<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-14837-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Unprecedented strength of Hadley circulation in 2015–2016 impacts on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interhemispheric difference</article-title><alt-title>Unprecedented Hadley circulation in 2015–2016 impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Unprecedented Hadley circulation in 2015--2016 impacts on {$\chem{CO_{2}}$}}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~S.~Frederiksen and R.~J.~Francey}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Frederiksen</surname><given-names>Jorgen S.</given-names></name>
          <email>jorgen.frederiksen@csiro.au</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Francey</surname><given-names>Roger J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jorgen S. Frederiksen (jorgen.frederiksen@csiro.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>14837</fpage><lpage>14850</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e107">The extreme El Niño of 2015 and 2016 coincided with record
global warming and unprecedented strength of the Hadley circulation with
significant impact on mean interhemispheric (IH) transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The relative roles of eddy transport and mean advective transport on
interannual differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration between Mauna Loa and
Cape Grim (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), from 1992 through to 2016, are explored. Eddy
transport processes occur mainly in boreal winter–spring when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is large; an important component is due to Rossby wave generation by the
Himalayas and propagation through the equatorial Pacific westerly duct
generating and transmitting turbulent kinetic energy. Mean transport occurs
mainly in boreal summer–autumn and varies with the strength of the Hadley
circulation. The timing of annual changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  is found to
coincide well with dynamical indices that we introduce to characterize the
transport. During the unrivalled 2009–2010 step in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the effects
of the eddy and mean transport were reinforced. In contrast, for the 2015 to 2016
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the mean transport counteracts the eddy transport and
the record strength of the Hadley circulation determines the annual IH
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference. The interaction of increasing global warming and
extreme El Niños may have important implications for altering the balance
between eddy and mean IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer. The effects of interannual
changes in mean and eddy transport on interhemispheric gradients in other
trace gases are also examined.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e242">Interhemispheric (IH) exchange of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs mainly by eddy
transport in the boreal winter–spring and by mean convective and advective
exchange in the boreal summer–autumn (Bowman and Cohen, 1997; Lintner et al.,
2004; Miyazaki et al., 2008; and references therein).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e259">Definitions of dynamical indices characterizing eddy and mean
tracer transport.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dynamical index</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Definition</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average 300 hPa zonal velocity in the region 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 140 to 170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average 300 hPa vertical velocity in pressure coordinates in the region 10 to 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 0 to 360<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average 200 hPa meridional velocity in the region 5  to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 0 to 360<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average 300 hPa vertical velocity in pressure coordinates in the region 10  to 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120 to 240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average 200 hPa meridional velocity in the region 5  to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120 to 240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page14838?><p id="d1e475">On the basis of long-term (1949–2011) correlations of the upper tropospheric
zonal wind with the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), Francey and
Frederiksen (2016; hereafter FF16) defined an index for the Pacific westerly duct, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a measure of IH eddy transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
index is the average zonal wind in the region 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
140 to 170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W at 300 hPa, as summarized in Table 1. In this article
the period of interest is 1992 to 2016 and the corresponding correlation is
shown in Fig. S1 of the Supplement. There the role of the changing Walker
circulation with the cycle of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in
determining the properties of the Pacific and Atlantic westerly ducts is also
documented. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index is an indicator of cross-equatorial
Rossby wave dispersion and associated increases in near-equatorial upper
tropospheric transient kinetic energy (Frederiksen and Webster, 1988),
particularly between 300 and 100 hPa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km above sea
level). The process normally occurs over the eastern Pacific Ocean during the
boreal winter–spring, and the Rossby waves (Webster and Holton, 1982; Stan et
al., 2017), generated downwind of thermal anomalies and continental
influences, in particular the massive Himalayan orography, propagate in a
south-east direction through the Pacific westerly duct generating and
transporting turbulent kinetic energy. The generation of turbulent kinetic
energy occurs through Rossby wave breaking in the Pacific and Atlantic ducts
and enhances turbulent mixing (Ortega et al., 2018 and references therein).
FF16 also considered the relationship of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other trace
gases including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed, recently Pandey et al. (2017) and
Krol
et al. (2018)  also considered the implications of faster IH transfer of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the La Niña of 2011 when the Pacific westerly wind
duct was open and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was large.</p>
      <p id="d1e604">FF16 explained the exceptional step in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH difference between
2009 and 2010 as being due to a contribution from the large anomaly in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed at the time. Recently results from the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2
(OCO-2) during the 2015–2016 El Niño have been published (Chatterjee et
al., 2017; and references therein). In particular release by NASA (2016) of
data in a video “Following Carbon Dioxide through the Atmosphere” provides
further direct evidence of the Pacific duct hypothesis. The NASA OCO-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in Fig. 1a is for 17 February 2015 and shows
Rossby wave trains over the eastern Pacific and across South America
associated with IH exchange as a typical example of OCO-2 images that
coincide with the shaded 2015 period in Fig. 1b. The dynamical properties of
these Rossby waves are further explored in the Supplement, including Figs. S3
and S4. Figure 1b uses the covariance between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in early 2015, indicated by shading, to predict IH
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange through the Pacific duct. The atmospheric circulation
data and indices used throughout this article are obtained from the National
Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and National Center for
Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis (NNR) data (Kalnay et al., 1996); in
Sect. 6 we briefly consider the robustness of our results using another
reanalysis data set. The results in Fig. 1a and b are also consistent with
upper tropospheric (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) wind vectors. Between 5 and 23 February 2015
NNR wind vectors show that a strong Pacific North American height anomaly
caused a split in the Pacific upper tropospheric winds, the Pacific westerly
duct was open, and there were south-east cross-equatorial winds from the
Northern to Southern Hemisphere. This is illustrated in Fig. 1c for 300 hPa
wind vectors on 17 February 2015.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e689"><bold>(a)</bold> OCO-2 image for 17 February 2015 showing Rossby wave dispersion
(dashed red lines) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration across the Equator (dotted
black line). <bold>(b)</bold> Seasonal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with area where both are positive shaded, for 1 January 2014
to 31 December 2016, and <bold>(c)</bold> 300 hPa wind vector directions and wind strength
(ms<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) on 17 February 2015.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e757">The focus here is on IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference, anomalies in the mean
convective and advective mode of IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange, and changes in the
relative importance of the mean and eddy transport modes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Changes in {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} interhemispheric difference}?><title>Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interhemispheric difference</title>
      <?pagebreak page14839?><p id="d1e800">To represent the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interhemispheric difference, we define
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the difference in Commonwealth Scientific and
Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO, 2018) analysed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in baseline air sampled from Mauna Loa (mlo, 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
156<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) and Cape Grim (cgo, 41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 145<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). FF16
discussed the measurement and sampling strategy, consistently applied over
25 years, which has been used to establish the data set with minimum
uncertainty. They also examined the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interhemispheric difference
with the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) Mauna Loa and South Pole
data (Keeling et al., 2009) and found broad agreement in the two data sets,
in the period of overlap since the 1990s, in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes
and the relationships to the opening and closing of the Pacific westerly
duct.</p>
      <p id="d1e900">Figure 2 summarizes annual covariations that motivated this study. In Fig. 2a
the overall trend in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects the increasing
emissions, mainly in the Northern Hemisphere, of carbon from combustion of
fossil fuels coupled with relatively slow transport into the Southern
Hemisphere. The smooth dashed curve shows global annual anthropogenic
emissions (Le Quéré et al., 2018) scaled by the coefficients of linear
regression between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and emissions from 1992 to 2015
(0.36 ppm (PgC)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The year-to-year
variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are more pronounced than the variations in
emissions (for example, only 2009, corresponding to the global financial
crisis, clearly interrupts the smooth emissions increase).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e993"><bold>(a)</bold> Annual average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid) and global
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission estimate (dashed) for 1992 to 2016, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for boreal winter–spring (blue) and summer–autumn (orange), <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for boreal winter–spring (blue) and summer–autumn (orange),
and <bold>(d)</bold> boreal summer–autumn <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (orange) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The influences of terrestrial fluxes and transport on
interhemispheric {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} differences}?><title>The influences of terrestrial fluxes and transport on
interhemispheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences</title>
      <p id="d1e1108">The growth rate and concentration of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depend on many
mechanisms including fossil fuel emissions, surface fluxes, such as
associated with the growth and decay of vegetation, and atmospheric mean and
eddy transport. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rate and IH gradients in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vary on daily, monthly, yearly, and multi-year timescales, where
there is a quasi-periodic variability associated with the influence of ENSO
(e.g. Thoning et al., 1989). This reflects the response of tropical vegetation
to rainfall variations and both hemispheres are also affected through
dynamical coupling.</p>
      <p id="d1e1144">A number of recent inversion studies have largely attributed growth anomalies
in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations to anomalous responses of the
terrestrial biosphere. However, the variability in the responses within
dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) is significant. Le Quéré et
al. (2018), for example, note that the “standard deviation of the annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink across the DGVMs averages to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GtC year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for the period 1959 to 2016”. This is significantly larger than the reported
extratropical sink anomalies during, for example, the major 2009–2010 step in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Poulter et al., 2014; Trudinger et al., 2016).
Francey and Frederiksen (2015) presented reasons supporting a dynamical
contribution to the cause of the 2009–2010 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> step.</p>
      <p id="d1e1219">For the 2015–2016 period of particular relevance here there are two studies
that stand out. Keenan et al. (2016) interpret slowing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> growth
in 2016 as strong uptake by Northern Hemisphere terrestrial forests. Yue et
al. (2017) examine the reasons for the strong positive anomalies in
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rates during 2015. They present evidence of
the Northern Hemisphere terrestrial response to El Niño events by way of
satellite observations of vegetation greenness. To reconcile increased
greenness with increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> growth, their inversion modelling
requires the “largest ever observed” transition from sink to source in the
tropical biosphere at the peak of the El Niño, “but the detailed
mechanisms underlying such an extreme transition remain to be elucidated”.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14840?><p id="d1e1255">In this study, we find that the 2015–2016 El Niño also corresponds to
unprecedented anomalies in both mean and eddy IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport
characterized by indices of these transfers that we introduce. As for the
anomalies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH gradient during the 2009–2010 El Niño,
studied in FF16, this again suggests a contributing role for anomalous IH
transport during the 2015–2016 event. We examine this possibility in detail
and study the relationships between the extremes in IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
differences and transport anomalies for 1992 to 2016 and associated
correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and other trace gases) and dynamical
indices of transport.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Dynamical influences on IH exchange</title>
      <p id="d1e1313">Figure 2b confirms that much of the year-to-year variability in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly preceding 2010, occurs in the boreal
winter–spring (December–May), when eddy transport is expected to make a more active
contribution to IH exchange (FF16). The step jump in annual values between
2009 and 2010, which was the focus of FF16, is the most prominent feature. A
similar relationship with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is supported prior to 2010 as
indicated here by vertical dashed grid lines aligned with the beginning of the
calendar years when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unusually low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ms<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
At these times <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally corresponds to
above-average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with an accumulation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Northern Hemisphere at a time when the Pacific duct
transfer is small.</p>
      <p id="d1e1420">A notable exception occurs in 2015–2016, and this is a particular focus of
this study that we address in the context of the unusual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
behaviour since 2010. For example, since 2010 the annual average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 2a shows reduced scatter and a slight decrease at a
time when fossil fuel emissions continue to grow. As shown in Fig. 2b, this
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease is more marked in the boreal summer–autumn (June–November)
than in boreal winter–spring (December–May) when it is relatively stable (and even
recovers in the last 3 years).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1473">Hovmöller diagrams of 300 hPa zonal wind (ms<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) averaged
between 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N as a function of longitude and time for <bold>(a)</bold> 1 January 2008
to 31 December 2010, <bold>(b)</bold> 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013, and
<bold>(c)</bold> 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016. Green through to red represent westerly winds
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> winds, ms<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the Western Hemisphere. White solid rounded
rectangles denote the longitudinal extent of the Pacific duct, and the height
denotes the February to April period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1541">The steadily decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since 2012 occurs all year round in
Fig. 2c. Similar decreases occur in indices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 2d, which measure the strength and location of the
Hadley circulation. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the 300 hPa vertical velocity in
pressure coordinates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is pressure) averaged zonally
(0–360<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and between 10 and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Table 1).
Also, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the 200 hPa south–north meridional wind averaged
zonally and between 5  and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Table 1). Both
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> become more negative and the mean transport from the
Northern to Southern Hemisphere increases with a strengthening of the Hadley
circulation. As noted by Freitas et al. (2017; and references therein), the
Hadley circulation strengthens during El Niños, and particularly for
strong events such as during 2015–2016 (L'Heureux et al., 2017). There are
subtle relationships between the latitudinal width of the equatorial heating
during El Niño and global warming (Freitas et al., 2017) and the Hadley
circulation. However, it is expected that there will be an increasing
frequency of extreme El Niño events with increasing global warming (Cai
et al., 2014; Yeh et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e1678">Before examining the Hadley component further, we clarify factors associated
with the eddy transfer through the Pacific duct.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The role of the Pacific westerly duct in IH {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} eddy
transport}?><title>The role of the Pacific westerly duct in IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> eddy
transport</title>
      <p id="d1e1701">We examine here the concept of relatively rapid interhemispheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange through a spatially restricted Pacific duct and
discuss issues of the uniqueness of the duct and the transport of both
turbulent kinetic energy and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to and through the Pacific duct
region.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Eddy generation in the equatorial zone</title>
      <p id="d1e1731">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zonal wind based on the peak climatological correlation
with SOI (140–170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) is also largely representative of
near-equatorial (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) zonal winds and their
variability in the larger region between 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Pattern correlations between the two vary from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for November to
April to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for May to October.</p>
      <p id="d1e1815">In Fig. 3, Hovmöller diagrams for the Western Hemisphere (180
to 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) between 2008 and 2016 show the time–longitude of daily
300 hPa zonal winds between 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The cool blue
background represents easterly winds (negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), while warm colours,
green to yellow through to red, depict westerlies (positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Frederiksen and Webster (1988) found that near-equatorial upper
tropospheric transient kinetic energy generation is approximately linearly
related to zonal wind strength (their Fig. 6) and is strongest for
westerlies when the winds oppose the earth's rotation. The longitudinal
limits of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined from the SOI correlation are enclosed by
solid white rounded rectangles in Fig. 3, while the time period (rectangle
height) represents those months when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is at a seasonal maximum
and winds in the Pacific duct are normally westerly (February–April).</p>
      <p id="d1e1887">In most years, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is positive in boreal winter–spring and
Rossby waves generated by, for example, the Himalayas (height of 8.8 km) can
propagate through the downstream Pacific duct region (140–170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,
5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), producing and transporting turbulent kinetic
energy southwards. In some years, such as the boreal winter–spring of
2009–2010 and 2015–2016, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is anomalously weak and the peak
equatorial 300 hPa zonal winds are over the Atlantic Ocean, particularly in
the Atlantic duct region defined as 10–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,
5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The Atlantic duct region, most conspicuously,
is downstream of the Rockies (height of 4.4 km). Our Fig. S1 and Fig. 4a of
FF16 show that the SOI and Atlantic duct zonal winds are strongly
<italic>anti-correlated</italic> in contrast to the strong correlation with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; in the Eastern Hemisphere the correlation between the SOI
and equatorial zonal winds is quite weak as well. We note that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the Atlantic duct winds are anti-correlated with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is anti-correlated with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Atlantic duct winds are correlated with a similar
magnitude. This indicates that changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the primary
determinant of interhemispheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> duct transfer via eddy
processes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the opening of the Atlantic duct is
mainly important<?pagebreak page14841?> through the associated closing of the Pacific duct. This is
consistent with the idea that Rossby wave dispersion from the smaller
topographic features of the Rockies is less important than from the
comparatively massive Himalayas, as further discussed in the Supplement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2074">Correlation of vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pas<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 300 hPa with SOI for February–April and 1948–2016.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Transport of surface {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} emissions to the upper
troposphere}?><title>Transport of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions to the upper
troposphere</title>
      <?pagebreak page14842?><p id="d1e2122">Transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the surface to the upper
troposphere is explored next. We find that when the Pacific duct is open
there is also large-scale uplift slightly downstream of Asia so that in a
given winter–spring season the substantial regional emissions are effectively
transported directly through the duct via Rossby wave dispersion, including
by the Himalayan wave train. Figure 4 shows the February–April correlation between
the 500 hPa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the vertical wind in pressure coordinates with
negative values corresponding to uplift in height coordinates) and the SOI
from 1948 to 2016. The most prominent correlations occur within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the Equator at longitudes 120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E to
170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, upstream, and at the longitudes of the Pacific duct, and
this is in fact the case at all levels between the surface and 100 hPa (not
shown). Broadly similar correlations are obtained between the 500 hPa
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for February–April (and for 500 hPa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and SOI for January–December). At other times, for example in 2010 and 2015–2016,
when there have been persisting easterlies in the Pacific duct region, there
has been descent slightly downstream of the Asian region. Thus the recent
record Asian emissions may play a significant role in direct episodic IH
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer through the Pacific duct. To the extent that Asian
emissions might be preferentially represented in direct IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
transfer, it is relevant that uncertainty and possibly variability in Asian
emissions are greater than the reported uncertainty and variability in the
global totals (Andres et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e2229">Latitude–height cross section of June to August 120–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E average
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pas<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) – vertical velocity in pressure coordinates –
for 1979–2016, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> difference of 2016 minus 1979–2016, and<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> difference of 2016 minus 2010.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The role of the Hadley circulation in mean IH {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} transport}?><title>The role of the Hadley circulation in mean IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport</title>
      <p id="d1e2311">As noted in Sect. 2, the years 2010 and 2016 exhibit a similar anomalous
eddy transport index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but have different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> responses
relative to previous years (Fig. 2a). Since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted in
the Northern Hemisphere and tropics is also transported into the Southern
Hemisphere by the mean divergent flow associated with the Hadley circulation,
particularly during boreal summer (Miyazaki et al., 2008), this is
now explored in more detail. The Pacific duct transfer in boreal
winter–spring, with peaks in February–April, occurs when the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH
partial pressure difference is near the maximum due to forest respiration.
Likewise the mean IH transport related to the Hadley circulation occurs in
boreal summer–autumn, with peaks in June–August, when the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH
partial pressure difference has a proportionally larger contribution due to
the accumulated fossil fuel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from NH industrial emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2386">Figure 5 shows latitude–height cross sections, over the Pacific, averaged
between 120 and 240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, of June to August vertical wind in
pressure coordinates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while Fig. 6 shows the corresponding results
for the meridional wind, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Recall that negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to
positive vertical velocity in height coordinates and negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
north–south meridional wind. In the boreal summer–spring, average values
for 1979 to 2016 show the uplift (negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at low northern
latitudes (Fig. 5a), while the advective Hadley cell meridional transfer
(negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the Southern Hemisphere at high altitude can be seen in
Fig. 6a.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e2443">Latitude–height cross section of June to August
120–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E average <bold>(a)</bold> meridional wind <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (ms<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
1979–2016, <bold>(b)</bold> meridional wind <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> difference of 2016 minus
1979–2016, and <bold>(c)</bold> meridional wind <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> difference of 2016 minus
2010.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2505">By subtracting the 1979–2016 average from the 2016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>  values, the nature of the extreme 2016 anomaly becomes visible,
with strong uplift including between 10 and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N shown
in Fig. 5b and extensive meridional wind penetration into the Southern
Hemisphere, particularly between 500 and 300 hPa, shown in Fig. 6b.</p>
      <p id="d1e2531">Figures 5c and 6c depict the difference between the anomaly years 2016
and 2010. Both the uplift between 10 and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
penetration of the meridional wind into the Southern Hemisphere is stronger
in the upper troposphere and mean transport through convection and advection
into the Southern Hemisphere more extensive in 2016.</p>
      <p id="d1e2543">On the basis of these figures, and similar figures for the corresponding
zonally averaged quantities, we have chosen four indices to characterize the
mean circulation by the Hadley cell (Table 1). These are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
vertical velocity in pressure coordinates over the Pacific Ocean at 300 hPa
averaged between 120–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 10–15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the meridional wind at 200 hPa averaged between
120–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 5–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, as well
as the corresponding zonally averaged indices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
introduced in Sect. 2.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page14843?><sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Quantifying the $C_{\mathrm{mlo-gco}}$ relationships with eddy and mean
transport indices}?><title>Quantifying the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gco</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships with eddy and mean
transport indices</title>
      <p id="d1e2652">The timing of a majority of short term variations in the 25-year baseline
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to atmospheric transport changes that
influence the interhemispheric exchange. To quantify relationships between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the eddy and mean transport indices involved, we
first suppress the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes expected from reported
anthropogenic emissions. The global annual average anthropogenic emissions
(Le Quéré et al., 2018) are converted to ppm using the coefficient
0.36 ppm (PgC)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr derived in Sect. 2 from Fig. 2 and subtracted
from the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Fig. 6 we compare the FF-adjusted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which we denote <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for two
periods when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is positive; the first is February–April
that best captures the eddy IH exchange, and the second is June–August when
mean transfer related to the Hadley circulation is captured.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2784"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged
between February and April for 1992–2016 and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged between June and August for 1992–2016.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2892">We focus first on the FF-adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plots in Fig. 7a
and b. The mean and year-to-year variation is very much larger in (a)
compared to (b) and is also larger in (a) compared to the annual averaged
values in Fig. 2a. The contrasting behaviour between the two periods after
2012 is also more marked.</p>
      <p id="d1e2914">To emphasize the similarities between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Pacific duct
winds, we plot <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  in Fig. 7a, so that easterlies are
shown as positive and the more frequent westerlies as negative; the timings
of peaks in both panels then correspond to each other. When winds in the Pacific duct are
easterly or near zero, FF-adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak or are above
average; this is now more obvious in 2016 compared with the corresponding
results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in December–May shown in Fig. 2b and c. In
fact the FF-adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has very similar behaviour to the
detrended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with pattern correlations of anomalies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.931</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.954</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.981</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for January–December, June–August, and February–April
respectively. The similarity can also be seen by comparing the top panel of
Fig. 7b with that of Fig. 8. Despite persistent agreement in timing, the
magnitude of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
anomaly is more variable. This is reflected in the correlation between the
detrended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies and the detrended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
anomalies, which is  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for February–April and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.228</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
December–May. These results confirm the preferential Pacific duct transfer in late
boreal winter and early spring (February–April). They also indicate that although
there is an important relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the zonal
wind in the Pacific duct, other processes detailed in Sect. 2, such as
changes in direct advective transport by the mean winds and emissions, also
play roles in year-to-year IH variations. This is also confirmed by a
regression analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies onto <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
anomalies (not shown), where there is significant scatter about the regression
line.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14844?><p id="d1e3180">In particular, during 2009–2010 there were a number of complicating factors
that most likely contributed to this. The unusually low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2008 and 2009
coincide with the global financial crisis when global emissions dipped (and
recent estimates of emissions by British Petroleum, 2018, suggest an even larger
2008–2009 anomaly than in data used here). Terrestrial net biosphere
production south of 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S was also anomalously low in 2009 and
anomalously high in 2010 (FF16; Trudinger et al., 2016; though by amounts not
sufficient to impact on the Cape Grim baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records). The
low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also align with near-record strong westerlies in the
Pacific duct, and associated larger eddy transport, in 2008; both potentially
contribute to an increase in the magnitude of the subsequent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> step.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e3248">Time series of June–August and annual averages of detrended
mlo–cgo differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and June–August average
dynamical indices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14837/2018/acp-18-14837-2018-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3301">In Fig. 7b the post-2010 decrease in June–August FF-adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is clearly mirrored in the decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
indices (indicating strengthened Hadley circulation), particularly in the
120–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E Pacific sector (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
compared to the zonal average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
considerably weaker strength of the Hadley circulation in 2010 compared with
2016 is shown quite distinctly. The correlations between the detrended
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies and indices of mean transport are shown in
Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e3409">Correlations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the detrended
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies and indices of mean transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged for June–August and June–November
1992–2016.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">June–August</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.361</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.522</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.539</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">June–November</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.297</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.481</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.355</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.355</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3675">Generally June–August correlations are stronger than the June–November
correlations, and correlations over the Pacific sector 120–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E
are generally larger than for the zonally averaged quantities. This is
clearly the case for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an exception, being
larger for the longer time period. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlations for
June–August involving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have roughly
similar magnitudes to those for February–April, involving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provide similar predictability of
the role of the Hadley circulation in mean IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does for eddy transport. Interestingly, during 2009–2010
the effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reinforce one another to make the step in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> large, while for 2015–2016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> counteract <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the exceptionally strong
Hadley circulation becomes the dominant feature in determining the annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1a). These results show that there is an important
connection between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the indices that
characterizes the strength of the Hadley circulation and mean transport.
Again, as also suggested by regression analysis (not shown), other processes,
detailed in Sect. 2 and above, also play important roles.</p>
      <p id="d1e3915">The somewhat different behaviours of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the dynamical indices,
particularly during the El Niños of 2009–2010 and 2015–2016 and of
1997–1998, may partly reflect the diversity of El Niños and whether the
heating is focussed in the eastern Pacific or in the central Pacific
(Capotondi et al., 2015; L'Heureux et al., 2017 and references therein). The
strong 1997–1998 event, like the 1982–1983 event, was a classic eastern Pacific El Niño, with maximum temperature anomalies of nearly
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (L'Heureux et al., 2017). The 2009–2010 event, in contrast, was a
central Pacific El Niño, with record-breaking warming in the central
Pacific (Kim et al., 2011). The 2015–2016 El Niño fell between these two
canonical cases, with less warming in the eastern Pacific Ocean than the
1997–1998 event, but similar warming to the 2009–2010 event in the central
Pacific (L'Heureux et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e3953">The broadly increasing magnitude of the negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indices
since 2012 is associated with both increasing global temperatures, breaking
the record in 2016, and the large El Niño of 2015 and 2016. This has
resulted in the increasing importance of the mean convective and advective
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2<?pagebreak page14845?></mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport by the Hadley circulation relative to the eddy
transport including through the Pacific duct. It will be interesting to see
whether this favouring of the mean over the eddy IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport
will become increasingly important with further global warming and the extent
to which it depends on extreme El Niños (Cai et al., 2014; Freitas et
al., 2017; Yeh et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e3992">The dynamical indices that we have used for this study are based on the
NCEP-NCAR reanalysis (NNR) data (Kalnay et al., 1996). There is generally
close correspondence between the major global atmospheric circulation data
sets that, like the NNR data, use full data assimilation throughout the
atmosphere (Frederiksen and Frederiksen, 2007; Frederiksen et al., 2017a;
Rikus, 2018). We have confirmed this by recalculating our dynamical indices
and main correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the NASA Modern Era
Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) data (Rienecker
et al., 2011). For example, the 1992 to 2016 correlation between MERRA and NNR
data for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in February–April is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.974</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in June–August
is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.899</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in June–August is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.931</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding
correlations between detrended anomalies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the MERRA-based
dynamical indices are also very similar. The correlations are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.512</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for February–April (compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the NNR index),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.504</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  for June–August (compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.522</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on
NNR), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.538</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for June–August (compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.539</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on
NNR).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Interhemispheric exchange of other trace gases</title>
      <p id="d1e4213">Next, we consider the eddy and mean IH exchange of other trace gas species
and their correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dynamical indices of transport.
We focus on February–April for eddy transport and June–August for mean
transport since these periods were the peaks for correlations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH difference with eddy and mean transport indices
respectively. However, there are differences in the seasonal variability of
the interhemispheric gradient in the different trace gas species that are
reflected in their transport, and for that reason we also briefly mention the
results for other time periods. We begin by further examining Mauna Loa minus
Cape Grim (mlo–cgo) differences, between 1992–2016, in the routinely
monitored CSIRO species (CSIRO, 2018) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that were briefly considered by Francey and
Frederiksen (FF16), as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (for 1993–2016). Thereafter we
discuss mlo–cgo differences in SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data sourced from the NOAA
Halocarbons and other Atmospheric Trace Species Group (HATS) program from
1998 (NOAA, 2018).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <title>Pacific westerly duct and eddy IH transport of CSIRO-monitored
trace gases</title>
      <p id="d1e4299">The IH exchange of the trace gas species, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in
addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the role of the Pacific westerly wind duct
were also considered in FF16. In particular, the covariance, of the mlo–cgo
difference in these routinely monitored CSIRO species with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
is shown in Fig. 5 of FF16. We recall that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index is the
average zonal wind in the region 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
140  to 170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W at 300 hPa. As noted in FF16, the extreme
cases of Pacific westerly duct closure in 1997–1998 and 2009–2010 show up in
the reduction of seasonal IH exchange for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO as well as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The similar behaviour of detrended anomalies of mlo–cgo
difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their correlations with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Table 3 for February–April. We note the quite high
correlations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.697</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.645</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  respectively) and the significant anti-correlations of all
these three species with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.448</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.605</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively). In fact, for March–May the correlation between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is even larger at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.728</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.474</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while between CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.611</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.507</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  These results
are of course consistent with Fig. 5 of FF16 and are further evidence of
similarities of IH transient eddy transport<?pagebreak page14846?> of these three gases. Table 3
also shows that the February–April correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
anti-correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  have smaller magnitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.296</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.218</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). These results for anomalies are
probably related to corresponding similarities and differences in the
seasonal mean values (not shown) of these gases in February–April, as discussed
below.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p id="d1e4708">Correlations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the detrended mlo–cgo gas
anomalies for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index of transient transport averaged between February and April for
1992–2016. Also shown are corresponding correlations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
1993–2016 and for SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1998–2012.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.697</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.448</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.645</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.605</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.296</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.218</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.215</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.088</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.619</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.617</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e5096">Anomalies in mlo–cgo differences in CSIRO-monitored <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally
poorly correlated with those in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown for February–April and
June–August in Tables 3 and 4 respectively (the maximum 3-month average
correlation is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.274</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  for March–May), and this is mirrored in generally
poor correlation with the dynamical indices shown in Tables 3 and 4. This
reflects the fact that natural exchanges with equatorial agriculture and
oceans are the main sources (Ishijima et al., 2009), and the seasonal range
in mlo–cgo difference is only around 0.2 % of the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level, more
than 10 times less than is the case for the other species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <title>Hadley circulation and mean IH transport of CSIRO-monitored
trace gases</title>
      <p id="d1e5154">We examine the role of the Hadley circulation in the mean transport of trace
gases focusing on the boreal summer period of June–August. Table 4 shows the
correlations between the detrended anomalies of mlo–cgo difference in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and with the dynamical indices
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1). We note that the largest June–August
correlation is between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.680</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the correlations
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are considerably smaller
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.246</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), while for April–June the latter
correlations are more comparable at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.583</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.496</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e5316">These correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are also reflected in the respective
correlations of the other trace gases with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We
note from Table 4 that the June–August correlations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.427</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.442</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively, which is
slightly less than the corresponding correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the dynamical indices (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.522</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.539</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), but
considerably larger than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO. For May–July the correlation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  is slightly larger, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.526</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5491">Again, the different behaviour of the trace gas anomalies may be related to
their different seasonal mean values; the seasonal mean IH difference for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks in boreal summer, while for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, it is relatively low
with a minimum in August. The distribution and variability of surface
exchange is different for each of the trace gases and there is potential for
this to interact with the restricted extent and seasonal meandering of the
regions of uplift to influence IH exchange of a species. For example, 70 %
of the global total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are from mainly equatorial biogenic
sources that include wetlands, rice agriculture, livestock, landfills,
forests, oceans, and termites (Denman et al., 2007), and CO emissions receive a
significant contribution from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and from tropical biomass
burning.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p id="d1e5541">Correlations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the detrended mlo–cgo gas
anomalies for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and
indices of mean transport, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged between
June–August for 1992–2016. Also shown are corresponding correlations for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1993–2016 and for SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1998–2012.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.522</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.539</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.246</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.195</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.205</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.236</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.680</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.427</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.442</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.290</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.266</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.223</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.433</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.385</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6024">A more detailed examination of the inter-annual variation of the mlo–cgo
difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during boreal summer is presented in Fig. 8. It shows
the detrended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in comparison with the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
data and with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indices.</p>
      <p id="d1e6082">First we note that the detrended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in the top panel have very
similar inter-annual variation to the FF-adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Fig. 7b. We also see that the qualitative behaviour of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mirrors many
aspects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as expected from the correlations in Table 4. In
particular, the increase in the IH difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2010 is even more
pronounced than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there is
a steady reduction in the IH difference from around 2013, leading to a local
minimum in 2016. In both of these respects these gases broadly follow the
changes in the Hadley circulation, including the strengthening during
2015–2016. Vertical lines in Fig. 8 indicate other times between 1992 and
2016 when transitions occur in both these trace gases and in the Hadley
circulation characterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6203">Surface exchanges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have similarities to those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
that they occur mostly at mid–northern latitudes and are mainly due to
emissions from fossil fuel combustion. However <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also has
mid–northern-latitude photochemical sources peaking in August (Price et al., 2007).<?pagebreak page14847?> These
boreal summer sources are almost offset by a combined soil and hydroxyl sink,
but the overall interhemispheric partial pressure difference is boosted by a
significant reduction in the Southern Hemisphere photochemical source at that
time. For both species, the most northern excursions of the intertropical
convergence zone that occurs at Pacific latitudes encounter increasing
concentrations of both gases.</p>
      <p id="d1e6239">As noted above, anomalies in mlo–cgo differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are poorly
correlated with those in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and in dynamical indices (Tables 3
and 4). Indeed the 3-month average anti-correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that has the
largest magnitude is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.133</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  for March–May and the largest correlation
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.359</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  for April–June and with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for May–July.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Interhemispheric exchange of SF${}_{{6}}$}?><title>Interhemispheric exchange of SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e6353">In the case of SF6 we have analysed the mlo–cgo difference in available NOAA
HATS data from 1998 to 2012 when cgo HATS measurements ceased. Correlations
(Tables 3 and 4) of detrended anomalies in IH differences in SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
those in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are as follows: the February–April correlation is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.619</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the March–May correlation is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.722</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the April–June correlation is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.595</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the May–July correlation is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.303</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the June–August correlation
is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.223</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding correlations with dynamical indices are as
follows: for February–April the correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.617</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the May–July correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.465</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the June–August
correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.433</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the May–July correlation with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.517</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the June–August correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.385</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We note that SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has an anti-correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
February–April that has a larger magnitude than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and even CO. Thus, again there is a significant influence of the Pacific westerly duct, in late
boreal winter and spring, and of the Hadley circulation, in boreal summer and
late spring, as measured by these indices, on the mlo–cgo differences of
SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; these SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> differences exhibit a similar step change in
2009–2010 as shown for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Figs. 2 and 7.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6623">The major El Niño of 2015 and 2016 coincided with record global warming,
with 2016 having the highest global average surface temperatures and 2015 the
third highest (2017 had the second highest). The strength of the Hadley
circulation also increased to unprecedented levels during 2015–2016 and had
a major impact on the mean interhemispheric (IH) transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and on the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration between Mauna Loa and
Cape Grim (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This study has focussed on the roles of IH
transient eddy and mean transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on interannual variations
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and has established dynamical indices that
characterize the broad features of this transfer (Table 1). Interestingly,
some of these indices are based on regions that lie close to or overlap the
region of the Niño 3.4 sea surface temperature (SST) index
(the average SST in the region 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 120–170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), where ENSO is strongly
coupled to the overlying atmosphere (L'Heureux et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e6719">One of these indices, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a measure of eddy IH transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was introduced in FF16. This index is the 300 hPa Pacific
zonal wind averaged between 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 140–170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and is strongly correlated with the Southern Oscillation
(SOI) index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 4a of FF16). A particular focus of that
study was to propose an explanation for the record step in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH
difference between 2009 and 2010 and it was concluded that the closing of the
Pacific duct (negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the El Niño of 2010 was a
significant contributing factor. It was also noted that there were half a
dozen other occasions going back to the 1960s when the closing of the Pacific
duct was related to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH difference (Keeling et
al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e6817">Here, we have extended the analysis of the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 2016. We again find that during boreal winter–spring,
and particularly during February–April when eddy transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
Northern to Southern Hemisphere is most active, there is an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the El Niño of 2015–2016. However, while the timing
of the increases in these years, and for other occasions going back to 1992,
agree with the closing of the Pacific duct, the magnitude is more variable,
indicating the contribution of other processes discussed in Sect. 2. We
have analysed the intermittent nature of the opening and closing of the
Pacific westerly duct. In particular, episodes in February 2015 have been
related to results from NASA (2016) data in the video “Following Carbon
Dioxide through the Atmosphere”. The video provides further evidence of the
propagation of Rossby waves through the open Pacific westerly duct and the
transfer of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the Southern Hemisphere. We have also noted
that large-scale uplift slightly downstream of Asia occurs when the Pacific
duct is open, allowing these substantial emissions to be transported directly,
via Rossby wave dispersion, through the duct.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14848?><p id="d1e6885">A major focus of this article has also been the role of changes in the mean
IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport from the Northern to Southern Hemisphere due to
variability in the Hadley circulation. We have introduced indices (Table 1)
that measure this transfer based on the 300 hPa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the vertical
velocity in pressure coordinates, between 10 and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 200 hPa
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the meridional wind between 5 and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, both zonally averaged
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and with averaging restricted to the
Pacific sector 120–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The correlations for June–August between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have roughly similar
magnitudes to those in February–April involving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
indices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provide similar predictability
of the role of the Hadley circulation in mean IH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does for eddy transport. We have also found that during
2009–2010, the effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reinforce one another to make the step in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mlo</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cgo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> large. In contrast, for 2015–2016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> counteract <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the record Hadley
circulation primarily determines the annual Mauna Loa and Cape Grim
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference. The effects of interannual changes in mean and eddy
transport on IH gradients in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been examined for the period
1992 to 2016.</p>
      <p id="d1e7241">The sign and strength of zonal winds in the Pacific westerly duct
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">duct</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are related to Rossby wave dispersion and breaking and are
correlated with corresponding changes in near-equatorial transient kinetic
energy (Fig. 6; Frederiksen and Webster, 1988), resulting in intermittent
changes in the mixing of trace gases. This effect may not be adequately
represented in the parameterizations (Frederiksen et al., 2017b) used in
atmospheric circulation and transport models. Model determinations of short-term variations in the Hadley circulation exchange are also susceptible to
uncertainties in representations of the equatorial convective dynamics
(Lintner et al., 2004). Over at least 25 years, much of the variability in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two surface monitoring sites of Mauna Loa and Cape
Grim can be associated with dynamical near-equatorial atmospheric indices of
global significance in a changing climate. The changing nature of the
seasonal and inter-annual changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IH Pacific duct eddy and
mean Hadley circulation transfer between 1992 and 2016 provides an
interesting case study and potential test of inversion models of atmospheric
transport.</p>
      <p id="d1e7277">We plan to further explore trace gas IH transfer focussing on Southern
Hemisphere <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stable isotope data in a study that distinguishes
between mean IH transfer and eddy transfers of both current season emissions
and accumulated Northern Hemisphere fossil fuel emissions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e7295">Meteorological data are available from the NOAA/ESRL
website at <uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/</uri> (Kalnay et al., 1996) and from
the NASA website at <uri>https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/</uri> (Rienecker
et al., 2011), trace gas data for CSIRO-monitored species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are available from the
CSIRO website at
<uri>ftp://gaspublic:gaspublic@pftp.csiro.au/pub/data/gaslab/</uri> (CSIRO, 2018)
and the NOAA-monitored SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data are available from the NOAA website at
<uri>ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/sf6/flasks/Otto/monthly/</uri> (NOAA, 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e7366">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14837-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14837-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e7375">JSF provided information on
atmospheric dynamics and the roles of transport mechanisms, and RJF
provided the trace gas information. Both contributed to the writing of the
paper.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e7382">The authors declare that they have no conflicts of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7389">We thank Nada Derek and Stacey Osbrough for assistance with the graphics and
Paul Steele for providing valuable advice on the manuscript. The sustained
focus and innovation of CSIRO GASLAB personnel, and skilled trace gas sample
collection by personnel at the Bureau of Meteorology Cape Grim Baseline
Atmospheric Program and NOAA's Mauna Loa stations underpin the progress
reported here. The dynamics contributions were prepared using data and
software from the NOAA/ESRL Physical Sciences Division website at
<uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/</uri> except, as stated in Sect. 6, where NASA
MERRA data were also used from the website at
<uri>https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/</uri> . We acknowledge NASA Goddard
Flight Center and their Production Team for the video “Following Carbon
Dioxide through the Atmosphere” available on the website at
<uri>https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12445</uri> (last access:
11 October 2018).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Martin Heimann <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: Prabir K. Patra,
Abhishek Chatterjee, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Andres, R. J., Boden, T. A., and Higdon D.: A new evaluation of the
uncertainty associated with CDIAC estimates of fossil fuel carbon dioxide
emission, Tellus B, 66, 23616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v66.23616</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bowman, K. P.  and Cohen, P. J.: Interhemispheric exchange by seasonal
modulation of the Hadley circulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2045–2059, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>British Petroleum: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, available at:
<uri>https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/co2-emissions.html</uri>
(last access: 30 March 2018), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Cai, W., Borlace, S., Lengaigne, M., van Rensch, P., Collins, M., Vecchi, G.,
Timmermann, A., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M. J., Wu, L., England, M. H., Wang,
G., Guilyardi, E., and Jin, F. F.: Increasing frequency of extreme El
Niño events due to greenhouse warming, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 111–116,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2100</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Capotondi, A., Wittenberg, T., Newman, M., Lorenzo, E. D., Yu, J. Y.,
Braconnot, P., Cole, J., Dewitte, B., Giese, B., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F. F.,
Karnauskas, K., Kirtman, B., Lee, T., Schneider, N., Xue, Y., and Yeh, S.
W.: Understanding ENSO diversity, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 921–938,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chatterjee, A., Gierach, M. M., Sutton, A. J., Feely, R. A., Crisp, D.,
Eldering, A., Gunson, M. R., O'Dell, C. W., Stephens, B. B., and Schimel, D.
S.: Influence of El Niño on atmospheric CO2 over the tropical Pacific
Ocean: Findings from NASA's OCO-2 mission, Science, 358, eaam5776,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aam5776</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>CSIRO: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GASLAB data October 2018, Commonwealth
Scientific and Industrial Research<?pagebreak page14849?> Organisation, available at:
<uri>ftp://gaspublic:gaspublic@pftp.csiro.au/pub/data/gaslab/</uri> (last access:
10 October 2018), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Denman, K. L., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P. M.,
Dickinson, R. E., Hauglustaine, D., Heinze, C., Holland, E., Jacob, D.,
Lohmann, U., Ramachandran, S., da Silva Dias, P. L., Wofsy, S. C., and
Zhang, X.: Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and
Biogeochemistry, in:  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning,
M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York,
NY, USA, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Francey, R. J. and Frederiksen, J. S.: Interactive comment on “The
2009–2010 step in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inter-hemispheric difference” by
R. J. Francey and J. S. Frederiksen, available at:
<uri>https://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/C7771/2015/bgd-12-C7771-2015-supplement.pdf</uri>,
Biogeosciences Discuss., 12, C7771–C7771, 18 November 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Francey, R. J. and Frederiksen, J. S.: The 2009–2010 step in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
interhemispheric difference, Biogeosciences, 13, 873–885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-873-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-873-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Frederiksen, J. S.  and Frederiksen, C. S.: Interdecadal changes in Southern
Hemisphere winter storm track modes, Tellus A, 59, 599–617, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Frederiksen, J. S. and Webster, P. J.: Alternative theories of atmospheric
teleconnections and low-frequency fluctuations, Rev. Geophys., 26, 459–494,
1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Frederiksen, C. S., Frederiksen, J. S., Sisson, J. M., and Osbrough, S. L.:
Trends and projections of Southern Hemisphere baroclinicity: The role of
external forcing and impact on Australian rainfall, Clim. Dynam., 48,
3261–3282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3263-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-016-3263-8</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Frederiksen, J. S., Kitsios, V., O'Kane, T. J., and Zidikheri, M. J.:
Stochastic subgrid modelling for geophysical and three-dimensional
turbulence, in: Nonlinear and Stochastic Climate Dynamics, Chapter
9, 241–275, edited by: Franzke, C. J. E. and O'Kane, T. J., Cambridge
University Press, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Freitas, A. C. V., Frederiksen, J. S., O'Kane, T. J., and Ambrizzi, T.:
Simulated austral winter response of the Hadley circulation and stationary
Rossby wave propagation to a warming climate, Clim. Dynam., 49, 521–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3356-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-016-3356-4</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Ishijima, K., Nakazawa, T., and Aoki, S.: Variations of atmospheric nitrous
oxide concentration in the northern and western Pacific, Tellus B, 61,
408–415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00406.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00406.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.
C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
Reanalysis 40-year Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996 (data
available at: <uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/</uri>, last access:
11 October 2018).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Keeling, R. F., Piper, S. C., Bollenbacher, A. F., and Walker, J. S.:
Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records from sites in the SIO air sampling network,
In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change,  Carbon Dioxide Information
Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US
Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Keenan, T. F., Prentice, I. C., Canadell, J. G., Williams, C. A., Wang, H.,
Raupach, M., and Collatz, G. J.: Recent pause in the growth rate of
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake, Nat.
Commun., 7, 13428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms13428</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kim, W. M., Yeh, S. W., Kim, J. H., Kug, J. S., and Kwon, M. H.: The unique
2009–2010 El Niño event: A fast phase transition of warm pool El
Niño to La Niña, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L15809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048521</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Krol, M., de Bruine, M., Killaars, L., Ouwersloot, H., Pozzer, A., Yin, Y.,
Chevallier, F., Bousquet, P., Patra, P., Belikov, D., Maksyutov, S., Dhomse,
S., Feng, W., and Chipperfield, M. P.: Age of air as a diagnostic for
transport timescales in global models, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3109–3130,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3109-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-3109-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz, J.,
Manning, A. C., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson,
R. B., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Andrews, O. D., Arora, V. K., Bakker, D. C.
E., Barbero, L., Becker, M., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L., Chevallier, F., Chini,
L. P., Ciais, P., Cosca, C. E., Cross, J., Currie, K., Gasser, T., Harris,
I., Hauck, J., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Hunt, C. W., Hurtt, G., Ilyina,
T., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Kautz, M., Keeling, R. F., Klein Goldewijk, K.,
Körtzinger, A., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S.,
Lima, I., Lombardozzi, D., Metzl, N., Millero, F., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro,
D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., Nojiri, Y., Padin, X. A., Peregon,
A., Pfeil, B., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rehder, G., Reimer, J., Rödenbeck,
C., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Skjelvan, I., Stocker, B. D., Tian, H.,
Tilbrook, B., Tubiello, F. N., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Werf, G.
R., van Heuven, S., Viovy, N., Vuichard, N., Walker, A. P., Watson, A. J.,
Wiltshire, A. J., Zaehle, S., and Zhu, D.: Global Carbon Budget 2017, Earth
Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-405-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>L'Heureux, M. L., Takahashi, K., Watkins, A. B., Barnston, A. G., Becker, E.
J., Liberto, T. E., Gamble, F., Gottschalck, J., Halpert, M. S., Huang, B.,
Mosquera-Vásquez, K., and Wittenberg, A. T.: Observing and predicting the
2015/16 El Niño, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1363–1382,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0009.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0009.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Lintner, B. R., Gilliand, A. B., and Fung, I. Y.: Mechanisms of
convection-induced modulation of passive tracer interhemispheric transport
annual variability, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D13102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004306</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, K., Patra, P. K., Takigawa, M., Iwasaki, T. and Nakazawa T.:
Global-scale transport of carbon dioxide in the troposphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 113, D15301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009557</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>NASA: Following carbon dioxide through the atmosphere, available at:
<uri>https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12445</uri> (last access: 10 October 2018), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>NOAA: Combined Sulfur hexaflouride data from the NOAA/ESRL Global Monitoring
Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, available at:
<uri>ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/sf6/flasks/Otto/monthly/</uri>, last access:
10 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, S., Webster, P. J., Toma, V., and Chang, H. R.: The effect of
potential vorticity fluxes on the circulation of the<?pagebreak page14850?> tropical upper
troposphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 848–860, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3261</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Krol, M., Aben, I., Monteil, G., Nechita-Banda,
N., Dlugokencky, E. J., Detmers, R., Hasekamp, O., Xu, X., Riley, W. J.,
Poulter, B., Zhang, Z., McDonald, K. C., James W. C. White, J. W. C.,
Philippe Bousquet, P., and Röckmann, T.: Enhanced methane emissions from
tropical wetlands during the 2011 La Niña, Nature Scientific Reports, 7,
45759, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45759" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep45759</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Poulter, B., Frank, D., Ciais, P., Myneni, R. B., Andela, N., Bi, J.,
Broquet, G., Canadell, J. G., Chevallier, F., Liu, Y. Y., Running, S. W.,
Sitch, S., and van der Werf, G. R.: Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to
inter-annual variability of the global carbon cycle, Nature,
509, 600–603, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Price, H., Jaeglé, L., Rice, A., Quay, P., Novelli, P. C., and Gammon, R.:
Global budget of molecular hydrogen and its deuterium content: Constraints
from ground station, cruise, and aircraft observations, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D22108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008152</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J.,
Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G. K., Bloom,
S., Chen, J., Collins, D., Conaty, A., Da Silva, A., Gu, W., Joiner, J.,
Koster, R. D., Lucchesi, R., Molod, A., Owens, T., Pawson, S., Pegion, P.,
Redder, C. R., Reichle, R., Robertson, F. R., Ruddick, A. G., Sienkiewicz,
M., and Woollen, J.: MERRA: NASA's modern-era retrospective analysis for
research and applications, J. Climate, 24, 3624–3648,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1</ext-link>, 2011 (data available at:
<uri>https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/</uri>, last access: 3 June 2018).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Rikus, L.: A simple climatology of westerly jet streams in global reanalysis
datasets part 1: mid-latitude upper tropospheric jets, Clim. Dynam., 50,
2285–2310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2560-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-015-2560-y</ext-link>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Stan, C., Straus, D. M., Frederiksen, J. S., Lin, H., Maloney, E. D., and
Schumacher, C.: Review of tropical-extratropical teleconnections on
intraseasonal time scales, Rev. Geophys., 55, 902–937,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000538" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000538</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Thoning, K. W., Tans, P. P., and Komhyr, W. D.: Atmospheric carbon dioxide at
Mauna Loa Observatory, 2. Analysis of the NOAA/GMCC data, 1974–1985, J.
Geophys. Res., 94, 8549–8565, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Trudinger, C. M., Haverd, V., Briggs, P. R., and Canadell, J. G.: Interannual
variability in Australia's terrestrial carbon cycle constrained by multiple
observation types, Biogeosciences, 13, 6363–6383,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6363-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-6363-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Webster, P. J. and Holton, J. R.: Cross-equatorial response to mid-latitude
forcing in a zonally varying basic state, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 722–733, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Yeh, S. W., Cai, W., Min, S. K., McPhaden, M. J., Dommenget, D., Dewitte, B.,
Collins, M., Ashok, K., An, S. I., Yim, B. Y., and Kug, J. S.: ENSO
atmospheric teleconnections and their response to greenhouse gas forcing,
Rev. Geophys., 185–206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017RG000568</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Yue, C., Ciais, P., Bastos, A., Chevallier, F., Yin, Y., Rödenbeck, C., and
Park, T.: Vegetation greenness and land carbon-flux anomalies associated with
climate variations: a focus on the year 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
13903–13919, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13903-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-13903-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Unprecedented strength of Hadley circulation in 2015–2016 impacts on CO<sub>2</sub> interhemispheric difference</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The extreme El Niño of 2015 and 2016 coincided with record
global warming and unprecedented strength of the Hadley circulation with
significant impact on mean interhemispheric (IH) transport of CO<sub>2</sub>.
The relative roles of eddy transport and mean advective transport on
interannual differences in CO<sub>2</sub> concentration between Mauna Loa and
Cape Grim (<i>C</i><sub>mlo − cgo</sub>), from 1992 through to 2016, are explored. Eddy
transport processes occur mainly in boreal winter–spring when <i>C</i><sub>mlo − cgo</sub>
is large; an important component is due to Rossby wave generation by the
Himalayas and propagation through the equatorial Pacific westerly duct
generating and transmitting turbulent kinetic energy. Mean transport occurs
mainly in boreal summer–autumn and varies with the strength of the Hadley
circulation. The timing of annual changes in <i>C</i><sub>mlo − cgo</sub>  is found to
coincide well with dynamical indices that we introduce to characterize the
transport. During the unrivalled 2009–2010 step in <i>C</i><sub>mlo − cgo</sub>, the effects
of the eddy and mean transport were reinforced. In contrast, for the 2015 to 2016
change in <i>C</i><sub>mlo − cgo</sub>, the mean transport counteracts the eddy transport and
the record strength of the Hadley circulation determines the annual IH
CO<sub>2</sub> difference. The interaction of increasing global warming and
extreme El Niños may have important implications for altering the balance
between eddy and mean IH CO<sub>2</sub> transfer. The effects of interannual
changes in mean and eddy transport on interhemispheric gradients in other
trace gases are also examined.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andres, R. J., Boden, T. A., and Higdon D.: A new evaluation of the
uncertainty associated with CDIAC estimates of fossil fuel carbon dioxide
emission, Tellus B, 66, 23616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23616</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bowman, K. P.  and Cohen, P. J.: Interhemispheric exchange by seasonal
modulation of the Hadley circulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2045–2059, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
British Petroleum: CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, available at:
<a href="https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/co2-emissions.html" target="_blank">https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/co2-emissions.html</a>
(last access: 30 March 2018), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W., Borlace, S., Lengaigne, M., van Rensch, P., Collins, M., Vecchi, G.,
Timmermann, A., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M. J., Wu, L., England, M. H., Wang,
G., Guilyardi, E., and Jin, F. F.: Increasing frequency of extreme El
Niño events due to greenhouse warming, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 111–116,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2100</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Capotondi, A., Wittenberg, T., Newman, M., Lorenzo, E. D., Yu, J. Y.,
Braconnot, P., Cole, J., Dewitte, B., Giese, B., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F. F.,
Karnauskas, K., Kirtman, B., Lee, T., Schneider, N., Xue, Y., and Yeh, S.
W.: Understanding ENSO diversity, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 921–938,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chatterjee, A., Gierach, M. M., Sutton, A. J., Feely, R. A., Crisp, D.,
Eldering, A., Gunson, M. R., O'Dell, C. W., Stephens, B. B., and Schimel, D.
S.: Influence of El Niño on atmospheric CO2 over the tropical Pacific
Ocean: Findings from NASA's OCO-2 mission, Science, 358, eaam5776,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5776</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
CSIRO: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GASLAB data October 2018, Commonwealth
Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, available at:
<a href="ftp://gaspublic:gaspublic@pftp.csiro.au/pub/data/gaslab/" target="_blank">ftp://gaspublic:gaspublic@pftp.csiro.au/pub/data/gaslab/</a> (last access:
10 October 2018), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Denman, K. L., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P. M.,
Dickinson, R. E., Hauglustaine, D., Heinze, C., Holland, E., Jacob, D.,
Lohmann, U., Ramachandran, S., da Silva Dias, P. L., Wofsy, S. C., and
Zhang, X.: Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and
Biogeochemistry, in:  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning,
M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York,
NY, USA, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Francey, R. J. and Frederiksen, J. S.: Interactive comment on “The
2009–2010 step in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inter-hemispheric difference” by
R. J. Francey and J. S. Frederiksen, available at:
<a href="https://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/C7771/2015/bgd-12-C7771-2015-supplement.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/C7771/2015/bgd-12-C7771-2015-supplement.pdf</a>,
Biogeosciences Discuss., 12, C7771–C7771, 18 November 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Francey, R. J. and Frederiksen, J. S.: The 2009–2010 step in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>
interhemispheric difference, Biogeosciences, 13, 873–885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-873-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-873-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Frederiksen, J. S.  and Frederiksen, C. S.: Interdecadal changes in Southern
Hemisphere winter storm track modes, Tellus A, 59, 599–617, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Frederiksen, J. S. and Webster, P. J.: Alternative theories of atmospheric
teleconnections and low-frequency fluctuations, Rev. Geophys., 26, 459–494,
1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Frederiksen, C. S., Frederiksen, J. S., Sisson, J. M., and Osbrough, S. L.:
Trends and projections of Southern Hemisphere baroclinicity: The role of
external forcing and impact on Australian rainfall, Clim. Dynam., 48,
3261–3282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3263-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3263-8</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Frederiksen, J. S., Kitsios, V., O'Kane, T. J., and Zidikheri, M. J.:
Stochastic subgrid modelling for geophysical and three-dimensional
turbulence, in: Nonlinear and Stochastic Climate Dynamics, Chapter
9, 241–275, edited by: Franzke, C. J. E. and O'Kane, T. J., Cambridge
University Press, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Freitas, A. C. V., Frederiksen, J. S., O'Kane, T. J., and Ambrizzi, T.:
Simulated austral winter response of the Hadley circulation and stationary
Rossby wave propagation to a warming climate, Clim. Dynam., 49, 521–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3356-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3356-4</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Ishijima, K., Nakazawa, T., and Aoki, S.: Variations of atmospheric nitrous
oxide concentration in the northern and western Pacific, Tellus B, 61,
408–415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00406.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00406.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.
C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
Reanalysis 40-year Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996 (data
available at: <a href="http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/" target="_blank">http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/</a>, last access:
11 October 2018).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Keeling, R. F., Piper, S. C., Bollenbacher, A. F., and Walker, J. S.:
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> records from sites in the SIO air sampling network,
In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change,  Carbon Dioxide Information
Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US
Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Keenan, T. F., Prentice, I. C., Canadell, J. G., Williams, C. A., Wang, H.,
Raupach, M., and Collatz, G. J.: Recent pause in the growth rate of
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake, Nat.
Commun., 7, 13428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13428</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, W. M., Yeh, S. W., Kim, J. H., Kug, J. S., and Kwon, M. H.: The unique
2009–2010 El Niño event: A fast phase transition of warm pool El
Niño to La Niña, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L15809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048521</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Krol, M., de Bruine, M., Killaars, L., Ouwersloot, H., Pozzer, A., Yin, Y.,
Chevallier, F., Bousquet, P., Patra, P., Belikov, D., Maksyutov, S., Dhomse,
S., Feng, W., and Chipperfield, M. P.: Age of air as a diagnostic for
transport timescales in global models, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3109–3130,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3109-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3109-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz, J.,
Manning, A. C., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson,
R. B., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Andrews, O. D., Arora, V. K., Bakker, D. C.
E., Barbero, L., Becker, M., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L., Chevallier, F., Chini,
L. P., Ciais, P., Cosca, C. E., Cross, J., Currie, K., Gasser, T., Harris,
I., Hauck, J., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Hunt, C. W., Hurtt, G., Ilyina,
T., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Kautz, M., Keeling, R. F., Klein Goldewijk, K.,
Körtzinger, A., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S.,
Lima, I., Lombardozzi, D., Metzl, N., Millero, F., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro,
D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., Nojiri, Y., Padin, X. A., Peregon,
A., Pfeil, B., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rehder, G., Reimer, J., Rödenbeck,
C., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Skjelvan, I., Stocker, B. D., Tian, H.,
Tilbrook, B., Tubiello, F. N., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Werf, G.
R., van Heuven, S., Viovy, N., Vuichard, N., Walker, A. P., Watson, A. J.,
Wiltshire, A. J., Zaehle, S., and Zhu, D.: Global Carbon Budget 2017, Earth
Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
L'Heureux, M. L., Takahashi, K., Watkins, A. B., Barnston, A. G., Becker, E.
J., Liberto, T. E., Gamble, F., Gottschalck, J., Halpert, M. S., Huang, B.,
Mosquera-Vásquez, K., and Wittenberg, A. T.: Observing and predicting the
2015/16 El Niño, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1363–1382,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0009.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0009.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Lintner, B. R., Gilliand, A. B., and Fung, I. Y.: Mechanisms of
convection-induced modulation of passive tracer interhemispheric transport
annual variability, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D13102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004306</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Miyazaki, K., Patra, P. K., Takigawa, M., Iwasaki, T. and Nakazawa T.:
Global-scale transport of carbon dioxide in the troposphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 113, D15301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009557</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
NASA: Following carbon dioxide through the atmosphere, available at:
<a href="https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12445" target="_blank">https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12445</a> (last access: 10 October 2018), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
NOAA: Combined Sulfur hexaflouride data from the NOAA/ESRL Global Monitoring
Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, available at:
<a href="ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/sf6/flasks/Otto/monthly/" target="_blank">ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/sf6/flasks/Otto/monthly/</a>, last access:
10 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Ortega, S., Webster, P. J., Toma, V., and Chang, H. R.: The effect of
potential vorticity fluxes on the circulation of the tropical upper
troposphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 848–860, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3261</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Krol, M., Aben, I., Monteil, G., Nechita-Banda,
N., Dlugokencky, E. J., Detmers, R., Hasekamp, O., Xu, X., Riley, W. J.,
Poulter, B., Zhang, Z., McDonald, K. C., James W. C. White, J. W. C.,
Philippe Bousquet, P., and Röckmann, T.: Enhanced methane emissions from
tropical wetlands during the 2011 La Niña, Nature Scientific Reports, 7,
45759, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45759" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45759</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Poulter, B., Frank, D., Ciais, P., Myneni, R. B., Andela, N., Bi, J.,
Broquet, G., Canadell, J. G., Chevallier, F., Liu, Y. Y., Running, S. W.,
Sitch, S., and van der Werf, G. R.: Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to
inter-annual variability of the global carbon cycle, Nature,
509, 600–603, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Price, H., Jaeglé, L., Rice, A., Quay, P., Novelli, P. C., and Gammon, R.:
Global budget of molecular hydrogen and its deuterium content: Constraints
from ground station, cruise, and aircraft observations, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D22108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008152</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J.,
Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G. K., Bloom,
S., Chen, J., Collins, D., Conaty, A., Da Silva, A., Gu, W., Joiner, J.,
Koster, R. D., Lucchesi, R., Molod, A., Owens, T., Pawson, S., Pegion, P.,
Redder, C. R., Reichle, R., Robertson, F. R., Ruddick, A. G., Sienkiewicz,
M., and Woollen, J.: MERRA: NASA's modern-era retrospective analysis for
research and applications, J. Climate, 24, 3624–3648,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1</a>, 2011 (data available at:
<a href="https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/" target="_blank">https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/</a>, last access: 3 June 2018).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Rikus, L.: A simple climatology of westerly jet streams in global reanalysis
datasets part 1: mid-latitude upper tropospheric jets, Clim. Dynam., 50,
2285–2310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2560-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2560-y</a>, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Stan, C., Straus, D. M., Frederiksen, J. S., Lin, H., Maloney, E. D., and
Schumacher, C.: Review of tropical-extratropical teleconnections on
intraseasonal time scales, Rev. Geophys., 55, 902–937,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000538" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000538</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Thoning, K. W., Tans, P. P., and Komhyr, W. D.: Atmospheric carbon dioxide at
Mauna Loa Observatory, 2. Analysis of the NOAA/GMCC data, 1974–1985, J.
Geophys. Res., 94, 8549–8565, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Trudinger, C. M., Haverd, V., Briggs, P. R., and Canadell, J. G.: Interannual
variability in Australia's terrestrial carbon cycle constrained by multiple
observation types, Biogeosciences, 13, 6363–6383,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6363-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6363-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Webster, P. J. and Holton, J. R.: Cross-equatorial response to mid-latitude
forcing in a zonally varying basic state, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 722–733, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Yeh, S. W., Cai, W., Min, S. K., McPhaden, M. J., Dommenget, D., Dewitte, B.,
Collins, M., Ashok, K., An, S. I., Yim, B. Y., and Kug, J. S.: ENSO
atmospheric teleconnections and their response to greenhouse gas forcing,
Rev. Geophys., 185–206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000568</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Yue, C., Ciais, P., Bastos, A., Chevallier, F., Yin, Y., Rödenbeck, C., and
Park, T.: Vegetation greenness and land carbon-flux anomalies associated with
climate variations: a focus on the year 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
13903–13919, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13903-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13903-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
