<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-4981-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Concentrations and source regions of light-absorbing particles in snow/ice
in northern Pakistan and their impact on snow albedo</article-title><alt-title>Impacts of light-absorbing particles in western Himalayan snow</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Impacts of light-absorbing particles in western Himalayan snow}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~Gul et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Gul</surname><given-names>Chaman</given-names></name>
          <email>chaman.gul@icimod.org</email><email>chaman@lzb.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Puppala</surname><given-names>Siva Praveen</given-names></name>
          <email>sivapraveen.puppala@icimod.org</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>Shichang</given-names></name>
          <email>shichang.kang@lzb.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Adhikary</surname><given-names>Bhupesh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yulan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1839-4987</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Shaukat</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xiaofei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Cryosphere Science, Northwest Institute of
Eco-Environment and Resources, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 73000,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD),
G.P.O. Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal
</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Global Change Impact Studies Centre (GCISC), Ministry of Climate Change, Islamabad, Pakistan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Shichang Kang (shichang.kang@lzb.ac.cn), Siva Praveen Puppala
(sivapraveen.puppala@icimod.org)<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> and Chaman Gul
(chaman.gul@icimod.org, chaman@lzb.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>4981</fpage><lpage>5000</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e179">Black carbon (BC), water-insoluble organic carbon (OC), and mineral dust are
important particles in snow and ice which significantly reduce albedo and
accelerate melting. Surface snow and ice samples were collected from the
Karakoram–Himalayan region of northern Pakistan during 2015 and 2016 in
summer (six glaciers), autumn (two glaciers), and winter (six mountain
valleys). The average BC concentration overall was
2130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1560 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer samples,
2883 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3439 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn samples, and
992 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 883 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter samples. The average water-insoluble
OC concentration overall was 1839 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1108 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer
samples, 1423 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 208 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn samples, and
1342 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 672 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter samples. The overall concentration
of BC, OC, and dust in aged snow samples collected during the summer campaign
was higher than the concentration in ice samples. The values are relatively
high compared to reports by others for the Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau.
This is probably the result of taking more representative samples at lower
elevation where deposition is higher and the effects of ageing and enrichment
are more marked. A reduction in snow albedo of 0.1–8.3 % for fresh snow
and 0.9–32.5 % for aged snow was calculated for selected solar zenith
angles during daytime using the Snow, Ice, and Aerosol Radiation (SNICAR)
model. The daily mean albedo was reduced by 0.07–12.0 %. The calculated
radiative forcing ranged from 0.16 to 43.45 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on snow
type, solar zenith angle, and location. The potential source regions of the
deposited pollutants were identified using spatial variance in wind vector
maps, emission inventories coupled with backward air trajectories, and simple
region-tagged chemical transport modeling. Central, south, and west Asia were
the major sources of pollutants during the sampling months, with only a small
contribution from east Asia. Analysis based on the Weather Research and
Forecasting (WRF-STEM) chemical transport model
identified a significant contribution (more than 70 %) from south Asia at
selected sites. Research into the presence and effect of pollutants in the
glaciated areas of Pakistan is economically significant because the surface
water resources in the country mainly depend on the rivers (the Indus and its
tributaries) that flow from this glaciated area.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e317">Carbon is an essential component of atmospheric aerosols, where it appears
in the form of black carbon (BC, also known as elemental carbon, EC), and
organic carbon (OC). BC is emitted into the atmosphere from the incomplete
combustion of carbon-based fuels (mainly fossil fuels and biomass)
(Jacobson, 2004), while OC can be directly emitted into or formed in the
atmosphere. After deposition on snow and ice<?pagebreak page4982?> surfaces, BC particles
significantly reduce the snow albedo (hemispheric reflectance) in the
visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum, cause snow albedo feedback
(Doherty et al., 2013), enhance solar radiation absorption (Warren and
Wiscombe, 1980), and accelerate snow melting (Hansen and Nazarenko, 2004).
BC, both in air and deposited on snow, is important in net positive forcing
of the climate. Clean snow is one of the most reflective natural surfaces on
Earth at the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths, while BC is the most
efficient light-absorbing species in the visible spectral range (Horvarth,
1993). With regard to BC, 1 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> has almost the same effect on albedo
reduction as 100 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral dust at 500 nm wavelength (Warren, 1982). However, the exact amount of albedo reduction also depends on
the refractive index, grain size, solar zenith angle (SZA), snow density,
dust particle size and concentration, particle morphology, surface
roughness, snow depth, liquid water content, snow shape, and topography
(Warren and Wiscombe, 1985). Albedo reduction usually results in
the amplification of the energy absorbed by dirty snow (Painter et al., 2010).
An albedo feedback is triggered and amplified by the deposition of impurities on
the snow surface, which reduces snow albedo, thus accelerating melting and
further reducing albedo (Doherty et al., 2013; Flanner et al., 2009). Albedo
feedback is amplified by the presence of light-absorbing particles (Doherty
et al., 2013). Studies conducted in Greenland showed that at visible
wavelengths, 10 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> coarse-grained BC particles in aged snow and 40 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> BC particles in new snow can reduce snow albedo by around 1 to
3 % (Warren and Wiscombe, 1985).</p>
      <p id="d1e368">Increased BC mass concentration and deposition on the Tibetan glaciers over
the last 20 years (Xu et al., 2009) have played a significant role in rapid
glacier melting in the region (Xu et al., 2012; Yao et al., 2012). A high
concentration of aerosol has deposited on the snow surface and increased the
BC content in snow over the southern edge of the Tibetan Plateau to the
north of the Himalayas (Gertler et al., 2016). The southern slope of the
Himalayas is relatively even more exposed to BC due to emissions from India
and transport through southwesterly and westerly winds (Xu et al., 2009;
Yasunari et al., 2010). BC deposited on snow in the Himalayan region induces
an increase in net shortwave radiation at the snow surface with an annual
mean of about 1 to 3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  producing an estimated 0.05–0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
warming (Ménégoz et al., 2014). The deposition of
anthropogenic BC has been observed to contribute significantly to the
decrease in snow cover extent over recent decades (Déry et al., 2007) and
a shortening of the duration of the snow cover season by several days
(Ménégoz et al., 2013). The climate warming efficiency of BC in
snow is greater than the warming efficiency of other anthropogenic
pollutants, including carbon dioxide (Hansen et al., 2005). Another
important characteristic of BC is its higher snowmelt efficiency. The
snowmelt efficiency of BC in terms of snow cover fraction and snow water
equivalent is larger than that induced by an increase in carbon dioxide (Qian
et al., 2011). The annual snow albedo reduction effect due to BC outweighs
the aerosol dimming effect (reduction in solar radiation reaching the
surface) by a factor of about 6 over the global snow cover (Flanner et
al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e392">At present, south and east Asia are considered to be the two largest BC
emission regions in the world and are likely to remain so (Menon et al., 2010).
BC transported from east Asia can be lifted high and moved towards the
northeast during the summer monsoon season (Zhang et al., 2015; Cong et al.,
2015; Lüthi et al., 2015), affecting the life of glaciers and
snow-covered areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e395">Research into the glaciers of the extended Himalayan region and Tibetan
Plateau has prime importance because these glaciers act as a water storage
tower for south and east Asia, and shrinking could affect the water resources
for up to 1 billion people (Immerzeel et al., 2010). The glaciated area in
northern Pakistan may be more exposed to BC effects than that in other
regions because it can potentially receive emissions generated from both
south and central Asia as well as from the Middle East. Meltwater coming
from these glaciers flows into the river Indus, which has major economic
importance for the people of Pakistan.</p>
      <p id="d1e399">A number of authors have described the concentration and impacts of light-absorbing particles in the Tibetan glaciers (for example Qian et al., 2015;
Wang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017; Niu et al., 2017).
However, until now, no studies have been published relating to the
concentration of light-absorbing aerosols in the surface snow and ice of
northern Pakistan, and although several authors have investigated transport
pathways over the Himalayan region (e.g., Babu et al., 2011 for the western
trans-Himalayas; Lu et al., 2012 for the Tibetan Plateau and Himalayas), little is known about the potential sources and transport pathways of
pollutants affecting the Pakistan area.</p>
      <p id="d1e402">In this study, we looked at the concentration of light-absorbing particles
(BC, OC, dust) in snow and ice in northern Pakistan, their impact on snow
albedo and radiative forcing, and the likely source regions. Albedo was
estimated from the BC and dust concentrations identified in collected
samples of snow and ice using the online snow albedo simulation Snow, Ice, and
Aerosol Radiation (SNICAR) model
(Flanner et al., 2009). Radiative forcing was calculated from the albedo
reduction obtained from the SNICAR model together with the incident
shortwave solar radiation obtained from the Santa Barbara DISORT
Atmospheric Radiative Transfer (SBDART) model. The frequency distribution of aerosol
subtypes (smoke, polluted continental, dust, and others) in the atmosphere
over the study area was calculated for the snow and ice sampling periods
using Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite
Observations (CALIPSO) satellite data from 2006 to 2014 as a further indication of
the types of aerosol contributing to the observed deposition. The potential
source regions of pollutants were identified using spatial variance in wind
vector maps prepared using Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for<?pagebreak page4983?> Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) reanalysis data, calculation of back air
trajectories using the HYSPLIT-4 (Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory) model, and a simple region-tagged chemical transport
model (Weather Research and Forecast, WRF-STEM). The back air trajectories approach has been used in many
studies to identify possible source regions for atmospheric and deposited BC
(Zhang et al., 2013). Pollutant source regions identified using the
different approaches were compared and the most likely source regions of the
pollutants identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study area</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e418">The study area and sampling sites: <bold>(a)</bold> Himalayan mountain
range and Tibetan Plateau, <bold>(b)</bold> winter sampling sites (solid black
circles), <bold>(c)</bold> glaciers selected for summer and autumn sampling.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/4981/2018/acp-18-4981-2018-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e436">The study area was located around 35.40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 74.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E in
the mountains and adjacent mountain valleys of the Karakoram and Himalayan
region in northern Pakistan (Fig. 1). Snow and ice samples were collected
in summer from six glaciers – Passu, Gulkin, Barpu, Mear,
Sachin, and
Henarche – and in autumn from Gulkin and Sachin (Fig. 1). The Passu and
Gulkin glaciers are located very near the Karakoram highway connecting
Pakistan with China, and there are a number of small villages (Passu,
Hussaini, Gulmit, and others) close by. The Barpu and Mear glaciers are
located very close to each other and around 3 km away from the residential
area of the Hopar and Nagar valleys. There is a small city (Astore) near the
Sachin glacier and some restaurants near its terminus (Muhammad and Tian, 2016). Winter snow samples were collected from mountain valleys near the
Passu, Barpu, and Sachin glaciers and three other areas to the west with a
number of small villages (Fig. 1). The average elevation of the selected
glaciers was quite low compared to the elevation of the glaciers studied for
BC, OC, and dust on the Tibetan Plateau by previous researchers. The
mountains around the selected glaciers are mostly dry and rocky. The 10-year
records (1999–2008) of the two nearby climate stations at Khunjerab (36.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 75.40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 4730 m a.s.l.) and Naltar
(36.29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 74.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 2858 m a.s.l.) show mean total annual
precipitation values of 170 and 680 mm, respectively. The daily average
temperature during winter and the pre-monsoon showed an increasing trend between
1980 and 2014 (Gul et al., 2017). The study area is mostly exposed to the
westerlies and emissions from south Asia. Most of the people in the region
use wood for cooking and heating.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sample collection</title>
      <p id="d1e500">A total of 50 surface ice and 49 snow samples were collected from the
glaciers in summer 2015 and 2016 (Passu – 15; Gulkin – 31; Barpu – 6; Mear – 8;
Sachin – 35; Henarche – 4) and 13 (total of ice and snow samples combined) in autumn 2016 (Gulkin – 7; Sachin – 6) at
elevations ranging from 2569 to 3895 m a.s.l. (Fig. 1). Eighteen snow
samples were collected in winter 2015 and 2016 from nearby mountain valleys
at elevations of 1958 to 2698 m a.s.l.; the winter sampling region was divided
into six sites (S1 to S6) based on geographical location and elevation
(Fig. 1). Samples were collected using the “clean hands – dirty hands”
principle (Fitzgerald, 1999). Ice samples were collected from the surface (5 cm depth) at different points on the glaciers. The elevation difference
between collection points on the same glacier ranged from 30 to 100 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e503">The samples were preserved in ultraclean plastic bags, allowed to melt in a
temporary laboratory near the sampling location, and filtered through
quartz filters immediately after melting. An electric vacuum pump was used
to accelerate filtration. The melted snow/ice volume of the samples was
measured using a graduated cylinder. Sampled filters were carefully packed
inside petri slides marked with a unique code representing the sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e506">The snow density of winter snow samples was measured using a balance,
snow/ice grain sizes were observed with an accuracy of 0.02 mm using a hand
lens (25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Aoki et al., 2011), and snow shape was estimated using
a snow card. In the models, we assumed external mixing of snow and aerosol
particles and spherical snow grains. Snow grain size and snow texture were
the largest sources of uncertainty in albedo reduction (Sect. 3.3). Qian
et al. (2015) have summarized the sampling methods available for light-absorbing particles in snow and ice from different regions including the
Arctic, the Tibetan Plateau, and midlatitude regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Dust, OC, and BC analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e522">Before analysis, sampled filters were allowed to dry in an oven for 24 h
and then weighed using a microbalance. The dust mass on the filters was
calculated from the mass difference in weight before and after sampling
(Kaspari et al., 2014; Li et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e525">There are many methods available for analyzing BC and OC. The three methods
considered the most effective for measuring BC and water-insoluble OC
concentrations in snow are thermal optical analysis, filter-based analysis,
and single-particle soot photometer analysis (Ming et al., 2008). The
thermal optical (filter-based) analysis method has been used by many
researchers (e.g., Li et al., 2017) and was chosen for the study. This is an
indirect method for measuring BC and OC on sampled filters; it follows
Beer's law and uses the stepwise combustion of the particles deposited on quartz
filters (Boparai et al., 2008), followed by the measurement of light
transmission and/or reflectance of the filters. The BC and OC content in the
collected samples was measured using a thermal optical Desert Research Institute (DRI) carbon analyzer,
similar to the Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) protocol (Cao et al., 2003). The temperature
threshold applied to separate the two species is described in M. Wang et al. (2012). A few (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10) filters had higher dust loads; for these the
method was slightly modified using a 100 % helium atmosphere and
temperature plateau (550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). A very few (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5) samples
with very dense dust<?pagebreak page4984?> concentrations were not properly analyzed by the
instrument and were excluded from the results. The extremely high dust value
of one sample from Passu (15 times the level in the next-highest sample), which had low values of other pollutants, was excluded as a probable error.
In some cases, a single sample was analyzed two or three times to ensure
accurate results were obtained.</p>
      <p id="d1e551">The CALIPSO models also define multiple aerosol subtypes – clean
continental, clean marine, dust, polluted continental, polluted dust, smoke,
and other – using the 532 nm (1064 nm) extinction-to-backscatter ratio. The
frequency of these different aerosol subtypes in the atmosphere over the
study region was investigated using CALIPSO data for the same months in
which ice and snow samples were collected, i.e., January, May, June, and
December, over the period June 2006 to December 2014. The CALIPSO Level 2
lidar vertical feature mask data product describes the vertical and
horizontal distribution of clouds and aerosol layers (downloaded from
<uri>https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/calipso/aerosol_profile_table</uri>, last access: May 2016). The aerosol subtypes were
classified in the downloaded data using the observed backscatter strength
and depolarization values. The details of the algorithm used for
classification are given in Omar et al. (2009). The percentage
contributions of individual aerosol subtypes were plotted using MATLAB
(MathWorks, Inc.).</p>
      <p id="d1e557">The frequencies of different subtypes were calculated along the specific
paths followed by CALIPSO over the study region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Albedo simulations and estimation of radiative forcing</title>
      <p id="d1e566">Snow albedo was estimated for each of the 18 winter samples and the average
calculated for samples at each of the sites (1 to 6). Albedo from two sites
– S1 (Sost), which had the highest average concentration of BC and dust,
and S6 (Kalam), which had the lowest average concentration of BC and dust –
was further explored using the SNICAR model (Flanner et al., 2007). The aim
was to quantify the effect of BC, dust, and mass absorption cross section
(MAC) on albedo reduction. Sensitivity model experiments were carried out
using various combinations of BC, dust, and MAC values, while other
parameters were kept constant (parameters for sites 1 and 6 shown in the
Supplement, Table S1). Snow albedo was simulated for different
daylight times, with the solar zenith angle (SZA) set in the range 57.0–88.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on
the position of the sun in the sky for the sampling date and locations. The
daily mean was calculated from the mean of the albedo values simulated for
24 different SZA values (one per hour) and the daytime mean from the mean
of the albedo values simulated for 10 SZA values (one per hour during
daylight). The midlatitude winter clear-sky option was selected for surface
spectral distribution. The parameters used for sensitivity analysis are
shown in Table S1 in the Supplement. MAC values of 7.5, 11, and 15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were selected
based on a<?pagebreak page4985?> literature review (Qu et al., 2014; Pandolfi et al., 2014). In
order to reduce the uncertainty, the dust concentration in the samples was
divided into four diameter classes (as per the model requirements): size 1
(0.1–1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) was taken to be 2 %, size 2 (1–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) to be
13 %, size 3 (2.5–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) to be 31 %, and size 4 (5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)
to be 54 % of total dust mass present in the sample, based on results
published by others (Gillette et al., 1974; Mahowald et al., 2014).
Radiative forcing (RF) was estimated for the same samples following Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M37" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>in-short</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>in-short</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes incident shortwave solar radiation (daily
mean), as measured by the SBDART model, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the daily mean
reduction in albedo, as simulated by the SNICAR model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Source regions of pollutants</title>
      <p id="d1e690">Three methods were used to identify the potential source regions of
pollutants found at the study site: wind maps, emissions inventory coupled
with back trajectories, and a region-tagged chemical transport modeling
analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e693">Wind vector maps were prepared using MERRA-2 reanalysis data (available from
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): <uri>https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/reanalysis/MERRA-2/docs/</uri>, last access: December 2017). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind
components were combined into a matrix around the study area for each
individual month and then plotted against latitude–longitude values to show
the spatial variance of monthly wind stress at 850 mb using arrows to
indicate the direction and intensity of wind.</p>
      <p id="d1e713">Air trajectories were calculated backwards from the sampling sites (S1:
36.40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 74.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; S6: 35.46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
72.54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) to identify potential source regions for the pollutants
using the web version of the HYSPLIT-4 model (Draxler and Hess, 1998). The HYSPLIT-4 model
has been used by others to compute air mass trajectories to identify
possible source regions (Ming et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013). Reanalysis
meteorological data from the same source as the wind data
(<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data</uri>, last access: November 2016) were used as input data in the HYSPLIT
model for May, June, and December 2015 and January 2016. HYSPLIT was run in
a 7-day backward trajectory mode with trajectories initiating every 6 h (0, 6, 12, and 18) on a daily basis from 4 May to 19 June 2015 (77 days during summer) and from 1 December 2015 to 31 January 2016 (62 during
winter). The HYSPLIT model results were combined with Representative
Concentration Pathway (RCP) emission data for 2010 (available from
<uri>http://sedac.ipcc-data.org/ddc/ar5_scenario_process/RCPs.html</uri>, last access: November 2016; data file <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>RCPs_anthro_BC_2005-2100_95371.nc<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) to identify the source location. This comprises
emission pathways starting from an identical base year (2000) for multiple
pollutants, including BC and OC; the file description indicates that the
inventory includes biomass burning sources. The RCP inventory has the same
emissions sectors as the Hemispheric Transport Air Pollution (HTAP) emission
inventory used in the modeling approach for identifying source regions (see
below), including fuel combustion, industry, agriculture, and livestock, but
the HTAP inventory has a higher resolution (0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than the RCP
inventory (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Lamarque et al. (2010) give a more detailed
discussion of the inventory and sectors (12) used in the base year
calibration of the RCP. Monthly CALIPSO satellite-based extinction data from
2006 to 2014 were used to calculate the vertical profile for aerosol
extinction over the study region. The CALIPSO extinction profile was
constructed for selected months in 2006 to 2014 – May and June for summer
and December and January for winter (Fig. S1). The exponential
equation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.46</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical height of individual trajectories in kilometers and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
indicates the extinction against the height of trajectories, was used to
calculate the extinction profile for the trajectory heights. The normalized
extinction profile was obtained by assuming that surface extinction equals 1
(Fig. S1).</p>
      <p id="d1e855">The WRF-STEM model was used as a third approach for identifying the origin
(source regions) of air masses carrying pollutants. The WRF-STEM model uses
region-tagged carbon monoxide (CO) tracers for many regions in the world to
identify geographical areas contributing to observed pollutants (Adhikary et
al., 2010). Region-tagged CO tracers are used as a standard air quality
modeling tool in various regional and global chemical transport models to
identify pollution source regions (Chen et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Lamarque and Hess, 2003). The
WRF-STEM model domain was centered on 50.377<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E longitude and
29.917<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude, with a model horizontal grid resolution of 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 km with 200 grids in the east–west direction and 125 north–south. The
meteorological variables needed for the chemical transport were derived from
the WRF meteorological model (Grell et al.,
2005) using FNL (Final) data (ds083.2) available from the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) website as input
data. The main aim of the simulation was to identify the geographic
locations contributing to the observed pollutants at the field sites. The
HTAP version 2 emission inventory, which comprises multiple pollutants
including BC and OC, was used for the WRF-STEM modeling (available from
<uri>http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/htap_v2/</uri>, last access: January 2017). This emission inventory includes major sectors, such as energy, industry,
transport, and residential, but not large-scale open agricultural and open
forest burning. The simulations applied in our study used the anthropogenic
emissions from the HTAP inventory. Thus, the results indicate the amount of
pollutants reaching the study area from day-to-day planned and recurring
activities in domestic, transport, industrial, and other sectors. The model
was run for a month prior to the field campaign dates to allow for model
spin-up (normal practice for a regional<?pagebreak page4986?> chemical transport model) and then
for the months of December, January, and June to match the field campaign
dates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>BC, OC, and dust concentrations</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e901">Concentration of black carbon, organic carbon, and dust in summer,
autumn, and winter samples in 2015 and 2016.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glacier/</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Elevation (m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">BC min–max (avg)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OC min–max (avg)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Dust min–max (avg)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Type<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Year</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">site</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">min–max</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">snow age in days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">Summer (May 2015/May 2016) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Barpu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2901–3405</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">877–5994 (2938)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">244–1228 (691)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">292–5250 (1998)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DCI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07–1.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gulkin</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2741–3319</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">82–5676 (1327)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">238–8514 (1594)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31–2039 (648)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DCIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.169–3.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2015/16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Henarche</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2569–2989</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">778–10502 (4820)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">275–4176 (1628)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">225–2723 (993)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.04–1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mear</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2961–3539</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">222–3656 (1593)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">703–6588 (2992)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33–656 (211)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DCI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.72–4.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Passu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2663–3158</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87–734 (346)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">132–1810 (741)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28–524 (196)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DCI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.85–4.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sachin</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3414–3895</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">257–4127 (1769)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">128–7592 (3348)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.6–2495 (314)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DCIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.08–0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2015/2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">Autumn (Oct 2016) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gulkin</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2741–3319</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">125–1028 (451)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">266–3574 (1276)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60–767 (253)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DCIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.29–3.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sachin</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3414–3895</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4342–6481 (5314)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">543–3478 (1571)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">124–1348 (546)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DCIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.11–0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">Winter (Dec 2015/Jan 2016) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S1-Sost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2873–3092</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">482–5957 (2506)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">378–2934 (1039)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29–311 (131)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2–17 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.25–0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S2-Hopar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2602–2794</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">229–1064 (646)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">330–1976 (1153)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23–129 (76)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1–15 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.4–1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S3-Tawas</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2437</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">650</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1320</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8–17 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S4-Astore</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2132–2396</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">450–2640 (1305)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">914–3645 (2161)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55–171 (97)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4–7 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.38–2.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S5-Shangla</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2324–2373</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">367–1110 (739)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1302–2856 (2079)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13–49 (31)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8–9 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.5–3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S6-Kalam</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1933–2101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79–123 (107)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">214–558 (347)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4–6 (5)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.3–5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col9" align="center"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e904"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Type: snow or ice type; DCI: debris-covered ice;
DCIS: debris-covered ice and aged snow.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range of OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC in individual samples.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1610">The minimum, maximum, and average concentrations of BC, OC, and dust in the ice and snow samples are given in Table 1.
The OC and BC concentration values were blank corrected by subtracting the
average value of the field blanks. Blank concentrations were used to
calculate detection limits as mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation. The average
BC concentration overall was 2130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1560 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer
samples, 2883 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3439 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn samples (both from
glaciers), and 992 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 883 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter samples. The average
OC concentration overall was 1839 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1108 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer
samples, 1423 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 208 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn samples, and 1342 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 672 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter samples. There was considerable variation in
individual samples, with summer values of BC ranging from 82 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Gulkin glacier) to 10 502 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Henarche glacier), autumn
values from 125 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gulkin glacier) to 6481 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sachin
glacier), and winter samples from 79 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kalam) to 5957 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Sost).</p>
      <p id="d1e1809">The lowest BC (82 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC (128 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were
observed in summer samples collected from the Gulkin and Sachin glaciers,
respectively. The average values of BC and OC were low in all samples from
the Passu glacier, even though it lies close to the Karakoram highway which
links Pakistan with China. The low concentrations of BC may have been due to
the east-facing aspect of the glacier shielding it from pollutants
transported from west to east. Slope aspect of a glacier is known to be
important for snow cover dynamics (Gul et al., 2017); dust concentrations
are known to vary with slope aspect due to the effects of wind direction on
deposition.</p>
      <p id="d1e1842">The highest average concentration of BC was found in autumn samples from the
Sachin glacier and the highest average concentration of OC in summer samples
from the same glacier. The average concentration of BC was much greater in
autumn than in summer on the Sachin glacier but somewhat greater in summer
than in autumn on the Gulkin glacier, indicating highly spatiotemporal
patterns in the deposition of particles. The marked difference on the Sachin
glacier may have reflected the difference in the direction of air, which
comes from Iran and Afghanistan in summer and the Bay of Bengal via India in
autumn, with the generally lower deposition on the Gulkin glacier more
affected by other factors (such as slope aspect of the glacier and status of
local emissions near the glacier). There was no clear correlation between the
average BC concentration in glacier samples and glacier elevation. However,
winter snow samples showed a weak increasing trend in average BC with site
elevation (Table 1, Fig. S3). <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e1847">Most summer samples were
collected from surface ice (Fig. S2a), but a few samples for Gulkin and
Sachin were collected from aged snow on the glacier surface (Fig. S2b, c).
Dust was visible on the relatively aged snow, and the BC and OC
concentrations in these snow samples were much higher than those in ice. The
highest average BC values in winter were also observed in aged snow (from
Sost) and the lowest in fresh snow (from Kalam) (Table 1). Generally, snow
samples collected within 24 h of a snowfall event were considered to be
fresh snow.</p>
      <p id="d1e1850">We analyzed the ratios of OC to BC in the different samples as in
atmospheric fractions; this can be used as an indicator of the emission
source, although apportionment is not simple and only indicative. The BC
fraction is emitted during the combustion of fossil fuels, especially biomass
burning in rural areas in winter, and urban emissions from road transport.
The OC fraction can be directly emitted to the atmosphere as particulate
matter (primary OC) from fossil fuel emissions, from biomass burning, or in the
form of biological particles or plant debris; it can also be generated in
the atmosphere as gases are converted to particles (secondary OC). In
general, lower OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratios are associated with fossil fuel emissions and
higher OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratios with biomass burning. Overall, there was no clear
correlation between BC and OC concentrations in our samples. In most cases,
the concentration of OC was greater than the concentration of BC, which
might indicate a greater contribution from biomass burning in the emissions,
but in a few, the concentration of BC was greater than that of OC, which
might indicate a greater contribution from coal combustion. The lowest OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC
ratio of 0.041 was observed in a summer sample from Henarche glacier and
the highest ratio of 5 in a winter sample from Kalam. The higher value at
Kalam may indicate greater contributions from biomass burning than from
fossil fuel combustion in the region. In summer samples, the average
concentration of OC was greater than the average concentration of BC in
samples from four of the six glaciers, but it was much lower in Barpu and
Henarche. In winter, individual snow samples indicated that the concentration of
OC was greater than BC at low-elevation sites and vice versa; the average OC
was greater than average BC at all except the highest elevation site (Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1876">Frequency distribution of aerosol subtypes in the atmosphere over
the study region calculated from CALIPSO data; average for the study months
in 2006 to 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/4981/2018/acp-18-4981-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1885">However, these results should be considered with caution. There are a number of
factors that can affect the OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratio in snow and ice samples apart from
the concentrations in the atmosphere. Spatiotemporal variability of the
OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratio may indicate the contribution of different sources, seasonal
variation, and frequent change in wind direction. In deposited samples, low
OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratios can result from a reduction in OC (Niu et al., 2017), greater
contributions from BC enrichment and OC scavenging, and/or the contribution
of different emission sectors (including quantity, combustion conditions,
and fuel type). Post-deposition processes of scavenging and enrichment,
which are influenced by the snowmelt rate, can cause water-soluble OC to be
underrepresented as meltwater removes OC but not BC, with OC and BC being
redistributed primarily by meltwater rather than by sublimation and/or
dry/wet deposition. Thus, the OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratio often reflects the impact of
the dilution of dissolved organic carbon and the enrichment of primary organic
carbon during snow/ice melting, with differences in OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratios reflecting
differences in the enrichment process. The low OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratio in the samples
from Henarche, the glacier at the lowest elevation, could, for example, be
due to preferential washing out of OC particles with meltwater. Overall,
there was a higher positive correlation between BC and dust than with OC,
suggesting that for BC and dust, particle precipitation and enrichment
processes were similar. The method used for analysis and the amount of dust
loading on the sample can also affect the OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratio, as can the presence
of metal oxides and calcium carbonate. High iron oxide concentrations can
cause BC to pre-oxidize or drop off the filter, while calcium carbonate can
be wrongly identified as BC. Laboratory studies have shown that the presence
of metal oxides in aerosol samples can alter the OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratio either by
enhancing OC charring or by lowering the BC oxidation temperature (Wang et
al., 2010), while higher fractions of metal oxide can increase BC divergence
across the thermal optical protocols (Wu et al., 2016). Dust can lead to a
greater decrease in optical reflectance during the 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C heating
stage in the thermal–optical method and thus an incorrect OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratio (M. Wang
et al., 2012). Carbon detected by the flame ionization detector (FID) before
the optical signal attains the initial value is defined as OC and that
detected after is defined as BC; dust on the filter results in the FID
division<?pagebreak page4988?> being postponed or inefficient and thus OC being overestimated and
BC underestimated or even negative (M. Wang et al., 2012). M. Wang et al. (2012)
provide a more detailed discussion of OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC ratios derived using the
thermal optical method.</p>
      <p id="d1e1968">A wide range of values has been reported by different authors for BC
concentrations in snow and ice samples from different regions (Table S2).
The concentrations of BC in our samples were higher than those reported by
many authors (Table S2) but were comparable with the results reported by Xu
et al. (2012)  in the Tien Shan, by Li et al. (2016) in the northeast
of the Tibetan Plateau, by Wang et al. (2017) in northern China, and by Zhang et
al. (2017) in western Tien Shan, central Asia. High concentrations indicate
high deposition rates on the snow and ice surface, but there are several
possible reasons for a wide variation in values apart from differences in
deposition rates, including differences in sampling protocols,
geographical/sampling location and elevation of sampling site (Qu et al.,
2014), and year/season of sampling. The majority of samples were from the
ablation zone of the glaciers. Strong melting of surface snow and ice in the
ablation zone could lead to BC enrichment and high-BC concentrations, as
observed by Li et al. (2017) for glaciers on the southern Tibetan Plateau.
The sampling season (May to September in our study) is an important factor
because rapid enrichment occurs as snowmelts during the melting season. The
peak melting period is May to August/September; thus, the concentration of
BC, OC, and dust in our samples would have been increased as melting
progressed due to the enrichment in melting snow and scavenging by the
melting water. In most cases, snow and ice samples were collected quite a
long time after snow fall, and the concentration of pollutants would also
have increased in the surface snow and ice due to dry deposition. It seems
likely that the pollutants in surface samples would be affected by
sublimation and deposition until the next melt season (Yang et al., 2015).
In some of the cases in our study, the average concentration of BC, OC,
and/or dust for a particular glacier/site was increased as a result of a
single highly concentrated sample, reflecting the wide variation that
results from the interplay of many factors.</p>
      <p id="d1e1972">Enrichment is more marked at lower elevations as the temperatures are higher, which enhances melting and ageing of surface snow, while deposition also
tends to be higher because the pollutant concentrations in the air are
higher (J. Wang et al., 2012; Nair et al., 2013). Previous studies have tended
to focus on the accumulation area of glaciers (e.g., ice cores and snow
pits), where enrichment influences are less marked, and on high-elevation areas,
where deposition is expected to be lower, in both cases leading to lower
values. In our study, the majority of samples collected in summer and autumn
were collected from the ablation area of debris-covered glaciers where
enrichment influences are marked due to the relatively high temperature, and
this is reflected in the relatively high values of BC, OC, and dust. Li et
al. (2017) showed a strong negative relationship between the elevation of
glacier sampling locations and the concentration of light-absorbing
particles. Stronger melt at lower elevations leads to higher pollutant
concentrations in the exposed snow. Equally, BC may be enriched in the lower-elevation areas of glaciers as a result of the proximity to source areas as well as by the higher temperatures causing greater melting. Thus, the main
reason for the high concentrations of BC, OC, and dust in our samples may
have been that the samples were taken from relatively low-elevation sites.
Human activities near the sampling sites in association with the summer
pilgrimage season probably also contributed to an increase in pollutant
concentrations. Our results do not necessarily indicate that all the
glaciers in the Karakoram region are substantially darkened by BC. The
ablation zones of debris-covered glaciers which are at relatively low
elevations and near pollution sources may be more polluted than other
glacier areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Frequency distribution of aerosol subtypes in the atmosphere</title>
      <p id="d1e1981">The analysis of aerosol types using the CALIPSO data identified smoke as the
most frequent aerosol type over the study region in both summer and winter,
indicating that biomass burning may be the dominant source of emissions.
Figure 2 shows the average frequency of different aerosol types in May–June
(summer) and December–January (winter) over the period 2006 to 2014 in the
form of a box plot. The frequency of different aerosol subtypes in June from
2006 to 2014 is shown in Fig. S4; smoke had the highest frequency
(39 %), followed by dust (21 %), polluted dust (12 %), and other
(20 %). This type of aerosol measurement in the atmosphere was useful for
our current study because it provides observation-based data over the study
region, whereas the other approaches used (such as modeling) were based on
interpolation not observation. Pollutant deposition depends on the
concentration of pollutants in the atmosphere, and the results are consistent
with the high concentration of BC (from smoke) and dust particles in the
glacier and snow surface samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Snow albedo reduction</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1992">Spectral variation in albedo for winter sampling sites and selected
mass absorption cross-section (MAC) values: <bold>(a)</bold> average albedo of
samples at each of the sites; <bold>(b)</bold> daily mean albedo reduction of
fresh snow (site S6) and aged snow (site S1) snow (note different scales of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis); <bold>(c)</bold> albedo of fresh snow site S6; <bold>(d)</bold> albedo of
aged snow site S1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/4981/2018/acp-18-4981-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page4989?><p id="d1e2020">The albedo of individual winter snow samples was calculated using the SNICAR
model and then averaged for each site (S1 to S6). Figure 3a shows the average
for each site across the visible and infrared spectrum. Two sites were chosen
for further analysis: S1 (Sost), which had the highest average concentration
of BC, and S6 (Kalam), which had the lowest average concentration of BC. The
albedo was simulated for selected MAC values and SZA for samples at the two
sites, as described in Sect. 2.4 (“Methods”). The values for the
average albedo of samples from the two sites simulated for MAC values of 7.5,
11, and 15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and SZA of 57.0–88.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (daytime) under
a clear sky ranged from 0.39 (site S1, BC only, midday, MAC
15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 0.85 (site S6, dust only, early evening, MAC
7.5–15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The detailed values are shown in Table S3.</p>
      <p id="d1e2096">The percentage change in albedo was calculated in absolute terms as the
change between albedo values with a pollutant (BC or dust or both) and a
reference albedo value with zero pollutants (zero BC and dust
concentration). Table 2 shows the calculated percentage reductions in daily
minimum, maximum, and mean broadband snow albedo at different MAC values
(7.5, 11, 15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) resulting from the average BC, dust, and combined BC
and dust concentrations found in samples at each of the sites. The reduction
was strongly dependent on BC concentration and almost independent of dust
concentration and increased with increasing MAC value. The results suggest
that BC was the dominant forcing factor, rather than dust, influencing
glacial surface albedo and accelerating glacier melt. BC was found to play
an important role in forcing in the northern Tibetan Plateau (Li et al.,
2016), whereas in the central Tibetan Plateau and the Himalayas, dust played a
more important role (Qu et al., 2014; Kaspari et al., 2014). The MAC value
affected the albedo more in the visible range than at 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (near-infrared) wavelength (Fig. 3c, d). The combined concentration of BC and dust,
or BC alone, strongly reduced the snow albedo for a given combination of
other input parameters. The effect at the low-pollutant site (S6) was small:
the values for daytime snow albedo at 0.975 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m due to BC, or BC plus
dust with different MAC and SZA, ranged from 0.70 to 0.83, with a reduction
in daily mean albedo of 1.8 to 2.9 %, and those for dust alone range from 0.79
to 0.85, with a reduction in daily mean albedo of less than 0.1 %. The
effect at the high-pollutant site (S1) was much more marked: BC or BC and
dust reduced daytime snow albedo to values ranging from 0.39 to 0.64, a
reduction in daily mean albedo of 8.8 to 12.0 %, but the effect of dust
alone was still low, with values of 0.70 to 0.78, again representing a reduction in daily
mean albedo of less than 0.1 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e2134">Both the snow albedo and the impact of light-absorbing particles depend on a
range of factors including the SZA, snow depth, snow grain size, and snow
density. For example, the snow albedo reduction due to BC is known to be
less in the presence of other light-absorbing particles as these<?pagebreak page4990?> will absorb
some of the available solar radiation (Kaspari et al., 2011). The snow
albedo calculated for our samples was strongly dependent on the SZA with
albedo increasing with decreasing SZA, especially at near-infrared
wavelengths (Table S3).</p>
      <p id="d1e2138">The impact of snow ageing was also investigated. The winter samples from S1
(Sost) were aged snow, whereas those from S6 (Kalam) were fresh snow (Table 1, Fig. S5b, c). Not only was dust clearly visible on the surface of the
aged snow, the grain size was large and the snow was dense. The aged snow
had a much higher concentration of BC and dust, which reduced the albedo,
but the extent of reduction is also affected by other factors. Albedo
reduction by BC and dust particles is known to be greater for aged snow than
for fresh snow (Warren and Wiscombe, 1985). In our samples, the calculated
reduction in snow albedo for high MAC values (15) compared to low MAC values
(7.5) was greater in aged snow than in fresh snow (Fig. 3b). The effective
grain size of snow increases with time as water surrounds the grains. Snow
with a larger grain size absorbs more radiation because the light can
penetrate deeper into the snowpack, thus decreasing surface albedo (Flanner and Charles, 2006) . In the melting season, the snowpack becomes optically thin
and more particles are concentrated near the surface layer, which further
increases the effect on albedo.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2144">Snow albedo reduction (%) by black carbon, dust, and black carbon
plus dust at the site with the lowest average pollutant concentration (S6)
and the site with the highest average pollutant concentration (S1) under
different mass absorption cross-section (MAC) values.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pollutant</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MAC value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Low-concentration site (S6) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">High-concentration site (S1) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daytime min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Daytime max</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Daily mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Daytime min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Daytime max</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Daily mean</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Black carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">32.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Black carbon and dust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">32.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2485">The estimated reduction in snow albedo by dust and BC (up to 29 % of the daytime maximum value, Table 2) was higher than that reported by others for
high Asia based on farmers' recordings (e.g., 1.5 to 4.6 % reported by Nair
et al., 2013) and in the Himalayas (Ming et al., 2008; Kaspari et al., 2014;
Gertler et al., 2016). However, although the values were relatively high,
they were at the same level or lower than the estimates for an albedo reduction
of 28 % by BC and 56 % by dust in clean ice samples and of 36 % by BC
and 29 % by dust in aged snow samples, reported by Qu et al. (2014) for
surface samples from the Zhadang glacier, China. Simulation results by Ming
et al. (2013) showed BC, dust, and grain growth to reduce the broadband albedo
by 11, 28, and 61 %, respectively, in a snowpack in central Tibet.
Dust was the most significant contributor to albedo reduction when mixed
inside the snow and ice or when the glacier was covered in bare ice. In our
case BC was a more influential factor than dust during a similar study
period to that reported by Li et al. (2017), indicating that BC plays a
major role in albedo reduction.</p>
      <p id="d1e2488">The possible reasons for the relatively high values for albedo reduction in
our samples include the lower elevation of the sampling locations,
relatively high concentrations of BC and dust, high MAC values, low snow
thickness, underlying ground quality, the presence of small and large towns near
the sampling sites, and the predominance of aged snow samples. Most of the
samples collected in winter were from places with a snow depth of less than 50 cm (Fig. S5a); thus, mud, stones, and clay below the snow layer would be
expected to increase the absorption of solar radiation and reduce the
albedo.</p>
      <p id="d1e2491">The high albedo reduction in the visible range of the electromagnetic
spectrum could be due to the relatively high concentration of surface
snow impurities. The total amount of deposited particles in the surface
layer of aged snow was relatively high, indicating a high deposition rate of
atmospheric pollutants.</p>
      <p id="d1e2495">Flanner et al. (2007) reported that BC emission and snow ageing are the two
largest sources of uncertainty in albedo estimates. The uncertainties in our
estimated albedo reduction include the BC type (uncoated or sulfate coated),
the size distribution of dust concentration, the accuracy of snow grain
size, snow texture, snow density, and the albedo of the underlying ground.
Sulfate-coated particles have an absorbing sulfate shell surrounding the
carbon; recent studies confirm that coated BC has a larger absorbing power
than non-coated BC (Naoe et al., 2009). We used uncoated black carbon
concentration in the SNICAR model, but the pollutants at the remote site are
presumed to be mainly from long-range transport; thus, the BC may have gained
some coating. The albedo reduction for sulfate-coated black carbon was
calculated to be 3–8.5 % higher, depending on the MAC and SZA values,
than for uncoated black carbon at the low-concentration site S6 (Fig. S6).
The snow grain size (snow aging) and snow texture are also large sources of
uncertainty. The effect of snow grain size is generally larger than the
uncertainty in light-absorbing particles and varies with the snow type
(Schmale et al., 2017). The albedo reduction caused by 100 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
BC for an effective snow grain radius of 80, 100, or 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m was calculated to be 0.017, 0.019, or 0.021,
respectively. The snow grain size was measured with a hand lens with an
accuracy of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m; thus, the associated uncertainty in the albedo
results was at least 0.002. The snow grain shape was measured with the help
of a snow card, but a spherical shape was assumed for snow grains in the
(online) SNICAR albedo simulation model. The albedo of nonspherical grains
is higher than the albedo of spherical grains (Chen et al., 2016), and the
shape of snow grains and/or ice crystals changes significantly with snow age
and meteorological conditions during and after snowfall (LaChapelle, 1969). A
number of recent studies (e.g., Flanner et al., 2012; Liou et al., 2014; He
et al., 2014, 2017) have shown that both snow grain shape and aerosol–snow
internal mixing play an important role in snow albedo calculations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Radiative forcing</title>
      <p id="d1e2530">RF is a measure of the capacity of a forcing agent to
affect the energy balance in the atmosphere – the difference between
sunlight absorbed by the Earth and energy radiated back to space – thereby
contributing to climate change. Changes in albedo contribute directly to
radiative forcing: a decrease in albedo means that more radiation will be
absorbed and the temperature will rise. In snow and ice, the additional
energy<?pagebreak page4991?> absorbed by any pollutants present also increases and accelerates the
melting rate.</p>
      <p id="d1e2533">Various authors have described the impact of albedo change in snow and ice
on radiative forcing. Zhang et al. (2017) reported that a reduction in
albedo by 9 to 64 % can increase the instantaneous radiative forcing
by as much as 24.05–323.18 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Nair et al. (2013) estimated that in
aged snow a BC concentration of 10–200 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> can increase radiative
forcing by 2.6 to 28.1 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while Yang et al. (2015) reported
radiative forcing of 18–21 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for aged snow in samples from the
westernmost Tibetan Plateau. The authors used different atmospheric
conditions in the forcing estimates: Zhang et al. (2017) used midlatitude
winter with a clear sky and a cloudy environment, Nair et al. (2013)
midlatitude winter, and Yang et al. (2015) clear-sky and cloudy conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2584">We calculated the radiative forcing in the samples assessed for daytime
albedo and daily (24 h) mean albedo. The radiative forcing at different
daylight times caused by BC deposition varied from 3.93 to 43.44 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(3.93–11.54 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the low-BC site and 20.88–43.45 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at the high-BC site) and that cause by dust from 0.16 to 2.08 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.16–0.30 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the low-BC site and 1.38–2.08 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at the high-BC site) (detailed values given in Table S4),
indicating that BC was the dominant factor. The radiative forcing due to
combined BC and dust was very similar to that for BC alone. In contrast,
studies by others have shown higher forcing by dust than by BC based on the
optical properties and size distribution of dust particles (Qu et al.,
2014). In our study, the increase in daily mean radiative forcing ranged
from 0.1 % for dust only at the low-pollutant site to 14.9 % for BC at
the high-pollutant site. However, dust forcing varies strongly with dust
optical properties, source material, and particle size distribution. The
properties for dust are unique in each of the four size bins used in the
SNICAR online model. These size bins represent partitions of a lognormal
size distribution. We used an estimated size of dust particles and generic
dust properties in the model, but some dust particles can have a larger
impact on snow albedo than the dust applied here (e.g., Painter et al.,
2007).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2662">Daily mean radiative forcing reduction and albedo reduction (%)
caused by black carbon and dust for different mass absorption cross-section
values (MAC) in <bold>(a)</bold> fresh (low black carbon) and <bold>(b)</bold> aged
(high black carbon) snow samples (note different scales of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/4981/2018/acp-18-4981-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2685">Both radiative forcing and albedo reduction increased with decreasing
daytime SZA, indicating higher melting at midday compared to morning and
evening. Figure 4 shows the<?pagebreak page4992?> daily mean albedo reduction and corresponding
radiative forcing caused by BC for fresh (low-BC) and aged (high-BC) snow
with different MAC values. Snow aging (snow grain size) plays an important
role in albedo reduction and radiative forcing. According to
Schmale et al. (2017) the effect of snow grain size is
generally larger than the uncertainty in light-absorbing particles, which
varies with snow type. Snow aging reduces snow albedo and accelerates snowmelt, but the impact of snow aging on BC in snow and the induced forcing is
complex and includes spatial and seasonal variation (Qian et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e2688">An increase in MAC value from 7.5 to 15 led to an increase in radiative
forcing by 1.48 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in fresh snow and 4.04 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in aged snow.
This suggests that when the surface of snow, ice, and glaciers experiences
strong melting, enrichment with BC and dust could cause more forcing.
Previous studies of ice cores and snow pits probably underestimated the
albedo reduction and radiative forcing in glacier regions as samples were
taken from high-elevation areas where there is less ageing and melting and
thus lower surface enrichment of BC and dust than at lower elevation. Our
results are higher than those reported in other studies on the northern
slope of the Himalayas (Ming et al., 2012), on the western Tibetan Plateau (Yang et
al., 2015), and the Tien Shan (Ming et al., 2016). However, they are
comparable to values for radiative forcing reported more recently by others,
for example for the Muji glacier (Yang et al., 2015), Zhadang glacier (Qu et
al., 2014), in high Asia (Flanner et al., 2007; Nair et al., 2013), and in
the Arctic (Wang et al., 2011; Flanner, 2013). The results suggest that
the enrichment of black carbon (in our case) and mineral dust (other authors)
can lead to the increased absorption of solar radiation, exerting a stronger
effect on climate and accelerating glacier melt.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Potential source regions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <title>Wind vector maps</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2729">Monthly average horizontal wind patterns at 850 hPa during
<bold>(a)</bold> May, <bold>(b)</bold> June, <bold>(c)</bold> December, and
<bold>(d)</bold> January, corresponding to approximately 2500 m a.s.l., from NASA Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC). Red star indicates the position of the study area, and white lines
indicate streamlines. The background colors show monthly mean aerosol optical
depth.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/4981/2018/acp-18-4981-2018-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2750">Figure 5 shows the spatial variance of wind vector maps (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
850 hPa in May, June, January, and December prepared using MERRA-2
reanalysis data for the year 2015–2016. The wind blows primarily from west
to east, but there were variations over the year. Central Asia contributed
some part of the air in May and June. In May, the prevailing air masses were
from Syria, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Iraq, Azerbaijan, northwest Iran,
Afghanistan, Nepal, southwest China, and southern Pakistan; the trend was
similar in June but with a smaller contribution from Nepal and southwest
China. In December and January (winter), the western trade winds were
stronger than the easterlies and the wind blew from Azerbaijan and northwest
Iran, reaching the study site via Syria, Iraq, Turkmenistan, and Afghanistan.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <title>Coupled emissions inventory with back air trajectory</title>
      <p id="d1e2774">Trajectory analysis using the HYSPLIT model showed that in May and June 2015, air parcels reached the study site along three different pathways: one from
north Asia (Russia) via central Asia (Kazakhstan); one from western Asia
(Cyprus and Syria) via central and southern Asia (Georgia),; and one via
India, which was more local (Fig. 6). The trajectories in summer had
distinct pathways, while those in winter were dispersed in all directions,
partially covering west, east, and south Asia and completely covering
central Asia. Figure 6 shows the product of extinction and emission
calculated along the pathways of trajectories calculated using the vertical
profile for aerosol extinction over the study region obtained from the
monthly CALIPSO satellite-based extinction data. Scattering and absorption
decreased exponentially with increasing elevation (Fig. S1) but were still
visible at elevations above 5 km in summer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2779">Source contribution regions of pollutants identified using an
emissions inventory (Representative Concentration Pathways) coupled with back
trajectories: <bold>(a)</bold> 77 simulated days; <bold>(b)</bold> 63 simulated days.
Red star indicates the position of the study area.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/4981/2018/acp-18-4981-2018-f06.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2794">The RCP emission data combined with back trajectories and extinction data
showed that the hot spot regions of pollution that affected the study sites
during winter were mainly to the southwest rather than very distant (Fig. 6b). Iran, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the eastern part of Turkey,
and the southwestern part of Russia all showed comparatively high-pollutant
emissions in winter which moved towards northern Pakistan. The western part
of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and northeastern Turkey emitted particularly high
concentrations of pollutants.</p>
      <p id="d1e2797">The combination of the back-trajectory results and surface-wind direction
analysis indicated that during the sampling months, aerosols were
significantly influenced by the long-range transport of pollutants coming
from central and south Asia, with a small contribution from west and east
Asia. This differs somewhat from previous reports which suggested that the
Tibetan Plateau and Himalayan region are mainly affected by pollutants from
east and south Asia (Zhang et al., 2015). An increasing trend has been
reported for black carbon emissions in central and south Asia over the past
150 years (Bond et al., 2007), and a significant increase has been found in
black carbon concentrations in glacier snow in west China in the last 20 years, especially during the summer and monsoon seasons (Ming et al., 2008).
In south Asia, the largest source of atmospheric black carbon is emission
from biomass and biofuels used for cooking and heating (dung, crop residues,
wood) (Venkataraman et al., 2005).</p>
      <?pagebreak page4993?><p id="d1e2801">The results indicate that only a low level of pollutants (minor contribution)
reached the study area from northwest China. BC particles emitted from
distant low-latitude source regions such as tropical Africa barely reach the
Tibetan Plateau and Himalayan regions because their emissions are removed
along the transport pathways during the summer monsoon season (Zhang et al.,
2015).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS3">
  <title>Chemical transport modeling</title>
      <p id="d1e2811">The contribution of pollutants from potential source regions was also
investigated using the WRF-STEM model with tagged carbon monoxide tracers
and source regions of east Asia, south Asia, central Asia, the Middle East,
Europe, the Russian Federation, and west Asia. (The individual countries in
the regions are listed in Table S5.)</p>
      <p id="d1e2814">Figure 7 shows the results of the model simulations for summer (1 June to 4 July 2015) and winter (15 December 2015 to 17 January 2016) at two glacier
sites (Sachin and Shangla), where the model terrain elevation was close to
the observation terrain elevation. The model simulations showed Pakistan to
be the major contributor of pollutants in summer (77 % at Shangla and
43 % at Sachin) followed by the south Asian countries. The south Asian
countries were the major contributor in winter (47 % at Shangla and 71 % at Sachin) followed by
Pakistan, which is in line with the findings by Lu et al. (2012) that south
Asia contributed 67 % black carbon in the Himalayas. There were minor
contributions of 2–7 % of pollutants from Afghanistan, Iran, central
Asia, and the Middle East and extremely small amounts from east Asia,
Europe, Africa, west Asia, and China. The contribution from Iran, the Middle
East, and Europe was greater in winter than in summer, while the
contribution from central Asia and China was greater in summer than in
winter. The proportion of daily contributions fluctuated considerably, with
higher contributions from Iran, the Middle East, and Europe on individual
days in winter, ranging, for example, from 2 to 30 % for the Middle East.</p>
      <p id="d1e2817">The concentration of hydrophobic BC (BC1), hydrophilic BC (BC2), and total
black carbon (BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC2) given by the model for the Sachin glacier
grid point in the summer and winter seasons is shown in the Supplement (Fig. S7). In<?pagebreak page4994?> the model, freshly emitted BC particles are
hydrophobic and gradually acquire a hygroscopic coating over time. A time
series analysis of BC1 and BC2 concentrations shows the influence of both
freshly emitted BC and aged BC reaching the observation location. The
highest concentration of BC1 was observed on 20 December 2015 and the
second highest on 25 June 2015, indicating an influence from freshly
emitted air masses in both the summer and winter months. Future studies (BC
tracer) will evaluate the details of the different source regions of the BC
reaching the glaciers compared to region-tagged CO tracers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS4">
  <title>Comparison of the different approaches used to identify potential
source regions</title>
      <p id="d1e2840">The high-BC concentration in the atmosphere over the study region was
attributed to long-range transport from urban source regions. Potential
source regions of the pollutants deposited on glaciers and snow were
identified using wind vector mapping with MERRA-2 reanalyzed data,
calculation of back air trajectories using the HYSPLIT-4 model, and chemical
transport pathways using the WRF-STEM tagged chemical transport model. The
back-trajectory results indicated that the majority of pollutants in summer
were from central and south Asia, and those in winter were from Iran, Pakistan, Iraq,
Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Jordan, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Libya, and Egypt. The WRF-STEM model indicated that most anthropogenic pollutants
were from Pakistan and south Asia during both summer and winter. However,
both approaches showed a reasonable contribution from central Asian
countries and a limited contribution from east Asian countries in summer. The
wind vector maps also indicated that the study site was mostly affected by
westerly winds. All three approaches showed a reasonable contribution from
neighboring countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and India in
specific months. Overall, the results indicate that south, central, and west
Asia were the major sources of the pollutants detected at the sampling
sites.</p>
      <p id="d1e2843">There was some mismatching in source regions among the three approaches. The
WRF-STEM model and wind vector maps both identified a small contribution
from east Asia, but this was not identified in the back trajectories
approach. Similarly, the wind vector maps and back air trajectories showed a
dominant contribution from the west, while the WRF-STEM model showed a major
contribution from Pakistan and south Asia. The differences in the results
obtained by the different methods may be due in part to the complex
topography of the region and the different altitudes used in the methods, the coarse resolution of the WRF-STEM model, and differences in the emission
source inventories and meteorological parameters used by the WRF-STEM and
HYSPLIT-4 models. The limitations of using back trajectories to identify
source regions is discussed further in a paper by Jaffe et al. (1999).</p>
      <p id="d1e2846">Furthermore, the atmospheric BC concentration over the Himalayas has
significant temporal variations associated with synoptic and mesoscale
changes in the advection pattern (Babu et al., 2011) which can affect
pollutant transport and deposition. The large uncertainty among different
emission inventories can also affect the results, especially in the
Himalayan region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2851">Source contribution regions of carbon monoxide for selected sites
identified by WRF-STEM during <bold>(a)</bold> summer and <bold>(b)</bold> winter.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/4981/2018/acp-18-4981-2018-f07.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page4995?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e2874">BC and OC concentrations were measured using
thermal optical analysis of snow and ice surface samples collected from
glacier and mountain valleys in northern Pakistan in summer, autumn, and
winter. The samples contained high concentrations of BC, OC, and dust in low-elevation glaciers and surface snow in mountain valleys. The samples from
Sost contained the highest average concentration of BC in mountain valley
snow (winter) and those from Kalam the lowest, probably due to the impact of
snow age and an increased concentration of black carbon and dust (the Sost
samples were aged snow, and Kalam samples were fresh snow). The average
concentration of BC in surface samples from the Sachin glacier was higher in
autumn than in summer; the BC values in summer snow samples collected from
the Sachin and Gulkin glaciers (aged snow from the glacier surface) were
much higher than those in ice. The average BC concentration in summer
samples collected from glaciers was 2130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1560 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and that
in autumn samples 2883 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3439 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average concentration of
OC was 1839 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1108 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer samples, 1423 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 208 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn samples, and 1342 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 672 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter
samples, with the highest variability in summer samples. The individual
lowest BC (82 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC (129 ng g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were
observed in summer samples collected from the Gulkin and Sachin glaciers,
respectively. Dust and other pollutants were clearly visible on aged snow
and ice surfaces; the results indicate considerable enrichment during
ageing. The pollutant concentrations in our samples were relatively higher
than those reported by others in earlier studies, which tended to focus on
the accumulation area of glaciers (e.g., ice cores and snow pits), where
enrichment influences are less marked and measured values are likely to be
lower, and on high-elevation areas, where the deposition of pollutants is expected
to be lower. It is likely that pollutant concentrations were underestimated
in these earlier studies, particularly when there was strong surface
melting.</p>
      <p id="d1e3004">Snow albedo was calculated for winter samples using the SNICAR model with
various combinations of BC and dust concentrations, three values for MAC,
and a range of values for SZA (57–88.89<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during daytime),
with other parameters kept constant. BC was the major component responsible
for albedo reduction; dust had little effect. The reduction by BC ranged
from 2.8 to 32.5 % during daytime, which<?pagebreak page4996?> is quite high, with albedo
reduced to below 0.6. The reduction was greater for higher concentrations of
BC and greater MAC. The reduction in 24 h average albedo ranged from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07–2.9 % for fresh snow samples and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05–12.0 %
for aged snow. Changes in albedo contribute directly to radiative forcing: a
decrease in albedo means that more radiation will be absorbed and the
temperature will rise. The radiative forcing by BC was also higher than that
caused by dust, indicating that BC was the dominant factor. The daytime
albedo values in winter snow samples ranged from 0.39 to 0.82 with BC alone
or BC plus dust and from 0.70 to 0.85 with dust alone; the corresponding
radiative forcing was 3.93–43.44 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for BC alone, 4.01–43.45 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for BC and dust, and 0.16–2.08 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with dust alone. The
radiative forcing calculated from the daily mean albedo reduction ranged
from 0.1 % for dust only at the low-pollutant site to 14.9 % for BC at
the high-pollutant site. The potential source regions of the pollutants
deposited on glaciers and snow were identified using spatial variance in
wind vector maps, emission inventories coupled with back air trajectories,
and region-tagged chemical transport modeling. The wind vector maps
identified central Asian and south Asian countries (such as Azerbaijan,
Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, and Turkey) as more important.
The trajectory analysis coupled with emission inventories showed that air
parcels reached northern Pakistan along three pathways: one from north Asia
(Russia) via central Asia (Kazakhstan), one from western Asia (Cyprus and
Syria) via central and southern Asia (Georgia), and one via India.
The combination of the back-trajectory results and surface-wind direction
analysis indicated that aerosols were significantly influenced by the
long-range transport of pollutants from central and south Asia. The
region-tagged chemical transport model indicated that Pakistan and south
Asia were the main contributors of pollutants. Analysis based on the
WRF-STEM model identified a significant contribution from Pakistan (up to
77 %) and south Asia (up to 71 %) at selected sites. Overall, the
results indicate that central, south, and west Asia were the major sources
of the pollutants detected at the sampling sites, with only a small
contribution from east Asia.</p>
      <p id="d1e3067">The overall uncertainty of the BC and OC concentrations was estimated, taking into account the analytical precision of concentration measurements
and the mass contribution from field blanks. The uncertainty in the BC and
OC mass concentrations was calculated from the standard deviation of the
field blanks, the experimentally determined analytical uncertainty, and the
projected uncertainty associated with filter extraction. The major source of
uncertainty was the effect of dust on the OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e3077">The albedo reduction from OC was not quantified. The contribution of OC to
total visible absorption in the top snow layer is relatively small compared
to that of BC and dust but has been shown to be significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 % of the total solar visible absorption) in several regions, including
northeastern east Asia and western Canada (Yasunari et al., 2015). Snow
grain size (snow aging) and snow texture were probably the main sources of
uncertainty in the albedo reduction/radiative forcing calculations. The
measured grain size was generally different from the effective optical grain
size used in the SNICAR modeling, and although snow grain shape was
measured, the results were not used in the online SNICAR albedo simulation
model, which assumes a spherical shape for snow grains. This could slightly
affect the results because the albedo of nonspherical grain is higher than
the albedo of spherical grains (Chen et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e3088">The possible uncertainties on the modeling side relate to the use of CO as a
tracer for light-absorbing particles to identify the source region.
Uncertainties are also attributed to errors in the emission inventories,
simulated meteorology, and removal processes built into the model. The
physics and chemistry of removal of BC and CO differ, especially in the wet
season. However, we analyzed the model during pre-monsoon and relatively dry
periods when there should be a relatively good correlation in the transport
of CO and BC. The global emission inventories used are unable to capture
emissions at a local scale, and the contribution of local sources may also
be underestimated by coarse-resolution models. High-resolution models and
emission inventories at a local scale are required to capture local
emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3091">Better constrained measurements will be required to obtain more robust
results. High-resolution satellite imagery, high-resolution models, and
continuous monitoring will help to reduce the present uncertainty.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3099">The data can be accessed at
<uri>http://shichang-kang.sklcs.ac.cn</uri> (Kang and Jie, 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3105"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4981-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4981-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e3111">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><?pagebreak page4997?><p id="d1e3117">This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(41630754, 41671067, 41721091), the Chinese Academy of Sciences
(QYZDJ-SSW-DQC039), the State Key Laboratory of Cryosphere Science
(SKLCS-ZZ-2017), program funding to ICIMOD from the governments of Sweden
and Norway, and ICIMOD core funds contributed by the governments of
Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar,
Nepal, Norway, Pakistan, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Acknowledgement is also due to  A. Beatrice Murray for English editing of
the manuscript. The authors would like to thank both the anonymous
reviewers, whose reviews were extremely helpful in enhancing the quality of
the manuscript. We would also like to convey our gratitude to the editor for
the smooth handling of the manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: Robert McLaren
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adhikary, B., Carmichael, G. R., Kulkarni, S., Wei, C., Tang, Y., D'Allura,
A., Mena-Carrasco, M., Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., Pierce, R. B., Al-Saadi, J.
A., Emmons, L. K., Pfister, G. G., Avery, M. A., Barrick, J. D., Blake, D.
R., Brune, W. H., Cohen, R. C., Dibb, J. E., Fried, A., Heikes, B. G., Huey,
L. G., O'Sullivan, D. W., Sachse, G. W., Shetter, R. E., Singh, H. B.,
Campos, T. L., Cantrell, C. A., Flocke, F. M., Dunlea, E. J., Jimenez, J. L.,
Weinheimer, A. J., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Schauer, J. J., Stone, E.
A., Jaffe, D. A., and Reidmiller, D. R.: A regional scale modeling analysis
of aerosol and trace gas distributions over the eastern Pacific during the
INTEX-B field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2091–2115,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2091-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2091-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aoki, T., Kuchiki, K., Niwano, M., Kodama, Y., Hosaka, M., and Tanaka, T.:
Physically based snow albedo model for calculating broadband albedos and the
solar heating profile in snowpack for general circulation models, J. Geophys.
Res. Atmos., 116, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015507</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Babu, S. S., Chaubey, J. P., Krishna Moorthy, K., Gogoi, M. M., Kompalli, S.
K., Sreekanth, V., Bagare, S. P., Bhatt, B. C., Gaur, V. K., Prabhu, T. P.,
and Singh, N. S.: High altitude (4520 m amsl) measurements of black carbon
aerosols over western trans-Himalayas: Seasonal heterogeneity and source
apportionment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D24201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016722</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Bhardwaj, E., Dong, R., Jogani, R., Jung, S., Roden, C.,
Streets, D. G., and Trautmann, N. M.: Historical emissions of black and
organic carbon aerosol from energy-related combustion, 1850–2000, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB2018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002840</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Boparai, P., Lee, J., and Bond, T. C.: Revisiting Thermal-Optical Analyses of
Carbonaceous Aerosol Using a Physical Model, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
930–948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802360690" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802360690</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Ho, K. F., Zhang, X. Y., Zou, S. C., Fung, K., Chow,
J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosol in Pearl
River Delta Region, China during 2001 winter period, Atmos. Environ., 37,
1451–1460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01002-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01002-6</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, D., Wang, Y., McElroy, M. B., He, K., Yantosca, R. M.,
and Le Sager, P.: Regional CO pollution and export in China
simulated by the high-resolution nested-grid GEOS-Chem model, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 3825–3839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3825-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3825-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cong, Z., Kawamura, K., Kang, S., Fu, P., River, G., River, Y., and River,
Y.: Penetration of biomass-burning emissions from South Asia through the
Himalayas?: new insights from, Scientific report, 5, 9580, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep09580</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Déry, S. J. and Brown, R. D.: Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover
extent trends and implications for the snow-albedo feedback, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L22504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031474" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031474</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Doherty, S. J., Grenfell, T. C., Forsström, S., Hegg, D. L., Brandt, R.
E., and Warren, S. G.: Observed vertical redistribution of black carbon and
other insoluble light-absorbing particles in melting snow, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 5553–5569, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50235</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An Overview of the HYSPLIT_4
Modelling System for Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition, Aust.
Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Fitzgerald, W. F.: Clean hands, dirty hands: Clair Patterson and the aquatic
biogeochemistry of mercury, in: Clean Hands: Clair Patterson's crusade
against environmental lead contamination, 119–137, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G.: Arctic climate sensitivity to local black carbon, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1840–1851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50176</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G. and Zender, C. S.: Linking snowpack microphysics and albedo
evolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006834</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T., and Rasch, P. J.:
Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008003</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Liu, X., Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., and Jiao, C.: Enhanced
solar energy absorption by internally-mixed black carbon in snow grains,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4699–4721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Hess, P. G., Mahowald, N. M., Painter, T. H.,
Ramanathan, V., and Rasch, P. J.: Springtime warming and reduced snow cover
from carbonaceous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2481–2497,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gertler, C. G., Puppala, S. P., Panday, A., Stumm, D., and Shea, J.: Black
carbon and the Himalayan cryosphere: A review, Atmos. Environ., 125,
404–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.078</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gillette, D. A., Blifford, I. H., and Fryrear, D. W.: Influence of wind velocity on
size distributions of aerosols generated by wind erosion of soils, J.
Geophys. Res., 79, 4068–4075, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i027p04068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC079i027p04068</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled chemistry within the WRF model,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gul, C., Kang, S., Ghauri, B., Haq, M., Muhammad, S., and Ali, S.: Using
Landsat images to monitor changes in the snow-covered area of selected
glaciers in northern Pakistan, J. Mt. Sci., 14, 2013–2027,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4097-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11629-016-4097-x</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, J. and Nazarenko, L.: Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 423–428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237157100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2237157100</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Nazarenko, L., Lacis, A., Schmidt, G. A.,
Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Bell, N., Cairns, B., Canuto,
V., Chandler, M., Cheng, Y., Del Genio, A., Faluvegi, G., Fleming, E.,
Friend, A., Hall, T., Jackman, C., Kelley, M., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lean, J.,
Lerner, J., Lo, K., Menon, S., Miller, R., Minnis, P., Novakov, T., Oinas,
V., Perlwitz, J., Perlwitz, J., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Shindell, D., Stone,
P., Sun,<?pagebreak page4998?> S., Tausnev, N., Thresher, D., Wielicki, B., Wong, T., Yao, M., and
Zhang, S.: Efficacy of climate forcings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,
D18104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd005776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd005776</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>He, C.,  Li, Q.,  Liou, K.-N.,  Takano, Y.,  Gu, Y.,  Qi, L.,  Mao, Y., and  Leung, L. R.:
Black carbon radiative forcing over the Tibetan Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 7806–7813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062191" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062191</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>He, C., Takano, Y., Liou, K.-N., Yang, P.,  Li, Q., and  Chen, F.: Impact of Snow Grain Shape and Black Carbon-Snow Internal
Mixing on Snow Optical Properties: Parameterizations for Climate Models, J.
Climate, 30, 1253–1268, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0300.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0300.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Horvath, H.: Atmospheric light absorption – A review, Atmos. Environ., 27A,
293–317, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Immerzeel, W. W., van Beek, L. P. H., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Climate change
will affect the Asian water towers, Science, 328, 1382–1385,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1183188</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Climate response of fossil fuel and biofuel soot,
accounting for soot's feedback to snow and sea ice albedo and emissivity, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D21201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004945" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004945</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jaffe, D., Anderson, T., Covert, D., Kotchenruther, R., Trost, B.,
Danielson, J., Simpson, W., Blake, D., Harris, J., and Carmichael, G.:
Transport of Asian air pollution to North America, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
711–714, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kang, S. and Jie, Y.: BC-OC-dust in snow and glacier in Pakistan, available at: <uri>http://shichang-kang.sklcs.ac.cn</uri>,  last access: 10 April 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kaspari, S., Painter, T. H., Gysel, M., Skiles, S. M., and Schwikowski, M.:
Seasonal and elevational variations of black carbon and dust in snow and ice
in the Solu-Khumbu, Nepal and estimated radiative forcings, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 8089–8103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8089-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8089-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kaspari, S. D., Schwikowski, M., Gysel, M., Flanner, M. G., Kang, S., Hou,
S., and Mayewski, P. A.: Recent increase in black carbon concentrations from
a Mt. Everest ice core spanning 1860–2000 AD, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
11–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046096</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>LaChapelle, E. R.: Field guide to snow crystals, University of Washington
Press, Seattie, Washington, USA, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J. and Hess, P. G.: Model analysis of the temporal and
geographical origin of the CO distribution during the TOPSE campaign, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002077</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Li, X., Kang, S., He, X., Qu, B., Tripathee, L., Jing, Z., Paudyal, R., Li,
Y., Zhang, Y., Yan, F., Li, G., and Li, C.: Light-absorbing impurities
accelerate glacier melt in the Central Tibetan Plateau, Sci. Total Environ.,
587-588, 482–490, p. 587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.169</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Chen, J., Kang, S., Li, C., Qu, B., Tripathee, L., Yan, F., Zhang,
Y., Guo, J., Gul, C., and Qin, X.: Impacts of black carbon and mineral dust
on radiative forcing and glacier melting during summer in the Qilian
Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, The Cryosphere Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2016-32" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-2016-32</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Liou, K. N.,  Takano, Y.,  He, C.,  Yang, P.,  Leung, L. R.,  Gu, Y., and
Lee, W. L.: Stochastic parameterization for light absorption by internally
mixed BC/dust in snow grains for application to climate models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 7616–7632, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021665</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., and Wang, S.: A novel back-trajectory
analysis of the origin of black carbon transported to the Himalayas and
Tibetan Plateau during 1996–2010, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L01809,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049903</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lüthi, Z. L., Škerlak, B., Kim, S.-W., Lauer, A., Mues, A., Rupakheti,
M., and Kang, S.: Atmospheric brown clouds reach the Tibetan Plateau by
crossing the Himalayas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6007–6021,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6007-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6007-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward, D.
S., and Flanner, M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and its
impact on the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 15, 53–71,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Ménégoz, M., Krinner, G., Balkanski, Y., Cozic, A., Boucher, O., and
Ciais, P.: Boreal and temperate snow cover variations induced by black carbon
emissions in the middle of the 21st century, The Cryosphere, 7, 537–554,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-537-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-537-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Ménégoz, M., Krinner, G., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Cozic, A., Lim, S.,
Ginot, P., Laj, P., Gallée, H., Wagnon, P., Marinoni, A., and Jacobi, H.
W.: Snow cover sensitivity to black carbon deposition in the Himalayas: from
atmospheric and ice core measurements to regional climate simulations, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 4237–4249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Menon, S., Koch, D., Beig, G., Sahu, S., Fasullo, J., and Orlikowski, D.:
Black carbon aerosols and the third polar ice cap, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
4559–4571, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Cachier, H., Xiao, C., Qin, D., Kang, S., Hou, S., and Xu, J.:
Black carbon record based on a shallow Himalayan ice core and its climatic
implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1343–1352,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1343-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1343-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Xiao, C., Cachier, H., Qin, D., Qin, X., Li, Z., and Pu, J.: Black
Carbon (BC) in the snow of glaciers in west China and its potential effects
on albedos, Atmos. Res., 92, 114–123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.007</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Du, Z., Xiao, C., Xu, X., and Zhang, D.: Darkening of the
mid-Himalaya glaciers since 2000 and the potential causes, Environ. Res.
Lett., 7, 014021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Xiao, C., Du, Z., and Yang, X.: An overview of black carbon
deposition in High Asia glaciers and its impacts on radiation balance, Adv.
Water Resour., 55, 80–87, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.015</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4999?><ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Xiao, C., Wang, F., Li, Z., and Li, Y.: Grey Tienshan Urumqi
Glacier No.1 and light-absorbing impurities, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 23,
9549–9558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6182-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-016-6182-7</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Muhammad, S. and Tian, L.: Changes in the ablation zones of glaciers in the
western Himalaya and the Karakoram between 1972 and 2015, Remote Sens.
Environ., 187, 505–512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.034</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K.,Sharma, A. K., Marinoni, A., and Ajai: Black carbon aerosols over the Himalayas: Direct and surface albedo
forcing, Tellus B, 65, 19738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.19738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.19738</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Naoe, H., Hasegawa, S., Heintzenberg, J., Okada, K., Uchiyama, A., Zaizen,
Y., Kobayashi, E., and Yamazaki, A.: State of mixture of atmospheric
submicrometer black carbon particles and its effect on particulate light
absorption, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1296–1301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.031</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Niu, H., Kang, S., Shi, X., Paudyal, R., He, Y., Li, G., and Wang, S.:
Science of the Total Environment In-situ measurements of light-absorbing
impurities in snow of glacier on Mt. Yulong and implications for radiative
forcing estimates, Sci. Total Environ., 581–582, 848–856,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.032</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Omar, A. H.,  Winker, D. M.,  Kittaka,  C.,  Vaughan, M. A.,
Hu, Z. L. Y., Trepte, C. R., Rogers, R. R., Ferrare, R. A., and Lee, K. P.,
Kuehn, R. E., and Hostetler, C. A.: The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol
Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
26, 1994–2014, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Barrett, A. P., Landry, C. C., Neff, J. C., Cassidy, M. P.,
Lawrence, C. R., McBride, K. E., and Farmer, G. L.: Impact of disturbed
desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L12502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030284" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030284</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Deems, J. S., Belnap, J., Hamlet, A. F., Landry, C. C., and
Udall, B.: Response of Colorado River runoff to dust radiative forcing in
snow, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 17125–17130,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913139107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0913139107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Pandolfi, M., Ripoll, A., Querol, X., and Alastuey, A.: Climatology of
aerosol optical properties and black carbon mass absorption cross section at
a remote high-altitude site in the western Mediterranean Basin, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 6443–6460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6443-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6443-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.: Transport
pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model
of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART), J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D0830114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010621</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Flanner, M. G., Leung, L. R., and Wang, W.: Sensitivity studies on
the impacts of Tibetan Plateau snowpack pollution on the Asian hydrological
cycle and monsoon climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1929–1948,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, R., and Flanner, M. G.: A sensitivity study on
modeling black carbon in snow and its radiative forcing over the Arctic and
Northern China, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 6,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064001</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Yasunari, T. J.,  Doherty, S. J.,  Flanner, M. G.,  Lau, W. K., Ming, J.,  Wang, H.,
Wang, M., Warren, S. G., and Zhang, R.: Light-absorbing Particles in Snow and
Ice: Measurement and Modeling of Climatic and Hydrological Impact, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 32, 64–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Qu, B., Ming, J., Kang, S.-C., Zhang, G.-S., Li, Y.-W., Li, C.-D., Zhao,
S.-Y., Ji, Z.-M., and Cao, J.-J.: The decreasing albedo of the Zhadang
glacier on western Nyainqentanglha and the role of light-absorbing
impurities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11117–11128,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11117-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11117-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schmale, J., Flanner, M., Kang, S., Sprenger, M., Zhang, Q., Guo, J., Li,
Y., Schwikowski, M., and Farinotti, D.: Modulation of snow reflectance and
snowmelt from Central Asian glaciers by anthropogenic black carbon, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 7, 40501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep40501</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Venkataraman, C., Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Miguel, A. H.,
and Friedlander, S. K.: Residential Biofuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous
Aerosol Emissions and Climate Impacts, Science, 307, 1454–1456,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1104359</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., He, X., Ye, B., and Yang, G.: Variations of Albedo on the
Dongkemadi Glacier, Tang gula Range, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,
34, 21–28, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Xu, B., Zhao, H., Cao, J., Joswiak, D., Wu, G., and Lin, S.: The
Influence of Dust on Quantitative Measurements of Black Carbon in Ice and
Snow when Using a Thermal Optical Method, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 60–69,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.605815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.605815</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Xu, B., Cao, J., Tie, X., Wang, H., Zhang, R., Qian, Y., Rasch, P.
J., Zhao, S., Wu, G., Zhao, H., Joswiak, D. R., Li, J., and Xie, Y.:
Carbonaceous aerosols recorded in a southeastern Tibetan glacier: analysis of
temporal variations and model estimates of sources and radiative forcing,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1191–1204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1191-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1191-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Mao, J., Leibensperger, E. M.,
Carouge, C. C., Le Sager, P., Kondo, Y., Jimenez, J. L., Cubison, M. J., and
Doherty, S. J.: Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon
in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 12453–12473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12453-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12453-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Chung, A., and Paulson, S. E.: The effect of metal salts on
quantification of elemental and organic carbon in diesel exhaust particles
using thermal-optical evolved gas analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
11447–11457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Pu, W., Ren, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Shi, J., Jin, H., Dai, M.,
and Chen, Q.: Observations and model simulations of snow albedo reduction in
seasonal snow due to insoluble light-absorbing particles during 2014 Chinese
survey, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2279–2296,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2279-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2279-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G.: Optical Properties of Snow (Paper 1R1505), Rev. Geophys.
Space Ge., 20, 67–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG020i001p00067</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G. and Wiscombe, W. J.: Dirty snow after nuclear war, Nature,
313, 467–470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/313467a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/313467a0</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Huang, X. H. H., Ng, W. M., Griffith, S. M., and Yu, J. Z.:
Inter-comparison of NIOSH and IMPROVE protocols for OC and EC determination:
implications for inter-protocol data conversion, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
4547–4560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4547-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4547-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Xu, B., Cao, J., Hansen, J., Yao, T., Joswia, D. R., Wang, N., Wu, G., Wang,
M., Zhao, H., Yang, W., Liu, X., and He, J.: Black soot<?pagebreak page5000?> and the survival of
Tibetan glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 22114–22118,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910444106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910444106</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Xu, B., Cao, J., Joswiak, D. R., Liu, X., Zhao, H., and He, J.:
Post-depositional enrichment of black soot in snow-pack and accelerated
melting of Tibetan glaciers, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 14022,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014022</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Yang, S., Xu, B., Cao, J., Zender, C. S., and Wang, M.: Climate effect of
black carbon aerosol in a Tibetan Plateau glacier, Atmos. Environ., 111,
71–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.016</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Yao, T., Thompson, L., Yang, W., Yu, W., Gao, Y., Guo, X., Yang, X., Duan,
K., Zhao, H., and Xu, B.: Different glacier status with atmospheric
circulations in Tibetan Plateau and surroundings, Nat. Clim. Change, 2,
663–667, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Yasunari, T. J., Bonasoni, P., Laj, P., Fujita, K., Vuillermoz, E., Marinoni,
A., Cristofanelli, P., Duchi, R., Tartari, G., and Lau, K.-M.: Estimated
impact of black carbon deposition during pre-monsoon season from Nepal
Climate Observatory – Pyramid data and snow albedo changes over Himalayan
glaciers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6603–6615,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6603-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6603-2010</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Yasunari, T. J., Koster, R. D., Lau, W. K. M., and Kim, K.: Impact of snow
darkening via dust, black carbon, and organic carbon on boreal spring climate
in the Earth system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 5485–5503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022977" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022977</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Kang, S., Fujita, K., Huintjes, E., Xu, J., Yamazaki, T.,
Haginoya, S., Wei, Y., Scherer, D., Schneider, C., and Yao, T.: Energy and
mass balance of Zhadang glacier surface, central Tibetan Plateau, J.
Glaciol., 59, 137–148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2013JoG12J152</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Hirabayashi, Y., Liu, Q., and Liu, S.: Glacier runoff and its
impact in a highly glacierized catchment in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau:
Past and future trends, J. Glaciol., 61, 713–730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2015JoG14J188</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Kang, S., Xu, M., Sprenger, M., Gao, T., Cong, Z., Li, C., Guo,
J., Xu, Z., Li, Y., Li, G., Li, X., Liu, Y., and Han, H.: Light-absorbing
impurities on Keqikaer Glacier in western Tien Shan?: concentrations and
potential impact on albedo reduction, Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 9,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1226.2017.00097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3724/SP.J.1226.2017.00097</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Concentrations and source regions of light-absorbing particles in snow/ice in northern Pakistan and their impact on snow albedo</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Black carbon (BC), water-insoluble organic carbon (OC), and mineral dust are
important particles in snow and ice which significantly reduce albedo and
accelerate melting. Surface snow and ice samples were collected from the
Karakoram–Himalayan region of northern Pakistan during 2015 and 2016 in
summer (six glaciers), autumn (two glaciers), and winter (six mountain
valleys). The average BC concentration overall was
2130 ± 1560 ng g<sup>−1</sup> in summer samples,
2883 ± 3439 ng g<sup>−1</sup> in autumn samples, and
992 ± 883 ng g<sup>−1</sup> in winter samples. The average water-insoluble
OC concentration overall was 1839 ± 1108 ng g<sup>−1</sup> in summer
samples, 1423 ± 208 ng g<sup>−1</sup> in autumn samples, and
1342 ± 672 ng g<sup>−1</sup> in winter samples. The overall concentration
of BC, OC, and dust in aged snow samples collected during the summer campaign
was higher than the concentration in ice samples. The values are relatively
high compared to reports by others for the Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau.
This is probably the result of taking more representative samples at lower
elevation where deposition is higher and the effects of ageing and enrichment
are more marked. A reduction in snow albedo of 0.1–8.3 % for fresh snow
and 0.9–32.5 % for aged snow was calculated for selected solar zenith
angles during daytime using the Snow, Ice, and Aerosol Radiation (SNICAR)
model. The daily mean albedo was reduced by 0.07–12.0 %. The calculated
radiative forcing ranged from 0.16 to 43.45 W m<sup>−2</sup> depending on snow
type, solar zenith angle, and location. The potential source regions of the
deposited pollutants were identified using spatial variance in wind vector
maps, emission inventories coupled with backward air trajectories, and simple
region-tagged chemical transport modeling. Central, south, and west Asia were
the major sources of pollutants during the sampling months, with only a small
contribution from east Asia. Analysis based on the Weather Research and
Forecasting (WRF-STEM) chemical transport model
identified a significant contribution (more than 70 %) from south Asia at
selected sites. Research into the presence and effect of pollutants in the
glaciated areas of Pakistan is economically significant because the surface
water resources in the country mainly depend on the rivers (the Indus and its
tributaries) that flow from this glaciated area.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adhikary, B., Carmichael, G. R., Kulkarni, S., Wei, C., Tang, Y., D'Allura,
A., Mena-Carrasco, M., Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., Pierce, R. B., Al-Saadi, J.
A., Emmons, L. K., Pfister, G. G., Avery, M. A., Barrick, J. D., Blake, D.
R., Brune, W. H., Cohen, R. C., Dibb, J. E., Fried, A., Heikes, B. G., Huey,
L. G., O'Sullivan, D. W., Sachse, G. W., Shetter, R. E., Singh, H. B.,
Campos, T. L., Cantrell, C. A., Flocke, F. M., Dunlea, E. J., Jimenez, J. L.,
Weinheimer, A. J., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Schauer, J. J., Stone, E.
A., Jaffe, D. A., and Reidmiller, D. R.: A regional scale modeling analysis
of aerosol and trace gas distributions over the eastern Pacific during the
INTEX-B field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2091–2115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2091-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2091-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aoki, T., Kuchiki, K., Niwano, M., Kodama, Y., Hosaka, M., and Tanaka, T.:
Physically based snow albedo model for calculating broadband albedos and the
solar heating profile in snowpack for general circulation models, J. Geophys.
Res. Atmos., 116, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015507</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Babu, S. S., Chaubey, J. P., Krishna Moorthy, K., Gogoi, M. M., Kompalli, S.
K., Sreekanth, V., Bagare, S. P., Bhatt, B. C., Gaur, V. K., Prabhu, T. P.,
and Singh, N. S.: High altitude (4520 m amsl) measurements of black carbon
aerosols over western trans-Himalayas: Seasonal heterogeneity and source
apportionment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D24201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016722</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Bhardwaj, E., Dong, R., Jogani, R., Jung, S., Roden, C.,
Streets, D. G., and Trautmann, N. M.: Historical emissions of black and
organic carbon aerosol from energy-related combustion, 1850–2000, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB2018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002840</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Boparai, P., Lee, J., and Bond, T. C.: Revisiting Thermal-Optical Analyses of
Carbonaceous Aerosol Using a Physical Model, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
930–948, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802360690" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802360690</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Ho, K. F., Zhang, X. Y., Zou, S. C., Fung, K., Chow,
J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosol in Pearl
River Delta Region, China during 2001 winter period, Atmos. Environ., 37,
1451–1460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01002-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01002-6</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, D., Wang, Y., McElroy, M. B., He, K., Yantosca, R. M.,
and Le Sager, P.: Regional CO pollution and export in China
simulated by the high-resolution nested-grid GEOS-Chem model, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 3825–3839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3825-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3825-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cong, Z., Kawamura, K., Kang, S., Fu, P., River, G., River, Y., and River,
Y.: Penetration of biomass-burning emissions from South Asia through the
Himalayas?: new insights from, Scientific report, 5, 9580, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09580</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Déry, S. J. and Brown, R. D.: Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover
extent trends and implications for the snow-albedo feedback, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L22504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031474" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031474</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Doherty, S. J., Grenfell, T. C., Forsström, S., Hegg, D. L., Brandt, R.
E., and Warren, S. G.: Observed vertical redistribution of black carbon and
other insoluble light-absorbing particles in melting snow, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 5553–5569, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50235</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An Overview of the HYSPLIT_4
Modelling System for Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition, Aust.
Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Fitzgerald, W. F.: Clean hands, dirty hands: Clair Patterson and the aquatic
biogeochemistry of mercury, in: Clean Hands: Clair Patterson's crusade
against environmental lead contamination, 119–137, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G.: Arctic climate sensitivity to local black carbon, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1840–1851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50176</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G. and Zender, C. S.: Linking snowpack microphysics and albedo
evolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D12208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006834</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T., and Rasch, P. J.:
Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008003</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Flanner, M. G., Liu, X., Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., and Jiao, C.: Enhanced
solar energy absorption by internally-mixed black carbon in snow grains,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4699–4721, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Hess, P. G., Mahowald, N. M., Painter, T. H.,
Ramanathan, V., and Rasch, P. J.: Springtime warming and reduced snow cover
from carbonaceous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2481–2497,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2481-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gertler, C. G., Puppala, S. P., Panday, A., Stumm, D., and Shea, J.: Black
carbon and the Himalayan cryosphere: A review, Atmos. Environ., 125,
404–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.078</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gillette, D. A., Blifford, I. H., and Fryrear, D. W.: Influence of wind velocity on
size distributions of aerosols generated by wind erosion of soils, J.
Geophys. Res., 79, 4068–4075, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i027p04068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i027p04068</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled chemistry within the WRF model,
Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gul, C., Kang, S., Ghauri, B., Haq, M., Muhammad, S., and Ali, S.: Using
Landsat images to monitor changes in the snow-covered area of selected
glaciers in northern Pakistan, J. Mt. Sci., 14, 2013–2027,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4097-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4097-x</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, J. and Nazarenko, L.: Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 423–428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237157100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237157100</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Nazarenko, L., Lacis, A., Schmidt, G. A.,
Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Bell, N., Cairns, B., Canuto,
V., Chandler, M., Cheng, Y., Del Genio, A., Faluvegi, G., Fleming, E.,
Friend, A., Hall, T., Jackman, C., Kelley, M., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lean, J.,
Lerner, J., Lo, K., Menon, S., Miller, R., Minnis, P., Novakov, T., Oinas,
V., Perlwitz, J., Perlwitz, J., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Shindell, D., Stone,
P., Sun, S., Tausnev, N., Thresher, D., Wielicki, B., Wong, T., Yao, M., and
Zhang, S.: Efficacy of climate forcings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,
D18104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd005776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd005776</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>He, C.,  Li, Q.,  Liou, K.-N.,  Takano, Y.,  Gu, Y.,  Qi, L.,  Mao, Y., and  Leung, L. R.:
Black carbon radiative forcing over the Tibetan Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 7806–7813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062191" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062191</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>He, C., Takano, Y., Liou, K.-N., Yang, P.,  Li, Q., and  Chen, F.: Impact of Snow Grain Shape and Black Carbon-Snow Internal
Mixing on Snow Optical Properties: Parameterizations for Climate Models, J.
Climate, 30, 1253–1268, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0300.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0300.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Horvath, H.: Atmospheric light absorption – A review, Atmos. Environ., 27A,
293–317, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Immerzeel, W. W., van Beek, L. P. H., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Climate change
will affect the Asian water towers, Science, 328, 1382–1385,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183188</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Climate response of fossil fuel and biofuel soot,
accounting for soot's feedback to snow and sea ice albedo and emissivity, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D21201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004945" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004945</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jaffe, D., Anderson, T., Covert, D., Kotchenruther, R., Trost, B.,
Danielson, J., Simpson, W., Blake, D., Harris, J., and Carmichael, G.:
Transport of Asian air pollution to North America, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
711–714, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, S. and Jie, Y.: BC-OC-dust in snow and glacier in Pakistan, available at: <a href="http://shichang-kang.sklcs.ac.cn" target="_blank">http://shichang-kang.sklcs.ac.cn</a>,  last access: 10 April 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kaspari, S., Painter, T. H., Gysel, M., Skiles, S. M., and Schwikowski, M.:
Seasonal and elevational variations of black carbon and dust in snow and ice
in the Solu-Khumbu, Nepal and estimated radiative forcings, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 8089–8103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8089-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8089-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kaspari, S. D., Schwikowski, M., Gysel, M., Flanner, M. G., Kang, S., Hou,
S., and Mayewski, P. A.: Recent increase in black carbon concentrations from
a Mt. Everest ice core spanning 1860–2000 AD, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
11–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046096</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>LaChapelle, E. R.: Field guide to snow crystals, University of Washington
Press, Seattie, Washington, USA, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J. and Hess, P. G.: Model analysis of the temporal and
geographical origin of the CO distribution during the TOPSE campaign, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002077</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z.,
Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D.,
Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M.,
Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions
of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Li, X., Kang, S., He, X., Qu, B., Tripathee, L., Jing, Z., Paudyal, R., Li,
Y., Zhang, Y., Yan, F., Li, G., and Li, C.: Light-absorbing impurities
accelerate glacier melt in the Central Tibetan Plateau, Sci. Total Environ.,
587-588, 482–490, p. 587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.169</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Chen, J., Kang, S., Li, C., Qu, B., Tripathee, L., Yan, F., Zhang,
Y., Guo, J., Gul, C., and Qin, X.: Impacts of black carbon and mineral dust
on radiative forcing and glacier melting during summer in the Qilian
Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, The Cryosphere Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2016-32" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2016-32</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Liou, K. N.,  Takano, Y.,  He, C.,  Yang, P.,  Leung, L. R.,  Gu, Y., and
Lee, W. L.: Stochastic parameterization for light absorption by internally
mixed BC/dust in snow grains for application to climate models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 7616–7632, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021665" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021665</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., and Wang, S.: A novel back-trajectory
analysis of the origin of black carbon transported to the Himalayas and
Tibetan Plateau during 1996–2010, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L01809,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049903" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049903</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lüthi, Z. L., Škerlak, B., Kim, S.-W., Lauer, A., Mues, A., Rupakheti,
M., and Kang, S.: Atmospheric brown clouds reach the Tibetan Plateau by
crossing the Himalayas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6007–6021,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6007-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6007-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward, D.
S., and Flanner, M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and its
impact on the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 15, 53–71,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Ménégoz, M., Krinner, G., Balkanski, Y., Cozic, A., Boucher, O., and
Ciais, P.: Boreal and temperate snow cover variations induced by black carbon
emissions in the middle of the 21st century, The Cryosphere, 7, 537–554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-537-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-537-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ménégoz, M., Krinner, G., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Cozic, A., Lim, S.,
Ginot, P., Laj, P., Gallée, H., Wagnon, P., Marinoni, A., and Jacobi, H.
W.: Snow cover sensitivity to black carbon deposition in the Himalayas: from
atmospheric and ice core measurements to regional climate simulations, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 4237–4249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4237-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Menon, S., Koch, D., Beig, G., Sahu, S., Fasullo, J., and Orlikowski, D.:
Black carbon aerosols and the third polar ice cap, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
4559–4571, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4559-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ming, J., Cachier, H., Xiao, C., Qin, D., Kang, S., Hou, S., and Xu, J.:
Black carbon record based on a shallow Himalayan ice core and its climatic
implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1343–1352,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1343-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1343-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Xiao, C., Cachier, H., Qin, D., Qin, X., Li, Z., and Pu, J.: Black
Carbon (BC) in the snow of glaciers in west China and its potential effects
on albedos, Atmos. Res., 92, 114–123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.007</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Du, Z., Xiao, C., Xu, X., and Zhang, D.: Darkening of the
mid-Himalaya glaciers since 2000 and the potential causes, Environ. Res.
Lett., 7, 014021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014021</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Xiao, C., Du, Z., and Yang, X.: An overview of black carbon
deposition in High Asia glaciers and its impacts on radiation balance, Adv.
Water Resour., 55, 80–87, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.015</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Ming, J., Xiao, C., Wang, F., Li, Z., and Li, Y.: Grey Tienshan Urumqi
Glacier No.1 and light-absorbing impurities, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 23,
9549–9558, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6182-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6182-7</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Muhammad, S. and Tian, L.: Changes in the ablation zones of glaciers in the
western Himalaya and the Karakoram between 1972 and 2015, Remote Sens.
Environ., 187, 505–512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.034</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K.,Sharma, A. K., Marinoni, A., and Ajai: Black carbon aerosols over the Himalayas: Direct and surface albedo
forcing, Tellus B, 65, 19738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.19738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.19738</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Naoe, H., Hasegawa, S., Heintzenberg, J., Okada, K., Uchiyama, A., Zaizen,
Y., Kobayashi, E., and Yamazaki, A.: State of mixture of atmospheric
submicrometer black carbon particles and its effect on particulate light
absorption, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1296–1301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.031</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Niu, H., Kang, S., Shi, X., Paudyal, R., He, Y., Li, G., and Wang, S.:
Science of the Total Environment In-situ measurements of light-absorbing
impurities in snow of glacier on Mt. Yulong and implications for radiative
forcing estimates, Sci. Total Environ., 581–582, 848–856,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.032</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Omar, A. H.,  Winker, D. M.,  Kittaka,  C.,  Vaughan, M. A.,
Hu, Z. L. Y., Trepte, C. R., Rogers, R. R., Ferrare, R. A., and Lee, K. P.,
Kuehn, R. E., and Hostetler, C. A.: The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol
Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
26, 1994–2014, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Barrett, A. P., Landry, C. C., Neff, J. C., Cassidy, M. P.,
Lawrence, C. R., McBride, K. E., and Farmer, G. L.: Impact of disturbed
desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L12502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030284" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030284</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Deems, J. S., Belnap, J., Hamlet, A. F., Landry, C. C., and
Udall, B.: Response of Colorado River runoff to dust radiative forcing in
snow, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 17125–17130,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913139107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913139107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Pandolfi, M., Ripoll, A., Querol, X., and Alastuey, A.: Climatology of
aerosol optical properties and black carbon mass absorption cross section at
a remote high-altitude site in the western Mediterranean Basin, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 6443–6460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6443-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6443-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.: Transport
pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model
of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART), J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D0830114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010621" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010621</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Qian, Y., Flanner, M. G., Leung, L. R., and Wang, W.: Sensitivity studies on
the impacts of Tibetan Plateau snowpack pollution on the Asian hydrological
cycle and monsoon climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1929–1948,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1929-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, R., and Flanner, M. G.: A sensitivity study on
modeling black carbon in snow and its radiative forcing over the Arctic and
Northern China, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064001</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Yasunari, T. J.,  Doherty, S. J.,  Flanner, M. G.,  Lau, W. K., Ming, J.,  Wang, H.,
Wang, M., Warren, S. G., and Zhang, R.: Light-absorbing Particles in Snow and
Ice: Measurement and Modeling of Climatic and Hydrological Impact, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 32, 64–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0010-0</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Qu, B., Ming, J., Kang, S.-C., Zhang, G.-S., Li, Y.-W., Li, C.-D., Zhao,
S.-Y., Ji, Z.-M., and Cao, J.-J.: The decreasing albedo of the Zhadang
glacier on western Nyainqentanglha and the role of light-absorbing
impurities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11117–11128,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11117-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11117-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schmale, J., Flanner, M., Kang, S., Sprenger, M., Zhang, Q., Guo, J., Li,
Y., Schwikowski, M., and Farinotti, D.: Modulation of snow reflectance and
snowmelt from Central Asian glaciers by anthropogenic black carbon, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 7, 40501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40501</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Venkataraman, C., Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Miguel, A. H.,
and Friedlander, S. K.: Residential Biofuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous
Aerosol Emissions and Climate Impacts, Science, 307, 1454–1456,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104359</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., He, X., Ye, B., and Yang, G.: Variations of Albedo on the
Dongkemadi Glacier, Tang gula Range, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,
34, 21–28, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Xu, B., Zhao, H., Cao, J., Joswiak, D., Wu, G., and Lin, S.: The
Influence of Dust on Quantitative Measurements of Black Carbon in Ice and
Snow when Using a Thermal Optical Method, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 60–69,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.605815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.605815</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Xu, B., Cao, J., Tie, X., Wang, H., Zhang, R., Qian, Y., Rasch, P.
J., Zhao, S., Wu, G., Zhao, H., Joswiak, D. R., Li, J., and Xie, Y.:
Carbonaceous aerosols recorded in a southeastern Tibetan glacier: analysis of
temporal variations and model estimates of sources and radiative forcing,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1191–1204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1191-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1191-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Mao, J., Leibensperger, E. M.,
Carouge, C. C., Le Sager, P., Kondo, Y., Jimenez, J. L., Cubison, M. J., and
Doherty, S. J.: Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon
in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 12453–12473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12453-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12453-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Chung, A., and Paulson, S. E.: The effect of metal salts on
quantification of elemental and organic carbon in diesel exhaust particles
using thermal-optical evolved gas analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
11447–11457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Pu, W., Ren, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Shi, J., Jin, H., Dai, M.,
and Chen, Q.: Observations and model simulations of snow albedo reduction in
seasonal snow due to insoluble light-absorbing particles during 2014 Chinese
survey, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2279–2296,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2279-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2279-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G.: Optical Properties of Snow (Paper 1R1505), Rev. Geophys.
Space Ge., 20, 67–89, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G. and Wiscombe, W. J.: Dirty snow after nuclear war, Nature,
313, 467–470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/313467a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/313467a0</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, C., Huang, X. H. H., Ng, W. M., Griffith, S. M., and Yu, J. Z.:
Inter-comparison of NIOSH and IMPROVE protocols for OC and EC determination:
implications for inter-protocol data conversion, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
4547–4560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4547-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4547-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Xu, B., Cao, J., Hansen, J., Yao, T., Joswia, D. R., Wang, N., Wu, G., Wang,
M., Zhao, H., Yang, W., Liu, X., and He, J.: Black soot and the survival of
Tibetan glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 22114–22118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910444106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910444106</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Xu, B., Cao, J., Joswiak, D. R., Liu, X., Zhao, H., and He, J.:
Post-depositional enrichment of black soot in snow-pack and accelerated
melting of Tibetan glaciers, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 14022,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014022</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Yang, S., Xu, B., Cao, J., Zender, C. S., and Wang, M.: Climate effect of
black carbon aerosol in a Tibetan Plateau glacier, Atmos. Environ., 111,
71–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.016</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Yao, T., Thompson, L., Yang, W., Yu, W., Gao, Y., Guo, X., Yang, X., Duan,
K., Zhao, H., and Xu, B.: Different glacier status with atmospheric
circulations in Tibetan Plateau and surroundings, Nat. Clim. Change, 2,
663–667, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Yasunari, T. J., Bonasoni, P., Laj, P., Fujita, K., Vuillermoz, E., Marinoni,
A., Cristofanelli, P., Duchi, R., Tartari, G., and Lau, K.-M.: Estimated
impact of black carbon deposition during pre-monsoon season from Nepal
Climate Observatory – Pyramid data and snow albedo changes over Himalayan
glaciers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6603–6615,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6603-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6603-2010</a>, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Yasunari, T. J., Koster, R. D., Lau, W. K. M., and Kim, K.: Impact of snow
darkening via dust, black carbon, and organic carbon on boreal spring climate
in the Earth system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 5485–5503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022977" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022977</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Kang, S., Fujita, K., Huintjes, E., Xu, J., Yamazaki, T.,
Haginoya, S., Wei, Y., Scherer, D., Schneider, C., and Yao, T.: Energy and
mass balance of Zhadang glacier surface, central Tibetan Plateau, J.
Glaciol., 59, 137–148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J152</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Hirabayashi, Y., Liu, Q., and Liu, S.: Glacier runoff and its
impact in a highly glacierized catchment in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau:
Past and future trends, J. Glaciol., 61, 713–730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J188</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Kang, S., Xu, M., Sprenger, M., Gao, T., Cong, Z., Li, C., Guo,
J., Xu, Z., Li, Y., Li, G., Li, X., Liu, Y., and Han, H.: Light-absorbing
impurities on Keqikaer Glacier in western Tien Shan?: concentrations and
potential impact on albedo reduction, Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1226.2017.00097" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1226.2017.00097</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
