<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-9979-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonal variations in high time-resolved chemical compositions, sources, and
evolution of atmospheric submicron aerosols in the megacity Beijing</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seasonal variations in atmospheric submicron aerosols in the megacity Beijing}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W.~Hu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-1130</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
          <email>minhu@pku.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-9123</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Wei-Wei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-6304</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Yusheng</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-8272</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Song</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-2313</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution
Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking
University, Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advanced
Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Graduate School of Environmental and Symbiotic Sciences,
Prefectural University of Kumamoto, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Kumamoto 862-8502, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>b</label><institution>now at: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Min Hu (minhu@pku.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>9979</fpage><lpage>10000</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>A severe regional haze problem in the megacity Beijing and surrounding areas,
caused by fast formation and growth of fine particles, has attracted much
attention in recent years. In order to investigate the secondary formation
and aging process of urban aerosols, four intensive campaigns were conducted
in four seasons between March 2012 and March 2013 at an urban site in
Beijing (116.31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 37.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). An Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry (HR-ToF-AMS) was
deployed to measure non-refractory chemical components of submicron
particulate matter (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average mass concentrations of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>black carbon) were 45.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45.8, 37.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31.0, 41.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42.7, and 81.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring,
summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. Organic aerosol (OA) was the most
abundant component in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, accounting for 31, 33, 44, and 36 %
seasonally, and secondary inorganic aerosol (SNA, sum of sulfate, nitrate,
and ammonium) accounted for 59, 57, 43, and 55 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
correspondingly. Based on the application of positive matrix factorization
(PMF), the sources of OA were obtained, including the primary ones of
hydrocarbon-like (HOA), cooking (COA), biomass burning OA (BBOA) and coal
combustion OA (CCOA), and secondary component oxygenated OA (OOA). OOA, which
can be split into more-oxidized (MO-OOA) and less-oxidized OOA (LO-OOA), accounted
for 49, 69, 47, and 50 % in four seasons, respectively. Totally, the
fraction of secondary components (OOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SNA) contributed about 60–80 %
to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that secondary formation played an important role in
the PM pollution in Beijing, and primary sources were also non-negligible.
The evolution process of OA in different seasons was investigated with
multiple metrics and tools. The average carbon oxidation states and other
metrics show that the oxidation state of OA was the highest in summer,
probably due to both strong photochemical and aqueous-phase oxidations. It
was indicated by the good correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.53–0.75, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01)
between LO-OOA and odd oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and between
MO-OOA and liquid water content in aerosols. BBOA was resolved in spring and
autumn, influenced by agricultural biomass burning (e.g., field preparation
burnings, straw burning after the harvest). CCOA was only identified in
winter due to domestic heating. These results signified that the
comprehensive management for biomass burning and coal combustion emissions
is needed. High concentrations of chemical components in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Beijing, especially in winter or in adverse meteorological conditions,
suggest that further strengthening the regional emission control of primary
particulate and precursors of secondary species is expected.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>With rapid economic development and urbanization, air pollution has become an
increasingly serious issue in China. Severe regional air pollution,
mostly characterized by high concentration of fine particulate matter
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, happens frequently. Severe fine particle pollution can lead to
visibility deterioration, damage ecosystems and human health, and affect
climate change substantially, which has attracted widespread attention.
Submicron particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for a large proportion of
both mass and number concentrations in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Its physical and chemical
properties can be greatly modified by dynamic and chemical conversion
processes in the atmosphere (Buseck and Adachi, 2008). A full examination on
the properties of chemical compositions, sources, and formation mechanisms
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> will improve our abilities to understand, predict, and control
its impacts.</p>
      <p>Multiple observations have been conducted to investigate the concentrations
and chemical compositions of non-refractory submicron particle (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at diverse sites around the world (Jimenez et al., 2009, and references
therein), and also in China (Hu et al., 2016a; Huang et al., 2014; Xu et
al., 2014; Sun et al., 2010; and references therein). The PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration in the megacity Beijing was 2–10 times higher than those in
western cities, highlighting the severe situation of particulate pollution.
Anthropogenic emissions due to a dense population, as well as the adverse
meteorological and geographical conditions, can result in high-PM pollution
in Beijing (Hu et al., 2016a).</p>
      <p>In urban atmospheres, aerosols can be directly emitted from complicated
anthropogenic sources, such as coal and biomass burning, cooking, and
traffic-related and industrial emissions, or formed through gas to particle
conversion and heterogeneous/aqueous-phase oxidations (Lee and Allen, 2012).
Secondary inorganic aerosol (SNA, sum of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium) is
important in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in urban regions (Guo et al., 2014; Huang et al.,
2014; Lee, 2015). Organic aerosol (OA) is the most complicated component in
fine particles, with a high mass fraction of 20–90 % (Turpin et al.,
2000; Carlton et al., 2009). OA is comprised of hundreds of species, but
only a small fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %) can be quantified by chemical
analysis (Hallquist et al., 2009). A better understanding on OA properties
is crucial for identifying the sources of OA.</p>
      <p>The Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) is currently one of the most
popular technologies used to characterize the main species in NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and has been applied to many field and laboratory studies (Hallquist et al.,
2009). By combining the time series of OA mass spectra (MS) from the AMS
with source receptor models, different OA sources can be effectively
distinguished. Analyzed with positive matrix factorization (PMF) model,
several OA factors have been resolved (Hu et al., 2013; Jimenez et al.,
2009; Ng et al., 2011). For instance, hydrocarbon-like (HOA), cooking (COA),
biomass burning (BBOA), and coal combustion OA (CCOA), etc. are classified
into primary organic aerosols (POA). Oxygenated OA (OOA) usually consists of
low-volatility (LV-OOA) and semivolatile OOA (SV-OOA) based on their
correlations with sulfate and nitrate, respectively, and inferred
volatilities. OOA is also identified as more oxidized (MO-OOA) and less
oxidized OOA (LO-OOA) because they show different O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios but
insignificantly different volatility (Hu et al., 2016a; Setyan et al.,
2012). Based on the AMS measurement, the aging process of OA can also be
characterized with some metrics, e.g., C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O atomic ratios, OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC, carbon
oxidation state (OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the abundance of characteristic fragment
ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These results can help to quantify the
contributions of primary emissions and secondary formations and probe into
secondary formation mechanisms and the aging process of OA (Ulbrich et al.,
2009).</p>
      <p>The characteristics and evolution of aerosol pollution are influenced by
multiple factors, e.g., meteorological conditions, regional transport, and
local sources. Generally, these factors have quite distinct patterns in
different seasons; thus the formation, transformation, and removal of
pollutants are affected. Some studies on the characteristics of submicron
aerosol pollution in Beijing using the AMS were mainly carried out in summer
and winter. Characterization of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer (e.g., Huang et al.,
2010; Sun et al., 2010) and comparisons of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> characteristics
between summer and winter (e.g., Hu et al., 2016a; Sun et al., 2012; Y. Sun et al., 2013),
between the low- and high-humidity atmosphere (e.g., Y. L. Sun et al., 2013), and
between the polluted and unpolluted days (e.g., Zhang et al., 2014) have been
conducted in Beijing. Yet the study comprehensively characterized the
seasonal variations in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under different meteorological conditions
and pollutant sources in Beijing is lacking, especially based on high-mass-resolution measurements. Zhang et al. (2013) and Sun et al. (2015)
investigated the seasonal variations in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in Beijing based
on unit mass resolution (UMR), and there was no elemental information in
these studies. High-mass-resolution AMS can obtain elemental information,
which can be used to more easily determine the oxidation state of OA and
characterize the evolution of secondary OA (SOA). Therefore, to deeply explore the
formation and evolution of SOA in urban atmosphere, the researches on
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonality in Beijing based on field observations applying high-mass-resolution AMS remain very necessary.</p>
      <p>In this study, to investigate the seasonal characteristics of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, a
high-resolution time-of-flight AMS (HR-ToF-AMS) and other online instruments
for real-time measurement of gaseous and particulate pollutants were
deployed at an urban site in Beijing from 2012 to 2013. First, the
seasonal variations in chemical compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were analyzed. Then
the seasonal sources of OA were fully explored. Finally, we compared and
discussed the evolution process of OA in different seasons. This study is of
great significance for further understanding complex air pollution and
providing scientific support for model simulations of atmospheric aerosols,
and also serves as a theoretical basis for fine particulate pollution control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experiments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling site and measurements</title>
      <p>During the periods from March 2012 to March 2013, four intensive campaigns
were carried out at the PeKing University Urban Atmosphere Environment
MonitoRing Station (PKUERS; 39.99<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), which
is located on the roof of a building (approximately 20 m above ground level)
on the campus (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The details about the observation
site were described in several published papers (Wu et al., 2007; Huang et
al., 2010). A HR-ToF-AMS (Aerodyne Research Inc., USA) was deployed to
measure the mass concentrations and size distributions of submicron
non-refractory species, including OA and inorganic aerosols (sulfate,
nitrate, ammonium and chloride). In addition to the HR-ToF-AMS, multiple
high-time-resolution instruments for the measurements of meteorological
conditions, and gaseous and particulate pollutants (as listed in Table S1)
were also available in these campaigns.</p>
      <p>The liquid water content (LWC) in aerosols was roughly estimated with the
ISORROPIAII model. The input data included the concentrations of sulfate,
nitrate, ammonium, and chloride measured by the AMS, the relative humidity
(RH) and temperature of ambient air. The reverse mode and the metastable
state of aerosols were selected.</p>
      <p>To give an insight into the impacts of regional/long-distance transport on
atmospheric aerosols in Beijing, the backward trajectories of air parcels
during the observation periods were calculated with the NOAA's HYSPLIT4
trajectory model (<uri>http://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit.html</uri>). A new 3-day
backward trajectory was traced from the observation site at an altitude of
500 m above ground level every hour. Cluster analyses of backward
trajectories were applied to reveal the major pathways during different
campaigns (Sect. S11 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>HR-ToF-MS operation and data analysis</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Concentrations <bold>(a)</bold> and fractions <bold>(b)</bold> of main
chemical components in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during seasonal observations in Beijing in
recent years. The data and references are available in Table S3 in the
Supplement.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Ambient air was first introduced through a cutoff cyclone of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.5 m above the roof) and a copper tube (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in.) at 10 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and was then sampled into the AMS at 0.09 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A Nafion drier was set before the
AMS inlet to keep the RH of ambient air sampled into the AMS below 30 %.
The time resolutions applied in all campaigns were 4 min, with 2 min in
V mode for concentrations and size distributions, and 2 min W mode to obtain
the HR-MS data. Ionization efficiency (IE) calibrations were done every few
days by sampling monodispersed 400 nm dried pure NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles
into the AMS. Those particles were aerosolized by an aerosol atomizer (3076,
TSI Inc., USA) and selected with a differential mobility analyzer (DMA,
model 3081, TSI Inc., USA). IE values measured using the brute-force
single-particle method (BFSP) were used. The ratio of IE to airbeam signal
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AB, where AB refers to N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detected by the AMS) of each
calibration was applied for converting the instrument signals to actual mass
concentrations. The IE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AB calibration values (Fig. S2) within the interval
of two calibrations were obtained by linear interpreting IE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AB values before
and after. Unless there was an instrument failure (e.g., turbo pump down and
filament exchange), the last well-calibrated IE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AB value was applied until
the instrument failure time. The size distribution calibration of main
species in NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was done in the beginning and ending of all campaigns
by selecting pure NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles (Stokes diameter 50–550 nm)
with vacuum aerodynamic diameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 100–900 nm. The detected
limits (V mode) of organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride during
all campaigns were shown in Table S2. For the detailed operation and
calibration procedures of the HR-ToF-AMS, refer to Hu et al. (2016a).</p>
      <p>For data analysis, we followed the procedures described in Hu et al. (2016a). Middlebrook et al. (2012) created an algorithm estimating AMS
collection efficiencies (CEs) for field data based on the aerosol chemical
composition and sampling line RH. The chemical-composition-based CEs
(around 0.5) were applied to calculate the mass concentration of chemical
compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Good consistencies (Figs. S3–S5) of the results
between the AMS and other instruments also prove the reliability of CEs used
here. Pieber et al. (2016)  found that the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interference
related to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling on the vaporizer showed a median of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4 % relative to nitrate, and highly varied between instruments and
with operation history (percentiles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.2 %).
The effect of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion signal was quite
limited (about 1–2 %) and not considered here. In this study, the
“improved-ambient” correction (Canagaratna et al., 2015) was performed to
calculate the elemental ratios of OA. The HR-MS data of OA in four seasons
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range 12–283 in winter campaign and 12–196 in other campaigns) were
analyzed with PMF, respectively, which follows the procedures described in
Ulbrich et al. (2009). The optimum solutions were selected following the
steps as described in Zhang et al. (2011). The key diagnostic plots of the
PMF analyses are shown in Sect. S5 in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Dynamic variations in PM${}_{{{1}}}$ pollution}?><title>Dynamic variations in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Seasonality of chemical compositions in PM${}_{{{1}}}$}?><title>Seasonality of chemical compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Atmospheric black carbon (BC) particles are mostly in the submicron range
because of their formation mechanisms (Bond et al., 2013). The average
concentrations of main chemical components in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (non-refractory
species measured by AMS and BC by Aethalometer or MAAP) and gaseous
pollutants, and meteorological conditions are listed in Table 1. The time
series of meteorological parameters, including temperature, relative
humidity (RH), atmospheric pressure, and wind speed and direction, can be
found in Figs. S6–S9.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Seasonal variations in main chemical components in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
gaseous pollutants, and meteorological conditions (temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; relative
humidity, RH; wind speed, WS; pressure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The data are listed in the form
of “average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation”. Units of particulate and gaseous
pollutants are ppbv and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Spring</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Autumn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Winter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 Mar–7 May 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29 Jul–29 Aug 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13 Oct–13 Nov 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23 Jan–2 Mar 2013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">81.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  MO-OOA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">  6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">  3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">  8.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">  9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  LO-OOA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">  5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">  5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  COA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">  2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">  2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">  5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">  4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  HOA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">  2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">  1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">  2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">  5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  BBOA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">  1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">  2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  CCOA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">  5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LWC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.8. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.8. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.2. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">636 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 568</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">671 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 317</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1229 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1139</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2224 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1844</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WS (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (hPa)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1004.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1001.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1012.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1019.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations showed little difference in spring,
summer, and autumn, which were 45.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45.8, 37.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31.0, and
41.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration of 81.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter was the highest
among the four seasons. OA was the most important component (31–44 %) in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, similar to previous studies (Fig. 1). In autumn, the contribution
of the carbonaceous components (OA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>BC) to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was over 50 %. In
four seasons, SNA accounted for about 40–60 % in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Secondary
inorganics (sulfate and nitrate) correlated well with RH and/or LWC (Table S14), indicating that aqueous-phase reactions in aerosols played an
important role in secondary inorganic formation in Beijing. The contribution
of photochemical processes to secondary inorganics was likely less than
that of aqueous-phase reactions according to the weaker correlations
between secondary inorganics and odd oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In particular, nitrate did not correlate with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer (Table S14).
Lower temperatures in winter, spring, and autumn favored the partitioning to
particulate nitrate and were partially related to higher concentrations of
nitrate in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1).</p>
      <p>Compared with the results obtained over the world, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
concentrations of major chemical species in Beijing, especially in winter,
were 2–10 times higher than those at US and European sites (Hu et
al., 2016a). In China, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in urban Beijing in winter was much higher
than those results (27–48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained in the Yangtze River
Delta (YRD) and Pearl River Delta (PRD) regions (Gong et al., 2012; He et
al., 2011; Huang et al., 2011, 2012, 2013). However, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in other seasons
was approximate to those obtained at the sites at Changdao Island, and in
the YRD and PRD regions in the same seasons (Hu et al., 2013, 2016a, and
references therein). These results suggest that Beijing suffered from severe
particulate pollution, especially in winter, which should be seriously taken
into consideration.</p>
      <p>Aerosol pollution in Beijing exhibited distinctive characteristics in four
seasons, because of the significantly different meteorological conditions
and emission sources of pollutants. Compared with the previous results in
Beijing (Fig. 1), PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer was lower than before, which likely
resulted from the more effective washout (Fig. S7) and lower concentrations
of gaseous precursors (Table 1 and Table 1 in Sun et al., 2015). In summer,
high temperature, strong solar radiation, and high oxidant concentrations
generally enhance the secondary aerosol formation from gaseous precursors
(such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and VOCs). As illustrated in Fig. 2, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
summer was mainly in the range of less than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %), and skew-normally distributed, with the highest
frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 %) in 15–35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
probability distribution of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was similar to the previous results in
Beijing in summer (Huang et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2010), but the range of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was narrower. In contrast, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter was higher than the
previous results in Beijing before 2013, and equivalent to those in close
periods from January to February 2013 (Fig. 1; Zhang et al., 2014; Sun et
al., 2014). The heaviest particulate pollution in winter was the co-effect
of the large amount of particles emitted from primary sources, prolonged
control of weak weather system (i.e., low mixed layer and static air), and the rapid generation and accumulation of secondary particles from
gaseous precursors (Hu et al., 2016a; Y. Sun et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Fractions of main chemical compositions in submicron aerosols at
different PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, and the probability density of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (white
curves) during the spring <bold>(a)</bold>, summer <bold>(b)</bold>,
autumn <bold>(c)</bold>, and winter <bold>(d)</bold> observations. The average RH
values in each segment are illustrated and the error bars in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis were the standard deviations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In spring, autumn, and winter, the passage of strong cold air parcels
transported from Siberia and Mongolia through Beijing (Sect. S11) was
usually accompanied by strong winds, thus atmospheric relative humidity
decreased, pressure increased, which was conductive to the dispersal of
pollutants (Figs. S6, S8, and S9). The heavy pollution processes were usually
ended by the passages, demonstrating periodic cycles of aerosol pollution
(Guo et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2009). In spring and autumn, the biomass
burning emissions in North China occurred often due to agricultural
activities and traditional activities around Tomb-Sweeping Day (early
April). Dense fire points were frequently observed by satellites
(<uri>https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/firemap</uri>) in Beijing and surrounding
areas (Figs. S10–S11). For instance, during 7–8 and 26–28 April,
18–20 and 23–27 October, and 6–11 November 2012, the concentrations of OA and
other pollutants increased substantially (Figs. S6 and S8). Higher nitrate
concentrations in spring and autumn, likely caused by the secondary
conversion of gaseous nitrogen oxides emitted from biomass burning (Fabian
et al., 2005). The probability distributions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring, autumn
and winter were quite different from that in summer (Fig. 2), because the
scavenging effect of strong wind was apparent due to the intrusion of
long-range-transported air parcels. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mainly concentrated in the
range of low levels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with frequencies of
40–60 %. However, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged much more broadly, with the highest
concentrations of over 200 or 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting from
accumulated pollutants under strong primary emissions coupled with extremely
unfavorable meteorological conditions, e.g., long-lasting stagnant weather,
high humidity, and temperature inversion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Contributions of chemical compositions to the PM${}_{{1}}$ increase}?><title>Contributions of chemical compositions to the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase</title>
      <p>The contributions of chemical components in atmospheric aerosols at
different concentration levels can help better understand the origins of
chemical components. The proportions of chemical compositions as a function
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 2.</p>
      <p>In all seasons, at low PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the contribution of carbonaceous components
(OA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>BC) was dominant, accounting for 50–80 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. With the
increase in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the proportions of SNA in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased
gradually, indicating that the enhancement of SNA primarily contributed to
the increase in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with previous studies (Huang et al.,
2010; Sun et al., 2010, 2012). The proportions of nitrate
increased significantly and the nitrate concentration increased rapidly
under higher RH (Figs. 2 and  S6–S9). Nitrate showed good correlations
with RH (Pearson correlation coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.34–0.79, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01)
and the LWC in aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.82–0.87, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01). These results
indicate that the aqueous-phase reactions in wet aerosols and/or clouds
could substantially contribute to nitrate formation. It is worth noting that
when PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, carbonaceous aerosols
dominated PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> again in autumn, mainly resulting from large amounts of
primary emissions. The proportions of chemical components in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied
less significantly in winter, reflecting the characteristics of regional
pollution over the North China under the control of static weather system.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Diurnal patterns of chemical compositions in PM${}_{{{1}}}$}?><title>Diurnal patterns of chemical compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Affected by different meteorological conditions, e.g., solar radiation,
temperature, RH, boundary layer, and mountain-valley breezes (Fig. S7), as
well as different emission sources, the chemical compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
showed distinct diurnal patterns in four seasons. The diurnal patterns of
gaseous and particulate pollutants during the seasonal observations are
shown in Fig. 3.</p>
      <p>Diurnal patterns of OA were similar in spring, summer, and autumn. OA showed
two obvious peaks around noon and in the evening. Similar peaks were also
observed in winter, but these were not as strong as in the other seasons. These
two peaks corresponding to meal time were mainly caused by cooking
emissions, which will be discussed later in Sect. 3.2.1. The peak
concentration of OA in the evening in autumn was about 2 times higher than
in spring and summer, consistent with the results in October–November 2011 (Sun
et al., 2015), possibly because of the more intensive cooking activities. In
autumn, charcoal grilling, or barbecuing, has become one of the most popular
outdoor recreational activities in urban Beijing and surrounding areas, due
to more moderate and pleasant weather conditions than in other seasons
(Table 1). In winter study, OA increased at night due to extra primary
emissions, e.g., coal combustion and biomass burning.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Diurnal patterns of chemical species of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, gaseous
pollutants, temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and relative humidity (RH) during seasonal
observations. The ranges of diurnal variations for each season are shown in
Figs. S12–S15.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Compared with OA diurnal patterns, flatter diurnal cycles of sulfate were
observed in four seasons, identifying the regional characteristics of
sulfate formation (Sun et al., 2015). In spring, sulfate showed small peaks
around 13:00 and 20:00. In the daytime, both active photochemical production
and more favorable dispersion conditions due to a higher planetary boundary
layer (PBL), possibly caused such a diurnal pattern of sulfate. In summer,
sulfate enhanced gradually from morning to evening and peaked in the evening
only, indicating that the photochemical production of sulfate might be
significant. Guo et al. (2010) reported that in addition to the gas-phase
processes, the formation of sulfate was mainly attributed to aqueous-phase
reactions in clouds and/or wet aerosols (70–80 %) in the summer of
Beijing. The aqueous-phase formation of sulfate in summer should also be
more intense than in spring and autumn due to high temperature and high
humidity (Fig. 3k–l). In winter, sulfate showed two peaks in the morning
(06:00–10:00) and evening (around 20:00), which was likely influenced by
the secondary formation of primarily emitted SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3f). The lower
sulfate concentration in the daytime was quite related to the dilution
effect of the planetary boundary layer (PBL). The PBL height decreases at
night, and the atmospheric stability increases, thus the pollutants are
difficult to spread (Hu et al., 2016a).</p>
      <p>Nitrate showed distinct diurnal patterns in four seasons.
Heterogeneous/aqueous-phase reactions and gas-to-particle condensation
processes are the main pathways to form fine-mode nitrate (Guo et al.,
2010). In summer, nitrate exhibited an obvious diurnal pattern with the
concentrations gradually decreasing in the daytime, indicating that
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> evaporated due to high temperatures (Fig. 3k) and overcame
the photochemical production of nitrate. The elevated PBL also plays a role
in reducing the concentration of nitrate in the daytime (Sun et al., 2015).
In winter, nitrate increased gradually during 09:00–20:00, which did not
appear in other seasons, suggesting that in addition to photochemical
processes in the daytime, the partitioning of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into
particulate nitrate was more significant due to low temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; Fig. 3k). Similar diurnal patterns in summer and winter have
been observed in previous studies (Sun et al., 2015). In autumn, nitrate
increased in the morning and then later in the evening, primarily driven by
the photochemical production. The diurnal variation in nitrate in spring was
insignificant. Because ammonium mainly existed in the forms of
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, its diurnal patterns
generally exhibited a combined effect of sulfate and nitrate formation
mechanisms. In summer, the diurnal variation in ammonium correlated better
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.55, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01) with that of nitrate than sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.19,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.05). In other seasons, the diurnal variations in ammonium
showed good correlations with those of both sulfate and nitrate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.50–0.98, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01 or 0.05).</p>
      <p>Chloride showed higher concentrations at night, with a peak in the morning,
and then deceased in the daytime. Such a diurnal pattern was possibly caused
by high primary emissions of chloride at night. It was also driven by the
diurnal patterns of both temperatures and the PBL height, and controlled by
the temperature-dependent gas–particle partitioning (Hu et al., 2016a; Sun
et al., 2015). Chloride usually presents at semivolatile state in the form
of ammonium chloride in urban areas (Zhang et al., 2005); therefore the
diurnal cycles of chloride and temperature trend oppositely. In winter,
chloride was higher at night because of coal combustion and biomass burning
emissions. Hu et al. (2016a) estimated that in winter over 50 % of
chloride in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> existed as NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl, and part of chloride existed as
KCl and NaCl. BC was mainly affected by the diurnal variation in the PBL
height. BC showed a marked rise at night (around 21:00–00:00) and a small
morning peak (07:00–08:00). Nocturnal heavy-duty vehicular exhausts (Lin et
al., 2009; Hu et al., 2012), coal combustion, and biomass burning emissions
in the urban atmosphere also contributed to the high concentration of BC at
night. The morning peak of BC was consistent with that of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, probably
due to vehicular emissions during rush hour.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Size distributions of chemical compositions in PM${}_{{{1}}}$}?><title>Size distributions of chemical compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>The mass size distributions of chemical compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during
seasonal campaigns are shown in Fig. 4. The size distributions of SNA
concentrated in accumulation mode, peaking at about 600–800 nm
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating the internally mixed states of submicron aerosols. The
mode diameters of SNA in Beijing were higher than those (500–600 nm) in
Hong Kong in four seasons (Li et al., 2015). The mode size (700 nm) of
sulfate was smaller than that (790 nm) of nitrate in autumn. In contrast,
the mode size of sulfate (760 nm) was larger than that (700 nm) of nitrate
in winter. The size distribution of ammonium was more consistent with that
of nitrate than sulfate in winter. More nitrate likely existed in the form
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, formed by the reaction of gaseous HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> condensed on atmospheric particles (Weimer et al., 2006).</p>
      <p>During the winter, the peak size of OA was close to those of SNA, while in
other seasons it was smaller than those of SNA, indicating a more aged state
of OA in winter. The mass size distributions of chemical components in
winter were also similar to those in the heavy-pollution episodes in other
seasons, consistent with the severity of aerosol pollution in winter. In
spring, summer, and autumn, the size distributions of OA were wider than
those of SNA. The OA concentrations were much higher than those of SNA in
the range of small size (100–500 nm), similar to the results in other
urban areas (Weimer et al., 2006; Aiken et al., 2009), probably caused by
the contribution of POA (Huang et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2013). In particular,
influenced by primary emissions, the concentration of OA at peak size was
much higher than those of other species in autumn. During the spring, summer
and autumn, the proportions of OA decreased, while those of SNA increased
rapidly with the increase in particle size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 nm). SNA
contributed predominantly to the enhancement of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in accordance with
that mentioned in Sect. 3.1.2. Different OA sources played different roles
with the increase in particle size in winter, and the proportion of OA
(about 40 %) varied slightly. However, the proportions of sulfate rose
with the increase in size, implying the significant contribution of
regionally transported sulfate.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Investigating OA sources with PMF</title>
      <p>The sources of OA in four seasons were resolved by combining high-resolution
OA mass spectra and PMF model respectively. The resolved fractions of OA
during seasonal observations are shown in Fig. 5. The mass spectra and time
series of OA components and some external tracers in each season are shown
in Figs. S28–S31 and  S32–S35, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Mass size distributions of chemical compositions in NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during the spring <bold>(a, b)</bold>, summer <bold>(c, d)</bold>, autumn <bold>(e, f)</bold>, and winter <bold>(g, h)</bold> observations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Resolved components of OA during seasonal observations in Beijing
(<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>; data and references are listed in Table S8 in the
Supplement) and at other sites <bold>(c)</bold> in Mt. Tai (Zhang et al., 2014),
Hong Kong (Li et al., 2015) and the southeastern USA (Budisulistiorini et al.,
2016) in recent years. LSOA, local SOA; RSOA, regional SOA; 91fac, a
biogenically influenced factor characterized by distinct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91. MO-OOA
and LO-OOA are identified as LV-OOA and SV-OOA, respectively, except for
during August–September 2011 and November–December 2010 (Hu et al., 2016a),
and in this study.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In spring and autumn, four OA components, i.e., OOA, COA, BBOA, and HOA, were
identified. The fractions of POA (sum of HOA, COA, and BBOA) were slightly higher than those of OOA because primary emissions (e.g., biomass burning) strongly influenced Beijing and surrounding areas. In autumn, the fraction
of POA was close to that in the autumn of 2008 (Fig. 5b). OA was comprised of MO-OOA, LO-OOA, COA, and HOA in summer. OOA (MO-OOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>LO-OOA) dominated OA
(69 %), signifying the predominant contribution of SOA formation.
Consistent with previous results, the contribution of SOA to OA is about
60–70 % of OA in the summer in Beijing, which has been quite stable in recent
years (Fig. 5; Guo et al., 2012, 2013). In winter, five components
(MO-OOA, LO-OOA, COA, HOA, and CCOA) were resolved. Secondary formations and
primary emissions (e.g., biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion)
contributed to OA equivalently. The fraction of SOA in OA in winter (50 %)
was much higher than those fractions (20–30 %) in previous studies, and comparable
to the results in the same winter in Beijing (Fig. 5b and Table S8), which
was related to effective SOA formation under the stable meteorological
conditions during long-lasting severe haze episodes.</p>
      <p>The comparison of seasonal variations in OA in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between this study
and studies carried out at other sites is shown in Fig. 5c. The fractions of
SOA during all seasons in Beijing were higher than or comparable to those at
Mt. Tai (1534 m a.s.l.), North China (Zhang et al., 2014). Both in Beijing
and at Mt. Tai, the fractions of SOA were higher in summer than in other
seasons. The contribution of SOA to OA in Beijing was much lower than those
in less-polluted atmospheres in Hong Kong (Li et al., 2015) and the southeastern
USA (Budisulistiorini et al., 2016). The fraction of SOA in OA was as high
as 80–86 % in Hong Kong in four seasons. At a downtown site in Atlanta,
SOA accounted for over 80 % in spring and summer, and 65 and 56 % in
autumn and winter. At a rural/forested site Look Rock, Great Smoky
Mountains, no POA sources were resolved except for BBOA in winter.
Different from the two sites in southeastern USA, there was no
isoprene-epoxydiols-derived SOA (IEPOX-SOA) and a biogenically influenced factor
characterized by distinct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 resolved in urban Beijing. No IEPOX-SOA factor
(i.e., below the PMF detection limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % of OA) was
found in Beijing because the formation of IEPOX-SOA under IEPOX-poor and
polluted urban environments is quite limited (Hu et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Overall, the proportions of OOA in OA in this study were comparable to the
average (58 %) obtained at other urban sites around the world (Zhang et
al., 2011). In total, secondary species (SNA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SOA) accounted for 74, 80, 64
and 73 % of the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The serious secondary
pollution stresses the importance of control measures targeting the emission
reduction of gaseous precursors, e.g., NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and VOCs (Guo et
al., 2014; Pye  et al., 2013).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Primary OA sources</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>COA</title>
      <p>COA refers to OA emitted from cooking activities (Allan et al., 2010). The
knowledge on the transformation of COA in the atmosphere is limited
(Dall'Osto et al., 2015). The reductive alkyl fragment ions are
abundant in the MS of COA (Figs. S28–S31). The abundance of fragments <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mass fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57) in the MS of COA were
about 7–10 and 3–4 %, respectively. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
the most remarkable characteristic in the MS of identified COA factors,
which are crucial to identify COA and HOA (Mohr et al., 2012). In this
study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in COA factors was significantly higher than in corresponding
HOA factors, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in COA factors was comparable to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
corresponding HOA factors (Figs. S28–S31). The oxidation state of COA was
low, with low O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C (0.13–0.23) and OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC (1.33–1.46) ratios in this
study.</p>
      <p>As the edible oil is rich in oleic and linoleic acids (Dyer et al., 2008),
the fragments <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 are not only contributed by the reductive alkyl
fragments C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but also by
oxygenated fragments C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
mass fractions of the later ones were about one-third of those of the reductive
alkyl fragments with the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ratios of oxygenated and reductive
fragments <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 are used to identify the sources of OA. The ratio of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in COA is about 2, while in
HOA it is about 1; the ratio of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
COA is about 2.5 and that in HOA is approximately 1 (Mohr et al., 2012). In this study,
the ratios of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in COA were
2.7, 3.4, 3.8, and 2.4, and in HOA were 4.1, 0.6, 0.0, and 1.3; the ratios of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in COA and HOA were 2.3, 1.8,
2.3, and 2.4, and 1.4, 1.6, 1.1, and 1.1, respectively.</p>
      <p>The reasonability of resolved COA factors was investigated through their
concentrations, diurnal patterns, correlations of COA with external tracers,
and the uncentered correlations (UC) of MS. The COA concentrations could be
simply estimated with the formula provided by Mohr et al. (2012) based on
the fragments <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44. The estimated COA concentrations were 4.7,
4.4, 6.5, and 5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in four seasons, accounting for 33, 35, 35
and 18 % of OA, respectively. Compared with the concentrations (2.6, 2.5,
5.2 and 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and proportions (19, 20, 28, and 15 %) based
on the AMS-PMF analysis (Fig. 5), the results were overestimated, especially
in summer, which is likely related to the applicability of experience
parameters in different regions and seasons. The COA factors showed apparent
diurnal patterns during seasonal observations, which is a key feature in
identifying COA (see Sect. 3.2.3).</p>
      <p>COA correlated well with some gaseous and other particulate pollutants,
e.g., NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC (Tables S9–S12). Dall'Osto et al. (2015)
considered that the COA factors at a rural site contained more sources other
than cooking emissions, based on the good correlations between COA with HOA,
BC, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrate, etc. The UC coefficients (Ulbrich et al., 2009)
between the MS of resolved COA factors in this study and the average MS of
COA in previous studies (Lanz et al., 2008; Mohr et al., 2009; Huang et al.,
2010; He et al., 2010) were calculated. The UC coefficients were in the
range of 0.910–0.990 (Table S13), confirming the good similarity and
rationality of the resolved COA factors.</p>
      <p>In previous studies, it was reported that COA accounted for 14–25 %
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % on average) of the total OA in summer and winter in
Beijing, with an average concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is a relatively stable component of OA (Hu et al., 2016a; Wang et al.,
2009). In this study, the concentrations and proportions of COA in OA during
seasonal observations were in the range of 2.5–5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
15–28 %, respectively, comparable to previous results. The highest
concentration and proportion of COA in autumn were likely caused by strong
emissions from charcoal-grilling or barbecue activities, which are popular
in Beijing and surrounding areas in autumn as mentioned above. Fewer cooking
activities during and around the Chinese New Year holiday (7–19 February) and
the lower evaporation rates of cooking oils (Ndiaye et al., 2005) led to the
lower concentration and proportion of COA in winter (Fig. S35). Overall, COA
is an important non-fossil POA sources in all seasons, which should be taken
into consideration, especially in autumn.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>BBOA</title>
      <p>The BBOA factors that were identified in spring and autumn accounted for
13  and 11 % of OA, respectively. In summer and winter, the
contributions of biomass burning to OA might be relatively low
(probably <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %) and cannot be resolved in our dataset by PMF.
Levoglucosan is a significant tracer of biomass burning emissions, the
fragment of which, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60) is regarded as a tracer
of BBOA (Alfarra et al., 2007; Cubison et al., 2011). The abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8–1.3 %) in the MS of BBOA was much higher than the
background abundance (0.3 %) in the urban without biomass burning
emissions, which is a primary feature in identifying BBOA factors. The O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C
ratios (0.24–0.31) of BBOA factors were higher than those (0.07–0.18) of
HOA, and comparable to those (0.2–0.4) in previous studies (Mohr et al.,
2009; He et al., 2010, 2011). In spring, farmers start preparing fields and
burn straw leftover on the field. In autumn, burning crop straw
randomly happens quite often during the harvest season for corn and other
crops in North China. These phenomena result in serious atmospheric
particulate pollution in Beijing and surrounding areas (Duan et al., 2004;
Zheng et al., 2005).</p>
      <p>BBOA tracked well (Tables S9 and S11) with chloride, BC,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and acetonitrile, similar to the results of
previous studies (DeCarlo et al., 2010; He et al., 2011; Gong et al., 2012).
Particles emitted from biomass burning could contain a high proportion of
chlorides (Silva et al., 1999). The diurnal variations in BBOA were similar
with those of HOA, with higher concentrations at night and in the morning
and lower ones in the daytime (see Sect. 3.2.3). They could be partially
attributed to similar emission processes, such as residential burning
activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>CCOA</title>
      <p>Coal accounts for two-thirds of the total primary energy consumption and coal
combustion is an important source of air pollution in China (You and Xu,
2010; Huang et al., 2014). CCOA was only resolved in winter, consistent with
the domestic heating period, suggesting that this CCOA factor was dominated
by residential burning with higher OA emission factors (Hu et al., 2016a).
Alkyl
fragments (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the most abundant in the MS of CCOA. The MS of
CCOA also showed pronounced signals of ion fragments from polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), e.g., C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 128) from
naphthalene and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 178) from anthracene (Fig. S31). The
CCOA spectrum in winter is similar to those in our previous studies at
Changdao Island and in the winter of Beijing (Hu et al., 2013, 2016a).
Compared to the average H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios (1.76–1.96) in other POA factors
(Canagaratna et al., 2015), H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C in CCOA (1.45) is lower. The O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC
ratios in CCOA were 0.14 and 1.32, respectively. CCOA accounted for 17 %
of total OA on average, within the range of 10–33 % reported in other
studies in the winter of Beijing (Fig. 5; Hu et al., 2016a).
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>HOA</title>
      <p>HOA is the sum of unresolved reductive and primary OA except specific OA
(e.g., COA, BBOA, and CCOA), which is generally considered to be related to
the emissions of fossil fuel combustion. The mass spectra (MS) features of
HOA in this study are similar to those in previous studies (Huang et al.,
2010; Hu et al., 2013; and references therein). Alkyl fragments
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are abundant in the
spectra (Figs. S28–S31). O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios of
HOA factors were 0.18, 0.19, 0.07, and 0.36, and 1.40, 1.41, 1.27, and 1.63
during four seasons, respectively. Compared with the corresponding ratios
(O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C: 0.04–0.26; OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC: 1.21–1.50) of HOA in previous studies
(Canagaratna et al., 2015), the higher values in winter were influenced by
the contribution of BBOA. Absolutely independent sources cannot be
identified by factor analysis (e.g., PMF model). Therefore, the typical MS
features of OA from other primary sources can be found in the MS of HOA. In
this study, the abundant fragment ions in the MS of POA factors, e.g., CCOA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 67, 69, 91, etc.) and COA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55, 57, etc.), were also presented in the MS of
HOA (He et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2013, 2016a). This can also be confirmed
through the correlations between HOA and external tracers (see Tables S9–S12). HOA tracked well (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.6–0.9, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01) with traces of
primary emissions (e.g., coal combustion and vehicular exhausts), such as
chloride, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, BC, and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with
the primary sources of HOA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Oxygenated OA sources</title>
      <p>OOA, considered as a good alternative to SOA in most cases, has been
extensively investigated in a large number of previous studies (Jimenez et
al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2005; Ulbrich et al., 2009; Ng et al., 2011).
During the seasonal observations, OOA was an important component of OA. In
summer and winter, OOA was separated into MO-OOA and LO-OOA. Oxygenated
fragments (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are prominent in the MS of OOA. The
abundance of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in MO-OOA was higher than that in
LO-OOA. For instance, the fragment of carboxylic acid CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44)
accounted for 17–21 % in MO-OOA, and 7–14 % in LO-OOA. The average
O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios for SV-OOA, LV-OOA, and OOA reported in some studies around the
world were 0.53, 0.84, and 0.67, respectively (Canagaratna et al., 2015). In
spring and autumn, the O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios of OOA were 1.0 and 0.88, respectively. In
summer and winter, the O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios in resolved MO-OOA factors were about 0.91
and 0.84, higher than those of corresponding LO-OOA (0.67 and 0.77). In all
four seasons, O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios of OOA were higher than the average values
mentioned above, indicating that OA was much more oxygenated and secondary
formation contributed significantly to OA in urban Beijing.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
Overall, OOA (MO-OOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>LO-OOA) correlated well (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.89–0.96,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01) with secondary inorganics (sulfate and nitrate). MO-OOA, as an
extremely aged secondary component, exhibited good correlations with SNA
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.78–0.95, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01). However, the correlation coefficients
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.63–0.89, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01) between LO-OOA and SNA were slightly lower
(Tables S10 and S12). In summer, LO-OOA and nitrate trended well during most
days; during the whole winter campaign, LO-OOA tracked well with nitrate.
OOA had strong correlations with RH and/or LWC (Table S14), indicating that
aqueous-phase reactions play a dominant role in OOA formation. The slope of
OOA against O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> steepened with the increase in RH and LWC (Figs. S41–S42), also implying that the aqueous-phase oxidation was an important
pathway of the OOA formation. The good correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.53–0.73,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.01) between O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LO-OOA in summer, and between O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and OOA in autumn and winter, suggested that photochemical processes also
contributed substantially to SOA, especially LO-OOA, in these seasons (Xu et
al., 2017). Note that gaseous pollutants and main chemical compositions in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> displayed good correlations with each other in winter, which may be
caused by regional pollution characteristics under a weak weather system on
heavy-pollution days.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Diurnal variations in OA components in spring <bold>(a)</bold>,
summer <bold>(b)</bold>, autumn <bold>(c)</bold>, and winter <bold>(d)</bold>
observations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Diurnal variations in OA components</title>
      <p>The diurnal patterns of OA components during seasonal observations are shown
in Fig. 6. As mentioned above, the COA factors showed obvious diurnal
patterns during all four campaigns, with two peaks around noon (about 13:00) and
in the evening (about 20:00), in accordance with living habits of residents.
The concentrations of COA factors at the noon peak (about 12:00–14:00)
were 3.1, 2.5, 4.0, and 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average, respectively. COA
reached the highest concentrations in the evening (18:00–21:00), as 5.6,
6.2, 14.0, and 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average, respectively. HOA was lower
in the daytime and higher at night. Nocturnal activities, such as
heavy-duty diesel vehicles only permitted at night (Lin et al., 2009),
biomass burning and coal combustion, could make more significant
contributions to POA. In autumn, the OA concentrations began to raise in the
evening, peaked at about 19:00, and kept higher at night (Fig. 2), reaching
twice that in the daytime. As Fig. 6c shows, the anthropogenic emissions,
e.g., biomass burning, coal combustion, and especially cooking emissions,
contributed significantly to OA. In winter, CCOA showed clear diurnal
variations with high concentrations at night, consistent with the
residential heating periods. The high concentration (10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %) of CCOA in total OA points
to strong coal combustion emissions at night in Beijing.</p>
      <p>The peaks of OOA (or LO-OOA) coincided with the peaks of primary emitted COA
(spring, summer, and autumn) and HOA (winter) in diurnal patterns, probably
because strong primary emissions favored SOA production. It has been found
that primary emissions evaporate substantially upon dilution to ambient
conditions and those vapors undergo photooxidation, which produces SOA
efficiently (Robinson et al., 2007; Murphy and Pandis, 2009). Recently, Liu
et al. (2017) reported that SOA formed from gas-phase emissions of heated
cooking oils. SOA may also be formed after photochemical aging of the large
amounts of POA emitted from cooking oils.</p>
      <p>In summer, OOA showed obvious diurnal variations: MO-OOA peaked in the
morning and afternoon; LO-OOA showed two pronounced peaks at noon and at
night. This was likely the co-effect of SOA formation via gas-phase
photochemical reactions in the daytime and aqueous chemistry in humid air at
night (Ervens et al., 2011; Lim et al., 2010). The concentration and
proportion of LO-OOA increased significantly in the afternoon
(12:00–16:00), up to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 50 %, respectively (Fig. 6b), suggesting that LO-OOA was a strong local/regional photochemical
product despite the much higher PBL in the daytime (Hu et al., 2016a).
Regardless of the air mass history (local, regional, and long-distance
transported), LO-OOA dominated OOA, accounting for 29–48 % of OA (Fig. S43). In winter, despite the expanded PBL, MO-OOA increased gradually from
noon, and peaked in the evening, implying that MO-OOA could form through
photochemical oxidations in the daytime.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>Source contributions to the OA increase</title>
      <p>The probability distributions of OA and the fractions of OA components as a
function of OA concentrations are illustrated in Fig. 7. In spring, autumn
and winter, similar to the probability distributions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the OA
concentrations were frequently (about 50–80 %) lower than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to the scavenging effect of strong wind accompanying
long-range-transported air parcels. In autumn and winter, primary emissions
(e.g., cooking emission and coal combustion) influenced strongly, resulting
in the wide ranges of OA concentrations, up to 120  and 140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. In contrast, OA concentrations presented a
skew-normal distribution, mainly in the range of 5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in summer, similar to previous results (Huang et al., 2010; Hu et al.,
2016a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Fractions of OA components at different OA concentration levels and
the probability distributions of OA concentrations (white curves) during the
spring <bold>(a)</bold>, summer <bold>(b)</bold>, autumn <bold>(c)</bold>, and
winter <bold>(d)</bold> observations. The average O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios in each
segment are illustrated and the error bars in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis were the
standard deviations of OA concentration and O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>During the spring observation (Fig. 7a), as the OA concentration was less
than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, OOA dominated OA (up to 55 %), which was likely
associated with the new particle formation in clean atmosphere (Wu et al.,
2007). When the OA concentration was higher than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, OOA
primarily contributed to the increase in OA. The fraction of OOA remained at
about 50–60 % as the OA concentration was over 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
summer, as the OA concentration was lower than 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, OOA
accounted for about 60–70 % of OA (Fig. 7b). As mentioned above, LO-OOA
formation was efficient due to both the strong photochemical and
aqueous-phase processes under high-RH and high-temperature conditions (Xu et
al., 2017). With the increase in OA, the fraction of MO-OOA enhanced
gradually, implying that the aged MO-OOA contributed importantly to the OA
increase. In autumn, with the increase in OA, the proportion of OOA
decreased gradually (Fig. 7c). In winter, when the OA concentration was
lower than 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, OOA and POA contributed equally to OA, while
the fraction of LO-OOA increased gradually (Fig. 7d). In both autumn and
winter, the fractions of OOA slightly increased around 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
More work is needed to accurately clarify the cause of the OOA increase
within this range.</p>
      <p>In spring, summer, and autumn, as the OA concentration was higher than 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fraction of COA in OA increased to a different extent,
reaching 30–60 %. In autumn, the contributions of BBOA and HOA to OA
were relatively stable, while that of COA dramatically enhanced with OA
increase, probably because that the static air during some intervals (e.g.,
23–25 October) was not conducive to the dispersal of heavy emissions from
cooking activities (Figs. S8 and  S34). Furthermore, in autumn, considerable
barbecue activities in urban Beijing and surrounding areas could be an
important source of COA as mentioned above. These results indicate that
strong cooking emissions were partially responsible for high OA concentrations
in these seasons. In winter, when the OA concentration reached 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fraction of CCOA dramatically increased, from 10
to about 40 %, indicating that the strong emissions from coal combustion
contributed predominately to high OA concentrations (Hu et al., 2016a). The
O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios of OA at different OA concentrations were dependent on the source
contributions, showing lower values when the POA were dominant in all
seasons (Fig. 7).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>The aging process of OA</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Elemental ratios, van Krevelen diagram, and carbon oxidation state</title>
      <p>Some important metrics or tools, such as elemental ratios, van Krevelen
(VK) diagrams, and carbon oxidation state (OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of OA, are used to
investigate dynamic evolution and oxidation mechanisms for bulk organic
aerosols.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Elemental ratios and OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios in OA obtained from field
observations at urban and rural/suburban sites. The ratios are corrected by
the “improved-ambient” method (Canagaratna et al., 2015), except for Hu et
al. (2013) and Gong et al. (2013). Abbreviations in parentheses correspond to seasons (sp: spring; su: summer; a: autumn; w: winter).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sites</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Site types</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Periods</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Urban</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar–May 2012 (sp)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jul–Aug 2012 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Oct–Nov 2012 (a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jan–Mar 2013 (w)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Aug–Sep 2011 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Hu et al. (2016a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Nov–Dec 2010 (w)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jul–Sep 2008 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Huang et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shenzhen (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Oct–Dec 2009 (a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">He et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Aug–Sep 2011 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.81<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Gong et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shanghai (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">May–Jun 2010 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Huang et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mexico City (Mexico)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar 2006 (sp)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Aiken et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bologna (Italy)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar–Apr 2008 (sp)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Saarikoski et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fresno, CA (US)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jan 2010 (w)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Ge et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Riverside, CA (US)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jul–Aug 2005 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Docherty et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kaiping (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rural/suburban</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Oct–Nov 2008 (a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Huang et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Heshan (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Nov–Dec 2010 (a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Gong et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Changdao Island (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar–Apr 2011 (sp)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">2.08<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Hu et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ziyang (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Dec 2012–Jan 2013 (w)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">2.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Hu et al. (2016b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jiaxing (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jun–Jul 2010 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Huang et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Dec 2010 (w)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Melpitz (Germany)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">May–Jul 2008 (su)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Poulain et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Sep–Nov 2008 (a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">1.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Feb–Mar 2009 (w)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C, H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C, and OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios were
scaled up by 27, 11, and 7 % (the average corrections for ambient OA;
Canagaratna et al., 2015), respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>The elemental compositions of OA are closely related to their properties,
e.g., density, hygroscopicity, and vapor pressure. The element ratios and
OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios in OA obtained from seasonal observations in Beijing and at
other urban and rural/suburban sites are listed in Table 2. During the
campaigns, the average O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios (in atomic number), and OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC
ratios were in the range of 0.47–0.53, 1.52–1.63, and 1.77–1.88,
respectively. In spring, the average OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratio in Beijing was lower than
those determined in Mexico City and Bologna and at Changdao Island (Table 2).
In the summers of 2011–2012, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios in Beijing were higher than
those measured at urban sites in Shenzhen and Riverside, and rural/suburban
sites in Jiaxing and Melpitz, indicating a high oxidation state of OA due to
strong SOA formation via photochemical reactions in Beijing. However, in
summers of 2008 in Beijing and 2010 in Shanghai, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios were quite
lower, maybe because the reduction of pollutant emissions reduced SOA
formation during the Beijing Olympic Games and Shanghai World Expo,
respectively (Pye et al., 2013). In autumn, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratio in Beijing was
slightly higher than that in Shenzhen but far lower than those ratios obtained at
rural/suburban sites, e.g., Kaiping, Heshan, and Melpitz. The observed OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC
ratio in Beijing in winter 2012 was higher than those in Fresno and in
Beijing 2010, but comparable to or lower than those at rural/suburban sites
such as Ziyang, Jiaxing, and Melpitz. Overall, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios in Beijing
were higher among urban sites except for in spring, and lower among
rural/suburban sites except for in summer.</p>
      <p>The van Krevelen (VK) diagram is an important tool to investigate the
evolution and functional group alteration of OA (Heald et al., 2010). As
shown in Table 3 and Figs. S36–S38, H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios of OA exhibit good
negative correlation (coefficient of determination <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.70–0.79),
with the slopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.57, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.62, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.67 and intercepts of 1.91, 1.94, and 1.90 in
the VK diagram in spring, summer, and autumn, respectively. The slopes are
flatter than those (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0) obtained across the world (Chen et al.,
2015) but are steeper than that determined in Ziyang (Table 3). The
intercepts are slightly lower than those (2.1–2.2) at urban and downwind
sites (Chen et al., 2015). However, the VK diagram in winter (Figs. 8 and
S39) does not show any correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.02) between H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and
O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C. The slope is nearly zero (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.08). This is possibly caused by the more
complex sources of OA in winter; for example, CCOA was only resolved in winter.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Slopes in the van Krevelen diagram based on field observations at
urban and background/suburban sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sites</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Site types</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Periods</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Urban</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar–May 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.12–0.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jul–Aug 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.20–0.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Oct–Nov 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.15–0.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jan–Mar 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.18–0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mexico City (Mexico)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar 2006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">2.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Aiken et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fresno (US)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Jan 2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">2.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Ge et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Riverside (US)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jul–Aug 2005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Docherty et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake Hongze (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Background/suburban</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar–Apr 2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">2.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Zhu et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mount Wuzhi (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Mar–Apr 2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ziyang (China)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Dec 2012–Jan 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.12–0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">Hu et al. (2016b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Melpitz (Germany)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">May–Jul 2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Poulain et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Tri-VK-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram based on seasonal
observations. The scatterplot of H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C vs. O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios is colored by
the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The OA factors resolved by the
AMS-PMF analysis are also marked in the diagram. The majority of the data
fall within the dashed red and blue lines (Ng et al., 2011). Improved-ambient results
for OA factors are from Hu et al. (2016a, b) and the
summarization of Canagaratna et al. (2015).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Scatterplots of OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO-0.1)
ratios vs. O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C atomic ratios in OA during the <bold>(a)</bold> spring,
<bold>(b)</bold> summer, <bold>(c)</bold> autumn, and <bold>(d)</bold> winter
observations. The OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios are in the range of 1st and
99th percentile. The scatterplots are colored by the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Heald et al. (2010) concluded that OA trends to evolve along with a slope of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 in the VK diagram. Ng et al. (2011) derived that the evolution from
SV-OOA to LV-OOA is mainly along with a slope of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5, and is
associated with the replacement of carboxyl functional group (OH-(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O)-).
The identified reactions related to the alteration of functional groups are
shown in Fig. 8. In spring, summer, and autumn, the slopes fell between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1
(the addition of carboxyl functional groups without fragmentation or
carbonyl and hydroxyl in different carbons) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 (carboxyl
functionalization with fragmentation). In winter, the nearly zero slope of
the VK diagram suggests that hydroxylation and/or peroxidation processes
(slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) were likely to occur in Beijing during winter. On the other
hand, carboxylation process might be unlikely to occur since the slope is
higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Scatterplots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
OA during the spring <bold>(a, e)</bold>, summer <bold>(b, f)</bold>, autumn
<bold>(c, g)</bold>, and winter <bold>(d, h)</bold> observations. The triangle for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived by Ng et al. (2010) is lineated. The
conceptual space for BBOA and the nominal background value at 0.3 %
(Cubison et al., 2011) are marked by arrows and vertical dash lines,
respectively. The scatterplots are colored by the metric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The OA factors resolved by the AMS-PMF
analysis are also marked in all diagrams.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9979/2017/acp-17-9979-2017-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The average carbon oxidation state (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
approximated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C–H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C, can also reflect the
oxidation degree of OA (Kroll et al., 2011). The estimated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values of OA during seasonal observations are
listed in Table 2 and the integrated Tri-VK-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
diagram is shown as Fig. 8. In summer and winter, the average carbon
oxidation states were higher, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 (in
the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.42–0.23) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.32–0.11),
respectively. In spring and autumn, the average carbon oxidation states were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.96–0.55) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.66–0.64). Compared with previous studies, in spring, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly lower than those at
Changdao Island and Bologna sites, but slightly higher than that in Mexico
City. In summer, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> was comparable to
those in Beijing in 2011 and Melpitz and much higher than those in Beijing
in 2008, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Riverside, and Jiaxing. In autumn, it was higher
than that in Shenzhen, lower than those in Kaiping and Melpitz, and close to
that at Heshan site. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter was
significantly higher than those in Beijing 2010, Fresno, and Jiaxing, but
lower than those in Ziyang and Melpitz. Compared with the oxidation states of
SV-OOA, OOA, and LV-OOA summarized by Canagaratna et al. (2015), the oxidation
states of OOA, especially LO-OOA, in Beijing were generally higher than in
other areas (Fig. 8). The oxidation states of MO-OOA in Beijing were only
lower than those in very aged air masses in Ziyang in the basin (Hu et al.,
2016b), over Mexico City (DeCarlo et al., 2010) and in Barcelona (Mohr et
al., 2012). The oxidation states of LO-OOA were only slightly lower than
those of MO-OOA in Beijing and were comparable to those of MO-OOA in other
urban areas (Fig. 8).</p>
      <p>In summary, in urban Beijing, bulk organic aerosols were in a higher
oxidation state in summer and in a medium oxidation state in other seasons
and were less oxygenated than at several rural/suburban sites. The possible
reasons for relatively higher oxidation states of OA in Beijing could be the
high hygroscopicity of aerosols and high OH radical concentration in air
(Jimenez et al., 2009). The trend of increasing hygroscopicity with
increasing O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C is robust based on field observations in Beijing and at
several other sites (Jimenez et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2016). Xu et al. (2017) suggest a major role of aqueous-phase processes in increasing the
oxidation degree of SOA in Beijing based on the consistency of higher O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C of
SOA and higher RH. Lim et al. (2010) suggest that reactions with OH radicals
tend to be faster and form more SOA than non-radical reactions. High daily
maximum concentrations (0.4–1.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for OH were
observed in the North China Plain (Lu et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Evolution of OA along with the aging of air masses</title>
      <p>The aging process of the air mass indicates that the physical and chemical
changes occur and that secondary organics or inorganics form continuously,
and the physicochemical properties of the air mass are modified during the
transport of the air mass from source areas. In previous studies, the
ratio or standardized ratio of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is used
as a criterion to characterize the aging degree of air masses (Liang et al.,
1998). Here the metric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to investigate the
relationship between OA oxidation and the aging of air masses. The larger
the metric is, the more aged the air mass (Kleinman et al., 2008; DeCarlo
et al., 2008, 2010).</p>
      <p>When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.1, the air plume is considered
fresh (Liang et al., 1998). The maxima of the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were about 0.4, 0.4, 0.2, and 0.2 during seasonal
observations. This was consistent with the photochemical reactions being more
active in spring and summer due to strong solar radiation, while in autumn
and winter the plumes of primary emissions had greater impacts. The urban
Beijing was under the control of the relatively aged air masses during some
periods (e.g., 23–24 April, 17–18 August, and 26–27 October 2012). However,
compared with the aerial results in Mexico City, where the highest -log
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded 1.4 (DeCarlo et al., 2010), the aging degree of
air masses in urban Beijing was much lower.</p>
      <p>The scatterplot of H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C vs. O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios in
Tri-VK-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram (Fig. 8) is colored with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. There was a trend that the oxidation state
of OA was higher (i.e., lower H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio, and higher O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the air mass aged more (from the upper left
to the lower right). The OA factors resolved by the AMS-PMF analysis during
seasonal campaigns are also marked in Fig. 8. In the order from POA (HOA,
COA, CCOA, and BBOA) to SOA (LO-OOA, OOA, and MO-OOA), the factors evolved
along with the direction to a higher oxidation state, which is consistent
with the oxidation characteristics of the factors.</p>
      <p>The OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratio is used to evaluate the contribution of SOA
formation, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO is CO subtracted the regional background
concentration (0.1 ppmv) to exclude the influences of emitted and
transported OA (de Gouw and Jimenez, 2009; DeCarlo et al., 2010). With the
SOA formation, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratio increases. The average of OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios (in the range of 1st and 99th percentile) were
37.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.7, 25.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.4, 20.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.5, and 15.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The ratios were comparable to or
higher than the urban <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>POA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but were much lower than the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios
(70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in aged urban air (de Gouw and
Jimenez, 2009), implying that the contribution of POA was considerable in
Beijing during seasonal campaigns, especially in autumn and winter.</p>
      <p>Investigating the variations in OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios with the aging process
of air masses can help reveal the formation rate of SOA and parameterize it
in the model simulation (Dzepina et al., 2011). The scatterplots of
OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios over O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios during the seasonal observations in
Beijing are shown in Fig. 9, colored with the metric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In laboratory and field studies on OA aging under
strong oxidizing conditions, it was found that the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios
remain relatively stable at high O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios with the increase in O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios
because organics obtain oxygen atoms but lose carbon atoms in the oxidation
processes (DeCarlo et al., 2008, 2010). During seasonal campaigns in
Beijing, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios showed different trends with the increase
in O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios as well as aging degrees of air masses (Fig. 9). Due to the
intricate sources of OA in urban Beijing, the O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios cannot reach higher
values and the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO cannot remain an obviously stable level. In
autumn, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios decreased with the increase in O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios
in more aged air masses, suggesting that reductive POA contributed
substantially to high OA concentrations. An important reason for the
decrease in OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios in aged air in autumn is the mixing of
urban and biomass burning plumes with high CO content (DeCarlo et al.,
2010). In summer and winter, along with the increase in O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios and the
aging degree of air masses, the OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO ratios trended to increase,
indicating the material contribution of SOA formation. Guo et al. (2014)
concluded that photochemical oxidations of VOCs from urban traffic emissions
are primarily responsible for the secondary formation during severe aerosol
pollution events. Many studies have reported the rapid increase in SOA
significantly exceeding the initial POA emission ratios in urban atmosphere
in a day in the absence of biomass burning (DeCarlo et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>In mass spectra measured by AMS, some relatively abundant fragment ions
have a certain representativeness. As mentioned above, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44, mainly as
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, are predominant in
the MS of OOA. While in the MS of HOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 is mainly composed of alkyl
fragment C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ng et al., 2010). The difference between the
relative contents of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 in OA can reflect the oxidation degree, e.g.,
the abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 in MO-OOA is higher than that in LO-OOA. The fragment
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 (mainly C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is often used as a tracer of biomass
burning (Alfarra et al., 2007; Cubison et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>The scatterplots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during seasonal campaigns are shown in Fig. 10, colored with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The data points in the scatterplots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substantially fell into the triangle derived by Ng et al. (2010). As
the aging degree of air masses increased, OA showed the evolution trends
moving from the lower right to the upper left generally in the triangle. The
POA factors (HOA, COA, CCOA, and BBOA) are concentrated in the bottom of the
triangle, LO-OOA with a higher oxidation state is in an intermediate
location, and MO-OOA with the highest oxidation state is at the top of the
triangle. Ng et al. (2010) found that with the enhancement of OA oxidation,
data points gradually move upward from the lower half of the triangle
through summarizing the results of chamber experiments and field
observations.</p>
      <p>In the scatterplots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the majority of the data points
concentrated on the left side and presented in a band-shaped region (Fig. 10e–h). Cubison et al. (2011) found that in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
space, data from biomass burning appear in the lower right part, while data
with negligible biomass burning influence are concentrated on the left side
as a band shape. There are a part of data points appearing in the conceptual
space for BBOA (Cubison et al., 2011), more obviously in spring, autumn, and
winter (Fig. 10e, g, h). In spring and autumn, a large number of data points
are of higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than in other seasons, and the aging degrees of air
masses were low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>log(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.05), which may be
subject to biomass burning emissions as mentioned above. HOA, COA, CCOA,
LO-OOA, MO-OOA, and OOA are located on the left side, while BBOA appears on
the right. With the increase in the aging degree of air masses, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did
not trend to change dramatically, suggesting that the contribution of
biomass burning to OA has no dependence on the aging degree of air masses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We investigated the compositions of submicron aerosols during four seasons
in urban Beijing with highly time-resolved HR-ToF-AMS measurements. The
following
conclusions can be drawn:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p>The average
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was highest (82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter, resulting from intense
emissions due to adverse meteorological conditions and secondary formation,
and lowest (38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer due to frequent washout. Chemical
compositions in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> also showed seasonal dependence. Carbonaceous
fraction (OA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>BC) constituted more than 50 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn due to
primary emissions, while SNA contributed 60 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in other
seasons.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>OA was identified as secondary fractions (MO-OOA and LO-OOA, or total
OOA) and primary fractions (COA, CCOA, BBOA, and HOA). In summer, OOA
dominated OA (69 %) due to the crucial contribution of SOA formation,
while POA (50–53 % of total OA) was almost equivalent to SOA in other
seasons. In winter, SOA contributed to OA much more significantly (50 %)
than in previous studies (20–30 %), which may be associated with
stronger SOA formation under long-lasting static and heavy-pollution days.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Secondary species (SNA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SOA) represented about 60–80 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in four seasons, stressing the importance of measures targeting the
reduction of gaseous precursor (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and VOCs) emissions.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>OA was in a relatively high oxidation state in urban Beijing according
to OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC and O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>,
especially in summer and winter. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.54, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.66, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58 in four seasons, respectively. The
evolution of OA was, along with the increase in oxidation state, from POA
(HOA, COA, CCOA, and BBOA) to SOA (LO-OOA and MO-OOA). Moreover, higher
oxidation states of OA were observed in more aged air masses.</p></list-item></list>
In this study, the chemical compositions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clearly varied in
four seasons. Meteorological conditions and gaseous and particulate
emissions determined the severity of atmospheric aerosol pollution. To
prevent regional aerosol pollution effectively, further strengthening of the
control of primary particulate emissions is expected. In addition, the
emissions of secondary species' precursors must be reduced,
especially under adverse meteorological conditions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data presented in this article are available from the authors upon
request (minhu@pku.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9979-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9979-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(91544214, 41421064, 51636003), the National Basic Research Program of China
(2013CB228503), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China
(2016YFC0202003). The authors express their appreciation to  Min Shao and  Yudong Yang in
Peking University for data of VOCs and  Jeffrey Morrow  in the Prefectural
University of Kumamoto for his assistance in language editing.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: Jason Surratt
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R.,
Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M.,
Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J.,
Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P.,
Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis
during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban
supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source
apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer, S., Lanz,
V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Identification of the
mass spectral signature of organic aerosols from wood burning emissions,
Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 5770–5777, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Morgan, W. T., Martin, C. L., Flynn, M. J.,
Lee, J., Nemitz, E., Phillips, G. J., Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.:
Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary
organic aerosols in two UK cities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 647–668,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-647-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-647-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Bairai, S. T.,
Mueller, S., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.:
Seasonal characterization of submicron aerosol chemical composition and
organic aerosol sources in the southeastern United States: Atlanta,
Georgia,and Look Rock, Tennessee, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5171–5189,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Buseck, P. R. and Adachi, K.: Nanoparticles in the Atmosphere, Elements, 4,
389–394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.6.389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gselements.4.6.389</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Heald, C. L., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., He,
L.-Y., Huang, X.-F., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Poulain, L., Kuwata,
M., Martin, S. T., Abbatt, J. P. D., Lee, A. K. Y., and Liggio, J.:
Elemental composition of organic aerosol: The gap between ambient and
laboratory measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4182–4189,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063693" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl063693</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Paglione, M., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., O'Dowd,
C., Plass-Duellmer, C., and Harrison, R. M.: On the origin of AMS “Cooking
Organic Aerosol” at a rural site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
13964–13972, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Dunlea, E. J., Kimmel, J. R., Aiken, A. C., Sueper, D.,
Crounse, J., Wennberg, P. O., Emmons, L., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A., Zhou,
J., Tomlinson, J., Collins, D. R., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Montzka, D.
D., Campos, T., and Jimenez, J. L.: Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry
measurements above Mexico City and Central Mexico during the MILAGRO
campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4027–4048,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4027-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4027-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J.,
Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic
aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during
MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>de Gouw, J.  and Jimenez, J. L.: Organic aerosols in the Earth's atmosphere,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7614–7618, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Docherty, K. S., Aiken, A. C., Huffman, J. A., Ulbrich, I. M., DeCarlo, P.
F., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Snyder, D. C., Peltier, R. E., Weber, R. J.,
Grover, B. D., Eatough, D. J., Williams, B. J., Goldstein, A. H., Ziemann, P.
J., and Jimenez, J. L.: The 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols at Riverside
(SOAR-1): instrumental intercomparisons and fine particle composition, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 12387–12420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Duan, F., Liu, X., Yu, T., and Cachier, H.: Identification and estimate of
biomass burning contribution to the urban aerosol organic carbon
concentrations in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 38, 1275–1282, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dyer, J. M., Stymne, S., Green, A. G., and Carlsson, A. S.: High-value oils
from plants, Plant J., 54, 640–655, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03430.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03430.x</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dzepina, K., Cappa, C. D., Volkamer, R. M., Madronich, S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Zaveri, R. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the multiday evolution and aging
of secondary organic aerosol during MILAGRO 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 3496–3503, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fabian, P., Kohlpaintner, M., and Rollenbeck, R.: Biomass burning in the
Amazon-fertilizer for the mountaineous rain forest in Ecuador, Environ. Sci.
Pollut. R., 12, 290–296, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Ge, X. L., Setyan, A., Sun, Y. L., and Zhang, Q.: Primary and secondary
organic aerosols in Fresno, California during wintertime: Results from high
resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D19301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jd018026</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gong, Z., Lan, Z., Xue, L., Zeng, L., He, L., and Huang, X.:
Characterization of submicron aerosols in the urban outflow of the central
Pearl River Delta region of China, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 6, 725–733,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gong, Z., Xue, L., Sun, T., Deng, Y., He, L., and Huang, X.: Online
measurement of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition and size distribution using a
high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer during 2011 Shenzhen Universiade,
Sci. Sinica Chim., 43, 363–372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1360/032012-384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1360/032012-384</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Slanina, J., and Zhao, Y. L.: Size-resolved
aerosol water-soluble ionic compositions in the summer of Beijing:
implication of regional secondary formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
947–959, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-947-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-947-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Guo, Q., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Zheng, J., Chang, C. C.,
Schauer, J. J., and Zhang, R.: Primary sources and secondary formation of
organic aerosols in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9846–9853,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Guo, Q., Zhang, X., Schauer, J. J., and Zhang, R.:
Quantitative evaluation of emission controls on primary and secondary organic
aerosol sources during Beijing 2008 Olympics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8303–8314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8303-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8303-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Elucidating severe
urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>He, L.-Y., Lin, Y., Huang, X.-F., Guo, S., Xue, L., Su, Q., Hu, M., Luan,
S.-J., and Zhang, Y.-H.: Characterization of high-resolution aerosol mass
spectra of primary organic aerosol emissions from Chinese cooking and biomass
burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11535–11543,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>He, L. Y., Huang, X. F., Xue, L., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Zheng, J., Zhang, R., and
Zhang, Y.-H.: Submicron aerosol analysis and organic source apportionment in
an urban atmosphere in Pearl River Delta of China using high-resolution
aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014566</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Kroll, J. H., Jimenez, J. L., Docherty, K. S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Aiken, A. C., Chen, Q., Martin, S. T., Farmer, D. K., and Artaxo, P.: A
simplified description of the evolution of organic aerosol composition in
the atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L08803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010gl042737</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu,
Y., Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical
composition, sources and aging process of sub-micron aerosols in Beijing:
contrast between summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024020</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W.-W., Niu, H., Zheng, J., Wu, Y., Chen, W., Chen, C.,
Li, L., Shao, M., Xie, S., and Zhang, Y.: Characterization of submicron
aerosols influenced by biomass burning at a site in the Sichuan Basin,
southwestern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13213–13230,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13213-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13213-2016</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Deng, Z. Q., Xiao, R., Kondo, Y., Takegawa, N., Zhao, Y.
J., Guo, S., and Zhang, Y. H.: The characteristics and origins of
carbonaceous aerosol at a rural site of PRD in summer of 2006, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 1811–1822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1811-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1811-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Yuan, B., Jimenez, J. L., Tang, Q., Peng, J. F., Hu, W.,
Shao, M., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Wu, Y. S., Gong, Z. H., Huang, X. F., and
He, L. Y.: Insights on organic aerosol aging and the influence of coal
combustion at a regional receptor site of central eastern China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 10095–10112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes,
P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S.,
McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M.,
Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D.,
Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss,
A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A.,
Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a
real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol
(IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 11807–11833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R. J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga,
A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An,
Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prevot, A. S.: High
secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in
China, Nature, 514, 218–222, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Hu, M., Canagaratna, M. R., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhu,
T., Xue, L., Zeng, L.-W., Liu, X.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Jayne, J. T., Ng, N. L.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time-resolved chemical characterization of
atmospheric submicron particles during 2008 Beijing Olympic Games using an
Aerodyne High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8933–8945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Hu, M., Canagaratna, M. R., Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L.,
Zhang, Y.-H., Lin, Y., Xue, L., Sun, T.-L., Liu, X.-G., Shao, M., Jayne, J.
T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of submicron aerosols at a rural
site in Pearl River Delta of China using an Aerodyne High-Resolution Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1865–1877,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1865-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1865-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Xue, L., Sun, T.-L., Zeng, L.-W., Gong, Z.-H., Hu,
M., and Zhu, T.: Highly time-resolved chemical characterization of
atmospheric fine particles during 2010 Shanghai World Expo, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 4897–4907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4897-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4897-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X. F., Xue, L., Tian, X. D., Shao, W. W., Sun, T. L., Gong, Z. H.,
Ju, W. W., Jiang, B., Hu, M., and He, L.-Y.: Highly time-resolved
carbonaceous aerosol characterization in Yangtze River Delta of China:
Composition, mixing state and secondary formation, Atmos. Environ., 64,
200–207, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K.,
Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Kleinman, L. I., Springston, S. R., Daum, P. H., Lee, Y.-N., Nunnermacker, L.
J., Senum, G. I., Wang, J., Weinstein-Lloyd, J., Alexander, M. L., Hubbe, J.,
Ortega, J., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jayne, J.: The time evolution of aerosol
composition over the Mexico City plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1559–1575,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1559-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1559-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C.,
Szidat, S., Wehrli, M. N., Wacker, L., Weimer, S., Caseiro, A., Puxbaum, H.,
and Prevot, A. S. H.: Source attribution of submicron organic aerosols
during wintertime inversions by advanced factor analysis of aerosol mass
spectra, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 214–220, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K.: Haze formation in China: Importance of secondary aerosol, J.
Environ. Sci., 33, 261–262, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lee, S.-H.  and Allen, H. C.: Analytical measurements of atmospheric urban
aerosol, Anal. Chem., 84, 1196–1201, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y. J., Lee, B. P., Su, L., Fung, J. C. H., and Chan, C. K.: Seasonal
characteristics of fine particulate matter (PM) based on high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometric (HR-ToF-AMS) measurements at the
HKUST Supersite in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 37–53,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-37-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-37-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Liang, J., Horowitz, L. W., Jacob, D. J., Wang, Y., Fiore, A. M., Logan, J.
A., Gardner, G. M., and Munger, J. W.: Seasonal budgets of reactive nitrogen
species and ozone over the United States, and export fluxes to the global
atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 13435–13450,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD03126</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., Perri, M. J., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10521–10539,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Hu, M., Deng, Z., Slanina, J., Han, S., Kondo, Y., Takegawa, N.,
Miyazaki, Y., Zhao, Y., and Sugimoto, N.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of
organic carbon in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing and the estimation of secondary
organic carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00G11,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010902</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Liu, T., Li, Z., Chan, M., and Chan, C. K.: Formation of secondary organic
aerosols from gas-phase emissions of heated cooking oils, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
17, 7333–7344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7333-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7333-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Lu, K. D., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Fuchs, H.,
Hu, M., Häseler, R., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Li, X., Lou, S. R., Oebel, A.,
Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Wahner, A., Zhu, T., Zhang, Y. H., and Rohrer, F.:
Missing OH source in a suburban environment near Beijing: observed and
modelled OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in summer 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1057–1080, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1057-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1057-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection efficiencies for the Aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer using field data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46,
258–271, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Huffman, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S.,
Kimmel, J. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Hannigan, M., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Characterization of primary organic aerosol emissions from meat cooking,
trash burning, and motor vehicles with high-resolution aerosol mass
spectrometry and comparison with ambient and chamber observations, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 2443–2449, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Slowik, J. G.,
Richter, R., Reche, C., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Seco, R., Peñuelas, J.,
Jiménez, J. L., Crippa, M., Zimmermann, R., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification and quantification of organic aerosol
from cooking and other sources in Barcelona using aerosol mass spectrometer
data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1649–1665,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N. and Pandis, S. N.: Simulating the formation of semivolatile
primary and secondary organic aerosol in a regional chemical transport
model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4722–4728, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ndiaye, P. M., Tavares, F. W., Dalmolin, I., Dariva, C., Oliveira, D., and
Oliveira, J. V.: Vapor pressure data of soybean oil, castor oil, and their
fatty acid ethyl ester derivatives, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 50, 330–333,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/je049898o" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/je049898o</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Pieber, S. M., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Platt, S. M., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R.,
Frohlich, R., Vlachou, A., Klein, F., Dommen, J., Miljevic, B., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U.,
and Prevot, A. S.: Inorganic salt interference on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Aerodyne AMS and ACSM organic aerosol composition studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10494–10503, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Birmili, W., Plass-Dülmer, C., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Herrmann, H.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of particulate nitrate and
organic matter at the IfT research station Melpitz, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12579–12599, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O.,  Pinder, R. W.,  Piletic, I. R., Xie, Y.,  Capps, S. L.,  Lin, Y.-H.,  Surratt, J.
D., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Luecken, D. J.: Epoxide pathways improve model
predictions of isoprene markers and reveal key role of acidity in aerosol
formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11056–11064, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Saarikoski, S., Carbone, S., Decesari, S., Giulianelli, L., Angelini, F.,
Canagaratna, M., Ng, N. L., Trimborn, A., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S.,
Hillamo, R., and Worsnop, D.: Chemical characterization of springtime
submicrometer aerosol in Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8401–8421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8401-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8401-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Setyan, A., Zhang, Q., Merkel, M., Knighton, W. B., Sun, Y., Song, C.,
Shilling, J. E., Onasch, T. B., Herndon, S. C., Worsnop, D. R., Fast, J. D.,
Zaveri, R. A., Berg, L. K., Wiedensohler, A., Flowers, B. A., Dubey, M. K.,
and Subramanian, R.: Characterization of submicron particles influenced by
mixed biogenic and anthropogenic emissions using high-resolution aerosol mass
spectrometry: results from CARES, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8131–8156,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8131-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8131-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Silva, P. J., Liu, D.-Y., Noble, C. A., and Prather, K. A.: Size and
chemical characterization of individual particles resulting from biomass
burning of local Southern California species, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33,
3068–3076, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Y., Ng, N. L., Sun, Y.,
Jayne, J. T., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time- and
size-resolved characterization of submicron aerosol particles in Beijing
using an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 44, 131–140,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne,
J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing,
China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51,
250–259, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge, X.: The
impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes
during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J.,
and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime
in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Pan, X.
L., Li, J., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Long-term real-time measurements
of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal variations,
meteorological effects, and source analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
10149–10165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Tan, Z., Fuchs, H., Lu, K., Hofzumahaus, A., Bohn, B., Broch, S., Dong, H.,
Gomm, S., Häseler, R., He, L., Holland, F., Li, X., Liu, Y., Lu, S.,
Rohrer, F., Shao, M., Wang, B., Wang, M., Wu, Y., Zeng, L., Zhang, Y.,
Wahner, A., and Zhang, Y.: Radical chemistry at a rural site (Wangdu) in the
North China Plain: observation and model calculations of OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 663–690,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-663-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-663-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. J., Saxena, P., and Andrews, E.: Measuring and simulating
particulate organics in the atmosphere: problems and prospects, Atmos.
Environ., 34, 2983–3013, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., Hu, M., and Guo, S.: Source
apportionment of fine organic aerosols in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
8573–8585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8573-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8573-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Weimer, S., Drewnick, F., Hogrefe, O., Schwab, J. J., Rhoads, K., Orsini,
D., Canagaratna, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Demerjian, K. L.: Size-selective
nonrefractory ambient aerosol measurements during the Particulate Matter
Technology Assessment and Characterization Study–New York 2004 Winter
Intensive in New York City, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D18305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007215" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007215</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Liu, S., Wehner, B., Bauer, S., Ssling, A. M.,
Wiedensohler, A., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., and Kulmala, M.: New particle
formation in Beijing, China: Statistical analysis of a 1-year data set, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007406</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. J., Cheng, Y. F., Hu, M., Wehner, B., Sugimoto, N., and Wiedensohler,
A.: Dust events in Beijing, China (2004–2006): comparison of ground-based
measurements with columnar integrated observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
6915–6932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6915-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6915-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. J., Zheng, J., Shang, D. J., Du, Z. F., Wu, Y. S., Zeng, L. M.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Hu, M.: Particle hygroscopicity and its link to
chemical composition in the urban atmosphere of Beijing, China, during
summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1123–1138,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1123-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1123-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Xu, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Ge, X., Ren, J., and Qin, D.: Chemical
composition, sources, and processes of urban aerosols during summertime in
northwest China: insights from high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12593–12611,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12593-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12593-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Han, T., Du, W., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Li, J.,
Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Effects of aqueous-phase and
photochemical processing on secondary organic aerosol formation and evolution
in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 762–770, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>You, C. and Xu, X.: Coal combustion and its pollution control in China,
Energy, 35, 4467–4472, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang, Y.
S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious
pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Deconvolution and quantification of
hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4938–4952, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem., 401, 3045–3067, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Shen, X., Wang, T., and Qin, M.: Seasonal
characterization of components and size distributions for submicron aerosols
in Beijing, Sci. China Earth Sci., 56, 890–900, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, X. Y., Sun, J. Y., Hu, G. Y., Shen, X. J., Wang, Y. Q.,
Wang, T. T., Wang, D. Z., and Zhao, Y.: Chemical composition and mass size
distribution of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at an elevated site in central east China, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 12237–12249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12237-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12237-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, X., Liu, X., Zhao, F., Duan, F., Yu, T., and Cachier, H.: Seasonal
characteristics of biomass burning contribution to Beijing aerosol, Sci.
China Ser. B Chem., 48, 481–488, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Q., He, L.-Y., Huang, X.-F., Cao, L.-M., Gong, Z.-H., Wang, C., Zhuang,
X., and Hu, M.: Atmospheric aerosol compositions and sources at two national
background sites in northern and southern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
10283–10297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10283-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10283-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Seasonal variations in high time-resolved chemical compositions, sources, and evolution of atmospheric submicron aerosols in the megacity Beijing</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">A severe regional haze problem in the megacity Beijing and surrounding areas,
caused by fast formation and growth of fine particles, has attracted much
attention in recent years. In order to investigate the secondary formation
and aging process of urban aerosols, four intensive campaigns were conducted
in four seasons between March 2012 and March 2013 at an urban site in
Beijing (116.31° E, 37.99° N). An Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry (HR-ToF-AMS) was
deployed to measure non-refractory chemical components of submicron
particulate matter (NR-PM<sub>1</sub>). The average mass concentrations of
PM<sub>1</sub> (NR-PM<sub>1</sub>+black carbon) were 45.1 ± 45.8, 37.5 ± 31.0, 41.3 ± 42.7, and 81.7 ± 72.4 µg m<sup>−3</sup> in spring,
summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. Organic aerosol (OA) was the most
abundant component in PM<sub>1</sub>, accounting for 31, 33, 44, and 36 %
seasonally, and secondary inorganic aerosol (SNA, sum of sulfate, nitrate,
and ammonium) accounted for 59, 57, 43, and 55 % of PM<sub>1</sub>
correspondingly. Based on the application of positive matrix factorization
(PMF), the sources of OA were obtained, including the primary ones of
hydrocarbon-like (HOA), cooking (COA), biomass burning OA (BBOA) and coal
combustion OA (CCOA), and secondary component oxygenated OA (OOA). OOA, which
can be split into more-oxidized (MO-OOA) and less-oxidized OOA (LO-OOA), accounted
for 49, 69, 47, and 50 % in four seasons, respectively. Totally, the
fraction of secondary components (OOA+SNA) contributed about 60–80 %
to PM<sub>1</sub>, suggesting that secondary formation played an important role in
the PM pollution in Beijing, and primary sources were also non-negligible.
The evolution process of OA in different seasons was investigated with
multiple metrics and tools. The average carbon oxidation states and other
metrics show that the oxidation state of OA was the highest in summer,
probably due to both strong photochemical and aqueous-phase oxidations. It
was indicated by the good correlations (<i>r</i> = 0.53–0.75, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01)
between LO-OOA and odd oxygen (O<sub><i>x</i></sub> =  O<sub>3</sub> + NO<sub>2</sub>), and between
MO-OOA and liquid water content in aerosols. BBOA was resolved in spring and
autumn, influenced by agricultural biomass burning (e.g., field preparation
burnings, straw burning after the harvest). CCOA was only identified in
winter due to domestic heating. These results signified that the
comprehensive management for biomass burning and coal combustion emissions
is needed. High concentrations of chemical components in PM<sub>1</sub> in
Beijing, especially in winter or in adverse meteorological conditions,
suggest that further strengthening the regional emission control of primary
particulate and precursors of secondary species is expected.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R.,
Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M.,
Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J.,
Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P.,
Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis
during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban
supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source
apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer, S., Lanz,
V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Identification of the
mass spectral signature of organic aerosols from wood burning emissions,
Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 5770–5777, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Morgan, W. T., Martin, C. L., Flynn, M. J.,
Lee, J., Nemitz, E., Phillips, G. J., Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.:
Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary
organic aerosols in two UK cities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 647–668,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-647-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-647-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Bairai, S. T.,
Mueller, S., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.:
Seasonal characterization of submicron aerosol chemical composition and
organic aerosol sources in the southeastern United States: Atlanta,
Georgia,and Look Rock, Tennessee, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5171–5189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5171-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Buseck, P. R. and Adachi, K.: Nanoparticles in the Atmosphere, Elements, 4,
389–394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.6.389" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.6.389</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Heald, C. L., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., He,
L.-Y., Huang, X.-F., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Poulain, L., Kuwata,
M., Martin, S. T., Abbatt, J. P. D., Lee, A. K. Y., and Liggio, J.:
Elemental composition of organic aerosol: The gap between ambient and
laboratory measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4182–4189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063693" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl063693</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Paglione, M., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., O'Dowd,
C., Plass-Duellmer, C., and Harrison, R. M.: On the origin of AMS “Cooking
Organic Aerosol” at a rural site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
13964–13972, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Dunlea, E. J., Kimmel, J. R., Aiken, A. C., Sueper, D.,
Crounse, J., Wennberg, P. O., Emmons, L., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A., Zhou,
J., Tomlinson, J., Collins, D. R., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Montzka, D.
D., Campos, T., and Jimenez, J. L.: Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry
measurements above Mexico City and Central Mexico during the MILAGRO
campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4027–4048,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4027-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4027-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Crounse, J., de Foy, B., Dunlea, E. J.,
Aiken, A. C., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Campos, T., Wennberg, P. O., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Investigation of the sources and processing of organic
aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during
MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257–5280,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>de Gouw, J.  and Jimenez, J. L.: Organic aerosols in the Earth's atmosphere,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7614–7618, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Docherty, K. S., Aiken, A. C., Huffman, J. A., Ulbrich, I. M., DeCarlo, P.
F., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Snyder, D. C., Peltier, R. E., Weber, R. J.,
Grover, B. D., Eatough, D. J., Williams, B. J., Goldstein, A. H., Ziemann, P.
J., and Jimenez, J. L.: The 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols at Riverside
(SOAR-1): instrumental intercomparisons and fine particle composition, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 12387–12420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Duan, F., Liu, X., Yu, T., and Cachier, H.: Identification and estimate of
biomass burning contribution to the urban aerosol organic carbon
concentrations in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 38, 1275–1282, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dyer, J. M., Stymne, S., Green, A. G., and Carlsson, A. S.: High-value oils
from plants, Plant J., 54, 640–655, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03430.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03430.x</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dzepina, K., Cappa, C. D., Volkamer, R. M., Madronich, S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Zaveri, R. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the multiday evolution and aging
of secondary organic aerosol during MILAGRO 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 3496–3503, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fabian, P., Kohlpaintner, M., and Rollenbeck, R.: Biomass burning in the
Amazon-fertilizer for the mountaineous rain forest in Ecuador, Environ. Sci.
Pollut. R., 12, 290–296, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Ge, X. L., Setyan, A., Sun, Y. L., and Zhang, Q.: Primary and secondary
organic aerosols in Fresno, California during wintertime: Results from high
resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D19301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018026</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gong, Z., Lan, Z., Xue, L., Zeng, L., He, L., and Huang, X.:
Characterization of submicron aerosols in the urban outflow of the central
Pearl River Delta region of China, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 6, 725–733,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gong, Z., Xue, L., Sun, T., Deng, Y., He, L., and Huang, X.: Online
measurement of PM<sub>1</sub> chemical composition and size distribution using a
high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer during 2011 Shenzhen Universiade,
Sci. Sinica Chim., 43, 363–372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1360/032012-384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1360/032012-384</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Slanina, J., and Zhao, Y. L.: Size-resolved
aerosol water-soluble ionic compositions in the summer of Beijing:
implication of regional secondary formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
947–959, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-947-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-947-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Guo, Q., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Zheng, J., Chang, C. C.,
Schauer, J. J., and Zhang, R.: Primary sources and secondary formation of
organic aerosols in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9846–9853,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Guo, Q., Zhang, X., Schauer, J. J., and Zhang, R.:
Quantitative evaluation of emission controls on primary and secondary organic
aerosol sources during Beijing 2008 Olympics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8303–8314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8303-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8303-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Elucidating severe
urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
He, L.-Y., Lin, Y., Huang, X.-F., Guo, S., Xue, L., Su, Q., Hu, M., Luan,
S.-J., and Zhang, Y.-H.: Characterization of high-resolution aerosol mass
spectra of primary organic aerosol emissions from Chinese cooking and biomass
burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11535–11543,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11535-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>He, L. Y., Huang, X. F., Xue, L., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Zheng, J., Zhang, R., and
Zhang, Y.-H.: Submicron aerosol analysis and organic source apportionment in
an urban atmosphere in Pearl River Delta of China using high-resolution
aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014566</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Kroll, J. H., Jimenez, J. L., Docherty, K. S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Aiken, A. C., Chen, Q., Martin, S. T., Farmer, D. K., and Artaxo, P.: A
simplified description of the evolution of organic aerosol composition in
the atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L08803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042737</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu,
Y., Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical
composition, sources and aging process of sub-micron aerosols in Beijing:
contrast between summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W.-W., Niu, H., Zheng, J., Wu, Y., Chen, W., Chen, C.,
Li, L., Shao, M., Xie, S., and Zhang, Y.: Characterization of submicron
aerosols influenced by biomass burning at a site in the Sichuan Basin,
southwestern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13213–13230,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13213-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13213-2016</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Deng, Z. Q., Xiao, R., Kondo, Y., Takegawa, N., Zhao, Y.
J., Guo, S., and Zhang, Y. H.: The characteristics and origins of
carbonaceous aerosol at a rural site of PRD in summer of 2006, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 1811–1822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1811-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1811-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Yuan, B., Jimenez, J. L., Tang, Q., Peng, J. F., Hu, W.,
Shao, M., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Wu, Y. S., Gong, Z. H., Huang, X. F., and
He, L. Y.: Insights on organic aerosol aging and the influence of coal
combustion at a regional receptor site of central eastern China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 10095–10112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes,
P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S.,
McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M.,
Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D.,
Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss,
A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A.,
Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a
real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol
(IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 11807–11833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R. J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga,
A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An,
Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prevot, A. S.: High
secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in
China, Nature, 514, 218–222, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Hu, M., Canagaratna, M. R., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhu,
T., Xue, L., Zeng, L.-W., Liu, X.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Jayne, J. T., Ng, N. L.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time-resolved chemical characterization of
atmospheric submicron particles during 2008 Beijing Olympic Games using an
Aerodyne High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8933–8945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8933-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Hu, M., Canagaratna, M. R., Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L.,
Zhang, Y.-H., Lin, Y., Xue, L., Sun, T.-L., Liu, X.-G., Shao, M., Jayne, J.
T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of submicron aerosols at a rural
site in Pearl River Delta of China using an Aerodyne High-Resolution Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1865–1877,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1865-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1865-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, X.-F., He, L.-Y., Xue, L., Sun, T.-L., Zeng, L.-W., Gong, Z.-H., Hu,
M., and Zhu, T.: Highly time-resolved chemical characterization of
atmospheric fine particles during 2010 Shanghai World Expo, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 4897–4907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4897-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4897-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X. F., Xue, L., Tian, X. D., Shao, W. W., Sun, T. L., Gong, Z. H.,
Ju, W. W., Jiang, B., Hu, M., and He, L.-Y.: Highly time-resolved
carbonaceous aerosol characterization in Yangtze River Delta of China:
Composition, mixing state and secondary formation, Atmos. Environ., 64,
200–207, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S.,
Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi,
T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K.,
Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kleinman, L. I., Springston, S. R., Daum, P. H., Lee, Y.-N., Nunnermacker, L.
J., Senum, G. I., Wang, J., Weinstein-Lloyd, J., Alexander, M. L., Hubbe, J.,
Ortega, J., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jayne, J.: The time evolution of aerosol
composition over the Mexico City plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1559–1575,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1559-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1559-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C.,
Szidat, S., Wehrli, M. N., Wacker, L., Weimer, S., Caseiro, A., Puxbaum, H.,
and Prevot, A. S. H.: Source attribution of submicron organic aerosols
during wintertime inversions by advanced factor analysis of aerosol mass
spectra, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 214–220, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K.: Haze formation in China: Importance of secondary aerosol, J.
Environ. Sci., 33, 261–262, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lee, S.-H.  and Allen, H. C.: Analytical measurements of atmospheric urban
aerosol, Anal. Chem., 84, 1196–1201, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. J., Lee, B. P., Su, L., Fung, J. C. H., and Chan, C. K.: Seasonal
characteristics of fine particulate matter (PM) based on high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometric (HR-ToF-AMS) measurements at the
HKUST Supersite in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 37–53,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-37-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-37-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Liang, J., Horowitz, L. W., Jacob, D. J., Wang, Y., Fiore, A. M., Logan, J.
A., Gardner, G. M., and Munger, J. W.: Seasonal budgets of reactive nitrogen
species and ozone over the United States, and export fluxes to the global
atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 13435–13450,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03126" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03126</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., Perri, M. J., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10521–10539,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10521-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Hu, M., Deng, Z., Slanina, J., Han, S., Kondo, Y., Takegawa, N.,
Miyazaki, Y., Zhao, Y., and Sugimoto, N.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of
organic carbon in PM<sub>2. 5</sub> in Beijing and the estimation of secondary
organic carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00G11,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010902</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, T., Li, Z., Chan, M., and Chan, C. K.: Formation of secondary organic
aerosols from gas-phase emissions of heated cooking oils, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
17, 7333–7344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7333-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7333-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, K. D., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Fuchs, H.,
Hu, M., Häseler, R., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Li, X., Lou, S. R., Oebel, A.,
Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Wahner, A., Zhu, T., Zhang, Y. H., and Rohrer, F.:
Missing OH source in a suburban environment near Beijing: observed and
modelled OH and HO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in summer 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1057–1080, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1057-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1057-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection efficiencies for the Aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer using field data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46,
258–271, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Huffman, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S.,
Kimmel, J. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Hannigan, M., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Characterization of primary organic aerosol emissions from meat cooking,
trash burning, and motor vehicles with high-resolution aerosol mass
spectrometry and comparison with ambient and chamber observations, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 2443–2449, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Heringa, M. F., Chirico, R., Slowik, J. G.,
Richter, R., Reche, C., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Seco, R., Peñuelas, J.,
Jiménez, J. L., Crippa, M., Zimmermann, R., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Identification and quantification of organic aerosol
from cooking and other sources in Barcelona using aerosol mass spectrometer
data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1649–1665,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1649-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B. N. and Pandis, S. N.: Simulating the formation of semivolatile
primary and secondary organic aerosol in a regional chemical transport
model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4722–4728, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ndiaye, P. M., Tavares, F. W., Dalmolin, I., Dariva, C., Oliveira, D., and
Oliveira, J. V.: Vapor pressure data of soybean oil, castor oil, and their
fatty acid ethyl ester derivatives, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 50, 330–333,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/je049898o" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/je049898o</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Pieber, S. M., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Platt, S. M., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R.,
Frohlich, R., Vlachou, A., Klein, F., Dommen, J., Miljevic, B., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U.,
and Prevot, A. S.: Inorganic salt interference on CO<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> in Aerodyne AMS and ACSM organic aerosol composition studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10494–10503, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Birmili, W., Plass-Dülmer, C., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Herrmann, H.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of particulate nitrate and
organic matter at the IfT research station Melpitz, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12579–12599, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O.,  Pinder, R. W.,  Piletic, I. R., Xie, Y.,  Capps, S. L.,  Lin, Y.-H.,  Surratt, J.
D., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Luecken, D. J.: Epoxide pathways improve model
predictions of isoprene markers and reveal key role of acidity in aerosol
formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11056–11064, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Saarikoski, S., Carbone, S., Decesari, S., Giulianelli, L., Angelini, F.,
Canagaratna, M., Ng, N. L., Trimborn, A., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S.,
Hillamo, R., and Worsnop, D.: Chemical characterization of springtime
submicrometer aerosol in Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8401–8421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8401-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8401-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Setyan, A., Zhang, Q., Merkel, M., Knighton, W. B., Sun, Y., Song, C.,
Shilling, J. E., Onasch, T. B., Herndon, S. C., Worsnop, D. R., Fast, J. D.,
Zaveri, R. A., Berg, L. K., Wiedensohler, A., Flowers, B. A., Dubey, M. K.,
and Subramanian, R.: Characterization of submicron particles influenced by
mixed biogenic and anthropogenic emissions using high-resolution aerosol mass
spectrometry: results from CARES, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8131–8156,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8131-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8131-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Silva, P. J., Liu, D.-Y., Noble, C. A., and Prather, K. A.: Size and
chemical characterization of individual particles resulting from biomass
burning of local Southern California species, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33,
3068–3076, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Y., Ng, N. L., Sun, Y.,
Jayne, J. T., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time- and
size-resolved characterization of submicron aerosol particles in Beijing
using an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 44, 131–140,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne,
J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing,
China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51,
250–259, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge, X.: The
impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes
during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J.,
and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime
in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Pan, X.
L., Li, J., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Long-term real-time measurements
of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal variations,
meteorological effects, and source analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
10149–10165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, Z., Fuchs, H., Lu, K., Hofzumahaus, A., Bohn, B., Broch, S., Dong, H.,
Gomm, S., Häseler, R., He, L., Holland, F., Li, X., Liu, Y., Lu, S.,
Rohrer, F., Shao, M., Wang, B., Wang, M., Wu, Y., Zeng, L., Zhang, Y.,
Wahner, A., and Zhang, Y.: Radical chemistry at a rural site (Wangdu) in the
North China Plain: observation and model calculations of OH, HO<sub>2</sub> and
RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 663–690,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-663-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-663-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. J., Saxena, P., and Andrews, E.: Measuring and simulating
particulate organics in the atmosphere: problems and prospects, Atmos.
Environ., 34, 2983–3013, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., Hu, M., and Guo, S.: Source
apportionment of fine organic aerosols in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
8573–8585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8573-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8573-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Weimer, S., Drewnick, F., Hogrefe, O., Schwab, J. J., Rhoads, K., Orsini,
D., Canagaratna, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Demerjian, K. L.: Size-selective
nonrefractory ambient aerosol measurements during the Particulate Matter
Technology Assessment and Characterization Study–New York 2004 Winter
Intensive in New York City, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D18305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007215" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007215</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Liu, S., Wehner, B., Bauer, S., Ssling, A. M.,
Wiedensohler, A., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., and Kulmala, M.: New particle
formation in Beijing, China: Statistical analysis of a 1-year data set, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007406" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007406</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. J., Cheng, Y. F., Hu, M., Wehner, B., Sugimoto, N., and Wiedensohler,
A.: Dust events in Beijing, China (2004–2006): comparison of ground-based
measurements with columnar integrated observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
6915–6932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6915-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6915-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. J., Zheng, J., Shang, D. J., Du, Z. F., Wu, Y. S., Zeng, L. M.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Hu, M.: Particle hygroscopicity and its link to
chemical composition in the urban atmosphere of Beijing, China, during
summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1123–1138,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1123-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1123-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Ge, X., Ren, J., and Qin, D.: Chemical
composition, sources, and processes of urban aerosols during summertime in
northwest China: insights from high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12593–12611,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12593-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12593-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Han, T., Du, W., Wang, Q., Chen, C., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Li, J.,
Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Effects of aqueous-phase and
photochemical processing on secondary organic aerosol formation and evolution
in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 762–770, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>You, C. and Xu, X.: Coal combustion and its pollution control in China,
Energy, 35, 4467–4472, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang, Y.
S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious
pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Deconvolution and quantification of
hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4938–4952, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem., 401, 3045–3067, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Shen, X., Wang, T., and Qin, M.: Seasonal
characterization of components and size distributions for submicron aerosols
in Beijing, Sci. China Earth Sci., 56, 890–900, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, X. Y., Sun, J. Y., Hu, G. Y., Shen, X. J., Wang, Y. Q.,
Wang, T. T., Wang, D. Z., and Zhao, Y.: Chemical composition and mass size
distribution of PM<sub>1</sub> at an elevated site in central east China, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 12237–12249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12237-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12237-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, X., Liu, X., Zhao, F., Duan, F., Yu, T., and Cachier, H.: Seasonal
characteristics of biomass burning contribution to Beijing aerosol, Sci.
China Ser. B Chem., 48, 481–488, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Q., He, L.-Y., Huang, X.-F., Cao, L.-M., Gong, Z.-H., Wang, C., Zhuang,
X., and Hu, M.: Atmospheric aerosol compositions and sources at two national
background sites in northern and southern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
10283–10297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10283-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10283-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
