<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-18079-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Modeling organic aerosol concentrations and properties during winter 2014 in the northwestern Mediterranean region</article-title><alt-title>Organic aerosol concentrations during ChArMEx 2014 winter</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Organic aerosol concentrations during ChArMEx 2014 winter}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. Chrit et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chrit</surname><given-names>Mounir</given-names></name>
          <email>mounir.chrit@enpc.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sartelet</surname><given-names>Karine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Sciare</surname><given-names>Jean</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Majdi</surname><given-names>Marwa</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8618-8355</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>José</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Petit</surname><given-names>Jean-Eudes</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-5927</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Dulac</surname><given-names>François</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>CEREA, joint laboratory Ecole des Ponts ParisTech – EDF R&amp;D,
Université Paris-Est, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 77455 Champs sur Marne, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>LSCE, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL),
Université Paris-Saclay, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Gif-sur-Yvette, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>EEWRC, The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>INERIS,
Parc Technologique ALATA, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Laboratoire de Métérologie Dynamique – IPSL, Sorbonne
Université, Centre national de <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> la recherche scientifique (CNRS),
Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 8539, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Mounir Chrit (mounir.chrit@enpc.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>24</issue>
      <fpage>18079</fpage><lpage>18100</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e170">Organic aerosols are measured at a remote site (Ersa) on the cape of Corsica
in the northwestern Mediterranean basin during the winter campaign of 2014 of the CHemistry and AeRosols Mediterranean
EXperiment (CharMEx), when high organic
concentrations from anthropogenic origins are observed.
This work aims to represent the observed organic aerosol
concentrations and properties (oxidation state) using the
air-quality model Polyphemus with a surrogate approach for secondary organic
aerosol (SOA) formation.
Because intermediate and semi-volatile organic compounds (I/S-VOCs) are the main
precursors of SOAs at Ersa during winter 2014, different parameterizations
to represent the emission and aging of I/S-VOCs were implemented in the
chemistry-transport model of Polyphemus (different volatility distribution
emissions and single-step oxidation vs multi-step oxidation within a volatility basis set – VBS – framework, inclusion of non-traditional volatile organic
compounds – NTVOCs). Simulations using the different parameterizations are compared to
each other and to the measurements (concentration and oxidation state). The
highly observed organic concentrations are well reproduced in all the
parameterizations. They are slightly underestimated in most
parameterizations. The volatility distribution at emissions influences the concentrations more strongly than the choice of the parameterization that may
be used for aging (single-step oxidation vs multi-step oxidation), stressing
the importance of an accurate characterization of emissions. Assuming the
volatility distribution of sectors other than residential heating to be the
same as residential heating may lead to a strong underestimation of organic
concentrations. The observed organic oxidation and oxygenation states are
strongly underestimated in all simulations, even when multigenerational
aging of I/S-VOCs from all sectors is modeled. This suggests that
uncertainties in the emissions and aging of I/S-VOC emissions remain to be
elucidated, with a potential role of formation of organic nitrate and
low-volatility highly oxygenated organic molecules.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e180">Organic aerosols (OAs) are one of the main compound of submicron particulate
matter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref>. Their primary fraction originates
mostly from combustion sources, such as traffic and residential heating.
However, large uncertainties remain regarding their emissions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.2"/>. POAs have been
considered<?pagebreak page18080?> non-volatile in emissions inventories and chemistry-transport
models (CTMs); however, recent studies have provided clear evidence that a
large portion of POA emissions partition between the gas and the particle
phases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.3"/>. Organic species that compose POAs are often
classified depending on their volatility: intermediate volatility organic
compounds (IVOCs; with saturation concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), semi-volatile organic compounds
(SVOCs; with saturation concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range
0.1–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), or low-volatility organic compounds
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">LVOCs; with saturation concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than
0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e332">OAs originate not only from the partitioning of POAs between the gas and the
particle phases but also from secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation through the
gas-to-particle partitioning of the oxidation products of biogenic and
anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and intermediate and semi
volatile organic compounds (I/S-VOCs). The main biogenic VOC precursors are
terpenes (<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, limonene, humulene) and isoprene
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.5"/>, while the main anthropogenic VOC precursors are
aromatics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., toluene and xylene;</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e364">Available measurements and modeling studies are useful in elucidating the
composition and origin of OAs in different seasons
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.7"/>.
Indeed, over the Mediterranean region, the oxidation of biogenic VOCs may
dominate the formation of OAs during the summer
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.8"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.9"/> found that
I/S-VOC emissions do not influence the concentrations of OAs in summer
over the Mediterranean region much, but biogenic SOAs prevail. Because biogenic
emissions are low in winter, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.10"/> demonstrated a clear shift
in the SOA origin between summer and winter during a measurement campaign
from February 2012 to February 2013 conducted in Zurich using the Aerosol
Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="altparen.11"/>) measurements. This last
study notably highlights the importance of biogenic VOC emissions and
biogenic SOA production in summer as well as the importance of residential heating
in winter. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.12"/> performed a source apportionment study at
the European scale and revealed that residential combustion (mainly related
to wood burning) contributed about 60 %–70 % to SOA formation during
the winter, whereas non-residential combustion and road-transportation sector
contributed about 30 %–40 % to SOA formation. Moreover, residential
heating can also be a source of POAs, which may make up a large fraction
(20 % to 90 %) of the submicron particulate matter in winter
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.13"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e389">Modeling OA concentrations in winter is challenging, because it mostly involves
the characterization of I/S-VOC emissions and aging. Standard gridded
emission inventories, such as those of the European Monitoring and Evaluation
Programme (EMEP, <uri>http://www.emep.int</uri>, last access: 10 December 2018) over Europe, do not yet include I/S-VOC
emissions, and their emissions are still highly uncertain. For example,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.14"/> estimated that emissions from residential wood combustion
were underestimated by a factor of 2–3 in the 2005 EUCAARI inventory. As an
indirect method of accounting for the missing organic emissions in the absence
of precise emission inventories, numerous modeling studies estimate the
I/S-VOC  emissions from POA emissions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.15"/> or more
recently from VOC emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.16"/>. A
ratio of  <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>    of 1.5 has been used in several air-quality studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.17"/>. For
example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.18"/> simulated the particle composition over greater
Paris during the winter MEGAPOLI campaign, and they found that simulated OAs
agreed well with observed OAs when gas-phase I/S-VOCs emissions are estimated
using a ratio <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> of 1.5, as derived following the
measurements at the tailpipe of vehicles representative of the average French
vehicle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.19"/>. However, various ratios are used to better fit the
measurements. For example, over Europe, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.20"/> used a <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> ratio
of 4, but they also used a ratio of 6 in a sensitivity simulation
to better fit the observed OA concentrations in winter. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.21"/> used
an IVOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> POA ratio of 1.5, but they also used a ratio of 3 in their high-IVOC emission
scenario.</p>
      <?pagebreak page18081?><p id="d1e441">The atmospheric evolution (also known as aging) of I/S-VOCs as well as their
impacts on atmospheric OA concentrations remain poorly characterized
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.22"/> and deserve a better understanding. A widely used approach
to model the aging of I/S-VOCs in CTMs is the volatility basis set (VBS)
approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.23"/>. I/S-VOCs are divided into several classes of
volatility where each class is represented by a surrogate. When oxidized by
the hydroxyl radical, it leads to the formation of surrogates of lower
volatility classes. This approach tends to lead to an overestimation of
simulated organic concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.24"/> if fragmentation is
not considered (formation of high-volatility surrogates during the
oxidation). Although the one-dimensional basis set (1-D VBS) accounts for the
volatility of the surrogates, it does not allow the representation of varying
oxidation levels of OAs. The prognostic tool to date that is more powerful, the two-dimensional
VBS approach (2-D VBS), although it is computationally
burdensome, describes not only the aging of I/S-VOCs using not only the volatility
property (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but also the oxidation level (the oxygen-to-carbon ratio
O : C), taking into account three competing processes: functionalization,
oligomerization and fragmentation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.25"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.26"/>
developed a 1.5-D aging VBS-type scheme that accounts for multigenerational
aging, including functionalization, oligomerization and fragmentation, and
that represents both the volatility and the oxidation properties of the
surrogates. When oxidized by a hydroxyl radical, each surrogate leads to the
formation of more-oxidized and less-volatile surrogates with a reduced carbon
number. Functionalization and fragmentation are implicitly taken into account
in this approach because of the increase of the oxygen number and the
decrease of the carbon number of the surrogates formed. The 1.5-D VBS module
is implemented within two widely used CTMs, namely the Comprehensive Air Quality Model
with extensions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">CAMx;</named-content></xref>
and the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">CMAQ;</named-content></xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx17" id="text.29"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.30"/> used a simplified aging scheme with three
volatility bins. When oxidized by the hydroxyl radical, each surrogate forms
a less-volatile and more-oxidized surrogate that does not undergo
multigenerational aging. This simplified aging scheme is implemented in the
two widely used CTMs, Polyphemus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.31"/> and Chimere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.32"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e494">In winter, when anthropogenic emissions impact air quality the most,
anthropogenic emissions such as toluene and xylene may also form SOAs,
although they may be much less efficient than I/S-VOCs
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.33"/>. To take into account the emissions and
aging of anthropogenic VOCs that are usually not considered in CTMs (phenol;
naphthalene; <italic>m</italic>-,<italic>o</italic>-,<italic>p</italic>-cresol; etc., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.34"/> modified the
approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.35"/> by considering non-traditional VOCs (NTVOCs).
They are VOCs or IVOCs, not usually taken into account in CTMs, with a
saturation concentration in the low range of IVOCs.</p>
      <p id="d1e516">Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.36"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.37"/> estimated these NTVOCs
using chamber experiments as the mixture of phenol; <italic>m</italic>-, <italic>o</italic>-, <italic>p</italic>-cresol; <italic>m</italic>-,
<italic>o</italic>-, <italic>p</italic>-benzenediol/2-methylfuraldehyde;
dimethylphenols; guaiacol/methylbenzenediols; naphthalene; 2-methylnaphthalene/1-methylnaphthalene; acenaphthylene; syringol; biphenyl/acenaphthene; and
dimethylnaphthalene. Furthermore, they estimated the ratio NTVOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SVOC,
where SVOC is the primary semi-volatile organic matter, to be about 4.75.</p>
      <p id="d1e551">The oxidation level of OAs is important, because it is indicative of the degree
of hygroscopicity, surface tension <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.38"/>, and radiative property
of the OAs in addition to its ability to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)
over the Mediterranean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.39"/>.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.40"/> showed that, in summer in the western Mediterranean region,
OAs are highly oxidized and oxygenated. The CTM Polyphemus and Polair3d used in their study
does represent this high oxidation level of OAs after adding the
formation processes of highly oxidized species (autoxidation) and organic
nitrate formation to the model.</p>
      <p id="d1e563">The particle oxidation state is represented by the organic-mass-to-organic-carbon ratio (OM : OC). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.41"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.42"/>, OM : OC is an index of the contribution of heteroatoms
(O, H, S, N, etc.)   to the organic mass; chemically processed and aged
particles are expected to have higher OM : OC ratios compared to freshly
emitted and unprocessed aerosols. The oxygenation state is represented by the
oxygen-to-carbon ratio (O : C). It indicates the contribution of oxygen to
organic molecules and the ability of carbon atoms to form bonds with oxygen.</p>
      <p id="d1e572">Although the organic matter to organic carbon ratio (OM : OC) was first
believed to lie between 1.2 and 1.4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.43"/>, numerous studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.44"/> show that OM : OC is approximately 1.6 for
urban aerosols and 2.1 for non urban aerosols. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.45"/> developed an
algorithm to deconvolve the mass spectra of OAs obtained with an
Aerodyne<sup>™</sup> aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) in
order to estimate the mass concentrations of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated
organic aerosols (HOAs and OOAs). The mass of HOAs represents primary sources,
with an OM : OC ratio close to 1.2 and O : C ratio close to 0.1, while the
mass of OOAs represents secondary sources (aged and oxygenated) with an
OM : OC ratio close to 2.2 and an O : C ratio close to 1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.46"/>.
Using this technique, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.47"/> found an average OM : OC ratio of
1.8 in Pittsburgh in September. Over Europe, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.48"/> found that
secondary OAs are dominant in the OA fraction, with primary sources
contributing to less than 30 % of the total mass fraction.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.49"/> measured a ratio OM : OC ratio over 14 cities throughout
China and found that in summer, OM : OC is nearly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
the ratio is lower in winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.59</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The OM : OC ratio is lower
during winter due to the slow oxidation process owing to the low temperatures
in addition the low biogenic contribution to OA mass during winter. At Ersa,
over the Mediterranean and during the summer, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.50"/> found high
OM : OC and O : C ratios (2.5 and 1 respectively). They are due to aged
biogenic OAs, which <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.51"/> were able to represent by adding the
formation of extremely low-volatility species and organic nitrate to the
model and by considering the formation of organosulfate.</p>
      <p id="d1e636">Quantifying the effect of I/S-VOC emissions and their impact on the
atmospheric organic budget as well as the OA oxidation and oxygenation levels
during different seasons is challenging in spite of the recent advances
concerning the description of I/S-VOCs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.52"/>.
This work aims to evaluate how commonly used parameterizations and
assumptions of I/S-VOCs emissions and aging perform to model the OA
concentrations and properties in the western Mediterranean region in winter.
To that end, the CTM from the air-quality platform Polyphemus is<?pagebreak page18082?> used with
different parameterizations of I/S-VOCs emissions and aging.</p>
      <p id="d1e642">This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the setup of the
air-quality model used and reference measurements. Section 3 presents the
different emissions and aging mechanisms used to describe the evolution of
I/S-VOCs as well as the comparison method. Section 4 compares the simulated
concentrations, which are compositions of OAs for the simulations using the different
parameterizations. Finally, Sect. 5 compares the measured and simulated
OM : OC and O : C ratios.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model and measurement setup</title>
      <p id="d1e651">The period of interest of this study is January–March 2014, hereafter
referred to as the winter 2014 campaign.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>General model setup</title>
      <p id="d1e659">The Polyphemus and Polair3d air-quality model is used, with a similar setup to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.53"/>. Transport and dry and wet deposition are modeled following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.54"/>. The Carbon Bond 05 model is used for gas-phase
chemistry. Semi-volatile organic compound formation mechanisms from five SOA
gaseous precursors, namely isoprene, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and aromatic
compounds, and intermediate and semi-volatile organic compounds from
anthropogenic emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.55"/>, are added to CB05
model. These five precursors are modeled with a few surrogates as proxies to
represent all the species. The aerosol dynamics (coagulation and
condensation and evaporation) are modeled using the size-resolved aerosol model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.56"><named-content content-type="pre">SIREAM;</named-content></xref> based on a sectional approach with an
aerosol distribution of 24 sections of bound diameters: 0.01, 0.0141, 0.0199,
0.0281, 0.0398, 0.0562, 0.0794, 0.1121, 0.1585, 0.199, 0.25, 0.316, 0.4, 0.5,
0.63, 0.79, 1.0, 1.2589, 1.5849, 1.9953, 2.5119, 3.5481, 5.0119, 7.0795 and
10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p>
      <p id="d1e683">The thermodynamic model used for the condensation and evaporation of inorganic
aerosol is ISORROPIA v1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.57"/>, and the gas-particle partitioning of
SOAs is computed with SOAP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.58"/>. In order to compute the
gas-particle partitioning of both inorganics and organics, a bulk equilibrium
approach is adopted. After condensation and evaporation, the mass is
redistributed among size bins using the moving diameter algorithm
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.59"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e695">The simulations are run between 1 January and 2 April 2014 for both the
nesting (Europe) and the nested (Mediterranean) domains. The simulation
domains (Europe and Mediterranean) and the spatial resolution used in the
present study are the same as the ones used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.60"/>. The
spatial resolutions used for the European and Mediterranean domains are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
along longitude and latitude. 14 vertical levels are used for both domains
from the ground to 12 km. The heights of the cell interfaces are 0, 30, 60,
100, 150, 200, 300, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2400, 3500, 6000 and 12 000 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e741">Boundary conditions for the European domain are obtained from the global
chemistry-transport model MOZART v4.0
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="altparen.61"/>; <uri>https://www.acom.ucar.edu/wrf-chem/mozart.shtml</uri>,
last access: 10 December 2018). The European simulation provides initial and
boundary conditions to the Mediterranean one. The European Centre for
Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model provides the meteorological
fields. The Troen and Mahrt parameterization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.62"/> is used to
compute the vertical diffusion. The land cover is modeled using the Global
Land Cover 2000 (GLC-2000;
<uri>http://forobs.jrc.ec.europa.eu/products/glc2000/data_access.php</uri>, last
access: 10 December 2018) data set. Sea-salt emissions are parameterized
following Jaeglé et al. (2011) and are assumed to be composed of sodium,
chloride and sulfate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.63"/>. Biogenic emissions are estimated
with the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="altparen.64"/>). Anthropogenic emissions are generated using the
EDGAR-HTAP_V2 inventory for 2010
(<uri>http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/htap_v2/</uri>, last access:
10 December 2018). The monthly and daily temporal distribution for the
different activity sectors are obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.65"/>, and the hourly
temporal distribution is obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.66"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are speciated as described
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.67"/>. I/S-VOC gas-phase emissions are estimated from the POA
emissions from residential heating by multiplying them by a constant factor
assumed to be 1.5 in the default simulation. The total (gas and particle) I/S-VOC is therefore
equal to 2.5 times the original POA.</p>
      <p id="d1e810">As described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>, different values will be used and compared
for I/S-VOC gas-phase emissions from residential heating and from other
sectors. The I/S-VOCs emissions from residential heating are assumed to be
those of the sector “htap_6_residential” of the EDGAR-HTAP_V2 inventory.
The emissions from this sector (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) concern the
emissions from heating and cooling and equipment and lighting of buildings as well
as waste treatment. The I/S-VOC emissions from residential heating (RH) are
obtained from the POA emissions of sector 6 by multiplying them by a constant
factor represented by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>. These emissions over the
Mediterranean domain are located over big cities (Marseille, Milan, Rome,
etc.). I/S-VOC emissions from the six other anthropogenic sources (shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) are estimated from the POA emissions by multiplying
them by a constant factor noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>. These emissions are
located over big cities and along the main traffic routes as well as on the
shipping routes linking Marseille to Ajaccio and Bastia. Different
estimations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be used as well as different
approaches to represent the aging of I/S-VOCs (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e874">Surface emissions of POAs from the residential
heating sector <bold>(a)</bold> and from the other six anthropogenic
sectors <bold>(b)</bold> during winter 2014. The emissions are in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page18083?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Measurement setup</title>
      <p id="d1e926">The ground-based measurements were performed in the framework of the
CHemistry and AeRosols Mediterranean EXperiment (ChArMEx) at Ersa
(42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) on a ridge at the northern tip of
the island of Corsica, at an altitude of about 530 m a.s.l. The
ground-based comparisons are performed by comparing the measured and modeled
concentrations at the model cell closest to the station (42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>52 N,
9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 494 m a.s.l.), as detailed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.68"/>.
An Aerodyne<sup>™</sup> ACSM was used in order to measure
the near real-time mass concentration and chemical composition of aerosols
with aerodynamic diameters between 70 and 1000 nm, with a time resolution of
30 min <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.69"/>. This instrument has been continuously running at Ersa
between June 2012 and July 2014 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.70"/>, with an on-site setup
similar to that presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.71"/>. A recent intercomparison
exercise, in which the ACSM used in this study has successfully taken part,
reports an expanded uncertainty of 19 % for OM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.72"/>.
OM : OC and O : C ratios are estimated using these measurements,
following the methodology provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.73"/>.
Although <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.74"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.75"/> have shown consistent
results (e.g., satisfactorily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-scores) in terms of fragmentation pattern,
higher discrepancies were observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mass fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44),
which is an essential variable in the calculation of these elemental ratios.
In this respect, results are presented with an uncertainty which can be
estimated as being twice the one of PM (i.e., around 40 %). The
measurements are compared to concentrations and properties of particles of
diameters between 0.01 and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Model and measurement comparison method</title>
      <p id="d1e1077">To evaluate the performance of the model, we compare model simulation results
to measurements at the Ersa site using a variety of performance statistical
indicators. These indicators are: the simulated mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>), the
root-mean-square error (RMSE), the correlation coefficient (corr), the mean
fractional bias (MFB) and the mean fractional error (MFE). Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T1"/>
of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/> lists the key statistical indicators definitions used
in the model-to-data intercomparison. Furthermore, the criteria of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.76"/>, which is detailed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T2"/> of
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>, is used to assess the performance of the simulations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Modeling of I/S-VOC emissions and aging</title>
      <p id="d1e1109">In order to understand the behavior of the different parameterizations
commonly used in CTMs to represent emissions and aging of I/S-VOCs in the
western Mediterranean region, several simulations using different
parameterizations, described in the following sections, are compared. These
parameterizations are those described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.77"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.78"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.79"/>. The differences concern the
emission ratios used to estimate I/S-VOCs from POAs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
the aging scheme (one step or multi-generational), the modeling of NTVOCs
and the ratio OM : OC and volatility distribution at emissions.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>One-step oxidation scheme</title>
      <p id="d1e1144">The one-step oxidation mechanism of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.80"/> is based on the
fitting of the curve of dilution of POAs from diesel exhaust of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.81"/>. I/S-VOCs are modeled with three surrogate species
POAlP, POAmP and POAhP of different volatilities chosen to fit the dilution
curve of POAs from diesel exhaust of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.82"/> and characterized by
their saturation concentrations (0.91, 86.21 and
3225.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively).</p>
      <p id="d1e1175">The properties of the primary and aged I/S-VOCs are shown in
Table <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E1"/> of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>. The
aging of each of these primary surrogates is modeled by a one-step
OH-oxidation reaction in the gas phase (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>),
leading to the<?pagebreak page18084?> formation of secondary surrogates SOAlP, SOAmP and SOAhP. Once
formed, these secondary surrogates do not undergo further oxidations.
Compared to the primary surrogates, the volatility of the secondary
surrogates is reduced by a factor of 100, and their molecular weight is
increased by 40 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.83"/> to represent
functionalization and fragmentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Multi-generational step oxidation scheme</title>
      <p id="d1e1193">In sensitivity simulations, for anthropogenic I/S-VOC emissions, the
oxidation mechanism is based on the hybrid volatility basis set (1.5-D VBS)
approach developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.84"/>. This mechanism combines the simplicity
of the 1-D VBS with the ability to describe evolution of OAs
in the 2-D space of oxidation state and volatility. This basis set
uses five volatility surrogates, characterized by saturation concentrations
varying between 0.1 and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The surrogates VAP0,
VAP1, VAP2, VAP3 and VAP4 refer to the primary surrogates, and VAS0, VAS1,
VAS2, VAS3 and VAS4 refer to the secondary ones. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T4"/> of
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/> lists their properties.</p>
      <p id="d1e1222">In the scheme developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.85"/>, the OH-oxidation of the primary
surrogates leads to a mixture of primary and secondary surrogates of lower
volatility. The carbon number (and oxygen number for secondary surrogates) of
the lower volatility surrogate decreases (and increases for secondary
surrogates), indicating that functionalization and fragmentation are
implicitly accounted for. This mechanism is detailed in
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Multi-generational step oxidation scheme for residential heating</title>
      <p id="d1e1236">In sensitivity simulations, for anthropogenic I/S-VOC emissions from
residential heating, the VBS model developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.86"/> is also
used. As in the previously detailed multi-step oxidation scheme, five
surrogates with volatilities characterized by saturation concentrations
extending from 0.1 to 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are used. The primary
surrogates (BBPOA1, BBPOA2, BBPOA3, BBPOA4, BBPOA5) react with OH to form
secondary surrogates (BBSOA0, BBSOA1, BBSOA2, BBSOA3, BBSOA4), whose
volatility is 1 order of magnitude lower than the primary surrogate. In
opposition to the one-step and multi-step oxidation schemes detailed above,
here the secondary surrogates may also undergo OH-oxidation forming the
secondary surrogate of lower volatility. As in the other schemes,
functionalization and fragmentation are taken into account as the carbon and
oxygen numbers of the secondary surrogates decreases and increases
respectively. The properties of the VBS surrogates are shown in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T5"/> of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>, where
reactions are also detailed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1265">Data from recent wood combustion and aging experiments performed in smog
chamber by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.87"/> show significant contribution of SOAs from
non-traditional volatile organic compounds (NTVOCs: phenol; <italic>m</italic>-,  <italic>o</italic>-,
<italic>p</italic>-cresol;  <italic>m</italic>-,  <italic>o</italic>-,  <italic>p</italic>-benzenediol/2-methylfuraldehyde;
dimethylphenols; guaiacol/methylbenzenediols; naphthalene;
2-methylnaphthalene/1-methylnaphthalene; acenaphthylene; syringol;
biphenyl/acenaphthene; and dimethylnaphthalene) to OA mass. These NTVOCs are
usually not accounted for as SOA precursors in CTMs. The NTVOC mixture saturation
concentration is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
falling with the IVOC saturation concentration range limit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.88"/>. NTVOCs emissions are estimated using a ratio of
NTVOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SVOC of 4.75 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.89"/> and their OH-oxidation
produces four secondary surrogates of different volatilities. These four
surrogates may undergo OH-oxidation leading to the less-volatile and more-oxidized secondary surrogate, similarly to the multi-step oxidation described
in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>. This mechanism is detailed in
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>, and the surrogates properties are listed
in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T5"/> of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Volatility distribution and properties of primary emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e1351">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> shows emission rates of OA precursors averaged
over the Mediterranean domain and over the simulation period.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1359">Emission rates of OA precursors averaged temporally and over the
Mediterranean domain.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA precursor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Emission rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VOCs from biogenic and anthropogenic sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0314</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NTVOCs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0062</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I/S-VOCs from residential heating</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I/S-VOCs from other sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0030</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1453">Emissions of I/S-VOCs are allocated into the surrogate compounds detailed in
the above sections using emission distribution profiles, which are based on
chamber measurements. The distribution of the emission profiles as a function
of volatility (saturation concentration) is detailed in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. Two emission profiles are used. The first one
corresponds to the measurements of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.90"/> for biomass burning, and
it is similar to the emission profile used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.91"/> for all
sectors and by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.92"/> for residential heating. The second
emission profile corresponds to an average of emission distributions from
gasoline and diesel vehicles measured by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx52" id="text.93"/>, and it
is used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.94"/>. Here, the volatility emission distributions are
assigned to a profile number (equal to 1 or 2), depending on whether the
volatility profile is similar to the profile from biomass burning emissions
of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.95"/> (profile number 2) or whether it is similar to the
profile from the vehicle emissions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx50" id="text.96"/>
(profile number 1). As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, the emitted
I/S-VOCs are less volatile in the profile 1 than in the biomass-burning
volatility distribution (profile 2). Depending on the emission sector, the
OM : OC and O : C ratios of the emitted surrogates may differ. For most
sectors, such as traffic, the OM : OC and O : C ratios are assumed to be
low; OM : OC is equal to 1.3 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.97"/>. However, for
residential heating, the emissions may be more oxidized. The scheme of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.98"/> assumes higher OM : OC and O : C rations, as
described in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>. Here, the OM : OC and O : C ratios are
assigned to a profile number (equal to 1 or 2), depending on<?pagebreak page18085?> whether the
ratios are similar to the profile from the biomass burning emissions of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.99"/>(profile number 2)  or whether they are lower (profile
number 1).</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1496">Summary of the volatility distributions of the primary I/S-VOC
surrogates. Saturation concentrations are expressed in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each saturation concentration and volatility
coefficient, the name of the associated primary surrogate is in
square brackets. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Profil no.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reference</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx52" id="text.100"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.101"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx52" id="text.102"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.103"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="4"><?xmltex \hspace{0.3cm}?>Saturation conc. <?xmltex \hspace{0.3cm}?></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">0.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">0.35 [POAlP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">0.25 [BBPOAlP]</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="4"><?xmltex \hspace{0.3cm}?>Saturation conc. <?xmltex \hspace{0.3cm}?></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15 [VAP0]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.20 [BBPOA0]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20 [VAP1]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.10 [BBPOA1]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">86.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">0.51 [POAmP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">0.32 [BBPOAmP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.31 [VAP2]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.10 [BBPOA2]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20 [VAP3]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.20 [BBPOA3]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3225.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14 [POAhP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.43 [BBPOAhP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.14 [VAP4]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4 [BBPOA4]</oasis:entry>

       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1714">Summary of the OM : OC (and O : C) ratio of the primary I/S-VOC
surrogates. Saturation concentrations are expressed in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each saturation concentration and OM : OC ratio,
the name of the associated primary surrogate is in square brackets.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Profil no.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reference</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.104"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.105"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.106"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="4">Saturation conc. <?xmltex \hspace{0.3cm}?></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">0.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">1.3 (0.15) [POAlP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">1.7 (0.55) [BBPOAlP]</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="4">Saturation conc. <?xmltex \hspace{0.3cm}?></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.36 (0.16) [VAP0]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.64 (0.37) [BBPOA0]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.31 (0.12) [VAP1]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.53 (0.29) [BBPOA1]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">86.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">1.3 (0.15) [POAmP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">1.7 (0.55) [BBPOAmP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.26 (0.07) [VAP2]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.44 (0.22) [BBPOA2]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.21 (0.03) [VAP3]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.36 (0.15) [BBPOA3]</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3225.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3 (0.15) [POAhP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.7 (0.55) [BBPOAhP]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.17 (0) [VAP4]</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.28 (0.09) [BBPOA4]</oasis:entry>

       <?xmltex \interline{[5.690551pt]}?></oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Sensitivity simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e1929">The setup of the different simulations is summarized in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>. The simulation S1 uses the setup commonly used in
air-quality simulations with the Polyphemus platform: the one-step aging
scheme of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.107"/> is used for both residential heating and other
anthropogenic sectors.</p>
      <p id="d1e1937">The links between the compared simulations and the sensitivity parameters
studied are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>. The simulation S2 is
conducted to evaluate the impact of the volatility distribution of emissions.
Instead of using a volatility distribution specific of biomass burning for
all sectors as in S1, the volatility distribution specific of car emissions
is used for anthropogenic sectors other than residential heating.</p>
      <p id="d1e1942">The simulation S3 is conducted to evaluate the impact of the aging scheme.
The volatility distributions are similar as S2, but multi-generational
schemes are used rather than a single-oxidation strep for all anthropogenic
sectors.</p>
      <p id="d1e1945">The simulation S4 is evaluated to estimate the impact of NTVOCs. It has the
same setup as S2 with multi-generational aging, but NTVOCs are taken into
account. Even though NTVOCs are added, emissions of I/S-VOCs as modeled by
the factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are kept.</p>
      <p id="d1e1960">The simulations S5 and S6 are conducted to assess the impact of the
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> ratio used for residential heating
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The simulation S5 has the same setup as the simulation S2
(single-step oxidation), but it differs in the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
is assumed to be equal to 4 rather than 1.5. The simulation S6 has the same
setup as the simulation S4 (multi-step oxidation and NTVOCs), but it differs
in the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is assumed to be equal to 4 rather than
1.5.</p>
      <p id="d1e2000">In terms of the OM : OC ratio, the ratio specific of car emissions is used
for emissions from anthropogenic sectors other than residential heating. For
residential heating, higher OM : OC ratios are used in all simulations,
except in S1, where the ratio specific of car emissions is used for all
sectors.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2006">Summary of the parameters used in the different simulations
performed.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Residential heating </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col10" align="center">Other anthropogenic sectors </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Simulation</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">Aging</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Volatility</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OM : OC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">NTVOCs</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="1">Aging</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Volatility</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">OM : OC</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">profile</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">profile</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">profile</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">profile</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">One-step (Couvidat)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">No</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">One-step (Couvidat)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">One-step (Couvidat)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">No</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">One-step (Couvidat)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Multi-step (Ciarelli)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">No</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Multi-step (Koo)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Multi-step (Ciarelli)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Multi-step (Koo)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">One-step (Couvidat)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">No</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">One-step (Couvidat)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Multi-step (Ciarelli)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Multi-step (Koo)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><caption><p id="d1e2323">Links between the compared simulations and the sensitivity parameters studied.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sensitivity study of the impact of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Simulations to</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">be compared</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">The volatility distribution of emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S1, S2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">The aging scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S3, S2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NTVOCs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S4, S2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">The <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S5, S2 and S6, S4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Organic concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e2405">The spatial distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations averaged over the
first 3 months of 2014 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/> of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>)
shows that high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are mostly located over big
cities, like Marseille (2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), Genoa
(1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), Turin (4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), Milan
(4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), Rome (2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Naples
(2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and along maritime traffic routes, stressing
that organics during wintertime are likely to be mostly of anthropogenic
origins.</p>
      <p id="d1e2550">The simulated composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Ersa is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> for the simulations S4 and S5. In all
simulations, primary and secondary organic aerosols (POAs and SOAs) from
anthropogenic I/S-VOCs are the main components of the organic mass (between
60 % and 84 %). POAs tend to account for almost the same fraction of
the organic mass than SOAs (between 46 % and 62 %). Similarly, in the
U.S., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.108"/> found that the SOAs account for less than half of the
modeled OA mass in winter 2005 due to the slow chemical aging during the
cold season. Over Europe, in March 2009, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.109"/> simulated that
POAs account for between 12 % and 68 % of the OAs, with an average value
of 38 %. The emission sector 6 (residential heating) has a large
contribution to OAs (between 31 % and 33 %). This is also in line with
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.110"/> who found that, over Europe in March 2009, the
contribution of the residential sector to OAs varies between 20 % and
45 %, with an average value of 38 %. Furthermore, this sector
contributes more to SOAs (between 42 % and 52 % of SOAs from I/S-VOCs)
than to POAs (between 17 % and 31 % of POAs from I/S-VOCs), because
their I/S-VOC emissions are more volatile.</p>
      <p id="d1e2575">The contribution from aromatic VOCs is low (lower than 3 %), and when
NTVOCs are considered, they represent between 18 % and 21 % of the
organic mass. The model simulations performed revealed that, for winter
2014, the biogenic OA fraction is low (15 %–18 %).
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.111"/> also estimated the biogenic contribution to the organic
budget to be between 5 % and 20 % over Europe.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2583">Simulated composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the winter campaign
of 2014 for two simulations: S4 <bold>(a)</bold> and S5 <bold>(b)</bold>.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2610">The statistical evaluation of the simulations is shown in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T6"/>. The model-to-measurement correlation is high for all
simulations (between 76 % and 83 %). The performance criterion is
satisfied for all simulations, and the goal criterion is satisfied for S2, S3,
S4 and S5. The goal criterion is not satisfied for the simulation S1, which
uses single-step oxidation with a biomass-burning-type volatility
distribution for all<?pagebreak page18086?> anthropogenic sectors as well as for the simulation S6, which
uses multi-step oxidation with NTVOCs and a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The
simulation S1 strongly underestimates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at Ersa,
whereas the simulation S6 strongly overestimates it. All the simulations
tend to underestimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at Ersa, except for the
two simulations where NTVOCs are taken into account (S4 and S6), which
overestimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at Ersa. Because I/S-VOC
emissions as modeled by the factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are kept in those
simulations, the IVOCs forming SOAs may have been counted twice by adding
NTVOCs, explaining the overestimation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2671">Other CTMs showed the same underestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
during winter over Europe, even when I/S-VOC emissions are taken into account
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.112"/>. The CTM CAMx also underestimated the organic
concentrations over Europe during February and March 2009
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.113"/>, but considerable improvement was found for the modeled
OA mass, with the MFB decreasing from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % when the
parameterization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.114"/> with NTVOCs was added.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2717">Statistics of model to measurements comparisons for daily
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations during the winter campaign of 2014 at Ersa.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the observed mean. Other statistical indicators
are defined in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T1"/> of Appendix<xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">Simulations </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">S1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">S2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">S3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">S5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">S6</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RMSE</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Correlation (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">78.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">76.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">82.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">78.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">82.7</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MFB (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">38</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MFE (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3023">The model-to-measurement comparison during the first 3 months of 2014 is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> in terms of the daily concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Ersa. Globally, the temporal variations of the simulated
concentrations are well reproduced by the model. The simulation S1, which
uses single-step oxidation with a biomass-burning-type volatility
distribution for all anthropogenic sectors, underestimates the peaks.
However, the peaks are well reproduced by the simulations S2, S3 and S5. The
simulations S4 and S6, which take into account NTVOCs, overestimate the
peaks. All simulations underestimate the beginning of the peak between 9 and
15 March, probably due to uncertainties in meteorology, especially rain
episodes and changes in the origin of air mass.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3041">Daily evolution of measured and simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>concentrations at
Ersa from 1 January to 2 April.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3062">As detailed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>, the differences between the simulations S2
and S1 originate in differences in the volatility distribution of emissions
from anthropogenic sectors other than residential heating. In the simulation
S2, a less-volatile distribution is used than in the simulation S1, leading
to larger OA concentrations in the particle phase. This difference in the
volatility distribution makes a large difference in the OA concentrations,
removing the strong underestimation simulated in simulation S1 (the MFB is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in S1 and only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % in S2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3089">Daily evolution of the ratios OM : OC <bold>(a)</bold> and
O : C <bold>(b)</bold> from 1 January to 2 April 2014 at Ersa.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3104">Considering multi-step aging for all anthropogenic sectors also leads to an
increase of OA concentrations (the MBF of the simulation S3 is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
which is lower in absolute value than the simulation S2). However, the
influence of the multi-step aging (difference between S2 and S3 shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/> of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>) is smaller than the
influence of the volatility distribution (difference between S1 and S2 shown
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/> of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>). This larger influence
of the volatility distribution than the multi-step aging is true<?pagebreak page18087?> not only at
Ersa but also over the whole Mediterranean domain, where the average RMSE
between the simulations S1 and S2 is 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (impact of
volatility), compared to 0.005 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the RMSE between the simulations S2 and S3
(impact of multi-step aging).</p>
      <p id="d1e3164">At Ersa, increasing the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1.5 to 4 (difference
between simulation S3 and S2 shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/> of
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>) has almost the same impact as considering the
multi-step aging (difference between simulations S5 and S2 shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/> of Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>), although the
statistics are slightly better when the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is increased
from 1.5 to 4 than when multi-step aging is considered. However, this is not
true over the whole Mediterranean domain, where the impact of increasing the
ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1.5 to 4 is large over cities, whereas the impact
of multi-step aging stays small (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/> of
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>). Over the whole Mediterranean domain, the
average RMSE between the simulations S2 and S5 is 0.014 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(impact of increasing the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1.5 to 4), compared to
0.005 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the RMSE between the simulations S2 and S3 (impact
of multi-step aging).</p>
      <p id="d1e3263">Finally, the best statistics in terms of MFE and MFB are obtained for the
simulation S5, with a one-step aging scheme, a volatility distribution
typical of biomass burning for the residential sector with a ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 4 and a volatility distribution typical of car emissions
for other sectors with a ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Oxidation and oxygenation of organics</title>
      <p id="d1e3291">The oxidation state is quantified using two metrics, OM : OC and O : C,
calculated as detailed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.115"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>
shows the daily variations of the measured and simulated ratios for the
different simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3299">The measurements at Ersa show highly oxidized and oxygenated organics; the
measured OM : OC and O : C ratios at Ersa are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. These values are lower than the index measured
during summer 2013 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.116"/>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the measured OM : OC and O : C ratios at Ersa, respectively),<?pagebreak page18088?> due
to the slower oxidation process owing to the lower temperatures during
winter. The average simulated OM : OC and O : C ratios are shown in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T7"/>. Both indices are strongly underestimated by all
simulations, due to the high contribution of POAs to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (POAs are less volatile and oxygenated than SOAs). The
simulations using multi-step aging schemes for I/S-VOC emissions have higher
OM : OC and O : C ratios, although the differences are very low; the
OM : OC ratio is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in S2 (single-step) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
S3 (multi-step). Organics in the simulations where the strength of I/S-VOC
emissions from residential heating was increased (simulations S5 and S6) and have
higher OM : OC and O : C ratios, because POAs and SOAs from I/S-VOCs from
residential heating are more oxidized and oxygenated than POAs and SOAs from
other anthropogenic sources. Similarly, organics in the simulations where
NTVOCs are taken into account have higher OM : OC and O : C ratios,
because in the model, NTVOCs lead to very oxidized and oxygenated OAs.
However, the simulated ratios OM : OC and O : C stay underestimated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at most, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the measurements).</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3444">Daily averages of OM : OC and O : C ratios at Ersa during winter
2014 for the different simulations. The average measured OM : OC ratio is
2.21 and the average measured O : C ratio is 0.82.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">S2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">S3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">S4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">S6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Measurements</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OM : OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O : C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3699">The underestimation of the O : C ratio may be due to an underestimation of
oxidants' concentrations and secondary aerosol formation. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows that the model tends to underestimate ozone concentrations
(the modeled and measured average concentrations between 21 January and 24 February 2014 are 46.2 and 68.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, the O : C
ratio stays underestimated even during the days where ozone is well modeled.
It is difficult to come to a conclusion on the underestimation of oxidants, because
measurements were not performed for other oxidants than ozone, such as OH,
which probably has other sources than ozone photolysis in winter.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e3726">Daily evolution of ozone concentrations from 21 January to 24 February 2014 at Ersa.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e3741">This study shows a ground-based comparison of both modeled organic
concentrations and properties to measurements performed at Ersa (the cape of Corsica, France) during winter 2014. This work aims to evaluate how
commonly used parameterizations and assumptions of intermediate and semi-volatile
organic compound (I/S-VOC) emissions and aging perform in modeling OA
concentrations and properties in the western Mediterranean region in winter.
To that end, the chemistry-transport model from the air-quality platform
Polyphemus is used with different parameterizations of I/S-VOC emissions and
aging (different volatility distribution emissions, single-step oxidation vs
multi-step oxidation within a Volatility Basis Set framework, including
non-traditional volatile organic compounds NTVOCs). Winter 2014 simulations
are performed and compared to measurements obtained with an ACSM at the
background station of Ersa in the north of the island of Corsica. In all
simulations,<?pagebreak page18089?> OAs at Ersa are mainly from anthropogenic sources (only 15 % to
18 % of OAs are from biogenic sources). The emission sector 6 (residential
heating) has a large contribution to OAs (between 31 % and 33 %). The
contribution from aromatic VOCs is low (lower than 3 %). NTVOCs, as
modeled with the parameterization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.117"/>, represent between
18 % and 21 % of the organic mass. For most simulations, the
concentrations of OAs compare well to the measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e3747">Over the whole western Mediterranean domain, the volatility distribution at
the emission influences the concentrations more strongly than the choice of
the parameterization that may be used for aging (single-step oxidation vs
multi-step oxidation). Modifying the volatility distribution of sectors other
than residential heating leads to a decrease of 29 % in OA concentrations
at Ersa, while using the multi-step oxidation parameterization rather than
the single-step one leads to an increase of 13 %. The best statistics are
obtained using two configurations; the first one is a one-step aging scheme,
a volatility distribution typical of biomass burning for the residential
sector with an <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> ratio of 4 at emissions, and the second one is a multi-generational aging scheme,
a volatility distribution typical of car emissions for other sectors with a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>I/S-VOC / POA<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> ratio of 1.5 at emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3765">Both the OM : OC and O : C ratios are underestimated at Ersa in all
simulations. The largest simulated OM : OC ratio is equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the measurements. For the summer
campaign, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.118"/> improved the simulated OM : OC ratio by adding
the formation mechanisms of organic
compounds with extremely low volatility from the autoxidation of monoterpenes
and organic nitrate from monoterpene oxidation. Similarly, the formation of
organic nitrate and highly oxygenated organic molecules <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.119"/>
from the autoxidation of aromatic precursors should be added in order to
better reproduce the observed OA oxidation and oxygenation levels.</p>
      <?pagebreak page18090?><p id="d1e3798">However, adding these new OA formation pathways may lead to an increase in OA
concentrations, suggesting that the actual parameterizations may need to be
revisited, for example by better characterizing their deposition. Because the
volatility distribution at the emission is the parameter influencing the
concentrations the most, further experimental research should therefore focus
on characterizing it for the different sectors. The emissions and formation
of compounds with very low volatility should also be further investigated to represent the aerosol
characteristics observed.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3805">Data can be requested from the corresponding
author (mounir.chrit@enpc.fr).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page18091?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Statistical indicators and criteria</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><caption><p id="d1e3821"> Definitions of the statistics used in this work.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the observed and the simulated concentrations at
time and location <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of data.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="170.716535pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Statistical indicator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Definition</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Root-mean-square error (RMSE)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><?xmltex \vspace{0.1cm}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Correlation (Corr)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean fractional bias (MFB)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean fractional error (MFE)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><caption><p id="d1e4218">Boylan and Russell criteria.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Criteria</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Performance criterion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><?xmltex \vspace{0.0cm}?>Goal criterion</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">|MFB|</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MFE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page18092?><app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Single-step aging of I/S-VOCs (Couvidat et al., 2012)</title>
      <p id="d1e4307">The reactions below describe the single-step aging of I/S-VOCs following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.120"/>.

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M172" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POAlP</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOAlP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POAmP</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOAmP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POAhP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOAhP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><caption><p id="d1e4451">Properties of the primary and secondary anthropogenic I/S-VOCs. The
molecular weights are in g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  is the enthalpy of
vaporization in KJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which describes the temperature dependance of
the saturation pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surrogate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Emission fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Molecular weight</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 298 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POAlP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">106.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POAmP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">91.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POAhP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">79.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOAlP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">392</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">106.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOAmP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">392</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">91.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOAhP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">392</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">79.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page18093?><app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <title>Multi-step aging of I/S-VOCs (Koo et al., 2014)</title>
      <p id="d1e4789">The reactions below describe the multi-step aging of I/S-VOCs following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.121"/>.

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M191" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.864</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.142</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.877</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.129</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.889</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.116</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.869</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.137</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VAS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T4"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><caption><p id="d1e5025">Properties of the VBS species (the primary and secondary
anthropogenic SVOCs). The molecular weights are in g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the enthalpy of vaporization in KJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
describes the temperature dependance of
the saturation pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surrogate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Emission fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Molecular weight</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 298 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAP0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">96.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAP1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">275</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">85.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAP2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">272</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">74.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAP3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">268</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAP4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">266</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">55.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAS0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">172</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAS1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">167</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">163</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAS3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">158</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAS4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">153</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page18094?><app id="App1.Ch1.S4">
  <title>Multi-step aging of I/S-VOCs from residential heating (Ciarelli et al., 2017b)</title>
      <p id="d1e5455">The reactions below describe the multi-step aging of I/S-VOCs following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.122"/>.

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M209" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0ex 0ex 0ex 0ex 0ex 0ex 0ex 5.690551pt 5.690551pt 0ex 0ex 0ex" displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBPOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBPOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBPOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBPOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBSOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NTVOCs</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.143</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.097</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E15"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hspace{1.35cm}}?><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.069</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.011</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E16"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E17"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E18"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E19"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⟶</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T5"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><caption><p id="d1e5954">Properties of the VBS species (the NTVOCs
and primary and secondary RH-I/S-VOCs). The molecular weights are in g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the enthalpy of vaporization in KJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which describes the temperature dependance of
the saturation pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surrogate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Emission fraction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Molecular weight</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 298 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NTVOCs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBPOA0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">85.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBPOA1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBPOA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">70.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBPOA3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBPOA4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">215</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">55.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBSOA0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">194</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBSOA1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">189</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBSOA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">184</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBSOA3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">179</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB3SOA0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">149</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB3SOA1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">144</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB3SOA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">140</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB3SOA3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">135</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB3SOA4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">131</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page18095?><app id="App1.Ch1.S5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Maps of {$\protect\chem{OM_{1}}$} concentrations and differences between simulations.}?><title>Maps of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and differences between simulations.</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e6532">Maps of the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) averaged
from January to March 2014 using S1 <bold>(a)</bold> and the absolute
difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations between S2 and S1 (<bold>b</bold>, impact of volatility), S3 and S2 (<bold>c</bold>, impact of
multi-step aging), and S5 and S2 (<bold>d</bold>, impact of increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1.5 to 4).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18079/2018/acp-18-18079-2018-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e6614">MC, KS and MM performed the simulations. The other co-authors performed
experiments and carried out measurements.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e6620">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e6626">This article is part of the special issue “CHemistry and
AeRosols Mediterranean EXperiments (ChArMEx) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It
is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6632">This research was funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR)
projects SAF-MED (grant ANR-12-BS06-0013). It is part of the ChArMEx project
supported by ADEME, CNRS-INSU, CEA and Météo-France through the
multidisciplinary programme MISTRALS (Mediterranean Integrated STudies at
Regional And Local Scales). It contributes to ChArMEx work packages 1 and 2
on emissions and aerosol aging, respectively. The ACSM at Ersa was funded by
the CORSiCA project, which was funded by the Collectivité Territoriale de Corse
through the Fonds Européen de Développement Régional of the European
Operational Program 2007–2013 and the Contrat de Plan Etat-Région. Eric
Hamounou is acknowledged for his great help in setting up the Ersa station.
We thank François Gheusi for the measurements of ozone concentrations.
CEREA is a member of the Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:  Matthias Beekmann<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aiken et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A., DeCarlo, P., Krol, J., Worsno, D., Huffma, J., Docherty, K.,
Ulbrich, I., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J., Sueper, D., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn,
A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P., Canagaratna, M., Onasch, T., Alfarra, M.,
Prevot, A., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and
Jimenez, J.: O/C and OM/OC Ratios of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic
Aerosols with High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4478–4485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bergström et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Bergström, R., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Prévôt, A. S. H., Yttri,
K. E., and Simpson, D.: Modelling of organic aerosols over Europe
(2002–2007) using a volatility basis set (VBS) framework: application of
different assumptions regarding the formation of secondary organic aerosol,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8499–8527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Boylan and Russell(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance
metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models,
Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bruns et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Kilic, D., Klein, F.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification of
significant precursor gases of secondary organic aerosols from residential
wood combustion, Sci. Rep., 6, 27881, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep27881</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Byun and Ching(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Byun, D. and Ching, J.: Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community
Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Canagaratna et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Canonaco et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.:
Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications
for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6993–7002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Cappa and Jimenez(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D. and Jimenez, J. L.: Quantitative estimates of the volatility of
ambient organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5409–5424,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Cholakian et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Cholakian, A., Beekmann, M., Colette, A., Coll, I., Siour, G., Sciare, J.,
Marchand, N., Couvidat, F., Pey, J., Gros, V., Sauvage, S., Michoud, V.,
Sellegri, K., Colomb, A., Sartelet, K., Langley DeWitt, H., Elser, M.,
Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., and Dulac, F.: Simulation of fine organic
aerosols in the western Mediterranean area during the ChArMEx 2013 summer
campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7287–7312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7287-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7287-2018</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Chrit et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Chrit, M., Sartelet, K., Sciare, J., Pey, J., Marchand, N., Couvidat, F.,
Sellegri, K., and Beekmann, M.: Modelling organic aerosol concentrations and
properties during ChArMEx summer campaigns of 2012 and 2013 in the western
Mediterranean region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12509–12531,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12509-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12509-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Ciarelli et al.(2017a)</label><mixed-citation>Ciarelli, G., Aksoyoglu, S., El Haddad, I., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M.,
Poulain, L., Äijälä, M., Carbone, S., Freney, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Modelling winter organic
aerosol at the European scale with CAMx: evaluation and source apportionment
with a VBS parameterization based on novel wood burning smog chamber
experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7653–7669,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7653-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7653-2017</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Ciarelli et al.(2017b)</label><mixed-citation>Ciarelli, G., El Haddad, I., Bruns, E., Aksoyoglu, S., Möhler, O.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Constraining a hybrid volatility
basis-set model for aging of wood-burning emissions using smog chamber
experiments: a box-model study based on the VBS scheme of the CAMx model
(v5.40), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2303–2320,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2303-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-2303-2017</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Couvidat and Sartelet(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F. and Sartelet, K.: The Secondary Organic Aerosol Processor (SOAP
v1.0) model: a unified model with different ranges of complexity based on the
molecular surrogate approach, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1111–1138,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Couvidat et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F., Debry, É., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: A
hydrophilic/hydrophobic organic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) model: Model development,
evaluation and sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D10304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017214</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page18097?><ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Couvidat et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F., Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., Seigneur, C., Marchand, N., and Sciare,
J.: Modeling secondary organic aerosol in an urban area: application to
Paris, France, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 983–996,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-983-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-983-2013</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Couvidat et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: Investigating the impact of
aqueous-phase chemistry and wet deposition on organic aerosol formation using
a molecular surrogate modeling approach, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
914–922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es3034318" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es3034318</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Couvidat et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F., Bessagnet, B., Garcia-Vivanco, M., Real, E., Menut, L., and
Colette, A.: Development of an inorganic and organic aerosol model (CHIMERE
2017<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> v1.0): seasonal and spatial evaluation over Europe, Geosci. Model
Dev., 11, 165–194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-165-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-165-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Crenn et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Crenn, V., Sciare, J., Croteau, P. L., Verlhac, S., Fröhlich, R., Belis, C.
A., Aas, W., Äijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Artiñano, B., Baisnée, D.,
Bonnaire, N., Bressi, M., Canagaratna, M., Canonaco, F., Carbone, C.,
Cavalli, F., Coz, E., Cubison, M. J., Esser-Gietl, J. K., Green, D. C., Gros,
V., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, H., Lunder, C., Minguillón, M. C., Mocnik, G.,
O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petit, J.-E., Petralia, E., Poulain, L.,
Priestman, M., Riffault, V., Ripoll, A., Sarda-Estève, R., Slowik, J. G.,
Setyan, A., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Jayne,
J. T., and Favez, O.: ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 1: Reproducibility
of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol
Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located
instruments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5063–5087,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Crippa et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D.,
Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo, P.
F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M.,
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski, S.,
Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U.,
and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25 AMS data
sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source apportionment
approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Dawson et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Dawson, M. L., Xu, J., Griffin, R. J., and Dabdub, D.: Development of
aroCACM/MPMPO 1.0: a model to simulate secondary organic aerosol from
aromatic precursors in regional models, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2143–2151,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2143-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2143-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Debry et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Debry, E., Fahey, K., Sartelet, K., Sportisse, B., and Tombette, M.:
Technical Note: A new SIze REsolved Aerosol Model (SIREAM), Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 1537–1547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1537-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1537-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Denier van der Gon et al.(2015a)</label><mixed-citation>Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Bergström, R., Fountoukis, C., Johansson, C.,
Pandis, S. N., Simpson, D., and Visschedijk, A. J. H.: Particulate emissions
from residential wood combustion in Europe – revised estimates and an
evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6503–6519,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Denier van der Gon et al.(2015b)</label><mixed-citation>Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Bergström, R., Fountoukis, C., Johansson, C.,
Pandis, S. N., Simpson, D., and Visschedijk, A. J. H.: Particulate emissions
from residential wood combustion in Europe – revised estimates and an
evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6503–6519,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Donahue et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Donahue et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A
two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of
organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Duplissy et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A.,
Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M.,
Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D.
R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and
composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1155–1165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>El Haddad et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>El Haddad, I., D'Anna, B., Temime-Roussel, B., Nicolas, M., Boreave, A.,
Favez, O., Voisin, D., Sciare, J., George, C., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Wortham, H.,
and Marchand, N.: Towards a better understanding of the origins, chemical
composition and aging of oxygenated organic aerosols: case study of a
Mediterranean industrialized environment, Marseille, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7875–7894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7875-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7875-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>El-Zanan et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>El-Zanan, H., Lowenthal, D., Zielinska, B., Chow, J., and Kumar, N.:
Determination of the organic aerosol mass to organic carbon ratio in IMPROVE
samples, Chemosphere, 60, 480–496,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>ENVIRON(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
ENVIRON: User's Guide, Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions
(CAMx), Version 5.40, Environ International Corporation, California, USA,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Fountoukis et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C., Megaritis, A. G., Skyllakou, K., Charalampidis, P. E.,
Pilinis, C., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Mohr,
C., Prévôt, A. S. H., Allan, J. D., Poulain, L., Petäjä, T., Tiitta,
P., Carbone, S., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C., Swietlicki, E.,
and Pandis, S. N.: Organic aerosol concentration and composition over Europe:
insights from comparison of regional model predictions with aerosol mass
spectrometer factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9061–9076,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9061-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9061-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Fröhlich et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Fröhlich, R., Cubison, M. J., Slowik, J. G., Bukowiecki, N., Canonaco, F.,
Croteau, P. L., Gysel, M., Henne, S., Herrmann, E., Jayne, J. T.,
Steinbacher, M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.:
Fourteen months of on-line measurements of the non-refractory submicron
aerosol at the Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.) – chemical composition,
origins and organic aerosol sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11373–11398,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>GENEMIS(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
GENEMIS: Technical Report, EUROTEC, annual report 1993, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Gentner et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Gentner, D., Jathar, S., Gordon, T., Bahreini, R., Day, D., El Haddad, I.,
Hayes, P., Pieber, S., Platt, S., de Gouw, J., Goldstein, A., Harley, R.,
Jimenez, J., Prévôt, A., and Robinson, A.: Review of Urban Secondary
Organic Aerosol Formation from Gasoline and Diesel Motor Vehicle Emissions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 1074–1093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Gilardoni et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Gilardoni, S., Liu, S., Takahama, S., Russell, L. M., Allan, J. D.,
Steinbrecher, R., Jimenez, J. L., De Carlo, P. F., Dunlea, E. J.,<?pagebreak page18098?> and
Baumgardner, D.: Characterization of organic ambient aerosol during MIRAGE
2006 on three platforms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5417–5432,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5417-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5417-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Grieshop et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Laboratory
investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires
2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2227–2240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Grosjean and Friedlander(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Grosjean, D. and Friedlander, S.: Gas-particle distribution factors for
organic and other pollutants in the Los Angeles atmosphere, J. Air Pollut.
Control Assoc., 25, 1038–1044, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Guenther et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Hayes et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Hayes, P. L., Carlton, A. G., Baker, K. R., Ahmadov, R., Washenfelder, R. A.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A.,
Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg,
J. H., Ma, P. K., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the formation and aging of
secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 5773–5801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Horowitz et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4784, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002853</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Huffman et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Mohr, C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M.,
Ziemann, P. J., Onasch, T. B., and Jimenez, J. L.: Chemically resolved
volatility measurements of organic aerosol from different sources, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 5351–5357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es803539d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es803539d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Jacobson(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Development and application of a new air pollution modeling
system – II. Aerosol module structure and design, Atmos. Environ., 31,
131–144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00202-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(96)00202-6</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J.-T.:
Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and
remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Jathar et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O. T., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
10473–10478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1323740111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S., Zhang, Q.,
Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A. C.,
Docherty, K. D., Ulbrich, I., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L., Duplissy, J.,
Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y. L., Tian, J.,
Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara, P., Ehn, M.,
Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J., Dunlea, E. J.,
Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T.,
Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel,
J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams,
L. R., Wood, E. C., Kolb, C. E., Middlebrook, A. M., Baltensperger, U., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Science,
326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Kim et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: Formation of secondary aerosols over
Europe: comparison of two gas-phase chemical mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 583–598, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-583-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-583-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Kim et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., Seigneur, C., Charron, A., Besombes, J.-L., Jaffrezo,
J.-L., Marchand, N., and Polo, L.: Effect of measurement protocol on organic
aerosol measurements of exhaust emissions from gasoline and diesel vehicles,
Atmos. Environ., 140, 176–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.045</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Koo et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Koo, B., Knipping, E., and Yarwood, G.: 1.5-Dimensional volatility basis set
approach for modeling organic aerosol in CAMx and CMAQ, Atmos. Environ., 95,
158–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.031</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Kroll et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M., Wilson, K. R.,
Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D.,
Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Carbon oxidation
state as a metric for describing the chemistry of atmospheric organic
aerosol, Nature Chem., 3, 133–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NCHEM.948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NCHEM.948</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Lipsky and Robinson(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Lipsky, E. M. and Robinson, A. L.: Effects of dilution on fine particle mass
and partitioning of semivolatile organics in diesel exhaust and wood smoke,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 155–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es050319p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es050319p</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>May et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T., Collett,
J. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Gas-particle
partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass burning, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11327–11338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50828</ext-link>,
2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>May et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T.,
Collett Jr., J. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass
burning, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11327–11338,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50828</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>May et al.(2013c)</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., Nguyen, N. T., Gordon, T. D., and
Robinson, A. L.: Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol
emissions: (1) gasoline vehicle exhaust, Atmos. Environ., 77,
128–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.060</ext-link>, 2013c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>May et al.(2013d)</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., Nguyen, N. T., Gordon, T. D., and
Robinson, A. L.: Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol
emissions: (2) diesel vehicles, Envir. Sci. Tech., 47,
8288–8296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400782j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400782j</ext-link>, 2013d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Michoud et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Michoud, V., Sciare, J., Sauvage, S., Dusanter, S., Léonardis, T., Gros,
V., Kalogridis, C., Zannoni, N., Féron, A., Petit, J.-E., Crenn, V.,
Baisnée, D., Sarda-Estève, R., Bonnaire, N., Marchand, N., DeWitt, H. L.,
Pey, J., Colomb, A., Gheusi, F., Szidat, S., Stavroulas, I., Borbon, A., and
Locoge, N.: Organic carbon at a remote site of the western Mediterranean
Basin: sources and chemistry during the ChArMEx SOP2 field experiment, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 17, 8837–8865, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8837-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-8837-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Minguillón et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Minguillón, M., Pérez, N., Marchand, N., Bertrand, A., Temime-Roussel, B.,
Agrios, K., Szidat, S., van Drooge, B., Sylvestre,<?pagebreak page18099?> A., Alastuey, A., Reche,
C., Ripoll, A., Marco, E., Grimalt, J., and Querol, X.: Secondary organic
aerosol origin in an urban environment: influence of biogenic and fuel
combustion precursors, Faraday Discuss., 189, 337–359,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fd00182j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c5fd00182j</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Molteni et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Molteni, U., Bianchi, F., Klein, F., El Haddad, I., Frege, C., Rossi, M. J.,
Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic
molecules from aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1909–1921,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Murphy et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L.,
Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R.
A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total
combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Murphy et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hudson, P. K., Matthew, B. M.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Peltier, R. E., Sullivan, A., Thomson, D. S., and Weber,
R. J.: Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles,
J. Geophys. Res., 11, 23–32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007340</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Nenes et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1009604003981</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Ng et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring
of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 45, 780–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Nicolas(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Nicolas, J.: Caractérisation physico-chimique de l’aérosol
troposphérique en Méditerranée : sources et devenir, PhD dissertation,
Univ. Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Ots et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Ots, R., Young, D. E., Vieno, M., Xu, L., Dunmore, R. E., Allan, J. D., Coe,
H., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Ng, N. L., Hamilton, J. F., Bergström,
R., Di Marco, C., Nemitz, E., Mackenzie, I. A., Kuenen, J. J. P., Green, D.
C., Reis, S., and Heal, M. R.: Simulating secondary organic aerosol from
missing diesel-related intermediate-volatility organic compound emissions
during the Clean Air for London (ClearfLo) campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
6453–6473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Robinson et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and
Photochemical Aging, Science, 315, 1259–1262,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Sartelet et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Sartelet, K., Couvidat, F., Seigneur, C., and Roustan, Y.: Impact of biogenic
emissions on air quality over Europe and North America, Atmos. Environ., 53,
131–141, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Sartelet et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Sartelet, K., Zhu, S., Moukhtar, S., André, M., André, J. M., Gros, V.,
Favez, O., Brasseur, A., and Redaelli, M.: Emission of intermediate, semi and
low volatile organic compounds from traffic and their impact on secondary
organic aerosol concentrations over Greater Paris, Atmos. Environ., 180,
126–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.031</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Sartelet et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Sartelet, K. N., Debry, E., Fahey, K., Roustan, Y., Tombette, M., and
Sportisse, B.: Simulation of aerosols and related species over Europe with
the Polyphemus system. Part I: model-to-data comparison for 2001, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 6116–6131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.024</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Schwier et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Schwier, A. N., Rose, C., Asmi, E., Ebling, A. M., Landing, W. M., Marro, S.,
Pedrotti, M.-L., Sallon, A., Iuculano, F., Agusti, S., Tsiola, A., Pitta, P.,
Louis, J., Guieu, C., Gazeau, F., and Sellegri, K.: Primary marine aerosol
emissions from the Mediterranean Sea during pre-bloom and oligotrophic
conditions: correlations to seawater chlorophyll a from a mesocosm study,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7961–7976, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7961-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7961-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Shrivastava et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C., Fan, J., Goldstein, A., Guenther, A., Jimenez, J.,
Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S., Ng, N., Petaja, T., Pierce, J., Rasch, P.,
Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J., Shilling, J., Smith, J., Thornton, J., Volkamer,
R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D., Zaveri, R., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent
advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global
climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000540</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Stockwell et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Williams, J., and Yokelson, R. J.:
Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop
residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 845–865,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-845-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Tost and Pringle(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Tost, H. and Pringle, K. J.: Improvements of organic aerosol representations
and their effects in large-scale atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8687–8709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8687-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8687-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Troen and Mahrt(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Troen, I. B. and Mahrt, L.: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer;
sensitivity to surface evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 129–148,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122760" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00122760</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Tsimpidi et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Molina, L., Ulbrich, I.
M., Jimenez, J. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of the volatility basis-set
approach for the simulation of organic aerosol formation in the Mexico City
metropolitan area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 525–546,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-525-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-525-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Tsimpidi et al.(2017)Tsimpidi, Karydis, Pandis, and
Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N., and Lelieveld, J.:
Global-scale combustion sources of organic aerosols: sensitivity to formation
and removal mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7345–7364,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7345-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7345-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Tsimpidi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pozzer, A., Pandis, S. N., and Lelieveld,
J.: ORACLE 2-D (v2.0): an efficient module to compute the volatility and
oxygen content of organic aerosol with a global chemistry–climate model,
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3369–3389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-3369-2018</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Turpin and Lim(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. and Lim, H.-J.: Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations:
Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 35, 602–610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820119445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820119445</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Wong et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Lee, A. K. Y., Slowik, J. G., Cziczo, D. J., Leaitch, W. R.,
Macdonald, A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of ambient biogenic secondary
organic aerosol by hydroxyl radicals: Effects on cloud condensation nuclei
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 22805–22811,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL04935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL04935</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page18100?><ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Woody et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Woody, M. C., Baker, K. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Koo, B., and Pye,
H. O. T.: Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex-2010 using
the CMAQ-VBS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4081–4100,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Xing et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Xing, L., Fu, T.-M., Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Wang, G. H., Ho, K. F., Cheng,
M.-C., You, C.-F., and Wang, T. J.: Seasonal and spatial variability of the
OM/OC mass ratios and high regional correlation between oxalic acid and zinc
in Chinese urban organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4307–4318,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Zhang et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M., Worsnop, D., Allan, J., Coe, H., Canagaratna, M., and
Jimenez, J.: Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and
oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 39, 4938–4952, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048568l" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es048568l</ext-link>, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Zhang et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into
sources and processes of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3289–3311,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005</ext-link>, 2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Zhao et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Nguyen, N., Presto, A., Hennigan, C., May, A., and Robinson, A.:
Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from on-road diesel
vehicles: chemical composition, emission factors, and estimated secondary
organic aerosol production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 11516–11526,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02841</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Zhao et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Nguyen, N., Presto, A., Hennigan, C., May, A., and Robinson, A.:
Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from on-road gasoline
vehicles and small off-road gasoline engines., Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
4554–4563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b06247</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Zhu et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, S., Sartelet, K., Healy, R., and Wenger, J.: Simulation of particle
diversity and mixing state over Greater Paris: A model-measurement
inter-comparison, Faraday Discuss., 189, 547–566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00175G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5FD00175G</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Modeling organic aerosol concentrations and properties during winter 2014 in the northwestern Mediterranean region</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Organic aerosols are measured at a remote site (Ersa) on the cape of Corsica
in the northwestern Mediterranean basin during the winter campaign of 2014 of the CHemistry and AeRosols Mediterranean
EXperiment (CharMEx), when high organic
concentrations from anthropogenic origins are observed.
This work aims to represent the observed organic aerosol
concentrations and properties (oxidation state) using the
air-quality model Polyphemus with a surrogate approach for secondary organic
aerosol (SOA) formation.
Because intermediate and semi-volatile organic compounds (I/S-VOCs) are the main
precursors of SOAs at Ersa during winter 2014, different parameterizations
to represent the emission and aging of I/S-VOCs were implemented in the
chemistry-transport model of Polyphemus (different volatility distribution
emissions and single-step oxidation vs multi-step oxidation within a volatility basis set – VBS – framework, inclusion of non-traditional volatile organic
compounds – NTVOCs). Simulations using the different parameterizations are compared to
each other and to the measurements (concentration and oxidation state). The
highly observed organic concentrations are well reproduced in all the
parameterizations. They are slightly underestimated in most
parameterizations. The volatility distribution at emissions influences the concentrations more strongly than the choice of the parameterization that may
be used for aging (single-step oxidation vs multi-step oxidation), stressing
the importance of an accurate characterization of emissions. Assuming the
volatility distribution of sectors other than residential heating to be the
same as residential heating may lead to a strong underestimation of organic
concentrations. The observed organic oxidation and oxygenation states are
strongly underestimated in all simulations, even when multigenerational
aging of I/S-VOCs from all sectors is modeled. This suggests that
uncertainties in the emissions and aging of I/S-VOC emissions remain to be
elucidated, with a potential role of formation of organic nitrate and
low-volatility highly oxygenated organic molecules.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aiken et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A., DeCarlo, P., Krol, J., Worsno, D., Huffma, J., Docherty, K.,
Ulbrich, I., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J., Sueper, D., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn,
A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P., Canagaratna, M., Onasch, T., Alfarra, M.,
Prevot, A., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and
Jimenez, J.: O/C and OM/OC Ratios of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic
Aerosols with High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4478–4485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bergström et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Bergström, R., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Prévôt, A. S. H., Yttri,
K. E., and Simpson, D.: Modelling of organic aerosols over Europe
(2002–2007) using a volatility basis set (VBS) framework: application of
different assumptions regarding the formation of secondary organic aerosol,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8499–8527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Boylan and Russell(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance
metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models,
Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bruns et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Bruns, E. A., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Kilic, D., Klein, F.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification of
significant precursor gases of secondary organic aerosols from residential
wood combustion, Sci. Rep., 6, 27881, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27881</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Byun and Ching(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Byun, D. and Ching, J.: Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community
Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Canagaratna et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Canonaco et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.:
Seasonal differences in oxygenated organic aerosol composition: implications
for emissions sources and factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6993–7002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6993-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cappa and Jimenez(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D. and Jimenez, J. L.: Quantitative estimates of the volatility of
ambient organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5409–5424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5409-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Cholakian et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Cholakian, A., Beekmann, M., Colette, A., Coll, I., Siour, G., Sciare, J.,
Marchand, N., Couvidat, F., Pey, J., Gros, V., Sauvage, S., Michoud, V.,
Sellegri, K., Colomb, A., Sartelet, K., Langley DeWitt, H., Elser, M.,
Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., and Dulac, F.: Simulation of fine organic
aerosols in the western Mediterranean area during the ChArMEx 2013 summer
campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7287–7312, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7287-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7287-2018</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Chrit et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Chrit, M., Sartelet, K., Sciare, J., Pey, J., Marchand, N., Couvidat, F.,
Sellegri, K., and Beekmann, M.: Modelling organic aerosol concentrations and
properties during ChArMEx summer campaigns of 2012 and 2013 in the western
Mediterranean region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12509–12531,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12509-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12509-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Ciarelli et al.(2017a)</label><mixed-citation>
Ciarelli, G., Aksoyoglu, S., El Haddad, I., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M.,
Poulain, L., Äijälä, M., Carbone, S., Freney, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Modelling winter organic
aerosol at the European scale with CAMx: evaluation and source apportionment
with a VBS parameterization based on novel wood burning smog chamber
experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7653–7669,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7653-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7653-2017</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Ciarelli et al.(2017b)</label><mixed-citation>
Ciarelli, G., El Haddad, I., Bruns, E., Aksoyoglu, S., Möhler, O.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Constraining a hybrid volatility
basis-set model for aging of wood-burning emissions using smog chamber
experiments: a box-model study based on the VBS scheme of the CAMx model
(v5.40), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2303–2320,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2303-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2303-2017</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Couvidat and Sartelet(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F. and Sartelet, K.: The Secondary Organic Aerosol Processor (SOAP
v1.0) model: a unified model with different ranges of complexity based on the
molecular surrogate approach, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1111–1138,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Couvidat et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F., Debry, É., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: A
hydrophilic/hydrophobic organic (H<sup>2</sup>O) model: Model development,
evaluation and sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D10304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017214</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Couvidat et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F., Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., Seigneur, C., Marchand, N., and Sciare,
J.: Modeling secondary organic aerosol in an urban area: application to
Paris, France, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 983–996,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-983-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-983-2013</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Couvidat et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: Investigating the impact of
aqueous-phase chemistry and wet deposition on organic aerosol formation using
a molecular surrogate modeling approach, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
914–922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es3034318" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es3034318</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Couvidat et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F., Bessagnet, B., Garcia-Vivanco, M., Real, E., Menut, L., and
Colette, A.: Development of an inorganic and organic aerosol model (CHIMERE
2017<i>β</i> v1.0): seasonal and spatial evaluation over Europe, Geosci. Model
Dev., 11, 165–194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-165-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-165-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Crenn et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Crenn, V., Sciare, J., Croteau, P. L., Verlhac, S., Fröhlich, R., Belis, C.
A., Aas, W., Äijälä, M., Alastuey, A., Artiñano, B., Baisnée, D.,
Bonnaire, N., Bressi, M., Canagaratna, M., Canonaco, F., Carbone, C.,
Cavalli, F., Coz, E., Cubison, M. J., Esser-Gietl, J. K., Green, D. C., Gros,
V., Heikkinen, L., Herrmann, H., Lunder, C., Minguillón, M. C., Mocnik, G.,
O'Dowd, C. D., Ovadnevaite, J., Petit, J.-E., Petralia, E., Poulain, L.,
Priestman, M., Riffault, V., Ripoll, A., Sarda-Estève, R., Slowik, J. G.,
Setyan, A., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Jayne,
J. T., and Favez, O.: ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 1: Reproducibility
of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol
Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located
instruments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5063–5087,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Crippa et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D.,
Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo, P.
F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M.,
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski, S.,
Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U.,
and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25 AMS data
sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source apportionment
approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Dawson et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Dawson, M. L., Xu, J., Griffin, R. J., and Dabdub, D.: Development of
aroCACM/MPMPO 1.0: a model to simulate secondary organic aerosol from
aromatic precursors in regional models, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2143–2151,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2143-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2143-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Debry et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Debry, E., Fahey, K., Sartelet, K., Sportisse, B., and Tombette, M.:
Technical Note: A new SIze REsolved Aerosol Model (SIREAM), Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 1537–1547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1537-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1537-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Denier van der Gon et al.(2015a)</label><mixed-citation>
Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Bergström, R., Fountoukis, C., Johansson, C.,
Pandis, S. N., Simpson, D., and Visschedijk, A. J. H.: Particulate emissions
from residential wood combustion in Europe – revised estimates and an
evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6503–6519,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Denier van der Gon et al.(2015b)</label><mixed-citation>
Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Bergström, R., Fountoukis, C., Johansson, C.,
Pandis, S. N., Simpson, D., and Visschedijk, A. J. H.: Particulate emissions
from residential wood combustion in Europe – revised estimates and an
evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6503–6519,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6503-2015</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Donahue et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Donahue et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A
two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of
organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Duplissy et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A.,
Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M.,
Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D.
R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and
composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1155–1165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>El Haddad et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
El Haddad, I., D'Anna, B., Temime-Roussel, B., Nicolas, M., Boreave, A.,
Favez, O., Voisin, D., Sciare, J., George, C., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Wortham, H.,
and Marchand, N.: Towards a better understanding of the origins, chemical
composition and aging of oxygenated organic aerosols: case study of a
Mediterranean industrialized environment, Marseille, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7875–7894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7875-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7875-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>El-Zanan et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
El-Zanan, H., Lowenthal, D., Zielinska, B., Chow, J., and Kumar, N.:
Determination of the organic aerosol mass to organic carbon ratio in IMPROVE
samples, Chemosphere, 60, 480–496,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>ENVIRON(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
ENVIRON: User's Guide, Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions
(CAMx), Version 5.40, Environ International Corporation, California, USA,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Fountoukis et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Fountoukis, C., Megaritis, A. G., Skyllakou, K., Charalampidis, P. E.,
Pilinis, C., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Mohr,
C., Prévôt, A. S. H., Allan, J. D., Poulain, L., Petäjä, T., Tiitta,
P., Carbone, S., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C., Swietlicki, E.,
and Pandis, S. N.: Organic aerosol concentration and composition over Europe:
insights from comparison of regional model predictions with aerosol mass
spectrometer factor analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9061–9076,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9061-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9061-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Fröhlich et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Fröhlich, R., Cubison, M. J., Slowik, J. G., Bukowiecki, N., Canonaco, F.,
Croteau, P. L., Gysel, M., Henne, S., Herrmann, E., Jayne, J. T.,
Steinbacher, M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.:
Fourteen months of on-line measurements of the non-refractory submicron
aerosol at the Jungfraujoch (3580&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l.) – chemical composition,
origins and organic aerosol sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11373–11398,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>GENEMIS(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
GENEMIS: Technical Report, EUROTEC, annual report 1993, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Gentner et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Gentner, D., Jathar, S., Gordon, T., Bahreini, R., Day, D., El Haddad, I.,
Hayes, P., Pieber, S., Platt, S., de Gouw, J., Goldstein, A., Harley, R.,
Jimenez, J., Prévôt, A., and Robinson, A.: Review of Urban Secondary
Organic Aerosol Formation from Gasoline and Diesel Motor Vehicle Emissions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 1074–1093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Gilardoni et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Gilardoni, S., Liu, S., Takahama, S., Russell, L. M., Allan, J. D.,
Steinbrecher, R., Jimenez, J. L., De Carlo, P. F., Dunlea, E. J., and
Baumgardner, D.: Characterization of organic ambient aerosol during MIRAGE
2006 on three platforms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5417–5432,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5417-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5417-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Grieshop et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Laboratory
investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires
2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2227–2240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Grosjean and Friedlander(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Grosjean, D. and Friedlander, S.: Gas-particle distribution factors for
organic and other pollutants in the Los Angeles atmosphere, J. Air Pollut.
Control Assoc., 25, 1038–1044, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Guenther et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Hayes et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, P. L., Carlton, A. G., Baker, K. R., Ahmadov, R., Washenfelder, R. A.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A.,
Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg,
J. H., Ma, P. K., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the formation and aging of
secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 5773–5801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Horowitz et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4784, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Huffman et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Mohr, C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M.,
Ziemann, P. J., Onasch, T. B., and Jimenez, J. L.: Chemically resolved
volatility measurements of organic aerosol from different sources, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 5351–5357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es803539d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/Es803539d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Jacobson(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Development and application of a new air pollution modeling
system – II. Aerosol module structure and design, Atmos. Environ., 31,
131–144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00202-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00202-6</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J.-T.:
Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and
remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Jathar et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O. T., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
10473–10478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S., Zhang, Q.,
Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A. C.,
Docherty, K. D., Ulbrich, I., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L., Duplissy, J.,
Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y. L., Tian, J.,
Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara, P., Ehn, M.,
Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J., Dunlea, E. J.,
Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T.,
Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel,
J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams,
L. R., Wood, E. C., Kolb, C. E., Middlebrook, A. M., Baltensperger, U., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Science,
326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Kim et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: Formation of secondary aerosols over
Europe: comparison of two gas-phase chemical mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 583–598, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-583-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-583-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Kim et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, Y., Sartelet, K., Seigneur, C., Charron, A., Besombes, J.-L., Jaffrezo,
J.-L., Marchand, N., and Polo, L.: Effect of measurement protocol on organic
aerosol measurements of exhaust emissions from gasoline and diesel vehicles,
Atmos. Environ., 140, 176–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.045</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Koo et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Koo, B., Knipping, E., and Yarwood, G.: 1.5-Dimensional volatility basis set
approach for modeling organic aerosol in CAMx and CMAQ, Atmos. Environ., 95,
158–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.031</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Kroll et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M., Wilson, K. R.,
Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D.,
Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Carbon oxidation
state as a metric for describing the chemistry of atmospheric organic
aerosol, Nature Chem., 3, 133–139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NCHEM.948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NCHEM.948</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Lipsky and Robinson(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Lipsky, E. M. and Robinson, A. L.: Effects of dilution on fine particle mass
and partitioning of semivolatile organics in diesel exhaust and wood smoke,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 155–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/Es050319p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/Es050319p</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>May et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation>
May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T., Collett,
J. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Gas-particle
partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass burning, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11327–11338, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828</a>,
2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>May et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation>
May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T.,
Collett Jr., J. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass
burning, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11327–11338,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>May et al.(2013c)</label><mixed-citation>
May, A. A., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., Nguyen, N. T., Gordon, T. D., and
Robinson, A. L.: Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol
emissions: (1) gasoline vehicle exhaust, Atmos. Environ., 77,
128–139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.060</a>, 2013c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>May et al.(2013d)</label><mixed-citation>
May, A. A., Presto, A. A., Hennigan, C. J., Nguyen, N. T., Gordon, T. D., and
Robinson, A. L.: Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol
emissions: (2) diesel vehicles, Envir. Sci. Tech., 47,
8288–8296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400782j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400782j</a>, 2013d.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Michoud et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Michoud, V., Sciare, J., Sauvage, S., Dusanter, S., Léonardis, T., Gros,
V., Kalogridis, C., Zannoni, N., Féron, A., Petit, J.-E., Crenn, V.,
Baisnée, D., Sarda-Estève, R., Bonnaire, N., Marchand, N., DeWitt, H. L.,
Pey, J., Colomb, A., Gheusi, F., Szidat, S., Stavroulas, I., Borbon, A., and
Locoge, N.: Organic carbon at a remote site of the western Mediterranean
Basin: sources and chemistry during the ChArMEx SOP2 field experiment, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 17, 8837–8865, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8837-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8837-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Minguillón et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Minguillón, M., Pérez, N., Marchand, N., Bertrand, A., Temime-Roussel, B.,
Agrios, K., Szidat, S., van Drooge, B., Sylvestre, A., Alastuey, A., Reche,
C., Ripoll, A., Marco, E., Grimalt, J., and Querol, X.: Secondary organic
aerosol origin in an urban environment: influence of biogenic and fuel
combustion precursors, Faraday Discuss., 189, 337–359,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fd00182j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fd00182j</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Molteni et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Molteni, U., Bianchi, F., Klein, F., El Haddad, I., Frege, C., Rossi, M. J.,
Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic
molecules from aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1909–1921,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Murphy et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N., Woody, M. C., Jimenez, J. L., Carlton, A. M. G., Hayes, P. L.,
Liu, S., Ng, N. L., Russell, L. M., Setyan, A., Xu, L., Young, J., Zaveri, R.
A., Zhang, Q., and Pye, H. O. T.: Semivolatile POA and parameterized total
combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11107–11133,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Murphy et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hudson, P. K., Matthew, B. M.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Peltier, R. E., Sullivan, A., Thomson, D. S., and Weber,
R. J.: Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles,
J. Geophys. Res., 11, 23–32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007340</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Nenes et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Ng et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring
of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 45, 780–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560211</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Nicolas(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Nicolas, J.: Caractérisation physico-chimique de l’aérosol
troposphérique en Méditerranée : sources et devenir, PhD dissertation,
Univ. Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Ots et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Ots, R., Young, D. E., Vieno, M., Xu, L., Dunmore, R. E., Allan, J. D., Coe,
H., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Ng, N. L., Hamilton, J. F., Bergström,
R., Di Marco, C., Nemitz, E., Mackenzie, I. A., Kuenen, J. J. P., Green, D.
C., Reis, S., and Heal, M. R.: Simulating secondary organic aerosol from
missing diesel-related intermediate-volatility organic compound emissions
during the Clean Air for London (ClearfLo) campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
6453–6473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6453-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Robinson et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and
Photochemical Aging, Science, 315, 1259–1262,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Sartelet et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Sartelet, K., Couvidat, F., Seigneur, C., and Roustan, Y.: Impact of biogenic
emissions on air quality over Europe and North America, Atmos. Environ., 53,
131–141, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Sartelet et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Sartelet, K., Zhu, S., Moukhtar, S., André, M., André, J. M., Gros, V.,
Favez, O., Brasseur, A., and Redaelli, M.: Emission of intermediate, semi and
low volatile organic compounds from traffic and their impact on secondary
organic aerosol concentrations over Greater Paris, Atmos. Environ., 180,
126–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.031</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Sartelet et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Sartelet, K. N., Debry, E., Fahey, K., Roustan, Y., Tombette, M., and
Sportisse, B.: Simulation of aerosols and related species over Europe with
the Polyphemus system. Part I: model-to-data comparison for 2001, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 6116–6131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.024</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Schwier et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwier, A. N., Rose, C., Asmi, E., Ebling, A. M., Landing, W. M., Marro, S.,
Pedrotti, M.-L., Sallon, A., Iuculano, F., Agusti, S., Tsiola, A., Pitta, P.,
Louis, J., Guieu, C., Gazeau, F., and Sellegri, K.: Primary marine aerosol
emissions from the Mediterranean Sea during pre-bloom and oligotrophic
conditions: correlations to seawater chlorophyll a from a mesocosm study,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7961–7976, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7961-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7961-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Shrivastava et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C., Fan, J., Goldstein, A., Guenther, A., Jimenez, J.,
Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S., Ng, N., Petaja, T., Pierce, J., Rasch, P.,
Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J., Shilling, J., Smith, J., Thornton, J., Volkamer,
R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D., Zaveri, R., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent
advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global
climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Stockwell et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Williams, J., and Yokelson, R. J.:
Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop
residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 845–865,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Tost and Pringle(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Tost, H. and Pringle, K. J.: Improvements of organic aerosol representations
and their effects in large-scale atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8687–8709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8687-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8687-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Troen and Mahrt(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Troen, I. B. and Mahrt, L.: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer;
sensitivity to surface evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 129–148,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122760" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122760</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Tsimpidi et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Molina, L., Ulbrich, I.
M., Jimenez, J. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of the volatility basis-set
approach for the simulation of organic aerosol formation in the Mexico City
metropolitan area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 525–546,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-525-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-525-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Tsimpidi et al.(2017)Tsimpidi, Karydis, Pandis, and
Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>
Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N., and Lelieveld, J.:
Global-scale combustion sources of organic aerosols: sensitivity to formation
and removal mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7345–7364,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7345-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7345-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Tsimpidi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pozzer, A., Pandis, S. N., and Lelieveld,
J.: ORACLE 2-D (v2.0): an efficient module to compute the volatility and
oxygen content of organic aerosol with a global chemistry–climate model,
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3369–3389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3369-2018</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Turpin and Lim(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Turpin, B. and Lim, H.-J.: Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations:
Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 35, 602–610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820119445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820119445</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Wong et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Lee, A. K. Y., Slowik, J. G., Cziczo, D. J., Leaitch, W. R.,
Macdonald, A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of ambient biogenic secondary
organic aerosol by hydroxyl radicals: Effects on cloud condensation nuclei
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 22805–22811,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL04935" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL04935</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Woody et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Woody, M. C., Baker, K. R., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Koo, B., and Pye,
H. O. T.: Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex-2010 using
the CMAQ-VBS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4081–4100,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Xing et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, L., Fu, T.-M., Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Wang, G. H., Ho, K. F., Cheng,
M.-C., You, C.-F., and Wang, T. J.: Seasonal and spatial variability of the
OM/OC mass ratios and high regional correlation between oxalic acid and zinc
in Chinese urban organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4307–4318,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Zhang et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M., Worsnop, D., Allan, J., Coe, H., Canagaratna, M., and
Jimenez, J.: Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and
oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 39, 4938–4952, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048568l" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es048568l</a>, 2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Zhang et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into
sources and processes of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3289–3311,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005</a>, 2005b.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Zhao et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Nguyen, N., Presto, A., Hennigan, C., May, A., and Robinson, A.:
Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from on-road diesel
vehicles: chemical composition, emission factors, and estimated secondary
organic aerosol production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 11516–11526,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02841</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Zhao et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Nguyen, N., Presto, A., Hennigan, C., May, A., and Robinson, A.:
Intermediate volatility organic compound emissions from on-road gasoline
vehicles and small off-road gasoline engines., Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
4554–4563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06247</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Zhu et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, S., Sartelet, K., Healy, R., and Wenger, J.: Simulation of particle
diversity and mixing state over Greater Paris: A model-measurement
inter-comparison, Faraday Discuss., 189, 547–566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00175G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00175G</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
