<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-9931-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Modeling intercontinental transport of ozone in North America with CAMx for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) Phase 3</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Modeling intercontinental transport of ozone in North America}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{U.~Nopmongcol et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nopmongcol</surname><given-names>Uarporn</given-names></name>
          <email>unopmongcol@ramboll.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Zhen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stoeckenius</surname><given-names>Till</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yarwood</surname><given-names>Greg</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-3649</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Ramboll Environ, 773 San Marin Dr., Suite 2115, Novato, CA 94945, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Uarporn Nopmongcol (unopmongcol@ramboll.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>9931</fpage><lpage>9943</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Intercontinental ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) transport extends the geographic
range of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air pollution impacts and makes local air pollution
management more difficult. Phase 3 of the Air Quality Modeling Evaluation
International Initiative (AQMEII-3) is examining the contribution of
intercontinental transport to regional air quality by applying regional-scale atmospheric models jointly with global models. We investigate methods
for tracing O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from global models within regional models. The CAMx
photochemical grid model was used to track contributions from boundary
condition (BC) O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over a North American modeling domain for calendar
year 2010 using a built-in tracer module called RTCMC. RTCMC can track BC
contributions using chemically reactive tracers and also using inert tracers
in which deposition is the only sink for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lack of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction
chemistry in the inert tracer approach leads to overestimation biases that
can exceed 10 ppb. The flexibility of RTCMC also allows tracking O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
contributions made by groups of vertical BC layers. The largest BC
contributions to seasonal average daily maximum 8 h averages (MDA8) of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the US are found to be from the mid-troposphere (over 40 ppb)
with small contributions (a few ppb) from the upper troposphere–lower
stratosphere. Contributions from the lower troposphere are shown to not
penetrate very far inland. Higher contributions in the western than the
eastern US, reaching an average of 57 ppb in Denver for the 30 days with
highest MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2010, present a significant challenge to air quality
management approaches based solely on local or US-wide emission reductions.
The substantial BC contribution to MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Intermountain West
means regional models are particularly sensitive to any biases and errors in
the BCs. A sensitivity simulation with reduced BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to
20 % lower emissions in Asia found a near-linear relationship between the
BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes and surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes in the western US in all
seasons and across the US in fall and winter. However, the surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreases are small: below 1 ppb in spring and below 0.5 ppb in other seasons.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Intercontinental ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) transport extends the geographic range of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air pollution impacts and makes local air pollution management more
difficult (Jaffe et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2011; Emery et al., 2012). The
Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) aims to
better understand uncertainties in regional-scale model predictions and
foster continued model improvement by providing a collaborative,
cross-border forum for model development and evaluation in North America and
Europe (Galmarini and Rao, 2011). While phases 1 and 2 of the AQMEII focused
on performance of different types of regional-scale models, Phase 3
(AQMEII-3) examines the contribution of intercontinental transport to
regional air quality by applying regional-scale atmospheric models jointly
with global models (Galmarini et al., 2017). Other AQMEII-3 objectives
include assessing the sensitivity of regional transport to emissions changes
in key source regions worldwide and intercomparing the performance of
global and regional-scale models. Multiple models were applied in the
AQMEII-3 for North American (NA) and European (EU) regional domains with each
model required to track the inflow of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the lateral domain
boundaries at various vertical heights. As in previous phases of AQMEII the
organizers made key model input data available to promote consistent model
applications and simplify interpretation of results across participating models.</p>
      <p>We applied the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx)
photochemical grid model (Ramboll Environ, 2015) for the NA domain using
model inputs provided by the AQMEII. Our simulations address the first two
objectives of AQMEII-3 by evaluating contributions introduced via boundary
conditions (BCs) as inert tracer (i.e., excluding photochemical removal
process) and examining O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> response to reduction of anthropogenic
emissions in East Asia or globally. Our study is unique in that we are the
only AQMEII-3 participants to also track BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using chemically reactive tracers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Base case modeling</title>
      <p>Air quality modeling for the NA domain and calendar year 2010 used CAMx
version 6.2 (Ramboll Environ, 2015) to simulate formation and transport of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Gas-phase chemistry was included using the Carbon Bond (CB05)
mechanism (Yarwood et al., 2005), but heterogeneous-phase chemistry was not
included for efficiency and because the focus is on O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The CAMx
modeling domain covers the continental US with 459 by 299 grid cells of
12 km by 12 km resolution and 26 vertical layers (Table S1 in the Supplement). The vertical height
of the first layer is 20 m. Model inputs were prepared from data
provided to all AQMEII participants supplemented by other data sources
(described later). The 2010 annual simulation was initialized on 22 December 2009
to limit the influence of initial concentrations.</p>
      <p>This study uses reactive tracers with a chemical mechanism compiler (RTCMC)
in CAMx to track contributions from BCs. The RTCMC module simulates explicit
tracers in parallel to the host model and represents sources (emissions and
BCs), transport processes (advection and diffusion), deposition, and
user-defined chemistry (Yarwood et al., 2014). RTCMC chemistry can use
species concentrations from the host model, e.g., OH radical, in the
reactions of tracers. If no chemistry is defined for an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer, then
it becomes chemically inert and deposition is the only sink. Currently,
the RTCMC models dry deposition of tracers but not wet deposition, which will
result in conservative estimates of BC contributions.</p>
      <p>CAMx can also track BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions through the ozone source
apportionment technology (OSAT; Ramboll Environ, 2015) module, but we use
RTRAC because it offers flexibility to model reactive and inert tracers, and
to track BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from specific groups of vertical layers. Vertical
attribution is valuable in identifying height ranges of transported O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
that are most influential to ground-level O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Baker et al. (2015)
compared RTCMC and OSAT over North America and found that the two approaches
estimated very similar BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions in warmer months. Baker et
al. also evaluated computational efficiency of RTCMC tracers. We use the
same RTCMC scheme for reactive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers as Baker et al. (2015)
(Table S2), which includes O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction by odd hydrogen (i.e., HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH)
and alkenes but not O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction by NO because this would entail
tracking conversion of BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to/from several NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species, including
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, PAN and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. OSAT accounts for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction by NO and
Baker et al. show that omission of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction by NO in the RTCMC
scheme causes some positive bias in BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in winter months
(Baker et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions are analyzed in terms of MDA8 by season because
the MDA8 is relevant to the US National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is set at a level of 70 ppb. Seasonal averages are used to
evaluate how BC contributions depend upon transport patterns and photochemistry.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Meteorology</title>
      <p>Meteorological data for calendar year 2010 were developed by the
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for AQMEII phase 2 using the Weather
Research Forecast (WRF; Skamarock et al., 2008) model with 12 km resolution.
The WRF domain was defined in Lambert conformal projection with 471 by
311 grid cells and 35 vertical layers with a 20 m deep surface layer. The
WRF physics options were described in Gilliam et al. (2012). The WRFCAMx
pre-processor reformatted WRF output for CAMx and diagnosed vertical mixing
parameters. CAMx employed fewer vertical layers (26) than WRF (35) to reduce
the computational burden of the air quality simulations. The CAMx vertical
layers exactly matched those used in WRF for the lowest 10 layers (up to
577 m); above this height several WRF layers were combined to single CAMx layers
(Table S1). The minimum vertical diffusivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was set to
0.1–1.0 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on input landuse.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Emissions</title>
      <p>Anthropogenic and fire emissions for 2010 were provided by AQMEII (Pouliot
et al., 2015) separately for surface emissions and six elevated source
groups, namely fires, international marine shipping, electric generating
units (EGU), other point sources (non-EGU), Mexico point sources, and Canada
point sources. Biogenic emissions were obtained from the Model of Emissions
of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN; Guenther et al.,
2006; Sakulyanontvittaya et al., 2008). MEGAN has a global database of
land cover derived from satellite data at 1 km resolution. Meteorological
input data for MEGAN (i.e., temperature and solar radiation) were taken from
the WRF predictions. Annual emissions in 2010 in the modeling domain for
each source sector are summarized in Table 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Boundary conditions</title>
      <p>BCs were provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).
The ECMWF BC data were based on the Composition-Integrated Forecast
System (C-IFS) model (Flemming et al., 2015), which outputs 3-hourly,
three-dimensional gridded concentrations which were formatted for CAMx.</p>
      <p>We tracked contributions from O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BCs in three height ranges defined at
the CAMx boundaries, namely from layers 1 to 16 (layers below 750 mb; lower
troposphere, LT), 17 to 23 (layers between 750 and 240 mb; middle
troposphere, MT), and 24 to 26 (layers above 250 mb; upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere, UTLS). We introduced both reactive and inert O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
tracers for the same vertical groups. Reactive tracers undergo chemical
decay according to chemistry scheme defined using the RTCMC, whereas inert
tracers only participate in physical processes with no chemical removal.
Table S2 presents the RTCMC chemistry scheme for reactive tracers as well as
the physical properties for both reactive and inert tracers.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sensitivity scenarios</title>
      <p>Two sensitivity simulations defined by AQMEII were conducted to quantify
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> response to anthropogenic emission reductions. The GLO scenario
reduced all anthropogenic emissions by 20 % globally and the EAS scenario
reduced anthropogenic emissions in the East Asia by 20 %. In the GLO
scenario, the CAMx NA anthropogenic emissions were reduced by 20 % for the
entire modeling domain with no changes to fire and biogenic emissions. Under
the EAS scenario the CAMx NA emissions are the same as in the base case.
ECMWF provided BCs specific for each scenario. The ECMWF BCs inadvertently
omitted H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the EAS scenario and so we followed the AQMEII
suggestion to use H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the base case for both the EAS and GLO
scenarios. Other modeling inputs are unchanged from the base case. The
annual CAMx sensitivity simulations were conducted with the inert and active
boundary O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers described above. Several metrics are used when
comparing sensitivity scenarios to the base case including the fourth highest
maximum daily 8 h average (H4MDA8), the average of the 30
highest MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days (Top 30), and seasonal average
MDA8. We show the results for the entire modeling domain and additionally
discuss our findings for 22 selected major cities in a wide variety of
climatic and geographic environments (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). Cities are represented by
the monitoring site with highest H4MDA8 in the metropolitan statistical area.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Annual emissions by source sector in 2010 (thousand short tons per year; 1 short ton <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.907185 metric tons).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sector</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">VOC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CO</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Elevated sources</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EGU (ptipm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2141</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">691</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Non-EGU (ptnonipm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1558</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">323</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2047</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">International shipping (c3marine)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1186</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mexico (mexpt)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">384</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">153</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Canada (canpt)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">504</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">577</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">834</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fire (ptfire)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">198</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1783</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13 172</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Low-level sources</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anthropogenic surface</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 067</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 562</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58 672</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biogenic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">728</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53 469</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4309</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Total</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19 765</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">71 850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79 977</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Model performance evaluation (MPE) of ozone</title>
      <p>We evaluate O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> model performance for the base case relative to
benchmarks that are accepted in NA. Predictions of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are evaluated
against observations from the Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET;
rural) and the Air Quality System (AQS; urban and rural). Observations are
considered valid when at least 75 % of data are available. A 40 ppb
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cutoff is applied to focus on the upper end of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> frequency
distributions. Statistical metrics used in this evaluation include two bias
metrics (normalized mean bias, NMB; fractional bias, FB) and two error
metrics (normalized mean error, NME; fractional error, FE) (Table 2). Table 3
shows that model biases (NMB, FB) are less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 % and errors (NME,
FE) up to 15 % for all seasons and both networks, well within the
bias/error goals of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 % and 35 % recommended by
EPA (1991). The model tends to overestimate O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring and summer,
while it underestimates in fall and winter. Model biases and errors are
slightly improved, by less than 2 %, at CASTNET sites. The AQS network
includes many urban sites that are heavily impacted by local emissions not
well resolved by our modeling grid.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Model performance metrics, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation of the observed (o) or modeled (m)
concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Metric (potential range)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Equation</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Normalized mean bias (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NMB</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NME</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Normalized mean error (%)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(0 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fractional bias (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FB</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 %)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fractional error (%)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 %)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Correlation coefficient</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="〈" close="〉"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Root mean square error</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RMSE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Seasonal and annual model performance statistics for MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (with
40 ppb cutoff) at AQS and CASTNET sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Season</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Network</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No. obs.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NMB</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NME</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">FB</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">FE</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">RMSE</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Spring</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AQS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">71 074</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.44</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CASTNET</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5737</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.11</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Summer</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AQS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72 548</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">57.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.53</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CASTNET</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5029</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.47</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Fall</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AQS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41 729</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.68</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.26</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CASTNET</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3597</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.71</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.24</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Winter</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AQS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 823</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.35</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CASTNET</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2328</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.67</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">Annual</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AQS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">197 174</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.48</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CASTNET</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16 691</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.66</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.52</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>See Table 2 for definitions of the statistical metrics.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The seasonal spatial distributions of NMB, NME, and Pearson's correlation
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at individual CASTNET and AQS sites are shown in Figs. S2–S5.
The springtime performance is weakest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5)
in the western US, where high terrain prevails. Stratospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
intrusions are influential in the high terrain of the western US during
spring (Langford et al., 2009, 2015; Lin et al., 2012b; Emery et al., 2012)
but models do not always represent this process accurately. In summer, the
performance is weakest along the Gulf Coast and California coast. Model
performance against AQS observations is presented separately for selected
22 major cities. CAMx performs well at these cities, with NMB of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 to
12 % and NME of 12 to 21 % for MDA8 with zero threshold (Table S3),
satisfying the bias/error goals. The performance statistics improve when
applying a 40 ppb threshold (Table S4). We additionally provide
quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plots (Fig. S8) which compare independently sorted
(time-unpaired; space-paired) observed and modeled O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for each city.
The Q–Q plots suggest good model distributions (e.g., data pairs near the
1 : 1 line) for Los Angeles, Sacramento, Phoenix, Denver, Dallas, Houston,
Pittsburgh, and Philadelphia.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Observed (black circle) and CAMx-predicted (red line) daily MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
at Galveston (<bold>a</bold>; coordinates: 29.254474, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>94.861289<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
Sabine Pass (<bold>b</bold>; coordinates: 29.727931, 93.894081<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) monitoring
sites located on the Texas Gulf Coast near Houston and Beaumont, respectively.
Contributions are shown for inert (green line) and reactive (blue line) BC
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers summed over boundary height ranges.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We evaluated vertical profiles of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at Trinidad Head (41.0541,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>124.151<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the northern coast of California (Figs. S6 and S7). This
location is indicative of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> entering the US with prevailing winds from
the Pacific Ocean and useful for evaluating O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BCs over the Pacific.
CAMx reproduces the strong gradient in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> starting at the tropopause
(between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 km) but sometimes
underestimates O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> near the model top (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 km). In the
free troposphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km), CAMx
performance is reasonable with a mix of over- and underpredictions. In the
marine boundary layer (MBL; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 m), CAMx tends to overpredict
surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> because the model lacks a consistently observed gradient
toward lower O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (typically lower than 50 ppb) at the surface.
Potential causes are too little O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition to the ocean, a lack of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction by halogen chemistry in the MBL, too strong vertical
mixing in the MBL, or a combination of factors. The influence of low bias in
the Pacific MBL will be confined to west coast states because this air is
blocked effectively by western mountain ranges (see Sect. 3.5). However,
similar biases in the MBL over the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean could
influence O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the southern and eastern US (see Sect. 3.2).
Further analysis is required to address this uncertainty.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Regional MPE analysis at remote sites along the Gulf Coast</title>
      <p>We found a consistent high bias for summer O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at sites near the Gulf
Coast and investigated potential causes using our tracer simulation results.
Global modeling studies have reported high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bias simulated in air
arriving along the Texas coast (Fiore et al., 2002, 2014; McDonald-Buller et
al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011). The high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bias over 10 ppb has been
reported by a regional modeling study (Sarwar et al., 2015; Smith et al.,
2015). Adding reactions of halogens (especially iodine; Smith et al., 2015)
to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry in CAMx mitigated (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 ppb
reduction of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at coastal sites) but did not eliminate this bias.
This study provides an opportunity to examine whether bias in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BCs
could contribute to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bias along the Gulf Coast.</p>
      <p>Time series of daily MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> together with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BC contributions
are shown in Fig. 1 for Galveston and Sabine Pass in Texas. CAMx tends to
overpredict O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during summer months when onshore winds are prevalent
(TCEQ, 2016) due to the enhancement of the Bermuda High bringing warm air from
the Gulf of Mexico (Zhu and Liang, 2013). During this period CAMx has a
large overprediction bias exceeding 15 ppb at the two sites when
observations are low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 ppb). Reactive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers
exceed observed O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by an average of 2–3 ppb, which explains only a
portion of the total model bias, so other factors must be contributing (not
examined here). Inert O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers are on average higher than the
reactive tracers by 10–12 ppb, demonstrating that inert tracers can overestimate BC contributions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>BC ozone contributions to surface ozone</title>
      <p>BC contributions based on the active tracers to seasonal average MDA8
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the US are higher in spring than summer (Fig. 2). Spring
contributions are over 40 ppb across the western US, which is the region most
influenced by pollution transported from Asia (Jaffe et al., 2003; Zhang et
al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012a; Emery et al., 2012). In particular,
high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> events over the high terrain in the western US have been linked to
intercontinental transport and stratospheric intrusions (Lin et al., 2012a, b).
The highest modeled contributions occur in spring, which is consistent
with observations (Parish et al., 2012; Cooper et al., 2012) and previous
modeling studies (Emery et al., 2012; Fiore et al., 2014). BC contributions
in the eastern US are generally below 40 ppb in spring and below 30 ppb in other seasons.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>BC contributions to seasonal average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from reactive tracers
summed over boundary height ranges.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>BC contributions on high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days are compared to the summer average BC
contributions in Fig. 3 for 22 major cities. The metrics for high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the H4MDA8, which is relevant to the NAAQS but is a single day, and the
Top 30, which includes a variety of conditions that can lead to high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
They are compared to the summer average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> metric which includes
high- and low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days. In 15 of the 22 major cities (Los Angeles,
Sacramento, Dallas, Kansas City, St. Louis, Chicago, Atlanta, Cincinnati,
Columbus, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York, and
Boston), the BC contribution to the Top 30 and summer average days differs
by less than 15 %, indicating that higher O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the Top 30 days is
mainly attributable to larger O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production within the modeling domain.
BC contributions to the H4MDA8 are smaller than to the Top 30 in 16 of the
22 cities, which is consistent with greater destruction of BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by
local photochemistry on the highest O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days in these cities. Los
Angeles and Sacramento fall in this category with BC contributions to H4MDA8
below 20 ppb. For the cities east of the Rocky Mountains the H4MDA8
contributions range from 19 ppb (St. Louis) to 34 ppb (Detroit) and the
differences among the three metrics are generally within 5 ppb with no
metric consistently being highest or lowest. In contrast, for cities in the
Intermountain West (Boise, Phoenix, Salt Lake, and Denver) the BC
contribution is consistently lower for summer average than the two high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> day metrics (i.e., differences are more than 8 ppb). For Denver, our
model estimates 57 ppb of BC contribution to the Top 30 and 72 ppb to the
H4MDA8. However, the modeled 72 ppb BC contribution to the Denver H4MDA8 is
certainly overstated, because the observed MDA8 on this day was only 50 ppb,
and we place more emphasis on metrics like the Top 30 that consider
multiple days. BC contributions tend to be higher in the western than the
eastern US because of higher terrain and deeper planetary boundary layer (PBL)
that can efficiently transport mid-tropospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to ground
level, and longer O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetimes in the PBL (Fiore et al., 2002).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions to the H4MDA (blue dot), average MDA8 on the
Top 30 MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days (red triangle), and summer average MDA8 (green square)
at 22 major cities.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Box-and-whisker plots comparing modeled total MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to modeled
BC contribution in 10 ppb ranges paired in time and space for Phoenix, Denver,
Philadelphia, and New York.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We further investigated how total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes as the modeled BC
contributions increase (in 10 ppb increments) as shown in Fig. 4 for several
cities. The relationships vary between cities and the model captures this
variation with the western cities (Denver and Phoenix) showing different
patterns than eastern cities (Philadelphia and Atlanta). For Denver and
Phoenix in the Intermountain West, total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with BC
contribution and approaches the 1 : 1 line at higher BC contribution, revealing
small groups of days when MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded 60 ppb (11 days for Denver
and 7 days for Phoenix) and the modeling indicates that BCs accounted for
almost all of this O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In other words, BC contributions alone
distinguish high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days from low days. These groups of high BC-contributed
days are important because local emission reductions, or even US-wide
emission reductions, would be ineffective at reducing O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However,
there are other days in Denver when total MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded 60 ppb
with modeled BC contribution below 30 ppb (see first and second bars in
Fig. 4) on which reducing local or US emissions would lower O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Air
quality managers need methods to identify dates when emission reductions
would be ineffective so that those dates can be excluded from emission
strategy development. Nonetheless, these results should be interpreted with
consideration given to model performance. As shown in the Q–Q plot for
Denver (Fig. S8), the model can capture the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution quite well,
although it underestimates MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over 65 ppb and overestimates MDA8
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over 80 ppb. For this reason, we encourage making use of multi-day
metrics (such as Top 30) rather than a single-day metric (e.g., H4MDA8).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Inert vs. active ozone BCs</title>
      <p>Contributions to seasonal average MDA8 from reactive and inert tracers are
shown in Fig. 5, where positive differences indicate larger contributions
from inert tracers in all seasons. In summer, when photochemistry is active,
the differences are more than 10 ppb. At the Galveston and Sabine Pass
sites, the differences frequently exceed 20 ppb in summer days (Fig. 1).
During spring and fall, contributions from inert tracers are 5 ppb higher
than contributions from active tracers in southern regions and less than
5 ppb elsewhere. In winter, when photochemistry is less active, the estimated
contributions from the inert and active tracers are similar. Such seasonal
variation is consistent across all three groups of vertical layers (Figs. S9–S11).
These results emphasize the critical role of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry
and highlight the estimation bias inherent to the inert tracer approach.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Differences between inert and reactive BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer contributions
to seasonally averaged MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (inert – reactive) summed over all boundary
height ranges.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{{3}}$ contributions by boundary height range}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions by boundary height range</title>
      <p>The largest BC contributions to seasonal average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the US
are from the MT with small contributions from the UTLS (Fig. 6). The
contributions from the MT are highest in spring, followed by summer, fall,
and winter. The attribution of the MT to spring maxima is over 40 ppb across
the western US, but less than 25 ppb in the eastern US. The contributions
from the LT are highest (more than 30 ppb) along the western boundary but
decrease sharply at the coastline as a result of dilution as the boundary
layer moves onshore along with higher O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition velocities over
land. Dissipating contributions from the model boundaries with distance are
seen at all lateral sides because O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposits to the earth's surface
and is destroyed by chemical reactions in the atmosphere. The penetration of
LT BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inland O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks in winter, when chemistry and deposition
are least active. The UTLS BC tracers contribute only a few ppb, mostly over
the highest western terrain, and up to 6 ppb in summer when vertical
convection is most active.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Sensitivity to changing anthropogenic emissions (GLO and EAS scenarios)</title>
      <p>Reducing emissions in East Asia by 20 % (EAS scenario) decreases average
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the US in all seasons (Fig. 7, first-column panels). As expected,
decreases are highest in the west because the western US is closest to Asia
and has high terrain. The O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases are small: below 1 ppb in spring
and below 0.5 ppb in other seasons. Decreases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BC reactive tracers
(Fig. 7, second-column panels) are almost identical to modeled O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases
but slightly smaller (e.g., generally within 0.1 ppb) because the reactive
tracers omit some chemical interactions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Seasonal average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions from boundary height ranges
using reactive BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We examine more closely the relationship between changes in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
reactive tracers in the EAS scenario. In each surface grid cell, we regress
hourly O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes against reactive tracer concentration changes (summed
over boundary height ranges) to compute slope and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as demonstrated in the
two scatter plots for Denver in spring and summer. Slope and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 1
indicate that the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes are explained entirely by the changes in
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BC reactive tracers. The delta total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and delta tracer
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship is near-linear at Denver with a slope of 0.87 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of 0.9. The 16 panels in Fig. 7 show the regression parameters for each grid
surface cell and match the scatter plots for Denver. The slope and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7, third- and fourth-column panels) values have similar spatial
patterns in all seasons. In winter and fall the slope values are near 1 with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.8 to 1 across the US, suggesting strong influence of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transport
from Asia during these seasons. In spring, strong correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 to 1)
is seen in the western US, but areas in the eastern US have a slope lower
than 0.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than 0.4, indicating that the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BC tracers can
explain only a fraction of the total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> change. The lowest correlation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2) is in the summertime over the southeastern US in a region
where the EAS scenario produces almost no change in surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
indicating that transport from Asia becomes unimportant. High correlation in
the western US in all seasons emphasizes the influence of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transport
from Asia in this region.</p>
      <p>Reducing global emissions by 20 % (GLO scenario), including US emissions,
decreases summertime average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by up to 4 ppb (Fig. 8). The largest
reductions occur over the eastern US, where US emissions cause domestic
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reductions in fall and winter are small,
generally lower than 1–2 ppb. Many NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich areas (e.g., urban cores) show
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases as a result of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reductions (i.e., NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
disbenefit) in all seasons. The spatial pattern and magnitude of the changes
in BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers differs from the changes in surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8,
first- and second-column panels) except near the boundaries and in winter. The
correlation between changes in surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC tracers is low
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4) in all seasons except winter (Fig. 8, fourth-column panels). Overall, in the GLO scenario US surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is more
sensitive to domestic emission reductions than changes in BCs.</p>
      <p>We use summer average MDA O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to show how the two emission scenarios
change BC contributions for the 22 major cities (Fig. 9). The EAS scenario
reduces BC contribution in all cities with reductions range from 0.06 ppb
(Houston) to 0.3 ppb (Boise). Reductions are larger in the western US and
more northern latitude in the eastern US (e.g., larger reduction in Columbus
than Atlanta). These reductions result mostly from smaller MT and LT BC
contributions because the EAS scenario scaled back the contribution of each
height range about equally. The EAS scenario changed the UTLS BC
contributions by less than 0.01 ppb. The GLO scenario produced larger
reductions than the EAS scenario and they range from 0.4 ppb (Boston) to
1.2 ppb (Los Angeles). These reductions are mainly driven by the MT BCs in all
of the cities except Dallas and Houston. Higher influence from the LT in the
GLO scenario than the EAS scenario for most cities is consistent with the
GLO scenario reducing emissions just outside the CAMx domain, whereas in the
EAS scenario the emission reductions occur only in East Asia.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Scatter plots on the top show delta daily average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis)
and reactive tracer BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) for Denver in spring
and summer for 20 % reduction in East Asia emissions (EAS scenario). The
16 panels summarize the same information showing seasonal delta total
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> and reactive tracer BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution <bold>(d)</bold>
for each grid surface. The correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and slope of a linear regression
of <bold>(d)</bold> against column are shown in columns <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Changes to seasonal average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and reactive tracer
BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution <bold>(b)</bold> for 20 % reduction of global emissions
(GLO scenario). The correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and slope of a linear regression of <bold>(b)</bold>
against column are shown in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f08.pdf"/>

          <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{3mm}}?>
        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Changes in BC contribution (ppb) to summer average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by
height range for the EAS <bold>(a)</bold> and GLO <bold>(b)</bold> scenarios from the base case.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f09.pdf"/>

          <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{3mm}}?>
        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Differences in seasonally averaged MDA8 contributions from inert BC
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers in CAMx and CMAQ (CAMx–CMAQ).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/9931/2017/acp-17-9931-2017-f10.pdf"/>

          <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{10mm}}?>
        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Comparing BC O${}_{{3}}$ contributions in two regional models}?><title>Comparing BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions in two regional models</title>
      <p>The AQMEII activity permits comparison of BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions in
different regional models. US EPA applied the CMAQ model over the NA domain
with the same model input data as we used with CAMx except for biogenic
emissions. The WRF-CMAQ system was configured using WRFv3.4 and CMAQv5.0.2
(Appel et al., 2013; see also Foley et al., 2010, and Byun and Schere, 2006).
Options in CMAQ include wet deposition as described in Byun and Schere (2006)
and dry deposition as described in Pleim and Ran (2011). Additional
details on the CMAQ configuration used in these simulations can be found in
Solazzo et al. (2017). Figure 10 compares BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions to
seasonal average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated by CAMx and CMAQ using inert BC
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers (CMAQ was not run with reactive tracers). Differences
between the CMAQ and CAMx inert tracer impacts are smaller than the
differences between inert and reactive tracers in CAMx, which exceed 10 ppb
(Fig. 5), but they are notable, in a range of 4–8 ppb in summer and 2–6 ppb
in spring with CAMx being higher. Factors contributing to these differences
may include fewer vertical layers in CAMx (26, compared to 35 in CMAQ),
allowing greater transport of UTLS O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to ground level (Emery et al.,
2012), omission of wet scavenging for the CAMx inert tracers, treatment of
deep convective transport in CMAQ, or differences in model treatments of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dry deposition. Liu et al. (2017) performed multi-model
process comparisons with four AQMEII models and draw similar conclusions
regarding factors that can contribute to differences in tracer impacts.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The overall MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> performance is within evaluation goals. We do not
see evidence of systematic problems with the model setup, although
performance at individual monitor does vary, and the potential for hidden
biases and errors always exists. Future studies could benefit from refining
model assumptions that may be important at specific sites. For example,
overstated MBL O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at Trinidad Head is partly attributable to the lack
of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction by oceanic halogen chemistry. Other possible reasons
include insufficient O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition to the ocean, too strong vertical
mixing in the MBL, or a combination of factors. The model tendency to
overestimate O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring may suggest overstated BC contributions as
seen at the Denver site. Perfecting model performance at individual sites across
the US is not pursued in the current study. If accuracy in estimating BC
contributions is critical, such as in demonstrating attainment of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
standards, model performance and BC contributions cannot be overlooked, especially on high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
days.</p>
      <p>Inert BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers consistently estimate higher BC contributions to
seasonal average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the US than reactive tracers,
particularly in summer. The inherent bias in the inert tracer approach
(i.e., omitting chemical destruction) can exceed 10 ppb in seasonally
averaged MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is substantial in comparison to the 70 ppb level
of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> NAAQS. This information is critical for interpreting results
obtained with inert tracers in AQMEII-3 and other studies.</p>
      <p>Comparing inert tracers in two regional models that used substantially the
same input data found differences in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that were generally within
5 ppb, smaller than the differences between inert and reactive tracers run
in a single model (CAMx), but nevertheless those inert model differences
were notable. Potential causes include differing numbers of model vertical
layers (influencing movement of UTLS O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to ground level) and
differences in model treatments of deposition. This exercise emphasizes that
source contribution analyses of BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (or other non-inert pollutants)
using the inert tracer approach should only be interpreted qualitatively,
especially during the spring and summer period. Making tracers reactive is a
simple improvement that is very important to this type of analysis. Future
studies should consider adopting the reactive tracer approach.</p>
      <p>Contributions from O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BCs in three height ranges (LT, MT and UTLS)
differ spatially and temporally. The LT BC tracers do not penetrate very far
inland, with contributions to MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 20 ppb in coastal states.
The largest contributions to MDA are from the MT BCs with springtime maxima
exceeding 40 ppb in the high terrain of the western US. The high
contribution of BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to ground level O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in portions of the
western US presents a significant challenge to air quality management
approaches based solely on local emission reductions. Nonetheless, model
comparison with observations suggests that estimated high BC contributions in
the Intermountain West could be overstated and that the bias inherited in
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> BCs can affect model performance. Replicating the highest end of
observed O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution is particularly challenging. We encourage
making use of multi-day metrics (such as Top 30) as an alternative to a
single-day metric (e.g., H4MDA8) when examining contributions from
international transport.</p>
      <p>Reducing emissions in East Asia (EAS scenario) revealed a near-linear
relationship between changes in BC O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and changes in surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the western US in all seasons and across the US in fall and winter with a
near 1 : 1 slope. However, the surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases are small: below
1 ppb in spring and below 0.5 ppb in other seasons. These reductions result
mostly from smaller MT and LT BC contributions because the EAS scenario
scaled back the contribution from each height range about equally. In the
GLO scenario US surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is more sensitive to domestic emission
reductions than changes in the BCs. Our 2010 EAS contribution results are
slightly higher than the estimates of 0.35–0.45 ppb from a multi-model
experiment that also simulated the EAS scenario but for the year 2001
(Reidmiller et al., 2009). This is expected as East Asia emissions have
increased over the last decade. Assuming a linear relationship, our study
suggests an EAS total contribution of 2.5 ppb in certain seasons based on
0.5 ppb O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction with 20 % emission decrease. It is
difficult to quantify how the model biases affect the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> response to
emission perturbations because the sources of biases are unknown.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>CAMx, the model used
in the study, can be downloaded from <uri>http://www.camx.com/</uri>. The observed
data used to evaluate model performance can be obtained from
<uri>https://www.epa.gov/aqs</uri> (AQS) and <uri>https://www.epa.gov/castnet</uri>
(CASTNET). The AQMEII modeling inputs used in the study are available to the
AQME project participants at the AQME website:
<uri>http://aqmeii.jrc.ec.europa.eu/</uri>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9931-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9931-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p>This article is part of the special issue “Global and regional
assessment of intercontinental transport of air pollution: results from HTAP,
AQMEII and MICS”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by the Coordinating Research Council Atmospheric Impacts Committee.</p><p>We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of various groups to the third air
Quality Model Evaluation international Initiative (AQMEII) modeling database used in this work:
US EPA, Environment Canada,
Mexican Secretariat of the Environment and Natural Resources (Secretaría
de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales-SEMARNAT) and National Institute of
Ecology (Instituto Nacional de Ecología-INE) (North American national
emissions inventories), US EPA (North American emissions processing and
meteorology inputs), ECMWF/MACC project, and Météo-France/CNRM-GAME
(Chemical boundary conditions). We thank Christian Hogrefe for discussions
and CMAQ results. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Frank Dentener
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Appel, K. W., Pouliot, G. A., Simon, H., Sarwar, G., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok,
S. L., Akhtar, F., and Roselle, S. J.: Evaluation of dust and trace metal
estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0,
Geosci. Model. Dev., 6, 883–899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, K. R., Emery, C., Dolwick, P., and Yarwood, G.: Photochemical grid model
estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter
across the continental United States, Atmos. Environ., 123, 49–62, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Byun, D. W. and Schere, K. L.: Review of the governing equations, computational
algorithms, and other components of the Models – 3 Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, O. R., Gao, R.-S., Tarasick, D., Leblanc, T., and Sweeney, C.: Long-term
ozone trends at rural ozone monitoring sites across the United States, 1990–2010,
J. Geophys. Res., 117, D22307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018261</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Emery, C., Jung, J., Downey, N., Johnson, J., Jimenez, J., Yarwood, G., and
Morris, R.: Regional and global modeling estimates of policy relevant background
ozone over the United States, Atmos. Environ., 47, 206–217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency: Guidance for Regulatory Application
of the Urban Airshed Model (UAM), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Research Triangle Park, NC, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Field, B. D., and Fusco,
A. C.: Background ozone over the United States in summer: origin, trend, and
contribution to pollution episodes, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000982</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Oberman, J. T., Lin, M.Y., Zhang, L., Clifton, O. E., Jacob, D. J.,
Naik, V., Horowits, L. W., Pinto, J. P., and Milly, G. P.: Estimating North
American background ozone in U.S. surface air with two independent global models:
Variability, uncertainties, and recommendations, Atmos. Environ., 96, 284–300,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.045</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Arteta, J., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., Blechschmidt,
A.-M., Diamantakis, M., Engelen, R. J., Gaudel, A., Inness, A., Jones, L., Josse,
B., Katragkou, E., Marecal, V., Peuch, V.-H., Richter, A., Schultz, M. G., Stein,
O., and Tsikerdekis, A.: Tropospheric chemistry in the Integrated Forecasting
System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975–1003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Foley, K. M., Roselle, S. J., Appel, K. W., Bhave, P. V., Pleim, J. E., Otte,
T. L., Mathur, R., Sarwar, G., Young, J. O., Gilliam, R. C., Nolte, C. G.,
Kelly, J. T., Gilliland, A. B., and Bash, J. O.: Incremental testing of the
Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7, Geosci.
Model. Dev., 3, 205–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Galmarini, S. and Rao, S. T.: The AQMEII two-continent Regional Air Quality
Model Evaluation study: fueling ideas with unprecedented data, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 2464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.025</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Galmarini, S., Koffi, B., Solazzo, E., Keating, T., Hogrefe, C., Schulz, M.,
Benedictow, A., Griesfeller, J. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Carmichael, G., Fu,
J., and Dentener, F.: Technical note: Coordination and harmonization of the
multi-scale, multi-model activities HTAP2, AQMEII3, and MICS-Asia3: simulations,
emission inventories, boundary conditions, and model output formats, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 1543–1555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gilliam, R. C., Godowitch, J. M., and Rao, S. T.: Improving the horizontal
transport in the lower troposphere with four dimensional data assimilation,
Atmos. Environ., 53, 186–201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.064</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffe, D., McKendry, I., Anderson, T., and Price, H.: Six `new' episodes of
trans-Pacific transport of air pollutants, Atmos. Environ., 37, 391–404, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Langford, A. O., Aikin, K. C., Eubank, C. S., and Williams, E. J.:
Stratospheric contribution to high surface ozone in Colorado during
springtime, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038367" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL038367</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Langford, A. O., Senff, C. J., Alvarez, R. J., Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R.,
Holloway, J. S., Lin, M. Y., Marchbanks, R. D., Pierce, R. B., Sandberg, S. P.,
and Weickmann, A. M.: An Overview of the 2013 Las Vegas Ozone Study (LVOS):
Impact of stratospheric intrusions and long-range transport on surface air
quality, Atmos. Environ., 109, 305–322, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Cooper, O. R., Naik, V., Holloway,
J., Johnson, B. J., Middlebrook, A. M., Oltmans, S. J., Pollack, I. B., and
Ryerson, T. B.: Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the
western United States in spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V07,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016961" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016961</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Cooper, O. R., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Levy,
H., Johnson, B. J., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., and Senff, C. J.: Springtime
high surface ozone events over the western United States: Quantifying the
role of stratospheric intrusions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018151</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P., Hogrefe, C., Bieser, J., Im, U., Mathur, R., Nopmongcol., U.,
Roselle, S., and Spero, T.: Multi-Model Comparison of Lateral Boundary
Contributions to Surface Ozone Over the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys. in
preparation, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
McDonald-Buller, E. C., Allen, D. T., Brown, N., Jacob, D. J., Jaffe, D., Kolb,
C. E., Lefohn, A. S., Oltmans, S., Parrish, D. D., Yarwood, G., and Zhang, L.:
Establishing policy relevant background (PRB) ozone concentrations in the United
States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 9484–9497, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Parrish, D. D., Law, K. S., Staehelin, J., Derwent, R., Cooper, O. R., Tanimoto,
H., Volz-Thomas, A., Gilge, S., Scheel, H.-E., Steinbacher, M., and Chan, E.:
Long-term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations at northern
mid-latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11485–11504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11485-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11485-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Pleim, J. and Ran, L.: Surface Flux Modeling for Air Quality Applications,
Atmosphere, 2, 271–302, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Pouliot, G., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J., Makar, P., Moran M., and Zhang,
J.: Analysis of the Emission Inventories and Model-Ready Emission Datasets of
Europe and North America for Phase 2 of the AQMEII Project, Atmos. Environ.,
115, 345–360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ramboll Environ: CAMx Users Guide, available at:
<uri>http://www.camx.com/files/camxusersguide_v6-20.pdf</uri>, last access: 5
April 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Reidmiller, D. R., Fiore, A. M., Jaffe, D. A., Bergmann, D., Cuvelier, C.,
Dentener, F. J., Duncan, B. N., Folberth, G., Gauss, M., Gong, S., Hess, P.,
Jonson, J. E., Keating, T., Lupu, A., Marmer, E., Park, R., Schultz, M. G.,
Shindell, D. T., Szopa, S., Vivanco, M. G., Wild, O., and Zuber, A.: The
influence of foreign vs. North American emissions on surface ozone in the US,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5027–5042, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Wiedinmyer, C., Helmig, D., Matsunaga, S.,
Potosnak, M., Milford, J., and Guenther, A.: Monoterpene and Sesquiterpene
Emission Estimates for the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 1623–1629, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Sarwar, G., Gantt, B., Schwede, D., Foley, K., Mathur, R., and Saiz-Lopez, A.:
Impact of enhanced ozone deposition and halogen chemistry on tropospheric ozone
over the Northern Hemisphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 9203–9211, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda,
M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A Description of the
Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>STR, NCAR,
Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Smith, J. H., Estes. M., Mellberg, J., Nopmongcol. U., and Yarwood, G.:
Addressing model over-prediction of ozone influx from the Gulf of Mexico,
Presented at Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) conference,
available at: <uri>https://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2015/agenda.cfm</uri>
(last access: 10 January 2016), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Solazzo, E., Bianconi, R., Hogrefe, C., Curci, G., Alyuz, U., Balzarini, A.,
Baro, R., Bellasio, R., Bieser, J., Brandt, J., Christensen, J. H., Colette,
A., Francis, X., Fraser, A., Garcia Vivanco, M., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Im,
U., Manders, A., Nopmongcol, U., Kitwiroon, N., Pirovano, G., Pozzoli, L.,
Prank, M., Sokhi, R.S., Tuccella, P., Yarwood, G., and Galmarini, S.: Evaluation
and Error Apportionment of an Ensemble of Atmospheric Chemistry Transport
Modeling Systems: Multi-Variable Temporal and Spatial Breakdown, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 3001–3054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3001-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3001-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>TCEQ – Texas Commission of Environmental Quality: Illustrations of wind
direction movement at particular Texas cities from 1984 to 1992, available
at: <uri>https://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/monops/windroses.html</uri> (last
access: 18 August 2017), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Yarwood, G., Rao, S., Yocke, M., and Whitten, G.: Updates to the Carbon Bond
Chemical mechanism: CB05, report, Rpt. RT-0400675, US EPA, Res. Tri. Park,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Yarwood, G., Emery, C., Baker, K., and Dolwick, P.: Resolving and Quantifying
Ozone Contributions from Boundary Conditions Within Regional Models, in: Air
Pollution Modeling and its Application XXIII, Springer International
Publishing, 445–450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04379-1_73" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-319-04379-1_73</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Jacob, D. J., Downey, N. V., Wood, D. A., Blewitt, D., Carouge, C.
C., van Donkelaar, A., Jones, D. B. A., Murray, L. T., and Wang, Y.: Improved
estimate of the policy-relevant background ozone in the United States using the
GEOS-Chem global model with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution over
North America, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6769–6776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.054</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, J. and Liang, X: Impacts of the Bermuda High on Regional Climate and
Ozone over the United States, J. Climate, 26, 1018–1032,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00168.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00168.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Modeling intercontinental transport of ozone in North America with CAMx for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) Phase 3</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Intercontinental ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) transport extends the geographic
range of O<sub>3</sub> air pollution impacts and makes local air pollution
management more difficult. Phase 3 of the Air Quality Modeling Evaluation
International Initiative (AQMEII-3) is examining the contribution of
intercontinental transport to regional air quality by applying regional-scale atmospheric models jointly with global models. We investigate methods
for tracing O<sub>3</sub> from global models within regional models. The CAMx
photochemical grid model was used to track contributions from boundary
condition (BC) O<sub>3</sub> over a North American modeling domain for calendar
year 2010 using a built-in tracer module called RTCMC. RTCMC can track BC
contributions using chemically reactive tracers and also using inert tracers
in which deposition is the only sink for O<sub>3</sub>. Lack of O<sub>3</sub> destruction
chemistry in the inert tracer approach leads to overestimation biases that
can exceed 10 ppb. The flexibility of RTCMC also allows tracking O<sub>3</sub>
contributions made by groups of vertical BC layers. The largest BC
contributions to seasonal average daily maximum 8 h averages (MDA8) of
O<sub>3</sub> over the US are found to be from the mid-troposphere (over 40 ppb)
with small contributions (a few ppb) from the upper troposphere–lower
stratosphere. Contributions from the lower troposphere are shown to not
penetrate very far inland. Higher contributions in the western than the
eastern US, reaching an average of 57 ppb in Denver for the 30 days with
highest MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> in 2010, present a significant challenge to air quality
management approaches based solely on local or US-wide emission reductions.
The substantial BC contribution to MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> in the Intermountain West
means regional models are particularly sensitive to any biases and errors in
the BCs. A sensitivity simulation with reduced BC O<sub>3</sub> in response to
20 % lower emissions in Asia found a near-linear relationship between the
BC O<sub>3</sub> changes and surface O<sub>3</sub> changes in the western US in all
seasons and across the US in fall and winter. However, the surface O<sub>3</sub>
decreases are small: below 1 ppb in spring and below 0.5 ppb in other seasons.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Appel, K. W., Pouliot, G. A., Simon, H., Sarwar, G., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok,
S. L., Akhtar, F., and Roselle, S. J.: Evaluation of dust and trace metal
estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0,
Geosci. Model. Dev., 6, 883–899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, K. R., Emery, C., Dolwick, P., and Yarwood, G.: Photochemical grid model
estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter
across the continental United States, Atmos. Environ., 123, 49–62, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Byun, D. W. and Schere, K. L.: Review of the governing equations, computational
algorithms, and other components of the Models – 3 Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cooper, O. R., Gao, R.-S., Tarasick, D., Leblanc, T., and Sweeney, C.: Long-term
ozone trends at rural ozone monitoring sites across the United States, 1990–2010,
J. Geophys. Res., 117, D22307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018261</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Emery, C., Jung, J., Downey, N., Johnson, J., Jimenez, J., Yarwood, G., and
Morris, R.: Regional and global modeling estimates of policy relevant background
ozone over the United States, Atmos. Environ., 47, 206–217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency: Guidance for Regulatory Application
of the Urban Airshed Model (UAM), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Research Triangle Park, NC, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Fiore, A. M., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Field, B. D., and Fusco,
A. C.: Background ozone over the United States in summer: origin, trend, and
contribution to pollution episodes, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Fiore, A. M., Oberman, J. T., Lin, M.Y., Zhang, L., Clifton, O. E., Jacob, D. J.,
Naik, V., Horowits, L. W., Pinto, J. P., and Milly, G. P.: Estimating North
American background ozone in U.S. surface air with two independent global models:
Variability, uncertainties, and recommendations, Atmos. Environ., 96, 284–300,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.045</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Arteta, J., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., Blechschmidt,
A.-M., Diamantakis, M., Engelen, R. J., Gaudel, A., Inness, A., Jones, L., Josse,
B., Katragkou, E., Marecal, V., Peuch, V.-H., Richter, A., Schultz, M. G., Stein,
O., and Tsikerdekis, A.: Tropospheric chemistry in the Integrated Forecasting
System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 975–1003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Foley, K. M., Roselle, S. J., Appel, K. W., Bhave, P. V., Pleim, J. E., Otte,
T. L., Mathur, R., Sarwar, G., Young, J. O., Gilliam, R. C., Nolte, C. G.,
Kelly, J. T., Gilliland, A. B., and Bash, J. O.: Incremental testing of the
Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7, Geosci.
Model. Dev., 3, 205–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Galmarini, S. and Rao, S. T.: The AQMEII two-continent Regional Air Quality
Model Evaluation study: fueling ideas with unprecedented data, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 2464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.025</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Galmarini, S., Koffi, B., Solazzo, E., Keating, T., Hogrefe, C., Schulz, M.,
Benedictow, A., Griesfeller, J. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Carmichael, G., Fu,
J., and Dentener, F.: Technical note: Coordination and harmonization of the
multi-scale, multi-model activities HTAP2, AQMEII3, and MICS-Asia3: simulations,
emission inventories, boundary conditions, and model output formats, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 1543–1555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1543-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gilliam, R. C., Godowitch, J. M., and Rao, S. T.: Improving the horizontal
transport in the lower troposphere with four dimensional data assimilation,
Atmos. Environ., 53, 186–201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.064</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffe, D., McKendry, I., Anderson, T., and Price, H.: Six `new' episodes of
trans-Pacific transport of air pollutants, Atmos. Environ., 37, 391–404, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Langford, A. O., Aikin, K. C., Eubank, C. S., and Williams, E. J.:
Stratospheric contribution to high surface ozone in Colorado during
springtime, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038367" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038367</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Langford, A. O., Senff, C. J., Alvarez, R. J., Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R.,
Holloway, J. S., Lin, M. Y., Marchbanks, R. D., Pierce, R. B., Sandberg, S. P.,
and Weickmann, A. M.: An Overview of the 2013 Las Vegas Ozone Study (LVOS):
Impact of stratospheric intrusions and long-range transport on surface air
quality, Atmos. Environ., 109, 305–322, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Cooper, O. R., Naik, V., Holloway,
J., Johnson, B. J., Middlebrook, A. M., Oltmans, S. J., Pollack, I. B., and
Ryerson, T. B.: Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the
western United States in spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V07,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016961" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016961</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Cooper, O. R., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Levy,
H., Johnson, B. J., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., and Senff, C. J.: Springtime
high surface ozone events over the western United States: Quantifying the
role of stratospheric intrusions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P., Hogrefe, C., Bieser, J., Im, U., Mathur, R., Nopmongcol., U.,
Roselle, S., and Spero, T.: Multi-Model Comparison of Lateral Boundary
Contributions to Surface Ozone Over the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys. in
preparation, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
McDonald-Buller, E. C., Allen, D. T., Brown, N., Jacob, D. J., Jaffe, D., Kolb,
C. E., Lefohn, A. S., Oltmans, S., Parrish, D. D., Yarwood, G., and Zhang, L.:
Establishing policy relevant background (PRB) ozone concentrations in the United
States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 9484–9497, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Parrish, D. D., Law, K. S., Staehelin, J., Derwent, R., Cooper, O. R., Tanimoto,
H., Volz-Thomas, A., Gilge, S., Scheel, H.-E., Steinbacher, M., and Chan, E.:
Long-term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations at northern
mid-latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11485–11504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11485-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11485-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Pleim, J. and Ran, L.: Surface Flux Modeling for Air Quality Applications,
Atmosphere, 2, 271–302, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Pouliot, G., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J., Makar, P., Moran M., and Zhang,
J.: Analysis of the Emission Inventories and Model-Ready Emission Datasets of
Europe and North America for Phase 2 of the AQMEII Project, Atmos. Environ.,
115, 345–360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.061</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ramboll Environ: CAMx Users Guide, available at:
<a href="http://www.camx.com/files/camxusersguide_v6-20.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.camx.com/files/camxusersguide_v6-20.pdf</a>, last access: 5
April 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Reidmiller, D. R., Fiore, A. M., Jaffe, D. A., Bergmann, D., Cuvelier, C.,
Dentener, F. J., Duncan, B. N., Folberth, G., Gauss, M., Gong, S., Hess, P.,
Jonson, J. E., Keating, T., Lupu, A., Marmer, E., Park, R., Schultz, M. G.,
Shindell, D. T., Szopa, S., Vivanco, M. G., Wild, O., and Zuber, A.: The
influence of foreign vs. North American emissions on surface ozone in the US,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5027–5042, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Wiedinmyer, C., Helmig, D., Matsunaga, S.,
Potosnak, M., Milford, J., and Guenther, A.: Monoterpene and Sesquiterpene
Emission Estimates for the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 1623–1629, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Sarwar, G., Gantt, B., Schwede, D., Foley, K., Mathur, R., and Saiz-Lopez, A.:
Impact of enhanced ozone deposition and halogen chemistry on tropospheric ozone
over the Northern Hemisphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 9203–9211, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda,
M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A Description of the
Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-45+STR, NCAR,
Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. H., Estes. M., Mellberg, J., Nopmongcol. U., and Yarwood, G.:
Addressing model over-prediction of ozone influx from the Gulf of Mexico,
Presented at Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) conference,
available at: <a href="https://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2015/agenda.cfm" target="_blank">https://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2015/agenda.cfm</a>
(last access: 10 January 2016), 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Solazzo, E., Bianconi, R., Hogrefe, C., Curci, G., Alyuz, U., Balzarini, A.,
Baro, R., Bellasio, R., Bieser, J., Brandt, J., Christensen, J. H., Colette,
A., Francis, X., Fraser, A., Garcia Vivanco, M., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Im,
U., Manders, A., Nopmongcol, U., Kitwiroon, N., Pirovano, G., Pozzoli, L.,
Prank, M., Sokhi, R.S., Tuccella, P., Yarwood, G., and Galmarini, S.: Evaluation
and Error Apportionment of an Ensemble of Atmospheric Chemistry Transport
Modeling Systems: Multi-Variable Temporal and Spatial Breakdown, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 3001–3054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3001-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3001-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
TCEQ – Texas Commission of Environmental Quality: Illustrations of wind
direction movement at particular Texas cities from 1984 to 1992, available
at: <a href="https://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/monops/windroses.html" target="_blank">https://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/monops/windroses.html</a> (last
access: 18 August 2017), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Yarwood, G., Rao, S., Yocke, M., and Whitten, G.: Updates to the Carbon Bond
Chemical mechanism: CB05, report, Rpt. RT-0400675, US EPA, Res. Tri. Park,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Yarwood, G., Emery, C., Baker, K., and Dolwick, P.: Resolving and Quantifying
Ozone Contributions from Boundary Conditions Within Regional Models, in: Air
Pollution Modeling and its Application XXIII, Springer International
Publishing, 445–450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04379-1_73" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04379-1_73</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Jacob, D. J., Downey, N. V., Wood, D. A., Blewitt, D., Carouge, C.
C., van Donkelaar, A., Jones, D. B. A., Murray, L. T., and Wang, Y.: Improved
estimate of the policy-relevant background ozone in the United States using the
GEOS-Chem global model with 1∕2  ×  2∕3 horizontal resolution over
North America, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6769–6776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.054</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, J. and Liang, X: Impacts of the Bermuda High on Regional Climate and
Ozone over the United States, J. Climate, 26, 1018–1032,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00168.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00168.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
