<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-14637-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Aerosol chemistry and particle growth events at an urban downwind site in
North China Plain</article-title><alt-title>Aerosol chemistry and particle growth events</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Aerosol chemistry and particle growth events}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Zhang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yingjie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-0244</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7890-3099</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yuying</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-8563</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Qingqing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Haofei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Haitao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Fang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-601X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Hongrong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Bian</surname><given-names>Yuxuan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-417X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Yongxiang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Pingqing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-2280</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Canonaco</surname><given-names>Francesco</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Prévôt</surname><given-names>André S. H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Tong</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-7924</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Pucai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Zhanqing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-382X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff10">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Yele</given-names></name>
          <email>sunyele@mail.iap.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-0221</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of
Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science &amp;
Technology, Nanjing 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>College of Earth Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal
University, Beijing 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Key Laboratory of 3D Information Acquisition and Application of
Ministry of Education, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment
Observation, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of
Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen
PSI 5232, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute
of Urban Environment, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yele Sun (sunyele@mail.iap.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>14637</fpage><lpage>14651</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e295">The North China Plain (NCP) has experienced frequent severe haze pollution
events in recent years. While extensive measurements have been made in
megacities, aerosol sources, processes, and particle growth at urban downwind
sites remain less understood. Here, an aerosol chemical speciation monitor
and a scanning mobility particle sizer, along with a suite of collocated
instruments, were deployed at the downwind site of Xingtai, a highly polluted
city in the NCP, for real-time measurements of submicron aerosol (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
species and particle number size distributions during May and June 2016. The
average mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was 30.5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is significantly lower than that during
wintertime. Organic aerosols (OAs) constituted the major fraction of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(38 %), followed by sulfate (25 %) and nitrate (14 %). Positive
matrix factorization with the multilinear engine version 2 showed that
oxygenated OA (OOA) was the dominant species in OA throughout the study, on
average accounting for 78 % of OA, while traffic and cooking emissions
both accounted for 11 % of OA. Our results highlight that aerosol
particles at the urban downwind site were highly aged and mainly from
secondary formation. However, the diurnal cycle also illustrated the
substantial influence of urban emissions on downwind sites, which are
characterized by similar pronounced early morning peaks for most aerosol
species. New particle formation and growth events were also frequently
observed (58 % of the time) on both clean and polluted days. Particle
growth rates varied from 1.2 to 4.9 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and our results showed that
sulfate and OOA played important roles in particle growth during clean
periods, while OOA was more important than sulfate during polluted events.
Further analyses showed that particle growth rates have no clear dependence
on air mass trajectories.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page14638?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e374">Atmospheric aerosols can reduce visibility (Zhang et al.,
2010), have adverse effects on human health (Chen et al., 2013), and also
affect radiative forcing directly by absorbing and scattering solar radiation
and indirectly by modifying cloud formation and properties (Boucher et al.,
2013). According to the latest report on global urban air quality by the
World Health Organization (WHO), the top 10 most polluted cities in China are
all located in the North China
Plain (NCP). The concentration of particulate matter (PM) less than or equal
to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in diameter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Xingtai was ranked the
highest in China in 2014
(<uri>http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.AMBIENTCITY2016?lang=en</uri>, last
access: 24 September 2017). Although extensive studies have characterized the
formation mechanisms and evolution processes of haze in the NCP (Quan et al.,
2011; Zhao et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017), high
anthropogenic emissions and stagnant meteorological conditions are the major
factors leading to severe PM pollution (R. Zhang et al., 2015; Fu and Chen,
2017; Guo et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2014). Mitigating air pollution in the
NCP remains a challenge. One reason is the complexity of ambient aerosols,
which have largely different compositions and come from different sources
from different regions and cities.</p>
      <p id="d1e399">Xingtai, one of the most polluted cities in China, had an urgent front-burner
environmental problem. PM sources are dynamic and include local emissions,
e.g., biomass burning, traffic, and cooking emissions, and the transport of
pollutants from upwind (east and south) polluted areas (Fu et al., 2014). As
a result, both local and regional sources contribute to high concentrations
of PM, leading to certain uncertainties in air quality control. Although the
annual average concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Xingtai decreased from
160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2013 to 87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2016 (the
data are from four monitoring sites in urban Xingtai that was released by the
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre), it still far exceeds the
Chinese National Air Quality Standard (35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for an
annual average) and that of the WHO (10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition,
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO changed little from 2013 to 2016 while
that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased substantially (Fig. S1). As a response to the
changes in precursors, aerosol particle composition may also change
significantly. Therefore, characterization of the composition, sources, and
processes of PM in regions near Xingtai is important to do so that effective
strategies for future air quality improvements can be provided. Previous
studies carried out in Xingtai have investigated the frequency of haze events
(Fu et al., 2014), ammonia emissions (Zhou et al., 2015), and the sources of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (L. Wang et al., 2015). The results highlighted the importance of
both local (especially industrial) and regional sources of air pollution in
Xingtai. However, real-time characterizations of aerosol composition and
particle number size distributions have not yet been reported. A recent study
conducted in a similarly polluted city, Handan, which is approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km south of Xingtai, showed significant contributions of coal and
biomass combustion to haze formation in winter (Li et al., 2017). However,
aerosol characteristics in Xingtai are not well known and the impacts of
urban emissions on downwind sites also remain poorly understood.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e535"><bold>(a)</bold> Location of the sampling site. <bold>(b)</bold> Average
diurnal evolution of wind vector. The pie chart in <bold>(a)</bold> shows the
average aerosol composition for the entire study.
The two arrows in <bold>(a)</bold> show the daytime and nighttime prevailing wind directions.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e555">In this study, an Aerodyne aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) along
with a suite of collocated instruments was deployed at the downwind site of
Xingtai from 30 April to 20 June 2016 to characterize aerosol chemistry and
particle growth events in spring and summer. The mass concentrations,
chemical composition, and temporal and diurnal variations of submicron
aerosol (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) species are characterized, and the sources of organic
aerosols (OA) are investigated with positive matrix factorization (PMF) and a
FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART) analysis. Also, particle growth
events and their relationship to aerosol chemistry are discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling site</title>
      <p id="d1e578">Xingtai is located in the central-south part of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
region with the Taihang Mountains to the west (Fig. 1a). In this work, all
measurements were made at the Xingtai National Meteorological Basic Station
(XNMBS), a suburban site located approximately 17 km northwest of Xingtai
City (37.18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 114.37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 180 m a.s.l.), from 30 April
to 20 June 2016. The sampling site was influenced<?pagebreak page14639?> by mountain–plain winds
during the study period. As shown in Fig. 1b, the wind direction showed clear
day and night patterns with prevailing south-southeasterly winds in the day
and west-northwesterly winds at night. The average wind speed was
4 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the average temperature was 22.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the
study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e626">All instruments were placed in a container at the sampling site. The
non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical components including sulfate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), chloride
(Chl), and organics (Org) were measured in situ by an ACSM at a time
resolution of 5 min. The ACSM was operated in the same way as in previous studies (Sun et al., 2016b;
Zhang et al., 2016). A PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone (Model: URG-2000-30ED) was supplied
in front of the sampling inlet to remove coarse particles larger than
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The ambient air was drawn into the container through a
0.5 in. (outer diameter) stainless steel tube at a flow rate of
3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using an external pump, of which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
was sub-sampled into the ACSM. The sampling height was approximately
2 m, and the particle residence time in the sampling tube
was about 5 s. Aerosol particles were then dried by a silica gel diffusion
dryer before sampling into the ACSM. Before the campaign, the ACSM was
calibrated with pure ammonium nitrate particles following the standard
protocols in Ng et al. (2011b). Because the ACSM does not measure refractory
black carbon (BC), a seven-wavelength Aethalometer (model AE33, Magee
Scientific Corp.; Drinovec et al., 2015) was used to measure BC.</p>
      <p id="d1e734">The size-resolved particle number concentrations in the size range from 15 to 685 nm
were measured in situ by a
condensation particle counter (CPC, model 3775, TSI) equipped with a long
differential mobility analyzer (DMA, model 3081A, TSI). The time resolution
is 5 min. The total number concentrations (7–2000 nm) were measured by a
mixing condensation particle counter (MCPC, model 1720, Brechtel). Other
collocated measurements included the light extinction of dry PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
630 nm measured by a cavity attenuated phase shift extinction monitor (CAPS
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ext</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Massoli et al., 2010); the mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured by a six-channel particle counter (manufactured by Graywolf); and
gaseous species of CO, NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured by gas analyzers (manufactured by ECOTECH). Meteorological
parameters including ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative humidity (RH), wind
speed (WS), wind direction (WD), precipitation, and solar radiation were also
measured at the same site by the Xingtai Meteorological Administration.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>ACSM data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e817">ACSM data were analyzed using the ACSM standard software (version 1.5.3.0)
within the Igor Pro software environment (Wave Metrics, Inc., Oregon, USA).
The default relative ionization efficiencies for all species except
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were used in the study. That for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined from
the ionization efficiency calibration. A collection efficiency (CE) of 0.5
was used to account for the incomplete detection of aerosol species, mainly
due to particle bounce at the vaporizer (Matthew et al., 2008). The CE can be
composition dependent and especially sensitive to the fraction of ammonium
nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as affected by particle acidity and RH
(Middlebrook et al., 2012). In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominated inorganic
species and the average contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 18 %
(maximum: 38 %), which would not affect CE substantially. Aerosol
particles were slightly acidic, as indicated by the average ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
of measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is required to fully
neutralize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Chl (Zhang et al., 2007), which are
also not acidic enough to affect the CE. Default relative ionization
efficiencies (RIEs) were used except for ammonium (5.0) and sulfate (0.98),
which were determined from pure ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate,
respectively. In addition, to reduce the influence of RH on CE, a silica gel
diffusion dryer was deployed to keep the RH in the sampling line below
40 %. In fact, the differences in mass concentrations were less than
5 % between composition-dependent CE and a constant CE of 0.5 in this
study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e942">Mass spectral profiles <bold>(a)</bold> and time series of the mass
concentrations of three OA factors <bold>(b)</bold>, i.e., HOA, COA, and OOA.
Time series of the mass concentrations of BC and sulfate (right axis) are
also shown.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e957">Figure S2 shows the comparison between the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass (equal to
NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC) and particle volume concentrations measured by the
SMPS. Particle volume concentrations were highly correlated with total
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.51). We then
estimated the particle density using the chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Du
et al., 2017). The average density during the study period was
1.5 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming spherical particles, the calculated SMPS mass
reports 75 % of the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass. Such a difference may be caused
by measurement uncertainties between different instruments, the effects of
particle shape, and the uncertainties in estimating particle density.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1053">To determine the sources of OA, ACSM mass spectra were processed using the
Multilinear Engine version 2 (ME-2) algorithm implemented with the toolkit
called Source Finder (Canonaco et al., 2013). The so-called <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
approach allows the user to introduce a priori information in the form of
known factor profiles or time series to obtain a unique solution and thus
reduce the rotational ambiguity of the PMF algorithm. The mass spectra and
error matrices of OA were prepared according to the procedures detailed by
Ulbrich et<?pagebreak page14640?> al. (2009) and Zhang et al. (2011). Given the interference of the
internal standard of naphthalene at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 127–129 and the low
signal-to-noise ratios of larger ions, we only considered <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values below
120 in this study. A reference hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA) profile, which is
the average of multiple ambient data sets (Ng et al., 2011), and a reference
cooking OA (COA) profile in Beijing (Sun et al., 2013) were introduced to
constrain the model performance with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values varying from 0 to 1.
Following the guidelines presented by Canonaco et al. (2013) and Crippa et
al. (2014), an optimal solution involving three factors with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of
0.2 was accepted. Some important criteria for selecting the optimal solution
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values varying from 0 to 1 are shown in Figs. S3–S7. The mass
spectra and time series of three OA factors are shown in Fig. 2.</p>
      <p id="d1e1109">The HOA factor has a similar mass spectrum to that of freshly emitted traffic
or other fossil-fuel combustion aerosols with major peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equal to
41, 43, 55, and 57. HOA was moderately correlated with BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The COA resolved in Xingtai had a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 2.3, within the range of values for COA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Mohr et al., 2012). We further evaluated the factors of HOA and COA
assuming that BC is predominantly from traffic emissions while the
contribution from cooking emissions is minor. POA from the two-factor
solution was highly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with BC between 01:00 and 10:00 when cooking emissions were not
significant (Fig. S8). The ratios of POA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC were also the lowest during
this period, suggesting the dominant contribution of HOA to POA. We then used
the average ratio of POA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC (0.62) during this period to estimate the
concentrations of HOA and COA. The estimated HOA and COA both contributed
11 % to OA on average, consistent with the results of the ME-2 analysis.
This suggested that the results from ME-2 analysis are reasonable.</p>
      <p id="d1e1205">The mass spectrum of oxygenated OA (OOA) is characterized by a prominent peak
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 (23.6 % of the total OOA signal), which has also been
reported in previous studies. In addition, OOA was highly correlated with
sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and moderately correlated with nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that OOA is a surrogate of secondary OA (SOA; Fig. 2). We
also performed a PMF analysis by applying the PMF2 algorithm to the
ACSM-measured OA. Although the two-factor solution identifies a primary OA
(POA) and an OOA, solutions with three to five factors show a splitting and
mixing of factors. Therefore, the ME-2 algorithm was used in this study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1252">Time series of <bold>(a)</bold> temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in black) and relative
humidity (RH, in magenta), <bold>(b)</bold> wind direction (WD, in orange) and
wind speed (WS, in black), <bold>(c)</bold> particle extinction coefficient
(Ext., in orange) and precipitation (Precip., in purple),
<bold>(d)</bold> particle number size distribution, <bold>(e)</bold> mass concentrations of Org,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Chl, and BC, and <bold>(f)</bold> mass
fractional contribution of chemical species to total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Polluted
events (PEs) and clean periods (CPs) are marked as shaded orange and blue
areas, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Source region analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1336">The footprints of the selected episodes were determined using backward
simulations from FLEXPART, a Lagrangian transport and dispersion model (Stohl
et al., 2005). The model calculated the 36 h backward trajectories of
10 000 particles released every hour from the sampling site at a height of
180 m above sea level. The meteorological data driving the model were
simulated by version 3.4 of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model
with a 1 h time resolution and a 10 km spatial resolution. The WRF model
was driven by initial and boundary conditions from National Centers for
Environmental Prediction global reanalysis data.</p>
      <p id="d1e1339">The 72 h back trajectories at a height of 500 m were calculated every hour
using the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian<?pagebreak page14641?> Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT)
model (Stein et al., 2015) at the XNMBS. To investigate the chemical
characteristics of aerosols from different source regions, a cluster analysis
was then performed on the trajectories and three clusters were identified
according to their similarities in spatial distributions.</p>
      <p id="d1e1342">In addition, non-parametric wind regression (NWR; Petit et al., 2017) was
performed to evaluate the sources of local emissions and regional transport
for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol species and OA factors. The NWR plots represent the
probability that a specific compound or source is located in a certain wind
direction.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Aerosol composition and temporal variations</title>
      <p id="d1e1366">The temporal variations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol species and meteorological
parameters (RH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, WS, WD, and precipitation) are shown in Fig. 3. The
average mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (equal to NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC) was
30.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and ranged from 0.2 to
140.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Several pollution episodes usually lasting
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3 days were observed during the study period, e.g., on 9–11,
17–23, 28–31 May, and 2–4 June. These pollution episodes were quickly
cleaned, mainly by wet scavenging. The temporal variations varied differently
among different chemical species. Organics showed dramatic variations,
ranging from 0.01 to 101.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and comprised the major
fraction of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for most of the time in this study. High concentration
peaks of organics were frequently observed, likely due to the influences of
local emissions. By contrast, sulfate concentrations obviously increased and
remained relatively high during the pollution events, suggesting the
important role of regional transport at the downwind site of Xingtai. The
average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration was 45.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Although the average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration was 15 % lower than
that (53.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at the urban sites in Xingtai, it
exceeded the Chinese National Ambient Air Quality Standards by 29 %.
These results suggest that the urban downwind sites also experience similar
PM pollution events as the urban sites. For example, the daily PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exceeded the Chinese National Ambient Air Quality Standards 24 % of the
time during this study. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was highly correlated with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and on average, comprised <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
average mass concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to that measured in Xinzhou
(35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a city in central China (Wang et al., 2016), but
lower than that measured in 2013 in Xianghe (73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a
rural site near Beijing (Sun et al., 2016a; Fig. S9). One possible
explanation is the significant improvement in air quality during the last
4 years (Fig. S1).</p>
      <?pagebreak page14642?><p id="d1e1664">On average, OA was the largest component of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, accounting for 38 %
of the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass, followed by sulfate (25 %), nitrate
(14 %), ammonium (10 %), and BC (10 %; Fig. 1a). POA (equal to
HOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> COA) and SOA (OOA) accounted for 22 % and 78 %,
respectively, of the total OA mass. Together, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
comprised of primary-related materials (POA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC) and 82 % was from
secondary formation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating
that aerosol particles from secondary aerosol formation processes dominated
at the downwind site of Xingtai. Compared with aerosol composition in
megacities in the NCP, e.g., Beijing (Hu et al., 2016), aerosol composition
in this study showed substantially higher contributions of SOA (29 %) and
BC (10 %), while the contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (14 %) and COA
(4 %) were low due to the lesser amount of local traffic and cooking
emissions. The nitrate contribution was similar to that observed at a
suburban site in Xinzhou (Wang et al., 2016), but the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
contribution was relatively low (25 % vs. 32 %). One reason is that
the higher RH (70 % vs. 52 %) in Xinzhou facilitated the formation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during this study period was more
than twice as low as that in winter (151 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S10),
suggesting different sources between spring–summer and winter. For example, the winter season
has significantly enhanced coal combustion emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e1814">We also investigated the compositional differences between clean periods and
polluted events (Fig. 3). Secondary inorganic aerosols (SIA) including
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (26 % vs. 21 %), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15 % vs. 9 %), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10 % vs. 7 %) showed enhanced contributions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during polluted events, while a corresponding decrease was found for
organics. For example, the contribution of SIA increased by 14 % from
37 % during clean periods to 51 % during polluted events, while
organics and BC decreased by 9 % and 3 %, respectively. Although SOA
dominated the OA composition during both polluted events and clean periods,
SOA also contributed more to OA during polluted events (78 % vs.
72 %). Comparatively, POA (HOA and COA) was relatively more important
than SOA during clean periods. These results suggest that PM at the downwind
site of Xingtai was mainly affected by regional transport and secondary
formation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1861">Average diurnal cycles of chemical species of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OA
factors during the entire study period, as well as polluted events (PEs) and clean
periods (CPs).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1882">Bivariate polar plots of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species as a function of wind
speed and wind direction: <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> Org.,
<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(f)</bold> Chl, <bold>(g)</bold> BC, <bold>(h)</bold> HOA, <bold>(i)</bold> COA, and
<bold>(j)</bold> OOA. The color scales in <bold>(a–j)</bold> range from 0 to 44, 17,
11, 7.2, 4.5, 1.9, 4.1, 2.0, 2.7, and 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Diurnal patterns</title>
      <p id="d1e2003">Aerosol species showed distinctly different diurnal patterns in this study
(Fig. 4), indicating that the sources and formation processes of PM
pollutants were different. The diurnal cycle of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was characterized by
peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10:00 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21:00 local time (LT). The first peak in
the late morning was consistent with that of gas pollutants including CO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S12). Through comparisons with
the diurnal cycle of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the urban site in Xingtai (Fig. S13) and
daily variations in WD (Fig. 1), the morning peak was mainly associated with
the transport of pollutants from urban sites located to the southeast.</p>
      <p id="d1e2061">The high concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at night was clearly associated with
enhanced primary emission concentrations, e.g., HOA and COA, although the
shallower boundary layer may have also played a role. It is interesting to
note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ext</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did not show a pronounced nighttime peak as did
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the extinction coefficients of primary aerosols
were smaller than those of secondary aerosol species (Q. Wang et al., 2015).
The diurnal pattern of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> only showed a pronounced peak at night during
clean periods, consistent with those of HOA and COA. While the diurnal
variations support the enhanced roles of primary emissions for PM during
clean periods, they also indicate the lesser influences from urban emissions
during daytime.</p>
      <p id="d1e2102">The diurnal pattern of organics overall resembles that of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and was
characterized by two pronounced peaks between 09:00–12:00 and
19:00–21:00 LT. However, the three OA factors showed different diurnal
cycles. The average diurnal cycle of HOA showed a small morning peak and a
pronounced nighttime peak. While the two peaks were comparable during
polluted periods, only the pronounced nighttime peak was observed during
clean periods. As shown in Fig. S11a, winds were dominantly from the
south-southeast during polluted periods and mainly from the west-northwest
during clean periods. These results suggest that the high morning HOA peak
was mainly caused by the transport of pollutants from urban sites, while
local traffic emissions became an important source of HOA at night. This is
also consistent with what is seen in the corresponding bivariate polar plot
(Fig. 5h), which shows high concentrations of HOA in regions to the
south-southeast and to the north. The decrease in HOA during the day was
mainly associated with the rising planetary boundary layer height.</p>
      <p id="d1e2114">The diurnal pattern of COA (Fig. 4h) was also similar to that observed in
megacities (Sun et al., 2013; Crippa et al., 2013; Elser et al., 2016;
Y. J. Zhang et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016) and was
characterized by two peaks around the mealtime hours, reflecting the
influence of cooking emissions. However, the COA concentration in this study
was much lower than that reported in megacities (e.g., peak concentration:
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing; Hu et
al., 2016), suggesting much lower cooking emissions at the suburban site. The
corresponding bivariate polar plot further shows that the high concentration
of COA mainly originated from restaurants and inhabitants' activities to the
southeast of the site (Fig. 5i).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2158">Time series of particle number concentrations for
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>7–15</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated from the differences between MCPC
and SMPS measurements, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–40</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15–40 nm),
<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>40–100</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (40–100 nm),
<bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>100–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (100–685  nm), and <bold>(e)</bold> all
particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15–685 nm). The gap in <bold>(a)</bold> is
mainly due to the malfunction of MCPC during this period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2241">Overall, the diurnal cycle of OOA (Fig. 4i) was flat during both clean and
polluted periods in this study, reflecting regional characteristics. This is
also consistent with the wide distribution of OOA seen in the corresponding
bivariate polar plot (Fig. 5j). Secondary inorganic species of nitrate and
sulfate had different diurnal profiles. Nitrate had a pronounced diurnal
cycle with much higher concentrations at night than during the day. As shown
in Fig. 4d, the nitrate concentration decreased from 6.0 to
2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between 11:00 and 19:00 LT, which was mainly due
to the evaporative loss of particulate ammonium nitrate particles due to high
temperatures. Such diurnal cycles have been observed many times during the
summer in megacities, e.g., Beijing (Sun et al., 2012), Nanjing (Ge et al.,
2017), and Lanzhou (Xu et al., 2016), as well as those on other continents (e.g., Lanz et
al., 2007). Nitrate also showed an increase in the early morning after
sunrise (Fig. 4d). While the transport from urban sites played a role, this
increase was mainly caused by daytime photochemical production when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was
not high enough to substantially affect gas partitioning. During daytime
clean periods, the diurnal cycle of nitrate was flat, with higher
concentrations at night. Sulfate showed a much smoother diurnal evolution
compared with nitrate (Fig. 4c), reflecting the regional characteristics of
sulfate. Two small peaks were observed during the day. While the first peak
between 09:00 and 11:00 LT was most likely from urban transport, consistent
with regional sources from the southeast indicated by the corresponding
bivariate polar plot (Fig. 5c), the second one was<?pagebreak page14644?> more likely from daytime
photochemical production. Chloride accounted for a small fraction of the
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass, yet it showed a strong diurnal cycle with a pronounced peak in
the morning (Fig. 4e). This peak was noticeably similar to those of CO and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S11a and c), suggesting that the dominant source was from
combustion emissions in the southeast.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Particle number size distributions</title>
      <p id="d1e2296">Figure 6 shows the time series of total number concentration (15–685 nm,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and three different modes including the small Aitken mode
(15–40 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–40</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the large Aitken mode (40–100 nm,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>40–100</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the accumulation mode (100–400 nm,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>100–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as particles in the range of 7–15 nm
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>7–15</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that were calculated from the difference between MCPC and
SMPS measurements. The corrections for diffusion loss and multiple charges
have been applied in SMPS data analysis. The average total number
concentration was 11 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5800 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is comparable to that
measured in Shangdianzi (12 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Shen et al., 2011) and Yufa
(10 200 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Peng et al., 2014) and slightly higher than that
observed in Beijing (10 100 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Du et al., 2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
showed a pronounced diurnal cycle with a clear increase during the day
(Fig. 7e). A further analysis highlights that this increase was mainly driven
by small and large Aitken mode particles, indicating the impacts of new
particle formation and growth on the diurnal variations in particle number
(Fig. S14). For example, the small Aitken-mode particles and ultrafine
particles showed rapid daytime increases after sunrise by more than a factor
of 5 during both polluted events and clean periods. Note that the number
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>7–15</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during clean periods was much higher than
during polluted events (6600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 3300 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, on average),
which is comparable to the number concentration of small Aitken-mode
particles. These results show that (1) new particle formation was much
stronger on clean days than on polluted days, and (2) new particle formation
also occurred on polluted days, with newly formed particles growing quickly
due to the higher condensation sink (CS; 0.05 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. About 49 % of
the total particle number was made up of large Aitken-mode particles.
However, these particles accounted for a small fraction of the total volume
concentration (5 %). We also note that the pronounced nighttime peak in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>40–100</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coincidently agrees with that of COA during clean periods,
suggesting the influence of cooking emissions on large Aitken-mode particles.
We calculated the particle number size distribution for two nights that
experienced significant cooking emission events, i.e., 2 and 13 May. Narrow
single-mode distributions peaking at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm were seen (Fig. S15),
supporting the influence of cooking emissions on large Aitken-mode particles.
The diurnal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>100–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was relatively flat except for a
small morning peak (Fig. 7d). This is also consistent with results from the
corresponding bivariate polar plot (Fig. S16d). The number concentration of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>100–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during polluted events was more than a factor of
3–4 times that during clean periods, which contributes toward the major
difference in particle number characteristics between polluted events and
clean periods. One reason is the higher CS during polluted events, which
facilitated the growth of particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e2528">Diurnal cycles of particle number concentration for
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>7–15</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated from the differences between MCPC
and SMPS measurements, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–40</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15–40 nm),
<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>40–100</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (40–100 nm),
<bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>100–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (100–685  nm), and <bold>(e)</bold> all
particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15–685 nm). Overall mean cycles are shown as
black lines. Mean cycles for polluted events (PEs) and clear periods (CPs) are
shown as red and blues lines, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2608">Figure 8 shows that the average particle number concentration had a bimodal
size distribution with the geometric<?pagebreak page14645?> mean diameter (GMD) peaking at 46 and
106 nm. Note that the peak diameter for the entire study was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, which is higher than that observed in urban Beijing (45 nm;
Du et al., 2017). The higher CS (0.36 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.29 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be
one of the reasons leading to more water vapor condensing on preexisting
particles at the rural site. This is also consistent with the shift in the
peak diameter from 57 nm during clean periods to 88 nm during polluted
events. Although similar bimodal size distribution modes peaking at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (41 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">109</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (106 nm) were observed during clean
periods and polluted events, respectively, the relative contributions of the
two modes were largely different. While the particle number concentration was
dominated by the small mode (56 %) during clean periods, the large mode
was more important during polluted events, accounting for 73 % of the
particle number concentration (Table 1). These results confirm the different
roles of different mode particles between clean periods and polluted events.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e2672">Comparison of aerosol properties and meteorological parameters
between polluted events and clean periods.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Polluted</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Clean</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">events</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">periods</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Org</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">COA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Particle number concentration (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–40</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2176</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2471</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>40–100</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6095</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5308</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>100–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5424</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2977</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>15–685</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 696</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 756</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Gaseous species </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO (ppm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">81.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Meteorological parameters </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3127">Average particle number size distributions during <bold>(a)</bold> the
entire study, <bold>(b)</bold> polluted events, and <bold>(c)</bold> clean periods.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3147">Average diurnal evolution of particle number size distributions and
aerosol composition for new particle growth events during <bold>(a)</bold> the
entire study, <bold>(b)</bold> polluted events, and <bold>(c)</bold> clean periods.
The black solid lines in the top three panels show the diurnal cycles of CS.
The circles and squares show the GMD from the log-normal fitting from this
study and in Beijing (Du et al., 2017), respectively. The average diurnal
cycles of aerosol species and CO-normalized aerosol species during polluted
events and clean periods are shown in <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Particle growth events</title>
      <p id="d1e3177">New particle growth events (NPEs) were frequently observed during the study
period. As shown in Fig. 9a, particle growth typically started at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 08:00 LT and ended at midnight with an increase in GMD from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. This result is consistent with those previously
reported for rural sites in the NCP (Wang et al., 2013) and urban sites,
e.g., Beijing (Du et al., 2017). Note that the growth sizes of particles were
overall larger than those observed in urban Beijing (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm), likely indicating a stronger aging process at the suburban site.
The growth of particles tracked the diurnal cycle of CS, which showed a
continuous increase from early morning to midnight. Although ACSM only has a good
transmission for particles within the size range between 70 and 500 nm
in diameter (Jayne et al., 2000), some particles from the small Aitken mode
might not be detected by the ACSM. Simultaneous comparison between aerosol
chemical composition and particle size distribution during the growth period
make some sense. Aerosol composition seemed to significantly change during
the growth period. As shown in Fig. 9a, OOA and sulfate were the only two
species whose contributions increased, going from 26 % to 33 % and
27 % to 33 %, respectively, during the growth period
(10:00–18:00 LT). Although the increases in sulfate and OOA were partly due
to the decreases in nitrate and chloride because of the evaporative loss in
the afternoon, the CO-normalized sulfate and OOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) also showed increases. Note that CO here was subtracted by a
background<?pagebreak page14646?> value of 0.068 ppm that was calculated as the average of the
lowest 5 % data in this study. These results show that both sulfate and
OOA played important roles in daytime particle growth.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3257"><bold>(a)</bold> Particle growth rates (GRs) and the corresponding
aerosol composition during the growth period, <bold>(b)</bold> the relationship
between GR and CS, color-coded by OOA/PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> the
relationship between GR and sulfate concentration, color-coded by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The numbers over the circles in <bold>(b)</bold> represent
different source regions (Fig. 11) and the triangles represent data without
information about composition.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3304">We also examined particle growth events on polluted days and clean days. As
shown in Fig. 9b and c, the growth process of particles on polluted days
started at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12:00 LT with the GMD increasing from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm in 6 h. Particle growth started earlier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10:00 LT) on clean
days with the GMD increasing from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. Particle growth
on polluted days was faster than on clean days, which was likely due to the
higher CS on polluted days. This is also consistent with more significant
increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sulfate</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on polluted days. The
increase in CS between 09:00 and 12:00 LT on polluted days was associated
with the corresponding increases in most aerosol species. However, the
CO-normalized aerosol species did not show such an increase during this
period suggesting that aerosol species and gaseous species were from the same
air mass, i.e., transported in from urban sites. Such a pattern was not
observed on clean days. Particle growth at night was more clearly seen on
clean days than on polluted days, consistent with the increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, such an increase was not observed for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sulfate</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on clean days, suggesting that OOA played a more important
role than sulfate in particle growth at night.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3413">Particle GR and sulfate concentrations during the days shown in
Fig. 10a with different footprints: <bold>(a)</bold> north,
<bold>(b)</bold> southwest, and <bold>(c)</bold> east-southeast.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p id="d1e3433">Average composition of aerosol particles and particle number
concentration for three different clusters.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14637/2018/acp-18-14637-2018-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page14647?><p id="d1e3442">We further calculated the particle growth rate (GR) of each growth event that
lasted more than 3 h (Fig. 10a and Table S1). The particle growth
rates were calculated using Eq. (1).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M230" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the geometric mean diameter from the log-normal fitting
of each size distribution and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the increase in diameter
during the growth period of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The particle GR varied from 1.2 to
4.7 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which generally falls within the range of values
(1–20 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on observations from around the world (Kulmala et
al., 2004; Yu et al., 2017). As indicated in Fig. 10b, GR was positively
correlated with CS for most of the time, mainly for the fraction of OOA
higher than 30 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S17a). As CS increased from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.05 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, GR increased from 3 to 5 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Higher CS is
usually associated with lower particle GR due to faster consumption of
condensable vapors. The positive relationship between GR and CS might
indicate that the source of condensable vapors contributes to the increase in
CS prior to the observation. Another possible explanation is that
heterogeneous surface chemistry was more important than CS in growing aerosol
particles in highly polluted environment (Kulmala et al., 2017). Figure 10b
also showed some low GRs with high CS, which were characterized by low
contributions of OOA. These results support the importance of the involvement
of OOA in particle growth (Wu et al., 2017). Figure 10c further shows that GR
was positively correlated with the concentration of sulfate during periods
with low sulfate mass loadings (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Fig. S17b), while periods with higher concentrations of sulfate had lower
GRs. This is corroborated by Fig. S18, showing that GR decreased as the
sulfate contribution increased. By contrast, GR was positively correlated
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
most of the time. These results highlight that OOA played a more important
role in particle growth than sulfate, although sulfate was also important
during periods with low mass loadings. We further checked the dependence of
GR on source region, but no clear relationship was found. For example, GR
varied from 1.6 to 3.2 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during periods with air masses from the
north, 1.8–4.9 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the southwest, and 1.8–4.6 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the east-southeast (Fig. 11). This shows that GR had no clear dependence
on air masses from different regions, although sulfate concentrations showed
much difference.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Aerosol composition and particle number concentrations from
different source regions</title>
      <p id="d1e3693">Figure 12 shows the average composition and particle number distributions
from different source regions. The air masses in cluster 3 (C3, 39 % of
the time) were mainly from the southeast while the other two clusters were
mainly from the northwest. The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for C3 was
42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % higher than that from the
other two source regions. The high mass loadings for this cluster suggest
that source regions to the southeast were responsible for the high PM pollution at the sampling site.
This is also<?pagebreak page14648?> supported by the bivariate polar plots of aerosol species with
high concentration regions in the southeast (Fig. 5). Among all clusters, the
two dominant species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were SOA (26 %–28 %) and sulfate
(26 %–29 %). Overall, the aerosol bulk composition for the three
clusters from different source areas was similar. These results suggest that
aerosol particles were relatively well mixed over the region around Xingtai.
Particle number concentrations showed more differences among the different
clusters. The two clusters from the northwest were both dominated by large
Aitken-mode particles, on average accounting for 49 % and
51 % of the total particles, respectively. Although large Aitken-mode particles dominated the
total particle number for C3, we also observed large increases in
accumulation-mode particles (39 %) compared with the other two clusters
(28 %–30 %). These results suggest that air masses from the
northwest were relatively clean, which led to a more frequent occurrence of
new particle formation and growth events, while those from the southeast with
higher PM loadings tended to form more large particles due to the high CS.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3750">We presented an analysis of aerosol chemistry and particle growth events at
an urban downwind site in the NCP during May and June of 2016 using real-time
measurements from an ACSM, an SMPS, and a suite of collocated instruments.
Our results showed that the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level in spring and summer
(30.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was much lower than that during wintertime when
coal combustion emissions were enhanced. Similar to previous studies with a
focus on the NCP, aerosol composition at the downwind site of Xingtai was
dominated by organics (38 %), 78 % of which was identified as
secondary<?pagebreak page14649?> OA according to the ME-2 analysis. Secondary aerosols (i.e.,
SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SOA) accounted for 78 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, highlighting the major
source of secondary formation and regional transport at the downwind site.
Local sources of PM from traffic and cooking emissions accounted for less
than 10 % of the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass. We also observed daytime transport
from urban sites leading to similar pronounced early morning peaks for most
aerosol species. New particle growth events were frequently observed
(58 % of the time) during the study period. By linking the GR with
aerosol composition, we found that OOA and sulfate were two major species
affecting the growth of particles. In particular, both OOA and sulfate played
important roles in particle growth during clean periods, while OOA was more
important than sulfate during polluted events. This is also supported by the
decrease in GR as the sulfate contribution increased. A further analysis
showed that particle growth rates have no clear dependence on air mass
trajectories.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3812">The data in this study are available from the authors upon
request (sunyele@mail.iap.ac.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3815">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14637-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14637-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e3824">YS and ZL designed research. YZ, WD, YW, QW, HW, HZ, FZ, HS, YB, YH, PF,
TZ, PW, and YS performed research. FC and AP shared the data analysis
software. YZ, WD, and YS analyzed the data and wrote the paper. YZ and WD
have contributed equally to this work.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e3830">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e3836">This article is part of the special issue “Regional transport
and transformation of air pollution in eastern China”. It is not associated
with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3842">This study was supported by the National Key Project of Basic Research
(2013CB955801, 2014CB447900) and the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (41575120).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Hang
Su<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., and Lohmann, U.: Clouds and Aerosols:
in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels,
A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK, New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use
of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment:
ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6,
3649–3661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Ebenstein, A., Greenstone, M., and Li, H.: From the cover: evidence
on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from
China's Huai River policy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 12936–12941, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Mohr, C., Heringa, M. F., Chirico,
R., Poulain, L., Freutel, F., Sciare, J., Cozic, J., Di Marco, C. F.,
Elsasser, M., Nicolas, J. B., Marchand, N., Abidi, E., Wiedensohler, A.,
Drewnick, F., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Nemitz, E., Zimmermann, R.,
Jaffrezo, J.-L., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Wintertime
aerosol chemical composition and source apportionment of the organic fraction
in the metropolitan area of Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 961–981,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-961-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-961-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D.,
Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo, P.
F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M.,
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski,
S., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger,
U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25
AMS data sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source
apportionment approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14650?><ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Mocnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl,
C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and
Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of
aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Du, W., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Xu, W., Chen, C., Han, T.,
Zhang, F., Li, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Wang, Z., and Sun, Y.: Simultaneous
measurements of particle number size distributions at ground level and 260 m
on a meteorological tower in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
6797–6811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6797-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6797-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Elser, M., Huang, R.-J., Wolf, R., Slowik, J. G., Wang, Q., Canonaco, F., Li,
G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Cao, J.,
Baltensperger, U., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: New insights
into PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition and sources in two major cities in China
during extreme haze events using aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 3207–3225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fu, G. Q., Xu, W. Y., Yang, R. F., Li, J. B., and Zhao, C. S.: The
distribution and trends of fog and haze in the North China Plain over the
past 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11949–11958,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Fu, H. and Chen, J.: Formation, features and controlling strategies of severe
haze-fog pollutions in China, Sci. Total Environ., 578, 121–138,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Ge, X., He, Y., Sun, Y., Xu, J., Wang, J., Shen, Y., and Chen, M.:
Characteristics and formation mechanisms of fine particulate nitrate in
typical urban areas in China, Atmosphere, 8, 62, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos8030062</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Elucidating severe
urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1419604111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu, Y.,
Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical composition,
sources, and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing: contrast between
summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024020</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb, C.
E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size
and composition analysis of submicron particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33,
49–70, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Vehkamäki, H., Petäjä, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A.,
Kerminen, V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates
of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol
Sci., 35, 143–176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V. M., Petaja, T., Ding, A. J., and Wang, L.:
Atmospheric gas-to-particle conversion: why NPF events are observed in
megacities?, Faraday Discuss., 200, 271–288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FD00257A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C6FD00257A</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C.,
and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of submicron organic
aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass
spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1503–1522,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Li, H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Chen, C., Wang, L., Wei, Z., Zhou, S.,
Parworth, C., Zheng, B., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Chen, P.,
Zhang, H., Wallington, T. J., and He, K.: Wintertime aerosol chemistry and
haze evolution in an extremely polluted city of the North China Plain:
significant contribution from coal and biomass combustion, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 4751–4768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., and Chan, C. K.:
Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in
China: A review, Atmos. Environ., 158, 270–304, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.:
Aerosol light extinction measurements by cavity attenuated phase shift (CAPS)
spectroscopy: laboratory validation and field deployment of a compact aerosol
particle extinction monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 428–435, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Matthew, B. M., Middlebrook, A. M., and Onasch, T. B.: Collection
efficiencies in an aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer as a function of
particle phase for laboratory generated aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
884–898, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies for the aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer using field data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Slowik, J. G.,
Richter, R., Reche, C., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Seco, R., Peñuelas, J.,
Jiménez, J. L., Crippa, M., Zimmermann, R., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification and quantification of organic
aerosol from cooking and other sources in Barcelona using aerosol mass
spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1649–1665,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-time methods for estimating organic component mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci. Tech., 45,
910–916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102951k</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Peng, J. F., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Huang, X. F., Kumar, P., Wu, Z. J., Guo,
S., Yue, D. L., Shang, D. J., Zheng, Z., and He, L. Y.: Submicron aerosols at
thirteen diversified sites in China: size distribution, new particle
formation and corresponding contribution to cloud condensation nuclei
production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10249–10265,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10249-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10249-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Petit, J. E., Favez, O., Albinet, A., and Canonaco, F.: A user-friendly tool
for comprehensive evaluation of the geographical origins of atmospheric
pollution: wind and trajectory analyses, Environ. Modell. Softw., 88,
183–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Quan, J., Zhang, Q., He, H., Liu, J., Huang, M., and Jin, H.: Analysis of the
formation of fog and haze in North China Plain (NCP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8205–8214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14651?><ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Wehner, B., Nowak, A., Tuch, T.,
Zhang, X. C., Wang, T. T., Zhou, H. G., Zhang, X. L., Dong, F., Birmili, W.,
and Wiedensohler, A.: First long-term study of particle number size
distributions and new particle formation events of regional aerosol in the
North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1565–1580,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1565-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1565-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-14-00110.1</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne,
J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing,
China with an aerosol chemical speciation monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51,
250–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J.,
and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime
in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021641" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd021641</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Xu, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Li, W., Wang, F., Li,
J., Wang, P., and Li, Z.: Aerosol characterization over the North China
Plain: haze life cycle and biomass burning impacts in summer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 2508–2521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024261</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Chen, C., Zhang, Y. J., Xu, W. Q., Zhou, L. B., Cheng, X. L., Zheng,
H. T., Ji, D. S., Li, J., Tang, X., Fu, P. Q., and Wang, Z. F.: Rapid
formation and evolution of an extreme haze episode in Northern China during
winter 2015, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 27151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep27151</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Wei, Z., Wei, W., Fu, J. S., Meng, C., and Ma, S.: Source
apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in top polluted cities in Hebei, China using the
CMAQ model, Atmos. Environ., 122, 723–736,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.041</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Du, W., Sun, C., Fu, P., and Wang, Z.: Chemical
composition of aerosol particles and light extinction apportionment before
and during the heating season in Beijing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 12708–12722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023871" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023871</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Du, W., Ana, G., Wang, Z., Sun, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, F.,
Li, Z., Ye, X., and Sun, Y.: Characterization of submicron aerosols at a
suburban site in central China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 115–123,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.054</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Sun, J. Y., Wu, Z. J., Yue, D. L., Shen, X. J., Zhang,
Y. M., Pei, X. Y., Cheng, Y. F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Characteristics of
regional new particle formation in urban and regional background environments
in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12495–12506,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12495-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12495-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z.: Gain Insight into Chemical Components Driving New Particle Growth on
a Basis of Particle Hygroscopicity and Volatility Measurements: a Short
Review, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 3, 175–181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-017-0064-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40726-017-0064-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Xu, J., Shi, J., Zhang, Q., Ge, X., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
Vonwiller, M., Szidat, S., Ge, J., Ma, J., An, Y., Kang, S., and Qin, D.:
Wintertime organic and inorganic aerosols in Lanzhou, China: sources,
processes, and comparison with the results during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 14937–14957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y. R., Liu, X. G., Qu, Y., An, J. L., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y. H., Sun, Y.
L., Wu, Z. J., Zhang, F., Xu, W. Q., and Ma, Q. X.: Characteristics and
formation mechanism of continuous hazes in China: a case study during the
autumn of 2014 in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8165–8178,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Ren, L., and Kanawade, V. P.: New Particle Formation and Growth
Mechanisms in Highly Polluted Environments, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 3, 245–253,
10.1007/s40726-017-0067-3, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case study
of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Tech., 41, 3213–3219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061812j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es061812j</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q. H., Zhang, J. P., and Xue, H. W.: The challenge of improving
visibility in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7821–7827,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zarnora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W.,
Hu, M., and Wang, Y.: Formation of urban fine particulate matter, Chem. Rev.,
115, 3803–3855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Du, W., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Han, T., Lin, J., Zhao, J.,
Xu, W., Gao, J., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Han, Y.: Response of aerosol
composition to different emission scenarios in Beijing, China, Sci. Total
Environ., 571, 902–908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.073</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. J., Tang, L. L., Wang, Z., Yu, H. X., Sun, Y. L., Liu, D., Qin, W.,
Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Zhang, H. L., and Zhou, H. C.:
Insights into characteristics, sources, and evolution of submicron aerosols
during harvest seasons in the Yangtze River delta region, China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 1331-1349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1331-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1331-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng,, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y., Cheng, S., Lang, J., Chen, D., Zhao, B., Liu, C., Xu, R., and Li,
T.: A comprehensive ammonia emission inventory with high-resolution and its
evaluation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, China, Atmos. Environ.,
106, 305–317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.069</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Aerosol chemistry and particle growth events at an urban downwind site in North China Plain</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The North China Plain (NCP) has experienced frequent severe haze pollution
events in recent years. While extensive measurements have been made in
megacities, aerosol sources, processes, and particle growth at urban downwind
sites remain less understood. Here, an aerosol chemical speciation monitor
and a scanning mobility particle sizer, along with a suite of collocated
instruments, were deployed at the downwind site of Xingtai, a highly polluted
city in the NCP, for real-time measurements of submicron aerosol (PM<sub>1</sub>)
species and particle number size distributions during May and June 2016. The
average mass concentration of PM<sub>1</sub> was 30.5 (±19.4)&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>, which is significantly lower than that during
wintertime. Organic aerosols (OAs) constituted the major fraction of PM<sub>1</sub>
(38&thinsp;%), followed by sulfate (25&thinsp;%) and nitrate (14&thinsp;%). Positive
matrix factorization with the multilinear engine version 2 showed that
oxygenated OA (OOA) was the dominant species in OA throughout the study, on
average accounting for 78&thinsp;% of OA, while traffic and cooking emissions
both accounted for 11&thinsp;% of OA. Our results highlight that aerosol
particles at the urban downwind site were highly aged and mainly from
secondary formation. However, the diurnal cycle also illustrated the
substantial influence of urban emissions on downwind sites, which are
characterized by similar pronounced early morning peaks for most aerosol
species. New particle formation and growth events were also frequently
observed (58&thinsp;% of the time) on both clean and polluted days. Particle
growth rates varied from 1.2 to 4.9&thinsp;nm&thinsp;h<sup>−1</sup> and our results showed that
sulfate and OOA played important roles in particle growth during clean
periods, while OOA was more important than sulfate during polluted events.
Further analyses showed that particle growth rates have no clear dependence
on air mass trajectories.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., and Lohmann, U.: Clouds and Aerosols:
in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels,
A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK, New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use
of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment:
ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6,
3649–3661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Ebenstein, A., Greenstone, M., and Li, H.: From the cover: evidence
on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from
China's Huai River policy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 12936–12941, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, M., DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Mohr, C., Heringa, M. F., Chirico,
R., Poulain, L., Freutel, F., Sciare, J., Cozic, J., Di Marco, C. F.,
Elsasser, M., Nicolas, J. B., Marchand, N., Abidi, E., Wiedensohler, A.,
Drewnick, F., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Nemitz, E., Zimmermann, R.,
Jaffrezo, J.-L., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Wintertime
aerosol chemical composition and source apportionment of the organic fraction
in the metropolitan area of Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 961–981,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-961-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-961-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D.,
Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo, P.
F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M.,
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski,
S., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger,
U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25
AMS data sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source
apportionment approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Drinovec, L., Mocnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl,
C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and
Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of
aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Du, W., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Xu, W., Chen, C., Han, T.,
Zhang, F., Li, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Wang, Z., and Sun, Y.: Simultaneous
measurements of particle number size distributions at ground level and 260&thinsp;m
on a meteorological tower in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
6797–6811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6797-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6797-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Elser, M., Huang, R.-J., Wolf, R., Slowik, J. G., Wang, Q., Canonaco, F., Li,
G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Cao, J.,
Baltensperger, U., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: New insights
into PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical composition and sources in two major cities in China
during extreme haze events using aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 3207–3225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, G. Q., Xu, W. Y., Yang, R. F., Li, J. B., and Zhao, C. S.: The
distribution and trends of fog and haze in the North China Plain over the
past 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11949–11958,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, H. and Chen, J.: Formation, features and controlling strategies of severe
haze-fog pollutions in China, Sci. Total Environ., 578, 121–138,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, X., He, Y., Sun, Y., Xu, J., Wang, J., Shen, Y., and Chen, M.:
Characteristics and formation mechanisms of fine particulate nitrate in
typical urban areas in China, Atmosphere, 8, 62, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030062</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Elucidating severe
urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu, Y.,
Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical composition,
sources, and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing: contrast between
summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb, C.
E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size
and composition analysis of submicron particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33,
49–70, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Vehkamäki, H., Petäjä, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A.,
Kerminen, V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates
of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol
Sci., 35, 143–176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V. M., Petaja, T., Ding, A. J., and Wang, L.:
Atmospheric gas-to-particle conversion: why NPF events are observed in
megacities?, Faraday Discuss., 200, 271–288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FD00257A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FD00257A</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C.,
and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of submicron organic
aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass
spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1503–1522,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Chen, C., Wang, L., Wei, Z., Zhou, S.,
Parworth, C., Zheng, B., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Chen, P.,
Zhang, H., Wallington, T. J., and He, K.: Wintertime aerosol chemistry and
haze evolution in an extremely polluted city of the North China Plain:
significant contribution from coal and biomass combustion, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 4751–4768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., and Chan, C. K.:
Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in
China: A review, Atmos. Environ., 158, 270–304, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.:
Aerosol light extinction measurements by cavity attenuated phase shift (CAPS)
spectroscopy: laboratory validation and field deployment of a compact aerosol
particle extinction monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 428–435, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Matthew, B. M., Middlebrook, A. M., and Onasch, T. B.: Collection
efficiencies in an aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer as a function of
particle phase for laboratory generated aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42,
884–898, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies for the aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer using field data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Slowik, J. G.,
Richter, R., Reche, C., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Seco, R., Peñuelas, J.,
Jiménez, J. L., Crippa, M., Zimmermann, R., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification and quantification of organic
aerosol from cooking and other sources in Barcelona using aerosol mass
spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1649–1665,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-time methods for estimating organic component mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci. Tech., 45,
910–916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, J. F., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Huang, X. F., Kumar, P., Wu, Z. J., Guo,
S., Yue, D. L., Shang, D. J., Zheng, Z., and He, L. Y.: Submicron aerosols at
thirteen diversified sites in China: size distribution, new particle
formation and corresponding contribution to cloud condensation nuclei
production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10249–10265,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10249-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10249-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J. E., Favez, O., Albinet, A., and Canonaco, F.: A user-friendly tool
for comprehensive evaluation of the geographical origins of atmospheric
pollution: wind and trajectory analyses, Environ. Modell. Softw., 88,
183–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.022</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Quan, J., Zhang, Q., He, H., Liu, J., Huang, M., and Jin, H.: Analysis of the
formation of fog and haze in North China Plain (NCP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8205–8214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Wehner, B., Nowak, A., Tuch, T.,
Zhang, X. C., Wang, T. T., Zhou, H. G., Zhang, X. L., Dong, F., Birmili, W.,
and Wiedensohler, A.: First long-term study of particle number size
distributions and new particle formation events of regional aerosol in the
North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1565–1580,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1565-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1565-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-14-00110.1</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne,
J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing,
China with an aerosol chemical speciation monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51,
250–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J.,
and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime
in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021641" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021641</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Xu, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Li, W., Wang, F., Li,
J., Wang, P., and Li, Z.: Aerosol characterization over the North China
Plain: haze life cycle and biomass burning impacts in summer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 2508–2521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024261</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Chen, C., Zhang, Y. J., Xu, W. Q., Zhou, L. B., Cheng, X. L., Zheng,
H. T., Ji, D. S., Li, J., Tang, X., Fu, P. Q., and Wang, Z. F.: Rapid
formation and evolution of an extreme haze episode in Northern China during
winter 2015, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 27151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27151</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., Wei, Z., Wei, W., Fu, J. S., Meng, C., and Ma, S.: Source
apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in top polluted cities in Hebei, China using the
CMAQ model, Atmos. Environ., 122, 723–736,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.041</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Du, W., Sun, C., Fu, P., and Wang, Z.: Chemical
composition of aerosol particles and light extinction apportionment before
and during the heating season in Beijing, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 12708–12722, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023871" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023871</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Du, W., Ana, G., Wang, Z., Sun, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, F.,
Li, Z., Ye, X., and Sun, Y.: Characterization of submicron aerosols at a
suburban site in central China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 115–123,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.054</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Sun, J. Y., Wu, Z. J., Yue, D. L., Shen, X. J., Zhang,
Y. M., Pei, X. Y., Cheng, Y. F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Characteristics of
regional new particle formation in urban and regional background environments
in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12495–12506,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12495-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12495-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z.: Gain Insight into Chemical Components Driving New Particle Growth on
a Basis of Particle Hygroscopicity and Volatility Measurements: a Short
Review, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 3, 175–181, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-017-0064-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-017-0064-6</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Shi, J., Zhang, Q., Ge, X., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
Vonwiller, M., Szidat, S., Ge, J., Ma, J., An, Y., Kang, S., and Qin, D.:
Wintertime organic and inorganic aerosols in Lanzhou, China: sources,
processes, and comparison with the results during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 14937–14957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y. R., Liu, X. G., Qu, Y., An, J. L., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y. H., Sun, Y.
L., Wu, Z. J., Zhang, F., Xu, W. Q., and Ma, Q. X.: Characteristics and
formation mechanism of continuous hazes in China: a case study during the
autumn of 2014 in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8165–8178,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Ren, L., and Kanawade, V. P.: New Particle Formation and Growth
Mechanisms in Highly Polluted Environments, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 3, 245–253,
10.1007/s40726-017-0067-3, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case study
of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Tech., 41, 3213–3219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061812j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es061812j</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q. H., Zhang, J. P., and Xue, H. W.: The challenge of improving
visibility in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7821–7827,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zarnora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W.,
Hu, M., and Wang, Y.: Formation of urban fine particulate matter, Chem. Rev.,
115, 3803–3855, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Du, W., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Han, T., Lin, J., Zhao, J.,
Xu, W., Gao, J., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Han, Y.: Response of aerosol
composition to different emission scenarios in Beijing, China, Sci. Total
Environ., 571, 902–908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.073</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. J., Tang, L. L., Wang, Z., Yu, H. X., Sun, Y. L., Liu, D., Qin, W.,
Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Zhang, H. L., and Zhou, H. C.:
Insights into characteristics, sources, and evolution of submicron aerosols
during harvest seasons in the Yangtze River delta region, China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 1331-1349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1331-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1331-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng,, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y., Cheng, S., Lang, J., Chen, D., Zhao, B., Liu, C., Xu, R., and Li,
T.: A comprehensive ammonia emission inventory with high-resolution and its
evaluation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, China, Atmos. Environ.,
106, 305–317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.069</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
