<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-14445-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Air quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River channel:
a cruise campaign</article-title><alt-title>Air quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River channel</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Air quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River channel}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z. Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Zhong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Chunlin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>Xingnan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-6561</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Hongbo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-3432</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9173-1188</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xinke</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Zhuohui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kan</surname><given-names>Haidong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Mellouki</surname><given-names>Abdelwahid</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6594-5262</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Jianmin</given-names></name>
          <email>jmchen@fudan.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-3070</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science &amp; Engineering,
Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 CNRS, IRCELYON, 69626, Villeurbanne, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institut de Combustion, Aérothermique, Réactivité et Environnement, CNRS, 45071 Orléans CEDEX 02, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jianmin Chen (jmchen@fudan.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>14445</fpage><lpage>14464</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e199">The Yangtze River is
the longest river in China; nearly one-third of the national population lives
along the river. Air quality over the Yangtze River is important as it may
have significant influences on the aquatic ecosystem, the health of everyone
living along the Yangtze River, and regional climate change. Chemical
compositions of ambient aerosol were determined during a comprehensive cruise
campaign carried out along the mid–lower reaches of the Yangtze River (MLYR)
in winter of 2015. The total average concentration of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the dominant ionic composition in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in this cruise. Based on the filter samples,
the concentration and chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were remarkably
varied or fluctuated from coastal areas to inland over the MLYR region.
Crustal elements (Ca, Mg, Al, and K) from floating dust showed peak
concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, while secondary
inorganic species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and some of the most enriched elements (Pb, As, Se, and
Cd) presented high levels in central China (Wuhan region). The significant
correlation between Se and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggested that coal combustion
may play an important role in secondary inorganic aerosol formation. The
relatively high enrichment factors (EFs) of Ca (EFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) suggested the
crustal elements may derive from anthropogenic sources. Furthermore, the
concentration of levoglucosan in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the CO column level from
satellite observation were greatly enhanced in the rural areas (Anhui and
Jiangxi), indicating that biomass burning may make a remarkable contribution
to rural areas. The concentrations of typical tracer for heavy oil (V and Ni)
significantly increased in the Shanghai port, which was mainly ascribed to
ship emissions, based on the air mass source analysis and the relatively high
ratio of V <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ni as well. The results shown herein portray a good picture
of air pollution along the Yangtze River.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page14446?><p id="d1e535">The Yangtze River is the longest river in China, originating from the
Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau and extending to the East China Sea, and it drains an
area of 1 808 500 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is China's
great granary, and feeds nearly one-third of the national population (Liu et
al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2008). Currently, three
dense city agglomerations, including Wuhan, Nanjing, and Shanghai (WNS),
which are the centers of economy, transportation, politics, and culture in
central and eastern China, and all of which are home to larger petrochemical
complexes and/or steel industry, have formed along both shores of the mid–lower
reaches of the Yangtze River (MLYR). The MLYR region is one of the most developed
and economically vibrant regions in China, accounting for 34.13 % of
China's total GDP in 2015. Owing to fast economic development and
industrialization, this region has become one of the most polluted areas in
China (X. Xu et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e547">Fine aerosol particles have become more important in recent years due to
their negative effects on human health, agriculture, and climate change (Wang
et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2013; Pöschl, 2005; Seaton et al., 1995;
Ackerman et al., 2004; Stier et al., 2005; Chameides et al., 1999; Novakov
and Penner, 1993; Jones et al., 1994). Numerous field observations related to
fine particles have been conducted in the megacities in the Yangtze River
Delta (YRD) region, especially in Nanjing and Shanghai. Over the past years,
the variation in mass concentrations, chemical compositions, size
distributions, seasonal variations, daily change, optical properties, and
temporal–spatial distributions of fine particles in this region
has been investigated, and the causes and impacts of aerosol pollution have also been
studied (Zhou et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2013; Y. Tao et al., 2014; Shen et
al., 2014; Fu et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2013, 2012b, a; A. J. Ding et al.,
2013; Ding et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2010). By analysis of several serious
haze cases, Huang et al. (2012a) pointed out that secondary inorganic and
dust episodes always erupted in spring, while biomass burning (BB) events
were often observed in summer (harvest season for wheat). Further, the high
sulfate oxidizing rate (SOR) and nitrate oxidizing rate (NOR) were also
observed from long-term field measurements in Nanjing and Shanghai,
indicating that photochemical reactions in the atmosphere were quite active
in these areas (Zhou et al., 2016, 2017; An et al., 2015). H. L. Wang et
al. (2015) also found that secondary pollutants contributed the major
fraction of aerosol mass, especially in the Shanghai–Nanjing city cluster.
The increasing trend in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
since the year 2000 suggested that vehicle sources became more important in
this region (Kang et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2012a; Y. Tao et al., 2014; Sun
et al., 2017). Furthermore, Cheng et al. (2014) estimated that BB contributed
37 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 70 % of organic carbon (OC), and 61 % of
elemental carbon (EC) in harvest. If BB was controlled and even forbidden in
this season, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels would decrease by 47 % in the YRD
region (Cheng et al., 2014). Some typical events, including fresh combustion
pollution from fireworks (Zhang et al., 2010; Kong et al., 2015) and the peak
of secondary inorganic aerosol species (sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium,
SNA)
derived from the travel rush and re-opening of factories after the China
Spring Festival (Huang et al., 2012b; Kong et al., 2015), have also been
focused on and analyzed. Huang et al. (2013) also investigated the chemical
composition of fine particles in Shanghai, finding that the concentrations of
anthropogenic calcium drastically decreased as a result of strict monitoring
and implementing control of construction activity during the Expo Shanghai
2010. Compared with normal (pre-control) periods, the levels of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were also reduced 55 % and 46 %
during the 2014 Youth Olympic Games, respectively (Zhou et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e620">The MLYR region faces the most complex anthropogenic emission sources,
including a variety of power plants, large petrochemical and steel
industries, and farmland distributed along both banks of the Yangtze River,
as well as ship emissions. It was well documented that ship emissions
displayed a significant impact on regional air quality, particularly in
traffic hubs and harbors (Pandis et al., 1999; Becagli et al., 2017;
Zhan et al., 2014). The contribution and effect of
ship emissions to local air pollution, especially PM, have been briefly
analyzed at regional to global levels (Jalkanen et al., 2016; Zhan et
al., 2014; Pandis et al., 1999; Fan et al., 2016; Coggon et al., 2012). The
emission factors, and properties of emitted particles and gases from
ship plumes at different engine speeds, were also reported (Zhang et al., 2016;
Moldanová et al., 2009; Agrawal et al., 2009). Ship-related pollutants
have been identified in the YRD port cluster and surrounding area. In 2010,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from ship emissions in
the YRD port cluster were up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> t yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The maximum
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from ship emissions in
harbors or traffic hubs were nearly 36 times and 17 times higher than the
maximum land-based emissions, respectively (Fan et al., 2016). M. Zhao et
al. (2013) pointed out that Ni and V were enriched in submicron particles in
the
Shanghai port. Recently, Liu et al. (2017) also reported that ship plumes
contributed 2–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to fine particles within the
coastal area of the Shanghai port, accounting for 20 %–30 % of total
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Known as the “golden canal”, the Yangtze River was an important route
for trade and travel. However, there are seldom data related to air quality
and the influence of ship emissions along the Yangtze River channel.
Meanwhile, related observations with the synchronous trend in aerosol in the
MLYR region remain insufficient.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e765">Cruise tracks, source region limits, the sampling sites, and land
use during the YRC.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14445/2018/acp-18-14445-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e775">To characterize air quality in this region, a round-trip field observation
voyage, namely the Yangtze River Campaign (YRC), was carried out
between Shanghai and Wuhan. This cruise aimed to characterize the chemical
components of atmospheric pollutants, to analyze these spatial
distributions, and to identify potential source contributions. To the best of
our knowledge, it is the first systematic observation of air pollution along
the largest and longest river in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Measurements and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Overview of the YRC</title>
      <p id="d1e789">A mobile monitoring platform (a container with a length of 10.0 m, width of 4.0 m, and
height of 2.5 m) was placed on a vessel (length: 20 m, width 6 m), sailing from
22 November to 5 December in 2015 along the Yangtze River channel between
Shanghai and Wuhan (29.72–32.33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 114.33–121.61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). This campaign route is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Starting on 22 November in the Waigaoqiao port of Shanghai, the vessel then
crossed Jiangsu and Anhui Province and finally<?pagebreak page14447?> arrived at the Hankou port in
Wuhan, Hubei Province, on 29 November along the Yangtze River waterway. The
ship shifted at an average speed of 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> heading up the Yangtze
River towards Wuhan. After berthing in the port of Wuhan one night, the
vessel turned around, departed, and shifted towards Shanghai. This cruise
finally ended in the Waigaoqiao port in Shanghai on 5 December. During the YRC,
a wide range of data, including common meteorological parameters, trace gas
concentrations (CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), chemical
composition of aerosol particles, and a satellite dataset over this region
were acquired and analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Trace gases measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e866">A series of commercial trace gas instruments, including a 43i <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
analyzer, 48i CO analyzer, and 42i <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer
(Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc., USA C-series), were installed in an
air-conditioned container to measure the concentration of gaseous pollutants.
The routine procedures of QA/QC (quality assurance and quality control) were
performed, according to the technical guidance of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA, 1998).</p>
      <p id="d1e902">Trace alkanes, including toluene and benzene, were also sampled in a stainless
steel canister and quantified using a gas chromatograph with a mass
spectrometer and a flame ionization detector (GC-MS/FID) (Wang et al., 2014).
The sampling interval of volatile organic compounds was 3 h with fluctuation. The ratio of
toluene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> benzene (T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B) was commonly regarded as an indicator of
the photochemical processing (Baltrenas et al., 2011). The high ratio of
T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B indicated that air masses were fresh emissions, while a lower value
suggested that air masses had undergone photochemical processes. In this
paper, we used the same value ratio of T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B in CalNex (Gaston et al.,
2013). Air masses with T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were expected to undergo
photochemical aging while urban fresh air masses had a much higher T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B
ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Ship track self-emission was removed by subducting the
periods when the winds blew from the stern; that is, the relative wind
direction was from 130 to 220<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the ship direction (0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the front). The real-time measurement of trace gases and aerosol data
presented here was filtered out using this method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Chemical analysis of the filter samples</title>
      <p id="d1e992">Particulate samples of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were simultaneously
collected on separate quartz filters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 mm, Whatman Inc., Maidstone,
UK) using a medium-volume sampler from HY-100 (Qingdao Hengyuan S.T.
Development Co., Ltd., China) (model: PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; flow rate: 100 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which was placed on the foredeck at approximately
3.0 m above sea level. The duration time of collection was generally
set at 12 h (in parallel: day 07:00–19:00 Beijing standard time (BST, GMT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8), night 19:00–07:00 BST), while particulate matter was
also collected for 24 h. High-purity quartz filters were preheated at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 10 h to virtually eliminate the residues prior to sampling.
All the samples were stored in a refrigerator kept at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
analysis. The filter sample masses were measured by an intelligent weight
system (Hangzhou Wmade Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.), which was maintained
at a constant condition (temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and relative humidity, RH: 40 %). All the procedures were well documented and supervised to
avoid possible contaminations. The sample instruments were placed on the
bow of the ship far away from its track. Ship self-emission in the filter
samples was ignored since the most prevailing winds blew from the bow to
the stern during the sampling periods.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14448?><p id="d1e1109">One-eighth of each filter was extracted ultrasonically using 20 mL of deionized
water (18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 40 min. After filtering, eight
inorganic ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were analyzed by ion chromatography (940
Professional IC, Metrohm, Switzerland), and a Metrosep A Supp 10 - 100/2.0 separation column coupled with
pulsed electrochemical detection (945 Professional Detector Vario, Metrohm,
Switzerland) was used to measure levoglucosan in the extract. Both
instruments were controlled with IC software. The lower and upper limits
of detection were 0.5 and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The relative
standard deviation of each ion was less than or equal to 2 % from three
reproducibility tests. Blank samples were analyzed with the same processes
to remove potential contaminations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1255">One-eighth of the sample filter and the blank filter were cut into fragments
and digested at 170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 4 h in a high-pressure Teflon digestion
vessel with 3 mL of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1 mL of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HClO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et
al., 2006; T. Li et al., 2015). After cooling, the digested solution was
filtered and diluted to 15 mL with ultrapure Milli-Q water. An inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, Agilent 7500a) was employed to
measure the concentrations of 17 elements (Al, As, Ca, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg,
Mn, Na, Ni, Se, Tl, Pb, V, and Zn) in the filter samples. National standard
material (soil, GSS-12, China) was also digested and used to calculate the
element recoveries ranging from 91 % to 102 %. The detection limits of
the trace elements were derived from the standard deviation (3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
the blank values. Details relating to ICP-MS have been described elsewhere
(T. Li et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e1296">OC and EC in the aerosol samples were
analyzed with a thermal–optical carbon analyzer (DRI model 2001). Each sample
was identified as four OC fractions (OC1, OC2, OC3, and OC4 at 120, 250,
450, and 550<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, in helium air) and three EC
fractions (EC1, EC2, and EC3 at 550,700, and 800<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively)
in the mixture air (98 % helium and 2 % oxygen) by an IMPROVE
thermal–optical reflectance (TOR) protocol. Pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC)
was separately detected by transmittance. IMPROVE OC was defined as OC1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> POC, and EC was calculated by EC1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> POC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Satellite data and ship traffic data</title>
      <p id="d1e1373">The satellites, including the Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km,
Measurement of Pollutants in the Troposphere (MOPITT), and the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument (OMI) reaching a spatial resolution
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km at nadir, and the Earth Observing
System (NASA EOS) Aura satellite, were applied to provide spatial
distribution of aerosol particles and trace gases (Xu et al., 2011; Huang
et al., 2012a). The column levels of CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and aerosol
optical depth (AOD) were retrieved over the MLYR region. In this study, all data from satellite datasets were interpolated and averaged into grid
cells with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution.</p>
      <p id="d1e1442">Ship positions and numbers in the Yangtze River channel were decoded by
Automatic Identification System (AIS) databases, which were obtained from the
Maritime Safety Administration of Shanghai. A 15-day AIS dataset along
the Yangtze River was selected with a high time resolution (about 15 min).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1448">Detailed information of ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the YRC.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.96}[.96]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Start data</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Day/night</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ship</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Sampling</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">samples</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">state</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">duration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">latitude, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">longitude, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">117.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">58.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">91.33 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">116.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">112.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">75.06 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">115.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">106.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">90.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">84.96 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">115.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">81.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">73.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">90.43 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daytime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">114.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">157.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">136.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">86.32 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nighttime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Stopped</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">114.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">161.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">152.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">94.06 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daytime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">114.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">80.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">65.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">81.38 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 Nov 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nighttime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Stopped</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">115.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">106.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">89.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">83.99 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daytime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">115.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">96.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">81.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">85.24 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nighttime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">116.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">92.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">82.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">90.04 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daytime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">117.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">122.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">85.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">69.34 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nighttime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">118.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">163.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">118.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">72.55 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daytime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">119.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">152.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">108.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">71.09 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nighttime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">120.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">133.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">105.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">78.89 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daytime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Moving</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">121.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">146.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">111.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">76.57 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nighttime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Stopped</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">121.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">131.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">102.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">78.27 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Potential source contribution function</title>
      <p id="d1e2218">The potential source contribution function developed by Hopke et al. (1995)
was applied to derive the potential source regions and spatial distributions.
In this study, 3-day back trajectories arriving at a height of 500 m were
calculated using the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory
(HYSPLIT-4) model from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) (<uri>https://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT_hytrial.php</uri>, last access:
1 April 2017) with global meteorological data from the NCEP reanalysis
(<uri>ftp://arlftp.arlhq.noaa.gov/pub/archives/reanalysis</uri>, last access:
17 December 2015) (Draxler and Hess, 1998). The contribution of the potential
sources during the YRC was calculated by the potential source contribution
function (PSCF) analysis with TrajStat (Wang et al., 2009). The domain
sources were restricted to 25–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 110–125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, which
were divided into grid cells with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution. The PSCF value for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>th grid cell was defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M126" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSCF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of trajectory segment endpoints
that fall in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cell, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of endpoints for
the same cell with arrival times at the sampling site, corresponding to
pollutant concentrations higher than an arbitrary criterion value. In this
study, the average concentration for each trace element was set as the
criteria value. To reduce the random error and uncertainty of the small
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the weighting function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduced the PSCF values when the total number of the endpoints in a
particular cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately 3 times fewer than the
average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ave</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the endpoints per each cell (Han et al., 2005):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ave</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ave</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ave</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ave</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ave</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ave</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Classification of the typical pollution episodes</title>
      <p id="d1e2560">The air pollution during the cruise was classified into eight distinct
episodes, based on sampling locations, backward trajectories, and
photochemical processes (T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B value) (Fig. 1, Supplement Figs. S1 and S2
and Table 1). The detailed meteorological information over the MLYR region is
also summarized in the Supplement. As shown in Fig. S1, the first<?pagebreak page14449?> episode
(EP-1), starting from 22 to 23 November, was characterized by the sampled air
masses that came from the East China Sea and was typically influenced by the
local industry and Shanghai harbor pollution. The ratio of T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B ranged
from 0.6 to 2 with an average of 1.3, suggesting fresh air masses mixed by
the aged ones. The air masses in the secondary episode (EP-2), with
B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, originated from the rural areas (Anhui and Henan), carrying
agriculture emissions (Fig. S2). Sampled air masses stagnated around Jiujiang
to Wuhan from the third episode (EP-3) to the fifth episode (EP-5). However,
the fourth episode (EP-4) (Wuhan region) with the low average T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B ratio
of 0.97 underwent significant
atmospheric aging. The local air during EP-4 was in a low-pressure system
with low wind speeds that did not favor the diffusion of the local pollution
(Fig. S3). Air masses with T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were identified from fresh
emissions. Both EP-3 and EP-5 (nearly Jiujiang) were characterized by a high
T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B value (Fig. S2), suggesting that these two pollution episodes were
contributed to mainly by regional fresh emissions. For the sixth episode
(EP-6), the wind direction shifted from southwest to northwest, and the
vessel again traveled through the rural area of the middle reach of the
Yangtze River, suggesting that air masses may originate from agricultural
activities. Then, in the seventh episode (EP-7), a cold front arrived, and
wind speeds increased significantly from the average 3.84 to
5.38 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 2) with air masses transported from northern inland
regions, which was further confirmed by wind fields (Fig. S3) and the sharp
decreases in RH (Table 2). The last episode (EP-8) was in the YRD region
where highly intensive anthropogenic activities released a large amount of
pollutants. Air masses in EP-8, with the average T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B value of 1.73,
were expected to be a mixture of aged sources with regional fresh emissions.
Overall, EP-1 and EP-8 (the YRD region) were mainly influenced by fresh local
emissions mixed with aged air masses, while agriculture emissions contributed
significantly during the EP-2 and EP-6 episodes. Both EP-3 and EP-5 were
characterized by fresh emissions, even though the megapolis was not available
in this region. The cruise started on 22 November, but the offline PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
samples were collected after 25 November. Thus, the EP-1 description was
ignored in the present study.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2657">The pollutant levels and meteorological parameters in eight
different episodes. Dates and times are given in YYYY/MM/DD and HH:MM.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Periods</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data and time (BST<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Latitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Wind speed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">RH%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(SN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/11/22 12:00 to 2015/11/23 18:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.28 to 32.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">121.23 to 119.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">88.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">65.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">443.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/11/25 12:00 to 2015/11/27 14:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.01 to 29.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">117.79 to 116.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">57.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">704.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(#1,2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/11/27 14:00 to 2015/11/29 00:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.84 to 30.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.35 to 114.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">68.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">676.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(#3,4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/11/29 00:00 to 2015/11/30 18:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.50 to 30.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">114.83 to 115.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">83.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">62.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1030.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(#5–7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/11/30 18:00 to 2015/12/01 20:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.18 to 30.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">115.25 to 116.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">79.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">51.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">989.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(#8,9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/12/01 20:00 to 2015/12/02 20:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.02 to 31.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.66 to 118.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">74.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1139.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(#10,11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/12/02 20:00 to 2015/12/03 20:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.67 to 32.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">118.40 to 119.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1224.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(#12,13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EP-8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015/12/03 20:00 to 2015/12/05 06:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32.32 to 31.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">119.73 to 121.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">57.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1061.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(#14–16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2660"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Beijing standard time (GMT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8); T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B is
the ratio of toluene to benzene. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Sample number in Table 1.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Air pollution during the YRC</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Variability in air pollutants observed in the vessel</title>
      <p id="d1e3167">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were sampled from 25 November to 5 December in
2015. Detailed information is also summarized in Table 1. The average mass
concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the YRC were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The
average ratio of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.085</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying
that PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was mainly dominated by fine particles with a size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Detailed meteorological information, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH,
pressure, wind direction and wind speed, and trace gases in different
episodes, is also summarized in Table 2. The peak concentrations of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed in EP-4 and EP-7 (Table 1). However, there were
obvious differences between EP-4 and EP-7 in the meteorological parameters
and trace gas levels, indicating that these two pollution events were
completely different. As mentioned in Sect. 3.1, sampled air masses in EP-4
mainly originated from local emissions, whereas EP-7 was influenced by
long-range transport of air pollution.</p>
      <p id="d1e3330">As shown in Table 2, the average concentrations of CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied dramatically in the different pollution episodes.
Average concentrations of CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">993.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">387.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv, respectively) were<?pagebreak page14450?> slightly lower than those in the
cities in winter, including Wuhan (1024.00 and 13.30 ppbv) (Wang et al.,
2017), Nanjing (1096.00 and 13.09 ppbv) (Sun et al., 2017), Chengdu
(1440.00 and 12.60 ppbv) (Liao et al., 2017), and Shanghai (1067.20 and
18.90 ppbv) (Huang et al., 2012a). CO levels continued to rise since the
start of the YRC and finally peaked in EP-6 and EP-7. Meanwhile, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels were much lower in these two
episodes, which were identified as the BB event. As previously reported,
biomass burning could produce large amounts of CO, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were not the major gaseous pollutants released from BB
(Huang et al., 2012a; X. Ding et al., 2013). The mean CO concentration in
EP-7 reached 1224.88 ppbv, which was close to the level recorded at
Shanghai during the harvest season of wheat (June) (Huang et al., 2012a). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in EP-3 and EP-8 greatly increased and were
close to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level in the haze event in Shanghai (Huang et al.,
2012a). This was partly caused by local fresh emissions (the high T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B
in EP-3 and EP-8). Except for EP-6 and EP-7 (BB event), the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration almost exceeded 50 ppbv along this
cruise. The average mass concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this cruise
is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv, which was much higher than the mean level in
Shanghai (42.40 ppbv, 2012) (Han et al., 2015) and Guangzhou (39.14 ppbv,
2012) (Zou et al., 2015) that represented the typical urban <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
level. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration peaked in EP-3, which was
identified to mainly come from local emissions. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
level during the YRC was identified to come from strong regional emissions. It
could be derived that multiple sources of air pollution were distributed on both
banks of the Yangtze River.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3535">The average distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> aerosol optical depth at
550 nm (MODIS L2); <bold>(b)</bold> CO column mixture ratio (MOPITT L2);
<bold>(c)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column concentration (OMI L2);
<bold>(d)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column concentration (OMI L2) over the MLYR
region.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14445/2018/acp-18-14445-2018-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Regional distribution of air pollutants identified by remote
sensing observation</title>
      <p id="d1e3585">The MLYR region is one of the most polluted areas in China, and the spatial
distribution of various pollutants was apparently different from coastal to
inland regions. As shown in Fig. 2a, the high average values of AOD retrieved
from MODIS MOD04 were observed in eastern Jiangsu and Shanghai, etc., where
human and industrial activities were concentrated, suggesting that
anthropogenic emissions were dominated. However, there was much missing data
for AOD in central China due to heavy clouds. As presented in Fig. S4 of the
MODIS true-color imagery on 28 November, thick clouds covered central
China. In addition, the average of AOD was about 0.45, which was slightly lower
than that in Shanghai in winter (0.55) (He et al., 2012) and background
(0.65) in the North China Plain (Xu et al., 2011). The AOD value in northern
China was higher than that in southern China. As plotted in Fig. 2b, the CO
surface mixing ratio calculated by MOPITT revealed that Shandong, Henan, and
Anhui were exposed to elevated CO column concentrations. CO is an important
tracer for incomplete combustion sources, such as BB and fossil fuel
combustions (Girach et al., 2014). BB should be a major source for CO in
grain-producing areas (Huang et al., 2012a; A. J. Ding et al.,
2013).
As mentioned in Sect. 3.2.1, the peak CO level was also observed in Anhui and
the west of Jiangsu, which was characterized by agriculture emissions (EP-6
and EP-7). However, the sources of CO in northern China should be further
studied in the future. The high levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were mainly observed in
the east in Anhui and stretched to the Shanghai area (Fig. 2c), suggesting
high-sulfur fossil fuels were still widely utilized over the MLYR region.
Conversely, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in Nanjing urban areas were measured at
background pollution levels. In general, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was regarded as a
tracer for the local emission source due to a short lifetime in the atmosphere
(Geng et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2011). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions mainly
originated from vehicles and power plants (Fu et al., 2013; Geng et al.,
2009). One can see that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were characterized by strong local sources in north
China and the YRD region (Fig. 2d), which is in good agreement with
previous reports (Lin, 2012; B. Zhao et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3645">Spatial concentration distributions of the soluble ions and
levoglucosan in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the cruise path.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14445/2018/acp-18-14445-2018-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3665">Comparisons of major ionic species during the YRC with other regions,
including Beijing, Xi'an, Chengdu, Wuhan, Guangzhou, Shanghai, northern
South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, South China Sea, East China Sea, and Tuoji
Dao. The red lines mark the sample routes in different
cruises.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14445/2018/acp-18-14445-2018-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Chemical composition of fine particles during the YRC and
comparisons with other published data</title>
      <p id="d1e3681">The concentrations and mass fractions of the major ions and levoglucosan in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 3. The water-soluble ions constitute one of the
dominant components in<?pagebreak page14451?> atmospheric aerosol and determine the aerosol acidity
(Kerminen et al., 2001), accounting for 37.43 % and 40.15 % in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the YRC, respectively. To access the data
quality, ion balance gained by the major anions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and cations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
calculated in this cruise. Both cations and anions are in units of
equivalent concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> eq. m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). There is a good
correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between cation
and anions (equivalent concentration) in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, implying a high quality of data and the same source of major ions
in this cruise (Fig. S5a) (Boreddy and Kawamura, 2015). Additionally, the
relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was further investigated. As plotted
in Fig. S5b, the slopes of linear regression lines for [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] vs. [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 1.171 and 1.154, respectively, suggesting that
the alkaline substance in aerosol could completely neutralize
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the YRC.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14452?><p id="d1e4052">For the ionic concentration, the most abundant species of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S6a). The mass concentration of SNA
accounted for 85.89 % of the total water-soluble ions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Comparing with previous reports (Fig. 4), the SNA concentrations were much
lower than those collected in the western and northern polluted cities in
winter, including Beijing (38.90, 22.70, and 22.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(H. Wang et al., 2015), Xi'an (39.7, 21.43, and 12.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(H. Xu et al., 2016), Wuhan (29.80, 29.80, and 16.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Zhang et al., 2015), and Chengdu (31.80, 15.5, and
15.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Tao et al., 2014a). However, the concentrations
of SNA were higher than those collected in the marine boundary layer, such as
the East China Sea (29.80, 29.80, and 16.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Nakamura
et al., 2005), northern South China Sea (7.80, 0.24, and
2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zhang et al., 2007), South China sea (7.99,
0.08, and 1.083 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Hsu et al., 2007), Taiwan Strait
(5.20, 3.13, and 1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Li et al., 2016), and Tuoji
Dao in Bohai Economic Rim (8.90, 5.80, and 1.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Zhang et al., 2014). The SNA levels during the YRC were close to those in
Shanghai in winter (11.7, 13.33, and 8.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zhou et
al., 2016). The mass ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
regarded as a marker to distinguish mobile source vs. stationary source
(Huang et al., 2013). The ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
this campaign was also close to that of Shanghai and lower than that in other
cities (Fig. 4), indicating that mobile source emissions (traffic)
contributed the most to fine particles. In addition, the mass concentration
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> definitely exceeded the level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the marine boundary layer (Fig. 4), indicating that marine sources were also
important for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Calhoun et al., 1991). The average
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in this cruise
was the highest among all locations and cruises (Fig. 4), followed by Chengdu
(2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), Wuhan (1.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Xi'an
(1.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). As shown in Fig. 4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also
presented a higher concentration in the cities and decreased from inland to
coastal regions, indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was mainly from terrace
crustal emissions (Xiao et al., 2017). However, the concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the YRC were lower than those in most
samples among all locations (Fig. 4). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may originate from BB, sea
salt, and crustal dust. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during the
YRC was also lower than that in most cities (Fig. 4). However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels on this cruise were higher than most reported values (Fig. 4). The
poor correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also indicated that
two ions may have different sources during the YRC. Furthermore, the ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among all locations (Fig. 4) was much higher
than 1.17 (ratio of seawater), suggesting that anthropogenic sources,
including BB and coal combustion, contributed to the excessive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in China cities (C. Li et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2013). The concentration
of levoglucosan, a BB tracer, ranged from 0.015 to
0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.075</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, much higher than the average concentration of
0.0394 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lin'an (30.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
119.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) (a rural site in the YRD region) (Liang et al., 2017),
indicating that BB was also a major contributor to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the YRC.</p>
      <p id="d1e5052">A total of 17 elements of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured, and the
average concentrations are summarized in Table 3. For comparison, the data
reported previously in megacities (in winter) and the cruises are also
outlined in Table 4. Ca shows the highest concentration among all elements
(Table 3) at all locations (Table 4) and shared 2.16 % on average in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, partly due to a cold front with floating dust in this campaign.
The secondary highest concentration among all elements was Fe (Table 3). This
concentration (1.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the campaign was higher than
that at many urban sites, such as Beijing (1.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(P. S. Zhao et al., 2013), Shanghai (0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Huang et
al., 2012b), and Guangzhou (0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Lai et al., 2016),
probably due to numerous steel industries and/or shipyards densely<?pagebreak page14453?> distributed on both banks of the Yangtze River.
Other elements decreased from K (865.88 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to Tl
(0.32 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Pb and Zn contributed the highest levels among heavy
metals of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Except for inland cities, such as Beijing (P. S. Zhao
et al., 2013), Wuhan (Zhang et al., 2015), and Chengdu (Tao et al., 2014a),
the average concentrations of Pb and Zn during the YRC were much higher than
those in the other regions and cruises (Table 4). Both Pb and Zn could
originate from coal combustion and/or mineral industry, which were related to
energy structure and industrial layout over the MLYR region (P. S. Zhao et
al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Tao et al., 2014a).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p id="d1e5196">The average concentration of the elements in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the YRC.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Contents </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Max.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Min.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">629.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1487.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">135.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">589.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">358.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">328.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">699.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">359.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">213.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Al</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">863.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2400.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">786.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">618.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">631.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1894.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">473.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">483.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">865.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1723.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">368.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">805.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">367.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">771.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1560.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">326.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">739.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">303.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2724.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5657.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">391.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2381.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1729.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1525.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3371.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">108.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1455.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1108.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">V</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">]Cr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">152.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">43.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">106.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1644.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5188.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">860.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1590.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">934.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2616.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">516.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">850.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Co</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ni</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">295.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">638.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">125.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">221.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">159.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">288.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">485.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">81.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">261.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">156.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">As</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">107.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">111.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">32.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Se</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">98.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">176.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">53.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">95.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">110.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">274.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">53.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">102.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">54.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e5229"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> SD is 1 standard deviation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e6410">Comparisons of trace element concentrations with the reported data
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.91}[.91]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2015<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2013–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2012–2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2012–2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2008–2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2009–2010</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">this study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Zhang et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Zhao et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Li et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Lai et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Tao et al. (2014a)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Zhang et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Huang et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">P. S. Zhao et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Winter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yangtze River</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Northern South</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">East China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Taiwan Strait</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Guangzhou</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Chengdu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Wuhan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Shanghai</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Beijing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">channel<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(rural)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Al</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">As</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ni</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">V</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e6432"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Sampling periods. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Sampling sites.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e7104">The enrichment factors (EFs) were applied to distinguish crustal elements
from the anthropogenic sources. The formula to evaluate EFs is
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M376" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aerosol</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crust</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          of which EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the enrichment factor of element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the concentrations of element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and reference element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
aerosol, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the background content of
elements in the MLYR soil (Wei et al., 1991). Al was determined to originate
from soil. Hence, it was selected as the reference element for the
calculation. The elements of EFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> included Al, K, Mg, and Na, all of
which were regarded as coming from crustal or resuspended local soil. The species
with higher EFs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> EFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were thought to be a mixture of
crustal and anthropogenic sources, including Cr, Cu, Co, Ni, and V. Trace
elements of EFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including Ca, Zn, Se, Pb, As, Mo, Fe, and Cd, were
attributed to anthropogenic sources. To further explore sources of trace
elements and potential geographical distributions, principle component analysis (PCA) was used to classify
the main source of trace elements of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using the rotate component
matrix and PSCF for individual elements was performed to infer the potential
source and/or pathway regions. As shown in Fig. 5a, trace elements were
classified into four categories (PCA), which could explain 86.73 % of the
variance, indicating that the major sources of elements of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could
be considered and explained. More specifically, the first component
(component 1) could account for 38.48 % of the variance, which was
derived from coal combustion, including the high loadings of Cd, As, Pb, Tl,
and Se. Particularly, Se was generally considered a tracer for coal
combustion due to its formation in the high-temperature environment. Se
produced by the rapid gas-to-particle conversion could undergo long-range
transport (Nriagu, 1989; Wen and Carignan, 2007). As shown in Fig. S6b, a
significant correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Se also confirmed coal combustion. Furthermore, As and
Pb mainly originated from coal combustion after phasing out of leaded
gasoline in<?pagebreak page14454?> China since 1997 (Xu et al., 2012), both of which had
significant correlations with Se. Component 2 had a variation of
25.45 %, contributed by the high loadings of Al, Mg, Ca, and K, all of
which obviously represented crustal or soil elements, and showed low
EF values (EFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except Ca). Component 3, accounting for 15.14 %
of the variation, was considered to be the primary source of V, Co, and Ni. Both
V and Ni were usually regarded as tracers of heavy oil combustion (M. Zhao
et al., 2013; Becagli et al., 2017). The fourth component (component 4)
showed high loadings of Mn, Co, Zn, and Fe, all of which could explain
7.33 % of the variance. Fe exhibited high EF values, indicating that
it may originate from anthropogenic sources. Anthropogenic Fe was usually
deemed to originate from steel factories and/or shipyards, both of which were
densely distributed along the Yangtze River (Fu et al., 2014). Their chemical
processes and potential source contributions are detailed in Sect. 3.4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7358"><bold>(a)</bold> Principal component analysis (PCA) of the typical
elements in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold> time series of four typical element
sources derived from PCA. All of the units are in micrograms per cubic meter.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14445/2018/acp-18-14445-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7383">Probable sources from PSCF for individual elements in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during the YRC. The criteria are the mean concentration for all.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14445/2018/acp-18-14445-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Regional difference in formation mechanisms of aerosol pollution
and potential source contributions of elements in PM${}_{{2.5}}$ over the MLYR region}?><title>Regional difference in formation mechanisms of aerosol pollution
and potential source contributions of elements in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the MLYR region</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Secondary component pollution related to coal combustion in
central China</title>
      <p id="d1e7424">As illustrated in Fig. 3, the mass concentrations of SNA with an average of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increased dramatically from coastal
to inland cities and exhibited the highest level (no. 6,
79.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Wuhan region (EP-4), accounting for nearly
50 % of the local PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass loading. As mentioned above,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also presented the highest
concentrations
in this region. Furthermore, Wuhan and the surrounding regions were
controlled by a low-pressure system with low wind speed and high-RH
conditions (Fig. S3), which have been verified to cause haze episodes
(X. J. Zhao et al., 2013; Quan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2010). In addition,
the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Wuhan area was close
to the values of cities in northern China (relatively low) (Fig. 4), suggesting
that the stationary sources (such as coal-fired power stations or stove
emissions) dominated in this region. Heavy clouds and high humidity in central
China suggested aqueous-phase transformation processes were probably the main
reaction path of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2016;
X. J. Zhao et al., 2013). In addition, the mass fractions of SNA in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
also peaked in rural regions (EP-2 and EP-6), which was in accord with the
low ratio of T <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> B in these regions, suggesting that aerosol particles in rural regions were well aged.</p>
      <p id="d1e7580">Meanwhile, trace elements for coal combustion (component 1) also had the
highest
concentrations in EP-4 and EP-5 (Fig. 5b) when the ship anchored in Wuhan and
traveled through the Jiujiang area. As illustrated in Fig. 6a–d, As, Cd, Pb,
and Se showed similar source distribution. The higher PSCF values in
Hubei, Hunan, and Jiangxi provinces coincided well with the uneven regional
distribution of residential coal consumption (Fig. S7) in central China,
suggesting coal-related PM pollution was quite serious in this region during
this cruise. The peak mass fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Wuhan also confirmed this result Thus, we conclude
that coal combustion contributed significantly to serious pollution with a
high SNA loading in Wuhan and the surrounding regions during sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Mineral dust in the YRD region</title>
      <p id="d1e7625">In contrast to SNA distribution, the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  along this
cruise increased from the mainland to the coast of the East China Sea (Fig. 3). The peak concentration of crustal elements (component 2) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mass fraction of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred in EP-7 when a cold front and
associated northeast winds arrived, accompanied by floating dust (Figs. 3
and 5b). The dust episode was verified by the MODIS
true-color image on 2 and 3 December (Fig. S4) and was further confirmed by a
drastic decrease in RH with the prevailing northwest wind (Table 2 and
Fig. S3). As shown in Fig. 6e–h, the YRD region and the Loess Plateau
with the highest PSCF values were identified as important source regions
and/or pathways for crustal elements of Al, K, Mg, and Ca. Meanwhile,
central China also showed distribution of K and Mg, for which the coal
combustion in this region could be primarily responsible. Furthermore, Ca
showed high EFs (EFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that the crustal
element may not derive from a natural source but from anthropogenic
resuspension of dust from road and/or construction activities along the Yangtze
River. To further evaluate the impact of anthropogenic Ca, the equation
below was applied:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M418" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">anthropogenic</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crust</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crust</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of Ca to Al in the crust,
and its value is 0.5. According to this method, the average
Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">anthropogenic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the peak level reached 3.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on 3 December. If all
Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">anthropogenic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the<?pagebreak page14457?> samples of other cities and cruises
(Table 4) were calculated according to the same method, the level in this
cruise was much higher than those in other samples, suggesting that
anthropogenic dust dominated and was distributed in the YRD region during the
period.</p>
      <p id="d1e7803">Resembling the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution pattern, the maximum concentration and
mass fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were also
measured during EP-7. Significant correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggested that dust could be the major source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampled during the YRC (Fig. 3). In general, it is well known that dust
particles with high alkalinity could first neutralize
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in aerosol particles and then
atmospheric ammonia was absorbed. The concentrations and mass fractions of
SNA in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> slightly increased at the end of the cruise (EP-7 and EP-8)
(Fig. 3) since carbonate in aerosol could enhance the uptake of acidic gases
on particles (Huang et al., 2010). Meanwhile, the increasing mass
ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in EP-7 and EP-8 was
attributed to two main reasons (Fig. 3). The mobile sources (such as vehicle
emissions) increased and released a huge amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when
the vessel was close to megacities (Huang et al., 2013). Furthermore,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could transform into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via heterogeneous
processes on the dust aerosol surface (Nie et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS3">
  <title>Heavy metals in megacities</title>
      <p id="d1e8004">Heavy metals have toxic effects on plants, animals, and human beings.
However, there is no uniform standard<?pagebreak page14458?> concentration as a control indicator
(Sharma and Agrawal, 2005). The trace elements (component 3 and component 4),
with high EFs ranging from 24 to 1213, were considered to mainly come from
heavy oil and industry, respectively. The high concentrations of V and Ni
were observed when the ship berthed in the Waigaoqiao port region of
Shanghai (EP-8) (Fig. 5b), where some field observations also identified
that heavy oil combustion exerts a significant impact on the local air quality
(M. Zhao et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017).
It is also reported that the transition metals of Ni and V were greatly
enriched in smaller particles with a diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Jang
et al., 2007). Fine-particle Ni (Fig. 6i) had almost the same spatial
distribution as Cr (Fig. 6j), and Shanghai, Jiangsu, and the east of Anhui
were identified as the major potential source regions and/or pathways, owing
to ship emissions, nonferrous metal mining, and smelting industries. The
Mongolian plateau was also a source region, indicating that natural
dust may be another possible source for Cr and Ni. However, the high PSCF
values of fine-particle V were only derived from the YRD region and Mongolian
plateau (Fig. 6j). V was considered to originate from heavy
oil combustion, while Ni and Cr probably have other sources (Table S1)
(M. Zhao et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e8024">The temporal variations in component 4 nearly peaked in Wuhan and Shanghai
(EP-4, EP-7, and EP-8) (Fig. 5b) where the China Baowu steel industry and
numerous shipyards are located (Ivošević et al.,
2016). Fine-particle Fe, Co, Mn, and Zn displayed similar regional
distribution (Fig. 6l–o), and the high PSCF levels were observed in the YRD
region, indicating that steel industries and/or shipyards were densely
distributed in the east of Anhui, Jiangsu, and Shanghai. In addition, the high PSCF
value for Zn (Fig. 6l) was also exhibited in Hubei, Henan, and
Shanxi provinces, probably due to the influence of coal combustion and
nonferrous metal smelting activities in these regions (T. Li et al., 2015).
Overall, it should be noted that anthropogenic sources in megacities (WNS)
were dominant origins for trace elements in fine particles collected during
this cruise.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS4">
  <title>Biomass burning in rural regions</title>
      <p id="d1e8033">Numerous studies have also confirmed that levoglucosan mostly originates from
BB (Liang et al., 2017; X. Ding et al., 2013; Wan et al., 2017; Wang et al.,
2014). The distribution of levoglucosan is irregularly parabolic from inland
to coastal areas in Fig. 3. The maximum value of levoglucosan
(0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was observed in the rural of Anhui Province
(EP-6), while its level in the YRD region (EP-8) was very low. The elevated
levels of CO and low concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
also confirmed BB in EP-6 and EP-7 (Table 2). However, fire points could not
be apparently observed in the satellite-detected fire maps
(<uri>https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map</uri>, last access: 1 June 2017)
due to heavy cloud cover on 27 November and 1 December. During the whole
observation period, there was only one sample (no. 12, Fig. S8) collected
during a BB event. It was verified by MODIS fire points due to a cold front
blowing heavy clouds away (Fig. S4). The slightly higher levoglucosan
concentration was observed in the night and was attributed to the lower
boundary layer at night and BB for heating and cooking in the rural regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e8080">The levoglucosan concentration and ratio of OC to
levoglucosan (OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> levoglucosan) were
also widely applied to estimate the contribution of BB to OC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
An empirical model was utilized as proposed by Wan et al. (2017):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M449" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lev</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ambient</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lev</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The differences of the (lev <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio among different
biomass fuels and combustion conditions were taken into account. Thus, the
average (lev <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BB</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 8.14 % was selected to
calculate the contribution of BB to OC (Wan et al., 2017). Figure S9 presents
the variation in levoglucosan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratio along the Yangtze River. The ratio of
levoglucosan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC during this cruise ranged from 0.03 % to 0.91 %
with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, which was comparable to that of
Lin'an in the YRD region (Liang et al., 2017). However, the ratio of
levoglucosan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC during the YRC was near an order of magnitude lower
than its value in New Delhi (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) (Li et al., 2014) and
Lumbini (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) on the northern edge of the Indo-Gangetic
Plain (Wan et al., 2017), where BB plays an important role in air quality.
Figure S9 also shows the time series of contribution of BB OC to OC. The
average contribution of BB OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, while the
mean mass fraction of OC to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was slightly higher than 20 %. The
peak contribution of OC derived from BB to total OC of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nearly
accounted for 11 % in EP-6, which approached that of the Pearl River
region sites (13 %) (Ho et al., 2014). Here, it is emphasized that our
method based on empirical formula and value is just a rough estimation.
Hence, the radiocarbon measurement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of carbonaceous aerosol
and air quality model simulation will need to confirm this result in the
future.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e8299">Time series of V concentration (read column), estimates of primary
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from ship emissions, and number of ships distributed in the Yangtze
River channel during the YRC.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14445/2018/acp-18-14445-2018-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Ship emission</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <title>Primary ship emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e8330">Over the past few decades,
China's rapid economic development has led to increasingly busy shipping
transportation in the Yangtze River. However, there is lack of data related
to ship emissions along the Yangtze River, especially in inland areas. The
ratio of V to Ni was used to judge whether ship emissions could influence air
quality (Isakson et al., 2001). The average ratio of V <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ni during the
cruise is 1.27, which was in good agreement with previous studies (Pandolfi
et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2014). Emission factors of heavy metals from
different types of fuel oil were also analyzed in our group (Table S1). Only
heavy oil contained V, while the V levels emitted from other diesel and
petrol<?pagebreak page14459?> sources were under the detector limits. In this study, only V was
regarded as a tracer for heavy oil combustion. However, it was still
difficult to distinguish V from refinery and ship emissions. Hence, the
high-resolution back trajectory and high-resolution of the ship position from
the AIS data were applied to investigate ship plumes during this cruise. As
plotted in Fig. 7, the numbers of the ship from AIS were closely related to
the V concentrations. From the inland region to the East China Sea at
Shanghai, the concentration of V of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generally increased and
reached the highest level of 0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on 4 December when
the vessel berthed in the anchorage of the Yangtze River estuary. Meanwhile,
air masses on this evening originated from the port and anchorage (Fig. S10).
Hence, V of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampled in the port of Shanghai could be attributable
to ship emissions, especially from oceangoing vessels.</p>
      <p id="d1e8377">The contribution of primary ship emissions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could be calculated
by the equation developed by Agrawal et al. (2009):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M472" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HFO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the primary PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
estimated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a coefficient of
the fraction of V from ship emissions in fine particles in China (0.85);
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average ratio of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to normalized V
emitted (ppm); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the V amount of the samples
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the YRC and is the V content of heavy oil on
average from the vessels (ppm). The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set as
8205.8 ppm as Agrawal et al. (2009) reported. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HFO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set as 65.3 ppm, which represents the average
V content (M. Zhao et al., 2013). The average concentration of primary ship
emissions was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging from 0.02 to
6.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is higher than that at Tuoji Dao
(0.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zhang et al., 2014). The peak level of primary
ship emissions was observed in the Shanghai harbor.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Ship emission contribution to {$\protect\chem{SO^{{2-}}_{{4}}}$}, {$\protect\chem{NO^{{-}}_{{3}}}$}, and OC}?><title>Ship emission contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OC</title>
      <p id="d1e8682">To in-depth characterize the contribution of the ship emissions to secondary
fine particles, a lower limit of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V, EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V, and OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V
ratios (equal to the average minus 1 standard deviation) was applied to
estimate the particulate from heavy oil combustion along the
Yangtze River (Becagli et al., 2017). As presented in Fig. S11a–b,
the mass ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V decreased rapidly with increasing V
concentration. According to ship traffic numbers, weather conditions, and the
EFs of different types of oils (Table S1), the samples with V <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were mainly considered to come from ship
emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e8809">The limit ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V, and
OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V, and the estimation of ship emission contributions to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is summarized in
Table S2 in the Supplement. The minimum ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V in
this cruise was nearly two times larger than the limit ratio for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V, which was contrary to the previous results with
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from ship emissions observed in summer on the
island of Lampedusa (35.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in the central
Mediterranean. In general, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
aerosol were mainly formed through gas precursors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, both of which were completely different
for lift time and chemical processes in the atmosphere. High UV radiation and
humidity could accelerate the reaction rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhou et al., 2016). However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was in
gas-aerosol equilibrium with gaseous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (g). Low temperature and
humidity would shift the gas-aerosol equilibrium to the particle phase
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Matthias et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2016). One reason
for this discrepancy was probably meteorological and photochemical
conditions, which led to lower sulfur conversion rate and particulate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> domination in low temperatures and moisture in winter
during this cruise (Table 2). Conversely, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may have other sources in the Shanghai
port, whereas Lampedusa was a remote site (Becagli et al., 2017). The average
estimated concentration of minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from ship
emissions was 1.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the YRC, which was similar
to the value (1.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured in the Mediterranean
(Becagli et al., 2017, 2012).</p>
      <?pagebreak page14460?><p id="d1e9177">EC and OC were also estimated using the same methods for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the lower limit for the OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V and EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> V
ratios is also
presented in Fig. S11c–d. In addition, significant correlation between V and
EC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) suggested that V and EC have the same sources
(Agrawal et al., 2009). In this cruise, organic matter (OM) of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
estimated from OC by multiplying a conversion factor of 1.4, due to typical
fresh emissions and weak light in winter (Becagli et al., 2017). The
estimated lower limit for the average of ship emissions was
7.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, contributing 6.41 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
YRC. The peak ship contribution could reach up to 36.04 % of total
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> when the vessel berthed in the Waigaoqiao port of Shanghai, which
was slightly above the value (20 %–30 %) estimated by Liu et
al. (2017) during ship-plume-influenced periods. It should be noted that the
ship emissions decreased from the Shanghai port to the inland area. One
reason for this corresponded to the density of ships in the Yangtze River
channel. However, fuel oils were completely different between the ships
traveling on inland waterways and oceangoing vessels. In general, light
diesel with low EFs of heavy metals (such as V and Ni) was widely used by the
ships on the river, whereas heavy oil with a high content of V and Ni was
widely burned onboard marine vessels (Table S1). Oceangoing ship emissions
were probably the major air pollution sources in the Shanghai port. Hence, it
is urgent to establish emission control areas (ECAs) in Shanghai ports.
However, it is worth noting that our estimation based on empirical values was
also limited by meteorological conditions and sample numbers. Hence,
long-term observation and high-resolution model simulations of ship emissions
should be strengthened as part of the control of air quality along the
Yangtze River, especially in the Shanghai harbor cluster.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e9305">In order to better characterize air quality over the region of MLYR,
an intensive shipboard atmospheric observation was conducted to measure and analyze a suite of air pollutants (trace gases and fine particles)
during the YRC. The average concentrations
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the cruise, respectively. The
most abundant ionic species in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Combined with satellite data,
back trajectories, principal component analysis (PCA), and potential source
contribution function (PSCF), major chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
manifested great geographical differences and diverse anthropogenic
emission sources from coastal to inland regions. Wuhan suffered secondary
aerosol pollution with SNA accounting for nearly 50 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
significant correlation between Se and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed that stationary
emissions may play an important role in SNA formation. The concentrations of
levoglucosan of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO column levels from the satellite data were
significantly enhanced in the rural areas (Anhui and Jiangxi), indicating
that BB from both shores of the Yangtze River may have made a remarkable
contribution to air pollution in rural areas during the YRC. Further, the crustal
elements of Al and Ca presented high levels in the YRD regions, and a
high value of enrichment factors (EFs) of Ca (EFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) coupled
with the PSCF results suggested the crustal elements may derive from
resuspension of dust from road and/or construction activity along the banks
of the Yangtze River. Ship emissions displayed a significant effect on air
quality and could contribute to more than 36 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
ports of Shanghai. As far as we know, it is the first comprehensive
observation of air quality over the MLYR region using a mobile vessel
platform. The results herein suggest that the differentiated control
measures in accordance with local pollution characteristics should be
considered
to tackle air pollution.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e9803">The satellite data are accessible from
<uri>https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov/</uri> (1 June 2017). The data for
gaseous pollutant concentration and chemical composition in this article are
available from the authors upon request (samllclock@126.com).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e9809">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14445-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14445-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e9818">ZL,  HF and JC conceived
the central idea, analyzed the data, and wrote the initial draft of the
paper. The remaining authors contributed to refining the ideas and finalizing
this paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e9824">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e9830">This article is part of the special issue “Regional transport
and transformation of air pollution in eastern China”. It is not associated
with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9836">This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China
(nos. 2016YFC0202700, 2014BAC22B00), the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (nos. 91743202, 21527814), and the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
(690958-MARSU-RISE-2015).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Yuanhang Zhang<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: The
impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on<?pagebreak page14461?> indirect aerosol climate
forcing, Nature, 432, 1014–1017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature03174</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Agrawal, H., Eden, R., Zhang, X., Fine, P. M., Katzenstein, A., Miller, J.
W., Ospital, J., and Teffera, S.: Primary particulate matter from ocean-going
engines in the Southern California Air Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43,
5398–5402, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
An, J., Wang, H., Shen, L., Zhu, B., Zou, J., Gao, J., and Kang, H.:
Characteristics of new particle formation events in Nanjing, China: Effect of
water-soluble ions, Atmos. Environ., 108, 32–40, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baltrenas, P., Baltrenaite, E., Sereviciene, V., and Pereira, P.: Atmospheric
BTEX concentrations in the vicinity of the crude oil refinery of the Baltic
region, Environ. Monit. Assess., 182, 115–127, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Becagli, S., Sferlazzo, D. M., Pace, G., di Sarra, A., Bommarito, C.,
Calzolai, G., Ghedini, C., Lucarelli, F., Meloni, D., Monteleone, F., Severi,
M., Traversi, R., and Udisti, R.: Evidence for heavy fuel oil combustion
aerosols from chemical analyses at the island of Lampedusa: a possible large
role of ships emissions in the Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3479–3492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3479-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3479-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Becagli, S., Anello, F., Bommarito, C., Cassola, F., Calzolai, G., Di Iorio,
T., di Sarra, A., Gómez-Amo, J.-L., Lucarelli, F., Marconi, M., Meloni,
D., Monteleone, F., Nava, S., Pace, G., Severi, M., Sferlazzo, D. M.,
Traversi, R., and Udisti, R.: Constraining the ship contribution to the
aerosol of the central Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2067–2084,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2067-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2067-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Boreddy, S. K. R. and Kawamura, K.: A 12-year observation of water-soluble
ions in TSP aerosols collected at a remote marine location in the western
North Pacific: an outflow region of Asian dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6437–6453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6437-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6437-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Calhoun, J. A., Bates, T. S., and Charlson, R. J.: Sulfur isotope
measurements of submicrometer sulfate aerosol particles over the Pacific
Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 1877–1880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl02304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91gl02304</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chameides, W. L., Yu, H., Liu, S. C., Bergin, M., Zhou, X., Mearns, L., Wang,
G., Kiang, C. S., Saylor, R. D., and Luo, C.: Case study of the effects of
atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: an opportunity to
enhance crop yields in China through emission controls?, P. Nat. Acad. Sci.
USA, 96, 13626–13633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.24.13626" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.96.24.13626</ext-link>,1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Z., Wang, S., Fu, X., Watson, J. G., Jiang, J., Fu, Q., Chen, C., Xu,
B., Yu, J., Chow, J. C., and Hao, J.: Impact of biomass burning on haze
pollution in the Yangtze River delta, China: a case study in summer 2011,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4573–4585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Coggon, M. M., Sorooshian, A., Wang, Z., Metcalf, A. R., Frossard, A. A.,
Lin, J. J., Craven, J. S., Nenes, A., Jonsson, H. H., Russell, L. M., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Ship impacts on the marine atmosphere: insights
into the contribution of shipping emissions to the properties of marine
aerosol and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8439–8458,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ding, A. J., Fu, C. B., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Petäjä, T.,
Kerminen, V.-M., Wang, T., Xie, Y., Herrmann, E., Zheng, L. F., Nie, W., Liu,
Q., Wei, X. L., and Kulmala, M.: Intense atmospheric pollution modifies
weather: a case of mixed biomass burning with fossil fuel combustion
pollution in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10545–10554,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Wang, X., Xie, Z., Zhang, Z., and Sun, L.: Impacts of Siberian
biomass burning on organic aerosols over the North Pacific Ocean and the
Arctic: primary and secondary organic tracers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
3149–3157, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., Kong, L., Du, C., Zhanzakova, A., Wang, L., Fu, H., Chen, J., Yang,
X., and Cheng, T.: Long-range and regional transported size-resolved
atmospheric aerosols during summertime in urban Shanghai, Sci. Total
Environ., 583, 334–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.073</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modelling
system for trajectories, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, Q., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Ma, H., Feng, J., Yu, Q., Yang, X., Ng, S. K.,
Fu, Q., and Chen, L.: Spatial and Seasonal Dynamics of Ship Emissions over
the Yangtze River Delta and East China Sea and Their Potential Environmental
Influence, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1322–1329, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fu, H. B., Shang, G. F., Lin, J., Hu, Y. J., Hu, Q. Q., Guo, L., Zhang, Y.
C., and Chen, J. M.: Fractional iron solubility of aerosol particles enhanced
by biomass burning and ship emission in Shanghai, East China, Sci. Total
Environ., 481, 377–391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.118</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Wang, S., Zhao, B., Xing, J., Cheng, Z., Liu, H., and Hao, J.:
Emission inventory of primary pollutants and chemical speciation in 2010 for
the Yangtze River Delta region, China, Atmos. Environ., 70, 39–50, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gaston, C. J., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Gilman, J. B., Bon, D. M., Kuster,
W. C., and Prather, K. A.: The impact of shipping, agricultural, and urban
emissions on single particle chemistry observed aboard the R/V
<italic>Atlantis</italic> during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5003–5017,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Geng, F., Zhang, Q., Tie, X., Huang, M., Ma, X., Deng, Z., Yu, Q., Quan, J.,
and Zhao, C.: Aircraft measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CO, VOCs, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Yangtze River Delta region, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 584–593, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Girach, I., Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., and Nair, P. R.: Black carbon and
carbon monoxide over Bay of Bengal during W_ICARB: Source characteristics,
Atmos. Environ., 94, 508–517, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Han, T., Qiao, L., Zhou, M., Qu, Y., Du, J., Liu, X., Lou, S., Chen, C.,
Wang, H., and Zhang, F.: Chemical and optical properties of aerosols and
their interrelationship in winter in the megacity Shanghai of China, J.
Environ. Sci.-China, 27, 59–69, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Han, Y.-J., Holsen, T. M., Hopke, P. K., and Yi, S.-M.: Comparison between
back-trajectory based modeling and Lagrangian backward dispersion modeling
for locating sources of reactive gaseous mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39,
1715–1723, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>He, Q., Li, C., Geng, F., Yang, H., Li, P., Li, T., Liu, D., and Pei, Z.:
Aerosol optical properties retrieved from Sun photometer measurements over
Shanghai, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D16204,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017220</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ho, K. F., Engling, G., Sai Hang Ho, S., Huang, R., Lai, S., Cao, J., and
Lee, S. C.: Seasonal variations of anhydrosugars in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Pearl
River Delta Region, China, Tellus B., 66, 103–107,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22577" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v66.22577</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hopke, P. K., Barrie, L. A., Li, S. M., Cheng, M. D., Li, C., and Xie, Y.:
Possible sources and preferred pathways for biogenic<?pagebreak page14462?> and non-sea-salt sulfur
for the high Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 16595–16603, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hsu, S.-C., Liu, S. C., Kao, S.-J., Jeng, W.-L., Huang, Y.-T., Tseng, C.-M.,
Tsai, F., Tu, J.-Y., and Yang, Y.: Water-soluble species in the marine
aerosol from the northern South China Sea: High chloride depletion related to
air pollution, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D19304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd008844</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Fu, J. S., Wang, Q., Liu, T., Zhang, R.,
Jiang, Y., Deng, C., Fu, Q., Hsu, N. C., and Cao, B.: Typical types and
formation mechanisms of haze in an Eastern Asia megacity, Shanghai, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 105–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-105-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-105-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Wang, Q., Fu, J. S., Zhang, R., Li, J., Deng,
C., and Fu, Q.: Impact of anthropogenic emission on air quality over a
megacity – revealed from an intensive atmospheric campaign during the
Chinese Spring Festival, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11631–11645,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11631-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11631-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Wang, Q., Fu, J. S., Fu, Q., Liu, T., and
Deng, C.: How to improve the air quality over megacities in China: pollution
characterization and source analysis in Shanghai before, during, and after
the 2010 World Expo, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5927–5942,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5927-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5927-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Isakson, J., Persson, T. A., and Lindgren, E. S.: Identification and
assessment of ship emissions and their effects in the harbour of
Göteborg, Sweden, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3659–3666, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Ivošević, T., Stelcer, E., Orlić, I., Bogdanović Radović,
I., and Cohen, D.: Characterization and source apportionment of fine
particulate sources at Rijeka, Croatia from 2013 to 2015, Nucl. Instrum.
Meth. A., 371, 376–380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.10.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.nimb.2015.10.023</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., and Kukkonen, J.: A comprehensive inventory
of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 71–84, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-71-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jang, H. N., Lee, S. J. H., Hwang, K. W., Yoo, J. I., Sok, C. H., and Kim, S.
H.: Formation of fine particles enriched by V and Ni from heavy oil
combustion: Anthropogenic sources and drop-tube furnace experiments, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 1053–1063, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, T., Kundzewicz, Z. W., and Su, B.: Changes in monthly precipitation
and flood hazard in the Yangtze River Basin, China, Int. J. Climatol., 28,
1471–1481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, A. D. L. A., Roberts, D. L., and Slingo, A.: A climate model study of
indirect radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulphate aerosols, Nature, 370,
450–453, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kang, H., Zhu, B., Su, J., Wang, H., Zhang, Q., and Wang, F.: Analysis of a
long-lasting haze episode in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Res., 120–121, 78–87,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.08.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kerminen, V.-M., Hillamo, R., Teinilä, K., Pakkanen, T., Allegrini, I.,
and Sparapani, R.: Ion balances of size-resolved tropospheric aerosol
samples: implications for the acidity and atmospheric processing of aerosols,
Atmos. Environ., 35, 5255–5265, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kong, S., Li, X., Li, L., Yin, Y., Chen, K., Yuan, L., Zhang, Y., Shan, Y.,
and Ji, Y.: Variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during winter haze period around 2014 Chinese Spring Festival at
Nanjing: Insights of source changes, air mass direction and firework particle
injection, Sci. Total Environ., 520, 59–72,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.001</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lai, S., Zhao, Y., Ding, A., Zhang, Y., Song, T., Zheng, J., Ho, K. F., Lee,
S.-C., and Zhong, L.: Characterization of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the major chemical
components during a 1-year campaign in rural Guangzhou, Southern China,
Atmos. Res., 167, 208–215, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Wang, X., Ye, X., Wang, L., Yang, X., Kan, H.,
Donaldson, D. J., and Mellouki, A.: Evolution of biomass burning smoke
particles in the dark, Atmos. Environ., 120, 244–252, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Wang, G., Aggarwal, S. G., Huang, Y., Ren, Y., Zhou, B., Singh, K.,
Gupta, P. K., Cao, J., and Zhang, R.: Comparison of abundances, compositions
and sources of elements, inorganic ions and organic compounds in atmospheric
aerosols from Xi'an and New Delhi, two megacities in China and India, Sci.
Total Environ., 476–477, 485–495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.011</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Li, T., Wang, Y., Li, W. J., Chen, J. M., Wang, T., and Wang, W. X.:
Concentrations and solubility of trace elements in fine particles at a
mountain site, southern China: regional sources and cloud processing, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 8987–9002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8987-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8987-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Li, T.-C., Yuan, C.-S., Hung, C.-H., Lin, H.-Y., Huang, H.-C., and Lee,
C.-L.: Chemical Characteristics of Marine Fine Aerosols over Sea and at
Offshore Islands during Three Cruise Sampling Campaigns in the Taiwan Strait
– Sea Salts and Anthropogenic Particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2016-384</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Liang, L., Engling, G., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Liu, C.,
Zhang, G., Liu, X., and Ma, Q.: Chemical characteristics of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during
summer at a background site of the Yangtze River Delta in China, Atmos. Res.,
198, 163–172, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Liao, T., Wang, S., Ai, J., Gui, K., Duan, B., Zhao, Q., Zhang, X., Jiang,
W., and Sun, Y.: Heavy pollution episodes, transport pathways and potential
sources of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the winter of 2013 in Chengdu (China), Sci.
Total Environ., 584, 1056–1065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.160</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J.-T.: Satellite constraint for emissions of nitrogen oxides from
anthropogenic, lightning and soil sources over East China on a
high-resolution grid, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2881–2898,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2881-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2881-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Z., Lu, X., Feng, J., Fan, Q., Zhang, Y., and Yang, X.: Influence of
Ship Emissions on Urban Air Quality: A Comprehensive Study Using Highly
Time-Resolved Online Measurements and Numerical Simulation in Shanghai,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 202–211, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Matthias, V., Bewersdorff, I., Aulinger, A., and Quante, M.: The contribution
of ship emissions to air pollution in the North Sea regions, Environ.
Pollut., 158, 2241–2250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Moldanová, J., Fridell, E., Popovicheva, O., Demirdjian, B., Tishkova,
V., Faccinetto, A., and Focsa, C.: Characterisation of particulate matter and
gaseous emissions from a large ship diesel engine, Atmos. Environ., 43,
2632–2641, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nakamura, T., Matsumoto, K., and Uematsu, M.: Chemical characteristics of
aerosols transported from Asia to the East China Sea:<?pagebreak page14463?> an evaluation of
anthropogenic combined nitrogen deposition in autumn, Atmos. Environ., 39,
1749–1758, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Nie, W., Wang, T., Xue, L. K., Ding, A. J., Wang, X. F., Gao, X. M., Xu, Z.,
Yu, Y. C., Yuan, C., Zhou, Z. S., Gao, R., Liu, X. H., Wang, Y., Fan, S. J.,
Poon, S., Zhang, Q. Z., and Wang, W. X.: Asian dust storm observed at a rural
mountain site in southern China: chemical evolution and heterogeneous
photochemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11985–11995,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11985-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11985-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Novakov, T. and Penner, J. E.: Large contribution of organic aerosols to
cloud-condensation-nuclei concentrations, Nature, 365, 823–826, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nriagu, J. O.: A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace
metals, Nature, 338, 47–49, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pandis, S. N., Capaldo, K., Corbett, J. J., Kasibhatla, P., and Fischbeck,
P.: Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate
forcing over the ocean, Nature, 400, 743–746, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Pandolfi, M., Gonzalez-Castanedo, Y., Alastuey, A., Jd, D. L. R., Mantilla,
E., As, D. L. C., Querol, X., Pey, J., Amato, F., and Moreno, T.: Source
apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at multiple sites in the strait of
Gibraltar by PMF: impact of shipping emissions, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.,
18, 260–269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0373-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-010-0373-4</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate
and health effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 7520–7540,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/anie.200501122</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Quan, J., Zhang, Q., He, H., Liu, J., Huang, M., and Jin, H.: Analysis of the
formation of fog and haze in North China Plain (NCP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8205–8214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Seaton, A., Godden, D., MacNee, W., and Donaldson, K.: Particulate air
pollution and acute health effects, Lancet, 345, 176–178, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sharma, R. K. and Agrawal, M.: Biological effects of heavy metals: An
overview, J. Environ. Biol., 26, 301–313, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Shen, G. F., Yuan, S. Y., Xie, Y. N., Xia, S. J., Li, L., Yao, Y. K., Qiao,
Y. Z., Zhang, J., Zhao, Q. Y., and Ding, A. J.: Ambient levels and temporal
variations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at a residential site in the
mega-city, Nanjing, in the western Yangtze River Delta, China, J. Environ.
Sci. Heal. A, 49, 171–178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2013.838851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10934529.2013.838851</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J.,
Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O.,
Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol–climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, X., Luo, X., Yan, C., Zhen, Z., Xu, J., Zhang, D., Suo, C., and Ding,
Y.: Spatio-temporal characteristics of air pollution in Nanjing during 2013
to 2016 under the pollution control and meteorological factors, J. Environ.
Earth. (China), 8, 506–515, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Gao, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Che, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., Jing,
J., Cao, J., and Hsu, S.-C.: PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in a megacity of southwest
China: source apportionment and implication, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
8679–8699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K., Zhang, R., Lin, Z., Zhang, Z., Lin, M., Cao, J.,
Liu, S., and Wang, G.: Impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical compositions on
aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou – the largest megacity in South China,
Atmos. Res., 135, 48–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tao, Y., Yin, Z., Ye, X., Ma, Z., and Chen, J.: Size distribution of
water-soluble inorganic ions in urban aerosols in Shanghai, Atmos. Pollut.
Res., 5, 639–647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5094/APR.2014.073</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Environmental Technology
Verification Report: Photoacoustic Infrared Monitor, Innova AirTech
Instruments Type 1312 Multi-Gas Monitor, EPA #600-R-98-143, USEPA,
Washington, DC, USA, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Wan, X., Kang, S., Li, Q., Rupakheti, D., Zhang, Q., Guo, J., Chen, P.,
Tripathee, L., Rupakheti, M., Panday, A. K., Wang, W., Kawamura, K., Gao, S.,
Wu, G., and Cong, Z.: Organic molecular tracers in the atmospheric aerosols
from Lumbini, Nepal, in the northern Indo-Gangetic Plain: influence of
biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8867–8885,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8867-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-8867-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin,
Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang,
Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L., Shao,
M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Cai, L.,
Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to
Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616540113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Lou, S., Huang, C., Qiao, L., Tang, X., Chen, C., Zeng, L., Wang,
Q., Zhou, M., and Lu, S.: Source Profiles of Volatile Organic Compounds from
Biomass Burning in Yangtze River Delta, China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 14,
818–828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Tian, M., Li, X., Chang, Q., Cao, J., Yang, F., Ma, Y., and He, K.:
Chemical Composition and Light Extinction Contribution of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Urban
Beijing for a 1-Year Period, Aerosol Air Qual. Res, 15, 2200–2211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H. L., Qiao, L. P., Lou, S. R., Zhou, M., Chen, J. M., Wang, Q., Tao,
S. K., Chen, C. H., Huang, H. Y., Li, L., and Huang, C.: PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution
episode and its contributors from 2011 to 2013 in urban Shanghai, China,
Atmos. Environ., 123, 298–305, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Yu, S., Yan, R., Zhang, Q., Li, P., Wang, L., Liu, W., and Zheng,
X.: Characteristics and origins of air pollutants in Wuhan, China, based on
observations and hybrid receptor models, J. Air Waste Manage., 67, 739–753,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1240724" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2016.1240724</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Nie, W., Gao, J., Xue, L. K., Gao, X. M., Wang, X. F., Qiu, J.,
Poon, C. N., Meinardi, S., Blake, D., Wang, S. L., Ding, A. J., Chai, F. H.,
Zhang, Q. Z., and Wang, W. X.: Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics:
secondary pollutants and regional impact, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7603–7615,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Bi, X., Sheng, G., and Fu, J.: Hospital indoor
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and associated trace elements in Guangzhou, China,
Sci. Total Environ., 366, 124–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.004</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Miao, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Wu, M., and Yu, G.: Primary sources
and secondary formation of organic aerosols in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 9846–9853, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14464?><ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. Q., Zhang, X. Y., and Draxler, R. R.: TrajStat: GIS-based software
that uses various trajectory statistical analysis methods to identify
potential sources from long-term air pollution measurement data, Environ.
Modell. Softw., 24, 938–939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.01.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.01.004</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, F., Chen, J., Wu, Y., and Zheng, C.: Study of the background contents of
61 elements of soils in China, Environm. Sci. (China), 12, 12–19, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, H. and Carignan, J.: Reviews on atmospheric selenium: Emissions,
speciation and fate, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7151–7165, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, H.-W., Xiao, H.-Y., Luo, L., Shen, C.-Y., Long, A.-M., Chen, L., Long,
Z.-H., and Li, D.-N.: Atmospheric aerosol compositions over the South China
Sea: temporal variability and source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
3199–3214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3199-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3199-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Xu, H., Cao, J., Chow, J. C., Huang, R.-J., Shen, Z., Chen, L. A., Ho, K. F.,
and Watson, J. G.: Inter-annual variability of wintertime PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical
composition in Xi'an, China: Evidences of changing source emissions, Sci.
Total Environ., 545, 546–555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.070</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, H. M., Cao, J. J., Ho, K. F., Ding, H., Han, Y. M., Wang, G. H., Chow, J.
C., Watson, J. G., Khol, S. D., Qiang, J., and Li, W. T.: Lead concentrations
in fine particulate matter after the phasing out of leaded gasoline in Xi'an,
China, Atmos. Environ., 46, 217–224, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W. Y., Zhao, C. S., Ran, L., Deng, Z. Z., Liu, P. F., Ma, N., Lin, W. L.,
Xu, X. B., Yan, P., He, X., Yu, J., Liang, W. D., and Chen, L. L.:
Characteristics of pollutants and their correlation to meteorological
conditions at a suburban site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 4353–4369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Zhao, T., Liu, F., Gong, S. L., Kristovich, D., Lu, C., Guo, Y.,
Cheng, X., Wang, Y., and Ding, G.: Climate modulation of the Tibetan Plateau
on haze in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1365–1375,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1365-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1365-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhan, J., Gao, Y., Li, W., Chen, L., Lin, H., and Lin, Q.: Effects of ship
emissions on summertime aerosols at Ny-Alesund in the Arctic, Atmos. Pollut.
Res., 5, 500–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5094/APR.2014.059</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Wang, X., Huang, G., Fang, Y., and Zong, Z.:
Identification and quantification of shipping emissions in Bohai Rim, China,
Sci. Total Environ., 497, 570–577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Wang, Z., Cheng, H., Lv, X., Gong, W., Wang, X., and Zhang, G.:
Seasonal variations and chemical characteristics of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Wuhan,
central China, Sci. Total Environ., 518, 97–105,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Lou, D., Li, J., Zhang, G., and Matthias, V.:
Emission factors for gaseous and particulate pollutants from offshore diesel
engine vessels in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6319–6334,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6319-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6319-2016</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, M., Wang, X., Chen, J., Cheng, T., Wang, T., Yang, X., Gong, Y., Geng,
F., and Chen, C.: Physical characterization of aerosol particles during the
Chinese New Year's firework events, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5191–5198, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Jing, J., Tao, J., Hsu, S.-C., Wang, G., Cao, J., Lee, C. S. L.,
Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., and Shen, Z.: Chemical characterization and
source apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing: seasonal perspective, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 7053–7074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Zhuang, G., Guo, J., Yin, K., and Zhang, P.: Characterization of
aerosol over the Northern South China Sea during two cruises in 2003, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 7821–7836, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Wang, S. X., Liu, H., Xu, J. Y., Fu, K., Klimont, Z., Hao, J. M.,
He, K. B., Cofala, J., and Amann, M.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in
China: historical trends and future perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
9869–9897, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, M., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Fu, Q., Yang, X., Li, C., Zhou, B., Yu, Q., and
Chen, L.: Characteristics and ship traffic source identification of air
pollutants in China's largest port, Atmos. Environ., 64, 277–286, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, P. S., Dong, F., He, D., Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, W. Z., Yao,
Q., and Liu, H. Y.: Characteristics of concentrations and chemical
compositions for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4631–4644,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, R., Han, B., Lu, B., Zhang, N., Zhu, L., and Bai, Z.: Element
composition and source apportionment of atmospheric aerosols over the China
Sea, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 6, 191–201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2015.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5094/APR.2015.023</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng,, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, D., Li, B., Huang, X., Virkkula, A., Wu, H., Zhao, Q., Qiao, Y., Shen,
G., Ding, A., Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Li, L., Li, C., Chen, F., and Yuan, S.: The
Impacts of Emission Control and Regional Transport on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Ions and
Carbon Components in Nanjing during the 2014 Nanjing Youth Olympic Games,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 17, 730–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0131</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, M., Qiao, L., Zhu, S., Li, L., Lou, S., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Tao, S.,
Huang, C., and Chen, C.: Chemical characteristics of fine particles and their
impact on visibility impairment in Shanghai based on a 1-year period
observation, J. Environ. Sci.-China, 48, 151–160, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Zou, Y., Deng, X. J., Zhu, D., Gong, D. C., Wang, H., Li, F., Tan, H. B.,
Deng, T., Mai, B. R., Liu, X. T., and Wang, B. G.: Characteristics of 1 year
of observational data of VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a
suburban site in Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6625–6636,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6625-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6625-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Air quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River channel: a cruise campaign</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The Yangtze River is
the longest river in China; nearly one-third of the national population lives
along the river. Air quality over the Yangtze River is important as it may
have significant influences on the aquatic ecosystem, the health of everyone
living along the Yangtze River, and regional climate change. Chemical
compositions of ambient aerosol were determined during a comprehensive cruise
campaign carried out along the mid–lower reaches of the Yangtze River (MLYR)
in winter of 2015. The total average concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub> was 119.29±33.67&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>, and the dominant ionic composition in
PM<sub>2.5</sub> was SO<sup>2−</sup><sub>4</sub> with an average concentration of 15.21±6.69&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>, followed by NO<sup>−</sup><sub>3</sub> (13.76±4.99&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>), NH<sup>+</sup><sub>4</sub> (9.38±4.35&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>), and Ca<sup>2+</sup> (2.23±1.24&thinsp;µg&thinsp;m<sup>−3</sup>) in this cruise. Based on the filter samples,
the concentration and chemical composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were remarkably
varied or fluctuated from coastal areas to inland over the MLYR region.
Crustal elements (Ca, Mg, Al, and K) from floating dust showed peak
concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, while secondary
inorganic species (SO<sup>2−</sup><sub>4</sub>, NO<sup>−</sup><sub>3</sub>, and
NH<sup>+</sup><sub>4</sub>) and some of the most enriched elements (Pb, As, Se, and
Cd) presented high levels in central China (Wuhan region). The significant
correlation between Se and SO<sup>2−</sup><sub>4</sub> suggested that coal combustion
may play an important role in secondary inorganic aerosol formation. The
relatively high enrichment factors (EFs) of Ca (EFs&thinsp; &gt; 100) suggested the
crustal elements may derive from anthropogenic sources. Furthermore, the
concentration of levoglucosan in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the CO column level from
satellite observation were greatly enhanced in the rural areas (Anhui and
Jiangxi), indicating that biomass burning may make a remarkable contribution
to rural areas. The concentrations of typical tracer for heavy oil (V and Ni)
significantly increased in the Shanghai port, which was mainly ascribed to
ship emissions, based on the air mass source analysis and the relatively high
ratio of V&thinsp;∕&thinsp;Ni as well. The results shown herein portray a good picture
of air pollution along the Yangtze River.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: The
impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate
forcing, Nature, 432, 1014–1017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03174</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Agrawal, H., Eden, R., Zhang, X., Fine, P. M., Katzenstein, A., Miller, J.
W., Ospital, J., and Teffera, S.: Primary particulate matter from ocean-going
engines in the Southern California Air Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43,
5398–5402, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
An, J., Wang, H., Shen, L., Zhu, B., Zou, J., Gao, J., and Kang, H.:
Characteristics of new particle formation events in Nanjing, China: Effect of
water-soluble ions, Atmos. Environ., 108, 32–40, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baltrenas, P., Baltrenaite, E., Sereviciene, V., and Pereira, P.: Atmospheric
BTEX concentrations in the vicinity of the crude oil refinery of the Baltic
region, Environ. Monit. Assess., 182, 115–127, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Becagli, S., Sferlazzo, D. M., Pace, G., di Sarra, A., Bommarito, C.,
Calzolai, G., Ghedini, C., Lucarelli, F., Meloni, D., Monteleone, F., Severi,
M., Traversi, R., and Udisti, R.: Evidence for heavy fuel oil combustion
aerosols from chemical analyses at the island of Lampedusa: a possible large
role of ships emissions in the Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3479–3492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3479-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3479-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Becagli, S., Anello, F., Bommarito, C., Cassola, F., Calzolai, G., Di Iorio,
T., di Sarra, A., Gómez-Amo, J.-L., Lucarelli, F., Marconi, M., Meloni,
D., Monteleone, F., Nava, S., Pace, G., Severi, M., Sferlazzo, D. M.,
Traversi, R., and Udisti, R.: Constraining the ship contribution to the
aerosol of the central Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2067–2084,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2067-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2067-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boreddy, S. K. R. and Kawamura, K.: A 12-year observation of water-soluble
ions in TSP aerosols collected at a remote marine location in the western
North Pacific: an outflow region of Asian dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6437–6453, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6437-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6437-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Calhoun, J. A., Bates, T. S., and Charlson, R. J.: Sulfur isotope
measurements of submicrometer sulfate aerosol particles over the Pacific
Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 1877–1880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl02304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl02304</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chameides, W. L., Yu, H., Liu, S. C., Bergin, M., Zhou, X., Mearns, L., Wang,
G., Kiang, C. S., Saylor, R. D., and Luo, C.: Case study of the effects of
atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: an opportunity to
enhance crop yields in China through emission controls?, P. Nat. Acad. Sci.
USA, 96, 13626–13633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.24.13626" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.24.13626</a>,1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Z., Wang, S., Fu, X., Watson, J. G., Jiang, J., Fu, Q., Chen, C., Xu,
B., Yu, J., Chow, J. C., and Hao, J.: Impact of biomass burning on haze
pollution in the Yangtze River delta, China: a case study in summer 2011,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4573–4585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Coggon, M. M., Sorooshian, A., Wang, Z., Metcalf, A. R., Frossard, A. A.,
Lin, J. J., Craven, J. S., Nenes, A., Jonsson, H. H., Russell, L. M., Flagan,
R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Ship impacts on the marine atmosphere: insights
into the contribution of shipping emissions to the properties of marine
aerosol and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8439–8458,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8439-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, A. J., Fu, C. B., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Petäjä, T.,
Kerminen, V.-M., Wang, T., Xie, Y., Herrmann, E., Zheng, L. F., Nie, W., Liu,
Q., Wei, X. L., and Kulmala, M.: Intense atmospheric pollution modifies
weather: a case of mixed biomass burning with fossil fuel combustion
pollution in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10545–10554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Wang, X., Xie, Z., Zhang, Z., and Sun, L.: Impacts of Siberian
biomass burning on organic aerosols over the North Pacific Ocean and the
Arctic: primary and secondary organic tracers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
3149–3157, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Kong, L., Du, C., Zhanzakova, A., Wang, L., Fu, H., Chen, J., Yang,
X., and Cheng, T.: Long-range and regional transported size-resolved
atmospheric aerosols during summertime in urban Shanghai, Sci. Total
Environ., 583, 334–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.073</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modelling
system for trajectories, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, Q., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Ma, H., Feng, J., Yu, Q., Yang, X., Ng, S. K.,
Fu, Q., and Chen, L.: Spatial and Seasonal Dynamics of Ship Emissions over
the Yangtze River Delta and East China Sea and Their Potential Environmental
Influence, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1322–1329, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, H. B., Shang, G. F., Lin, J., Hu, Y. J., Hu, Q. Q., Guo, L., Zhang, Y.
C., and Chen, J. M.: Fractional iron solubility of aerosol particles enhanced
by biomass burning and ship emission in Shanghai, East China, Sci. Total
Environ., 481, 377–391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.118</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Wang, S., Zhao, B., Xing, J., Cheng, Z., Liu, H., and Hao, J.:
Emission inventory of primary pollutants and chemical speciation in 2010 for
the Yangtze River Delta region, China, Atmos. Environ., 70, 39–50, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gaston, C. J., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Gilman, J. B., Bon, D. M., Kuster,
W. C., and Prather, K. A.: The impact of shipping, agricultural, and urban
emissions on single particle chemistry observed aboard the R/V
<i>Atlantis</i> during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5003–5017,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Geng, F., Zhang, Q., Tie, X., Huang, M., Ma, X., Deng, Z., Yu, Q., Quan, J.,
and Zhao, C.: Aircraft measurements of O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>,
CO, VOCs, and SO<sub>2</sub> in the Yangtze River Delta region, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 584–593, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Girach, I., Nair, V. S., Babu, S. S., and Nair, P. R.: Black carbon and
carbon monoxide over Bay of Bengal during W_ICARB: Source characteristics,
Atmos. Environ., 94, 508–517, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Han, T., Qiao, L., Zhou, M., Qu, Y., Du, J., Liu, X., Lou, S., Chen, C.,
Wang, H., and Zhang, F.: Chemical and optical properties of aerosols and
their interrelationship in winter in the megacity Shanghai of China, J.
Environ. Sci.-China, 27, 59–69, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Han, Y.-J., Holsen, T. M., Hopke, P. K., and Yi, S.-M.: Comparison between
back-trajectory based modeling and Lagrangian backward dispersion modeling
for locating sources of reactive gaseous mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39,
1715–1723, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
He, Q., Li, C., Geng, F., Yang, H., Li, P., Li, T., Liu, D., and Pei, Z.:
Aerosol optical properties retrieved from Sun photometer measurements over
Shanghai, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D16204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017220</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K. F., Engling, G., Sai Hang Ho, S., Huang, R., Lai, S., Cao, J., and
Lee, S. C.: Seasonal variations of anhydrosugars in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the Pearl
River Delta Region, China, Tellus B., 66, 103–107,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22577" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22577</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hopke, P. K., Barrie, L. A., Li, S. M., Cheng, M. D., Li, C., and Xie, Y.:
Possible sources and preferred pathways for biogenic and non-sea-salt sulfur
for the high Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 16595–16603, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, S.-C., Liu, S. C., Kao, S.-J., Jeng, W.-L., Huang, Y.-T., Tseng, C.-M.,
Tsai, F., Tu, J.-Y., and Yang, Y.: Water-soluble species in the marine
aerosol from the northern South China Sea: High chloride depletion related to
air pollution, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D19304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008844</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Fu, J. S., Wang, Q., Liu, T., Zhang, R.,
Jiang, Y., Deng, C., Fu, Q., Hsu, N. C., and Cao, B.: Typical types and
formation mechanisms of haze in an Eastern Asia megacity, Shanghai, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 105–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-105-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-105-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Wang, Q., Fu, J. S., Zhang, R., Li, J., Deng,
C., and Fu, Q.: Impact of anthropogenic emission on air quality over a
megacity – revealed from an intensive atmospheric campaign during the
Chinese Spring Festival, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11631–11645,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11631-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11631-2012</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, K., Zhuang, G., Lin, Y., Wang, Q., Fu, J. S., Fu, Q., Liu, T., and
Deng, C.: How to improve the air quality over megacities in China: pollution
characterization and source analysis in Shanghai before, during, and after
the 2010 World Expo, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5927–5942,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5927-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5927-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Isakson, J., Persson, T. A., and Lindgren, E. S.: Identification and
assessment of ship emissions and their effects in the harbour of
Göteborg, Sweden, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3659–3666, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Ivošević, T., Stelcer, E., Orlić, I., Bogdanović Radović,
I., and Cohen, D.: Characterization and source apportionment of fine
particulate sources at Rijeka, Croatia from 2013 to 2015, Nucl. Instrum.
Meth. A., 371, 376–380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.10.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.10.023</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., and Kukkonen, J.: A comprehensive inventory
of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 71–84, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jang, H. N., Lee, S. J. H., Hwang, K. W., Yoo, J. I., Sok, C. H., and Kim, S.
H.: Formation of fine particles enriched by V and Ni from heavy oil
combustion: Anthropogenic sources and drop-tube furnace experiments, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 1053–1063, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, T., Kundzewicz, Z. W., and Su, B.: Changes in monthly precipitation
and flood hazard in the Yangtze River Basin, China, Int. J. Climatol., 28,
1471–1481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, A. D. L. A., Roberts, D. L., and Slingo, A.: A climate model study of
indirect radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulphate aerosols, Nature, 370,
450–453, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, H., Zhu, B., Su, J., Wang, H., Zhang, Q., and Wang, F.: Analysis of a
long-lasting haze episode in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Res., 120–121, 78–87,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.08.004</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kerminen, V.-M., Hillamo, R., Teinilä, K., Pakkanen, T., Allegrini, I.,
and Sparapani, R.: Ion balances of size-resolved tropospheric aerosol
samples: implications for the acidity and atmospheric processing of aerosols,
Atmos. Environ., 35, 5255–5265, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kong, S., Li, X., Li, L., Yin, Y., Chen, K., Yuan, L., Zhang, Y., Shan, Y.,
and Ji, Y.: Variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric
PM<sub>2.5</sub> during winter haze period around 2014 Chinese Spring Festival at
Nanjing: Insights of source changes, air mass direction and firework particle
injection, Sci. Total Environ., 520, 59–72,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.001</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lai, S., Zhao, Y., Ding, A., Zhang, Y., Song, T., Zheng, J., Ho, K. F., Lee,
S.-C., and Zhong, L.: Characterization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the major chemical
components during a 1-year campaign in rural Guangzhou, Southern China,
Atmos. Res., 167, 208–215, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Wang, X., Ye, X., Wang, L., Yang, X., Kan, H.,
Donaldson, D. J., and Mellouki, A.: Evolution of biomass burning smoke
particles in the dark, Atmos. Environ., 120, 244–252, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Wang, G., Aggarwal, S. G., Huang, Y., Ren, Y., Zhou, B., Singh, K.,
Gupta, P. K., Cao, J., and Zhang, R.: Comparison of abundances, compositions
and sources of elements, inorganic ions and organic compounds in atmospheric
aerosols from Xi'an and New Delhi, two megacities in China and India, Sci.
Total Environ., 476–477, 485–495, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.011</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Li, T., Wang, Y., Li, W. J., Chen, J. M., Wang, T., and Wang, W. X.:
Concentrations and solubility of trace elements in fine particles at a
mountain site, southern China: regional sources and cloud processing, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 8987–9002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8987-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8987-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Li, T.-C., Yuan, C.-S., Hung, C.-H., Lin, H.-Y., Huang, H.-C., and Lee,
C.-L.: Chemical Characteristics of Marine Fine Aerosols over Sea and at
Offshore Islands during Three Cruise Sampling Campaigns in the Taiwan Strait
– Sea Salts and Anthropogenic Particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-384</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, L., Engling, G., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Liu, C.,
Zhang, G., Liu, X., and Ma, Q.: Chemical characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during
summer at a background site of the Yangtze River Delta in China, Atmos. Res.,
198, 163–172, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Liao, T., Wang, S., Ai, J., Gui, K., Duan, B., Zhao, Q., Zhang, X., Jiang,
W., and Sun, Y.: Heavy pollution episodes, transport pathways and potential
sources of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the winter of 2013 in Chengdu (China), Sci.
Total Environ., 584, 1056–1065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.160</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J.-T.: Satellite constraint for emissions of nitrogen oxides from
anthropogenic, lightning and soil sources over East China on a
high-resolution grid, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2881–2898,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2881-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2881-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Z., Lu, X., Feng, J., Fan, Q., Zhang, Y., and Yang, X.: Influence of
Ship Emissions on Urban Air Quality: A Comprehensive Study Using Highly
Time-Resolved Online Measurements and Numerical Simulation in Shanghai,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 202–211, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Matthias, V., Bewersdorff, I., Aulinger, A., and Quante, M.: The contribution
of ship emissions to air pollution in the North Sea regions, Environ.
Pollut., 158, 2241–2250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Moldanová, J., Fridell, E., Popovicheva, O., Demirdjian, B., Tishkova,
V., Faccinetto, A., and Focsa, C.: Characterisation of particulate matter and
gaseous emissions from a large ship diesel engine, Atmos. Environ., 43,
2632–2641, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nakamura, T., Matsumoto, K., and Uematsu, M.: Chemical characteristics of
aerosols transported from Asia to the East China Sea: an evaluation of
anthropogenic combined nitrogen deposition in autumn, Atmos. Environ., 39,
1749–1758, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Nie, W., Wang, T., Xue, L. K., Ding, A. J., Wang, X. F., Gao, X. M., Xu, Z.,
Yu, Y. C., Yuan, C., Zhou, Z. S., Gao, R., Liu, X. H., Wang, Y., Fan, S. J.,
Poon, S., Zhang, Q. Z., and Wang, W. X.: Asian dust storm observed at a rural
mountain site in southern China: chemical evolution and heterogeneous
photochemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11985–11995,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11985-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11985-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Novakov, T. and Penner, J. E.: Large contribution of organic aerosols to
cloud-condensation-nuclei concentrations, Nature, 365, 823–826, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nriagu, J. O.: A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace
metals, Nature, 338, 47–49, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pandis, S. N., Capaldo, K., Corbett, J. J., Kasibhatla, P., and Fischbeck,
P.: Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate
forcing over the ocean, Nature, 400, 743–746, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pandolfi, M., Gonzalez-Castanedo, Y., Alastuey, A., Jd, D. L. R., Mantilla,
E., As, D. L. C., Querol, X., Pey, J., Amato, F., and Moreno, T.: Source
apportionment of PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> at multiple sites in the strait of
Gibraltar by PMF: impact of shipping emissions, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.,
18, 260–269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0373-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0373-4</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate
and health effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 7520–7540,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Quan, J., Zhang, Q., He, H., Liu, J., Huang, M., and Jin, H.: Analysis of the
formation of fog and haze in North China Plain (NCP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8205–8214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8205-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Seaton, A., Godden, D., MacNee, W., and Donaldson, K.: Particulate air
pollution and acute health effects, Lancet, 345, 176–178, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Sharma, R. K. and Agrawal, M.: Biological effects of heavy metals: An
overview, J. Environ. Biol., 26, 301–313, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, G. F., Yuan, S. Y., Xie, Y. N., Xia, S. J., Li, L., Yao, Y. K., Qiao,
Y. Z., Zhang, J., Zhao, Q. Y., and Ding, A. J.: Ambient levels and temporal
variations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> at a residential site in the
mega-city, Nanjing, in the western Yangtze River Delta, China, J. Environ.
Sci. Heal. A, 49, 171–178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2013.838851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2013.838851</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J.,
Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O.,
Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol–climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, X., Luo, X., Yan, C., Zhen, Z., Xu, J., Zhang, D., Suo, C., and Ding,
Y.: Spatio-temporal characteristics of air pollution in Nanjing during 2013
to 2016 under the pollution control and meteorological factors, J. Environ.
Earth. (China), 8, 506–515, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, J., Gao, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Che, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., Jing,
J., Cao, J., and Hsu, S.-C.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution in a megacity of southwest
China: source apportionment and implication, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
8679–8699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K., Zhang, R., Lin, Z., Zhang, Z., Lin, M., Cao, J.,
Liu, S., and Wang, G.: Impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical compositions on
aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou – the largest megacity in South China,
Atmos. Res., 135, 48–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, Y., Yin, Z., Ye, X., Ma, Z., and Chen, J.: Size distribution of
water-soluble inorganic ions in urban aerosols in Shanghai, Atmos. Pollut.
Res., 5, 639–647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.073</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Environmental Technology
Verification Report: Photoacoustic Infrared Monitor, Innova AirTech
Instruments Type 1312 Multi-Gas Monitor, EPA #600-R-98-143, USEPA,
Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Wan, X., Kang, S., Li, Q., Rupakheti, D., Zhang, Q., Guo, J., Chen, P.,
Tripathee, L., Rupakheti, M., Panday, A. K., Wang, W., Kawamura, K., Gao, S.,
Wu, G., and Cong, Z.: Organic molecular tracers in the atmospheric aerosols
from Lumbini, Nepal, in the northern Indo-Gangetic Plain: influence of
biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8867–8885,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8867-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8867-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin,
Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang,
Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L., Shao,
M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Cai, L.,
Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to
Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H., Lou, S., Huang, C., Qiao, L., Tang, X., Chen, C., Zeng, L., Wang,
Q., Zhou, M., and Lu, S.: Source Profiles of Volatile Organic Compounds from
Biomass Burning in Yangtze River Delta, China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 14,
818–828, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H., Tian, M., Li, X., Chang, Q., Cao, J., Yang, F., Ma, Y., and He, K.:
Chemical Composition and Light Extinction Contribution of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Urban
Beijing for a 1-Year Period, Aerosol Air Qual. Res, 15, 2200–2211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0257</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H. L., Qiao, L. P., Lou, S. R., Zhou, M., Chen, J. M., Wang, Q., Tao,
S. K., Chen, C. H., Huang, H. Y., Li, L., and Huang, C.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution
episode and its contributors from 2011 to 2013 in urban Shanghai, China,
Atmos. Environ., 123, 298–305, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S., Yu, S., Yan, R., Zhang, Q., Li, P., Wang, L., Liu, W., and Zheng,
X.: Characteristics and origins of air pollutants in Wuhan, China, based on
observations and hybrid receptor models, J. Air Waste Manage., 67, 739–753,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1240724" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1240724</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, T., Nie, W., Gao, J., Xue, L. K., Gao, X. M., Wang, X. F., Qiu, J.,
Poon, C. N., Meinardi, S., Blake, D., Wang, S. L., Ding, A. J., Chai, F. H.,
Zhang, Q. Z., and Wang, W. X.: Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics:
secondary pollutants and regional impact, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7603–7615,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Bi, X., Sheng, G., and Fu, J.: Hospital indoor
PM<sub>10</sub>&thinsp;∕&thinsp;PM<sub>2.5</sub> and associated trace elements in Guangzhou, China,
Sci. Total Environ., 366, 124–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.004</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Miao, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Wu, M., and Yu, G.: Primary sources
and secondary formation of organic aerosols in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 9846–9853, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. Q., Zhang, X. Y., and Draxler, R. R.: TrajStat: GIS-based software
that uses various trajectory statistical analysis methods to identify
potential sources from long-term air pollution measurement data, Environ.
Modell. Softw., 24, 938–939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.01.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.01.004</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, F., Chen, J., Wu, Y., and Zheng, C.: Study of the background contents of
61 elements of soils in China, Environm. Sci. (China), 12, 12–19, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, H. and Carignan, J.: Reviews on atmospheric selenium: Emissions,
speciation and fate, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7151–7165, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, H.-W., Xiao, H.-Y., Luo, L., Shen, C.-Y., Long, A.-M., Chen, L., Long,
Z.-H., and Li, D.-N.: Atmospheric aerosol compositions over the South China
Sea: temporal variability and source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
3199–3214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3199-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3199-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, H., Cao, J., Chow, J. C., Huang, R.-J., Shen, Z., Chen, L. A., Ho, K. F.,
and Watson, J. G.: Inter-annual variability of wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical
composition in Xi'an, China: Evidences of changing source emissions, Sci.
Total Environ., 545, 546–555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.070</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, H. M., Cao, J. J., Ho, K. F., Ding, H., Han, Y. M., Wang, G. H., Chow, J.
C., Watson, J. G., Khol, S. D., Qiang, J., and Li, W. T.: Lead concentrations
in fine particulate matter after the phasing out of leaded gasoline in Xi'an,
China, Atmos. Environ., 46, 217–224, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, W. Y., Zhao, C. S., Ran, L., Deng, Z. Z., Liu, P. F., Ma, N., Lin, W. L.,
Xu, X. B., Yan, P., He, X., Yu, J., Liang, W. D., and Chen, L. L.:
Characteristics of pollutants and their correlation to meteorological
conditions at a suburban site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 4353–4369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Zhao, T., Liu, F., Gong, S. L., Kristovich, D., Lu, C., Guo, Y.,
Cheng, X., Wang, Y., and Ding, G.: Climate modulation of the Tibetan Plateau
on haze in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1365–1375,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1365-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1365-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhan, J., Gao, Y., Li, W., Chen, L., Lin, H., and Lin, Q.: Effects of ship
emissions on summertime aerosols at Ny-Alesund in the Arctic, Atmos. Pollut.
Res., 5, 500–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.059</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, F., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Wang, X., Huang, G., Fang, Y., and Zong, Z.:
Identification and quantification of shipping emissions in Bohai Rim, China,
Sci. Total Environ., 497, 570–577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, F., Wang, Z., Cheng, H., Lv, X., Gong, W., Wang, X., and Zhang, G.:
Seasonal variations and chemical characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Wuhan,
central China, Sci. Total Environ., 518, 97–105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, F., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Lou, D., Li, J., Zhang, G., and Matthias, V.:
Emission factors for gaseous and particulate pollutants from offshore diesel
engine vessels in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6319–6334,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6319-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6319-2016</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, M., Wang, X., Chen, J., Cheng, T., Wang, T., Yang, X., Gong, Y., Geng,
F., and Chen, C.: Physical characterization of aerosol particles during the
Chinese New Year's firework events, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5191–5198, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Jing, J., Tao, J., Hsu, S.-C., Wang, G., Cao, J., Lee, C. S. L.,
Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., and Shen, Z.: Chemical characterization and
source apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing: seasonal perspective, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 7053–7074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Zhuang, G., Guo, J., Yin, K., and Zhang, P.: Characterization of
aerosol over the Northern South China Sea during two cruises in 2003, Atmos.
Environ., 41, 7821–7836, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Wang, S. X., Liu, H., Xu, J. Y., Fu, K., Klimont, Z., Hao, J. M.,
He, K. B., Cofala, J., and Amann, M.: NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions in
China: historical trends and future perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
9869–9897, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, M., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Fu, Q., Yang, X., Li, C., Zhou, B., Yu, Q., and
Chen, L.: Characteristics and ship traffic source identification of air
pollutants in China's largest port, Atmos. Environ., 64, 277–286, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, P. S., Dong, F., He, D., Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, W. Z., Yao,
Q., and Liu, H. Y.: Characteristics of concentrations and chemical
compositions for PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4631–4644,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, R., Han, B., Lu, B., Zhang, N., Zhu, L., and Bai, Z.: Element
composition and source apportionment of atmospheric aerosols over the China
Sea, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 6, 191–201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2015.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2015.023</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng,, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, D., Li, B., Huang, X., Virkkula, A., Wu, H., Zhao, Q., Qiao, Y., Shen,
G., Ding, A., Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Li, L., Li, C., Chen, F., and Yuan, S.: The
Impacts of Emission Control and Regional Transport on PM<sub>2.5</sub> Ions and
Carbon Components in Nanjing during the 2014 Nanjing Youth Olympic Games,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 17, 730–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0131</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, M., Qiao, L., Zhu, S., Li, L., Lou, S., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Tao, S.,
Huang, C., and Chen, C.: Chemical characteristics of fine particles and their
impact on visibility impairment in Shanghai based on a 1-year period
observation, J. Environ. Sci.-China, 48, 151–160, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Zou, Y., Deng, X. J., Zhu, D., Gong, D. C., Wang, H., Li, F., Tan, H. B.,
Deng, T., Mai, B. R., Liu, X. T., and Wang, B. G.: Characteristics of 1 year
of observational data of VOCs, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and O<sub>3</sub> at a
suburban site in Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6625–6636,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6625-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6625-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
