<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-18043-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Source apportionment of the organic aerosol over the Atlantic Ocean from
53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S: significant contributions from<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> marine
emissions and long-range transport</article-title><alt-title>Source apportionment of the organic aerosol over the Atlantic
Ocean</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Source apportionment of the organic aerosol over the Atlantic
Ocean}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Huang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Shan</given-names></name>
          <email>shanhuang_eci@jnu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5575-4510</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Zhijun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Poulain</surname><given-names>Laurent</given-names></name>
          <email>poulain@tropos.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-7881</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>van Pinxteren</surname><given-names>Manuela</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-8620</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Merkel</surname><given-names>Maik</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Assmann</surname><given-names>Denise</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Herrmann</surname><given-names>Hartmut</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-2101</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wiedensohler</surname><given-names>Alfred</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-491X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University,
Guangzhou, 511443, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, 04318, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University,
Beijing, 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Laurent Poulain (poulain@tropos.de) and Shan Huang
(shanhuang_eci@jnu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>24</issue>
      <fpage>18043</fpage><lpage>18062</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e179">Marine aerosol particles are an important part of the natural aerosol systems
and might have a significant impact on the global climate and biological
cycle. It is widely accepted that truly pristine marine conditions are
difficult to find over the ocean. However, the influence of continental and
anthropogenic emissions on the marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosol is still
less understood and non-quantitative, causing uncertainties in the estimation
of the climate effect of marine aerosols. This study presents a detailed
chemical characterization of the MBL aerosol as well as the source
apportionment of the organic aerosol (OA) composition. The data set covers
the Atlantic Ocean from 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, based on four
open-ocean cruises in 2011 and 2012. The aerosol particle composition was
measured with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass
spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS), which indicated that sub-micrometer aerosol
particles over the Atlantic Ocean are mainly composed of sulfates (50 %
of the particle mass concentration), organics (21 %) and sea salt
(12 %). OA has been apportioned into five factors, including three
factors linked to marine sources and two with continental and/or
anthropogenic origins. The marine oxygenated OA (MOOA, 16 % of the total
OA mass) and marine nitrogen-containing OA (MNOA, 16 %) are identified as
marine secondary products with gaseous biogenic precursors dimethyl sulfide
(DMS) or amines. Marine hydrocarbon-like OA (MHOA, 19 %) was attributed
to the primary emissions from the Atlantic Ocean. The factor for the
anthropogenic oxygenated OA (Anth-OOA, 19 %) is related to continental
long-range transport. Represented by the combustion oxygenated OA (Comb-OOA),
aged combustion emissions from maritime traffic and wild fires in Africa
contributed, on average, a large fraction to the total OA mass (30 %).
This study provides the important finding that long-range transport was found
to contribute averagely 49 % of the submicron OA mass over the Atlantic
Ocean. This is almost equal to that from marine sources (51 %).
Furthermore, a detailed latitudinal distribution of OA source contributions
showed that DMS oxidation contributed markedly to the OA over the South
Atlantic during spring, while continental-related long-range transport
largely influenced the marine atmosphere near Europe and western and central
Africa (15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S). In addition, supported by a solid
correlation between marine tracer methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and the
DMS-oxidation OA (MOOA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), this study suggests that
the DMS-related secondary organic aerosol (SOA) over the Atlantic Ocean could
be estimated by MSA and a scaling factor of 1.79, especially in spring.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e240">As one of the most important natural aerosol systems at the global level,
the marine aerosol plays a significant role in the global radiation budget
through both direct and indirect climate effects, as well as playing a role
in biogeochemical cycling (O'Dowd and De Leeuw, 2007; Saltzman, 2009). In
pristine conditions, marine aerosols consist of primary<?pagebreak page18044?> and secondary
particles. Primary particles, usually referring to sea salt, are
mechanically generated via sea–air interaction (Andreas, 2002).
Secondary marine aerosol particles are chemically produced from atmospheric
reactions of gases emitted by organisms in the ocean (Charlson
et al., 1987). As one of the most well-known biological gases, dimethyl
sulfide (DMS), emitted by marine phytoplankton, can be oxidized to
eventually form sulfate and methanesulfonic acid (MSA) in the particulate
phase (Ayers and Gillett, 2000; Bates et al., 1987; Charlson et al.,
1987; Gondwe et al., 2003; Hertel et al., 1994; Shiro Hatakeyama, 1985; von
Glasow and Crutzen, 2004). Other volatile organic compounds, such as
isoprene and monoterpenes, can also be produced by marine organisms (Bonsang et al., 1992; Shaw et al., 2010; Yassaa et al., 2008) and
transformed to secondary particles (Fu et al., 2011). However,
the chemical and physical properties of the marine aerosol are still poorly
understood.</p>
      <p id="d1e243">For a long time, non-sea-salt sulfate (nss-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has attracted
substantial research attention, because it has been recognized as the major
source of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) over the ocean, consequently
influencing the cloud albedo (Charlson et al., 1987). This
biological regulation of climate has been referred to as the CLAW hypothesis (Charlson et al., 1987). Recently, this hypothesis was
challenged because of the possible importance of non-DMS sources of the
marine boundary layer (MBL) CCN, specifically sea salt and organics (Quinn and Bates, 2011). On the one hand, sea salt has
been found to be a major mass component (60 %) in the residual particles
of dried cloud droplets (Twohy and Anderson, 2008). On the other
hand, sea surface water is also a reservoir of organic matter that can be
injected into the air and enriched in the particles (Aller et al., 2005;
Kuznetsova et al., 2005; Russell et al., 2010; Schmitt-Kopplin et al., 2012;
van Pinxteren et al., 2017). Organic matter has been observed to dominate
the particle mass (up to 77 %) during phytoplankton bloom periods at a
coastal station in Ireland (O'Dowd et al., 2004; Ovadnevaite et al.,
2011). However, many marine aerosol studies were based on observations of
islands or in coastal areas, where biological activities are much higher
than the remote ocean (as illustrated by global maps of chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<uri>https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/GlobalMaps/view.php?d1=MY1DMM_CHLORA</uri>; last access: 15 November 2018). Hence, more
measurements aboard ships are required to provide
details of the chemical composition and physical properties of marine
aerosol over the open ocean far from the coast.</p>
      <p id="d1e274">The aerosol particle number size distribution and chemical composition over
the ocean can be influenced by many non-marine sources, including continental
and ship emissions (Andreae, 2007; Simpson et al., 2014). It is therefore
difficult to find pristine conditions over the ocean. Significant impacts
from ship and continental emissions were observed over the Pacific and
Atlantic (63 % of the sampling time; Frossard et al.,
2014), the Arctic (Chang et al., 2011),
and the North Pacific between southern Asia and northern Japan (Choi
et al., 2017). Nevertheless, there are still some regions with little
anthropogenic impact on marine aerosols, such as the station on the coast of
Ireland in the northeastern Atlantic (Ceburnis et al., 2011; O'Dowd et al.,
2014). Due to the paucity of ship-based measurements, the non-marine
influence on MBL aerosol particles is still unknown, especially for a large
area of the oceans. Additionally, previous studies were often based on
offline measurements, which could hardly provide variation of aerosol
chemical properties at high temporal and spatial resolution. In this study,
aerosol particle measurements were conducted on board the German research
vessel (R/V) <italic>Polarstern</italic>, based on four cruises in the Atlantic Ocean in 2011
and 2012, covering the range from 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The
detailed chemical properties of the aerosol over the Atlantic Ocean were
measured by a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer
(HR-ToF-AMS). Based on this unique data set, sources of the organic aerosol
particles over a major part of the Atlantic Ocean were investigated at a high
temporal and spatial resolution to provide a latitudinal distribution of
organic aerosol (OA) source contributions in spring and autumn in both the
Northern and Southern Hemispheres.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e301">The description of four cruises.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Expeditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Starting point and destination</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Duration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Season (in NH)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cruise 1 (ANT-XXVII/4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cape Town – Bremerhaven</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 April–20 May 2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Spring</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cruise 2 (ANT-XXVIII/1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bremerhaven – Cape Town</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 October–1 December 2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Autumn</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cruise 3 (ANT-XXVIII/5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Punta Arenas – Bremerhaven</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 April–15 May 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Spring</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cruise 4 (ANT-XXIX/1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bremerhaven – Cape Town</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 October–27 November 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Autumn</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e402"><bold>(a)</bold> Ship tracks of four cruises; <bold>(b)</bold> The position of the container
during <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Onboard ship campaigns measuring sub-micrometer marine aerosols over the
Atlantic Ocean</title>
      <p id="d1e430">This study is based on aerosol measurements conducted by the Leibniz
Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS) during four cruises on the R/V
<italic>Polarstern</italic> in 2011 and 2012. Expedition details and ship tracks of the
cruises are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. All cruises were part of transfer
voyages between Bremerhaven, Germany (53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and the German Antarctic research station via
either Cape Town, South Africa (33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), or Punta Arenas, Chile (53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). During each cruise, the ship briefly (and
only) moored at Las Palmas, Spain (28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), for resupply. The cruises can be divided into two
groups according to the period of the year; Cruise 1 (CR1) and Cruise 3 (CR3)
correspond to spring in the Northern Hemisphere (NH), while Cruise 2 (CR2)
and Cruise 4 (CR4) correspond to autumn in the NH. In terms of the spatial
range, CR1, CR2 and CR4 followed almost the same route, while CR3 had
different tracks in the Southern Hemisphere but followed the same route as
the other three cruises from approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e599">During all four cruises, the instruments were deployed inside (and on the
roof) of an air-conditioned laboratory container, which was located on the
first deck of the vessel, approximately 30 m above the ocean surface (Fig. 1). The whole-air sampling inlet of the container was made of<?pagebreak page18045?> a
stainless-steel tube (6 m long, 40 mm diameter, with an inclination angle of
45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the container roof). A vacuum system maintained a stable
total aerosol flow rate of 15 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> through the inlet. The inlet loss
due to diffusion and deposition was calculated (Fig. S1 in the Supplement), suggesting that
the average inlet efficiency was nearly 100 % in the particle size range
between 10 and 1000 nm but decreased rapidly for particles smaller
than 2 nm and larger than 1500 nm. Therefore, the inlet could be considered a
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inlet.</p>
      <p id="d1e632">An isokinetic splitter was used downstream of the aerosol inlet to
distribute the aerosol flow to different online instruments for analysis of
aerosol physicochemical properties, as mentioned below. Particle size
distributions from 10 nm to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (mobility diameter, equal to volume
equivalent diameter for spherical particles) were provided by a combination
of one TROPOS-type mobility particle size spectrometer (MPSS, 10–800 nm, TROPOS custom-built; see Wiedensohler et al., 2012) and one aerodynamic
particle size spectrometer (TSI APS model 3321, 500 nm–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, TSI
Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA). The particle hygroscopicity at 90 % relative
humidity (RH) was measured by a Hygroscopicity Tandem Differential Mobility
Analyzer (HTDMA, TROPOS custom-built; e.g., Wu et
al., 2011). A differential mobility analyzer, the Cloud Condensation Nuclei
Counter (DMA-CCNc, TROPOS custom-built;
e.g., Henning et al., 2014), was used for size-resolved CCN measurements.
Optical properties including light scattering and absorption coefficients of
particles were provided by an integrating nephelometer (Model 3563, TSI
Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA), a multi-angle absorption photometer (MAAP,
Model 5012, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; see Müller et al.,
2011) and a particle soot absorption photometer (PSAP, Radiance Research,
Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Particle chemical properties were investigated
using a HR-ToF-AMS (Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA), which is
the central instrument for the present study. In parallel, a high-volume
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampler (DIGITEL, DHA-80, DIGITEL Elektronik AG, Switzerland) was
fixed on the roof of the aerosol container and provided daily (24 h) filter
samples. Before each campaign, all instruments in the aerosol container were
synchronized to UTC (Coordinated Universal Time).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e661">The 20 min detection limits during four <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CR1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CR2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CR3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CR4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.025</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.022</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulfate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ammonium</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chloride</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.007</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.006</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Measurements</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Particle chemical analysis</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>HR-ToF-AMS</title>
      <p id="d1e851">The HR-ToF-AMS (referred to as AMS in the following text) can provide the
size-resolved chemical composition of non-refractory submicron particles (Canagaratna et al., 2007;<?pagebreak page18046?> DeCarlo et al., 2006). Its size cut is within
the range of near unity transmission efficiency of the main container inlet
during R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises (Fig. S1). To minimize the inlet loss
between the AMS and MPSS, the AMS was located next to the MPSS, and the
inlet of AMS was connected directly in front of the MPSS inlet. The two
instruments shared a Nafion dryer to maintain the RH of the sampling flow
below 40 %. The AMS was operated alternatively between V- and W-modes at a
time resolution of 2 min. Regular calibration was performed according to
reported methods (Jimenez et al., 2003). Collection
efficiency (CE) of 0.7 was applied based on intercomparisons between the (1)
AMS and MPSS and (2) AMS and offline measurements, as already described in
Huang et al. (2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e857">The default components measured by the AMS include organics, sulfate,
nitrate, ammonium and chloride. In particular, the marine biogenic tracer
MSA was quantified by the AMS based on standard calibrations and validated
by collocated offline measurements (Huang et al., 2017). To reduce the
signal noise, AMS data at 20 min resolution are calculated and used in the
following analysis except as noted. Table 2 provides the detection limits
(DLs) of detected AMS species at 20 min resolution (for calculation details,
see Huang et al., 2017). In addition, a total uncertainty of approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % is estimated for AMS measurements, including 10 % for the inlet
system, 20 % for the ionization efficiency calibration and 20 % for the
collection efficiency (Poulain et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e867">The AMS data measured during R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises were analyzed using the
software Squirrel v1.54 for the unit resolution and Pika v1.13 for the high
resolution, both downloaded from the ToF-AMS webpage
(<uri>http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/ToFAMSResources/ToFSoftware/index.html</uri>, last access: 15 December 2018).
The software was based on Igor Pro (version
6.22A, WaveMetrics Inc., Portland, OR, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Offline measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e882">A PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> high-volume DIGITEL filter sampler was deployed to sample aerosol
particles at a 24 h time resolution (midnight to midnight, UTC) during R/V
<italic>Polarstern</italic> CR1, CR2 and CR3, operating at a flow rate of
500 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The daily aerosol
masses were collected on quartz fiber filters (150 mm, Munktell and Filtrak, MK 360, Bärenstein, Germany), which
were pretreated at 105 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 24 h before being measured. All
filter samples were refrigerated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until analysis. The
total aerosol particle mass was determined by the weight of the clean and
particle-loaded filter, and the particle-loaded filter was separated into several
aliquots for different analyses. Inorganic ions were measured after aqueous
filter extraction (25 % of the filter in 20 mL, filtered with a
0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m syringe) with ion chromatography (IC; ICS3000, Dionex,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) were
analyzed by a thermo-optical method with a Sunset Laboratory Dual-Optical
Carbonaceous Analyzer (Sunset Laboratory Inc., Tigard, OR, USA) using the
EUSAAR 2 protocol (van Pinxteren et al., 2017). In total, 86 ambient samples
from CR1 (25 samples), CR2 (30 samples) and CR3 (31 samples) were analyzed,
while 45 effective samples were considered in this study due to the exclusion
of filters contaminated by ship exhausts and/or seawater.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Other measurements and data sources</title>
      <p id="d1e952">In this study, the MPSS and MAAP were used as external instruments to
evaluate the data quality of the AMS or provide supplementary information
for the total particle mass. The MPSS was operated at a time resolution of 8 min (CR1, CR2) and 5 min (CR3, CR4), following recommendations from
Wiedensohler et al. (2012). The resulting particle number size
distribution was corrected for internal particle losses. Generally, an
uncertainty of approximately 10 % can be considered, as shown by
intercomparison experiments (Wiedensohler et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e955">The particle mass concentration of equivalent black carbon (eBC) was
converted from the particle light absorption coefficient provided by the
MAAP. To be combined with the particle concentration measured by the AMS,
eBC mass concentration in the sub-micrometer size range is required. Here,
the MAAP was connected to the main inlet of the aerosol container, which
mostly collected particles no larger than 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Additionally,
Poulain et al. (2011b) reported that eBC particles are
mainly (90 % of mass) distributed in the sub-micrometer size range
according to a comparison between the data from 2 MAAPs with upper size cuts
of 1 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m inlets in Melpitz (Germany). Thus, we
suppose that the measured eBC particles are almost in the sub-micrometer size
range. In total, a global uncertainty of 10 % was attributed to MAAP
measurements, taking the uncertainties of the instrument, size cutting,
density and mass absorption efficiency into consideration.</p>
      <p id="d1e972">All meteorological parameters on R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises were measured by an
onboard German Weather Service (DWD) station. Air mass back trajectories
along the ship track in 12 h time resolution (00:00 UTC and 12:00 UTC every
day) were also retrieved from the DWD using a global meteorological model
GME (global model of the Earth).<?pagebreak page18047?> Air masses at 950 hPa (approximately 500 m)
were selected and considered as a well-mixed situation, and backward
trajectories over the last 5 days (120 h) were investigated in this
study. Navigation parameters, together with meteorological parameters, were
supplied by the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> central data acquisition system (<uri>https://dship.awi.de/</uri>, last access: 1 March 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization (PMF)</title>
      <p id="d1e990">The source apportionment of OA measured on the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> was analyzed
using the PMF method (Paatero, 1997; Paatero and Tapper, 1994).
High-resolution organic mass spectra and their uncertainties over the four
cruises were combined and input into the Igor Pro-based PMF Evaluation Tool (PET, v2.06; Ulbrich et al., 2009). Before
running the PMF model, the high-resolution organic mass matrix and its error
matrix were examined to remove incorrect signals (e.g., organic fragments
influenced by strong sulfate signal), very low signals (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group,
isotopes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ship contamination periods. According
to the instructions from Ulbrich et al. (2009), a
minimum error estimate of one measured ion was calculated; the “bad” data
with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) less than 0.2 were removed, and the
“weak” data with SNR between 0.2 and 2 were down-weighted by a factor of 2;
signals for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and related ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were also down-weighted by a factor of 2 to
avoid overestimating the importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To find the best
solution, PMF was run between one and seven factors for (1) rotational forcing
parameter fPeak between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1 (step of 0.2) and (2) seeds with random
starts between 0 and 50 (step of 2). Based on a comprehensive evaluation of
solutions with different factor numbers (regarding both time series and mass
spectral pattern), a 5-factor solution was selected with fPeak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9246</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The elemental analysis of PMF factors was performed
using the analytical procedure for elemental separation (APES light v1.06)
tool detailed by Aiken et al. (2008) and
Canagaratna et al. (2015). Detailed PMF
analysis results are shown and interpreted in Sect. 3.2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Particle chemical composition</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>AMS data quality assurance</title>
      <p id="d1e1175"><italic>Ship contamination exclusion.</italic> During all four cruises, the ship's
own exhausts (including emissions from the engine and kitchen) from the main
chimney occasionally affected the measurements, especially when the wind came
from behind the ship. The specific contamination periods are identified based
on extremely high concentrations of combustion tracers (e.g., eBC and
organics) and meteorological parameters (e.g., wind direction), as
illustrated in Figs. S2 and S3. Accordingly, the ship contamination
range of the relative wind direction (RWD) was determined to be between
135 and 250<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. With this criterion, 85.2 % of ambient
AMS data (2 min resolution) remained as “clean” data during all four
cruises. In the following text, all the data analyses are performed on the
clean data.</p>
      <p id="d1e1189"><italic>Intercomparisons between AMS and</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="italic">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>offline.</italic> Prior to investigating the particle chemical composition during
the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> measurements, intercomparisons between AMS and parallel
measurements were performed to assure the AMS data quality (Figs. S4 and S5). The mass concentration of the individual species from the AMS
was compared to that from the offline measurements (Fig. S4). Organic
matter (OM) provided by AMS measurement is correlated with OC from filter
measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The slope of 1.75, i.e., the OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratio,
is similar to those found in offshore areas, e.g., 1.8 in the Gulf of Mexico (Russell et al., 2009). An excellent linear
correlation was found for sulfate (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
the correlation for ammonium was moderate (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). No correlation was found for nitrate and chloride. A few values of
nitrate from the AMS are higher than those from offline measurements,
probably due to the evaporative loss of nitrate. The contribution of organic
nitrates remains unknown but might not be negligible. Chloride is
underestimated by the AMS, because this instrument partly detects sea salt,
which is the main source of the chloride measured during R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic>
cruises. Considering that nitrate and chloride account for only a tiny
fraction of the measured particle mass concentration, and the sea salt is
estimated specifically, the AMS can still properly detect a major part of
the MBL aerosols in our measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e1287"><italic>Mass closure with MPSS.</italic> The total particle mass concentration from
the AMS is calculated as the sum of the mass concentrations of default AMS
species (i.e., organics, sulfate, nitrate and ammonium) completed by estimated
sea salt and eBC. This concentration is compared to the calculated particle
mass concentration derived from the particle number size distribution
(Fig. S5). Taking sea salt into consideration can slightly improve the
correlation between the two different techniques (the slope varies from 0.81
to 0.85; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies from 0.72 to 0.77; Fig. S5). The intercomparisons
also demonstrated that a constant CE of 0.7 for AMS measurements could
achieve better agreement between AMS and external measurements, whereas the
composition-dependent collection efficiency introduced by Middlebrook et al. (2012) does not seem appropriate for R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic>
measurements because of the high acidity and low ammonium nitrate content of
the MBL aerosol particles (Huang et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1308">Latitudinal variation of organics, nitrate, sulfate, ammonium, eBC,
sea salt (left axis) and MSA (right axis) during the four <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises.
Air masses with continental influence (grey) and originating from the ocean
(blank) are marked in the background. Note that CR1, CR2 and CR4 followed almost
the same ship track between Bremerhaven and Cape Town, while the route of CR3
was different (from 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) since starting from Punta Arenas.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1330"><italic>Sea salt estimation.</italic> The important primary marine product, sea
salt, was estimated using the method from Ovadnevaite et al. (2012), who successfully quantified sea salt aerosol
concentration with HR-ToF-AMS in Mace Head, Ireland. The reported method is based on
the typical sea salt ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.95</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a scaling factor of 51
derived from laboratory calibration using artificial seawater (Ovadnevaite et al., 2012). In R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic>
measurements, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+<?pagebreak page18048?></mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragment was well identified by the high-resolution
mode. Nevertheless, the linear correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the AMS
and sea salt derived from PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> filter samples showed a mild
relationship with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.38 and yielded a scaling factor of 62
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). To be consistent with the literature (Ovadnevaite et al.,
2012, 2014; Schmale et al., 2013), the scaling factor of
51 from the reference is applied to the sea salt surrogate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
estimate the sea salt mass concentration in this study. With this factor,
the AMS-estimated sea salt concentrations are quite close to those measured
by the offline method, showing a slope of 1.01, and the main scattering
points are located within the uncertainty range of the Mace Head
measurements (Fig. S6). Additionally, the <italic>p</italic> value of the regression of
AMS-derived sea salt with offline results is 0.009 (Spearman's correlation
test), indicating that sea salt concentrations from the AMS and offline
methods are correlated significantly. The uncertainties of this estimation
method in R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> measurements probably link to the different
sampling (inlet) locations as well as the discrepant analysis methods
between the AMS and offline measurements.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1442">Seasonal chemical composition of measured submicron aerosol
particles over the Atlantic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Spring </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col10" align="center">Autumn </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">%</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">42 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Org</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">26 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">11 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">eBC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">57 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">47 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Org</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">24 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">eBC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Org</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(between</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">eBC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1464"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is standard deviation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is sulfate, Org is organics,
SS is sea salt, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is ammonium and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is nitrate.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Chemical composition of the aerosol over the Atlantic Ocean</title>
      <p id="d1e2496">An overview of the chemical composition of Atlantic aerosol particles during
four cruises is given in Fig. 2, including AMS default species (organics,
sulfate, nitrate and ammonium), specially quantified marine products (MSA and
sea salt) as well as eBC. Because the ship tracks on latitude are nearly
monotonic to the cruise time, particle chemical composition as a function of
latitude shows both temporal variation and latitudinal distribution. Air mass
back trajectories indicate that the air masses captured during R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic>
cruises either came from the ocean or were influenced by the continents
(Europe, Africa or South America), as marked in Fig. 2. Additionally, the
statistics of seasonal variation of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition over the
North (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and South (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) Atlantic Ocean are provided in Table 3.
Because there is no clear seasonal difference in the chemical composition of
measured PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the area near the equator, the average, median, standard
deviation and percentage in total were calculated for the region from
5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in latitude (defined as tropical in this
study), regardless of the season, and are also shown in Table 3.</p>
      <?pagebreak page18049?><p id="d1e2595">Over all measurements, the total measured submicron particle mass
concentration varied over a large range, from 0.22 to
14.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a median of 1.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
reported concentrations sit between the clean marine case (from 0.27 to 1.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured at the coastal
station Mace Head, Ireland (Ovadnevaite et al., 2014), and the case of mixed
marine and continental air masses (from 3.69 to 4.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over
the North Atlantic (Dall'Osto et al., 2010). This difference suggests
that the detected aerosols during the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises were from mixed
sources, as <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>evidenced<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> by the air mass origins. The average chemical
composition of the measured particles indicated that sulfate was the major
contributor to the total particle mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %),
followed by organics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), sea salt (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %),
ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), eBC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The mass concentrations of total particles and individual species
showed large variations associated with time and were obviously not
distributed normally. Hence, the median, rather than the average, of the mass
concentration is used below.</p>
      <p id="d1e2755">During all four cruises, sulfate dominated the particle mass most of time,
showing the highest median mass concentration (0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
all six species. Sulfate could contribute up to 85 % of the total particle
mass concentration. Seasonal discrepancies were found for sulfate mass
concentration (a higher level in spring than in autumn), especially over the
South Atlantic (Table 3). A similar seasonal variation of the marine
biogenic tracer MSA was also observed (Huang et al., 2017),
suggesting that biogenic sources (i.e., phytoplankton) contributed
significantly to sulfate (Charlson et al., 1987; Hoffmann et al., 2016).
In the tropical Atlantic, sulfate appeared at a slightly lower value than
that in spring but was still much higher than that in autumn. Nonetheless,
anthropogenic sources of sulfate cannot be ruled out and can even be
important, considering that long-range transport has been found to be a
major source of sulfate (more important than DMS) over the tropical Pacific (Simpson et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e2780">Organics (here including MSA) are the second most abundant species (median:
0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Organics did not show pronounced variation
associated with seasons but did vary with location. The mass concentration of
organics was elevated in air masses under continental influence. During CR2
and CR4, organics dominated the total measured particle mass concentration
(up to 59 %) in the region between 0 and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. This
resulted in substantial organic aerosols over the tropical Atlantic (median:
0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover, the non-marine species eBC tended to
increase together with organics, especially near the equator, although taking
up only a tiny portion of the total particle mass in the whole measurements,
which indicates that anthropogenic emissions may be a significant contributor
to the organic aerosols over this region of the Atlantic Ocean.</p>
      <p id="d1e2831">The marine primary product, sea salt, was found to play a minor role (6 %–17 %
in different regions) in the measured submicron
particles during R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises. However, the mass concentration of
sea salt could reach 1.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3<?pagebreak page18050?></mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> while taking up to 66 % of
the total particle mass loading associated with elevated wind speed. This
finding is comparable to the importance of sea salt reported over the
northeastern Atlantic (66 %–84 %; Ovadnevaite et al., 2014) and
in the sub-Antarctic islands (47 %; Schmale et al., 2013) for high wind speed
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2878">The ammonium concentrations did not exhibit a seasonal difference between
spring and autumn. The highest median value was found over the tropical
Atlantic, followed by the North Atlantic, while the lowest median value was
in the Southern Hemisphere. Both continental emissions via long-range
transport and marine organisms could be the origin of the ammonium or its
precursor ammonia in the MBL (Adams et al., 1999). Nitrate
showed low mass concentration (0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is not
surprising, because it both has no marine sources and would mainly occur in
supermicron particles – nitrate would react with sulfuric acid and escape
from submicron particles in the form of gaseous nitric acid, which will
relocate to larger particles, e.g., sea salt particles (Saltzman,
2009).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2903">Summary of correlations of time series and mass spectra for the
five-factor PMF solution.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="30pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="84pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="79pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="80pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="75pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="60pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MNOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Anth-OOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Comb-OOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">MHOA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time series <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particulate MSA <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(0.83)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(0.86)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(0.52)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Particulate BC <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(0.68)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mass spectra <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOOA in Bird Island <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Schmale et al., 2013)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NOA in New York <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Sun et al., 2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Continental organics <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Chang et al., 2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Below the clouds<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>along the ship track<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Coggon et al.,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2012)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Marine primary<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>organic matter<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in Mace Head<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Ovadnevaite et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al., 2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">(0.71)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">(0.70)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">(0.98)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">(0.73)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">(0.61)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOA in Paris summer<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Crippa et al., 2013)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Alanine (Schneider et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al., 2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Average OOA (Ng et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al., 2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Oxidation products<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>of diesel generator<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>exhausts (Sage et al.,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2008)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">(0.68)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">(0.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">(0.67)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">(0.46)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Marine organics over<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Arctic (Chang et al.,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Average LVOOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Ng et al., 2011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ship track (Coggon<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>et al., 2012)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(0.54)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(0.66)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(0.40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2906"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> LVOOA: low-volatility oxygenated organic aerosol.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Source apportionment for organic aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e3233">Source apportionment of the MBL organic aerosol particles is necessary for a
better understanding of both the sources contributing to the OA and their
distribution over the Atlantic Ocean. For the OA source apportionment, PMF
analysis was performed on the data set of high-resolution OA mass spectra.
Eventually, the best solution was obtained with five factors. A summary of
the model validation of and selection of the five-factor solution is
provided in Figs. S7, S8 and S9 with captions. Among the five
OA factors of the selected solution, three marine factors and two non-marine
factors were identified. Their temporal variation and mass spectral profiles
are shown in Fig. 3. The marine factors included (1) marine oxygenated
OA (MOOA), (2) marine nitrogen-containing OA
(MNOA) and (3) marine hydrocarbon-like OA (MHOA), the only
primary OA factor. The remaining two factors related to non-marine origins
were anthropogenic oxygenated OA (Anth-OOA) and combustion
oxygenated OA (Comb-OOA).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3238"><bold>(a)</bold> High-resolution mass spectra and
<bold>(b)</bold> time series of five OA components. Also shown are simultaneous variations
of tracer compounds on the right axes. Air masses with continental influence
(grey) and originating from the ocean (blank) are marked in the background.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3254"><bold>(a)</bold> Average mass fraction of each component in the total OA
mass concentration, the functional group composition of each OA factor
and <bold>(b)</bold> diurnal variations of five OA factors with global radiation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3271">Latitudinal distribution of five OA factor mass fractions in the
total OA, with total OA mass concentration along
the ship track during four cruises. The Benguela upwelling is marked in the
maps for CR2 and CR4, while it is not displayed (but still exists) in CR1 and
CR3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3280">Table 4 summarizes all comparisons for source identification of the five OA
factors, including (1) correlations of time series between the OA factors and
the measured tracers and (2) correlations of mass spectral patterns between
the OA factors and the identified OA sources in the literature (Jimenez-Group, 2018).
The average mass fraction of all five factors in the total
measured OA, the functional group composition and the diurnal variation of
each factor with global radiation (the sum of the direct solar radiation and
diffuse radiation) are shown in Fig. 4. As a final summary, Fig. 5 provides
the latitudinal distribution of five OA factors (mass fraction in the total
OA mass) during the four R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises. Note that the
residuals correspond to the unexplained organics by PMF. They are negligible
in the average case (Fig. 4) but can be recognized in the latitude series
(Fig. 5). Details on the characteristics of each OA component, including mass
spectral profile, temporal variation, and associations with different sources
and processes, are discussed in the following sections.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Marine oxygenated organic aerosol (MOOA)</title>
      <p id="d1e3291">The MOOA factor contributes an average of 16 % to the total OA mass, with
a median mass concentration of 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This factor is well
correlated with the marine secondary organic aerosol (SOA) tracer MSA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3) and is consequently linked to the oxidation
of DMS emitted by phytoplankton (Charlson et al., 1987; Gondwe et al.,
2003). One characteristic of the MOOA factor is a high contribution from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions (7 %), which mainly include the MSA identified
ions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78.985</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77.978</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95.988</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHS</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.980</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.988</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>; e.g., Huang et al., 2017). This leads to a high
S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio (0.030), which is 10 to 30 times higher than that of other factors
(Fig. 3). Note that the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios derived from the PMF analysis tool have
to be used with caution because of calculation uncertainties (Aiken et al., 2007), but they can still provide an indication
of the significance of sulfur when calculated with the same tool among the
factors from the same data set. Even though organic sulfur species play a remarkable role, oxygenated
organic fragments are still the major species, accounting for 52 % of MOOA
mass loading (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 %; Fig. 4a).
These fragment families are followed by hydrocarbon
fragments, making up 30 % of the MOOA mass loading. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
most abundant fragment of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> family, contributing
43 % to the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group mass loading in the MOOA. As
a result, MOOA shows the highest H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio (1.73) of all five OA factors,
similar to those reported previously: 1.57 (marine OA) in Paris during
summer (Crippa et al., 2013) and 1.8 (MOOA) on
Bird Island in the sub-Antarctic region (Schmale et al., 2013). This suggests that a
high level of hydrocarbon ions (in particular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), together with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, could be an important characteristic for
marine-sourced SOA. The MOOA includes almost all organic fragments observed in MSA, as well
as some additional oxygenated fragments, which indicates that the MOOA
factor consists not only of MSA but also of other organic components either
emitted from the same source or produced via similar processes as MSA. This
finding is also proved by the relationship between the mass concentration of
MOOA and MSA (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Significant
oxygen-containing ions, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.990</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">COOH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.998</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>), could be related to carboxylic acids, which are important in
the composition of secondary marine aerosol (Decesari et al., 2011; Fu et
al., 2011). The possible precursors of these carboxylic acids could be
isoprene and monoterpenes emitted by marine phytoplankton (Bonsang et
al., 1992; Shaw et al., 2010; Yassaa et al., 2008), which<?pagebreak page18051?> can be easily
oxidized to form highly oxygenated products such as 2-methylglyceric acid,
2-methyltetrol and pinic acids (Claeys et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2011). It
is well known that isoprene and monoterpene oxidation also leads to the
formation of organosulfate compounds (Claeys et al., 2010; Fu et al.,
2011; Iinuma et al., 2007; Surratt et al., 2007, 2008),
which can contribute to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments observed in the
MOOA factor.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3780">The characteristics of the MOOA-dominating period: <bold>(a)</bold> time series
of MOOA and MSA (top), possibly non-marine species (eBC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
middle figure), as well as the ratio between MSA and MOOA and the mass
fraction of MOOA in the total OA (bottom). <bold>(b)</bold> The diurnal variation of
MOOA, MSA, sulfate (reduced to one tenth for comparison) and the global
radiation.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3817">The secondary origin of MOOA was supported by its diurnal cycle (Fig. 4),
showing a small but clear elevation in the afternoon, and reaching the maximum
(0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 16:00 UTC, almost when global radiation started
declining. To focus on the atmospheric behavior of MOOA and exclude the
influence of other chemical compositions, an “MOOA-dominating period” was
selected for a case study (approximately 57 h from 19:40 UTC, 18 November 2012 to
04:20 UTC, 21 November 2012). As shown in Fig. 6, the MOOA played an important role
in the total OA during the selected period, constituting an average of
78 % (up to 100 %) of the total OA mass concentration. The MOOA had
strong correlation with MSA with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.81, almost the same as the
overall coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Note that the latter one is slightly
higher mainly due to greater variation of both MOOA and MSA concentrations
during all four cruises. This covariation also resulted in a quite stable
MSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MOOA ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the MOOA-dominating period.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and eBC showed low mass concentrations (median: 0.04,
0.08 and 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively) close to their DLs, indicating a negligible impact from
anthropogenic emissions during this period. The diurnal pattern for this
specific period (Fig. 6b), with a minimum of 0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (MOOA mass concentration) at
07:00 UTC
and a maximum of 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 16:00 UTC, was more noticeable than the average case (Fig. 4b).
Similar diurnal cycles are observed for MSA and sulfate, suggesting that
MOOA, MSA and sulfate are formed via the same secondary pathway (Charlson
et al., 1987; Gondwe et al., 2003; von Glasow and Crutzen, 2004). Model
studies found that the DMS is mainly (84 % globally) removed via
photooxidation by OH radicals (Kloster et al., 2006) or
oxidized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in aqueous-phase reactions to yield a significant amount
of MSA (Hoffmann et al., 2016). These findings suggest that
DMS oxidation is controlled by photochemical processes and that its products
should show a daytime maximum associated with solar radiation (as well as
global radiation, as shown in Fig. 6b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3985">The correlations between the MSA and MOOA factor in spring and
autumn over different regions of the Atlantic Ocean.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page18052?><p id="d1e3994">The enhancement of MOOA mass concentration was observed to be independent of
the air mass categories, and most MOOA peaks were associated with marine air
masses (Fig. 3). The average MOOA mass concentration with marine air masses
was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a maximum of 0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, both higher than those for MOOA from air masses with continental
influence, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a maximum of 0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This finding also supports that MOOA originate mainly
from the ocean. Related to the DMS oxidation, the MOOA factor shows prominent
seasonality and higher contributions to the total OA mass concentration in
spring than in autumn; moreover, it shows higher contributions over the South
Atlantic than the North Atlantic in spring (Fig. 5). In particular, the MOOA could
be the exclusive contributor to the OA at approximately 16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in
spring, linked to the high biological activity fueled by the Benguela
upwelling system, which is a northward-flowing ocean current along the west
coast of southern Africa from Cape Point (Nelson and Hutchings,
1983), bringing up the nutrients from deep cold waters.</p>
      <p id="d1e4107">Because the MOOA component is successfully traced by MSA, the relationship
between the MSA and MOOA should be applicable to estimate DMS-related SOA
over the Atlantic Ocean. The correlations between MSA and MOOA in spring,
autumn and the tropical season (with unclear seasonal variation, 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to
5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S latitude) are shown in Fig. 7. The scattering points are
fitted using linear orthogonal distance regression (ODR). Overall, the
correlations between MSA and MOOA in three cases are robust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.53, 0.88), consistent (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.56, 0.56), and independent
of regions and seasons (for spring and autumn). We therefore infer that the
relation between MSA and its concomitant (DMS-related) SOA is roughly stable
over the Atlantic Ocean and suggest<?pagebreak page18053?> estimating MOOA mass concentration as the
product of the MSA concentration multiplied by a factor of 1.79, which may be
useful for a better estimation of marine DMS-related SOA both in field
measurements and in models.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Marine nitrogen-containing organic aerosol (MNOA)</title>
      <p id="d1e4159">The MNOA component showed a unique time series and poor correlation with the
other four factors (all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were below 0.13). The mass concentration of
MNOA varied from below the DL to 0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (median 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and contributed 16 % of the OA. The MNOA is
characterized by a remarkable contribution from organonitrogen fragments
(17 %, Fig. 4), mainly related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (accounting for 5.3 % of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> intensity),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.6 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.7 % of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are at least 1 order of magnitude higher (intensity
fraction in the located <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in other factors. Nevertheless, this
factor is still dominated by oxygenated fragments including
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (28 %,
Fig. 4), and the diurnal variation of MNOA shows a broad afternoon peak
with a maximum at 16:00 UTC (Fig. 4), similar to that of the amine-related
secondary factor in New York City showing a diurnal pattern with maximum at
12:00 EST (Eastern Standard Time; Sun et al., 2011). Both of these
findings may indicate that secondary formation could be one of the possible
pathways for MNOA generation.</p>
      <p id="d1e4406">N-containing OA (NOA) factors from PMF analysis have been found in many
studies and can be related to various origins highly dependent on local
sources, such as gentoo penguin hatching activities (Schmale et al., 2013)
and local primary (industrial) emissions (Aiken et al., 2009). During the R/V
<italic>Polarstern</italic> campaign, the MNOA is correlated with neither eBC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) nor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), excluding the possibility
of combustion and anthropogenic (continental) sources. Meanwhile, high
similarity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the mass spectral profile is found between the
R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> MNOA and the NOA in Sun et al. (2011), who attributed
that factor in New York City to marine and local industry emissions and
stressed the possibility of gas-to-particle conversion via the reactions of
acidic gases and the gaseous amines. It is worth noting that the
characteristic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments are actually
different in these two studies: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) dominated the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group in the New York study, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) played a more important role in R/V
<italic>Polarstern</italic> measurements. These C1–C3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments may originate from
low-molecular-weight aliphatic amines such as methylamine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
dimethylamine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and trimethylamine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which have been regarded as the main species in organonitrogen fragments from
marine sources (Gibb et al., 1999; Müller et al., 2009) as well as
important biogenic SOA precursors over the ocean (Dall'Osto et al., 2012;
Facchini et al., 2008; Müller et al., 2009). In addition, a large number
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments results in the highest
N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C atom ratio (0.124) among all five OA factors, and this N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C
ratio is close to the one used in a global 3-D chemistry-transport model by
Kanakidou et al. (2012) to trace the organonitrogen from ocean sources
(0.15), while it is different from the ratio for biomass burning (BB) and
anthropogenic sources (0.3). This may also support the idea<?pagebreak page18054?> that the MNOA
originates from the ocean, likely transformed from phytoplankton-emitted
gaseous amines.</p>
      <p id="d1e4821">The MNOA shows no correlation with marine secondary product tracer MSA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This absence of correlation has already been reported
in several marine measurements of particulate amines with biogenic origins (Facchini et al., 2008; Miyazaki et al., 2011; Müller et al., 2009),
although acid–base reactions were considered a key process of
gas-to-particle conversion for amines over the ocean (Facchini et al.,
2008; Sun et al., 2011). Given that gaseous amines can enter the particle
phase in different ways (Ge et al., 2011), other pathways,
including oxidation, nucleation and condensation, should also be considered.</p>
      <p id="d1e4839">During each cruise, the MNOA had a low mass concentration with no clear
seasonality. However, its high significance can be found when the total OA
mass concentration was extremely low, generally below 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 5), e.g., 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in CR1 and CR3. It is
interesting that during CR3, the MNOA contributed to nearly half of the total
OA between the equator and 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in association with very clean air
masses from the open ocean, which may confirm its marine origin. We also
noticed that the MNOA had a similar variation trend during all four cruises,
slowly increasing and then decreasing broadly between 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. This<?pagebreak page18055?> variation was generally coincident with the change in the
water temperature (Fig. S10). The covariation might be explained by the
biogenic sources of the MNOA – temperature could positively affect metabolism
rate, including N excretion of marine microorganisms (Ikeda,
2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Marine hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol (MHOA)</title>
      <p id="d1e4913">The only true primary factor identified, MHOA, is related to marine primary
emissions. It is characterized by a high contribution of hydrocarbon ions
(64 % of total factor mass concentration, Fig. 4), which is usually
considered a feature of primary emissions. One-fourth of the MHOA mass was
identified as oxygenated organic compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This finding is not surprising, because
carboxylic acids can also be supplied via the primary pathway and have been
identified as a distinct type of primary marine organic matter (Hawkins and Russell, 2010). A small but pronounced portion
(5 %) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments was observed in total MHOA mass
loadings, consistent with the findings in previous measurements that amines
also existed in primary marine OA (Frossard et al., 2014; Quinn et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e4981">The time series of MHOA mass concentration was spiky and varied from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> DL to 0.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a median of 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. It contributed 19 % to the total OA mass concentration,
comparable to two marine secondary factors<?pagebreak page18056?> (MOOA 16 %, MNOA 16 %). No
clear diurnal pattern was found for the MHOA, indicating that the
contribution of photooxidation could possibly be ignored for this factor.</p>
      <p id="d1e5029">Considering that the ship contamination periods have been eliminated and the
MHOA was not correlated with eBC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), fresh ship emissions
were unlikely to have been a contributor to this primary factor. The primary
emissions from the ocean were considered a main source of the MHOA because of
the similarity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the mass spectral profile between
this factor and primary marine OA during high biological activity at Mace
Head, Ireland (Ovadnevaite et al., 2011). For the entire
measurement period, the MHOA was not correlated with sea salt (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or the wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), even though a similar variation
trend (but no strong linear correlation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was found in
several periods, such as the southern parts (from 33 to
0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) of CR2 and CR4 (Fig. S11). This trend does not conflict with
the speculation that MHOA is related to marine primary emissions, because the
mass fraction of organics in the sea spray aerosol was found to be
size-dependent, increasing with decreasing particle size (Gantt et al.,
2011; Quinn et al., 2015). The enrichment factor of organic compounds, i.e.,
the ratio between the organic carbon in sea spray aerosols and that in seawater,
is also largely influenced by particle size (Quinn et al.,
2015). In addition, the transfer of organic matter from seawater to the
particles is chemoselective and more complicated than it is for inorganic sea
salt (Schmitt-Kopplin et al., 2012). During all four
cruises, the MHOA factor did not show any location dependence but played a
more prominent role in regions with extremely low OA mass concentrations,
e.g., the southern part of CR1 and the whole period of CR3 (Fig. 5). This
finding could support the hypothesis that the MHOA originates from the ocean.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5119">The variation of Comb-OOA (green dot),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments (red
line) and potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the yellow bar with grey box) during
<italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises. Note that the 24 h average mass concentration of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained from offline measurements only performed during the
first three cruises. The scattering plot in the sub-window provides the
correlation between 24 h average mass concentration of Comb-OOA from AMS and
potassium from offline measurements.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/18043/2018/acp-18-18043-2018-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Anthropogenic oxygenated organic aerosol (Anth-OOA)</title>
      <p id="d1e5187">Although measured over the ocean, 19 % of the organic aerosol mass was
contributed by continental emissions from human activities, presented by the
Anth-OOA factor with a similar median (0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) but the
highest maximum (2.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to the other OA
factors. The Anth-OOA factor was identified by the anthropogenic tracer
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> regarding time series (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3) and resemblance
of mass spectral profiles to several reported continental OOA factors
(Table 4). The Anth-OOA in this study was in excellent agreement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a factor of continental organics observed over the central Arctic
Ocean (Chang et al., 2011). It was also similar (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the
average OOA factor based on nine urban measurements (Ng et al., 2011). As
shown in Fig. 4, the Anth-OOA factor was dominated by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments (contributing 40 % to the
total factor mass), followed by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (26 %). Significant
contributions were observed from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, 21 % of
total Anth-OOA mass loading) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>,
6 %), comparable to values in previous studies in urban and rural areas
(e.g., Ng et al., 2011; Poulain et al., 2011a). Another carboxylic acid
fragment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, 21 % of total Anth-OOA mass
loading), was estimated according to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion; thus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not specifically discussed in the present work. There was no
clear diurnal pattern for the Anth-OOA factor (Fig. 4). The Anth-OOA mass
concentration dropped in the early morning from
05:00 UTC, reached a minimum at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10:00 UTC, then stayed stable until 00:00 UTC. This
change may be explained by the rising mixing layer in the morning, which
dilutes the particle concentration, and/or increasing temperature after
sunrise, and drives volatile species from particles into the gas phase.
Hence, the Anth-OOA is unlikely to be contributed to by local photochemical
formation but rather by continental outflow from anthropogenic activities via
long-range transport.</p>
      <p id="d1e5464">Significant elevation of Anth-OOA mass concentrations (up to 2.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
was associated mainly with continental air masses (Fig. 3). The
median value of the Anth-OOA mass concentration in marine air masses was
0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and higher (0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during periods
influenced by continental air masses. Additionally, the contribution of
Anth-OOA to the total OA significantly increased, even when close to Africa
and Europe (Fig. 8). This confirms that the continental outflow is the
main source of the Anth-OOA factor.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>Combustion oxygenated organic aerosol (Comb-OOA)</title>
      <p id="d1e5532">Of all five factors, the Comb-OOA is the only one correlated with eBC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3), pointing to combustion sources. It was the most
abundant component of the measured OA on average, contributing 30 % of
the total OA mass. The median Comb-OOA mass concentration was
0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> DL to 1.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Similar to the Anth-OOA, most Comb-OOA peaks appeared together with
continental air masses (Fig. 3), indicating a non-marine source. One
significant characteristic of the Comb-OOA factor was its highly oxygenated
level. Oxygenated fragments including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accounted for 73 % of
the total Comb-OOA mass concentration (Fig. 4). This factor contained
remarkably high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to total
Comb-OOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, indicating a
possible origin from organic acids. As
a result, the Comb-OOA exhibited the highest O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio (O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
1.35) and lowest H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio (H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of all OA factors. The
Comb-OOA was also contributed by pronounced N-containing fragments:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4 %) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2 %).
Despite the small contribution to the Comb-OOA mass concentration,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments were
primarily distributed in this factor (46 % of total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intensity).</p>
      <p id="d1e5836">The Comb-OOA factor was attributed to aged aerosol particles from combustion
emissions, mainly because of its highly oxygenated level and covariance with
combustion tracer eBC. Additionally, this factor had a similar mass<?pagebreak page18057?> spectrum
to the OA below clouds measured by a flight impacted by ship emissions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Coggon et al., 2012) and the photooxidation products of diluted diesel generator exhaust
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Sage et al., 2008), rather
than any fresh combustion emissions, e.g., the fresh ship emissions factor
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Chang et al.,
2011), the average BB organic aerosols (BBOA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Ng et al., 2011) and the
average HOA factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Ng et al., 2011). This finding is
reasonable, because the influence of direct ship emissions from the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> has been removed. Sage et al. (2008) found
that SOA could be quickly formed from fresh diesel exhausts, and the aged
products were increasingly oxidized with time, resembling the profile of
atmospheric aged OA within a few hours of oxidation. Given that, most of the
time, the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> traveled along major shipping routes (Fig. S12),
a possible source of the Comb-OOA could be the transported ship exhausts
from other ships.</p>
      <p id="d1e5921">The BB emissions via long-range transport are likely to be the other
important source of the Comb-OOA, indicated by a good correlation with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments (from AMS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from offline measurements, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as
shown in Fig. 8. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions have been
related to the photooxidation product of m-cresol, a typical wood burning
emission (Iinuma et al., 2010; Poulain et al., 2011a), and potassium is
commonly regarded as an unreactive tracer of BB emissions. Nevertheless,
some frequently used BB tracers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Capes et al., 2008; Cubison et al., 2011),
were extremely low in our Comb-OOA factor (the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to total
Comb-OOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to total
Comb-OOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), even though the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased to
0.18 % during the high-Comb-OOA period (the factor mass concentration and
mass fraction in total OA reached 1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 47 %). The
absence of these BB tracers may be caused by decay in the aging process
during long-range transport. Fresh BB emissions can be quickly
photochemically aged (in several hours), resulting in the formation of new
OA with a higher degree of oxygenation and a significant decrease in BB
tracers as well as saturated hydrocarbon compounds. This change has been
observed in both laboratory (Bertrand et al., 2018; Grieshop et al.,
2009) and field measurements (Capes et al., 2008; DeCarlo et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e6179">The significance of the Comb-OOA, i.e., the aged particles from combustion
emissions, are dependent on regions and seasons (Fig. 5). More than 50 %
of the total OA was contributed by aged particles from combustion emissions,
especially during the two November cruises (CR2 and CR4) between
15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, when the ship was near western and central
Africa. It is well known that Africa is the single biggest continental source
of BB emissions with strong seasonality (Roberts et al., 2009). In
western and central Africa, more intense fires occurred in November than in
April and May according to the fire maps (Fig. S13), consistent with higher
mass concentrations of Comb-OOA in CR2 and CR4 than during the other two
cruises. In addition, the mass concentration of the Comb-OOA increased when
the ship was near the English Channel, where marine traffic is very busy
(Fig. S12).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d1e6208">This study presents the physicochemical measurements of the MBL aerosol over
the Atlantic Ocean conducted during<?pagebreak page18058?> four open-ocean cruises for a total of 17
weeks in 2011 and 2012 and covering latitudes from 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to
53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. Based on this unique data set, especially the part obtained
with HR-ToF-AMS, the aerosol chemical composition and OA sources were
investigated in detail.</p>
      <p id="d1e6229">The sub-micrometer chemical aerosol composition varied dynamically during the
cruises, with an average of sulfate (50 %), organics (21 %), sea salt
(12 %), ammonium (9 %), eBC (5 %) and nitrate (3 %). Sulfate was
found to be the dominant species of submicron aerosol particles over the open
Atlantic Ocean. Sulfate also showed noticeable seasonality, suggesting a
major contribution of marine biogenic sources. Considering that organics are
an important constituent of the sub-micrometer aerosol and contain a large
number of compounds from different sources and processes, source
apportionment of OA was therefore performed using the PMF method. Five OA
factors were identified and linked to distinct sources, including following
three marine factors: (a) an MOOA factor related to marine DMS oxidation
(16 % of the total OA mass concentration), (b) an MNOA factor from the
secondary formation of biogenic amines (16 %) and (c) an MHOA factor from
primary marine emissions (19 %). Two non-marine factors have been
identified: (a) an Anth-OOA factor from continental outflow (19 %) and (b) a
Comb-OOA factor attributed to aged aerosol particles from combustion
emissions, mainly from biomass burning over the African continent and marine
traffic over the Atlantic Ocean (30 %). The MOOA factor shows prominent
seasonality, with an increased contribution to the total OA mass
concentration in spring compared to autumn. Moreover, it shows a higher
contribution over the South Atlantic than over the North Atlantic Ocean in spring.
This seasonality is, however, not observed for the other two marine factors.
The MNOA and MHOA both played a significant role in the clean marine regions
with low particle mass concentrations (e.g., in CR3 when the ship started from
Punta Arenas). Continental influences on the MBL aerosol over the Atlantic
Ocean were latitude-dependent during the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> measurements,
represented by the Anth-OOA and Comb-OOA factors. Both factors had dominant,
even overwhelming, mass fractions, when measurements have been performed
close to a continent, e.g., Europe and western and central Africa, especially
between 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>
      <p id="d1e6253">During the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> cruises, marine sources contributed, on
average, 51 % to the total OA mass concentration, close to that of the non-marine
emissions (49 %), reflecting the fact that continental-related long-range
transport has a large influence on the MBL aerosol, even over the open
ocean. However, the latitudinal source contribution shows that marine-sourced
OA is ubiquitous and, in a great part of cruising areas, dominates the total
OA mass loadings. DMS oxidation could even be the sole source of the OA in
some regions, e.g., with upwelling, while the marine primary OA and
amine-related organics represented a background marine contribution and were
more visible in the clean marine areas. Finally, as a coproduct of the
source apportionment, a solid linear correlation has been found between MOOA
and MSA, which enables the estimation of marine SOA with DMS origins in the
spring to be the MSA mass concentration times a factor of 1.79. This may be
applicable in both field measurements and model studies with a focus on
marine aerosols.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e6264">The data in the study are available upon request
at TROPOS (poulain@tropos.de). Air mass back
trajectories along the ship track were ordered and obtained from German
Weather Service (DWD). Navigation parameters and meteorological parameters
were downloaded from the R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic> central data acquisition system
(<uri>https://dship.awi.de/</uri>). Fire maps were obtained from an online database of
the MODIS satellite (<uri>http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/firemaps/</uri>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6276">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-18043-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-18043-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e6285">SH, ZW and LP conducted the AMS measurements.
SH processed the AMS data and wrote the paper. MvP analyzed the offline
samples. MM processed the MPSS data. DA processed the MAAP data. HH and AW
designed the campaigns and improved the flow of the paper. SH and
ZW contributed equally.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e6291">The authors declare that they have no conflict
of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6297">We thank all scientists and crews aboard R/V <italic>Polarstern</italic>. We are grateful for the support from the Alfred Wegener Institute
(AWI) and Germany Weather Service (DWD) for sharing data of cruises,
including data of navigation, oceanography, meteorology and air mass back
trajectories. We thank all the support through the following projects and
research programs: (1) the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Association (OCEANET
project in the framework of PAKT)
and (2) <italic>Polarstern</italic> expeditions
AWI_ANT27/4, AWI_ANT28/1, AWI_ANT28/5 and AWI_ANT29/1. Acknowledgement is also given to “the
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” for supporting the
first author with paper rewriting and data reanalysis in Jinan
University, China. We thank Jun Yang and Weiwei Lin for valuable
discussion on statistical analysis.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Jason Surratt<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <?pagebreak page18059?><ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adams, P. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Koch, D. M.: Global concentrations of
tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general
circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 13791–13823,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999jd900083</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Elemental Analysis of
Organic Species with Electron Ionization High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 79, 8350–8358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071150w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac071150w</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC Ratios
of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic Aerosols with High-Resolution
Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
4478–4485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R.,
Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M.,
Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J.,
Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P.,
Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis
during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban
supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source
apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Aller, J. Y., Kuznetsova, M. R., Jahns, C. J., and Kemp, P. F.: The sea
surface microlayer as a source of viral and bacterial enrichment in marine
aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 801–812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.10.012</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O.: Aerosols Before Pollution, Science, 315, 50–51,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136529" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1136529</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Andreas, E. L.: A review of the sea spray generation function for the open
ocean, Vol. 1, WIT Press, Southampton, UK, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ayers, G. P. and Gillett, R. W.: DMS and its oxidation products in the remote
marine atmosphere: implications for climate and atmospheric chemistry, J. Sea
Res., 43, 275–286, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bates, T. S., Charlson, R. J., and Gammon, R. H.: Evidence for the climatic
role of marine biogenic sulphur, Nature, 329, 319–321, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bertrand, A., Stefenelli, G., Jen, C. N., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Ni,
H., Temime-Roussel, B., Slowik, J. G., Goldstein, A. H., El Haddad, I.,
Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.:
Evolution of the chemical fingerprint of biomass burning organic aerosol
during aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7607–7624,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bonsang, B., Polle, C., and Lambert, G.: Evidence for marine production of
isoprene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1129–1132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92GL00083</ext-link>,
1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia,
A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb,
C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical
characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/mas.20115</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Capes, G., Johnson, B., McFiggans, G., Williams, P. I., Haywood, J., and
Coe, H.: Aging of biomass burning aerosols over West Africa: Aircraft
measurements of chemical composition, microphysical properties, and emission
ratios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D00C15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009845</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ceburnis, D., Garbaras, A., Szidat, S., Rinaldi, M., Fahrni, S., Perron, N.,
Wacker, L., Leinert, S., Remeikis, V., Facchini, M. C., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Jennings, S. G., Ramonet, M., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Quantification of the
carbonaceous matter origin in submicron marine aerosol by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotope analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8593–8606,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Chang, R. Y.-W., Leck, C., Graus, M., Müller, M., Paatero, J., Burkhart, J.
F., Stohl, A., Orr, L. H., Hayden, K., Li, S.-M., Hansel, A., Tjernström,
M., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aerosol composition and sources in
the central Arctic Ocean during ASCOS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10619–10636,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10619-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10619-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., and Warren, S. G.: Oceanic
phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate, Nature, 326,
655–661, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Choi, Y., Rhee, T. S., Collett, J. L., Park, T., Park, S.-M., Seo, B.-K.,
Park, G., Park, K., and Lee, T.: Aerosol concentrations and composition in
the North Pacific marine boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 171, 165–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.047</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Kourtchev, I., Chi, X. G., Farhat, Y.,
Surratt, J. D., Gomez-Gonzalez, Y., Sciare, J., and Maenhaut, W.: Chemical
characterisation of marine aerosol at Amsterdam Island during the austral
summer of 2006–2007, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 13–22, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Coggon, M. M., Sorooshian, A., Wang, Z., Metcalf, A. R., Frossard, A. A.,
Lin, J. J., Craven, J. S., Nenes, A., Jonsson, H. H., Russell, L. M., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Ship impacts on the marine atmosphere: insights
into the contribution of shipping emissions to the properties of marine
aerosol and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8439–8458,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., DeCarlo, P. F., Mohr, C., Heringa,
M. F., Chirico, R., Marchand, N., Sciare, J., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification of marine and continental aerosol
sources in Paris using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 1950–1963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50151</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft<?pagebreak page18060?> and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Ceburnis, D., Martucci, G., Bialek, J., Dupuy, R., Jennings,
S. G., Berresheim, H., Wenger, J., Healy, R., Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M.,
Giulianelli, L., Finessi, E., Worsnop, D., Ehn, M., Mikkilä, J., Kulmala,
M., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Aerosol properties associated with air masses arriving
into the North East Atlantic during the 2008 Mace Head EUCAARI intensive
observing period: an overview, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8413–8435,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8413-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8413-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Ceburnis, D., Monahan, C., Worsnop, D. R., Bialek, J.,
Kulmala, M., Kurtén, T., Ehn, M., Wenger, J., Sodeau, J., Healy, R., and
O'Dowd, C.: Nitrogenated and aliphatic organic vapors as possible drivers
for marine secondary organic aerosol growth, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,
D12311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jd017522</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac061249n</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J.,
Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic
aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during
MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Rinaldi, M., Paglione, M., Fuzzi, S., Stephanou,
E. G., Tziaras, T., Spyros, A., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M.,
Harrison, R. M., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Facchini, M. C.: Primary and
secondary marine organic aerosols over the North Atlantic Ocean during the
MAP experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D22210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd016204</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Carbone, C., Finessi, E., Mircea,
M., Fuzzi, S., Moretti, F., Tagliavini, E., Ceburnis, D., and O'Dowd, C. D.:
Important Source of Marine Secondary Organic Aerosol from Biogenic Amines,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9116–9121, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Burrows, S. M., Elliott, S. M., Bates, T.
S., and Quinn, P. K.: Sources and composition of submicron organic mass in
marine aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2014JD021913,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd021913</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Fu, P., Kawamura, K., and Miura, K.: Molecular characterization of marine
organic aerosols collected during a round-the-world cruise, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D13302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015604" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd015604</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Gantt, B., Meskhidze, N., Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M., Ceburnis, D., and
O'Dowd, C. D.: Wind speed dependent size-resolved parameterization for the
organic mass fraction of sea spray aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8777–8790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8777-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8777-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Ge, X., Wexler, A. S., and Clegg, S. L.: Atmospheric amines – Part I. A
review, Atmos. Environ., 45, 524–546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.012</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Gibb, S. W., Mantoura, R. F. C., and Liss, P. S.: Ocean-atmosphere exchange
and atmospheric speciation of ammonia and methylamines in the region of the
NW Arabian Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 161–178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98gb00743" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98gb00743</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gondwe, M., Krol, M., Gieskes, W., Klaassen, W., and de Baar, H.: The
contribution of ocean-leaving DMS to the global atmospheric burdens of DMS,
MSA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NSS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1056,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gb001937" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002gb001937</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Laboratory
investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires
2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2227–2240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hawkins, L. N., and Russell, L. M.: Polysaccharides, Proteins, and
Phytoplankton Fragments: Four Chemically Distinct Types of Marine Primary
Organic Aerosol Classified by Single Particle Spectromicroscopy, Adv.
Meteorol., 2010, 612132,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/612132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2010/612132</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Henning, S., Dieckmann, K., Ignatius, K., Schäfer, M., Zedler, P., Harris,
E., Sinha, B., van Pinxteren, D., Mertes, S., Birmili, W., Merkel, M., Wu,
Z., Wiedensohler, A., Wex, H., Herrmann, H., and Stratmann, F.: Influence of
cloud processing on CCN activation behaviour in the Thuringian Forest,
Germany during HCCT-2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7859–7868,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7859-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7859-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hertel, O., Christensen, J., and Hov, Ø.: Modelling of the end products of
the chemical decomposition of DMS in the marine boundary layer, Atmos.
Environ., 28, 2431–2449, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Schrödner, R., Bräuer, P., Wolke, R.,
and Herrmann, H.: An advanced modeling study on the impacts and atmospheric
implications of multiphase dimethyl sulfide chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 113, 11776–11781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606320113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1606320113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Huang, S., Poulain, L., van Pinxteren, D., van Pinxteren, M., Wu, Z.,
Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.: Latitudinal and Seasonal Distribution of
Particulate MSA over the Atlantic using a Validated Quantification Method
with HR-ToF-AMS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 418–426,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03186</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Müller, C., Böge, O., Gnauk, T., and Herrmann, H.: The
formation of organic sulfate esters in the limonene ozonolysis secondary
organic aerosol (SOA) under acidic conditions, Atmos. Environ., 41,
5571–5583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Gräfe, R., and Herrmann, H.:
Methyl-Nitrocatechols: Atmospheric Tracer Compounds for Biomass Burning
Secondary Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8453–8459,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102938a</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Ikeda, T.: Respiration and ammonia excretion by marine metazooplankton taxa:
synthesis toward a global-bathymetric model, Mar. Biol., 161, 2753–2766,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2540-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00227-014-2540-5</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page18061?><ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Shi, Q., Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., Yourshaw,
I., Seinfeld, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Zhang, X., Smith, K. A., Morris, J. W.,
and Davidovits, P.: Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd001213</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez-Group: Aerosol Mass Spectrometer Web Mass Spectral Database,
High-Resolution AMS Spectra, available at:
<uri>http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/HRAMSsd/</uri> (last access: 12
November, 2018), unit mass resolution spectra, available at:
<uri>http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/AMSsd/</uri> (last access: 12
November, 2018), University of Colorado, Boulder, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kanakidou, M., Duce, R. A., Prospero, J. M., Baker, A. R., Benitez-Nelson,
C., Dentener, F. J., Hunter, K. A., Liss, P. S., Mahowald, N., Okin, G. S.,
Sarin, M., Tsigaridis, K., Uematsu, M., Zamora, L. M., and Zhu, T.:
Atmospheric fluxes of organic N and P to the global ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB3026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gb004277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011gb004277</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Kloster, S., Feichter, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Six, K. D., Stier, P., and
Wetzel, P.: DMS cycle in the marine ocean-atmosphere system – a global model
study, Biogeosciences, 3, 29–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-29-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-3-29-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Kuznetsova, M., Lee, C., and Aller, J.: Characterization of the proteinaceous
matter in marine aerosols, Mar. Chem., 96, 359–377,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2005.03.007</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Jung, J., Furutani, H., and Uematsu, M.:
Latitudinal distributions of organic nitrogen and organic carbon in marine
aerosols over the western North Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3037–3049,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Müller, C., Iinuma, Y., Karstensen, J., van Pinxteren, D., Lehmann, S.,
Gnauk, T., and Herrmann, H.: Seasonal variation of aliphatic amines in marine
sub-micrometer particles at the Cape Verde islands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
9587–9597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9587-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9587-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A.,
Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C.,
Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y.,
Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C.,
Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A.,
Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J.,
Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm,
R., and Wang, Y. Q.: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol
absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 245–268, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-245-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Nelson, G., and Hutchings, L.: The Benguela upwelling area, Prog. Oceanogr.,
12, 333–356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(83)90013-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0079-6611(83)90013-7</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-Time Methods for Estimating Organic Component Mass
Concentrations from Aerosol Mass Spectrometer Data, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 910–916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102951k</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
O'Dowd, C. D. and De Leeuw, G.: Marine aerosol production: a review of the
current knowledge, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 365, 1753–1774, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Ovadnevaite, J., Vaishya, A., Rinaldi, M., and
Facchini, M. C.: Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources
impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
10687–10704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10687-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10687-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
O'Dowd, C. D., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Mircea, M.,
Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Yoon, Y. J., and Putaud, J. P.: Biogenically driven
organic contribution to marine aerosol, Nature, 431, 676–680, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M., Ceburnis, D., Worsnop, D. R., and
Berresheim, H.: Detecting high contributions of primary organic matter to
marine aerosol: A case study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L02807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046083</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Canagaratna, M., Berresheim, H., Bialek, J.,
Martucci, G., Worsnop, D. R., and O'Dowd, C.: On the effect of wind speed on
submicron sea salt mass concentrations and source fluxes, J. Geophys. Res.,
117, D16201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017379" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd017379</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Leinert, S., Dall'Osto, M., Canagaratna, M.,
O'Doherty, S., Berresheim, H., and O'Dowd, C.: Submicron NE Atlantic marine
aerosol chemical composition and abundance: Seasonal trends and air mass
categorization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2013JD021330,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013jd021330</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P.: Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor
analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 37, 23–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(96)00044-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-7439(96)00044-5</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/env.3170050203</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Poulain, L., Iinuma, Y., Müller, K., Birmili, W., Weinhold, K.,
Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Hausmann, A., Löschau, G., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Herrmann, H.: Diurnal variations of ambient particulate wood burning
emissions and their contribution to the concentration of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Seiffen, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12697–12713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12697-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12697-2011</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Birmili, W., Plass-Dülmer, C., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Herrmann, H.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of particulate nitrate and
organic matter at the IfT research station Melpitz, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12579–12599, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Poulain, L., Birmili, W., Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Wu, Z. J., Nordmann, S.,
Spindler, G., Prévôt, A. S. H., Wiedensohler, A., and Herrmann, H.:
Chemical mass balance of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C non-volatile particles at the
tropospheric research site Melpitz, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
10145–10162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10145-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10145-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K. and Bates, T. S.: The case against climate regulation via
oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions, Nature, 480, 51–56, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K., Collins, D. B., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Bates, T.
S.: Chemistry and Related Properties of Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4383–4399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500713g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500713g</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page18062?><ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, G., Wooster, M. J., and Lagoudakis, E.: Annual and diurnal african
biomass burning temporal dynamics, Biogeosciences, 6, 849–866,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-849-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-849-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Takahama, S., Liu, S., Hawkins, L. N., Covert, D. S., Quinn,
P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Oxygenated fraction and mass of organic aerosol from
direct emission and atmospheric processing measured on the R/V <italic>Ronald Brown</italic> during TEXAQS/GoMACCS 2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00F05,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011275" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd011275</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Hawkins, L. N., Frossard, A. A., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T.
S.: Carbohydrate-like composition of submicron atmospheric particles and
their production from ocean bubble bursting, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
6652–6657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908905107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0908905107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Sage, A. M., Weitkamp, E. A., Robinson, A. L., and Donahue, N. M.: Evolving
mass spectra of the oxidized component of organic aerosol: results from
aerosol mass spectrometer analyses of aged diesel emissions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 1139–1152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1139-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1139-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, E. S.: Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Processes, American
Geophysical Union, Washington, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Nemitz, E., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Blackall,
T. D., Trathan, P. N., Phillips, G. J., Sutton, M., and Braban, C. F.:
Sub-Antarctic marine aerosol: dominant contributions from biogenic sources,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8669–8694, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8669-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8669-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Liger-Belair, G., Koch, B. P., Flerus, R., Kattner, G.,
Harir, M., Kanawati, B., Lucio, M., Tziotis, D., Hertkorn, N., and
Gebefügi, I.: Dissolved organic matter in sea spray: a transfer study from
marine surface water to aerosols, Biogeosciences, 9, 1571–1582,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, J., Freutel, F., Zorn, S. R., Chen, Q., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J.
L., Martin, S. T., Artaxo, P., Wiedensohler, A., and Borrmann, S.:
Mass-spectrometric identification of primary biological particle markers and
application to pristine submicron aerosol measurements in Amazonia, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 11415–11429, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11415-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11415-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Shaw, S. L., Gantt, B., and Meskhidze, N.: Production and Emissions of Marine
Isoprene and Monoterpenes: A Review, Adv. Meteorol., 2010, 408696,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/408696" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2010/408696</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Hatakeyama, S., Izumi, K., and Akimoto, H.: Yield of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
formation of aerosol in the photo-oxidation of DMS under atmospheric
conditions, Atmos. Environ., 19, 135–141,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(85)90144-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(85)90144-1</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, R. M. C., Howell, S. G., Blomquist, B. W., Clarke, A. D., and
Huebert, B. J.: Dimethyl sulfide: Less important than long-range transport as
a source of sulfate to the remote tropical Pacific marine boundary layer, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9142–9167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd021643</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y.-L., Zhang, Q., Schwab, J. J., Demerjian, K. L., Chen, W.-N., Bae,
M.-S., Hung, H.-M., Hogrefe, O., Frank, B., Rattigan, O. V., and Lin, Y.-C.:
Characterization of the sources and processes of organic and inorganic
aerosols in New York city with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass
apectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1581–1602,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Claeys, M.,
Sorooshian, A., Ng, N. L., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evidence for Organosulfates in Secondary
Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 517–527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062081q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es062081q</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R.,
Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic
Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp802310p</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Twohy, C. H., and Anderson, J. R.: Droplet nuclei in non-precipitating
clouds: composition and size matter, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045002,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045002</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>van Pinxteren, M., Barthel, S., Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., von
Tümpling, W., and Herrmann, H.: The influence of environmental drivers on
the enrichment of organic carbon in the sea surface microlayer and in
submicron aerosol particles – measurements from the Atlantic Ocean, Elem.
Sci. Anth., 5, 35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.225</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>von Glasow, R. and Crutzen, P. J.: Model study of multiphase DMS oxidation
with a focus on halogens, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 589–608,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-589-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-589-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Wiedensohler, A., Birmili, W., Nowak, A., Sonntag, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel,
M., Wehner, B., Tuch, T., Pfeifer, S., Fiebig, M., Fjäraa, A. M., Asmi, E.,
Sellegri, K., Depuy, R., Venzac, H., Villani, P., Laj, P., Aalto, P., Ogren,
J. A., Swietlicki, E., Williams, P., Roldin, P., Quincey, P., Hüglin, C.,
Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Riccobono, F., Santos,
S., Grüning, C., Faloon, K., Beddows, D., Harrison, R., Monahan, C.,
Jennings, S. G., O'Dowd, C. D., Marinoni, A., Horn, H.-G., Keck, L., Jiang,
J., Scheckman, J., McMurry, P. H., Deng, Z., Zhao, C. S., Moerman, M.,
Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Löschau, G., and Bastian, S.: Mobility particle
size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure
to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle
number size distributions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 657–685,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-657-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-657-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. J., Nowak, A., Poulain, L., Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.:
Hygroscopic behavior of atmospherically relevant water-soluble carboxylic
salts and their influence on the water uptake of ammonium sulfate, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 12617–12626, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12617-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12617-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Yassaa, N., Peeken, I., Zöllner, E., Bluhm, K., Arnold, S., Spracklen,
D., and Williams, J.: Evidence for marine production of monoterpenes,
Environ. Chem., 5, 391–401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN08047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN08047</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Source apportionment of the organic aerosol over the Atlantic Ocean from 53°&thinsp;N to 53°&thinsp;S: significant contributions from marine emissions and long-range transport</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Marine aerosol particles are an important part of the natural aerosol systems
and might have a significant impact on the global climate and biological
cycle. It is widely accepted that truly pristine marine conditions are
difficult to find over the ocean. However, the influence of continental and
anthropogenic emissions on the marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosol is still
less understood and non-quantitative, causing uncertainties in the estimation
of the climate effect of marine aerosols. This study presents a detailed
chemical characterization of the MBL aerosol as well as the source
apportionment of the organic aerosol (OA) composition. The data set covers
the Atlantic Ocean from 53°&thinsp;N to 53°&thinsp;S, based on four
open-ocean cruises in 2011 and 2012. The aerosol particle composition was
measured with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass
spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS), which indicated that sub-micrometer aerosol
particles over the Atlantic Ocean are mainly composed of sulfates (50&thinsp;%
of the particle mass concentration), organics (21&thinsp;%) and sea salt
(12&thinsp;%). OA has been apportioned into five factors, including three
factors linked to marine sources and two with continental and/or
anthropogenic origins. The marine oxygenated OA (MOOA, 16&thinsp;% of the total
OA mass) and marine nitrogen-containing OA (MNOA, 16&thinsp;%) are identified as
marine secondary products with gaseous biogenic precursors dimethyl sulfide
(DMS) or amines. Marine hydrocarbon-like OA (MHOA, 19&thinsp;%) was attributed
to the primary emissions from the Atlantic Ocean. The factor for the
anthropogenic oxygenated OA (Anth-OOA, 19&thinsp;%) is related to continental
long-range transport. Represented by the combustion oxygenated OA (Comb-OOA),
aged combustion emissions from maritime traffic and wild fires in Africa
contributed, on average, a large fraction to the total OA mass (30&thinsp;%).
This study provides the important finding that long-range transport was found
to contribute averagely 49&thinsp;% of the submicron OA mass over the Atlantic
Ocean. This is almost equal to that from marine sources (51&thinsp;%).
Furthermore, a detailed latitudinal distribution of OA source contributions
showed that DMS oxidation contributed markedly to the OA over the South
Atlantic during spring, while continental-related long-range transport
largely influenced the marine atmosphere near Europe and western and central
Africa (15°&thinsp;N to 15°&thinsp;S). In addition, supported by a solid
correlation between marine tracer methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and the
DMS-oxidation OA (MOOA, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup><i>&gt;</i>0.85), this study suggests that
the DMS-related secondary organic aerosol (SOA) over the Atlantic Ocean could
be estimated by MSA and a scaling factor of 1.79, especially in spring.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adams, P. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Koch, D. M.: Global concentrations of
tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general
circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 13791–13823,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900083" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900083</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Elemental Analysis of
Organic Species with Electron Ionization High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 79, 8350–8358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071150w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071150w</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O&thinsp;∕&thinsp;C and OM&thinsp;∕&thinsp;OC Ratios
of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic Aerosols with High-Resolution
Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
4478–4485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R.,
Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M.,
Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J.,
Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P.,
Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis
during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban
supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source
apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, J. Y., Kuznetsova, M. R., Jahns, C. J., and Kemp, P. F.: The sea
surface microlayer as a source of viral and bacterial enrichment in marine
aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 801–812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.10.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.10.012</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.: Aerosols Before Pollution, Science, 315, 50–51,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136529" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136529</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Andreas, E. L.: A review of the sea spray generation function for the open
ocean, Vol. 1, WIT Press, Southampton, UK, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ayers, G. P. and Gillett, R. W.: DMS and its oxidation products in the remote
marine atmosphere: implications for climate and atmospheric chemistry, J. Sea
Res., 43, 275–286, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bates, T. S., Charlson, R. J., and Gammon, R. H.: Evidence for the climatic
role of marine biogenic sulphur, Nature, 329, 319–321, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bertrand, A., Stefenelli, G., Jen, C. N., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Ni,
H., Temime-Roussel, B., Slowik, J. G., Goldstein, A. H., El Haddad, I.,
Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.:
Evolution of the chemical fingerprint of biomass burning organic aerosol
during aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7607–7624,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bonsang, B., Polle, C., and Lambert, G.: Evidence for marine production of
isoprene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1129–1132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00083" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00083</a>,
1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia,
A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb,
C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical
characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Capes, G., Johnson, B., McFiggans, G., Williams, P. I., Haywood, J., and
Coe, H.: Aging of biomass burning aerosols over West Africa: Aircraft
measurements of chemical composition, microphysical properties, and emission
ratios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D00C15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009845</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ceburnis, D., Garbaras, A., Szidat, S., Rinaldi, M., Fahrni, S., Perron, N.,
Wacker, L., Leinert, S., Remeikis, V., Facchini, M. C., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Jennings, S. G., Ramonet, M., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Quantification of the
carbonaceous matter origin in submicron marine aerosol by <sup>13</sup>C and
<sup>14</sup>C isotope analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8593–8606,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8593-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, R. Y.-W., Leck, C., Graus, M., Müller, M., Paatero, J., Burkhart, J.
F., Stohl, A., Orr, L. H., Hayden, K., Li, S.-M., Hansel, A., Tjernström,
M., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aerosol composition and sources in
the central Arctic Ocean during ASCOS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10619–10636,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10619-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10619-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., and Warren, S. G.: Oceanic
phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate, Nature, 326,
655–661, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, Y., Rhee, T. S., Collett, J. L., Park, T., Park, S.-M., Seo, B.-K.,
Park, G., Park, K., and Lee, T.: Aerosol concentrations and composition in
the North Pacific marine boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 171, 165–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.047</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Kourtchev, I., Chi, X. G., Farhat, Y.,
Surratt, J. D., Gomez-Gonzalez, Y., Sciare, J., and Maenhaut, W.: Chemical
characterisation of marine aerosol at Amsterdam Island during the austral
summer of 2006–2007, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 13–22, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Coggon, M. M., Sorooshian, A., Wang, Z., Metcalf, A. R., Frossard, A. A.,
Lin, J. J., Craven, J. S., Nenes, A., Jonsson, H. H., Russell, L. M., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Ship impacts on the marine atmosphere: insights
into the contribution of shipping emissions to the properties of marine
aerosol and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8439–8458,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, M., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., DeCarlo, P. F., Mohr, C., Heringa,
M. F., Chirico, R., Marchand, N., Sciare, J., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification of marine and continental aerosol
sources in Paris using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 1950–1963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50151</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Ceburnis, D., Martucci, G., Bialek, J., Dupuy, R., Jennings,
S. G., Berresheim, H., Wenger, J., Healy, R., Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M.,
Giulianelli, L., Finessi, E., Worsnop, D., Ehn, M., Mikkilä, J., Kulmala,
M., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Aerosol properties associated with air masses arriving
into the North East Atlantic during the 2008 Mace Head EUCAARI intensive
observing period: an overview, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8413–8435,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8413-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8413-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Ceburnis, D., Monahan, C., Worsnop, D. R., Bialek, J.,
Kulmala, M., Kurtén, T., Ehn, M., Wenger, J., Sodeau, J., Healy, R., and
O'Dowd, C.: Nitrogenated and aliphatic organic vapors as possible drivers
for marine secondary organic aerosol growth, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,
D12311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017522</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J.,
Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic
aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during
MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Rinaldi, M., Paglione, M., Fuzzi, S., Stephanou,
E. G., Tziaras, T., Spyros, A., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M.,
Harrison, R. M., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Facchini, M. C.: Primary and
secondary marine organic aerosols over the North Atlantic Ocean during the
MAP experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D22210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016204</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Carbone, C., Finessi, E., Mircea,
M., Fuzzi, S., Moretti, F., Tagliavini, E., Ceburnis, D., and O'Dowd, C. D.:
Important Source of Marine Secondary Organic Aerosol from Biogenic Amines,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 9116–9121, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Burrows, S. M., Elliott, S. M., Bates, T.
S., and Quinn, P. K.: Sources and composition of submicron organic mass in
marine aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2014JD021913,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021913" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021913</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P., Kawamura, K., and Miura, K.: Molecular characterization of marine
organic aerosols collected during a round-the-world cruise, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D13302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015604" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015604</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gantt, B., Meskhidze, N., Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M., Ceburnis, D., and
O'Dowd, C. D.: Wind speed dependent size-resolved parameterization for the
organic mass fraction of sea spray aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8777–8790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8777-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8777-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, X., Wexler, A. S., and Clegg, S. L.: Atmospheric amines – Part I. A
review, Atmos. Environ., 45, 524–546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.012</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gibb, S. W., Mantoura, R. F. C., and Liss, P. S.: Ocean-atmosphere exchange
and atmospheric speciation of ammonia and methylamines in the region of the
NW Arabian Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 161–178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98gb00743" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98gb00743</a>,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Gondwe, M., Krol, M., Gieskes, W., Klaassen, W., and de Baar, H.: The
contribution of ocean-leaving DMS to the global atmospheric burdens of DMS,
MSA, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NSS SO<sub>4</sub><sup>=</sup>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1056,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gb001937" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gb001937</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Laboratory
investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires
2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2227–2240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hawkins, L. N., and Russell, L. M.: Polysaccharides, Proteins, and
Phytoplankton Fragments: Four Chemically Distinct Types of Marine Primary
Organic Aerosol Classified by Single Particle Spectromicroscopy, Adv.
Meteorol., 2010, 612132,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/612132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/612132</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Henning, S., Dieckmann, K., Ignatius, K., Schäfer, M., Zedler, P., Harris,
E., Sinha, B., van Pinxteren, D., Mertes, S., Birmili, W., Merkel, M., Wu,
Z., Wiedensohler, A., Wex, H., Herrmann, H., and Stratmann, F.: Influence of
cloud processing on CCN activation behaviour in the Thuringian Forest,
Germany during HCCT-2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7859–7868,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7859-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7859-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hertel, O., Christensen, J., and Hov, Ø.: Modelling of the end products of
the chemical decomposition of DMS in the marine boundary layer, Atmos.
Environ., 28, 2431–2449, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Schrödner, R., Bräuer, P., Wolke, R.,
and Herrmann, H.: An advanced modeling study on the impacts and atmospheric
implications of multiphase dimethyl sulfide chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 113, 11776–11781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606320113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606320113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, S., Poulain, L., van Pinxteren, D., van Pinxteren, M., Wu, Z.,
Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.: Latitudinal and Seasonal Distribution of
Particulate MSA over the Atlantic using a Validated Quantification Method
with HR-ToF-AMS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 418–426,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03186" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03186</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Müller, C., Böge, O., Gnauk, T., and Herrmann, H.: The
formation of organic sulfate esters in the limonene ozonolysis secondary
organic aerosol (SOA) under acidic conditions, Atmos. Environ., 41,
5571–5583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Gräfe, R., and Herrmann, H.:
Methyl-Nitrocatechols: Atmospheric Tracer Compounds for Biomass Burning
Secondary Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8453–8459,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ikeda, T.: Respiration and ammonia excretion by marine metazooplankton taxa:
synthesis toward a global-bathymetric model, Mar. Biol., 161, 2753–2766,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2540-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2540-5</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Shi, Q., Kolb, C. E., Worsnop, D. R., Yourshaw,
I., Seinfeld, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Zhang, X., Smith, K. A., Morris, J. W.,
and Davidovits, P.: Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001213</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez-Group: Aerosol Mass Spectrometer Web Mass Spectral Database,
High-Resolution AMS Spectra, available at:
<a href="http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/HRAMSsd/" target="_blank">http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/HRAMSsd/</a> (last access: 12
November, 2018), unit mass resolution spectra, available at:
<a href="http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/AMSsd/" target="_blank">http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/AMSsd/</a> (last access: 12
November, 2018), University of Colorado, Boulder, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kanakidou, M., Duce, R. A., Prospero, J. M., Baker, A. R., Benitez-Nelson,
C., Dentener, F. J., Hunter, K. A., Liss, P. S., Mahowald, N., Okin, G. S.,
Sarin, M., Tsigaridis, K., Uematsu, M., Zamora, L. M., and Zhu, T.:
Atmospheric fluxes of organic N and P to the global ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB3026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gb004277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gb004277</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kloster, S., Feichter, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Six, K. D., Stier, P., and
Wetzel, P.: DMS cycle in the marine ocean-atmosphere system – a global model
study, Biogeosciences, 3, 29–51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-29-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-29-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kuznetsova, M., Lee, C., and Aller, J.: Characterization of the proteinaceous
matter in marine aerosols, Mar. Chem., 96, 359–377,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.03.007</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Jung, J., Furutani, H., and Uematsu, M.:
Latitudinal distributions of organic nitrogen and organic carbon in marine
aerosols over the western North Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3037–3049,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3037-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, C., Iinuma, Y., Karstensen, J., van Pinxteren, D., Lehmann, S.,
Gnauk, T., and Herrmann, H.: Seasonal variation of aliphatic amines in marine
sub-micrometer particles at the Cape Verde islands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
9587–9597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9587-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9587-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A.,
Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C.,
Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y.,
Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C.,
Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A.,
Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J.,
Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm,
R., and Wang, Y. Q.: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol
absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 245–268, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Nelson, G., and Hutchings, L.: The Benguela upwelling area, Prog. Oceanogr.,
12, 333–356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(83)90013-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(83)90013-7</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-Time Methods for Estimating Organic Component Mass
Concentrations from Aerosol Mass Spectrometer Data, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 910–916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
O'Dowd, C. D. and De Leeuw, G.: Marine aerosol production: a review of the
current knowledge, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 365, 1753–1774, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Ovadnevaite, J., Vaishya, A., Rinaldi, M., and
Facchini, M. C.: Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources
impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
10687–10704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10687-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10687-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
O'Dowd, C. D., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Mircea, M.,
Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Yoon, Y. J., and Putaud, J. P.: Biogenically driven
organic contribution to marine aerosol, Nature, 431, 676–680, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Ovadnevaite, J., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M., Ceburnis, D., Worsnop, D. R., and
Berresheim, H.: Detecting high contributions of primary organic matter to
marine aerosol: A case study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L02807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046083" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046083</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Canagaratna, M., Berresheim, H., Bialek, J.,
Martucci, G., Worsnop, D. R., and O'Dowd, C.: On the effect of wind speed on
submicron sea salt mass concentrations and source fluxes, J. Geophys. Res.,
117, D16201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017379" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017379</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., Leinert, S., Dall'Osto, M., Canagaratna, M.,
O'Doherty, S., Berresheim, H., and O'Dowd, C.: Submicron NE Atlantic marine
aerosol chemical composition and abundance: Seasonal trends and air mass
categorization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2013JD021330,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021330" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021330</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P.: Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor
analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 37, 23–35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(96)00044-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(96)00044-5</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Poulain, L., Iinuma, Y., Müller, K., Birmili, W., Weinhold, K.,
Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Hausmann, A., Löschau, G., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Herrmann, H.: Diurnal variations of ambient particulate wood burning
emissions and their contribution to the concentration of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Seiffen, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12697–12713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12697-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12697-2011</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Birmili, W., Plass-Dülmer, C., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Herrmann, H.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of particulate nitrate and
organic matter at the IfT research station Melpitz, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12579–12599, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Poulain, L., Birmili, W., Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Wu, Z. J., Nordmann, S.,
Spindler, G., Prévôt, A. S. H., Wiedensohler, A., and Herrmann, H.:
Chemical mass balance of 300&thinsp;°C non-volatile particles at the
tropospheric research site Melpitz, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
10145–10162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10145-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10145-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K. and Bates, T. S.: The case against climate regulation via
oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions, Nature, 480, 51–56, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K., Collins, D. B., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Bates, T.
S.: Chemistry and Related Properties of Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4383–4399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500713g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500713g</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, G., Wooster, M. J., and Lagoudakis, E.: Annual and diurnal african
biomass burning temporal dynamics, Biogeosciences, 6, 849–866,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-849-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-849-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, L. M., Takahama, S., Liu, S., Hawkins, L. N., Covert, D. S., Quinn,
P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Oxygenated fraction and mass of organic aerosol from
direct emission and atmospheric processing measured on the R/V <i>Ronald
Brown</i> during TEXAQS/GoMACCS 2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00F05,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011275" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011275</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, L. M., Hawkins, L. N., Frossard, A. A., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T.
S.: Carbohydrate-like composition of submicron atmospheric particles and
their production from ocean bubble bursting, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
6652–6657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908905107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908905107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Sage, A. M., Weitkamp, E. A., Robinson, A. L., and Donahue, N. M.: Evolving
mass spectra of the oxidized component of organic aerosol: results from
aerosol mass spectrometer analyses of aged diesel emissions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 1139–1152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1139-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1139-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, E. S.: Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Processes, American
Geophysical Union, Washington, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Nemitz, E., Tang, Y. S., Dragosits, U., Blackall,
T. D., Trathan, P. N., Phillips, G. J., Sutton, M., and Braban, C. F.:
Sub-Antarctic marine aerosol: dominant contributions from biogenic sources,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8669–8694, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8669-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8669-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Liger-Belair, G., Koch, B. P., Flerus, R., Kattner, G.,
Harir, M., Kanawati, B., Lucio, M., Tziotis, D., Hertkorn, N., and
Gebefügi, I.: Dissolved organic matter in sea spray: a transfer study from
marine surface water to aerosols, Biogeosciences, 9, 1571–1582,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, J., Freutel, F., Zorn, S. R., Chen, Q., Farmer, D. K., Jimenez, J.
L., Martin, S. T., Artaxo, P., Wiedensohler, A., and Borrmann, S.:
Mass-spectrometric identification of primary biological particle markers and
application to pristine submicron aerosol measurements in Amazonia, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 11415–11429, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11415-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11415-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Shaw, S. L., Gantt, B., and Meskhidze, N.: Production and Emissions of Marine
Isoprene and Monoterpenes: A Review, Adv. Meteorol., 2010, 408696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/408696" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/408696</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Hatakeyama, S., Izumi, K., and Akimoto, H.: Yield of SO<sub>2</sub> and
formation of aerosol in the photo-oxidation of DMS under atmospheric
conditions, Atmos. Environ., 19, 135–141,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(85)90144-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(85)90144-1</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Simpson, R. M. C., Howell, S. G., Blomquist, B. W., Clarke, A. D., and
Huebert, B. J.: Dimethyl sulfide: Less important than long-range transport as
a source of sulfate to the remote tropical Pacific marine boundary layer, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9142–9167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021643</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y.-L., Zhang, Q., Schwab, J. J., Demerjian, K. L., Chen, W.-N., Bae,
M.-S., Hung, H.-M., Hogrefe, O., Frank, B., Rattigan, O. V., and Lin, Y.-C.:
Characterization of the sources and processes of organic and inorganic
aerosols in New York city with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass
apectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1581–1602,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Claeys, M.,
Sorooshian, A., Ng, N. L., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evidence for Organosulfates in Secondary
Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 517–527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062081q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es062081q</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R.,
Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic
Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Twohy, C. H., and Anderson, J. R.: Droplet nuclei in non-precipitating
clouds: composition and size matter, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045002,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045002</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
van Pinxteren, M., Barthel, S., Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., von
Tümpling, W., and Herrmann, H.: The influence of environmental drivers on
the enrichment of organic carbon in the sea surface microlayer and in
submicron aerosol particles – measurements from the Atlantic Ocean, Elem.
Sci. Anth., 5, 35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
von Glasow, R. and Crutzen, P. J.: Model study of multiphase DMS oxidation
with a focus on halogens, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 589–608,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-589-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-589-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wiedensohler, A., Birmili, W., Nowak, A., Sonntag, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel,
M., Wehner, B., Tuch, T., Pfeifer, S., Fiebig, M., Fjäraa, A. M., Asmi, E.,
Sellegri, K., Depuy, R., Venzac, H., Villani, P., Laj, P., Aalto, P., Ogren,
J. A., Swietlicki, E., Williams, P., Roldin, P., Quincey, P., Hüglin, C.,
Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Riccobono, F., Santos,
S., Grüning, C., Faloon, K., Beddows, D., Harrison, R., Monahan, C.,
Jennings, S. G., O'Dowd, C. D., Marinoni, A., Horn, H.-G., Keck, L., Jiang,
J., Scheckman, J., McMurry, P. H., Deng, Z., Zhao, C. S., Moerman, M.,
Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Löschau, G., and Bastian, S.: Mobility particle
size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure
to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle
number size distributions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 657–685,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-657-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-657-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. J., Nowak, A., Poulain, L., Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.:
Hygroscopic behavior of atmospherically relevant water-soluble carboxylic
salts and their influence on the water uptake of ammonium sulfate, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 12617–12626, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12617-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12617-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Yassaa, N., Peeken, I., Zöllner, E., Bluhm, K., Arnold, S., Spracklen,
D., and Williams, J.: Evidence for marine production of monoterpenes,
Environ. Chem., 5, 391–401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN08047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN08047</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
