<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-12363-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Aerosol distribution in the northern Gulf of Guinea: local anthropogenic
sources, long-range transport, and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> the role of coastal shallow
circulations</article-title><alt-title>Aerosol distribution in the northern Gulf of Guinea</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Aerosol distribution in the northern Gulf of Guinea}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. Flamant et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Flamant</surname><given-names>Cyrille</given-names></name>
          <email>cyrille.flamant@latmos.ipsl.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-6495</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Deroubaix</surname><given-names>Adrien</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-7802</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Chazette</surname><given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6230-2982</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Brito</surname><given-names>Joel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-9442</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gaetani</surname><given-names>Marco</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2923-6773</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Knippertz</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-619X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Fink</surname><given-names>Andreas H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5840-2120</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>de Coetlogon</surname><given-names>Gaëlle</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Menut</surname><given-names>Laurent</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9776-0812</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Colomb</surname><given-names>Aurélie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2595-3911</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Denjean</surname><given-names>Cyrielle</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Meynadier</surname><given-names>Rémi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Rosenberg</surname><given-names>Philip</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6920-0559</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Dupuy</surname><given-names>Regis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Dominutti</surname><given-names>Pamela</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9876-6383</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Duplissy</surname><given-names>Jonathan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8819-0264</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Bourrianne</surname><given-names>Thierry</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Schwarzenboeck</surname><given-names>Alfons</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ramonet</surname><given-names>Michel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1157-1186</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Totems</surname><given-names>Julien</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-455X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire Atmosphères Milieux Observations Spatiales, Sorbonne
Université,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>  Université Paris-Saclay and CNRS, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Ecole Polytechnique,
IPSL Research University, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université
Paris-Saclay, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Palaiseau, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA, CNRS,
Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, Université Clermont
Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont-Ferrand, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques,
Météo-France and CNRS, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Institute of Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and
Environment,  University of Leeds, Leeds, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki,
Finland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Cyrille Flamant (cyrille.flamant@latmos.ipsl.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>12363</fpage><lpage>12389</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e307">The complex vertical distribution of
aerosols over coastal southern West Africa (SWA) is investigated using
airborne observations and numerical simulations. Observations were gathered
on 2 July 2016 offshore of Ghana and Togo, during the field phase of the
Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa project. This
was the only flight conducted over the ocean during which a downward-looking
lidar was operational. The aerosol loading in the lower troposphere includes
emissions from coastal cities (Accra, Lomé, Cotonou, and Lagos) as well
as biomass burning aerosol and dust associated with long-range transport from
central Africa and the Sahara, respectively. Our results indicate that the
aerosol distribution on this day is impacted by subsidence associated with
zonal and meridional regional-scale overturning circulations associated with
the land–sea surface temperature contrast and orography over Ghana and Togo,
as typically observed on hot, cloud-free summer days such as 2 July 2016.
Furthermore, we show that the zonal circulation evidenced on 2 July is a
persistent feature over the Gulf of Guinea during July 2016. Numerical tracer
release experiments highlight the dominance of aged emissions from Accra on
the observed pollution plume loadings over the ocean, in the area of aircraft
operation. The contribution of aged emission from Lomé and Cotonou is
also evident above the marine boundary layer. Given the general direction of
the monsoon flow, the tracer experiments indicate no contribution from Lagos
emissions to the atmospheric composition of the area west of Cotonou, where
our airborne observations were gathered. The tracer plume does not extend
very far south over the ocean (i.e. less than 100 km from Accra), mostly
because emissions are transported northeastward near the surface over land
and westward above the marine atmospheric boundary layer. The latter is
possible due to interactions between the monsoon flow, complex terrain, and
land–sea breeze systems, which support the vertical mixing of the urban
pollution. This work sheds light on the complex – and to date undocumented
– mechanisms by which coastal shallow circulations can distribute
atmospheric pollutants over the densely populated SWA region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page12364?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e317">Aerosol–cloud–climate interactions play a fundamental role in radiative
balance and energy redistribution in the tropics. Aerosol particles from
natural and anthropogenic origins can serve as cloud condensation nuclei
(Haywood and Boucher, 2000; Carslaw et al., 2010) and interact with solar and
terrestrial radiation through absorption and scattering.</p>
      <p id="d1e320">The atmosphere over southern West Africa (SWA) is a complex mix of local
emissions (vegetation, traffic, domestic and waste fires, power plants, oil
and gas rigs, ships) and remote sources (dust from the north and wild-fire
related biomass burning aerosols from central Africa) (Knippertz et al.,
2015a; Brito et al., 2018). In order to enhance our understanding of
aerosol–cloud–climate interactions in SWA, it is of paramount importance to
better characterize the composition and vertical distribution of the aerosol
load over the eastern tropical Atlantic. This is particularly vital, since
SWA is currently experiencing major economic and population growths (Liousse
et al., 2014), and is projected to host several megacities (cities with over
10 million inhabitants) by the middle of the 21st century (World Urbanization
Prospect, 2015). This will likely boost anthropogenic emissions to
unprecedented levels and imply profound impacts on population health
(Lelieveld et al., 2015), on the radiative budget over
SWA, and also on the West
African Monsoon (WAM) system (Knippertz et al., 2015b). This will also add to
the dust and biomass burning aerosol related perturbations already evidenced
for the precipitation in the area (e.g. Huang et al., 2009). Likewise, urban
pollution may also affect surface–atmosphere interactions and associated
lower tropospheric dynamics over SWA such as for instance dust over the
tropical Atlantic (e.g. Evan et al., 2009) or biomass burning aerosols over
Amazonia (Zhang et al., 2008, 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e323">One of the aims of EU-funded project Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud
Interactions in West Africa (DACCIWA, Knippertz et al., 2015b) is to
understand the influence of atmospheric dynamics on the spatial distribution
of both anthropogenic and natural aerosols over SWA after emission. One
particularly important aspect is the fate of anthropogenic aerosols emitted
at the coast as they are being transported away from the source. In addition,
DACCIWA aims at assessing the impact of this complex atmospheric composition
on the health of humans and ecosystems.</p>
      <p id="d1e326">Urban aerosols are mostly transported with the southwesterly monsoon flow
below 700 hPa (e.g. Deroubaix et al., 2018). They may also reach the nearby
ocean as the result of complex dynamical interactions between the monsoon
flow, the northeasterly flow from the Sahel above, and the interactions with
the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) over the continent coupling the two
layers when it is fully developed during daytime. This is because, as opposed
to the marine ABL, the continental ABL exhibits a strong diurnal cycle (e.g.
Parker et al., 2005; Lothon et al., 2008; Kalthoff et al., 2018). On hot,
cloud-free summer days, land–sea breeze systems can develop at the coast (in
conditions of moderate background monsoon flow, Parker et al., 2017), which
contribute to the transport of pollutants emitted along the urbanized coastal
strip of SWA.</p>
      <p id="d1e330">The main objective of the present study is to understand how shallow
overturning circulations developing in the lower troposphere over SWA on hot,
cloud-free days can shape the urban pollution plumes emitted from coastal
cities such as Accra, Lomé, Cotonou, and Lagos, both over the Gulf of
Guinea and inland. Here, we take advantage of the airborne measurements
acquired during the DACCIWA field campaign (June–July 2016, Flamant et al.,
2018) as part of the European Facility for Airborne Research (EUFAR) funded
Observing the Low-level Atmospheric Circulation in the Tropical Atlantic
(OLACTA) project to assess the characteristics of different aerosol layers
observed over the Gulf of Guinea. To study the role of atmospheric dynamics
in aerosol spatial distribution, we use a unique combination of airborne
observations from 2 July 2016, space-borne observations, and finally
high-resolution simulations performed using the Weather and Research Forecast
(WRF) and CHIMERE models. We show that the aerosol distribution on this day
is impacted by subsidence associated with zonal and meridional regional-scale
overturning circulations linked with land–sea surface temperature contrast
and orography over Ghana and Togo, and that the zonal circulation evidenced
on 2 July is a persistent feature over the Gulf of Guinea during July 2016.
The flight made on the afternoon of 2 July is unique in the sense that it is
the only flight conducted over the ocean during which a downward-looking
lidar was operational. The combination of remote sensing to monitor the
aerosol landscape over the Gulf of Guinea and in situ measurements to assess
the nature of the observed aerosols was only possible on that day. Therefore,
one should keep in mind that we are detailing a few mechanisms possibly
responsible for shaping the aerosol composition over the Gulf of Guinea, and
caution should be exercised when drawing more general conclusions regarding
the role of the observed circulation in the aerosol redistribution in this
region.</p>
      <p id="d1e333">The airborne and space-borne data used in this paper are presented in
Sect. 2, whereas the simulations are detailed in Sect. 3. Section 4 presents
the synoptic situation and airborne operations over SWA on 2 July 2016.
Atmospheric composition over the Gulf of Guinea as observed from aircraft in
situ and remote sensing data is discussed in Sect. 5. Insights into the
distribution of anthropogenic aerosols from tracer experiments are presented
in Sect. 6 and long-range transport of aerosols related to regional-scale
dynamics is described in Sect. 7. The influence of lower-tropospheric
overturning circulations induced by the land–sea surface temperature
gradient on the vertical distribution of aerosols over SWA is discussed in
Sect. 8. In Sect. 9, we summarize and conclude.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page12365?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Airborne observations</title>
      <p id="d1e347">During the DACCIWA field campaign, airborne operations on the afternoon of
2 July 2016 were conducted with the ATR 42 of the Service des Avions
Français Instrumentés pour la Recherche en Environnement (SAFIRE)
over the Gulf of Guinea (Fig. 1). The afternoon flight was carried out in the
framework of the EUFAR OLACTA project (Flamant et al., 2018). The aircraft
was equipped with in situ dynamical and thermodynamical probes (yielding mean
and turbulent variables), as well as in situ aerosol and cloud probes, and
gas-phase chemistry instruments. It also carried several radiometers (upward-
and downward-looking pyranometers and pyrgeometers) as well as the
Ultraviolet Lidar for Canopy Experiment (ULICE, Shang and Chazette, 2014).
Table 1 summarizes the instruments used in this study (see the Supplement
of Flamant et al., 2018, for the complete ATR 42 payload during the field
campaign).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e352"><bold>(a)</bold> Map of southern West Africa with the location of the
main landmarks (e.g. cities, countries). The thick blue line represents the
ATR 42 flight track on the afternoon of 2 July 2016. The red filled square
symbols represent DACCIWA radiosounding stations used in this study. The pink
filled circle represents the base of operation for aircraft during the
DACCIWA field campaign. The green thick box represents the domain of the
2 km WRF simulation. <bold>(b)</bold> Topographic map of Ghana and Togo showing
the main features of interest for this study as well as the transects along
which tracer simulations are shown in Fig. 8. The transects are centered at
0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, and 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E
(for I, II, III, and IV, respectively) and are 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wide.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e415">SAFIRE ATR 42 payload. Only instruments used in this study are
listed. The complete payload is detailed in the Supplement of
Flamant et al. (2018).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="156.490157pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="199.169291pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instrument</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Responsible institution</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (static &amp; dynamic): Rosemount 120 and 1221</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pressure <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1 s time resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SAFIRE/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">INS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GPS inertial units</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wind component, position <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1 s time resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SAFIRE/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adjustable (flow, orientation) Aerosol Community Inlet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle aerosol sampling <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CNRM/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aircraft DUAL CPC counter MARIE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle number concentrations <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm &amp; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (variable) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1 s time resolution <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Uncertainty: 10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LaMP/UBP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OPC Grimm 1.109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ambient particle size distribution <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.25–25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>6 s time resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CNRM/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PSAP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Absorption coefficient, black carbon content <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Blue 476 nm, green 530 nm, red 660 nm <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>10 s time resolution <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Uncertainty: 30 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LaMP/UPB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CAPS-PMex</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Extinction Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 530 nm <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1 s time resolution <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Uncertainty: 3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CNRM/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TEI 49i</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>20 s time resolution <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Precision: 1 ppbv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SAFIRE/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TEI 42CTL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyser</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>8 s time resolution <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Precision: 50 ppt integration over 120 s</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SAFIRE/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PICARRO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CO cavity ring-down spectroscopy <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>5 s time resolution <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Precision: 30 ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SAFIRE/CNRS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ULICE aerosol/cloud lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol backscatter @ 355 nm <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Resolution: 15 m on the vertical, averaged over 10 s (1000 shots) on the horizontal.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LSCE/UPMC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>ULICE observations</title>
      <p id="d1e748">The ULICE system was specifically designed to monitor the aerosol
distribution in the lower troposphere. During the DACCIWA field campaign,
ULICE was pointing to the nadir. The system's nominal temporal and
along-line-of-sight resolutions are 100 Hz and 15 m, respectively. In the
present study, we use lidar-derived profiles of aerosol-related properties
averaged over 1000 laser shots (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s sampling).</p>
      <p id="d1e761">The ULICE receiver implements two channels for the detection of the elastic
backscatter from the atmosphere in the parallel and perpendicular
polarization planes relative to the linear polarization of the emitted light.
The design and the calculations to retrieve the depolarization properties are
explained in Chazette et al. (2012). Using co- and cross-polarization
channels, the lidar allows identification of non-spherical particles in the
atmosphere such as dust. The overlap factor is nearly identical for the two
polarized channels, thereby permitting the assessment of the volume
depolarization ratio (VDR) very close to the aircraft (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m).</p>
      <p id="d1e774">Lidar-derived extinction coefficient profiles (as well as other optical
properties) are generally retrieved from so-called inversion procedures as
abundantly described in the literature (e.g. Chazette et al., 2012). During
the DACCIWA field campaign the lack of adequate observations did not allow us
to perform proper retrievals of aerosol optical properties using such
procedures. Hence, in the following we only use the apparent scattering ratio
(ASR, the ratio of the total apparent backscatter coefficient to the
molecular apparent backscatter coefficient denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
the VDR. Details are given in Appendix A, together with the characteristics
of the lidar system.</p>
      <p id="d1e788">Generally speaking, the VDR values observed during the flight are not very
high and absolute values may be subject to biases. Nevertheless, relative
fluctuations of VDR are accurately measured and useful as indicators of
changes in aerosol properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Aerosol- and gas-phase chemistry measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e797">For this study, we focus on available observations that can provide insights
into the origin of the aerosol distribution over coastal SWA, namely biomass
burning aerosols, dust, and urban pollution. Because of the complex
atmospheric dynamics in the area, we cannot assume that only homogeneous air
masses will be sampled with the aircraft. Rather, the selected observations
are indicators of which type of aerosol dominates the composition of a given
sampled air mass.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e802">Biomass burning aerosols: identification was conducted at times of
enhanced ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and carbon monoxide (CO) mixing ratios as well
as aerosol parameters such as light absorption/extinction and number
concentration.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e817">Urban pollution: the main tracers used were CO, nitrogen oxide
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and total (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) particle number concentrations.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e842">Terrigenous aerosols (dust): layers were identified at times of
enhanced aerosol parameters (particularly super-micron aerosols), in
complement to the lidar-derived VDR observations and not followed by CO or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements (mostly associated with biomass burning here).</p></list-item></list>
Sea salt cannot formally be identified with the in situ measurements
conducted with the ATR 42 payload during DACCIWA. Gas-phase and aerosol
metrics above are typically insensitive to relative humidity. The aerosol
sampling lines are heated (to 35–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), effectively limiting water
uptake and relative humidity to values below 40 %. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements in the ATR are based on dual-cell technology, and are therefore
largely insensitive to ambient relative humidity according to Spicer et
al. (2010), in spite of the humid environmental conditions over the Gulf of
Guinea.</p>
      <p id="d1e877">In addition, absorption Angstrom exponent (AAE) measurements are used to
distinguish urban air pollution from biomass burning smoke (Clarke et al.,
2007) and mineral dust (Collaud Coen et al., 2004). In general the AAE values
for carbonaceous particles are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for urban pollution, between 1.5 and
2 for biomass smoke, and around 3 for dust (Bergstrom et al., 2007). AAE
values are rather insensitive to the size distribution of sampled aerosols.
Therefore, even though aerosol measurements may be affected by the inlet
efficiency, the derived AAE will still be a good indicator for discriminating
plumes dominated by dust, biomass burning, and urban aerosols (e.g.
Kirchstetter et al., 2004; Bergstrom et al., 2007; Toledano et al., 2007;
Russell et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e890">The Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP, model PSAP3L) measures the
aerosol optical absorption coefficient at three wavelengths (467, 530, and
660 nm) with a sampling time of 10 s. The data were corrected for multiple
scattering and shadowing effects according to Bond et al. (1999) and
Müller et al. (2009). Data with a filter transmission under 0.7 are
removed as corrections are not applicable. Furthermore, PSAP measurements
were used to compute the AAE. The particle extinction coefficient is measured
with a cavity attenuated phase shift particle light extinction monitor
(CAPS-PMex, Aerodyne Research) operated at the wavelength of 530 nm. Data
were processed with a time resolution of 1 s. An integrated nephelometer
(Ecotech, model Aurora 3000) provided aerosol light scattering at three
wavelengths (450, 550, and 700 nm), which was used to correct for the impact
of aerosol scattering based on the correction scheme by Anderson and Ogren
(1998) and using correction factors obtained by Müller et al. (2011)
without a submicron size cut-off. Uncertainties in the absorption coefficient
are of the order of 30 % (Müller et al., 2011). The nephelometer was
calibrated with particle-free air and high-purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to and
after the campaign.</p>
      <p id="d1e904">Prior to the campaign, the CAPS data were evaluated against the combination
of the nephelometer and the PSAP measurements. The instrument intercomparison
has been performed with purely scattering ammonium sulfate particles and with
strongly absorbing black carbon particles. Both types of aerosols were
generated by nebulizing a solution of the respective substances and
size-selected using a differential mobility analyser. For instrument
intercomparison purposes, the extinction coefficient from the nephelometer
and PSAP was adjusted to that for 530 nm by using the scattering and
absorption Angstrom exponent. The instrument evaluation showed an excellent
accuracy of the CAPS measurements by comparison to the combination of
nephelometer and PSAP measurements. The level of uncertainty obtained for the
test aerosol was beyond the upper limit of the CAPS uncertainty, which was
estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % according to
Massoli et al. (2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e918">Total particle concentrations for particle diameters above 10 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
are measured using a Condensational Particle
Counter (CPC, model MARIE built by the University of Mainz), calibrated prior
to the experiment (sampling time 1 Hz). The associated uncertainty is of the
order of 10 %. Aerosol optical size in the range 0.25–25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m is
measured using an Optical Particle Counter (OPC, model 1.109 from GRIMM
Technologies) in 32 channels, with a 6 s sampling rate. Particulate matter
number concentrations for size ranges smaller than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, between 1
and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and between 2.5 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, are computed from
the OPC, and are referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, in the following. The GRIMM OPC was
calibrated with size-standard particles prior to and after the field
campaign.</p>
      <p id="d1e1006">Sampling with all the above-mentioned instruments is achieved through the
Community Aerosol Inlet of the ATR 42.</p>
      <p id="d1e1009">Regarding gas-phase chemistry, we make use of an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyser and a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyser from Thermo Environmental Instruments (TEI
Model 49i and TEI 42CTL, respectively). The associated uncertainty is of the
order of 5 and 10 %, respectively. Carbon monoxide (CO) measurements are
performed using the near-infrared cavity ring-down spectroscopy technique
(G2401, Picarro Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), with a time resolution of 5 s.</p>
      <p id="d1e1034">All in-cloud measurements are removed from the data shown here.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page12367?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Space-borne observations</title>
      <p id="d1e1044">The Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infra-Red Imager (SEVIRI), onboard Meteosat
Second Generation (MSG), measures aerosol optical depth (AOD) with spatial
and temporal resolutions of 10 km and 15 min, respectively (Bennouna et
al., 2009). We use the operational version 1.04 of the AOD product at
550 nm, downloaded from the ICARE data service center
(<uri>http://www.icare.univ-lille1.fr/</uri>, last access: 16 August 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e1050">The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS, Salmonson et al.,
1989; King et al., 1992) flies aboard polar-orbiting platforms Aqua and
Terra. Terra crosses the Equator from north to south in the morning (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:30 local time), whereas Aqua crosses from south to north during the
afternoon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:30 local time). They provide a complete coverage of the
Earth's surface in 1 to 2 days with a resolution between 250 and 1000 m,
depending on the spectral band. In the following, we use MODIS-derived level
2 AODs at 550 nm from both Terra and Aqua. Level 2 products are provided as
granules with a spatial resolution of 10 km at nadir. The standard deviation
on the AOD retrieval (Remer et al., 2005) over land (ocean) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We also use level 3
daily sea surface temperature (SST) data derived from the 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
thermal infrared band available at 9.26 km spatial resolution for daytime
passes (Werdell et al., 2013).</p>
      <?pagebreak page12368?><p id="d1e1112">The hourly land surface temperature products from the Copernicus Global Land
Service (<uri>https://land.copernicus.eu/global/products/lst</uri>, last access: 16 August 2018) used in this study are available at 5 km spatial
resolution. The radiative skin temperature of the land surface is estimated
from the infrared spectral channels of sensors onboard a constellation of
geostationary satellites (among them SEVIRI on MSG). Its estimation further
depends on the surface albedo, the vegetation cover, and the soil moisture.</p>
      <p id="d1e1118">The Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) flies onboard
the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO), following
a similar polar orbit to Aqua within the A-train constellation. In this work,
we use CALIOP level-2 data (version 4.10) below 8 km above mean sea level
(a.m.s.l.; <uri>https://www-calipso.larc.nasa.gov/products/</uri>, last access: 16 August 2018). Details on the CALIOP instrument, data
acquisition, and science products are given by Winker et al. (2007). We
mainly consider the aerosol typing, which was corrected in version 4.10, as
described in Burton et al. (2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Radiosounding network</title>
      <p id="d1e1130">During the DACCIWA field campaign, the upper air network was successfully
augmented in June and July 2016 to a spatial density unprecedented for SWA
(see Flamant et al., 2018). In this study, we use radiosounding data from
meteorological balloons launched in Abidjan, Accra, and Cotonou on the
afternoon of 2 July (see Fig. 1). The management of soundings at Abidjan and
Cotonou was subcontracted to a private company, while the Ghana
Meteorological Agency took care of the soundings in Accra. The Karlsruhe
Institute of Technology was instrumental in the Ghana sounding and staff from
the Agence pour la Sécurité de la Navigation Aérienne en Afrique
et à Madagascar helped with the Abidjan and Cotonou soundings.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Models and simulations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>ECMWF operational analyses and CAMS forecasts</title>
      <p id="d1e1145">For the investigation of atmospheric dynamics at the regional scale, we use
operational analyses from the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS, a global
data assimilation and forecasting system) developed by the European Centre
for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The analyses presented in this
paper are associated with IFS model cycle CY41r2. The
original T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1279 (O1280) resolution of the operational analysis
was transformed onto a 0.125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> regular latitude–longitude grid.
Long-range transport of biomass burning and dust-laden air masses transported
over the Gulf of Guinea are monitored with respective optical depths at
550 nm calculated from the ECMWF Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring
Service-Integrated Forecasting System (CAMS-IFS; Flemming et al., 2015)
available at a resolution of 0.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>WRF and CHIMERE simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e1182">The WRF model (version v3.7.1, Shamarock and Klemp, 2008) and the CHIMERE
chemistry-transport model (2017 version, Mailler et al., 2017) are used in
this study. WRF calculates meteorological fields that are then used in
offline mode by CHIMERE to (i) conduct tracer experiments and (ii) compute
backplumes. WRF and CHIMERE simulations are performed on common domains. For
the period 30 June–3 July 2016, two simulations are conducted for both WRF
and CHIMERE to provide insights into the airborne observations: a simulation
with a 10 km mesh size in a domain extending from 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to
14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and from 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (larger than the
domain shown in Fig. 1a) and a simulation with a 2 km mesh size in a
domain extending from 2.8 to 9.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and from 2.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to
3.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (Fig. 1a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1249">The nested WRF simulations are first performed with hourly outputs. For the
two horizontal resolutions, the same physical parameterizations are used and
are those described in Deroubaix et al. (2018). The ABL scheme is the one
proposed by Yonsei University (Hong et al., 2006), the microphysics is
calculated using the Single Moment-6 class scheme (Hong and Lim, 2006), the
radiation scheme is RRTMG (Mlawer et al., 1997), the cumulus parameterization
is the Grell–Dévényi scheme, and the surface fluxes are calculated
using the Noah scheme (Ek et al., 2003). The 10 km WRF simulation uses
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Final global analyses as
initial and boundary conditions. NCEP Real-Time Global SSTs (Thiébaux et
al., 2003) are used as lower boundary conditions over the ocean. The
meteorological initial and boundary conditions for the 2 km WRF simulation
are provided by the 10 km WRF run, which, in turn, receives information from
the 2 km WRF simulation (two-way nesting). The chemistry and aerosol initial
and boundary conditions for the 2 km CHIMERE simulation are provided by the
10 km simulation (one-way nesting). The simulations are carried out using 32
vertical sigma-pressure levels from the surface to 50 hPa, with 6 to 8
levels in the ABL.</p>
      <p id="d1e1252">Then the CHIMERE simulations are performed. The horizontal grid is the same
as WRF. Vertically, CHIMERE uses 20 levels from the surface to
300 hPa and three-dimensional meteorological
fields are vertically interpolated from the WRF to the CHIMERE grid. The
two-dimensional fields, such as 10 m wind speed, 2 m temperature, surface
fluxes, and boundary-layer height are used directly in CHIMERE. The chemistry
and aerosol initial and boundary conditions for the 2 km CHIMERE simulation
are provided by the 10 km simulation (one-way nesting).</p>
      <p id="d1e1255">The representation of the atmospheric dynamics in the 2 km simulation was
verified against dynamical and thermodynamical observations from both
aircraft (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) and the DACCIWA radiosounding network
from Accra and Cotonou (Fig. S2), yielding satisfactory results. For each
aircraft and sounding data point, the<?pagebreak page12369?> corresponding WRF grid cell value is
extracted. A bilinear interpolation is performed horizontally to exactly
match the horizontal position of the balloon or aircraft. Linear
interpolations are also performed vertically between two WRF levels as well
as temporally between two consecutive model outputs to match the altitude of
the balloon or aircraft at the time the pressure, temperature, humidity, and
wind observations are made.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Tracer experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e1264">A series of numerical tracer experiments were conducted to aid interpretation
of airborne observations, particularly by separating (locally emitted) urban
pollution from long-range transported aerosol plumes. Passive tracers were
set to be released from four major coastal cities: Accra (Ghana,
5.60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 0.19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), Lomé (Togo, 6.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
1.23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Cotonou (Benin, 6.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 2.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and
Lagos (Nigeria, 6.49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 3.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). We conducted two sets of
experiments, one for which emissions from the cities are identical (TRA_I,
with “I” standing for “identical”) and one for which the emissions are
different and proportional to the size of the population (TRA_D, with “D”
standing for “different”), based on the World Urbanization Prospect report
(2015). In the latter case, emissions from Lomé, Accra, and Lagos are
scaled to Cotonou emissions (1.8, 3, and 13 times, respectively). Large
cities in developing countries are generally considered to generate an
atmospheric pollution roughly proportional to their total population due to a
lack of adequate emission policies. Tracers are emitted in the lowest level
of the model (below 10 m altitude) during the period of interest: in
experiences TRA_D12 and TRA_I12, tracers are emitted continuously on 1 and
2 July, while in experiences TRA_D1 and TRA_D2, tracer emissions only occur
on 1 and 2 July, respectively. Emissions take place in a
2 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km mesh for each city. For the sake of simplicity,
emissions are constant in time and thus do not have a diurnal cycle. Tracer
concentrations in the atmosphere are then shown in arbitrary units (a.u.) and
coloured according to the city: blue for Accra, green for Lomé, and red
for Cotonou.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Backplumes</title>
      <p id="d1e1353">Backplumes (or back-trajectory ensembles) are computed according to Mailler
et al. (2016), using a dedicated regional CHIMERE simulation with a mesh size
of 30 km, covering the whole of Africa. The objective is to assess the
origin of an elevated aerosol layer observed with the ULICE lidar (see
Sect. 5). For this study, 50 tracers are released at the same time for
selected locations along the ATR 42 flight trajectory, where large aerosol
contents are observed: (i) the southernmost part of the flight
(2.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 4.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and (ii) the northernmost part of the
flight (1.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 5.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). For both locations, backplumes are
launched at 2500 m a.m.s.l. on 2 July 2016 at 17:00 UTC (i.e. the height
of the elevated aerosol layer above the Gulf of Guinea; see Sect. 5). Very
similar results are obtained for both backplumes. A similar sensitivity
analysis is conducted by changing the altitude of the backplume from 2500 m
to 3500 m a.m.s.l., but the effect is small (not shown). There again, very
similar results are obtained for both backplumes. Hence, in the following we
shall only show results from the backplume released from the northernmost
location at 2500 m a.m.s.l.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Synoptic situation and airborne operations on 2 July 2016</title>
      <p id="d1e1400">The entire DACCIWA aircraft campaign took place during WAM post-onset
conditions (Knippertz et al., 2017), i.e. after the migration of the
climatological precipitation maximum from the coast to the Sahel, with the
monsoon flow being well established over SWA. The campaign took place after
the onset of the Atlantic Cold Tongue as evident in Fig. 3 of Knippertz et
al. (2017), which also highlights that the coastal upwelling started
progressively building up around 27 June 2016.</p>
      <p id="d1e1403">In the period spanning from 29 June to 5 July 2016, the major weather
disturbances over SWA are associated with African easterly waves travelling
along the well-organized African easterly jet (AEJ). A cyclonic centre
propagating to the south of the AEJ (identified from ECMWF 850 hPa
streamline charts, not shown) originated from eastern Nigeria on 29 June,
sweeping through SWA during the following days.</p>
      <p id="d1e1406">On 2 July 2016, the cyclonic centre is located at the coast of Sierra Leone
(see the disturbance labelled “F” in Fig. 14 of Knippertz et al., 2017).
The monsoonal winds are almost southerly over the Gulf of Guinea (south of
4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and progressively veer to southwesterly farther north and over
the continent (Fig. S3a). In the mid-troposphere, SWA is under the influence
of easterly flow conditions (Fig. S3b). West of 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, the AEJ is
located over the Sahel and is intensified along its northern boundary by a
strong Saharan high located over Libya. The AEJ maximum is seen off the coast
of Senegal.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1429">SEVIRI visible images of SWA on 2 July at <bold>(a)</bold> 12:00 UTC
and <bold>(b)</bold> 15:00 UTC. Country borders are shown as solid white lines.
The yellow thick box represents the domain of the 2 km WRF simulation as in
Fig. 1a. The coordinates of the lower left corner of the images are
0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N/8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, and the coordinates of the upper right corner of
the images are 13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1490">The region of interest experiences high insolation on 1 July with
temperatures in the 30s of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C across SWA and widespread low-level
clouds dissolving rapidly in the course of the morning. On 2 July, there is a
clear indication of land–sea breeze clouds in the high-resolution SEVIRI
image at 12:00 UTC (Fig. 2a) with relatively cloud-free conditions over
the ocean, where the ATR 42 flew later on. The land–sea breeze front is seen
inland to follow the coastline from western Ghana to western Nigeria. The
front is observed to move farther inland until 15:00 UTC (Fig. 2b) with
shallow convective cells forming along it. Farther south the area is free of
low-level clouds (both over land and ocean). Oceanic convection occurred
offshore on the previous day and mesoscale convective systems were present
over northern–central<?pagebreak page12370?> Nigeria on the morning of 2 July. Satellite images
show both oceanic and inland convection to be decaying by midday (Fig. 2a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1502">On 2 July, the ATR 42 aircraft took off from Lomé at 14:45 UTC
(<italic>NB: UTC equals local time in July in Togo</italic>) and headed towards the
ocean, flying almost parallel to the Ghana coastline (Fig. 1a) at low level
(in the marine ABL). Before reaching Cape Three Points (close to the border
between Ghana and Ivory Coast), the ATR 42 changed direction and headed
south. Upon reaching its southernmost position (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), the
ATR 42 turned around, climbed to 3200 m a.m.s.l., and finally headed back
to Lomé at that level. On the way back, the aircraft changed, heading
around 16:53 UTC to fly along the coast prior to landing. The ATR 42 passed
the longitude of Accra at 17:29 UTC and landed in Lomé at 18:07 UTC.
The high-level flight back allowed mapping out of the vertical distribution
of aerosols and clouds using the ULICE lidar. In situ aerosol- and gas-phase
chemistry measurements will be used in the following to characterize the
composition of aerosols and related air masses sampled with the lidar,
particularly during the ascent over the ocean (between 16:33 and 16:47 UTC),
the elevated levelled run,<?pagebreak page12371?> and the descent towards Lomé airport (between
17:53 and 18:07 UTC).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Atmospheric composition over the Gulf of Guinea and the link with
lower tropospheric circulation</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1535">Time–height evolution of the ULICE-derived <bold>(a)</bold> apparent
scattering ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> volume depolarization
ratio (VDR) below the ATR 42 flight track over the Gulf of Guinea between
16:44 and 18:00 UTC on 2 July 2016 (see Fig. 1a). The ATR leg parallel to
the coastline starts at 16:54 UTC. The ATR passed the longitude of Accra at
17:29 UTC. See text for explanations of features A–E. The arrow in
<bold>(b)</bold> points to feature A. The distance covered by the ATR 42 along
this transect is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1574">Figure 3 shows ULICE-derived ASR and VDR cross sections acquired between
16:40 and 18:00 UTC, including data gathered during the aircraft ascent over
the ocean and descent in the vicinity of the coast. It is worth noting that
most of the lidar data shown in Fig. 3 were acquired while the aircraft was
flying along the coastline (from 16:53 UTC on). Wind measurements from the
Abidjan, Accra, and Cotonou soundings as well as from the ATR 42 sounding
over the ocean clearly show that above 1.2 km a.m.s.l. the flow is easterly
over the region of aircraft operation (Fig. 4). Given that the heading of
the aircraft along this elevated leg is 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lidar “curtains”
above 1.2 km a.m.s.l. in Fig. 3 map out aerosol layers that are
transported westward (with the ATR 42 flying against the mean flow).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1588"><bold>(a)</bold> Wind speed and <bold>(b)</bold> wind direction profiles
measured during the ATR 42 sounding over the ocean (16:30 to 16:47 UTC, ATR,
black solid line) as well as from the radiosoundings launched in Accra at
17:00 UTC (AC, red solid line), in Abidjan at 16:08 UTC (AB, green solid
line), and in Cotonou at 16:12 UTC (CO, blue solid line). The location of
the radiosounding sites is shown in Fig. 1a.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1603">Several outstanding features are highlighted in Fig. 3. Generally few
clouds were encountered along the flight track (they appear in dark red
colours). Exceptions are the low-level clouds at the top of the marine ABL
with a base around 500 m a.m.s.l. to the west of the track between 16:55
and 17:02 UTC (Fig. 3a). The vertical extension and the number of the
cumulus clouds topping the marine ABL decrease towards the east. This
shoaling of the marine ABL is likely ascribed to the increasing trajectory
length of near-surface parcels over the cold coastal waters (as the aircraft
flies over the coastal upwelling region). Near Lomé, the top of the
marine ABL can only be identified from the higher ASR values, reflecting the
impact of high relative humidity on the scattering properties of the marine
aerosols (Fig. 3a). An isolated deeper convective cloud is observed before
16:48 UTC between 2 and 2.5 km, which is also sampled in situ by the ATR 42
cloud probes. The top of the cloud is likely connected to a temperature
inversion observed during the aircraft ascent over the ocean (not shown).
High lidar-derived ASRs are observed near the marine ABL top and to some
extent in the mixed layer (Fig. 3a). The ASR-enhanced layers do not show in
the VDR plot, possibly because they are related to the presence of sea-salt
aerosols, which are spherical particles that do not depolarize the
backscattered lidar signal. However, the high ASR values could also be
related to the advection of biomass burning aerosols from the south in the
marine ABL (e.g. Menut et al., 2018) as suggested by the relatively high CO
and extinction coefficient values observed in the ABL over the ocean
(110 ppb and 50 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) in Fig. 5c and e. Biomass burning
aerosols are also generally associated with low VDR values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1620">Profiles measured during the ATR 42 sounding over the ocean (16:33
to 16:47 UTC, red solid line) and at the coast in the vicinity of Lomé
(17:53 to 18:07 UTC, black solid line) for <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, <bold>(c)</bold> CO
concentration, <bold>(d)</bold> total aerosol concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured
with the CPC, and <bold>(e)</bold> extinction coefficient.
<bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration profiles (black, red, and blue, respectively) measured over the
ocean (dashed lines) and at the coast in the vicinity of Lomé (solid
lines). <bold>(g)</bold> AAE profiles in the vicinity of Lomé computed
between 467 and 530, 530 and 660, and 467 and 660 nm (black, red, and green
solid symbols, respectively).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1730">In addition to clouds and marine ABL aerosols, several distinct aerosol
features in the free troposphere stand out from the lidar
plot.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1737">Features A and B correspond to plumes with high values of ASR (larger
than 1.2) and VDR (larger than 0.8 %) observed near the coast between the
surface and 0.5 km a.m.s.l. and between 0.5 and 1.5 km a.m.s.l.,
respectively, during the aircraft descent towards Lomé. According to the
aircraft in situ observations, feature B is located in a strong wind shear
environment at the top (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) of the ABL (Fig. 4) with its upper
part being located in the easterly flow, while feature A is associated with a
south-southwesterly flow. This sheared environment likely explains the
slanted structure of the aerosol plume associated with feature B.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1751">Feature C is an intermediate aerosol layer characterized by VDR values
lower than those for feature B, suggesting more spherical (possibly more aged
pollution) aerosols. This feature is bounded by much lower VDR values,
especially above, while being associated with higher ASR values than its
immediate environment. This feature is slanted between Lomé and the
deeper isolated cloud. The layer thickness is larger near Lomé than over
the more remote ocean, leading to a less slanted layer top. This layer has
also been sampled in situ by the ATR 42 during its ascent over the ocean. It
is characterized by VDRs of the order of 0.7 %. Based on the aircraft
sounding data, it appears that this layer is mostly advected with the
easterly flow above 1.2 km a.m.s.l. (Fig. 4).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1755">Feature D is an elevated aerosol layer observed at the level of the
aircraft (i.e. at 3200 m a.m.s.l.) in the vicinity of Lomé, which was
also sampled in situ by the ATR 42. This layer is separated from feature B by
a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m deep layer of non-depolarizing aerosols (very low VDRs). The
base of this layer exhibits a slanting similar to the one observed for the
top of the intermediate aerosol layer (feature B). Large VDRs are found in
the core of this feature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). It appears that this layer is also
advected with the easterly flow above 1.2 km a.m.s.l.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1779">Feature E is also an elevated aerosol layer, but observed farther south
over the ocean and in the vicinity of the isolated deeper cloud. It is
characterized by large ASR values but low VDR values (suggesting the presence
of low-depolarizing aerosols).</p></list-item></list>
Given the distance of the oceanic profile to the coast (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km), we
consider the oceanic (ascending) profile to be representative of background
aerosol- or gas-phase conditions upstream of coastal SWA. Using this profile
as a reference, we have analysed the characteristics of the aerosol plume
sampled with the ATR 42 (both in situ and remotely) during the aircraft
descent over Lomé. The most significant differences between the ATR 42
observations acquired during the oceanic profile and the profile over
Lomé are found below 1.7 km a.m.s.l. (Fig. 5) and are associated with
features A and B.</p>
      <p id="d1e1793">ATR 42 observations associated with feature A (below 0.5 km a.m.s.l.) show
increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol concentrations
(Fig. 5a, c, f, respectively) as well as an extinction coefficient
(Fig. 5e), together with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration reduction
(Fig. 5b). Plume A is related to fresh anthropogenic emissions from
Lomé, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The addition of a large quantity of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the atmosphere can lead to a significant shift in
the ozone chemical equilibrium, which can effectively result in near-source
consumption, as observed here. No CPC-derived aerosol concentrations are
available below 0.5 km a.m.s.l. The few PSAP measurements made around
0.5 km a.m.s.l. during the descent yield an AAE value around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 5g). These are solid indications that the ATR 42 sampled a fresh
urban anthropogenic plume near Lomé (Brito et al., 2018), advected with
the south-southwesterly monsoon flow (the ATR 42 being downstream of Lomé
then).</p>
      <?pagebreak page12373?><p id="d1e1862">ATR 42 observations associated with feature B (between 0.5 and
1.5 km a.m.s.l.) show increases in concentrations for all variables under
scrutiny, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter (Fig. 5b) is the most
significant difference between the characteristics of features B and A. Other
differences include the much smaller increases in CO concentration and OPC
aerosol (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
concentrations as well as extinction coefficients observed in feature B
(Fig. 5c, e, f, respectively). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (an indicator of
air mass aging, e.g. Jaffe and Wigder, 2012, and Kim et al., 2013) observed
to be associated with feature B increases with respect to feature A (0.25 vs.
0.15, i.e. a 65 % increase), which is compatible with a further processed
urban plume, as also corroborated by wind measurements. These observations,
together with wind measurements, suggest that feature B corresponds to a more
aged urban plume. This could be an indication that the ATR 42 sampled more
than just the Lomé plume. This will be investigated using tracer
experiments in Sect. 6. Above 2 km a.m.s.l., the AAE increases to larger
values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), evidencing a change in aerosol nature, i.e. a transition
from local urban emissions to elevated background pollution (Fig. 5g),
possibly resulting from a mixture of long-lived anthropogenic pollution and
long-range transport of dust and biomass burning aerosols from previous days.</p>
      <p id="d1e1948">Regarding feature C, the in situ measurements do not allow characterization
of the nature of the aerosols. The origin of this layer will also be
investigated using tracer experiments (see Sect. 6).</p>
      <p id="d1e1951">The in situ measurements along the elevated ATR 42 track reveal significant
differences in aerosol- or gas-phase concentrations and properties between
the western part (where feature E is observed with the lidar) and the eastern
part (where feature D is observed) of the ATR 42 leg (Fig. 6). In the
western part, ATR 42 measurements highlight enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO
concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppvb, respectively, Fig. 6a, b)
together with AAE values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6f), suggesting the presence
of biomass burning aerosol. Furthermore, aerosol number concentrations
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show enhanced values for small particles (100
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, Fig. 6c, d). The observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are larger than the background values measured during the
ascent over the ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv, 150 ppbv, and 500 no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, Fig. 5b, c, f). Large extinction values are also observed
(100 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), largely exceeding the background value of 30 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(compare Figs. 6e and 5e).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2115"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, <bold>(b)</bold> CO
concentration, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (black, red, and green, respectively),
<bold>(d)</bold> CPC-derived total aerosol concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(e)</bold> extinction coefficient, and <bold>(f)</bold> AAE computed between
476 and 530, 530 and 660, and 476 and 660 nm (black, red, and green crosses,
respectively) measured during the ATR 42 elevated straight level run from
16:47 to 17:53 UTC. The distance covered by the ATR 42 along this transect
is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">395</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2219">In the eastern part of the leg, AAE values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also suggest that
biomass burning aerosols are sampled. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations diminish approximately halfway through the leg to
their background values (from 17:16 UTC on, Fig. 6a, b, c, d), as does the
extinction coefficient. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations increase significantly, as opposed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
combined with enhanced lidar-derived VDR suggest mixing with larger
particles, possibly dust. Further insight into the origin of these aerosols,
observed as a result of long-range transport, will be investigated in
Sect. 7.</p>
      <p id="d1e2315">Finally, in Sect. 8 we will investigate the cause of the slanting of the
elevated aerosol layers from west to east along the flight track, which also
possibly leads, in addition to the colder SSTs, to a thinning of the marine
ABL and the suppression of clouds at its top in the vicinity of Lomé
(Fig. 3).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page12374?><sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Tracer experiments for anthropogenic aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e2324">The objectives of the tracer experiments are 3-fold: (i) understand how the
lower tropospheric circulation shapes the structure of the urban pollution
plume emitted from coastal cities and observed with the ULICE lidar (marked A
and B in Fig. 3), (ii) assess which cities contribute to the plume observed
with ULICE and whether it results from Lomé emissions only, and
(iii) provide insight into the origin of the intermediate aerosol layer
(marked B in Fig. 3). For this we have analysed along the ATR 42 aircraft
flight track the tracer simulations introduced in Sect. 3.</p>
      <p id="d1e2327">As an ancillary objective, we also aim to assess how far over the ocean the
urban pollution aerosols can be transported by the complex low-level
circulation over SWA. For this, we have analysed the tracer simulations along
four 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wide north–south transects spanning the longitudinal range
of the ATR 42 flight (centered at 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; cf. Fig. 1b).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <title>Structure of the urban plume along the coastline</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2382">Time–height evolution of tracer concentration (a.u.) below the ATR
42 between 14:00 and 18:00 UTC for the <bold>(a)</bold> TRA_D12,
<bold>(b)</bold> TRA_I12, <bold>(c)</bold> TRA_D1, and <bold>(d)</bold> TRA_D2
experiments (see Sect. 3.2.1 for details). Tracer emissions in Accra,
Lomé, and Cotonou appear in blueish, greenish, and reddish colours,
respectively. The solid grey line represents the altitude of the aircraft.
The dashed magenta line represents the height of the top of the marine ABL
from the WRF 2 km simulation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2403">Figure 7 shows the structure of the urban pollution plume along the
aircraft track between 14:00 and 18:00 UTC in the TRA_D and TRA_I
experiments. In TRA_D12 (Fig. 7a), feature A as observed in the lidar VDR
field (Fig. 3) corresponds to emissions from Lomé only (in greenish
colours) in the ABL (magenta dotted line), while feature B corresponds to
emissions from Lomé mainly with a contribution from Accra (superimposed
with the Lomé plume) and Cotonou (reddish colours in the upper western
boundary of the Lomé<?pagebreak page12375?> plume). In the TRA_I12 experiment, the Accra
contribution is missing altogether (Fig. 7b). More strikingly, TRA_D2
shows an elevated tracer plume over the ocean originating from Accra (blueish
colours), which mimics feature C in Fig. 3 fairly well. This feature is
almost absent in TRA_I1, stressing the importance of accounting for enhanced
emissions from Accra (with respect to Lomé and Cotonou) to produce a more
realistic tracer simulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2406">Results from experiment TRA_D1 (Fig. 7c) show that feature C in the lidar
VDR observations is likely related to emissions from Accra from the previous
day only (i.e. 1 July), as the structure of the Accra plume in TRA_D12 and
TRA_D1 is the same. In experiment TRA_D1, the structures of the plume
corresponding to features A and B in Fig. 3 are clearly altered by the lack
of recent emissions in Lomé on 2 July (the lower part of the plume is
likely advected northward with the southerly flow here). This is confirmed by
looking at the result of TRA_D2 (Fig. 7d): the fresh emissions (on 2 July)
from Lomé do lead to a realistic simulation of the shape of features A
and B observed by lidar. On the other hand, feature C is not reproduced in
this experiment, suggesting that feature B as observed by lidar is a mix of
fresh and more aged emissions from Lomé, as well as aged emissions from
Cotonou and Accra, while feature C is almost entirely related to aged
pollution from Accra. What is also worth noting is that no emissions from
Lagos on 1 and 2 July are observed along the ATR 42 flight track in the
TRA_D and TRA_I experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <title>Southward transport of the urban plume over the Gulf of Guinea</title>
      <p id="d1e2415">Figure 8 shows the structure of the urban pollution plume along four
0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wide north–south transects centered at 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, and 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E on 2 July at
16:00 UTC, i.e. halfway through the ATR 42 flight.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2465">Tracer concentrations (a.u.) from the TRA_D12 experiment (see
Sect. 3.2.1 for details) along four 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wide north–south transects
centered on <bold>(a)</bold> 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, <bold>(b)</bold> 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,
<bold>(c)</bold> 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, and <bold>(d)</bold> 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (marked I,
II, III, and IV, respectively, in Fig. 1b) at 16:00 UTC. Tracer emissions
in Accra, Lomé, and Cotonou appear in blueish, greenish, and reddish
colours, respectively, as in Fig. 7. Also shown are meridional–vertical
wind vectors in the transects. The green solid line represents the ABL
derived from the WRF 2 km simulation. The vertical dashed lines represent
the locations of the cities of Accra (blue), Lomé (green), and Cotonou
(red). The orography along the transects is shaded in black.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2532">Along the westernmost transect, labelled I in Fig. 1b (centered at
0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), the pollution plume is only composed of emissions from
Accra and is lifted off the surface above the ABL (Fig. 8a). Note that no
tracer emissions directly occur in this transect, with Accra emissions being
contained in transect II, to the east of transect I. As discussed by
Knippertz et al. (2017), during the campaign, pollution plumes from<?pagebreak page12376?> coastal
cities were mostly directed northeastwards (see their Fig. 19). Hence the
tracer plume seen in the experiment on 2 July is associated with transport of
tracers emitted on 1 July in the monsoon flow toward the northeast, which are
then vertically mixed (due to thermally and mechanically driven turbulence),
and westward advection of the tracers by the easterly flow above the monsoon
layer. Over the ocean, the plume is seen to extend as far south as
4.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, i.e. the southernmost extension seen on all transects shown
in Fig. 8. This is linked to a small equatorward component in the easterly
flow.</p>
      <p id="d1e2553">Along the transect centered at 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W (transect II, Fig. 1b), the
plume is seen to be in contact with the surface as far north as
6.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Fig. 8b). The strong ascent at 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N is related to
the presence of the Mampong range in the Ashanti uplands (see Fig. 1b). The
presence of the range and the associated upward motion contributes to deep
mixing of the plume north of Accra, with the top of the tracer plume reaching
4 km above the ground level or higher. Strong subsidence is seen north of
the Mampong range that mixes tracers down to the surface. Other ascending and
subsiding motions are detectable over the Lake Volta area, which could be
related to land–lake breeze systems. South of 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, the tracer
plume is as deep as along transect I, but does not extend southward over the
ocean. Here also, only emissions from Lomé contribute to the pollution
plume on 2 July, suggesting that it took 24 h for these emissions to reach
transect II.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2595">Ten-day CHIMERE-derived backplume ending at 2500 m a.m.s.l. at
5.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N/1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E at 17:00 UTC on 2 July 2016.
<bold>(a)</bold> Individual trajectories are shown as blue solid lines over a
political map of Africa with state borders appearing in black. The red
triangle indicates the location of the origin of the back-trajectories.
<bold>(b)</bold> Time–height representation of the individual back-trajectories
shown in the top panel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2628">The pollution plume along the transect centered at 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (transect
III) is structurally similar to the one along transect II, but reaches
farther inland (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N at the surface, Fig. 8c) than in
transect II, likely due to the gap between the Mampong range and the
Akwapim–Togo range, and the flat terrain around Lake Volta. Again, ascending
and subsiding motions are detectable over the Lake Volta area that could be
related to land–lake breeze systems. Over the ocean, the plume reaches
5.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N at 1.5 km a.m.s.l. Emissions from Lomé and Cotonou
contribute to the upper and southernmost part of the tracer plume along this
transect, just north of 5.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p>
      <p id="d1e2676">Finally, along transect IV, the composition of the urban pollution plume is
dominated by emissions from Accra, with a small contribution of emissions
from Cotonou and Lomé in<?pagebreak page12377?> the southern, uppermost part of the plume
because of short-range westward transport above the monsoon flow (Fig. 8d).
The Accra plume is seen to extend from the coastline to as far as
9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and above the depth of the continental ABL, but not as deeply
as along other transects with more pronounced orography. The northward
extension of the plume suggests that emissions from Accra are transported
over Togo along the eastern flank of the Akwapim–Togo range. Over the ocean,
the upper part of the plume barely reaches 5.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N at an altitude of
2 km a.m.s.l.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2699"><bold>(a)</bold> Daily AOD obtained by averaging MODIS Dark target AOD
(at 13:25 UTC) and SEVIRI AOD (daily mean) on 2 July 2016. White areas
indicate missing data. Country borders of Ghana, Togo, and Benin are shown as
thin solid black lines. The straight dashed–dotted line indicates the
location of the CALIOP afternoon overpass at 13:27 UTC. The thick solid
black line represents the ATR 42 flight track. <bold>(b)</bold> CALIOP-derived
aerosol classification for the afternoon overpass.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2713">The differences seen in the structure of the pollution plume obtained from
the tracer experiment over land are likely due to interactions between the
monsoon flow and the orography just to the north of Accra, namely the
southeast–northwest running Mampong range and the north–south running
Akwapim–Togo range to the east of Accra, both bordering Lake Volta
(Fig. 1b). In addition to those orographic effects, the monsoon flow
transporting the tracers towards the north may also interact with the
land–lake breeze system occurring in the summer over Lake Volta (Buchholz et
al., 2017; Buchholz, 2017). Addressing the impact of these complex
circulations over land on the urban pollution plumes is beyond the scope of
this paper.</p>
      <p id="d1e2717">Strikingly, as in the along-aircraft flight track cross section, emissions
from Lagos on 1 and 2 July are never seen in the north–south transects,
confirming that they likely do not impact on the air quality in the major
coastal cities to the west during this period. Furthermore, the tracer
simulations suggest that the pollution plume over SWA related to emissions in
the four cities considered here does not extend very far over the ocean (to
4.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N at most), essentially because<?pagebreak page12378?> they are transported northward
within and westward above the marine ABL. Nevertheless, the western part of
the Accra pollution plume spreads farther south over the ocean than the
eastern part.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Long-range transport of aerosols related to regional-scale dynamics</title>
      <p id="d1e2736">To gain insights into the origin of the aerosol layers sampled by the ATR
along the elevated leg and observed by lidar (features D and E in Fig. 3),
10-day back-trajectories ending at 2500 m a.m.s.l. at 17:00 UTC on 2 July
are computed using CHIMERE. The backplume associated with feature D is shown
in Fig. 9a (the one associated with feature E is nearly identical and will
not be discussed). The back-trajectories suggest that feature D originates
from a broad area including Gabon, Congo, and the Democratic Republic of
Congo. Most of the back-trajectories then travel over the Gulf of Guinea
towards SWA in the free troposphere (Fig. 9b). Daily mean AOD derived from
MODIS and SEVERI observations on 2 July (Fig. 10a) shows large values
offshore of Gabon<?pagebreak page12379?> and Congo known to be biomass burning aerosol emission
hotspots at this time of year (e.g. Menut et al., 2018). This is corroborated
by the CAMS biomass burning aerosol forecast at 12:00 UTC (Fig. S4a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2741">Vertical velocity averaged between 850 and 600 hPa (colour,
Pa s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with 10 m winds (vectors) and SST (contours, black dotted
lines) from IFS analyses at <bold>(a)</bold> 12:00 UTC and
<bold>(b)</bold> 18:00 UTC. The thick black line represents the SWA coastline.
The straight white line represents the ATR 42 flight track.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2774">Correlation between vertical velocity and land–sea skin temperature
gradients at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 UTC for July 2016. The land–sea
zonal skin temperature gradient is computed using a “land box” defined as
6–9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 4.5–6.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and a “sea box” defined as
2–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 4.5–6.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The land–sea meridional skin
temperature gradient is computed using a “land box” defined as
2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 6–8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and a “sea box” defined
as 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 3–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Vertical velocity is
averaged in the layer 850–600 hPa over a box defined as
2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 4–6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Correlations are computed
using vertical velocity and skin temperature gradient indices standardized to
00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 UTC means for the month of July 2016.
Significant correlations (and their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) are given in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Zonal cell </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center">Vertical velocity </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">00:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">06:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Skin temperature gradient</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">00:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">06:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.53</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.002</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Meridional cell </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center">Vertical velocity </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">00:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">06:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Skin temperature gradient</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">00:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">06:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.34</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3256"><bold>(a)</bold> West–east oriented vertical cross section
(1000–500 hPa) of zonal–vertical wind vectors from IFS analyses (blue)
between 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E averaged between 4.54 and
6.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N at 18:00 UTC on 2 July 2016. The thick red line is the
projection of the ATR 42 aircraft track onto the cross section. The thick
green and blue lines at the bottom of the graph indicate the presence of land
and ocean, respectively. Surface characteristics are defined based on the
dominating surface type in the latitudinal band considered for the average of
the wind field. <bold>(b)</bold> IFS skin temperature (colours) and wind field at
10 m (vectors) at 18:00 UTC. The former, originally at 0.125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution, has been linearly interpolated onto the Copernicus grid at 5 km
before computing the skin temperature differences between the observations
and the model. <bold>(c)</bold> North–south oriented vertical cross section
(1000–500 hPa) of meridional–vertical wind vectors from IFS analyses
(blue) between 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N averaged between
2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 1.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E at 18:00 UTC. The thick red line is the
projection of the ATR 42 aircraft track onto the cross section. Cross
sections shown in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> are computed in the zonal and
meridian windows' delimited east–west and north–south lines, respectively,
shown in <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3356">The afternoon CALIOP observations acquired to the east of the ATR 42 flight
track across the enhanced AOD feature (see the track in Fig. 10a) indeed
classify the aerosols over the ocean as elevated smoke, transported between
1.5 and 4 km a.m.s.l. (Fig. 10b). The altitude of transport is consistent
with that derived from the CHIMERE backplume (Fig. 9b) as also shown by
Menut et al. (2018). Along this transect, dust is observed to almost reach
the SWA coastline from the north (Fig. 10b), consistent with the moderate
AOD values observed over Togo and Benin (Fig. 10a). Furthermore, the
morning ATR 42 flight conducted on 2 July in the region of Savè (Benin,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) highlighted the presence of dust over northern Benin
(Flamant et al., 2018). Interestingly, at the coast (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N),
CALIOP shows evidence of polluted dust, possibly resulting from the mixing of
dust with anthropogenic emissions from coastal cities. However,<?pagebreak page12380?> the CAMS
forecast does not show dust reaching the SWA coast (Fig. S4b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3397">Vertical velocity anomaly along <bold>(a)</bold> the westernmost
transect shown in Fig. 1b (transect I) and <bold>(b)</bold> the easternmost
transect shown in Fig. 1b (transect IV), from the WRF 2 km simulation. The
anomalies are computed with respect to the average vertical velocity between
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/12363/2018/acp-18-12363-2018-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3430">The backplume and regional-scale dynamics analyses indicate that the
upper-level aerosol features D and E (as observed by lidar) are related to
biomass burning over central Africa. In the case of feature D, closer to
Lomé, MODIS, SEVIRI, and CALIOP observations suggest the possibility of
mixing with dust, which is consistent with the ATR in situ and lidar-related
observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8">
  <title>Coastal circulations: the role of surface temperature gradients and
orography</title>
      <?pagebreak page12382?><p id="d1e3439">IFS vertical velocity computed between 850 and 600 hPa (i.e. above the
monsoon flow) shows that most of the northern Gulf of Guinea is under the
influence of subsiding motion on 2 July at 18:00 UTC (Fig. 11b). Stronger
subsidence is seen to the east of the region of operation of the ATR 42 at
that time. Strong subsidence is also seen over the eastern part of the ATR 42
flight track at 12:00 UTC (Fig. 11a). However, at 12:00 UTC, the eastern
part of the northern Gulf of Guinea is characterized by upward motion,
possibly in relationship with the SST gradient (cold water to the west linked
with the coastal upwelling and warmer waters to the east in the Niger Delta
region). The signature of the sea breeze is also visible inland in the IFS
analysis at 12:00 UTC (Fig. 11a) in the form of a line of strong
ascendance running parallel to the coastline.</p>
      <p id="d1e3442">At the regional scale, IFS analyses show the existence of a marked surface
temperature difference between the ocean and the continent at 12:00 UTC
(Fig. S5d) because of the high insolation across SWA as noted in Sect. 2.
The surface temperature gradient across the coast creates shallow overturning
circulations as evidenced by IFS analyses at 18:00 UTC (Fig. 12). A
well-defined closed zonal cell can be identified below 600 hPa around
5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and between 0 and 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (Fig. 12a), while a
well-defined meridional cell is seen around 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E between 3 and
8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Fig. 12c). It is worth noting that the overturning
circulations are most intense and better defined at 18:00 UTC than at
12:00 UTC (compare Fig. 12a with Fig. S5c for the zonal cell), even
though the surface temperature difference across the coast is weaker (compare
Fig. 12b with Fig. S5d). The overturning circulation exhibits a strong
diurnal cycle (Fig. S5), which is driven by the surface temperatures over
land. The quality of IFS skin temperature during the day was verified against
observed land-surface temperature observations (the so-called Copernicus
product; see Fig. S6). In spite of a systematic bias of the order of
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C over land, IFS skin temperature analyses are seen to be
consistent (in terms of spatio-temporal distribution) with the Copernicus
product (Fig. S6). This gives us confidence that the overturning
circulations exist and contribute to enhancing subsidence over the Gulf of
Guinea. Furthermore, we have conducted an analysis of the correlation between
the land–sea skin temperature gradients associated with both the zonal and
meridian cells and the vertical velocity over the Gulf of Guinea at different
times of day for the whole of July 2016, based on IFS data (Table 2). The
analysis shows that the zonal land–sea skin temperature gradient at 12:00
and 18:00 UTC is significantly correlated with vertical velocity at
18:00 UTC, with values around 0.5. Hence, the overturning cells evidenced on
2 July appear to be persistent features over the Gulf of Guinea, at least in
post-monsoon onset conditions. On the other hand, the meridional land–sea
skin temperature gradient at 12:00 UTC is correlated (0.34) with vertical
velocity at 12:00 UTC, possibly due to the presence of orography as
discussed in the following. The meridional gradient of skin temperature
between the sea and the land is an indicator of the pressure difference and
thus drives the intensity of the southerly flow associated with the land–sea
breeze. When the southerly flow impinges on the low terrain over SWA, as it
progresses over the continent, enhanced vertical motion is generated.</p>
      <p id="d1e3490">In addition to the subsidence generated at the regional scale by the
land–sea temperature gradient, the interaction of the monsoon flow with the
orography over Ghana and Togo is responsible for more local coastal
circulations. This interaction is reflected in the vertical velocity anomaly
simulated with WRF along the westernmost and easternmost transects in
Fig. 1b (transects I and IV, respectively). The anomalies are computed with
respect to the average vertical velocity between 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. Figure 13 shows that in the region where orography is more
pronounced (i.e. to the west), the<?pagebreak page12383?> vertical velocity anomaly is positive,
while it is negative to the east where orography is less marked (compare
Fig. 13a and b). As a result, the eastern region of ATR 42 operation on
2 July is under the influence of a strong subsiding motion. This subsiding
motion suppresses low-level cloudiness near Lomé and is key to the
interpretation of the ATR 42 lidar observations along the track regarding the
slanting of the elevated aerosol layers and, possibly, the thinning of the
marine ABL towards the eastern end of the aircraft track, together with an
additional effect of colder SSTs.</p>
      <p id="d1e3511">MODIS observations show the existence of an SST dipole across the northern
part of the Gulf of Guinea (Figs. S7 and 11), between the coastal upwelling
offshore of Lomé and Accra (SSTs of the order of 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and the
warmer SST to the east in the Bight of Bonny (offshore Nigeria, where SSTs of
the order of 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are generally observed). Even though this SST
dipole may also generate a secondary circulation over the Gulf of Guinea
(e.g. around 900–800 hPa and between 0 and 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E in Fig. S5c), it
is very likely that the lower tropospheric dynamics in the region of
operation of the aircraft<?pagebreak page12384?> are dominated by the monsoon dynamics to the first
order and by the sea–land surface temperature gradient at the regional
scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3547">In this study, detailed aircraft observations on 2 July 2016 and accompanying
model simulations were used to analyse the distribution of aerosols over the
Gulf of Guinea and its meteorological causes. We show that land–sea surface
temperature gradients between the northern part of the Gulf of Guinea and the
continent as well as orography over Ghana and Togo play important roles for
the distribution of aerosols and gases over coastal SWA on that day. The
former creates large-scale subsidence conditions over the northern part of
the Gulf of Guinea through the generation of zonal and meridional overturning
circulations below 600 hPa, with the downward branch of the circulation
around 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E over the ocean. The latter generates enhanced subsidence
over the eastern part of the ATR 42 operation area, near Lomé and Accra.
Together this leads to a west–east tilting of the aerosol layers (that can
be considered passive tracers of the dynamics) along the flight track. The
ATR 42 sampled remotely and in situ the complex aerosol layering occurring
between 2.5 and 3.2 km a.m.s.l. over the Gulf of Guinea as a result of
long-range transport of dust (from the northeast) and biomass burning aerosol
from the south (feature E in Fig. 3) and the mixing between these (feature
D).</p>
      <p id="d1e3559">The orography-forced circulation also has an influence on the structure of
the urban pollution plumes from Accra, Lomé, and Cotonou as assessed from
airborne lidar measurements on 2 July and numerical passive tracer
experiments using the WRF and CHIMERE models. When accounting for the
relative size of the emitting cities along the coast (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times more
emissions in Accra than in Lomé), we find that the tracer experiment
designed to include emissions from 1 and 2 July is the most realistic in
reproducing the lidar observations. The analysis shows that (a) the large
pollution plumes observed at the coast up to 1.5 km (features A and B) are
essentially related to emissions in the Lomé area from both 1 and 2 July,
with a moderate contribution from Accra and Cotonou, (b) the elevated plume
over the northern part of the Gulf of Guinea (feature C) is related to
emissions from Accra exclusively from the day before the ATR 42 flight (i.e.
1 July) and these clearly dominate the composition of the tracer plume in the
region covered by the flight track on 2 July, (c) given the general direction
of the monsoon flow, Lagos emissions (taken to be 13 times that of Cotonou)
do not appear to have affected the atmospheric composition west of Cotonou,
where our airborne observations were gathered, as also shown by Deroubaix et
al. (2018) in post-monsoon onset conditions, and (d) the tracer plumes do not
extend very far over the ocean during the short period under scrutiny, mostly
because they are transported northward within the marine ABL and westward
above it so that their extent is controlled by the equatorward component in
the mostly easterly flow as modulated by synoptic-scale disturbances
(Knippertz et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e3572">The unique combination of in situ and remote sensing observations acquired
over the Gulf of Guinea during the 2 July 2016 OLACTA flight together with
global and regional model simulations revealed in detail the impact of the
complex atmospheric circulation at the coast on the aerosol composition and
distribution over the northern Gulf of Guinea. We show that on hot,
cloud-free summer days such as 2 July, the western Gulf of Benin is a place
favourable for subsidence in the afternoon due to three factors, namely cool
SSTs, zonal overturning connected with the Niger Delta region, and meridional
overturning connected with the main West African landmass, anchored
geographically at the Mampong and Akwapim–Togo ranges. We also show that the
overturning cells are robust features of the atmospheric circulation over the
Gulf of Guinea in July 2016. To the best of the authors' knowledge such
features have not been documented in the literature to date. Still, one
should keep in mind that the mechanisms described in detail are based on a
unique dataset. Even though we have highlighted the fact that some of the key
dynamical features are persistent during July 2016, and hence not just
representative of 2 July, caution should be exercised when drawing more
general conclusions regarding the role of observed circulation in aerosol
redistribution in this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e3575">Further research will be dedicated to enhancing our understanding of the
complex interactions between the monsoon flow and the orography north of
major coastal cities as well as the land–sea and land–lake breezes, and
their impact on the dispersion of pollution emissions from major coastal
cities in SWA. Future research will also be conducted to assess the long-term
impact of the land–sea surface temperature gradient (and related shallow
overturning circulation) on the distribution of aerosols over the northern
Gulf of Guinea.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3582">The aircraft and radiosonde data used here can be accessed
using the DACCIWA database at <uri>http://baobab.sedoo.fr/DACCIWA/</uri> (Brissebrat et al., 2017). The tracer simulations discussed in this paper are also
available in the database. An embargo period of 2 years after the upload
applies. After that, external users can access the data in the same way as
DACCIWA participants before that time. Before the end of the embargo period,
external users can request the release of individual datasets. It is planned
for DACCIWA data to get DOIs, but this has not been realized for all datasets
yet.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page12385?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>The ULICE lidar characteristics and data processing</title>
      <p id="d1e3598">For the two channels of the lidar (indexed 1 and 2), the apparent backscatter
coefficient (ABC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M214" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
backscatter coefficients for the molecular and aerosol contributions,
respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerosol extinction coefficient;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the instrumental constants for each channel. The total ABC is
given by

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M219" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VDR</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VDR</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the transmissions of the
co-polarization and cross-polarization contributions of the lidar polarized
plate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The VDR is thus given by the equation

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M223" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VDR</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><caption><p id="d1e4059">Summary of ULICE lidar characteristics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="284.527559pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ULICE lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Characteristics</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Emitter (laser)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Quantel Centurion, diode-pumped, air cooled <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>6.5 mJ, 8 ns, 100 Hz @ 354.7 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Laser divergence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mrad</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Output beam</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Eyesafe <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm beam, tunable 0 to 40 mrad divergence with Altechna Motex expander (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Receiver</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Two channels with the cross-polarizations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Telescope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Refractive, 150 mm diameter, 280 mm effective focal length</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Field of view</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mrad</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filtering</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Narrow-band filters (200 pm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Detection</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hamamatsu H10721 photo-multiplier tubes.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Detection mode</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Analogue</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data acquisition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 bits, 200 MHz sampling, two-channel NI-5124 digitizer manufactured by the National Instruments Company.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical sampling <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Native <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>After data processing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.75 m <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>15–30 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Weight of the optical head</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Weight of the electronics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Consumption</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">350 W at 24–28 V DC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4287"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The apparent scattering ratio (ASR, denoted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is expressed as

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M231" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">app</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        As also shown by Chazette et al. (2012), the cross-calibration coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be assessed by normalizing the lidar signals
obtained in aerosol-free conditions, assuming the molecular VDR to be equal
to 0.3945 % at 355 nm, following Collis and Russel (1976). The dominant
error source is the characterization of the plate transmission on the optical
bench, which leads to a relative error close to 8 % on the VDR (Chazette et
al., 2012). During the DACCIWA field campaign, all lidar measurements were
conducted within aerosol layers and therefore we had to use measurements
performed just before the campaign during flight tests above the
Mediterranean for assessing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the flight over the
Mediterranean, the ATR 42 was flying at an altitude of 6.3 km a.m.s.l.,
with ULICE lidar data acquired in the nadir pointing mode between 0 and
6 km a.m.s.l. The calibration was performed using lidar data acquired well
above any aerosol layers, i.e. between 5 and 6 km a.m.s.l., where the lidar
backscatter is only sensitive to the molecular background signal.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4390"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12363-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12363-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4398">CF conducted the analysis of the data as well as wrote the paper and selected
the figures. AD and LM conducted the WRF/CHIMERE simulation and produced the
associated relevant figures. PC and JT processed the ULICE lidar data. PC
also created the figures showing CALIOP/MODIS/SEVIRI observations. MG
provided the figures showing ECMWF charts as well as Copernicus LST data.
Together with PK and AHF, he provided expertise on the analysis of such data
for identifying shallow overturning circulations. GdC and RM provided
expertise on air–sea interaction processes over the Gulf of Guinea area. JB,
CD, PR, RD, TB and AS contributed to the acquisition and the processing of
the aerosol data gathered on the ATR42 during the flight on 2 July 2016. AC,
PD, JD and MR contributed to the acquisition and the processing of the gas-phase chemistry data gathered on the ATR42 during the flight. All co-authors
contributed to the data analysis.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4404">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e4410">This article is part of the special issue “Results of the
project “Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa”
(DACCIWA) (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a
conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4416">The DACCIWA project has received funding from the European Union Seventh
Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 603502. The
European Facility for Airborne Research (EUFAR, <uri>http://www.eufar.net/</uri>,
last access: 16 August 2018) also supported the project through the funding
of Transnational Activity project OLACTA. The Centre National d'Etudes
Spatiales (CNES) provided financial support for the operation of the ULICE
lidar. The personnel of the Service des Avions Français Instrumentés
pour la Recherche en Environnement (SAFIRE, a joint entity of CNRS,
Météo-France, and CNES, and operator of the ATR 42) are thanked for
their support. Marco Gaetani has been supported by the LABEX project funded
by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency,
grant ANR-10-LABX-18-01). The authors would like to thank Bruno Piguet (CNRM)
for his support in the data acquisition and processing.
The authors would also like to thank Gregor Pante (KIT) for providing IFS
data, as well as Hugh Coe, Sophie Haslett, and Jonathan Taylor (University of
Manchester) for helpful discussions. The authors are thankful to the two
anonymous referees whose comments helped improve the overall quality of the
paper. MODIS data were made available via the Geospatial Interactive Online
Visualization ANd aNalysis interface
(<uri>https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/</uri>, last access:
16 August 2018).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: Susan van den Heever
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining aerosol radiative properties
using the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 29, 57–69,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bennouna, Y. S., de Leeuw, G., Piazzola, J., and Kusmierczyk-Michulec, J.:
Aerosol remote sensing over the ocean using MSG-SEVIRI visible images, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D23203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011615</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bergstrom, R. W., Pilewskie, P., Russell, P. B., Redemann, J., Bond, T. C.,
Quinn, P. K., and Sierau, B.: Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5937–5943,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., and Campbell, D.: Calibration and
intercomparison of filter-based measurements of visible light absorption by
aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 582–600, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brissebrat, G., Belmahfoud, N., Cloché, S., Ferré, H., Fleury, L.,
Mière, A., and Ramage, K.: The BAOBAB data portal and DACCIWA database,
19th EGU General Assembly, EGU2017, 23–28 April, 2017, Vienna, Austria,
p. 4685, available at: <uri>http://baobab.sedoo.fr/DACCIWA/</uri> (last
access: 16 August 2018), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Brito, J., Freney, E., Dominutti, P., Borbon, A., Haslett, S. L., Batenburg,
A. M., Colomb, A., Dupuy, R., Denjean, C., Burnet, F., Bourriane, T.,
Deroubaix, A., Sellegri, K., Borrmann, S., Coe, H., Flamant, C., Knippertz,
P., and Schwarzenboeck, A.: Assessing the role of anthropogenic and biogenic
sources on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over southern West Africa using aircraft measurements,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 757–772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-757-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-757-2018</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Buchholz, M., Fink, A. H., Knippertz, P., and Yorke, C.: Impacts of the
land-lake breeze of the Volta reservoir on the diurnal cycle of cloudiness
and precipitation, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 April 2017,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Buchholz, M. A.: The influence of Lake Volta on weather and climate, Karlsruhe
Institute of Technology Master Thesis, available at:
<uri>http://www.imk-tro.kit.edu/download/Masterarbeit_Marcel_Buchholz.pdf</uri>,
2017 (in German).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Burton, S. P., Hair, J. W., Kahnert, M., Ferrare, R. A., Hostetler, C. A.,
Cook, A. L., Harper, D. B., Berkoff, T. A., Seaman, S. T., Collins, J. E.,
Fenn, M. A., and Rogers, R. R.: Observations of the spectral dependence of
linear particle depolarization ratio of aerosols using NASA Langley airborne
High Spectral Resolution Lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13453–13473,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13453-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13453-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L.,
Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and
feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chazette, P., Dabas, A., Sanak, J., Lardier, M., and Royer, P.: French
airborne lidar measurements for Eyjafjallajökull ash plume survey, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 7059–7072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7059-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7059-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A., McNaughton, C., Kapustin, V., Shinozuka, Y., Howell, S., Dibb,
J., Zhou, J., Anderson, B., Brekhovskikh,<?pagebreak page12387?> V., Turner, H., and Pinkerton, M.:
Biomass Burning and Pollution Aerosol over North America: Organic Components
and their influence on Spectral Optical Properties and Humidification
Response, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12S18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007777" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007777</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Schaub, D., Hueglin, C., Corrigan, C.,
Henning, S., Schwikowski, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Saharan dust events at
the Jungfraujoch: detection by wavelength dependence of the single scattering
albedo and first climatology analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2465–2480,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Collis, R. T. H.  and Russell, P. B.: Lidar measurement of particles and
gases by elastic backscattering and differential absorption in Laser
Monitoring of the Atmosphere, edited by: Hinkley, E. D., Springler-Verlag,
New York, 71–152, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Deroubaix, A., Flamant, C., Menut, L., Siour, G., Mailler, S., Turquety, S.,
Briant, R., Khvorostyanov, D., and Crumeyrolle, S.: Interactions of
atmospheric gases and aerosols with the monsoon dynamics over the
Sudano-Guinean region during AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 445–465,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-445-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-445-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8851,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003296</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Evan, A. T., Vimont, D. J., Heidinger, A. K., Kossin, J. P., and  Bennartz,
R.: The role of aerosols in the evolution of tropical North Atlantic Ocean
temperature anomalies, Science, 324, 778–781, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Flamant C., Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Akpo, A., Brooks, B., Chiu, C. J.,
Coe, H., Danuor, S., Evans, M., Jegede, O., Kalthoff, N., Konaré, A.,
Liousse, C., Lohou, F., Mari, C., Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., Adler,
B., Amekudzi, L., Aryee, J., Ayoola, M., Batenburg, A. M., Bessardon, G.,
Borrmann, S., Brito, J., Bower, K., Burnet, F., Catoire, V., Colomb, A.,
Denjean, C., Fosu-Amankwah, K., Hill, P. G., Lee, J., Lothon, M., Maranan,
M., Marsham, J., Meynadier, R., Ngamini, J.-B., Rosenberg, P., Sauer, D.,
Smith, V., Stratmann, G., Taylor, J. W., Voigt, C., and Yoboué, V.: The
Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa field campaign:
Overview and research highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 83–104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Arteta, J., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A.,
Blechschmidt, A.-M., Diamantakis, M., Engelen, R. J., Gaudel, A., Inness, A.,
Jones, L., Josse, B., Katragkou, E., Marecal, V., Peuch, V.-H., Richter, A.,
Schultz, M. G., Stein, O., and Tsikerdekis, A.: Tropospheric chemistry in the
Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975–1003,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Haywood, J.  and Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative
forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S.  and Lim, J.: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme
(WSM6), Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 42, 129–151, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with
an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134,
2318–2341, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Huang, J., Zhang, C., and Prospero, J. M.: Large-scale effect of aerosols on
precipitation in the West African Monsoon region, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
135, 581–594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.391" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.391</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Jaffe, D. A. and Wigder, N. L.: Ozone production from wildfires: A critical
review, Atmos. Environ., 51, 1–10, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kalthoff, N., Lohou, F., Brooks, B., Jegede, G., Adler, B., Babic, K., Dione,
C., Ajao, A., Amekudzi, L. K., Aryee, J. N. A., Ayoola, M., Bessardon, G.,
Danuor, S. K., Handwerker, J., Kohler, M., Lothon, M., Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia,
X., Smith, V., Sunmonu, L., Wieser, A., Fink, A. H., and Knippertz, P.: An
overview of the diurnal cycle of the atmospheric boundary layer during the
West African monsoon season: results from the 2016 observational campaign,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2913–2928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2913-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2913-2018</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Liu, X., Warner, J. X., Yang, K., Chance, K.,
Thouret, V., and Nedelec, P.: Global ozone–CO correlations from OMI and
AIRS: constraints on tropospheric ozone sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
9321–9335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9321-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9321-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Menzel, W. P., and  Tanré, D.: Remote-sensing of
cloud, aerosol, and water-vapor properties from the Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS), IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 30, 2–27, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the spectral
dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D21208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Evans, M., Field, P. R., Fink, A. H., Liousse, C., and
Marsham, J. H.: The possible role of local air pollution in climate change in
West Africa, Nat. Clim. Chang., 5, 815–822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NCLIMATE2727</ext-link>,
2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Coe, H., Chiu, C., Evans, M. J., Fink, A. H., Kalthoff, N.,
Liousse, C., Mari, C., Allan, R., Brooks B., Danour, S., Flamant, C., Jegede,
O. O., Lohou, F., and Marsham, J. H.: The DACCIWA project:
Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1451–1460, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Deroubaix, A., Morris, E., Tocquer, F., Evans, M.
J., Flamant, C., Gaetani, M., Lavaysse, C., Mari, C., Marsham, J. H.,
Meynadier, R., Affo-Dogo, A., Bahaga, T., Brosse, F., Deetz, K., Guebsi, R.,
Latifou, I., Maranan, M., Rosenberg, P. D., and Schlueter, A.: A
meteorological and chemical overview of the DACCIWA field campaign in West
Africa in June–July 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10893–10918,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., and Pozzer, A.: The
contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a
global scale, Nature, 525, 367–371, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Liousse, C., Assamoi, E., Criqui, E. P., Granier, C., and Rosset, R.:
Explosive growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030, Environ.
Res. Lett., 9, 35003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org//10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003" ext-link-type="DOI">/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lothon, M., Said, F., Lohou, F., and Campistron, B.: Observation of the diurnal
cycle in the low troposphere of West Africa, Mon. Weather Rev., 136,
3477–3500, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Mailler, S., Menut, L., di Sarra, A. G., Becagli, S., Di Iorio, T.,
Bessagnet, B., Briant, R., Formenti, P., Doussin, J.-F., Gómez-Amo, J. L.,
Mallet, M., Rea, G., Siour, G., Sferlazzo, D. M., Traversi, R., Udisti, R.,
and Turquety, S.: On the radiative impact of aerosols on photolysis rates:
comparison of simulations and observations in the Lampedusa island during the
ChArMEx/ADRIMED campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1219–1244,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1219-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1219-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Mailler, S., Menut, L., Khvorostyanov, D., Valari, M., Couvidat, F., Siour,
G., Turquety, S., Briant, R., Tuccella, P., Bessagnet, B., Colette, A.,
Létinois, L., Markakis, K., and Meleux, F.: CHIMERE-2017: from urban to
hemispheric chemistry-transport modeling, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2397–2423,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2397-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-2397-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.:
Aerosol Light Extinction Measurements by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS)
Spectroscopy: Laboratory Validation and Field Deployment of a Compact Aerosol
Particle Extinction Monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 428–435,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003716599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786821003716599</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Menut, L., Flamant, C., Turquety, S., Deroubaix, A., Chazette, P., and
Meynadier, R.: Impact of biomass burning on pollutant surface concentrations
in megacities of the Gulf of Guinea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2687–2707,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2687-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2687-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S.
A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Sheridan, P., Laborde, M.,
Covert, D. S., Marinoni, A., Imre, K., Henzing, B., Roger, J.-C., Martins dos
Santos, S., Wilhelm, R., Wang, Y.-Q., and de Leeuw, G.: Angular Illumination
and Truncation of Three Different Integrating Nephelometers: Implications for
Empirical, Size-Based Corrections, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 581–586, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A.,
Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C.,
Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y.,
Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C.,
Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A.,
Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J.,
Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm,
R., and Wang, Y. Q.: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol
absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 245–268, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-245-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Parker, D. J., Burton, R. R., Diongue-Niang, A., Ellis, R. J., Felton, M. A.,
Taylor, C. M., Thorncroft, C. D., Bessemoulin, P., and Tompkins, A.: The
diurnal cycle of the West African Monsoon circulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 131, 2839–2860, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Parker, D. J., Kassimou, A., Orji, B. N., Osika, D. P., Hamza, I.,
Diop-Kane, M., Fink, A., Galvin, J., Guichard, F., Lamptey, B. L., Hamidou,
H., van der Linden, R., Redl, R., Lebel, T., and Tubbs, C.: Local Weather,
in: Meteorology of Tropical West Africa: The Forecasters' Handbook, edited
by: Parker, D. J. and Diop-Kane, M., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd, Chichester,
UK, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118391297.ch4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781118391297.ch4</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A., Martins,
J. V., Li, R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kleidman, R. G., Eck, T. F.,
Vermote, E., and Holben, B. N.: The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and
Validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 947–973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3385.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3385.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Russell, P. B., Bergstrom, R. W., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., DeCarlo, P.
F., Jimenez, J. L., Livingston, J. M., Redemann, J., Dubovik, O., and Strawa,
A.: Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator
of aerosol composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1155–1169,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Salomonson, V. V., Barnes, W. L. , Maymon, P. W., Montgomery, H. E., and
Ostrow, H.: MODIS: Advanced facility instrument for studies of the Earth as a
system, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 27, 145–153, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Shamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B.: A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric
model for weather research and forecasting applications, J. Comput. Phys.,
227, 3465–3485, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Shang, X. and Chazette, P.: Interest of a Full-Waveform Flown UV Lidar to
Derive Forest Vertical Structures and Aboveground Carbon, Forests, 5,
1454–1480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f5061454" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/f5061454</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Spicer, C. W., Joseph, D. W., and Ollison, W. M.: A Re-Examination of Ambient
Air Ozone Monitor Interferences, J. Air Waste Manage., 60, 1353–1364,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Thiébaux, J., Rogers, E., Wang, E., and Katz, B.: A new high-resolution
blended real-time global sea surface temperature analysis, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 84, 645–656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-5-645" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-84-5-645</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Toledano, C., Cachorro, V. E., Berjon, A., de Frutos, A. M., Sorribas, M.,
de la Morena, B. A., and Goloub, P.: Aerosol optical depth and
Ångström exponent climatology at El Arenosillo AERONET site (Huelva,
Spain), Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 795–807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.54" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.54</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Werdell, P. J., Franz, B. A., Bailey, S. W., Feldman, G. C., Boss, E., Brando, V. E., Dowell, M., Hirata, T.,
Lavender, S. J., Lee, Z., Loisel, H., Maritorena, S., Mélin, F., Moore, T. S., Smyth, T. J., Antoine, D., Devred, E., Hembise Fanton d'Andon, O., and Mangin,
A.:
Generalized ocean color inversion model for retrieving marine
inherent optical properties, Appl. Optics, 52, 2019–2037, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Winker, D. M., Hunt, W. H., and McGill, M. J.: Initial performance
assessment of CALIOP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030135</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, United Nations,
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2015,
ST/ESA/SER.A/366, 517 pp., available at:
<uri>http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/WUP2011_Report.pdf</uri>
(last access: 16 August 2018), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Fu, R., Yu, H., Dickinson, R. E., Juarez, R. N., Chin, M., and
Wang, H.: A regional climate model study of how biomass burning aerosol
impacts land-atmosphere interactions over the Amazon, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D14S15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009449</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Fu, R., Yu, H., Qian, Y., Dickinson, R., Silva Dias, M. A. F., da Silva Dias,
P. L., and Fernandes, K.:<?pagebreak page12389?> Impact of biomass burning aerosol on the monsoon
circulation transition over Amazonia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10814,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037180" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL037180</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Aerosol distribution in the northern Gulf of Guinea: local anthropogenic sources, long-range transport, and the role of coastal shallow circulations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The complex vertical distribution of
aerosols over coastal southern West Africa (SWA) is investigated using
airborne observations and numerical simulations. Observations were gathered
on 2 July 2016 offshore of Ghana and Togo, during the field phase of the
Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa project. This
was the only flight conducted over the ocean during which a downward-looking
lidar was operational. The aerosol loading in the lower troposphere includes
emissions from coastal cities (Accra, Lomé, Cotonou, and Lagos) as well
as biomass burning aerosol and dust associated with long-range transport from
central Africa and the Sahara, respectively. Our results indicate that the
aerosol distribution on this day is impacted by subsidence associated with
zonal and meridional regional-scale overturning circulations associated with
the land–sea surface temperature contrast and orography over Ghana and Togo,
as typically observed on hot, cloud-free summer days such as 2 July 2016.
Furthermore, we show that the zonal circulation evidenced on 2 July is a
persistent feature over the Gulf of Guinea during July 2016. Numerical tracer
release experiments highlight the dominance of aged emissions from Accra on
the observed pollution plume loadings over the ocean, in the area of aircraft
operation. The contribution of aged emission from Lomé and Cotonou is
also evident above the marine boundary layer. Given the general direction of
the monsoon flow, the tracer experiments indicate no contribution from Lagos
emissions to the atmospheric composition of the area west of Cotonou, where
our airborne observations were gathered. The tracer plume does not extend
very far south over the ocean (i.e. less than 100&thinsp;km from Accra), mostly
because emissions are transported northeastward near the surface over land
and westward above the marine atmospheric boundary layer. The latter is
possible due to interactions between the monsoon flow, complex terrain, and
land–sea breeze systems, which support the vertical mixing of the urban
pollution. This work sheds light on the complex – and to date undocumented
– mechanisms by which coastal shallow circulations can distribute
atmospheric pollutants over the densely populated SWA region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining aerosol radiative properties
using the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 29, 57–69,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bennouna, Y. S., de Leeuw, G., Piazzola, J., and Kusmierczyk-Michulec, J.:
Aerosol remote sensing over the ocean using MSG-SEVIRI visible images, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D23203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011615</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bergstrom, R. W., Pilewskie, P., Russell, P. B., Redemann, J., Bond, T. C.,
Quinn, P. K., and Sierau, B.: Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5937–5943,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., and Campbell, D.: Calibration and
intercomparison of filter-based measurements of visible light absorption by
aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 582–600, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brissebrat, G., Belmahfoud, N., Cloché, S., Ferré, H., Fleury, L.,
Mière, A., and Ramage, K.: The BAOBAB data portal and DACCIWA database,
19th EGU General Assembly, EGU2017, 23–28 April, 2017, Vienna, Austria,
p. 4685, available at: <a href="http://baobab.sedoo.fr/DACCIWA/" target="_blank">http://baobab.sedoo.fr/DACCIWA/</a> (last
access: 16 August 2018), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brito, J., Freney, E., Dominutti, P., Borbon, A., Haslett, S. L., Batenburg,
A. M., Colomb, A., Dupuy, R., Denjean, C., Burnet, F., Bourriane, T.,
Deroubaix, A., Sellegri, K., Borrmann, S., Coe, H., Flamant, C., Knippertz,
P., and Schwarzenboeck, A.: Assessing the role of anthropogenic and biogenic
sources on PM<sub>1</sub> over southern West Africa using aircraft measurements,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 757–772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-757-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-757-2018</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Buchholz, M., Fink, A. H., Knippertz, P., and Yorke, C.: Impacts of the
land-lake breeze of the Volta reservoir on the diurnal cycle of cloudiness
and precipitation, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 April 2017,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Buchholz, M. A.: The influence of Lake Volta on weather and climate, Karlsruhe
Institute of Technology Master Thesis, available at:
<a href="http://www.imk-tro.kit.edu/download/Masterarbeit_Marcel_Buchholz.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.imk-tro.kit.edu/download/Masterarbeit_Marcel_Buchholz.pdf</a>,
2017 (in German).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Burton, S. P., Hair, J. W., Kahnert, M., Ferrare, R. A., Hostetler, C. A.,
Cook, A. L., Harper, D. B., Berkoff, T. A., Seaman, S. T., Collins, J. E.,
Fenn, M. A., and Rogers, R. R.: Observations of the spectral dependence of
linear particle depolarization ratio of aerosols using NASA Langley airborne
High Spectral Resolution Lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13453–13473,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13453-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13453-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L.,
Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and
feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chazette, P., Dabas, A., Sanak, J., Lardier, M., and Royer, P.: French
airborne lidar measurements for Eyjafjallajökull ash plume survey, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 7059–7072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7059-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7059-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A., McNaughton, C., Kapustin, V., Shinozuka, Y., Howell, S., Dibb,
J., Zhou, J., Anderson, B., Brekhovskikh, V., Turner, H., and Pinkerton, M.:
Biomass Burning and Pollution Aerosol over North America: Organic Components
and their influence on Spectral Optical Properties and Humidification
Response, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12S18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007777" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007777</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Schaub, D., Hueglin, C., Corrigan, C.,
Henning, S., Schwikowski, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Saharan dust events at
the Jungfraujoch: detection by wavelength dependence of the single scattering
albedo and first climatology analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2465–2480,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Collis, R. T. H.  and Russell, P. B.: Lidar measurement of particles and
gases by elastic backscattering and differential absorption in Laser
Monitoring of the Atmosphere, edited by: Hinkley, E. D., Springler-Verlag,
New York, 71–152, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Deroubaix, A., Flamant, C., Menut, L., Siour, G., Mailler, S., Turquety, S.,
Briant, R., Khvorostyanov, D., and Crumeyrolle, S.: Interactions of
atmospheric gases and aerosols with the monsoon dynamics over the
Sudano-Guinean region during AMMA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 445–465,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-445-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-445-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8851,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Evan, A. T., Vimont, D. J., Heidinger, A. K., Kossin, J. P., and  Bennartz,
R.: The role of aerosols in the evolution of tropical North Atlantic Ocean
temperature anomalies, Science, 324, 778–781, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Flamant C., Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Akpo, A., Brooks, B., Chiu, C. J.,
Coe, H., Danuor, S., Evans, M., Jegede, O., Kalthoff, N., Konaré, A.,
Liousse, C., Lohou, F., Mari, C., Schlager, H., Schwarzenboeck, A., Adler,
B., Amekudzi, L., Aryee, J., Ayoola, M., Batenburg, A. M., Bessardon, G.,
Borrmann, S., Brito, J., Bower, K., Burnet, F., Catoire, V., Colomb, A.,
Denjean, C., Fosu-Amankwah, K., Hill, P. G., Lee, J., Lothon, M., Maranan,
M., Marsham, J., Meynadier, R., Ngamini, J.-B., Rosenberg, P., Sauer, D.,
Smith, V., Stratmann, G., Taylor, J. W., Voigt, C., and Yoboué, V.: The
Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa field campaign:
Overview and research highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 83–104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Arteta, J., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A.,
Blechschmidt, A.-M., Diamantakis, M., Engelen, R. J., Gaudel, A., Inness, A.,
Jones, L., Josse, B., Katragkou, E., Marecal, V., Peuch, V.-H., Richter, A.,
Schultz, M. G., Stein, O., and Tsikerdekis, A.: Tropospheric chemistry in the
Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975–1003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Haywood, J.  and Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative
forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review, Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S.  and Lim, J.: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme
(WSM6), Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 42, 129–151, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with
an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134,
2318–2341, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Huang, J., Zhang, C., and Prospero, J. M.: Large-scale effect of aerosols on
precipitation in the West African Monsoon region, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
135, 581–594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.391" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.391</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Jaffe, D. A. and Wigder, N. L.: Ozone production from wildfires: A critical
review, Atmos. Environ., 51, 1–10, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kalthoff, N., Lohou, F., Brooks, B., Jegede, G., Adler, B., Babic, K., Dione,
C., Ajao, A., Amekudzi, L. K., Aryee, J. N. A., Ayoola, M., Bessardon, G.,
Danuor, S. K., Handwerker, J., Kohler, M., Lothon, M., Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia,
X., Smith, V., Sunmonu, L., Wieser, A., Fink, A. H., and Knippertz, P.: An
overview of the diurnal cycle of the atmospheric boundary layer during the
West African monsoon season: results from the 2016 observational campaign,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2913–2928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2913-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2913-2018</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Liu, X., Warner, J. X., Yang, K., Chance, K.,
Thouret, V., and Nedelec, P.: Global ozone–CO correlations from OMI and
AIRS: constraints on tropospheric ozone sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
9321–9335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9321-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9321-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Menzel, W. P., and  Tanré, D.: Remote-sensing of
cloud, aerosol, and water-vapor properties from the Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS), IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 30, 2–27, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the spectral
dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D21208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Evans, M., Field, P. R., Fink, A. H., Liousse, C., and
Marsham, J. H.: The possible role of local air pollution in climate change in
West Africa, Nat. Clim. Chang., 5, 815–822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2727</a>,
2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Knippertz, P., Coe, H., Chiu, C., Evans, M. J., Fink, A. H., Kalthoff, N.,
Liousse, C., Mari, C., Allan, R., Brooks B., Danour, S., Flamant, C., Jegede,
O. O., Lohou, F., and Marsham, J. H.: The DACCIWA project:
Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1451–1460, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Deroubaix, A., Morris, E., Tocquer, F., Evans, M.
J., Flamant, C., Gaetani, M., Lavaysse, C., Mari, C., Marsham, J. H.,
Meynadier, R., Affo-Dogo, A., Bahaga, T., Brosse, F., Deetz, K., Guebsi, R.,
Latifou, I., Maranan, M., Rosenberg, P. D., and Schlueter, A.: A
meteorological and chemical overview of the DACCIWA field campaign in West
Africa in June–July 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10893–10918,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., and Pozzer, A.: The
contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a
global scale, Nature, 525, 367–371, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Liousse, C., Assamoi, E., Criqui, E. P., Granier, C., and Rosset, R.:
Explosive growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030, Environ.
Res. Lett., 9, 35003, <a href="https://doi.org//10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003" target="_blank">https://doi.org//10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lothon, M., Said, F., Lohou, F., and Campistron, B.: Observation of the diurnal
cycle in the low troposphere of West Africa, Mon. Weather Rev., 136,
3477–3500, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Mailler, S., Menut, L., di Sarra, A. G., Becagli, S., Di Iorio, T.,
Bessagnet, B., Briant, R., Formenti, P., Doussin, J.-F., Gómez-Amo, J. L.,
Mallet, M., Rea, G., Siour, G., Sferlazzo, D. M., Traversi, R., Udisti, R.,
and Turquety, S.: On the radiative impact of aerosols on photolysis rates:
comparison of simulations and observations in the Lampedusa island during the
ChArMEx/ADRIMED campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1219–1244,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1219-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1219-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mailler, S., Menut, L., Khvorostyanov, D., Valari, M., Couvidat, F., Siour,
G., Turquety, S., Briant, R., Tuccella, P., Bessagnet, B., Colette, A.,
Létinois, L., Markakis, K., and Meleux, F.: CHIMERE-2017: from urban to
hemispheric chemistry-transport modeling, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2397–2423,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2397-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2397-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.:
Aerosol Light Extinction Measurements by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS)
Spectroscopy: Laboratory Validation and Field Deployment of a Compact Aerosol
Particle Extinction Monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 428–435,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003716599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003716599</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Menut, L., Flamant, C., Turquety, S., Deroubaix, A., Chazette, P., and
Meynadier, R.: Impact of biomass burning on pollutant surface concentrations
in megacities of the Gulf of Guinea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2687–2707,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2687-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2687-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S.
A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Sheridan, P., Laborde, M.,
Covert, D. S., Marinoni, A., Imre, K., Henzing, B., Roger, J.-C., Martins dos
Santos, S., Wilhelm, R., Wang, Y.-Q., and de Leeuw, G.: Angular Illumination
and Truncation of Three Different Integrating Nephelometers: Implications for
Empirical, Size-Based Corrections, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 581–586, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A.,
Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C.,
Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y.,
Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C.,
Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A.,
Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J.,
Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm,
R., and Wang, Y. Q.: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol
absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 245–268, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Parker, D. J., Burton, R. R., Diongue-Niang, A., Ellis, R. J., Felton, M. A.,
Taylor, C. M., Thorncroft, C. D., Bessemoulin, P., and Tompkins, A.: The
diurnal cycle of the West African Monsoon circulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 131, 2839–2860, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Parker, D. J., Kassimou, A., Orji, B. N., Osika, D. P., Hamza, I.,
Diop-Kane, M., Fink, A., Galvin, J., Guichard, F., Lamptey, B. L., Hamidou,
H., van der Linden, R., Redl, R., Lebel, T., and Tubbs, C.: Local Weather,
in: Meteorology of Tropical West Africa: The Forecasters' Handbook, edited
by: Parker, D. J. and Diop-Kane, M., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd, Chichester,
UK, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118391297.ch4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118391297.ch4</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A., Martins,
J. V., Li, R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kleidman, R. G., Eck, T. F.,
Vermote, E., and Holben, B. N.: The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and
Validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 947–973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3385.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3385.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, P. B., Bergstrom, R. W., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., DeCarlo, P.
F., Jimenez, J. L., Livingston, J. M., Redemann, J., Dubovik, O., and Strawa,
A.: Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator
of aerosol composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1155–1169,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Salomonson, V. V., Barnes, W. L. , Maymon, P. W., Montgomery, H. E., and
Ostrow, H.: MODIS: Advanced facility instrument for studies of the Earth as a
system, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 27, 145–153, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Shamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B.: A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric
model for weather research and forecasting applications, J. Comput. Phys.,
227, 3465–3485, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Shang, X. and Chazette, P.: Interest of a Full-Waveform Flown UV Lidar to
Derive Forest Vertical Structures and Aboveground Carbon, Forests, 5,
1454–1480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f5061454" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/f5061454</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Spicer, C. W., Joseph, D. W., and Ollison, W. M.: A Re-Examination of Ambient
Air Ozone Monitor Interferences, J. Air Waste Manage., 60, 1353–1364,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Thiébaux, J., Rogers, E., Wang, E., and Katz, B.: A new high-resolution
blended real-time global sea surface temperature analysis, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 84, 645–656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-5-645" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-5-645</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Toledano, C., Cachorro, V. E., Berjon, A., de Frutos, A. M., Sorribas, M.,
de la Morena, B. A., and Goloub, P.: Aerosol optical depth and
Ångström exponent climatology at El Arenosillo AERONET site (Huelva,
Spain), Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 795–807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.54" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.54</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Werdell, P. J., Franz, B. A., Bailey, S. W., Feldman, G. C., Boss, E., Brando, V. E., Dowell, M., Hirata, T.,
Lavender, S. J., Lee, Z., Loisel, H., Maritorena, S., Mélin, F., Moore, T. S., Smyth, T. J., Antoine, D., Devred, E., Hembise Fanton d'Andon, O., and Mangin,
A.:
Generalized ocean color inversion model for retrieving marine
inherent optical properties, Appl. Optics, 52, 2019–2037, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Winker, D. M., Hunt, W. H., and McGill, M. J.: Initial performance
assessment of CALIOP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030135</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, United Nations,
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2015,
ST/ESA/SER.A/366, 517 pp., available at:
<a href="http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/WUP2011_Report.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/WUP2011_Report.pdf</a>
(last access: 16 August 2018), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Fu, R., Yu, H., Dickinson, R. E., Juarez, R. N., Chin, M., and
Wang, H.: A regional climate model study of how biomass burning aerosol
impacts land-atmosphere interactions over the Amazon, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D14S15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009449</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Fu, R., Yu, H., Qian, Y., Dickinson, R., Silva Dias, M. A. F., da Silva Dias,
P. L., and Fernandes, K.: Impact of biomass burning aerosol on the monsoon
circulation transition over Amazonia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10814,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037180" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037180</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
