<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-13987-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Composition of ice particle residuals in mixed-phase clouds at Jungfraujoch
(Switzerland): enrichment and depletion of<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> particle groups relative to total
aerosol</article-title><alt-title>Composition of ice particle residuals in mixed-phase clouds</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Composition of ice particle residuals in mixed-phase clouds}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Eriksen Hammer et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Eriksen Hammer</surname><given-names>Stine</given-names></name>
          <email>sehammer@geo.tu-darmstadt.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Mertes</surname><given-names>Stephan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-3973</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ebert</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kandler</surname><given-names>Konrad</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weinbruch</surname><given-names>Stephan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Applied Geosciences, Darmstadt University of Technology,
Schnittspahnstraße 9, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Leibniz-Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstraße 15,
04318 Leipzig, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Particle Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry,
Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Stine Eriksen Hammer (sehammer@geo.tu-darmstadt.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>13987</fpage><lpage>14003</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e141">Ice particle residuals (IRs) and the total aerosol particle population were
sampled in parallel during mixed-phase cloud events at the high-altitude
research station Jungfraujoch in January–February 2017. Particles were
sampled behind an ice-selective counterflow impactor (Ice-CVI) for IRs and a
heated total inlet for the total aerosol particles. A dilution set-up was
used to collect total particles with the same sampling duration as for IRs to
prevent overloading of the substrates. About 4000 particles from 10 Ice-CVI
samples (from 7 days of cloud events at temperatures at the site between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) were analysed and classified with
operator-controlled scanning electron microscopy. Contamination particles
(identified by their chemical composition), most likely originating from
abrasion in the Ice-CVI and collection of secondary ice, were excluded from
further analysis. Approximately 3000 total aerosol particles (IRs and
interstitial particles) from 5 days in clouds were also analysed. Enrichment
and depletion of the different particle groups (within the IR fraction
relative to the total aerosol reservoir) are presented as an odds ratio
relative to alumosilicate (particles only
consisting of Al, Si, and O), which was chosen as reference due to the large
enrichment of this group relative to total aerosol and the relatively high
number concentration of this group in both total aerosol and the IR samples.
Complex secondary particles and soot are the major particle groups in the
total aerosol samples but are not found in the IR fraction and are hence
strongly depleted. C-rich particles (most likely organic particles) showed a
smaller enrichment compared to aluminosilicates by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
particle groups with enrichment similar to aluminosilicate are silica, Fe
aluminosilicates, Ca-rich particles, Ca sulfates, sea-salt-containing
particles, and metal/metal oxide. Other aluminosilicates – consisting of
variable amounts of Na, K, Ca, Si, Al, O, Ti, and Fe – are somewhat more
enriched (factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Pb-rich particles are more (factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
enriched than aluminosilicates. None of the sampled IR groups showed a temperature or
size dependence in respect to ice activity, which might be due to the limited
sampling temperature interval and the similar size of the particles.
Footprint plots and wind roses could explain the different total aerosol
composition in one sample (carbonaceous particle emission from the
urban/industrial area of Po Valley), but this did not affect the IR
composition. Taking into account the relative abundance of the particle
groups in total aerosol and the ice nucleation ability, we found that silica,
aluminosilicates, and other aluminosilicates were the most important ice particle
residuals at Jungfraujoch during the mixed-phase cloud events in winter 2017.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e211">Mixed-phase clouds are important because they have an impact on the
hydrological cycle and cloud electrification and because they influence the
atmospheric radiation balance (Storelvmo, 2017). Ice-nucleating
particles (INPs) can initiate cloud glaciation, which may cause precipitation (Myhre et al., 2013). The order of
magnitude of the effect from<?pagebreak page13988?> aerosol–cloud interaction on the
“second indirect aerosol effect” and “semi-indirect effect” is still
uncertain (Myhre et al., 2013; Flato et al., 2013; Korolev et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e214">In nature, spontaneous freezing of supersaturated droplets occurs at
temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and a relative humidity with
respect to ice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Kanji et al., 2017), termed
homogeneous ice nucleation (Vali et al., 2015). At higher temperatures, a
surface – like a particle surface – can lower the free energy and thereby
assist the phase transition to ice when relative humidity allows for this,
termed heterogeneous ice nucleation. Heterogeneous ice nucleation can occur
in different hypothesized modes: (1) deposition nucleation, (2) immersion
freezing, (3) contact freezing, and (4) condensation freezing. A detailed
description of the different modes is found elsewhere (Vali et al., 2015; Kanji et al., 2017). Mixed-phase cloud temperature ranges between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Storelvmo, 2017), with immersion and contact freezing as
the dominating ice formation modes (Lohmann and Diehl, 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e267">Ice nucleation ability was studied offline and online in many laboratory
and field experiments as well as by modelling (Hoose et al., 2010; Hoose
and Möhler, 2012; Kanji et al., 2017, and references therein).
Summarized from laboratory studies (Hoose and Möhler,
2012), biological particles seem to dominate the ice activity at higher
temperatures above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, whereas mineral dust is found to be mostly
ice active below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and organic particles and soot nucleate
ice below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C close to homogenous freezing. A model study of
mixed-phase clouds on a global scale by Hoose et al. (2010) shows
that the main component of INPs is mineral dust particles. The findings of
field experiments at different locations globally are presented by Kanji et al. (2017) as a function of nucleation temperature. In this paper only broadly
defined classes are given to characterize the ice nucleation efficiency from
INP concentration in different environments. To summarize, biological
particles from rural areas dominate at higher temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), and marine particles from coastal areas show a lower ice
activity in the higher temperature range than biological particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Particles from Arctic and Antarctic
locations seem to have a relatively high INP abundance between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and particles from areas with biomass burning show
high INP concentrations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.
Mineral-dust-rich regions show particles with the highest ice activity in
the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and these particles
seem to be the most ice-active component. Exact number concentration is
found in Kanji et al. (2017) and references therein. Particle groups
determined based on chemical composition in cirrus clouds are reported as
sulfates, organics, sea salt, mineral dust or fly ash, metal particles,
soot, and biological material in the ice particle residual (IR) fraction (Heintzenberg et al.,
1996; Cziczo et al., 2004, 2013). Twohy and
Poellot (2005) found the highest abundance of salts and industrial particles in
cirrus, followed by crustal, organic and soot particles. In mixed-phase
clouds, at the high-altitude research station Jungfraujoch in Switzerland,
different IR groups were reported to act as ice nuclei. With the use of
electron microscopy and looking at the enrichment relative to interstitial
aerosol, Ebert et al. (2011) interpreted complex secondary aerosol,
Pb-bearing particles, and complex mixtures as ice nuclei. In contrast, Worringen et al. (2015) considered only
particle groups as ice nuclei, which were found with three different
techniques (FINCH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PCVI, Ice-CVI, and ISI). These groups included
silicates, Ca-rich particles, carbonaceous particles, metal/metal oxide, and
soot. Using single-particle mass spectrometry, Schmidt et al. (2017) considered all particles
observed in the IR fraction as INPs (biological, soil dust, minerals, sea
salt/cooking, aged material, engine exhaust, soot, lead-containing particles,
industrial metals, Na- and K-dominated particles, and others). Kamphus et al. (2010) report mineral dust and
fly ash (with and without some volatiles), metallic particles, and black
carbon as the most ice-active particles, measured with two different mass
spectrometers behind the Ice-CVI. Cozic et al. (2008a)
investigated black carbon enrichment with two particle soot absorption photometers simultaneously behind the
Ice-CVI and a total inlet and by aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) and single-particle mass spectrometer (measuring particles between 200 nm and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)
behind the Ice- CVI during cloud events. They concluded, based on the
enrichment, that black carbon is ice active.</p>
      <p id="d1e489">In situ cloud measurements of IRs can be performed with
an aircraft for pure ice clouds, like for cirrus clouds, with the use of a
counterflow virtual impactor (CVI) (Ogren et al., 1985; Heintzenberg et
al., 1996; Ström and Ohlsson, 1998; Twohy et al., 2003; Froyd et al.,
2010; Cziczo and Froyd, 2014; Cziczo et al., 2017) and references therein).
In situ IR sampling in mixed-phase cloud requires an extra step to separate
ice crystals from droplets and has, therefore, up to now been restricted to ground-based measurements. A dedicated inlet system (Ice-CVI) was developed by
Mertes et al. (2007) to sample freshly produced ice particles in mixed-phase
clouds and, after sublimating the ice, deliver the residuals (IRs) to
connected sampling or analysing instruments. As described in Mertes et al. (2007), a residual particle can be interpreted as its original INP only
when sampling small ice crystals. There are three reasons for this size
restriction leading to sampling of rather young ice particles. The first
reason is that only the small ice particles grow by water vapour diffusion;
in contrast, larger ice particles could further grow by riming. Moreover,
larger and older ice particles experience impaction scavenging by
interstitial particles. Both processes add more aerosol particles to the ice
crystal and thus the original INP cannot be identified any more after ice
sublimation in the Ice-CVI. Last is the technical reason that larger ice
particles would shatter and break up at the inner surfaces of the Ice-CVI
sampling system.</p>
      <p id="d1e493">The major aims of our paper are to improve the sampling approach and to
study the variation in IRs in mixed-phase clouds. In contrast to previous
work (Worringen et al., 2015;<?pagebreak page13989?> Ebert et al., 2011; Kamphus et al.,
2010; Schmidt et al., 2017), IR and total aerosol were collected in parallel.
This allows us to examine the ice nucleation efficiency of the various
particle groups and to investigate the dependence on temperature, particle
size, and air mass history.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e507">In January–February 2017 an extensive field campaign was conducted by INUIT
(Ice Nucleation Research Unit funded by the German Research Foundation, DFG)
at the high-altitude research station Jungfraujoch in Switzerland (3580 m a.s.l.). The campaign lasted for 5 weeks with the aim to investigate IRs
from mixed-phase clouds, which are considered to be the original true INPs.
During mixed-phase cloud events, IRs were separated from other cloud
constituents like interstitial aerosol particles, supercooled droplets, and
large ice aggregates by use of the Ice-CVI (Mertes et al., 2007). Total
aerosol particles (interstitial particles and IRs) were sampled in parallel.
Particles were sampled by the use of multi MINI cascade impactors with the
same design as described in Ebert et al. (2016) and Schütze et al. (2017), but with the use of only one stage with a lower 50 % cut-off
diameter of approximately 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (aerodynamic). The multi MINI cascade
impactor is equipped with purge flow and 5 min flushing of the system was
always performed prior to sampling to avoid carryover of particles from
previous samples. The particles were collected on boron substrates to allow
detection of light elements including carbon (Choël et al., 2005; Ebert
et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Total aerosol sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e523">Total aerosol particles were sampled in parallel to IRs behind a heated
inlet (Weingartner et al., 1999) to study IR enrichment and depletion,
identify contaminants, and characterize the air masses present. Total aerosol
samples were collected with a dilution set-up (Fig. 1) to match the longer
sampling time (up to 5 h) of the Ice-CVI. The dilution unit is built up
by two valves to control the air stream in and out of the system, making it
possible to send air through two filters to dilute the incoming aerosol
flow. Without this dilution, due to the much higher concentration of total
particles, these samples would be overloaded and not suited for single-particle analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e528">Illustration of the dilution unit behind the heated total inlet.
<bold>(a)</bold> An inlet tube attached to the total inlet, <bold>(b)</bold> diluter, <bold>(c)</bold> multi MINI
impactor, <bold>(d)</bold> pump, <bold>(e)</bold> valve to control outflow, <bold>(f)</bold> valve to control air
going back in the system, <bold>(g)</bold> pre-filter (Whatman, Sigma-Aldrich), and <bold>(h)</bold> main
filter (Millipore, Sigma-Aldrich). Arrows indicate the air flow direction.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Ice-CVI</title>
      <p id="d1e568">The Ice-CVI is a modified counterflow virtual impactor which can separate
freshly formed ice particles in mixed-phase clouds; for details see Mertes et al. (2007). The inlet consists of several
components to separate: (a) large precipitating ice crystals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m by the 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inlet, (b) large ice particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m with a virtual impactor, (c) supercooled droplets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m with two cold impaction plates where the droplets freeze and the
ice crystals bounce off, and (d) interstitial particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, which are removed by a counterflow virtual impactor.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Scanning electron microscopy</title>
      <p id="d1e655">Size, morphology, chemical composition, and mixing state of IRs and total
aerosol particles were investigated by scanning electron microscopy using a
FEI Quanta 400 ESEM FEG instrument (FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands)
equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray detector (Oxford, Oxfordshire,
UK). All analyses were carried out manually, referred to as
operator-controlled scanning electron microscopy (SEM) instrument, using an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and a sample
chamber pressure of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mbar. The multipoint feature
“point&amp;ID” in the Oxford software Aztec (version 3.3 SP1) was used for
the operator-controlled single-particle analysis. On each sample, about 500
particles were measured with 5 s of counting time for X-ray
microanalysis. To ensure unbiased results, all particles in an image frame
with an equivalent projected area diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm were investigated.
The particles were classified based on chemical composition, mixing state,
morphology, and stability under the electron beam. Classification criteria
and possible sources are given in Table 1. Particles that could not be
assigned to any of the defined classes were grouped as “other”. This group
contains for example Mg-rich, Zn-rich, and Ag-containing particles. Four
groups are interpreted as contamination particles: pure salt, alumina,
and Cu-rich and Ni-rich particles.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e689">Classification criteria and possible sources/explanations for
particle groups for both total aerosol and ice particle residuals.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="82pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="100pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="160pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Group</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Major elements</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Morphology/ <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>beam stability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Source/particle explanation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Chain-like or more com-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>pact agglomerates of pri-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>mary particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Combustion, black carbon</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-rich particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No soot morphology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Organic aerosol, biomass burning<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>biological<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Complex secondary<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No X-ray spectra or <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>S peak</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Most particles evaporating, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>some relatively stable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfur-rich secondary organic aerosol;<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>might also contain a substantial fraction of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>nitrates and other organics</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aged – sea salt <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Na, S (sometimes small amount of Cl and Mg) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Relatively stable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Marine aerosol, sea spray, might contain<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>organics</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mixed – sea salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Na, S (sometimes small amount of Cl and Mg) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral composition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Marine aerosol mixed with mineral particles. Might contain organics.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca-rich particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ca, C, O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mineral particles, calcium carbonates,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>e.g. calcite</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca sulfate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ca, S, O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mineral particles, e.g. gypsum and anhydrite</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Silica</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Si, O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mineral particles, e.g. quartz</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aluminosilicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Al, Si, O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mineral particles, e.g. kaolinite</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe aluminosilicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Al, Si, Fe, O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mineral particles, e.g. almandine</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other aluminosilicates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Variable amounts of Na, K, Ca, Si, Al, O, Ti, and Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mineral particles, e.g. feldspars, illite, and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>smectite (montmorillonite)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Metal/metal oxides</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fe, O or Ti, O or Fe, Cr, Mn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fly ash was detected as<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>spherical particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mineral particles like hematite, magnetite,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>and rutile, or steel particles (alloys)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pb-rich particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pb, or Pb, Cl <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Single particle or inclusions within particle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Helicopters and small aircrafts, previously reported at Jungfraujoch</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particles which do not<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>meet the classification<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>criteria above</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alumina<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Al, O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Artefact, Ice-CVI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ni-rich particles<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ni</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Artefact, Ice-CVI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cu-rich particles<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Artefact, particle substrate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pure salt<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Na, Cl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Artefact, hypothesized from secondary ice<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>processes, e.g. crystal break-up, marine<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>origin<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e692"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Most likely contamination. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Uncertain origin because the chemical characterization and/or
morphology was not typical for this particle group.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1126">Temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and sampling times in February 2017 behind
Ice-CVI and total inlet. Sample numbers are given above the bars. Blue bars
indicate sampling periods with parallel samples, and green bars periods for which
only IR samples could be analysed. Temperature data were received from the
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology (MeteoSwiss;
<uri>https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch</uri>, last access: 17 October 2017 ).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page13990?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Sampling days, meteorology, and footprint plots</title>
      <p id="d1e1154">During 7 days, 10 Ice-CVI samples were taken in clouds at site
temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Sampling day, time, and site
temperatures are presented in Fig. 2 and as a table in the electronic
Supplement (Table S1). Temperatures were measured at the station and can
differ from the onset ice nucleation temperature of the particles depending on
where in the mixed phase cloud nucleation occurred. Six parallel total
aerosol samples were successfully collected. The<?pagebreak page13991?> other four total samples
are either overloaded or do not have enough particles on the substrate.</p>
      <p id="d1e1186">During the whole campaign, north-easterly and south-westerly winds were the
dominating local wind directions in accordance with the topography at
Jungfraujoch. Footprint plots, showing the probable air mass residence time
at the surface, were calculated with the FLEXPART model (Stohl et al.,
1998, 2005; Stohl and Thomson, 1999; Seibert and Frank, 2004).
These plots are calculated with 10-day back trajectories and a potential
emission sensitivity to determine the probable emission region of the
particles arriving at Jungfraujoch. Wind roses and footprint plots are
presented in Fig. 3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1191">Wind rose <bold>(a)</bold> and footprint plots <bold>(b)</bold> calculated with the
FLEXPART model, <uri>http://lagrange.empa.ch/FLEXPART_browser/</uri> (last access: 17 January 2018)
(Stohl et al., 1998, 2005; Stohl and Thomson, 1999; Seibert and Frank, 2004). Horizontal wind direction and speed were obtained from the
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology (MeteoSwiss;
<uri>https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch</uri>, last access: 17 October 2017).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Methodological problems</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS1">
  <title>Sampling artefacts</title>
      <p id="d1e1223">The observed alumina, pure salt, and Ni-rich and Cu-rich particles are
regarded as sampling artefacts. The IR samples are heavily loaded with
artefacts (40 %–78 % of the particles – alumina, Ni-rich particles,
and pure salt) easily characterized and removed in further analysis. The
Cu-rich particles are a part of the substrates and can in principle be found
in both IR samples and total aerosol samples. Alumina particles are found in
all IR samples at relative
high number abundances between 25 % and 70 %, despite the fact that
the Ice-CVI was coated before the present campaign with Ni to avoid this
contamination. The relative abundance of alumina particles in IR samples is
higher in our campaign compared to two previous campaigns at Jungfraujoch
using the same instrumentation but without the Ni coating of the Ice-CVI
(Ebert et al., 2011; Worringen et al., 2015). This might be explained by the
fact that we only focused on the sub-micrometer particles and/ or the
difference in meteorology, sample time, and particle load all influencing the
relative composition of contamination particles. In contrast to previous
work, we sampled IR and total aerosol in parallel to be able to clearly
distinguish instrumental artefacts from IRs. As we did not detect a single
alumina particle in total aerosol samples, this particle group is regarded as
contamination. Alumina particles are easily recognized and were subtracted
from the real IRs. Nevertheless, their presence helped substantially to
locate the impaction spot on the boron substrates.</p>
      <?pagebreak page13993?><p id="d1e1226">Secondary ice processes can produce ice crystals in the critical size range
selected by the Ice-CVI. The low temperature during sampling does not
support the Hallett–Mossop process (Hallett and Mossop, 1974)
regarding rime splintering, but other secondary processes producing ice
crystals like ice-crystal break-up, blown snow, or crystal–crystal collisions
in the critical size range are plausible (Mertes et al.,
2007). We hypothesize that pure salt is an artefact due to sampling of the
mentioned secondary ice production processes in clouds. The presence of
sodium and chloride in ice crystals previously acting as cloud condensation
nuclei can later form solid NaCl in line or on the substrate after
evaporation of water. This hypothesis is inconclusive because pure salt is
not observed in the total aerosol fraction, where only aged and mixed salt
are present. This might be explained by evaporation of ice crystals in the
heated inlet and the longer sampling line and the relatively low number
concentration of these particles compared to the dominating groups (soot and
complex secondary particles) in the total aerosol samples. It should be
mentioned here that sea salt was considered to be an artefact in the IR
fraction by Worringen et al. (2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e1229">A few Ni-rich particles (1 %–7 % relative by number) were encountered in
the IR fraction but not in the total aerosol. The Ni-rich particles most
likely stem from the Ni coating of some parts of the Ice-CVI. The few
Cu-rich particles found, in both total aerosol and the IR samples, are from
the boron substrate in which boron is embedded in copper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS2">
  <title>Accuracy of particle group abundance</title>
      <p id="d1e1238">Accuracy of the particle group abundance depends on three different factors:
(1) separation of IR from the rest of the aerosol particles by the Ice-CVI
and deposition losses behind both inlets, (2) detection of particles in SEM,
and (3) the classification procedure. Sampling issues like abrasion,
deposition losses, and ice crystal break-up may occur in the Ice-CVI (Mertes et al., 2007). Abrasion particles were easily
recognized as discussed in the previous paragraph. Sampling of secondary ice
may have led to the relatively high abundance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–28 %)
of pure salt particles in the IR fraction discussed in the previous
paragraph. As we regard pure salt particles as an artefact, they are not
included in the sea-salt-containing particle group. Deposition loss can
generally not be excluded. Three of the total aerosol samples (S-3b, S-4b,
and S-6b) are sampled under conditions in which the concentration (measured
with condensation particle counters) of the total inlet was lower than the
interstitial inlet. There are two possible explanations for this: deposition
loss in the total aerosol inlet and/or a leak in the interstitial inlet. The
relative abundance of the different particle groups in these samples is
however comparable to previous findings at Jungfraujoch (Cozic et al.,
2008b; Kamphus et al., 2010; Fröhlich et al., 2015). A possible deposition
loss leading to systematic bias in the concentration measurements does not
seem to change the relative abundance of the different particle groups. Our
conclusions are thus not affected as we do not discuss number
concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1251">For most particle groups we do not expect to have significant detection
artefacts in SEM. These particle groups are detected with high efficiency,
in both the total aerosol as well as the IR fraction. However, C-rich
particles and soot may be interchanged in total aerosol samples because the
image quality can be reduced by evaporating complex secondary particles,
leading to less efficient detection of carbonaceous species, which have a low
contrast in SEM images. Usually, evaporation of complex secondary particles
is not a problem because the particles are observed at the start of
analysis. Nevertheless, in one sample, complex secondary particles were lost
prior to observation because this sample was erroneously left in the chamber
for a longer time before it was analysed. However, these effects seem to be
small because we have observed an abundance of carbonaceous
particles and complex secondary aerosol particles (in total aerosol) comparable to in
previous work (Cozic et al., 2008b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1254">The classification criteria used (Table 1) may lead to problems for small
(below approximately 150 nm equivalent projected area diameter) carbonaceous
particles. Due to the limited lateral resolution of the instrument, the
typical morphology of soot may not be recognized for small particles. In
this case, soot would be misclassified as C-rich particles. Still, the sum
of both particle groups should be accurate. However, this problem is only
significant for the total aerosol samples because evaporating secondary
aerosol in these samples leads to deterioration of the image quality.
Misclassification of soot as C-rich particles would imply that soot is even
more depleted in the IR fraction.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1264">To calculate enrichment and depletion of the different particle groups in
the IR fraction relative to total aerosol, all particle group abundances are
normalized to the abundance of the aluminosilicate group. We have chosen this
group as a reference as it has the highest relative abundance in both the IR
samples and the total aerosol. We do not show a simple ratio of proportions
(e.g. proportion of aluminosilicates in IRs divided by proportion of this
group in total aerosol) because the proportion is constrained to values
between 0 and 1. This is generally referred to as closed data (Aitchison, 2003; Van den Boogaart and Tolosana-Delgado, 2013) and
implies that only ratios of two groups can be interpreted (i.e. not the
proportion of one group alone). Furthermore, we do not discuss differences
in proportions between IR and total aerosol as in Ebert et al. (2011), as this difference is strongly dependent on the relative
abundance of a particle group. To overcome these problems, only
aluminosilicate normalized particle group abundances are used to quantify
enrichment/depletion of a particle group in the IR fraction. This measure
is termed odds ratio in the statistical literature.</p>
      <p id="d1e1267">The odds ratios (OR) is calculated in the following way:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AlSi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AlSi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the absolute number of particles in particle group i,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AlSi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the absolute number of particles in the group of aluminosilicates
in both IR and the total aerosol fraction. For particle groups which did not
contain a single particle, one particle (which is the detection limit) was
added to the respective group in order to calculate an odds ratio. For these
groups the odds ratios shown in Fig. 8 represent an upper or lower limit. The odds ratios represent enrichment or depletion of a particle
group normalized to aluminosilicates when the IR fraction is compared to the
total aerosol. Enrichment relative to aluminosilicates is discussed for each
group that is present in the IR. The two groups of complex secondary
particles and soot are interpreted as depleted because these<?pagebreak page13994?> particles are
not found in the IR fraction. These two particle groups are hence depleted
compared to aluminosilicates and absolutely depleted compared to total aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e1347">The Fisher test was applied to estimate confidence intervals for the odds
ratio and was calculated with RStudio (RStudioTeam, 2016). Figures 5,
7, and 8 are plotted in RStudio with the package “ggplot2” (Wickham, 2009). Wind roses (Fig. 3) were plotted with the RStudio
package “openair” (Carlslaw and Ropkins, 2012).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Total aerosol</title>
      <p id="d1e1362">Particle groups observed in the total aerosol samples include complex
secondary particles, soot, C-rich particles, Ca-rich particles, Ca sulfates, silica,
aluminosilicates, Fe aluminosilicates, other aluminosilicates, metal/metal oxide,
sea-salt-containing particles (aged and mixed), and other particles (Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1367">Relative number abundance of the different particle groups within
total aerosol samples. Sample S-2b shows a combustion event with air mass
history from the Po Valley, and sample S-5b is influenced by an analytical
artefact from particle loss of volatile particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1378">Size of total aerosol particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1388">A few fly ash particles were detected in the metal/metal oxides group. In
addition, one group of artefact particles (Cu-rich particles) originating from the
substrate was found and excluded from further analysis. Four of the six
samples are dominated by secondary aerosol, which consists of sulfates and
highly instable particles (under vacuum and/or electron bombardment) for
which no X-ray spectrum could be obtained. Still, remains of these particles
are easily seen in the secondary electron images. The highly instable
particles are classified based on the fact that they evaporated during the
operator-controlled X-ray analysis. In contrast to the IR fraction, we
observed two groups of carbonaceous particles. Carbon-dominated particles
without typical morphology are classified as C-rich particles (Fig. S1).
Chain-like or more compacted agglomerates of spherical primary carbonaceous
particles are interpreted as soot in accordance with previous literature,
e.g. Wentzel et al. (2003), Buseck et al. (2014), and Weinbruch et al. (2018).
Sample S-2b was taken during night-time and consists of two separate samples
directly taken one after the other (for 3 h each). The unusually high
abundance of carbonaceous particles within this sample most likely results
from urban/industrial sources of the Po Valley seen in the footprint plot
(Fig. 3). Sample S-5b shows a high relative abundance of mineral particles,
which may be the result of having lost complex secondary particles in the
instrument, as this sample was exposed to the vacuum of the electron
microscope for a much longer time than the other samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e1391">Most of the total aerosol particles have a geometric diameter below 500 nm
(Fig. 5). The mineral groups of aluminosilicates, Fe aluminosilicates, and
other aluminosilicates are somewhat larger than the rest of the particle
groups. The size distribution (dNdlogD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. particle diameter) is shown
in the electronic Supplement (Fig. S3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Ice particle residuals</title>
      <p id="d1e1409">The following particle groups were observed in the IR samples (Fig. 6):
minerals (silica, aluminosilicates, Fe aluminosilicates, other aluminosilicates,
Ca sulfates, and Ca-rich particles), sea-salt-containing particles (aged and mixed
salt), C-rich particles, Pb-rich particles, metal/metal oxide, and other particles. In addition,
four groups of sampling artefacts were found: pure salt, alumina, and Ni-rich
and Cu-rich particles. The sampling artefacts are regarded as contamination
(see Sect. 2.6.) and are thus not included in the figures. Composition
including contamination particles is given in the electronic Supplement
(Fig. S5).</p>
      <p id="d1e1412">Mineral particles are of highest relative abundance (between 60 % and 90 %
by number) in all samples (Fig. 6), and mainly consist of silica,
aluminosilicates, and other aluminosilicates, as well as smaller fractions of
Fe aluminosilicates, Ca sulfates, and Ca-rich particles. A small percentage
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % by number) of Pb-rich particles – PbCl or particles
containing heterogeneous Pb inclusions – are found in eight of the samples.
Sea-salt-containing particles are present in all samples in variable amounts
of
up to 12 %. The C-rich particles observed in the IR fraction can be
excluded from soot because they do not show the typical morphology of
chain-like or more compacted agglomerates of primary particles (see Fig. S1). Instead, these particles are most probably organic
particles. The group of metal/metal oxide particles includes
Fe oxides/hydroxides, Ti oxides, and steel particles (Fe, Cr, Mn alloys).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1427">Relative number abundance of the different particle groups of IR
sampled in mixed-phase clouds at site temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Sampling artefacts (pure salt, alumina, and Ni-rich and
Cu-rich particles) are not shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1468">Size of IRs. Three outliers of other aluminosilicates are shown (2.7, 2.9, and 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1484">Most IRs have an equivalent projected area diameter below 500 nm (Fig. 7).
The groups of Fe aluminosilicates and other aluminosilicates are somewhat larger
and show a higher variation than the rest of the particle groups. The size
distribution (dNdlogD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. particle diameter) is shown in the
electronic Supplement in Fig. S4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>IR vs. total aerosol</title>
      <p id="d1e1502">For six sample pairs (simultaneous sampling of total aerosol and IR) the
enrichment or depletion of the particle groups compared to aluminosilicates is
shown in Fig. 8 as the odds ratio. Complex secondary particles and soot are
always strongly depleted in the IR fraction, as not a single particle of
both groups was observed as IR. An upper limit for the depletion relative to
aluminosilicates can be obtained by setting the number of particles in the IR
fraction for both groups equal to 1 (the detection limit). With this
assumption it can be seen that soot is depleted in the IR fraction relative
to aluminosilicates by at least a factor of 700 and secondary aerosol particles
by a factor of at least 4200. Both particle groups are also depleted in the
IR fraction relative to total aerosol. C-rich particles are less enriched in
the IR fraction than aluminosilicates by a factor of approximately 20.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1507">Enrichment or depletion of the different particle groups within the
IR fraction expressed as the odds ratio (see text for details). The 95 %
confidence interval (CI) of the odds ratio is shown as error bars. For soot
and complex secondary particles the lower limit of the CI, and for Pb-rich
particles the upper limit of the CI, cannot be defined precisely due to
counting statistics. Thus they are marked by arrows.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/13987/2018/acp-18-13987-2018-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page13997?><p id="d1e1516">Pb-rich particles and other aluminosilicates are enriched (relative to
aluminosilicates) within the IR fraction. However, the enrichment factor has
large uncertainties due to counting statistics. The remaining particle
groups are, within counting error, enriched similarly in the IR fraction to
aluminosilicates (for this latter group the odd ratio is 1 per definition).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1526">The major finding of our paper is that sea-salt-containing particles,
Ca-rich particles, Ca sulfates, silica, Fe aluminosilicates, and metal/metal
oxides are ice active similar to aluminosilicates at Jungfraujoch in warm
mixed-phase clouds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).
Other aluminosilicates and the Pb-rich particles seem to be even more
ice active as aluminosilicates. In contrast, soot and complex secondary
particles are strongly depleted (compared to aluminosilicates and absolutely
compared to total aerosol) in the ice residuals. C-rich particles are less
enriched than aluminosilicates by a factor of approximately 20. Thus, it is
concluded that their ice nucleation ability under these conditions is
significantly lower. The ice nucleation activities of the different particle
groups are discussed in Sect. 4.2.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Composition of total aerosol</title>
      <p id="d1e1563">Four of the six total aerosol samples are dominated by complex secondary
particles (Fig. 4), which seems to be typical for Jungfraujoch (Cozic et
al., 2008b; Fröhlich et al., 2015). Two samples (S-2b and S-5b) have a
different composition (Fig. 4). The first sample (S-2b) shows a higher
carbonaceous fraction, and the second sample (S-5b) a higher fraction of mineral
particles and C-rich particles. The high soot and C-rich particle abundance
of the first sample may be explained by footprint plots showing that the
air mass had a longer surface residence time over the Po Valley (Italy), which is
an urban/industrial area with abundant sources of carbonaceous particles.
The potential artefact in the second sample does not influence the
enrichment factor for all other particle groups. The odds ratio of
complex secondary particles shown in Fig. 8 will merely be somewhat lower. Our
general conclusion that complex secondary particles are inefficient ice
nuclei under the investigated conditions is not changed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1566">Most particles of the total aerosol have sizes below approximately 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, which is in good agreement with Herrmann et al. (2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e1576">Overall, our total aerosol samples consist of complex secondary particles
(60 % by number) and C-rich particles (16 %), soot (10 %), and
mineral particles (14 %). This composition is similar to previous
findings at Jungfraujoch during winter. According to Cozic et al. (2008b) the total aerosol is dominated by organic matter and secondary
aerosol (87 % by mass), with smaller contributions of black carbon (4 %)
and a non-determined mass (reported as “assumed to be composed of insoluble compounds such as silicate from mineral dust”)
fraction (9 %). It was
also shown by Kamphus et al. (2010)<?pagebreak page13998?> that the
main components of the ambient aerosol at Jungfraujoch in winter (2007) are
sulfate and organics, and only a small fraction (between 1 % and 17 %)
is classified as mineral particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e1579">With respect to ice nucleation, mineral dust particles are of the most
importance (see Sect. 4.2.). Aluminosilicates are the most abundant group of
mineral particles in the total aerosol with almost twice the amount of
silica. This fits well to the distribution of different minerals in soils
presented by Hoose et al. (2008) in which kaolinite and illite show a
higher abundance than calcite and quartz in the clay fraction worldwide.
Other aluminosilicates and Ca-rich particles are present in four of the six
samples at a low number concentration (1–2 %). Ca-containing particles at
Jungfraujoch were also found by Cozic et al. (2008b), albeit mainly in
the coarse mode.</p>
      <p id="d1e1583">The footprint plots (Fig. 3) were quite similar with high particle residence
time over the North Atlantic Ocean. None of the samples are taken during
mineral dust events, which normally occur in spring at Jungfraujoch (Coen et al., 2007). One total aerosol sample with a higher
fraction of carbonaceous particles had a higher surface residence time over
the
Po Valley than the rest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Ice nucleation activity of different particle groups</title>
      <p id="d1e1592">IRs mainly consist of mineral particles (Fig. 6). The
classes of Fe aluminosilicates, Ca sulfates, Ca-rich particles, silica, sea-salt-containing particles, and metal/metal oxides are enriched similar
to
aluminosilicates (odds ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Other aluminosilicates are more
enriched than aluminosilicates by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mineral
particles' abundance between 60 % and 85 % in the IR fraction is in good
agreement with previous findings for mixed-phase clouds at Jungfraujoch (Kamphus et al., 2010; Ebert et al., 2011; Worringen et al., 2015). Mineral
particles are also reported as ice active in cirrus clouds (DeMott et
al., 2003; Cziczo and Froyd, 2014). Studies of IRs in cirrus clouds are
mentioned sometimes in the discussion to show which kinds of IRs are found in
the environment, independent on the cloud regime. It has to be emphasized
here that this is not meant as a direct comparison as the temperature and
freezing regimes are quite different; note that deposition nucleation
dominates in cirrus clouds (Cziczo et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e1615">The size of IRs varies between the detection limit (100 nm) and 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Fig. 7). The size distribution is comparable to
previous findings by Worringen et al. (2015) showing a maximum
around 300 nm. We did not find a relationship between the size of the
particles and the enrichment factor (odds ratio), presumably because the
particle size did not differ much.</p>
      <p id="d1e1625">The sampling temperature at the site varied between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 2). Temperature was measured at the station and can
differ from the onset ice nucleation temperature of the particles depending on
where in the mixed-phase cloud nucleation occurred. None of the particle
group abundances in the IR fraction showed a systematic temperature
dependence. However, based on the limited number of samples and the
relatively small temperature range, no definite conclusion regarding the
temperature dependence can be drawn.</p>
      <p id="d1e1657">The importance of a given particle group for ice nucleation in the
atmosphere depends on the ice nucleation ability and the abundance of this
group in the total aerosol. Both parameters will be discussed in the
following. Complex secondary aerosol particles and soot were not found in
the IR fraction, in contrast to previous work at Jungfraujoch (Cozic et
al., 2008a; Ebert et al., 2011; Worringen et al., 2015; Schmidt et al., 2017),
even though these groups dominate the total aerosol fraction. Thus, their
ice-nucleating ability under the conditions of our campaign can be assumed
to be very low. One explanation for this difference might be the higher site
temperatures during our campaign. In the present study, complex secondary
particles are defined by the presence of an S peak in the X-ray spectrum
and/or the instability under electron bombardment. It must be emphasized
here that this particle group most likely also consists of a substantial
fraction of organics and nitrates (Vester et al., 2007),
see Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e1661">C-rich particles were observed in the total aerosol and the IR fraction but
are less ice active than aluminosilicates (odds ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
C-rich particles are reported in previous studies of mixed-phase clouds at
Jungfraujoch (Mertes et al., 2007; Cozic et al., 2008; Kamphus et al., 2010;
Ebert et al., 2011; Worringen et al., 2015; Schmidt et al., 2017). Our results
are also in agreement with findings of many cirrus cloud field studies (see
recent review by Knopf et al., 2018, and references therein), which show that
organic aerosol is found in the IR fraction but is depleted relative to
total aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e1674">Aluminosilicates are enriched in all samples and have the highest relative
number abundance in the IR fraction. Aluminosilicates are also found to be
efficient ice nuclei in other field experiments (Cziczo et al.,
2013; Worringen et al., 2015; Iwata and Matsuki, 2018). Among aluminosilicates,
kaolinite is reported as efficient ice nucleus in laboratory studies
(Zimmermann et al., 2007; Murray et al., 2011; Wex et al., 2014; Freedman,
2015). As aluminosilicates often have a high abundance in the total aerosol
and in the IR samples, they are the most important particle group for ice
nucleation. Therefore the enrichment or depletion of the particle groups was
normalized to this group.</p>
      <p id="d1e1677">Silica is the second most abundant mineral particle group in the IR samples
and the only mineral group which seems to have a somewhat lower ice activity
than aluminosilicates (upper limit of 95 % confidence interval of the odds
ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, keeping in mind the counting error for
aluminosilicates, silica is statistically similarly enriched. This observation
is in agreement with Atkinson et al. (2013) but in contradiction to Eastwood et al. (2008), who concluded that quartz is less ice
active than kaolinite and montmorillonite. The silica fraction in the IR
samples varies between 1 % and 30 %. Boose et al. (2016) point out that
quartz is always present in atmospheric dust in all size ranges, even in<?pagebreak page13999?> the
smallest size fraction, which is dominated by clay minerals. They conclude
that quartz is an important atmospheric INP component because it is present
in the size fraction with the longest atmospheric residence time. Despite
the fact that the enrichment of silica is somewhat lower than aluminosilicate,
the relative high abundance in the IR fraction in our samples confirms this
conclusion.</p>
      <p id="d1e1690">Fe aluminosilicates are similarly enriched in the IR fraction as aluminosilicates.
Fe aluminosilicates were reported as cloud residual by Matsuki et al. (2010). As these authors did not
differentiate between droplet and ice crystals, nothing can be said about
the ice nucleation ability of Fe aluminosilicates. This mineral group is not
present at high relative abundance at Jungfraujoch; thus, it will not
contribute much to ice nucleation at this location.</p>
      <p id="d1e1693">The group of other aluminosilicates most likely consists of different minerals
like feldspars, illite, and smectite. Laboratory studies (Atkinson et al., 2013; Iwata and Matsuki, 2018) showed that K feldspar
and clay minerals (Zimmermann et al., 2008; Hiranuma et al., 2015; Boose et
al., 2016) have a high ice nucleation ability compared to other minerals. A
high ice nucleation ability of clay minerals is also reported from field
experiments (Targino et al., 2006; Worringen et al., 2015). Also, our field
study shows an enrichment of other aluminosilicates in the IR fraction,
indicating a high ice nucleation ability. However, as feldspar is less
common in the smallest dust fraction, it was concluded by Boose et al. (2016) that at least the feldspar group is generally of minor importance.</p>
      <p id="d1e1696">Ca-rich and Ca-sulfate particles are relatively low in number
concentration, both in total aerosol and IR samples. Similar to quartz,
calcium-containing particles showed different ice nucleation ability in
previous laboratory studies (Zimmermann et al., 2008; Atkinson et al.,
2013). In field experiments, however, Ca-rich particles and Ca sulfates
were observed in the IR fraction (Ebert et al., 2011; Worringen et al.,
2015; Iwata and Matsuki, 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e1700">Based on chemistry, three subgroups of salt can be distinguished in the IR
samples: pure salt, aged sea salt, and mixed sea salt. The pure salt is
regarded as an artefact (see Sect. 2.6.1.) and thus excluded from the
further analysis. Due to their low number abundance, the two other salt
subgroups are combined into the sea-salt-containing particles group. Sea-salt-containing particles is enriched similar to aluminosilicates. The ice
activity of salt and sea salt is still controversial due to discrepancies
among different laboratory studies (Wise et al., 2012; Niehaus and
Cantrell, 2015; Ladino et al., 2016). Kanji et al. (2017)
assign these differences to the experimental set-up, i.e. different size,
composition, and particle generation methods. In field experiments, however,
salts are present in the IR fraction of both cirrus and mixed-phase clouds (Targino et al., 2006; Ebert et al., 2011; Cziczo et al., 2013; Worringen et
al., 2015; Iwata and Matsuki, 2018). It is advocated by Iwata and Matsuki (2018) that pure NaCl is not ice active due to molar depression of the
freezing point. Sea-salt-containing particles may act as an INP due to the
presence of organics (Wilson et al., 2015; DeMott et al., 2016; Iwata and
Matsuki, 2018). However, we cannot define
where the ice nucleation occurs in a particle, i.e. pores or thin coating, with our measurement technique.</p>
      <p id="d1e1703">The enrichment of metal and metal oxides is similar to aluminosilicates. The
ice activity of different metal and metal oxide particles varies with their
chemical composition (Kanji et al., 2017). Our samples are
dominated by FeCrMn (steel), Ti oxide, and Fe oxide. Literature regarding the
metal/metal oxide group is ambiguous. Hematite was reported as ice active
by Zimmermann et al. (2008). In contrast, hematite, magnetite, and rutile
were found not to be very ice active in deposition mode by Yakobi-Hancock et al. (2013). Even so, metal and
metal oxides are often found in IR samples from cirrus and mixed-phase
clouds (Kamphus et al., 2010; DeMott et al., 2003; Ebert et al.,
2011; Worringen et al., 2015; Schmidt et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1706">Pb-containing particles are present in the IR fraction as already reported in
previous work at Jungfraujoch (Cziczo et al., 2009; Kamphus et al., 2010;
Ebert et al., 2011; Worringen et al., 2015; Schmidt et al., 2017). In the
present study, Pb-rich particles are the most enriched particle group. A high
enrichment of Pb-rich particles among IRs was also reported by Ebert et
al. (2011). In addition, laboratory work showed that Pb can increase the ice
activity of mineral particles considerably (Cziczo et al., 2009;
Yakobi-Hancock et al., 2013). Helicopters and small aircrafts were discussed
as local sources of Pb at Jungfraujoch by Kamphus et al. (2010) and Ebert et
al. (2011). As the samples were collected during in-cloud conditions, we do
not expect Pb-rich particles emitted freshly on-site from the mentioned
sources. A time delay between emission and sampling results in relatively low
concentrations of Pb in the ambient air in clouds at Jungfraujoch. However,
Kamphus et al. (2010) and Schmidt et al. (2017) detected Pb-bearing particles
with mass spectrometry in both ambient air and IRs. Keeping in mind the
better counting statistics of mass spectrometry, it seems plausible that
total aerosol contains a small amount of Pb-rich particles which were missed
in our total samples.</p>
      <p id="d1e1709">To summarize, the two particle groups of complex secondary particles and
soot are strongly depleted compared to aluminosilicates as well as absolutely
depleted compared
to the total aerosol. Despite an uncertainty due to potential
misclassification, the C-rich group is less enriched compared to
aluminosilicates. Other aluminosilicates and Pb-rich particles are enriched
compared to aluminosilicates. A high enrichment of Pb-rich particles indicates
that this group is more ice active than the rest of the groups present in the IR
fraction. All other particle groups (silica, Fe aluminosilicates,
Ca sulfates, Ca-rich particles, sea-salt-containing particles, and metal/metal oxides)
are enriched similar to aluminosilicate. The relatively high abundance of
artefacts was identified by comparing the IR and total aerosol fraction,
showing how important parallel sampling is for identification of IRs.<?pagebreak page14000?> Taking
into account the relative abundance of the particle groups in total aerosol
and the ice nucleation ability, we conclude that silica, aluminosilicates, and
other aluminosilicates were the most important ice-nucleating particles in
mixed-phase clouds at site temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the campaign at Jungfraujoch in winter 2017.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1747">The data set is available for the community and can be
accessed by request to Stine Eriksen Hammer (sehammer@geo.tu-darmstadt.de) of
the Technical University Darmstadt.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e1750">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13987-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13987-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e1759">SEH collected the samples, analysed the particles by
electron microscopy, performed data analysis, and prepared the paper.
ME contributed to electron microscopy and data analysis. KK designed the
dilution unit and contributed to data analysis. SM designed, improved, and operated the Ice-CVI during the campaign.
JS organized the field campaign at Jungfraujoch and
contributed to data analysis. SW contributed to data analysis
and paper preparation.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1765">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e1771">This article is part of the special issue “Results from the ice
nucleation research unit (INUIT) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1777">Stine Eriksen Hammer would like to thank Annette Worringen and Nathalie
Benker for discussion and support and Thomas Dirsch for building the
dilution unit. We thank the whole INUIT-JFJ team for discussions and
support. The authors thank MeteoSwiss for meteorological data and the
International Foundation HFSJG, who made it possible to carry out the
experiment at the high-altitude research station Jungfraujoch. The authors
also gratefully acknowledge the German Research Foundation for financial
support within the research group INUIT – INUIT (FOR 1525) and within grant
KA 2280/2-1.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
This project has received funding from the European Union's
Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no.
654109.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Allan Bertram<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aitchison, J.: A concise guide to compositional data analysis, Cairndow,
UK, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K.
J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The
importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase
clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12278</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Boose, Y., Welti, A., Atkinson, J., Ramelli, F., Danielczok, A., Bingemer, H.
G., Plötze, M., Sierau, B., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Heterogeneous ice
nucleation on dust particles sourced from nine deserts worldwide – Part 1:
Immersion freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15075–15095,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., and Pósfai,
M.: Ns-Soot: A Material-Based Term for Strongly Light-Absorbing
Carbonaceous Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 777–788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.919374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.919374</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Carlslaw, D. C. and Ropkins, K.: Openair – an R package for air quality
data analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27–28, 52–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Choël, M., Deboudt, K., Osán, J., Flament, P., and Van Grieken, R.:
Quantitative Determination of Low-Z Elements in Single Atmospheric Particles
on Boron Substrates by Automated Scanning Electron
Microscopy-Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 77,
5686–5692, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050739x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac050739x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Coen, M. C., Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., Cozic, J., Henning, S., Verheggen,
B., Gehrig, R., and Baltensperger, U.: Long-term trend analysis of aerosol
variables at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007995</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cozic, J., Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Cziczo, D. J., Gallavardin, S. J.,
Walter, S., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Black carbon enrichment
in atmospheric ice particle residuals observed in lower tropospheric mixed
phase clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D15209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009266</ext-link>,
2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cozic, J., Verheggen, B., Weingartner, E., Crosier, J., Bower, K. N., Flynn,
M., Coe, H., Henning, S., Steinbacher, M., Henne, S., Collaud Coen, M.,
Petzold, A., and Baltensperger, U.: Chemical composition of free tropospheric
aerosol for PM1 and coarse mode at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 8, 407–423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-407-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-407-2008</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J. and Froyd, K. D.: Sampling the composition of cirrus ice
residuals, Atmos. Res., 142, 15–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., DeMott, P. J., Brooks, S. D., Prenni, A. J., Thomson, D. S.,
Baumgardner, D., Wilson, J. C., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Murphy, D. M.:
Observations of organic species and atmospheric ice formation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, L12116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019822</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Stetzer, O., Worringen, A., Ebert, M., Weinbruch, S.,
Kamphus, M., Gallavardin, S. J., Curtius, J., Borrmann, S., and Froyd, K.
D.: Inadvertent climate modification due to anthropogenic lead, Nat. Geosci.,
2, 333–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo499</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M.
A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and<?pagebreak page14001?> Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the Dominant
Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1234145</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Ladino, L., Boose, Y., Kanji, Z. A., Kupiszewski, P., Lance,
S., Mertes, S., and Wex, H.: Measurements of Ice Nucleating Particles and
Ice Residuals, Meteor. Mon., 58, 8.1–8.13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0008.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0008.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P., Cziczo, D., Prenni, A., Murphy, D., Kreidenweis, S., Thomson,
D., Borys, R., and Rogers, D.: Measurements of the concentration and
composition of nuclei for cirrus formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100,
14655–14660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2532677100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2532677100</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D.
B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T.,
Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S.,
Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault,
A. P., Axson, J. L., Diaz Martinez, M., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G.,
Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram,
T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol
as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
113, 5797–5803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1514034112</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Eastwood, M. L., Cremel, S., Gehrke, C., Girard, E., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice
nucleation on mineral dust particles: Onset conditions, nucleation rates and
contact angles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D22203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010639" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010639</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ebert, M., Worringen, A., Benker, N., Mertes, S., Weingartner, E., and
Weinbruch, S.: Chemical composition and mixing-state of ice residuals sampled
within mixed phase clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2805–2816,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2805-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2805-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Ebert, M., Weigel, R., Kandler, K., Günther, G., Molleker, S., Grooß,
J.-U., Vogel, B., Weinbruch, S., and Borrmann, S.: Chemical analysis of
refractory stratospheric aerosol particles collected within the arctic vortex
and inside polar stratospheric clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8405–8421,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W.
J., Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P.,
Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., and Rummukaines, M.:
Evaluation of Climate Models, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Assessment Reports of IPCC, edited
by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 741–866, available
at: <uri>https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter09_FINAL.pdf</uri>
(last access: 13 March 2017), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Freedman, M. A.: Potential Sites for Ice Nucleation on Aluminosilicate Clay
Minerals and Related Materials, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6, 3850–3858, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01326</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Fröhlich, R., Cubison, M. J., Slowik, J. G., Bukowiecki, N., Canonaco, F.,
Croteau, P. L., Gysel, M., Henne, S., Herrmann, E., Jayne, J. T.,
Steinbacher, M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S.
H.: Fourteen months of on-line measurements of the non-refractory submicron
aerosol at the Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.) – chemical composition, origins
and organic aerosol sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11373–11398,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Lawson, P., Baumgardner, D., and Herman, R. L.:
Aerosols that form subvisible cirrus at the tropical tropopause, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 209–218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-209-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-209-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hallett, J. and Mossop, S. C.: Production of secondary ice particles during
the riming process, Nature, 249, 26–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/249026a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/249026a0</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Heintzenberg, J., Okada, K., and Ström, J.: On the composition of
non-volatile material in upper tropospheric aerosols and cirrus crystals,
Atmos. Res., 41, 81–88, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(95)00042-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0169-8095(95)00042-9</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Herrmann, E., Weingartner, E., Henne, S., Vuilleumier, L., Bukowiecki, N.,
Steinbacher, M., Conen, F., Collaud Coen, M., Hammer, E., and Jurányi,
Z.: Analysis of long-term aerosol size distribution data from Jungfraujoch
with emphasis on free tropospheric conditions, cloud influence, and air mass
transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9459–9480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023660</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J.,
Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann,
N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius,
B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J.,
Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T.,
McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M.
D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A.,
Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive
laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a
comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 2489–2518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C., Lohmann, U., Erdin, R., and Tegen, I.: The global influence of
dust mineralogical composition on heterogeneous ice nucleation in mixed-phase
clouds, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 025003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025003</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., and Burrows, S. M.: How important is
biological ice nucleation in clouds on a global scale?, Environ. Res. Lett.,
5, 024009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric
aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Iwata, A. and Matsuki, A.: Characterization of individual ice residual
particles by the single droplet freezing method: a case study in the Asian
dust outflow region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1785–1804,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1785-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1785-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kamphus, M., Ettner-Mahl, M., Klimach, T., Drewnick, F., Keller, L., Cziczo,
D. J., Mertes, S., Borrmann, S., and Curtius, J.: Chemical composition of
ambient aerosol, ice residues and cloud droplet residues in mixed-phase
clouds: single particle analysis during the Cloud and Aerosol
Characterization Experiment (CLACE 6), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8077–8095,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14002?><ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D.
J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor. Mon.,
58, 1.1–1.33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., and Wang, B.: The Role of Organic Aerosol in
Atmospheric Ice Nucleation: A Review, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 168–202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Korolev, A., McFarquhar, G., Field, P. R., Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Wang,
Z., Williams, E., Abel, S. J., Axisa, D., Borrmann, S., Crosier, J., Fugal,
J., Krämer, M., Lohmann, U., Schlenczek, O., Schnaiter, M., and Wendisch,
M.: Mixed-Phase Clouds: Progress and Challenges, Meteor. Mon., 58, 5.1–5.50,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0001.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0001.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., Si, M.,
Li, J., Miller, L. A., Schiller, C. L., Huffman, J. A., Aller, J. Y., Knopf,
D. A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating
abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and
field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Diehl, K.: Sensitivity Studies of the Importance of Dust Ice
Nuclei for the Indirect Aerosol Effect on Stratiform Mixed-Phase Clouds, J.
Atmos. Sci., 63, 968–982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3662.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas3662.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Matsuki, A., Schwarzenboeck, A., Venzac, H., Laj, P., Crumeyrolle, S., and
Gomes, L.: Cloud processing of mineral dust: direct comparison of cloud
residual and clear sky particles during AMMA aircraft campaign in summer
2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1057–1069,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1057-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1057-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Walter, S., Connolly, P., Ebert, M., Schneider,
J., Bower, K. N., Cozic, J., Weinbruch, S., Baltensperger, U., and
Weingartner, E.: Counterflow Virtual Impactor Based Collection of Small Ice
Particles in Mixed-Phase Clouds for the Physico-Chemical Characterization of
Tropospheric Ice Nuclei: Sampler Description and First Case Study, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 41, 848–864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701501881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701501881</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Murray, B. J., Broadley, S. L., Wilson, T. W., Atkinson, J. D., and Wills, R.
H.: Heterogeneous freezing of water droplets containing kaolinite particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4191–4207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4191-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4191-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A.,
Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative
Forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and
Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY,
USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Niehaus, J. and Cantrell, W.: Contact Freezing of Water by Salts, J. Phys.
Chem. Lett., 6, 3490–3495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01531</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A., Heintzenberg, J., and Charlson, R. J.: In-situ sampling of
clouds with a droplet to aerosol converter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12, 121–124,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i003p00121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL012i003p00121</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A., Heintzenberg, J., and Charlson, R. J.: In-Situ Sampling of
Clouds with a Droplet to Aerosol Converter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12,
121–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i003p00121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL012i003p00121</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>RStudio Team: RStudio: Integrated Development for R, RStudio Inc., Boston,
MA, available at: <uri>http://www.rstudio.com/</uri> (last access: 9 March 2018), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, S., Schneider, J., Klimach, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L. P.,
Kupiszewski, P., Curtius, J., and Borrmann, S.: Online single particle
analysis of ice particle residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase clouds using
laboratory derived particle type assignment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
575–594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-575-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Schütze, K., Wilson, J. C., Weinbruch, S., Benker, N., Ebert, M.,
Günther, G., Weigel, R., and Borrmann, S.: Sub-micrometer refractory
carbonaceous particles in the polar stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
12475–12493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12475-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12475-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Seibert, P. and Frank, A.: Source-receptor matrix calculation with a
Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4,
51–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-51-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M., and Wotawa, G.: Validation of the lagrangian
particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experiment
data, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4245–4264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00184-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00184-8</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A. and Thomson, D. J.: A Density Correction for Lagrangian Particle
Dispersion Models, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 90, 155–167,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001741110696" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1001741110696</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Storelvmo, T.: Aerosol Effects on Climate via Mixed-Phase and Ice Clouds,
Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 45, 199–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012240</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Ström, J. and Ohlsson, S.: Real-time measurement of absorbing material in
contrail ice using a counterflow virtual impactor, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
103, 8737–8741, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00425" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD00425</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Targino, A. C., Krejci, R., Noone, K. J., and Glantz, P.: Single particle
analysis of ice crystal residuals observed in orographic wave clouds over
Scandinavia during INTACC experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1977–1990,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1977-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1977-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Twohy, C. H., Strapp, J. W., and Wendisch, M.: Performance of a Counterflow
Virtual Impactor in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20, 781–790,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;0781:poacvi&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;0781:poacvi&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Twohy, C. H. and Poellot, M. R.: Chemical characteristics of ice residual
nuclei in anvil cirrus clouds: evidence for homogeneous and heterogeneous ice
formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2289–2297,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2289-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2289-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A
proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
10263–10270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page14003?><ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Van den Boogaart, K. G. and Tolosana-Delgado, R.: Analyzing compositional
data with R, Springer, Berlin, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Vester, B. P., Ebert, M., Barnert, E. B., Schneider, J., Kandler, K.,
Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Composition and mixing state of the urban
background aerosol in the Rhein-Main area (Germany), Atmos. Environ., 41,
6102–6115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.021</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Weinbruch, S., Benker, N., Kandler, K., Schütze, K., Kling, K.,
Berlinger, B., Thomassen, Y., Drotikova, T., and Kallenborn, R.: Source
identification of individual soot agglomerates in Arctic air by transmission
electron microscopy, Atmos. Environ., 172, 47–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.033</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.: Seasonal and diurnal
variation of aerosol size distributions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) at a
high-alpine site (Jungfraujoch 3580 m a.s.l.), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 26809–26820, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900170</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wentzel, M., Gorzawski, H., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., and Weinbruch, S.:
Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization
of soot aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1347–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wex, H., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Hartmann, S., Rösch, M., Clauss, T.,
Tomsche, L., Niedermeier, D., and Stratmann, F.: Kaolinite particles as ice
nuclei: learning from the use of different kaolinite samples and different
coatings, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5529–5546,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5529-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5529-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wickham, H.: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer-Verlag
New York, New York, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M.,
Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffman, J. A., Judd, C., and Kilthau, W.
P.: A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles,
Nature, 525, 234–238, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14986" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14986</ext-link>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Wise, M. E., Baustian, K. J., Koop, T., Freedman, M. A., Jensen, E. J., and
Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation onto crystalline hydrated NaCl
particles: a new mechanism for ice formation in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 1121–1134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Worringen, A., Kandler, K., Benker, N., Dirsch, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L.,
Kästner, U., Frank, F., Nillius, B., Bundke, U., Rose, D., Curtius, J.,
Kupiszewski, P., Weingartner, E., Vochezer, P., Schneider, J., Schmidt, S.,
Weinbruch, S., and Ebert, M.: Single-particle characterization of
ice-nucleating particles and ice particle residuals sampled by three
different techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4161–4178,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Ladino, L. A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Feldspar minerals
as efficient deposition ice nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11175–11185,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11175-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11175-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zimmermann, F., Ebert, M., Worringen, A., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.:
Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) as a new technique to
determine the ice nucleation capability of individual atmospheric aerosol
particles, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8219–8227,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zimmermann, F., Weinbruch, S., Schütz, L., Hofmann, H., Ebert, M.,
Kandler, K., and Worringen, A.: Ice nucleation properties of the most
abundant mineral dust phases, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D23204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010655</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Composition of ice particle residuals in mixed-phase clouds at Jungfraujoch (Switzerland): enrichment and depletion of particle groups relative to total aerosol</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Ice particle residuals (IRs) and the total aerosol particle population were
sampled in parallel during mixed-phase cloud events at the high-altitude
research station Jungfraujoch in January–February 2017. Particles were
sampled behind an ice-selective counterflow impactor (Ice-CVI) for IRs and a
heated total inlet for the total aerosol particles. A dilution set-up was
used to collect total particles with the same sampling duration as for IRs to
prevent overloading of the substrates. About 4000 particles from 10 Ice-CVI
samples (from 7 days of cloud events at temperatures at the site between
−10 and −18&thinsp;°C) were analysed and classified with
operator-controlled scanning electron microscopy. Contamination particles
(identified by their chemical composition), most likely originating from
abrasion in the Ice-CVI and collection of secondary ice, were excluded from
further analysis. Approximately 3000 total aerosol particles (IRs and
interstitial particles) from 5 days in clouds were also analysed. Enrichment
and depletion of the different particle groups (within the IR fraction
relative to the total aerosol reservoir) are presented as an odds ratio
relative to alumosilicate (particles only
consisting of Al, Si, and O), which was chosen as reference due to the large
enrichment of this group relative to total aerosol and the relatively high
number concentration of this group in both total aerosol and the IR samples.
Complex secondary particles and soot are the major particle groups in the
total aerosol samples but are not found in the IR fraction and are hence
strongly depleted. C-rich particles (most likely organic particles) showed a
smaller enrichment compared to aluminosilicates by a factor of  ∼ 20. The
particle groups with enrichment similar to aluminosilicate are silica, Fe
aluminosilicates, Ca-rich particles, Ca sulfates, sea-salt-containing
particles, and metal/metal oxide. Other aluminosilicates – consisting of
variable amounts of Na, K, Ca, Si, Al, O, Ti, and Fe – are somewhat more
enriched (factor  ∼ 2) and Pb-rich particles are more (factor  ∼ 8)
enriched than aluminosilicates. None of the sampled IR groups showed a temperature or
size dependence in respect to ice activity, which might be due to the limited
sampling temperature interval and the similar size of the particles.
Footprint plots and wind roses could explain the different total aerosol
composition in one sample (carbonaceous particle emission from the
urban/industrial area of Po Valley), but this did not affect the IR
composition. Taking into account the relative abundance of the particle
groups in total aerosol and the ice nucleation ability, we found that silica,
aluminosilicates, and other aluminosilicates were the most important ice particle
residuals at Jungfraujoch during the mixed-phase cloud events in winter 2017.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aitchison, J.: A concise guide to compositional data analysis, Cairndow,
UK, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K.
J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The
importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase
clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Boose, Y., Welti, A., Atkinson, J., Ramelli, F., Danielczok, A., Bingemer, H.
G., Plötze, M., Sierau, B., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Heterogeneous ice
nucleation on dust particles sourced from nine deserts worldwide – Part 1:
Immersion freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15075–15095,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., and Pósfai,
M.: Ns-Soot: A Material-Based Term for Strongly Light-Absorbing
Carbonaceous Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 777–788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.919374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.919374</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Carlslaw, D. C. and Ropkins, K.: Openair – an R package for air quality
data analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27–28, 52–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Choël, M., Deboudt, K., Osán, J., Flament, P., and Van Grieken, R.:
Quantitative Determination of Low-Z Elements in Single Atmospheric Particles
on Boron Substrates by Automated Scanning Electron
Microscopy-Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 77,
5686–5692, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050739x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050739x</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Coen, M. C., Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., Cozic, J., Henning, S., Verheggen,
B., Gehrig, R., and Baltensperger, U.: Long-term trend analysis of aerosol
variables at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cozic, J., Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Cziczo, D. J., Gallavardin, S. J.,
Walter, S., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Black carbon enrichment
in atmospheric ice particle residuals observed in lower tropospheric mixed
phase clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D15209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009266</a>,
2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cozic, J., Verheggen, B., Weingartner, E., Crosier, J., Bower, K. N., Flynn,
M., Coe, H., Henning, S., Steinbacher, M., Henne, S., Collaud Coen, M.,
Petzold, A., and Baltensperger, U.: Chemical composition of free tropospheric
aerosol for PM1 and coarse mode at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 8, 407–423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-407-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-407-2008</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J. and Froyd, K. D.: Sampling the composition of cirrus ice
residuals, Atmos. Res., 142, 15–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.012</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., DeMott, P. J., Brooks, S. D., Prenni, A. J., Thomson, D. S.,
Baumgardner, D., Wilson, J. C., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Murphy, D. M.:
Observations of organic species and atmospheric ice formation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, L12116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019822</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Stetzer, O., Worringen, A., Ebert, M., Weinbruch, S.,
Kamphus, M., Gallavardin, S. J., Curtius, J., Borrmann, S., and Froyd, K.
D.: Inadvertent climate modification due to anthropogenic lead, Nat. Geosci.,
2, 333–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo499</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M.
A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the Dominant
Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Ladino, L., Boose, Y., Kanji, Z. A., Kupiszewski, P., Lance,
S., Mertes, S., and Wex, H.: Measurements of Ice Nucleating Particles and
Ice Residuals, Meteor. Mon., 58, 8.1–8.13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0008.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0008.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P., Cziczo, D., Prenni, A., Murphy, D., Kreidenweis, S., Thomson,
D., Borys, R., and Rogers, D.: Measurements of the concentration and
composition of nuclei for cirrus formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100,
14655–14660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2532677100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2532677100</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D.
B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T.,
Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S.,
Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault,
A. P., Axson, J. L., Diaz Martinez, M., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G.,
Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram,
T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol
as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
113, 5797–5803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Eastwood, M. L., Cremel, S., Gehrke, C., Girard, E., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice
nucleation on mineral dust particles: Onset conditions, nucleation rates and
contact angles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D22203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010639" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010639</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Ebert, M., Worringen, A., Benker, N., Mertes, S., Weingartner, E., and
Weinbruch, S.: Chemical composition and mixing-state of ice residuals sampled
within mixed phase clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2805–2816,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2805-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2805-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ebert, M., Weigel, R., Kandler, K., Günther, G., Molleker, S., Grooß,
J.-U., Vogel, B., Weinbruch, S., and Borrmann, S.: Chemical analysis of
refractory stratospheric aerosol particles collected within the arctic vortex
and inside polar stratospheric clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8405–8421,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W.
J., Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P.,
Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., and Rummukaines, M.:
Evaluation of Climate Models, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Assessment Reports of IPCC, edited
by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 741–866, available
at: <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter09_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter09_FINAL.pdf</a>
(last access: 13 March 2017), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Freedman, M. A.: Potential Sites for Ice Nucleation on Aluminosilicate Clay
Minerals and Related Materials, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6, 3850–3858, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01326</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Fröhlich, R., Cubison, M. J., Slowik, J. G., Bukowiecki, N., Canonaco, F.,
Croteau, P. L., Gysel, M., Henne, S., Herrmann, E., Jayne, J. T.,
Steinbacher, M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S.
H.: Fourteen months of on-line measurements of the non-refractory submicron
aerosol at the Jungfraujoch (3580&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l.) – chemical composition, origins
and organic aerosol sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11373–11398,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11373-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Lawson, P., Baumgardner, D., and Herman, R. L.:
Aerosols that form subvisible cirrus at the tropical tropopause, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 209–218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-209-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-209-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hallett, J. and Mossop, S. C.: Production of secondary ice particles during
the riming process, Nature, 249, 26–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/249026a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/249026a0</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Heintzenberg, J., Okada, K., and Ström, J.: On the composition of
non-volatile material in upper tropospheric aerosols and cirrus crystals,
Atmos. Res., 41, 81–88, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(95)00042-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(95)00042-9</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, E., Weingartner, E., Henne, S., Vuilleumier, L., Bukowiecki, N.,
Steinbacher, M., Conen, F., Collaud Coen, M., Hammer, E., and Jurányi,
Z.: Analysis of long-term aerosol size distribution data from Jungfraujoch
with emphasis on free tropospheric conditions, cloud influence, and air mass
transport, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9459–9480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023660</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J.,
Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann,
N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius,
B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J.,
Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T.,
McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M.
D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A.,
Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive
laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a
comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 2489–2518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C., Lohmann, U., Erdin, R., and Tegen, I.: The global influence of
dust mineralogical composition on heterogeneous ice nucleation in mixed-phase
clouds, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 025003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025003</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., and Burrows, S. M.: How important is
biological ice nucleation in clouds on a global scale?, Environ. Res. Lett.,
5, 024009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric
aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Iwata, A. and Matsuki, A.: Characterization of individual ice residual
particles by the single droplet freezing method: a case study in the Asian
dust outflow region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1785–1804,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1785-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1785-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kamphus, M., Ettner-Mahl, M., Klimach, T., Drewnick, F., Keller, L., Cziczo,
D. J., Mertes, S., Borrmann, S., and Curtius, J.: Chemical composition of
ambient aerosol, ice residues and cloud droplet residues in mixed-phase
clouds: single particle analysis during the Cloud and Aerosol
Characterization Experiment (CLACE 6), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8077–8095,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D.
J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor. Mon.,
58, 1.1–1.33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., and Wang, B.: The Role of Organic Aerosol in
Atmospheric Ice Nucleation: A Review, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 168–202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Korolev, A., McFarquhar, G., Field, P. R., Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Wang,
Z., Williams, E., Abel, S. J., Axisa, D., Borrmann, S., Crosier, J., Fugal,
J., Krämer, M., Lohmann, U., Schlenczek, O., Schnaiter, M., and Wendisch,
M.: Mixed-Phase Clouds: Progress and Challenges, Meteor. Mon., 58, 5.1–5.50,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0001.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0001.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., Si, M.,
Li, J., Miller, L. A., Schiller, C. L., Huffman, J. A., Aller, J. Y., Knopf,
D. A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating
abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and
field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Diehl, K.: Sensitivity Studies of the Importance of Dust Ice
Nuclei for the Indirect Aerosol Effect on Stratiform Mixed-Phase Clouds, J.
Atmos. Sci., 63, 968–982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3662.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3662.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Matsuki, A., Schwarzenboeck, A., Venzac, H., Laj, P., Crumeyrolle, S., and
Gomes, L.: Cloud processing of mineral dust: direct comparison of cloud
residual and clear sky particles during AMMA aircraft campaign in summer
2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1057–1069,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1057-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1057-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Walter, S., Connolly, P., Ebert, M., Schneider,
J., Bower, K. N., Cozic, J., Weinbruch, S., Baltensperger, U., and
Weingartner, E.: Counterflow Virtual Impactor Based Collection of Small Ice
Particles in Mixed-Phase Clouds for the Physico-Chemical Characterization of
Tropospheric Ice Nuclei: Sampler Description and First Case Study, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 41, 848–864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701501881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701501881</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, B. J., Broadley, S. L., Wilson, T. W., Atkinson, J. D., and Wills, R.
H.: Heterogeneous freezing of water droplets containing kaolinite particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4191–4207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4191-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4191-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A.,
Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative
Forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and
Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY,
USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Niehaus, J. and Cantrell, W.: Contact Freezing of Water by Salts, J. Phys.
Chem. Lett., 6, 3490–3495, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01531</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ogren, J. A., Heintzenberg, J., and Charlson, R. J.: In-situ sampling of
clouds with a droplet to aerosol converter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12, 121–124,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i003p00121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i003p00121</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ogren, J. A., Heintzenberg, J., and Charlson, R. J.: In-Situ Sampling of
Clouds with a Droplet to Aerosol Converter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12,
121–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i003p00121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i003p00121</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
RStudio Team: RStudio: Integrated Development for R, RStudio Inc., Boston,
MA, available at: <a href="http://www.rstudio.com/" target="_blank">http://www.rstudio.com/</a> (last access: 9 March 2018), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, S., Schneider, J., Klimach, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L. P.,
Kupiszewski, P., Curtius, J., and Borrmann, S.: Online single particle
analysis of ice particle residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase clouds using
laboratory derived particle type assignment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
575–594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Schütze, K., Wilson, J. C., Weinbruch, S., Benker, N., Ebert, M.,
Günther, G., Weigel, R., and Borrmann, S.: Sub-micrometer refractory
carbonaceous particles in the polar stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
12475–12493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12475-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12475-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Seibert, P. and Frank, A.: Source-receptor matrix calculation with a
Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4,
51–63, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M., and Wotawa, G.: Validation of the lagrangian
particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experiment
data, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4245–4264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00184-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00184-8</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A. and Thomson, D. J.: A Density Correction for Lagrangian Particle
Dispersion Models, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 90, 155–167,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001741110696" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001741110696</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Storelvmo, T.: Aerosol Effects on Climate via Mixed-Phase and Ice Clouds,
Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 45, 199–222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012240</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ström, J. and Ohlsson, S.: Real-time measurement of absorbing material in
contrail ice using a counterflow virtual impactor, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
103, 8737–8741, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00425" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00425</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Targino, A. C., Krejci, R., Noone, K. J., and Glantz, P.: Single particle
analysis of ice crystal residuals observed in orographic wave clouds over
Scandinavia during INTACC experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1977–1990,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1977-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1977-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Twohy, C. H., Strapp, J. W., and Wendisch, M.: Performance of a Counterflow
Virtual Impactor in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20, 781–790,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;0781:poacvi&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;0781:poacvi&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Twohy, C. H. and Poellot, M. R.: Chemical characteristics of ice residual
nuclei in anvil cirrus clouds: evidence for homogeneous and heterogeneous ice
formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2289–2297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2289-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2289-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A
proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
10263–10270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Van den Boogaart, K. G. and Tolosana-Delgado, R.: Analyzing compositional
data with R, Springer, Berlin, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Vester, B. P., Ebert, M., Barnert, E. B., Schneider, J., Kandler, K.,
Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Composition and mixing state of the urban
background aerosol in the Rhein-Main area (Germany), Atmos. Environ., 41,
6102–6115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.021</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Weinbruch, S., Benker, N., Kandler, K., Schütze, K., Kling, K.,
Berlinger, B., Thomassen, Y., Drotikova, T., and Kallenborn, R.: Source
identification of individual soot agglomerates in Arctic air by transmission
electron microscopy, Atmos. Environ., 172, 47–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.033</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.: Seasonal and diurnal
variation of aerosol size distributions (10<i>&lt;</i>D<i>&lt;</i>750&thinsp;nm) at a
high-alpine site (Jungfraujoch 3580&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l.), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 26809–26820, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900170</a>,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wentzel, M., Gorzawski, H., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., and Weinbruch, S.:
Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization
of soot aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1347–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wex, H., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Hartmann, S., Rösch, M., Clauss, T.,
Tomsche, L., Niedermeier, D., and Stratmann, F.: Kaolinite particles as ice
nuclei: learning from the use of different kaolinite samples and different
coatings, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5529–5546,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5529-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5529-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wickham, H.: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer-Verlag
New York, New York, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M.,
Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffman, J. A., Judd, C., and Kilthau, W.
P.: A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles,
Nature, 525, 234–238, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14986" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14986</a>, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wise, M. E., Baustian, K. J., Koop, T., Freedman, M. A., Jensen, E. J., and
Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation onto crystalline hydrated NaCl
particles: a new mechanism for ice formation in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 1121–1134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Worringen, A., Kandler, K., Benker, N., Dirsch, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L.,
Kästner, U., Frank, F., Nillius, B., Bundke, U., Rose, D., Curtius, J.,
Kupiszewski, P., Weingartner, E., Vochezer, P., Schneider, J., Schmidt, S.,
Weinbruch, S., and Ebert, M.: Single-particle characterization of
ice-nucleating particles and ice particle residuals sampled by three
different techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4161–4178,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Ladino, L. A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Feldspar minerals
as efficient deposition ice nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11175–11185,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11175-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11175-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zimmermann, F., Ebert, M., Worringen, A., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.:
Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) as a new technique to
determine the ice nucleation capability of individual atmospheric aerosol
particles, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8219–8227,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.023</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zimmermann, F., Weinbruch, S., Schütz, L., Hofmann, H., Ebert, M.,
Kandler, K., and Worringen, A.: Ice nucleation properties of the most
abundant mineral dust phases, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D23204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010655" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010655</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
