<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-6601-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>LES study of the impact of moist thermals on the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere in southern West Africa</article-title><alt-title>Impact of turbulence on the total OH reactivity in West Africa</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Impact of turbulence on the total OH reactivity in West Africa}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F. Brosse et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Brosse</surname><given-names>Fabien</given-names></name>
          <email>fabien.brosse@aero.obs-mip.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-9454</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Leriche</surname><given-names>Maud</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mari</surname><given-names>Céline</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Couvreux</surname><given-names>Fleur</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CNRM, Météo-France &amp; CNRS, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Fabien Brosse (fabien.brosse@aero.obs-mip.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>6601</fpage><lpage>6624</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>October</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2018 Fabien Brosse et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e113">The hydroxyl radical (OH) is a highly reactive species and plays a key role
in the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere. We explore the potential impact
of a convective boundary layer on reconciling the calculation–measurement
differences for OH reactivity (the inverse of OH lifetime) attributable to
the segregation of OH and its reactants by thermals and the resulting
modification of averaged reaction rates. The large-eddy simulation version of
the Meso-NH model is used, coupled on-line with a detailed chemistry
mechanism to simulate two contrasted biogenic and urban chemical regimes. In
both environments, the top of the boundary layer is the region with the
highest calculated segregation intensities but with the opposite sign. In the
biogenic environment, the inhomogeneous mixing of isoprene and OH leads to a
maximum decrease of 30 % of the mean reaction rate in this zone. In the
anthropogenic case, the effective rate constant for OH reacting with
aldehydes is 16 % higher than the averaged value. OH reactivity is always
higher by 15 to 40 % inside thermals in comparison to their surroundings
as a function of the chemical environment and time of the day. Since thermals
occupy a small fraction of the simulated domain, the impact of turbulent
motions on domain-averaged total OH reactivity reaches a maximum decrease of
9 % for the biogenic case and a maximum increase of 5 % for the
anthropogenic case. Accounting for the segregation of air masses by turbulent
motions in regional and global models may increase OH reactivity in urban
environments but lower OH reactivity in biogenic environments. In both cases,
segregation alone is insufficient for resolving the underestimation between
observed and modeled OH reactivity.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e123">The
hydroxyl radical (OH) is an efficient cleansing molecule present in the
troposphere. It is mainly produced during the daytime through the reaction of
water vapor with O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D), formed by ozone photolysis, while nitrogen
oxides and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are its major sinks. OH is
highly reactive and reacts with numerous chemical species, controlling their
chemical lifetimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.1"/>. Both OH concentrations and OH reactivity
are key elements of the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6602?><p id="d1e138">Several field campaigns have been conducted to study total OH reactivity for
urban and forested environments. Measured reactivities have been compared to
calculated reactivities obtained by summing OH reactant concentrations and
multiplying them by their reaction rate constants. A missing part,
corresponding to the difference between measured and calculated OH
reactivity, is found not only under urban or biogenic conditions but also in
clean remote regions. Measured OH reactivity in urban areas has been shown to
be similar (less than 10 %) to calculated OH reactivity in New York
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.2"/>, in Houston <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.3"/> and in a controlled urban
environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.4"/>. However, discrepancies in urban areas have been
observed between measured and calculated OH reactivity in Nashville
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.5"/> (35 % less for calculated reactivity), in Mexico
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.6"/> (25 %) and in Tokyo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.7"/> (25 %). The
differences between measured and calculated total OH reactivity are even
higher in forested areas. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.8"/> found an unexplained fraction of
50 % in measured OH reactivity during the PROPHET campaign in Michigan. These
results are comparable to the missing part (50 to 58 %) calculated from
measurements made in a boreal forest in Finland
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.9"/>. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.10"/> calculated an
accounted fraction of measured OH reactivity close to 49 % in an Amazonian
rainforest.</p>
      <p id="d1e169">As shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.11"/>, atmospheric models do not correctly
simulate observed total OH reactivity. Attempts to use numerical models to
explain the missing fraction of OH reactivity have proved to be insufficient.
Indeed, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.12"/> found an underestimation of 30 % of OH
reactivity in a box model with a detailed chemical mechanism for the OP3
project. In the PRIDE-PRD campaign, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.13"/> found
discrepancies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % between the
results of the OH reactivity model and the measurements, also using a box
model. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.14"/> used a column model to elucidate the
missing part of OH reactivity, but only explained 30 to 50 % of the OH
reactivity measured over a forest in Finland.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.15"/> used a three-dimensional model with coarse
resolution to fill the gap in OH reactivity but 40 % of the measured OH
sinks remained unexplained. The difficulty of getting models to represent OH
reactivity could be partly due to as yet nondiscovered OH reaction pathways,
which are therefore not implemented in atmospheric models. OH recycling
by the isoprene oxidation chain in forest environments characterized by low
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (sum of NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) conditions (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 ppb) was proposed
to explain the uncertainties in the simulated HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (sum of OH and
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) budget <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e242">However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.17"/> studied several proposed OH recycling mechanisms
present in the literature and found that biases from OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations still exist whatever the mechanism.</p>
      <p id="d1e258">One possible issue in total OH reactivity retrieval not mentioned by previous
studies could lie in neglecting turbulent motions in the transport of
chemical compounds in the boundary layer. Indeed, turbulence can spatially
segregate or bring together chemical species, reducing or increasing the mean
reaction rate and thus chemical reactivity. However, as far as we know this
physical process has not been investigated in previous studies. The time
response of current OH reactivity measurement techniques is not yet
sufficient to directly resolve the smallest relevant turbulent spatial
scales. The limitations in time resolutions range from 30 seconds for
LIF-based methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.18"/> to 1 min for
the CRM method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.19"/>. In comparison, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.20"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.21"/>
used direct isoprene and OH concentrations measurements with temporal
resolution of a few seconds, fast enough to estimate the segregation of the
compounds.</p>
      <p id="d1e273">The atmospheric boundary layer has a turbulent structure characterized by
strong and narrow updrafts surrounded by weak and large descending areas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.22"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.23"/> considered passive scalars and found
that surface bottom-up transport plays a more important role in the vertical
diffusion than the entrainment zone top-down transport in a convective
boundary layer. Updrafts in the boundary layer lead to the spatial
discrimination of pollutant concentrations between thermals and their
environment. This heterogeneity in chemical species redistribution influences
the mean reaction rate obtained when considering averaged reactant
concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.24"/>. Using an idealized simulation, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.25"/>
showed that, for a second-order reaction implying a top-down and a bottom-up
species, reaction rates are maximum in updrafts near the surface and in
downdrafts at the top of the boundary layer. Segregation between the VOC and the
OH radical was first addressed by the numerical study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.26"/>, who
investigated the turbulence effects on the mean reaction rates of these
species. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.27"/> studied the inefficiency of turbulent mixing
over heterogeneous surfaces and found that the highest reaction rates for
isoprene and OH are located in thermals at the top of the boundary layer. The
chemical reactivity of the boundary layer is therefore determined by the
capacity of turbulence to mix reactive species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.28"/>. However,
modeling and experimental studies investigating heterogeneities in the
boundary layer have focused on OH radical concentrations rather than on OH
reactivity due to the instrumental limitations discussed above.</p>
      <p id="d1e298">Vertical motions associated with clouds and sea breezes impact the atmospheric
chemistry and pollution levels near the surface since they dilute chemical
species and increase the upward transport of surface emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.29"/>.
In the case of updrafts leading to cloud formation, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.30"/> found a
decrease of 10 to 50 % of tracer mixing ratios averaged over the
boundary layer with respect to a situation without clouds due to the
deepening of the boundary layer. Clouds have multiple impacts on the
atmospheric boundary layer as they induce turbulent mixing of chemical
compounds which modifies reaction rates. They also modify incoming solar
radiation, which in turn disturbs photolysis reactions and alters the
emissions of biogenic compounds, such as isoprene. Finally, they alter
atmospheric chemistry due to soluble gas washout and chemical reactions
occurring in cloud droplets.</p>
      <p id="d1e307">Cloud cover over West Africa is an important feature of the African monsoon
but is poorly represented by global models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.31"/>.
This could lead to overly low simulated clouds and overly high incoming
radiation at the surface, implying excessively high diurnal temperature and
relative humidity cycles over this region. The nocturnal low-level stratus
was studied during the monsoon period at Parakou (Benin) by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.32"/> with radiosondes. The authors found that
turbulent processes are responsible for cloudy nights, whereas clear nights
are associated with a nocturnal inversion, leading to the decoupling of the
surface and lower atmosphere. <?pagebreak page6603?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.33"/> investigated
nighttime cloud formation. They observed that the presence of a nighttime
low-level jet induces the shear-driven vertical mixing of moisture
accumulated near the surface. This leads to stratus formation whose cover is
likely to persist until the early afternoon when it breaks up to form cumulus
clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.34"/>. However,
studying the impact of this specific cloudy environment on the turbulent
transport of chemical species in tropical West Africa has not been reported.</p>
      <p id="d1e322">High-resolution simulations which explicitly resolve the turbulent and
convective advection terms were conducted
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.35"/> to assess the impacts of
clouds and the convective boundary layer on the mixing of chemical compounds.
However, previous numerical studies on the impact of the turbulent mixing of
chemical compounds mainly used relatively simple or only slightly more
detailed chemical schemes (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.36"/>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="altparen.37"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="altparen.38"/>), resulting in possible limitations in the
representation of the atmospheric chemistry. Besides, more recent studies by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.39"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.40"/> used a more detailed chemical scheme
derived from Mozart v2.2, allowing the formation of OH radicals initiated by
peroxy radicals. This limits the spatial heterogeneities caused by the
reactions consuming the OH radical.</p>
      <p id="d1e344">The goal of this work is to evaluate the role of thermals in OH reactivity in
the framework of a convective boundary layer with contrasted chemical
environments in southern West Africa. It focuses in particular on
investigating turbulence as a possible explanation of the discrepancies
between calculated and measured OH reactivities mentioned in the literature.</p>
      <p id="d1e348">Two contrasted chemical regimes represented by a detailed chemical scheme are
studied by using large-eddy simulations. The first simulation is influenced
by biogenic emissions, whereas the second is characterized by anthropogenic
emissions representative of Cotonou (Benin) in the center of the domain.
Based on a conditional sampling implemented in the model, the thermals are
discriminated in these simulations, allowing the specific chemical regime
inside thermals to be investigated. The model experiments are presented in
Sect. 2. Section 3 presents the dynamical and chemical results for the two
cases while Sect. 4 presents the discussion relating to these results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Simulation description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Model configuration</title>
      <p id="d1e362">LES simulations are performed with the mesoscale nonhydrostatic atmospheric
model Meso-NH (<uri>http://mesonh.aero.obs-mip.fr/mesonh/</uri>, last access: 26 April 2018) version 5.2.1,
developed jointly by the Laboratoire d'Aérologie and the Centre National de
la Recherche Météorologique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.41"/>. Cloud microphysical processes are
represented by the ICE3 scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.42"/> that includes six different
types of hydrometeors. The turbulence is solved by a three-dimensional scheme
using a prognostic equation for the turbulent kinetic energy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.43"/>
with the turbulent mixing length given by the mesh size. Surface processes
and interactions with the atmosphere are simulated by the SURFEx model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.44"/> coupled with Meso-NH.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e383">Initial vertical profiles of mixing ratios and associated profiles.
Numbers in brackets refer to (1) uniform profile, (2) stratospheric profile
(initial profile multiplied by 1 from 0 to 2000 m, then by 0.5 from 3000 m
to 13 000 m, by 0.75 at 14 000 m and 1 above), (3) boundary layer profile
(multiplied by 1 from 0 to 1000 m, by 0.10 from 2000 to 13 000 m and 0.05
above). Chemical names are those used in the ReLACS3 chemical mechanism. ALD2
corresponds to aldehydes C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2, ALKL to lumped alkanes C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
ALKM to lumped alkanes C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ALKH to lumped alkenes
 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OLEH to lumped alkenes
C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, ETHE to ethene, ISOP to isoprene, AROL to lumped low SOA yield
aromatic species, AROH to lumped high SOA yield aromatic species, AROO to
lumped phenolic species, ARAC+ to lumped aromatic monoacids, MEOH to
methanol, ARAL to lumped aromatic monoaldehydes, MVK to methyl-vinyl-ketone,
MCR to methacrolein, HCHO to formaldehyde, KETL to lumped ketones
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PAN2 to peroxy acetyl nitrate</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Initial mixing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Initial mixing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.19 ppb (2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.48 ppt (1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07 ppt (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55.25 ppt (2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">149.23 ppb (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HCHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">747.47 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALD2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">896.82 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PAN2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.70 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALKL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">282.90 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ALKM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.67 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALKH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.60 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ETHE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">277.12 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLEL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">104.71 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OLEH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.94 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISOP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.23 ppb (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AROH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.29 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AROL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.11 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AROO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.66 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ARAC+</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.69 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ARAL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.98 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MEOH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">564.54 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">KETL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.69 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MVK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">537.74 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MCR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">268.87 ppt (3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e717">The resolution used is 50 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m for a domain size of 10 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid points). 10 km is the targeted mesh size of an
increasing number of current large-scale chemistry models. Along the
vertical, 121 levels are stretched from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m at the surface to
250 m on top of the domain at 20 km, and the boundary conditions are cyclic.</p>
      <p id="d1e760">The simulation is run for 3 days, in which 2 days consist of the spin-up
for chemistry. The same dynamical conditions and the same initial and forcing
thermodynamical fields are used for each day. The results are shown only for
the third day and from 06:00 to 17:00 UTC (LT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> UTC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1), when<?pagebreak page6604?> the convective
boundary layer is well developed. A passive scalar is emitted only during
this part of the simulation with a constant emission rate and is used to
determine the boundary layer height (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1"/>). The thermals
are identified by the conditional sampling method implemented in the model by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.45"/>, which relies on a first-order decay passive tracer mixing
ratio emitted with a constant flux at the surface. In brief, in order to be
considered as thermals, air parcels at a given altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> must satisfy
simultaneous conditions such as a positive vertical velocity anomaly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and tracer anomalies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than the standard deviation of the
tracer concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a minimum threshold
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the cloud
layer, a supplementary condition is that the grid box has to be cloudy. This
passive tracer is emitted from the beginning of the third day of simulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e900">The initial and forcing dynamical fields are taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.46"/> who
used a single-column model to study the representation of the diurnal cycles
of meteorological parameters at four observation sites in West Africa (Agadez
and Niamey in Niger, Parakou and Cotonou in Benin). Here we focus on the
“cloudy” regime of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.47"/>, representative of the climate
encountered close to the Gulf of Guinea. The vegetation present in our
simulation is dominated by tropical crops and open shrublands (35 % of the
domain for each type), sea (15 %), inland water (5 %), wetlands (5 %) and
tropical grasslands (5 %) and a high moisture content is prescribed with soil
water indexes of 0.7 and 0.74 for the surface and the ground, respectively.
The initial conditions and composite large-scale advections were extracted
from the ECMWF reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.48"/> prepared for
the AMMA campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.49"/>. The present simulation was initialized at
06:00 UTC with stable initial conditions extracted from the ECMWF AMMA
reanalysis (black curve in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). The large-scale conditions
from the ECMWF reanalysis are weak in magnitude but include sea-breeze
circulations from the surface to 500 m, linked to moist and cool advection
throughout the simulation, topped by the advection of dry and warm air from
1000 to 3000 m.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e919"><bold>(a)</bold> Boundary layer height diurnal evolution computed from
the bulk-Richardson method (red), the tracer method (blue) and composite
values of boundary layer height for the SOP-2 period (1 August 2006–15 August 2006)
based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.50"/> (black dots). <bold>(b)</bold> Potential vertical
temperature profiles at 06:00 (black), 10:00 (red), 14:00 (green) and 17:00 UTC
(blue).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chemical model setup</title>
      <p id="d1e942">The chemical scheme ReLACS 3.0 (Reduced Lumped Atmospheric Chemical Scheme
version 3.0) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.51"/> applied is a reduced version of the Caltech
Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism (CACM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.52"/>. This mechanism
describes the reaction system of gaseous ozone precursors as well as of
secondary organic aerosols (SOA) with 365 reactions involving 87 species.</p>
      <p id="d1e951">For both simulations, the initial vertical profiles of the main primary
chemical species are taken from airborne measurements made during the B235
flight of the AMMA campaign performed by the BAE-146 aircraft (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). This particular flight gives access to measurements
performed in the boundary layer over a tropical forest in the north of Benin
(10.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 2.69<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) during the early afternoon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.53"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e977">Biogenic emissions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) are taken from the MEGAN-MACC
(Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature – Monitoring
Atmospheric Composition and Climate) inventory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.54"/>, except for
NO, which is not available in this inventory. Biogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
from the GEIAv1 (Global Emission InitiAtive) inventory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.55"/> proved
to be too low for the region studied in comparison to estimations based on
airborne measurements during the AMMA campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.56"/>.
Therefore, a maximum value of 10 ng N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was set for nitrogen
oxide emissions from soils in the simulation.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e1028">Emission values for the biogenic and the anthropogenic cases, in
kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For NO, ISOP, BIOL and BIOH in the biogenic case, Gaussian shape
emissions were set and only the maximum value is indicated here. Please see
text for details.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Molar mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Biogenic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Anthropogenic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">patch emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">patch emissions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ETHE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLEL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OLEH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">126</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALKL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALKM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALKH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">226</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AROH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">134</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AROL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AROO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">122</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ARAC+</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">136</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ARAL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALD2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.99</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ORA1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ORA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KETL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KETH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MEOH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ETOH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALCH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISOP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BIOL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">154</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BIOH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MTBE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page6605?><p id="d1e2407">The emissions are constant in space and time except for NO, isoprene and
monoterpenes, for which a Gaussian diurnal cycle is used. For biogenic NO,
the maximum emission occurs at 13:00 UTC and the standard deviation of the
Gaussian curve is equal to 3 h. These parameters are set in order to
approximate the ground temperature, since <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.57"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="text.58"/>
noted that NO emissions from soils are closely linked to soil temperature.
For isoprene and the sum of monoterpenes (represented as ISOP, BIOL and BIOH
in the chemical scheme), the maximum occurs at 12:00 UTC and the standard
deviation is equal to 2.5 h, chosen to fit the diurnal evolution of the
solar radiation reaching the surface. This is in agreement with
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.59"/>, who showed that isoprene emissions are thought to be null
when photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is equal to zero and maximum
when the PAR exceeds the value of 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
For isoprene and monoterpenes, the maximum emission values were defined to
ensure that an equal amount of chemical species is emitted over one day
compared to the constant value provided by MEGAN-MACC.</p>
      <p id="d1e2452">The anthropogenic emissions are provided by a squared patch in the center of
the domain. Its area is chosen as equal to half the domain area. However, the
cyclic boundary conditions applied for these simulations tend to homogenize
the chemical mixing ratios. This especially affects long-lived species in the
boundary layer and leads to the deletion of the biogenic emission signature.
The values of anthropogenic emissions are representative of Cotonou (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.60"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2460">In the following, the study focuses on isoprene for the biogenic case because
it is the major biogenic VOC emitted into the atmosphere and influences ozone
and secondary organic aerosol formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.61"/>. For the
anthropogenic case, attention is given to the lumped C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 aldehydes
(ALD2 in the chemical scheme) because they have both primary and secondary
sources and their role is very important in the troposphere as they
contribute to the production of radicals and are precursors of ozone
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.62"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Metrics</title>
      <p id="d1e2482">In order to study the competition between chemical reactivity and turbulent
mixing, as well as inhomogeneity in chemical species mixing ratios, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.63"/>
introduced two dimensionless numbers: the Damkhöler number and the
segregation coefficient. The first corresponds to the ratio between the
characteristic turbulence timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">turb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the chemical reactivity
timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">chem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For a given compound <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Damkhöler number
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is as follows:</p>
      <p id="d1e2528"><disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">turb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">chem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext> with </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">turb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext> and </mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">chem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sinks</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> refer to the convective velocity and the boundary layer
height (BLH), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sinks</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to
the total chemical loss rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The convective velocity is computed with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the standard acceleration due to gravity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the potential
temperature, according to the relation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the buoyancy flux at the surface.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.64"/> distinguished different chemical regimes<?pagebreak page6606?> for the reaction
between nitrogen oxide and ozone and found that the impact of turbulence on
this reaction rate is highest for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1. Later studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.65"/> have shown that the impacts of turbulence on
atmospheric chemistry are expected to be maximum when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Therefore, this value will be used in the following to discriminate slow and
fast chemical reactions in the boundary layer. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then the
turbulent mixing is more efficient than the chemistry. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
strong competition can be expected between dynamics and chemical reactivity.
Finally, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the chemical reactions occur faster than turbulent
mixing.</p>
      <p id="d1e2890">The turbulent mixing causes fluctuations of chemical species mixing ratios in
the LES domain, which can be quantified by the intensity of segregation. For
a second-order reaction involving two species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a reaction
constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the intensity of segregation
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M124" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3003">The lower case letters represent species mixing ratios at a grid point. The
overline denotes a spatial average, and the prime a deviation from this
average. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then the two species are completely segregated
and no reaction will take place between them. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
compounds are perfectly mixed. A positive segregation coefficient means that
the covariance between species is similar and thus the mean chemical reaction
rate would be higher in comparison to perfect mixing. The segregation is
calculated with mixing ratio anomalies related to spatial averages in
numerical models. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.66"/> stated that these averages should
correspond to the complete mixing volume in order to allow comparisons
between models and measurements. In the following, the large-scale spatial
average is calculated over the 10 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km model domain. An effective
average reaction rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be defined that includes the impact of
turbulent mixing on chemical reactivity as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M129" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext> with </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3152">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective mean reaction constant. In the current LES
experiments, chemical reaction rates are calculated with a focus on OH. OH
radical reactivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the inverse of OH lifetime
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is defined as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M133" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3245">In Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the reaction constant
between OH and the <italic>i</italic>-th reactant, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to its
concentration. As with the effective reaction constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, effective
reactivity for the OH radical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined by including the effect
of turbulent mixing in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3439"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M139" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3516"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the OH total reactivity calculated with averaged values. In
order to obtain the relative deviation of the total OH reactivity from the
reactivity computed with averaged mixing ratios, factorization is performed
on Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>), which results in the following:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M141" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3620"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M142" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3662">From Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) the mean relative error, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, found on
total OH reactivity considering only averaged values is as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M144" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3761">The segregation intensity used to compute the mean error corresponds to the
deviation from the averaged boundary layer values. This error on OH
reactivity was not considered in previous numerical studies focused on
identifying the missing part of OH reactivity. Indeed, using a box model or a
single-column model like <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.67"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.68"/> or
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.69"/> leads to neglect of the turbulent motions that could
affect the redistribution of chemical species within the atmospheric boundary
layer. This may imply an underestimation or an overestimation of OH
reactivity as a function of the sign of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
positive or negative, then the effective OH reactivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is either
higher or lower, respectively, than the OH reactivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> found by
neglecting the turbulent motions. Due to the crucial aspect of the OH radical
in the atmosphere, this could subsequently modify the lifetimes of gaseous OH
reactants such as ozone and carbon monoxide.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page6607?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Simulation assessment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Dynamics</title>
      <p id="d1e3839">The diurnal evolution of the boundary layer height is
analyzed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a. It is diagnosed using two different
methods. The first corresponds to a determination according to the bulk
Richardson number method as presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.70"/>. The boundary layer
height is defined as a threshold value for the bulk Richardson number
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, computed at a given height with the virtual potential temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and horizontal wind speeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at this altitude
and at the surface:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M153" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3970">A clear diurnal cycle is observed, with the maximum height at 14:00 UTC and
the minimum during nighttime (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a, red line). This first
diagnostic did not include the cloud layer on the boundary layer. Daytime BLH
is consistent with observations from Cotonou in West Africa, studied by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.71"/>, who noticed daily variabilities ranging from 400 to 600 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a, black dots). In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.72"/>, the boundary layer
height is derived from radio soundings by comparing the virtual potential
temperature at one level and the averaged value below.</p>
      <p id="d1e3983">The slight differences between the simulated BLH and observations reveal the
same biases noticed in the one-dimensional simulation performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.73"/>. This
may be explained by uncertainties in the derivations of large-scale advection
fields.</p>
      <p id="d1e3989">The second method determines the boundary layer height according to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.74"/> by identifying the height at which a passive bottom-up scalar
emitted at the surface is equal to 0.5 % of its surface value.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.75"/> mentioned that this definition could be valuable when
studying boundary layer deepening due to clouds. This diagnostic captured the
growth of the boundary layer height due to the development of cumulus clouds
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a, blue line) and is used to mark the BLH in the
following. The tracer used for this diagnostic was emitted only during the
period of interest, from 06:00 to 18:00 UTC.</p>
      <p id="d1e4001">The range of simulated virtual potential temperature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b)
overestimates the AMMA observations in Cotonou of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.76"/> in the
lowest 500 m, as shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.77"/>. At 06:00 UTC, the model has a cold
bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K turning throughout the simulation to a simulated potential
temperature overestimated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K at the end of the simulation. Both the dry
and cloudy layers are identified by two inflections on the vertical profiles
of the virtual potential temperature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). The first
inflection increases from 400 m at 06:00 UTC to 600 m at 17:00 UTC,
corresponding to a thin inversion zone between the well-mixed dry layer and
the cloudy layer above it. The second inflection defines the top of the
boundary layer ranging from 500 m at 06:00 UTC to 1600 m at 17:00 UTC.</p>
      <p id="d1e4035">The southern part of West Africa is a region characterized by high diurnal
variability in cloud occurrence. Low-level stratus clouds form during the
night and persist in the morning; these stratus then break up during the
afternoon into cumulus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.78"/>. This feature is
simulated in this work as low-level stratus clouds that occupy a large
fraction of the simulated domain in the morning (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a and c). In
the afternoon, the cloud deck breaks up and less uniform but higher cumulus
clouds are simulated (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b and d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4047"><bold>(a)</bold> Cloud water mixing ratio horizontal cross sections at
10:00 UTC and 800 m height and <bold>(b)</bold> at 14:00 UTC and 1000 m
height. Black dashed lines represent the vertical cross sections at
<bold>(c)</bold> 10:00 UTC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km and at <bold>(d)</bold> 14:00 UTC and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. Black isolines denote thermals identified by the conditional
sampling method.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4091">Throughout the growth of the boundary layer, dry thermals develop capped by
the temperature inversion zone. Some thermals penetrate this inversion (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) and cloud formation occurs at the upper part of the updrafts. The
vertical profiles of the fraction area (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) occupied by thermals
exhibit a local maximum at the height corresponding to the separation between
the two layers. This altitude is variable through the simulation but tends to
stabilize between 500 and 600 m in the early afternoon and is associated with
a preferential detrainment zone. The peaks observed at the surface and at the
top of the cloudy layer correspond to two other local maxima. Due to the
deepening of the boundary layer, the top of the cloudy layer increases
throughout the simulation (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Simulated convective
velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 1 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the morning to 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
midday, and the turbulence characteristic timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">turb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
6 h in the morning to 20 min at midday.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e4151">Vertical profiles of the fraction occupied by thermals at 06:00
(black), 10:00 (red), 14:00 (green) and 17:00 UTC (blue).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Atmospheric chemistry</title>
      <p id="d1e4166">Typical diurnal cycles are obtained for isoprene in the biogenic case and for
OH in the biogenic and anthropogenic cases in which both compounds exhibit
maximum mixing ratios around midday (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). For the biogenic
case, the simulated isoprene mixing ratios averaged from the surface to 600 m reach a maximum close to 1 ppbv (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a) at noon, when isoprene
emissions are highest. This is in the same range as the AMMA measurement
studied by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.79"/>, who found a maximum of 1.5 ppbv on the composite
diurnal cycle of isoprene at midday. In our study, the ozone mixing ratios
did not exhibit strong variability throughout the day. The simulated values
around 18 ppbv were lower than the observations recorded over forested areas
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), ranging from 22 to 30 ppbv. The NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios were close to 0.2 ppbv on average around midday (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b)
and are in agreement with AMMA measurements where a mean value of 0.1 ppbv of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed. Simulated OH mixing ratios varied between 0 and 0.18
pptv (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), within the observational range of 0.05 to 0.15
pptv during the AMMA campaign (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The biogenic
environment is characteristic of a limited NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> regime.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4215">Measurements collected during the AMMA campaign over forested areas
(upper part) and over cities (lower part). The last column corresponds to the
concerned period.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mixing ratio</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Altitude</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Location</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">References</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Comments</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="3">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">500 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.80"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13:40 UTC – 17 August</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 900 hPa</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.81"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median value (20 July–21 August)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25–30 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300–1700 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12–13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.82"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">08:00–18:00 UTC</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 700 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.2–13.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.83"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean value (17 July–17 August)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="3">Isoprene</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.2 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 700 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.84"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13:45 UTC – 17 August</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.604 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 700 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.2–13.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="1">
                        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.85"/>
                      </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean value (17 July–17 August)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–1.5 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">400–1450 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12:00 UTC – 17 August</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2–1.5 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Surface</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N;1,44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.86"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Composite diurnal cycle (7 June–13 June)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05–0.15 pptv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">500 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.87"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13:45 UTC – 17 August</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 900 hPa</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.88"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median value (20 July–21 August)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 700 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.89"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean value (5 August–17 August)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="3">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 2 km</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cotonou</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.90"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Afternoon flight – 19 August</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24–30 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–2 km</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cotonou</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.91"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean value (August 2006)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="1">&lt; 700 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Lagos</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="1">
                        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.92"/>
                      </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">B229 flight</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Niamey</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean value (17 July–17 August)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 ppbv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 2 km</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cotonou</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.93"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Afternoon flight – 19 August</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–0.5 pptv</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">500 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Lagos</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.94"/>
                    </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">B229 flight</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4859"><bold>(a–b)</bold> LES-simulated diurnal cycles for isoprene (green),
OH (red), ozone (purple), NO (brown), NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue), <bold>(c–d)</bold> ALD2
(grey), OH (red), ozone (purple), NO (brown) and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue).
Panels <bold>(a–b)</bold> correspond to the biogenic environment, <bold>(c–d)</bold> to
the anthropogenic environment. The shaded areas denote the minimum and
maximum of mean vertical profiles between the surface and 600 m height, and
the colored lines correspond to the averages of these profiles.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page6608?><p id="d1e4898">The chemical regime induced by the anthropogenic emissions is contrasted with
the previous biogenic case (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c and d), including NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions nearly 40 times higher at 13:00 UTC. The averaged NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratio was 1.5 ppbv at midday (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d), which is similar to the
averaged value of 1 ppbv measured during a flight over Cotonou during the
AMMA campaign (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The increase in NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
led to considerable oxidant formations. OH mixing ratios varied between 0 and
0.40 pptv in the simulation, in agreement with the AMMA measurements ranging
from 0 to 0.50 pptv over Lagos (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). Ozone was
produced throughout the simulation but did not exhibit strong spatial
variabilities. Its mixing ratios varied from 17 ppbv in the morning to 82
ppbv in late afternoon. This was higher than the observations recorded over
several cities in West Africa, varying between 26 and 40 ppbv (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). ALD2 increased continuously during this case through
chemical production and emissions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Its mixing ratios
ranged from less than 1 ppbv in the morning to 11 ppbv at the end of the
simulation. Unfortunately, no aldehyde observations, except formaldehyde,
were available from the AMMA experiment despite the use of a PTR-MS due to
interferences during the measurements for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> identified as acetaldehyde
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.95"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4960">A minimum of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was found around 12:00 UTC for both cases and can be
explained by two factors. The first is dynamical and is linked to the
boundary layer. In the middle of the simulation, the boundary layer growth
was maximal and induced dilution in a larger mixing volume. The second factor
was chemical because at that instant, NO was efficiently converted into
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical transformations in a reservoir such as
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or PANs are net sinks for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The chemical balance
between reservoir species and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represented 2.12 % of the net
destruction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over the domain at 20 m and 12:00 UTC for the
biogenic case, and 34.2 % for the anthropogenic case. For both cases, the
main reservoirs of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were PAN1 and PAN2. Therefore, less NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
available for conversion into NO, which explains the low NO mixing ratios at
midday (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b and d).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page6609?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Vertical transport and chemical reactions in the convective boundary layer</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Impact of turbulent mixing on the OH reactions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Vertical transport and Damkh\"{o}ler numbers}?><title>Vertical transport and Damkhöler numbers</title>
      <p id="d1e5075">Isoprene is highly reactive, especially towards OH, and is rapidly consumed
in the boundary layer linked to its chemical lifetime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ch</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
approximately equal to 30 min in the biogenic case. The Damkhöler number of
isoprene is close to 1 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>), indicating that the isoprene
chemical lifetime is comparable with the timescale of turbulent mixing. This
implies that chemical reactions and turbulent mixing are competing processes
for this compound. Isoprene is both transported and consumed inside the
thermals and exhibits vertical and horizontal gradients (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a).
The average profiles of isoprene decrease with altitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a).
The lower mixing ratios in the updraft-free region (dashed line) are close to
the domain-averaged values due to domain coverage by thermals (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Updraft regions contain higher isoprene mixing ratios with
significant anomalies over the whole boundary layer, although these ratios decrease with
rising altitude.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p id="d1e5100">Simulated Damkhöler number of chemical species averaged from the
surface to 0.6 km at 12:00 UTC for the two cases calculated with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">turb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 min.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">Damkhöler number (unitless) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Biogenic case</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Anthropogenic case</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4402.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12 002.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">137.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISOP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.79</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">81.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALD2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.086</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5265"><bold>(a)</bold> Isoprene (ppb) and <bold>(b)</bold> OH radical (ppt) mixing
ratios for the biogenic case at 12:00 UTC. <bold>(c)</bold> ALD2 (ppb) and
<bold>(d)</bold> OH radical (ppt) mixing ratios for the anthropogenic case at the
same time. For each figure, the left part consists of a vertical cross
section at the middle of the domain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km). Black isolines denote
thermals identified by the conditional sampling method. In the right part of
each panel, the shaded areas denote twice the standard deviation at a given
altitude and the line represents the horizontal average over the domain. The
dashed line corresponds to the average in the environment and the dotted
lines inside thermals.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5298">For the biogenic case, OH has a very short chemical lifetime of the order of
0.2 s. The OH radical rapidly reaches steady state and is relatively
undisturbed by the turbulent mixing, as evidenced by its large Damkhöler
number (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Therefore, OH mixing ratios (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) have almost<?pagebreak page6610?> homogeneous values below 600 m with no distinction
between thermals and their environment. Average OH profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) show no strong variability below 600 m in the boundary layer.
Above this height, the thermals have lower OH concentrations on average with
relatively small differences. The differences between thermals and their
surroundings are more pronounced in the cloudy layer because clouds arise
from air parcels transported by thermals and characterized by lower OH mixing
ratios than the rest of the domain. Since OH is almost constant over the
boundary layer, the highest reaction rate for the oxidation of isoprene by OH
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOP</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOP</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is located where the isoprene
mixing ratios are the highest. This implies that both the surface and air
lifted by thermals are preferential reaction zones in the boundary layer.</p>
      <p id="d1e5329">For the anthropogenic simulation, the reaction rate of ALD2 with OH is lower
than the reaction rate of OH with isoprene. Its calculated Damkhöler number
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17) indicates that turbulent mixing dominates over chemical
reactions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Consequently, ALD2 is efficiently
transported by updrafts (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c). The contrast between
concentrated air parcels lifted upwards by thermals and relatively diluted
air outside is illustrated by the large differences in the ALD2 average
profile in thermals and in the environment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c). As with
isoprene in the biogenic case, the two-layer<?pagebreak page6611?> structure presented above is
present on the vertical profiles. It results from the mixing in the sub-cloud
layer and from the mixing within clouds.</p>
      <p id="d1e5345">OH mixing ratios are nearly twice as high in the anthropogenic environment as
in the biogenic case, inducing a more reactive atmosphere and a shorter
chemical lifetime for species whose OH is the main sink in the boundary
layer. OH has a very short chemical lifetime of 0.07 s in this simulation,
which represents a large Damkhöler number close to 12 000. OH mixing ratios
are maximal in thermals (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d) due to the transport of OH
precursors, such as NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and fast steady state. Conversely, lower mixing
ratios in average OH profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d) correspond to regions
without updrafts, leading to strong OH anomalies within updrafts from the
surface to the top of clouds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Vertical profile of segregation intensity</title>
      <p id="d1e5367">Negative values of segregation coefficients up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % are calculated at the
top of the cloudy boundary layer from 10:00 to 17:00 UTC which means that OH
and isoprene are partly segregated in this frontier zone. In other words, the
hypothesis of a well-mixed atmosphere would lead to a 30 % overestimation of
the reaction rate at the frontier between the boundary layer and the free
troposphere. The negative segregation (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) means the
anomalies of isoprene and OH have opposite signs, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a. This is due to lower OH mixing ratios in thermals than in the
environment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). These results are consistent with the
previous studies of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.96"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.97"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.98"/> (see Discussion).</p>
      <p id="d1e5396">In the biogenic case, isoprene anomalies in thermals are considerable from
the surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv on average at midday) to the top of the boundary
layer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv on average at midday) and are thought to be always positive
as OH is uniformly emitted at the ground (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a). On the
contrary, OH mixing ratios are almost constant in the boundary layer at 12:00 UTC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b), so the magnitude of OH anomalies are expected to be
low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv on average at midday at the top of the boundary layer).
Besides, due to its very short chemical lifetime, OH quickly reaches
equilibrium with its surroundings, implying that its fluctuations are mostly
due to<?pagebreak page6612?> thermals transporting air originating from different chemical
environments. Thus, isoprene anomalies are thought to be the major driver of
the magnitude of segregation over the boundary layer, whereas changes in OH
anomalies are related to changes in the segregation sign.</p>
      <p id="d1e5433">Positive values around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % are calculated at 700 m starting from 14:00
to 18:00 UTC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). The intensity of segregation becomes positive
due to positive anomalies of both compounds. Due to a decrease in isoprene
emissions in the afternoon, OH destruction slows down, especially inside
thermals. They are still active in transporting enough NO to react with
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce OH, inducing higher OH mixing ratios inside updrafts than
in the surroundings (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv on average at 16:00 UTC).</p>
      <p id="d1e5467">Before 09:00 UTC near the surface, the segregation coefficient in the
anthropogenic simulation between OH and ALD2 is negative up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in the
lower 200 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b), due to the anthropogenic emission patch. As
chemical equilibrium is not yet reached, more of the OH radical is destroyed
through its reaction with recently emitted compounds than that which is
produced (not shown). This means that OH is less concentrated inside updrafts
at that moment so its anomalies are negative near the surface.
Simultaneously, positive segregations develop at the top of the boundary
layer from 07:00 to 12:30 UTC with a maximum of 16 % at 10:00 UTC and from
15:30 to 17:30 UTC. The positive segregation is related to the concomitant
transport of ALD2 and precursors of OH by thermals. Moreover, the high
segregation values correspond to the presence of clouds between 0.6 and 0.9 km (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c), simultaneous with a high cloud fraction over the
domain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b). This specific point is discussed in the
Discussion. As ALD2 is emitted at the surface, its anomalies are high
and positive inside updrafts. For example, at midday, anomalies are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv
on average at the surface and nearly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv at the top of the boundary
layer. However, in this case, OH anomalies are more difficult to predict due
to the spatial heterogeneities of chemical emissions. Local changes in OH
production and destruction explain the changes in the segregation sign
throughout the simulation. Except for positive segregation simulated between
500 and 1400 m from 11:30 to 16:00 UTC with values ranging from 2 to 4 %, ALD2
and OH can be considered well-mixed in the central part of the boundary
layer. The ALD2 oxidation reaction by OH is accelerated up to 16 % at the top
of the cloudy layer from the morning to the early afternoon compared to a
perfect mixing assumption.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5520"><bold>(a)</bold> Diurnal evolution of the segregation coefficient for
isoprene and OH in the biogenic case and <bold>(b)</bold> for ALD2 and OH in the
anthropogenic case. The red line represents the boundary layer height as
determined by the tracer approach. The diurnal evolution of cloud fraction (blue line) is added above each panel.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5534">Regarding the two simulations, the segregation has both spatial and temporal
variations. The maximum values of the segregation coefficient are calculated
near the top of the boundary layer. Below and during daytime, the considered
species are well-mixed for both cases. This means that in the biogenic
environment, the highest decrease induced by the thermals of isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH
reaction is located near the top of the boundary layer. It also implies that
in the anthropogenic environment, the highest increase induced by the
thermals of isoprene and ALD2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH reaction is also located near the top of
the boundary layer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>OH budget and reactivity in a convective boundary layer</title>
      <p id="d1e5558">The previous part emphasized the nonuniform mixing between isoprene and OH
for the biogenic case and between OH and ALD2 for the urban case, and the
modification of the reaction rates between these species. However, this
feature must be taken into account for every OH reactant in order to obtain
the full picture of total OH reactivity and gain insight into how the Meso-NH
model computes the OH budget in different chemical regimes.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page6613?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>OH budget in thermals versus surroundings</title>
      <p id="d1e5567">In order to identify and quantify the major OH sources and sinks in the
boundary layer, the instantaneous chemical budget of OH at 20 m above
ground level is investigated at 12:00 UTC for both environments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). This height is the first level in the model, and computing the
chemical budget at this height leads to uncertainties due to subgrid-scale
mixing and chemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.99"/>. However, it makes it possible to
compare the model results with the measurements in the literature.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5577">OH radical chemical budget at 12:00 UTC averaged at 20 m for the
biogenic <bold>(a)</bold> and the anthropogenic case <bold>(b)</bold>. Source terms
are in red for updrafts and pale red for nonupdrafts. Destruction terms are
in blue for updrafts and pale blue for nonupdrafts. The bar lengths
determine the absolute values, and the relative contributions for destruction
and production are given by the percentage near each bar. Numbers between
parentheses in the legend box are the OH production and destruction rates in
updrafts and in nonupdrafts. Chemical names correspond to the names given in
the ReLACS 3 mechanism.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5592">The budget distinguishes between updraft and updraft-free columns.
Percentages are related to the fraction of the overall production and
destruction within or outside thermals. In the biogenic case (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a), the OH budget is dominated by its destruction by isoprene
oxidation (41.7 % of the total loss in updrafts and 29.3 % of the total loss
in the rest of the domain) and its production by the reaction of peroxy
radicals with HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (37.2 % of its total source in updrafts and 42.4 % of
the total source in nonupdrafts) and NO reaction with HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (32.4 % of
the total source in updrafts and 17.8 % of its total source in the rest of
the domain). In this case, the peroxy radicals are mainly formed by the
oxidation of isoprene and its degradation products. The absolute value of OH
reactivity is higher in thermals than in the rest of the domain.</p>
      <p id="d1e5615">The OH budget for the anthropogenic case (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b) shows that the
chemical reactivity is higher inside thermals at the surface compared to the
rest of the domain. The budget is largely dominated by the production of OH
by NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (79.2 % of its total source in updrafts and 71.2 % of the
total source in nonupdrafts) and by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (14.4 % of the total
source in updrafts and 18.5 % of its total source in the rest of the domain).
Over the whole domain, ALD2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (21.6 % of the total loss in updrafts and
26.0 % of the total loss in the rest of the domain) is the most important
sink at the surface, followed closely by the oxidation of carbon
monoxide (17 % of the destruction of OH in thermals and 18.8 % in
nonupdrafts).</p>
      <p id="d1e5670">The chemical budget at 1200 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), namely at the top of
the boundary layer, allows the investigation of chemical reactions inside the
ascending air parcel lifted by thermals and its comparison with its
surroundings. For the biogenic case, the major OH reactants in the thermals
have a chemical lifetime greater than the turbulence timescale. At this
altitude, only species whose Damkhöler numbers are lower than 1 are present
in sufficient amounts to react with the OH radical. For example, carbon
monoxide (26.2 % of total OH destruction in thermals and 36.6 % in the
surroundings) is the major sink, but also methane (11.8 % of total OH loss in
updrafts and 18.4 % in the environment). Chemical compounds with a secondary
source like formaldehyde and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 aldehydes (ALD2) are other important sinks
at 1200 m. Isoprene, the major OH reactant close to the surface, is present
only in thermals at this altitude due to its reaction with OH in the
ascending air parcel and consumes 11.8 % of OH in thermals. OH production by
NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction is null inside updrafts and low in the nonupdraft area
(3.2 % of the total OH production) due to NO destruction in updrafts. The
reaction between hydroxyl radicals RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, secondary products, with
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2<?pagebreak page6614?></mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a major OH source in thermals (49.7 % of total production) but
also in the surroundings (36.1 % of OH production in updraft-free region).
Production of OH by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O or H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis are
similar in magnitude in thermals and in the nonthermal areas. The production
and destruction terms are higher in the thermals compared to these terms in
nonupdrafts due to higher concentrations of OH reactants inside the
thermals, but lower than at 20 m.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5762">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> for the height of 1200 m.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page6615?><p id="d1e5773">Regarding the anthropogenic case, species whose lifetimes are higher than the
turbulence timescale are major OH reactants at 1200 m. Carbon monoxide
contributes 22 % of the OH destruction in thermals and 34.3 % in the rest of
the domain. As with the biogenic case, chemical compounds with a secondary
source are important OH sinks like formaldehyde (11.1 % in thermals and
11.0 % in updraft-free regions) and ALD2 (26.4 % of total OH destruction in
updrafts and 11.8 % in the surroundings), corresponding to the major OH
destruction term at the top of the boundary layer. The OH production terms in
the anthropogenic case are similar in thermals compared to the surface, with a
high contribution of NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction (66.9 % of total OH production),
followed by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O reaction (15.3 %) and RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(10.6 %). In the rest of the domain, NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution drops to
12.7 % while O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (49.4 %) and RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (23.4 %)
are major production terms.</p>
      <p id="d1e5910">The differences between the OH reactivity at the surface and the top of the
boundary layer are mainly driven by the changes in chemical mixing ratios of
precursors caused by chemical reactions and consequently by their Damkhöler
number, and by the secondary products formed inside the thermals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>OH reactivity in the convective boundary layer</title>
      <p id="d1e5919">The OH reactivity for the biogenic case (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) at 20 m is maximum
around midday and is equal to 6.0, 4.25 and 4.55 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
respectively in updrafts, in nonupdrafts and averaged over the domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a). This feature is linked to the photochemical maximum activity
at noon, and the diurnal cycle of emissions amplifies this phenomenon. At
that time and near the surface, many chemical compounds are available to
react with OH, which leads to a high value of reactivity. The values in
updrafts are higher than outside due to higher reactant mixing ratios inside
thermals (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a). The arithmetical difference between updrafts
and nonupdrafts reaches a maximum at 12:00 UTC and is about 1.75 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, as the thermals occupy less than 15 % of the domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), the evolution of the domain-averaged OH reactivity is very
similar to that linked to updraft-free regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5955">The diurnal cycle of OH total reactivity with a maximum around midday in a
biogenic environment is well documented in the literature on observations of
OH reactivity for a Mediterranean forest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.100"/>, for temperate
forests <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.101"/> and for tropical forests
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.102"/>. The values of OH reactivity in or outside
thermals in the<?pagebreak page6616?> present study are the lower bounds of measurements taken over
forests and gathered in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.103"/>, between 1 and 76 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5982">The mean relative error made on OH reactivity is calculated by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). This diagnostic includes the segregation,
computed relative to the boundary layer averaged values, between OH and every
one of its reactants in the chemical scheme. It is negative throughout the
simulation, increases during the morning and is maximal in the early
afternoon with a peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at 14:30 UTC. In other words, neglecting the
segregation of reactive species by turbulent mixing in the boundary layer
would lead to overestimating OH reactivity by 9 % at most in an environment
dominated by biogenic emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5999">For the anthropogenic case, total OH reactivity (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) in thermals
and in the rest of the domain does not present a clear diurnal cycle (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b). From the 08:00 UTC value of 11.6 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the domain-averaged
OH reactivity fluctuates but tends to increase to 14.2 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 16:00 UTC.
The evolution of the OH reactivity in thermals is similar and ranges from
14.8 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 08:00 UTC to 17.7 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 16:00 UTC. For the same period,
the values in updraft-free domains vary between 11 and 13.5 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
consequence of higher OH reactant mixing ratios in the boundary layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c and d), is higher OH reactivity in this case compared to the
biogenic simulation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6072"><bold>(a)</bold> OH reactivity (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in thermals (red), domain
averaged (green) and in a nonthermal region (blue) averaged at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m
for the biogenic and <bold>(b)</bold> the anthropogenic case.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6110">The mean relative error of the OH reactivity (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) is generally
positive throughout the simulation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). It ranges between
0 and 4 % from 09:00 to 16:00 UTC with a maximum value of 4.5 % at 13:30 UTC. In
this case, the turbulent mixing induces a moderate increase up to 4.5 % of
the total OH reactivity for two reasons. The segregation effect is limited to
the last 200 m of the boundary layer. Thus averaging on the whole boundary
layer cancels the extreme values. Moreover, chemicals have either negative or
positive segregation towards OH that may compensate or increase the positive
values simulated for ALD2 and OH (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d1e6119">In both cases, the occurrence and development of clouds (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, upper
panel) is concomitant with linear increases in the error made on the OH
reactivity while neglecting the impact of turbulence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>).
The diurnal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in each case is correlated to the
development of the convective boundary layer. Firstly, a rapid change occurs
during the first hours of the simulations, characterized by the occurrence of
thermals and an increase in chemical emissions for the biogenic environment.
Then, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively stable from the end of the morning to the
middle of the afternoon, with a maximum value computed around 14:00 UTC,
corresponding to the maximum turbulent activity in the convective boundary
layer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e6164">The redistribution of chemical species by the boundary layer turbulence
induces a different mean reaction rate between compounds when compared to a
situation in which chemical species would be perfectly mixed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.104"/> among others). The perfectly mixed assumption used in
regional- and large-scale atmospheric models leads to errors in the mean reaction rates
between species as the turbulent mixing occurs at scales smaller than the
grid length <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.105"/>. This implies that the OH total reactivity has
been calculated inaccurately, in turn leading to a modification in the
lifetimes of the OH reactants such as ozone and carbon monoxide.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e6175">Mean relative error <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> made on the OH reactivity by
neglecting turbulent motions for the biogenic case (green) and the
anthropogenic case (red).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/6601/2018/acp-18-6601-2018-f10.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e6199">In a biogenic environment characterized by low NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.106"/> found negative segregation between isoprene and OH varying
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % near the surface and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in the cloud layer due to increasing
OH mixing ratios in thermals with altitude. That implied positive isoprene
anomalies and negative ones for OH in the frontier region between the
boundary layer and the free troposphere. These features are reproduced in our
biogenic simulation although our segregation values are higher in the cloud
layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>) due to sharper gradients of OH mixing ratios at the top
of the cloudy layer.</p>
      <p id="d1e6236">Using a simple chemistry scheme of 19 reactions representing the basic
reactions of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–VOC–HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.107"/>
found an almost constant value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for the segregation between OH and
isoprene in the boundary layer over the Amazonian forest. This was the result
of positive isoprene anomalies due to transport by thermals and negative OH
anomalies due to consumption therein. Negative segregation ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % inside the convective boundary layer was simulated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.108"/>
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.109"/>. In the biogenic case in this study, the negative
segregation of a few percent in the middle of the boundary layer is
reproduced. As in this case, higher segregation values were simulated with
altitude in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.110"/>, especially in the cloudy layer. However,
segregation computed in the cloudy layer in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.111"/> was equal to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a value lower than that computed in the biogenic case of the present
study. The discrepancies in this study and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.112"/> are likely due to
the vertical OH profiles. In the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.113"/>, OH concentrations
increased linearly with altitude. This implies lower OH covariances for
ascending air parcels and thus lower segregation values (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>).
On the contrary, in the present study, OH is relatively homogeneous in the
boundary layer and a strong gradient is present only at the top of the
boundary layer. This induces high covariances for OH concentrations inside
air transported by thermals at the top of the boundary layer, implying higher
segregation values. As segregation computed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.114"/> is not
available above 1000 m height, a direct comparison with results regarding the
cloudy layer is not<?pagebreak page6617?> possible with the results from the biogenic case. The
positive values of segregation simulated in the afternoon (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a) in
the biogenic case are not reproduced in other studies and might be the result
of efficient OH recycling in ReLACS 3.0, initiated in particular inside the
thermals due to peroxy radicals formed by isoprene oxidation. Indeed, this
recycling is either absent or indirect in previous works like in the
mechanism used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.115"/> that produces only HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from peroxy
radicals, which may explain the discrepancies in OH covariances. Furthermore,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.116"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.117"/> investigated the sensitivity of
segregation to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. It was found that different NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels imply
differences in the segregation of OH and other compounds as they contribute
to OH production.</p>
      <p id="d1e6374"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.118"/> used LES to study the OH budget in a biogenic environment
averaged over the domain and over time from 13:30 to 14:30 LT with a chemical
scheme adapted from MOZART v2.2. For a low NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case with ozone mixing
ratios close to 64 ppbv, they found that OH production was mostly influenced
by four predominant reactions (including O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO). These production terms
are present in the biogenic case of the present study. However,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.119"/> did not take into account recycling by peroxy radicals as the
latter formed only HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the chemical scheme they used. Moreover, they
found that OH loss by reaction with isoprene was dominant near the surface,
followed by reactions with CO and formaldehyde, as in the present study. The
contribution of BVOC species to OH reactivity was simulated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.120"/>
for three distinct biogenic cases of the DISCOVER-AQ (Deriving Information on
Surface Conditions from Column and Vertically Resolved Observations Relevant
to Air Quality) campaign. The production terms of OH were not available but
it was found that isoprene was a dominant sink for OH; about 25–30 % of the
OH reactivity was linked to BVOC reactions at 0.3 km during midday. This
contribution is comparable to the percentage calculated for isoprene in the
OH destruction in thermals (41.7 %) or in an updraft-free area (29.3 %). The
contribution of formaldehyde was comparable to isoprene at that height, with
HCHO mixing ratios ranging from 2 to 4.5 ppbv at the surface. The higher
formaldehyde contribution of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.121"/> is the result of higher
concentrations than in the current work.</p>
      <p id="d1e6495"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.122"/> found that in forest areas the OH budget was largely dominated
by isoprene and its oxidation products. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="text.123"/> measured
OH reactivity and the concentration of biogenic compounds over a
Mediterranean forest. They found that isoprene was the dominant sink for OH
and contributed up to 74 % of total OH<?pagebreak page6618?> reactivity during daytime due to its
high reactivity towards OH and its high concentration over the forested area.
Isoprene predominance in OH loss was reproduced in the OH budget of the
biogenic environment of the present study, and for carbon monoxide. The
formaldehyde mixing ratios were close to 2 ppbv, which explains that this is
not a major sink like isoprene, but remains important for OH loss through the
reaction OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HCHO. OH production in the biogenic case was similar to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.124"/>, as almost the same production terms are present. However,
overall production was dominated by the reaction of peroxy radicals with
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the ozone mixing ratios of 18 ppbv decrease the importance of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O source for OH.</p>
      <p id="d1e6551">However, the mechanism used to represent atmospheric chemistry in our
simulation has fast OH cycling due to the reaction of peroxy radicals
RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This reaction yield in OH is greater than in the
laboratory studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx86" id="paren.125"/>,
implying an overestimation of OH mixing ratios, especially in the biogenic
case where RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are high. As the hydroxyl radical is recycled through the
isoprene oxidation products, it tends to reduce the impact of isoprene
chemistry on OH mixing ratios and thus influences the low segregation
simulated in the core of the boundary layer. This is similar to a case
considered by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.126"/> where an ISOPO2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ISOPOOH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 OH recycling mechanism was proposed to increase the simulated OH
concentrations and provided the best agreement with OH observations. This
reaction implied that isoprene has no net impact on OH concentrations. This
conclusion was also reached by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.127"/> who found
better agreement between simulated and measured HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations by
ignoring isoprene chemistry. As the chemistry of isoprene is not well
understood, the results obtained in our work are subject to these
uncertainties.</p>
      <p id="d1e6626">Aldehydes have not been considered in previous works on segregation.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.128"/> calculated segregation at 250 m and 11:00 UTC between each
species of the chemical model CHIMERE used in their simulation. They found
segregation ranging from 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % between OH and acetaldehyde. This is
comparable to a range of results of the anthropogenic case of the present study
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b) considering the incomplete mixing between OH and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2
aldehydes at the same height.</p>
      <p id="d1e6651">In the anthropogenic simulation, the high values of segregation computed at
the top of the boundary layer are coincident with the presence of clouds. In
the absence of aqueous-phase chemistry, clouds impacts on chemical species
are dynamical and photochemical. They modify heat and moisture fluxes at
their surroundings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.129"/> and thus the transport of compounds, as
noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.130"/> who demonstrated that cloud presence could increase
transport of chemicals by 1000 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e6660">In this set of simulations, the chemical impact of clouds on species involves
photolysis rates as they are corrected at every time step due to the presence
of clouds according to the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.131"/>. At each point of the
domain, photolysis rates are increased above clouds and decreased below them.</p>
      <p id="d1e6667">Another effect of clouds on the atmospheric chemistry lies in isoprene
emissions, as demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.132"/>. As isoprene emissions are
dependent on incoming radiation and temperature near the surface, cloud
shading could decrease the amount of isoprene emitted. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.133"/> showed
that isoprene concentrations are decreased by 10 % and OH concentrations
increased by 5 % in the boundary layer when isoprene emissions are reduced by
up to 10 %. The ultimate impact on segregation cannot be anticipated since it
corresponds to two compensating effects.</p>
      <p id="d1e6676">Finally, clouds impact atmospheric chemistry through aqueous-phase
reactivity. Aqueous-phase chemistry was not considered here, nor were the
exchanges between gas and aqueous phases. However, it could have an impact on
soluble species mixing ratios, such as formaldehyde and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
through the capture and degassing cycles of these compounds.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.134"/> showed a decrease in oxidative capacity of the
atmosphere through aqueous-phase reactions via a significant decrease in
ozone mixing ratios, but also OH, formaldehyde and nitrogen oxides. However,
the effects of aqueous-phase chemistry on gas-phase compound concentrations
are various <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.135"/> and OH concentrations could decrease in clouds
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.136"/>. This result was confirmed by the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.137"/>
who found that HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations decreased in clouds. Recently,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.138"/> studied segregation effects in a biogenic environment when
aqueous-phase chemistry is included. They found that isoprene concentrations
are increased by up to 100 % while OH concentrations decreased by 18 %,
resulting in a maximum segregation of 55 % in the cloudy layer. In both biogenic and anthropogenic environments, segregation effects are expected to be enhanced
due to the decrease in OH concentrations in the gaseous phase in the cloud layer,
reducing the cleansing capacity of the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e6722">Several instrumental studies examined OH total reactivity in urban
environments, and more especially the OH budget. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.139"/> found that
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution (50 to 55 %) in an urban environment had the
greatest effect on OH loss, considering NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios between 10 and
300 ppbv. The next most important contribution came from oxygenated volatile organic compounds
(OVOCs; especially aldehydes and ketones), leading to 15 to 25 % of OH
destruction with mixing ratios close to 20 ppbv. Some discrepancies exist
between this experimental study and the OH budget for the anthropogenic case
in our study (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). Given the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios
simulated in the present study (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 ppbv at midday), they are not an
important sink for OH as measured by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.140"/>. However, the range of
OVOC contribution reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.141"/> is comparable to what was found
for ALD2 in the anthropogenic case.</p>
      <?pagebreak page6619?><p id="d1e6771">In the city of Tokyo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.142"/> found that the OH budget was dominated
by NMHCs and by OVOCs. In their study, the OVOC group, including acetaldehyde,
formaldehyde, methanol, ethanol and acetone, contributed up to 18 % of OH
reactivity. If aggregated, the species constituting the NMHC group are the
predominant sink for OH in our anthropogenic simulation, as observed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.143"/>. However, C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 aldehydes contribute more to OH destruction in
our study than in that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.144"/>. This could result from the cyclic
boundary conditions prescribed at the borders of our domain, which can cause
the ageing of air masses and increase the mixing ratios of secondary products
such as aldehydes.</p>
      <p id="d1e6790"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.145"/> studied the global distribution and budget of OH
radical using the EMAC model (ECHAM/Messy Atmospheric Chemistry) coupled with
the Mainz Organics Chemistry (MOM). They found that the annual mean OH
reactivity near the surface ranged from 10 to 20 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in southern West
Africa, which is in agreement with the results of the anthropogenic case but
slightly higher than the values obtained in our biogenic case. However,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.146"/> studied, by means of observations, the effects of
seasonality in rainforest air reactivity and noticed that total OH reactivity
was much lower during the wet season than during the dry season due to lower
temperatures and incoming radiation. More specifically, measurements of
reactivity performed during the wet season varied between 6 and 12 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
with an average value of 9.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 24 m, which is much
closer to the Meso-NH model results. Moreover, the error made on the total OH
reactivity neglecting the turbulent mixing could cumulate with the
uncertainties reported in the literature regarding OH reactivity techniques
such LIF with a flow tube (from 10 to 15 %, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="altparen.147"/>),
LP-LIF (from 10 to 20 %, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="altparen.148"/>) and the CRM measurement method
(15 to 20 %, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="altparen.149"/>). In addition, uncertainties on reaction rate
constants are also present in chemical schemes, including those used by
numerical models. These uncertainties on reaction rate coefficients range
from 5 to 15 %, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.150"/>. It is likely
that the unaccounted fraction of OH reactivity reported in the literature may
be explained at least partially by a combination of the following phenomena
similar in intensity: turbulence effects on chemical reactivity and
uncertainties on the OH reactivity measurements and reaction rate
coefficients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6861">A numerical simulation coupled with a realistic chemical mechanism was
performed with the atmospheric model Meso-NH to study the impact of thermals
on the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere. The fine grid resolution of the
LES version of the model made it possible to explicitly resolve the thermals
spatially and temporally. Identification of thermals was based on a
conditional sampling method relying on a first-order decay passive scalar.
The impact of turbulent mixing on chemical species redistribution, and of the
consequences on OH reactivity was determined in a natural environment and a
more contrasted urban case.</p>
      <p id="d1e6864">The differentiated transport by thermals is dependent on the chemical
lifetime of the compounds, represented by the Damkhöler number. This
transport induces inhomogeneous mixing of the species within the boundary
layer, with an impact on the mean chemical rate between reactive species. In
both natural and urban environments, the top of the boundary layer was the
region with the highest calculated segregation intensities but of the
opposite sign. Between isoprene and the OH radical, an effective maximum
decrease of 30 % of the reaction rate was calculated at the top of the
boundary layer in a biogenic environment compared to a perfectly mixed case.
In the urban case, the reduction of the mean chemical reaction rate between
the OH radical and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 aldehydes reached 8 % at the surface in the
early morning while this reaction increased by 16 % at the top of the boundary layer during most of the
simulation. Thermals transporting species emitted at the surface can lead to
different chemical regimes inside updrafts and the environment. For both
cases, the surface and the thermals are the preferential reaction zones, with
highest chemical reactivity. This was especially the case for the OH radical
whose precursors are either transported by thermals or created inside them.
OH reactivity was always higher by 15 to 40 % inside thermals compared to
their surroundings, depending on the time of day. For the natural case, the
major OH precursors close to the surface were radicals originating from the
oxidation of isoprene and its degradation products, whereas the
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O reaction became more predominant with increasing
altitudes. In the urban case, OH was mainly produced through the reaction
between HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO, at the surface or higher in the boundary layer. This
led to a higher oxidation capacity in the air transported by thermals for
both cases.</p>
      <p id="d1e6908">The overall impact of turbulence on OH concentrations and reactivity at the
domain scale differs depending on the chemical environment considered. In a
biogenic environment with low OH mixing ratios varying from 0.18 to 0.24 ppt,
turbulent structures had little impact on the redistribution of OH in the
boundary layer. This was due to an efficient OH recycling initiated by peroxy
radicals formed by BVOC oxidation. In the anthropogenic case, OH mixing
ratios ranged from 0.26 to 0.50 ppt. The turbulence significantly impacted
the spatial distribution of OH and its precursors in the boundary layer, with
higher mixing ratios in thermals.</p>
      <p id="d1e6911">The mean relative error on domain-averaged OH reactivity revealed that
effective OH reactivity (taking into account segregation by turbulent
motions) in the biogenic case was up to 9 % below the OH reactivity
calculated based on averaged boundary layer mixing ratios. Accounting for
inhomogeneous mixing between OH and its reactants (primarily isoprene) in a
regional or global model could lower the<?pagebreak page6620?> calculated OH reactivity and
increase the discrepancies with observed OH reactivities. In the urban
environment, the mean relative error was slightly positive which means that
air mass segregation by turbulence increases OH reactivity. Considering the
effect of turbulent motions could reduce the gap between modeled and
observed OH reactivity. However, segregation alone is unlikely to resolve the
underestimation between observed and modeled OH reactivity.</p>
      <p id="d1e6915">This study addressed the impact of moist thermals on the oxidative capacity
of the atmosphere on two contrasted chemical situations in a wet environment
represented by the monsoon flow. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.151"/> observed a
substantial seasonal cycle in OH reactivity over an Amazonian forest ranging
from 10 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the wet season to 62 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the dry season. It
would be interesting to assess the impact of turbulent mixing on chemistry in
the dry season over the southern part of West Africa. Moreover, the influence
of urban area in this study was only linked to chemical emissions. This work
should be repeated by taking into account the dynamical forcing due to the
presence of the urban area as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.152"/> in which the authors
introduced heterogeneous surface conditions over forest and savannah patches.
They showed that the difference in buoyancy fluxes at the surface could have
an impact on the redistribution of species, and thus on segregation. Finally,
the presence of clouds was considered only from a dynamical view. Adding
aqueous-phase chemistry in these simulations could provide further insight
into the impact of moist thermals on chemical reactivity.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e6952">The ECMWF reanalysis run for the AMMA campaign
(Agustí-Panareda et al., 2010) used in this study are available after
registration on the AMMA database, accessible at
<uri>https://www.aeris-data.fr/amma/</uri> (last access: 26 April 2018). The UK
FAAM BAe-146 measurements made during AMMA (Reeves et al., 2010) can be found
for the particular flight B235 at
<uri>http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/faam/data/2006/b235-aug-17/</uri> (last acess: 26
April 2018). The Meso-NH model is publicly available at
<uri>http://mesonh.aero.obs-mip.fr</uri> (last access: 26 April 2018; Lac et al.,
2018). Biogenic chemical emissions from the MEGAN-MACC inventory (Sindelarova et
al, 2014) and anthropogenic chemical emissions in West Africa from Junker et
Liousse (2008) are archived at <uri>http://eccad.aeris-data.fr/</uri> (last acess:
26 April 2018).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e6970">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e6976">This article is part of the special issue “Results of the
project `Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa'
(DACCIWA) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a
conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6982">The authors are very grateful to Mat Evans for his helpful comments and
discussions. The research leading to these results has received funding from
the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant
agreement no. 603502 (EU project DACCIWA: Dynamics–aerosol–chemistry–cloud
interactions in West Africa). This work was performed using HPC resources
from GENCI-CINES (grant 2016-A0010100005) and CALMIP Toulouse (P12171,
P17015). The authors acknowledge ECCAD (<uri>http://eccad.aeris-data.fr/</uri>) for the
archiving and distribution of emissions data.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Dominick Spracklen<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Agust\'{\i}-Panareda et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Agustí-Panareda et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Agustí-Panareda, A., Beljaars, A., Ahlgrimm, M., Balsamo, G., Bock, O.,
Forbes, R., Ghelli, A., Guichard, F., Köhler, M., Meynadier, R., and
Morcrette, J.-J.: The ECMWF re-analysis for the AMMA observational
campaign, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136,
1457–1472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.662" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.662</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ancellet et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Ancellet, G., Leclair de Bellevue, J., Mari, C., Nedelec, P., Kukui, A.,
Borbon, A., and Perros, P.: Effects of regional-scale and convective
transports on tropospheric ozone chemistry revealed by aircraft observations
during the wet season of the AMMA campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 383–411,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-383-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-383-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Atkinson et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F.,
Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and IUPAC Subcommittee:
Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II
– gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625–4055,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Auger and Legras(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Auger, L. and Legras, B.: Chemical segregation by heterogeneous emissions,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 2303–2318,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.032</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Barth et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Barth, M. C., Sillman, S., Hudman, R., Jacobson, M. Z., Kim, C.-H., Monod,
A., and Liang, J.: Summary of the cloud chemistry modeling intercomparison:
Photochemical box model simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002673</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Borbon et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Borbon, A., Ruiz, M., Bechara, J., Aumont, B., Chong, M., Huntrieser, H.,
Mari,
C., Reeves, C. E., Scialom, G., Hamburger, T., Stark, H., Afif, C., Jambert,
C., Mills, G., Schlager, H., and Perros, P. E.: Transport and chemistry of
formaldehyde by mesoscale convective systems in West Africa during AMMA
2006: Formaldehyde in West Africa, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D12301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017121</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Butler et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Butler, T. M., Taraborrelli, D., Brühl, C., Fischer, H., Harder, H.,
Martinez, M., Williams, J., Lawrence, M. G., and Lelieveld, J.: Improved
simulation of isoprene oxidation chemistry with the ECHAM5/MESSy
chemistry-climate model: lessons from the GABRIEL airborne field campaign,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4529–4546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chang et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P.,
Stockwell, W. R., and Walcek, C. J.: A three-dimensional Eulerian acid
deposition model: Physical concepts<?pagebreak page6621?> and formulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 92, 14681–14700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD12p14681" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD092iD12p14681</ext-link>,
1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Chatani et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Chatani, S., Shimo, N., Matsunaga, S., Kajii, Y., Kato, S., Nakashima, Y.,
Miyazaki, K., Ishii, K., and Ueno, H.: Sensitivity analyses of OH missing
sinks over Tokyo metropolitan area in the summer of 2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 8975–8986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8975-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8975-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Chen et al.(2012)Chen, Xue, Feingold, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>Chen, G., Xue, H., Feingold, G., and Zhou, X.: Vertical transport of
pollutants by shallow cumuli from large eddy simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 11319–11327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11319-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11319-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Commane et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Commane, R., Floquet, C. F. A., Ingham, T., Stone, D., Evans, M. J., and
Heard, D. E.: Observations of OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals over West Africa, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 8783–8801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8783-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8783-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Couvreux et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Couvreux, F., Hourdin, F., and Rio, C.: Resolved Versus Parametrized
Boundary-Layer Plumes, Part I: A Parametrization-Oriented
Conditional Sampling in Large-Eddy Simulations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 134, 441–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9456-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-009-9456-5</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Couvreux et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Couvreux, F., Guichard, F., Gounou, A., Bouniol, D., Peyrillé, P., and
Köhler, M.: Modelling of the Thermodynamical Diurnal Cycle in the
Lower Atmosphere: A Joint Evaluation of Four Contrasted
Regimes in the Tropics Over Land, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 150,
185–214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9862-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-013-9862-6</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Cuxart et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Cuxart, J., Bougeault, P., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: A turbulence scheme
allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49712656202</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Delon et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Delon, C., Galy-Lacaux, C., Boone, A., Liousse, C., Serça, D., Adon, M.,
Diop, B., Akpo, A., Lavenu, F., Mougin, E., and Timouk, F.: Atmospheric
nitrogen budget in Sahelian dry savannas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2691–2708,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2691-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2691-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Di Carlo(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Di Carlo, P.: Missing OH Reactivity in a Forest: Evidence for
Unknown
Reactive Biogenic VOCs, Science, 304, 722–725,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094392" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1094392</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dlugi et~al.(2010)Dlugi, Berger, Zelger, Hofzumahaus, Siese, Holland,
Wisthaler, Grabmer, Hansel, Koppmann, Kramm, M\"{o}llmann-Coers, and
Knaps}}?><label>Dlugi et al.(2010)Dlugi, Berger, Zelger, Hofzumahaus, Siese, Holland,
Wisthaler, Grabmer, Hansel, Koppmann, Kramm, Möllmann-Coers, and
Knaps</label><mixed-citation>Dlugi, R., Berger, M., Zelger, M., Hofzumahaus, A., Siese, M., Holland, F.,
Wisthaler, A., Grabmer, W., Hansel, A., Koppmann, R., Kramm, G.,
Möllmann-Coers, M., and Knaps, A.: Turbulent exchange and segregation of
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and volatile organic compounds above a deciduous forest,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6215–6235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6215-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6215-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Edwards et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Edwards, P. M., Evans, M. J., Furneaux, K. L., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T.,
Jones, C., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Moller, S. J., Stone, D., Whalley, L.
K., and Heard, D. E.: OH reactivity in a South East Asian tropical rainforest
during the Oxidant and Particle Photochemical Processes (OP3) project, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 9497–9514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Ehhalt(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Ehhalt, D. H.: Photooxidation of trace gases in the troposphere Plenary
Lecture, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1, 5401–5408,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/a905097c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/a905097c</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Ferreira et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Ferreira, J., Reeves, C. E., Murphy, J. G., Garcia-Carreras, L., Parker, D.
J., and Oram, D. E.: Isoprene emissions modelling for West Africa: MEGAN
model evaluation and sensitivity analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8453–8467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Gounou et al.(2012)Gounou, Guichard, and Couvreux</label><mixed-citation>Gounou, A., Guichard, F., and Couvreux, F.: Observations of Diurnal
Cycles
Over a West African Meridional Transect: Pre-Monsoon and
Full-Monsoon Seasons, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 144, 329–357,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9723-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-012-9723-8</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Griffin(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Griffin, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol 1. Atmospheric chemical mechanism
for production of molecular constituents, J. Geophys. Res.,
107,  4332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000541</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gro{\ss} et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Groß et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Groß, C. B. M., Dillon, T. J., Schuster, G., Lelieveld, J., and Crowley,
J. N.: Direct Kinetic Study of OH and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Formation
in the Reaction of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> C(O)O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J.  Phys. Chem. A, 118, 974–985,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp412380z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp412380z</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Guenther et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Guenther et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Monson, R. K., and Fall, R.: Isoprene and monoterpene
emission
rate variability: observations with eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm
development, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96,
10799–10808, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hannak et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Hannak, L., Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Kniffka, A., and Pante, G.: Why Do
Global Climate Models Struggle to Represent Low-Level Clouds
in the West African Summer Monsoon?, J. Climate, 30,
1665–1687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0451.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0451.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Hansen et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, R. F., Blocquet, M., Schoemaecker, C., Léonardis, T., Locoge, N.,
Fittschen, C., Hanoune, B., Stevens, P. S., Sinha, V., and Dusanter, S.:
Intercomparison of the comparative reactivity method (CRM) and pump-probe
technique for measuring total OH reactivity in an urban environment, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 8, 4243–4264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4243-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-4243-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Hasson et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Hasson, A. S., Tyndall, G. S., and Orlando, J. J.: A Product Yield
Study
of the Reaction of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Radicals with Ethyl Peroxy
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), Acetyl
Peroxy (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> C(O)O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Acetonyl
Peroxy (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> C(O)CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) Radicals, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108,
5979–5989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp048873t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp048873t</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Jenkin et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Hurley, M. D., and Wallington, T. J.: Investigation of the
radical product channel of the CH3C(O)O2 + HO2 reaction in the gas
phase, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9, 3149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b702757e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b702757e</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Junker and Liousse(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Junker, C. and Liousse, C.: A global emission inventory of carbonaceous
aerosol from historic records of fossil fuel and biofuel consumption for the
period 1860–1997, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1195–1207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1195-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1195-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kim et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Kim, S.-W., Barth, M. C., and Trainer, M.: Influence of fair-weather cumulus
clouds on isoprene chemistry: Impact of shallow convection on
isoprene, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,  D10302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017099</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kim et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Kim, S.-W., Barth, M. C., and Trainer, M.: Impact of turbulent mixing on
isoprene chemistry: Impact of Turbulence on isoprene chemistry,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7701–7708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069752</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Knippertz et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Schuster, R., Trentmann, J., Schrage, J. M., and
Yorke, C.: Ultra-low clouds over the southern West African monsoon
region: ULTRA-LOW CLOUDS OVER WEST AFRICA, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,  L21808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049278</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page6622?><ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Kovacs and Brune(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Kovacs, T. A. and Brune, W. H.: Total OH Loss Rate Measurement, J.
Atmos. Chem., 39, 105–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010614113786" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1010614113786</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kovacs et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Kovacs, T. A., Brune, W. H., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Simpas, J. B., Frost,
G. J., Williams, E., Jobson, T., Stroud, C., Young, V., Fried, A., and Wert,
B.: Direct measurements of urban OH reactivity during Nashville SOS in
summer 1999, J. Environ. Monitor., 5, 68–74, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Krol et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Krol, M. C., Molemaker, M. J., and de Arellano, J. V. G.: Effects of
turbulence and heterogeneous emissions on photochemically active species in
the convective boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6871,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900958</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kubistin et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Kubistin, D., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Rudolf, M., Sander, R., Bozem, H.,
Eerdekens, G., Fischer, H., Gurk, C., Klüpfel, T., Königstedt, R.,
Parchatka, U., Schiller, C. L., Stickler, A., Taraborrelli, D., Williams, J.,
and Lelieveld, J.: Hydroxyl radicals in the tropical troposphere over the
Suriname rainforest: comparison of measurements with the box model MECCA,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9705–9728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9705-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9705-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lac et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Lac, C., Chaboureau, J.-P., Masson, V., Pinty, J.-P., Tulet, P., Escobar, J.,
Leriche, M., Barthe, C., Aouizerats, B., Augros, C., Aumond, P., Auguste, F.,
Bechtold, P., Berthet, S., Bieilli, S., Bosseur, F., Caumont, O., Cohard,
J.-M., Colin, J., Couvreux, F., Cuxart, J., Delautier, G., Dauhut, T.,
Ducrocq, V., Filippi, J.-B., Gazen, D., Geoffroy, O., Gheusi, F., Honnert,
R., Lafore, J.-P., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Libois, Q., Lunet, T., Mari, C.,
Maric, T., Mascart, P., Mogé, M., Molinié, G., Nuissier, O.,
Pantillon, F., Peyrillé, P., Pergaud, J., Perraud, E., Pianezze, J.,
Redelsperger, J.-L., Ricard, D., Richard, E., Riette, S., Rodier, Q.,
Schoetter, R., Seyfried, L., Stein, J., Suhre, K., Taufour, M., Taufour, M.,
Thouron, O., Turner, S., Verrelle, A., Vié, B., Visentin, F., Vionnet,
V., and Wautelet, P.: Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its
applications, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-297" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-2017-297</ext-link>, in review, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lelieveld and Crutzen(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J. and Crutzen, P.: Influences of cloud photochemical processes on
tropospheric ozone, Nature, 343, 227–233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/343227a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/343227a0</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Lelieveld et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H.,
Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D.,
and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical
forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06870</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Lelieveld et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global
tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Li et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Barth, M. C., Chen, G., Patton, E. G., Kim, S.-W., Wisthaler, A.,
Mikoviny, T., Fried, A., Clark, R., and Steiner, A. L.: Large-eddy simulation
of biogenic VOC chemistry during the DISCOVER-AQ 2011 campaign:
Large-Eddy Simulation of BVOC chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8083–8105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024942" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD024942</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Li et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Barth, M. C., Patton, E. G., and Steiner, A. L.: Impact of In-Cloud
Aqueous Processes on the Chemistry and Transport of Biogenic Volatile Organic
Compounds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11131–11153,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026688</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Lou et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Lou, S., Holland, F., Rohrer, F., Lu, K., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Chang, C.
C., Fuchs, H., Häseler, R., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Li, X., Shao, M., Zeng,
L., Wahner, A., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., and Hofzumahaus, A.: Atmospheric OH
reactivities in the Pearl River Delta – China in summer 2006: measurement
and model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11243–11260,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11243-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11243-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Mamtimin et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Mamtimin, B., Meixner, F. X., Behrendt, T., Badawy, M., and Wagner, T.: The
contribution of soil biogenic NO and HONO emissions from a managed hyperarid
ecosystem to the regional NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions during growing season, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 10175–10194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10175-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10175-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Mao et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Ren, X., Chen, S., Brune, W. H., Chen, Z., Martinez, M., Harder, H.,
Lefer, B., Rappenglück, B., Flynn, J., and Leuchner, M.: Atmospheric
oxidation capacity in the summer of Houston 2006: Comparison with summer
measurements in other metropolitan studies, Atmos. Environ., 44,
4107–4115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Masson et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Masson, V., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., Faroux, S., Alias, A., Alkama, R.,
Belamari, S., Barbu, A., Boone, A., Bouyssel, F., Brousseau, P., Brun, E.,
Calvet, J.-C., Carrer, D., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Donier, S., Essaouini,
K., Gibelin, A.-L., Giordani, H., Habets, F., Jidane, M., Kerdraon, G.,
Kourzeneva, E., Lafaysse, M., Lafont, S., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Lemonsu,
A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Marguinaud, P., Mokhtari, M., Morin, S., Pigeon, G.,
Salgado, R., Seity, Y., Taillefer, F., Tanguy, G., Tulet, P., Vincendon, B.,
Vionnet, V., and Voldoire, A.: The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform
for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes,
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 929–960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Mauldin et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Mauldin, R. L., Madronich, S., Flocke, S. J., Eisele, F. L., Frost, G. J.,
and Prevot, A. S. H.: New insights on OH: Measurements around and in
clouds,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 3033–3036, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02983" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GL02983</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Mogensen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Mogensen, D., Smolander, S., Sogachev, A., Zhou, L., Sinha, V., Guenther, A.,
Williams, J., Nieminen, T., Kajos, M. K., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., and Boy,
M.: Modelling atmospheric OH-reactivity in a boreal forest ecosystem, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 9709–9719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9709-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9709-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Molemaker and Vil\`{a}-Guerau~de Arellano(1998)}}?><label>Molemaker and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Molemaker, M. J. and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Control of Chemical
Reactions by Convective Turbulence in the Boundary Layer, J.
Atmos. Sci., 55, 568–579,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055&lt;0568:COCRBC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055&lt;0568:COCRBC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Murphy et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, J. G., Oram, D. E., and Reeves, C. E.: Measurements of volatile
organic compounds over West Africa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5281–5294,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{N\"{o}lscher et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Nölscher et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Sinha, V., Custer, T., Song, W., Johnson,
A. M., Axinte, R., Bozem, H., Fischer, H., Pouvesle, N., Phillips, G.,
Crowley, J. N., Rantala, P., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., Gonzales, D.,
Valverde-Canossa, J., Vogel, A., Hoffmann, T., Ouwersloot, H. G.,
Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., and Lelieveld, J.: Summertime total OH
reactivity measurements from boreal forest during HUMPPA-COPEC 2010, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 8257–8270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8257-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8257-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{N\"{o}lscher et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Nölscher et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Nölscher, A. C., Yañez-Serrano, A. M., Wolff, S., de Araujo, A. C.,
Lavrič<?pagebreak page6623?>, J. V., Kesselmeier, J., and Williams, J.: Unexpected seasonality
in quantity
and composition of Amazon rainforest air reactivity, Nat. Comm.,
7, 10383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms10383</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Ouwersloot et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Ouwersloot, H. G., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., van Heerwaarden, C. C.,
Ganzeveld, L. N., Krol, M. C., and Lelieveld, J.: On the segregation of
chemical species in a clear boundary layer over heterogeneous land surfaces,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10681–10704,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10681-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10681-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Peeters et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Peeters, J., Nguyen, T. L., and Vereecken, L.: HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical regeneration
in
the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 5935,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b908511d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b908511d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Pinty and Jabouille(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Pinty, J.-P. and Jabouille, P.: A mixed-phase cloud parameterization for use
in a mesoscale non-hydrostatic model: simulations of a squall line and of
orographic precipitation, in: Proceedings of the conference on cloud physics, American Meteorological Society, Everett, USA,  217–220, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Pugh et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Pugh, T. A. M., MacKenzie, A. R., Hewitt, C. N., Langford, B., Edwards, P.
M., Furneaux, K. L., Heard, D. E., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan,
A., Lee, J., Mills, G., Misztal, P., Moller, S., Monks, P. S., and Whalley,
L. K.: Simulating atmospheric composition over a South-East Asian tropical
rainforest: performance of a chemistry box model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
279–298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-279-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-279-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Pugh et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Pugh, T. A. M., MacKenzie, A. R., Langford, B., Nemitz, E., Misztal, P. K.,
and Hewitt, C. N.: The influence of small-scale variations in isoprene
concentrations on atmospheric chemistry over a tropical rainforest, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 4121–4134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4121-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4121-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Ramasamy et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Ramasamy, S., Ida, A., Jones, C., Kato, S., Tsurumaru, H., Kishimoto, I.,
Kawasaki, S., Sadanaga, Y., Nakashima, Y., Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y.,
Mochida, M., Kagami, S., Deng, Y., Ogawa, S., Kawana, K., and Kajii, Y.:
Total OH reactivity measurement in a BVOC dominated temperate forest
during a summer campaign, 2014, Atmos. Environ., 131, 41–54,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.039</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Redelsperger et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Redelsperger, J.-L., Thorncroft, C. D., Diedhiou, A., Lebel, T., Parker,
D. J.,
and Polcher, J.: African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis: An
International Research Project and Field Campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1739–1746,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1739</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Reeves et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Reeves, C. E., Formenti, P., Afif, C., Ancellet, G., Attié, J.-L.,
Bechara, J., Borbon, A., Cairo, F., Coe, H., Crumeyrolle, S., Fierli, F.,
Flamant, C., Gomes, L., Hamburger, T., Jambert, C., Law, K. S., Mari, C.,
Jones, R. L., Matsuki, A., Mead, M. I., Methven, J., Mills, G. P., Minikin,
A., Murphy, J. G., Nielsen, J. K., Oram, D. E., Parker, D. J., Richter, A.,
Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., and Thouret, V.: Chemical and aerosol
characterisation of the troposphere over West Africa during the monsoon
period as part of AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7575–7601,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Ren(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Ren, X.: OH and HO2 Chemistry in the urban atmosphere of New York
City, Atmos. Environ., 37, 3639–3651,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00459-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00459-X</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Sadanaga(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Sadanaga, Y.: The importance of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and volatile organic
compounds in the urban air from the viewpoint of the OH reactivity,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L08102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019661</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Sadanaga et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Sadanaga, Y., Yoshino, A., Kato, S., Yoshioka, A., Watanabe, K., Miyakawa,
Y.,
Hayashi, I., Ichikawa, M., Matsumoto, J., Nishiyama, A., Akiyama, N., Kanaya,
Y., and Kajii, Y.: The importance of NO2 and volatile organic compounds in
the urban air from the viewpoint of the OH reactivity, Geophys. Res.  Lett., 31, 08102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019661</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Saxton et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Saxton, J. E., Lewis, A. C., Kettlewell, J. H., Ozel, M. Z., Gogus, F., Boni,
Y., Korogone, S. O. U., and Serça, D.: Isoprene and monoterpene
measurements in a secondary forest in northern Benin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7,
4095–4106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4095-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4095-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Schrage and Fink(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Schrage, J. M. and Fink, A. H.: Nocturnal Continental Low-Level
Stratus
over Tropical West Africa: Observations and Possible Mechanisms
Controlling Its Onset, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 1794–1809,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00172.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-11-00172.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Schrage et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Schrage, J. M., Augustyn, S., and Fink, A. H.: Nocturnal stratiform
cloudiness
during the West African monsoon, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 95,
73–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-006-0194-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00703-006-0194-7</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Schumann(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Schumann, U.: Large-eddy simulation of turbulent diffusion with chemical
reactions in the convective boundary layer, Atmos. Environ. (1967),
23, 1713–1727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90056-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(89)90056-5</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Shirley et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Shirley, T. R., Brune, W. H., Ren, X., Mao, J., Lesher, R., Cardenas, B.,
Volkamer, R., Molina, L. T., Molina, M. J., Lamb, B., Velasco, E., Jobson,
T., and Alexander, M.: Atmospheric oxidation in the Mexico City Metropolitan
Area (MCMA) during April 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2753–2765,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2753-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-2753-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Sindelarova et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S.,
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.:
Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over
the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Sinha et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Sinha, V., Williams, J., Crowley, J. N., and Lelieveld, J.: The Comparative
Reactivity Method – a new tool to measure total OH Reactivity in ambient
air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2213–2227,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2213-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2213-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Sinha et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Sinha, V., Williams, J., Lelieveld, J., Ruuskanen, T., Kajos, M., Patokoski,
J., Hellen, H., Hakola, H., Mogensen, D., Boy, M., Rinne, J., and Kulmala,
M.: OH Reactivity Measurements within a Boreal Forest: Evidence
for Unknown Reactive Emissions, Envir. Sci. Tech. Lib.,
44, 6614–6620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es101780b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es101780b</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Stewart et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, D. J., Taylor, C. M., Reeves, C. E., and McQuaid, J. B.: Biogenic
nitrogen oxide emissions from soils: impact on NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and ozone over west Africa
during AMMA (African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis): observational
study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2285–2297,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2285-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2285-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Stone et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Stone, D., Evans, M. J., Commane, R., Ingham, T., Floquet, C. F. A., McQuaid,
J. B., Brookes, D. M., Monks, P. S., Purvis, R., Hamilton, J. F., Hopkins,
J., Lee, J., Lewis, A. C., Stewart, D., Murphy, J. G., Mills, G., Oram, D.,
Reeves, C. E., and Heard, D. E.: HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations over West Africa during
AMMA: impact of isoprene and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9415–9429,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9415-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9415-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Stone et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Stone, D., Evans, M. J., Edwards, P. M., Commane, R., Ingham, T., Rickard, A.
R., Brookes, D. M., Hopkins, J., Leigh, R. J., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S.,
Oram, D., Reeves, C. E., Stewart, D., and Heard, D. E.: Isoprene oxidation
mechanisms: measurements and modelling of OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over a South-East
Asian tropical<?pagebreak page6624?> rainforest during the OP3 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 6749–6771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6749-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6749-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Thouret et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Thouret, V., Saunois, M., Minga, A., Mariscal, A., Sauvage, B., Solete, A.,
Agbangla, D., Nédélec, P., Mari, C., Reeves, C. E., and Schlager, H.:
An overview of two years of ozone radio soundings over Cotonou as part of
AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6157–6174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6157-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6157-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Tulet et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Tulet, P., Grini, A., Griffin, R. J., and Petitcol, S.: ORILAM-SOA: A
computationally efficient model for predicting secondary organic aerosols in
three-dimensional atmospheric models, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D23208,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007152</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vil\`{a}-Guerau~de Arellano and Cuijpers(2000)}}?><label>Vilà-Guerau de Arellano and Cuijpers(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J. and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: The Chemistry of a
Dry
Cloud: The Effects of Radiation and Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1573–1584,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;1573:TCOADC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;1573:TCOADC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vil\`{a}-Guerau~de Arellano et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Vilà-Guerau de Arellano et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Kim, S.-W., Barth, M. C., and Patton, E. G.:
Transport and chemical transformations influenced by shallow cumulus over
land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3219–3231,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3219-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3219-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vinuesa and Vil\`{a}-Guerau~de Arellano(2005)}}?><label>Vinuesa and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Vinuesa, J.-F. and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Introducing effective
reaction
rates to account for the inefficient mixing of the convective boundary layer,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 445–461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.003</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Whalley et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Whalley, L. K., Edwards, P. M., Furneaux, K. L., Goddard, A., Ingham, T.,
Evans, M. J., Stone, D., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan, A., Lee,
J. D., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S., Moller, S. J., and Heard, D. E.:
Quantifying the magnitude of a missing hydroxyl radical source in a tropical
rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7223–7233,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Whalley et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Whalley, L. K., Stone, D., Bandy, B., Dunmore, R., Hamilton, J. F., Hopkins,
J., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., and Heard, D. E.: Atmospheric OH reactivity in
central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ
ozone production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2109–2122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Williams et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Williams, I., Revitt, D., and Hamilton, R.: A comparison of carbonyl compound
concentrations at urban roadside and indoor sites, Sci. Total
Environ., 189–190, 475–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(96)05248-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0048-9697(96)05248-5</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Williams and Brune(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Williams, J. and Brune, W.: A roadmap for OH reactivity research, Atmos.
Environ., 106, 371–372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.017</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Williams et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Williams, J., Keßel, S. U., Nölscher, A. C., Yang, Y., Lee, Y.,
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Wolff, S., Kesselmeier, J., Klüpfel, T., Lelieveld,
J., and Shao, M.: Opposite OH reactivity and ozone cycles in the Amazon
rainforest and megacity Beijing: Subversion of biospheric oxidant control
by anthropogenic emissions, Atmos. Environ., 125, 112–118,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Winiberg et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Winiberg, F. A. F., Dillon, T. J., Orr, S. C., Groß, C. B. M., Bejan, I.,
Brumby, C. A., Evans, M. J., Smith, S. C., Heard, D. E., and Seakins, P. W.:
Direct measurements of OH and other product yields from the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
+CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>C(O)O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4023–4042,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4023-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4023-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Wyngaard and Brost(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Wyngaard, J. C. and Brost, R. A.: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Diffusion of a
Scalar
in the Convective Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 41,
102–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0102:TDABUD&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0102:TDABUD&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Yang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y., Shao, M., Wang, X., Nölscher, A. C., Kessel, S., Guenther, A., and
Williams, J.: Towards a quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity:
A review, Atmos. Environ., 134, 147–161,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Yienger and Levy(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Yienger, J. J. and Levy, H.: Empirical model of global soil-biogenic
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11447,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00370" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD00370</ext-link>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Zannoni et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Zannoni, N., Gros, V., Lanza, M., Sarda, R., Bonsang, B., Kalogridis, C.,
Preunkert, S., Legrand, M., Jambert, C., Boissard, C., and Lathiere, J.: OH
reactivity and concentrations of biogenic volatile organic compounds in a
Mediterranean forest of downy oak trees, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1619–1636,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1619-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1619-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Gao, Li, Li, Zhang, Zhao, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Gao, Z., Li, D., Li, Y., Zhang, N., Zhao, X., and Chen, J.: On the
computation of planetary boundary-layer height using the bulk Richardson
number method, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2599–2611,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2599-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-2599-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>LES study of the impact of moist thermals on the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere in southern West Africa</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The hydroxyl radical (OH) is a highly reactive species and plays a key role
in the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere. We explore the potential impact
of a convective boundary layer on reconciling the calculation–measurement
differences for OH reactivity (the inverse of OH lifetime) attributable to
the segregation of OH and its reactants by thermals and the resulting
modification of averaged reaction rates. The large-eddy simulation version of
the Meso-NH model is used, coupled on-line with a detailed chemistry
mechanism to simulate two contrasted biogenic and urban chemical regimes. In
both environments, the top of the boundary layer is the region with the
highest calculated segregation intensities but with the opposite sign. In the
biogenic environment, the inhomogeneous mixing of isoprene and OH leads to a
maximum decrease of 30&thinsp;% of the mean reaction rate in this zone. In the
anthropogenic case, the effective rate constant for OH reacting with
aldehydes is 16&thinsp;% higher than the averaged value. OH reactivity is always
higher by 15 to 40&thinsp;% inside thermals in comparison to their surroundings
as a function of the chemical environment and time of the day. Since thermals
occupy a small fraction of the simulated domain, the impact of turbulent
motions on domain-averaged total OH reactivity reaches a maximum decrease of
9&thinsp;% for the biogenic case and a maximum increase of 5&thinsp;% for the
anthropogenic case. Accounting for the segregation of air masses by turbulent
motions in regional and global models may increase OH reactivity in urban
environments but lower OH reactivity in biogenic environments. In both cases,
segregation alone is insufficient for resolving the underestimation between
observed and modeled OH reactivity.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Agustí-Panareda et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Agustí-Panareda, A., Beljaars, A., Ahlgrimm, M., Balsamo, G., Bock, O.,
Forbes, R., Ghelli, A., Guichard, F., Köhler, M., Meynadier, R., and
Morcrette, J.-J.: The ECMWF re-analysis for the AMMA observational
campaign, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136,
1457–1472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.662" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.662</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Ancellet et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Ancellet, G., Leclair de Bellevue, J., Mari, C., Nedelec, P., Kukui, A.,
Borbon, A., and Perros, P.: Effects of regional-scale and convective
transports on tropospheric ozone chemistry revealed by aircraft observations
during the wet season of the AMMA campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 383–411,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-383-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-383-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Atkinson et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F.,
Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and IUPAC Subcommittee:
Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II
– gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625–4055,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Auger and Legras(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Auger, L. and Legras, B.: Chemical segregation by heterogeneous emissions,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 2303–2318,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.032</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Barth et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Barth, M. C., Sillman, S., Hudman, R., Jacobson, M. Z., Kim, C.-H., Monod,
A., and Liang, J.: Summary of the cloud chemistry modeling intercomparison:
Photochemical box model simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002673</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Borbon et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Borbon, A., Ruiz, M., Bechara, J., Aumont, B., Chong, M., Huntrieser, H.,
Mari,
C., Reeves, C. E., Scialom, G., Hamburger, T., Stark, H., Afif, C., Jambert,
C., Mills, G., Schlager, H., and Perros, P. E.: Transport and chemistry of
formaldehyde by mesoscale convective systems in West Africa during AMMA
2006: Formaldehyde in West Africa, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D12301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017121</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Butler et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Butler, T. M., Taraborrelli, D., Brühl, C., Fischer, H., Harder, H.,
Martinez, M., Williams, J., Lawrence, M. G., and Lelieveld, J.: Improved
simulation of isoprene oxidation chemistry with the ECHAM5/MESSy
chemistry-climate model: lessons from the GABRIEL airborne field campaign,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4529–4546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chang et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P.,
Stockwell, W. R., and Walcek, C. J.: A three-dimensional Eulerian acid
deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 92, 14681–14700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD12p14681" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD12p14681</a>,
1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Chatani et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Chatani, S., Shimo, N., Matsunaga, S., Kajii, Y., Kato, S., Nakashima, Y.,
Miyazaki, K., Ishii, K., and Ueno, H.: Sensitivity analyses of OH missing
sinks over Tokyo metropolitan area in the summer of 2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 8975–8986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8975-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8975-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Chen et al.(2012)Chen, Xue, Feingold, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, G., Xue, H., Feingold, G., and Zhou, X.: Vertical transport of
pollutants by shallow cumuli from large eddy simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 11319–11327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11319-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11319-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Commane et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Commane, R., Floquet, C. F. A., Ingham, T., Stone, D., Evans, M. J., and
Heard, D. E.: Observations of OH and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals over West Africa, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 8783–8801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8783-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8783-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Couvreux et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Couvreux, F., Hourdin, F., and Rio, C.: Resolved Versus Parametrized
Boundary-Layer Plumes, Part I: A Parametrization-Oriented
Conditional Sampling in Large-Eddy Simulations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 134, 441–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9456-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9456-5</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Couvreux et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Couvreux, F., Guichard, F., Gounou, A., Bouniol, D., Peyrillé, P., and
Köhler, M.: Modelling of the Thermodynamical Diurnal Cycle in the
Lower Atmosphere: A Joint Evaluation of Four Contrasted
Regimes in the Tropics Over Land, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 150,
185–214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9862-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9862-6</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Cuxart et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Cuxart, J., Bougeault, P., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: A turbulence scheme
allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656202</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Delon et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Delon, C., Galy-Lacaux, C., Boone, A., Liousse, C., Serça, D., Adon, M.,
Diop, B., Akpo, A., Lavenu, F., Mougin, E., and Timouk, F.: Atmospheric
nitrogen budget in Sahelian dry savannas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2691–2708,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2691-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2691-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Di Carlo(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Di Carlo, P.: Missing OH Reactivity in a Forest: Evidence for
Unknown
Reactive Biogenic VOCs, Science, 304, 722–725,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094392" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094392</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Dlugi et al.(2010)Dlugi, Berger, Zelger, Hofzumahaus, Siese, Holland,
Wisthaler, Grabmer, Hansel, Koppmann, Kramm, Möllmann-Coers, and
Knaps</label><mixed-citation>
Dlugi, R., Berger, M., Zelger, M., Hofzumahaus, A., Siese, M., Holland, F.,
Wisthaler, A., Grabmer, W., Hansel, A., Koppmann, R., Kramm, G.,
Möllmann-Coers, M., and Knaps, A.: Turbulent exchange and segregation of
HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radicals and volatile organic compounds above a deciduous forest,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6215–6235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6215-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6215-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Edwards et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, P. M., Evans, M. J., Furneaux, K. L., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T.,
Jones, C., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Moller, S. J., Stone, D., Whalley, L.
K., and Heard, D. E.: OH reactivity in a South East Asian tropical rainforest
during the Oxidant and Particle Photochemical Processes (OP3) project, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 9497–9514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Ehhalt(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Ehhalt, D. H.: Photooxidation of trace gases in the troposphere Plenary
Lecture, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1, 5401–5408,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/a905097c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/a905097c</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Ferreira et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Ferreira, J., Reeves, C. E., Murphy, J. G., Garcia-Carreras, L., Parker, D.
J., and Oram, D. E.: Isoprene emissions modelling for West Africa: MEGAN
model evaluation and sensitivity analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8453–8467, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8453-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gounou et al.(2012)Gounou, Guichard, and Couvreux</label><mixed-citation>
Gounou, A., Guichard, F., and Couvreux, F.: Observations of Diurnal
Cycles
Over a West African Meridional Transect: Pre-Monsoon and
Full-Monsoon Seasons, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 144, 329–357,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9723-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9723-8</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Griffin(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Griffin, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol 1. Atmospheric chemical mechanism
for production of molecular constituents, J. Geophys. Res.,
107,  4332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000541</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Groß et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Groß, C. B. M., Dillon, T. J., Schuster, G., Lelieveld, J., and Crowley,
J. N.: Direct Kinetic Study of OH and O<sub>3</sub> Formation
in the Reaction of CH<sub>3</sub> C(O)O<sub>2</sub> with
HO<sub>2</sub>, J.  Phys. Chem. A, 118, 974–985,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp412380z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp412380z</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Guenther et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Guenther et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Monson, R. K., and Fall, R.: Isoprene and monoterpene
emission
rate variability: observations with eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm
development, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96,
10799–10808, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hannak et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Hannak, L., Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Kniffka, A., and Pante, G.: Why Do
Global Climate Models Struggle to Represent Low-Level Clouds
in the West African Summer Monsoon?, J. Climate, 30,
1665–1687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0451.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0451.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Hansen et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, R. F., Blocquet, M., Schoemaecker, C., Léonardis, T., Locoge, N.,
Fittschen, C., Hanoune, B., Stevens, P. S., Sinha, V., and Dusanter, S.:
Intercomparison of the comparative reactivity method (CRM) and pump-probe
technique for measuring total OH reactivity in an urban environment, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 8, 4243–4264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4243-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4243-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hasson et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Hasson, A. S., Tyndall, G. S., and Orlando, J. J.: A Product Yield
Study
of the Reaction of HO<sub>2</sub> Radicals with Ethyl Peroxy
(C<sub>2</sub> H<sub>5</sub> O<sub>2</sub>), Acetyl
Peroxy (CH<sub>3</sub> C(O)O<sub>2</sub>), and Acetonyl
Peroxy (CH<sub>3</sub> C(O)CH<sub>2</sub> O<sub>2</sub>) Radicals, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108,
5979–5989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp048873t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp048873t</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Jenkin et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkin, M. E., Hurley, M. D., and Wallington, T. J.: Investigation of the
radical product channel of the CH3C(O)O2 + HO2 reaction in the gas
phase, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9, 3149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b702757e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b702757e</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Junker and Liousse(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Junker, C. and Liousse, C.: A global emission inventory of carbonaceous
aerosol from historic records of fossil fuel and biofuel consumption for the
period 1860–1997, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1195–1207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1195-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1195-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kim et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, S.-W., Barth, M. C., and Trainer, M.: Influence of fair-weather cumulus
clouds on isoprene chemistry: Impact of shallow convection on
isoprene, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,  D10302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017099</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kim et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, S.-W., Barth, M. C., and Trainer, M.: Impact of turbulent mixing on
isoprene chemistry: Impact of Turbulence on isoprene chemistry,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7701–7708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069752</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Knippertz et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Schuster, R., Trentmann, J., Schrage, J. M., and
Yorke, C.: Ultra-low clouds over the southern West African monsoon
region: ULTRA-LOW CLOUDS OVER WEST AFRICA, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,  L21808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049278</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kovacs and Brune(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kovacs, T. A. and Brune, W. H.: Total OH Loss Rate Measurement, J.
Atmos. Chem., 39, 105–122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010614113786" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010614113786</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kovacs et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Kovacs, T. A., Brune, W. H., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Simpas, J. B., Frost,
G. J., Williams, E., Jobson, T., Stroud, C., Young, V., Fried, A., and Wert,
B.: Direct measurements of urban OH reactivity during Nashville SOS in
summer 1999, J. Environ. Monitor., 5, 68–74, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Krol et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Krol, M. C., Molemaker, M. J., and de Arellano, J. V. G.: Effects of
turbulence and heterogeneous emissions on photochemically active species in
the convective boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6871,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900958</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kubistin et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Kubistin, D., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Rudolf, M., Sander, R., Bozem, H.,
Eerdekens, G., Fischer, H., Gurk, C., Klüpfel, T., Königstedt, R.,
Parchatka, U., Schiller, C. L., Stickler, A., Taraborrelli, D., Williams, J.,
and Lelieveld, J.: Hydroxyl radicals in the tropical troposphere over the
Suriname rainforest: comparison of measurements with the box model MECCA,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9705–9728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9705-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9705-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Lac et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Lac, C., Chaboureau, J.-P., Masson, V., Pinty, J.-P., Tulet, P., Escobar, J.,
Leriche, M., Barthe, C., Aouizerats, B., Augros, C., Aumond, P., Auguste, F.,
Bechtold, P., Berthet, S., Bieilli, S., Bosseur, F., Caumont, O., Cohard,
J.-M., Colin, J., Couvreux, F., Cuxart, J., Delautier, G., Dauhut, T.,
Ducrocq, V., Filippi, J.-B., Gazen, D., Geoffroy, O., Gheusi, F., Honnert,
R., Lafore, J.-P., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Libois, Q., Lunet, T., Mari, C.,
Maric, T., Mascart, P., Mogé, M., Molinié, G., Nuissier, O.,
Pantillon, F., Peyrillé, P., Pergaud, J., Perraud, E., Pianezze, J.,
Redelsperger, J.-L., Ricard, D., Richard, E., Riette, S., Rodier, Q.,
Schoetter, R., Seyfried, L., Stein, J., Suhre, K., Taufour, M., Taufour, M.,
Thouron, O., Turner, S., Verrelle, A., Vié, B., Visentin, F., Vionnet,
V., and Wautelet, P.: Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its
applications, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-297" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-297</a>, in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lelieveld and Crutzen(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J. and Crutzen, P.: Influences of cloud photochemical processes on
tropospheric ozone, Nature, 343, 227–233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/343227a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/343227a0</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Lelieveld et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H.,
Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D.,
and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical
forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Lelieveld et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global
tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Li et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Barth, M. C., Chen, G., Patton, E. G., Kim, S.-W., Wisthaler, A.,
Mikoviny, T., Fried, A., Clark, R., and Steiner, A. L.: Large-eddy simulation
of biogenic VOC chemistry during the DISCOVER-AQ 2011 campaign:
Large-Eddy Simulation of BVOC chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8083–8105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024942" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024942</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Li et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Barth, M. C., Patton, E. G., and Steiner, A. L.: Impact of In-Cloud
Aqueous Processes on the Chemistry and Transport of Biogenic Volatile Organic
Compounds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11131–11153,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026688" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026688</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Lou et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lou, S., Holland, F., Rohrer, F., Lu, K., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Chang, C.
C., Fuchs, H., Häseler, R., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Li, X., Shao, M., Zeng,
L., Wahner, A., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., and Hofzumahaus, A.: Atmospheric OH
reactivities in the Pearl River Delta – China in summer 2006: measurement
and model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11243–11260,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11243-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11243-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Mamtimin et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Mamtimin, B., Meixner, F. X., Behrendt, T., Badawy, M., and Wagner, T.: The
contribution of soil biogenic NO and HONO emissions from a managed hyperarid
ecosystem to the regional NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions during growing season, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 10175–10194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10175-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10175-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Mao et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, J., Ren, X., Chen, S., Brune, W. H., Chen, Z., Martinez, M., Harder, H.,
Lefer, B., Rappenglück, B., Flynn, J., and Leuchner, M.: Atmospheric
oxidation capacity in the summer of Houston 2006: Comparison with summer
measurements in other metropolitan studies, Atmos. Environ., 44,
4107–4115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.013</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Masson et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Masson, V., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., Faroux, S., Alias, A., Alkama, R.,
Belamari, S., Barbu, A., Boone, A., Bouyssel, F., Brousseau, P., Brun, E.,
Calvet, J.-C., Carrer, D., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Donier, S., Essaouini,
K., Gibelin, A.-L., Giordani, H., Habets, F., Jidane, M., Kerdraon, G.,
Kourzeneva, E., Lafaysse, M., Lafont, S., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Lemonsu,
A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Marguinaud, P., Mokhtari, M., Morin, S., Pigeon, G.,
Salgado, R., Seity, Y., Taillefer, F., Tanguy, G., Tulet, P., Vincendon, B.,
Vionnet, V., and Voldoire, A.: The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform
for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes,
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 929–960, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Mauldin et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Mauldin, R. L., Madronich, S., Flocke, S. J., Eisele, F. L., Frost, G. J.,
and Prevot, A. S. H.: New insights on OH: Measurements around and in
clouds,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 3033–3036, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02983" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02983</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Mogensen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Mogensen, D., Smolander, S., Sogachev, A., Zhou, L., Sinha, V., Guenther, A.,
Williams, J., Nieminen, T., Kajos, M. K., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., and Boy,
M.: Modelling atmospheric OH-reactivity in a boreal forest ecosystem, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 9709–9719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9709-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9709-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Molemaker and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Molemaker, M. J. and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Control of Chemical
Reactions by Convective Turbulence in the Boundary Layer, J.
Atmos. Sci., 55, 568–579,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055&lt;0568:COCRBC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055&lt;0568:COCRBC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Murphy et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, J. G., Oram, D. E., and Reeves, C. E.: Measurements of volatile
organic compounds over West Africa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5281–5294,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5281-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Nölscher et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Sinha, V., Custer, T., Song, W., Johnson,
A. M., Axinte, R., Bozem, H., Fischer, H., Pouvesle, N., Phillips, G.,
Crowley, J. N., Rantala, P., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., Gonzales, D.,
Valverde-Canossa, J., Vogel, A., Hoffmann, T., Ouwersloot, H. G.,
Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., and Lelieveld, J.: Summertime total OH
reactivity measurements from boreal forest during HUMPPA-COPEC 2010, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 8257–8270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8257-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8257-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Nölscher et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Nölscher, A. C., Yañez-Serrano, A. M., Wolff, S., de Araujo, A. C.,
Lavrič, J. V., Kesselmeier, J., and Williams, J.: Unexpected seasonality
in quantity
and composition of Amazon rainforest air reactivity, Nat. Comm.,
7, 10383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10383</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Ouwersloot et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Ouwersloot, H. G., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., van Heerwaarden, C. C.,
Ganzeveld, L. N., Krol, M. C., and Lelieveld, J.: On the segregation of
chemical species in a clear boundary layer over heterogeneous land surfaces,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10681–10704,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10681-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10681-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Peeters et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Peeters, J., Nguyen, T. L., and Vereecken, L.: HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radical regeneration
in
the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 5935,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b908511d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b908511d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Pinty and Jabouille(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Pinty, J.-P. and Jabouille, P.: A mixed-phase cloud parameterization for use
in a mesoscale non-hydrostatic model: simulations of a squall line and of
orographic precipitation, in: Proceedings of the conference on cloud physics, American Meteorological Society, Everett, USA,  217–220, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Pugh et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Pugh, T. A. M., MacKenzie, A. R., Hewitt, C. N., Langford, B., Edwards, P.
M., Furneaux, K. L., Heard, D. E., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan,
A., Lee, J., Mills, G., Misztal, P., Moller, S., Monks, P. S., and Whalley,
L. K.: Simulating atmospheric composition over a South-East Asian tropical
rainforest: performance of a chemistry box model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
279–298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-279-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-279-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Pugh et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Pugh, T. A. M., MacKenzie, A. R., Langford, B., Nemitz, E., Misztal, P. K.,
and Hewitt, C. N.: The influence of small-scale variations in isoprene
concentrations on atmospheric chemistry over a tropical rainforest, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 4121–4134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4121-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4121-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Ramasamy et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Ramasamy, S., Ida, A., Jones, C., Kato, S., Tsurumaru, H., Kishimoto, I.,
Kawasaki, S., Sadanaga, Y., Nakashima, Y., Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y.,
Mochida, M., Kagami, S., Deng, Y., Ogawa, S., Kawana, K., and Kajii, Y.:
Total OH reactivity measurement in a BVOC dominated temperate forest
during a summer campaign, 2014, Atmos. Environ., 131, 41–54,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.039</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Redelsperger et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Redelsperger, J.-L., Thorncroft, C. D., Diedhiou, A., Lebel, T., Parker,
D. J.,
and Polcher, J.: African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis: An
International Research Project and Field Campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1739–1746,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1739</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Reeves et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Reeves, C. E., Formenti, P., Afif, C., Ancellet, G., Attié, J.-L.,
Bechara, J., Borbon, A., Cairo, F., Coe, H., Crumeyrolle, S., Fierli, F.,
Flamant, C., Gomes, L., Hamburger, T., Jambert, C., Law, K. S., Mari, C.,
Jones, R. L., Matsuki, A., Mead, M. I., Methven, J., Mills, G. P., Minikin,
A., Murphy, J. G., Nielsen, J. K., Oram, D. E., Parker, D. J., Richter, A.,
Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., and Thouret, V.: Chemical and aerosol
characterisation of the troposphere over West Africa during the monsoon
period as part of AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7575–7601,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7575-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Ren(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Ren, X.: OH and HO2 Chemistry in the urban atmosphere of New York
City, Atmos. Environ., 37, 3639–3651,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00459-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00459-X</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Sadanaga(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Sadanaga, Y.: The importance of NO<sub>2</sub> and volatile organic
compounds in the urban air from the viewpoint of the OH reactivity,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L08102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019661</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Sadanaga et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Sadanaga, Y., Yoshino, A., Kato, S., Yoshioka, A., Watanabe, K., Miyakawa,
Y.,
Hayashi, I., Ichikawa, M., Matsumoto, J., Nishiyama, A., Akiyama, N., Kanaya,
Y., and Kajii, Y.: The importance of NO2 and volatile organic compounds in
the urban air from the viewpoint of the OH reactivity, Geophys. Res.  Lett., 31, 08102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019661</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Saxton et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Saxton, J. E., Lewis, A. C., Kettlewell, J. H., Ozel, M. Z., Gogus, F., Boni,
Y., Korogone, S. O. U., and Serça, D.: Isoprene and monoterpene
measurements in a secondary forest in northern Benin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7,
4095–4106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4095-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4095-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Schrage and Fink(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Schrage, J. M. and Fink, A. H.: Nocturnal Continental Low-Level
Stratus
over Tropical West Africa: Observations and Possible Mechanisms
Controlling Its Onset, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 1794–1809,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00172.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00172.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Schrage et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Schrage, J. M., Augustyn, S., and Fink, A. H.: Nocturnal stratiform
cloudiness
during the West African monsoon, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 95,
73–86, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-006-0194-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-006-0194-7</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Schumann(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U.: Large-eddy simulation of turbulent diffusion with chemical
reactions in the convective boundary layer, Atmos. Environ. (1967),
23, 1713–1727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90056-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90056-5</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Shirley et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Shirley, T. R., Brune, W. H., Ren, X., Mao, J., Lesher, R., Cardenas, B.,
Volkamer, R., Molina, L. T., Molina, M. J., Lamb, B., Velasco, E., Jobson,
T., and Alexander, M.: Atmospheric oxidation in the Mexico City Metropolitan
Area (MCMA) during April 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2753–2765,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2753-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2753-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Sindelarova et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S.,
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.:
Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over
the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Sinha et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Sinha, V., Williams, J., Crowley, J. N., and Lelieveld, J.: The Comparative
Reactivity Method – a new tool to measure total OH Reactivity in ambient
air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2213–2227,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2213-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2213-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Sinha et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Sinha, V., Williams, J., Lelieveld, J., Ruuskanen, T., Kajos, M., Patokoski,
J., Hellen, H., Hakola, H., Mogensen, D., Boy, M., Rinne, J., and Kulmala,
M.: OH Reactivity Measurements within a Boreal Forest: Evidence
for Unknown Reactive Emissions, Envir. Sci. Tech. Lib.,
44, 6614–6620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es101780b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es101780b</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Stewart et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, D. J., Taylor, C. M., Reeves, C. E., and McQuaid, J. B.: Biogenic
nitrogen oxide emissions from soils: impact on NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and ozone over west Africa
during AMMA (African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis): observational
study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2285–2297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2285-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2285-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Stone et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Stone, D., Evans, M. J., Commane, R., Ingham, T., Floquet, C. F. A., McQuaid,
J. B., Brookes, D. M., Monks, P. S., Purvis, R., Hamilton, J. F., Hopkins,
J., Lee, J., Lewis, A. C., Stewart, D., Murphy, J. G., Mills, G., Oram, D.,
Reeves, C. E., and Heard, D. E.: HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> observations over West Africa during
AMMA: impact of isoprene and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9415–9429,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9415-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9415-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Stone et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Stone, D., Evans, M. J., Edwards, P. M., Commane, R., Ingham, T., Rickard, A.
R., Brookes, D. M., Hopkins, J., Leigh, R. J., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S.,
Oram, D., Reeves, C. E., Stewart, D., and Heard, D. E.: Isoprene oxidation
mechanisms: measurements and modelling of OH and HO<sub>2</sub> over a South-East
Asian tropical rainforest during the OP3 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 6749–6771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6749-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6749-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Thouret et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Thouret, V., Saunois, M., Minga, A., Mariscal, A., Sauvage, B., Solete, A.,
Agbangla, D., Nédélec, P., Mari, C., Reeves, C. E., and Schlager, H.:
An overview of two years of ozone radio soundings over Cotonou as part of
AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6157–6174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6157-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6157-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Tulet et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Tulet, P., Grini, A., Griffin, R. J., and Petitcol, S.: ORILAM-SOA: A
computationally efficient model for predicting secondary organic aerosols in
three-dimensional atmospheric models, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D23208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007152</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Vilà-Guerau de Arellano and Cuijpers(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J. and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: The Chemistry of a
Dry
Cloud: The Effects of Radiation and Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1573–1584,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;1573:TCOADC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;1573:TCOADC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Vilà-Guerau de Arellano et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Kim, S.-W., Barth, M. C., and Patton, E. G.:
Transport and chemical transformations influenced by shallow cumulus over
land, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3219–3231,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3219-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3219-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Vinuesa and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Vinuesa, J.-F. and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.: Introducing effective
reaction
rates to account for the inefficient mixing of the convective boundary layer,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 445–461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.003</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Whalley et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Whalley, L. K., Edwards, P. M., Furneaux, K. L., Goddard, A., Ingham, T.,
Evans, M. J., Stone, D., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan, A., Lee,
J. D., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S., Moller, S. J., and Heard, D. E.:
Quantifying the magnitude of a missing hydroxyl radical source in a tropical
rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7223–7233,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Whalley et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Whalley, L. K., Stone, D., Bandy, B., Dunmore, R., Hamilton, J. F., Hopkins,
J., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., and Heard, D. E.: Atmospheric OH reactivity in
central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ
ozone production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2109–2122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Williams et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, I., Revitt, D., and Hamilton, R.: A comparison of carbonyl compound
concentrations at urban roadside and indoor sites, Sci. Total
Environ., 189–190, 475–483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(96)05248-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(96)05248-5</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Williams and Brune(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, J. and Brune, W.: A roadmap for OH reactivity research, Atmos.
Environ., 106, 371–372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.017</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Williams et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, J., Keßel, S. U., Nölscher, A. C., Yang, Y., Lee, Y.,
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Wolff, S., Kesselmeier, J., Klüpfel, T., Lelieveld,
J., and Shao, M.: Opposite OH reactivity and ozone cycles in the Amazon
rainforest and megacity Beijing: Subversion of biospheric oxidant control
by anthropogenic emissions, Atmos. Environ., 125, 112–118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.007</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Winiberg et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Winiberg, F. A. F., Dillon, T. J., Orr, S. C., Groß, C. B. M., Bejan, I.,
Brumby, C. A., Evans, M. J., Smith, S. C., Heard, D. E., and Seakins, P. W.:
Direct measurements of OH and other product yields from the HO<sub>2</sub>
+CH<sub>3</sub>C(O)O<sub>2</sub> reaction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4023–4042,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4023-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4023-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Wyngaard and Brost(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Wyngaard, J. C. and Brost, R. A.: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Diffusion of a
Scalar
in the Convective Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 41,
102–112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0102:TDABUD&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0102:TDABUD&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Yang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y., Shao, M., Wang, X., Nölscher, A. C., Kessel, S., Guenther, A., and
Williams, J.: Towards a quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity:
A review, Atmos. Environ., 134, 147–161,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Yienger and Levy(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Yienger, J. J. and Levy, H.: Empirical model of global soil-biogenic
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11447,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00370" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00370</a>, 1995.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Zannoni et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Zannoni, N., Gros, V., Lanza, M., Sarda, R., Bonsang, B., Kalogridis, C.,
Preunkert, S., Legrand, M., Jambert, C., Boissard, C., and Lathiere, J.: OH
reactivity and concentrations of biogenic volatile organic compounds in a
Mediterranean forest of downy oak trees, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1619–1636,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1619-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1619-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Gao, Li, Li, Zhang, Zhao, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Gao, Z., Li, D., Li, Y., Zhang, N., Zhao, X., and Chen, J.: On the
computation of planetary boundary-layer height using the bulk Richardson
number method, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2599–2611,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2599-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2599-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
