<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-5921-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Experimental study of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol nucleation at<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> high ionization levels</article-title><alt-title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation at high ionization levels</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{{$\chem{H_{2}SO_{4}}$} nucleation at high ionization levels}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Tomicic et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tomicic</surname><given-names>Maja</given-names></name>
          <email>majtom@space.dtu.dk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bødker Enghoff</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8452-698X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Svensmark</surname><given-names>Henrik</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>National Space Institute, Danish Technical University, Elektrovej 327, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Maja Tomicic (majtom@space.dtu.dk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5921</fpage><lpage>5930</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e128">One hundred and ten direct measurements of aerosol nucleation rate at high
ionization levels were performed in an 8 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction chamber. Neutral and
ion-induced particle formation from sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
studied as a function of ionization and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. Other
species that could have participated in the nucleation, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
or organic compounds, were not measured but assumed constant, and the
concentration was estimated based on the parameterization by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.1"/>. Our parameter space is thus [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, [NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> org] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K,
RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 %, and ion concentrations of 1700–19 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
ion concentrations, which correspond to levels caused by a nearby supernova,
were achieved with gamma ray sources. Nucleation rates were directly measured
with a particle size magnifier (PSM Airmodus A10) at a size close to critical
cluster size (mobility diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 nm) and formation rates at a
mobility diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 nm were measured with a CPC (TSI model 3775).
The measurements show that nucleation increases by around an order of
magnitude when the ionization increases from background to supernova levels
under fixed gas conditions. The results expand the parameterization presented
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.2"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.3"/> (for [NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
2.2 ppb and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) to lower sulfuric acid concentrations and higher
ion concentrations. The results make it possible to expand the
parameterization presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.4"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.5"/> to
higher ionization levels.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e361">Secondary aerosol particles, which are formed by nucleation
processes in the atmosphere, play an important role in atmospheric chemistry
and in the Earth's climate system. They affect the Earth's radiation balance by
scattering solar radiation back to space and can also act as cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN) and thereby affect the amount of cloud and its radiative
properties. Clouds have a net cooling effect on the Earth's radiation
budget of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.7 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.6"/>. Thus, a small
change in cloud properties can have significant effect on the climate system.
Results by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.7"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.8"/> have shown that a
significant fraction (ranging between 31 and 70 %) of cloud-forming
aerosol particles in the atmosphere are secondary particles that originate
from nucleation. Therefore, understanding nucleation is crucial in order to
fully understand the atmospheric and climatic effects of aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d1e392">Sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the primary ingredient in the production of
secondary aerosols because of its low vapour pressure and its ability to bond
with water, which is ubiquitous in the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.9"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is primarily produced in the atmosphere from sulfur dioxide
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) via oxidation by the OH radical, produced photochemically with
ultraviolet light coming from the Sun. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collides with
other molecules, it starts forming small clusters of molecules that can grow
into new stable aerosols. If only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> take part,
the process is termed binary homogeneous nucleation. Nucleation can be
significantly enhanced by other substances, the dominant ones being ammonia
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and organic molecules
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.10"/>. These processes
are termed ternary and organic-mediated nucleation, respectively. Recent
results show that in low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> environments nucleation also happens
by condensation of highly oxygenated organic molecules alone
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.11"/>. Further, ions enhance the nucleation process<?pagebreak page5922?> by
stabilizing the molecular clusters. This process is termed ion-induced
nucleation. The fraction of ion-induced nucleation of total particle
formation was observed in various environments by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.12"/>. This
study found that the fraction was in the range 1–30 % being highest in
environments with generally low nucleation rates.</p>
      <p id="d1e524">The typical concentration range of gas-phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere
is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The concentrations vary with location, time of
day and emission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be both anthropogenic and natural.
Ions are ubiquitous in the lower atmosphere and are mainly produced by
galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), forming 1–40 ion pairs cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
formation rate depends on factors such as altitude, latitude, and the solar
cycle. Ionization is higher above land than above ocean due to natural
radioactivity from soils, and the maximum ionization is at altitudes of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.13"/>. In addition to the natural
variations in ionization, an event such as a nearby supernova would
significantly increase the atmospheric ionization in the time following the
event. There exists strong indications of a supernova at a relatively close
distance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 pc from the solar system <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 million years
ago <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.14"/>. According to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.15"/> the increase in GCR from such an event would cause an
increase in tropospheric ionization of up to a factor of 50 during the first
few hundred years following the event.</p>
      <p id="d1e644">Few measurements exist that quantify parameters affecting and assisting
nucleation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
Recent laboratory measurements made in the European Organization for Nuclear
Research CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving Outdoor Droplets) chamber were presented in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.17"/> and showed the dependence on temperature, trace gas and ion
concentrations. Based on the measurements a parameterization that can be
incorporated into climate models was developed and this parameterization was
improved by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.18"/>. These and other measurements,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.19"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> have verified that
ionization helps the nucleation process. In this work we expand on these
results by measuring nucleation at ion production rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), ranging from
background levels to 560 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and corresponding to those
following a nearby supernova, and atmospherically relevant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental methods</title>
      <p id="d1e759">The measurements presented in this work were performed in an 8 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
reaction chamber (SKY2). The set-up is shown schematically in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. The chamber is made of electro-polished stainless
steel and has one side fitted with a Teflon foil to allow UV light
(253.7 nm) to illuminate the chamber and start the photochemical reaction to
generate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dry purified air (20 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from a
compressor with an active charcoal, citric acid, and particle filter was
passed through a humidifier and added to the chamber to reach a relative
humidity of 38 %. 5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of dry air from the same compressor
went through an ozone generator where O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is photolysed by a UV lamp to
produce O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sulfur dioxide (3.5 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was added from a
pressurized bottle (5 ppm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in air, AGA). The resulting
concentrations of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (20–30 ppb) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.6–0.9 ppb) were
measured by a Teledyne T400 analyser and with a Thermo 43 CTL analyser,
respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was measured with a chemical
ionization atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight (CI-API-ToF) mass
spectrometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.20"/>. The chamber is also equipped with
instruments to measure temperature, differential and absolute pressure,
humidity, and UV intensity. The pressure was held at a standard pressure of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 bar with a slight (0.1 mbar) overpressure relative to the
surroundings, the temperature was at 295 K, and the UV intensity was varied
as part of the experiments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e904">A schematic of the SKY2 reaction chamber and the instruments used
for the experiment. The figure is an edited version of the schematic from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.21"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5923?><p id="d1e916">Two different condensation particle counters (CPCs) and a particle size
magnifier (PSM) were used to count the aerosols formed in the experiments. A
TSI model 3775 CPC was used to determine the aerosol particle concentration
above a cut-off diameter of 4 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cut</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">off</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). A TSI
3776 CPC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cut</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">off</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) was used in series with the
PSM Airmodus A10, developed and described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.22"/> to detect
particles above a cut-off diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 nm. The cut-off diameter
is defined as the mobility diameter of particles, of which 50 % are
counted, and it depends on the saturator flow rate and the chemical
composition of the particles. For the PSM, the saturator flow rate was set to
1.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which corresponds to a cut-off diameter of 1.4 nm for
tungsten oxide particles. The cut-off for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols is not
known exactly. The cut-off diameter of the PSM is very close to the critical
size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.23"/>, which allows for direct
measurements of nucleation rate, thereby avoiding extrapolations of the
nucleation rate from larger sizes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.24"/>. Both instruments (PSM
and CPC) sampled from the same line and had identical sampling pathways as
illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. The CPC with the larger cut-off
diameter was used on its own to achieve a larger size span between the
instruments, which enables the determination of the particle growth rate
(GR).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Ionization of air by gamma sources</title>
      <p id="d1e1028">The air in the 8 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction chamber was ionized by gamma sources.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="normal.25"/> have shown that the nature of the ionizing particles is
not important for the nucleation of aerosols. Therefore, even though
particles from an accelerator beam can have energies closer to GCR, gamma
radiation, which is more accessible, can be used to study the ion-induced
nucleation. Three Cs-137 sources were used in the set-up: two 27 MBq and one
270 MBq. To achieve a homogeneous irradiation of the chamber, the 270 MBq
source was placed on one side of the chamber at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 cm distance,
and the two 27 MBq sources were placed close to each other on opposite
sides of the chamber at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 cm distance. The set-up is illustrated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Ions are also produced in the chamber by naturally
occurring GCR and background radiation from Radon at a rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In order to perform measurements at different
ionization levels, lead shielding of varying thickness was placed in front of
the sources. Four ionization levels were achieved by using either 0, 1.5,
3.5, or 8.5 cm lead shielding.</p>
      <p id="d1e1091">The uniformity and level of the ionization caused by the sources were
estimated from simulations in Geant 4, with the G4beamline programme
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.26"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the ionization rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in the chamber caused by the gamma sources, for minimum and maximum shielding
thickness. The graphs show the chamber as seen from opposite the UV lamps.
Thus, the 270 MBq source is on the left side of the graphs. From the
simulation results in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, it is clear that when the gamma
sources were fully exposed the 270 MBq source created more ion pairs than the
two weaker sources on the opposite side of the chamber. The variation from
highest to lowest ionization is around a factor of 2, which translates into
a factor of 1.4 in ion concentration. There is some circulation of the air in
the chamber and the air is sampled from approximately midway between
the sources as seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Therefore it is assumed that
the average ionization for the entire chamber is a good representation of the
ionization of the sampled air.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e1112">Geant 4 simulations of ionization rate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>],
in the chamber with 0 cm <bold>(a)</bold> and 8.5 cm <bold>(b)</bold> lead
shielding. The average ionization for the entire chamber is presented in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e1165">Average ionization rate for the entire chamber (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) achieved with
the gamma sources at various thicknesses of lead shielding calculated with
Geant 4. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ion density including the ions produced by naturally
occurring radiation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shielding thickness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.5 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0 cm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">560</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2900</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8400</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1182"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Approximate values calculated with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the recombination coefficient and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sum of the
natural ionization (3 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the enhanced ionization
caused by the sources.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Design of experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e1423">The experiments were conducted by turning on the UV lamps for 20 min to
generate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] depends on the intensity of the
UV light; thus by varying the intensity between experiments, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was varied. Once sufficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
present, nucleation started and continued until the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used
up and/or lost to the chamber walls. The aerosol formation rate was measured
at the respective cut-off diameters with the PSM and CPC. The procedure
lasted 6 to 14 h for a single run under fixed gas conditions, depending on
the sulfuric acid concentration, because the system had to return to its
initial conditions (PSM concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) before a new
experiment was started. In between experiments, the ionization conditions
were varied by changing the amount of lead shielding in front of the gamma
sources. At least 1 h before each experiment the lead shielding was put in
the right position to allow the ionization level to stabilize before the
nucleation started.</p>
      <p id="d1e1526">The upper limit to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations was chosen based on time
constraints, because too high concentrations yielded a particle count which
took a long time to decay to initial conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
lower limit of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations was chosen based on the
particle detection limit of the CPC model 3775, which was the limiting
instrument because the majority of the particles are lost during the growth
from 1.4 to 4 nm. On average, 25 % of the particles survive the growth.
The survival is only 10 % for low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations since the
GR is slower in this case.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5924?><p id="d1e1596">Every fifth measurement was performed as a reference experiment with a
standard ion concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2900</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and UV intensity
(20 %) to avoid unnoticed drifts in parameters or instruments. The
reference experiments showed that the [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] varied despite the
identical UV setting, because the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration decreased during the
measurement series. This drift was caused by the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generator, in which a
UV lamp was replaced immediately prior to the measurements series. The lamp
intensity decreased with time, causing smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
for a given UV setting. A list of settings and the number of measurements at
each setting is presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e1691">The range of UV and radiation level settings that were used
through the measurement series. The radiation levels are
0: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2900</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
2: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The last column
shows the number of measurements at each setting. The reference measurements
were performed at 20 % UV and radiation level 1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UV intensity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radiation level</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No. of measurements</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5/4/2/5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2/0/0/2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5/18/3/8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">22 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4/3/3/5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2/3/3/5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3/2/0/3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">35 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1/3/0/3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">40 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2/2/0/2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">45 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0/1/2/3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2/2/0/3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Data processing</title>
      <p id="d1e1947">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows an example of a run sequence (for 22 % UV
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) as a function of time. The UV lamps were turned
on for 20 min from 02:26:10 to 02:46:12. The top panel shows the temperature
in the chamber during the experiment. It shows that the temperature increased
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 K when the UV lamps were turned on. When the UV was on the
highest setting (45 %) the temperature increased by 0.2 K. This slight
increase in temperature is negligible with regards to the nucleation rate
(5 % change for a 0.2 K increase at the highest [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] based
on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.27"/>). Therefore, a constant temperature of 295.4 K was
used in the further analysis. The second panel shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration in units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]. The red line is the 50-point
boxcar moving average. Immediately after the UV lamps were turned on, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration started to increase. When the UV was turned off,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lost to scavenging by aerosol particles and to the
chamber walls. The third panel shows the aerosol particle concentration
measured with the PSM and CPC without any corrections for the wall losses.
The red lines represent the 50-point boxcar moving average, which is used for
further data analysis to avoid artefacts from noise. Corrections for particle
loss to chamber walls are presented further down and the data analysis was
performed on the corrected version of the moving average.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2076">Run sequence for an experiment with 22 % UV and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]. The vertical lines show when the UV lamps were turned on
and off. <bold>(a)</bold> Temperature in the chamber. <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration measured with the CI-API-ToF and 50-point moving average shown
in red. <bold>(c)</bold> Aerosol particle concentration measured with PSM and CPC
(before the loss correction). The 50-point moving average is shown in red.
The purple dashed line on top of the PSM data shows the linear fit between 20
and 80 of the maximum concentration. The gradient of this fit (on the
loss-corrected data) was used as the nucleation rate.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Sulfuric acid measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2140">The CI-API-ToF mass spectrometer was used to determine the concentration of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The CI-API-ToF spectrometer used in the set-up was calibrated
with the calibration system presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.28"/>. We use the
calibration coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as defined in Eq. (1) in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.29"/>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M131" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HSO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HSO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>HNO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>HNO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>HNO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2267">The resulting calibration coefficient was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Values in the literature vary from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2358">The concentrations measured directly by the mass spectrometer are integrated
concentrations of masses over a small region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 AMU) of the spectrum.
This means that the concentrations are overestimated because they include
noise around the actual peak. This was also taken into account and corrected
for using the results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.31"/>, where a relation between
the analysis of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 AMU data was found from the API-ToF and data analysed using
Tofware <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.32"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2381">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is determined from the peak value of the
50-point boxcar moving average (the red line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).
This method introduces a statistical uncertainty in addition to the
uncertainty in the calibration factor. The statistical uncertainty arises
from the fluctuations in the non-smoothed data and was calculated from the
standard error of the difference between the non-smoothed and the smoothed
data for the 50 points around the peak.</p>
      <p id="d1e2403">The CI-API-ToF mass spectrometer broke down during the measurement series.
Therefore, 60 out of 110 experiments do not include direct measurements of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. For these experiments, the concentration
was interpolated from a linear relation between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, in the 50 direct measurements, and the GR of the aerosol
particles; see Sect. 3.2. Previously, linear relations between GR and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.33"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Determination of growth rate</title>
      <p id="d1e2463">The different cut-off diameters of the PSM A10 (1.4 nm) and TSI model 3775
CPC (4 nm) allow for the GR to be calculated from the time difference,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, between measurements in the two instruments. A percentage limit
(50 % of the maximum concentration) was used instead of absolute numbers to take particle losses during growth into
account. The difference in the cut-off diameters of the two
instruments is 2.6 nm. The GR is therefore defined as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M144" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <?pagebreak page5925?><p id="d1e2501">The calculated GRs were in the interval 14–34 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These GR values are reasonable compared to atmospheric GR
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–20 nm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.34"/>. We note that, although the GR
are higher than expected from pure sulfuric acid condensation at the kinetic
limit, indicating the participation of other vapours in the early growth
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.35"/>, we still find a linear relationship between sulfuric acid
and the GR. These other vapours can also contribute to the observed
nucleation rates (see Sect. 4 Results and Discussion).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Determination of nucleation rate</title>
      <p id="d1e2607">Nucleation rates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were measured at a mobility diameter of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  nm with the PSM A10. The particle diameter of 1.4 nm comes
close to the critical cluster size, and therefore the PSM allows for direct
measurements of the nucleation rate. The PSM measures the concentration of
particles with diameters above the cut-off, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2646">The nucleation rate is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a loss term that represents loss to
the chamber walls and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time after the particles reached the critical
size. From <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.36"/> we have the size-dependent loss term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is an approximation of particle loss to the chamber walls:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M160" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined experimentally in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.37"/> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that the
particles have at a certain time is given by the critical radius (0.7 nm),
the growth rate, and the time they took to grow. This is multiplied by 0.5
to get the average size:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M167" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The loss term is used to correct the particle count from the PSM at any time
and the result is seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2873">An example of the particle count from the PSM (light blue) and the
loss-corrected data (dark blue). The dashed lines show the linear fit between 20 and 80 % of the maximum count.
The gradient of the fit on the corrected data was used as the nucleation rate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2893">The nucleation rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined by calculating the gradient of
the area between 20 and 80 % of each corrected peak of particle
concentration. This is illustrated by the dashed lines in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. The nucleation rates as a
function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ion concentrations are seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> with error bars. The error bars on the nucleation rate
are the 95 % confidence interval of the gradient. The error bars on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the statistical standard errors. The Poisson counting
uncertainty for the PSM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Sect. 3.4) and the calibration
uncertainty for the mass spectrometer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % measurement error +
additional errors from calibration parameters; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.38"/>) are not shown.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e2974">Nucleation rates as a function of sulfuric acid concentration and
ion concentration. The error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation on
the [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and the 95 % confidence interval on the nucleation
rate.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Additional uncertainties</title>
      <?pagebreak page5926?><p id="d1e3015">Additional uncertainties in the particle concentration measurement arise, for
example, from low particle counting statistics, from chemical-composition-dependent variation in the cut-off diameter of the particle counters, and from
loss of particles in the sampling system. According to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.39"/> particle sampling and counting is a Poisson process
and the statistical uncertainty is determined from the Poisson counting
uncertainty, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula>, which describes the standard deviation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, of
the counted particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3043">Aerosols are lost to the walls of the sampling system due to diffusion. This
type of loss is size dependent and was estimated using the particle loss
calculator (PLC) developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.40"/>. The loss function
estimates that the losses of the 1.4 nm particles in the sampling system are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % and only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % for the 4 nm particles. Since we
do not measure the particle size distribution diffusion losses are not
included directly in the data analysis. This means that we could have
underestimated the concentration of the smallest aerosols and thereby the
nucleation rates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3070">As the measurements presented here are an extension of the measurements
presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.41"/>, at the given conditions, it is natural to
compare the two. Therefore, the results shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> are
compared to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="normal.42"/>, which presents
the parameterization of the CLOUD experiments to the highest precision. In their
work nucleation is represented as a sum of binary (b), ternary (t), neutral
(n), ion-induced (i), and organic nucleation (org). The term representing the
organic nucleation rate is not used in the following, as our study does not
intentionally add or measure organic molecules. However, as deduced from the
high GR, there might be traces of organic species that can also contribute to
the nucleation rate. The concentration of organics is considered constant and
is included in the ternary nucleation rate. Thus, a nucleation rate given by
the sum of the four contributions is considered:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M182" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3143">At the temperatures and gas concentrations used in this study, ternary
nucleation is expected to dominate, as binary clusters are unstable
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.43"/>. The model of binary nucleation presented in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="normal.44"/> shows good agreement with measurements performed in the
European Organization for Nuclear Research CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving Outdoor
Droplets) chamber at lower temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 273 K). However at
tropospheric temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 273 K) the binary nucleation rate cannot
explain the nucleation rates that are observed in either of these studies at
the given sulfuric acid concentrations. Since the sulfuric acid
concentration is lower in our study, this is particularly important here.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.45"/> attributes the differences to contamination which is more
important in providing stabilization for the pre-nucleating clusters when the
temperature (and thereby the evaporation) is high. Nevertheless, we have included
the binary term for the sake of completeness.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3171">Parameterization from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.46"/> with
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 ppb (dashed lines) and nucleation rate measurements
from this study at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 %,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and all
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/5921/2018/acp-18-5921-2018-f06.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3260">Ammonia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is filtered from the air that enters the chamber with a
citric acid filter. However, trace amounts (which can originate from
incomplete filtering or introduction through the humidifier or the bottled
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in air) are still present in the chamber and contribute to the
production of stable clusters together with organic molecules. As the
concentrations of neither <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nor organic molecules are measured, an
ammonia equivalent concentration [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org] that represents both
species is estimated by comparing the results from the two studies under the
same conditions (including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 %, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page5927?><p id="d1e3363">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows the parameterization from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.47"/> (dashed lines) on top of the data from our experiments
with the [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] concentration set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(2.2 ppbv) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (left) and all ionization levels
(right). Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is the value
that gives the best match between the data and the extrapolated
parameterization, it is assumed to represent the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and organic species, [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> org]. Atmospherically observed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are typically at the sub-ppbv and ppbv levels
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.48"/>. Since the air is filtered before entering the
chamber, we would expect a concentration that is lower than in the
atmosphere. Once again, this is an indication of the presence of other
nucleation-enhancing species in our chamber.</p>
      <p id="d1e3517">We note that nucleation rates were reported for a mobility diameter of
1.7 nm in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="normal.49"/>, meaning that the rates measured in this study
should be slightly overestimated since we measure at a mobility diameter of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 nm (see Sect. 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e3530">As seen from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> the parameterization presented in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.50"/> matches the nucleation rates from this study, when
extrapolated to the same region, especially at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. At higher values of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] the nucleation rates
from this study are higher than expected from the parameterization. The
resulting parameterization shows that at an atmospherically relevant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the increase in
ions from background levels to the highest measured levels causes an increase
in nucleation rate of around an order of magnitude.</p>
      <p id="d1e3642">The disagreement between the data and the expected parameterization could be
caused by the narrow range of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] in this study, which are all
within 1 order of magnitude. Another explanation could be that the detection
efficiency of the PSM is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % for particles close to the critical
size of 1.4 nm. Since we use a percentage region instead of a fixed time
interval when calculating the nucleation rate (see Sect. 3.3), it is possible
that the dependence on [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] was overestimated due to the lower
detection efficiency of PSM for particles smaller than 2 nm. At higher
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], more particles could grow into sizes that are detected more
efficiently by the PSM compared to at lower [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]. This was taken
into account by verifying that the regions between 20 and 80 % of each
peak of particle concentration were linear. If the detection efficiency was
dependent on [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], these regions would not be linear but the
gradient would increase with time for a given peak. However, we still note
that the detection efficiency of the PMS could have affected the results in
another way. Likewise, it is worth noting that the effect of ions on the
detection efficiency of the PSM is unknown, but ions may be more efficiently
detected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.51"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5928?><p id="d1e3736">It can be complicated to compare different experimental studies, even under
similar conditions, because it is unclear how experimental techniques and
parameters affect the results. Four studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.52"/>, all performed in the
CLOUD chamber, are most relevant for intercomparison, because they were made
in a reaction chamber analogous to this study. The experiments presented in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.53"/> were performed in a flow tube. Yet, we include these in
the comparison, because in it nucleation was measured directly at the
critical cluster size with a PSM instrument. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> gives an
overview of the studies and conditions that were compared. Some studies
consist of several experiments using varying parameters. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>
only shows the measurements made under the conditions that were closest to
the parameters of this study. The experiments from this study with lowest
ionization are used for comparison, because this ionization level
(4.4 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is close to the cosmic ray background ionization
(GCR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3809">Comparison of similar nucleation rate experiments. The numbers refer
to the different studies: 1 is this study, 2 is <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.54"/>, 3 is
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.55"/>, 4 is <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.56"/>, 5 is <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.57"/>, and
6 is <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.58"/>. The fifth parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is the mobility diameter.
GCR corresponds to the background GCR (galactic cosmic ray) ionization
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Cells with a dash mean that the value was
not measured or reported.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.98}[.98]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">295</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">292</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">299</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">292</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">293</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GCR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GCR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">GCR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GCR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GCR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3–1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 ppt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2–250 ppt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1400 ppt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.002–1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.005–30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003–25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01–1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3–10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1–1000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.98}[.98]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3866"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{2mm}}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The nucleation rates were read from the figures in the respective papers and are therefore only approximate values.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The observed growth rate in this study was close to that from
pure sulfuric acid.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4417">From Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> it is clear that experiments conducted under the
exact same conditions as in this study do not exist. Nevertheless, the
nucleation rates in this study lie slightly below or within the range of the
nucleation rates obtained in the experiments performed in the CLOUD chamber
(studies 2–5). Except for study 3, which was made under lower temperatures,
these studies have sulfuric acid concentrations that are 1 to 2 orders of
magnitude higher than is the case for this study. As with the
parameterization this indicates the existence of other nucleating species
within our chamber. By comparing studies 2 and 5 made under almost identical
conditions the effect on nucleation of an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration is evident (e.g. at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the lower limit for study 2 and the upper limit
for study 5).</p>
      <p id="d1e4477">The temperature used in this paper is only relevant to the boundary layer of
the troposphere. At this high temperature evaporation of pre-nucleation
clusters is very important and the stabilization provided by ions can have a
strong effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.59"/>, as is also seen in this study. Higher in
the troposphere where temperatures are lower the importance of evaporation
decreases. However ions can still have a strong effect on the nucleation
rates. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.60"/> showed that ions can affect pure binary nucleation
rates at mid-troposphere conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 K). An even higher increase
in ionization, as used in this work, would increase the nucleation rates even
more – by about 1 order of magnitude according to the parameterization used
here. The concentrations of ternary gases are also expected to be lower in the
free troposphere, which increases the effect of the ions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4493">In order to fully account for the variables in nucleation processes observed
in this study, direct measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and organic substances would
have been preferred. Nonetheless, the results show that the nucleation
increases linearly with ion concentration, even at the highest ionization.
Also, consistency with the results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.61"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.62"/> is shown.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4520">The nucleation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols was
studied under near-atmospheric conditions in an 8 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction chamber.
Sulfuric acid was produced in situ in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the ionization of the air in the chamber
was increased from background levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 up to
560 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ion concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1700</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) using gamma sources. Such levels of ionization are
relevant for a nearby (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 pc) supernova which is thought to have
occurred <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 million years ago. The experiments were performed at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K and RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 %. The study shows that nucleation increases
linearly with ion concentration over the full range of ion concentrations. We
find that nucleation increases by an order of magnitude, when the ion
concentration is increased from background to maximum levels. We have not
measured the concentration of nucleating species other than sulfuric acid, so
the nucleation pathways are unclear. Based on comparisons with other studies
we conclude that ternary nucleation involving ammonia or organics is required
to explain the observed nucleation rates. Still, this study is a novel
contribution to the experimental studies of nucleation rates for the
ammonia/organic-mediated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system because of the
direct measurements of nucleation rates at sizes close to the critical
cluster size at high ion concentrations. This work expands the measurements
presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.63"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb,
RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K. Based on the presented experiments we find
it possible to expand the parameterization from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.64"/> to higher
ion concentrations.</p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-2.5mm}}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4801">The data sets generated and analysed during the current
study are available from the corresponding author on request.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-4.5mm}}?><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4808">MT co-designed and co-performed the experiments, performed
the data analysis, and co-wrote the paper. MBE co-designed and co-performed
the experiments, and provided input to the data analysis and co-wrote the
paper. HS provided input to all parts of the work.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-4mm}}?><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4815">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4822">We thank Mikael Jensen and DTU NUTECH for lending us the 270 MBq Cs-137
source and for help with transport. We thank Andreas Kürten for lending
us his model for the calibration of the CI-API-ToF. We thank Knud
Højgaards Foundation for funding the TSI 3776 CPC. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Christopher Hoyle   <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Brian Thomas and two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Almeida et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten,, A., et al.: Molecular
understanding of sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere,
Nature, 502, 359–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12663</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bazilevskaya et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Bazilevskaya, G. A., Usoskin, I. G., Flückiger, E. O., Harrison, R. G.,
Desorgher, L., Bütikofer, R., Krainev, M. B., Makhmutov, V. S., Stozhkov,
Y. I., Svirzhevskaya, A. K., Svirzhevsky, N. S., and Kovaltsov, G. A.: Cosmic
Ray Induced Ion Production in the Atmosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 137, 149–173,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9339-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-008-9339-y</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Benson et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Benson, D. R., Yu, J. H., Markovich, A., and Lee, S.-H.: Ternary homogeneous
nucleation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under conditions
relevant to the lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4755–4766,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4755-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4755-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Berndt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T., Böge, O., and Stratmann, F.: Formation of atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles in the absence of organics: A laboratory
study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L15817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026660</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bianchi et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Bianchi, F., Tröstl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C.
R., Molteni, U., Herrmann, E., Adamov, A., Bukowiecki, N., Chen, X.,
Duplissy, J., Gysel, M., Hutterli, M. Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J.,
Kürten, A. Manninen, H. E., Münch, S. Peräkylä, O.,
Petäjä, T., Rondo, L., Williamson, C., Weingartner, E. Curtius, J.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U.: New particle
formation in the free troposphere: A question of chemistry and timing,
Science, 352, 1109–1112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aad5456</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>CMS Groupware(2017)</label><mixed-citation>CMS Groupware: G4-Beamline open source software, available at:
<uri>http://www.muonsinternal.com/muons3/G4beamline</uri> (last access: 24 May
2016), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Curtius(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Curtius, J.: Nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, C. R. Phys., 7,
1027–1045, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2006.10.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.crhy.2006.10.018</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Dunne et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kürten, A., et al.: Global atmospheric particle
formation from CERN CLOUD measurements, Science, 354, 1119–1124,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaf2649</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Duplissy et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Duplissy, J., Merikanto, J., Franchin, A., et al.: Effect of ions on sulfuric
acid-water binary particle formation: 2. Experimental data and comparison
with QC-normalized classical nucleation theory, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121,
1752–1775, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Ehn et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., et al.: A large source of
low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Ehrhart et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Ehrhart, S., Ickes, L., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Barmet, P., Bianchi, F.,
Dommen, J., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Franchin, A., Kangasluoma, J.,
Kirkby, J., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Lehtipalo, K., Nieminen, T., Riccobono,
F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Steiner, G., Tomé, A., Wimmer, D.,
Baltensperger, U., Wagner, P. E., and Curtius, J.: Comparison of the SAWNUC
model with CLOUD measurements of sulphuric acid-water nucleation, J Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 12401–12414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023723" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023723</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Enghoff et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Enghoff, M. B., Pedersen, J. O. P., Uggerhøj, U. I., Paling, S. M., and
Svensmark, H.: Aerosol nucleation induced by a high energy particle beam,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L09805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047036</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Erupe et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Erupe, M. E., Benson, D. R., Li, J., Young, L.-H., Verheggen, B., Al-Refai,
M., Tahboub, O., Cunningham, V., Frimpong, F., Viggiano, A. A., and Lee,
S.-H.: Correlation of aerosol nucleation rate with sulfuric acid and ammonia
in Kent, Ohio: An atmospheric observation, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D23216,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013942" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD013942</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Fimiani et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Fimiani, L., Cook, D. L., Faestermann, T., Gómez-Guzmán, J. M., Hain, K.,
Herzog, G., Knie, K., Korschinek, G., Ludwig, P., Park, J., Reedy, R. C., and
Rugel, G.: Interstellar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Fe on the Surface of the Moon, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 116, 151104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.151104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.151104</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Gordon et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, H., Kirkby, J., Baltensperger, U., et al.: Causes and importance of
new particle formation in the present-day and<?pagebreak page5930?> preindustrial atmospheres,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 8739–8760, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026844</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Hansen(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, N.: Analysis of CI API-ToF mass spectrometer data from an atmospheric
reaction chamber, Bachelor's thesis, National Space Institute, Danish
Technical Univertsity, Denmark, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hanson and Lovejoy(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Hanson, D. R. and Lovejoy, E. R.: Measurement of the Thermodynamics of the
Hydrated Dimer and Trimer of Sulfuric Acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110,
9525–9528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp062844w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp062844w</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hartmann(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, D. L.: Radiative effects of clouds on earth's climate, in:
Aerosol–Cloud–Climate Interactions, edited by: Hobbs, P. V., International
Geophysics, 54, 151–173, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Jokinen et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Jokinen, T., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Lönn, G., Hakala, J.,
Petäjä, T., Mauldin III, R. L., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Atmospheric sulphuric acid and neutral cluster measurements using CI-APi-TOF,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4117–4125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kachelrie\ss{} et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Kachelrieß et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Kachelrieß, M., Neronov, A., and Semikoz, D. V.: Signatures of a Two
Million Year Old Supernova in the Spectra of Cosmic Ray Protons, Antiprotons,
and Positrons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 115, 181103,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181103</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Kangasluoma and Kontkanen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Kangasluoma, J. and Kontkanen, J.: On the sources of uncertainty in the
sub-3nm particle concentration measurement, J. Aerosol Sci., 112, 34–51,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.07.002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Kirkby et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., et al.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia
and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476,
429–433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10343</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Kirkby et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., et al.: Ion-induced nucleation of
pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature17953</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Knie et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Knie, K., Korschinek, G., Faestermann, T., Dorfi, E. A., Rugel, G., and
Wallner, A: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Anomaly in a Deep-Sea Manganese Crust
and Implications for a Nearby Supernova Source, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 171103,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171103</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Kulmala et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Vehkamäki, H., Petäjä, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A.,
Kerminen, V.-M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates
of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol
Sci., 35, 143–176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Kulmala et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Dal Maso, M., Mäkelä, J. M., Pirjola, L.,
Väkevä, M., Aalto, P., Miikkulainen, P., Hämeri, K., and O'dowd,
C. D.: On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles,
Tellus B, 53, 479–490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{u}rten et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Kürten et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Kürten, A., Rondo, L., Ehrhart, S., and Curtius, J.: Calibration of a
Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer for the Measurement of Gaseous Sulfuric
Acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6375–6386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212123n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp212123n</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{u}rten et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Kürten et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Kürten, A., Bianchi, F., Almeida, J., et al.: Experimental particle
formation rates spanning tropospheric sulfuric acid and ammonia abundances,
ion production rates, and temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121,
12377–12400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023908</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{u}rten et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Kürten et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Kürten, A., Li, C., Bianchi, F., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Donahue, N. M.,
Duplissy, J., Flagan, R. C., Hakala, J., Jokinen, T., Kirkby, J., Kulmala,
M., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Rissanen, M. P.,
Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tröstl, J., Ye, P., and McMurry,
P. H.: New particle formation in the sulfuric acid-dimethylamine-water
system: reevaluation of CLOUD chamber measurements and comparison to an
aerosol nucleation and growth model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 845–863,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-845-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lovejoy  et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Lovejoy, E. R., Curtius, J., and Froyd, K. D.: Atmospheric ion-induced
nucleation of sulfuric acid and water, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D08204,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004460</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Manninen et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagné, S., Häkkinen, S.,
Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hörrak, U.,
Plass-Dülmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Töro, N.,
Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G. N.,
Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A.,
Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C.,
Birmili, W., Sonntag, A., Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj,
P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A.,
Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and
Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites –
analysis of new particle formation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
7907–7927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Melott et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Melott, A. L., Thomas, B. C., Kachelrieß, M., Semikoz, D. V., and
Overholt, A. C.: A Supernova at 50 pc: Effects on the Earth's Atmosphere and
Biota, The Astrophys. J., 840, 105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c57" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c57</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Merikanto et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw,
K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Nowak et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Nowak, J. B., Huey, L. G., Russell, A. G., Tian, D., Neuman, J. A., Orsini,
D., Sjostedt, S. J., Sullivan, A. P., Tanner, D. J., Weber, R. J., Nenes, A.,
Edgerton, E., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.: Analysis of urban gas phase ammonia
measurements from the 2002 Atlanta Aerosol Nucleation and Real-Time
Characterization Experiment (ANARChE), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D17308,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11029/12006JD007113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.11029/12006JD007113</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Savchenko et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Savchenko, V., Kachelrieß, M., and Semikoz, D. V.: Imprint of a 2 Million
Year Old Source on the Cosmic-Ray Anisotropy, Astrophys. J. Lett., 809, L23,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/809/2/L23" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/2041-8205/809/2/L23</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sipil{\"{a}} et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Sipilä et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Sipilä, M., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Brus, D., Vanhanen, J.,
Stratmann, F., Patokoski, J., Mauldin, R. L., Hyvärinen, A.-P.,
Lihavainen, H., and Kulmala, M.: The Role of Sulfuric Acid in Atmospheric
Nucleation, Science, 327, 1243–1246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180315" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180315</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Stark et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Stark, H., Yatavelli, R. L., Thompson, S. L., Kimmel, J. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Chhabra, P. S., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Methods to extract molecular and bulk chemical information
from series of complex mass spectra with limited mass resolution, Int.
J. Mass Spectrom., 389, 26–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2015.08.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2015.08.011</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Svensmark et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Svensmark, H., Pedersen, J. O. P., Marsh, N. D., Enghoff, M. B., and
Uggerhøj, U. I.: Experimental evidence for the role of ions in particle
nucleation under atmospheric conditions, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 463,
385–396, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5931?><ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Svensmark et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Svensmark, H., Enghoff, M. B., and Pedersen, J. O. P.: Response of cloud
condensation nuclei (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 nm) to changes in ion-nucleation, Phys.
Lett. A, 377, 2343–2347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tr\"{o}stl et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Tröstl et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., et al.: The role of low-volatility
organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere, Nature, 533,
527–531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature18271</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Vanhanen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H.
E., Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Particle Size Magnifier
for Nano-CN Detection, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 533–542,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.547889</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>von der Weiden et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss
Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of
aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Winkler et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Winkler, P. M., Steiner, G., Vrtala, A., Vehkamäki, H., Noppel, M.,
Lehtinen, K. E. J., Reischl, G. P., Wagner, P. E., and Kulmala, M.:
Heterogeneous Nucleation Experiments Bridging the Scale from Molecular Ion
Clusters to Nanoparticles, Science, 319, 1374–1377,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1149034</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Yu and Luo(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Yu, F. and Luo, G.: Simulation of particle size distribution with a global
aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number
concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7691–7710,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Yu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Dai, L., Zhao, Y., Kanawade, V. P., Tripathi, S. N., Ge, X., Chen,
M., and Lee, S.-H.: Laboratory observations of temperature and humidity
dependencies of nucleation and growth rates of sub-3 nm particles,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1919–1929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025619</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Zhang et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Suh, I., Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Fortner, E. C., Tie, X., Molina,
L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Atmospheric New Particle Formation Enhanced by
Organic Acids, Science, 304, 1487–1490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1095139</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Experimental study of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> aerosol nucleation at high ionization levels</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>One hundred and ten direct measurements of aerosol nucleation rate at high
ionization levels were performed in an 8&thinsp;m<sup>3</sup> reaction chamber. Neutral and
ion-induced particle formation from sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) was
studied as a function of ionization and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> concentration. Other
species that could have participated in the nucleation, such as NH<sub>3</sub>
or organic compounds, were not measured but assumed constant, and the
concentration was estimated based on the parameterization by
Gordon et al. (2017). Our parameter space is thus [H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>]  = 4×10<sup>6</sup> − 3×10<sup>7</sup>&thinsp;cm<sup>−3</sup>, [NH<sub>3</sub>+ org]  =  2.2&thinsp;ppb, <i>T</i> = 295&thinsp;K,
RH&thinsp; = &thinsp;38&thinsp;%, and ion concentrations of 1700–19&thinsp;000&thinsp;cm<sup>−3</sup>. The
ion concentrations, which correspond to levels caused by a nearby supernova,
were achieved with gamma ray sources. Nucleation rates were directly measured
with a particle size magnifier (PSM Airmodus A10) at a size close to critical
cluster size (mobility diameter of  ∼ &thinsp;1.4&thinsp;nm) and formation rates at a
mobility diameter of  ∼ &thinsp;4&thinsp;nm were measured with a CPC (TSI model 3775).
The measurements show that nucleation increases by around an order of
magnitude when the ionization increases from background to supernova levels
under fixed gas conditions. The results expand the parameterization presented
in Dunne et al. (2016) and Gordon et al. (2017) (for [NH<sub>3</sub> + org]  = 
2.2&thinsp;ppb and <i>T</i> = 295&thinsp;K) to lower sulfuric acid concentrations and higher
ion concentrations. The results make it possible to expand the
parameterization presented in Dunne et al. (2016) and Gordon et al. (2017) to
higher ionization levels.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Almeida et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten,, A., et al.: Molecular
understanding of sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere,
Nature, 502, 359–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bazilevskaya et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Bazilevskaya, G. A., Usoskin, I. G., Flückiger, E. O., Harrison, R. G.,
Desorgher, L., Bütikofer, R., Krainev, M. B., Makhmutov, V. S., Stozhkov,
Y. I., Svirzhevskaya, A. K., Svirzhevsky, N. S., and Kovaltsov, G. A.: Cosmic
Ray Induced Ion Production in the Atmosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 137, 149–173,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9339-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9339-y</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Benson et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Benson, D. R., Yu, J. H., Markovich, A., and Lee, S.-H.: Ternary homogeneous
nucleation of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and H<sub>2</sub>O under conditions
relevant to the lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4755–4766,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4755-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4755-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Berndt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Berndt, T., Böge, O., and Stratmann, F.: Formation of atmospheric
H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>/H<sub>2</sub>O particles in the absence of organics: A laboratory
study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L15817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026660</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bianchi et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchi, F., Tröstl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C.
R., Molteni, U., Herrmann, E., Adamov, A., Bukowiecki, N., Chen, X.,
Duplissy, J., Gysel, M., Hutterli, M. Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J.,
Kürten, A. Manninen, H. E., Münch, S. Peräkylä, O.,
Petäjä, T., Rondo, L., Williamson, C., Weingartner, E. Curtius, J.,
Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U.: New particle
formation in the free troposphere: A question of chemistry and timing,
Science, 352, 1109–1112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>CMS Groupware(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
CMS Groupware: G4-Beamline open source software, available at:
<a href="http://www.muonsinternal.com/muons3/G4beamline" target="_blank">http://www.muonsinternal.com/muons3/G4beamline</a> (last access: 24 May
2016), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Curtius(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Curtius, J.: Nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, C. R. Phys., 7,
1027–1045, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2006.10.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2006.10.018</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Dunne et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kürten, A., et al.: Global atmospheric particle
formation from CERN CLOUD measurements, Science, 354, 1119–1124,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Duplissy et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Duplissy, J., Merikanto, J., Franchin, A., et al.: Effect of ions on sulfuric
acid-water binary particle formation: 2. Experimental data and comparison
with QC-normalized classical nucleation theory, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121,
1752–1775, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Ehn et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., et al.: A large source of
low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Ehrhart et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Ehrhart, S., Ickes, L., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Barmet, P., Bianchi, F.,
Dommen, J., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Franchin, A., Kangasluoma, J.,
Kirkby, J., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Lehtipalo, K., Nieminen, T., Riccobono,
F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Steiner, G., Tomé, A., Wimmer, D.,
Baltensperger, U., Wagner, P. E., and Curtius, J.: Comparison of the SAWNUC
model with CLOUD measurements of sulphuric acid-water nucleation, J Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 12401–12414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023723" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023723</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Enghoff et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Enghoff, M. B., Pedersen, J. O. P., Uggerhøj, U. I., Paling, S. M., and
Svensmark, H.: Aerosol nucleation induced by a high energy particle beam,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L09805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047036</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Erupe et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Erupe, M. E., Benson, D. R., Li, J., Young, L.-H., Verheggen, B., Al-Refai,
M., Tahboub, O., Cunningham, V., Frimpong, F., Viggiano, A. A., and Lee,
S.-H.: Correlation of aerosol nucleation rate with sulfuric acid and ammonia
in Kent, Ohio: An atmospheric observation, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D23216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013942" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013942</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Fimiani et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Fimiani, L., Cook, D. L., Faestermann, T., Gómez-Guzmán, J. M., Hain, K.,
Herzog, G., Knie, K., Korschinek, G., Ludwig, P., Park, J., Reedy, R. C., and
Rugel, G.: Interstellar <sup>60</sup>Fe on the Surface of the Moon, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 116, 151104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.151104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.151104</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Gordon et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Gordon, H., Kirkby, J., Baltensperger, U., et al.: Causes and importance of
new particle formation in the present-day and preindustrial atmospheres,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 8739–8760, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026844</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Hansen(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, N.: Analysis of CI API-ToF mass spectrometer data from an atmospheric
reaction chamber, Bachelor's thesis, National Space Institute, Danish
Technical Univertsity, Denmark, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Hanson and Lovejoy(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, D. R. and Lovejoy, E. R.: Measurement of the Thermodynamics of the
Hydrated Dimer and Trimer of Sulfuric Acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110,
9525–9528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp062844w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp062844w</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Hartmann(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, D. L.: Radiative effects of clouds on earth's climate, in:
Aerosol–Cloud–Climate Interactions, edited by: Hobbs, P. V., International
Geophysics, 54, 151–173, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Jokinen et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Jokinen, T., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Lönn, G., Hakala, J.,
Petäjä, T., Mauldin III, R. L., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Atmospheric sulphuric acid and neutral cluster measurements using CI-APi-TOF,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4117–4125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Kachelrieß et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Kachelrieß, M., Neronov, A., and Semikoz, D. V.: Signatures of a Two
Million Year Old Supernova in the Spectra of Cosmic Ray Protons, Antiprotons,
and Positrons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 115, 181103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181103</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Kangasluoma and Kontkanen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Kangasluoma, J. and Kontkanen, J.: On the sources of uncertainty in the
sub-3nm particle concentration measurement, J. Aerosol Sci., 112, 34–51,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.07.002</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Kirkby et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., et al.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia
and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476,
429–433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Kirkby et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., et al.: Ion-induced nucleation of
pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Knie et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Knie, K., Korschinek, G., Faestermann, T., Dorfi, E. A., Rugel, G., and
Wallner, A: <sup>60</sup>Fe Anomaly in a Deep-Sea Manganese Crust
and Implications for a Nearby Supernova Source, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 171103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171103</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Kulmala et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Vehkamäki, H., Petäjä, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A.,
Kerminen, V.-M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates
of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol
Sci., 35, 143–176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Kulmala et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Dal Maso, M., Mäkelä, J. M., Pirjola, L.,
Väkevä, M., Aalto, P., Miikkulainen, P., Hämeri, K., and O'dowd,
C. D.: On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles,
Tellus B, 53, 479–490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kürten et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Kürten, A., Rondo, L., Ehrhart, S., and Curtius, J.: Calibration of a
Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer for the Measurement of Gaseous Sulfuric
Acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 6375–6386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212123n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212123n</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Kürten et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kürten, A., Bianchi, F., Almeida, J., et al.: Experimental particle
formation rates spanning tropospheric sulfuric acid and ammonia abundances,
ion production rates, and temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121,
12377–12400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023908</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kürten et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Kürten, A., Li, C., Bianchi, F., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Donahue, N. M.,
Duplissy, J., Flagan, R. C., Hakala, J., Jokinen, T., Kirkby, J., Kulmala,
M., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Rissanen, M. P.,
Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tröstl, J., Ye, P., and McMurry,
P. H.: New particle formation in the sulfuric acid-dimethylamine-water
system: reevaluation of CLOUD chamber measurements and comparison to an
aerosol nucleation and growth model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 845–863,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lovejoy  et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Lovejoy, E. R., Curtius, J., and Froyd, K. D.: Atmospheric ion-induced
nucleation of sulfuric acid and water, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D08204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004460</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Manninen et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagné, S., Häkkinen, S.,
Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hörrak, U.,
Plass-Dülmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Töro, N.,
Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G. N.,
Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A.,
Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C.,
Birmili, W., Sonntag, A., Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj,
P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A.,
Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and
Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites –
analysis of new particle formation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
7907–7927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Melott et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Melott, A. L., Thomas, B. C., Kachelrieß, M., Semikoz, D. V., and
Overholt, A. C.: A Supernova at 50&thinsp;pc: Effects on the Earth's Atmosphere and
Biota, The Astrophys. J., 840, 105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c57" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c57</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Merikanto et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw,
K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Nowak et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Nowak, J. B., Huey, L. G., Russell, A. G., Tian, D., Neuman, J. A., Orsini,
D., Sjostedt, S. J., Sullivan, A. P., Tanner, D. J., Weber, R. J., Nenes, A.,
Edgerton, E., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.: Analysis of urban gas phase ammonia
measurements from the 2002 Atlanta Aerosol Nucleation and Real-Time
Characterization Experiment (ANARChE), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D17308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.11029/12006JD007113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.11029/12006JD007113</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Savchenko et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Savchenko, V., Kachelrieß, M., and Semikoz, D. V.: Imprint of a 2 Million
Year Old Source on the Cosmic-Ray Anisotropy, Astrophys. J. Lett., 809, L23,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/809/2/L23" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/809/2/L23</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Sipilä et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Sipilä, M., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Brus, D., Vanhanen, J.,
Stratmann, F., Patokoski, J., Mauldin, R. L., Hyvärinen, A.-P.,
Lihavainen, H., and Kulmala, M.: The Role of Sulfuric Acid in Atmospheric
Nucleation, Science, 327, 1243–1246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180315" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180315</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Stark et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Stark, H., Yatavelli, R. L., Thompson, S. L., Kimmel, J. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Chhabra, P. S., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Methods to extract molecular and bulk chemical information
from series of complex mass spectra with limited mass resolution, Int.
J. Mass Spectrom., 389, 26–38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2015.08.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2015.08.011</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Svensmark et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Svensmark, H., Pedersen, J. O. P., Marsh, N. D., Enghoff, M. B., and
Uggerhøj, U. I.: Experimental evidence for the role of ions in particle
nucleation under atmospheric conditions, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 463,
385–396, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Svensmark et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Svensmark, H., Enghoff, M. B., and Pedersen, J. O. P.: Response of cloud
condensation nuclei ( &gt; &thinsp;50&thinsp;nm) to changes in ion-nucleation, Phys.
Lett. A, 377, 2343–2347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.004</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Tröstl et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., et al.: The role of low-volatility
organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere, Nature, 533,
527–531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Vanhanen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H.
E., Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Particle Size Magnifier
for Nano-CN Detection, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 533–542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>von der Weiden et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss
Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of
aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Winkler et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Winkler, P. M., Steiner, G., Vrtala, A., Vehkamäki, H., Noppel, M.,
Lehtinen, K. E. J., Reischl, G. P., Wagner, P. E., and Kulmala, M.:
Heterogeneous Nucleation Experiments Bridging the Scale from Molecular Ion
Clusters to Nanoparticles, Science, 319, 1374–1377,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149034</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Yu and Luo(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, F. and Luo, G.: Simulation of particle size distribution with a global
aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number
concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7691–7710,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Yu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Dai, L., Zhao, Y., Kanawade, V. P., Tripathi, S. N., Ge, X., Chen,
M., and Lee, S.-H.: Laboratory observations of temperature and humidity
dependencies of nucleation and growth rates of sub-3 nm particles,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1919–1929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025619</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Zhang et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Suh, I., Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Fortner, E. C., Tie, X., Molina,
L. T., and Molina, M. J.: Atmospheric New Particle Formation Enhanced by
Organic Acids, Science, 304, 1487–1490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095139</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
