimated dominant NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission source
category for the 5 km by 5 km grid square, following the methodology
described in a similar comparison from Sutton et al. (2001b) for the year
2000.</p>
      <p id="d1e4134">For NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, both the model estimates and the measurement agree that
background and sheep sites are characterised by small NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> annual mean), while
agricultural areas, particularly areas with intensive pig and poultry areas,
are associated with large NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (up to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> annual mean). Overall, the comparison suggests a fairly good
fit with regard to both the magnitude and spatial variability of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations at a national scale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.6
(Fig. 5a). UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions with a 5 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 km grid-square
resolution is used as input in the FRAME model and the accuracy of the
emissions data is critical to the model performance. The broad agreement
between measurement and FRAME estimates broadly support the predictions of
the FRAME model, lending support to the AENEID model outputs. There is,
however, significant scatter in the comparison, with some systematic
differences in the comparison of FRAME and the measurements depending on the
air concentration and dominant source.</p>
      <p id="d1e4281">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is known to exhibit large sub-grid variability (e.g. Dragosits et al.,
2002), influenced by its proximity to emission source strength and type. In the
vicinity of emission sources, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations generally decay
exponentially with distance away from source due to dispersion and dilution
(e.g. Pitcairn et al., 1998). As it is a highly reactive gas, a significant
fraction of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted is also rapidly deposited within a 1 km radius
of the source, so that concentrations reach background concentrations at
distances of about 1–2 km from source (Fowler et al., 1998). This effect is
particularly important in areas with high local variability in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions, such as intensive agricultural areas. The observed scatter in the
comparison may therefore be due to the spatial location of the sampling site
relative to the distribution of sources. For example, at many of the sites
where the model overestimates concentrations, the measurements are in fact
made in nature reserves or in clearings inside forests. The monitoring sites
in these sink areas are typically well away from local sources and that
would on average be more distant from sources than assumed in the FRAME 5 km
average estimates, thereby underestimating concentrations. Conversely, some
of the outliers where measurements are larger than the model predictions show
indications of being affected by nearby emission sources, as was established
by investigations during site visits. This effect is particularly important
in areas with high local variability in ammonia emissions, such as intensive
agricultural areas, and illustrates the importance of having a large number of
sites for comparison.</p>
      <p id="d1e4320">Figure 6 considers measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at a subset of sites (44
out of the full 85 sites) that are located away from nearby local sources, in
forest or semi-natural areas, following the site classification and
assessment by Hallsworth et al. (2010). For this restricted set of sites,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2012, which is higher than the correlation for the overall
UK network. The improvement in correlation between measured and modelled
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for this subset of sites can be explained by the
monitoring locations typically being further away from sources, so that
uncertainties in local emission estimates are to some extent averaged out.
This observation is also consistent with the findings of Vieno et al. (2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e4357">In contrast to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the correlation between NAMN measurements and FRAME
model output is stronger for particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.87). However, measured concentrations are generally larger than
the modelled ones (slope 1.1, intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. 5b). One reason for the better agreement for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the more
slowly changing spatial patterns in concentrations, which are not expected to
vary on a finer scale than the model's 5 km by 5 km grid, improving the
representativeness of site-based measurements. The 2012 comparison shown here
updates an earlier inter-comparison assessment carried out by Dore et
al. (2007) for the year 2002 and demonstrates that the FRAME model is
performing well in describing the spatial distribution of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, for the 2012 inter-comparison, the FRAME model appears to
underestimate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at sites with concentrations
&lt; 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with better agreement at
concentrations above 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This suggests
either too low a formation rate for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model at cleaner
sites, or too high a removal rate for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or a combination of both.
The presence of higher measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in remote areas
than shown by the model may also indicate that NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a longer
residence time than treated in the model. Similar regressions between NAMN
and FRAME NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol concentrations were observed for other years.
For example, for 2008 the FRAME model underestimated NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
concentrations &lt; 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (slope 1.2,
intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89,
range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2–1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Changes in the chemical
climate, such as reduced emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UK, are postulated to
affect conversion rates of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the dry
deposition rates, leading to more NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> remaining in the atmosphere (van
Zanten et al., 2017). This is discussed further in Sect. 3.5.6.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Seasonal variability in measured UK NH${}_{{3}}$ and NH${}_{{4}}{}^{{+}}$
concentrations}?><title>Seasonal variability in measured UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e4761">A comprehensive account of the seasonal variability of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different regions across the UK is provided by the NAMN. In
Fig. 7, the average seasonal cycles of grouped sites from four different
emission source categories are compared for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4808">Seasonal trends in <bold>(a)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean monthly data for
1998–2014) and <bold>(b)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean monthly data for 1999–2014)
concentrations of sites in the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN)
classified according to four key emission source categories: cattle, sheep,
pigs &amp; poultry and background (based on 2005 dominant emission source
classification). The concentrations are plotted on a log scale for better
visualization of the low-concentration background and sheep profiles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4844">In addition to substantial differences in the overall magnitude of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, where the largest concentrations in the network are found at
sites dominated by pig and poultry farming, followed by areas where cattle
farming predominates, it is clear that the seasonal patterns of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> also
vary depending on the dominant source type (Fig. 7a). For background sites
(defined as located in grid squares with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
&lt; 1 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a clear summer maximum in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations can be observed, with minimum concentrations occurring in
winter. The summer peak is probably related to increased land surface
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in warm, dry summer conditions, both from the presence of
low-density grazing livestock and wildlife. It is also related to surface
factors such as the compensation point for vegetation, which is defined as
the concentration below which growing plants start to emit NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the
atmosphere (Sutton et al., 1995). The interaction between atmospheric
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and vegetation is complex, leading to both emission
and deposition fluxes, depending on relative differences in concentrations.
However, it is well established that warm, dry conditions promote NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission from vegetation (e.g. Massad et al., 2010; Flechard et al., 2013).
It is therefore possible that bi-directional exchange with vegetation is at
least partly controlling NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at remote sites distant from
intensive livestock farming.</p>
      <p id="d1e4957">The possibility for such interactions can be considered further using the
example of Inverpolly (UKA00457), a remote background site in the NW Scottish
Highlands. This site shows a very clear seasonal cycle with peak
concentrations in July when warmer, drier conditions prevail, while lowest
concentrations occur during the cooler and wetter winter months (Fig. 8a, b).
A smaller peak in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can also be seen annually in April, which
indicates potential longer-range influences of manure spreading in spring,
even at this remote location (Fig. 8b). Although there is substantial
scatter, Fig. 9 shows that there is significant correlation between monthly
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and both temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.33, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 231,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 231,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05). The influence of temperature and rainfall on NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission and concentrations is well characterized (e.g. see Sutton et al.,
2013; van Zanten et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5050"><bold>(a)</bold> Long-term trends in measured monthly-mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations at the remote background Inverpolly site in NW Scotland
(UKA00457), demonstrating strong intra- and inter-annual variability, from
the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN). Also plotted for
comparison are monthly rainfall and temperature data from the nearby Aultbea
meteorological station (ID no. 52; Met Office, 2016). <bold>(b)</bold> Comparison
of seasonal trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with temperature and rainfall
at Inverpolly. Data shown are averaged over the period 1996–2015. Peak
concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be seen to coincide with summer maxima in the
temperature profile, while the lowest concentrations occur in winter when the
temperature is lowest and also when rainfall is generally highest.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5091">For sites dominated by emissions from sheep farming, the seasonal profile in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is similar to that for background sites, although the
summer maximum in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger than background sites, because grazing
emissions are larger (Hellsten et al., 2008). It is notable that the peak
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration occurs later in the year for background areas
(July–September) than for sheep areas (June–August). This may be related to
the seasonal presence of lambs, which are often only present for the first
part of the summer. In areas with more intensive livestock farming, where
emissions come from either cattle or from pig and poultry farming, the
largest concentrations are observed in spring and autumn, corresponding to
periods of manure application to land. The spring peak in March is larger
than the autumn peak in September, which coincides with the main period for
manure application being in spring, before the sowing of arable crops or
early on in the grass-growing period (Hellsten et al., 2007). Ammonia
concentrations in these areas are also larger in summer than winter, due to
warmer conditions promoting volatilization. Interestingly, the dip in
concentrations in June matches a period when crops will be actively growing
with possible uptake and removal of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the atmosphere. Vegetation
can be a source or a sink of atmospheric NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and uptake of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can
occur when the relative concentration of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere is higher
than inside the plant stoma (e.g. Sutton et al.,1995; Massad et al., 2010;
Flechard et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e5158">For particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as expected for a secondary pollutant,
concentrations are more decoupled from the dominant NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source sectors
in the vicinity of a site. Although the formation of particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
primarily depends on the occurrence of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere, synoptic
meteorology and long-range transboundary transport from continental Europe
are important drivers influencing the seasonal variations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
across the UK, due to its longer lifetime (Vieno et al., 2014, 2016). The
seasonal trends in particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are seen to be broadly similar
for the four different emission source sectors (Fig. 7b), with the magnitude
of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations reflecting NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at a
regional level. In the atmosphere, particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are primarily in
the form of (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, formed when the acid
gases HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere are neutralized by
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Putaud et al., 2010). NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> preferentially neutralizes
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to its low saturation vapour pressure (forming
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> then (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), while NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
formed when abundant NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is available. In contrast to
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a semi-volatile component
(Stelson and Seinfeld, 1982). Long-term data from the UK Acid Gases and
Aerosols Monitoring Network (AGANet; Conolly et al., 2016) show a change in
the particulate phase of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with particulate nitrate concentrations exceeding that of
particulate sulfate approximately 3-fold (on a molar basis) (Fig. 18a). This
suggests that the thermodynamic equilibrium between the gas phase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the aerosol phase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> will have a much greater
effect on the seasonal concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The formation and dissociation of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
depend strongly on ambient temperature and humidity (Stelson and Seinfeld,
1982). Warm, dry weather in summer promotes dissociation, decreasing
particulate phase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to gas phase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the winter months, low temperature and high humidity favour
the formation of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the gas phase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
By contrast, the spring peak in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations may be attributed
to photochemical processes (elevated ozone) leading to enhanced formation of
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during this period (Pope et al., 2016) and also to import of
particulate NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through long-range transboundary transport, e.g.
from continental Europe, as discussed in Vieno et al. (2014). Nevertheless,
it is notable that the winter minima for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol concentrations
at sheep and background sites are more pronounced than for pig-, poultry- and
cattle-dominated sites. This may be a result of a combination of smaller
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in winter in these areas (as indicated by Fig. 7a) and
differences in long-range transport to the more remote areas in winter
conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5755">Overall, the seasonal distributions show that NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are
mostly governed by local emission sources and by changes in environmental
conditions, with warm, dry weather favouring increased volatilization. By
contrast, particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are largely determined
by more distant sources through long-range transport and synoptic
meteorology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Long-term trends in estimated UK NH${}_{{3}}$ emissions}?><title>Long-term trends in estimated UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e5796">UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are estimated to have fallen by 16 % between 1998
and 2014, from 336 to 281 kt (Fig. 10a) (<uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri>).
The most significant cause of the estimated reductions has been decreasing
cattle, pig and poultry numbers in the UK over this period. Between 2013 and
2014, the decreasing trend in UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions was however reversed with
an increase of 3.3 % from 272 to 281 kt NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to an increase in
emissions from the agricultural sector from 224 kt in 2013 to 234 kt in
2014. This is attributed to an increase in dairy cow numbers (and dairy cow
N
excretion) and increase in fertilizer N use (particularly urea, which is
associated with a higher emission factor than other fertilizer types used in
the UK) (Misselbrook et al., 2015; <uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e5834">Relationships between measured monthly-mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) and mean monthly
temperature and rainfall at Inverpolly (UKA00457). NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was negatively
correlated with rainfall (blue line: Log(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0059 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Log(rain) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1612, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 231, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) and positively
correlated with temperature (red line: Log(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1482 Log(temp) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2708 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.33, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 231, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05). Rain and
temperature data are from the nearby Aultbea meteorological station (ID
no. 52; Met Office, 2016).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5981"><bold>(a)</bold> Trends between 1998 and 2014 in the UK National
Atmospheric Emission Inventory (NAEI) for total UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and
selected sub-sources: cattle, pigs &amp; poultry and sheep. The 2010 NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
national emissions ceiling target of 297 kt (Gothenburg protocol and NECD)
and the 2020 target of 282 kt (revised Gothenburg protocol) are also shown for comparison.
<bold>(b)</bold> UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources in 2014. Data from
<uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri> and Misselbrook et al. (2015).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6026">Although the UK met the 2010 emission ceiling target of 297 kt NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission per year set out under the Gothenburg Protocol and NEC Directive, it
is committed to a further emission reduction by 2020 of 8 % from the 2005
total under the 2012 revised Gothenburg Protocol, and by 17 % after 2030
under the revised 2016 NEC Directive (EU, 2016). The revised 2020 target of
282 kt NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (8 % reduction of the baseline figure of 307 kt
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions total in 2005) may require emission strategies to be
implemented, rather than relying on decreasing livestock populations as
during the recent decades.</p>
      <p id="d1e6056">Agricultural emissions are by far the largest NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources in the UK's
emission inventory, accounting for 86 and 83 % of the total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions in 1998 and 2014, respectively. The primary source of agricultural
emissions is livestock manure management, in particular from cattle which
contribute approximately 46 % of the total agricultural emissions, followed
by pigs &amp; poultry contributing another 18 % in 2014 (Defra, 2015;
Misselbrook et al., 2015) (Fig. 10b). Over the period 1998 to 2014, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from cattle are estimated to have decreased by 11 % (from 144
to 128 kt), with emissions estimated to have remained relatively stable
since 2008, followed by a modest 2 % increase between 2013 and 2014 from
125 to 128 kt (Figs. 10a, 16). Emissions from pigs &amp; poultry showed a
large downward trend between 1998 and 2014, with a decrease of 39 % (from
82.7 to 50.3 kt) (Fig. 10a, 16), although the decreasing trend was reversed
between 2012 and 2014, with an increase of 6 % from 46.7 to 50.3 kt, The
sheep sector is a minor source, contributing 3.6 % to the total
agricultural emissions. NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this sector are estimated to
have decreased by 24 % in 2014 relative to 1998 (from 13.3 to 10.1 kt).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Long-term trends in measured NH${}_{{3}}$ concentrations}?><title>Long-term trends in measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e6111">The UK NAMN dataset was analysed to compare levels and trends against the
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission inventory. To avoid bias due to changes in the number and
locations of sites over the duration of the network, sites with incomplete
data runs over selected periods for analysis are excluded. Based on these
exclusion criteria, the number of sites with complete data runs was 59 for
the period 1998 to 2014, 66 sites for 1999 to 2014, and 75 sites for the
period 2000 to 2014. To ensure consistency in the trend analysis, several
combinations of the available data were used:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>1a.</label>
      <p id="d1e6125">1998–2014 (59 sites): annually averaged data</p></list-item><list-item><label>1b.</label>
      <p id="d1e6129">1998–2014 (59 sites): monthly mean data</p></list-item><list-item><label>2a.</label>
      <p id="d1e6133">1999–2014 (66 sites): annually averaged data</p></list-item><list-item><label>2b.</label>
      <p id="d1e6137">1999–2014 (66 sites): monthly mean data</p></list-item><list-item><label>3a.</label>
      <p id="d1e6141">2000–2014 (75 sites): annually averaged data</p></list-item><list-item><label>3b.</label>
      <p id="d1e6145">2000–2014 (75 sites): monthly mean data.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e6148">A visualization of the time series according to dataset 1a is summarized in
Fig. 11. This shows the mean UK monitored annual NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of
59 sites with complete data runs from 1998 (first complete year of
monitoring) to 2014, summarized in a box plot, together with annual mean UK
rainfall and temperature data and compared with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions trends
over the same period. The interquartile ranges and the spread of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations can be seen to be variable from year to year, demonstrating
both substantial inter- and intra-annual variability.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6180">Changes in annual mean atmospheric NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations averaged
over all sites in the National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) operational
between 1998 and 2014 (59 sites). The diamonds show the mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, with the grey box indicating the median and interquartile
range, while the error bars show the range (minimum and maximum) of measured
mean concentrations. Annual mean UK meteorological data (source
<uri>http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/</uri>) are also plotted for comparison over the
same period. 2010 was an unusual year, characterized by a considerably lower
than average mean annual temperature of 7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C due to an
exceptionally cold winter, with December 2010 recorded as the coldest for
over 100 years (cf. mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 1998 to 2014) and lower
than average rainfall of 950 mm (cf. mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1190 mm for 1998 to
2014).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6247">Summary of Mann–Kendall (MK) and seasonal Mann–Kendall (SMK) time
series trend analysis on NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data (annually averaged datasets 1a, 2a, 3a
and monthly mean datasets 1b, 2b, 3b) from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring
Network (NAMN). The following are shown: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value, median annual trend
(Sen's slope, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the relative median
change over the selected time period (in %). For the MK tests, the
95 % confidence interval (CI) for the trend and relative change are also
estimated. For comparison, the reduction in estimated UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
over the periods 1998–2014, 1999–2014 and 2000–2014 are 16.3, 15.6 and
13.1 % respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dataset</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time series</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Significant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median annual trend<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Relative median change</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of sites<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">trend</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[95 % CI] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">over the period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[95 % CI] (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1a: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>annual (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1998–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0071 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0200, 0.0125]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16, 12]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1b: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>monthly (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1998–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0096 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0264, 0.0060]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.2 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21, 5.5]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1b: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>monthly (SMK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1998–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2a: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>annual (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1999–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0000 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0227, 0.0200]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16, 16]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2b: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>monthly (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1999–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0060 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0252, 0.0132]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.5 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18, 11]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2b: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>monthly (SMK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1999–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0073</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3a: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>annual (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0000 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0283, 0.0175]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19, 14]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3b: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>monthly (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0072 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0264, 0.0120]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18, 9.5]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3b: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>monthly (SMK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0079</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e6307"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Number of sites providing complete data runs over
the time period. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Median annual trend <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> fitted Sen slope of
MK linear trend (unit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Relative median change calculated based on the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the end (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of time series
computed from the Sen slope and intercept (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <title>Mann–Kendall non-parametric time series analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e7035">To detect trends and to indicate the significance level of the trends in the
long-term NAMN data, the non-parametric MK approach was used combined with
the Sen slope method for estimating the trend and confidence interval of the
linear trend (see Sect. 2.2.5). The classic MK test was used on the annually
averaged data (datasets 1a, 2a, 3a), while both the classic MK and SMK tests
were applied to the monthly averaged data (datasets 1b, 2b, 3b).</p>
      <p id="d1e7038">Results of the MK tests are summarized in Table 1. For each time
series, the median annual trend (in units of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated from the Sen slope and
intercept of the MK linear trend. To assess the relative change over time,
the % relative median change was calculated from the estimated NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the end (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the selected
time period (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]) computed from the Sen
slope and intercept. This approach was adopted instead of a direct comparison
of actual observed NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the
end (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the time series, since there is substantial inter-annual
variability in the data (Figs. 10, 16). Using the estimated concentrations at
the start and end from the fitted Sen slope allows using a reference that
is less sensitive to inter-annual variability than the actual observed
concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e7182">For the annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations across the UK, dataset 1a
(1998–2014, 59 sites) show a small, but non-significant decreasing trend
(relative median change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 %), while datasets 2a (1999–2014,
66 sites) and 3a (2000–2014, 75 sites) show no discernible trends (median
relative change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0 % for both) (Table 1). Results from the
analysis of monthly data from all three different data groupings (1b, 2b, 3b)
(relative median change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.2 %) are similar to results for
dataset 1a, based on analysis of annual data (Table 1). In the SMK tests on
monthly data, two monthly “seasons” (January and April) in dataset 1b
(1998–2014, 59 sites) are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05), with a third
monthly “season” (August) near-significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06. For datasets 2b
(1999–2014, 66 sites) and 3b (2000–2014, 75 sites), August is the only
monthly “season” in either time series to be close to significance at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06. Trends in individual monthly “seasons” are therefore weak
and results between the MK and seasonal MK tests on monthly data are similar
(Table 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <title>Linear regression parametric time series analysis</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7261">Time series trend analysis by non-parametric Mann–Kendall Sen slope
vs. parametric linear regression on annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for
<bold>(a)</bold> dataset 1a (1998 to 2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59), <bold>(b)</bold> dataset 2a
(1999 to 2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 66) and <bold>(c)</bold> dataset 3a (2000 to 2014,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 75). Individual data points are annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7330">Time series trend analysis by non-parametric Mann–Kendall Sen slope
vs. parametric linear regression on monthly mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from
the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for <bold>(a)</bold> dataset 1b
(1998–2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59), <bold>(b)</bold> dataset 2b (1999–2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 66) and
<bold>(c)</bold> dataset 3b (2000–2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 75). Individual data points are
monthly mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7400">Summary of linear regression time series trend analysis on NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
data (annually averaged datasets 1a, 2a, 3a and monthly mean datasets 1b, 2b,
3b) from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN). The following are
shown: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value, annual trend (fitted slope, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the relative change over the selected time period (in
%). For comparison, the reduction in estimated UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over
the periods 1998–2014, 1999–2014 and 2000–2014 are 16.3, 15.6 and
13.1 % respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dataset</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time series</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Significant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Annual trend<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Relative change</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of sites<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">trend</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">over the period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1a: annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1998–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0035</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0167</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1b: monthly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1998–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0062</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0028</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2a: annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1999–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0040</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0154</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2b: monthly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1999–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0031</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3a: annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0130</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3b: monthly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0057</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0019</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e7471"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Number of sites providing complete data runs over the time period.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Annual trend <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> fitted slope of linear regression
(unit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Relative change calculated based on the estimated annual NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the end (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of time series
computed from the slope and intercept
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e8040">The parametric linear regression time series trend analysis was also
performed on the different data groupings. Results of the linear regression
tests are summarized in Table 2, and a comparison of trends from the
MK with the linear regression approach is provided in Fig. 12 for
annual datasets 1a, 2a, 3a, and Fig. 13 for monthly datasets 1b, 2b, 3b. A
similar approach to the MK was taken to assess the relative change,
by calculating the % relative change from the estimated NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the end (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the time
series (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]) computed from the linear
regression slope and intercept. The different data groupings all show small,
but non-significant decreasing trends (relative change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3 %), similar to the trends and % relative median change from the
MK and SMK analysis (Figs. 12, 13). This suggests that  the errors in the
NAMN data are normally distributed and that no or few outliers are present,
since the results from the non-parametric MK tests are very similar to
the parametric least squares linear regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Trends in NH${}_{{3}}$ concentrations vs. trends in NH${}_{{3}}$
emissions}?><title>Trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations vs. trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e8155">Overall, the long-term NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration data from the UK NAMN suggests
evidence of a small, but non-significant decreasing trend (Figs. 12 and 13). The
level of reduction observed in the datasets is however less than the 16.3,
15.6 and 13.1 % reduction in estimated UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the
periods 1998–2014, 1999–2014 and 2000–2014, respectively (Tables 1, 2).
Inventories have inherent uncertainties such as uncertainties in activity
data and emission factors, or may be missing emission sources. In terms of
measurement data, it has already been shown in Sects. 3.1 and 3.3 that the
annually averaged data mask considerable spatial and seasonal variability in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. Drivers contributing to this variability include the
influence of climate on emissions, variations in management practice for a
particular emission source, and influence of local emission sources and
interactions on concentrations at a site. In addition, once emissions have
taken place, the resulting atmospheric NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are influenced
by local deposition, which is in turn affected by receptor surfaces and by
concentrations of interacting chemical species that affect atmospheric
lifetime and transport distance of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and physical dispersion (e.g.
Bleeker et al., 2009; Sutton et al., 2013). In the following sections, we
consider the possibility of interactions with climate, emission source type
and chemical interactions as this may affect long-term trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e8216">Summary of Mann–Kendall (MK) and seasonal Mann–Kendall (SMK) time
series trend analysis on grouped NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration data (annually
averaged and monthly mean data) from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring
Network (NAMN) for four different emission source sectors. The following are
shown: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value, median annual trend (Sen slope, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the relative median change over the selected
time period (in %). For the MK tests, the 95 % confidence interval (CI)
for the trend and relative change are also estimated.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time series</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Significant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median annual trend<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Relative median</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">sector</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(1998–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of sites<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">trend</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[95 % CI] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">change over the</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; [95 % CI] (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cattle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0155 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0150, 0.0300]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10, 24]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cattle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0012 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0192, 0.0168]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14, 13]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cattle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (SMK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0043</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pigs &amp; Poultry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0043 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1008, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0071]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>42, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pigs &amp; Poultry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0648 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0984, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0300]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pigs &amp; Poultry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (SMK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0588</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sheep</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0029 [0.0000, 0.0069]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16 [0.0, 46]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sheep</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0036 [0.0000, 0.0072]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20 [0.0, 45]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sheep</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (SMK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">210</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Background</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0019 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0012, 0.0038]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10, 41]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Background</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (MK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0012 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0012, 0.0036]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13 [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11, 42]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Background</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly (SMK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e8266"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Number of sites providing complete data runs over the period 1998 to
2014.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Median annual trend <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> fitted Sen slope of Mann–Kendall linear
trend (unit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Relative median change calculated based on the annual NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the end (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of time series
computed from the Sen slope and intercept (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]).
Cattle sites: Bickerton Hill (UKA00297), Brown Moss (UKA00369), Castle Cary (UKA00328),
Cwmystwyth (UKA00325), Fenn's Moss (UKA00291), High Muffles (UKA00169),
Hillsborough (UKA00293), Little Budworth (UKA00298), Llynclys Common
(UKA00270), Lough Navar (UKA00166), Myerscough (UKA00356), Northallerton
(UKA00316), North Wyke (UKA00269), Penallt (UKA00324), Wardlow Hay Cop
(UKA00119), Wem Moss (UKA00299), Yarner Wood (UKA00168).
Pigs &amp; Poultry sites: Bedlingfield (UKA00334), Dennington (UKA00331),
Dunwich Heath (UKA00308), Fressingfield (UKA00335), Mere Sands Wood
(UKA00280), Redgrave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Lopham (UKA00311), Sibton (UKA00012), Stoke Ferry
(UKA00317), Stanford (UKA00476).
Sheep sites: Glensaugh (UKA00348; 2005 classification <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> background, but
1 km radius is predominantly sheep from local land use information),
Moorhouse (UKA00357) and Sourhope (UKA00347) (2005
classification <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> cattle, but 1 km radius around site is sheep from local
land-use information), Shetland (UKA00486).
Background sites: Allt a'Mharcaidh (UKA00086), Dumfries (UKA00368), Eskdalemuir (UKA00130),
Inverpolly (UKA00457), Strathvaich (UKA00162).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS4">
  <title>Influence of climate</title>
      <p id="d1e9068">UK temperature and rainfall varied from year to year over the period 1998 to
2014 (Fig. 11), with no clear relationship with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> easily visible in
the graph. Plotting the annual mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations against the
average temperature and rainfall however does show indicatively that elevated
annual mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are observed in warmer years, and reduced
annual mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are observed in wetter years (Fig. S4).
This analysis for the full network is therefore consistent with the
observation at a remote site (Inverpolly, Fig. 9). The thermodynamic
equilibrium shifts NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the aqueous (or particulate) phase to the
gas phase with increased temperature, hence emissions from animal manures,
soils and vegetation increase with increasing temperature (Asman et al.,
1998; Sutton et al., 1993). Conversely, increases in precipitation decrease
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions because rain events dilute the available NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pool,
while having the potential to wash urea and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in solution from the
surface. As NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is soluble and washed out of the atmosphere by rainfall,
this should also contribute to reduced NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during wet
periods.</p>
      <p id="d1e9162">An exception to this relationship can occur where N is excreted as uric
acid from birds (e.g. poultry). In this case, sufficient water is needed to
allow hydrolysis to form NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Riddick et al., 2014). In this situation,
the arrival of rain promoted uric acid hydrolysis from seabird guano
surfaces, which was limited in the absence of soil moisture. It is possible
that this interaction could lead to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from field spreading
of poultry litter to be larger in wetter years. In a recent trend analysis of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from the Dutch Air Quality Monitoring Network, an
attempt was also made to correct for meteorological (temperature and
rainfall) influences for the eight monitoring stations, which broadly
produced similar results with slightly enhanced statistical significance for
the trends (van Zanten et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS5">
  <title>Influence of local emission sources</title>
      <p id="d1e9198">The inter- and intra-annual variability is also expected to be linked to
influences from local emission source and activities. It has already been
shown in Sect. 3.1 that the concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in air are greatest in
parts of the country with a large presence of livestock farming, particularly
in areas of pig, poultry and cattle farming. Using the classification of NAMN
sites according to dominant emission source sectors described in Sect. 3.1,
the long-term change in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at sites grouped into four
different emission source sectors (background, sheep, cattle, and pigs &amp; poultry) are compared in Fig. 14 (annual mean data) and Fig. 15 (monthly mean
data). Results of the MK time series trend analysis are summarized
in Table 3 and results of linear regression analysis are summarized in
Table 4. A comparison of trends in measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with
trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for the different source types then provided
indicative evidence to support and inform the national emission inventory
compilation. In Fig. 16, the relative changes in UK emissions between 1998
and 2014 are compared with relative changes in mean measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations for all NAMN sites, and for grouped sites classified as
dominated by cattle, pigs &amp; poultry, and sheep.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9248">Time series trend analysis by non-parametric Mann–Kendall Sen slope
vs. parametric linear regression on annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for
sites in 5 km grid squares classed as dominated by <bold>(a)</bold> cattle
(&gt; 45 % of total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this category in a
grid square); <bold>(b)</bold> pigs &amp; poultry (&gt; 45 % of total
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this category in a grid square); <bold>(c)</bold> sheep
(&gt; 45 % of total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from sheep in a grid
square); <bold>(d)</bold> NAMN sites in grid squares classed as background
(defined as grid squares with average NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions &lt; 1 kg
N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Individual data points are annually averaged
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9354">Time series trend analysis by non-parametric Mann–Kendall Sen slope
vs. parametric least squares linear regression on annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for
sites in 5 km grid squares classed as dominated by <bold>(a)</bold> cattle
(&gt; 45 % of total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this category in a
grid square); <bold>(b)</bold> pigs &amp; poultry (&gt; 45 % of total
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this category in a grid square); <bold>(c)</bold> sheep
(&gt; 45 % of total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from sheep in a grid
square); <bold>(d)</bold> NAMN sites in grid squares classed as background
(defined as grid squares with average NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
&lt; 1 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Individual data points are monthly
mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9461"><bold>(a)</bold> Relative trends between 1998 and 2014 in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from the UK National Atmospheric Emission Inventory (NAEI) for
total emissions (all NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources) and emissions from cattle, pigs &amp; poultry, and sheep separately (data from <uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri> and
Misselbrook et al., 2015). <bold>(b)</bold> Relative trends between 1998 and 2014
in measured annual mean NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all UK National Ammonia Monitoring
Network (NAMN) sites, and for grouped sites classified as dominated by
cattle, pigs &amp; poultry, and sheep. Both figures are plotted with the same
scale to allow direct comparison of the relative magnitudes in trends.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f16.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9540">Summary of linear regression time series trend analysis on grouped
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration data (annually averaged data and also monthly mean
data) from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for four
different emission source sectors. The following are shown: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value,
annual trend (fitted slope, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the relative change over the selected time period (in %).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source sector</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time series</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Significant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Annual trend<inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Relative change</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(1998–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">sites<inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">over the period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [%]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cattle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0049</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0180</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cattle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">monthly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0019</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0002</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pigs &amp; Poultry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0434</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.2143</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pigs &amp; Poultry</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">monthly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0466</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0257</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sheep</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0034</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.1751</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sheep</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">monthly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0032</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0108</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Background</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">annual</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0627</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Background</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">monthly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">no</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0037</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e9602"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Number of sites providing complete data runs over
the specified time period in analysis. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Annual
trend <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> fitted slope of linear regression (unit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Relative change calculated based on the
estimated annual NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the end
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of time series computed from the slope and intercept
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]).
Cattle sites: Bickerton Hill (UKA00297), Brown Moss (UKA00369), Castle Cary (UKA00328),
Cwmystwyth (UKA00325), Fenn's Moss (UKA00291), High Muffles (UKA00169),
Hillsborough (UKA00293), Little Budworth (UKA00298), Llynclys Common
(UKA00270), Lough Navar (UKA00166), Myerscough (UKA00356), Northallerton
(UKA00316), North Wyke (UKA00269), Penallt (UKA00324), Wardlow Hay Cop
(UKA00119), Wem Moss (UKA00299), Yarner Wood (UKA00168).
Pig &amp; Poultry sites: Bedlingfield (UKA00334), Dennington (UKA00331), Dunwich Heath (UKA00308),
Fressingfield (UKA00335), Mere Sands Wood (UKA00280), Redgrave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Lopham
(UKA00311), Sibton (UKA00012), Stoke Ferry (UKA00317), Stanford (UKA00476).
Sheep sites: Glensaugh (UKA00348; 2005 classification <inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> background, but
1 km radius is predominantly sheep from local land-use information),
Moorhouse (UKA00357) and Sourhope (UKA00347) (2005
classification <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> cattle, but 1 km radius around site is sheep from local
land-use information), Shetland (UKA00486).
Background sites: Allt a'Mharcaidh (UKA00086), Dumfries (UKA00368), Eskdalemuir (UKA00130),
Inverpolly (UKA00457), Strathvaich (UKA00162).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e10179">For the 17 sites in cattle-dominated areas, there is an increasing, but
non-significant trend. Overall, based on MK analysis of annual data, the
relative change from 1998 to 2014 is a 12 % increase (Table 3, Fig. 14),
compared with a smaller increase of 4 % from linear regression (Table 4,
Fig. 14). With the monthly data, there is no discernible trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9 %
(MK); 1.4 % (LR)). In the seasonal MK test on monthly data (% relative
median change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9 %), no monthly “seasons” are significant, with
only January approaching significance at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07. The near-significant
trend for January is likely to be due to unusually high NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations recorded in January at some sites in the first few months of
the time series, attributed to manure spreading activities taking place in
the winter months when the ground was frozen (confirmed by local
observations), in direct contravention of good farming practice.</p>
      <p id="d1e10215">Although the long-term trend in monitored NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at sites
classified as dominated by cattle emissions shows a non-discernible or small
increasing trend (non-significant), the opposite is happening with UK cattle
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, which declined by an estimated 11 % over the same
period (Fig. 16, Table 5). In principle, a signal (changes in atmospheric
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations) related to substantial livestock changes associated
with the 2000 outbreak of foot and mouth disease might have been expected.
However, this outbreak was actually rather localized in northwest England and
southwest England, and was followed by substantial restocking from 2001
(Sutton et al., 2006) and there was no detectable signal of foot and mouth
disease in the average for cattle-dominated areas.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e10248">Comparison of % change in estimated UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
reported by the National Atmospheric Emission Inventory (NAEI) (data
from: <uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri>) with % change between 1998 and
2014 in annually averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration data from the UK National
Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for all NAMN sites (dataset 1a) and for
grouped sites in four different emission source sectors.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="142.26378pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Comparison period:<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1998–2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All sites <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(dataset 1a: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cattle <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pigs &amp; poultry <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Sheep <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Background <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions: % change relative to 1998</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">no data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK NAMN NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: % relative median change estimated from MK Sen slope and intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK NAMN NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: % relative change estimated from linear regression slope and intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.6 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see Table 4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(see table 4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e10272">Significance: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e10649">By contrast, in pig- and poultry-dominated areas (nine sites) there is a
decreasing trend with significant reduction in measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations between 1998 and 2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 % (MK), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02, Table 3;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 % (LR), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06, Table 4) from analysis of annual data
(Fig. 14). For the monthly data, the overall change based on linear
regression is also a 22 % decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02) (Table 4, Fig. 15),
compared with a larger level of decrease based on MK analysis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32 %,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01) (Table 3, Fig. 15). The SMK test also shows a significant
decreasing trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 %, overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001), with 6 of the
12 monthly “seasons” showing significant trends (February, June, November,
December: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, October: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01, January:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001). A decrease in emissions from pig and poultry of
39 % between 1998 and 2014 (Fig. 16, Table 5) is therefore broadly
supported, although not matched by a similar decrease in measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e10768">For sheep-dominated sites (four sites), there is an increasing trend in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(MK: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17, Table 3; LR: 20 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09, Table 4)
between 1998 and 2014 in the annual data (Fig. 14). The monthly data also
show a similar upward trend (Fig. 14) with relative change in concentrations
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 % based on MK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10) (Table 3) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 % based on
LR (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14) (Table 4). The increasing trend at sheep sites is therefore
in contrast to the estimated 24 % decrease in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from
this sector since 1998 (Fig. 16, Table 5). For the SMK test, no individual
monthly “seasons” were significant, although three of the monthly “seasons”
approached the significance level (April, December: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08, October: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09). Overall, the increasing trend from the SMK test is
significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01. While the Sen trend slope from both MK
and SMK tests were comparable, at 0.0036 and
0.0033 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, the % relative
median change results computed from them are very different
(MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 % cf. SMK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 210 %), because the intercepts of the
fitted Sen trend slopes are different (MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.289 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cf. SMK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0267 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Caution therefore needs to be exercised when
interpreting the % relative change results, especially at sites with low
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, which must be examined together with the fitted
trends.</p>
      <p id="d1e11008">At background sites (five sites where total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for the
respective 5 km grid squares are estimated at
&lt; 1 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations also
appear to have increased (non-significant). Based on the MK analysis for the
period 1998 to 2014, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased overall by 18 and
13 % from the analysis of annual and monthly data, respectively
(Table 3). Results from linear regression were similar, with an overall
increase of 13 and 12 % from analysis of the annual and monthly data,
respectively (Table 4). Similar to sheep sites, the % relative median
change estimated from the seasonal MK Sen slope and intercept (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>49 %)
is larger than from the classic MK Sen slope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 %) due to
differences in the intercepts of the fitted trend lines
(MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1528 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cf.
SMK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0388 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since the trend slopes are
the same (0.0012 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Overall, the SMK test
shows a significant increasing trend in the monthly data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). No
individual monthly “seasons” were significant, with March, April and
November monthly “seasons” approaching the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09).</p>
      <p id="d1e11206">As with the annual UK-wide long-term datasets (Sect. 3.5), it is useful to
consider the significance of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for the groupings of sites
according to dominant emission source sectors. Tables 3 and 4 show that
neither the annual nor the monthly time series showed a significant change in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for the cattle-dominated sites. In the case of pig-
and poultry-dominated sites, the decrease in measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
was significant for both the annual and monthly datasets. For sheep-dominated
and backgrounds sites, the estimated increase in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations was
not significant based on the MK and linear regression tests on the annual and
monthly data, but was significant based on the SMK test of the monthly data.
Overall, these statistics confirm significant differences between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
trends for sites dominated by different source types, with concentrations
decreasing at pig- and poultry-dominated sites, concentrations increasing at
sheep-dominated and background sites, and no significant trend at cattle-dominated sites (Table 5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Changing chemical climate and effects on long-term trends in NH${}_{{3}}$ and
NH${}_{{4}}{}^{{+}}$}?><title>Changing chemical climate and effects on long-term trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e11282">Other pollutants that affect NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the atmosphere
include SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, which determine rates of secondary
inorganic aerosol formation and therefore the lifetime of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
atmosphere. UK emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are estimated to have declined
significantly by 81 % from 1.6 million tonnes in 1998 to 0.3 million
tonnes in 2014 (Defra, 2015). Similarly, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the same
period are estimated to have fallen by 50 % from 2 million tonnes to 1
million tonnes (Defra, 2015). The reaction of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
to form (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is effectively irreversible (in the absence of
in-cloud reprocessing), whereas an equilibrium exists between gaseous
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl components which are
appreciably volatile at ambient temperatures. A change in the particulate
phase from (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
will remain longer in the atmosphere, since NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is volatile and
releases NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in warm weather.</p>
      <p id="d1e11507">Elsewhere, a mismatch between reported trends in emissions and measurement
data have similarly been investigated. The question of the “Ammonia Gap” in
the Netherlands was debated over a number of years. There, the estimated
reduction in emissions due to mitigation measures was not matched by expected
decreases in measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in air and/or NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
precipitation (Erisman et al., 2001; Bleeker et al., 2009; van Zanten et al.,
2017). Similarly in Hungary, monitored NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from long-term
measurements did not match the estimated reduction in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
following the decline in agricultural livestock population and fertilizer
usage after political changes in 1989 (Horvath and Sutton, 1998). This was
subsequently attributed to a reduction in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the same
period, increasing the atmospheric lifetime of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Horvath et al.,
2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e11568">Dry deposition of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are enhanced in the presence of both
gases, an interaction referred to as “co-deposition” (Fowler et al., 2001).
The acid-base neutralization by each of the gases provides an efficient sink
for dry deposition on leaf surfaces, and deposition enhancement for each gas
depends on the relative air concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the dry deposition process has been shown to be strongly influenced
by ambient concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> because the surface resistance is
regulated mainly by uptake in moisture on foliar surfaces, which, in turn, is
strongly influenced by the presence of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The large reduction in
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and ambient concentrations, compared with the relative
stagnation in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and concentrations over the same period, has
meant that the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio has decreased dramatically. This
has led to a systematic decrease in canopy resistance to uptake of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
on surfaces, increasing dry deposition of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UK (ROTAP 2012).
The underlying cause of the decrease in surface resistance is that the
ambient NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is sufficient to neutralize acidity from the solution and
oxidation of deposited SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, maintaining large rates of deposition.</p>
      <p id="d1e11715">Similar interactions are seen to be occurring in the UK based on the NAMN
data, where the concurrent reduction in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over
the same period (Fig. 18b) should theoretically lead to a longer atmospheric
lifetime of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby increasing NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the UK,
especially in remote areas. The interpretation of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement data can further be aided by comparison with
particulate nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the
UK AGANet that are made concurrently with the NAMN NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements at 30 sites (see Sect. 2.2). There is close agreement between
the aerosol components, with a near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the sum of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, lending support that
particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UK is mainly derived from NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and acidic
gases such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to form (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Conolly et al., 2016). For particulate
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it has already been shown in Sect. 3.3 that this regional
species has less of a relationship to the dominant NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source sectors;
trend analysis was therefore undertaken using all NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> site data
combined. As with the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> time series analysis, sites with incomplete
data runs for particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to reduced density of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements and site changes occurring from the period 2001–2006 were excluded (see
Sect. 2.2.1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17"><caption><p id="d1e12032">Long-term trends in ratio of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating
an increase in this ratio with time. The comparisons shown is for datasets
(i) 23 sites with complete NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series from 1999 to 2014, and
(ii) 30 sites with complete NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series from 2006 to 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f17.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e12088"><bold>(a)</bold> Long-term trends in particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) compared with particulate
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from the UK Acid Gases and
Aerosols Monitoring Network (AGANet; Conolly et al., 2016) measured at the
same time. Each data point represents the averaged monthly measurements from
all AGANet sites (increased from 12 to 30 sites since January 2006) and also
the original l2 AGANet sites in the network (1999 data were excluded as
measurements started in September 1999). <bold>(b)</bold> Trends in total UK
emissions of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M986" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M987" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M988" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the same period
(2000–2014). Data from the National Atmospheric Emission Inventory (NAEI,
<uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/705/2018/acp-18-705-2018-f18.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e12175">Comparison of % change in UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M989" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M990" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M991" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions reported by the National Atmospheric Emission Inventory (NAEI)
(data from: <uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri>) with % change in annually
averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M992" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration data from the UK National
Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) for sites with complete data runs of both
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M994" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M995" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the specified time periods.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="142.26378pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1004" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (23 sites)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1005" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (23 sites)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1006" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 sites)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1007" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 sites)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(1999–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(1999–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2006–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2006–2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK emissions: % change over<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>the time period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1008" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1009" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1010" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>75 (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1011" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1012" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>53 (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1013" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1014" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1015" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1016" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54 (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1017" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1018" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39 (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1019" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK NAMN: % relative median change<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>estimated from MK Sen slope<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>and intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1020" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1021" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1022" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1023" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1024" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK NAMN: % relative change<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>estimated from linear regression slope<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>and intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1025" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1026" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1027" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1028" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1029" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1030" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e12251">Significance: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M996" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M997" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M998" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M999" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1000" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1001" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1002" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1003" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e12687">Comparison of % change in UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1031" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1032" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1033" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions reported by the National Atmospheric Emission Inventory (NAEI)
(data from: <uri>http://naei.defra.gov.uk/</uri>) with % change in annually
averaged NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1034" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration data from the UK National Ammonia
Monitoring Network (NAMN) and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1035" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1036" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
data from the UK Acid Gases and Aerosols Monitoring Network (AGANet) for sites with complete concurrent data runs over
the specified time periods.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="128.037402pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1043" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(12 sites) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2000–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1044" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(12 sites) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2000–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1045" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(12 sites) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2000–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1046" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(30 sites) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2006–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1047" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(30 sites) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2006–2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1048" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(30 sites) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2006–2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK emissions: % change over<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>the time period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1049" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1050" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1051" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>75 (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1052" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1053" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>53 (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1054" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1055" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1056" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1057" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54 (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1058" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1059" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39 (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1060" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK NAMN: % relative median<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>change estimated from MK<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Sen slope and intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1061" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1062" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1063" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1064" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1065" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1066" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1067" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1068" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1069" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1070" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1071" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1072" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UK NAMN: % relative change<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>estimated from linear regression<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>slope and intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1073" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1074" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1075" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1076" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1077" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1078" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1079" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1080" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1081" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1082" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1083" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1084" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e12760"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{2mm}}?>Significance: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1037" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1038" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1039" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1040" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1041" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1042" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e13370">Two data series for NAMN NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1085" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data were selected for analysis: (i) 23
sites with complete NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1086" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series from 1999 to 2014, and (ii) 30
sites with complete NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1087" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series from 2006 to 2014. Both time
series show a large significant downward trend in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1088" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1089" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) (Table 6, Fig. S4). Overall, MK and LR tests show a
significant decrease in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1090" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations by 47 and 49 %,
respectively, between 1999 and 2014 and by 44 and 43 %, respectively,
between 2006 and 2014 (Table 6, Fig. S5). By contrast, concurrent NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1091" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
data from the same sites over the same time periods showed a much smaller,
non-significant downward trend between 2006 and 2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1092" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 %, MK;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1093" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 %, LR), and no discernible trend between 1999 and 2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1094" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
3 %, MK and LR) (Table 6). This reduction in particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1095" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be seen to be closely associated with parallel decreases in particulate
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1096" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1097" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from AGANet (Table 7,
Figs. 18a, S6), which are themselves associated with reductions in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1098" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1099" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Table 7, Fig. 18b).</p>
      <p id="d1e13529">The comparisons above therefore suggest that reductions in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the period have led to a lower formation of
particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere. Further evidence in support of
this is indicated by plotting the ratio of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1104" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 17b), which has increased from 1.8 in 1999 to 2.8 in 2014. This
demonstrates how a larger fraction of the reduced N is staying in the gas
phase as NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, increasing its atmospheric residence time and maintaining
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at a higher level than solely based on NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission trends. Although the overall changes in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
the UK dataset are small and in many cases not significant for particular
data groupings, they are consistent with similar phenomena observed in
Hungary, the Netherlands and Denmark (Horvath et al., 2009; Erisman et al.,
2001; Sutton et al., 2003; Bleeker et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e13635">Spatial and temporal trends in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are found to be related to
variability in emission source types across the UK and also to be influenced
by changes in environmental conditions. Extensive spatial heterogeneity in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations was observed, with lowest annual mean concentrations
at remote sites (&lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and highest in the
areas with intensive agriculture (up to 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations show less spatial variability (e.g. range of 0.14
to 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> annual mean in 2005) with a general decreasing
gradient from the southeast to the northwest of the UK, due to both
regional differences in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and import of particulate
matter into southeast England from Europe.</p>
      <p id="d1e13741">Peak NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are observed in summer at background sites
(defined by 5 km grid average NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
&lt; 1 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and in areas dominated by sheep
farming, driven by increased volatilization of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in warmer summer
temperatures. In areas where cattle, pig and poultry farming is dominant, the
largest NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are in spring and autumn, matching periods of
manure application to fields. By contrast, peak concentrations of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol occur in spring from long-range transboundary sources.
The spatial and seasonal patterns established for sites influenced by
different emission source sectors are important for providing a foundation to
understanding NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange processes, impacts and the UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
budget, and to inform abatement strategies.</p>
      <p id="d1e13838">Official published estimates of UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are estimated to have
declined by 16.3 % between 1998 and 2014. The long-term NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration data from the UK NAMN suggests evidence of a smaller, but
non-significant decreasing trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 %, MK; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1132" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1 %, LR),
based on analysis of annually averaged data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59) over the same period
(Table 2). Analysis of annually averaged data for different groupings of the
NAMN dataset for the time periods 1999–2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 66) and 2000–2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 75) also gave similar results. In each case, the level of reduction
observed in the datasets (1999–2014: 0.0 % (MK) vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0 % (LR);
2000–2014: 0.0 % (MK) vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1137" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.8 % (LR)) is less than the 15.6 and
13.1 % reduction in estimated UK NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the periods
1999–2014 and 2000–2014, respectively (Table 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e13927">In areas with intensive pig and poultry farming, there is a significant
downward trend in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from the analysis of annually
averaged data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1140" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 % (MK), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1142" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 % (LR), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06)
that is consistent with, but not as large as, the decrease in estimated
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this sector over the same period (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1145" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39 %)
(Table 5). By contrast, in cattle-dominated areas, there is evidence of a
small increasing, but non-significant trend in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1147" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 % (MK); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1148" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.6 % (LR): annually averaged data), despite the
decline in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from this sector since 1998 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1150" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 %)
(Table 5). At background and sheep-dominated sites, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
increased (non-significant) over the monitoring period (Table 5). These
increases in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at background (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1153" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 %, MK;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1154" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 %, LR: annually averaged data) and sheep-dominated sites
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1155" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 %, MK; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1156" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 %, LR: annually averaged data) are consistent
with decreasing SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (and to a lesser extent NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions) associated with a change in the PM from (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the latter being volatile and releasing NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in warm
weather.</p>
      <p id="d1e14148">Particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a secondary pollutant formed from
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and oxidation products of acidic gases such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the emissions of these acidic gases have reduced over the past
years, the ratio between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has increased from 1.8 to
2.8 between 1999 and 2014. These changes are consistent with observed
decreases in particulate SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations that
are associated with decline in SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the same
period. This effect appears to be of sufficient magnitude to explain the lack
of overall decrease in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, where the decrease in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger than for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at corresponding sites. Overall, UK
annual particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations decreased by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 (MK) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>49 % (LR) for period 1999–2014, associated with a slower formation of
particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere from gas-phase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
findings are consistent with a parallel change in partitioning from
particulate NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to gaseous NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as also detected in Hungary, the
Netherlands and Denmark.</p>
      <p id="d1e14357">Until now, only a modest commitment has been agreed to reduce European
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. By contrast, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions have
decreased over Europe over the past decades, and are projected to decrease
further under the revised Gothenburg Protocol and revised NECD. As a result,
the importance of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to oxidized N and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions is
expected to continue to increase over the next decades, playing a
significant role in the formation of fine PM and contributing to ecosystem
effects through N deposition. With longer atmospheric lifetimes of gaseous
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and little commitment to reduce emissions, combined with climate
warming effects tending to increase NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, there is a
substantial risk that exceedance of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> critical levels may
increase in the future, exacerbating the threat to the most sensitive
semi-natural habitats. The growing relative importance of reduced nitrogen
to total acidic and total nitrogen deposition indicates that future
strategies to tackle acidification and eutrophication will need to include
measures to abate emissions of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e14447">Ratified data from the National Ammonia Monitoring Network (NAMN) and the Acid Gases and Aerosol Network (AGANet)
are publically available on the Defra UK-AIR website (<uri>https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/data</uri>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e14453"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-705-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-705-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e14459">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e14465">This work was carried out with funding from the Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the devolved administrations, and from
supporting NERC CEH programmes. The assistance and contributions from the
large network of NAMN and AGANet site operators, former NAMN network
managers (Ben Miners, Antje Branding), the Centralised Analytical Chemistry Facility
at Lancaster, and in particular Heather Carter, Darren Sleep and Philip
Rowland, colleagues at CEH Edinburgh (Sarah Leeson, Matt Jones, Chris Andrews, Margaret Anderson, David Leaver), colleagues at RIVM who operate
Zegfeld station and Ricardo Energy and Environment (Martin Davies, Tim Bevington, Ben Davies) are also gratefully acknowledged.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Fangqun Yu<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: László Horváth and Xiaohong Yao</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adon, M., Yoboue, V., Galy-Lacaux, C., Liousse, C., Diop, B., Doumbia, E.
T., Gardrat, E., Ndiaye, S. A., and Jarnot, C.: Measurements of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in West African urban
environments, Atmos. Environ., 135, 31–40,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.050</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Asman, W. A. H., Sutton, M. A., and Schjorring, J. K.: Ammonia: emission,
atmospheric transport and deposition, New Phytol., 139, 27–48,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00180.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00180.x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>AQEG: Linking Emission Inventories and Ambient Measurements, AIR QUALITY
EXPERT GROUP report prepared for: Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs, Scottish Executive, Welsh Government, and Department of the
Environment in Northern Ireland, available at:
<uri>http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk</uri> (last access: 10 January 2017), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bleeker, A., Sutton, M. A., Acherman, B., Alebic-Juretic, A., Aneja, V. P.,
Ellermann, T., Erisman, J. W., Fowler, D., Fagerli, H., Gauger, T., Harlen,
K. S., Hole, L. R., Horvath, L., Mitosinkova, M., Smith, R. I., Tang, Y. S.,
and van Pul, A.: Linking Ammonia Emission Trends to Measured Concentrations
and Deposition of Reduced Nitrogen at Different Scales, Atmospheric Ammonia:
Detecting Emission Changes and Environmental Impacts, edited by: Sutton, M.
A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M. H., 123–180, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brunekreef, B., Harrison, R. M., Künzli, N., Querol, X., Sutton, M. A.,
Heederik, D. J. J., and Sigsgaard, T.: Reducing the health effect of
particles from agriculture, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 3, 831–832,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00413-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00413-0</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Colette, A., Aas, W., Banin, L., Braban, C.F., Ferm, M., Ortiz, A., Ilyin,
I., Mar, K., Pandolfi, M., Putaud, J. P., and Shatalov, V.: Air pollution
trends in the EMEP region between 1990 and 2012, Joint Report of the EMEP
Task Force on Measurements and Modelling (TFMM), Chemical Co-ordinating
Centre (CCC), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-East (MSC-E),
Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (MSC-W), EMEP/CCC-Report 1/2016,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cape, J. N., van der Eerden, L. J., Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D., and
Sutton, M. A.: Evidence for changing the critical level for ammonia,
Environ. Pollut., 157, 1033–1037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.049</ext-link>,
2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cape, J. N., van der Eerden, L. J., Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D., and
Sutton, M. A.: Reassessment of Critical Levels for Atmospheric Ammonia,
Atmospheric Ammonia, edited by: Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M.
H., 15–40, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Conolly, C., Davies, M., Knight, D., Vincent, K., Sanocka, A., Lingard, J.,
Richie, S., Donovan, B., Collings, A., Braban, C., Tang, Y. S., Stephens,
A., Twigg, M., Jones, M., Simmons, I., Coyle, C., Kentisbeer, J., Leeson,
S., van Dijk, N., Nemitz, E., Langford, B., Bealey, W., Leaver, D., Poskitt,
J., Carter, H., Thacker, S., Patel, M., Keenan, P., Pereira, G., Lawlor, A.,
Warwick, A., Farrand, P., and Sutton, M. A.: UK Eutrophying and Acidifying
Atmospheric Pollutants (UKEAP) Annual Report 2015, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Defra: Defra National Statistics Release: Emissions of air pollutants in the
UK, 1970 to 2014, Statistical release: 17 December 2015, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>den Bril, B. V., Meremans, D., and Roekens, E.: A Monitoring Network on
Acidification in Flanders, Belgium, Scientific World J., 11, 2358–2363,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1100/2011/897308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1100/2011/897308</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Dore, A. J., Vieno, M., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Dosio, A., Weston, K.
J., and Sutton, M. A.: Modelling the atmospheric transport and deposition of
sulphur and nitrogen over the United Kingdom and assessment of the influence
of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from international shipping, Atmos. Environ., 41,
2355–2367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.013</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dore, A. J., Theobald, M. R., Kryza, M., Vieno, M., Tang, S. Y., and Sutton,
M. A.: Modelling the deposition of reduced nitrogen at different scales in
the United Kingdom, in: Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application XIXXIX,
edited by: Borrego, C., and Miranda, A. I., Nato Science for Peace and
Security Series C, Environmental Security, 127–135, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Dore, A. J., Carslaw, D. C., Braban, C., Cain, M., Chemel, C., Conolly, C.,
Derwent, R. G., Griffiths, S. J., Hall, J., Hayman, G., Lawrence, S.,
Metcalfe, S. E., Redington, A., Simpson, D., Sutton, M. A., Sutton, P.,
Tang, Y. S., Vieno, M., Werner, M., and Whyatt, J. D.: Evaluation of the
performance of different atmospheric chemical transport models and
inter-comparison of nitrogen and sulphur deposition estimates for the UK,
Atmos. Environ., 119, 131–143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv2015.08.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv2015.08.008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dragosits, U.  and Sutton, M. A.: Maps of Ammonia emissions from agriculture,
waste, nature and other miscellaneous sources for the NAEI 2003, Report to
AEAT/DEFRA, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dragosits, U., Sutton, M. A., Place, C. J., and Bayley, A. A.: Modelling the
spatial distribution of agricultural ammonia emissions in the UK, Nitrogen,
the Confer-N-S, edited by: VanderHoek, K. W., Erisman, J. W., Smeulders, S.,
Wisniewski, J. R., and Wisniewski, J., 195–203, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dragosits, U., Theobald, M. R., Place, C. J., Lord, E., Webb, J., Hill, J.,
ApSimon, H. M., and Sutton, M. A.: Ammonia emission, deposition and impact
assessment at the field scale: a case study of sub-grid spatial variability,
Environ. Pollut., 117, 147–158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00147-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00147-6</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Erisman, J. W., Mosquera, J., and Hensen, A.: Two options to explain the
ammonia gap in The Netherlands, Environ. Sci. Policy, 4,
97–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00115-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00115-5</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>EEA: European Union emission inventory report 1990–2014 under the UNECE
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) European
Environment Agency Report No 16/2016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2800/628267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2800/628267</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
EU: Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain
atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing
Directive 2001/81/EC, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Eurostat: Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics, Publications Office
of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Flechard, C. R., Massad, R. S., Loubet, B., Personne, E., Simpson, D., Bash,
J. O., Cooter, E. J., Nemitz, E., and Sutton, M. A.: Advances in
understanding, models and parameterizations of biosphere-atmosphere ammonia
exchange, Biogeosciences, 10, 5183–5225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5183-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-5183-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Fournier, N., Pais, V. A., Sutton, M. A., Weston, K. J., Dragosits, U.,
Tang, S. Y., and Aherne, J.: Parallelisation and application of a
multi-layer atmospheric transport model to quantify dispersion and
deposition of ammonia over the British Isles, Environ. Pollut., 116,
95–107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00146-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00146-4</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Fournier, N., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., De Kluizenaar, Y., and Sutton, M.
A.: Regional atmospheric budgets of reduced nitrogen over the British Isles
assessed using a multi-layer atmospheric transport model, Water Air  Soil
Poll., 162, 331–351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-7249-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11270-005-7249-0</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, D., Sutton, M. A., Smith, R. I., Pitcairn, C. E. R., Coyle, M.,
Campbell, G., and Stedman, J.: Regional mass budgets of oxidized and reduced
nitrogen and their relative contribution to the nitrogen inputs of sensitive
ecosystems, Nitrogen, the Confer-N-S, edited by: VanderHoek, K. W., Erisman,
J. W., Smeulders, S., Wisniewski, J. R., and Wisniewski, J., 337–342,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Fowler, D., Sutton, M. A., Flechard, C., Cape, J. N., Storeton-West, R.,
Coyle, M., and Smith, R. I.: The control of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dry deposition on to
natural surfaces by NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its effects on regional deposition, Water
Air  Soil Poll., 1, 39–48, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Fowler, D., Pilegaard, K., Sutton, M. A., Ambus, P., Raivonen, M., Duyzer,
J., Simpson, D., Fagerli, H., Fuzzi, S., Schjoerring, J. K., Granier, C.,
Neftel, A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Laj, P., Maione, M., Monks, P. S., Burkhardt,
J., Daemmgen, U., Neirynck, J., Personne, E., Wichink-Kruit, R.,
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Flechard, C., Tuovinen, J. P., Coyle, M., Gerosa, G.,
Loubet, B., Altimir, N., Gruenhage, L., Ammann, C., Cieslik, S., Paoletti,
E., Mikkelsen, T. N., Ro-Poulsen, H., Cellier, P., Cape, J. N., Horváth,
L., Loreto, F., Niinemets, Ü., Palmer, P. I., Rinne, J., Misztal, P.,
Nemitz, E., Nilsson, D., Pryor, S., Gallagher, M. W., Vesala, T., Skiba, U.,
Brüggemann, N., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., Williams, J., O'Dowd, C.,
Facchini, M. C., de Leeuw, G., Flossman, A., Chaumerliac, N., and Erisman,
J. W.: Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems–Atmosphere interactions,
Atmos. Environ., 43, 5193–5267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Fowler, D., Dise, N., and Sheppard, L.: Committee on air pollution effects
research: 40 years of UK air pollution, Environ. Pollut., 208,
876–878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.014</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gilbert, R. O.: Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring,
New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hallsworth, S., Dore, A. J., Bealey, W. I., Dragosits, U., Vieno, M.,
Hellsten, S., Tang, Y. S., and Sutton, M. A.: The role of indicator choice
in quantifying the threat of atmospheric ammonia to the “Natura 2000”
network, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 671–687,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hellsten, S., Dragosits, U., Place, C. J., Misselbrook, T. H., Tang, Y. S.,
and Sutton, M. A.: Modelling Seasonal Dynamics from Temporal Variation in
Agricultural Practices in the UK Ammonia Emission Inventory, Water  Air
Soil Poll., 7, 3–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-006-9087-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11267-006-9087-5</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hellsten, S., Dragosits, U., Place, C. J., Vieno, M., Dore, A. J.,
Misselbrook, T. H., Tang, Y. S., and Sutton, M. A.: Modelling the spatial
distribution of ammonia emissions in the UK, Environ. Pollut., 154,
370–379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.017</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hirsch, R. M. and Slack, J. R.: A Nonparametric Trend Test for Seasonal
Data With Serial Dependence, Water Resour. Res., 20,
727–732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/WR020i006p00727</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Horvath, L. and Sutton, M. A.: Long-term record of ammonia and ammonium
concentrations at K-Puszta, Hungary, Atmos. Environ., 32, 339–344,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00046-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00046-0</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Horvath, L., Fagerli, H., and Sutton, M. A.: Long-Term Record (1981–2005) of
Ammonia and Ammonium Concentrations at K-Puszta Hungary and the Effect of
Sulphur Dioxide Emission Change on Measured and Modelled Concentrations,
Atmospheric Ammonia, edited by: Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M.
H., 181–185, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kim, K.-H., Kabir, E., and Kabir, S.: A review on the human health impact of
airborne particulate matter, Environ. Int., 74, 136–143,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lolkema, D. E., Noordijk, H., Stolk, A. P., Hoogerbrugge, R., van Zanten, M.
C.,
and van Pul, W. A. J.: The measuring ammonia in nature (MAN) network in the
Netherlands, Biogeosciences, 12, 5133–5142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5133-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-5133-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Massad, R. S., Nemitz, E., and Sutton, M. A.: Review and parameterisation of
bi-directional ammonia exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10359–10386,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10359-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10359-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Met Office: UK Daily Temperature and rainfall Data, Part of the Met Office
Integrated Data Archive System (MIDAS), NCAS British Atmospheric Data
Centre, 15/12/16, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>McLeod, A. I.: Package “Kendall”, version 2.2, Kendall rank correlation and
Mann-Kendall trend test,
<uri>https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Kendall/Kendall.pdf</uri> (last
access: 17 February 2017), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Misselbrook, T. H., Gilhespy, S. L., Cardenas, L. M., Williams, J., and
Dragosits, U.: Inventory of Ammonia Emissions from UK Agriculture – 2014.
DEFRA Contract SCF0102, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Pitcairn, C. E. R., Leith, I. D., Sheppard, L. J., Sutton, M. A., Fowler,
D., Munro, R. C., Tang, S., and Wilson, D.: The relationship between
nitrogen deposition, species composition and foliar nitrogen concentrations
in woodland flora in the vicinity of livestock farms, Environ.
Pollut., 102, 41–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80013-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80013-4</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Pohlert, T.: Package “Trend”, version 0.2.0: Non-Parametric Trend Tests and
Change-Point Detection,
<uri>https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/trend/trend.pdf</uri> (last access:
17 February 2017), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Pope, R. J., Butt, E. W., Chipperfield, M. P., Doherty, R. M., Fenech, S.,
Schmidt, A., Arnold, S. R., and Savage, N. H. The impact of synoptic weather
on UK surface ozone and implications for premature mortality, Environ. Res.
Lett., 11, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124004</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Puchalski, M. A., Sather, M. E., Walker, J. T., Lehmann, C. M. B., Gay, D.
A., Mathew, J., and Robarge, W. P.: Passive ammonia monitoring in the United
States: Comparing three different sampling devices, J. Environ.
Monitor., 13, 3156–3167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c1em10553a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c1em10553a</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Putaud, J. P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W., Cyrys,
J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H.C. and Harrison, R. M.: A
European aerosol phenomenology–3: Physical and chemical characteristics of
particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 1308–1320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Reis, S., Grennfelt, P., Klimont, Z., Amann, M., ApSimon, H., Hettelingh,
J.-P., Holland, M., LeGall, A.-C., Maas, R., Posch, M., Spranger, T.,
Sutton, M. A., and Williams, M.: From Acid Rain to Climate Change, Science,
338, 1153–1154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1226514</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Riddick, S. N., Blackall, T. D., Dragosits, U., Daunt, F., Braban, C. F.,
Tang, Y. S., MacFarlane, W., Taylor, S., Wanless, S., and Sutton, M. A.:
Measurement of ammonia emissions from tropical seabird colonies, Atmos.
Environ., 89, 35–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.012</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Serrano, A., Mateos, V. L., and Garcia, J. A.: Trend analysis of monthly
precipitation over the iberian peninsula for the period 1921–1995, Phys.
Chem. Earth Pt. B, 24,
85–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1909(98)00016-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1464-1909(98)00016-1</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D., Mizunuma, T., Cape, J. N., Crossley, A.,
Leeson, S., Sutton, M. A., Dijk, N., and Fowler, D.: Dry deposition of
ammonia gas drives species change faster than wet deposition of ammonium
ions: evidence from a long-term field manipulation, Glob. Change Biol.,
17, 3589–3607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02478.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02478.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Singles, R., Sutton, M. A., and Weston, K. J.: A multi-layer model to
describe the atmospheric transport and deposition of ammonia in Great
Britain, Atmos. Environ., 32, 393–399,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)83467-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(97)83467-x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Smith, R. I., Fowler, D., Sutton, M. A., Flechard, C., and Coyle, M.:
Regional estimation of pollutant gas dry deposition in the UK: model
description, sensitivity analyses and outputs, Atmos. Environ., 34,
3757–3777, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00517-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00517-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Stelson, A. W. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Relative humidity and temperature
dependence of the ammonium nitrate dissociation constant, Atmos.
Environ., 16, 983–992, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90184-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(82)90184-6</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A. and Fowler, D.: Introduction: fluxes and impacts of
atmospheric ammonia on national, landscape and farm scales, Environ.
Pollut. 119, 7–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00145-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00145-2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Pitcairn, C. E. R., and Fowler, D.: The Exchange of Ammonia
Between the Atmosphere and Plant Communities, Adv. Ecol.
Res., 24, 301–393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60045-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60045-8</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Fowler, D., Burkhardt, J. K., and Milford, C.: Vegetation
atmosphere exchange of ammonia: Canopy cycling and the impacts of elevated
nitrogen inputs, Water Air Soil Poll., 85, 2057–2063,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01186137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf01186137</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Milford, C., Dragosits, U., Place, C. J., Singles, R. J.,
Smith, R. I., Pitcairn, C. E. R., Fowler, D., Hill, J., ApSimon, H. M.,
Ross, C., Hill, R., Jarvis, S. C., Pain, B. F., Phillips, V. C., Harrison,
R., Moss, D., Webb, J., Espenhahn, S. E., Lee, D. S., Hornung, M., Ullyett,
J., Bull, K. R., Emmett, B. A., Lowe, J., and Wyers, G. P.: Dispersion,
deposition and impacts of atmospheric ammonia: quantifying local budgets and
spatial variability, Environ. Pollut., 102, 349–361,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80054-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80054-7</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Dragosits, U., Tang, Y. S., and Fowler, D. Ammonia emissions
from non-agricultural sources in the UK, Atmos. Environ., 34,
855–869, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00362-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00362-3</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Miners, B., Tang, Y. S., Milford, C., Wyers, G. P., Duyzer,
J. H., and Fowler, D.: Comparison of low cost measurement techniques for
long-term monitoring of atmospheric ammonia, J. Environ.
Monitor., 3, 446–453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b102303a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b102303a</ext-link>, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Fournier, N., Dore, A. J., Smith,
R. I., Weston, K. J., and Fowler, D.: A spatial analysis of atmospheric
ammonia and ammonium in the UK, Scientific World J., 2,  275–286,
1 Supplement,  doi10.1100/tsw.2001.313, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Tang, Y. S., Miners, B., Fowler, D., Trace, G., and Air
Pollution, R.: A new diffusion denuder system for long-term, regional
monitoring of atmospheric ammonia and ammonium, Water, Air and Soil
Pollution, Focus, 1, Part 5/6, 145–156, 2001c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Asman, W. A. H., Ellermann, T., Van Jaarsveld, J. A., Acker,
K., Aneja, V., Duyzer, J., Horvath, L., Paramonov, S., Mitosinkova, M.,
Tang, Y. S., Achermann, B., Gauger, T., Bartniki, J., Neftel, A., and
Erisman, J. W.: Establishing the link between ammonia emission control and
measurements of reduced nitrogen concentrations and deposition,
Environ. Monit. Assess., 82, 149–185,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021834132138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1021834132138</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Dragosits, U., Simmons, I., Tang, Y. S., Hellsten, S., Love,
L., Vieno, M., Skiba, U., di Marco, C., Storeton-West, R. L., Fowler, D.,
Williams, J., North, P., Hobbs, P., and Misselbrook, T.: Monitoring and
modelling trace-gas change's following the 2001 outbreak of Foot and Mouth
Disease to reduce the uncertainties in agricultural emissions abatement,
Environ. Sci. Policy, 9, 407–422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsci.2006.04.001</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., Riddick, S. N., Dragosits, U., Nemitz, E., Theobald,
M. R., Tang, Y. S., Braban, C. F., Vieno, M., Dore, A. J., Mitchell, R. F.,
Wanless, S., Daunt, F., Fowler, D., Blackall, T. D., Milford, C., Flechard,
C. R., Loubet, B., Massad, R., Cellier, P., Personne, E., Coheur, P. F.,
Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Ngadi, Y., Clerbaux, C., Skjoth, C. A., Geels,
C., Hertel, O., Kruit, R. J. W., Pinder, R. W., Bash, J. O., Walker, J. T.,
Simpson, D., Horvath, L., Misselbrook, T. H., Bleeker, A., Dentener, F., and
de Vries, W.: Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and
deposition, Philos. T. R. Soc. B-Biological, 368, 1–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0166" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2013.0166</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Tang, Y. S., Cape, J. N., and Sutton, M. A.: Development and types of
passive samplers for monitoring atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, Scientific World J., 1, 513–529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.82" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1100/tsw.2001.82</ext-link>,
2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Theobald, M. R., Fowler, D., and Sutton, M. A.:
Sub-grid variability in ammonia concentrations and dry deposition in an
upland landscape, in: Air surface exchange of gases and particles: Poster
proceedings, edited by:  Fowler, D., Pitcairn, C. E. R., Douglas, L., and Erisman, J.
W.,
48–57, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S. and Sutton, M. A.: Quality management in the UK national
ammonia monitoring network, in: Proceedings of the International Conference:
QA/QC in the field of emission and air quality measurements: harmonization,
standardization and accreditation, held in Prague, 21–23 May 2003, edited by:
Borowiak, A., Hafkenscheid, T., Saunders, A., and Woods, P., European
Commission, Ispra, Italy, 297–307, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S., Cape, J. N., Braban, C. F., Twigg, M. M., Poskitt, J., Jones,
M. R., Rowland, P., Bentley, P., Hockenhull, K., Woods, C., Leaver, D.,
Simmons, I., van Dijk, N., Nemitz, E., and Sutton, M. A.: Development of a
new model DELTA sampler and assessment of potential sampling artefacts in
the UKEAP AGANet DELTA system: summary and technical report, London, Defra,
CEH Project no. C04544, C04845, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Tang, Y. S., Poskitt, J., Cape, J. N., Nemitz, E., Bealey,W. J., Leaver, D.,
Simmons, I., Wood, C., Pereira, G., Sutton, M. A., Davies, M., Conolly, C.,
Donovan, B., and Braban, C. F.: UK Eutrophying and Acidifying Atmospheric
Pollutant project's National Ammonia Monitoring Network, NAMN, Data funded by
Defra and the Devolved Administrations and published under the Open
Government Licence v1.0,
<uri>https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=nh3</uri>, last
access: 10 January 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Tang, Y. S., Poskitt, J., Cape, J. N., Nemitz, E., Bealey,W. J., Leaver, D.,
Beith, S., Thacker, S., Simmons, I., Letho, K., Wood, C., Pereira, G.,
Sutton, M. A., Davies, M., Conolly, C., Donovan, B., and Braban, C. F.: UK
Eutrophying and Acidifying Atmospheric Pollutant project's Acid Gases and
Aerosol Network, AGANet (Data funded by Defra and the Devolved
Administrations and published under the Open Government Licence v1.0,
<uri>https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=aganet</uri>), last
access: 10 January 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Thijsse, T. R., Wyers, G. P., Duyzer, J. H., Verhagen, H. L. M., Wayers, A.,
and
Mols, J. J.: Measurement of ammonia with diffusion tube samplers, Atmos.
Environ., 32, 333–337,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00278-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00278-1</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Thöni, L., Brang, P., Braun, S., Seitler, E., and Rihm, B.: Ammonia
Monitoring in Switzerland with Passive Samplers: Patterns, Determinants and
Comparison with Modelled Concentrations, Environ. Monitor.
Assess., 98, 93–107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000038181.99603.6e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:EMAS.0000038181.99603.6e</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig, M.,
Hjellbrekke, A. G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.:
Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and
observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 5447–5481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Tsagatakis, I., Brace, S., Jephcote, C., Passant, N., Pearson, B., Kiff, B.,
and Fraser, A.: UK Emission Mapping Methodology – A report of the National
Atmospheric Emission Inventory 2014, Ricardo/ED59800104 – Issue Number 1,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
UNECE: Edinburgh workshop on atmospheric ammonia: Detecting emission changes
and environmental impacts (4–6 December 2006), Report by the organizers with
the assistance of the secretariat. Report to: the Executive Body for the
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, the Working Group on
Strategies and Review; the Working Group on Effects, the Steering Body to
the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range
Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
UNECE: Options for revising the Gothenburg Protocol, Reactive Nitrogen,
Report by the Co-chairs of the Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen, Working
Group on Strategies and Review, ECE/EB.AIR/WG.5/2010/4, Geneva, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Van Pul, A., Van Jaarsveld, H., Van Der Meulen, T., and Velders, G.: Ammonia
concentrations in the Netherlands: Spatially detailed measurements and model
calculations, Atmos. Environ., 38, 4045–4055,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.051</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>van Zanten, M. C., Wichink Kruit, R. J., Hoogerbrugge, R., Van der Swaluw,
E., and van Pul, W. A. J.: Trends in ammonia measurements in the Netherlands
over the period 1993–2014, Atmos. Environ., 148, 352–360,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.007</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Vieno, M., Dore, A. J., Wind, P., Marco, C. D., Nemitz, E., Phillips, G.,
Tarrasón, L., and Sutton, M. A.: Application of the EMEP Unified Model
to the UK with a Horizontal Resolution of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1203" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, in:
Atmospheric Ammonia: Detecting emission changes and environmental impacts,
edited by: Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M. H., Springer
Netherlands, Dordrecht, 367–372, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Vieno, M., Heal, M. R., Hallsworth, S., Famulari, D., Doherty, R. M., Dore,
A. J., Tang, Y. S., Braban, C. F., Leaver, D., Sutton, M. A., and Reis, S.:
The role of long-range transport and domestic emissions in determining
atmospheric secondary inorganic particle concentrations across the UK,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8435–8447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8435-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8435-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Vogt, E., Dragosits, U., Braban, C. F., Theobald, M. R., Dore, A. J., van
Dijk, N., Tang, Y. S., McDonald, C., Murray, S., Rees, R. M., and Sutton, M.
A.: Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and
consequences for environmental impact assessment, Environ. Pollut.,
179, 120–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Webb, J. and Misselbrook, T. H.: A mass-flow model of ammonia emissions from
UK livestock production, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2163–2176,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.023</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Wichink, Kruit, R. J., Schaap, M., Sauter, F. J., van Zanten, M. C., and van
Pul, W. A. J.: Modeling the distribution of ammonia across Europe including
bi-directional surface–atmosphere exchange, Biogeosciences, 9, 5261–5277,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5261-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-5261-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Wyers, G. P., Otjes, R. P., and Slanina, J.: A continuous-flow denuder for
the measurement of ambient concentrations and surface-exchange fluxes of
ammonia, Atmos. Environ. Pt. A, 27, 2085–2090,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90280-C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(93)90280-C</ext-link>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Wu, Q., Liu, X., Tang, A., Dore, A. J., and Heal, M. R.:
Characteristics of ammonia, acid gases, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for three typical land-use
types in the North China Plain, Environ. Sci. Poll.
Res., 23, 1158–1172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5648-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-015-5648-3</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Drivers for spatial, temporal and long-term trends in atmospheric ammonia and ammonium in the UK</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">A unique long-term dataset from the UK National Ammonia Monitoring Network
(NAMN) is used here to assess spatial, seasonal and long-term variability in
atmospheric ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>: 1998–2014) and particulate ammonium
(NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>: 1999–2014) across the UK. Extensive spatial heterogeneity in
NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations is observed, with lowest annual mean concentrations
at remote sites (&lt; 0.2 µg m<sup>−3</sup>) and highest in the
areas with intensive agriculture (up to 22 µg m<sup>−3</sup>), while
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations show less spatial variability (e.g. range of 0.14
to 1.8 µg m<sup>−3</sup> annual mean in 2005). Temporally, NH<sub>3</sub>
concentrations are influenced by environmental conditions and local emission
sources. In particular, peak NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations are observed in summer
at background sites (defined by 5 km grid average NH<sub>3</sub> emissions
&lt; 1 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and in areas dominated by sheep
farming, driven by increased volatilization of NH<sub>3</sub> in warmer summer
temperatures. In areas where cattle, pig and poultry farming is dominant, the
largest NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations are in spring and autumn, matching periods of
manure application to fields. By contrast, peak concentrations of
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> aerosol occur in spring, associated with long-range
transboundary sources. An estimated decrease in NH<sub>3</sub> emissions by
16 % between 1998 and 2014 was reported by the UK National Atmospheric
Emissions Inventory. Annually averaged NH<sub>3</sub> data from NAMN sites
operational over the same period (<i>n</i> =  59) show an indicative downward
trend, although the reduction in NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations is smaller and
non-significant: Mann–Kendall (MK), −6.3 %; linear regression (LR),
−3.1 %. In areas dominated by pig and poultry farming, a significant
reduction in NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations between 1998 and 2014 (MK: −22 %;
LR: −21 %, annually averaged NH<sub>3</sub>) is consistent with, but not as
large as the decrease in estimated NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from this sector over
the same period (−39 %). By contrast, in cattle-dominated areas there
is a slight upward trend (non-significant) in NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations (MK:
+12 %; LR: +3.6 %, annually averaged NH<sub>3</sub>), despite the
estimated decline in NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from this sector since 1998
(−11 %). At background and sheep-dominated sites, NH<sub>3</sub>
concentrations increased over the monitoring period. These increases
(non-significant) at background (MK: +17 %; LR: +13 %, annually
averaged data) and sheep-dominated sites (MK: +15 %; LR: +19 %,
annually averaged data) would be consistent with the concomitant reduction in
SO<sub>2</sub> emissions over the same period, leading to a longer atmospheric
lifetime of NH<sub>3</sub>, thereby increasing NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations in remote
areas. The observations for NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations not decreasing as fast as
estimated emission trends are consistent with a larger downward trend in
annual particulate NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations (1999–2014: MK: −47 %;
LR: −49 %, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, <i>n</i> =  23), associated with a
lower formation of particulate
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in the atmosphere from gas phase NH<sub>3</sub>.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adon, M., Yoboue, V., Galy-Lacaux, C., Liousse, C., Diop, B., Doumbia, E.
T., Gardrat, E., Ndiaye, S. A., and Jarnot, C.: Measurements of NO<sub>2</sub>,
SO<sub>2</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, HNO<sub>3</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> in West African urban
environments, Atmos. Environ., 135, 31–40,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.050</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Asman, W. A. H., Sutton, M. A., and Schjorring, J. K.: Ammonia: emission,
atmospheric transport and deposition, New Phytol., 139, 27–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00180.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00180.x</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
AQEG: Linking Emission Inventories and Ambient Measurements, AIR QUALITY
EXPERT GROUP report prepared for: Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs, Scottish Executive, Welsh Government, and Department of the
Environment in Northern Ireland, available at:
<a href="http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk" target="_blank">http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk</a> (last access: 10 January 2017), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bleeker, A., Sutton, M. A., Acherman, B., Alebic-Juretic, A., Aneja, V. P.,
Ellermann, T., Erisman, J. W., Fowler, D., Fagerli, H., Gauger, T., Harlen,
K. S., Hole, L. R., Horvath, L., Mitosinkova, M., Smith, R. I., Tang, Y. S.,
and van Pul, A.: Linking Ammonia Emission Trends to Measured Concentrations
and Deposition of Reduced Nitrogen at Different Scales, Atmospheric Ammonia:
Detecting Emission Changes and Environmental Impacts, edited by: Sutton, M.
A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M. H., 123–180, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brunekreef, B., Harrison, R. M., Künzli, N., Querol, X., Sutton, M. A.,
Heederik, D. J. J., and Sigsgaard, T.: Reducing the health effect of
particles from agriculture, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 3, 831–832,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00413-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00413-0</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Colette, A., Aas, W., Banin, L., Braban, C.F., Ferm, M., Ortiz, A., Ilyin,
I., Mar, K., Pandolfi, M., Putaud, J. P., and Shatalov, V.: Air pollution
trends in the EMEP region between 1990 and 2012, Joint Report of the EMEP
Task Force on Measurements and Modelling (TFMM), Chemical Co-ordinating
Centre (CCC), Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-East (MSC-E),
Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (MSC-W), EMEP/CCC-Report 1/2016,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cape, J. N., van der Eerden, L. J., Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D., and
Sutton, M. A.: Evidence for changing the critical level for ammonia,
Environ. Pollut., 157, 1033–1037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.049</a>,
2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cape, J. N., van der Eerden, L. J., Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D., and
Sutton, M. A.: Reassessment of Critical Levels for Atmospheric Ammonia,
Atmospheric Ammonia, edited by: Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M.
H., 15–40, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Conolly, C., Davies, M., Knight, D., Vincent, K., Sanocka, A., Lingard, J.,
Richie, S., Donovan, B., Collings, A., Braban, C., Tang, Y. S., Stephens,
A., Twigg, M., Jones, M., Simmons, I., Coyle, C., Kentisbeer, J., Leeson,
S., van Dijk, N., Nemitz, E., Langford, B., Bealey, W., Leaver, D., Poskitt,
J., Carter, H., Thacker, S., Patel, M., Keenan, P., Pereira, G., Lawlor, A.,
Warwick, A., Farrand, P., and Sutton, M. A.: UK Eutrophying and Acidifying
Atmospheric Pollutants (UKEAP) Annual Report 2015, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Defra: Defra National Statistics Release: Emissions of air pollutants in the
UK, 1970 to 2014, Statistical release: 17 December 2015, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
den Bril, B. V., Meremans, D., and Roekens, E.: A Monitoring Network on
Acidification in Flanders, Belgium, Scientific World J., 11, 2358–2363,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1100/2011/897308" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1100/2011/897308</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dore, A. J., Vieno, M., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Dosio, A., Weston, K.
J., and Sutton, M. A.: Modelling the atmospheric transport and deposition of
sulphur and nitrogen over the United Kingdom and assessment of the influence
of SO<sub>2</sub> emissions from international shipping, Atmos. Environ., 41,
2355–2367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.013</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dore, A. J., Theobald, M. R., Kryza, M., Vieno, M., Tang, S. Y., and Sutton,
M. A.: Modelling the deposition of reduced nitrogen at different scales in
the United Kingdom, in: Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application XIXXIX,
edited by: Borrego, C., and Miranda, A. I., Nato Science for Peace and
Security Series C, Environmental Security, 127–135, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dore, A. J., Carslaw, D. C., Braban, C., Cain, M., Chemel, C., Conolly, C.,
Derwent, R. G., Griffiths, S. J., Hall, J., Hayman, G., Lawrence, S.,
Metcalfe, S. E., Redington, A., Simpson, D., Sutton, M. A., Sutton, P.,
Tang, Y. S., Vieno, M., Werner, M., and Whyatt, J. D.: Evaluation of the
performance of different atmospheric chemical transport models and
inter-comparison of nitrogen and sulphur deposition estimates for the UK,
Atmos. Environ., 119, 131–143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv2015.08.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv2015.08.008</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dragosits, U.  and Sutton, M. A.: Maps of Ammonia emissions from agriculture,
waste, nature and other miscellaneous sources for the NAEI 2003, Report to
AEAT/DEFRA, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dragosits, U., Sutton, M. A., Place, C. J., and Bayley, A. A.: Modelling the
spatial distribution of agricultural ammonia emissions in the UK, Nitrogen,
the Confer-N-S, edited by: VanderHoek, K. W., Erisman, J. W., Smeulders, S.,
Wisniewski, J. R., and Wisniewski, J., 195–203, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dragosits, U., Theobald, M. R., Place, C. J., Lord, E., Webb, J., Hill, J.,
ApSimon, H. M., and Sutton, M. A.: Ammonia emission, deposition and impact
assessment at the field scale: a case study of sub-grid spatial variability,
Environ. Pollut., 117, 147–158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00147-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00147-6</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Erisman, J. W., Mosquera, J., and Hensen, A.: Two options to explain the
ammonia gap in The Netherlands, Environ. Sci. Policy, 4,
97–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00115-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00115-5</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
EEA: European Union emission inventory report 1990–2014 under the UNECE
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) European
Environment Agency Report No 16/2016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2800/628267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2800/628267</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
EU: Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain
atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing
Directive 2001/81/EC, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Eurostat: Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics, Publications Office
of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Flechard, C. R., Massad, R. S., Loubet, B., Personne, E., Simpson, D., Bash,
J. O., Cooter, E. J., Nemitz, E., and Sutton, M. A.: Advances in
understanding, models and parameterizations of biosphere-atmosphere ammonia
exchange, Biogeosciences, 10, 5183–5225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5183-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5183-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fournier, N., Pais, V. A., Sutton, M. A., Weston, K. J., Dragosits, U.,
Tang, S. Y., and Aherne, J.: Parallelisation and application of a
multi-layer atmospheric transport model to quantify dispersion and
deposition of ammonia over the British Isles, Environ. Pollut., 116,
95–107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00146-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00146-4</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fournier, N., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., De Kluizenaar, Y., and Sutton, M.
A.: Regional atmospheric budgets of reduced nitrogen over the British Isles
assessed using a multi-layer atmospheric transport model, Water Air  Soil
Poll., 162, 331–351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-7249-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-7249-0</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, D., Sutton, M. A., Smith, R. I., Pitcairn, C. E. R., Coyle, M.,
Campbell, G., and Stedman, J.: Regional mass budgets of oxidized and reduced
nitrogen and their relative contribution to the nitrogen inputs of sensitive
ecosystems, Nitrogen, the Confer-N-S, edited by: VanderHoek, K. W., Erisman,
J. W., Smeulders, S., Wisniewski, J. R., and Wisniewski, J., 337–342,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, D., Sutton, M. A., Flechard, C., Cape, J. N., Storeton-West, R.,
Coyle, M., and Smith, R. I.: The control of SO<sub>2</sub> dry deposition on to
natural surfaces by NH<sub>3</sub> and its effects on regional deposition, Water
Air  Soil Poll., 1, 39–48, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, D., Pilegaard, K., Sutton, M. A., Ambus, P., Raivonen, M., Duyzer,
J., Simpson, D., Fagerli, H., Fuzzi, S., Schjoerring, J. K., Granier, C.,
Neftel, A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Laj, P., Maione, M., Monks, P. S., Burkhardt,
J., Daemmgen, U., Neirynck, J., Personne, E., Wichink-Kruit, R.,
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Flechard, C., Tuovinen, J. P., Coyle, M., Gerosa, G.,
Loubet, B., Altimir, N., Gruenhage, L., Ammann, C., Cieslik, S., Paoletti,
E., Mikkelsen, T. N., Ro-Poulsen, H., Cellier, P., Cape, J. N., Horváth,
L., Loreto, F., Niinemets, Ü., Palmer, P. I., Rinne, J., Misztal, P.,
Nemitz, E., Nilsson, D., Pryor, S., Gallagher, M. W., Vesala, T., Skiba, U.,
Brüggemann, N., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., Williams, J., O'Dowd, C.,
Facchini, M. C., de Leeuw, G., Flossman, A., Chaumerliac, N., and Erisman,
J. W.: Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems–Atmosphere interactions,
Atmos. Environ., 43, 5193–5267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, D., Dise, N., and Sheppard, L.: Committee on air pollution effects
research: 40 years of UK air pollution, Environ. Pollut., 208,
876–878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.014</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gilbert, R. O.: Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring,
New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hallsworth, S., Dore, A. J., Bealey, W. I., Dragosits, U., Vieno, M.,
Hellsten, S., Tang, Y. S., and Sutton, M. A.: The role of indicator choice
in quantifying the threat of atmospheric ammonia to the “Natura 2000”
network, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 671–687,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hellsten, S., Dragosits, U., Place, C. J., Misselbrook, T. H., Tang, Y. S.,
and Sutton, M. A.: Modelling Seasonal Dynamics from Temporal Variation in
Agricultural Practices in the UK Ammonia Emission Inventory, Water  Air
Soil Poll., 7, 3–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-006-9087-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-006-9087-5</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hellsten, S., Dragosits, U., Place, C. J., Vieno, M., Dore, A. J.,
Misselbrook, T. H., Tang, Y. S., and Sutton, M. A.: Modelling the spatial
distribution of ammonia emissions in the UK, Environ. Pollut., 154,
370–379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.017</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hirsch, R. M. and Slack, J. R.: A Nonparametric Trend Test for Seasonal
Data With Serial Dependence, Water Resour. Res., 20,
727–732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00727</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Horvath, L. and Sutton, M. A.: Long-term record of ammonia and ammonium
concentrations at K-Puszta, Hungary, Atmos. Environ., 32, 339–344,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00046-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00046-0</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Horvath, L., Fagerli, H., and Sutton, M. A.: Long-Term Record (1981–2005) of
Ammonia and Ammonium Concentrations at K-Puszta Hungary and the Effect of
Sulphur Dioxide Emission Change on Measured and Modelled Concentrations,
Atmospheric Ammonia, edited by: Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M.
H., 181–185, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, K.-H., Kabir, E., and Kabir, S.: A review on the human health impact of
airborne particulate matter, Environ. Int., 74, 136–143,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lolkema, D. E., Noordijk, H., Stolk, A. P., Hoogerbrugge, R., van Zanten, M.
C.,
and van Pul, W. A. J.: The measuring ammonia in nature (MAN) network in the
Netherlands, Biogeosciences, 12, 5133–5142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5133-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5133-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Massad, R. S., Nemitz, E., and Sutton, M. A.: Review and parameterisation of
bi-directional ammonia exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10359–10386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10359-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10359-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Met Office: UK Daily Temperature and rainfall Data, Part of the Met Office
Integrated Data Archive System (MIDAS), NCAS British Atmospheric Data
Centre, 15/12/16, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
McLeod, A. I.: Package “Kendall”, version 2.2, Kendall rank correlation and
Mann-Kendall trend test,
<a href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Kendall/Kendall.pdf" target="_blank">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Kendall/Kendall.pdf</a> (last
access: 17 February 2017), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Misselbrook, T. H., Gilhespy, S. L., Cardenas, L. M., Williams, J., and
Dragosits, U.: Inventory of Ammonia Emissions from UK Agriculture – 2014.
DEFRA Contract SCF0102, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Pitcairn, C. E. R., Leith, I. D., Sheppard, L. J., Sutton, M. A., Fowler,
D., Munro, R. C., Tang, S., and Wilson, D.: The relationship between
nitrogen deposition, species composition and foliar nitrogen concentrations
in woodland flora in the vicinity of livestock farms, Environ.
Pollut., 102, 41–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80013-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80013-4</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pohlert, T.: Package “Trend”, version 0.2.0: Non-Parametric Trend Tests and
Change-Point Detection,
<a href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/trend/trend.pdf" target="_blank">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/trend/trend.pdf</a> (last access:
17 February 2017), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Pope, R. J., Butt, E. W., Chipperfield, M. P., Doherty, R. M., Fenech, S.,
Schmidt, A., Arnold, S. R., and Savage, N. H. The impact of synoptic weather
on UK surface ozone and implications for premature mortality, Environ. Res.
Lett., 11, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124004</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Puchalski, M. A., Sather, M. E., Walker, J. T., Lehmann, C. M. B., Gay, D.
A., Mathew, J., and Robarge, W. P.: Passive ammonia monitoring in the United
States: Comparing three different sampling devices, J. Environ.
Monitor., 13, 3156–3167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c1em10553a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c1em10553a</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Putaud, J. P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W., Cyrys,
J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H.C. and Harrison, R. M.: A
European aerosol phenomenology–3: Physical and chemical characteristics of
particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 1308–1320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Reis, S., Grennfelt, P., Klimont, Z., Amann, M., ApSimon, H., Hettelingh,
J.-P., Holland, M., LeGall, A.-C., Maas, R., Posch, M., Spranger, T.,
Sutton, M. A., and Williams, M.: From Acid Rain to Climate Change, Science,
338, 1153–1154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226514</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Riddick, S. N., Blackall, T. D., Dragosits, U., Daunt, F., Braban, C. F.,
Tang, Y. S., MacFarlane, W., Taylor, S., Wanless, S., and Sutton, M. A.:
Measurement of ammonia emissions from tropical seabird colonies, Atmos.
Environ., 89, 35–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.012</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Serrano, A., Mateos, V. L., and Garcia, J. A.: Trend analysis of monthly
precipitation over the iberian peninsula for the period 1921–1995, Phys.
Chem. Earth Pt. B, 24,
85–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1909(98)00016-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1909(98)00016-1</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D., Mizunuma, T., Cape, J. N., Crossley, A.,
Leeson, S., Sutton, M. A., Dijk, N., and Fowler, D.: Dry deposition of
ammonia gas drives species change faster than wet deposition of ammonium
ions: evidence from a long-term field manipulation, Glob. Change Biol.,
17, 3589–3607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02478.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02478.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Singles, R., Sutton, M. A., and Weston, K. J.: A multi-layer model to
describe the atmospheric transport and deposition of ammonia in Great
Britain, Atmos. Environ., 32, 393–399,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)83467-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)83467-x</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, R. I., Fowler, D., Sutton, M. A., Flechard, C., and Coyle, M.:
Regional estimation of pollutant gas dry deposition in the UK: model
description, sensitivity analyses and outputs, Atmos. Environ., 34,
3757–3777, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00517-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00517-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Stelson, A. W. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Relative humidity and temperature
dependence of the ammonium nitrate dissociation constant, Atmos.
Environ., 16, 983–992, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90184-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90184-6</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A. and Fowler, D.: Introduction: fluxes and impacts of
atmospheric ammonia on national, landscape and farm scales, Environ.
Pollut. 119, 7–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00145-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00145-2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Pitcairn, C. E. R., and Fowler, D.: The Exchange of Ammonia
Between the Atmosphere and Plant Communities, Adv. Ecol.
Res., 24, 301–393, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60045-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60045-8</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Fowler, D., Burkhardt, J. K., and Milford, C.: Vegetation
atmosphere exchange of ammonia: Canopy cycling and the impacts of elevated
nitrogen inputs, Water Air Soil Poll., 85, 2057–2063,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01186137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01186137</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Milford, C., Dragosits, U., Place, C. J., Singles, R. J.,
Smith, R. I., Pitcairn, C. E. R., Fowler, D., Hill, J., ApSimon, H. M.,
Ross, C., Hill, R., Jarvis, S. C., Pain, B. F., Phillips, V. C., Harrison,
R., Moss, D., Webb, J., Espenhahn, S. E., Lee, D. S., Hornung, M., Ullyett,
J., Bull, K. R., Emmett, B. A., Lowe, J., and Wyers, G. P.: Dispersion,
deposition and impacts of atmospheric ammonia: quantifying local budgets and
spatial variability, Environ. Pollut., 102, 349–361,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80054-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80054-7</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Dragosits, U., Tang, Y. S., and Fowler, D. Ammonia emissions
from non-agricultural sources in the UK, Atmos. Environ., 34,
855–869, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00362-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00362-3</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Miners, B., Tang, Y. S., Milford, C., Wyers, G. P., Duyzer,
J. H., and Fowler, D.: Comparison of low cost measurement techniques for
long-term monitoring of atmospheric ammonia, J. Environ.
Monitor., 3, 446–453, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b102303a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b102303a</a>, 2001a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Fournier, N., Dore, A. J., Smith,
R. I., Weston, K. J., and Fowler, D.: A spatial analysis of atmospheric
ammonia and ammonium in the UK, Scientific World J., 2,  275–286,
1 Supplement,  doi10.1100/tsw.2001.313, 2001b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Tang, Y. S., Miners, B., Fowler, D., Trace, G., and Air
Pollution, R.: A new diffusion denuder system for long-term, regional
monitoring of atmospheric ammonia and ammonium, Water, Air and Soil
Pollution, Focus, 1, Part 5/6, 145–156, 2001c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Asman, W. A. H., Ellermann, T., Van Jaarsveld, J. A., Acker,
K., Aneja, V., Duyzer, J., Horvath, L., Paramonov, S., Mitosinkova, M.,
Tang, Y. S., Achermann, B., Gauger, T., Bartniki, J., Neftel, A., and
Erisman, J. W.: Establishing the link between ammonia emission control and
measurements of reduced nitrogen concentrations and deposition,
Environ. Monit. Assess., 82, 149–185,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021834132138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021834132138</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Dragosits, U., Simmons, I., Tang, Y. S., Hellsten, S., Love,
L., Vieno, M., Skiba, U., di Marco, C., Storeton-West, R. L., Fowler, D.,
Williams, J., North, P., Hobbs, P., and Misselbrook, T.: Monitoring and
modelling trace-gas change's following the 2001 outbreak of Foot and Mouth
Disease to reduce the uncertainties in agricultural emissions abatement,
Environ. Sci. Policy, 9, 407–422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.04.001</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., Riddick, S. N., Dragosits, U., Nemitz, E., Theobald,
M. R., Tang, Y. S., Braban, C. F., Vieno, M., Dore, A. J., Mitchell, R. F.,
Wanless, S., Daunt, F., Fowler, D., Blackall, T. D., Milford, C., Flechard,
C. R., Loubet, B., Massad, R., Cellier, P., Personne, E., Coheur, P. F.,
Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Ngadi, Y., Clerbaux, C., Skjoth, C. A., Geels,
C., Hertel, O., Kruit, R. J. W., Pinder, R. W., Bash, J. O., Walker, J. T.,
Simpson, D., Horvath, L., Misselbrook, T. H., Bleeker, A., Dentener, F., and
de Vries, W.: Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and
deposition, Philos. T. R. Soc. B-Biological, 368, 1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0166" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0166</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S., Cape, J. N., and Sutton, M. A.: Development and types of
passive samplers for monitoring atmospheric NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub>
concentrations, Scientific World J., 1, 513–529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.82" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.82</a>,
2001a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Theobald, M. R., Fowler, D., and Sutton, M. A.:
Sub-grid variability in ammonia concentrations and dry deposition in an
upland landscape, in: Air surface exchange of gases and particles: Poster
proceedings, edited by:  Fowler, D., Pitcairn, C. E. R., Douglas, L., and Erisman, J.
W.,
48–57, 2001b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S. and Sutton, M. A.: Quality management in the UK national
ammonia monitoring network, in: Proceedings of the International Conference:
QA/QC in the field of emission and air quality measurements: harmonization,
standardization and accreditation, held in Prague, 21–23 May 2003, edited by:
Borowiak, A., Hafkenscheid, T., Saunders, A., and Woods, P., European
Commission, Ispra, Italy, 297–307, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S., Cape, J. N., Braban, C. F., Twigg, M. M., Poskitt, J., Jones,
M. R., Rowland, P., Bentley, P., Hockenhull, K., Woods, C., Leaver, D.,
Simmons, I., van Dijk, N., Nemitz, E., and Sutton, M. A.: Development of a
new model DELTA sampler and assessment of potential sampling artefacts in
the UKEAP AGANet DELTA system: summary and technical report, London, Defra,
CEH Project no. C04544, C04845, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S., Poskitt, J., Cape, J. N., Nemitz, E., Bealey,W. J., Leaver, D.,
Simmons, I., Wood, C., Pereira, G., Sutton, M. A., Davies, M., Conolly, C.,
Donovan, B., and Braban, C. F.: UK Eutrophying and Acidifying Atmospheric
Pollutant project's National Ammonia Monitoring Network, NAMN, Data funded by
Defra and the Devolved Administrations and published under the Open
Government Licence v1.0,
<a href="https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=nh3" target="_blank">https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=nh3</a>, last
access: 10 January 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Y. S., Poskitt, J., Cape, J. N., Nemitz, E., Bealey,W. J., Leaver, D.,
Beith, S., Thacker, S., Simmons, I., Letho, K., Wood, C., Pereira, G.,
Sutton, M. A., Davies, M., Conolly, C., Donovan, B., and Braban, C. F.: UK
Eutrophying and Acidifying Atmospheric Pollutant project's Acid Gases and
Aerosol Network, AGANet (Data funded by Defra and the Devolved
Administrations and published under the Open Government Licence v1.0,
<a href="https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=aganet" target="_blank">https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=aganet</a>), last
access: 10 January 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Thijsse, T. R., Wyers, G. P., Duyzer, J. H., Verhagen, H. L. M., Wayers, A.,
and
Mols, J. J.: Measurement of ammonia with diffusion tube samplers, Atmos.
Environ., 32, 333–337,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00278-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00278-1</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Thöni, L., Brang, P., Braun, S., Seitler, E., and Rihm, B.: Ammonia
Monitoring in Switzerland with Passive Samplers: Patterns, Determinants and
Comparison with Modelled Concentrations, Environ. Monitor.
Assess., 98, 93–107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000038181.99603.6e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000038181.99603.6e</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig, M.,
Hjellbrekke, A. G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.:
Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and
observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 5447–5481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Tsagatakis, I., Brace, S., Jephcote, C., Passant, N., Pearson, B., Kiff, B.,
and Fraser, A.: UK Emission Mapping Methodology – A report of the National
Atmospheric Emission Inventory 2014, Ricardo/ED59800104 – Issue Number 1,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
UNECE: Edinburgh workshop on atmospheric ammonia: Detecting emission changes
and environmental impacts (4–6 December 2006), Report by the organizers with
the assistance of the secretariat. Report to: the Executive Body for the
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, the Working Group on
Strategies and Review; the Working Group on Effects, the Steering Body to
the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range
Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
UNECE: Options for revising the Gothenburg Protocol, Reactive Nitrogen,
Report by the Co-chairs of the Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen, Working
Group on Strategies and Review, ECE/EB.AIR/WG.5/2010/4, Geneva, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Van Pul, A., Van Jaarsveld, H., Van Der Meulen, T., and Velders, G.: Ammonia
concentrations in the Netherlands: Spatially detailed measurements and model
calculations, Atmos. Environ., 38, 4045–4055,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.051</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
van Zanten, M. C., Wichink Kruit, R. J., Hoogerbrugge, R., Van der Swaluw,
E., and van Pul, W. A. J.: Trends in ammonia measurements in the Netherlands
over the period 1993–2014, Atmos. Environ., 148, 352–360,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.007</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Vieno, M., Dore, A. J., Wind, P., Marco, C. D., Nemitz, E., Phillips, G.,
Tarrasón, L., and Sutton, M. A.: Application of the EMEP Unified Model
to the UK with a Horizontal Resolution of 5  ×  5 km<sup>2</sup>, in:
Atmospheric Ammonia: Detecting emission changes and environmental impacts,
edited by: Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., and Baker, S. M. H., Springer
Netherlands, Dordrecht, 367–372, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Vieno, M., Heal, M. R., Hallsworth, S., Famulari, D., Doherty, R. M., Dore,
A. J., Tang, Y. S., Braban, C. F., Leaver, D., Sutton, M. A., and Reis, S.:
The role of long-range transport and domestic emissions in determining
atmospheric secondary inorganic particle concentrations across the UK,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8435–8447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8435-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8435-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Vogt, E., Dragosits, U., Braban, C. F., Theobald, M. R., Dore, A. J., van
Dijk, N., Tang, Y. S., McDonald, C., Murray, S., Rees, R. M., and Sutton, M.
A.: Heterogeneity of atmospheric ammonia at the landscape scale and
consequences for environmental impact assessment, Environ. Pollut.,
179, 120–131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.014</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Webb, J. and Misselbrook, T. H.: A mass-flow model of ammonia emissions from
UK livestock production, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2163–2176,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.023</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Wichink, Kruit, R. J., Schaap, M., Sauter, F. J., van Zanten, M. C., and van
Pul, W. A. J.: Modeling the distribution of ammonia across Europe including
bi-directional surface–atmosphere exchange, Biogeosciences, 9, 5261–5277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5261-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5261-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Wyers, G. P., Otjes, R. P., and Slanina, J.: A continuous-flow denuder for
the measurement of ambient concentrations and surface-exchange fluxes of
ammonia, Atmos. Environ. Pt. A, 27, 2085–2090,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90280-C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90280-C</a>, 1993.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, W., Wu, Q., Liu, X., Tang, A., Dore, A. J., and Heal, M. R.:
Characteristics of ammonia, acid gases, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> for three typical land-use
types in the North China Plain, Environ. Sci. Poll.
Res., 23, 1158–1172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5648-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5648-3</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
