<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-3603-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Atmospheric water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) in<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> the eastern
Mediterranean: origin and ramifications<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> regarding marine productivity</article-title><alt-title>Atmospheric WSON in the eastern Mediterranean</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Atmospheric WSON in the eastern Mediterranean}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. Nehir and M. Ko\c{c}ak}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nehir</surname><given-names>Münevver</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Koçak</surname><given-names>Mustafa</given-names></name>
          <email>mkocak@ims.metu.edu.tr</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Marine Sciences, Middle East Technical University,
P.O. Box 28, 33731, Erdemli-Mersin, Turkey</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Mustafa Koçak (mkocak@ims.metu.edu.tr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>3603</fpage><lpage>3618</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e90">Aerosol and rain sampling in two size fractions was carried out at a rural site located
on the coast of the eastern Mediterranean, Erdemli, Turkey
(36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). A total of 674
aerosol samples in two size fractions (337 coarse, 337 fine) and 23
rain samples were collected between March 2014 and April 2015. Samples were
analyzed for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ancillary water-soluble ions
using ion chromatography and water-soluble total nitrogen (WSTN) by applying a
high-temperature combustion method. The mean aerosol water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) was
23.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.3 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, reaching a maximum of
79 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with about 66 % being associated with coarse
particles. The volume weighted mean (VWM) concentration of WSON in rain was
21.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The WSON contributed 37 and 29 % to the
WSTN in aerosol and rainwater, respectively. Aerosol WSON concentrations
exhibited large temporal variation, mainly due to meteorology and the origin
of air mass flow. The highest mean aerosol WSON concentration was observed in
the summer and was attributed to the absence of rain and resuspension of
cultivated soil in the region. The mean concentration of WSON during dust
events (38.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.5 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 1.3 times higher than that
of non-dust events (29.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.9 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Source
apportionment analysis demonstrated that WSON was originated from
agricultural activities (43 %), secondary aerosol (20 %), nitrate
(22 %), crustal material (10 %) and sea salt (5 %). The dry and wet
depositions of WSON were equivalent and amounted to 36 % of the total
atmospheric WSTN flux.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e282">Research assessing the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (with a focus on
inorganic N in rainwater i.e., ammonium and nitrate) can be traced back to the
mid-1800s (Miller, 1905, and references therein) as it was accepted to be a
vital plant nutrient. Miller (1905) mentioned organic nitrogen in rain
samples as well. To quote Miller, “With regard to the amount of organic
nitrogen in the rainwater, the only available analyses relating to Rothamsted
are those of Frankland who found from 0.03 to 0.66 per million in
69 samples”. Cornell et al. (1995) highlighted the importance of organic
nitrogen in rain and snow accounting for almost half of the total atmospheric
dissolved nitrogen deposition. Since then, research defining the quantitative
importance of soluble organic nitrogen in the atmospheric transport of
nitrogen has greatly expanded (Neff et al., 2002; Cornell et al., 2003; Mace
et al., 2003a, b, c; Glibert et al., 2005; Sorooshian et al., 2008; Violaki
and Mihalopoulos, 2010; Violaki et al., 2010; Altieri et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e285">Water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) arises from a variety of sources including both natural and
anthropogenic. Anthropogenic sources include agricultural activities
(including fertilizer application, livestock and animal husbandry), cooking,
high-temperature fossil fuel combustion, vehicle exhaust, man-made biomass
burning and industrial activities. In contrast, natural sources of WSON
include mineral dust, bacteria, algal blooms, degraded proteins, sea salt,
organic debris and natural biomass burning (Neff et al., 2002; Cornell et al.,
2003; Mace et al., 2003a, b, c; Glibert et al., 2005; Sorooshian et al.,
2008; Cape et al., 2011; Altieri et al., 2016). Atmospheric organic nitrogen
can also be formed<?pagebreak page3604?> through chemical reactions. For example, reactions between
volatile organic compounds, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and ammonium sulfate aerosols may lead
to the formation of nitrogen-containing compounds (Surratt et al., 2008;
Galloway et al., 2009; De Haan et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2011). Furthermore,
atmospheric organic nitrogen plays an essential role in many global processes
which may impact the chemistry of the atmosphere as well as climate and
biogeochemical cycles. Similar to ammonium, some organic nitrogen species
such as urea and amines have acid-neutralizing capacities (Ge et al., 2011).
It has been shown that nitrogen-containing organic compounds nucleate cloud
droplets and may contribute considerably to the indirect aerosol effect
(Twohy et al., 2005). Phytoplankton and bacteria production in aquatic
environments has been found to be stimulated by the addition of water-soluble
organic nitrogen (Timperley et al., 1985; Peierls and Paerl, 1997; Seitzinger
and Sanders, 1999). The laboratory experiments performed by Seitzinger and
Sanders (1999) demonstrated the production of coastal marine bacteria and
phytoplankton, which are stimulated by the addition of water-soluble organic
nitrogen, 45–75 % being bioavailable. From the mid-1800s to 2000, as a
result of anthropogenic activities, reactive nitrogen and reactive
anthropogenic organic nitrogen increased by almost 3- and 5-fold,
respectively, leading to a significantly modified global nitrogen cycle
(Jickells et al., 2017). This in turn has impacted marine nitrogen
biogeochemical cycling (Galloway and Cowling, 2002; Galloway et al., 2008; Duce et al., 2008;
Jickells et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e297">The Mediterranean Sea is characterized by oligotrophic surface waters with
low-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (LNLC) regions. This has been attributed to
mainly anti-estuarine (reverse thermohaline) circulation (Hamad et al.,
2005). The eastern Mediterranean (25) has higher molar N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P ratios than
those observed in the western Mediterranean (22) and the Redfield ratio (Krom
et al., 2004; Yılmaz and Tuğrul, 1998). Generally, the primary
productivity in the eastern Mediterranean is phosphorus-limited (Krom et
al., 1991, 2010; Powley et al., 2017). Depending on the season,
limitation by nitrogen or co-limitation by nitrogen and phosphorus in the
eastern Mediterranean has been reported (Yücel, 2013, 2017, and
references therein). Based on molar N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P ratios in the atmospheric input
(order of magnitude higher than that of Redfield; Markaki et al., 2003, 2010;
Koçak et al., 2010) and riverine fluxes (at least 1.8 times larger than
that of Redfield; Ludwig et al., 2009; Koçak et al., 2010) it has been
suggested that the eastern Mediterranean receives excessive amounts of
dissolved inorganic nitrogen and that this unbalanced input may result in even
more phosphorus deficiency (Ludwig et al., 2009; Koçak et al., 2010),
whilst the atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen may cause accumulation
of nitrogen in the water column (Jickells et al., 2017). Very little research has
focused on the importance of water-soluble organic nitrogen input to marine
productivity in the eastern Mediterranean (Mace et al., 2003a; Violaki and
Mihalopoulos, 2010; Violaki et al., 2010). Hence, the unique contributions of
the current study will be to (i) define the temporal variability of
atmospheric water-soluble organic nitrogen, (ii) assign the origin of the
water-soluble organic nitrogen, (iii) assess the influence of mineral dust on
water-soluble organic nitrogen and (iv) enhance our knowledge of the
quantitative dry and wet deposition of water-soluble organic nitrogen and
its possible influence on marine productivity in the northeastern Mediterranean.</p>
      <p id="d1e314">These aims will be achieved by using the acquired data from the analyses for
water-soluble inorganic and organic nitrogen species of a series of size-fractionated aerosol (coarse and fine) and rain samples collected from
March 2014 to April 2015 from the northern coast (Erdemli, Turkey) of the
Levantine Basin, eastern Mediterranean.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling site description</title>
      <p id="d1e328">Aerosol and rain sampling was carried out at a rural site located on the
coast of the eastern Mediterranean, Erdemli, Turkey
(36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). The sampling tower
(above sea level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 m away from the sea) is situated
at the Institute of Marine Sciences, Middle East Technical University
(IMS-METU). Its immediate vicinity is surrounded by cultivated land to the
north and to the south of the northern Levantine Basin. Although the site is
not under the direct influence of any industrial activities (such as soda production and
fertilizer production), the city of Mersin with a population of around 800 000 is
located 45 km to the east of the sampling site (Kubilay and Saydam, 1995;
Koçak et al., 2012), and hence aerosol and rainwater samples may have been
influenced by the aforementioned regional anthropogenic activities when air mass
is transported from the east.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sample collection and preparation</title>
      <p id="d1e412"><italic>Aerosol</italic>. A Gent-type stacked filter unit (SFU) was used to collect
aerosol samples in two size fractions (coarse: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and
fine: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) (for more details, see Hopke et al., 1997;
Koçak et al., 2007). Briefly, the first section of the filter holder was
loaded with an 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size polycarbonate filter (Whatman Track
Etched 111114, circle diameter: 47 mm), whilst the second section was loaded
with a 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size polycarbonate filter (Whatman Track
Etched 111107, circle diameter: 47 mm). The cassette unit was then placed
into the cylindrical cassette holder, which is designed to prevent the
intrusion of particles larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m when the sampler is
operated at a flow rate of 16.0–16.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Daily (24 h) temporal
sample resolution was carried out. Operational blank filters were processed
in the same way as the collected samples with the exception that no air was
passed through the filters. In order to minimize any possible contamination,
the filter loading and unloading were achieved in a laminar airflow cabinet.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3605?><p id="d1e489">The aerosol sampling campaign commenced in March  2014 and ended in
April 2015. During the sampling period, a total of 674 aerosol samples in two
size fractions (coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 337; fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 337) were obtained. The
observational coverage of the aerosol sampling period was 80 %. The
observational coverage for winter, spring, summer and fall was respectively
60, 92, 81 and 79 %. The seasonal observational coverage, after applying
a precision value of 0.3 (for more details, see Sect. 2.4 and Eq. 4), was
found to be comparable for winter (49 %), spring (53 %), summer
(51 %) and fall (52 %). The sampling was terminated from time to time
due to technical malfunction of the SFU and/or the cleaning procedure of the
sampling apparatus.</p>
      <p id="d1e506"><italic>Rain.</italic> Rainwater samples were collected using an automatic wet/dry
sampler (Model ARS 1000, MTX Italy). A total of 23 rain samples was
collected during the sampling period. After each rain event, the rainwater
samples were immediately transferred to the laboratory for filtration
(0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m Whatman, polycarbonate filters). Operational blanks for
rain samples were taken by using 100 mL of Milli-Q water after cleaning the
HDPE buckets with phosphate-free detergent, HCl (10 %) and Milli-Q water
(3 times).</p>
      <p id="d1e518"><italic>Storage of samples.</italic> Aerosol and rainwater samples were stored frozen
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) immediately after collection until analyses (not more
than a month). Cape et al. (2001) showed that there were no
significant losses for inorganic and organic nitrogen during storage
(freezing for 3 months) of rain samples with an added biocide.</p>
      <p id="d1e540"><italic>Sample preparation.</italic> In order to determine the concentrations of
water-soluble total nitrogen species (WSTN, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
major water-soluble ions (Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in an aerosol sample, one-quarter of the filter was
extracted for 60 min in 20 mL ultra-pure water (18.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) by
mechanic shaking. About 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L chloroform (Merc 2444, 99.8 %)
was added as a preservative to prevent biological activity after removing the
filter (Bardouki et al., 2003; Koçak et al., 2007). Before measuring the
water-soluble species, extracts were filtered with 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size
polycarbonate filters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Chemical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e668"><italic>Water-soluble total nitrogen. </italic>High-temperature catalytic oxidation
(Torch Teledyne Tekmar TOC/TN) was applied to determine the WSTN
concentrations in the aerosol and rainwater samples. The liquid aliquot of
the sample is injected into the combustion furnace (750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and the
N in the sample was then converted to NO gas. The carrier gas (high-purity
dry air) sweeps the sample into the nondispersive infrared detector. From here,
the sample is carried to the nitrogen module. In this unit NO is mixed with
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> since the chemiluminescent detection of NO is based on the reaction
between NO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. After the formation of excited nitrogen dioxide
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the extra energy is given off as light when NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relaxes to its ground state. The light signal to an electronic signal for
quantification is then measured by a chemiluminescence detector with a
photomultiplier tube.</p>
      <p id="d1e726">The standards were prepared from KNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of high purity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 %,
Merck Extra Pure, CC551961). In order to evaluate accuracy of the WSTN
measurements, nitrate, ammonium, urea and mixture of these species were
detected by a Teledyne Tekmar torch instrument. Recovery for these substances
was better than 92 %. In addition, the accuracy of the total nitrogen
determination by the instrument was verified against intercalibration samples
of the QUASIMEME program (Quality Assurance of Information for Marine
Environmental Monitoring in Europe).
Correspondingly, recoveries for QNU277SW (IMS-METU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M,
Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M), QNU278SW (IMS-METU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M,
Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) and QNU279SW
(IMS-METU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M, Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) were 90, 92 and
83 %. Blank values of WSTN for aerosol and rain samples were less than
the limit of detection (3.6 nmol).</p>
      <p id="d1e831"><italic>Water-soluble inorganic and ancillary species. </italic>In addition to
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, major water-soluble ions concentrations were
measured by using a Dionex ICS-5000 ion chromatography instrument.
Water-soluble anions (Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were determined
by applying a AS11-HC separation column, KOH (30 mM) eluent and AERS-500
(4 mm) suppressor whilst water-soluble cations (Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were detected electrochemically by using a CS12-A
separation column, MSA (20 mM) eluent and CSRS-300 (4 mm) suppressor
(Product Manual for Dionex IonPac AS11-HC-4m, IonPac CS12A Manual). The blank
contributions for all water-soluble ions in aerosol samples were found to be
less than 10 % and concentrations were corrected for blanks.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Calculations</title>
      <p id="d1e950">WSON concentrations (see Eq. 1) were determined from the difference between
the individual concentrations of WSTN and water-soluble inorganic nitrogen
(WSIN) (see Eq. 2) since there is no direct analytical method to detect the
concentration of water-soluble organic nitrogen. The precision for WSON was
calculated via the formula (see Eq. 3) suggested by Hansell (1993). The
precision (75 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be almost 3 times higher
(see Eq. 4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than that of the arithmetic mean of WSON in
aerosols, whilst it (90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to be
approximately 4 times larger than that of the volume weighted mean of WSON in
rain. Such high values are not unusual. For example, if the data presented by
Mace et al. (2003a) had been used, precisions would have been 5 and 8 times
higher than those of the concentrations of WSON in aerosol and rain,
respectively. Table 1 shows the number of negative WSON values and the
positive WSON biases for coarse and fine modes. Correspondingly, about 5
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 15 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the values were negative in coarse and fine
particles. The substitution with zero yielded 2 and 14 % positive bias
for the coarse and fine mode; whereas the omission of zero resulted in 8 and
34 % positive bias in coarse and fine WSON<?pagebreak page3606?> mean concentrations.
Consequently, the presentation of the general characteristics of the data
includes all negative concentrations (see Table 1) and the values
presented in Table 1 will be used for calculating dry and wet deposition. It
has been stated that the uncertainty in WSON concentrations results from the
additions of errors such as the oxidation efficiency of the method, the sampling
material, the storage of the samples and the usage of preservatives (Cape et al., 2011).
These authors have particularly pointed out the low precision for samples
with low concentrations of WSON and high levels of WSIN (see Eq. 2).
Although the calculation of precision for WSON is very difficult owing to
the aforementioned errors, Hansell (1993) has proposed the estimation of precision
for WSON exclusively relying on measured WSTN and WSIN concentrations.
Consequently, in order to evaluate the variability in the aerosol WSON and
apply positive matrix factorization (PMF), however, a different approach was adopted. To this end, arbitrary
thresholds have been defined as the ratio between the WSON mean concentration and
the calculated precision (see Eq. 4). Thus, during assessment of the variability
in aerosol WSON and the application of PMF, WSON concentrations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values larger than 0.3 will be considered since the arbitrary threshold
simply reduces the uncertainty. A total of 216 aerosol samples was found to
have higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values than 0.3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e1044">The number of negative WSON values and positive biases in coarse and
fine particles at Erdemli.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fine</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of samples</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">337</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">337</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of negatives</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SZ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–positive bias (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PZ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–positive bias (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1047">1 and 2 refer to as the substitution with zero and the omission
of zero for arithmetic mean, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1144"><disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M91" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>WSON</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>WSTN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>WSIN</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>WSIN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>WSON</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>WSTN</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>WSIN</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>WSON</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>MEAN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>WSON</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The rain volume weighted average concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of nitrogen
species can be calculated as follows:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The wet and dry atmospheric fluxes of nitrogen species were calculated
according to the procedure explained in Herut et al. (1999, 2002). The wet
atmospheric deposition fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated from the annual
precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>annual</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the volume weighted mean concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the substance of interest.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>annual</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The dry deposition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as the product of the
atmospheric mean nutrient concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their settling
velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given in units of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in units of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in units of m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M110" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The settling velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Eq. 8) for each water-soluble
nitrogen species were calculated by using an approach adopted by Spokes et
al. (2001). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refer to the relative
contribution of coarse and fine modes, and 2.0 and 0.1 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are
deposition velocities proposed by Duce et al. (1991) for coarse and fine
particles, respectively.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M115" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Air mass back trajectories and airflow classification</title>
      <p id="d1e1649">Three-day back trajectories of air masses at the four altitude levels (1000, 2000,
3000 and 4000 m) arriving at Erdemli station were computed by using
the HYSPLIT dispersion model (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated
Trajectory; Draxler and Rolph, 2003). Three-day back trajectories reaching
the altitude of 1000 m were classified into six sectors: (i) Middle East,
(ii) north Africa, (iii) Turkey, (iv) eastern Europe, (v) western Europe and
(vi) the Mediterranean Sea, in order to assess the influence of airflow on WSON
concentration in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (for more details, see Koçak et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization (PMF) for source apportionment of
WSON</title>
      <p id="d1e1667">The receptor modeling tool positive matrix factorization (US
Environmental Protection Agency PMF version 5.0, hereinafter referred to as
“PMF”) was utilized to identify the sources of WSON in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
Erdemli. PMF has been proven to be a robust tool in characterizing the
sources of aerosol (Paatero and Tapper, 1994; Huang et al., 1999; Lee et al.,
1999; Viana et al., 2008; Koçak et al., 2009; for more details, see
Appendix A). EPA PMF 5.0 software mainly consists of model run and rotational
tools (see EPA/600/R-14/108; US EPA, 2014). Before application of the
software, the user must supply two input files, namely concentration and
uncertainty. The former contains concentrations of the aerosol species whilst
the latter contains the corresponding uncertainty for each variable. Uncertainty was
set to 5 % for each species with the exception of WSON (15 %) since
WSON<?pagebreak page3607?> exclusively exhibited high uncertainty (for more details, see Appendix A).
The base run of PMF was achieved by setting the number of runs and random
starting points (in other words, seeds) to 250 and 50, respectively. Base model
displacement (DISP), bootstrap (BS) and bootstrap displacement (BS-DISP)
methods were sequentially used after the base run. The DISP accesses the
rotational ambiguity. DISP error estimates showed that there were no factor
swaps and significant decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during DISP, being 0 and 0.00,
respectively. Therefore, DISP results did not reveal rotational ambiguity,
implying the solutions to be robust. Except in one case, results from BS and
BS-DISP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) did not indicate any asymmetry or rotational ambiguity for
five factors. To evaluate the rotational ambiguity, different Fpeak values were
applied, considering changes in d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be less than 5 %. Furthermore,
G-shape plots of Fpeak solutions were examined to determine convergence
toward the axis or lower/zero contribution. Thus, an Fpeak value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 was
used and five factors were identified by using PMF 5.0. BS of Fpeak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7
did not reveal any swaps for five factors. The slope of the estimated WSON
against measured WSON was 10 % less than unity with a correlation
coefficient and intercept of 0.87 and 1.5 (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>General characteristics of the data</title>
      <p id="d1e1747">In this section the general characteristics of the water-soluble organic
nitrogen (WSON), nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
water-soluble total nitrogen (WSTN) in aerosol and rain will be discussed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1778"><italic>Aerosol.</italic> The statistical summary for WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and WSTN in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol samples obtained from Erdemli
between March 2014 and April 2015 is presented in Table 2. Median values for
WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and WSTN were, respectively, 10, 20, 40 and
10 % lower than those of arithmetic means. Among the nitrogen species,
WSON exhibited the highest arithmetic mean, followed by ammonium and nitrate
concentrations. The maximum concentration of WSON was estimated
to be 79 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean value and standard deviation of
23.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.3 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The observed arithmetic was comparable
to that reported by Mace et al. (2003a) for the same site. Approximately
66 % of the WSON was associated with coarse particles; the remaining
fraction (34 %) was present within the fine mode. A number of studies
have reported the relative size distribution of WSON for the eastern Mediterranean marine aerosol (Finokalia; Violaki and Mihalopoulos, 2010) and
aerosol observed at remote marine sites (Hawaii; Cornell et al., 2001;
Tasmania, Mace et al., 2003b). The aerosol WSON at Finokalia (68 %) and
Hawaii was primarily found in the fine mode, whilst WSON in South Pacific
marine aerosol (Tasmania) was mainly associated with the coarse fraction. It
is likely that the WSON at Erdemli (a) is relatively less impacted by
anthropogenic sources and/or (b) is more influenced by mineral dust transport
and resuspension of cultivated soil compared to that observed at Finokalia.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e1875">The statistical summary of the WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
WSTN for aerosol (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and rain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
samples collected at Erdemli from March 2014 to April 2015.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Aerosol (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) number of samples: 337 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSTN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WSON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Arithmetic mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">63.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Standard deviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">57.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Minimum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">176.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">79.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">88.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">164.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative contribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">to WSTN (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Rain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) number of samples: 23 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VWM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">73.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Minimum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">356.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">257.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">122.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative contribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">to WSTN (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1939"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> VWM refers to volume weighted mean.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2316">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>aerosol concentrations ranged between 0.2–88.4
and 0.5–164.4 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with mean values (standard deviations) of
17.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.7) and 23.3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.4) nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As expected,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was mainly associated with coarse particles, accounting for
87 % of the observed mean value, while NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was dominant in the
fine mode, contributing 96 % to the detected mean concentration. Similar
results have been reported for eastern Mediterranean marine aerosol (Bardouki
et al., 2003; Koçak et al., 2007). The predominance of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the coarse mode might be due to gaseous nitric acid or other nitrogen oxides
reacting with alkaline sea salts and mineral dust particles. In contrast, the
occurrence of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fine fraction is mainly as a result of the
reaction between gaseous alkaline ammonia and acidic sulfuric acid
(Mihalopoulos et al., 2007).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3608?><p id="d1e2431">WSTN concentrations in aerosols varied between 9.7 and
176.5 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an arithmetic mean value of
63.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32.0 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mean WSTN
concentration was almost equally influenced by coarse (51 %) and fine
particles (49 %). Table 2 demonstrates the relative contributions of
WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the WSTN in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. As can be
deduced from the table, the WSTN concentration was equally influenced by WSON
and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, each species contributing 37 and 35 %, respectively. In
contrast the contribution of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to WSTN was found to be 28 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e2523"><italic>Rain.</italic> Volume weighted mean (VWM) concentrations of WSON,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and WSTN in rainwater are presented in Table 2,
along with the minimum and maximum concentrations as well as the relative
contributions of WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to WSTN. As can be
deduced from the table, VWM concentrations of each species were comparable
and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited the highest concentration, with a value of
28.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The VWM concentrations of WSON and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 21.5 and 23.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
Considering their relative contributions to WSTN, WSON and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
account for 29 and 32 % of the WSTN, whilst NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represented 39 %
of the observed WSTN concentration in rainwater.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Comparison of WSON in aerosol and rain with data from the
literature</title>
      <p id="d1e2670">The concentrations of WSON in marine aerosols and rain samples collected from
different sites located around the Mediterranean, Atlantic and Pacific
regions are illustrated in Table 3. Comparing the current WSON values with
those reported in the literature is challenging due to (i) different applied
sampling periods, sampling and measurement techniques and (ii) the high
uncertainty associated with the estimation of WSON. Furthermore, within the
literature there is a lack of information defining the uncertainty of WSON
though there is a substantial statistical knowledge. Keene at al. (2002), in
particular, have highlighted the tendency in the literature to neglect
negative values or substitute such values with zero instead when calculating
the WSON from the difference between WSTN and WSIN. As these authors have
highlighted, the omission or substitution of such values inevitably would
result in a positive bias in the WSON concentrations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2676">Comparison of WSON concentrations in aerosol (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
rain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples for different sites of the world.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mediterranean Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Erdemli, Turkey</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">674</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2014–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Erdemli, Turkey</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mace et al. (2003a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Finokalia, Crete</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2005–2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Violaki and Mihalopoulos (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hawaii</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1998</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cornell et al. (2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tasmania</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mace et al. (2003b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Taiwan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">75.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Chen et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xi'an, China (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2008–2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ho et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Barbados</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2007–2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Zamora et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amazon, dry season</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1999</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mace et al. (2003c)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amazon, wet season</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1999</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mace et al. (2003c)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Indian Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amsterdam Island</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Violaki et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rainwater (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mediterranean Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Erdemli, Turkey</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2014–2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Erdemli, Turkey</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mace et al. (2003a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Finokalia, Crete</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2003–2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Violaki et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tahiti<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cornell et al. (1998)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hawaii</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1998</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cornell et al. (2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tasmania</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mace et al. (2003b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North China Plain, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">103</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2003–2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Zhang et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kilauea, Hawaii</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1998</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cornell et al. (2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic Ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bermuda</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1994</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cornell et al. (1998)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mace Head</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cornell et al. (1998)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Norwich, UK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cornell et al. (1998)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Virginia, United States</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1996–1999</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Keene et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Delaware, United States</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1997–1999</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Keene et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">New Hampshire, United States</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1997</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Keene et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2716"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> RC, NS and SP refer to relative contribution of WSON to WSTN, number of samples and sampling period, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e3390">The daily variation in the concentrations of <bold>(a)</bold> WSON,
<bold>(b)</bold> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(c)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
together with rain amount (mm) from March 2014 to April 2015 for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/3603/2018/acp-18-3603-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3458">In general, the lowest concentrations in aerosols were found in those derived
from remote or pristine marine environments. The WSON concentrations in the
atmosphere over the Indian (Amsterdam Island: 1.0 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Violaki
et al., 2015), Atlantic (Barbados: 1.3 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Zamora et al.,
2011) and Pacific Ocean (Hawaii, Oahu: 4.1 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cornell et
al., 2001, Tasmania: 5.3 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mace et al., 2003b) were at
least 4 times less than those observed for the eastern Mediterranean (Erdemli:
23.8 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, this study; Finokalia: 17.1 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Violaki and Mihalopoulos, 2010). These lower values might be attributed to
(i) the absence of the strong anthropogenic sources in the vicinity of the
sampling sites, (ii) the dilution of the WSON originating from long-range
transport via both dry and wet deposition and/or (iii) small contributions
from non-land-based local emissions such as sea salt and algal blooms. The
highest WSON concentrations emerged particularly over China (Ho et al., 2015,
concentration of WSON measured in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Taiwan (Chen et al., 2010),
with values above 70 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As stated in Chen et al. (2010) WSON
concentrations at these sampling sites were markedly influenced by
anthropogenic activities such as fossil fuel combustion and human-induced
biomass burning. Concentrations over the Amazon (Mace et al., 2003c) in the
dry season (61 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have also been noted. Such high values
were ascribed to natural fires (Mace et al., 2003c). The mean WSON
concentration at Erdemli (23.8 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was comparable to that
reported previously for the same site (29 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mace et al.,
2003a). In contrast, the present WSON concentration was almost 1.5 times
higher than that observed at Finokalia (Violaki and Mihalopoulos, 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e3597">The reported WSON values for rain also exhibited the lowest concentrations in
those derived from remote or pristine marine environments, such as Hawaii
(2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cornell et al., 2001). The highest WSON
concentrations were observed in China (North China Plain:
103 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Zhang et al., 2008) and in Norwich, UK
(33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol N L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cornell et al., 1998). These
high values were again attributed to the anthropogenic sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Temporal variability of water-soluble nitrogen species in aerosol
Erdemli</title>
      <p id="d1e3664">Figure 1 illustrates daily variation of the water-soluble nitrogen species in
aerosol samples together with the daily rainfall from March 2014 to
April 2015. The same figure also presents the concentrations in rainwater
samples collected between October 2014 and April 2015. It is clear that<?pagebreak page3609?> WSON
concentrations exhibited large variation from one day to another day. The
daily variability in the concentration of WSON may be an order of magnitude.
Such variability has also been reported in Atlantic (Zamora et al.,
2011), Pacific (Chen et al., 2010) and eastern Mediterranean marine aerosols
(Violaki and Mihalopoulos, 2010). These studies demonstrated that the daily
change in the concentrations of WSON arises from a combination of
(a) meteorological parameters (such as rain, temperature and wind
speed/direction), (b) chemical reactions, (c) history of air masses back
trajectories and (d) source emission strength.</p>
      <p id="d1e3667">In general, lower concentrations of WSON were found to be associated with
rainy days. To serve as an illustration, one of the lowest WSON
concentrations was observed on 19 October 2014, after two consecutive days of
rainfall, with a value of 6 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, one of the
highest observed WSON concentrations (66.1 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected
on 2 March 2014, when the air mass back trajectories were associated with
south/southwesterly<?pagebreak page3610?> airflow (for more details, see Sect. 3.4). Another high
concentration of WSON was observed on 5 July 2014, with a value of
66 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A total of 94 % of the WSON was present in the coarse
mode; however, during this event there was no intense dust intrusion either from
the Sahara or from the Middle Eastern deserts. The corresponding OMI-AI and
nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (33 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also support this observation (see
Fig. 2). Lower layer air mass back trajectories (1000 and 2000 m)
demonstrated that Erdemli was under the influence of north/northwesterly
airflow from Turkey after passing over Turkey's largest cultivated plain,
Konya. Thus, this high value might be attributed to resuspension of the soil
affected by intense agricultural activities. On 20 January 2015 the WSON
concentration was 60 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 72 % being present in the fine
mode. For this event, the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was
20 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2 times higher than the observed arithmetic mean in
winter. Corresponding trajectories, AOD (aerosol optical depth) and AC
(Ångström component) images are presented in Fig. 3. Airflow at 1 km showed
air mass flow arriving at the sampling site from Turkey. AOD values over the
sampling site and coastline of northeastern Mediterranean ranged from 0.2 to
0.5, whilst AC values demonstrated that the region was dominated by fine
particles. Based on the above indicators, it may be concluded that anthropogenic
sources were dominant.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e3775">Three-day back trajectories showing the transport of air masses
1000 m (black circle), 2000 m (black star), 3000 m (black square) and
4000 m (black triangle) on 5 July 2014 for Erdemli. Aerosol index (AI) from
OMI (Ozone Mapping Instrument) distribution also illustrated with a color bar
from grey to dark red.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/3603/2018/acp-18-3603-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3787">Three-day back trajectories showing the transport of air masses
1000 m (black circle), 2000 m (black star), 3000 m (black square) and
4000 m (black triangle) on 20 January 2015 for Erdemli. The aerosol optical
depth (AOD, <bold>a</bold>) and Ångström component (AC, <bold>b</bold>) from MODIS
(Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) distribution are also
demonstrated with a color bar from grey to dark red.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/3603/2018/acp-18-3603-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3802">A summary of the statistical analyses of the seasonal dataset of aerosol-associated WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Table 4. The
Mann–Whitney U test indicated that there was a statistically significant
difference among seasons, such that summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> winter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> fall. The arithmetic mean value of WSON in the summer was
found to be 1.3 and 2.0 times greater than that observed for spring/winter and
fall, respectively. Percent WSON contributions of coarse mode for winter
(50 %), spring (50 %) and fall (55 %) were comparable. However,
WSON was chiefly associated with coarse particles in summer, amounting to
83 %. This high value in summer might be due to the absence of rainfall
(see Fig. 1) and enhanced resuspension of cultivated soil in the region. In
summer, the mean concentration of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was almost 2.4 times larger
than all other seasons. The mean water-soluble NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer was
1.4 higher than that of spring. High NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in summer might be attributed again to the absence of rainfall
and increase in incoming radiation. Similar results have been reported for
the eastern Mediterranean (Bardouki et al., 2003).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p id="d1e3902">Seasonal statistical summary of the WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, WSTN (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
aerosol samples collected at Erdemli from March 2014 to April 2015.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.94}[.94]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">Winter</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">Spring</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">Summer</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">Fall</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">species</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSON</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">83</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">55</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of samples</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">47</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">79</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meteorology</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">Winter</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">Spring</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">Summer</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">Fall</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">parameter</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rain (mm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">78</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">118</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">132</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of rain events</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Influence of mineral dust episodes on WSON aerosol
concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e4414">As is well documented, the eastern Mediterranean Sea is heavily impacted
by mineral dust episodes originating from Sahara and Middle Eastern deserts
(Kubilay and Saydam, 1995; Kubilay et al., 2000, Koçak et al., 2004a, b,
2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e4417">For the current study between March 2014 and April 2015, water-soluble
non-sea salt calcium concentrations higher than 50 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(2000 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as a threshold value) were defined as mineral “dust
events”. These events were additionally confirmed using air mass back
trajectories and OMI-AI. However, it is worth mentioning that for samples
containing concentrations of nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 50 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
mineral dust transport from Sahara and Middle Eastern deserts to the sampling
site may not be excluded, particularly in winter. Yet, the application of such
an arbitrary value is inevitable since it provides simplicity to explore if
there is any influence of mineral dust intrusion on WSON.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3611?><p id="d1e4468">For example, one of the highest WSON concentrations (66.1 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was observed on 2 March 2014, when the air mass back trajectories were
associated with south/southwesterly airflow. During this event, nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a dramatic increase in their concentrations compared
to the values observed during the previous day, reaching up to 429 and
60 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The OMI (Ozone Mapping Instrument) aerosol
index (AI) and 3-day backward trajectory (1, 2, 3 and 4 km altitudes)
air masses arriving at the Erdemli sampling site on 2 March 2014 are shown in
Fig. 4. As can be seen from the figure, all air masses (except at 1 km
altitude) originated from north Africa, whereas the back trajectory for 1 km
altitude exhibited airflow from the Middle East. Hence, it is suggested that the
sampling site was under the influence of mineral dust transport originating
from desert regions located in the Middle East and north Africa. In support of this,
the OMI-AI diagram clearly indicates a large dust plume over the eastern Mediterranean between coordinates 20–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 15–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.
The aerosol index was found to be very high over the northeastern
Mediterranean, ranging from 2.0 to 4.5. During this dust episode, 85 % of
the WSON was associated with the coarse fraction, which further supports
mineral dust being a main source of water-soluble organic nitrogen.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e4543">Three-day back trajectories indicating the transport of air masses
1000 m (black circle), 2000 m (black star), 3000 m (black square) and
4000 m (black triangle) on 2 March 2014 for Erdemli. The aerosol index (AI) from
OMI (Ozone Mapping Instrument) distribution is also illustrated with a color bar
from grey to dark red.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/3603/2018/acp-18-3603-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4553">Arithmetic mean concentrations together with corresponding standard
deviations of WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust and
non-dust events are presented in Fig. 5. As can be deduced from the diagram
(except for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> indicated
a distinct difference between dust and non-dust events. Indeed, the application
of the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test indicated statistically significant
differences between dust and non-dust events for WSON (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03),
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00002) and nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000001),
whereas no statistically significant difference was observed for
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The crustally derived nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
anthropologically derived NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust events had arithmetic means of
95.8 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 26.1 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were almost 4 and
2 times higher than those observed for non-dust events, respectively.
Such an increase in concentrations during dust events for these species has
been previously reported in the eastern Mediterranean (Koçak et al.,
2004b). Similarly, the arithmetic mean of WSON (38.2 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during
dust events was 1.3 times higher compared to the value observed during
non-dust events (29.4 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Percent contributions of coarse WSON
for dust and non-dust events were almost identical, being 58 and 60 %,
respectively. A similar enrichment of WSON during dust events has been
reported for Erdemli (Mace et al., 2003a), the Yellow Sea (Shi et al., 2010) and
Finokalia (Violaki and Mihalopoulos, 2010). In addition, Griffin et
al. (2007) have demonstrated a significant difference between dust and
non-dust events for bacterial- and fungal-colony-forming units at Erdemli, the
former being much greater. Thus, it might be speculated that this enhancement
during dust events can be due to (a) mineral-dust-borne microorganisms, and/or
(b) interaction (e.g., adsorption, acid-based reaction) between mineral
dust and organic nitrogen compounds.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e4803">Arithmetic means together with corresponding standard deviations of
WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust and non-dust
events at the Erdemli site. Orange and blue bars denote arithmetic means for dust
and non-dust, respectively. The black vertical line shows standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=219.08622pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/3603/2018/acp-18-3603-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4851">Arithmetic means along with standard deviations of WSON,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in aerosol samples as a function of the classified airflow
corresponding to 3-day air mass back trajectories reaching Erdemli.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Airflow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Middle East</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Turkey</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Eastern Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Western Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mediterranean Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Impact of airflow on WSON</title>
      <p id="d1e5323">Arithmetic mean concentrations together with corresponding standard
deviations for water-soluble nitrogen species and nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in aerosol
samples according to categorized air mass sectors (at 1 km) are presented in
Table 5. WSON concentrations for the Middle East, north Africa and Turkey<?pagebreak page3612?> were
comparable and arithmetic mean values were, respectively, 33, 36 and
32 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Correspondingly, mean WSON concentrations for eastern
Europe, western Europe and the Mediterranean Sea were 26, 26 and
22 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, being at least 1.2 times lower than those observed for
the Middle East, north Africa and Turkey (Mann–Whitney U test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Coarse-mode contributions of WSON for air flow from the Middle East (61 %),
north Africa (58 %) and Turkey (63 %) ranged from 58 to 63 %.
However, lower coarse-mode contributions were observed when air flow
originated from eastern Europe (49 %), western Europe (48 %) and the Mediterranean Sea (27 %). The highest NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were
associated with airflow from north Africa and Turkey, with a value of 18 and
15 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and there was a statistically
significant difference compared to the remaining air mass sectors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The mean concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for air masses
derived from north Africa and Turkey were at least 1.3 times larger than those
calculated for the Middle East, eastern Europe, western Europe and
Mediterranean Sea air sectors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had the highest
concentration under the influence of airflow derived from Turkey. For this
airflow, detected concentration was 1.5–2.4 times greater than that
calculated for other air mass sectors. The Mann–Whitney U test showed that
there was a statistically significant difference in the nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations. Arithmetic mean concentrations of nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Middle
East and north Africa were approximately 2 times higher compared to the
remaining air masses. As expected, these two airflows were primarily
influenced by crustal material due to sporadic dust events originating from
deserts located in north Africa and the Middle East.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5474">Source apportionment of WSON from positive matrix factorization for
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at Erdemli.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/3603/2018/acp-18-3603-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Source apportionment for WSON in aerosol</title>
      <p id="d1e5498">A number of studies have discussed the possible sources of WSON in aerosol
material by applying either simple correlation analyses (Mace et al., 2003a;
Violaki and Mihalapoulos, 2010; Ho et al., 2015) or multivariate factor
analyses (FA; Chen and Chen, 2010), including PMF (Chen et al., 2010). Usage of
correlation analyses is useful when the numbers in sample populations are
limited; however large datasets are required in order to carry out PMF and
FA. Direct and indirect emissions of WSON from the sea surface have been
demonstrated (Miyakazi et al., 2011; Altieri et al., 2016). Previous studies
in the eastern Mediterranean have observed WSON to be associated with mineral
dust (Mace et al., 2003a; Violaki and Mihalopoulos, 2010). As stated by Mace
et al. (2003a), WSON might either have originated from mineral dust or
might have been carried by dust events owing to adsorption of gaseous organic nitrogen
compounds onto preexisting particles. In addition, Violaki and
Mihalapoulos (2010) have shown fossil fuel and biomass burning as sources of
WSON in the eastern Mediterranean atmosphere.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3613?><p id="d1e5501">Figure 6 describes the potential sources of WSON by applying PMF 5.0. The
predominant two factors were chiefly found to be related with WSTN. The first
factor had a high-loading for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a value of 0.81 and a
moderate loading of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.45). As expected, the factor
contribution plot (not shown) indicated a summer maximum, demonstrating
accumulation of these particles due to the absence of rain and enhanced
gas–particle formation under the prevailing conditions (high temperature
and solar radiation). The equivalent ratio of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for this factor was 0.79, indicating (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Koçak
et al., 2007). A total of 60 % of the air mass trajectories was found to be
originated from Turkey when the first highest 20 % of the factor loading
were considered. Consequently, this factor might principally be ascribed to
regional sources such as urban agglomerations (Ankara, İzmir and
İstanbul) and industrial activities (particularly the Marmara region). The
second factor explained 77 % of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation and described
17 and 10 % of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation,
respectively. This group was also associated with cations such as Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(11 %), K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (7 %), Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (22 %) and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (29 %),
implying reactions mainly between acidic nitrate and alkaline species. It has
been shown that emissions of Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result from motor
vehicles (Lim at al., 2010). Taking into account the absence of Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
this factor may be attributed to combustion. The first and second factors
accounted for 20 and 22 % of the variability in WSON, respectively. It
might, therefore, be argued that the variability of WSON in the first group
resulted from the reaction between volatile organic N and ammonium sulfate
aerosols, whilst the variability of WSON explained by the second factor was as
a result of the reaction between volatile organic compounds and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and/or neutralization of acidic nitrate by alkaline nitrogen-containing
compounds such as urea and amine. The third factor was heavily influenced by
Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.8) and Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.70), while it was moderately impacted by Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This factor is likely due to sea salt formation. The fourth factor
was predominantly impacted by Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence may be attributed to
crustal material. Crustal sources explained 10 % of the WSON variability.
The final defined factor had a moderate loading of WSON (EV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43,
explained 43 %) while it was affiliated with Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.15), K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(0.22) and Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.24). The factor contribution diagram shows the highest
values to be in summer (not shown) and hence it can be attributed to resuspension
of the soil particularly affected by intense agricultural activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>Atmospheric depositions of N species and implications
regarding marine production</title>
      <p id="d1e5797">The atmospheric dry (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">337</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 21.3 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and wet
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 36.7 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition fluxes of WSON,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and WSTN from March 2014 and April 2015 are
demonstrated in Table 6. The atmospheric deposition of water-soluble total
nitrogen (57.8 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was chiefly originated from wet
deposition (36.7 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, amounting to 63 % of the
total atmospheric deposition. This difference might be attributed to the
water-soluble ammonium; for instance, the atmospheric deposition of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15.6 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was dominated by wet
deposition, contributing 92 % of the total ammonium atmospheric flux.
In contrast, the atmospheric fluxes of WSON and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were more or less
equally influenced by both deposition modes. Corresponding WSON
(9.8 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(10.0 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions to dry deposition were
found to be 46 and 48 % respectively. In contrast, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(1.3 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was only estimated to contribute 6 %
of the total deposition. Wet deposition of nitrogen was impacted by WSON
(10.8 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(11.7 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(14.3 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the increasing order
29 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 %. On average, WSON accounted for
36 % of the total atmospheric deposition of WSTN. The atmospheric
deposition of the dissolved inorganic nitrogen
(DIN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37.3 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to decrease about
45 % compared to the value reported by Koçak et al. (2010,
DIN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The reason for this decrease is
beyond the scope of this article; nonetheless, there is a need to understand how
the DIN flux changed from the beginning of the 2000s to 2015.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6"><caption><p id="d1e6308">Atmospheric dry (337 samples) and wet (23 samples) deposition of
WSON, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and WSTN together with their relative
contributions at Erdemli during the period of March 2014 to April 2015.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Relative</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">contribution</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSTN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Relative</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">contribution</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSTN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3614?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d1e6617">In the current study, water-soluble organic nitrogen in aerosol and rain
samples obtained over the eastern Mediterranean has been investigated. From
this investigation the following summary may be made.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6622">Of the nitrogen species, aerosol WSON (23.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.3 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
exhibited the highest arithmetic mean, followed by ammonium
(23.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.4 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then nitrate
(17.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.7 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerosol WSON was mainly associated
with coarse particles (66 %). The WSTN was equally influenced by WSON and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, each contributing 37 and 35 %, respectively, whereas the
contribution to WSTN of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>was 28 %. In rainwater, the VWM
concentrations of water-soluble nitrogen species were comparable. WSON and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accounted for 29 and 32 % of the WSTN, whilst NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
elucidated 39 % of the WSTN.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6741">Aerosol WSON concentrations exhibited large variation from one day to
another day. Generally, lower concentrations were observed during rainy days.
Higher concentrations of aerosol WSON were associated with different airflow.
The three highest concentrations were related to (i) mineral dust transport
from Sahara and Middle Eastern deserts, (ii) north/northwesterly airflow
from Turkey's largest cultivated plain, Konya, and (iii) mid-range pollution
transport from the Turkish coast.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6746">Influence of mineral dust transport on aerosol WSON concentrations was
assessed. The crustally derived nssCa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and anthropogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for dust events had arithmetic means of 95.8 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
26.1 nmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were almost 4 and 2 times higher than
those of observed for non-dust events. The arithmetic mean of WSON
(38.2 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust events was 1.3 times higher compared to that
observed for non-dust events (29.4 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6829">Source apportionment suggested that aerosol WSON was mainly originated
from anthropogenic sources, including agricultural (43 %), secondary
aerosols (20 %) and nitrate (22 %); whereas the two natural sources,
crustal material (10 %) and sea salts (5 %), contributed 15 % to
the WSON.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6833">The total atmospheric deposition of water-soluble nitrogen
(57.8 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was mainly via wet deposition
(36.7 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the atmospheric fluxes of
WSON and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were equally influenced by the dry and wet deposition
modes. On average, WSON accounted for 36 % of the total atmospheric
deposition of WSTN. From the beginning of the 2000s to 2015, the atmospheric
deposition of the dissolved inorganic nitrogen declined about 45 %; as a
consequence there is a need to understand how the DIN flux changed.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e6906">Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page3615?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title/>
      <p id="d1e6917">In this section, the authors briefly summarize the main features of the
positive matrix factorization (PMF).</p>
      <p id="d1e6920">The PMF receptor model was described in detail by Paatero and Tapper (1994) and the EPA PMF 5.0 User Guide. The details of the algorithm are
also provided by the EPA PMF 5.0 User Guide. This multivariate tool decomposes the data
matrix (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> rows in other words number of
samples and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> columns: number of species) into two matrices: (i) source
contributions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and (ii) source profiles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This can be given as follows:

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M445" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">GF</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the residual part and the number of factors
extracted, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e7016">In order to run PMF, two input files are needed: (i) concentration and
(ii) uncertainty. The first file includes concentrations, whilst the second
file contains uncertainty for each species. Uncertainty for PMF application
can be calculated using different approaches such as an ad hoc formula (Anttila et
al., 1995), a fixed fraction of the concentration (Paatero et al., 2014) or
a more complicated way, as proposed by Polissar et al. (1998). No matter how it
is calculated, if uncertainty is too high for one parameter, species will be
categorized as bad<?xmltex \hack{\vadjust{\newpage}}?> by the PMF. For example, the precision of WSON for this
study was found to be almost 3 times more than that of the arithmetic mean. If one
uses Eq. (3) to calculate the uncertainty of WSON for each data point, then
it will be omitted by PMF, causing very high uncertainty values.
Consequently, there will be no source apportionment for WSON. In order to
obtain reasonable factor profiles for WSON, a two-step procedure was proposed.
First, Eq. (3) is used to eliminate WSON samples when their
corresponding precisions are lower than a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.3 (see Eq. 4).
Second, the uncertainty is set to a higher value for WSON (15 %) compared to
the remaining species (5 %) since WSON inevitably exhibits very low
precision (see Eqs. 1 and 3).</p>
      <p id="d1e7028">After the base run one has to estimate the quality of the obtained results from
PMF (for more details, see the EPA PMF 5.0 User Guide and Paatero et al., 2014).
Base model displacement (DISP), bootstrap (BS) and bootstrap displacement
(BS-DISP) methods are the main tools of assessing quality. It has been demonstrated
that these three methods complement each other (for more details, see Paatero et
al., 2014). EFA PMF 5.0 provides aerosol data obtained from Baltimore and
guides the applicant step by step to robustly use the source apportionment
program of EPA PM 5.0. More details are given in the EFA 5.0 User Guide, and this is
accessible to the scientific community.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e7036">MK developed the concept and designed the study.
MN and MK performed the experiments, analyzed the data and prepared the
manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e7042">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e7048">This article is part of the special issue “CHemistry and AeRosols
Mediterranean EXperiments (ChArMEx) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7054">This work was mainly supported by the Scientific and Technological Research
Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). Required data were collected within the
framework of the TUBITAK 113Y107 project. This study was also supported by
the DEKOSIM (Center for Marine Ecosystem and Climate Research) Project
(BAP-08-11-DPT.2012K120880) funded by the Ministry of Development of Turkey. We
would like to thank Ersin Tursak, Pınar Kalegeri and
Merve Açıkyol for helping during sample collection and analysis.
Aerosol optical thickness, Ångström component and aerosol index values used
in this study were produced with the Giovanni online data system and developed
and maintained by the NASA GES DISC. We also acknowledge the MODIS and OMI
mission scientists and associated NASA personnel for the production of the
data used in this research effort. The authors would like to thank the two
anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments which greatly improved the
submitted manuscript. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Evangelos
Gerasopoulos<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Altieri, K., Fawcett, S., Peters, A., Sigman, D., and Hastings, M.: Marine
biogenic source of atmospheric organic nitrogen in the subtropical North
Atlantic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 925–930, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anttila, P., Paatero, P., Tapper, U., and Järvinen, O.: Source
identification of bulk wet deposition in Finland by positive Matrix
Factorization, Atmos. Environ., 14, 1705–1718, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bardouki, H., Liakakou, H., Economou, C., Sciare, J., Smolik, J., Zdimal, V.,
Eleftheriadis, K., Lazaridis, M., Dye, C., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Chemical
composition of size resolved atmospheric aerosols in the eastern
Mediterranean during summer and winter, Atmos. Environ., 37, 195–208, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cape, J. N., Kirika, A., Rowland, A. P., Wilson, D. R., Jickells, T. D., and
Cornell, S: Organic nitrogen in precipitation: real problem or sampling
artefact?, The Scientific World, 1, 230–237, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cape, J. N., Cornell, S. E., Jickells, T. D., and Nemitz, E.: Organic
nitrogen in the atmosphere – Where does it come from? A review of sources
and methods, Atmos. Res., 102, 30–48, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, H. and Chen, L.: Occurrence of water soluble organic nitrogen in
aerosols at a coastal area, J. Atmos. Chem., 65, 49–71,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-010-9181-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-010-9181-y</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, H., Chen, L., Chiang, Z., Hung, C., Lin, F., Chou, W., Gong, G., and
Wen, L.: Size fractionation and molecular composition of water-soluble
inorganic and organic nitrogen in aerosols of a coastal environment, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D22307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014157</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S., Rendell, A., and Jickells, T.: Atmospheric inputs of dissolved
organic nitrogen to the oceans, Nature, 376, 243–246, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S., Jickells, T., and Thornton, C.: Urea in rainwater and
atmospheric aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1903–1910, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S., Mace, K., Coeppicus, S., Duce, R., Huebert, B., Jickells, T.,
and Zhuang, L. Z.: Organic nitrogen in Hawaiian rain and aerosols, J.
Geophys. Res., 106, 7973–7983, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S. E., Jickells, T. D., Cape, J. N., Rowland, A. P., and Duce, R.
A.: Organic nitrogen deposition on land and coastal environments: a review of
methods and data, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2173–2191, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Kononenko, J. A., Turley, J. J., Corrigan, A.
L., Tolbert, M. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Formation of Nitrogen-Containing
Oligomers by Methylglyoxal and Amines in Simulated Evaporating Cloud
Droplets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 948–991, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory), Model Access via NOAA ARL READY Website, NOAA Air
Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, available at:
<uri>https://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri> (last access: 28 February 2018), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Duce, R. A., Liss, P. S., Merrill, J. T., Atlas, E. L., and Buat-Menard, P.:
The atmospheric input of trace species to the world ocean, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 5, 193–259, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Duce, R. A., LaRoche, J., Altieri, K., Arrigo, K. R., Baker, A. R., Capone,
D. G., Cornell, S., Dentener, F., Galloway, J., Ganeshram, R. S., Geider, R.
J., Jickells, T., Kuypers, M. M., Langlois, R., Liss, P. S., Liu, S. M.,
Middelburg, J. J., Moore, C. M., Nickovic, S., Oschlies, A., Pedersen, T.,
Prospero, J., Schlitzer, R., Seitzinger, S., Sorensen, L. L., Uematsu, M.,
Ulloa, O., Voss, M., Ward, B., and Zamora, L.: Impacts of atmospheric
anthropogenic nitrogen on the open ocean, Science, 320, 893–897, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. and Cowling, E.: Reactive nitrogen and the world: 200 years of
change, Ambio, 31, 64–71, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z. C.,
Freney, J. R., Martinelli, L. A., Seitzinger, S. P., and Sutton, M. A.:
Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential
solutions, Science, 320, 889–892, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, X., Wexler, A., and Clegg, S.: Atmospheric amines e part I. A review,
Atmos. Environ., 45, 524–546, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Glibert, P. M., Trice, T. M., Michael, B., and Lane, L.: Urea in the
tributaries of the Chesapeake and coastal bays of Maryland, Water Air Soil
Poll., 43, 160–229, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3617?><ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Griffin, D. W., Kubilay, N., Koçak, M., Gray, M. A., Borden, T. C., and
Shinn, E.: Airborne desert dust and aeromicrobiology over the Turkish
Mediterranean coastline, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4050–4062, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hamad, N., Millot, C., and Taupier-Letage, I.: A new hypothesis about the
surface circulation in the eastern basin of the Mediterranean Sea, Prog.
Oceanogr., 66, 287–298, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hansell, D.: Results and observations from the measurement of DOC and DON in
seawater using a high-temperature catalytic oxidation technique, Mar. Chem.,
41, 195–202, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Herut, B., Krom, M. D., Pan, G., and Mortimer, R.: Atmospheric input of
nitrogen and phosphorus to the Southeast Mediterranean: sources, fluxes, and
possible impact, Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1683–1692, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Herut, B., Collier, R., and Krom, M. D.: The role of dust in supplying
nitrogen and phosphorus to the Southeast Mediterranean, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
47, 870–878, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K., Ho, S. S., Huang, R., Liu, S., Cao, J., Zhang, T., Chuang H., Chan,
C. S., Hu, D., and Tian, L.: Characteristics of water-soluble organic
nitrogen in fine particulate matter in the continental area of China, Atmos.
Environ., 106, 252–261, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hopke, P. K., Xie, Y., Raunemaa, T., Biegalski, S., Landsberger, S.,
Maenhaut, W., Artaxo, P., and Cohen, D.: Characterization of the Gent Stacked
Filter Unit PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Sampler, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 27, 726–735, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, S., Rahn, K. A., and Arimoto, R.: Testing and optimizing two factor
analysis techniques on aerosol at Narragansett, Rhode Island, Atmos.
Environ., 33, 2169–2185, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jickells, T. D., Buitenhuis, E., Altieri, K., Baker, A. R., Capone, D., Duce,
R. A., Dentener, F., Fennel, K., Kanakidou, M., LaRoche, J., Lee, K., Liss,
P., Middelburg, J. J., Moore, J. K., Okin, G., Oschlies, A., Sarin, M.,
Seitzinger, S., Sharples, J., Singh, A., Suntharalingam, P., Uematsu, M., and
Zamora, L. M.: A reevaluation of the magnitude and impacts of anthropogenic
atmospheric nitrogen inputs on the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31,
289–305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GB005586</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Keene, W., Montag, J., Maben, J., Southwell, M., Leonard, J., Church, T.,
Moody, J., and Galloway, J.: Organic nitrogen in precipitation over Eastern
North America, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4529–4540, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Nimmo, M., Kubilay, N., and Herut, B.: Spatio-temporal aerosol
trace metal concentrations and sources in the Levantine Basin of the Eastern
Mediterranean, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2133–2144, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Kubilay, N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Ionic composition of lower
tropospheric aerosols at a Northeastern Mediterranean site: implications
regarding sources and long-range transport, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2067–2077,
2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Mihalopoulos, N., and Kubilay, N.: Chemical composition of the
fine and coarse fraction of aerosols in the Northeastern Mediterranean,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 7351–7368, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Koçak, M., Mihalopoulos, N., and Kubilay, N.: Source regions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the Eastern Mediterranean atmosphere, Atmos. Res., 92, 464–474, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Koçak, M., Kubilay, N., Tugrul, S., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Atmospheric
nutrient inputs to the northern levantine basin from a long-term observation:
sources and comparison with riverine inputs, Biogeosciences, 7, 4037–4050,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-4037-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-4037-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Theodosi, C., Zarmpas, P., Seguret, M. J. M., Herut, B.,
Kallos, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Kubilay, N., and Nimmo, M.: Influence of
mineral dust transport on the chemical composition and physical properties of
the Eastern Mediterranean aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 57, 266–277, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Krom, M. D., Brenner, S., Kress, N., and Gordon, L. I.: Phosphorus limitation
of primary productivity in the E. Mediterranean sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 36,
424–432, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Krom, M. D., Herut, B., and Mantoura, R. F. C.: Nutrient budget for the
Eastern Mediterranean: implications for P limitation, Limnol. Oceanogr., 49,
1582–1592, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Krom, M. D., Emeis, K.-C., and Van Cappellen, P.: Why is the Eastern
Mediterranean phosphorus limited?, Prog. Oceanogr., 85, 236–244, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kubilay, N. and Saydam, C.: Trace elements in atmospheric particulates over
the Eastern Mediterranean: concentration, sources and temporal variability,
Atmos. Environ., 29, 2289-2300, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kubilay, N., Nickovic, S., Moulin, C., and Dulac, F.: An illustration of the
transport and deposition of mineral dust onto the eastern Mediterranean,
Atmos. Environ., 34, 1293–1303, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, E., Chan, C. K., and Paatero, P.: Application of positive matrix
factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 3201–3212, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lim, J. M., Lee, J. H., Moon, J. H., Chung, Y. S., and Kim, K. H.: Source
apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at a small industrial area using positive matrix
factorization, Atmos. Res., 95, 88–100, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ludwig, W., Dumont, E., Meybeck, M., and Heussner, S.: River discharges of
water and nutrients to the Mediterranean and Black Sea: Major drivers for
ecosystem changes during past and future decades?, Prog. Oceanogr., 80,
199–217, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Mace, K. A., Kubilay, N., and Duce, R. A.: Organic nitrogen in rain and
aerosol in the eastern Mediterranean atmosphere: An association with
atmospheric dust, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002997" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002997</ext-link>,
2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Mace, K. A., Duce, R. A., and Tindale, N. W.: Organic nitrogen in rain and
aerosol at Cape Grim, Tasmania Australia, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4338,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003051</ext-link>,
2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Mace, K. A., Artaxo, P., and Duce, R.: Water-soluble organic nitrogen in
Amazon Basin aerosols during the dry (biomass burning) and wet seasons, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003557</ext-link>, 2003c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Markaki, Z., Oikonomou, K., Koçak, M., Kouvarakis, G., Chaniotaki, A.,
Kubilay, N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Atmospheric deposition of inorganic
phosphorus in the Levantine Basin, eastern Mediterranean: Spatial and
temporal variability and its role in seawater productivity, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 48, 1557–1568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1557</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Markaki, Z., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Violaki, K., Benyahya, L., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Variability of atmospheric deposition of dissolved nitrogen
and phosphorus in the Mediterranean and possible link to the anomalous
seawater N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P ratio, Mar. Chem., 120, 187–194,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2008.10.005</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mihalopoulos, N., Kerminen, V. M., Kanakidou, M., Berresheim, H., and Sciare,
J.: Formation of particulate sulfur species (sulfate and methanesulfonate)
during summer over the Eastern Mediterranean: a modelling approach, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 6860–6871, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, J.: The nitrogen content of rain falling at Rothamsted, J. Agr. Sci.,
1, 280–303, 1905.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3618?><ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Jung, J., Furutani, H., and Uematsu, M.:
Latitudinal distributions of organic nitrogen and organic carbon in marine
aerosols over the western North Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3037–3049,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Neff, J. C., Holland, E. A., Dentener, F. J., McDowell, W. H., and Russell,
K. M.: The origin, composition and rates of organic nitrogen deposition: A
missing piece of the nitrogen cycle. <italic>Biogeochemistry, 57</italic>, 99–136,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data value,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P., Eberly, S., Brown, S. G., and Norris, G. A.: Methods for
estimating uncertainty in factor analytic solutions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7,
781–797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-781-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-781-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Peierls, B. L. and Paerl, H. W.: Bioavailability of atmospheric organic
nitrogen deposition to coastal phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42,
1819–1823, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., Paatero, P., Malm, W. C., and Sisler, J. F.:
Atmospheric aerosol over Alaska 2. Elemental composition and sources,
J. Geophys. Res., 103, 19045–19057, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Powley, H. R., Krom, M. D., and Van Cappellen, P.: Understanding the unique
biogeochemistry of the Mediterranean Sea: Insights from a coupled phosphorus
and nitrogen model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 1010–1031,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GB005648</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. P. and Sanders, R. W.: Atmospheric inputs of dissolved organic
nitrogen stimulate estuarine bacteria and phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
44, 721–730, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Shi, J. H., Gao, H. W., Qi, J. H., Zhang, J., and Yao, X. H.: Sources,
compositions, and distributions of water-soluble organic nitrogen in aerosols
over the China Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 115,  D17303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013238" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013238</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Sorooshian, A., Murphy, S. M., Hersey, S., Gates, H., Padro, L. T., Nenes,
A., Brechtel, F. J., Jonsson, H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Comprehensive airborne characterization of aerosol from a major bovine
source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5489–5520,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5489-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5489-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Spokes, L. J., Jickells, T. D., and Jarvis, K.: Atmospheric inputs of trace
metals to the northeast Atlantic Ocean: the importance of south-easterly
flow, Mar. Chem., 76, 319–330, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R.,
Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, Claeys, W. M., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic
Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Timperley, M. H., Vigor-Brown, R. J., Kawashima, M., and Ishigami, M.:
Organic nitrogen compounds in atmospheric precipitation: their chemistry and
availability to phytoplankton, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 42, 1171–1177,
1985.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Twohy, C. H., Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Stevens, B., Tahnk, W., Wetzel,
M., Russell, L., and Burnet, F.: Evaluation of the aerosol indirect effect in
marine stratocumulus clouds: Droplet number, size, liquid water path, and
radiative impact, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005116</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>US EPA: EPA/600/R-14/108, available at: <uri>https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/pmf_5.0_user_guide.pdf</uri> (last access: 8 March 2018), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Viana, M., Pandolfi, M., Minguillon, M. C., Querol, X., Alastuey, A.,
Monfort, E., and Celades, I.: Inter-comparison of receptor models for PM
sources apportionment: case study in an industrial area, Atmos. Environ., 42,
3820–3832, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Violaki, K. and Mihalopoulos, N.: Water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) in
size-segregated atmospheric particles over the Eastern Mediterranean, Atmos.
Environ., 44, 4339–4345, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Violaki, K., Zarbas, P., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Long-term measurements of
dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in atmospheric deposition in the Eastern
Mediterranean: fluxes, origin and biogeochemical implications, Mar. Chem.,
120, 179–186, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Violaki, K., Sciare, J., Williams, J., Baker, A. R., Martino, M., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Atmospheric water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) over
marine environments: a global perspective, Biogeosciences, 12, 3131–3140,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3131-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-3131-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Yılmaz, A. and Tuğrul, S.: The effect of cold- and warm-core eddies on
the distribution and stoichiometry of dissolved nutrients in the northeastern
Mediterranean, J. Marine Syst., 16, 253–268, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in Aqueous Ammonium Sulfate Solutions: Products,
Kinetics and Hydration Effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es200989n</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yücel, N.: Monthly changes in primary and bacterial productivity in the
north-eastern Mediterranean shelf waters, PhD thesis, Middle East Technical
University, Institute of Marine Sciences, Erdemli, Turkey, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yücel, N.: Seasonal and spatial variation of bacterial production and
abundance in the northern Levantine Sea, Mediterr. Mar. Sci., 18, 97–106,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Zamora, L. M., Prospero, J. M., and Hansell, D. A.: Organic nitrogen in
aerosols and precipitation at Barbados and Miami: Implications regarding
sources, transport and deposition to the western subtropical North Atlantic,
J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20309,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD015660</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Liu, X., Jickells, T., Cape, N., Goulding, K.,
Fangmeier, A., and Zhang, F.: Evidence for organic N deposition and its
anthropogenic sources in China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1035–1041, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Atmospheric water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) in the eastern Mediterranean: origin and ramifications regarding marine productivity</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Aerosol and rain sampling in two size fractions was carried out at a rural site located
on the coast of the eastern Mediterranean, Erdemli, Turkey
(36°33′54′′&thinsp;N, 34°15′18′′&thinsp;E). A total of 674
aerosol samples in two size fractions (337 coarse, 337 fine) and 23
rain samples were collected between March 2014 and April 2015. Samples were
analyzed for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and ancillary water-soluble ions
using ion chromatography and water-soluble total nitrogen (WSTN) by applying a
high-temperature combustion method. The mean aerosol water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) was
23.8&thinsp;±&thinsp;16.3&thinsp;nmol&thinsp;N&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>, reaching a maximum of
79&thinsp;nmol&thinsp;N&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>, with about 66&thinsp;% being associated with coarse
particles. The volume weighted mean (VWM) concentration of WSON in rain was
21.5&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;N&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup>. The WSON contributed 37 and 29&thinsp;% to the
WSTN in aerosol and rainwater, respectively. Aerosol WSON concentrations
exhibited large temporal variation, mainly due to meteorology and the origin
of air mass flow. The highest mean aerosol WSON concentration was observed in
the summer and was attributed to the absence of rain and resuspension of
cultivated soil in the region. The mean concentration of WSON during dust
events (38.2&thinsp;±&thinsp;17.5&thinsp;nmol&thinsp;N&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>) was 1.3 times higher than that
of non-dust events (29.4&thinsp;±&thinsp;13.9&thinsp;nmol&thinsp;N&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>). Source
apportionment analysis demonstrated that WSON was originated from
agricultural activities (43&thinsp;%), secondary aerosol (20&thinsp;%), nitrate
(22&thinsp;%), crustal material (10&thinsp;%) and sea salt (5&thinsp;%). The dry and wet
depositions of WSON were equivalent and amounted to 36&thinsp;% of the total
atmospheric WSTN flux.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Altieri, K., Fawcett, S., Peters, A., Sigman, D., and Hastings, M.: Marine
biogenic source of atmospheric organic nitrogen in the subtropical North
Atlantic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 925–930, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anttila, P., Paatero, P., Tapper, U., and Järvinen, O.: Source
identification of bulk wet deposition in Finland by positive Matrix
Factorization, Atmos. Environ., 14, 1705–1718, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bardouki, H., Liakakou, H., Economou, C., Sciare, J., Smolik, J., Zdimal, V.,
Eleftheriadis, K., Lazaridis, M., Dye, C., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Chemical
composition of size resolved atmospheric aerosols in the eastern
Mediterranean during summer and winter, Atmos. Environ., 37, 195–208, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cape, J. N., Kirika, A., Rowland, A. P., Wilson, D. R., Jickells, T. D., and
Cornell, S: Organic nitrogen in precipitation: real problem or sampling
artefact?, The Scientific World, 1, 230–237, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cape, J. N., Cornell, S. E., Jickells, T. D., and Nemitz, E.: Organic
nitrogen in the atmosphere – Where does it come from? A review of sources
and methods, Atmos. Res., 102, 30–48, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H. and Chen, L.: Occurrence of water soluble organic nitrogen in
aerosols at a coastal area, J. Atmos. Chem., 65, 49–71,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-010-9181-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-010-9181-y</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H., Chen, L., Chiang, Z., Hung, C., Lin, F., Chou, W., Gong, G., and
Wen, L.: Size fractionation and molecular composition of water-soluble
inorganic and organic nitrogen in aerosols of a coastal environment, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D22307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014157</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S., Rendell, A., and Jickells, T.: Atmospheric inputs of dissolved
organic nitrogen to the oceans, Nature, 376, 243–246, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S., Jickells, T., and Thornton, C.: Urea in rainwater and
atmospheric aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1903–1910, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S., Mace, K., Coeppicus, S., Duce, R., Huebert, B., Jickells, T.,
and Zhuang, L. Z.: Organic nitrogen in Hawaiian rain and aerosols, J.
Geophys. Res., 106, 7973–7983, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cornell, S. E., Jickells, T. D., Cape, J. N., Rowland, A. P., and Duce, R.
A.: Organic nitrogen deposition on land and coastal environments: a review of
methods and data, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2173–2191, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Kononenko, J. A., Turley, J. J., Corrigan, A.
L., Tolbert, M. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Formation of Nitrogen-Containing
Oligomers by Methylglyoxal and Amines in Simulated Evaporating Cloud
Droplets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 948–991, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory), Model Access via NOAA ARL READY Website, NOAA Air
Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, available at:
<a href="https://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php" target="_blank">https://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</a> (last access: 28 February 2018), 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Duce, R. A., Liss, P. S., Merrill, J. T., Atlas, E. L., and Buat-Menard, P.:
The atmospheric input of trace species to the world ocean, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 5, 193–259, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Duce, R. A., LaRoche, J., Altieri, K., Arrigo, K. R., Baker, A. R., Capone,
D. G., Cornell, S., Dentener, F., Galloway, J., Ganeshram, R. S., Geider, R.
J., Jickells, T., Kuypers, M. M., Langlois, R., Liss, P. S., Liu, S. M.,
Middelburg, J. J., Moore, C. M., Nickovic, S., Oschlies, A., Pedersen, T.,
Prospero, J., Schlitzer, R., Seitzinger, S., Sorensen, L. L., Uematsu, M.,
Ulloa, O., Voss, M., Ward, B., and Zamora, L.: Impacts of atmospheric
anthropogenic nitrogen on the open ocean, Science, 320, 893–897, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. and Cowling, E.: Reactive nitrogen and the world: 200 years of
change, Ambio, 31, 64–71, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z. C.,
Freney, J. R., Martinelli, L. A., Seitzinger, S. P., and Sutton, M. A.:
Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential
solutions, Science, 320, 889–892, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, X., Wexler, A., and Clegg, S.: Atmospheric amines e part I. A review,
Atmos. Environ., 45, 524–546, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Glibert, P. M., Trice, T. M., Michael, B., and Lane, L.: Urea in the
tributaries of the Chesapeake and coastal bays of Maryland, Water Air Soil
Poll., 43, 160–229, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Griffin, D. W., Kubilay, N., Koçak, M., Gray, M. A., Borden, T. C., and
Shinn, E.: Airborne desert dust and aeromicrobiology over the Turkish
Mediterranean coastline, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4050–4062, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hamad, N., Millot, C., and Taupier-Letage, I.: A new hypothesis about the
surface circulation in the eastern basin of the Mediterranean Sea, Prog.
Oceanogr., 66, 287–298, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hansell, D.: Results and observations from the measurement of DOC and DON in
seawater using a high-temperature catalytic oxidation technique, Mar. Chem.,
41, 195–202, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Herut, B., Krom, M. D., Pan, G., and Mortimer, R.: Atmospheric input of
nitrogen and phosphorus to the Southeast Mediterranean: sources, fluxes, and
possible impact, Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1683–1692, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Herut, B., Collier, R., and Krom, M. D.: The role of dust in supplying
nitrogen and phosphorus to the Southeast Mediterranean, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
47, 870–878, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K., Ho, S. S., Huang, R., Liu, S., Cao, J., Zhang, T., Chuang H., Chan,
C. S., Hu, D., and Tian, L.: Characteristics of water-soluble organic
nitrogen in fine particulate matter in the continental area of China, Atmos.
Environ., 106, 252–261, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hopke, P. K., Xie, Y., Raunemaa, T., Biegalski, S., Landsberger, S.,
Maenhaut, W., Artaxo, P., and Cohen, D.: Characterization of the Gent Stacked
Filter Unit PM<sub>10</sub> Sampler, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 27, 726–735, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, S., Rahn, K. A., and Arimoto, R.: Testing and optimizing two factor
analysis techniques on aerosol at Narragansett, Rhode Island, Atmos.
Environ., 33, 2169–2185, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jickells, T. D., Buitenhuis, E., Altieri, K., Baker, A. R., Capone, D., Duce,
R. A., Dentener, F., Fennel, K., Kanakidou, M., LaRoche, J., Lee, K., Liss,
P., Middelburg, J. J., Moore, J. K., Okin, G., Oschlies, A., Sarin, M.,
Seitzinger, S., Sharples, J., Singh, A., Suntharalingam, P., Uematsu, M., and
Zamora, L. M.: A reevaluation of the magnitude and impacts of anthropogenic
atmospheric nitrogen inputs on the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31,
289–305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005586</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Keene, W., Montag, J., Maben, J., Southwell, M., Leonard, J., Church, T.,
Moody, J., and Galloway, J.: Organic nitrogen in precipitation over Eastern
North America, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4529–4540, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Nimmo, M., Kubilay, N., and Herut, B.: Spatio-temporal aerosol
trace metal concentrations and sources in the Levantine Basin of the Eastern
Mediterranean, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2133–2144, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Kubilay, N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Ionic composition of lower
tropospheric aerosols at a Northeastern Mediterranean site: implications
regarding sources and long-range transport, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2067–2077,
2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Mihalopoulos, N., and Kubilay, N.: Chemical composition of the
fine and coarse fraction of aerosols in the Northeastern Mediterranean,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 7351–7368, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Mihalopoulos, N., and Kubilay, N.: Source regions of PM<sub>10</sub>
in the Eastern Mediterranean atmosphere, Atmos. Res., 92, 464–474, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Kubilay, N., Tugrul, S., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Atmospheric
nutrient inputs to the northern levantine basin from a long-term observation:
sources and comparison with riverine inputs, Biogeosciences, 7, 4037–4050,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-4037-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-4037-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Koçak, M., Theodosi, C., Zarmpas, P., Seguret, M. J. M., Herut, B.,
Kallos, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Kubilay, N., and Nimmo, M.: Influence of
mineral dust transport on the chemical composition and physical properties of
the Eastern Mediterranean aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 57, 266–277, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Krom, M. D., Brenner, S., Kress, N., and Gordon, L. I.: Phosphorus limitation
of primary productivity in the E. Mediterranean sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 36,
424–432, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Krom, M. D., Herut, B., and Mantoura, R. F. C.: Nutrient budget for the
Eastern Mediterranean: implications for P limitation, Limnol. Oceanogr., 49,
1582–1592, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Krom, M. D., Emeis, K.-C., and Van Cappellen, P.: Why is the Eastern
Mediterranean phosphorus limited?, Prog. Oceanogr., 85, 236–244, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kubilay, N. and Saydam, C.: Trace elements in atmospheric particulates over
the Eastern Mediterranean: concentration, sources and temporal variability,
Atmos. Environ., 29, 2289-2300, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kubilay, N., Nickovic, S., Moulin, C., and Dulac, F.: An illustration of the
transport and deposition of mineral dust onto the eastern Mediterranean,
Atmos. Environ., 34, 1293–1303, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, E., Chan, C. K., and Paatero, P.: Application of positive matrix
factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 3201–3212, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, J. M., Lee, J. H., Moon, J. H., Chung, Y. S., and Kim, K. H.: Source
apportionment of PM<sub>10</sub> at a small industrial area using positive matrix
factorization, Atmos. Res., 95, 88–100, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ludwig, W., Dumont, E., Meybeck, M., and Heussner, S.: River discharges of
water and nutrients to the Mediterranean and Black Sea: Major drivers for
ecosystem changes during past and future decades?, Prog. Oceanogr., 80,
199–217, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mace, K. A., Kubilay, N., and Duce, R. A.: Organic nitrogen in rain and
aerosol in the eastern Mediterranean atmosphere: An association with
atmospheric dust, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002997" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002997</a>,
2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mace, K. A., Duce, R. A., and Tindale, N. W.: Organic nitrogen in rain and
aerosol at Cape Grim, Tasmania Australia, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4338,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003051</a>,
2003b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Mace, K. A., Artaxo, P., and Duce, R.: Water-soluble organic nitrogen in
Amazon Basin aerosols during the dry (biomass burning) and wet seasons, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003557</a>, 2003c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Markaki, Z., Oikonomou, K., Koçak, M., Kouvarakis, G., Chaniotaki, A.,
Kubilay, N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Atmospheric deposition of inorganic
phosphorus in the Levantine Basin, eastern Mediterranean: Spatial and
temporal variability and its role in seawater productivity, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 48, 1557–1568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1557</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Markaki, Z., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Violaki, K., Benyahya, L., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Variability of atmospheric deposition of dissolved nitrogen
and phosphorus in the Mediterranean and possible link to the anomalous
seawater N&thinsp;∕&thinsp;P ratio, Mar. Chem., 120, 187–194,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.10.005</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mihalopoulos, N., Kerminen, V. M., Kanakidou, M., Berresheim, H., and Sciare,
J.: Formation of particulate sulfur species (sulfate and methanesulfonate)
during summer over the Eastern Mediterranean: a modelling approach, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 6860–6871, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, J.: The nitrogen content of rain falling at Rothamsted, J. Agr. Sci.,
1, 280–303, 1905.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Jung, J., Furutani, H., and Uematsu, M.:
Latitudinal distributions of organic nitrogen and organic carbon in marine
aerosols over the western North Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3037–3049,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Neff, J. C., Holland, E. A., Dentener, F. J., McDowell, W. H., and Russell,
K. M.: The origin, composition and rates of organic nitrogen deposition: A
missing piece of the nitrogen cycle. <i>Biogeochemistry, 57</i>, 99–136,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data value,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P., Eberly, S., Brown, S. G., and Norris, G. A.: Methods for
estimating uncertainty in factor analytic solutions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7,
781–797, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-781-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-781-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Peierls, B. L. and Paerl, H. W.: Bioavailability of atmospheric organic
nitrogen deposition to coastal phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42,
1819–1823, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., Paatero, P., Malm, W. C., and Sisler, J. F.:
Atmospheric aerosol over Alaska 2. Elemental composition and sources,
J. Geophys. Res., 103, 19045–19057, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Powley, H. R., Krom, M. D., and Van Cappellen, P.: Understanding the unique
biogeochemistry of the Mediterranean Sea: Insights from a coupled phosphorus
and nitrogen model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 1010–1031,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005648</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. P. and Sanders, R. W.: Atmospheric inputs of dissolved organic
nitrogen stimulate estuarine bacteria and phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
44, 721–730, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, J. H., Gao, H. W., Qi, J. H., Zhang, J., and Yao, X. H.: Sources,
compositions, and distributions of water-soluble organic nitrogen in aerosols
over the China Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 115,  D17303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013238" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013238</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Sorooshian, A., Murphy, S. M., Hersey, S., Gates, H., Padro, L. T., Nenes,
A., Brechtel, F. J., Jonsson, H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Comprehensive airborne characterization of aerosol from a major bovine
source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5489–5520,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5489-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5489-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Spokes, L. J., Jickells, T. D., and Jarvis, K.: Atmospheric inputs of trace
metals to the northeast Atlantic Ocean: the importance of south-easterly
flow, Mar. Chem., 76, 319–330, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R.,
Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, Claeys, W. M., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic
Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Timperley, M. H., Vigor-Brown, R. J., Kawashima, M., and Ishigami, M.:
Organic nitrogen compounds in atmospheric precipitation: their chemistry and
availability to phytoplankton, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 42, 1171–1177,
1985.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Twohy, C. H., Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Stevens, B., Tahnk, W., Wetzel,
M., Russell, L., and Burnet, F.: Evaluation of the aerosol indirect effect in
marine stratocumulus clouds: Droplet number, size, liquid water path, and
radiative impact, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005116</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA: EPA/600/R-14/108, available at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/pmf_5.0_user_guide.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/pmf_5.0_user_guide.pdf</a> (last access: 8 March 2018), 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Viana, M., Pandolfi, M., Minguillon, M. C., Querol, X., Alastuey, A.,
Monfort, E., and Celades, I.: Inter-comparison of receptor models for PM
sources apportionment: case study in an industrial area, Atmos. Environ., 42,
3820–3832, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Violaki, K. and Mihalopoulos, N.: Water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) in
size-segregated atmospheric particles over the Eastern Mediterranean, Atmos.
Environ., 44, 4339–4345, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Violaki, K., Zarbas, P., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Long-term measurements of
dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in atmospheric deposition in the Eastern
Mediterranean: fluxes, origin and biogeochemical implications, Mar. Chem.,
120, 179–186, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Violaki, K., Sciare, J., Williams, J., Baker, A. R., Martino, M., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Atmospheric water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) over
marine environments: a global perspective, Biogeosciences, 12, 3131–3140,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3131-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3131-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Yılmaz, A. and Tuğrul, S.: The effect of cold- and warm-core eddies on
the distribution and stoichiometry of dissolved nutrients in the northeastern
Mediterranean, J. Marine Syst., 16, 253–268, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in Aqueous Ammonium Sulfate Solutions: Products,
Kinetics and Hydration Effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es200989n</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yücel, N.: Monthly changes in primary and bacterial productivity in the
north-eastern Mediterranean shelf waters, PhD thesis, Middle East Technical
University, Institute of Marine Sciences, Erdemli, Turkey, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yücel, N.: Seasonal and spatial variation of bacterial production and
abundance in the northern Levantine Sea, Mediterr. Mar. Sci., 18, 97–106,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zamora, L. M., Prospero, J. M., and Hansell, D. A.: Organic nitrogen in
aerosols and precipitation at Barbados and Miami: Implications regarding
sources, transport and deposition to the western subtropical North Atlantic,
J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20309,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015660</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Liu, X., Jickells, T., Cape, N., Goulding, K.,
Fangmeier, A., and Zhang, F.: Evidence for organic N deposition and its
anthropogenic sources in China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1035–1041, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
