<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-18-10869-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Does afforestation deteriorate haze pollution in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
(BTH), China?</article-title><alt-title>Effect of afforestation on haze pollution in BTH</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effect of afforestation on haze pollution in BTH}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{X. Long et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bei</surname><given-names>Naifang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Jiarui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Tian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xing</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Shuyu</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3433-2532</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Junji</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Tie</surname><given-names>Xuexi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>Zhisheng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Guohui</given-names></name>
          <email>ligh@ieecas.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Key Lab of Aerosol Chemistry &amp; Physics, SKLLQG, Institute of Earth
Environment, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Global Environmental Change, Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an, 710049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Joint Center for Global Change Studies (JCGCS), Beijing, 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80303, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Guohui Li (ligh@ieecas.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>10869</fpage><lpage>10879</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e194">Although aggressive emission control strategies have been
implemented recently in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area (BTH), China,
pervasive and persistent haze still frequently engulfs the region during
wintertime. Afforestation in BTH, primarily concentrated in the Taihang and
Yan Mountains, has constituted one of the controversial factors
exacerbating the haze pollution due to its slowdown of the surface wind
speed. We report here an increasing trend of forest cover in BTH during
2001–2013 based on long-term satellite measurements and the impact of the
afforestation on the fine-particle (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) level. Simulations using the
Weather Research and Forecast model with chemistry reveal that
afforestation in BTH since 2001 has generally been deteriorating the haze pollution in
BTH to some degree, enhancing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations by up to 6 % on
average. Complete afforestation or deforestation in the Taihang and Yan
Mountains would increase or decrease the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level within 15 % in
BTH. Our model results also suggest that implementing a large ventilation
corridor system would not be effective or beneficial to mitigate the haze
pollution in Beijing.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e231">Heavy haze with extremely high levels of fine particles (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), caused
by rapid growth of industrialization, urbanization, and transportation,
frequently covers northern China during wintertime, particularly in the
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area (BTH). The haze pollution in BTH remarkably
impairs visibility and potentially causes severe health defects (Lim et al.,
2013; Wang and Hao, 2012). The Chinese State Council issued the “Air
Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan” (APPCAP) in September 2013
with the aim of improving China's air quality within 5 years and reducing
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by up to 25 % by 2017 relative to 2012 levels. Although
aggressive emission control strategies have been undertaken since the
initiation and implementation of the Action Plan, widespread and persistent
haze still often engulfs BTH.</p>
      <p id="d1e252">Aside from emissions, meteorological conditions play a key role in the haze
pollution, affecting the formation, transformation, diffusion, transport,
and removal of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere (Bei et al., 2012, 2017).
Multifarious measurements have provided cumulative evidence that the
widespread slowdown of surface wind speeds has occurred globally and in
China since the 1980s (Chen et al., 2013; McVicar et al., 2012), which
facilitates the pollutant accumulation to deteriorate air quality (Zhao et
al., 2013; Sun et al., 2016). An increase in the surface roughness induced
by increased vegetative biomass has been proposed to be responsible for the
surface-level stilling to some degree (Wu et al., 2016b; Vautard et al.,
2010). Consequently, there has been ongoing debate in China on whether the
afforestation program contributes enough to mitigate the haze formation in BTH
(China Forestry Network, 2016a, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e264">Deforestation and its potential to severe droughts and massive floods has raised
serious concerns in China since the<?pagebreak page10870?> 1970s, fostering the largest afforestation
project in the world (Liu et al., 2008). Six key afforestation programs have
been implemented since 2001, and “the Green Great Wall” of China has been
established in northern China (Duan et al., 2011). A remarkable forest growth
has been reported in the northwest of BTH from 2000 to 2010 (Li et al.,
2016), which has the potential to increase the surface roughness and decrease
the surface wind speed (Wu et al., 2016a; Bichet et al., 2012), and could
potentially aggravate the haze pollution. In addition, previous studies have
shown that the afforestation is beneficial for the atmosphere to remove
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> through the dry deposition
process (Zhang et al., 2015, 2017; Huang et al., 2016). Hence, a large
artificial ventilation corridor system has been proposed, highly anticipated
to ventilate Beijing (China Forestry Network, 2014, 2016b, c).</p>
      <p id="d1e310">In the present study, we report an analysis of long-term satellite
measurements of the land cover change in BTH and quantitatively evaluate the
impacts of the afforestation on the haze pollution in BTH using the WRF-CHEM
model. We have further evaluated the effect of the proposed large artificial
ventilation corridor system on the haze mitigation in Beijing. The model
configuration and methodology are provided in Sect. 2. Data analysis and
model results are presented in Sect. 3, and conclusions are given in
Sect. 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data, model, and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>MODIS data</title>
      <p id="d1e324">The data utilized in the study are the annual land cover product, MCD12Q1,
derived from the Terra and Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
(MODIS) observations since 2001 (Friedl et al., 2002). The product has been
widely used in studies of atmospheric science, hydrology, ecology, and land
change science (Gerten et al., 2004; Guenther et al., 2006; Reichstein et
al., 2007; Turner et al., 2007). Wu et al. (2008) have compared four global
land cover datasets across China, concluding that the MODIS land cover
product is the most representative over China with the minimal bias from the
China's National Land Cover Dataset. The MCD12Q1 (Version 5.1) IGBP
(International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme) scheme with a spatial
resolution of 500 m is utilized to explore the variability of the land cover
fraction (LCF) from 2001 to 2013 in BTH and assimilated into the WRF-CHEM
model. The high-resolution land cover product is generated using a supervised
classification algorithm in conjunction with a revised database of
high-quality land cover training sites (Friedl et al., 2002). The accuracy of
the IGBP layer of MCD12Q1 is estimated to be 72.3–77.4 % globally, with
a 95 % confidence interval (Friedl et al.,
2002, 2010). Great efforts have been made to evaluate the accuracies of the
global land cover datasets over China. The overall accuracy of MCD12Q1 in
China is estimated to be 55.9–68.9 % (Bai et al., 2015; Yang et al.,
2017), which could be increased to about 70 % when ignoring the
differences of five forests.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e329"><bold>(a)</bold> The model domain, region of interest (ROI), and
monitoring sites. <bold>(b)</bold> The topography and monitoring sites in
January 2014. The circles represent the centers of cities with ambient
monitoring sites, and the size of circles denotes the number of monitoring
sites in the cities. The boundary of BTH region is highlighted with bright
lines. The Yan (Yanshan Mt.) and Taihang Mountains are also displayed.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e346">WRF-CHEM model configurations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="184.942913pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="256.074803pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation regions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei–Shandong</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 December 2013–31 January 2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domain size</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domain center</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Horizontal resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35 vertical levels with a stretched vertical grid with spacing ranging<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>from 30 m near the surface, to 500 m at 2.5 km and 1 km above 14 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Microphysics scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSM 6-class graupel scheme (Hong and Lim, 2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boundary layer scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MYJ TKE scheme (Janjić, 2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface layer scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MYJ surface scheme (Janjić, 2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Land-surface scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unified Noah land-surface model (Chen and Dudhia, 2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longwave radiation scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Goddard longwave scheme (Chou and Suarez, 2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shortwave radiation scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Goddard shortwave scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1999)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meteorological boundary and initial conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NCEP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reanalysis data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical initial and boundary conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOZART 6 h output (Horowitz et al., 2003)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anthropogenic emission inventory</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism emissions (Zhang et al., 2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biogenic emission inventory</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MEGAN model developed by Guenther et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model spin-up time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 h</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>WRF-CHEM model and configurations</title>
      <p id="d1e580">We use a specific version of the WRF-CHEM model (Grell et al., 2005) to
investigate the impacts of the afforestation on the haze pollution in BTH.
The model includes a new flexible gas phase chemical module and the
CMAQ/Models3 aerosol module developed by US EPA (Binkowski and Roselle,
2003). The wet deposition of chemical species follows the CMAQ method. The
dry deposition parameterization follows Wesely (1989), and the dry deposition
velocity of aerosols and trace gases is calculated as a function of the local
meteorology and land use. The photolysis rates are calculated by an FTUV
(fast radiation transfer model) (Li et al., 2005). The inorganic aerosols are
predicted using ISORROPIA Version 1.7
(<uri>http://nenes.eas.gatech.edu/ISORROPIA/</uri>, last access: 30 June 2018)
(Nenes et al., 1998). The secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is predicted using
a non-traditional SOA module, including the VBS (volatility basis set)
modeling approach and SOA contributions from glyoxal and methylglyoxal.
Detailed information about the WRF-CHEM model can be found in previous
studies (Li et al., 2010, 2011a, b, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e586">High PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution episodes from 1 December 2013 to<?pagebreak page10871?> 31 January 2014 in
the North China Plain (NCP) have been simulated using the WRF-CHEM model. The
model simulation domain is shown in Fig. 1, and detailed model
configurations can be found in Table 1. The chemical initial and boundary
conditions are interpolated from the 6 h output of MOZART-4 (Emmons et al.,
2010; Horowitz et al., 2003).
MOZART-4 is driven by meteorology fields from
the NASA GMAO GEOS-5 model, using anthropogenic emissions based on the
Streets et al. (2006) inventory and fire emissions from FINN-v1
(Wiedinmyer et al., 2011). The model has been evaluated comprehensively with
several sets of observations, reproducing the tropospheric chemical
composition well (Emmons et al., 2010). The model results have been successfully
and widely used as the initial and lateral boundary conditions for chemical
transport models. The anthropogenic emission inventory used in the present
study is developed by Zhang et al. (2009), with the base year of 2013,
including contributions from agriculture, industry, power, residential, and
transportation sources. Figure S1 shows the emission distribution of OC (organic carbon),
VOCs (volatile organic compounds), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the simulation domain. The high emissions
of OC, VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally concentrated in the plain
region of BTH and Shandong province, the downwind area of afforestation.</p>
      <p id="d1e644">The hourly near-surface CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations released by China's Ministry of
Environmental Protection are used to validate the model simulations and are
accessible from the following website: <uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn/</uri> (last access: 30 June 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e692">We use the normalized mean bias (NMB), the index of agreement (IOA), and the
correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to assess the WRF-CHEM model performance in
simulating air pollutants against measurements.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NMB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IOA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M28" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the calculated and observed air
pollutant concentrations, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of the
predictions used for comparisons, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the
average of predictions and observations, respectively. The IOA ranges from 0 to
1, with 1 showing perfect agreement of the prediction with the observation.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to 1, with 1 implicating perfect spatial consistency of
observations and predictions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>MCD12Q1 data assimilation to the WRF-CHEM model</title>
      <p id="d1e1058">The IGBP layer in MCD12Q1 is suitable for the WRF-CHEM IGBP land cover
scheme, which consists of 11 natural vegetation classes, 3 developed and
mosaicked land classes, and 3 non-vegetated land classes. Table S1
displays the comparison of land cover classification between the WRF-CHEM
model and MCD12Q1. We use the gridded<?pagebreak page10872?> LCF of each category to assimilate the
MCD12Q1 satellite data to the WRF-CHEM model.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>LCF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Area</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Area</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are grid cell indices of the WRF-CHEM model domain,
Area<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the total area of each land cover category <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within
grid cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Area<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the area of grid cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
LCF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 0 to 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e1217">To evaluate the afforestation impacts on the haze pollution in BTH, we have
used and modified the coupled unified Noah land-surface model (LSM), which
was developed based on Oregon State University LSM (Chen and Dudhia, 2001).
Noah is able to reasonably reproduce the observed diurnal variation of
sensible heat fluxes and surface skin temperature. Also, it is capable of
capturing the diurnal and seasonal evolution in evaporation and soil
moisture (Chen et al., 1996). Despite some remaining issues, Noah has
been chosen for further refinement and implementation in NCEP regional and
global coupled weather and climate models because of its relative simplicity
and adequate performance (Mitchell, 2005, update 2017). The surface roughness length
(SFz0) in Noah is calculated based on the dominant land cover category
(<uri>https://ral.ucar.edu/solutions/products/unified-noah-lsm/</uri>, last access: 30 June 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e1223"><disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M45" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>SFz0</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mfenced close="" open="{"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SFz0</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SFz0</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hspace*{2mm}}?><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SFz0</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SFz0</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SFz</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SFz</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the minimum and maximum SFz0 for each category. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
area fractional coverage of green vegetation, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the threshold, minimal, and
maximal value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SFz</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SFz0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are listed in
Table S2.</p>
      <p id="d1e1478">In order to more precisely simulate surface stress within the sub-grid scale
in heterogeneous terrain, the effective roughness length has been
extensively studied, especially in the 1990s. Claussen (1990) has defined
the effective roughness length as a value of the area average of the
roughness length in heterogeneous terrain. The effective roughness length
relies upon the blending height (Wieringa, 1986; Mason, 1988; Wood and
Mason, 1991; Philip, 1996; Mahrt, 1996), at which the flow is approximately
in equilibrium with underlying surface conditions and independent of
horizontal position (Ma and Daggupaty, 1998). We have modified the Noah SFz0
calculation using the spatial average of the vegetation roughness length.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SFz0</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mtext>LCF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SFz0</mml:mtext><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          SFz0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the gridded area fraction of land cover category <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
is alculated by Eq. (5).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e1528">Land cover change from 2001 to 2013. Spatial distributions of
<bold>(a)</bold> forests, <bold>(b)</bold> shrublands, <bold>(c)</bold> croplands, and
<bold>(d)</bold> grasslands.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e1552">Land cover change over Beijing and BTH from 2001 to 2013.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Land cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Land cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Beijing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">BTH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">categories</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1–5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Forests</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6–7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shrublands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12/14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Croplands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8–10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Grasslands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Others</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Land cover change in BTH</title>
      <?pagebreak page10873?><p id="d1e1753">The land cover in BTH and Beijing exhibits appreciable variation from 2001
to 2013 (Fig. 2 and Table 2). In BTH, forests and croplands have increased
by 7.2 % and 1.9 %, while shrublands and grasslands/savannas have
decreased by 3.9 % and 5.1 %, respectively. In Beijing, forests have
increased by 14.9 %, while shrublands have decreased by 12.6 %.
Apparently, the forest LCF has increased substantially in western and
northern BTH, concentrated in the Taihang and Yan Mountains, with an
increase up to 50 %. This result is consistent with the previous study of
Li et al. (2016), which has reported a remarkable forest growth in the
northwest of NCP from 2000 to 2010. As such, a “Green Great Wall” has been
established (Fig. 2a), which has reportedly protected the southeastern BTH
from the dust pollution (Liu et al., 2008; Duan et al., 2011; Parungo et
al., 2013). The land cover change, particularly the evident forest growth,
is primarily attributed to China's national afforestation programs
aiming to increase the forest coverage and to conserve soil and water,
including the Grain for Green Project, the Three-North Shelter Forest
System Project (Phase IV), and the Natural Forest Conservation Program (Yin
et al., 2010; Cao et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Model performance</title>
      <p id="d1e1762">We have first assimilated into the WRF-CHEM model the MCD12Q1 product of
2013 and performed the numerical simulation of haze pollution episodes from
1 December 2013 to 31 January 2014. To enable discussion, we have
defined the simulation with the 2013 land cover as the reference case
(hereafter referred to as REF case), and results from the reference
simulation are compared to observations in BTH.</p>
      <p id="d1e1765">Considering the key role of meteorological fields in determining the
formation, transformation, diffusion, transport, and removal of the air
pollutants (Bei et al., 2017), Fig. S2 presents the comparison of the
simulated wind speed and direction, and planetary boundary layer height with
the reanalysis data from ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-range Weather
Forecasts) at monitoring sites. The predicted temporal variations of the
three meteorological parameters are generally in agreement with the
reanalysis data, with the IOAs exceeding 0.80 and the absolute NMB less than
25 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e1768">Figure 3 presents the calculated and observed temporal profiles of
near-surface air pollutant concentrations averaged at monitoring sites in BTH
during the simulation period, including PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO. The WRF-CHEM model generally reproduces the haze
pollution episodes well. For example, all the haze events during the period
are captured successfully (Fig. 3a), with an IOA of 0.90 and a NMB of
2.1 % for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations. The model reasonably yields
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations compared to observations, with an IOA of 0.80, but
underestimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, with a NMB of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
(Fig. 3b). In winter, the insolation is weak in the north of China,
unfavorable for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemical production, so the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
level is substantially influenced by the boundary conditions (Li et al.,
2017; Wu et al., 2017). Hence, one of possible reasons for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
underestimation might be from the uncertainty in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> boundary
conditions. The simulated temporal variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentrations are well consistent with the observation, and the IOA and NMB
are 0.91 and 0.6 %, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO temporal
variations are also reasonably replicated against observations, with IOAs
of 0.82 and 0.84, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1922">Figure 4 shows the spatial comparison of calculated and observed PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations. Generally, the average predicted PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial patterns
agree well with the observations at the monitoring sites in BTH during the
whole period (Fig. 4b) and each month (Fig. 4c and d), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values exceeding
0.85, indicating good agreement of simulations with observations. The
observed PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations frequently exceed
150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH, showing the frequent occurrence of heavy
haze pollution events. The model generally yields the observed high
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in BTH and their surrounding areas, although the
model underestimation or overestimation still exists. Additionally, compared
to observations, the model also performs well in simulating the spatial
pattern of haze episodes with various timescales ranging from 8 to 16 days
(Fig. S3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e1991">Comparisons of observed (black dots) and simulated (solid red lines)
diurnal profiles of near-surface hourly mass concentrations of
<bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> CO averaged at monitoring sites in
BTH from 1 December 2013 to 31 January 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2060">Pattern comparisons of calculated and observed near-surface
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations. <bold>(a)</bold> Spatial correlation between
calculated and observed PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during each month and the
whole simulation period. Horizontal distribution of calculated (color
contour) and observed (colored circles) average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
during <bold>(b)</bold> the whole simulation period, <bold>(c)</bold> December 2013,
and <bold>(d)</bold> January 2014, along with the simulated wind fields (black
arrows).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2109">The good agreements of the simulated mass concentrations of air pollutants
with observations at monitoring sites in BTH show that the emission
inventory used in the present study and simulated wind fields are generally
reasonable, providing a reliable base for the further assessment. It is
worth noting that, although the predicted meteorological parameters are
generally consistent with the reanalysis data from ECMWF at monitoring
sites, other factors still affect the meteorological field simulations and
cause biases to compensate some of the deficiencies of the WRF-CHEM model,
such as overestimation of surface wind speeds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Effect of afforestation on haze pollution in BTH</title>
      <p id="d1e2118">Change in the land cover alters the surface roughness height (SFz0) that
plays an important role in determining the surface level wind speed and
energy exchange between the<?pagebreak page10874?> atmosphere and the land surface. Numerous
studies have demonstrated that increasing SFz0 tends to decelerate the
surface wind (Wu et al., 2016a, b), obstructing the dispersion of air
pollutants (Sun et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2013; Tie et al., 2015). In order
to evaluate the impact of the afforestation-induced SFz0 change and
resultant dynamical change (e.g., wind field) on the haze formation, a
sensitivity experiment is designed, in which the MCD12Q1 product of 2001 is
assimilated into the WRF-CHEM model to represent the land cover situations
before the afforestation (hereafter referred to as SEN-AFF case).</p>
      <p id="d1e2121">Figure 5a and b display the SFz0 change and its correlation with forest LCF
change from 2001 to 2013, respectively. The land cover change considerably
alters the SFz0, particularly in the afforestation area, with a SFz0 increase
ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 m. Apparently, the SFz0 exhibits a distinct
increasing trend in western and northern BTH, concentrated in the Taihang and
Yan Mountains, which is well consistent with the increase of the forest
LCF. The SFz0 change is highly correlated with the forest LCF change, with a
correlation coefficient of 0.91. Generally, the SFz0 is mainly dependent upon
the LCF (Eq. 6) and sensitive to the forest change (Table S2). Therefore,
afforestation constitutes the most important factor for the increase in the
SFz0 in BTH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e2126"><bold>(a)</bold> SFz0 change from 2001 to 2013, and <bold>(b)</bold> its
correlation with the forest LCF change; horizontal distribution of
<bold>(c)</bold> absolute and <bold>(d)</bold> relative near-surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentration changes caused by the afforestation. The wind field changes are
shown in black arrows in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2162">It is worth noting that Jiménez and Dudhia (2012) have point out that
there still exist large uncertainties in parameterizing the air land
interaction over complex terrain. Besides the vegetation effect on the
roughness length, drag of subgrid features of topography needs to be
considered. The parameterization of orographic flow over complex terrain is a
challenging problem at the mesoscale numerical simulation. In early
versions of the WRF model, a large bias in predicting surface winds over
complex terrain has occurred due to the drag exerted by unresolved topography
(Cheng and Steenburgh, 2005). Great efforts have been made to improve the
simulation of orographic flow over complex terrain. The new parameterization
scheme introduced in the WRF model since version 3.4.1 has corrected this
high wind speed bias over plains and valleys (Mughal et al., 2017), and it has also
corrected the low wind speed bias found over the mountains and hills
(Jiménez and Dudhia, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e2166">Figure 5c and d illustrate the influence of the afforestation on the surface
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and wind field averaged during the simulation period (defined as
(REF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SEN-AFF)). The prevailing westerly or northerly wind is
decelerated in the western and northwestern BTH due to the increased SFz0
caused by the afforestation, with the wind speed decrease ranging from
0.3 to 1.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The afforestation tends to deteriorate the haze
pollution in BTH, particularly in the downwind area of the afforestation,
with the period average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement reaching about
6–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or 3–6 %. The PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement in
Beijing is the most evident, corresponding to<?pagebreak page10875?> the rapid growth of forests in
the west and in the north of Beijing. Furthermore, during each episode,
the afforestation generally tends to deteriorate the haze pollution in BTH,
enhancing the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration by about up to 3–6 %,
particularly in the downwind area of the afforestation (Fig. S4). On average,
the difference of the simulated air pollutants and meteorological parameters
between the REF and SEN-AFF case is not significant (Fig. 5c and d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e2246">Horizontal distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> the average near-surface
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration and <bold>(b)</bold> its change due to the
afforestation during an intensified northerly/northwesterly event from 00:00
to 10:00 Beijing time on 18 January 2014. The wind field and its change are
shown in black arrows.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2270">The occurrence of heavy haze pollution in BTH is generally associated with
the weakening of northerly or northwesterly winds, which facilitates the
accumulation of air pollutants in BTH. The afforestation in the western and
northwestern BTH increases SFz0, further decelerating northerly or
northwesterly winds and deteriorating the haze pollution. However, the
afforestation only plays a marginal role in worsening the haze pollution
and does not constitute the main cause of the heavy haze formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2273">Apparently, during the haze development, when the northerly or northwesterly
wind is weak or becomes calm, the SFz0 increase due to the afforestation
contributes negligibly to the haze deterioration in BTH. However, once the
northerly or northwesterly wind commences to strengthen but is not strong
enough to evacuate the air pollutants in BTH, the SFz0 increase would play an
appreciable role in sustaining high PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the downwind area of
the afforestation. Figure 6 presents the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution of the
afforestation during the occurrence of a northerly gust on 18 January 2014.
The intensified northerly wind cleanses the northern BTH, but the haze
pollution is still very severe in the southern BTH. The afforestation
considerably elevates the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in southeastern BTH,
particularly in Beijing and Tianjin, with the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution
exceeding up to 15 % (Fig. 6b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e2314">Impacts of complete deforestation/afforestation over Taihang and
Yanshan Mountains on <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> SFz0 and
<bold>(b)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold> average near-surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentrations from 1 December 2013 to 31 January 2014, along with the wind
field change (black arrows).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2345">It is worth noting that the aerosol species (organic aerosol, sulfate,
nitrate, ammonium, and elemental carbon) exhibit the same variation trend as
the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the afforestation (Fig. S5). Apparently, the organic
aerosol is the major contributor to the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variation due to the
afforestation, followed by the sulfate and ammonium aerosol. The
afforestation also increases emissions of the biogenic SOA (BSOA) precursors,
such as isoprene and monoterpenes. However, due to the very low emissions of
BSOA precursors during wintertime (Guenther et al., 2006, 2012), the BSOA
contribution to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is insignificant, less than
3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average during the whole episodes (Fig. S6a). The
average BSOA enhancement due to the afforestation is less than 0.5 %
(Fig. S6b). Furthermore, in general, the afforestation has little effect on
the boundary layer height, upward sensible heat flux (associated with
turbulent mixing), and moisture (related to clouds) in BTH (Fig. S7).</p>
      <?pagebreak page10876?><p id="d1e2394">To assess the upper limit of impacts of the afforestation on the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
level in BTH, two additional experiments are conducted and compared to the
REF case. The two experiments are one with complete deforestation and the
other with complete afforestation in the Taihang and Yan Mountains
(Fig. 7a and c). In the complete deforestation sensitivity case, the barren
surface with SFz0 of 0.01 m is used to replace other land cover categories.
In the complete afforestation case, the deciduous broadleaf forest category
with SFz0 of 0.5 m is used to replace other land cover categories. As shown
in Fig. 7, complete deforestation considerably decreases the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level
in BTH, with the period average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction ranging from
5 to 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> generally, and in particular the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration in Beijing is reduced by more than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
due to the intensified northerly or northwesterly wind caused by the decrease
of SFz0 in the Taihang and Yan Mountains. Complete afforestation
deteriorates the haze pollution in BTH, and the haze pollution remains in
the Taihang and Yan Mountains due to the weakened northerly or
northwesterly wind. Additionally, the enhancement of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the foothills of the Taihang and Yan Mountains is obvious,
varying from 10 to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7d).</p>
      <p id="d1e2500">Interestingly, the afforestation deteriorates most of the haze pollution in
Beijing (see Fig. 5). So it is anticipated that the proposed large
ventilation corridor system could alleviate the haze pollution in Beijing
(China Forestry Network, 2014, 2016b, c). Originally, the ventilation
corridor system was devised to relieve the urban heat island effect and
improve the thermal environmental conditions in urbanized regions. With the
frequent occurrence of heavy haze in Beijing, the debatable system is
expected to blow away the haze and bring blue skies to Beijing. In order to
examine the effects of the wind corridor system, a sensitivity experiment is
conducted based on the base case, in which three artificial ventilation
corridors are designed in the northwest, north, and northeast of Beijing,
with a width of 6 km
(Fig. 8a). For all the grid cells within the corridors, the barren surface
with SFz0 of 0.01 m is used to replace other land cover categories. In contrast
to the expectation, our sensitivity results show that the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduction due to the designed ventilation corridor system is less than
1 % in Beijing (Fig. 8b). Note that the width of the ventilation corridor
in the sensitivity study is 12 times the proposed one. Hence, the proposed
large ventilation corridor system is not effective or beneficial to mitigate
the haze pollution in Beijing.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2519">The annual land cover product, MCD12Q1, derived from the MODIS observations
since 2001 has been used to analyze the land cover change in BTH. A
considerable increasing trend of forests in the western and northwestern BTH
has been identified, which is caused by China's national afforestation
programs. Forests in BTH and Beijing have increased by 7.2 % and 14.9 %,
respectively, from 2001 to 2013. The fast forest expansion has increased the
surface roughness height, particularly in Beijing and its surrounding areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e2522">The MCD12Q1 product of 2013 has been assimilated into the WRF-CHEM model to
represent the current land cover condition. Persistent haze pollution
episodes in BTH from 1 December 2013 to January 2014 are simulated using the
WRF-CHEM model. Generally, the WRF-CHEM model reproduces the
temporal variations and spatial distributions of air pollutants reasonably well compared to
observations at monitoring sites in BTH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e2527">Impacts of an artificial large ventilation corridor system on
<bold>(a)</bold> SFz0 and <bold>(b)</bold> average near-surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentrations from 1 December 2013 to 31 January 2014, along with the wind
field (black arrows).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10869/2018/acp-18-10869-2018-f08.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2551">Sensitivity studies have demonstrated that the increase of the surface
roughness height decreases the northwesterly or northerly wind speed in the
western and northwestern BTH by about 0.3–1.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The haze
pollution is deteriorated in BTH to some degree, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are generally enhanced by less than 6 % due to the
afforestation. The heavy haze formation in BTH is generally associated with
meteorological conditions when the northerly or northwesterly wind is weak.
Once the northerly or northwesterly wind is strengthened during the haze
development in BTH, afforestation plays a considerable role in maintaining
high PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the downwind of the afforestation area.
Complete afforestation or deforestation in the Taihang and Yan Mountains
would increase or decrease the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level within 15 % in BTH.</p>
      <p id="d1e2594">Additionally, our model results do not support that the proposed large
ventilation corridor system is beneficial to alleviate the haze pollution in
Beijing. Under the unfavorable synoptic situations, emissions mitigation is
the sole optimum approach to mitigate the haze pollution in BTH.</p>
      <p id="d1e2597">It is worth noting that, in the present study, contributions of the surface
roughness change induced by afforestation to the haze pollution are
primarily evaluated using the WRF-CHEM model, but many other factors which
directly or indirectly influence air quality are also modified by the land
cover change, including surface moisture, terrestrial erosion, pollutants'
dry deposition, planetary boundary layer thermal stability, etc. For example, changes in surface
moisture and surface erosion impact the emissions of natural particles;
changes in dry deposition directly influence the air quality in situ and
indirectly the air quality downwind with occurrence of recirculation.
Therefore, when changes in all those factors caused by land cover change are
accounted for, the role of afforestation in air quality in situ might be
uncertain. In the online WRF-CHEM model, besides the surface roughness, the
impacts of afforestation on the heat flux, surface moisture, surface
erosion, and dry deposition of air pollutants have also been considered.
Considering that afforestation in BTH is mainly distributed in the mountain
region, the surface roughness increases induced by afforestation obviously
decrease surface wind speeds, facilitating accumulation of air<?pagebreak page10877?> pollutants in
the downwind region and further deteriorating the haze pollution.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e2605">The real-time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations are
accessible for the public on the website <uri>http://106.37.208.233:20035/</uri>
(China MEP, 2013a). One can also access the historic profile of observed
ambient pollutants through visiting <uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn/</uri> (China MEP,
2013b). The MODIS Land Cover products (MOD12Q1) are accessible for the public
on the website
<uri>https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/dataset_discovery/modis/modis_products_table</uri>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2637">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10869-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10869-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e2646">GL designed the study. XL and GL wrote the paper. XL, NB, JW, and XL
performed model simulations. TF, SZ, JC, and ZA analyzed the data. All
authors reviewed and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e2652">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e2658">This article is part of the special issue “Regional transport
and transformation of air pollution in eastern China”. It is not associated
with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2664">This work was financially supported by National Key R&amp;D Plan (Quantitative
Relationship and Regulation Principle between Regional Oxidation Capacity of
Atmospheric and Air Quality (2017YFC0210000)). Long Xin was supported by the
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, a project
funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2016M602886), and the
Shaanxi Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2017BSHYDZZ27). Guohui Li is
supported by “Hundred Talents Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no.
41661144020).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Zhanqing
Li<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bai, Y., Feng, M., Jiang, H., Wang, J., and Liu, Y.: Validation of land cover
maps in China using a sampling-based labeling approach, Remote Sens.-Basel,
7, 10589–10606, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bei, N., Li, G., and Molina, L. T.: Uncertainties in SOA simulations due to
meteorological uncertainties in Mexico City during MILAGRO-2006 field
campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11295–11308,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11295-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11295-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bei, N., Wu, J., Elser, M., Feng, T., Cao, J., El-Haddad, I., Li, X., Huang,
R., Li, Z., Long, X., Xing, L., Zhao, S., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Li, G.: Impacts of meteorological uncertainties on the haze formation in
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) during wintertime: a case study, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 14579–14591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bichet, A., Wild, M., Folini, D., and Schar, C.: Causes for decadal
variations of wind speed over land: Sensitivity studies with a global climate
model, Geophy. Res. Lett., 39, L11701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051685</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component: 1. Model description, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 4183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001409</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, S., Chen, L., Shankman, D., Wang, C., Wang, X., and Zhang, H.: Excessive
reliance on afforestation in China's arid and semi-arid regions: lessons in
ecological restoration, Earth-Sci. Rev., 104, 240–245, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model
with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system, Part II: Preliminary model
validation, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 587–604, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y., Pan, H. L., Koren, V., Duan, Q.
Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land surface evaporation by four
schemes and comparison with FIFE observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101,
7251–7268, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, L., Li, D., and Pryor, S. C.: Wind speed trends over China: quantifying
the magnitude and assessing causality, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 2579–2590,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, W. Y. Y. and Steenburgh, W. J.: Evaluation of surface sensible weather
forecasts by the WRF and the Eta Models over the western United States,
Weather Forecast., 20, 812–821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/waf885.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/waf885.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>China Forestry Network: The Beijing's ventilation corridor system would
promote the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration to reach the standard, available at:
<uri>http://www.forestry.gov.cn/portal/main/s/2103/content-686660.html</uri>, last
access: 27 November 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>China Forestry Network: Chinese State Forestry Bureau: It is lack of
scientific basis between the shelter forest and severe haze pollution and
surface-level stilling, available at:
<uri>http://www.forestry.gov.cn/thw/1807/content-834072.html</uri>, last access:
27 November 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>China Forestry Network: Could the urban ventilation corridor system blow away
severe haze pollution?, available at:
<uri>http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/2103/content-857797.html</uri>, last access:
27 November 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>China Forestry Network: Scientists analyzed the effect of ongoing Beijing's
ventilation corridor system on blowing away Beijing's haze pollution,
available at: <uri>http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/2103/content-872159.html</uri>,
last access: 27 November 2016c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>China Forestry Network: Ecological controlling: The Three North Shelter
Forest helps to mitigate heavy pollution weather conditions, available at:
<uri>http://www.forestry.gov.cn/zlszz/4253/content-936157.html</uri>, last access:
27 November 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parameterization for
atmospheric studies, NASA Tech. Memo, 15, 40 pp., 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M.-D., Suarez, M. J., Liang, X.-Z., Yan, M. M.-H., and Cote, C.: A
thermal infrared radiation parameterization for<?pagebreak page10878?> atmospheric studies, Tech.
Rep. NASA/TM-2001-104606, 19, 55 pp., 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M.: Area-averaging of surface fluxes in a neutrally stratified,
horizontally inhomogeneous atmospheric boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 24,
1349–1360, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, H., Yan, C., Tsunekawa, A., Song, X., Li, S., and Xie, J.: Assessing
vegetation dynamics in the Three-North Shelter Forest region of China using
AVHRR NDVI data, Environ. Earth Sci., 64, 1011–1020, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G.,
Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando,
J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.:
Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical
Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43–67,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Friedl, M. A., McIver, D. K., Hodges, J. C., Zhang, X., Muchoney, D.,
Strahler, A. H., Woodcock, C. E., Gopal, S., Schneider, A., and Cooper, A.:
Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results, Remote
Sens. Environ., 83, 287–302, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N.,
Sibley, A., and Huang, X.: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm
refinements and characterization of new datasets, Remote Sens. Environ., 114,
168–182, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gerten, D., Schaphoff, S., Haberlandt, U., Lucht, W., and Sitch, S.:
Terrestrial vegetation and water balance – hydrological evaluation of a
dynamic global vegetation model, J. Hydrol., 286, 249–270, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the
WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T.,
Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols
from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for
modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J.-O. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics
Scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pac., J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X. X., Lamarque, J. F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4784, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002853</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Huang, T., Zhang, X., Ling, Z., Zhang, L., Gao, H., Tian, C., Guo, J., Zhao,
Y., Wang, L., and Ma, J.: Impacts of Large-Scale Land-Use Change on the
Uptake of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Artificial Three Northern
Regions Shelter Forest Across Northern China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
12885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04835" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04835</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jiménez, P. A. and Dudhia, J.: Improving the representation of resolved
and unresolved topographic effects on surface wind in the WRF Model, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 51, 300–316, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Janjić, Z. I.: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor–Yamada level 2.5
scheme in the NCEP Meso model, NCEP office note, 437, 61 pp., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Zhang, R., Fan, J., and Tie, X.: Impacts of black carbon aerosol on
photolysis and ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005898" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD005898</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Lei, W., Zavala, M., Volkamer, R., Dusanter, S., Stevens, P., and
Molina, L. T.: Impacts of HONO sources on the photochemistry in Mexico City
during the MCMA-2006/MILAGO Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6551–6567,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Bei, N., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: Aerosol effects on the
photochemistry in Mexico City during MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 5169–5182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N.,
Canagaratna, M. R., and Molina, L. T.: Simulations of organic aerosol
concentrations in Mexico City using the WRF-CHEM model during the
MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3789–3809,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Lei, W., Bei, N., and Molina, L. T.: Contribution of garbage burning
to chloride and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8751–8761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Li, G., Bei, N., Cao, J., Wu, J., Long, X., Feng, T., Dai, W., Liu, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Tie, X.: Widespread and persistent ozone pollution in eastern
China during the non-winter season of 2015: observations and source
attributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2759–2774,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2759-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2759-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Wang, H., Zhou, S., Sun, B., and Gao, Z.: Did ecological engineering
projects have a significant effect on large-scale vegetation restoration in
Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region, China? A remote sensing approach, Chinese
Geogr. Sci., 26, 216–228, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani,
H., AlMazroa, M. A., Amann, M., Anderson, H. R., and Andrews, K. G.: A
comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to
67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a
systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, The lancet,
380, 2224–2260, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J. G., Li, S. X., Ouyang, Z. Y., Tam, C., and Chen, X. D.: Ecological
and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 9477–9482, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J. and Daggupaty S. M.: Stability Dependence of Height Scales and
Effective Roughness Lengths of Momentum and Heat Transfer Over Roughness
Changes, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 88, 145–160, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mahrt, L.: The bulk aerodynamic formulation over heterogeneous surfaces,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 78, 87–119, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, P. J.: The formation of area-averaged roughness lengths, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 114, 399-420, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
McVicar, T. R., Roderick, M. L., Donohue, R. J., Li, L. T., Van Niel, T. G.,
Thomas, A., Grieser, J., Jhajharia, D., Himri, Y., Mahowald, N. M.,
Mescherskaya, A. V., Kruger, A. C., Rehman,<?pagebreak page10879?> S., and Dinpashoh, Y.: Global
review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind
speeds: Implications for evaporation, J. Hydrol., 416, 182–205, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Air Quality
Observation Real-time Release Platform of MEP Data Center, available at:
<uri>http://106.37.208.233:20035/</uri> (last access: 30 June 2018), 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Online Monitoring
and Analysis Platform of China Air Quality, available at:
<uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn/</uri> (last access: 30 June 2018), 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Mitchell, K.: The Community Noah Land-Surface Model (LSM), User's Guide,
Public Release Version 2.7.1, available at:
<uri>https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/public/product-tool/unified-noah-lsm/Noah_LSM_USERGUIDE_2.7.1.pdf</uri>
(last access: 30 June 2018), 2005 (updated 2017).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Mughal, M. O., Lynch, M., Yu, F., Mcgann, B., Sutton, J., and Sutton, J.:
Wind modelling, validation and sensitivity study using Weather Research and
Forecasting model in complex terrain, Environ. Modell. Softw., 90, 107–125,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Parungo, F., Li, Z., Li, X., Yang, D., and Harris, J.: Gobi dust storms and
The Great Green Wall, Geophy. Res. Lett., 21, 999–1002, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Philip, J. R.: Two-dimensional checkerboards and blending heights, Bound.
Lay. Meteorol., 80, 1–18, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., Papale, D., Valentini, R., Running, S., Viovy, N.,
Cramer, W., Granier, A., Ogee, J., and Allard, V.: Reduction of ecosystem
productivity and respiration during the European summer 2003 climate anomaly:
a joint flux tower, remote sensing and modelling analysis, Glob. Change
Biol., 13, 634–651, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Chen, C., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Zhou, L., Cheng, X., Zheng, H., Ji, D.,
Li, J., and Tang, X.: Rapid formation and evolution of an extreme haze
episode in Northern China during winter 2015, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 27151,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep27151</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., He, K., Hao, J., Wu, Y., Tang, Y., and
Carmichael, G. R.: Revisiting China's CO emissions after the Transport and
Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) mission: Synthesis of
inventories, atmospheric modeling, and observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D14306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007118</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Tie, X., Zhang, Q., He, H., Cao, J., Han, S., Gao, Y., Li, X., and Jia, X.
C.: A budget analysis of the formation of haze in Beijing, Atmos. Environ.,
100, 25–36, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., and Reenberg, A.: The emergence of land change
science for global environmental change and sustainability, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 104, 20666–20671, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Vautard, R., Cattiaux, J., Yiou, P., Thépaut, J.-N., and Ciais, P.:
Northern Hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in
surface roughness, Nat. Geosci., 3, 756–761, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S. and Hao, J.: Air quality management in China: Issues, challenges,
and options, J. Environ. Sci., 24, 2–13, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wesely, M.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition
in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J.
A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a
high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning,
Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wieringa, J.: Roughness-dependent geographical interpolation of surface wind
speed averages, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 867–889, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, N. and Mason, P.: The influence of static stability on the effective
roughness lengths for momentum and heat transfer, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc.,
117, 1025–1056, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, J., Zha, J., and Zhao, D.: Evaluating the effects of land use and cover
change on the decrease of surface wind speed over China in recent 30 years
using a statistical downscaling method, Clim. Dynam., 1–19, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, J., Zha, J., and Zhao, D.: Estimating the impact of the changes in land
use and cover on the surface wind speed over the East China Plain during the
period 1980–2011, Clim. Dynam., 46, 847–863, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wu, J., Li, G., Cao, J., Bei, N., Wang, Y., Feng, T., Huang, R., Liu, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Tie, X.: Contributions of trans-boundary transport to
summertime air quality in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2035–2051,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, W., Shibasaki, R., Ongaro, L., Ongaro, L., Zhou, Q., and Tang, H.:
Validation and comparison of 1 km global land cover products in China, Int.
J. Remote Sens., 29, 3769–3785, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y., Xiao, P., Feng, X., and Li, H.: Accuracy assessment of seven global
land cover datasets over China, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 125, 156–173, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, R. S., Yin, G. P., and Yin, R.: China's primary programs of terrestrial
ecosystem restoration: initiation, implementation, and challenges, Environ.
Manage., 45, 429–441, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari,
A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei,
Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B
mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Huang, T., Zhang, L., Gao, H., Shen, Y., and Ma, J.: Trends of
deposition fluxes and loadings of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in the
artificial Three Northern Regions Shelter Forest across northern China,
Environ. Pollut., 207, 238–247, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Du, J., Huang, T., Zhang, L., Gao, H., Zhao, Y., and Ma, J.:
Atmospheric removal of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by man-made Three Northern Regions Shelter
Forest in Northern China estimated using satellite retrieved PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, Sci. Total Environ., 593–594, 713, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng,, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Does afforestation deteriorate haze pollution in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), China?</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Although aggressive emission control strategies have been
implemented recently in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei area (BTH), China,
pervasive and persistent haze still frequently engulfs the region during
wintertime. Afforestation in BTH, primarily concentrated in the Taihang and
Yan Mountains, has constituted one of the controversial factors
exacerbating the haze pollution due to its slowdown of the surface wind
speed. We report here an increasing trend of forest cover in BTH during
2001–2013 based on long-term satellite measurements and the impact of the
afforestation on the fine-particle (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) level. Simulations using the
Weather Research and Forecast model with chemistry reveal that
afforestation in BTH since 2001 has generally been deteriorating the haze pollution in
BTH to some degree, enhancing PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations by up to 6&thinsp;% on
average. Complete afforestation or deforestation in the Taihang and Yan
Mountains would increase or decrease the PM<sub>2.5</sub> level within 15&thinsp;% in
BTH. Our model results also suggest that implementing a large ventilation
corridor system would not be effective or beneficial to mitigate the haze
pollution in Beijing.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bai, Y., Feng, M., Jiang, H., Wang, J., and Liu, Y.: Validation of land cover
maps in China using a sampling-based labeling approach, Remote Sens.-Basel,
7, 10589–10606, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bei, N., Li, G., and Molina, L. T.: Uncertainties in SOA simulations due to
meteorological uncertainties in Mexico City during MILAGRO-2006 field
campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11295–11308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11295-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11295-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bei, N., Wu, J., Elser, M., Feng, T., Cao, J., El-Haddad, I., Li, X., Huang,
R., Li, Z., Long, X., Xing, L., Zhao, S., Tie, X., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
and Li, G.: Impacts of meteorological uncertainties on the haze formation in
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) during wintertime: a case study, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 14579–14591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14579-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bichet, A., Wild, M., Folini, D., and Schar, C.: Causes for decadal
variations of wind speed over land: Sensitivity studies with a global climate
model, Geophy. Res. Lett., 39, L11701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051685</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component: 1. Model description, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 4183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, S., Chen, L., Shankman, D., Wang, C., Wang, X., and Zhang, H.: Excessive
reliance on afforestation in China's arid and semi-arid regions: lessons in
ecological restoration, Earth-Sci. Rev., 104, 240–245, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model
with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system, Part II: Preliminary model
validation, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 587–604, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y., Pan, H. L., Koren, V., Duan, Q.
Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land surface evaporation by four
schemes and comparison with FIFE observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101,
7251–7268, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, L., Li, D., and Pryor, S. C.: Wind speed trends over China: quantifying
the magnitude and assessing causality, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 2579–2590,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, W. Y. Y. and Steenburgh, W. J.: Evaluation of surface sensible weather
forecasts by the WRF and the Eta Models over the western United States,
Weather Forecast., 20, 812–821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/waf885.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/waf885.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
China Forestry Network: The Beijing's ventilation corridor system would
promote the PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration to reach the standard, available at:
<a href="http://www.forestry.gov.cn/portal/main/s/2103/content-686660.html" target="_blank">http://www.forestry.gov.cn/portal/main/s/2103/content-686660.html</a>, last
access: 27 November 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
China Forestry Network: Chinese State Forestry Bureau: It is lack of
scientific basis between the shelter forest and severe haze pollution and
surface-level stilling, available at:
<a href="http://www.forestry.gov.cn/thw/1807/content-834072.html" target="_blank">http://www.forestry.gov.cn/thw/1807/content-834072.html</a>, last access:
27 November 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
China Forestry Network: Could the urban ventilation corridor system blow away
severe haze pollution?, available at:
<a href="http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/2103/content-857797.html" target="_blank">http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/2103/content-857797.html</a>, last access:
27 November 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
China Forestry Network: Scientists analyzed the effect of ongoing Beijing's
ventilation corridor system on blowing away Beijing's haze pollution,
available at: <a href="http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/2103/content-872159.html" target="_blank">http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/2103/content-872159.html</a>,
last access: 27 November 2016c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
China Forestry Network: Ecological controlling: The Three North Shelter
Forest helps to mitigate heavy pollution weather conditions, available at:
<a href="http://www.forestry.gov.cn/zlszz/4253/content-936157.html" target="_blank">http://www.forestry.gov.cn/zlszz/4253/content-936157.html</a>, last access:
27 November 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parameterization for
atmospheric studies, NASA Tech. Memo, 15, 40 pp., 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, M.-D., Suarez, M. J., Liang, X.-Z., Yan, M. M.-H., and Cote, C.: A
thermal infrared radiation parameterization for atmospheric studies, Tech.
Rep. NASA/TM-2001-104606, 19, 55 pp., 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M.: Area-averaging of surface fluxes in a neutrally stratified,
horizontally inhomogeneous atmospheric boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 24,
1349–1360, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, H., Yan, C., Tsunekawa, A., Song, X., Li, S., and Xie, J.: Assessing
vegetation dynamics in the Three-North Shelter Forest region of China using
AVHRR NDVI data, Environ. Earth Sci., 64, 1011–1020, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G.,
Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando,
J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.:
Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical
Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Friedl, M. A., McIver, D. K., Hodges, J. C., Zhang, X., Muchoney, D.,
Strahler, A. H., Woodcock, C. E., Gopal, S., Schneider, A., and Cooper, A.:
Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results, Remote
Sens. Environ., 83, 287–302, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N.,
Sibley, A., and Huang, X.: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm
refinements and characterization of new datasets, Remote Sens. Environ., 114,
168–182, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gerten, D., Schaphoff, S., Haberlandt, U., Lucht, W., and Sitch, S.:
Terrestrial vegetation and water balance – hydrological evaluation of a
dynamic global vegetation model, J. Hydrol., 286, 249–270, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the
WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T.,
Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols
from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for
modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J.-O. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics
Scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pac., J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X. X., Lamarque, J. F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4784, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002853</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, T., Zhang, X., Ling, Z., Zhang, L., Gao, H., Tian, C., Guo, J., Zhao,
Y., Wang, L., and Ma, J.: Impacts of Large-Scale Land-Use Change on the
Uptake of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Artificial Three Northern
Regions Shelter Forest Across Northern China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
12885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04835" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04835</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jiménez, P. A. and Dudhia, J.: Improving the representation of resolved
and unresolved topographic effects on surface wind in the WRF Model, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 51, 300–316, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Janjić, Z. I.: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor–Yamada level 2.5
scheme in the NCEP Meso model, NCEP office note, 437, 61 pp., 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Zhang, R., Fan, J., and Tie, X.: Impacts of black carbon aerosol on
photolysis and ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005898" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005898</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Lei, W., Zavala, M., Volkamer, R., Dusanter, S., Stevens, P., and
Molina, L. T.: Impacts of HONO sources on the photochemistry in Mexico City
during the MCMA-2006/MILAGO Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6551–6567,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6551-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Bei, N., Tie, X., and Molina, L. T.: Aerosol effects on the
photochemistry in Mexico City during MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 5169–5182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5169-2011</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Zavala, M., Lei, W., Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Pandis, S. N.,
Canagaratna, M. R., and Molina, L. T.: Simulations of organic aerosol
concentrations in Mexico City using the WRF-CHEM model during the
MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3789–3809,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3789-2011</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Lei, W., Bei, N., and Molina, L. T.: Contribution of garbage burning
to chloride and PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8751–8761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Bei, N., Cao, J., Wu, J., Long, X., Feng, T., Dai, W., Liu, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Tie, X.: Widespread and persistent ozone pollution in eastern
China during the non-winter season of 2015: observations and source
attributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2759–2774,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2759-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2759-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Wang, H., Zhou, S., Sun, B., and Gao, Z.: Did ecological engineering
projects have a significant effect on large-scale vegetation restoration in
Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region, China? A remote sensing approach, Chinese
Geogr. Sci., 26, 216–228, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani,
H., AlMazroa, M. A., Amann, M., Anderson, H. R., and Andrews, K. G.: A
comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to
67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a
systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, The lancet,
380, 2224–2260, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J. G., Li, S. X., Ouyang, Z. Y., Tam, C., and Chen, X. D.: Ecological
and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 9477–9482, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J. and Daggupaty S. M.: Stability Dependence of Height Scales and
Effective Roughness Lengths of Momentum and Heat Transfer Over Roughness
Changes, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 88, 145–160, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mahrt, L.: The bulk aerodynamic formulation over heterogeneous surfaces,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 78, 87–119, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, P. J.: The formation of area-averaged roughness lengths, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 114, 399-420, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
McVicar, T. R., Roderick, M. L., Donohue, R. J., Li, L. T., Van Niel, T. G.,
Thomas, A., Grieser, J., Jhajharia, D., Himri, Y., Mahowald, N. M.,
Mescherskaya, A. V., Kruger, A. C., Rehman, S., and Dinpashoh, Y.: Global
review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind
speeds: Implications for evaporation, J. Hydrol., 416, 182–205, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Air Quality
Observation Real-time Release Platform of MEP Data Center, available at:
<a href="http://106.37.208.233:20035/" target="_blank">http://106.37.208.233:20035/</a> (last access: 30 June 2018), 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (China MEP): Online Monitoring
and Analysis Platform of China Air Quality, available at:
<a href="http://www.aqistudy.cn/" target="_blank">http://www.aqistudy.cn/</a> (last access: 30 June 2018), 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, K.: The Community Noah Land-Surface Model (LSM), User's Guide,
Public Release Version 2.7.1, available at:
<a href="https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/public/product-tool/unified-noah-lsm/Noah_LSM_USERGUIDE_2.7.1.pdf" target="_blank">https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/public/product-tool/unified-noah-lsm/Noah_LSM_USERGUIDE_2.7.1.pdf</a>
(last access: 30 June 2018), 2005 (updated 2017).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Mughal, M. O., Lynch, M., Yu, F., Mcgann, B., Sutton, J., and Sutton, J.:
Wind modelling, validation and sensitivity study using Weather Research and
Forecasting model in complex terrain, Environ. Modell. Softw., 90, 107–125,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Parungo, F., Li, Z., Li, X., Yang, D., and Harris, J.: Gobi dust storms and
The Great Green Wall, Geophy. Res. Lett., 21, 999–1002, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Philip, J. R.: Two-dimensional checkerboards and blending heights, Bound.
Lay. Meteorol., 80, 1–18, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., Papale, D., Valentini, R., Running, S., Viovy, N.,
Cramer, W., Granier, A., Ogee, J., and Allard, V.: Reduction of ecosystem
productivity and respiration during the European summer 2003 climate anomaly:
a joint flux tower, remote sensing and modelling analysis, Glob. Change
Biol., 13, 634–651, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Chen, C., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Zhou, L., Cheng, X., Zheng, H., Ji, D.,
Li, J., and Tang, X.: Rapid formation and evolution of an extreme haze
episode in Northern China during winter 2015, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 27151,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27151</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., He, K., Hao, J., Wu, Y., Tang, Y., and
Carmichael, G. R.: Revisiting China's CO emissions after the Transport and
Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) mission: Synthesis of
inventories, atmospheric modeling, and observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D14306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007118</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Tie, X., Zhang, Q., He, H., Cao, J., Han, S., Gao, Y., Li, X., and Jia, X.
C.: A budget analysis of the formation of haze in Beijing, Atmos. Environ.,
100, 25–36, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., and Reenberg, A.: The emergence of land change
science for global environmental change and sustainability, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 104, 20666–20671, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Vautard, R., Cattiaux, J., Yiou, P., Thépaut, J.-N., and Ciais, P.:
Northern Hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in
surface roughness, Nat. Geosci., 3, 756–761, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S. and Hao, J.: Air quality management in China: Issues, challenges,
and options, J. Environ. Sci., 24, 2–13, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wesely, M.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition
in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J.
A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a
high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning,
Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wieringa, J.: Roughness-dependent geographical interpolation of surface wind
speed averages, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 867–889, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, N. and Mason, P.: The influence of static stability on the effective
roughness lengths for momentum and heat transfer, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc.,
117, 1025–1056, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, J., Zha, J., and Zhao, D.: Evaluating the effects of land use and cover
change on the decrease of surface wind speed over China in recent 30 years
using a statistical downscaling method, Clim. Dynam., 1–19, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, J., Zha, J., and Zhao, D.: Estimating the impact of the changes in land
use and cover on the surface wind speed over the East China Plain during the
period 1980–2011, Clim. Dynam., 46, 847–863, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, J., Li, G., Cao, J., Bei, N., Wang, Y., Feng, T., Huang, R., Liu, S.,
Zhang, Q., and Tie, X.: Contributions of trans-boundary transport to
summertime air quality in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2035–2051,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2035-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, W., Shibasaki, R., Ongaro, L., Ongaro, L., Zhou, Q., and Tang, H.:
Validation and comparison of 1&thinsp;km global land cover products in China, Int.
J. Remote Sens., 29, 3769–3785, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y., Xiao, P., Feng, X., and Li, H.: Accuracy assessment of seven global
land cover datasets over China, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 125, 156–173, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, R. S., Yin, G. P., and Yin, R.: China's primary programs of terrestrial
ecosystem restoration: initiation, implementation, and challenges, Environ.
Manage., 45, 429–441, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari,
A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei,
Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B
mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Huang, T., Zhang, L., Gao, H., Shen, Y., and Ma, J.: Trends of
deposition fluxes and loadings of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in the
artificial Three Northern Regions Shelter Forest across northern China,
Environ. Pollut., 207, 238–247, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Du, J., Huang, T., Zhang, L., Gao, H., Zhao, Y., and Ma, J.:
Atmospheric removal of PM<sub>2.5</sub> by man-made Three Northern Regions Shelter
Forest in Northern China estimated using satellite retrieved PM<sub>2.5</sub>
concentration, Sci. Total Environ., 593–594, 713, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng,, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
