<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-14017-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Molecular and physical characteristics of aerosol at a remote free
troposphere site: implications for atmospheric aging</article-title><alt-title>Molecular and physical characteristics of aerosol</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Molecular and physical characteristics of aerosol}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~K.~Schum et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schum</surname><given-names>Simeon K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Bo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0746-4732</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Džepina</surname><given-names>Katja</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Fialho</surname><given-names>Paulo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9137-3870</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Mazzoleni</surname><given-names>Claudio</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-0721</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Mazzoleni</surname><given-names>Lynn R.</given-names></name>
          <email>lrmazzol@mtu.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0226-7337</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Michigan Technological University, Houghton,
MI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Atmospheric Sciences Program, Michigan Technological University,
Houghton, MI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute for Volcanology and Risk Assessment – IVAR, University of
the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton,
MI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: the National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>b</label><institution>now at: the Department of Biotechnology, University of Rijeka,
Rijeka, Croatia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lynn R. Mazzoleni (lrmazzol@mtu.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>14017</fpage><lpage>14036</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e160">Aerosol
properties are transformed by atmospheric processes during long-range
transport and play a key role in the Earth's radiative balance. To understand
the molecular and physical characteristics of free tropospheric aerosol, we
studied samples collected at the Pico Mountain Observatory in the North
Atlantic. The observatory is located in the marine free troposphere at
2225 m above sea level, on Pico Island in the Azores archipelago. The site
is ideal for the study of long-range-transported free tropospheric aerosol
with minimal local influence. Three aerosol samples with elevated organic
carbon concentrations were selected for detailed analysis. FLEXPART
retroplumes indicated that two of the samples were influenced by North
American wildfire emissions transported in the free troposphere and one by
North American outflow mainly transported within the marine boundary layer.
Ultrahigh-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass
spectrometry was used to determine the detailed molecular composition of the
samples. Thousands of molecular formulas were assigned to each of the
individual samples. On average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the molecular formulas
contained only carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms (CHO), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
contained nitrogen (CHNO), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % contained sulfur (CHOS). The
molecular formula compositions of the two wildfire-influenced aerosol
samples transported mainly in the free troposphere had relatively low average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) despite the 7–10
days of transport time according to FLEXPART. In contrast, the molecular
composition of the North American outflow transported mainly in the boundary
layer had a higher average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with 3 days of
transport time. To better understand the difference between free tropospheric
transport and boundary layer transport, the meteorological conditions along
the FLEXPART simulated transport pathways were extracted from the Global
Forecast System analysis for the model grids. We used the extracted
meteorological conditions and the observed molecular chemistry to predict the
relative-humidity-dependent glass transition temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
the aerosol components. Comparisons of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the ambient
temperature indicated that a majority of the organic aerosol components
transported in the free troposphere were more viscous and therefore less
susceptible to oxidation than the organic aerosol components transported in
the boundary layer. Although the number of observations is limited, the
results suggest that biomass burning organic aerosol injected into the free
troposphere is more persistent than organic aerosol in the boundary layer
having broader implications for aerosol aging.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e283">Atmospheric organic aerosol composition and mass concentrations are
transformed by atmospheric processes including oxidization (Dunlea et al.,
2009; Jimenez et al., 2009; Kroll et al., 2011), cloud processing (Ervens et
al., 2008, 2011; Zhao et al., 2013), and wet or dry deposition (Pöschl,
2005).<?pagebreak page14018?> Oxidation of organic aerosol impacts its lifetime, cloud droplet and
ice nucleation activity (Massoli et al., 2010; Lambe et al., 2011; China et
al., 2017), aerosol morphology, and optical properties (Pöschl, 2005;
China et al., 2015; Laskin et al., 2015 and references therein). As such, the
chemistry of atmospheric aerosol oxidation has received much attention
(George and Abbatt, 2010; Lee et al., 2011; Kroll et al., 2011). Jimenez et
al. (2009) studied the oxidation of anthropogenic organic aerosol emitted
from Mexico City as it was transported downwind. They used an aerosol mass
spectrometer (AMS) instrument on board an aircraft to measure the magnitude
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 fragment as a proxy for the oxidation of organic aerosol.
After 6 h and 63 km of transport, a noticeable increase in the overall
chemical oxidation was observed. Rapid oxidation was also observed in studies
of biomass burning organic aerosol in Africa (Capes et al., 2008; Vakkari et
al., 2014), over the Mediterranean Sea (Bougiatioti et al., 2014), and
Hyytiälä, Finland (Corrigan et al., 2013; Vogel et al., 2013). Other
studies focused on the oxidation of molecular tracers such as levoglucosan
have shown that they can be degraded rapidly after emission, depending on the
atmospheric conditions (Lai et al., 2014; Slade et al., 2014; Arrangio et
al., 2015; Bertrand et al., 2018). These studies all demonstrate the
importance of oxidation to the aging of organic aerosol and provide
motivation for studies of long-range-transported organic aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e298">A study of predominately Asian anthropogenic aerosol transported in the free
troposphere over the Pacific Ocean found that the oxidation, inferred by the
average oxygen to carbon ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), continued to increase over the
course of roughly a week (Dunlea et al., 2009). In a study of biomass burning
aerosol transported in the free troposphere across the North Atlantic Ocean,
Džepina et al. (2015) observed a relatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), considering the aerosol transport time of more than 10 days
(Aiken et al., 2008). Džepina et al. (2015) hypothesized that cloud
processing and other oxidative processes led to the formation and subsequent
removal of oxidized species, leaving behind the more persistent aerosol
species. Other recent studies of long-range-transported brown carbon (BrC)
from biomass burning in the boundary layer found that the aging of aerosol
led to a near-complete depletion of BrC within 24 h (Forrister et al., 2015;
Laing et al., 2016). The remaining BrC was found to lead to a 6 %
increase in BrC over background levels and may represent the ubiquitous BrC
present in the atmosphere far from the source (Forrister et al., 2015). This
leftover BrC aerosol could impact large areas globally because much of it is
located within the free troposphere and above clouds, due to the typically
elevated injection heights of aerosol over wildfires (Val Martin et al.,
2008a). These studies indicate that free tropospheric aerosol chemistry is
particularly important because this aerosol can have a longer atmospheric
lifetime than boundary layer aerosol (Laing et al., 2016) allowing it to be
transported over greater distances.</p>
      <p id="d1e337">Studies of transported biomass burning aerosol are typically performed using
instrumentation either on board aircraft (Capes et al., 2008) or located at
low altitude (Bougiatioti et al., 2014; Vakkari et al., 2014) and continental
mountain (Laing et al., 2016) sites. Aircraft measurements have the advantage
of sampling aerosol over wide spatial and altitudinal ranges, but they are
limited to short time periods, typically of a few days to a week (Capes et
al., 2008; Dunlea et al., 2009). Ground sites are less constricted by time,
but low-altitude sites are less often affected by pyro-convective wildfire
plumes due to the high injection heights of wildfires (Val Martin et al.,
2008a). Continental mountain sites typically have seasonally limited access
to the free troposphere, because high summer temperatures can lead to
convection of the planetary boundary layer (Collaud Coen et al., 2011). Thus,
many of the continental mountain sites have long-term access to the free
troposphere in the winter, but not in the summer when most wildfire activity
occurs. The Pico Mountain Observatory (PMO, see the Supplement for additional
information), is located 2225 m above sea level (a.s.l.) on the caldera
summit of Pico Mountain, on Pico Island in the Azores archipelago in the
North Atlantic. The marine boundary layer in the region has been measured and
is estimated to range from 500 to 2000 m a.s.l. in the summer months (Kleissl
et al., 2007; Remillard et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2017), well below the
observatory. This permits access to free tropospheric long-range-transported
aerosol during the wildfire season. This, in conjunction with negligible
local emission sources, makes PMO an ideal site for the study of long-range-transported free tropospheric aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e340">As described by Zhang et al. (2017), the Azores–Bermuda anticyclone causes
persistent downward mixing from the upper free troposphere and lower
stratosphere, and is the dominant meteorological pattern in this region, and
strengthens in the summer. The FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART)
retroplumes discussed in Zhang et al. (2017) show that this site is most
commonly impacted by North American outflow (30 %–40 %). In the
summer months (June–August), 15 % of the intercepted air masses have a
North American anthropogenic influence, and 7.3 % have a wildfire
influence (Zhang et al., 2017). These factors make PMO an excellent site for
the study of North American outflow (Val Martin et al., 2008a). In many of
the previous studies at PMO, investigators focused on the North American
outflows of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
non-methane hydrocarbons, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gases (Val Martin et al., 2006,
2008a, b; Pfister et al., 2006; Helmig et al., 2015) as well as the physical
characteristics of black carbon and mineral dust aerosol and their ice
nucleation activity (Fialho et al., 2005; China et al., 2015, 2017). So far,
only Džepina et al. (2015) has looked at the aerosol chemical
and molecular characteristics of the organic aerosol collected at the site.</p>
      <p id="d1e388">Recent environmental and laboratory studies have shown that under low
temperature and low relative humidity (conditions common in the free
troposphere), aerosol can be in a<?pagebreak page14019?> solid glassy phase (Zobrist et al., 2008;
Virtanen et al., 2010). This observation has been hypothesized to lead to
longer atmospheric lifetimes for organic species that are otherwise
susceptible to degradation through oxidative processes. As an example,
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as benzo[a]pyrene were observed
to have a much higher ambient concentration than what could be explained by
model simulations without considering the
aerosol phase state (Shrivastava et
al., 2017). Recently, PAHs have been shown to enhance the formation of a
viscous phase state in laboratory-generated secondary organic aerosol (SOA;
Zelenyuk et al., 2017). Since PAHs are common products of biomass burning and
anthropogenic emissions, the viscosity could be enhanced in ambient samples
as well, leading to a greater likelihood of the occurrence of solid-phase
aerosol. The solid phase can increase the resistance of aerosol to
photodegradation (Lignell et al., 2014; Hinks et al., 2015) and water
diffusivity (Berkemeier et al., 2014), and ozone reactions (Berkemeier et
al., 2016), which may lead to lower rates of oxidation. Shiraiwa and
colleagues developed a set of equations to predict the dry glass transition
temperature based on the mass and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of organic aerosol
components (Shiraiwa et al., 2017; DeRieux et al., 2018). Thus, the phase
state of molecular species with respect to ambient conditions can be
predicted using the Gordon–Taylor equation (Shiraiwa et al., 2017; DeRieux
et al., 2018). Additionally, estimation methods to determine the volatility
of organic aerosol were reported by Donahue et al. (2011) and Li et
al. (2016). Both the phase state and volatility are important in
understanding the processes that affect aerosol during transport and aging.
The low oxidation observed by Džepina et al. (2015) was attributed to the
dominance of persistent aerosol that resisted removal mechanisms; however, it
is possible that the phase state of the aerosol during transport played a
significant role. The increased resistance to photodegradation (Lignell et
al., 2014; Hinks et al., 2015) and water diffusivity (Berkemeier et al.,
2014) of solid-phase organic aerosol provide a basis for this hypothesis.</p>
      <p id="d1e403">Ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) is a necessary tool for
determining the molecular characteristics of complex mixtures such as organic
aerosol. It has been used to analyze dissolved organic matter (Kido-Soule et
al., 2010; Herzsprung et al., 2014), cloud water (Zhao et al., 2013; Cook et
al., 2017), fog water (Mazzoleni et al., 2010), sea spray (Schmitt-Kopplin et
al., 2012), and organic aerosol (Walser et al., 2007; Mazzoleni et al.,
2012; O'Brien et al., 2013; Wozniak et al., 2014; Džepina et al., 2015).
Ultrahigh-resolution MS techniques are typically paired with electrospray
ionization (ESI) because it is a soft ionization technique with little to no
fragmentation of the molecular species being analyzed. Negative mode ESI is
sensitive to molecules with acidic functional groups, which is ideal for the
analysis of long-range-transported organic aerosol due to its generally
acidic nature (Bougiatioti et al., 2016). The ultrahigh mass resolution
available from Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance MS (FT-ICR MS) and
the high-field Orbitrap Elite MS instruments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) separates
sulfur-containing species from carbon-, hydrogen-, and oxygen-containing
species (Schmitt-Kopplin et al., 2010), which is important because
sulfur-containing species are common in atmospheric aerosol (Schmitt-Kopplin
et al., 2010; Mazzoleni et al., 2012; Džepina et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e421">The observations of Džepina et al. (2015) raised interesting questions
regarding the nature of long-range-transported free tropospheric aerosol. To
further elucidate the detailed molecular characteristics of free tropospheric
aerosol, we analyzed three pollution events using ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR
MS. We observed key molecular differences pertaining to the extent of
oxidation likely related to the combination of transport pathways and their
apparent emission sources. In this paper, we present the detailed molecular
characteristics of organic aerosol collected at PMO and use the aerosol
chemical composition, FLEXPART model simulations, and physical property
estimates to interpret those characteristics and infer implications for
long-range-transported organic aerosol.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sample collection</title>
      <p id="d1e435">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were collected at PMO on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in. quartz fiber
filters using high-volume air samplers (EcoTech HiVol 3000, Warren, RI, USA)
operated at an average volumetric flow rate of 84 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
24 h. Prior to sampling, the filters were wrapped in clean, heavy-duty
aluminum foil and baked at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h to remove organic
artifacts associated with the filters. Afterward, they were placed in
antistatic sealable bags until deployment. We deployed four air samplers at
the site, each was simultaneously set up with a filter and programmed to
start one day after another, allowing for continuous sample collection for up
to 4 consecutive days. This procedure was used to maximize the number of
filters collected. Daily visits and maintenance were limited by the
time-consuming and strenuous hike necessary to reach the site. The sampled filters
were removed and returned to the same aluminum wrapper and bag. The samples
were then brought down the mountain and stored in a freezer until cold
transport back to Michigan Technological University where they were stored in a freezer until
analysis. Three samples, collected in consecutive years at PMO, on
27–28 June 2013, 5–6 July 2014, and 20–21 June 2015 were analyzed in this
study. The sampling time for all samples was 24 h; on 27–28 June the
sampling began at 19:00 LT, on 5–6 July and on 20–21 June the sampling began
at 15:00 LT, all local times.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page14020?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chemical analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e507">Organic carbon and elemental carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measurements were
performed using an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer (Model 4, Sunset Laboratory Inc.
Tigard, OR, USA) following the NIOSH protocol. Major anions and cations were
analyzed using ion chromatography. Anion analysis was performed using a
Dionex ICS-2100 instrument (Thermo Scientific) with an AS-17-C analytical and
guard column set (Thermo Scientific) using a KOH generator for gradient
elution. Cation analysis was performed using a Dionex ICS-1100 instrument
with CS-12A analytical and guard column set (Thermo Scientific) and an
isocratic 20 mM methanesulfonic acid eluent. The instruments were operated
in parallel using split flow from the autosampler. Additional details can be
found in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e540">The samples for FT-ICR MS analysis were selected based on the organic carbon
concentration. Selected samples typically had more than 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g of
organic carbon per quartz filter. Sample preparation was described in detail
in previous studies from our group (Mazzoleni et al., 2010, 2012; Zhao et
al., 2013; Džepina et al., 2015). Briefly, one-quarter of the quartz
filter was cut into strips, placed in a pre-washed and baked 40 mL glass
vial, and then extracted using ultrasonic agitation in an Optima
with deionized water of LC/MS grade (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 30 min. The
extract was then filtered using a pre-baked quartz filter syringe to remove
undissolved material and quartz filter fragments. The sample filter was then
sonicated again in 10 mL of Optima LC/MS-grade deionized water for 30 min,
filtered, and then added to the original 30 mL of filtrate yielding a total
of 40 mL. Ice packs were used during the sonication to ensure the water
temperature stayed below 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The water-soluble organic carbon
(WSOC) compounds were then isolated using Strata-X (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA,
USA) reversed phase solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges to remove inorganic salts that can adduct with
organic compounds during electrospray ionization. During the reversed phase
SPE, losses of highly water soluble, low molecular weight (MW) organic
compounds, and hydrophobic, high-MW organic compounds are expected. Thus, the
resulting WSOC is the SPE-recovered fraction. The cartridges were
pre-conditioned with acetonitrile and water of LC/MS grade before the 40 mL
filtrate was applied to the cartridges at a rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The cartridges were eluted with 2 mL of an aqueous acetonitrile solution
(90/10 acetonitrile/water by volume) and stored in the freezer until
analysis. The procedural loss of ionic low-MW compounds such as oxalate can
lead to an underprediction of the organic aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and
overprediction of the average glass transition temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
To investigate this, we used the concentrations of the prominent organic
anions measured with ion chromatography to estimate the abundance of these
compound relative to the compounds detected by FT-ICR MS. The low-MW organic
anion-corrected average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values correlated with the trends of the
original <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values; however, the significance of the impact varies
with the measured analyte concentrations and the assumptions associated with
the uncertain mass fraction of the molecular formula composition
(Supplement Table S4). When low-MW organic anions were included in the
estimated average dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, they dropped by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
which was deemed relatively insignificant (Table S5).</p>
      <p id="d1e650">Ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometric analysis was done using FT-ICR MS
with ESI at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (Thermo Scientific LTQ
Ultra). The samples were analyzed using direct infusion ESI in the negative
ion mode. Negative polarity is effective for the deprotonation of polar
organic molecules (Mazzoleni et al., 2010), which are expected to dominate
the organic aerosol mass fraction and were the focus of this study. The spray
voltage ranged from 3.15 to 3.40 kV depending on the ionization stability
with a sample flow rate of 4 to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. We used a scan
range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 100–1000 with a mass resolving power of 400 000 (defined at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 400) for all samples. The samples were run in duplicate and
200 transient scans were collected. The transients were co-added for each
replicate run using the MIDAS Coadd tool and molecular formula assignments
were made using the Composer software (Sierra Analytics), as described in
previous studies (Mazzoleni et al., 2012; Džepina et al., 2015). The
resulting molecular formula assignments underwent additional quality
assurance (QA) data filtering to remove chemically unreasonable formulas with
respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, hydrogen to carbon ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), double bond
equivalent (DBE), and absolute ppm error as described in the supplemental information of Putman et al. (2012).
Molecular formulas in common with the instrument blanks with signal intensity
ratios &lt; 3 were removed; meanwhile, analytes in common with the
field blanks with signal intensity ratios &lt; 3 were flagged.
Specifically, two formulas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observed in PMO-1 could not be classified as
pertaining only to the field blank and so they were not removed. Further
discussion about the blank subtraction is provided in the Supplement. To
produce the final data set for each sample, the replicates were aligned and
only the molecular formulas found in both replicates after QA were retained.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>FLEXPART numerical simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e769">FLEXPART was used to determine the sources, ages, and transport pathways of
the aerosol samples collected at PMO. FLEXPART backward simulations (also
called retroplumes) were driven by meteorology fields from the Global
Forecast System (GFS) and its “Final Analysis” with 3 h temporal
resolution, 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution, and 26 vertical levels. The
output was saved in a grid with a horizontal resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude by 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude, and 11 vertical levels from the<?pagebreak page14021?> surface to
15 000 m a.s.l. For each simulation, Eighty thousand air parcels were
released from the receptor and transported backwards for 20 days to calculate
a source–receptor relationship (in units of s kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Seibert and Frank,
2004). FLEXPART retroplumes were then multiplied with CO emission inventories
(kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research
(EDGAR version 3.2; Olivier and Berdowski, 2001) and the Global Fire
Assimilation System (Kaiser et al., 2012) to estimate the influence from
anthropogenic and wildfire sources, respectively. The FLEXPART CO tracer
calculated with this approach indicates the relative contributions from
anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions. Since CO chemistry and dry
deposition are not considered in the FLEXPART setup, the absolute FLEXPART CO
value does not reproduce the actual CO concentrations at Pico. FLEXPART does
not consider the background CO accumulated in the atmosphere. The difference
between FLEXPART CO and the actual CO largely depends on these factors. In
previous applications of this approach, FLEXPART CO was able to estimate the
episodes of CO enhancement due to transport of emissions (e.g., Brown et al.,
2009; Stohl et al., 2007; Warneke et al., 2009). This approach has been used
in several PMO studies and successfully captured elevated CO periods (e.g.,
Džepina et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2014, 2017) and it is used here to
assist in the interpretation of the chemical composition in this work.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e825">FLEXPART retroplumes for 28 June 2013 06:00 LT (PMO-1, <bold>a, d</bold>), 6 July 2014 03:00 LT (PMO-2, <bold>b, e</bold>), and 21 June 2015 03:00 LT  (PMO-3, <bold>c, f</bold>): column-integrated residence time over the 20-day transport time <bold>(a–c)</bold> and
vertical distribution of the retroplume residence time at given upwind times
<bold>(d–f)</bold>. The labels indicate the approximate locations of the center of the
plume for each of the transport days. Residence time is color coded by
logarithmic grades representing its ratio to the location of maximal
integrated residence time (100 %). The black lines in <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> indicate the mean
height of the plume during transport.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e856">In addition to the typical FLEXPART simulations done for the site (e.g.,
retroplume, CO source apportionment), we extracted the ambient temperature
and relative humidity (RH) from the GFS analysis data for model grids along
the FLEXPART simulated transport pathways. These parameters were then used to
estimate the glass transition temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the organic
aerosol components during transport, based on its molecular composition from
ultrahigh-resolution MS, using estimation methods recently developed by
Shiraiwa et al. (2017) and extended to higher masses by DeRieux et
al. (2018). DeRieux et al. (2018) reported an uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K for
the prediction of any single compound, but the uncertainty is expected to
decrease when a mixture of compounds is considered. Nonetheless, we assumed
an uncertainty range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and found that it did
not significantly change the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends presented in Sect. 3.5.
Further discussion on the uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is provided in the
Supplement. The distributions of the estimated organic aerosol component
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values provides new insight for the interpretation of
long-range-transported aerosol.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e939">Average concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of major ions and
organic carbon.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Component</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PMO-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PMO-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PMO-3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acetate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0519</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004587</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.000005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0071</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Formate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0289</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00438</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0119</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00439</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00232</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chloride</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0104</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0310</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.189</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0173</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3010</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00028</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulfate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.338</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.421</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxalate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0938</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00070</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0897</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00181</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05222</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sodium</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2101</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0004</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2560</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.548</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ammonium</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1364</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2394</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1193</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00062</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Potassium</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0791</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0020</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0126</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0197</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.478</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.026</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e961"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Sodium concentrations were not background subtracted due to inconsistent
and high blank levels, they are included to provide an upper limit on the
approximate sodium concentrations.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Replicate measurements of potassium were inconsistent. The sample could
not be re-analyzed because there was no remaining sample. Standard deviation
was determined by looking at the average standard deviation of 36 potassium
measurements in other samples. This sample should only be considered as
elevated potassium and only minimal importance placed on the actual measured
value.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Overview of the aerosol chemistry: {$\protect\chem{OC/EC}$} and IC}?><title>Overview of the aerosol chemistry: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IC</title>
      <p id="d1e1529">In this study, we present the detailed composition of three individual
samples collected for 24 h on 27–28 June 2013, 5–6 July 2014, and
20–21 June 2015 at the PMO. These samples, referred to as PMO-1, PMO-2, and
PMO-3, respectively, hereafter, were selected after analysis of organic and elemental carbon
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were performed for all 127 aerosol samples collected in this
study. The three selected samples all had elevated organic carbon (OC)
concentrations (Table 1) representing the capture of a pollution plume. After
blank subtraction, the median OC of the samples collected over the summers of
2013–2015 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The minimum OC level
measured was below the average blank concentration and the maximum was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (PMO-1). The most abundant anions and
cations in these samples are also shown in Table 1. The presence of these
ions is consistent with the results of other studies (Yu et al., 2005;
Aggarwal and Kawamura, 2009). Further discussion of the bulk chemical trends
will be presented in a future manuscript.</p>
      <p id="d1e1607">The concentrations of common anions and cations can offer important insight
regarding cloud processing and emission sources (Table 1). Specifically, the
elevated level of sulfate observed in the PMO-2 sample can be an indicator of
anthropogenic influence, cloud processing, or marine influence (Yu et al.,
2005). We also observed elevated oxalate concentrations in PMO-1 and PMO-2.
Oxalate is known to co-vary with sulfate concentrations in the atmosphere
when they are formed by aerosol–cloud processing (Yu et al., 2005; Sorooshian
et al., 2007). Thus, the oxalate to sulfate ratio can be an indication of
cloud processing (Sorooshian et al., 2007); in general, a higher ratio is the
result of increased cloud processing. As described in Sorooshian et
al. (2007), the oxalate concentrations increase with cloud processing because
there is more time for it to be produced, leading to an increased ratio.
PMO-1 had the highest oxalate to sulfate ratio (0.278), followed by PMO-3
(0.124), and PMO-2 (0.084). The observed oxalate to sulfate ratios for these
samples are all much higher than what was reported in Sorooshian et
al. (2007) suggesting other factors may have impacted the ion concentrations.
Specifically, an enrichment of oxalate from biomass combustion plumes (Cao et
al., 2017) likely contributed to the observed concentrations of these ions in
PMO-1 and PMO-3. The bulk concentration of oxalate in PMO-2 is similar to
PMO-1, but the sulfate in PMO-2 is much higher, leading to a low oxalate to
sulfate ratio. Based on FLEXPART simulations it is likely that PMO-2
underwent aqueous-phase processing (see Sect. 3.5), but the high
concentration of sulfate from possible anthropogenic and marine sources
appears to have obscured the oxalate–sulfate relationship (Yu et al., 2005;
Sorooshian et al., 2007).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1612">Reconstructed negative ion mass spectra <bold>(a–c)</bold> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> histograms <bold>(d–f)</bold> for the three PMO samples. The color in the mass
spectra indicates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value for the molecular formula it
represents. The tallest peaks in the mass spectra in <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> exceed the range, this was
done to improve the visibility of the lower abundance species (see also
Fig. S6).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1659">Despite inconsistencies in the replicate potassium measurements for PMO-1,
elevated potassium levels were observed, indicating contributions from
biomass combustion (Duan et al., 2004). PMO-3 had slightly elevated
potassium relative to PMO-2, but not as high as PMO-1. Chloride was also
present in PMO-1 and PMO-3, which has been shown in some studies to be a
minor product of biomass burning,<?pagebreak page14022?> depending on the fuel burned (Levin et
al., 2010; Liu et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1662">The nitrate levels in PMO-2 were significantly lower than what was observed
in PMO-1 and PMO-3, which is consistent with the observation that the marine
boundary layer promotes the rapid removal of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Val Martin et
al., 2008b). This is also consistent with removal due to cloud scavenging
(Dunlea et al., 2009). The elevated nitrate in PMO-1 and PMO-3 is consistent
with the observation of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plumes of wildfire emissions made in previous
studies at PMO (Val Martin et al., 2008a) and a lack of recent cloud
scavenging (Dunlea et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e1698">Despite the low-altitude transport, the major ion concentrations in PMO-2 do
not strongly support a major influence from marine sources (Quinn et al.,
2015; Kirpes et al., 2018). However, the increased concentration of methane
sulfonic<?pagebreak page14023?> acid (MSA) in PMO-2 relative to PMO-1 and PMO-3 suggests some degree
of marine influence. To estimate this, we used the non-background subtracted
sodium concentration as an upper limit to estimate sea salt sulfate according
to the method described in Chow et al. (2015), this led to a maximum sea salt
sulfate contribution of 25 %. The influence of marine sources supports
boundary layer transport. However, the results indicate that marine aerosol
is not likely a major component of PMO-2, perhaps because the rate of PMO-2
transport was very fast.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>FLEXPART retroplume simulation results</title>
      <p id="d1e1707">Representative FLEXPART retroplumes for the three samples are shown in
Fig. 1, additional time periods are in the Supplement (Figs. S1–S3). PMO-1 was largely influenced by North American outflow
transported relatively high in the free troposphere. Based on the FLEXPART
carbon monoxide (CO) modeling (Fig. S4 in the Supplement), PMO-1 was impacted by wildfire
emissions from Canada. The transport time for PMO-1 air masses from North
America to PMO was about 7 days. The free tropospheric transport is likely
due to the high injection heights (Val Martin et al., 2008a, 2010) of organic
aerosol from wildfire events in northwestern Quebec (see Figs. S4, S5).
Similar events at PMO have been previously identified by (Val Martin et al.,
2006, 2008a). The air masses intercepted during PMO-3 were North American
outflows that traveled in the lower free troposphere across the Northern
Atlantic Ocean to western Europe before circling back to PMO. The transport
time for the PMO-3 air masses from North America to PMO was roughly 10 days.
After a northward transport to western Europe in the jet stream during the
first 4–5 days, the simulated plume turned to the south and west, arriving
at PMO from Europe in about 2–4 days. This air mass was most likely
influenced by wildfire emissions in western and central Canada (US Air
Quality, Smog Blog, <uri>http://alg.umbc.edu</uri>; last access: 9 January 2018). Similar to PMO-1, FLEXPART CO source
apportionment (Fig. S4) suggests this sample was influenced by fire, although
considering the OC concentration and transport time, it was much more diluted
than what was observed in PMO-1. In contrast, the PMO-2 air masses traveled
relatively low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) over the “Rust Belt” (Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York) of the United States and stayed
at approximately the same altitude until it reached the observatory 2–4 days
later. This transport pattern suggests that the aerosol was predominantly
transported in the boundary layer on its way to the PMO and was primarily
influenced by a mixture of continental US anthropogenic and biogenic
emissions. This was supported by the FLEXPART CO simulations as well
(Fig. S4). The height of the boundary layer over the continent generally
ranges from 500 to 2500 m and is strongly affected by diurnal cycles, seasonal
effects, and topography (Liu and Liang, 2010); overall, the continental
boundary layer height generally increases during the day and during the
summer months. This suggests that PMO-2 was within the boundary layer over
the United States.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1725">Van Krevelen plots for the CHNO species with all
identified CHNO species (gray) and unique species (colored). The color
represents the number of double bond equivalents (DBEs) in the corresponding
molecular formula. The diagonal line is an oxidation line (OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for C, H, O elements; Tu et al., 2016), where the more oxidized
formulas are on the right side and less oxidized are on the left.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page14024?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Molecular formula oxidation metrics: {$\protect\chem{O/C}$} and OS${}_{\mathrm{C}}$}?><title>Molecular formula oxidation metrics: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e1775">In this section, we describe the detailed molecular formula composition of
the three individual samples: PMO-1, PMO-2, and PMO-3. Overall, nearly 80%
of the observed mass spectral peaks in the ultrahigh-resolution mass spectra
were assigned molecular formulas, which is comparable to previous studies
(Zhao et al., 2013; Džepina et al., 2015). After removing the duplicate
molecular formulas containing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a total of 3168
(PMO-1), 2121 (PMO-2), and 1820 (PMO-3) monoisotopic molecular formulas
remained. Groups of molecular formulas were assigned based on their elemental
composition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including: carbon, hydrogen,
and oxygen (CHO); carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen (CHNO); and carbon,
hydrogen, oxygen, and sulfur (CHOS). The most frequently observed
compositions were CHO and CHNO. The reconstructed negative ion mass spectra
of the monoisotopic molecular formulas for each of the samples are provided
in Fig. 2. Visual comparisons of the mass spectra indicate that PMO-2, which
was likely transported through the North American continental and North
Atlantic marine boundary layer, has an increased prevalence of higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio formulas compared to the two samples transported through the
free troposphere. Considering the ion distribution and normalized relative
abundances, PMO-1 and PMO-3 mass spectra look quite similar with a high
frequency of individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values &lt; 0.5. This may suggest
similar emission sources or aerosol processing. In contrast, PMO-2 has a
stronger relative influence of molecular compositions with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> histogram plots in Fig. 2 provide additional evidence
for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences between the two types of samples (free
troposphere and boundary layer) due to the difference in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1909">Molecular formula composition with abundance-weighted
average values and the numbers of formulas for each elemental group.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Group</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DBE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3168</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2121</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1820</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1848</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1281</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1183</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHNO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1120</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHNO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">561</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHNO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">608</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">200</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">274</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PMO-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CHOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2821">The North American boundary layer outflow of organic aerosol captured in
PMO-2 was likely influenced by SOA (Zhang et al., 2007) and thus is expected
to have a higher initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value compared to pyro-convected wildfire
emissions of organic aerosol (e.g., Aiken et al., 2008; Jimenez et al., 2009;
Bougiatioti et al., 2014). Although the initial compositions are unknown, we
anticipated that the samples with longer transport times (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> week for
PMO-1 and PMO-3) would be at least similar or perhaps more oxidized than
PMO-2, which had a much shorter transport time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days). This
expectation was based on literature describing SOA formation and aging
(Volkamer et al., 2006; Jimenez et al., 2009) and the reported molecular
composition of continental boundary layer aerosol (Mazzoleni et al., 2012;
Huang et al., 2014). The lower oxidation observed in the free tropospheric
samples transported for 7–10 days is consistent with our previous study at
this site reported in Džepina et al. (2015). In fact, when we compared
the molecular formula composition of the free tropospheric aerosol sample
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” from Džepina et al. (2015) to the free tropospheric samples in
this study (PMO-1 and PMO-3), we observed that 86 % and 91 % of the
molecular formulas are in common. FLEXPART simulations from both studies
indicated these samples were all affected by wildfire emissions, contributing
to their similarity. In contrast, only 75 % of the formulas found in the
boundary layer sample (PMO-2) were common with those in Džepina et
al. (2015). These comparisons are provided in Table S2.</p>
      <p id="d1e2869">As observed in the mass spectra and histograms presented in Fig. 2, the
samples have noticeable differences in the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.
This is also reflected in the abundance-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for
the samples: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PMO-1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PMO-2), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PMO-3). Note that these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are averages of thousands of
individual measurements, as such the standard deviation represents the range
of values and not uncertainties (see Figs. S7–S8 for violin plots of the
distributions). We also note that the relative abundance of compounds in ESI
mass spectra is not directly proportional to their solution concentration,
other factors including surface activity and polarity impact the ionization
efficiency (Cech and<?pagebreak page14025?> Enke, 2001). Nonetheless, the abundance does
differentiate trends between the samples and the assigned molecular formulas
which likely represent a collection of multifunctional isomers (e.g., LeClair et al.,
2012). For completeness, both the abundance-weighted average values for
various metrics of aerosol oxidation and saturation (Table 2) and the
unweighted average values (Table S3) are reported. Additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution insight was derived from separating the species into CHO, CHNO,
and CHOS elemental groups. For example, the comparison of the species with CHO
formulas in each sample indicates a smaller relative difference between PMO-2
aerosol compared to PMO-1 and PMO-3, with the PMO-2 aerosol having a higher
average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, PMO-2, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, PMO-1, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, PMO-3).
Meanwhile 85 %–98 % of the CHO
species in each sample are present in at least one other sample, with 848
(42 –78 %) of the formulas being found in all three samples, as shown
in Fig. S9. This suggests that the CHO composition may be fairly uniform
throughout the atmosphere, without a significant abundance of clear marker
species after long-range transport, regardless of the source region and
transport time. This observation is consistent with other studies which have
observed the decay of marker species after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h (Bougiatioti et al.,
2014; Forrister et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3018">Average OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. carbon number plots for
molecular formula identified in each of PMO samples <bold>(a–c)</bold>. The size of the
symbols is scaled to the analyte relative abundance and the color represents
the elemental group: CHO (green), CHNO (blue), and CHOS (red). The right
panels <bold>(d–f)</bold> contain average OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> histograms based on the sum of
normalized abundance.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3051">In contrast, the CHNO molecular formulas demonstrate stronger differences
that correlate with the overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value for the CHNO formulas in PMO-2 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PMO-1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PMO-3 (Table 2). Differences in the
elemental ratios are often visualized using the van Krevelen plot, which
shows the correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The van Krevelen plots
for the three samples with the unique CHNO formulas present in each sample
are shown in Fig. 3. Most of the unique CHNO species in PMO-2 (68 %) fall
in the more oxidized region of the plot (Tu et al., 2016) with high overall
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. This differs from the PMO-1 unique species that are
predominantly on the less oxidized, low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> side of the plot, or the
oxidized aromatic region. Another observation from the CHNO species is more
identified species in both PMO-1 (1120) and PMO-3 (608) than in PMO-2 (561),
despite the higher total number of molecular species in PMO-2 compared to
PMO-3. This is potentially due to the enrichment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species as previously observed in wildfire pollution
events (Val Martin et al., 2008a), which may in turn lead to an increased
nitrogen content in the organic aerosol species. The nitrogen-containing
species show a distinct difference in terms of the total oxidation between
the two sets of samples, more so than the CHO compounds. This implies that
much of the distinction between aerosol sources may come from heteroatom-containing species.</p>
      <p id="d1e3185">The difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is even more evident in the sulfur-containing formulas (CHOS). The PMO-2 CHOS species have a much higher average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than what is observed in PMO-1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Consistent with the CHNO formulas, the PMO-2 unique CHOS formulas (55 %
of unique formulas) are present in the oxidized region of the plot, whereas
those in PMO-1 are nearly completely in the less oxidized region of the van
Krevelen plot (Fig. S10). The Kendrick plot (Fig. S10c) also demonstrates a
clear difference between the two samples. Most of the unique CHOS compounds
in PMO-2 are located on the lower mass, higher defect side of the plot, while
the PMO-1 formulas are on the higher mass, lower defect side. This difference
is due to the larger amount of oxygen present in the PMO-2 formulas, which
would lead to a greater mass defect than the more reduced CHOS formulas
present in PMO-1. Higher oxygen content of PMO-2 aerosol is supported by its
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio when compared to PMO-1 as shown in box plots
(Fig. S10d). Very few CHOS molecular formulas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were identified in
PMO-3 and most of them (N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 of 29 total) were also present in PMO-1. Due
to the small number of identified CHOS formulas in PMO-3, we did not consider
it in the comparison between CHOS formulas in the samples. The increased
number of sulfur species observed in PMO-2 are likely associated with the
anthropogenic<?pagebreak page14026?> emission sources in the North American boundary layer. Overall,
the observed differences in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios between the boundary layer
transported aerosol (PMO-2) compared to the free troposphere transported
aerosol (PMO-1 and PMO-3) highlight differences in the aging and lifetime of
aerosol relative to its transport pathway and emission source.</p>
      <p id="d1e3280">Another commonly used metric of aerosol oxidation is the average oxidation
state of carbon (OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) described by Kroll et al. (2011). The
average OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> includes both hydrogen and oxygen for the average
oxidation of carbon in each molecular formula. Additionally, we assumed all
nitrogen and sulfur were present as nitrate and sulfate functional groups and
calculated the OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the appropriate corrections (Eq. S1 in
the Supplement). The average OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Table 2) for the three
samples show again that PMO-2 is more oxidized than the other two samples.
The average OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the CHO formulas in PMO-1 and PMO-2
are very similar (Table 2), but as shown in the histograms in Fig. 4, their
relative abundance distributions are quite different. The OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs.
carbon number plots in Fig. 4 show slight differences between PMO-1 and
PMO-2, mostly in the distribution of the sulfur-containing formulas. However,
the similarity of the PMO-1 and PMO-3 samples and their difference from the
PMO-2 sample is quite clear in the visual comparisons of the histograms of
the OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values with their normalized relative abundances. The
observation of an overall lower oxidation in PMO-1 and PMO-3 may support the
findings of Aiken et al. (2008) and Bougiatioti et al. (2014), who reported
that biomass burning aerosol is less oxidized than other types of aerosol,
even after some aging. Conversely, the overall higher oxidation of PMO-2
implies that the sampled aerosol was likely more hygroscopic, included more
efficient cloud condensation nuclei (Massoli et al., 2010), or had components
of a less volatile nature (Ng et al., 2011) than PMO-1 and PMO-3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3350">Normalized bar charts for the aromaticity of the three PMO
samples, calculated using the Koch and Dittmar (2006, 2016) modified
aromaticity index (AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Molecular formula aromaticity and brown carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e3374">The aromaticity of the samples is also different between the two groups of
aerosol samples. Based on the aromaticity index (AI, Eq. S2;
AI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. S3; Koch and Dittmar, 2006, 2016), the free
tropospheric aerosol samples (PMO-1 and PMO-3) are more aromatic than the
convected boundary layer aerosol (PMO-2; Fig. 5). The presence of more
aromatic species in the long-range-transported wildfire-influenced aerosol
may lead to increased light absorption (Bao et al., 2017) and perhaps an
increased resistance to oxidation (Perraudin et al., 2006). Aromatic species
can also be associated with the presence of brown carbon<?pagebreak page14027?> (BrC; Desyaterik et
al., 2013). Aromaticity is heavily dependent on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and the
DBE (Eq. S4), where low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and high DBE indicate aromatic structure.
Histograms depicting the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DBE values for the
three samples are shown in Fig. S11. As observed previously, PMO-1 and PMO-3
are more similar to each other than compared to PMO-2. Likewise, PMO-1 and
PMO-3 exhibit an increase in the number frequency of higher DBE species,
which is not observed in PMO-2, supporting the observation of an increased
overall aromaticity for these free tropospheric aerosol samples. Many
aromatic compounds, such as PAHs are known to be carcinogens, and are a
product of incomplete combustion biomass burning and anthropogenic emissions
(Perraudin et al., 2006; Bignal et al., 2008).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3424">OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. volatility estimated using the Li et
al. (2016) method for the CHO species in the three samples. The size is
determined by the normalized relative abundance (RA) and the color is determined
by the logarithm of the normalized relative abundance multiplied by 1000.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3442">Generally, BrC is considered to be aromatic or olefinic in nature (Bao et
al., 2017). In our observations, the two samples influenced by wildfire show
the greatest amount of olefinic and aromatic species, which is likely
associated with the presence of BrC compounds. Additional evidence for the
presence of BrC in PMO-1 comes from Aethalometer measurements using the
seven-wavelength Aethalometer (Magee Scientific, Berkeley, California, USA)
located at the site, which detected a wavelength-dependent peak with an
Ångström exponent of 1.3 during the sampling period. Ångström
exponents above 1 suggest the presence of BrC or iron oxides. Based on the
retroplume analysis and comparison to similar samples (Džepina et al.,
2015), the detected peak is most likely the result of BrC. Figure S12
contains the Aethalometer observations for this event. Difficulties with the
instrument prevented similar data from being collected for PMO-3; although
based on the retroplumes, ambient conditions, and molecular characteristics,
similar results seem likely. In addition to the Aethalometer response, PMO-1
contained species that were related to BrC in studies by Iinuma et al. (2010)
and Lin et al. (2016) (Table S4). This observation provides evidence for the
persistence of BrC species, which is contrary to the observations by
Forrister et al. (2015) who concluded that BrC is mostly removed within 24
hours. Additionally, the high concentration of OC for this sample makes it
seem unlikely that we observed just a minor residual fraction. Perhaps, the
lifetime of BrC is dependent on additional ambient conditions that influence
aerosol oxidation and phase state.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Phase state, volatility, and cloud processing: implications for
the observed aerosol oxidation</title>
      <p id="d1e3452">Atmospheric aging processes are influenced by ambient conditions, such as
temperature and water vapor, and the concentrations of reactive species.
Recently, Shrivastava et al. (2017) reported observations of long-range-transported
PAHs from Asia to North America and suggested an enhanced lifetime
due to a probable glassy aerosol phase state during transport. Additionally,
model simulations reported by Shiraiwa et al. (2017) indicated that model SOA
is predicted to be semisolid or glassy at altitudes above 2000 m in the
Northern Hemisphere. Since the PMO aerosol was sampled at 2225 m above sea
level, we examined the estimated glass transition temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the studied WSOC species in addition to the markers of
aqueous-phase processing for the three PMO samples. Increased aerosol
viscosity has been shown to decrease the rate of photodegradation (Lignell et
al., 2014; Hinks et al., 2015) and water diffusivity (Berkemeier et al.,
2014). Both photodegradation and water diffusion are expected to strongly
affect the oxidation and aging of aerosol species during transport.</p>
      <p id="d1e3466">In general, lower volatility typically inversely correlates with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Shiraiwa et al., 2017) and viscosity. As such it was
important to estimate the volatility of the PMO aerosol. Using the parameters
reported by Donahue et al. (2011) and Li et al. (2016), we estimated the
volatility of the FT-ICR MS identified organic aerosol molecular compositions
(Figs. S13 and S14, respectively). As expected based on the length of
transport for the samples, the majority of<?pagebreak page14028?> formulas show extremely low
volatility. Interestingly, PMO-2 has a larger number of higher abundance
molecular formulas with extremely low volatility and elevated oxidation
relative to PMO-1 and PMO-3 (Fig. 6). This highlights the relationship
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and volatility, where volatility is expected to decrease
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases when the mass range is constant (Ng et al., 2011);
the relationship between oxygen and carbon and its effect on volatility is
used by both Donahue et al. (2011) and Li et al. (2016) to estimate
volatility. Similarly, lower volatility is expected to lead to lower
diffusivity in aerosol even at elevated RH as demonstrated by Ye et
al. (2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3506">Panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> contain the ambient conditions extracted from
the GFS analysis along the FLEXPART modeled path weighted by the residence
time for PMO-1, PMO-2, and PMO-3, respectively. The line represents the mean
value and the shading represents 1 standard deviation of the values. Panels <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold>
contain the box plot distributions of the RH-dependent
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for molecular formulas using the maximum, mean, and
minimum RH for PMO-1, PMO-2, and PMO-3, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values for the full composition of each sample were calculated using the
maximum, mean, and minimum RH and then all three sets of data are combined
and plotted as a single distribution for each time period. The open circles
represent the abundance and Boyer–Kauzmann estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
acid forms of the three most abundant low-MW organic ions, the bars around
the circles represent the range of possible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for those
compounds when the range of RH is considered. The red line demonstrates the
ambient temperature at each time point, as extracted from GFS. The centerline
of the box plot represents the median, and the top and bottom of the box
represent the third and first quartiles, respectively. The whiskers
represent Q3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> interquartile
range (IQR, Q3–Q1, maximum), and
Q1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (IQR, minimum).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3605">As predicted in earlier studies (Shrivastava et al., 2017; Shiraiwa et al.,
2017), particles transported in the free troposphere are likely semisolid to
solid, where the actual particle viscosity depends on the ambient conditions
and the composition of the particles. Thus, to better understand the
potential phase state associated with the PMO organic aerosol, we first
estimated the dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the identified CHO molecular formulas in
each of the PMO aerosol using the estimation method by DeRieux et al. (2018,
Eq. S5). We then converted the dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the RH-dependent
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (below). Currently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can only be estimated for
CHO species; however, the CHO species were the most frequently observed and
constituted a major fraction of the total relative abundance in the PMO
negative ion mass spectra. Assuming the identified CHO compositions are
fairly representative of the total organic aerosol composition, a comparison
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to the ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">amb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
provides an indication of the likely phase state of the organic aerosol
particles. Generally, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">amb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a glassy
solid state is predicted, likewise, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">amb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> then either a semisolid or liquid state is predicted
depending on the ratio magnitude (Shiraiwa et al., 2017; DeRieux et al.,
2018). Although the exact composition of the total organic aerosol is yet
unknown, the identified water-soluble organic compounds provide a reasonable
upper limit for the estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Under this assumption,
the CHO molecular formulas in PMO-1 and PMO-3 had higher average dry
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than PMO-2 (Table S5, Fig. S16), which implies that
they would be more viscous than PMO-2, given similar atmospheric conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3743">Water is known to be a strong plasticizer relative to typical aerosol species
(Koop et al., 2011; Shiraiwa et al., 2017; Reid et al., 2018), thus it can
decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the overall aerosol viscosity. Therefore, it's
important to consider the ambient RH when estimating the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using the extracted ambient temperature and RH from the GFS
along the FLEXPART retroplumes and the Gordon–Taylor equation (Eqs. S6–S7),
the calculated dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were modified to RH-dependent
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the CHO molecular species. The distributions of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the three PMO samples based on 1 standard
deviation of the ambient conditions are shown as box plots in Fig. 7. The
range of ambient temperature and RH extracted from the GFS along the FLEXPART
simulated path yields a wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Figs. 7, S17).
The estimates were taken back only 5 days due to the increasing range of
possible meteorological conditions associated with the spread in the air
masses as shown in Figs. 1 and S1–S3. Overall, the distributions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in PMO-1 and PMO-3 generally exceed the ambient
temperature (Fig. 7), implying that particles<?pagebreak page14029?> containing a majority of these
compounds would likely be solid. To account for the low-MW
organic anions not observed in the FT-ICR mass spectra, their mass
concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (estimated using the Boyer–Kauzmann
rule; Koop et al., 2011; Shiraiwa et al., 2017; and DeRieux et al., 2018) are
also shown in Fig. 7. The three most prevalent low-MW organic
acids indicate the potential impact of those compounds on the overall
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of a particle that contains them. Oxalic acid was
estimated to have a similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value to a majority of the higher
MW species identified in PMO-2, but it is slightly lower than the majority of
species in PMO-1 and PMO-3. However, the organic mass fraction of oxalate is 3 times
lower in PMO-1 and PMO-3 (2.3 % and 3.0 %) compared to PMO-2 (9.4 %).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3859">PMO-2 van Krevelen plots for unique molecular formulas
separated by group. Symbols are scaled to indicate the normalized relative
abundance (Norm. RA). The DBE is indicated for each group of unique molecular formulas using
colored symbols. Formulas common with other samples are provided in gray for
context.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/14017/2018/acp-18-14017-2018-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3868">The results suggest that aerosol in PMO-1 and PMO-3 was overall less
susceptible to atmospheric oxidation due to the aerosol phase state during
free tropospheric long-range transport than it may have been in the boundary
layer with higher ambient RH and temperature. A more viscous phase state
during transport may also explain the presence of persistent BrC species in
PMO-1, where the BrC species are protected from oxidation similarly to the
long-lived PAHs observed by Shrivastava et al. (2017). In contrast to the
observations from PMO-1 and PMO-3, much of the PMO-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution falls below the ambient temperature implying a semisolid or
liquid state during the final 5 days of transport. This indicates an
increased susceptibility to oxidation processes in the atmosphere (Shiraiwa
et al., 2011), such as aqueous-phase processing. The possibility of aqueous-phase
processing is also supported by the extracted GFS RH in Fig. 7, which
is above 50 % for the last 5 days of PMO-2 transport. The potential for
liquid and/or semisolid aerosol in the boundary layer is consistent with other
studies (Shiraiwa et al., 2017; Maclean et al., 2017) due to the increased RH
in the boundary layer and the plasticizing effect of water. Although, we note
the PMO-2 average dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were 4–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than
those of PMO-1 and PMO-3. Overall, the estimates of dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RH-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provide an otherwise unattainable upper limit
estimate of the aerosol phase state of the sampled free tropospheric aerosol
in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e3924">As described above, the most obvious difference in the molecular composition
of PMO-2 vs. PMO-1 and PMO-3 is the increased extent of oxidation. In fact,
most of the unique species observed in PMO-2 are in the highly oxidized
region of the van Krevelen plot (Fig. 8). However, the exact oxidation
pathways that led to the increased oxidation observed for PMO-2 and its
initial composition are unclear. Both gas-phase and aqueous-phase reactions
lead to SOA, where aqueous SOA components can have higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
than gas-phase SOA components (Lim et al., 2010;<?pagebreak page14030?> Ervens et al., 2011). The
high numbers of CHNO and CHOS molecular formulas observed here are consistent
with secondary components associated with an emission plume likely enriched
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pertaining to its expected
anthropogenic influence. All three of these reactive species have been shown
to lead to production and oxidation of SOA in the atmosphere (Hoyle et al.,
2016; Bertrand et al., 2018). Cloud and aqueous processing have also been
shown to increase the oxidation of atmospheric organic matter (e.g., Ervens
et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2013; Cook et al., 2017; Brege et al., 2018).
Comparisons of the detailed molecular composition of the PMO samples with
studies of cloud (Zhao et al., 2013; Cook et al., 2017) and fog (Mazzoleni et
al., 2010) organic matter indicate that the formulas uniquely common to only
PMO-2 have a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which supports aqueous-phase processing during
transport. These results are provided in Fig. S19 and Table S6. Studies have
shown that the reactive species emitted from anthropogenic plumes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can play a role in the oxidation of the
organic species that are dissolved in water (Blando and Turpin, 2000; Chen et
al., 2008; Ervens et al., 2011); furthermore, studies have shown aerosol
liquid water content contributes to aqueous production of SOA (Volkamer et
al., 2009; Lim et al., 2010). The elevated RH extracted from the GFS for this
plume (Fig. 7) indicates the presence of aerosol liquid water and is
consistent with its ubiquitous nature (Nguyen et al., 2016). Additionally,
PMO-2 had a strongly elevated non-sea-salt sulfate concentration relative to
PMO-1 and PMO-3, which also indicates aqueous-phase processing (Crahan et
al., 2004; Yu et al., 2005; Sorooshian et al., 2007; Hoyle et al., 2016).
Oxalate, another well-known marker of potential aqueous-phase processing
(Warneck 2003; Crahan et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2005; Sorooshian et al., 2007;
Carlton et al., 2007), was also elevated in PMO-2. The organic mass fraction
of oxalate was 9.4 % in PMO-2 compared to 2.3 % and 3.0 % in
PMO-1 and PMO-3. The nitrate concentration in PMO-2 was very low compared to
PMO-1 or PMO-3 (Table 1), supporting aqueous-phase processed aerosol in
PMO-2. While clearly gas-phase SOA cannot be excluded, several lines of
evidence suggest that aqueous-phase oxidation likely influenced the chemical
and physical characteristics of the PMO-2 aerosol to a larger extent than
those of PMO-1 and PMO-3 based on the observed molecular characteristics,
major ion concentrations (Fig. S20), and the model simulated transport
pathways and GFS meteorology.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4025">Aerosol samples collected on 27–28 June 2013 (PMO-1), 5–6 July 2014
(PMO-2), and 20–21 June 2015 (PMO-3) at the Pico Mountain Observatory were
analyzed using ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR MS for molecular formula
composition determination. FLEXPART retroplumes for the sampled air masses
indicate that (a) PMO-1 and PMO-3 aerosol was transported predominantly
through the free troposphere and were primarily influenced by wildfire
emissions; and (b) PMO-2 aerosol was transported primarily through the
boundary layer over the northeast continental US and the North Atlantic Ocean
and were largely influenced by anthropogenic and biogenic sources. Although
elevated levels of OC, sulfate, and oxalate were found in all three samples,
PMO-2 had the overall highest mass fractions of oxalate and sulfate
indicating a clear influence of aqueous-phase processing. The molecular
formula assignments indicated differences in the aerosol oxidation between
the free troposphere transported aerosol (PMO-1 and PMO-3) and the boundary
layer transported aerosol (PMO-2). These observations suggest that the
transport pathways, in addition to the emission sources, contributed to the
observed differences in the organic aerosol oxidation. The ambient
temperature and RH at upwind times were extracted from the GFS analysis in
FLEXPART and were used to estimate the glass transition temperatures of the
aerosol species during transport. The results suggest that the organic
aerosol components extracted from PMO-1 and PMO-3 were considerably more
viscous due to lower RH than those from PMO-2 and thus were less susceptible
to oxidation. The relationship between aerosol viscosity and its
susceptibility to oxidation in the free<?pagebreak page14031?> troposphere is well supported (e.g.,
Koop et al., 2011; Berkemeier et al., 2014, 2016; Lignell et al., 2014;
Shiraiwa et al., 2017). This suggests that biomass burning emissions and BrC
injected into the free troposphere are more resistant to removal than aerosol
transported in the boundary layer, due largely to the ambient conditions in
the free troposphere. Although more work is needed to better constrain the
molecular composition of long-range-transported aerosol and the processes
that affect it during transport, the presented results have broader
implications for the aging of long-range-transported aerosol rapidly
convected to the free troposphere.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4033">The molecular formula composition for each sample in this
study is available via Digital Commons at the following link:
<uri>http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/chemistry-fp/88/</uri> (Schum and Mazzoleni, 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4039">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14017-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14017-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4048">LRM and CM were the project leaders for this measurement campaign. SKS, KD,
PF, CM, and LRM performed the sample collection, measurements, and the data
analysis. FT-ICR MS analysis was done by SKS and LRM. BZ performed the
FLEXPART model simulations and interpretation. All authors contributed to the
discussion and interpretation of the results and to the writing of the
manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4054">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4060">This project was supported with funding from NSF (AGS-1110059) and DOE
(DE-SC0006941). Logistical support for the operation of the Pico Mountain
Observatory was provided by the Regional Government of the Azores through the
Regional Secretary for Science and the Pico Island Natural Park. Major equipment
cost share and graduate student support associated with this project was
provided by the Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences Institute at Michigan
Technological University. We thank Mike Dziobak, Kendra Wright, Sumit Kumar,
Andrea Baccarini, Stefano Viviani, Jacques Huber, and Detlev Helmig for
assistance in the field. We thank Manabu Shiraiwa, Sarah Petters, and Marcus Petters for helpful
discussions regarding the aerosol phase state. Finally, we
thank Melissa Soule and Elizabeth Kujawinski of the Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution (WHOI) Mass Spectrometry Facility for FT-ICR MS instrument time
and assistance with data acquisition (NSF OCE-0619608 and Gordon and Betty
Moore Foundation).
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Neil M. Donahue<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by:  two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aggarwal, S. G. and Kawamura, K.: Carbonaceous and inorganic composition in
long-range transported aerosols over northern Japan: Implication for aging of
water-soluble organic fraction, Atmos. Env., 43, 2532–2540,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.032</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez J. L.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OM/OC
Ratios of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic Aerosols with
High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 4478–4485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Arangio, A. M., Slade, J. H., Berkemeier, T., Pöschl, U., Knopf, D. A.,
and Shiraiwa, M.: Multiphase Chemical Kinetics of OH Radical Uptake by
Molecular Organic Markers of Biomass Burning Aerosols: Humidity and
Temperature Dependence, Surface Reaction, and Bulk Diffusion, J. Phys. Chem.,
119, 4533–4544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510489z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp510489z</ext-link> , 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bao, H., Niggemann, J., Luo, L., Dittmar, T., and Kao, S.: Aerosols as a
source of dissolved black carbon to the ocean, Nat. Commun., 8, 1–7,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00437-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-017-00437-3</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Pöschl, U., and Koop, T.: Competition
between water uptake and ice nucleation by glassy organic aerosol particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12513–12531,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Berkemeier, T., Steimer, S., Krieger, U., Peter, T., Pöschl, U., Ammann,
M., and Shiraiwa, M.: Ozone uptake on glassy, semi-solid and liquid organic
matter and the role of reactive oxygen intermediates in atmospheric aerosol
chemistry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 12662–12674,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp00634e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c6cp00634e</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bertrand, A., Stefenelli, G., Jen, C. N., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Ni,
H., Temime-Roussel, B., Slowik, J. G., Goldstein, A. H., Haddad, I. E.,
Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.:
Evolution of the chemical fingerprint of biomass burning organic aerosol
during aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7607–7624,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018</ext-link> , 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bignal, K. L., Langridge, S., and Zhou, J. L.: Release of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate matter from biomass combustion
in a wood-fired boiler under varying boiler conditions, Atmos. Env., 42,
8863–8871, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.013</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Blando, J. D. and Turpin, B. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud
and fog droplets: a literature evaluation of plausibility, Atmos. Environ.,
34, 1623–1632, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00392-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00392-1</ext-link> , 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bougiatioti, A., Stavroulas, I., Kostenidou, E., Zarmpas, P., Theodosi, C.,
Kouvarakis, G., Canonaco, F., Prevot, A. S. H., Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Processing of biomass-burning aerosol in the eastern
Mediterranean during summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4793–4807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14032?><ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bougiatioti, A., Nikolaou, P., Stavroulas, I., Kouvarakis, G., Weber, R.,
Nenes, A., Kanakidou, M., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Particle water and pH in the
eastern Mediterranean: source variability and implications for nutrient
availability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4579–4591,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4579-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4579-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Brege, M., Paglione, M., Gilardoni, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., and
Mazzoleni, L. R.: Molecular insights on aging and aqueous phase processing
from ambient biomass burning emissions-influenced Po Valley fog and aerosol,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13197–13214,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13197-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-13197-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Brown, S. S., deGouw, J. A., Warneke, C., Ryerson, T. B., Dubé, W. P.,
Atlas, E., Weber, R. J., Peltier, R. E., Neuman, J. A., Roberts, J. M.,
Swanson, A., Flocke, F., McKeen, S. A., Brioude, J., Sommariva, R., Trainer,
M., Fehsenfeld, F. C., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Nocturnal isoprene oxidation
over the Northeast United States in summer and its impact on reactive
nitrogen partitioning and secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
3027–3042, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3027-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3027-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cao, F., Zhang, S., Kawamura, K., Liu, X., Yang, C., Xu, Z., Fan, M., Zhang,
W., Bao, M., Chang, Y., Song, W., Liu, S., Lee, X., Li, J., Zhang, G., and
Zhang, Y.: Chemical characteristics of dicarboxylic acids and related organic
compounds in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during biomass-burning and non-biomass-burning
seasons at a rural site of Northeast China, Environ. Pollut., 231, 654–662,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.045</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Capes, G., Johnson, B., McFiggans, G., Williams, P. I., Haywood, J., and Coe,
H.: Aging of biomass burning aerosols over West Africa: Aircraft measurements
of chemical composition, microphysical properties, and emission ratios, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009845</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S., Reff, A., Lim,
H.-J., and Ervens, B.: Atmospheric oxalic acid and SOA production from
glyoxal: Results of aqueous photooxidation experiments, Atmos. Environ., 41,
7588–7602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Cech, N. B. and Enke, C. G.: Practical implications of some recent studies in
electrospray ionization fundamentals, Mass Spec. Rev., 20, 362–387,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.10008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/mas.10008</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Z. M., Wang, H. L., Zhu, L. H., Wang, C. X., Jie, C. Y., and Hua, W.:
Aqueous-phase ozonolysis of methacrolein and methyl vinyl ketone: a
potentially important source of atmospheric aqueous oxidants, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 2255–2265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2255-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2255-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>China, S., Scarnato, B., Owen, R. C., Zhang, B., Ampadu, M. T., Kumar, S.,
Džepina, K., Dziobak, M. P., Fialho, P., Perlinger, J. A., Hueber, J.,
Helmig, D., Mazzoleni, L. R., and Mazzoleni, C.: Morphology and mixing state
of aged soot particles at a remote marine free troposphere site: Implications
for optical properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1243–1250,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl062404</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>China, S., Alpert, P. A., Zhang, B., Schum, S., Džepina, K., Wright, K.,
Owen, R. C., Fialho, P., Mazzoleni, L. R., Mazzoleni, C., and Knopf, D. A.:
Ice cloud formation potential by free tropospheric particles from long-range
transport over the Northern Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
3065–3079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd025817</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L. W. A., Wang, X., and Watson, J. G.:
Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 8,
243–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Furger, M., Nyeki, S., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Steinbacher, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol climatology and planetary
boundary influence at the Jungfraujoch analyzed by synoptic weather types,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5931–5944, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5931-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5931-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Cook, R. D., Lin, Y.-H., Peng, Z., Boone, E., Chu, R. K., Dukett, J. E.,
Gunsch, M. J., Zhang, W., Tolic, N., Laskin, A., and Pratt, K. A.: Biogenic,
urban, and wildfire influences on the molecular composition of dissolved
organic compounds in cloud water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15167–15180,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Takahama, S., Äijälä, M., Ehn,
M., Junninen, H., Rinne, J., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Vogel, A. L.,
Hoffmann, T., Ebben, C. J., Geiger, F. M., Chhabra, P., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Worsnop, D. R., Song, W., Auld, J., and Williams, J.: Biogenic and biomass
burning organic aerosol in a boreal forest at Hyytiälä, Finland,
during HUMPPA-COPEC 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12233–12256,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12233-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12233-2013</ext-link> , 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Crahan, K. K., Hegg, D., Covert, D. S., and Jonsson, H.: An exploration of
aqueous oxalic acid production in the coastal marine atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 38, 3757–3764, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.009</ext-link> , 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>DeRieux, W.-S. W., Li, Y., Lin, P., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., Bertram, A. K.,
Nizkorodov, S. A., and Shiraiwa, M.: Predicting the glass transition
temperature and viscosity of secondary organic material using molecular
composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6331–6351,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6331-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6331-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by agricultural
biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50561</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N., Epstein, S., Pandis, S., and Robinson, A.: A two-dimensional
volatility basis set: 1. organic-aerosol mixing thermodynamics, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 3303–3318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Duan, F., Liu, X., Yu, T., and Cachier, H.: Identification and estimate of
biomass burning contribution to the urban aerosol organic carbon
concentrations in Beijing, Atmos. Env., 38, 1275–1282,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.037</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Dunlea, E. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Aiken, A. C., Kimmel, J. R., Peltier, R. E.,
Weber, R. J., Tomlinson, J., Collins, D. R., Shinozuka, Y., McNaughton, C.
S., Howell, S. G., Clarke, A. D., Emmons, L. K., Apel, E. C., Pfister, G. G.,
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Millet, D. B., Heald, C. L., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Evolution of Asian aerosols during transpacific transport in INTEX-B,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7257–7287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7257-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7257-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Džepina, K., Mazzoleni, C., Fialho, P., China, S., Zhang, B., Owen, R.
C., Helmig, D., Hueber, J., Kumar, S., Perlinger, J. A., Kramer, L. J.,
Dziobak, M. P., Ampadu, M. T., Olsen, S., Wuebbles, D. J., and Mazzoleni, L.
R.: Molecular characterization of free tropospheric aerosol collected at the
Pico Mountain Observatory: a case study with a long-range transported biomass
burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5047–5068,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14033?><ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Carlton, A. G., Turpin B. J., Altieri, K. E., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
and Feingold, G.: Secondary organic aerosol yields from cloud-processing of
isoprene oxidation products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl031828</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Fialho, P., Hansen, A. D. A., and Honrath, R. E.: Absorption coefficients by
aerosols in remote areas: a new approach to decouple dust and black carbon
absorption coefficients using seven-wavelength Aethalometer data, J. Aerosol
Sci., 36, 267–282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.09.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.09.004</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Forrister, H., Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Ziemba, L., Thornhill, K. L.,
Anderson, B., Diskin, G., Perring, A. E., Schwarz, J. P., Campuzano-Jost, P.,
Day, D. A., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.:
Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
4623–4630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063897" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl063897</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>George, I. J. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of atmospheric
aerosol particles by gas-phase radicals, Nat. Chem., 2, 713–722,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nchem.806</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Helmig, D., Muoz, M., Hueber, J., Mazzoleni, C., Mazzoleni, L., Owen, R. C.,
Val-Martin, M., Fialho, P., Plass-Duelmer, C., Palmer, P. I., Lewis, A. C.,
and Pfister G.: Climatology and atmospheric chemistry of the non-methane
hydrocarbons ethane and propane over the North Atlantic, Elem. Sci. Anth., 3,
000054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12952/journal.elementa.000054</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Herzsprung, P., Hertkorn, N., Tümpling, W., Harir, M., Friese, K., and
Schmitt-Kopplin, P.: Understanding molecular formula assignment of Fourier
transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry data of natural organic
matter from a chemical point of view, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 406, 7977–7987,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8249-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-014-8249-y</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Hinks, M., Brady, M., Lignell, H., Song, M., Grayson, J., Bertram, A., Lin,
P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S.: Effect of viscosity on
photodegradation rates in complex secondary organic aerosol materials, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 8785–8793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp05226b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c5cp05226b</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Hoyle, C. R., Fuchs, C., Järvinen, E., Saathoff, H., Dias, A., Haddad, I.
E., Gysel, M., Coburn, S. C., Tröstl, J., Bernhammer, A.-K., Bianchi, F.,
Breitenlechner, M., Corbin, J. C., Craven, J., Donahue, N. M., Duplissy, J.,
Ehrhart, S., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Höppel, N., Heinritzi, M.,
Kristensen, T. B., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Pinterich, T., Prévôt,
A. S. H., Simon, M., Slowik, J. G., Steiner, G., Tomé, A., Vogel, A. L.,
Volkamer, R., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, R., Wexler, A. S., Williamson, C.,
Winkler, P. M., Yan, C., Amorim, A., Dommen, J., Curtius, J., Gallagher, M.
W., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Möhler, O.,
Stratmann, F., Worsnop, D. R., and Baltensperger, U.: Aqueous phase oxidation
of sulphur dioxide by ozone in cloud droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
1693–1712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1693-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1693-2016</ext-link> , 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K., Cao, J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K.
R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P., Wolf, R., Pieber,
S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski,
M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S.,
Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prevot, A. S. H.: High secondary
aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China,
Nature, 514, 13774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Boege, O., Graefe, R., and Herrmann, H.: Methyl-Nitrocatechols:
Atmospheric Tracer Compounds for Biomass Burning Secondary Organic Aerosols,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8453–8459, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102938a</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y,
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M.,
Džepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C.,
Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C.
E., Baltensperger U., and Worsnop D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the
Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones,
L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie M., and van der
Werf, G. R.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire
assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences,
9, 527–554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-527-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Kido-Soule, M., Longnecker, K., Giovannoni, S., and Kujawinski, E.: Impact of
instrument and experiment parameters on reproducibility of ultrahigh
resolution ESI FT-ICR mass spectra of natural organic matter, Org. Geochem.,
41, 725–733, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.05.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.05.017</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kirpes, R. M., Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin,
A., Ault, A. P., and Pratt, K. A.: Secondary sulfate is internally mixed with
sea spray aerosol and organic aerosol in the winter Arctic, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 3937–3949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3937-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3937-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Kleissl, J., Honrath, R. E., Dziobak, M. P., Tanner, D., Val Martín, M.,
Owen, R. C., and Helmig, D.: Occurrence of upslope flows at the Pico
mountaintop observatory: A case study of orographic flows on a small,
volcanic island, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007565" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007565</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Koch, B. P. and Dittmar, T.: From mass to structure: an aromaticity index for
high-resolution mass data of natural organic matter, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp.,
20, 926–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.2386</ext-link>, 2006</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Koch, B. P. and Dittmar, T.: From mass to structure: an aromaticity index for
high-resolution mass data of natural organic matter, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp.,
30, p. 250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7433" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.7433</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition
and phase state of organic compounds: dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 13, 19238–19255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp22617g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c1cp22617g</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14034?><ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., Bluhm,
H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Carbon
oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of atmospheric
organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nchem.948</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Lai, C., Liu, Y., Ma, J., Ma, Q., and He, H.: Degradation kinetics of
levoglucosan initiated by hydroxyl radical under different environmental
conditions, Atmos. Environ., 91, 32–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.054</ext-link> ,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Laing, J. R., Jaffe, D. A., and Hee, J. R.: Physical and optical properties
of aged biomass burning aerosol from wildfires in Siberia and the Western USA
at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15185–15197,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P.,
Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Worsnop, D. R., Brune, W. H., and Davidovits,
P.: Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized primary
organic aerosol (OPOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8913–8928,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011</ext-link>, 2011</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown
Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K. Y., Herckes, P., Leaitch, W. R., Macdonald, A. M., and Abbatt, J.
P. D.: Aqueous OH oxidation of ambient organic aerosol and cloud water
organics: Formation of highly oxidized products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011gl047439</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Levin, E., McMeeking, G. R., Carrico, C. M., Mack, L. E., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
Wold, C. E., Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Hao, W. M., Collett, J. L.,
and Malm, W. C.: Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties measured during
Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 115,
1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013601</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Molecular corridors and
parameterizations of volatility in the chemical evolution of organic
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3327–3344,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Lignell, H., Hinks, M., and Nizkorodov, S.: Exploring matrix effects on
photochemistry of organic aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
13780–13785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322106111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1322106111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., Perri, M. J., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10521–10539,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010</ext-link> , 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass Burning
Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S. and Liang, X.: Observed Diurnal Cycle Climatology of Planetary
Boundary Layer Height, J. Climate, 23, 5790–5809,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3552.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010jcli3552.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Huey, L. G., Yokelson, R. J., Selimovic, V., Simpson, I. J.,
Müller, M., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Beyersdorf, A. J., Blake,
D. R., Butterfield, Z., Choi, Y., Crounse, J. D., Day, D. A., Diskin, G. S.,
Dubey, M. K., Fortner, E., Hanisco, T. F., Hu, W., King, L. E., Kleinman, L.,
Meinardi, S., Mikoviny, T., Onasch, T. B., Palm, B. B., Peischl, J., Pollack,
I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Sachse, G. W., Sedlacek, A. J., Shilling, J. E.,
Springston, S., Clair, J., Tanner, D. J., Teng, A. P., Wennberg, P. O.,
Wisthaler, A., and Wolfe, G. M.: Airborne measurements of western US
wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality
implications, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 122, 6108–6129,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026315" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd026315</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Ehn, M.,
Mikkilä, J., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J.
T., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits,
P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Relationship between aerosol oxidation level and
hygroscopic properties of laboratory generated secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl045258" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010gl045258</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Mazzoleni, L. R., Ehrmann, B. M., Shen, X., Marshall, A. G., and Collett, J.
L.: Water-Soluble Atmospheric Organic Matter in Fog: Exact Masses and
Chemical Formula Identification by Ultrahigh-Resolution Fourier Transform Ion
Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
3690–3697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903409k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es903409k</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Mazzoleni, L. R., Saranjampour, P., Dalbec, M. M., Samburova, V., Hallar, A.
G., Zielinska, B., Lowenthal, D. H., and Kohl, S.: Identification of
water-soluble organic carbon in non-urban aerosols using ultrahigh-resolution
FT-ICR mass spectrometry: organic anions, Environ. Chem., 9, 285–297,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/en11167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/en11167</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. V., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Pike, M., and Carlton, A. G.:
Liquid Water: Ubiquitous Contributor to Aerosol Mass, Environ. Sci. Technol.
Lett., 3, 257–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00167</ext-link> , 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>O'Brien, R. E., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Liu, S., Weber, R., Russell, L. M.,
and Goldstein, A. H.: Molecular characterization of organic aerosol using
nanospray desorption/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: CalNex 2010
field study, Atmos. Environ., 68, 265–272,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.056</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Olivier, J. G. J. and Berdowski, J. J. M.: Global emissions sources and
sinks, in: The Climate System, edited by: Berdowski, J., Guicherit, R., and
Heij, B. J., A.A. Balkema Publishers/Swets &amp; Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse,
the Netherlands, 33–78, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Perraudin, E., Budzinski, H., and Villenave, E.: Kinetic Study of the
Reactions of Ozone with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Adsorbed on
Atmospheric Model Particles, J. Atmos. Chem., 56, 57–82,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9042-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-006-9042-x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Pfister, G. G., Emmons, L. K., Hess, P. G., Honrath, R. E., Lamarque, J. F.,
Val Martin, M., Owen, R. C., Avery, M. A., Browell, E. V., Holloway, J. S.,
Nedelec, P., Purvis, R., Ryerson, T. B., Sachse, G. W., and Schlager, H.:
Ozone production from the 2004 North American boreal fires, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 111, D24S07, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007695" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007695</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Composition, Transformation, Climate
and Health Effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 44, 7520–7540,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/anie.200501122</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14035?><ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Putman, A. L., Offenberg, J. H., Fisseha, R., Kundu, S., Rahn, T. A., and
Mazzoleni, L. R.: Ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry
characterization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis SOA, Atmos. Env., 46,
164–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.003</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K., Collins, D. B., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Bates, T.
S.: Chemistry and Related Properties of Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4383–4399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500713g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500713g</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Rémillard, J., Kollias, P., Luke, E., and Wood, R.: Marine Boundary Layer
Cloud Observations in the Azores, J. Climate, 25, 7381–7398,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00610.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-11-00610.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Schmitt-Koppli, P., Gelencsìr, A., Dabek-Zlotorzynsk, E., Kis, G.,
Hertkor, N., Harir, M., Hon, Y., and Gebefüg, I.: Analysis of he
Unresolved Organic Fraction in Atmospheric Aerosols with Ultrahigh-Resolution
Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Organosulfates
As Photochemical Smog Constituents, Anal. Chem., 82, 8017–8026,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101444r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac101444r</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Liger-Belair, G., Koch, B., Flerus, R., Kattner, G.,
Harir, M., Kanawati, B., Lucio, M., Tziotis, D., Hertkorn, N., and
Gebefügi, I.: Dissolved organic matter in sea spray: a transfer study
from marine surface water to aerosols, Biogeosciences, 9, 1571–1582,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Schum, S. K. and Mazzoleni, L. R.: Ultrahigh resolution FT-ICR MS data of
long-range transported free tropospheric aerosol collected at the Pico
Mountain Observatory in the Azores, available at:
<uri>http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/chemistry-fp/88/</uri>, last access: 26
September 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Seibert, P. and Frank, A.: Source-receptor matrix calculation with a
Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4,
51–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-51-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Gas uptake and
chemical aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 108, 11003–11008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1103045108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Li, Y., Tsimpidi, A., Karydis, V., Berkemeier, T., Pandis, S.,
Lelieveld, J., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Global distribution of particle
phase state in atmospheric secondary organic aerosols, Nat. Commun., 8,
15002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms15002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Lou, S., Zelenyuk, A., Easter, R., Corley, R., Thrall, B.,
Rasch, P., Fast, J., Simonich, S., Shen, H., and Tao, S.: Global long-range
transport and lung cancer risk from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons shielded
by coatings of organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 1246–1251,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618475114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1618475114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl060582</ext-link> , 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Sorooshian, A., Lu, M.-L., Brechtel, F., Jonsson, H., Feingold, G., Flagan,
R., and Seinfeld, J.: On the Source of Organic Acid Aerosol Layers above
Clouds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4647–4654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0630442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0630442</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Tu, P., Hall, W., and Johnston, M.: Characterization of Highly Oxidized
Molecules in Fresh and Aged Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, Anal. Chem.,
88, 4495–4501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00378</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>US Air Quality: Smog Blog, available at: <uri>http://alg.umbc.edu</uri>, last
access: 9 January 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Vakkari, V., Kerminen, V., Beukes, J., Tiitta, P., Zyl, P., Josipovic, M.,
Venter, A., Jaars, K., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., and Laakso, L.: Rapid
changes in biomass burning aerosols by atmospheric oxidation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2644–2651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl059396</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Val Martin, M., Honrath, R., Owen, R., Pfister, G., Fialho, P., and Barata,
F.: Significant enhancements of nitrogen oxides, black carbon, and ozone in
the North Atlantic lower free troposphere resulting from North American
boreal wildfires, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D23S60,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007530</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Val Martin, M., Honrath, R., Owen, R., and Lapina, K.: Large-scale impacts of
anthropogenic pollution and boreal wildfires on the nitrogen oxides over the
central North Atlantic region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D17308,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009689</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Val Martin, M., Honrath, R., Owen, R., and Li, Q.: Seasonal variation of
nitrogen oxides in the central North Atlantic lower free troposphere, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D17307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009688</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Val Martin, M., Logan, J. A., Kahn, R. A., Leung, F.-Y., Nelson, D. L., and
Diner, D. J.: Smoke injection heights from fires in North America: analysis
of 5 years of satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1491–1510,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1491-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1491-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Virtanen, A., Joutsensaari, J., Koop, T., Kannosto, J., Yli-Pirilä, P.,
Leskinen, J., Mäkelä, J., Holopainen, J., Pöschl, U., Kulmala,
M., Worsnop, D., and Laaksonen, A.: An amorphous solid state of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol particles, Nature, 467,09455,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09455</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, A., Äijälä, M., Corrigan, A., Junninen, H., Ehn, M.,
Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., Russell, L., Williams, J., and
Hoffmann, T.: In situ submicron organic aerosol characterization at a boreal
forest research station during HUMPPA-COPEC 2010 using soft and hard
ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10933–10950,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10933-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10933-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Jimenez, J. L., San Martini, F., Džepina, K., Zhang, Q.,
Salcedo, D., Molina, L. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher
than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl026899</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Ziemann, P., and Molina, M.: Secondary Organic Aerosol
Formation from Acetylene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): seed effect on SOA yields due to
organic photochemistry in the aerosol aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1907–1928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Walser, M. L., Desyaterik, Y., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S.:
High-resolution mass spectrometric analysis of secondary organic aerosol
produced by ozonation<?pagebreak page14036?> of limonene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 1009–1022,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b712620d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b712620d</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Warneck, P.: In-cloud chemistry opens pathway to the formation of oxalic acid
in the marine atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2423–2427,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00136-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00136-5</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Warneke, C., Bahreini, R., Brioude, J., Brock, C. A., Gouw, J., Fahey, D. W.,
Froyd, K. D., Holloway, J. S., Middlebrook, A., Miller, L., Montzka, S.,
Murphy, D. M., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R.,
and Veres, P.: Biomass burning in Siberia and Kazakhstan as an important
source for haze over the Alaskan Arctic in April 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
36, L02813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gl036194</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Wozniak, A. S., Willoughby, A. S., Gurganus, S. C., and Hatcher, P. G.:
Distinguishing molecular characteristics of aerosol water soluble organic
matter from the 2011 trans-North Atlantic US GEOTRACES cruise, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 8419–8434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8419-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8419-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Ye, Q., Robinson, E. S., Ding, X., Ye, P., Sullivan, R. C., and Donahue, N.
M.: Mixing of secondary organic aerosols versus relative humidity, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 12649–12654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604536113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1604536113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Yu, J. Z., Huang, X., Xu, J., and Hu, M.: When Aerosol Sulfate Goes Up, So
Does Oxalate: Implication for the Formation Mechanisms of Oxalate, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 39, 128–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es049559f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es049559f</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D. G., Wilson, J., Bell, D. M., Suski, K. J.,
Shrivastava, M., Beránek, J., Alexander, M. L., Kramer, A. L., and
Massey-Simonich, S. L.: The effect of gas-phase polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons on the formation and properties of biogenic secondary organic
aerosol particles, Faraday Discuss., 200, 143–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fd00032d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c7fd00032d</ext-link>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, B., Owen, R. C., Perlinger, J. A., Kumar, S., Wu, S., Val Martin, M.,
Kramer, L. Helmig, D., and Honrath, R. E.: A semi-Lagrangian view of ozone
production tendency in North American outflow in the summers of 2009 and
2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2267–2287,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2267-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2267-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, B., Owen, R. C., Perlinger, J. A., Helmig, D., Val Martín, M.,
Kramer, L., Mazzoleni, L. R., and Mazzoleni, C.: Ten-year chemical signatures
associated with long-range transport observed in the free troposphere over
the central North Atlantic, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 1–20,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.194</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J., Canagaratna, M., Allan, J., Coe, H., Ulbrich, I.,
Alfarra, M., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A., Sun, Y., Džepina, K., Dunlea,
E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P., Salcedo, D., Onasch, T., Jayne, J., Miyoshi,
T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J.,
Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Williams, P., Bower,
K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Rautiainen, J., Sun, J., Zhang,
Y., and Worsnop, D.: Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic
aerosols in anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L13801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl029979</ext-link> , 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Hallar, A. G., and Mazzoleni, L. R.: Atmospheric organic matter in
clouds: exact masses and molecular formula identification using
ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
12343–12362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Zobrist, B., Marcolli, C., Pedernera, D., and Koop, T.: Do atmospheric
aerosols form glasses?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5221–5244,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Molecular and physical characteristics of aerosol at a remote free troposphere site: implications for atmospheric aging</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Aerosol
properties are transformed by atmospheric processes during long-range
transport and play a key role in the Earth's radiative balance. To understand
the molecular and physical characteristics of free tropospheric aerosol, we
studied samples collected at the Pico Mountain Observatory in the North
Atlantic. The observatory is located in the marine free troposphere at
2225&thinsp;m above sea level, on Pico Island in the Azores archipelago. The site
is ideal for the study of long-range-transported free tropospheric aerosol
with minimal local influence. Three aerosol samples with elevated organic
carbon concentrations were selected for detailed analysis. FLEXPART
retroplumes indicated that two of the samples were influenced by North
American wildfire emissions transported in the free troposphere and one by
North American outflow mainly transported within the marine boundary layer.
Ultrahigh-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass
spectrometry was used to determine the detailed molecular composition of the
samples. Thousands of molecular formulas were assigned to each of the
individual samples. On average  ∼ 60&thinsp;% of the molecular formulas
contained only carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms (CHO),  ∼ 30&thinsp;%
contained nitrogen (CHNO), and  ∼ 10&thinsp;% contained sulfur (CHOS). The
molecular formula compositions of the two wildfire-influenced aerosol
samples transported mainly in the free troposphere had relatively low average
O∕C ratios (0.48±0.13 and 0.45±0.11) despite the 7–10
days of transport time according to FLEXPART. In contrast, the molecular
composition of the North American outflow transported mainly in the boundary
layer had a higher average O∕C ratio (0.57±0.17) with 3 days of
transport time. To better understand the difference between free tropospheric
transport and boundary layer transport, the meteorological conditions along
the FLEXPART simulated transport pathways were extracted from the Global
Forecast System analysis for the model grids. We used the extracted
meteorological conditions and the observed molecular chemistry to predict the
relative-humidity-dependent glass transition temperatures (<i>T</i><sub>g</sub>) of
the aerosol components. Comparisons of the <i>T</i><sub>g</sub> to the ambient
temperature indicated that a majority of the organic aerosol components
transported in the free troposphere were more viscous and therefore less
susceptible to oxidation than the organic aerosol components transported in
the boundary layer. Although the number of observations is limited, the
results suggest that biomass burning organic aerosol injected into the free
troposphere is more persistent than organic aerosol in the boundary layer
having broader implications for aerosol aging.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aggarwal, S. G. and Kawamura, K.: Carbonaceous and inorganic composition in
long-range transported aerosols over northern Japan: Implication for aging of
water-soluble organic fraction, Atmos. Env., 43, 2532–2540,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.032</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez J. L.: O∕C and OM/OC
Ratios of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic Aerosols with
High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 4478–4485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arangio, A. M., Slade, J. H., Berkemeier, T., Pöschl, U., Knopf, D. A.,
and Shiraiwa, M.: Multiphase Chemical Kinetics of OH Radical Uptake by
Molecular Organic Markers of Biomass Burning Aerosols: Humidity and
Temperature Dependence, Surface Reaction, and Bulk Diffusion, J. Phys. Chem.,
119, 4533–4544, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510489z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510489z</a> , 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bao, H., Niggemann, J., Luo, L., Dittmar, T., and Kao, S.: Aerosols as a
source of dissolved black carbon to the ocean, Nat. Commun., 8, 1–7,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00437-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00437-3</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Pöschl, U., and Koop, T.: Competition
between water uptake and ice nucleation by glassy organic aerosol particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12513–12531,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12513-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Berkemeier, T., Steimer, S., Krieger, U., Peter, T., Pöschl, U., Ammann,
M., and Shiraiwa, M.: Ozone uptake on glassy, semi-solid and liquid organic
matter and the role of reactive oxygen intermediates in atmospheric aerosol
chemistry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 12662–12674,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp00634e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp00634e</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bertrand, A., Stefenelli, G., Jen, C. N., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Ni,
H., Temime-Roussel, B., Slowik, J. G., Goldstein, A. H., Haddad, I. E.,
Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Wortham, H., and Marchand, N.:
Evolution of the chemical fingerprint of biomass burning organic aerosol
during aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7607–7624,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7607-2018</a> , 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bignal, K. L., Langridge, S., and Zhou, J. L.: Release of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate matter from biomass combustion
in a wood-fired boiler under varying boiler conditions, Atmos. Env., 42,
8863–8871, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.013</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blando, J. D. and Turpin, B. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud
and fog droplets: a literature evaluation of plausibility, Atmos. Environ.,
34, 1623–1632, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00392-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00392-1</a> , 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bougiatioti, A., Stavroulas, I., Kostenidou, E., Zarmpas, P., Theodosi, C.,
Kouvarakis, G., Canonaco, F., Prevot, A. S. H., Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Processing of biomass-burning aerosol in the eastern
Mediterranean during summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4793–4807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4793-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bougiatioti, A., Nikolaou, P., Stavroulas, I., Kouvarakis, G., Weber, R.,
Nenes, A., Kanakidou, M., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Particle water and pH in the
eastern Mediterranean: source variability and implications for nutrient
availability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4579–4591,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4579-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4579-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Brege, M., Paglione, M., Gilardoni, S., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., and
Mazzoleni, L. R.: Molecular insights on aging and aqueous phase processing
from ambient biomass burning emissions-influenced Po Valley fog and aerosol,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13197–13214,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13197-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13197-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, S. S., deGouw, J. A., Warneke, C., Ryerson, T. B., Dubé, W. P.,
Atlas, E., Weber, R. J., Peltier, R. E., Neuman, J. A., Roberts, J. M.,
Swanson, A., Flocke, F., McKeen, S. A., Brioude, J., Sommariva, R., Trainer,
M., Fehsenfeld, F. C., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Nocturnal isoprene oxidation
over the Northeast United States in summer and its impact on reactive
nitrogen partitioning and secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
3027–3042, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3027-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3027-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, F., Zhang, S., Kawamura, K., Liu, X., Yang, C., Xu, Z., Fan, M., Zhang,
W., Bao, M., Chang, Y., Song, W., Liu, S., Lee, X., Li, J., Zhang, G., and
Zhang, Y.: Chemical characteristics of dicarboxylic acids and related organic
compounds in PM<sub>2.5</sub> during biomass-burning and non-biomass-burning
seasons at a rural site of Northeast China, Environ. Pollut., 231, 654–662,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.045</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Capes, G., Johnson, B., McFiggans, G., Williams, P. I., Haywood, J., and Coe,
H.: Aging of biomass burning aerosols over West Africa: Aircraft measurements
of chemical composition, microphysical properties, and emission ratios, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009845</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S., Reff, A., Lim,
H.-J., and Ervens, B.: Atmospheric oxalic acid and SOA production from
glyoxal: Results of aqueous photooxidation experiments, Atmos. Environ., 41,
7588–7602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cech, N. B. and Enke, C. G.: Practical implications of some recent studies in
electrospray ionization fundamentals, Mass Spec. Rev., 20, 362–387,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.10008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.10008</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Z. M., Wang, H. L., Zhu, L. H., Wang, C. X., Jie, C. Y., and Hua, W.:
Aqueous-phase ozonolysis of methacrolein and methyl vinyl ketone: a
potentially important source of atmospheric aqueous oxidants, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 2255–2265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2255-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2255-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
China, S., Scarnato, B., Owen, R. C., Zhang, B., Ampadu, M. T., Kumar, S.,
Džepina, K., Dziobak, M. P., Fialho, P., Perlinger, J. A., Hueber, J.,
Helmig, D., Mazzoleni, L. R., and Mazzoleni, C.: Morphology and mixing state
of aged soot particles at a remote marine free troposphere site: Implications
for optical properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1243–1250,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062404</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
China, S., Alpert, P. A., Zhang, B., Schum, S., Džepina, K., Wright, K.,
Owen, R. C., Fialho, P., Mazzoleni, L. R., Mazzoleni, C., and Knopf, D. A.:
Ice cloud formation potential by free tropospheric particles from long-range
transport over the Northern Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
3065–3079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025817</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. C., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L. W. A., Wang, X., and Watson, J. G.:
Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 8,
243–263, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Furger, M., Nyeki, S., Prevot, A. S. H.,
Steinbacher, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol climatology and planetary
boundary influence at the Jungfraujoch analyzed by synoptic weather types,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5931–5944, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5931-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5931-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, R. D., Lin, Y.-H., Peng, Z., Boone, E., Chu, R. K., Dukett, J. E.,
Gunsch, M. J., Zhang, W., Tolic, N., Laskin, A., and Pratt, K. A.: Biogenic,
urban, and wildfire influences on the molecular composition of dissolved
organic compounds in cloud water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15167–15180,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15167-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Takahama, S., Äijälä, M., Ehn,
M., Junninen, H., Rinne, J., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Vogel, A. L.,
Hoffmann, T., Ebben, C. J., Geiger, F. M., Chhabra, P., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Worsnop, D. R., Song, W., Auld, J., and Williams, J.: Biogenic and biomass
burning organic aerosol in a boreal forest at Hyytiälä, Finland,
during HUMPPA-COPEC 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12233–12256,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12233-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12233-2013</a> , 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Crahan, K. K., Hegg, D., Covert, D. S., and Jonsson, H.: An exploration of
aqueous oxalic acid production in the coastal marine atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 38, 3757–3764, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.009</a> , 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
DeRieux, W.-S. W., Li, Y., Lin, P., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., Bertram, A. K.,
Nizkorodov, S. A., and Shiraiwa, M.: Predicting the glass transition
temperature and viscosity of secondary organic material using molecular
composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6331–6351,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6331-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6331-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X., Lee, T., Wang, X., Wang, T., and Collett,
J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by agricultural
biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7389–7399,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N., Epstein, S., Pandis, S., and Robinson, A.: A two-dimensional
volatility basis set: 1. organic-aerosol mixing thermodynamics, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 3303–3318, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3303-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, F., Liu, X., Yu, T., and Cachier, H.: Identification and estimate of
biomass burning contribution to the urban aerosol organic carbon
concentrations in Beijing, Atmos. Env., 38, 1275–1282,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.037</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Dunlea, E. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Aiken, A. C., Kimmel, J. R., Peltier, R. E.,
Weber, R. J., Tomlinson, J., Collins, D. R., Shinozuka, Y., McNaughton, C.
S., Howell, S. G., Clarke, A. D., Emmons, L. K., Apel, E. C., Pfister, G. G.,
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Millet, D. B., Heald, C. L., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Evolution of Asian aerosols during transpacific transport in INTEX-B,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7257–7287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7257-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7257-2009</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Džepina, K., Mazzoleni, C., Fialho, P., China, S., Zhang, B., Owen, R.
C., Helmig, D., Hueber, J., Kumar, S., Perlinger, J. A., Kramer, L. J.,
Dziobak, M. P., Ampadu, M. T., Olsen, S., Wuebbles, D. J., and Mazzoleni, L.
R.: Molecular characterization of free tropospheric aerosol collected at the
Pico Mountain Observatory: a case study with a long-range transported biomass
burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5047–5068,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5047-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Carlton, A. G., Turpin B. J., Altieri, K. E., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
and Feingold, G.: Secondary organic aerosol yields from cloud-processing of
isoprene oxidation products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031828</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Fialho, P., Hansen, A. D. A., and Honrath, R. E.: Absorption coefficients by
aerosols in remote areas: a new approach to decouple dust and black carbon
absorption coefficients using seven-wavelength Aethalometer data, J. Aerosol
Sci., 36, 267–282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.09.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.09.004</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Forrister, H., Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Ziemba, L., Thornhill, K. L.,
Anderson, B., Diskin, G., Perring, A. E., Schwarz, J. P., Campuzano-Jost, P.,
Day, D. A., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.:
Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
4623–4630, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063897" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063897</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
George, I. J. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of atmospheric
aerosol particles by gas-phase radicals, Nat. Chem., 2, 713–722,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.806</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Helmig, D., Muoz, M., Hueber, J., Mazzoleni, C., Mazzoleni, L., Owen, R. C.,
Val-Martin, M., Fialho, P., Plass-Duelmer, C., Palmer, P. I., Lewis, A. C.,
and Pfister G.: Climatology and atmospheric chemistry of the non-methane
hydrocarbons ethane and propane over the North Atlantic, Elem. Sci. Anth., 3,
000054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000054</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Herzsprung, P., Hertkorn, N., Tümpling, W., Harir, M., Friese, K., and
Schmitt-Kopplin, P.: Understanding molecular formula assignment of Fourier
transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry data of natural organic
matter from a chemical point of view, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 406, 7977–7987,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8249-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8249-y</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hinks, M., Brady, M., Lignell, H., Song, M., Grayson, J., Bertram, A., Lin,
P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S.: Effect of viscosity on
photodegradation rates in complex secondary organic aerosol materials, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 8785–8793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp05226b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp05226b</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Hoyle, C. R., Fuchs, C., Järvinen, E., Saathoff, H., Dias, A., Haddad, I.
E., Gysel, M., Coburn, S. C., Tröstl, J., Bernhammer, A.-K., Bianchi, F.,
Breitenlechner, M., Corbin, J. C., Craven, J., Donahue, N. M., Duplissy, J.,
Ehrhart, S., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Höppel, N., Heinritzi, M.,
Kristensen, T. B., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Pinterich, T., Prévôt,
A. S. H., Simon, M., Slowik, J. G., Steiner, G., Tomé, A., Vogel, A. L.,
Volkamer, R., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, R., Wexler, A. S., Williamson, C.,
Winkler, P. M., Yan, C., Amorim, A., Dommen, J., Curtius, J., Gallagher, M.
W., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Möhler, O.,
Stratmann, F., Worsnop, D. R., and Baltensperger, U.: Aqueous phase oxidation
of sulphur dioxide by ozone in cloud droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
1693–1712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1693-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1693-2016</a> , 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K., Cao, J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K.
R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P., Wolf, R., Pieber,
S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski,
M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S.,
Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prevot, A. S. H.: High secondary
aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China,
Nature, 514, 13774, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Boege, O., Graefe, R., and Herrmann, H.: Methyl-Nitrocatechols:
Atmospheric Tracer Compounds for Biomass Burning Secondary Organic Aerosols,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8453–8459, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102938a</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y,
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M.,
Džepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C.,
Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C.
E., Baltensperger U., and Worsnop D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the
Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones,
L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie M., and van der
Werf, G. R.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire
assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences,
9, 527–554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kido-Soule, M., Longnecker, K., Giovannoni, S., and Kujawinski, E.: Impact of
instrument and experiment parameters on reproducibility of ultrahigh
resolution ESI FT-ICR mass spectra of natural organic matter, Org. Geochem.,
41, 725–733, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.05.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.05.017</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kirpes, R. M., Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin,
A., Ault, A. P., and Pratt, K. A.: Secondary sulfate is internally mixed with
sea spray aerosol and organic aerosol in the winter Arctic, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 3937–3949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3937-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3937-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kleissl, J., Honrath, R. E., Dziobak, M. P., Tanner, D., Val Martín, M.,
Owen, R. C., and Helmig, D.: Occurrence of upslope flows at the Pico
mountaintop observatory: A case study of orographic flows on a small,
volcanic island, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007565" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007565</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, B. P. and Dittmar, T.: From mass to structure: an aromaticity index for
high-resolution mass data of natural organic matter, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp.,
20, 926–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2386</a>, 2006
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, B. P. and Dittmar, T.: From mass to structure: an aromaticity index for
high-resolution mass data of natural organic matter, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp.,
30, p. 250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7433" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7433</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition
and phase state of organic compounds: dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 13, 19238–19255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp22617g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp22617g</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., Bluhm,
H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Carbon
oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of atmospheric
organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lai, C., Liu, Y., Ma, J., Ma, Q., and He, H.: Degradation kinetics of
levoglucosan initiated by hydroxyl radical under different environmental
conditions, Atmos. Environ., 91, 32–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.054</a> ,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Laing, J. R., Jaffe, D. A., and Hee, J. R.: Physical and optical properties
of aged biomass burning aerosol from wildfires in Siberia and the Western USA
at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15185–15197,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15185-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P.,
Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Worsnop, D. R., Brune, W. H., and Davidovits,
P.: Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized primary
organic aerosol (OPOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8913–8928,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011</a>, 2011
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown
Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, A. K. Y., Herckes, P., Leaitch, W. R., Macdonald, A. M., and Abbatt, J.
P. D.: Aqueous OH oxidation of ambient organic aerosol and cloud water
organics: Formation of highly oxidized products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047439</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Levin, E., McMeeking, G. R., Carrico, C. M., Mack, L. E., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
Wold, C. E., Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Hao, W. M., Collett, J. L.,
and Malm, W. C.: Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties measured during
Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 115,
1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013601</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Pöschl, U., and Shiraiwa, M.: Molecular corridors and
parameterizations of volatility in the chemical evolution of organic
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3327–3344,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3327-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Lignell, H., Hinks, M., and Nizkorodov, S.: Exploring matrix effects on
photochemistry of organic aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
13780–13785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322106111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322106111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., Perri, M. J., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10521–10539,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010</a> , 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A.,
and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass Burning
Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S. and Liang, X.: Observed Diurnal Cycle Climatology of Planetary
Boundary Layer Height, J. Climate, 23, 5790–5809,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3552.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3552.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Huey, L. G., Yokelson, R. J., Selimovic, V., Simpson, I. J.,
Müller, M., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Beyersdorf, A. J., Blake,
D. R., Butterfield, Z., Choi, Y., Crounse, J. D., Day, D. A., Diskin, G. S.,
Dubey, M. K., Fortner, E., Hanisco, T. F., Hu, W., King, L. E., Kleinman, L.,
Meinardi, S., Mikoviny, T., Onasch, T. B., Palm, B. B., Peischl, J., Pollack,
I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Sachse, G. W., Sedlacek, A. J., Shilling, J. E.,
Springston, S., Clair, J., Tanner, D. J., Teng, A. P., Wennberg, P. O.,
Wisthaler, A., and Wolfe, G. M.: Airborne measurements of western US
wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality
implications, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 122, 6108–6129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026315" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026315</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Ehn, M.,
Mikkilä, J., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J.
T., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits,
P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Relationship between aerosol oxidation level and
hygroscopic properties of laboratory generated secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl045258" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl045258</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Mazzoleni, L. R., Ehrmann, B. M., Shen, X., Marshall, A. G., and Collett, J.
L.: Water-Soluble Atmospheric Organic Matter in Fog: Exact Masses and
Chemical Formula Identification by Ultrahigh-Resolution Fourier Transform Ion
Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
3690–3697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es903409k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es903409k</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Mazzoleni, L. R., Saranjampour, P., Dalbec, M. M., Samburova, V., Hallar, A.
G., Zielinska, B., Lowenthal, D. H., and Kohl, S.: Identification of
water-soluble organic carbon in non-urban aerosols using ultrahigh-resolution
FT-ICR mass spectrometry: organic anions, Environ. Chem., 9, 285–297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/en11167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/en11167</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. V., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Pike, M., and Carlton, A. G.:
Liquid Water: Ubiquitous Contributor to Aerosol Mass, Environ. Sci. Technol.
Lett., 3, 257–263, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00167</a> , 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
O'Brien, R. E., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Liu, S., Weber, R., Russell, L. M.,
and Goldstein, A. H.: Molecular characterization of organic aerosol using
nanospray desorption/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: CalNex 2010
field study, Atmos. Environ., 68, 265–272,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.056</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Olivier, J. G. J. and Berdowski, J. J. M.: Global emissions sources and
sinks, in: The Climate System, edited by: Berdowski, J., Guicherit, R., and
Heij, B. J., A.A. Balkema Publishers/Swets &amp; Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse,
the Netherlands, 33–78, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Perraudin, E., Budzinski, H., and Villenave, E.: Kinetic Study of the
Reactions of Ozone with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Adsorbed on
Atmospheric Model Particles, J. Atmos. Chem., 56, 57–82,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9042-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-9042-x</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Pfister, G. G., Emmons, L. K., Hess, P. G., Honrath, R. E., Lamarque, J. F.,
Val Martin, M., Owen, R. C., Avery, M. A., Browell, E. V., Holloway, J. S.,
Nedelec, P., Purvis, R., Ryerson, T. B., Sachse, G. W., and Schlager, H.:
Ozone production from the 2004 North American boreal fires, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 111, D24S07, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007695" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007695</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Composition, Transformation, Climate
and Health Effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 44, 7520–7540,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Putman, A. L., Offenberg, J. H., Fisseha, R., Kundu, S., Rahn, T. A., and
Mazzoleni, L. R.: Ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry
characterization of <i>α</i>-pinene ozonolysis SOA, Atmos. Env., 46,
164–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.003</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K., Collins, D. B., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Bates, T.
S.: Chemistry and Related Properties of Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4383–4399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500713g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500713g</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Rémillard, J., Kollias, P., Luke, E., and Wood, R.: Marine Boundary Layer
Cloud Observations in the Azores, J. Climate, 25, 7381–7398,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00610.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00610.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Schmitt-Koppli, P., Gelencsìr, A., Dabek-Zlotorzynsk, E., Kis, G.,
Hertkor, N., Harir, M., Hon, Y., and Gebefüg, I.: Analysis of he
Unresolved Organic Fraction in Atmospheric Aerosols with Ultrahigh-Resolution
Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Organosulfates
As Photochemical Smog Constituents, Anal. Chem., 82, 8017–8026,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101444r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101444r</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Liger-Belair, G., Koch, B., Flerus, R., Kattner, G.,
Harir, M., Kanawati, B., Lucio, M., Tziotis, D., Hertkorn, N., and
Gebefügi, I.: Dissolved organic matter in sea spray: a transfer study
from marine surface water to aerosols, Biogeosciences, 9, 1571–1582,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1571-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Schum, S. K. and Mazzoleni, L. R.: Ultrahigh resolution FT-ICR MS data of
long-range transported free tropospheric aerosol collected at the Pico
Mountain Observatory in the Azores, available at:
<a href="http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/chemistry-fp/88/" target="_blank">http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/chemistry-fp/88/</a>, last access: 26
September 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Seibert, P. and Frank, A.: Source-receptor matrix calculation with a
Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4,
51–63, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Gas uptake and
chemical aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 108, 11003–11008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Li, Y., Tsimpidi, A., Karydis, V., Berkemeier, T., Pandis, S.,
Lelieveld, J., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Global distribution of particle
phase state in atmospheric secondary organic aerosols, Nat. Commun., 8,
15002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15002</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Lou, S., Zelenyuk, A., Easter, R., Corley, R., Thrall, B.,
Rasch, P., Fast, J., Simonich, S., Shen, H., and Tao, S.: Global long-range
transport and lung cancer risk from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons shielded
by coatings of organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 1246–1251,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618475114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618475114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060582" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060582</a> , 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Sorooshian, A., Lu, M.-L., Brechtel, F., Jonsson, H., Feingold, G., Flagan,
R., and Seinfeld, J.: On the Source of Organic Acid Aerosol Layers above
Clouds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4647–4654, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0630442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0630442</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Tu, P., Hall, W., and Johnston, M.: Characterization of Highly Oxidized
Molecules in Fresh and Aged Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, Anal. Chem.,
88, 4495–4501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00378</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
US Air Quality: Smog Blog, available at: <a href="http://alg.umbc.edu" target="_blank">http://alg.umbc.edu</a>, last
access: 9 January 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Vakkari, V., Kerminen, V., Beukes, J., Tiitta, P., Zyl, P., Josipovic, M.,
Venter, A., Jaars, K., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., and Laakso, L.: Rapid
changes in biomass burning aerosols by atmospheric oxidation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2644–2651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059396" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059396</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Val Martin, M., Honrath, R., Owen, R., Pfister, G., Fialho, P., and Barata,
F.: Significant enhancements of nitrogen oxides, black carbon, and ozone in
the North Atlantic lower free troposphere resulting from North American
boreal wildfires, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D23S60,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007530</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Val Martin, M., Honrath, R., Owen, R., and Lapina, K.: Large-scale impacts of
anthropogenic pollution and boreal wildfires on the nitrogen oxides over the
central North Atlantic region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D17308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009689</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Val Martin, M., Honrath, R., Owen, R., and Li, Q.: Seasonal variation of
nitrogen oxides in the central North Atlantic lower free troposphere, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D17307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009688" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009688</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Val Martin, M., Logan, J. A., Kahn, R. A., Leung, F.-Y., Nelson, D. L., and
Diner, D. J.: Smoke injection heights from fires in North America: analysis
of 5 years of satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1491–1510,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1491-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1491-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Virtanen, A., Joutsensaari, J., Koop, T., Kannosto, J., Yli-Pirilä, P.,
Leskinen, J., Mäkelä, J., Holopainen, J., Pöschl, U., Kulmala,
M., Worsnop, D., and Laaksonen, A.: An amorphous solid state of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol particles, Nature, 467,09455,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09455</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, A., Äijälä, M., Corrigan, A., Junninen, H., Ehn, M.,
Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., Russell, L., Williams, J., and
Hoffmann, T.: In situ submicron organic aerosol characterization at a boreal
forest research station during HUMPPA-COPEC 2010 using soft and hard
ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10933–10950,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10933-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10933-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Jimenez, J. L., San Martini, F., Džepina, K., Zhang, Q.,
Salcedo, D., Molina, L. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher
than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026899</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Ziemann, P., and Molina, M.: Secondary Organic Aerosol
Formation from Acetylene (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>): seed effect on SOA yields due to
organic photochemistry in the aerosol aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
1907–1928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1907-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Walser, M. L., Desyaterik, Y., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S.:
High-resolution mass spectrometric analysis of secondary organic aerosol
produced by ozonation of limonene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 1009–1022,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b712620d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b712620d</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Warneck, P.: In-cloud chemistry opens pathway to the formation of oxalic acid
in the marine atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2423–2427,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00136-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00136-5</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Warneke, C., Bahreini, R., Brioude, J., Brock, C. A., Gouw, J., Fahey, D. W.,
Froyd, K. D., Holloway, J. S., Middlebrook, A., Miller, L., Montzka, S.,
Murphy, D. M., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R.,
and Veres, P.: Biomass burning in Siberia and Kazakhstan as an important
source for haze over the Alaskan Arctic in April 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
36, L02813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036194</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Wozniak, A. S., Willoughby, A. S., Gurganus, S. C., and Hatcher, P. G.:
Distinguishing molecular characteristics of aerosol water soluble organic
matter from the 2011 trans-North Atlantic US GEOTRACES cruise, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 8419–8434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8419-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8419-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, Q., Robinson, E. S., Ding, X., Ye, P., Sullivan, R. C., and Donahue, N.
M.: Mixing of secondary organic aerosols versus relative humidity, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 12649–12654, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604536113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604536113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J. Z., Huang, X., Xu, J., and Hu, M.: When Aerosol Sulfate Goes Up, So
Does Oxalate: Implication for the Formation Mechanisms of Oxalate, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 39, 128–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es049559f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es049559f</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D. G., Wilson, J., Bell, D. M., Suski, K. J.,
Shrivastava, M., Beránek, J., Alexander, M. L., Kramer, A. L., and
Massey-Simonich, S. L.: The effect of gas-phase polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons on the formation and properties of biogenic secondary organic
aerosol particles, Faraday Discuss., 200, 143–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fd00032d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fd00032d</a>,
2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B., Owen, R. C., Perlinger, J. A., Kumar, S., Wu, S., Val Martin, M.,
Kramer, L. Helmig, D., and Honrath, R. E.: A semi-Lagrangian view of ozone
production tendency in North American outflow in the summers of 2009 and
2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2267–2287,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2267-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2267-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B., Owen, R. C., Perlinger, J. A., Helmig, D., Val Martín, M.,
Kramer, L., Mazzoleni, L. R., and Mazzoleni, C.: Ten-year chemical signatures
associated with long-range transport observed in the free troposphere over
the central North Atlantic, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 1–20,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.194</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J., Canagaratna, M., Allan, J., Coe, H., Ulbrich, I.,
Alfarra, M., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A., Sun, Y., Džepina, K., Dunlea,
E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P., Salcedo, D., Onasch, T., Jayne, J., Miyoshi,
T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J.,
Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Williams, P., Bower,
K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Rautiainen, J., Sun, J., Zhang,
Y., and Worsnop, D.: Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic
aerosols in anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L13801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029979</a> , 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Hallar, A. G., and Mazzoleni, L. R.: Atmospheric organic matter in
clouds: exact masses and molecular formula identification using
ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
12343–12362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12343-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Zobrist, B., Marcolli, C., Pedernera, D., and Koop, T.: Do atmospheric
aerosols form glasses?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5221–5244,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
