<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-14351-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{6mm}}?> Ice crystal number concentration estimates from lidar–radar <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> satellite remote sensing – Part 2: Controls on the ice crystal <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> number concentration</article-title><alt-title>Controls on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Controls on the $N_{\mathrm{i}}$}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E.~Gryspeerdt et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gryspeerdt</surname><given-names>Edward</given-names></name>
          <email>e.gryspeerdt@imperial.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-4756</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Sourdeval</surname><given-names>Odran</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-5303</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Quaas</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Delanoë</surname><given-names>Julien</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Krämer</surname><given-names>Martina</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2888-1722</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kühne</surname><given-names>Philipp</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College London, London, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Meteorology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales/IPSL/UVSQ/CNRS/UPMC, Guyancourt, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institut für Energie und Klimaforschung (IEK-7), Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, Université Lille 1, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Edward Gryspeerdt (e.gryspeerdt@imperial.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>14351</fpage><lpage>14370</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>31</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e168">The ice crystal number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a key property of
ice clouds, both radiatively and microphysically. Due to sparse
in situ measurements of ice cloud properties, the controls on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have remained difficult to determine. As more advanced
treatments of ice clouds are included in global models, it is becoming
increasingly necessary to develop strong observational constraints on the
processes involved.</p>
    <p id="d1e193">This work uses the DARDAR-Nice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval described in Part 1
to investigate the controls on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a global scale. The
retrieved clouds are separated by type. The effects of temperature, proxies
for in-cloud updraft and aerosol concentrations are investigated.
Variations in the cloud top <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
consistent with both homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation are observed
along with differing relationships between aerosol and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on the prevailing meteorological
situation and aerosol type. Away from the cloud top, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
displays a different sensitivity to these controlling factors, providing a
possible explanation for the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity to temperature
and ice nucleating particles (INP) observed in previous in situ studies.</p>
    <p id="d1e288">This satellite dataset provides a new way of investigating the response of
cloud properties to meteorological and aerosol controls. The results
presented in this work increase our confidence in the retrieved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and will form the basis for further study into the processes
influencing ice and mixed phase clouds.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e309">Clouds play a central role in the Earth's energy budget, as they are responsible
for large variations in the reflected shortwave and emitted longwave
radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.1"/>. The response of clouds to changing greenhouse
gases and aerosols remains one of the largest uncertainties in understanding
past and future climate changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.2"/>. Significant advances have
been made into modeling and observing the role of aerosols in liquid clouds
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx95" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>,
especially through the use of retrievals of the cloud droplet number
concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, but the impact of
aerosols on high clouds remains uncertain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.5"/>.
A large part of this uncertainty comes from the difficulty
in retrieving cirrus cloud properties at a large enough scale to separate the
roles of individual factors controlling the ice crystal number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page14352?><p id="d1e343"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>A key microphysical property of ice clouds, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> links the
aerosol environment to dynamic effects driving cloud updrafts and the
generation of supersaturation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.6"/>. Through changes in the
ice crystal size, changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can have far-reaching
implications for a cloud, impacting the radiative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.7"/>,
precipitation and cloud lifetime properties <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.8"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is often used as a prognostic variable in two-moment cloud
microphysics schemes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This highlights a
requirement to understand the controls on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to improve
our understanding and parameterization of cloud processes. While aircraft
measurements of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exist, they are restricted in space and
time. They can also be affected by shattering of ice crystals at the instrument
inlet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.10"/> and difficulties in measuring
the smallest crystals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.11"/>. In this paper, the new DARDAR-Nice
satellite dataset described in Part 1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.12"/> allows the
processes that control the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be investigated globally.</p>
      <p id="d1e440">It is known that the temperature plays a strong role in determining the ice
crystal nucleation rate. The homogeneous nucleation rate is a strong function
of temperature and supersaturation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.13"/>, with atmospherically
relevant nucleation only taking place at temperatures colder than 235 K.
This strong temperature dependence in the nucleation rate does not
necessarily correspond to a strong temperature dependence in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.14"/>. A weak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature
dependence was found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.15"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.16"/> found similar
results, with a slight reduction in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the coldest
measurements. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values have been observed at cold
temperatures during ATTREX <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.17"/> than in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.18"/>, leading to a weak combined temperature dependence. However,
using different datasets targeting different cloud types, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.19"/>
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.20"/> both showed an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
decreasing temperature, demonstrating that there is still considerable
uncertainty regarding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature dependence.</p>
      <p id="d1e535">The in situ homogeneous nucleation of ice crystals is also dependent on the
supersaturation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.21"/>, which is often generated through
cooling due to vertical air motion. Large-scale updrafts cannot reproduce
observed cirrus properties on their own, the smaller scale variation in
updraft provided by gravity waves is necessary <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.22"/> and is
occasionally able to produce cirrus in regions of large-scale subsidence
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.23"/>. These small-scale updrafts can produce
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as high as 50 000 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.24"/>, highlighting
the important role that vertical motion can play in determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e586">Although ice can form by in situ nucleation, many ice crystals also form
through the freezing of liquid condensate. This liquid-origin cirrus often
originates from high updraft regions in mixed-phase clouds, forming thicker
cirrus than those composed of in situ ice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="altparen.25"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="altparen.26"/>).
Synoptic-scale updrafts can also produce liquid-origin cirrus in the
midlatitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.27"/>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed through these
liquid-origin processes is also strongly dependent on the cloud-scale
updrafts, with higher updrafts maintaining higher ice supersaturations
and producing larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.28"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e624">Aerosol also plays a role in determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although its
impact is complicated by variations in ice crystal nucleation pathways and
aerosol properties. While any particle can theoretically act as a homogeneous
nucleation center given a high enough supersaturation, in practice these
aerosols are often hydrophilic liquid aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.29"/>. Increases in
the aerosol number can result in an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through
increased homogeneous nucleation. However, in many situations, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is limited by dynamical concerns, which limits the impact of
aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e666">A second class of aerosols, known as ice nucleating particles (INP) are able
to nucleate ice heterogeneously and can freeze liquid water droplets at
temperatures warmer than 235 K. At these warmer temperatures, the presence
of INP will often control the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near nucleation locations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.31"/>, as they form the sites for creating an ice crystal,
although the nucleating ability of these INP is also a strong function of
temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.32"/>. As heterogeneous nucleation can take place at a
lower supersaturation than homogeneous nucleation, the introduction of INP
has the ability to prevent homogeneous nucleation by depressing the
supersaturation. As the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced through homogeneous
nucleation events is typically higher than the INP concentration (and so the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from heterogeneous nucleation), this implies that the
introduction of INP into a clean atmosphere can reduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.33"/>. In situ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.34"/> and satellite studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.35"/> have provided some evidence for a possible decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with increasing aerosol based on regional and hemispheric
differences in ice crystal properties, although it has proved difficult to
conclusively link these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes to a change in INP.</p>
      <p id="d1e751">The relative role of heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation in the
atmosphere is unclear, making it difficult to develop observational
constraints on the impact of aerosols on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.36"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In addition,
changing conditions over the life cycle of a cloud can result in a switch
between nucleation mechanisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.37"/>; nucleation is also not the only
control on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The rarity of INP suggests that other
processes, such as ice multiplication, are required to explain the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the lower atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.38"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14353?><p id="d1e799">These four factors (temperature, supersaturation/updraft, ice origin and
aerosol environment) are all thought to influence the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in high
clouds, but significant uncertainties remain in assessing the role of
these factors on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. First, although they have been
investigated using aircraft and balloon measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.39"/>,
the ice origin and in-cloud updraft are difficult to
determine from observations at a global scale and over a significant period
of time. A recent classification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.40"/> has shown some skill
at determining these quantities when compared to a convection permitting
model and is used in this work to account for this issue.</p>
      <p id="d1e830">Second, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a difficult property to measure at a global
scale. Aircraft measurements are limited in space and time and have been
afflicted by shattering of crystals on the tips of measurement probes,
casting doubt on some earlier measurements of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.41"/>. Additionally, due to the highly
variable nature of cirrus clouds and their strong sensitivity to
environmental conditions, it can be difficult to separate the relative roles
of aerosol and dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.42"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e862">The retrieval presented in Part 1 of this work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.43"/> has
demonstrated that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be retrieved using a combined
radar–lidar retrieval, and that this compares well to new in situ aircraft
measurements where shattering is accounted for. Combined with simultaneous
retrievals of the ice water content, this allows the global distribution of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the factors that control it to be investigated. Using
reanalysis aerosol concentrations and a proxy for the INP concentration, the
impact of aerosols on high clouds is also investigated, highlighting avenues
for future research into cirrus cloud processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e896">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset used in this work (DARDAR-Nice) has been described
in detail in Part 1 of this work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.44"/>, so only the main
features are outlined here. The DARDAR-Nice product is based on the DARDAR
retrieval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.45"/>, a combined raDAR–liDAR retrieval of ice cloud
water content (IWC) and ice crystal effective radius using data from the
CloudSat and CALIPSO satellites at approximately 13:30 LST (local solar time). Only
daytime data from the period from 2006 to 2013 is used in this work due to
constraints in the reanalysis data availability. The properties are retrieved
at a horizontal resolution of 1.7 km and a vertical resolution of 60 m.
Both the DARDAR IWC and the DARDAR-Nice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval compare
favorably to in situ aircraft data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.46"/>. The
best agreement is at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, where the retrievals are
more accurate due to the dominance of unimodal ice crystal size
distributions and reduced ambiguity in the cloud phase.</p>
      <p id="d1e950"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>To investigate the controls on ice crystal nucleation, a more in-depth study
is performed of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the cloud top (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
As the cloud top is the location of the
coldest temperature in the cloud, it has the highest theoretical nucleation
rates. Although the cloud top is close to the nucleation region in wave
clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.47"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, this is not always the case and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be rapidly reduced by differential
sedimentation and entrainment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, as the
coldest temperature, it provides a limitation on the maximum nucleated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
within the cloud, restricting the impact of temperature
variability due to the vertical extent of the cloud. The cloud top is taken
to be the top 120 m of the cloud and only the uppermost cloud layer (in
multilayer situations) is used to avoid issues with ice being seeded by ice
crystals falling from overlying layers. The data are also restricted to
locations where the retrieval has gone through at least two iterations,
limiting the impact of prior assumptions about the cloud structure.</p>
      <p id="d1e1023">Four main controls on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered in
this work: temperature, cloud-scale updraft, ice origin and aerosol.
Temperature data in this study are taken from the ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.49"/>. Information about the cloud-scale updraughts and the
ice-origin (liquid/ice) cannot yet be directly obtained at a global scale
using satellites. To provide an indication of these cloud properties, the
IC-CIR classification from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.50"/> is used. This classification is
based on the assumed cirrus source (orographic, frontal, convective or
synoptic) and determined at 13:30 LST using cloud retrievals
from the MODIS instrument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.51"/> and reanalysis data. This
classification selects orographic clouds by assuming the product of the
topographic variation and the wind speed is related to the in-cloud updraft,
similar to global climate model parameterizations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The
Oro 2 and Oro 1 regimes are the regimes with the respective highest and second highest
sextiles of the parameterized in-cloud updraft. Frontal and convective
regimes are selected as connected regions of high level cloud that intersect
with reanalysis fronts and regions of large-scale updraft, respectively.
Finally, the synoptic regime is taken as a residual, with clouds being
considered synoptic if they do not fit any of the other classes. Through
comparisons with convection permitting model data and classifications based
on reanalysis data, this classification has been shown to provide useful
information on the cloud scale updrafts and the ice origin. While not a
direct retrieval of these properties, it does allow some inferences to be made
regarding the response of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to these factors. The results in
this paper are restricted to daytime data, which in turn restricts it to
13:30 LST due to the orbit of the satellites used to construct the DARDAR-Nice dataset.</p>
      <p id="d1e1070">To investigate a possible aerosol link to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use the
“monitoring atmospheric composition and climate” (MACC) aerosol reanalysis
product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.53"/>, which assimilates MODIS aerosol
optical<?pagebreak page14354?> depth (AOD) retrievals into the ECMWF integrated forecast system. The
MACC product provides altitude information for aerosols along with speciation
information. Although the MACC speciation has not yet been validated, the
MODIS cloud droplet number concentration shows a stronger sensitivity to
hydrophilic aerosol types than hydrophobic aerosols, suggesting that the MACC
speciation conveys useful information about the aerosol type
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.54"/>. Further from sources, where ageing and other
assumptions come into play, the speciation may be less accurate. In the upper
troposphere, liquid aerosol is thought to be the dominant aerosol component
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.55"/>, although recent studies have noted that glassy organic
aerosols are abundant in the upper atmosphere and can act as INP at
temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx90" id="paren.56"/>. This work takes
the MACC total mass concentration as a measure of the liquid aerosol
concentration – high (low) aerosol is more (less) than 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
with the caveat that this measure of aerosol may shift towards a measure of
INP at the coldest temperatures considered in this work.</p>
      <p id="d1e1136">The response of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to aerosol is likely to vary by aerosol
type <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.57"/>. Although MACC provides a dust speciation, it is
not clear whether this can be used to determine the presence of INP. Previous
studies have suggested that high altitude aerosol may be responsible for
glaciating clouds between 0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.58"/>.
Based on this previous work, the glaciation of clouds between 0 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is used as a proxy for the occurrence of INP.</p>
      <p id="d1e1195">Cloud phase is determined using the DARDAR phase detection algorithm
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.59"><named-content content-type="pre">v1.1.4;</named-content></xref>. This algorithm uses the different response of lidar
backscatter and radar reflectivity to liquid and ice hydrometeors to identify
glaciated clouds. Clouds with a peak in lidar backscatter at the cloud top
are treated as liquid or mixed phase and those with only a strong radar
return are treated as glaciated. Experience suggests that the retrieved phase
can be unreliable for clouds less than 600 m thick, so these are excluded
from this part of the analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e1203">Using this cloud top phase product, a “glaciation index” is developed using
the phase retrievals between 0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. As approximately half of
cloud tops are glaciated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, glaciated clouds with a top
temperature warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are identified as “warm ice”, and
liquid topped clouds colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are identified as “cold
liquid”. The warm ice pixels are taken to indicate the presence of INP
within 100 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">the approximate spatial scale of aerosol variability
from</named-content></xref>, whilst the cold liquid pixels are taken to indicate a
relatively INP-free environment. If both (or neither) are detected within
100 km, that pixel is excluded from the analysis. The cloud phase is only
used for the uppermost cloud layer when determining this INP proxy to reduce
the impact of overlying ice clouds seeding ice in lower layers. In addition,
regions with nearby higher cloud layers (those within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> glide slope) are
also excluded from the glaciation index. To reduce the impact of random
errors in the phase retrieval, two or more neighboring pixels are required
for a detection of warm ice or cold liquid. This glaciation index
is produced for each DARDAR vertical profile and is then used as a proxy for
the occurrence of INP at temperatures colder then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in that
profile. The use of cloud glaciation as an INP proxy for colder temperatures
in the atmosphere assumes that cloud glaciation is correlated to INP between
0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and that there is a sufficient vertical correlation in INP
occurrence. These assumptions are discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1341">This combination of reanalysis temperature and aerosol data, along with
previously determined clouds regimes and a proxy for INP are used globally
for daytime data over the period from 2006 to 2013 to investigate the role of
different processes on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Global $N_{{\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{top})}}$ distribution}?><title>Global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution</title>
      <p id="d1e1385">The global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution for crystals larger
than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
displays several features that highlight the role of different cloud
processes in controlling the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The zonal mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a) shows a strong temperature dependence, with
significant increases in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the temperature
decreases from a mean of around 40 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to almost
140 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This temperature dependence is particularly
strong at temperatures colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in both the northern and
the southern midlatitudes. There is also a strong
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in the
tropics, although the initial increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is
weaker. Although the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced by heterogeneous nucleation
should also increase as temperatures decrease due to increasing INP
concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.61"/>, this strong increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
along with a continuing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase at colder temperatures is
indicative of homogeneous nucleation, which is only significant at temperatures
below around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p id="d1e1764">At temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively small,
especially in the Northern Hemisphere where it averages less than
50 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is expected from heterogeneous nucleation, where the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is limited by
available INP. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much larger in
the Southern Hemisphere and the tropics, although this is skewed by the long
tail of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). A phase misclassification, with
liquid topped cloud being mistaken for ice cloud might explain this
hemispheric contrast, due to the large amounts of supercooled water in the
Southern Hemisphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.62"/>. A strong lidar backscatter at the cloud
top would lead to a large retrieved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (if it<?pagebreak page14355?> was
misclassified as an ice cloud). As liquid topped clouds at sub-zero
temperatures are more common in the Southern Hemisphere, this would result in
an erroneously large mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Southern Hemisphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1947"><bold>(a)</bold> The zonal mean DARDAR-Nice cloud top <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for crystals
larger than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m as a function of temperature from DARDAR-Nice data
for the period from 2006 to 2013. Temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are in
greyscale. <bold>(b)</bold> The mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Grey indicates missing data. <bold>(c)</bold> The number of
cloud top retrievals at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Zonal means and maps of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are available in Part 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2107">The conditional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C temperature bins for each of the main cloud regimes
(orographic, frontal, convective and synoptic) from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.63"><named-content content-type="post">O2, F, C
and S</named-content></xref>. The top row shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
particles greater than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the bottom row
shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for particles greater than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The columns are
normalized so that they sum to 100 %. The vertical line is drawn at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C – approximately the homogeneous nucleation threshold
temperature. At temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the grid lines
show the INP numbers predicted by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.64"/> parameterization
for 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The grid lines at
temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.65"/> for 1, 10 and 100 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> updraft speeds for a mean
pressure and an aerosol particle number of 300 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.66"/>. The regime names and definitions are given in Table 1 of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.67"/>. Note the log scale for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2417">There are large geographical variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongly
affected by the topography (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). High
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are retrieved
in mountainous regions over land and around the edge of the Antarctic ice
sheet, similar to results from orographic cirrus parameterizations in global
climate models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.68"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and other satellite
retrievals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.69"/>. This is consistent with a high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being generated
through orographic uplift, which can generate the strong updrafts and high
supersaturations required for homogeneous nucleation. While it is possible
that the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is due to an increase in the vertical transport of INP, the lack of a similar
pattern in the cloud supercooled fraction at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.70"/>
makes this explanation unsatisfactory. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropics is
comparatively low, even in regions of significant topography such as the
Ethiopian highlands. This is due to low wind speeds in the tropics reducing
the in-cloud orographic updraft, similar to the GCM results of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.71"/>. The high orographic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also partially
explains the hemispheric asymmetry in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
midlatitude and polar regions, due to the high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generated by
orographic clouds over the Andes and around the edge of the East Antarctic
ice sheet. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the tropics is significantly lower than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Part 1). This is partly due to the low number of cloud tops at this
temperature in the tropics, meaning that there is a clear sampling bias.
Additionally, the cloud top temperature plays an important role in
determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, giving it a much weaker temperature
dependence. This temperature dependence is investigated further in the
following two subsections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Cloud regime dependence</title>
      <p id="d1e2792">The location map and temperature dependence of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) and the results from Part 1 hint that there may
be a significant regime dependence in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in
particular a strong role for orographic clouds and a possible role for
convective clouds, given the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
tropics. Separating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data by regime using
the classification of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.72"/> allows this dependence to be
independently investigated. Due to the strong temperature dependence and the
large variability of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, joint probability
histograms, showing the probability of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval at a given temperature are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.
Following the results of Part 1, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
investigated for crystals bigger than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). With a minimum
size of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
typically lines up with the smallest sizes measured by in situ instruments,
while with a larger minimum size, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> covers a size
range where less shattering is expected and where the normalized size
distribution performs well <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.73"/>. As noted in the
previous section, the skewed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution
makes a simple linear average complicated to interpret. For the remainder of
this work, normalized joint histograms are used, showing the probability of
finding a particular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, given that a certain temperature has
been observed.</p>
      <p id="d1e3096">There are a number of broad similarities between the regimes. Each regime
shows a very similar increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing
temperature, with the decrease becoming weaker at very colder temperatures,
rising to around 100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. While this is larger than
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values reported from many measurements of tropical
tropopause layer cirrus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.74"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, this may be due to sampling
differences between the satellite and in situ measurements, with some of the
thinnest clouds being missed by the DARDAR retrieval. It is also possible
that uncertainties in the shape of the particle size distribution (PSD) can
lead to overestimations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by as much as a
factor of 2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.75"/>. The temperature dependence is similar to
that observed during the SPARTICUS and MACPEX campaigns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.76"/>,
although the temperature dependence is stronger than that
observed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.77"/> where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was sampled in cloud,
rather than at the cloud top. However, if the satellite data are sampled in a
manner similar to previous work, it reproduces the in situ results
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.78"/>, giving confidence in the magnitude and temperature
dependence of the results presented here. There is evidence of possible
retrieval errors, as both the orographic and convective regimes have a small
number of retrievals of over 30 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with some as high as 50 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This suggests that the possible phase
misclassification and the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed
in the zonal mean are more common in certain regimes.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14356?><p id="d1e3284">All of the regimes also show a peak in the highest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentiles at
temperatures just colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The strength varies by regime,
with the orographic regime showing a stronger peak and only a weak peak being
observed in the frontal and convective regimes. The peak is barely present in
the synoptic regime. An increase in the largest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at this
temperature is consistent with homogeneous nucleation, either through an
increase in the freezing of liquid droplets or by increased homogeneous
nucleation through the freezing of unactivated aqueous haze particles. At
these colder temperatures, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is roughly
parallel with the contours of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> expected through homogeneous
nucleation at a constant updraft <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.79"/>, especially in cases
where the peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is small (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Warmer than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is broadly consistent with the number of INP predicted by the
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.80"/> parameterization, but the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes increasingly
large compared to the number of INP as the temperature increases. As the
DARDAR-Nice retrieval has not been evaluated at this temperature, it is
unclear if this is a real effect, or if it is due to the possible phase
classification issue mentioned previously.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e3515"><bold>(a)</bold> The difference in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of
temperature between the Oro 2 and Oro 1 regimes (highest and second highest
sextiles of estimated in-cloud updraft, respectively). Red above blue at a given
temperature indicates an increased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Oro 2 regimes
compared to Oro 1. <bold>(b)</bold> The difference between the frontal and
synoptic regimes. Note the different color scale
from <bold>(a)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page14357?><p id="d1e3585">The variation in the strength of this peak is clearly seen when comparing the
Oro 2 and Oro 1 regimes (the highest and second highest sextiles of the
estimated in-cloud updraft) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a. While there is
little difference between the regimes at warmer temperatures, below
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C there is a strong increase in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Oro 2 regime.
This increase peaks at about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, reducing and then almost
disappearing at the coldest temperatures studied. The high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved in these
clouds and the strong dependence on the in-cloud updraft explain the
geographical pattern shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b, where high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed in
mountainous regions. A high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these regimes is
supported by results from previous in situ studies, where large
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were recorded in orographic clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.81"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3750">It is possible that this increased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the result of
increased aerosol concentrations carried to lower temperatures in the
stronger updrafts of the Oro 2 regime. However, the lack of a difference in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the regimes
at temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C indicates that an increase in
INP is not driving this change in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which in turn makes
it less likely that this change is due to a change in liquid aerosol. As the
Oro regimes are defined by the estimated in-cloud updraft
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.82"/>, the difference between the regimes shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> is likely due to a change in the updraft
environment impacting freezing processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e3856"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>A change in the updraft environment could modify the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by changing the
likelihood of homogeneous nucleation, either through allowing more
liquid droplets to reach temperatures where they can freeze homogeneously or
by increasing the nucleation of haze droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.83"/>. These processes
cannot be easily distinguished in the current study, although the lack of a
significant occurrence of liquid-topped cloud in orographic regions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.84"/> suggests that an increased cloud droplet number concentration
is not the leading contributor to the increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This strong
response to updraft changes would support previous studies that highlighted
the updraft limited nature of many cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.85"/>.
A larger difference exists between the frontal and synoptic regimes
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b), indicating that the magnitude of this updraft
effect could be stronger than is shown here. However, the difference between
the frontal and synoptic regimes cannot be easily attributed to updraft variations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3924">The temperature dependence of crystals larger than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the cloud top
displays a different pattern (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, bottom row).
While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
temperature are negatively correlated at warmer temperatures, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches a peak at
around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and there is a decrease in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as temperatures
reduce further, with the strongest decrease observed in the orographic
regime. This is consistent with a shift towards smaller ice crystals at the
cloud top with colder temperatures. The synoptic regime shows a weaker
decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
indicating a slightly larger role for larger ice crystals in this regime.
This shift towards smaller crystals at the cloud top is expected due to
slower depositional growth and aggregation of ice crystals at colder
temperatures resulting in crystals precipitating from the cloud top region
before they grow larger than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The $N_{\mathrm{i}}$ within clouds}?><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within clouds</title>
      <p id="d1e4111">The behavior of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within clouds as a function of
temperature displays some significant contrasts to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). While all of the regimes show an increase
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing temperature, this increase is much
weaker than the increase in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly, although
the peak that is visible in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is still visible in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the orographic and
frontal regimes, it is much weaker than the peak observed at the cloud top.
The synoptic regime has the strongest temperature dependence of all of the
regimes. One explanation is the lower average cloud depth, such that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved is often closer to the cloud top than in the other
regimes. In all of the regimes, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much larger in-cloud
than at the cloud top for temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, with
values up to 100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> being commonly observed. The smaller
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that are more typically observed in the synoptic regime than the
other<?pagebreak page14358?> regimes suggest that seasonal variations of the cloud classes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.86"/> are likely responsible for the seasonal variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in Part 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4376">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, but using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
throughout the cloud, rather than just the cloud top. The temperature scale
is the temperature of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, rather than that of the
cloud top.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4409">Similar to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the temperature dependence of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is very different internally within clouds compared to at cloud tops.
The temperature dependence is much weaker, with almost no temperature
dependence at temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. There is a decrease
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the lowest temperatures, similar to the decrease
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and is explained by the retrievals at these
temperatures being closer to the cloud top than at warmer temperatures. The
synoptic regime has the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at warmer temperatures,
which may again be due to the lower geometrical thickness of clouds in this
regime, such that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is typically located closer to the
cloud top, resulting in a lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for any given
temperature inside a cloud.</p>
      <p id="d1e4582">The larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at warmer temperatures mean that larger
crystals comprise a larger proportion of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a reduced
contribution of small crystals to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A weaker temperature
dependence of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially at temperatures colder than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, is in better agreement with the results from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.87"/>, although a temperature dependence remains. It is possible
that the weak temperature dependence in previous results could be due to a
lack of measurements near the cloud top, where the temperature dependence is
strongest. This may also explain the apparent mismatch between the INP and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in aircraft data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.88"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, as the
retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are a much closer match to
the INP concentrations predicted by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.89"/> parameterization than
the internal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Further sampling differences between the
satellite and in situ studies due to the detection limits of satellite
instruments and the structuring of flight campaigns may explain the remaining
differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined using different methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Vertical structure of~$N_{\mathrm{i}}$}?><title>Vertical structure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4782">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ice water content (IWC) all change
significantly as a function of depth through the cloud (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).
For clouds with a top temperature between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> continues to
increase until about 500 m from the cloud top, at which point it starts to
decrease again (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, top row panels). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution width stays approximately constant from about 1 km into the
cloud until around 2–3 km from the cloud top, when it reaches a temperature
of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C where liquid water can form more easily. At this
point the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution broadens significantly. Similar to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also grows quickly when moving down
through the cloud, moving to a slower growth regime after the first 500 m
from the cloud top. This shift in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> growth regime is
roughly coincident with the location of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak. All of the
regimes also show an increase in the IWC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, bottom
row) with increasing depth in the cloud, which displays a sharp increase over 2.5 km
from the cloud top. This sharp increase is consistent with a possible
increase in ice through liquid water processes in warmer parts of the cloud.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5017">Retrieved properties as a function of the distance from the cloud
top. This is for clouds with tops between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Note
the nonlinear scale on the horizontal axis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5055">There are some differences between the regimes. The synoptic regime has a much
weaker peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the cloud top and a consequently lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the depth of the regime. Despite having similar
values at the cloud top to the other regimes, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
IWC in the synoptic regime remain lower than the other regimes through the
cloud, possibly due to lower in-cloud updrafts. At about 2.5 km from the
cloud top, both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC increase until they are roughly
comparable to the other regimes, suggesting that the signal from liquid water
swamps any signal based on ice nucleation.</p>
      <p id="d1e5135">The peak is also temperature dependent, almost disappearing in clouds with
colder tops (see supplementary information) and varying in size and location
between the regimes. When the peak occurs in the synoptic regime, it is
within 300 m of the cloud top in 67 % of cases, compared to only 48 % of
cases for the frontal regime. These distances are comparable to the thickness
of nucleation regions of between 20 and 500 m noted in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.90"/>. The
enhancement of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within this peak in the synoptic regime is
also smaller, with an average peak of 130 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to
270 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the frontal regime and 325 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the orographic
regime. The increased strength of this peak in regimes expected to have a
stronger updraft along with its location close to the cloud top may
indicate homogeneous nucleation. Model studies of cirrus clouds
suggest that homogeneous nucleation can produce peaks in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud
to the cloud top <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx82" id="paren.91"/>, with an increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at higher updraft velocities. The disappearance of the peak
at colder temperatures gives it a similar temperature dependence to the peak
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) providing further supporting evidence of the impact
of homogeneous nucleation on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this temperature range.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5263">The difference in the conditional histograms between cases with high
MACC total aerosol mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and low
total mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the four main
regimes. The grid lines are the same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The upper
set of plots show the difference in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the lower in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The changes sum
to zero vertically; red over blue indicates an increase in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for a given temperature and regime.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5433">It is possible that the varying sensitivities of the CloudSat radar and the
CALIOP lidar to crystal size and the attenuation of the CALIOP lidar in the
upper levels of the cloud could be generating this vertical structure. The
lower vertical resolution and sensitivity to small crystals of the radar
could result in it missing the cloud top, which would generate a peak in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the level where the retrieval starts to include radar information.
However, the results in Part 1 show no evidence of a bias in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval as a function of the instruments contributing to the
retrieval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.92"/>. This is primarily due to the sensitivity of
the instruments to different ice crystal size distributions. Although the
lidar-only retrievals have a higher expected error, they<?pagebreak page14359?> usually only occur
in cases where there is a monomodal size distribution dominated by small
crystals that can be accurately constrained by the lidar alone. Additionally,
the disappearance of the peak at colder temperatures indicates that it is a
physical property of the clouds, rather than a property of the retrieval, as
the instrument sensitivities would not be expected to strongly vary with temperature.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>The relationship to aerosol</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>The relationship to liquid aerosol</title>
      <p id="d1e5481">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows how the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution changes
as a function of temperature and MACC reanalysis aerosol (used to indicate
high concentrations of liquid aerosol). In most of the regimes, there is a
positive relationship between MACC aerosol and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at temperatures
below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (shown by red above blue in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). In the synoptic regime, this positive
aerosol–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship
only exists for temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C – at temperatures
colder than this, the relationship becomes weak and noisy. In the other
regimes, the positive relationship is maintained to very cold temperatures.
At temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the relationship becomes a lot
weaker, with almost no
aerosol–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship
existing in the orographic and convective regimes. In the frontal regime,
there is a slight negative relationship, with a stronger negative
relationship in the synoptic regime. It is possible that this negative
relationship is related to a misclassification of ice and liquid at these
warmer temperatures being a function of the MACC aerosol, particularly in
regions where INP rich aerosol constitute a majority of the aerosol population.</p>
      <p id="d1e5651">The aerosol–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationship shows a weaker pattern than the
aerosol–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationship, with the smaller enhancement of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at colder
temperatures in most regimes indicating a shift to smaller crystal sizes. The
change in the synoptic regimes is the strongest, likely related to the strong
relationship for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A negative
relationship between the aerosol environment and the crystal size has been noted in
previous work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.93"/> and often corresponds to an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although positive relationships have been
observed over the Indian Ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.94"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14360?><p id="d1e5783">It is difficult to demonstrate causality with observed aerosol–cloud
relationships, to the extent that it is not clear that this relationship is a
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to a change in aerosol. However,
this strong relationship between MACC aerosol and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with an increased ice crystal
nucleation through homogeneous nucleation, which can be sensitive to the
concentration of liquid aerosol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.95"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In situations
where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is primarily determined by the
freezing of liquid droplets, an increase in cloud droplets in high aerosol
regions could also lead to an increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
although the number of droplets frozen is relatively insensitive to the total
number of liquid droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.96"/>. As with the impact of in-cloud
updraft on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, further investigation is
required to determine if one of these mechanisms is dominant. As liquid water
has been found in clouds at temperatures as cold as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, increased
droplet freezing cannot be ruled out, even though many clouds are frozen
before reaching this temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.97"/>. At colder temperatures, it
seems likely that homogeneous nucleation plays a role, as liquid droplets
cannot form at these temperatures. In this case, the stronger updrafts in
the frontal and convective regimes are important for generating the high
supersaturations in which homogeneous nucleation can occur. Changing aerosol
types may also play a role at temperatures colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, where
the increasing impact of glassy aerosols may lead the aerosol to nucleate ice
heterogeneously. A combination of the weak expected updrafts and the
increasing ability of glassy aerosol to act as an INP at low temperatures may
explain the weak aerosol–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship in the
synoptic regime below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. While there is a clear relationship in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, the change in the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is small, even for this large aerosol
perturbation. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases from
around 140 to 175 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, an increase of 25 %. Much of this change is
driven by changes in the high updraft tail of the distribution, and producing a
25 % change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C would require
an updraft in excess of 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.98"/>. While plausible for
the convective and orographic regimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.99"/>, the large
updrafts required to generate such a sensitivity may indicate that this
relationship is affected by an updraft mediated covariation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>The relationship to an INP proxy</title>
      <p id="d1e6104">The sparse nature of INP measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.100"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and the high
sensitivity of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to low INP concentrations means that it is
difficult to use retrieved aerosol properties to investigate the effect of
INP on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To avoid this issue, the glaciated
fraction of clouds lower in the atmosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is used as a
proxy for the presence of INP at other levels in the atmosphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e6162"><bold>(a)</bold> The DARDAR supercooled fraction at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
defined as the fraction of the DARDAR cloud top phase retrievals between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from 2006 and 2013 that are classed as
liquid. <bold>(b)</bold> The conditional probability of observing a daily mean
supercooled fraction, given a specified MACC dust mixing ratio for the
regions specified in <bold>(a)</bold>. The black line shows the mean supercooled
fraction for each aerosol bin.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page14361?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Cloud glaciation and INP</title>
      <p id="d1e6235">The addition of the CloudSat data in the DARDAR phase retrieval allows smaller
quantities of ice to be detected than in the lidar-only studies, but it produces a
very similar pattern of cloud glaciation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) to the
previous CALIOP studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.101"/>. The supercooled fraction is
calculated as the number of DARDAR liquid phase retrievals divided by the total
number of liquid and ice retrievals between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from 2006 to 2013.
Only the phase of the top cloud layer is considered and only where this layer is more than 600 m thick.</p>
      <p id="d1e6272">There is a strong hemispheric contrast with a higher glaciated fraction over
the Northern Hemisphere and a high supercooled fraction over the Southern
Ocean and Antarctica, as observed in previous aircraft <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.102"/> and
satellite studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.103"/>. High glaciated fractions are
observed over desert locations in central Asia and Iran, stretching across
the North Pacific to the Americas. This is consistent with previous studies
suggesting that dust is a good INP. Previous studies have found Asian dust
over California, suggesting that transport across the Pacific is not
unexpected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.104"/>. There is also a significant proportion of
glaciated cloud downwind of the Andes, which appears to originate near the
Altiplano and Patagonia. These are sources of high altitude dust
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.105"/> and would support the hypothesis that high altitude dust is
able to glaciate clouds. While glaciated cloud in this region has
previously been noted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.106"/>, the lower resolution of the previous study
made it difficult to determine the source of possible INP. The longer dataset
and increased spatial resolution of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a make the source
in the upper Andes much clearer. Although southern Africa and Australia are
also sources of dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.107"/>, this dust is emitted at lower
altitudes, which would explain the lower glaciated fractions downwind of these regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e6296">The origin of the glaciated region over the north Atlantic is less clear, as
there are not many local sources of high level dust in the region. It is
possible that the dust here has been transported across the Sahara and lofted
by cyclone systems crossing the Atlantic. Furthermore, it is possible that the black
carbon or ash <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.108"/> from North America may act as an INP. This
might explain the lower supercooled fraction over Siberia, where black carbon
from fires typically occurs without the other aerosols that are found in
industrial pollution, allowing it to act as an INP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.109"/>
despite the low amounts of high level dust in this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e6305">The role of the ice nucleation impact of dust for driving the cloud glaciated fraction is
supported by comparing the cloud glaciated fraction to reanalysis aerosol
fields (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). Strong negative correlations between the
occurrence of supercooled liquid cloud at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and the mass
concentration of reanalysis dust (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b) are observed in
some regions, with glaciated cloud dominating at high mass concentrations<?pagebreak page14362?> of
reanalysis dust. However, this correlation varies by region. A stronger
relationship is found in regions close to dust sources, such as over the
N. Pacific (B) and central Asia (D); the relationship is much weaker in the
N. Atlantic (A) and the Southern Ocean (C) where the dust is further from source (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d1e6334">The stronger dust–glaciation relationship close to the dust source, where the
MACC aerosol speciation is best, suggests that the supercooled fraction of
clouds at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is strongly related to the occurrence of INP. The
weaker relationship further from source suggests that although the MACC
speciation has been shown to provide useful information on aerosol type, this
speciation is less reliable further from source. This is supported by results
in liquid clouds, where the dust optical depth–cloud droplet number
concentration relationship becomes stronger further from dust sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.110"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6359"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Due to the reduced speciation skill from MACC far from dust sources, the
occurrence of glaciated cloud at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is used as a proxy for the
occurrence of INP instead of the reanalysis aerosol. This relies on the following two assumptions:
(1) cloud glaciation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is related to INP at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; and (2) INP at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are correlated to INP at other temperatures.</p>
      <p id="d1e6440">Based on the relationship to MACC dust aerosol, the first assumption holds in
many cases. Although the second assumption is tenuous, previous studies have
found similar relationships between cirrus cloud properties and both column
and layer aerosol optical depth (AOD) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.111"/>, similar to model results showing a significant
correlation between high altitude cloud condensation nuclei concentration and column AOD
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.112"/>. Significant vertical aerosol autocorrelation has also been
observed in global climate models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.113"/>. Additionally, there is
very unlikely to be a negative correlation between the INP at the two
temperature levels, with the worst case being no correlation. As such, the
relationship between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the INP proxy is unable to give a
quantitative result for the impact of INP on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but it is able to
provide a qualitative indication of the sign of the INP impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The INP relationship to $N_{{\mathrm{i}(\mathrm{top})}}$}?><title>The INP relationship to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e6514">The relationship of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the proxy for INP
is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. There are a number of features that
are similar between the regimes, in particular the strong negative
relationship between INP occurrence and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at temperatures
warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. As with the large mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a, this may be due to liquid clouds being
misclassified as ice, resulting in large
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values being
retrieved. The requirement for “warm-ice” means that supercooled liquid
occurs less frequently in the high INP cases, and as such it is less likely
to be misclassified as ice. The lower frequency of this misclassification
then reduces the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cases of high
INP. The weaker <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
response in the synoptic and orographic regimes supports this, as the
misclassification in these regimes is weaker (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).
The warmer temperatures are shaded out in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> due to
the impact of this potential misclassification.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6730">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, but showing the difference in the
conditional histograms as a function of the INP proxy. Red indicates an
increase in the occurrence of a particular bin at a higher inferred INP and blue indicates a
decrease, meaning that red above blue indicates an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increased INP for a given temperature.
The shaded regions are likely affected by a phase misclassification at warmer
temperatures.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page14363?><p id="d1e6759">At colder temperatures, the
INP–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship
starts to vary between the regimes. All of the regimes show a decrease in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between around
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the temperatures where the peak in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is observed
connected with in-cloud updraft (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). This decrease
is strongest in the orographic regime and weakest in the synoptic regime,
similar to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak
observed in the different regimes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).
At temperatures colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the relationship becomes
different again. In all of the regimes, there is an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing
INP. This is consistent with an increasing number of INP shifting the size
distribution towards a smaller number of larger ice crystals. In the
orographic and synoptic regimes, this increase also appears in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, generating a
positive relationship between the INP proxy and the occurrence of small ice crystals.</p>
      <p id="d1e6973">As with the previous section, the impact of meteorological covariations
cannot be ruled out when interpreting these plots. However, they are
consistent with a reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to a
suppression of homogeneous nucleation by INP at around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This
relationship has previously been found in satellite relationships between the
aerosol environment and the ice crystal size, with an increase in the crystal
radius in situations where heterogeneous nucleation controls the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.114"/>. This would fit with the results in
previous sections, suggesting that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at this
temperature range just slightly colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is influenced by
homogeneous nucleation. This effect would only be expected in a narrow range
of updrafts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.115"/>, so further work is necessary to understand
the cause of this relationship.</p>
      <p id="d1e7076">The increase in large crystals at the coldest temperatures (below
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is consistent with an INP effect on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if heterogeneous nucleation was dominant at
these temperatures. This would fit with the results from
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, where at the coldest temperatures, there was a
relatively small response of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to MACC total
(liquid) aerosol, suggesting that homogeneous nucleation was not controlling
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in synoptic
cirrus. At these coldest temperatures, dust can act as an INP at very low
supersaturations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.116"><named-content content-type="pre">as low as 105 %;</named-content></xref> and organic aerosol
can occur in a glassy state allowing it to act as an INP. This may explain
relationships consistent with heterogeneous nucleation and a classical Twomey
effect at these temperatures. It is important to note that this proxy for INP
relies upon the correlation between cloud glaciation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
INP at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, but the absence of this correlation would produce no
relationship in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, giving some confidence to the
qualitative nature of these results.</p>
      <p id="d1e7207">If the peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
temperatures colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is primarily due to droplet freezing,
an increase glaciated fraction at warmer temperatures could also result in
this reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with increasing INP. As the number of INP and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> warmer than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is much lower than the cloud droplet number concentration, the
increase in cloud glaciation could result in a reduction in the number of
cloud droplets available to form ice crystals at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This would
result in a negative relationship between cloud glaciation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at colder
temperatures as observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. As with the relationship
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to updraft (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) and
aerosol (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), the difference between an aerosol impact
on homogeneous nucleation, a change in droplet freezing or<?pagebreak page14364?> an
updraft-mediated covariation (no causal effect of aerosol) cannot be
distinguished by this analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7403">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, but showing the difference in the
retrieved properties depending on the cloud top properties. Red over blue
indicates that clouds with above median properties at the cloud top
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) have higher values of the retrieved properties at a
specified depth from the cloud top. Note the nonlinear scale on the
horizontal axis.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14351/2018/acp-18-14351-2018-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Vertical information propagation</title>
      <p id="d1e7463">The changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
observed in the previous section have impacts throughout the depth of the
cloud. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows how <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC
information propagates vertically within a cloud. The cloud profiles are
split into two categories, based on whether they have above or below median
values of the cloud top properties (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The difference in the vertical structure of the clouds
(in a similar manner to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) is shown, with red over
blue indicating an increase in the retrieved quantity at a given
distance from the cloud top for profiles that were above median in that
property at the cloud top.</p>
      <p id="d1e7540">The top row of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
information propagates a significant distance through the cloud. Clouds with
an increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
maintain a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at distances at least 3km from the cloud top
in all regimes. However, as shown in the second row, vertical information
about the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not propagate nearly as far through the
cloud. The vertical propagation is the highest in the synoptic regime. The
vertical propagation of IWC information is very similar to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
with the relationship to the cloud top IWC being significantly reduced
more than 500 m from the cloud top.</p>
      <p id="d1e7648">The large vertical propagation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that the
changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the cloud top found in the previous section can
have considerable impacts at lower levels in the cloud. However, the lower
vertical propagation of the information about the larger crystals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
IWC) would support the suggestion that the growth of the ice
crystals after nucleation is primarily controlled by meteorological factors
that do not play a large role in the nucleation processes that control
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the temperature of the cloud top and the
distance from the cloud top can still play a large role in determining
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e7749">These results show that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongly affected
by several factors including temperature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>), cloud
type (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) and updraft (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>),
and that changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be maintained at
large distances from the cloud top (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). The
dependence of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
the in-cloud updraft and the relationship to reanalysis liquid aerosol
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>) at temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is consistent with the impact of homogeneous nucleation
processes on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This is supported by the relationship of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the INP proxy
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), where a reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing INP
could be indicative of an INP suppression of homogeneous nucleation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.117"/>. The relationship with INP is also consistent with
heterogeneous nucleation having a strong role to play in determining the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in synoptic cirrus
clouds at temperatures colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p id="d1e7997">Uncertainties in the retrieval have been covered in Part 1 of this work
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.118"/>. However, there are a few points to note with regards to
the relationship of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to other cloud and meteorological
properties. Although there is significant uncertainty in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, many of these uncertainties are random errors and not systematic
functions of the meteorological properties investigated here. Even ice
crystal shape, which can be a major issue in ice cloud retrievals, is a
function of temperature (to first order) and so does not impact the majority
of the results which are presented in this work stratified by temperature.
The geographical variations in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b show a similar
pattern to those from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx65" id="text.119"/>, with high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in mountainous regions and a reduced
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropics. The similarity of the results
from these two different retrieval products, each with a different physical
basis supports the conclusions drawn from these datasets regarding the global
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. There is also little evidence to suggest that
there are large biases caused by the retrieval only being able to use one
instrument (radar or lidar). Cases where only the lidar detects a cloud are
often characterized by monomodal ice distributions, which are well
represented by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.120"/> parameterization. As such, these cases
are retrieved with similar accuracy to the full radar–lidar retrieval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.121"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8084">The cloud phase classification is of critical importance to the warmer clouds
included in this study and there is evidence of the misclassification of a
small number of cases at temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). This can make it difficult to interpret results
at these temperatures, so they are not a focus of this work. The change in
phase of these clouds as a function of aerosol is likely to dominate the
radiative response of clouds to aerosols at these temperatures.</p>
      <p id="d1e8108">There are a number of limitations of this study that could be addressed in
future work. The lack of information about the location of INP is a serious
issue when investigating the impact of aerosol on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While the
INP proxy in this work is able to provide a qualitative estimate of the role
of INP in determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for a quantitative estimate a
better proxy or measure of the global INP concentration is required.</p>
      <?pagebreak page14365?><p id="d1e8134">Additionally, the impact of meteorological covariations makes it difficult to
assign causality to the aerosol–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships
observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. The lack of a complete picture of the
atmosphere makes it difficult to directly control for meteorological
variability. The causal link between aerosol and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is thought to be strong
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.122"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, but the lack of observations of in-cloud
updrafts also limits how accurately the impact of aerosol on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
can be determined. Although the cloud regimes used have some
ability to constrain the cloud-scale updraft <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.123"/>, the
updraft is a critical component in determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through
its influence on the supersaturation. The in-cloud updraft is assumed to
be largely independent of the aerosol properties in this work, but it is
possible that the reanalysis aerosol is related to the in-cloud updraft,
such that more aerosol is vertically transported in conditions with high
in-cloud updrafts. In this case, a positive correlation between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and MACC reanalysis aerosol could be generated. However, as
MACC does not explicitly simulate in-cloud updrafts, the impact of this
confounding issue is likely to be small.</p>
      <p id="d1e8217">It is also possible that using cloud glaciation as a proxy allows other
meteorological covariations, which could generate apparent relationships
between the INP and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the in-cloud updraft is of
a second-order importance in determining the cloud top phase compared to the
INP concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.124"/>. The inclusion of a glide-slope test
when determining the INP proxy means that it is also unlikely that clouds are
being glaciated by undetected ice falling from higher cloud layers. The
separation into cloud regimes also limits the impact of these kind of
meteorological covariations, which might be expected between different
regimes, but would be weaker within them.</p>
      <p id="d1e8234">The behavior of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval in this work follows the
expected behavior of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined in several previous
studies based on satellite remote sensing, in situ, theoretical and modeling
results. This provides further evidence that the DARDAR-Nice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.125"/> is able to retrieve the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a variety of situations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <?pagebreak page14366?><p id="d1e8290">Few global studies exist of the controls on the ice crystal number
concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), especially regarding the role of aerosols. In this
study, the DARDAR-Nice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval from Part 1
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.126"/> is used to investigate possible controls on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at a global scale for the period from 2006 to 2013. A special emphasis
is placed on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the cloud top
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), due to the close proximity to ice crystal
nucleation locations within many high clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.127"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8362">Strong relationships between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
updraft, cloud type and particularly temperature are observed
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), with a higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for crystals larger then 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) being found at
colder temperatures in all regimes, which is consistent with an increased nucleation
rate at lower temperatures. Fewer crystals larger than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m,
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are found at the
coldest temperatures, possibly due to the reduced depositional growth rate
meaning that they sediment from the cloud top region before they can grow to
a sufficient size.</p>
      <p id="d1e8472">Many of the regimes show an increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a decrease
in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing distance from the cloud top
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) due to the size sorting impact of sedimentation.
The rate of change of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> moving away from the cloud top
depends on the regime, with much slower changes in the synoptic regime
indicating a role of meteorological factors in determining ice crystal growth
rates. This is supported by the weaker temperature dependence of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
within clouds compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), which may also explain the apparent weak
dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.128"/> and INP
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.129"/> found in previous studies. Given the large difference between
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deeper in the
cloud, this may suggest that the cloud top would make a good target for
future in situ campaigns examining the controls on ice nucleation.</p>
      <p id="d1e8605">There are indications of homogeneous nucleation or possibly the freezing of
liquid droplets determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At
temperatures just colder than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, there is a peak in the upper
quantiles of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). This peak is related to the updraft
strength in the cloud, with the reliably high updrafts in the orographic
regime giving it the strongest peak (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). This is
further supported by the relationship between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the MACC
reanalysis aerosol (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), with an increased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being observed in
high aerosol environments. This indicates a possible dependence on the liquid
aerosol concentration, particularly for smaller crystals, although this
analysis cannot make a conclusive statement about the causality of this
relationship. An investigation into the covariances between the MACC
reanalysis aerosol, the DARDAR-Nice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and meteorological factors
is an important target for future work.</p>
      <p id="d1e8742">As previous work has suggested that INP occurrence is related to cloud
glaciation, the glaciated fraction at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is used as a qualitative
proxy for INP occurrence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). At temperatures between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, there is a reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing
INP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), which may indicate an INP suppression of
the homogeneous nucleation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.130"/>, providing further supporting
evidence for the role of homogeneous nucleation in determining the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At colder temperatures, some regimes show an
increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in particular,
which may be evidence of heterogeneous nucleation controlling the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and shifting the size distribution towards
larger crystals. However, as with the relationship to liquid aerosol,
meteorological covariations could be generating these relationships. Further
studies are required to separate the role of these different mechanisms in
controlling the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and to isolate the role of
aerosols in these relationships.</p>
      <p id="d1e8926">While changes to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are important for
radiative considerations, changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">top</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
have implications for the cloud many kilometers below the cloud top
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). This far reaching impact into the life cycle
of ice and mixed-phase clouds demonstrates the importance of developing
strong observational constraints on the controlling factors of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The results presented in this work provide a global context
for existing theory and in situ measurement based hypotheses about cloud
properties, highlighting areas for future research to further constrain ice
and mixed-phase cloud processes.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e8982">The DARDAR data product was retrieved from
the ICARE data center (<uri>http://www.icare.univ-lille1.fr</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="altparen.131"/>).
The IC-CIR cloud classification is available at (<uri>http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/cddfe3093be247d7bac56c9fa9edb3d5</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.132"/>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e8997">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14351-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14351-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e9006">EG, OS and JQ conceived the study, EG, OS and PK performed
the analysis, and EG and OS wrote the paper. All of the authors assisted with the
interpretation of the results and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e9012">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9018">This work was supported by funding from the European Research Council under the European
Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement
no. FP7-306284 (“QUAERERE”); the Bundesministerium für Bildung und
Forschung, grant numbers 01LK1210D, 01LK1503A and 01LK1505E; and the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft, grant number QU 311/14-1. Edward Gryspeerdt is supported
by an Imperial College Junior Research Fellowship. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Matthias Tesche <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Baker and Lawson(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Baker, B. A. and Lawson, R. P.: In Situ Observations of the Microphysical
Properties of Wave, Cirrus, and Anvil Clouds. Part I: Wave Clouds, J. Atmos.
Sci., 63, 3160–3185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3802.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3802.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation in
large-scale models: Homogeneous nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009355</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Barahona et al.(2017)Barahona, Molod, and Kalesse</label><mixed-citation>Barahona, D., Molod, A., and Kalesse, H.: Direct estimation of the global
distribution of vertical velocity within cirrus clouds, Sci. Rep., 7, 6840,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Benedetti et al.(2009)Benedetti, Morcrette, Boucher, Dethof, Engelen,
Fisher, Flentje, Huneeus, Jones, Kaiser, Kinne, Mangold, Razinger, Simmons, and Suttie</label><mixed-citation>Benedetti, A., Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Dethof, A., Engelen, R. J.,
Fisher, M., Flentje, H., Huneeus, N., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S.,
Mangold, A., Razinger, M., Simmons, A. J., and Suttie, M.: Aerosol analysis
and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Integrated Forecast System: 2. Data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D13205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011115</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P.,
Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S.,
Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, in: book section 7,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 571–658,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{B\"{u}hl et~al.(2013)Bhl, Ansmann, Seifert, Baars, and Engelmann}}?><label>Bühl et al.(2013)Bhl, Ansmann, Seifert, Baars, and Engelmann</label><mixed-citation>Bühl, J., Ansmann, A., Seifert, P., Baars, H., and Engelmann, R.: Toward a
quantitative characterization of heterogeneous ice formation with lidar/radar:
Comparison of CALIPSO/CloudSat with ground-based observations, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 4404–4408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50792" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50792</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Choi et al.(2010)Choi, Lindzen, Ho, and Kim</label><mixed-citation>Choi, Y.-S., Lindzen, R. S., Ho, C.-H., and Kim, J.: Space observations of
cold-cloud phase change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11211–11216,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006241107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1006241107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chylek et al.(2006)Chylek, Dubey, Lohmann, Ramanathan, Kaufman,
Lesins, Hudson, Altmann, and Olsen</label><mixed-citation>Chylek, P., Dubey, M. K., Lohmann, U., Ramanathan, V., Kaufman, Y. J., Lesins,
G., Hudson, J., Altmann, G., and Olsen, S.: Aerosol indirect effect over the
Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025397</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Creamean et al.(2013)Creamean, Suski, Rosenfeld, Cazorla, DeMott,
Sullivan, White, Ralph, Minnis, Comstock, Tomlinson, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>Creamean, J. M., Suski, K. J., Rosenfeld, D., Cazorla, A., DeMott, P. J.,
Sullivan, R. C., White, A. B., Ralph, F. M., Minnis, P., Comstock, J. M.,
Tomlinson, J. M., and Prather, K. A.: Dust and biological aerosols from the
Sahara and Asia influence precipitation in the western U.S., Science, 339,
1572–1578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1227279</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Cziczo et al.(2013)Cziczo, Froyd, Hoose, Jensen, Diao, Zondlo, Smith,
Twohy, and Murphy</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A.,
Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the dominant sources
and mechanisms of cirrus cloud formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1234145</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dee et~al.(2011)Dee, Uppala, Simmons, Berrisford, Poli, Kobayashi,
Andrae, Balmaseda, Balsamo, Bauer, Bechtold, Beljaars, van~de Berg, Bidlot,
Bormann, Delsol, Dragani, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hersbach,
H{\'{o}}lm, Isaksen, K{\aa}llberg, K{\"{o}}hler, Matricardi, McNally, Monge-Sanz,
Morcrette, Park, Peubey, de~Rosnay, Tavolato, Th{\'{e}}paut, and Vitart}}?><label>Dee et al.(2011)Dee, Uppala, Simmons, Berrisford, Poli, Kobayashi,
Andrae, Balmaseda, Balsamo, Bauer, Bechtold, Beljaars, van de Berg, Bidlot,
Bormann, Delsol, Dragani, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hersbach,
Hólm, Isaksen, Kållberg, Köhler, Matricardi, McNally, Monge-Sanz,
Morcrette, Park, Peubey, de Rosnay, Tavolato, Thépaut, and Vitart</label><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars,
A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R.,
Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm,
E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally,
A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay,
P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis:
configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy.
Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Delano\"{e} and Hogan(2010)}}?><label>Delanoë and Hogan(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Delanoë, J. and Hogan, R. J.: Combined CloudSat-CALIPSO-MODIS retrievals of
the properties of ice clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012346</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Delano\"{e} et~al.(2005)Delano\"{e}, Protat, Testud, Bouniol,
Heymsfield, Bansemer, Brown, Forbes, and Delano}}?><label>Delanoë et al.(2005)Delanoë, Protat, Testud, Bouniol,
Heymsfield, Bansemer, Brown, Forbes, and Delano</label><mixed-citation>Delanoë, J., Protat, A., Testud, J., Bouniol, D., Heymsfield, A. J.,
Bansemer, A., Brown, P. R. A., Forbes, R. M., and Delanoë, J.: Statistical
properties of the normalized ice particle size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.,
110, D10201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005405</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>DeMott et al.(1997)Demott, Rogers, and Kreidenweis</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Rogers, D. C., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: The susceptibility of
ice formation in upper tropospheric clouds to insoluble aerosol components, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 19575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD01138</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>DeMott et al.(2010)DeMott, Prenni, Liu, Kreidenweis, Petters, Twohy,
Richardson, Eidhammer, and Rogers</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910818107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Deng et al.(2013)Deng, Mace, Wang, and Lawson</label><mixed-citation>Deng, M., Mace, G. G., Wang, Z., and Lawson, R. P.: Evaluation of Several
A-Train Ice Cloud Retrieval Products with In Situ Measurements Collected
during the SPARTICUS Campaign, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 52, 1014–1030,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-054.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAMC-D-12-054.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Diao et al.(2017)Diao, Bryan, Morrison, and Jensen</label><mixed-citation>Diao, M., Bryan, G. H., Morrison, H., and Jensen, J. B.: Ice Nucleation
Parameterization and Relative Humidity Distribution in Idealized Squall-Line
Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2761–2787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Field et al.(2001)Field, Cotton, Johnson, Noone, Glantz, Kaye, Hirst,
Greenaway, Jost, Gabriel, Reiner, Andreae, Saunders, Archer, Choularton,
Smith, Brooks, Hoell, Bandy, and Heymsfield</label><mixed-citation>Field, P. R., Cotton, R. J., Johnson, D., Noone, K., Glantz, P., Kaye, P. H.,
Hirst, E., Greenaway, R. S., Jost, C., Gabriel, R., Reiner, T., Andreae, M.,
Saunders, C. P. R., Archer, A., Choularton, T., Smith, M., Brooks, B., Hoell,
C., Bandy, B., and Heymsfield, A.: Ice nucleation in orographic wave clouds:
Measurements made during INTACC, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 1493–1512,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49712757502</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Fusina et al.(2007)Fusina, Spichtinger, and Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>Fusina, F., Spichtinger, P., and Lohmann, U.: Impact of ice supersaturated
regions and thin cirrus on radiation in the midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D24S14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008449</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Gasparini and Lohmann(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Gasparini, B. and Lohmann, U.: Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially
cool the planet, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4877–4893, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024666</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gayet et~al.(2004)Gayet, Ovarlez, Shcherbakov, Str\"{o}m, Schumann,
Minikin, Auriol, Petzold, and Monier}}?><label>Gayet et al.(2004)Gayet, Ovarlez, Shcherbakov, Ström, Schumann,
Minikin, Auriol, Petzold, and Monier</label><mixed-citation>Gayet, J.-F., Ovarlez, J., Shcherbakov, V., Ström, J., Schumann, U., Minikin,
A., Auriol, F., Petzold, A., and Monier, M.: Cirrus cloud microphysical and
optical properties at southern and northern midlatitudes during the INCA
experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D20206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004803</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Gettelman(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A.: Putting the clouds back in aerosol–cloud interactions,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12397–12411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12397-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12397-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Gettelman et al.(2012)Gettelman, Liu, Barahona, Lohmann, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Barahona, D., Lohmann, U., and Chen, C.: Climate impacts
of ice nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D20201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017950</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Ghan et al.(2016)Ghan, Wang, Zhang, Ferrachat, Gettelman,
Griesfeller, Kipling, Lohmann, Morrison, Neubauer, Partridge, Stier,
Takemura, Wang, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Ghan, S., Wang, M., Zhang, S., Ferrachat, S., Gettelman, A., Griesfeller, J.,
Kipling, Z., Lohmann, U., Morrison, H., Neubauer, D., Partridge, D. G., Stier,
P., Takemura, T., Wang, H., and Zhang, K.: Challenges in constraining
anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using<?pagebreak page14368?> present-day
spatiotemporal variability, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5804–5811,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514036113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1514036113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Ginoux et al.(2012)Ginoux, Prospero, Gill, Hsu, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>Ginoux, P., Prospero, J. M., Gill, T. E., Hsu, N. C., and Zhao, M.: Global-scale
attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates
based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products, Rev. Geophys., 50, 3005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RG000388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012RG000388</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Grawe et al.(2016)Grawe, Augustin-Bauditz, Hartmann, Hellner,
Pettersson, Prager, Stratmann, and Wex</label><mixed-citation>Grawe, S., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Hartmann, S., Hellner, L., Pettersson, J. B.
C., Prager, A., Stratmann, F., and Wex, H.: The immersion freezing behavior of
ash particles from wood and brown coal burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
13911–13928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13911-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13911-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2016)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, and Bellouin</label><mixed-citation>Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., and Bellouin, N.: Constraining the aerosol influence
on cloud fraction, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 3566–3583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023744</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2017)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, Ferrachat,
Gettelman, Ghan, Lohmann, Morrison, Neubauer, Partridge, Stier, Takemura,
Wang, Wang, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., Ferrachat, S., Gettelman, A., Ghan, S., Lohmann, U.,
Morrison, H., Neubauer, D., Partridge, D. G., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Wang, H.,
Wang, M., and Zhang, K.: Constraining the instantaneous aerosol influence on
cloud albedo, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 4899–4904, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617765114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1617765114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2018a)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, Goren, Klocke, and Brueck</label><mixed-citation>Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., Goren, T., Klocke, D., and Brueck, M.: An automated
cirrus type classification, Atmos. Chem. Phys., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6157–6169,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6157-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6157-2018</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2018b)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, Goren, Klocke, and Brueck</label><mixed-citation>Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., Goren, T., Klocke, D., and Brueck, M.: Identification
and classification of Cirrus (IC-CIR): A cirrus classification based on satellite
and reanalysis data (2003–2013), Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, date
<uri>http://dx.doi.org/10.5285/cddfe3093be247d7bac56c9fa9edb3d5</uri>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Heymsfield and Miloshevich(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A. J. and Miloshevich, L. M.: Homogeneous Ice Nucleation and
Supercooled Liquid Water in Orographic Wave Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50,
2335–2353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2335:HINASL&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2335:HINASL&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Heymsfield et al.(2017)Heymsfield, Krmer, Luebke, Brown, Cziczo,
Franklin, Lawson, Lohmann, McFarquhar, Ulanowski, and Van Tricht</label><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Luebke, A., Brown, P., Cziczo, D. J.,
Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Lohmann, U., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and
Van Tricht, K.: Cirrus Clouds, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 2.1–2.26,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heyn et~al.(2017)Heyn, Block, M\"{u}lmenst\"{a}dt, Gryspeerdt,
K\"{u}hne, and Quaas}}?><label>Heyn et al.(2017)Heyn, Block, Mülmenstädt, Gryspeerdt,
Kühne, and Quaas</label><mixed-citation>Heyn, I., Block, K., Mülmenstädt, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kühne, P.,
and Quaas, J.: Assessment of simulated aerosol effective radiative forcings in
the terrestrial spectrum, Geophys. Res. Lett, 44, 1001–1007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071975</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoose and M\"{o}hler(2012)}}?><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric
aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Hoyle et al.(2005)Hoyle, Luo, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Hoyle, C. R., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: The Origin of High Ice Crystal Number
Densities in Cirrus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2568–2579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3487.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3487.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Huang et~al.(2012)Huang, Siems, Manton, Protat, and Delano\"{e}}}?><label>Huang et al.(2012)Huang, Siems, Manton, Protat, and Delanoë</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Siems, S. T., Manton, M. J., Protat, A., and Delanë, J.: A study
on the low-altitude clouds over the Southern Ocean using the DARDAR-MASK, J.
Geophys. Res., 117, D18204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017800" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017800</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Jensen et al.(1998)Jensen, Toon, Tabazadeh, Sachse, Anderson, Chan,
Twohy, Gandrud, Aulenbach, Heymsfield, Hallett, and Gary</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Toon, O. B., Tabazadeh, A., Sachse, G. W., Anderson, B. E.,
Chan, K. R., Twohy, C. W., Gandrud, B., Aulenbach, S. M., Heymsfield, A.,
Hallett, J., and Gary, B.: Ice nucleation processes in upper tropospheric
wave-clouds observed during SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1363–1366,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98GL00299</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Jensen et al.(2009)Jensen, Lawson, Baker, Pilson, Mo, Heymsfield,
Bansemer, Bui, McGill, Hlavka, Heymsfield, Platnick, Arnold, and Tanelli</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Lawson, P., Baker, B., Pilson, B., Mo, Q., Heymsfield, A. J.,
Bansemer, A., Bui, T. P., McGill, M., Hlavka, D., Heymsfield, G., Platnick, S.,
Arnold, G. T., and Tanelli, S.: On the importance of small ice crystals in
tropical anvil cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5519–5537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5519-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5519-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Jensen et al.(2013a)Jensen, Diskin, Lawson, Lance, Bui,
Hlavka, McGill, Pfister, Toon, and Gao</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Diskin, G., Lawson, R. P., Lance, S., Bui, T. P., Hlavka, D.,
McGill, M., Pfister, L., Toon, O. B., and Gao, R.: Ice nucleation and
dehydration in the Tropical Tropopause Layer, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
2041–2046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217104110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1217104110</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Jensen et al.(2013b)Jensen, Lawson, Bergman, Pfister, Bui, and Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Lawson, R. P., Bergman, J. W., Pfister, L., Bui, T. P., and
Schmitt, C. G.: Physical processes controlling ice concentrations in
synoptically forced, midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5348–5360,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50421" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50421</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Jensen et al.(2016)Jensen, Ueyama, Pfister, Bui, Lawson, Woods,
Thornberry, Rollins, Diskin, DiGangi, and Avery</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, E. J., Ueyama, R., Pfister, L., Bui, T. V., Lawson, R. P., Woods, S.,
Thornberry, T., Rollins, A. W., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., and Avery, M. A.:
On the Susceptibility of Cold Tropical Cirrus to Ice Nuclei Abundance, J. Atmos.
Sci., 73, 2445–2464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0274.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-15-0274.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Jiang et al.(2011)Jiang, Su, Zhai, Massie, Schoeberl, Colarco,
Platnick, Gu, and Liou</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, J. H., Su, H., Zhai, C., Massie, S. T., Schoeberl, M. R., Colarco, P. R.,
Platnick, S., Gu, Y., and Liou, K.-N.: Influence of convection and aerosol
pollution on ice cloud particle effective radius, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
457–463, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-457-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-457-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Joos et al.(2008)Joos, Spichtinger, Lohmann, Gayet, and Minikin</label><mixed-citation>Joos, H., Spichtinger, P., Lohmann, U., Gayet, J.-F., and Minikin, A.:
Orographic cirrus in the global climate model ECHAM5, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D18205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009605</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Kanitz et al.(2011)Kanitz, Seifert, Ansmann, Engelmann, Althausen,
Casiccia, and Rohwer</label><mixed-citation>Kanitz, T., Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Casiccia,
C., and Rohwer, E. G.: Contrasting the impact of aerosols at northern and
southern midlatitudes on heterogeneous ice formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L17802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048532</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Kanji et al.(2017)Kanji, Ladino, Wex, Boose, Burkert-Kohn, Cziczo, and Krmer</label><mixed-citation>Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D.
J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteorol. Monogr.,
58, 1.1–1.33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher(2017)}}?><label>Kärcher(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B.: Cirrus Clouds and Their Response to Anthropogenic Activities,
Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 3, 45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher and Lohmann(2002)}}?><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Homogenous freezing of supercooled aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4010,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000470</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher and Lohmann(2003)}}?><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003220</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher and Seifert(2016)}}?><label>Kärcher and Seifert(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Seifert, A.: On homogeneous ice formation in liquid clouds,
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 1320–1334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2735</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher and Str\"{o}m(2003)}}?><label>Kärcher and Ström(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Ström, J.: The roles of dynamical variability and
aerosols in cirrus cloud formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 823–838,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-823-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-823-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Kay and Wood(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Kay, J. E. and Wood, R.: Timescale analysis of aerosol sensitivity during
homogeneous freezing and implications for upper<?pagebreak page14369?> tropospheric water vapor
budgets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L10809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032628</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Kojima et al.(2004)Kojima, Buseck, Wilson, Reeves, and Mahoney</label><mixed-citation>Kojima, T., Buseck, P. R., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., and Mahoney, M. J.:
Aerosol particles from tropical convective systems: Cloud tops and cirrus
anvils, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D12201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004504" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004504</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant
for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35020537</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Korolev et al.(2013)Korolev, Emery, Strapp, Cober, and Isaac</label><mixed-citation>Korolev, A. V., Emery, E. F., Strapp, J. W., Cober, S. G., and Isaac, G. A.:
Quantification of the Effects of Shattering on Airborne Ice Particle
Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 2527–2553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00115.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00115.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kr\"{a}mer et~al.(2009)Kr\"{a}mer, Schiller, Afchine, Bauer, Gensch,
Mangold, Schlicht, Spelten, Sitnikov, Borrmann, de~Reus, and Spichtinger}}?><label>Krämer et al.(2009)Krämer, Schiller, Afchine, Bauer, Gensch,
Mangold, Schlicht, Spelten, Sitnikov, Borrmann, de Reus, and Spichtinger</label><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold, A.,
Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and
Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kr\"{a}mer et~al.(2016)Kr\"{a}mer, Rolf, Luebke, Afchine, Spelten,
Costa, Meyer, Z\"{o}ger, Smith, Herman, Buchholz, Ebert, Baumgardner,
Borrmann, Klingebiel, and Avallone}}?><label>Krämer et al.(2016)Krämer, Rolf, Luebke, Afchine, Spelten,
Costa, Meyer, Zöger, Smith, Herman, Buchholz, Ebert, Baumgardner,
Borrmann, Klingebiel, and Avallone</label><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A.,
Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V.,
Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics
guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Lindsey and Fromm(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Lindsey, D. T. and Fromm, M.: Evidence of the cloud lifetime effect from
wildfire-induced thunderstorms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035680" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035680</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Liou(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Liou, K.-N.: Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A
Global Perspective, Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1167–1199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lohmann and K\"{a}rcher(2002)}}?><label>Lohmann and Kärcher(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Kärcher, B.: First interactive simulations of cirrus clouds
formed by homogeneous freezing in the ECHAM general circulation model, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 4105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000767" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000767</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Lohmann et al.(2007)Lohmann, Stier, Hoose, Ferrachat, Kloster,
Roeckner, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U., Stier, P., Hoose, C., Ferrachat, S., Kloster, S., Roeckner, E.,
and Zhang, J.: Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global
climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3425–3446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Luebke et al.(2016)Luebke, Afchine, Costa, Groo, Meyer, Rolf,
Spelten, Avallone, Baumgardner, and Krmer</label><mixed-citation>Luebke, A. E., Afchine, A., Costa, A., Grooß, J.-U., Meyer, J., Rolf, C.,
Spelten, N., Avallone, L. M., Baumgardner, D., and Krämer, M.: The origin
of midlatitude ice clouds and the resulting influence on their microphysical
properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5793–5809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Mamouri and Ansmann(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Mamouri, R.-E. and Ansmann, A.: Potential of polarization lidar to provide
profiles of CCN- and INP-relevant aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
5905–5931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5905-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5905-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>McFarquhar et al.(2007)McFarquhar, Um, Freer, Baumgardner, Kok, and Mace</label><mixed-citation>McFarquhar, G. M., Um, J., Freer, M., Baumgardner, D., Kok, G. L., and Mace,
G.: Importance of small ice crystals to cirrus properties: Observations from
the Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE), Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029865" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029865</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Mitchell et al.(2016)Mitchell, Garnier, Avery, and Erfani</label><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Avery, M., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO observations
of the dependence of homo- and heterogeneous ice nucleation in cirrus clouds on
latitude, season and surface condition, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2016-1062</ext-link>, in review, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Mitchell et al.(2018)Mitchell, Garnier, Pelon, and Erfani</label><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Pelon, J., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO (IIR-CALIOP)
Retrievals of Cirrus Cloud Ice Particle Concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2018-526</ext-link>, in review, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{M\"{o}hler et~al.(2006)M\"{o}hler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Krmer, Mangold, and Heymsfield}}?><label>Möhler et al.(2006)Möhler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Krmer, Mangold, and Heymsfield</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter,
M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.:
Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Morcrette et al.(2009)Morcrette, Boucher, Jones, Salmond, Bechtold,
Beljaars, Benedetti, Bonet, Kaiser, Razinger, Schulz, Serrar, Simmons,
Sofiev, Suttie, Tompkins, and Untch</label><mixed-citation>Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Jones, L., Salmond, D., Bechtold, P., Beljaars,
A., Benedetti, A., Bonet, A., Kaiser, J. W., Razinger, M., Schulz, M., Serrar,
S., Simmons, A. J., Sofiev, M., Suttie, M., Tompkins, A. M., and Untch, A.:
Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather
Forecasts Integrated Forecast System: Forward modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D06206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011235</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Muhlbauer et al.(2014)Muhlbauer, Ackerman, Comstock, Diskin, Evans,
Lawson, and Marchand</label><mixed-citation>Muhlbauer, A., Ackerman, T. P., Comstock, J. M., Diskin, G. S., Evans, S. M.,
Lawson, R. P., and Marchand, R. T.: Impact of large-scale dynamics on the
microphysical properties of midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
3976–3996, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020035</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Murray(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Murray, B. J.: Inhibition of ice crystallisation in highly viscous aqueous
organic acid droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5423–5433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5423-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5423-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>O'Shea et al.(2016)O'Shea, Choularton, Lloyd, Crosier, Bower,
Gallagher, Abel, Cotton, Brown, Fugal, Schlenczek, Borrmann, and Pickering</label><mixed-citation>O'Shea, S. J., Choularton, T. W., Lloyd, G., Crosier, J., Bower, K. N.,
Gallagher, M., Abel, S. J., Cotton, R. J., Brown, P. R. A., Fugal, J. P.,
Schlenczek, O., Borrmann, S., and Pickering, J. C.: Airborne observations of
the microphysical structure of two contrasting cirrus clouds, J. Geophys. Res.,
121, 13510–13536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025278</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Platnick et al.(2017)Platnick, Meyer, King, Wind, Amarasinghe,
Marchant, Arnold, Zhang, Hubanks, Holz, Yang, Ridgway, and Riedi</label><mixed-citation>Platnick, S., Meyer, K. G., King, M. D., Wind, G., Amarasinghe, N., Marchant,
B., Arnold, G. T., Zhang, Z., Hubanks, P. A., Holz, R. E., Yang, P., Ridgway,
W. L., and Riedi, J.: The MODIS Cloud Optical and Microphysical Products:
Collection 6 Updates and Examples From Terra and Aqua, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
55, 502–525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Podglajen et al.(2016)Podglajen, Hertzog, Plougonven, and Legras</label><mixed-citation>Podglajen, A., Hertzog, A., Plougonven, R., and Legras, B.: Lagrangian
temperature and vertical velocity fluctuations due to gravity waves in the
lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3543–3553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068148</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Podglajen et al.(2017)Podglajen, Bui, Dean-Day, Pfister, Jensen,
Alexander, Hertzog, Krcher, Plougonven, and Randel</label><mixed-citation>Podglajen, A., Bui, T. P., Dean-Day, J. M., Pfister, L., Jensen, E. J.,
Alexander, M. J., Hertzog, A., Kärcher, B., Plougonven, R., and Randel, W.
J.: Small-Scale Wind Fluctuations in the Tropical Tropopause Layer from
Aircraft Measurements: Occurrence, Nature, and Impact on Vertical Mixing, J.
Atmos. Sci., 74, 3847–3869, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0010.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-17-0010.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Pruppacher and Klett(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation,
Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Quaas et al.(2008)Quaas, Boucher, Bellouin, and Kinne</label><mixed-citation>Quaas, J., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., and Kinne, S.: Satellite-based estimate
of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D05204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008962</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Rosenfeld et al.(2011)Rosenfeld, Yu, Liu, Xu, Zhu, Yue, Dai, Dong,
Dong, and Peng</label><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Yu, X., Liu, G., Xu, X., Zhu, Y., Yue, Z., Dai, J., Dong, Z.,
Dong, Y., and Peng, Y.: Glaciation temperatures of convective clouds ingesting
desert dust, air pollution and smoke from forest fires, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, 21804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049423</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14370?><ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Salzmann et~al.(2010)Salzmann, Ming, Golaz, Ginoux, Morrison,
Gettelman, Kr\"{a}mer, and Donner}}?><label>Salzmann et al.(2010)Salzmann, Ming, Golaz, Ginoux, Morrison,
Gettelman, Krämer, and Donner</label><mixed-citation>Salzmann, M., Ming, Y., Golaz, J.-C., Ginoux, P. A., Morrison, H., Gettelman,
A., Krämer, M., and Donner, L. J.: Two-moment bulk stratiform cloud
microphysics in the GFDL AM3 GCM: description, evaluation, and sensitivity tests,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8037–8064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8037-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8037-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Seifert et al.(2015)Seifert, Heus, Pincus, and Stevens</label><mixed-citation>Seifert, A., Heus, T., Pincus, R., and Stevens, B.: Large-eddy simulation of
the transient and near-equilibrium behavior of precipitating shallow convection,
J. Adv. Mod. Earth Syst., 7, 1918–1937, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000489" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015MS000489</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sourdeval et~al.(2018a)Sourdeval, Gryspeerdt, Kr\"{a}mer, Goren,
Delano\"{e}, Afchine, Hemmer, and Quaas}}?><label>Sourdeval et al.(2018a)Sourdeval, Gryspeerdt, Krämer, Goren,
Delanoë, Afchine, Hemmer, and Quaas</label><mixed-citation>Sourdeval, O., Gryspeerdt, E., Krämer, M., Goren, T., Delanoë, J.,
Afchine, A., Hemmer, F., and Quaas, J.: Ice crystal number concentration
estimates from lidar–radar satellite remote sensing – Part 1: Method and
evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14327–14350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14327-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14327-2018</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Sourdeval et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>Sourdeval, O., Gryspeerdt, E., Krämer, M., Goren, T., Delanoë, J.,
Afchine, A., Hemmer, F., and Quaas, J.: Ice crystal number concentration from
satellite lidar-radar observations (DARDAR-Nice), AERIS, <uri>https://doi.org/10.25326/09</uri>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Spichtinger and Gierens(2009a)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K. M.: Modelling of cirrus clouds – Part 1a:
Model description and validation, Atmos Chem Phys, 9, 685–706, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-685-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-685-2009</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Spichtinger and Gierens(2009b)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K. M.: Modelling of cirrus clouds – Part 1b:
Structuring cirrus clouds by dynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 707–719,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-707-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-707-2009</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Stephens et al.(2012)Stephens, Li, Wild, Clayson, Loeb, Kato,
L'Ecuyer, Stackhouse, Lebsock, and Andrews</label><mixed-citation>Stephens, G. L., Li, J., Wild, M., Clayson, C. A., Loeb, N., Kato, S., L'Ecuyer,
T., Stackhouse, P. W., Lebsock, M., and Andrews, T.: An update on Earth's energy
balance in light of the latest global observations, Nat. Geosci., 5, 691–696,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1580</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Stier(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Stier, P.: Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud
condensation nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6595–6607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Tan et al.(2014)Tan, Storelvmo, and Choi</label><mixed-citation>Tan, I., Storelvmo, T., and Choi, Y.-S.: Spaceborne lidar observations of the
ice-nucleating potential of dust, polluted dust, and smoke aerosols in
mixed-phase clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 6653–6665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021333</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Wang et al.(2011)Wang, Ghan, Ovchinnikov, Liu, Easter, Kassianov,
Qian, and Morrison</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Ghan, S., Ovchinnikov, M., Liu, X., Easter, R., Kassianov, E., Qian,
Y., and Morrison, H.: Aerosol indirect effects in a multi-scale aerosol-climate
model PNNL-MMF, Atmos Chem Phys, 11, 5431–5455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5431-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5431-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Weigum(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Weigum, N. M.: Scales of variability of atmospheric aerosols, PhD thesis,
University of Oxford, Oxford, 2014.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Weigum et al.(2012)Weigum, Stier, Schwarz, Fahey, and Spackman</label><mixed-citation>Weigum, N. M., Stier, P., Schwarz, J. P., Fahey, D. W., and Spackman, J. R.:
Scales of variability of black carbon plumes over the Pacific Ocean, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 39, L15804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052127</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Wernli et al.(2016)Wernli, Boettcher, Joos, Miltenberger, and Spichtinger</label><mixed-citation>Wernli, H., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., Miltenberger, A. K., and Spichtinger, P.:
A trajectory-based classification of ERA-Interim ice clouds in the region of
the North Atlantic storm track, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6657–6664,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068922" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068922</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Wilson et al.(2012)Wilson, Murray, Wagner, Mhler, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Skrotzki, Price, Malkin, Dobbie, and Al-Jumur</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, T. W., Murray, B. J., Wagner, R., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H.,
Schnaiter, M., Skrotzki, J., Price, H. C., Malkin, T. L., Dobbie, S., and
Al-Jumur, S. M. R. K.: Glassy aerosols with a range of compositions nucleate
ice heterogeneously at cirrus temperatures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8611–8632, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Wood et al.(2011)Wood, Mechoso, Bretherton, Weller, Huebert, Straneo,
Albrecht, Coe, Allen, Vaughan, Daum, Fairall, Chand, Gallardo Klenner,
Garreaud, Grados, Covert, Bates, Krejci, Russell, de Szoeke, Brewer, Yuter,
Springston, Chaigneau, Toniazzo, Minnis, Palikonda, Abel, Brown, Williams,
Fochesatto, Brioude, and Bower</label><mixed-citation>Wood, R., Mechoso, C. R., Bretherton, C. S., Weller, R. A., Huebert, B., Straneo,
F., Albrecht, B. A., Coe, H., Allen, G., Vaughan, G., Daum, P., Fairall, C.,
Chand, D., Gallardo Klenner, L., Garreaud, R., Grados, C., Covert, D. S., Bates,
T. S., Krejci, R., Russell, L. M., de Szoeke, S., Brewer, A., Yuter, S. E.,
Springston, S. R., Chaigneau, A., Toniazzo, T., Minnis, P., Palikonda, R., Abel,
S. J., Brown, W. O. J., Williams, S., Fochesatto, J., Brioude, J., and Bower,
K. N.: The VAMOS Ocean-Cloud-Atmosphere-Land Study Regional Experiment (VOCALS-REx):
goals, platforms, and field operations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 627–654,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-627-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-627-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Zhang et al.(2012)Zhang, Wang, Heymsfield, Fan, Liu, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Heymsfield, A., Fan, J., Liu, D., and Zhao, M.:
Quantifying the impact of dust on heterogeneous ice generation in midlevel
supercooled stratiform clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052831</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Zhao et al.(2018)Zhao, Gu, Liou, Wang, Liu, Huang, Jiang, and Su</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Gu, Y., Liou, K.-N., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Huang, L., Jiang, J. H., and
Su, H.: Type-Dependent Responses of Ice Cloud Properties to Aerosols From
Satellite Retrievals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3297–3306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2018GL077261</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Zhou et al.(2016)Zhou, Penner, Lin, Liu, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., Lin, G., Liu, X., and Wang, M.: What controls the low
ice number concentration in the upper troposphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
12411–12424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Zuidema et al.(2016)Zuidema, Redemann, Haywood, Wood, Piketh,
Hipondoka, and Formenti</label><mixed-citation>Zuidema, P., Redemann, J., Haywood, J., Wood, R., Piketh, S., Hipondoka, M.,
and Formenti, P.: Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic: Upcoming Field
Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol's Impact on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
97, 1131–1135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00082.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00082.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html> Ice crystal number concentration estimates from lidar–radar  satellite remote sensing – Part 2: Controls on the ice crystal  number concentration</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The ice crystal number concentration (<i>N</i><sub>i</sub>) is a key property of
ice clouds, both radiatively and microphysically. Due to sparse
in situ measurements of ice cloud properties, the controls on the
<i>N</i><sub>i</sub> have remained difficult to determine. As more advanced
treatments of ice clouds are included in global models, it is becoming
increasingly necessary to develop strong observational constraints on the
processes involved.</p><p>This work uses the DARDAR-Nice <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> retrieval described in Part 1
to investigate the controls on the <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> at a global scale. The
retrieved clouds are separated by type. The effects of temperature, proxies
for in-cloud updraft and aerosol concentrations are investigated.
Variations in the cloud top <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> (<i>N</i><sub>i(top)</sub>)
consistent with both homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation are observed
along with differing relationships between aerosol and
<i>N</i><sub>i(top)</sub> depending on the prevailing meteorological
situation and aerosol type. Away from the cloud top, the <i>N</i><sub>i</sub>
displays a different sensitivity to these controlling factors, providing a
possible explanation for the low <i>N</i><sub>i</sub> sensitivity to temperature
and ice nucleating particles (INP) observed in previous in situ studies.</p><p>This satellite dataset provides a new way of investigating the response of
cloud properties to meteorological and aerosol controls. The results
presented in this work increase our confidence in the retrieved
<i>N</i><sub>i</sub> and will form the basis for further study into the processes
influencing ice and mixed phase clouds.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Baker and Lawson(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, B. A. and Lawson, R. P.: In Situ Observations of the Microphysical
Properties of Wave, Cirrus, and Anvil Clouds. Part I: Wave Clouds, J. Atmos.
Sci., 63, 3160–3185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3802.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3802.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Barahona and Nenes(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation in
large-scale models: Homogeneous nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009355</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Barahona et al.(2017)Barahona, Molod, and Kalesse</label><mixed-citation>
Barahona, D., Molod, A., and Kalesse, H.: Direct estimation of the global
distribution of vertical velocity within cirrus clouds, Sci. Rep., 7, 6840,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Benedetti et al.(2009)Benedetti, Morcrette, Boucher, Dethof, Engelen,
Fisher, Flentje, Huneeus, Jones, Kaiser, Kinne, Mangold, Razinger, Simmons, and Suttie</label><mixed-citation>
Benedetti, A., Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Dethof, A., Engelen, R. J.,
Fisher, M., Flentje, H., Huneeus, N., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S.,
Mangold, A., Razinger, M., Simmons, A. J., and Suttie, M.: Aerosol analysis
and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Integrated Forecast System: 2. Data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D13205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P.,
Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S.,
Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, in: book section 7,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 571–658,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bühl et al.(2013)Bhl, Ansmann, Seifert, Baars, and Engelmann</label><mixed-citation>
Bühl, J., Ansmann, A., Seifert, P., Baars, H., and Engelmann, R.: Toward a
quantitative characterization of heterogeneous ice formation with lidar/radar:
Comparison of CALIPSO/CloudSat with ground-based observations, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 4404–4408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50792" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50792</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Choi et al.(2010)Choi, Lindzen, Ho, and Kim</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, Y.-S., Lindzen, R. S., Ho, C.-H., and Kim, J.: Space observations of
cold-cloud phase change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11211–11216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006241107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006241107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chylek et al.(2006)Chylek, Dubey, Lohmann, Ramanathan, Kaufman,
Lesins, Hudson, Altmann, and Olsen</label><mixed-citation>
Chylek, P., Dubey, M. K., Lohmann, U., Ramanathan, V., Kaufman, Y. J., Lesins,
G., Hudson, J., Altmann, G., and Olsen, S.: Aerosol indirect effect over the
Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025397</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Creamean et al.(2013)Creamean, Suski, Rosenfeld, Cazorla, DeMott,
Sullivan, White, Ralph, Minnis, Comstock, Tomlinson, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Creamean, J. M., Suski, K. J., Rosenfeld, D., Cazorla, A., DeMott, P. J.,
Sullivan, R. C., White, A. B., Ralph, F. M., Minnis, P., Comstock, J. M.,
Tomlinson, J. M., and Prather, K. A.: Dust and biological aerosols from the
Sahara and Asia influence precipitation in the western U.S., Science, 339,
1572–1578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227279</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Cziczo et al.(2013)Cziczo, Froyd, Hoose, Jensen, Diao, Zondlo, Smith,
Twohy, and Murphy</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A.,
Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the dominant sources
and mechanisms of cirrus cloud formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Dee et al.(2011)Dee, Uppala, Simmons, Berrisford, Poli, Kobayashi,
Andrae, Balmaseda, Balsamo, Bauer, Bechtold, Beljaars, van de Berg, Bidlot,
Bormann, Delsol, Dragani, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hersbach,
Hólm, Isaksen, Kållberg, Köhler, Matricardi, McNally, Monge-Sanz,
Morcrette, Park, Peubey, de Rosnay, Tavolato, Thépaut, and Vitart</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars,
A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R.,
Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm,
E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally,
A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay,
P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis:
configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy.
Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Delanoë and Hogan(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Delanoë, J. and Hogan, R. J.: Combined CloudSat-CALIPSO-MODIS retrievals of
the properties of ice clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012346</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Delanoë et al.(2005)Delanoë, Protat, Testud, Bouniol,
Heymsfield, Bansemer, Brown, Forbes, and Delano</label><mixed-citation>
Delanoë, J., Protat, A., Testud, J., Bouniol, D., Heymsfield, A. J.,
Bansemer, A., Brown, P. R. A., Forbes, R. M., and Delanoë, J.: Statistical
properties of the normalized ice particle size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.,
110, D10201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005405</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>DeMott et al.(1997)Demott, Rogers, and Kreidenweis</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Rogers, D. C., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: The susceptibility of
ice formation in upper tropospheric clouds to insoluble aerosol components, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 19575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01138</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>DeMott et al.(2010)DeMott, Prenni, Liu, Kreidenweis, Petters, Twohy,
Richardson, Eidhammer, and Rogers</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Deng et al.(2013)Deng, Mace, Wang, and Lawson</label><mixed-citation>
Deng, M., Mace, G. G., Wang, Z., and Lawson, R. P.: Evaluation of Several
A-Train Ice Cloud Retrieval Products with In Situ Measurements Collected
during the SPARTICUS Campaign, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 52, 1014–1030,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-054.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-054.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Diao et al.(2017)Diao, Bryan, Morrison, and Jensen</label><mixed-citation>
Diao, M., Bryan, G. H., Morrison, H., and Jensen, J. B.: Ice Nucleation
Parameterization and Relative Humidity Distribution in Idealized Squall-Line
Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2761–2787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0356.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Field et al.(2001)Field, Cotton, Johnson, Noone, Glantz, Kaye, Hirst,
Greenaway, Jost, Gabriel, Reiner, Andreae, Saunders, Archer, Choularton,
Smith, Brooks, Hoell, Bandy, and Heymsfield</label><mixed-citation>
Field, P. R., Cotton, R. J., Johnson, D., Noone, K., Glantz, P., Kaye, P. H.,
Hirst, E., Greenaway, R. S., Jost, C., Gabriel, R., Reiner, T., Andreae, M.,
Saunders, C. P. R., Archer, A., Choularton, T., Smith, M., Brooks, B., Hoell,
C., Bandy, B., and Heymsfield, A.: Ice nucleation in orographic wave clouds:
Measurements made during INTACC, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 1493–1512,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757502</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fusina et al.(2007)Fusina, Spichtinger, and Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
Fusina, F., Spichtinger, P., and Lohmann, U.: Impact of ice supersaturated
regions and thin cirrus on radiation in the midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D24S14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008449</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Gasparini and Lohmann(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Gasparini, B. and Lohmann, U.: Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially
cool the planet, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4877–4893, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024666" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024666</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gayet et al.(2004)Gayet, Ovarlez, Shcherbakov, Ström, Schumann,
Minikin, Auriol, Petzold, and Monier</label><mixed-citation>
Gayet, J.-F., Ovarlez, J., Shcherbakov, V., Ström, J., Schumann, U., Minikin,
A., Auriol, F., Petzold, A., and Monier, M.: Cirrus cloud microphysical and
optical properties at southern and northern midlatitudes during the INCA
experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D20206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004803</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Gettelman(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A.: Putting the clouds back in aerosol–cloud interactions,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12397–12411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12397-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12397-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Gettelman et al.(2012)Gettelman, Liu, Barahona, Lohmann, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Barahona, D., Lohmann, U., and Chen, C.: Climate impacts
of ice nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D20201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017950</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Ghan et al.(2016)Ghan, Wang, Zhang, Ferrachat, Gettelman,
Griesfeller, Kipling, Lohmann, Morrison, Neubauer, Partridge, Stier,
Takemura, Wang, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Ghan, S., Wang, M., Zhang, S., Ferrachat, S., Gettelman, A., Griesfeller, J.,
Kipling, Z., Lohmann, U., Morrison, H., Neubauer, D., Partridge, D. G., Stier,
P., Takemura, T., Wang, H., and Zhang, K.: Challenges in constraining
anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day
spatiotemporal variability, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5804–5811,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514036113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514036113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Ginoux et al.(2012)Ginoux, Prospero, Gill, Hsu, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
Ginoux, P., Prospero, J. M., Gill, T. E., Hsu, N. C., and Zhao, M.: Global-scale
attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates
based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products, Rev. Geophys., 50, 3005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RG000388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RG000388</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Grawe et al.(2016)Grawe, Augustin-Bauditz, Hartmann, Hellner,
Pettersson, Prager, Stratmann, and Wex</label><mixed-citation>
Grawe, S., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Hartmann, S., Hellner, L., Pettersson, J. B.
C., Prager, A., Stratmann, F., and Wex, H.: The immersion freezing behavior of
ash particles from wood and brown coal burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
13911–13928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13911-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13911-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2016)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, and Bellouin</label><mixed-citation>
Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., and Bellouin, N.: Constraining the aerosol influence
on cloud fraction, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 3566–3583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023744" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023744</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2017)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, Ferrachat,
Gettelman, Ghan, Lohmann, Morrison, Neubauer, Partridge, Stier, Takemura,
Wang, Wang, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., Ferrachat, S., Gettelman, A., Ghan, S., Lohmann, U.,
Morrison, H., Neubauer, D., Partridge, D. G., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Wang, H.,
Wang, M., and Zhang, K.: Constraining the instantaneous aerosol influence on
cloud albedo, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 4899–4904, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617765114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617765114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2018a)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, Goren, Klocke, and Brueck</label><mixed-citation>
Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., Goren, T., Klocke, D., and Brueck, M.: An automated
cirrus type classification, Atmos. Chem. Phys., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6157–6169,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6157-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6157-2018</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Gryspeerdt et al.(2018b)Gryspeerdt, Quaas, Goren, Klocke, and Brueck</label><mixed-citation>
Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., Goren, T., Klocke, D., and Brueck, M.: Identification
and classification of Cirrus (IC-CIR): A cirrus classification based on satellite
and reanalysis data (2003–2013), Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, date
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5285/cddfe3093be247d7bac56c9fa9edb3d5" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.5285/cddfe3093be247d7bac56c9fa9edb3d5</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Heymsfield and Miloshevich(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Heymsfield, A. J. and Miloshevich, L. M.: Homogeneous Ice Nucleation and
Supercooled Liquid Water in Orographic Wave Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50,
2335–2353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2335:HINASL&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2335:HINASL&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Heymsfield et al.(2017)Heymsfield, Krmer, Luebke, Brown, Cziczo,
Franklin, Lawson, Lohmann, McFarquhar, Ulanowski, and Van Tricht</label><mixed-citation>
Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Luebke, A., Brown, P., Cziczo, D. J.,
Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Lohmann, U., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and
Van Tricht, K.: Cirrus Clouds, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 2.1–2.26,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Heyn et al.(2017)Heyn, Block, Mülmenstädt, Gryspeerdt,
Kühne, and Quaas</label><mixed-citation>
Heyn, I., Block, K., Mülmenstädt, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kühne, P.,
and Quaas, J.: Assessment of simulated aerosol effective radiative forcings in
the terrestrial spectrum, Geophys. Res. Lett, 44, 1001–1007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071975</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric
aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 9817–9854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Hoyle et al.(2005)Hoyle, Luo, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
Hoyle, C. R., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: The Origin of High Ice Crystal Number
Densities in Cirrus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2568–2579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3487.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3487.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Huang et al.(2012)Huang, Siems, Manton, Protat, and Delanoë</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Siems, S. T., Manton, M. J., Protat, A., and Delanë, J.: A study
on the low-altitude clouds over the Southern Ocean using the DARDAR-MASK, J.
Geophys. Res., 117, D18204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017800" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017800</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Jensen et al.(1998)Jensen, Toon, Tabazadeh, Sachse, Anderson, Chan,
Twohy, Gandrud, Aulenbach, Heymsfield, Hallett, and Gary</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Toon, O. B., Tabazadeh, A., Sachse, G. W., Anderson, B. E.,
Chan, K. R., Twohy, C. W., Gandrud, B., Aulenbach, S. M., Heymsfield, A.,
Hallett, J., and Gary, B.: Ice nucleation processes in upper tropospheric
wave-clouds observed during SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1363–1366,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00299</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Jensen et al.(2009)Jensen, Lawson, Baker, Pilson, Mo, Heymsfield,
Bansemer, Bui, McGill, Hlavka, Heymsfield, Platnick, Arnold, and Tanelli</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Lawson, P., Baker, B., Pilson, B., Mo, Q., Heymsfield, A. J.,
Bansemer, A., Bui, T. P., McGill, M., Hlavka, D., Heymsfield, G., Platnick, S.,
Arnold, G. T., and Tanelli, S.: On the importance of small ice crystals in
tropical anvil cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5519–5537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5519-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5519-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Jensen et al.(2013a)Jensen, Diskin, Lawson, Lance, Bui,
Hlavka, McGill, Pfister, Toon, and Gao</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Diskin, G., Lawson, R. P., Lance, S., Bui, T. P., Hlavka, D.,
McGill, M., Pfister, L., Toon, O. B., and Gao, R.: Ice nucleation and
dehydration in the Tropical Tropopause Layer, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
2041–2046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217104110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217104110</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Jensen et al.(2013b)Jensen, Lawson, Bergman, Pfister, Bui, and Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Lawson, R. P., Bergman, J. W., Pfister, L., Bui, T. P., and
Schmitt, C. G.: Physical processes controlling ice concentrations in
synoptically forced, midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5348–5360,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50421" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50421</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Jensen et al.(2016)Jensen, Ueyama, Pfister, Bui, Lawson, Woods,
Thornberry, Rollins, Diskin, DiGangi, and Avery</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, E. J., Ueyama, R., Pfister, L., Bui, T. V., Lawson, R. P., Woods, S.,
Thornberry, T., Rollins, A. W., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., and Avery, M. A.:
On the Susceptibility of Cold Tropical Cirrus to Ice Nuclei Abundance, J. Atmos.
Sci., 73, 2445–2464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0274.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0274.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Jiang et al.(2011)Jiang, Su, Zhai, Massie, Schoeberl, Colarco,
Platnick, Gu, and Liou</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, J. H., Su, H., Zhai, C., Massie, S. T., Schoeberl, M. R., Colarco, P. R.,
Platnick, S., Gu, Y., and Liou, K.-N.: Influence of convection and aerosol
pollution on ice cloud particle effective radius, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
457–463, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-457-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-457-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Joos et al.(2008)Joos, Spichtinger, Lohmann, Gayet, and Minikin</label><mixed-citation>
Joos, H., Spichtinger, P., Lohmann, U., Gayet, J.-F., and Minikin, A.:
Orographic cirrus in the global climate model ECHAM5, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D18205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009605" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009605</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Kanitz et al.(2011)Kanitz, Seifert, Ansmann, Engelmann, Althausen,
Casiccia, and Rohwer</label><mixed-citation>
Kanitz, T., Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Casiccia,
C., and Rohwer, E. G.: Contrasting the impact of aerosols at northern and
southern midlatitudes on heterogeneous ice formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L17802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048532" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048532</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Kanji et al.(2017)Kanji, Ladino, Wex, Boose, Burkert-Kohn, Cziczo, and Krmer</label><mixed-citation>
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D.
J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteorol. Monogr.,
58, 1.1–1.33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Kärcher(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B.: Cirrus Clouds and Their Response to Anthropogenic Activities,
Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 3, 45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Homogenous freezing of supercooled aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4010,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Kärcher and Seifert(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Seifert, A.: On homogeneous ice formation in liquid clouds,
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 1320–1334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2735</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Kärcher and Ström(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Ström, J.: The roles of dynamical variability and
aerosols in cirrus cloud formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 823–838,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-823-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-823-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Kay and Wood(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Kay, J. E. and Wood, R.: Timescale analysis of aerosol sensitivity during
homogeneous freezing and implications for upper tropospheric water vapor
budgets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L10809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032628" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032628</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Kojima et al.(2004)Kojima, Buseck, Wilson, Reeves, and Mahoney</label><mixed-citation>
Kojima, T., Buseck, P. R., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., and Mahoney, M. J.:
Aerosol particles from tropical convective systems: Cloud tops and cirrus
anvils, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D12201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004504" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004504</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant
for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Korolev et al.(2013)Korolev, Emery, Strapp, Cober, and Isaac</label><mixed-citation>
Korolev, A. V., Emery, E. F., Strapp, J. W., Cober, S. G., and Isaac, G. A.:
Quantification of the Effects of Shattering on Airborne Ice Particle
Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 2527–2553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00115.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00115.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Krämer et al.(2009)Krämer, Schiller, Afchine, Bauer, Gensch,
Mangold, Schlicht, Spelten, Sitnikov, Borrmann, de Reus, and Spichtinger</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold, A.,
Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and
Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Krämer et al.(2016)Krämer, Rolf, Luebke, Afchine, Spelten,
Costa, Meyer, Zöger, Smith, Herman, Buchholz, Ebert, Baumgardner,
Borrmann, Klingebiel, and Avallone</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A.,
Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V.,
Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics
guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Lindsey and Fromm(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Lindsey, D. T. and Fromm, M.: Evidence of the cloud lifetime effect from
wildfire-induced thunderstorms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035680" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035680</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Liou(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Liou, K.-N.: Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A
Global Perspective, Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1167–1199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Lohmann and Kärcher(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Kärcher, B.: First interactive simulations of cirrus clouds
formed by homogeneous freezing in the ECHAM general circulation model, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 4105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000767" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000767</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Lohmann et al.(2007)Lohmann, Stier, Hoose, Ferrachat, Kloster,
Roeckner, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U., Stier, P., Hoose, C., Ferrachat, S., Kloster, S., Roeckner, E.,
and Zhang, J.: Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global
climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3425–3446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Luebke et al.(2016)Luebke, Afchine, Costa, Groo, Meyer, Rolf,
Spelten, Avallone, Baumgardner, and Krmer</label><mixed-citation>
Luebke, A. E., Afchine, A., Costa, A., Grooß, J.-U., Meyer, J., Rolf, C.,
Spelten, N., Avallone, L. M., Baumgardner, D., and Krämer, M.: The origin
of midlatitude ice clouds and the resulting influence on their microphysical
properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5793–5809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Mamouri and Ansmann(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Mamouri, R.-E. and Ansmann, A.: Potential of polarization lidar to provide
profiles of CCN- and INP-relevant aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
5905–5931, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5905-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5905-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>McFarquhar et al.(2007)McFarquhar, Um, Freer, Baumgardner, Kok, and Mace</label><mixed-citation>
McFarquhar, G. M., Um, J., Freer, M., Baumgardner, D., Kok, G. L., and Mace,
G.: Importance of small ice crystals to cirrus properties: Observations from
the Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE), Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029865" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029865</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Mitchell et al.(2016)Mitchell, Garnier, Avery, and Erfani</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Avery, M., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO observations
of the dependence of homo- and heterogeneous ice nucleation in cirrus clouds on
latitude, season and surface condition, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1062</a>, in review, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Mitchell et al.(2018)Mitchell, Garnier, Pelon, and Erfani</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Pelon, J., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO (IIR-CALIOP)
Retrievals of Cirrus Cloud Ice Particle Concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-526</a>, in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Möhler et al.(2006)Möhler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Krmer, Mangold, and Heymsfield</label><mixed-citation>
Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter,
M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.:
Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Morcrette et al.(2009)Morcrette, Boucher, Jones, Salmond, Bechtold,
Beljaars, Benedetti, Bonet, Kaiser, Razinger, Schulz, Serrar, Simmons,
Sofiev, Suttie, Tompkins, and Untch</label><mixed-citation>
Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Jones, L., Salmond, D., Bechtold, P., Beljaars,
A., Benedetti, A., Bonet, A., Kaiser, J. W., Razinger, M., Schulz, M., Serrar,
S., Simmons, A. J., Sofiev, M., Suttie, M., Tompkins, A. M., and Untch, A.:
Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather
Forecasts Integrated Forecast System: Forward modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D06206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011235</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Muhlbauer et al.(2014)Muhlbauer, Ackerman, Comstock, Diskin, Evans,
Lawson, and Marchand</label><mixed-citation>
Muhlbauer, A., Ackerman, T. P., Comstock, J. M., Diskin, G. S., Evans, S. M.,
Lawson, R. P., and Marchand, R. T.: Impact of large-scale dynamics on the
microphysical properties of midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 119,
3976–3996, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020035</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Murray(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, B. J.: Inhibition of ice crystallisation in highly viscous aqueous
organic acid droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5423–5433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5423-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5423-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>O'Shea et al.(2016)O'Shea, Choularton, Lloyd, Crosier, Bower,
Gallagher, Abel, Cotton, Brown, Fugal, Schlenczek, Borrmann, and Pickering</label><mixed-citation>
O'Shea, S. J., Choularton, T. W., Lloyd, G., Crosier, J., Bower, K. N.,
Gallagher, M., Abel, S. J., Cotton, R. J., Brown, P. R. A., Fugal, J. P.,
Schlenczek, O., Borrmann, S., and Pickering, J. C.: Airborne observations of
the microphysical structure of two contrasting cirrus clouds, J. Geophys. Res.,
121, 13510–13536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025278</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Platnick et al.(2017)Platnick, Meyer, King, Wind, Amarasinghe,
Marchant, Arnold, Zhang, Hubanks, Holz, Yang, Ridgway, and Riedi</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S., Meyer, K. G., King, M. D., Wind, G., Amarasinghe, N., Marchant,
B., Arnold, G. T., Zhang, Z., Hubanks, P. A., Holz, R. E., Yang, P., Ridgway,
W. L., and Riedi, J.: The MODIS Cloud Optical and Microphysical Products:
Collection 6 Updates and Examples From Terra and Aqua, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
55, 502–525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Podglajen et al.(2016)Podglajen, Hertzog, Plougonven, and Legras</label><mixed-citation>
Podglajen, A., Hertzog, A., Plougonven, R., and Legras, B.: Lagrangian
temperature and vertical velocity fluctuations due to gravity waves in the
lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3543–3553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068148</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Podglajen et al.(2017)Podglajen, Bui, Dean-Day, Pfister, Jensen,
Alexander, Hertzog, Krcher, Plougonven, and Randel</label><mixed-citation>
Podglajen, A., Bui, T. P., Dean-Day, J. M., Pfister, L., Jensen, E. J.,
Alexander, M. J., Hertzog, A., Kärcher, B., Plougonven, R., and Randel, W.
J.: Small-Scale Wind Fluctuations in the Tropical Tropopause Layer from
Aircraft Measurements: Occurrence, Nature, and Impact on Vertical Mixing, J.
Atmos. Sci., 74, 3847–3869, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0010.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0010.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Pruppacher and Klett(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation,
Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Quaas et al.(2008)Quaas, Boucher, Bellouin, and Kinne</label><mixed-citation>
Quaas, J., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., and Kinne, S.: Satellite-based estimate
of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D05204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008962</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Rosenfeld et al.(2011)Rosenfeld, Yu, Liu, Xu, Zhu, Yue, Dai, Dong,
Dong, and Peng</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Yu, X., Liu, G., Xu, X., Zhu, Y., Yue, Z., Dai, J., Dong, Z.,
Dong, Y., and Peng, Y.: Glaciation temperatures of convective clouds ingesting
desert dust, air pollution and smoke from forest fires, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, 21804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049423</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Salzmann et al.(2010)Salzmann, Ming, Golaz, Ginoux, Morrison,
Gettelman, Krämer, and Donner</label><mixed-citation>
Salzmann, M., Ming, Y., Golaz, J.-C., Ginoux, P. A., Morrison, H., Gettelman,
A., Krämer, M., and Donner, L. J.: Two-moment bulk stratiform cloud
microphysics in the GFDL AM3 GCM: description, evaluation, and sensitivity tests,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8037–8064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8037-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8037-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Seifert et al.(2015)Seifert, Heus, Pincus, and Stevens</label><mixed-citation>
Seifert, A., Heus, T., Pincus, R., and Stevens, B.: Large-eddy simulation of
the transient and near-equilibrium behavior of precipitating shallow convection,
J. Adv. Mod. Earth Syst., 7, 1918–1937, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000489" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000489</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Sourdeval et al.(2018a)Sourdeval, Gryspeerdt, Krämer, Goren,
Delanoë, Afchine, Hemmer, and Quaas</label><mixed-citation>
Sourdeval, O., Gryspeerdt, E., Krämer, M., Goren, T., Delanoë, J.,
Afchine, A., Hemmer, F., and Quaas, J.: Ice crystal number concentration
estimates from lidar–radar satellite remote sensing – Part 1: Method and
evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14327–14350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14327-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14327-2018</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Sourdeval et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
Sourdeval, O., Gryspeerdt, E., Krämer, M., Goren, T., Delanoë, J.,
Afchine, A., Hemmer, F., and Quaas, J.: Ice crystal number concentration from
satellite lidar-radar observations (DARDAR-Nice), AERIS, <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/09" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/09</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Spichtinger and Gierens(2009a)</label><mixed-citation>
Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K. M.: Modelling of cirrus clouds – Part 1a:
Model description and validation, Atmos Chem Phys, 9, 685–706, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-685-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-685-2009</a>, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Spichtinger and Gierens(2009b)</label><mixed-citation>
Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K. M.: Modelling of cirrus clouds – Part 1b:
Structuring cirrus clouds by dynamics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 707–719,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-707-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-707-2009</a>, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Stephens et al.(2012)Stephens, Li, Wild, Clayson, Loeb, Kato,
L'Ecuyer, Stackhouse, Lebsock, and Andrews</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, G. L., Li, J., Wild, M., Clayson, C. A., Loeb, N., Kato, S., L'Ecuyer,
T., Stackhouse, P. W., Lebsock, M., and Andrews, T.: An update on Earth's energy
balance in light of the latest global observations, Nat. Geosci., 5, 691–696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1580</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Stier(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Stier, P.: Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud
condensation nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6595–6607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Tan et al.(2014)Tan, Storelvmo, and Choi</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, I., Storelvmo, T., and Choi, Y.-S.: Spaceborne lidar observations of the
ice-nucleating potential of dust, polluted dust, and smoke aerosols in
mixed-phase clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 6653–6665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021333</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Wang et al.(2011)Wang, Ghan, Ovchinnikov, Liu, Easter, Kassianov,
Qian, and Morrison</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Ghan, S., Ovchinnikov, M., Liu, X., Easter, R., Kassianov, E., Qian,
Y., and Morrison, H.: Aerosol indirect effects in a multi-scale aerosol-climate
model PNNL-MMF, Atmos Chem Phys, 11, 5431–5455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5431-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5431-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Weigum(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Weigum, N. M.: Scales of variability of atmospheric aerosols, PhD thesis,
University of Oxford, Oxford, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Weigum et al.(2012)Weigum, Stier, Schwarz, Fahey, and Spackman</label><mixed-citation>
Weigum, N. M., Stier, P., Schwarz, J. P., Fahey, D. W., and Spackman, J. R.:
Scales of variability of black carbon plumes over the Pacific Ocean, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 39, L15804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052127</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Wernli et al.(2016)Wernli, Boettcher, Joos, Miltenberger, and Spichtinger</label><mixed-citation>
Wernli, H., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., Miltenberger, A. K., and Spichtinger, P.:
A trajectory-based classification of ERA-Interim ice clouds in the region of
the North Atlantic storm track, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6657–6664,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068922" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068922</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Wilson et al.(2012)Wilson, Murray, Wagner, Mhler, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Skrotzki, Price, Malkin, Dobbie, and Al-Jumur</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. W., Murray, B. J., Wagner, R., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H.,
Schnaiter, M., Skrotzki, J., Price, H. C., Malkin, T. L., Dobbie, S., and
Al-Jumur, S. M. R. K.: Glassy aerosols with a range of compositions nucleate
ice heterogeneously at cirrus temperatures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8611–8632, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8611-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Wood et al.(2011)Wood, Mechoso, Bretherton, Weller, Huebert, Straneo,
Albrecht, Coe, Allen, Vaughan, Daum, Fairall, Chand, Gallardo Klenner,
Garreaud, Grados, Covert, Bates, Krejci, Russell, de Szoeke, Brewer, Yuter,
Springston, Chaigneau, Toniazzo, Minnis, Palikonda, Abel, Brown, Williams,
Fochesatto, Brioude, and Bower</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, R., Mechoso, C. R., Bretherton, C. S., Weller, R. A., Huebert, B., Straneo,
F., Albrecht, B. A., Coe, H., Allen, G., Vaughan, G., Daum, P., Fairall, C.,
Chand, D., Gallardo Klenner, L., Garreaud, R., Grados, C., Covert, D. S., Bates,
T. S., Krejci, R., Russell, L. M., de Szoeke, S., Brewer, A., Yuter, S. E.,
Springston, S. R., Chaigneau, A., Toniazzo, T., Minnis, P., Palikonda, R., Abel,
S. J., Brown, W. O. J., Williams, S., Fochesatto, J., Brioude, J., and Bower,
K. N.: The VAMOS Ocean-Cloud-Atmosphere-Land Study Regional Experiment (VOCALS-REx):
goals, platforms, and field operations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 627–654,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-627-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-627-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Zhang et al.(2012)Zhang, Wang, Heymsfield, Fan, Liu, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Heymsfield, A., Fan, J., Liu, D., and Zhao, M.:
Quantifying the impact of dust on heterogeneous ice generation in midlevel
supercooled stratiform clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052831" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052831</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Zhao et al.(2018)Zhao, Gu, Liou, Wang, Liu, Huang, Jiang, and Su</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Gu, Y., Liou, K.-N., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Huang, L., Jiang, J. H., and
Su, H.: Type-Dependent Responses of Ice Cloud Properties to Aerosols From
Satellite Retrievals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3297–3306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077261</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Zhou et al.(2016)Zhou, Penner, Lin, Liu, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., Lin, G., Liu, X., and Wang, M.: What controls the low
ice number concentration in the upper troposphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
12411–12424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12411-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Zuidema et al.(2016)Zuidema, Redemann, Haywood, Wood, Piketh,
Hipondoka, and Formenti</label><mixed-citation>
Zuidema, P., Redemann, J., Haywood, J., Wood, R., Piketh, S., Hipondoka, M.,
and Formenti, P.: Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic: Upcoming Field
Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol's Impact on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
97, 1131–1135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00082.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00082.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
