<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-981-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Concentrations and stable carbon isotope compositions of <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>oxalic acid and
related SOA in Beijing before, during, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>and after the 2014 APEC</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Concentrations and stable carbon isotope compositions}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Wang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jiayuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Gehui</given-names></name>
          <email>wanggh@ieecas.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Jian</given-names></name>
          <email>gaojian@craes.org.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Han</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Yanqin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jianjun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-5379</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Bianhong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Can</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Shulan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>Fahe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Key Lab of
Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong
University, Xi'an 710079, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute
of Urban Environment,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment,
Chinese Research Academy of <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and
Equipment Technology, Nanjing 210000, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Gehui Wang (wanggh@ieecas.cn) and Jian Gao (gaojian@craes.org.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>981</fpage><lpage>992</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>To ensure good air quality for the 2014 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit,
stringent emission controls were implemented in Beijing and its surrounding
regions, leading to a significant reduction in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings. To
investigate the impact of the emission controls on aerosol chemistry,
high-volume PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were collected in Beijing from 8
October to 24 November 2014 and determined for secondary inorganic
aerosols (SIA, i.e., SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
dicarboxylic acids, keto-carboxylic acid, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls, as well
as stable carbon isotope composition of oxalic acid (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our results
showed that SIA, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and related secondary organic aerosols in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during APEC were
2–4 times lower than those before APEC, which is firstly ascribed to the
strict emission control measures and secondly attributed to the relatively
colder and drier conditions during the event that are unfavorable for
secondary aerosol production.</p>
    <p>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the polluted air masses, which mostly occurred before APEC, are
abundant and enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. On the contrary, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the clean
air masses, which mostly occurred during APEC, is much less abundant but
still enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In the mixed type of clean and polluted air
masses, which mostly occurred after APEC, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower than that
before APEC but higher than that during APEC and enriched in lighter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. A comparison on chemical composition of fine particles and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in two events that are characterized by high
loadings of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> further showed that after APEC SIA and the total
detected organic compounds (TDOC) are much less abundant and fine aerosols
are enriched with primary organics and relatively fresh, compared with those
before APEC.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Atmospheric aerosols profoundly impact the global climate directly by
scattering and absorbing solar radiation and indirectly by affecting cloud
formation and distribution via acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and
ice nuclei (IN). Moreover, atmospheric aerosols exert negative effects on
human health because of their toxicity. Due to fast urbanization and
industrialization, high levels of atmospheric fine particle (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
pollution have been a persistent problem in many cities of China since the
1990s (van Donkelaar et al., 2010). As the capital of
China and one of the largest megacities in the world, Beijing has suffered
from frequent severe haze pollution, especially in winter, affecting more than
21 million people by the end of 2014 (Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics,
2015) and causing billions in economic losses (Mu and Zhang, 2013). To improve
the air quality, the Beijing government has made many efforts to reduce the
pollutant emissions (i.e., SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, dust, and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs)) from a variety of sources. The 2014 Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) summit was hosted in Beijing from 5 to
11 November. To ensure good air quality for the summit, a joint
strict emission control program was conducted from 3 November 2014 in
Beijing and its neighboring provinces including Inner Mongolia, Shanxi,
Hebei, and Shandong provinces. During this period thousands of factories and power
plants with high emissions were shut down and/or halted, all the construction
activities were stopped, and the numbers of on-road vehicles were reduced.
These strict emission controls resulted in the air quality of Beijing during
the APEC period being significantly improved, leading to a decrease in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration by 59.2 % and an increase in visibility by
70.2 % in Beijing during the summit compared with those before the APEC
(Tang et al., 2015; Z. Wang et al., 2015) and a term of “APEC blue” being
created to refer to the good air quality. Such strong artificial intervening
not only reduced PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its precursors' loadings in Beijing and its
surrounding areas but also affected the composition and formation mechanisms
of the fine particles (Sun et al., 2016).</p>
      <p>A number of field measurements have shown that particle compositions in
Beijing during wintertime haze periods are dominated by secondary aerosols
(Guo et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015). Rapid accumulation
of particle mass in Beijing during the haze formation process is often
accompanied by continuous particle size growth (Guo et al., 2014; Zhang et
al., 2015), which is in part due to the coating of secondary organic
aerosols (SOA) on pre-existing particles (Li et al., 2010). Several studies
have found that SOA production during the 2014 Beijing APEC periods
significantly reduced and ascribed this reduction to the efficient regional
emission control (Sun et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2015). However, up to now
information on the SOA decrease on a molecular level has not been reported.</p>
      <p>Dicarboxylic acids are the major class of SOA species in the atmosphere and
ubiquitously found from the ground surface to the free troposphere (Fu et
al., 2008; Myriokefalitakis et al., 2011; Sorooshian et al., 2007; Sullivan and Prather, 2007).
Previous studies have suggested that organic acids including
dicarboxylic acids could take part in atmospheric particle nucleation (Zhang
et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2009) and growth processes (Zhang et al., 2012).
Furthermore, organic acids may play a central role in the aging of black carbon
particles (Xue et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2013), enhancing their roles in air
pollution accumulation, and direct radiative forcing (Peng et al., 2016). In
the current work we measured molecular distributions of dicarboxylic acids,
keto-carboxylic acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls and stable carbon isotope
composition of oxalic acid in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols collected in Beijing
before, during, and after the APEC event in order to explore the impact of
the APEC emission control on SOA in Beijing. We first investigated the
changes in concentration and composition of dicarboxylic acids and related
compounds during the three periods, then recognized the difference in stable
carbon isotope composition of oxalic acid in different air masses in Beijing
during the APEC campaign. Finally we compared the differences in chemical
compositions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during two heaviest pollution episodes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental section</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sample collection</title>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were collected by using a high-volume sampler (TISCH,
USA) from 8 October to 24 November 2014 on the rooftop of a
three-storey building located on the campus of the China Research Academy of
Environmental Sciences, which is situated in the north part of Beijing and
close to the fifth ring road. All the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were collected
onto pre-baked (450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 8 h) quartz fiber filters (Whatman 41, USA).
The duration of each sample collection is 23 h from 08:00 LT of the
previous day to 07:00 LT of the next day. Field blanks were also collected
before and after the campaign by mounting a pre-baked filter onto the
sampler for 15 min without pumping air. After collection, all the filter
samplers were individually sealed in aluminum foil bags and stored in a
freezer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) prior to analysis. Daily values of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
meteorological parameters were cited from the website of Beijing
Environmental Protection Agency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sample analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), water-soluble
organic carbon (WSOC), inorganic ions, aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) and
aerosol acidity</title>
      <p>Detailed methods for the analysis of EC, OC, WSOC, and inorganic ions in
aerosols were reported elsewhere (Wang et al., 2010). Briefly, EC and OC in
the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were determined by using DRI Model 2001 Carbon
analyzer following the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual
Environments (IMPROVE) thermal/optical reflectance (TOR) protocol (Chow
et al., 2007). WSOC and inorganic ions in the samples were extracted with
Milli-Q pure water and measured by using a Shimadzu TOC-L CPH analyzer and
Dionex-600 ion chromatography, respectively (Wang et al., 2010). In the
current work, aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) and acidity (i.e., liquid
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) of the samples were calculated by using
ISORROPIA-II model, which treated the
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
system  (Hennigan et al., 2015;
Weber et al., 2016).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Meteorological parameters and concentrations of gaseous pollutants and chemical components
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing during the 2014 APEC campaign.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Whole period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Before APEC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">During APEC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">After APEC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 48)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(08/10–02/11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(03/11–12/11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(13/11–14/11)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 12)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">I. Meteorological parameters </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3 (3.0–18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 (9.0–18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 (4.0–10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 (3.0–7.0)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative humidity,  %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (17–88)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (22–88)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 (17–65)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 (29–80)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Visibility, km</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8 (1.0–28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6 (1.0–24)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.7 (6.0–28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2 (2.0–15)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind speed, km h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 (3.0–26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.8 (3.0–26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6 (3.0–26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9 (3.0–13)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">II. Gaseous pollutants, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 (6.0–115)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 (9.0–115)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 (25–69)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 (6.0–60)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5 (2.0–43)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 (2.0–19)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9 (2.0–15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8 (13–43)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 (10–135)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 (22–118)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 (10–69)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 (45–135)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 730 (220–3320)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 700 (250–2460)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">960 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 410 (220–1420)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1720 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 830 (740–3320)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">III. Major components of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">157 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 (16–408)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">178 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 122 (16–408)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 46 (28–183)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">161 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 (36–383)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.5 (1.2–43)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 (1.2–43)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8 (1.8–11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 (2.9–34)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 (0.32–88)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 (0.32–88)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 (1.2–26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 (2.9–46)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2 (0.2–28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 (0.2–28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 (0.2–8.6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4 (1.0–22)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 (5.7–78)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 (6.0–67)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6 (5.7–29)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 (9.7–78)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.4 (1.4–25)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 (1.4–18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 (1.5–9.6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0 (2.1–25)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0 (2.4–32)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 (3.1–32)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 (2.4–11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.1 (4.5–24)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62 (0–299)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 (0–299)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5 (0–19)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41 (0.4–136)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.083 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14(0–0.56)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 (0–0.56)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.026 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025 (0–0.072)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.033 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.067 (0–0.20)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">IV. Mass ratios of major components of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 (0.3–4.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 (0.3–4.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 (0.5–2.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 (0.8–2.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 (2.2–4.7)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 (2.2–4.5)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 (2.0–4.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 (2.7–4.7)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 (0.10–0.71)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 (0.13–0.71)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 (0.16–0.65)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 (0.10–0.63)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Water-soluble organic carbon
(WSOC). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol liquid water content (ALWC). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Hydrogen ion concentration
([H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Dicarboxylic acids, keto-carboxylic acids and $\alpha$-dicarbonyls}?><title>Dicarboxylic acids, keto-carboxylic acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls</title>
      <p>The method of analyzing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples for dicarboxylic acids,
ketocarboxylic acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyl has been reported elsewhere
(Wang et al., 2002, 2012; Meng et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2015). Briefly,
one eighth of the filter was extracted with Milli-Q water, concentrated to
near dryness, and reacted with 14 % BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/butanol at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 1 h to convert the aldehyde group into dibutoxy acetal and the carboxyl group
into butyl ester. Target compounds in the derivatized samples were
identified by gas chromotography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and quantified by a gas chromotography–flame ionization detector (GC–FID) (Agilent GC7890A).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Stable carbon isotope composition of oxalic acid
(C${}_{{2}}$)}?><title>Stable carbon isotope composition of oxalic acid
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p>Stable carbon isotope composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
measured using the method developed by Kawamura and Watanabe (2004).
Briefly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of the derivatized samples above were
determined by gas chromatography–isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IR-MS; Thermo Fisher, Delta V Advantage). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C value of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was then calculated from an isotopic mass-balance equation based on the
measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the derivatizations and the derivatizing
reagent (1-butanol; Kawamura and Watanabe, 2004). Each sample was measured
three times to ensure the difference of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values
less than 0.2 ‰, and the isotope data reported here are
the averaged value of the triplicate measurements.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Concentrations of dicarboxylic acids and related compounds in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing during
the 2014 APEC campaign (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Whole period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Before APEC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">During APEC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">After APEC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 48)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(08/10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>02/11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(03/11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12/11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(13/11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14/11)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 12)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">I. Dicarboxylic acids </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxalic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">334 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 461 (10–2127)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">502 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 564 (10.5–2127)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">101 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 69 (35–251)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">166 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 157 (22–554)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Malonic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 42 (ND<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–247)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52.1 (1.44–247)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 (3.4–22.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.9 (ND–36)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Succinic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 118 (3.0–722)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">111 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 (3.0–722)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 (7.1–42)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 (4.9–90)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glutaric, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 (ND–68)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 (ND–68.1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.24 (0.9–5.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2 (ND–13)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adipic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 (0.9–83)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 (1.9–83)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 (2.1–14)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.1 (2.0–23)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pimelic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 (ND–27)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1(ND–27)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 (0.2–2.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 (0.9–4.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Suberic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 (ND–66)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 (ND–66)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0 (1.3–16)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0 (2.0–21)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Azelaic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 (0.5–21)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.7 (0.6–21)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 (0.5–3.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3 (1.3–13)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sebacic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.4 (ND–34)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8 (ND–34)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 (0.5–11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 (1.4–16)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Undecanedioic, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 (ND–77)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 (ND–77)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 (ND–7.5)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4 (0.8–23)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Methylsuccinic, iC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 (0.6–79)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (0.6–79)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 (1.0–9.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0(2.3–19)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Methyglutaric, iC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 (ND–36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 (ND–36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 09 (ND–2.6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1 (ND–14)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maleic, M</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9 (ND–15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7 (ND–15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 (ND–2.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 (ND–6.3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fumaric, F</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8 (ND–64)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 (ND–64)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 (ND–5.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 (1.4–10)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phthalic, Ph</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 (1.5–64)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 (1.5–64)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8 (2.3–20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0 (6.4–31)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Isophthalic, iPh</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 (ND–10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8 (ND–10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 (0.2–5.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 (ND–3.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Terephthalic, tPh</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 (2.6–133)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 (2.6–123)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (4.7–59)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 (7.4–133)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Subtotal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">593 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 739 (25–3788)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">849 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 905 (25–3788)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">214 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 135 (72–447)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 279 (85–965)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">II. Keto-carboxylic acids </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pyruvic, Pyr</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 (1.3–84)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 (2.4–84)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 (1.3–36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.3 (3.2–33)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glyoxylic, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51 (1.2–300)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 (1.2–300)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.7 (2.6–21)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 (2.8–80)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7-Oxoheptanoic, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 (ND–90)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 (ND–90)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 (ND–13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1 (ND–17)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Subtotal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 81 (3.6–474)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 (3.6–474)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 (5.9–66)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 (13–128)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">III <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Dicarbonyls </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glyoxal, Gly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47 (4.2–270)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 (4.2–270)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 (4.9–47)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 (7.3–101)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Methylglyoxal, mGly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 82 (ND–406)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">102 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 96 (ND–406)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 (15–139)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51 (5.8–144)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Subtotal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">126 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 115 (5.3–466)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">158 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 132 (5.3–466)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">81.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67.4 (22–186)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 (14–225)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TDOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">785 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 872 (36–4636)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1099 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1104 (36–4636)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">325 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 220 (107–664)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">487 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 387 (117–1318)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ND: not detectable. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> TDOC: total detected organic compounds.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Temporal variations of meteorological conditions, gaseous
pollutants and major components of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the 2014 APEC campaign.
(The green shadows represent two air pollution events characterized by
highest PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels before and after APEC, while the blue shadow
represents the APEC event).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Variations in meteorological conditions, gaseous pollutants, and
major components of PM${}_{{2.5}}$ during the Beijing 2014
APEC campaign}?><title>Variations in meteorological conditions, gaseous pollutants, and
major components of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the Beijing 2014
APEC campaign</title>
      <p>Based on the emission control implementation for the APEC, we divided the
whole study period into three phases: before APEC (8 October  to 2 November),
during APEC (3 to 12 November) and after APEC (13 to 24 November). Temporal
variations in meteorological parameters and concentrations of gaseous
pollutants and major components of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the three phases are
shown in Fig. 1 and summarized in Table 1.</p>
      <p>Temperature during the sampling campaign showed a continuous decreasing
trend with averages of 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6, 7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7, and 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C before, during, and
after APEC, respectively, while relative humidity (RH) did not show
a clear trend, with mean values of 62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19, 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14, and
51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 % during the three periods (Fig. 1a and Table 1). SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
showed a similar level before and during APEC (8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> versus
7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 1 and Fig. 1b),
but increased dramatically to 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after APEC due
to domestic coal burning for house heating. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the APEC reduced by about 30 %
compared to that in the before- and after-APEC phases (71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> versus 78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 1),
mainly because of
the reduction of the on-road vehicle numbers, as well as the reduced
productivities of power plant and industry. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> displayed a decreasing
trend similar to that of temperature (Fig. 1c). PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution
episodes in Beijing showed a periodic cycle of 4–5 days, which is caused
by the local weather cycles. Secondary inorganic aerosols (SIA, i.e.,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are major components of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and present a temporal variation pattern similar to that of the
fine particles (Fig. 1d). In the current work, the mass ratio of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the whole study time is
1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 (Table 1), which is in agreement with the ratio (1.6–2.4)
for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed during the same time by using aerosol mass
spectrometry (AMS; Sun et al., 2016). OC and EC of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are linearly
correlated each other (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91) and varied periodically in a cycle
similar to SIA (Fig. 1e). The OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio during the whole sampling period is
3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 (range: 2.2–4.7) with no significant differences among the
three APEC phases (Table 1), although the source emissions could be largely
different.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the 2014 APEC
campaign.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 2 shows the differences in chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
before, during, and after APEC. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is 98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during APEC, about 50 % lower than that before and after APEC
(178 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 122 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> versus 161 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). Organic matter (OM) is the most abundant component
of the fine particles. Relative abundance of OM (1.6 times OC; Xing
et al., 2013) to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> continuously increases from 24 % before APEC
to 30 and 39 % during and after APEC, respectively, although the mass
concentration (19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of OC during APEC is the
lowest compared to those before and after APEC (26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> versus 39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sulfate, nitrate, and
ammonium before APEC are 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13, 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26, and 9.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1) and account for 8, 16, and 5 % of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Fig. 2). Their concentrations decrease to 5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1, and 3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1)
with the relative contributions to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> down to 5, 10, and
3 % during APEC, respectively, while after APEC their concentrations
increased to 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10, 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13, and 6.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and accounted for 7, 9, and 4 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Such
significant decreases in concentrations of OM and SIA during APEC
demonstrate the efficiency of the emission controls. The OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio is almost
constant during the whole period, but the WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratio decreased by 20 % from
0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 before APEC, 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 during APEC to 0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 after APEC (Table 1). Since WSOC in fine aerosols consists mainly of
SOAs (Laskin et al., 2015), the decreasing ratio
of WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC probably indicates reduced SOA production during the campaign.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Molecular distributions of dicarboxylic acids and related
compounds in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of Beijing, China, during the 2014 APEC campaign. The
pie chart is the average composition of total detected organic compounds
(TDOC) and the top number is the average mass concentration of TDOC of the
whole study period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Oxalic acid and related SOA during the Beijing 2014 APEC
campaign</title>
      <p>A homogeneous series of dicarboxylic acids (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
keto-carboxylic acid and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples
were detected. As shown in Table 2, total dicarboxylic acids during the whole
study period is 593 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 739 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower than that
observed during the Campaign of Air Quality Research in Beijing 2006
(CAREBeijing; average 760 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2007 (average
1010 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Ho et al., 2010, 2015) and the averaged wintertime concentration reported by
a previous study on 14 Chinese cities (904 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Ho et al.,
2007). Total keto-carboxylic acid is 66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 81 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while total
dicarbonyl is 126 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 115 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 2). These values are
higher than those during CAREBeijing 2006 and 2007 (Ho et al., 2010, 2015),
but close to the value observed for the 14 Chinese megacities (Ho et al.,
2007). Being similar to those previous observations, oxalic acid (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the most abundant diacid in the 2014 APEC samples, with an average of 334 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 461 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (range: 10–2127 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 2) during the
whole campaign, followed by methylglyoxal (mGly), succinin acid (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
terephthalic acid (tPh), and glyoxal (Gly). These five species account for
43, 10, 9, 6 and 6 % of total detected organic compounds
(TDOC), respectively (Fig. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Compositions of total detected organic compounds (TDOC)
in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the 2014 APEC campaign.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>As seen in Fig. 4, TDOC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are 1099 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1104, 325 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 220,
and 487 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 387 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> before, during, and after APEC,
respectively. In comparison with those before APEC, TDOC during APEC
decreased by 71 %. Oxalic acid (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the leading species among the
detected organic compounds and accounted for 46, 31, and 34 % of
TDOC during the three phases, respectively (Fig. 4). C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is an end
product of precursors that are photochemically oxidized in aerosol aqueous
phase via either oxidation of small compounds containing two carbon atoms or
decomposition of larger compounds containing three or more carbon atoms.
Thus the mass ratio of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to TDOC is indicative of aerosol aging (Wang et
al., 2012; Ho et al., 2015). As shown in Fig. 4, the highest proportion of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> before APEC suggests that organic aerosols during this period are
more oxidized, compared to those during and after APEC. Gly and
methylglyoxal (mGly) are the precursors of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mass ratios of both
compounds to TDOC are lowest before APEC (Fig. 4), further indicating
enhanced SOA production during this period.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Formation mechanism of oxalic acid</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Correlation of oxalic acid with temperature, relative humidity
(RH), aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) and acidity and sulfate</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlation analysis for oxalic acid (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
sulfate in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the whole 2014 APEC campaign. <bold>(a–c)</bold> Concentrations of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with sulfate, relative humidity (RH), and aerosol
liquid water content (ALWC); <bold>(d, e)</bold> sulfate and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
aerosol acidity [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] and <bold>(f)</bold> temperature with mass ratio of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to total detected organic compounds (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TDOC).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>A few studies have pointed out that aerosol aqueous phase oxidation is a
major formation pathway for oxalic acid (Yu et al., 2005; van Pinxteren et
al., 2014; Bikkina et al., 2015; Tilgner and Herrmann, 2010). To explore the
formation mechanism of oxalic acid, we calculated ALWC and acidity (i.e.,
proton concentration, [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols by using
ISOROPPIA-II model (Weber et al., 2016). As shown in Fig. 5, during the
entire period C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a strong linear correlation with sulfate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70 Fig. 5a), which is consistent with the measurements observed in Xi'an
(Wang et al., 2012) and other Chinese cities (Yu et al., 2005). Previous
studies on particle morphology showed that sulfate particles internally
mix with SOA in Beijing, especially on humid haze days (Li et al., 2010,
2011), which probably indicates that they are formed via similar aqueous
phase pathways (Wang et al., 2016b). In addition, a robust correlation was
also found for C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64, Fig. 5b) and ALWC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61, Fig. 5c), indicating that humid
conditions are favorable for the aqueous phase formation of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
is most likely due to an enhanced gas-to-aerosol aqueous phase partitioning
of the precursors (e.g., Gly and mGly; Fu et al., 2008; G. Wang et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the dominant cation
and anions of fine particles in Beijing (Guo et al., 2014;
Zhang et al., 2015) and the molar ratio of [NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] to
[NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] in this study is 1.1. Thus it is
plausible that SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the APEC campaign largely existed as
ammonium bisulfate, resulting in a strong linear correlation between
[H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a molar slope of 1.03 (Fig. 5d; Zhang et
al., 2007). In addition, [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] shows a significant positive correlation
with C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.84; Fig. 5e), possibly due to the fact that
acidic conditions are favorable for the formation of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors. For
example, Surratt et al. (2007, 2010) found that aerosol acidity can promote
the formation of biogenic SOA (BSOA) derived from isoprene oxidation, such as
2-methylglyceric acid, Gly and mGly. These BSOA precursors can be further
oxidized into C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Meng et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>There is a significant positive correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.58,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001) between the mass ratios of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TDOC and
ambient temperatures (Fig. 5f), which is similar to the results found by
previous researchers (Ho et al., 2007; Strader et al., 1999), indicating
that organic aerosols are more aged under a higher temperature condition
(Erven et al., 2011; Carlton et al., 2009). Thus, compared with those
before APEC, the lower C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TDOC ratios (31 and 34 % (Fig. 4) during and after APEC respectively) can be ascribed in part to the relatively
lower temperature conditions that are not favorable for oxidation of the
precursors to produce oxalic acid (13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6, 7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 and 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the before-, during- and
after-APEC periods, respectively; Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Linear correlation coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mGly, and TDOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> WSOC.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mGly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TDOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> WSOC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Temporal variation in stable carbon isotopic composition of
oxalic acid</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> 72 h backward trajectories determined by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hybrid Single Particle
Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model arriving at the sampling
site to reveal the major air-mass flow types during the study period.
Northwesterly wind (light blue) was most frequent (64 %), followed by
northerly (21 %, pink) and southerly (15 %, black), and these are defined as
clean, mixed, and polluted types, respectively (see the definitions in the
text and the trajectories with a 6 h interval in the Supplement); <bold>(b)</bold> time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values and
concentration of oxalic acid during the whole study period (colors in Fig. 6a are corresponding to those in Fig. 6b).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>To further discuss the formation mechanism of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we investigated the
temporal variations of concentration and stable carbon isotopic composition
of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples (Fig. 6). Previous studies have
demonstrated that Gly, mGly, glyoxylic acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and pyruvic
acid (Pyr) are the precursors of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Carlton et al., 2006, 2007;
Ervens et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2012). Thus, higher mass ratios of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to its precursors indicate that organic aerosols are more oxidized
(Wang et al., 2010). As shown in Table 3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
this work positively correlated with the mass ratios of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mGly, and TDOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> WSOC, demonstrating an enrichment of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the aerosol oxidation process. Because decomposition (or
breakdown) of larger molecular weight precursors in aerosol aqueous phase is
the dominant formation pathway for C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aerosol ageing process
(Kawamura et al., 2016; Gensch et al., 2014; Kirillova et al., 2013), during
which organic compounds release CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO by reaction with OH radical and
other oxidants, resulting in the evolved species enriched with lighter
isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and the remaining substrate enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C due to
kinetic isotope effects (KIE; Hoefs, 1997; Rudolph et al., 2002).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Meteorological parameters and chemical compositions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of two
maximum PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between two pollution episodes in Beijing.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RH (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">V<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (km)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SIA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">TDOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Event I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">349 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">106 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2749 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1357</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(8/10–11/10, Before APEC)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Event II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">259 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 102</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">831 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(18/11–21/11, After APEC)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> V: visibility. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> SIA: secondary inorganic aerosols (the sum of sulfate, nitrate, and
ammonium). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> TDOC: total detected organic compounds.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>A 72 h backward trajectory analysis showed that air masses that moved to Beijing
during the whole sampling period can roughly be categorized into three types
(Fig. 6a; all trajectories during the entire study period can be found in
the Supplement). (1) Polluted type, by which air masses
originated inland and east coastal China and moved slowly into Beijing
within 72 h from its southern regions, i.e., Henan, Shandong, and Jiangsu
provinces. This type of air mass mostly occurred before APEC with high
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. Air pollution has been widely distributed in the three
provinces (Wei et al., 2016); thus aerosols transported by this type of air
mass are of regional characteristics. (2) Mixed type, by which air masses
originated from Mongolia and North China, and moved quickly into Hebei
province and then turned back to Beijing. The air in Mongolia and North China
was clean but polluted in Hebei province, which is adjacent to Beijing. This
type of air mass is a mixture of clean and polluted air and is thus named
mixed type. Since the resident time of the mixed type of air mass within
Hebei province is very short, thus aerosols transported by this type of air
mass are of local characteristics and relatively fresh. (3) Clean type, by
which air masses originated from Siberia and moved rapidly into Beijing
directly via long-range transport. Aerosols from the clean type of air
masses are much more aged, while those from the mixed type of air masses are
fresh. Since severe air pollution is widespread in the southern regions,
gas-to-aerosol phase partitioning of precursors and subsequent aerosol-phase
oxidation to produce SOA including C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> continuously proceed during the
air-mass movement. However, such a partition for producing SOA is not
significant when air masses move from Siberia, Mongolia, and northern China
because of the much less abundant VOCs. Instead, aerosols in the clean air
masses are continuously oxidized, during which C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is produced by
photochemical decomposition of larger molecular weight precursors.
Therefore, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transported by the mixed type air masses
is not only fresh and abundant but also enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, whereas
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transported by the clean type air masses is aged,
less abundant, and enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C due to KIE effects, as illustrated by
the pink and light blue columns in Fig. 6b, respectively. C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transported by the polluted type of air mass is most
abundant compared with that in other two types of air mass, which is not
only due to the severe air pollution in the Henan, Shandong, and Jiangsu
provinces but also due to the enhanced photochemical oxidation under the
humid, higher temperature and stagnant conditions that occurred mostly
before APEC, as discussed previously. Therefore, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the polluted
type of air masses is not only abundant but also enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (see
black columns in Fig. 6b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during
two air pollution events. <bold>(a)</bold> Percentages of major species in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b, c)</bold> mass ratios of major species and organic tracers
in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> stable carbon isotope composition of oxalic acid
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (data about levoglucosan (Lev), PAHs, and hopanes are cited from
Wang et al., 2016a).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/981/2017/acp-17-981-2017-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Different chemical characteristics of
PM${}_{{2.5}}$ between two severe haze events}?><title>Different chemical characteristics of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between two severe haze events</title>
      <p>From Fig. 1 and Table 4, it can be found that PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed two
equivalent maxima on 9 October and 20 November during the
whole study period. However, the chemical compositions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during
these two pollution events are significantly different. As shown in Fig. 7a,
relative abundances of SIA (sum of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are 30 % during event I and
23 % during event II. The relative abundance of OM
(21 %, Fig. 7a) during event I is lower than that (37 %) during
event II (Fig. 7b). In contrast, the ratios of WSOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC and TDOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC are
higher in event I than in event II, which is consistent with lower
levels of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> after APEC (Table 1), suggesting a weaker photochemical
oxidation capacity during event II. Organic biomarkers in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
samples have been measured for the source apportionment (Wang et al., 2016a)
and cited here to further identify the difference in chemical composition
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two events. Levoglucosan is a key tracer for
biomass burning smoke. The mass ratio of levoglucosan to OC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lev <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC) is comparable between the two events, suggesting a similar level
of contributions of biomass burning emission to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> before and
after APEC. However, the mass ratios of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and hopanes to OC are lower in
event I than those in event II (Fig. 7c), which again demonstrates the
enhanced emissions from coal burning for house heating, because these
compounds are key tracers of coal burning smokes (Wang et al., 2006). As
seen in Fig. 7d, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in event I was enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Such
relatively more abundant SIA, WSOC, and TDOC and heavier C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clearly demonstrate that PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during event I is
enriched with secondary products while the fine particles during event
II are enriched with primary compounds. After-APEC house heating activities
including residential coal burning were activated, which emitted huge
amounts of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and VOCs as well as primary particles, resulting
in both absolute concentrations and relative abundances of CO and EC
30–40 % higher after APEC than before APEC (see Table 1). Li et al. (2015) reported that VOCs in Beijing were 86 ppbv before APEC, 48 ppbv
during APEC, and 73 ppbv after APEC. As shown in Table 4, temperature
(16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for event I and 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for event
II) and relative humidity (RH; 82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 for event I and 62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 % for event II) are lower during event II than during event I.
Moreover, air masses arriving in Beijing during event II are the mixed
type, of which the resident time in Hebei province is short. Compared with
those in event I, such colder and drier conditions and a short reaction
time during event II are unfavorable for photochemical oxidation,
resulting in SOA not only less abundant but also enriched with lighter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during event II, although VOC levels are comparable before
and after APEC.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p>Temporal variations in molecular distribution of SIA, dicarboxylic acids,
ketoacids, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyl, and stable carbon isotopic composition
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> collected in Beijing before,
during and after the 2014 APEC were investigated. Absolute concentrations
and relative abundances of SIA and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are highest
before APEC, followed by those after and during APEC, suggesting that the
fine aerosols before APEC are enriched with secondary products, mainly due
to an enhanced photochemical oxidation under the warm, humid and stagnant
conditions. Concentrations of SIA, oxalic acid and related SOA in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during APEC are 2–4 times lower than those before APEC, which can be
ascribed to the effective emission controls and the favorable meteorological
conditions that brought clean air from Siberia and Mongolia into Beijing.</p>
      <p>Positive correlations of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with sulfate mass, RH, ALWC, and aerosol
acidity indicate that the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation pathway is involved in
acid-catalyzed aerosol aqueous phase oxidation. SIA, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and related SOA
in the polluted types of air mass are abundant with C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enriched in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. On the contrary, those in the clean types of air mass are much
less abundant, although C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is also enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. By comparing
the chemical composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in two events that are characterized by the highest loadings of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> before and after APEC, we further found that compared with those
before APEC fine aerosols after APEC are enriched with primary species and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is depleted in heavier <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, although SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and VOCs are
abundant during the heating season, again demonstrating the important role
of meteorological conditions in the secondary aerosol formation process,
which are warmer, humid, and stagnant before APEC and result in secondary
species being much more abundant than those during and after APEC.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-981-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-17-981-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was financially supported by the Strategic Priority Research
Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB05020401), the
China National Natural Science Founds for Distinguished Young Scholars
(grant no. 41325014), and the program from the National Nature Science
Foundation of China (no. 41405122, 91544226 and 41375132).
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: R. Zhang<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics: available at: <uri>http://www.bjstats.gov.cn/tjsj/yjdsj/rk/2014/201511/t20151124_323864.html</uri>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bikkina, S., Kawamura, K., and Miyazaki, Y.: Latitudinal distributions of
atmospheric dicarboxylic acids, oxocarboxylic acids, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls
over the western North Pacific: Sources and formation pathways, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 5010–5035, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd022235</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Lim, H.-J., Altieri, K. E., and Seitzinger,
S.: Link between isoprene and secondary organic aerosol (SOA): Pyruvic acid
oxidation yields low volatility organic acids in clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06822,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005gl025374</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S., Reff, A.,
Lim, H.-J., and Ervens, B.: Atmospheric oxalic acid and SOA production from
glyoxal: Results of aqueous photooxidation experiments, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7588–7602, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4987–5005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, C., Wang, G., Meng, J., Wang, Q., Cao, J., Li, J., and Wang, J.:
Size-resolved airborne particulate oxalic and related secondary organic
aerosol species in the urban atmosphere of Chengdu, China, Atmos. Res., 161–162, 134–142, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.04.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.04.010</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Chang, M. O., Robinson, N. F.,
Trimble, D., and Kohl, S.: The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol
for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a
long-term database, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.,
57, 1014–1023, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Feingold, G., Frost, G. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A modeling study of aqueous production of dicarboxylic acids: 1.
Chemical pathways and speciated organic mass production, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D15206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004387</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous
particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Fu, T.-M., Jacob, D. J., Wittrock, F., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., and
Henze, D. K.: Global budgets of atmospheric glyoxal and methylglyoxal, and
implications for formation of secondary organic aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15303,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009505</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Gensch, I., Kiendler-Scharr, A., and Rudolph, J.: Isotope ratio studies of
atmospheric organic compounds: Principles, methods, applications and
potential, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 365–366, 206–221,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2014.02.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2014.02.004</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Elucidating severe
urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1419604111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to
estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Kawamura, K., Zhang, R. J., Chow, J. C.,
and Watson, J. G.: Dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids, and dicarbonyls
in the urban atmosphere of China, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D22S27,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd008011</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Ho, S. S. H., Kawamura, K., Tachibana, E., Cheng, Y.,
and Zhu, T.: Dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls,
fatty acids, and benzoic acid in urban aerosols collected during the 2006
Campaign of Air Quality Research in Beijing (CAREBeijing-2006), J. Geophys. Res., 115, D19312,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013304</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Ho, K. F., Huang, R.-J., Kawamura, K., Tachibana, E., Lee, S. C., Ho, S. S. H., Zhu, T., and Tian, L.: Dicarboxylic acids,
ketocarboxylic acids, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls, fatty acids and benzoic acid in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol collected during CAREBeijing-2007:
an effect of traffic restriction on air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3111–3123, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3111-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3111-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hoefs, J. and Hoefs, J.: Stable isotope geochemistry, Springer, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R. J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G.,
Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J.,
Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and
Prevot, A. S.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution
during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kawamura, K. and Watanabe, T.: Determination of stable carbon isotopic
compositions of low molecular weight dicarboxylic acids and ketocarboxylic
acids in atmospheric aerosol and snow samples, Anal. Chem., 76,
5762–5768, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kawamura, K. and Bikkina, S.: A review of dicarboxylic acids and related
compounds in atmospheric aerosols: Molecular distributions, sources and
transformation, Atmos. Res., 170, 140–160,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.018</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kirillova, E. N., Andersson, A., Sheesley, R. J., Kruså, M., Praveen, P.
S., Budhavant, K., Safai, P. D., Rao, P. S. P., and Gustafsson, Ö.: 13C-
and14C-based study of sources and atmospheric processing of water-soluble
organic carbon (WSOC) in South Asian aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 614–626, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50130</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Xie, S. D., Zeng, L. M., Li, L. Y., Li, Y. Q., and Wu, R. R.: Characterization of ambient volatile organic
compounds and their sources in Beijing, before, during, and after Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation China 2014,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7945–7959, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7945-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7945-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Li, W. and Shao, L.: Mixing and water-soluble characteristics of
particulate organic compounds in individual urban aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D02301, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd012575</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Li, W., Zhou, S., Wang, X., Xu, Z., Yuan, C., Yu, Y., Zhang, Q., and Wang,
W.: Integrated evaluation of aerosols from regional brown hazes over
northern China in winter: Concentrations, sources, transformation, and
mixing states, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D09301, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd015099</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Ma, Y., Brooks, S. D., Vidaurre, G., Khalizov, A. F., Wang, L., and Zhang,
R.: Rapid modification of cloud-nucleating ability of aerosols by biogenic
emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 6293–6297,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013gl057895" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013gl057895</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Meng, J., Wang, G., Li, J., Cheng, C., Ren, Y., Huang, Y., Cheng, Y., Cao,
J., and Zhang, T.: Seasonal characteristics of oxalic acid and related SOA
in the free troposphere of Mt. Hua, central China: implications for sources
and formation mechanisms, Sci. Total Environ., 493, 1088–1097,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.086" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.086</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Mu, Q. and Zhang, S.: An evaluation of the economic loss due to the heavy
haze during January 2013 in China, China Environmental Science, 33,
2087–2094, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Myriokefalitakis, S., Tsigaridis, K., Mihalopoulos, N., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., Kawamura, K., Segers, A.,
and Kanakidou, M.: In-cloud oxalate formation in the global troposphere: a 3-D modeling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 5761–5782, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zamora, M. L.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., and Wu, Y.-S.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 113, 4266–4271, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Rudolph, J., Czuba, E., Norman, A., Huang, L., and Ernst, D.: Stable carbon
isotope composition of nonmethane hydrocarbons in emissions from
transportation related sources and atmospheric observations in an urban
atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 36, 1173–1181, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Sorooshian, A., Lu, M.-L., Brechtel, F. J., Jonsson, H., Feingold, G.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: On the Source of Organic Acid Aerosol
Layers above Clouds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4647–4654,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0630442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0630442</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Strader, R., Lurmann, F., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of secondary organic
aerosol formation in winter, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4849–4863, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Investigations of the Diurnal Cycle and
Mixing State of Oxalic Acid in Individual Particles in Asian Aerosol
Outflow, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8062–8069,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es071134g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es071134g</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Wild, O., Xu, W., Chen, C., Fu, P., Du, W., Zhou, L.,
Zhang, Q., Han, T., Wang, Q., Pan, X., Zheng, H., Li, J., Guo, X., Liu, J.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: “APEC Blue”: Secondary Aerosol Reductions from Emission
Controls in Beijing, Sci. Rep., 6, 20668, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20668" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep20668</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst,
T. E., Edney, E. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of acidity on secondary
organic aerosol formation from isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5363–5369, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M., Loza, C. L., Kwan,
A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation from
isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 107, 6640–6645,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Tang, G., Zhu, X., Hu, B., Xin, J., Wang, L., Münkel, C., Mao, G., and Wang, Y.: Impact of emission controls
on air quality in Beijing during APEC 2014: lidar ceilometer observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12667–12680, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Tilgner, A. and Herrmann, H.: Radical-driven carbonyl-to-acid conversion
and acid degradation in tropospheric aqueous systems studied by CAPRAM,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 5415–5422, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., Kahn, R., Levy, R., Verduzco,
C., and Villeneuve, P. J.: Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate
Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth:
Development and Application, Environ. Health Persp., 118,
847–855, 10.1289/ehp.0901623, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>van Pinxteren, D., Neusüß, C., and Herrmann, H.: On the abundance and source contributions of dicarboxylic
acids in size-resolved aerosol particles at continental sites in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3913–3928, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3913-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3913-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Niu, S., Liu, C., and Wang, L.: Identification of dicarboxylic
acids and aldehydes of PM10 and PM2.5 aerosols in Nanjing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 36, 1941–1950, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Kawamura, K., Lee, S., Ho, K., and Cao, J.: Molecular, seasonal,
and spatial distributions of organic aerosols from fourteen Chinese cities,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4619–4625, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Kawamura, K., Umemoto, N., Xie, M., Hu, S., and Wang, Z.:
Water-soluble organic compounds in PM2.5 and size-segregated aerosols over
Mount Tai in North
China Plain, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19208,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd011390</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Xie, M., Hu, S., Gao, S., Tachibana, E., and Kawamura, K.: Dicarboxylic acids, metals and isotopic
compositions of C and N in atmospheric aerosols from inland China: implications for dust and coal burning
emission and secondary aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6087–6096, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6087-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6087-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Kawamura, K., Cheng, C., Li, J., Cao, J., Zhang, R., Zhang, T.,
Liu, S., and Zhao, Z.: Molecular distribution and stable carbon isotopic
composition of dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids, and
alpha-dicarbonyls in size-resolved atmospheric particles from Xi'an City,
China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4783–4791, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es204322c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es204322c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Cheng, C., Meng, J., Huang, Y., Li, J., and Ren, Y.: Field
observation on secondary organic aerosols during Asian dust storm periods:
Formation mechanism of oxalic acid and related compounds on dust surface,
Atmos. Environ., 113, 169–176, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.013</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Wang, J., Ren, Y., and Li, J.: Chemical characterization of organic
aerosols from Beijing during the 2014 APEC, Atmos. Res., in preparation,
2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin,
Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang,
Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L.,
Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B.,
Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R.
A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London
Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 113,
13630–13635, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616540113</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Li, Y., Chen, T., Li, L., Liu, B., Zhang, D., Sun, F., Wei, Q.,
Jiang, L., and Pan, L.: Changes in atmospheric composition during the 2014
APEC conference in Beijing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 12695–12707, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023652</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Weber, R. J., Guo, H., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.: High aerosol acidity
despite declining atmospheric sulfate concentrations over the past 15 years,
Nat. Geosci., 9, 282–285, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2665</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Wei, X., Gu, X., Chen, H., Cheng, T., Wang, Y., Guo, H., Bao, F., and Xiang,
K.: Multi-Scale Observations of Atmosphere Environment and Aerosol
Properties over North China during APEC Meeting Periods, Atmosphere, 7, 4, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos7010004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos7010004</ext-link>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Xing, L., Fu, T.-M., Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Wang, G. H., Ho, K. F., Cheng, M.-C., You, C.-F., and Wang, T. J.:
Seasonal and spatial variability of the OM/OC mass ratios and high regional correlation between oxalic acid
and zinc in Chinese urban organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4307–4318, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W. Q., Sun, Y. L., Chen, C., Du, W., Han, T. T., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Wang, Z. F., Zhao, X. J.,
Zhou, L. B., Ji, D. S., Wang, P. C., and Worsnop, D. R.: Aerosol composition, oxidation properties, and
sources in Beijing: results from the 2014 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13681–13698, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13681-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13681-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, H., Khalizov, A. F., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R.: Effects of
coating of dicarboxylic acids on the mass- mobility relationship of soot
particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2787–2792, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Yu, J. Z., Huang, X.-F., Xu, J., and Hu, M.: When Aerosol Sulfate Goes Up,
So Does Oxalate? Implication for the Formation Mechanisms of Oxalate,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 128–133, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es049559f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es049559f</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Suh, I., Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Fortner, E. C., Tie, X., Molina, L.
T., and Molina, M. J.: Atmospheric new particle formation enhanced by
organic acids, Science, 304, 1487–1490, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1095139</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case study
of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3213–3219, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Khalizov, A., Wang, L., Hu, M., and Xu, W.: Nucleation and growth
of nanoparticles in the atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 112, 1957–2011,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr2001756" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr2001756</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zamora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W.,
Hu, M., and Wang, Y.: Formation of urban fine particulate matter, Chem. Rev., 115, 3803–3855, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Khalizov, A., Zhang, R., and McGraw, R.: Hydrogen-bonding
interaction in molecular complexes and clusters of aerosol nucleation
precursors,  J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 680–689, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Concentrations and stable carbon isotope compositions of oxalic acid and related SOA in Beijing before, during, and after the 2014 APEC</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">To ensure good air quality for the 2014 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit,
stringent emission controls were implemented in Beijing and its surrounding
regions, leading to a significant reduction in PM<sub>2.5</sub> loadings. To
investigate the impact of the emission controls on aerosol chemistry,
high-volume PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected in Beijing from 8
October to 24 November 2014 and determined for secondary inorganic
aerosols (SIA, i.e., SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>),
dicarboxylic acids, keto-carboxylic acid, and <i>α</i>-dicarbonyls, as well
as stable carbon isotope composition of oxalic acid (C<sub>2</sub>). Our results
showed that SIA, C<sub>2</sub>, and related secondary organic aerosols in PM<sub>2.5</sub> during APEC were
2–4 times lower than those before APEC, which is firstly ascribed to the
strict emission control measures and secondly attributed to the relatively
colder and drier conditions during the event that are unfavorable for
secondary aerosol production.</p><p class="p">C<sub>2</sub> in the polluted air masses, which mostly occurred before APEC, are
abundant and enriched in <sup>13</sup>C. On the contrary, C<sub>2</sub> in the clean
air masses, which mostly occurred during APEC, is much less abundant but
still enriched in <sup>13</sup>C. In the mixed type of clean and polluted air
masses, which mostly occurred after APEC, C<sub>2</sub> is lower than that
before APEC but higher than that during APEC and enriched in lighter
<sup>12</sup>C. A comparison on chemical composition of fine particles and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C values of C<sub>2</sub> in two events that are characterized by high
loadings of PM<sub>2.5</sub> further showed that after APEC SIA and the total
detected organic compounds (TDOC) are much less abundant and fine aerosols
are enriched with primary organics and relatively fresh, compared with those
before APEC.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics: available at: <a href="http://www.bjstats.gov.cn/tjsj/yjdsj/rk/2014/201511/t20151124_323864.html" target="_blank">http://www.bjstats.gov.cn/tjsj/yjdsj/rk/2014/201511/t20151124_323864.html</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bikkina, S., Kawamura, K., and Miyazaki, Y.: Latitudinal distributions of
atmospheric dicarboxylic acids, oxocarboxylic acids, and <i>α</i>-dicarbonyls
over the western North Pacific: Sources and formation pathways, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 5010–5035, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022235" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014jd022235</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Lim, H.-J., Altieri, K. E., and Seitzinger,
S.: Link between isoprene and secondary organic aerosol (SOA): Pyruvic acid
oxidation yields low volatility organic acids in clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06822,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025374" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005gl025374</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S., Reff, A.,
Lim, H.-J., and Ervens, B.: Atmospheric oxalic acid and SOA production from
glyoxal: Results of aqueous photooxidation experiments, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7588–7602, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4987–5005, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, C., Wang, G., Meng, J., Wang, Q., Cao, J., Li, J., and Wang, J.:
Size-resolved airborne particulate oxalic and related secondary organic
aerosol species in the urban atmosphere of Chengdu, China, Atmos. Res., 161–162, 134–142, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.04.010" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.04.010</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Chang, M. O., Robinson, N. F.,
Trimble, D., and Kohl, S.: The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol
for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a
long-term database, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.,
57, 1014–1023, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Feingold, G., Frost, G. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A modeling study of aqueous production of dicarboxylic acids: 1.
Chemical pathways and speciated organic mass production, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D15206, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004387" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD004387</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous
particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, T.-M., Jacob, D. J., Wittrock, F., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., and
Henze, D. K.: Global budgets of atmospheric glyoxal and methylglyoxal, and
implications for formation of secondary organic aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15303,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009505" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007jd009505</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Gensch, I., Kiendler-Scharr, A., and Rudolph, J.: Isotope ratio studies of
atmospheric organic compounds: Principles, methods, applications and
potential, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 365–366, 206–221,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2014.02.004" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2014.02.004</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J., Shang, D., Zheng, J., Du, Z., Wu,
Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Elucidating severe
urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1419604111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to
estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Kawamura, K., Zhang, R. J., Chow, J. C.,
and Watson, J. G.: Dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids, and dicarbonyls
in the urban atmosphere of China, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D22S27,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008011" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006jd008011</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Ho, S. S. H., Kawamura, K., Tachibana, E., Cheng, Y.,
and Zhu, T.: Dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids,<i>α</i>-dicarbonyls,
fatty acids, and benzoic acid in urban aerosols collected during the 2006
Campaign of Air Quality Research in Beijing (CAREBeijing-2006), J. Geophys. Res., 115, D19312,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013304" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009jd013304</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, K. F., Huang, R.-J., Kawamura, K., Tachibana, E., Lee, S. C., Ho, S. S. H., Zhu, T., and Tian, L.: Dicarboxylic acids,
ketocarboxylic acids, <i>α</i>-dicarbonyls, fatty acids and benzoic acid in PM<sub>2.5</sub> aerosol collected during CAREBeijing-2007:
an effect of traffic restriction on air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3111–3123, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3111-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-3111-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hoefs, J. and Hoefs, J.: Stable isotope geochemistry, Springer, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R. J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G.,
Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J.,
Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and
Prevot, A. S.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution
during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature13774</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kawamura, K. and Watanabe, T.: Determination of stable carbon isotopic
compositions of low molecular weight dicarboxylic acids and ketocarboxylic
acids in atmospheric aerosol and snow samples, Anal. Chem., 76,
5762–5768, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Kawamura, K. and Bikkina, S.: A review of dicarboxylic acids and related
compounds in atmospheric aerosols: Molecular distributions, sources and
transformation, Atmos. Res., 170, 140–160,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.018" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.018</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Kirillova, E. N., Andersson, A., Sheesley, R. J., Kruså, M., Praveen, P.
S., Budhavant, K., Safai, P. D., Rao, P. S. P., and Gustafsson, Ö.: 13C-
and14C-based study of sources and atmospheric processing of water-soluble
organic carbon (WSOC) in South Asian aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 614–626, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50130" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50130</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Xie, S. D., Zeng, L. M., Li, L. Y., Li, Y. Q., and Wu, R. R.: Characterization of ambient volatile organic
compounds and their sources in Beijing, before, during, and after Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation China 2014,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7945–7959, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7945-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7945-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W. and Shao, L.: Mixing and water-soluble characteristics of
particulate organic compounds in individual urban aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D02301, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012575" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009jd012575</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W., Zhou, S., Wang, X., Xu, Z., Yuan, C., Yu, Y., Zhang, Q., and Wang,
W.: Integrated evaluation of aerosols from regional brown hazes over
northern China in winter: Concentrations, sources, transformation, and
mixing states, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D09301, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015099" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010jd015099</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, Y., Brooks, S. D., Vidaurre, G., Khalizov, A. F., Wang, L., and Zhang,
R.: Rapid modification of cloud-nucleating ability of aerosols by biogenic
emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 6293–6297,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013gl057895" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013gl057895</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Meng, J., Wang, G., Li, J., Cheng, C., Ren, Y., Huang, Y., Cheng, Y., Cao,
J., and Zhang, T.: Seasonal characteristics of oxalic acid and related SOA
in the free troposphere of Mt. Hua, central China: implications for sources
and formation mechanisms, Sci. Total Environ., 493, 1088–1097,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.086" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.086</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Mu, Q. and Zhang, S.: An evaluation of the economic loss due to the heavy
haze during January 2013 in China, China Environmental Science, 33,
2087–2094, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Myriokefalitakis, S., Tsigaridis, K., Mihalopoulos, N., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., Kawamura, K., Segers, A.,
and Kanakidou, M.: In-cloud oxalate formation in the global troposphere: a 3-D modeling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 5761–5782, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zamora, M. L.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., and Wu, Y.-S.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 113, 4266–4271, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Rudolph, J., Czuba, E., Norman, A., Huang, L., and Ernst, D.: Stable carbon
isotope composition of nonmethane hydrocarbons in emissions from
transportation related sources and atmospheric observations in an urban
atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 36, 1173–1181, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Sorooshian, A., Lu, M.-L., Brechtel, F. J., Jonsson, H., Feingold, G.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: On the Source of Organic Acid Aerosol
Layers above Clouds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4647–4654,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0630442" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es0630442</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Strader, R., Lurmann, F., and Pandis, S. N.: Evaluation of secondary organic
aerosol formation in winter, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4849–4863, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Investigations of the Diurnal Cycle and
Mixing State of Oxalic Acid in Individual Particles in Asian Aerosol
Outflow, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8062–8069,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es071134g" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es071134g</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Wild, O., Xu, W., Chen, C., Fu, P., Du, W., Zhou, L.,
Zhang, Q., Han, T., Wang, Q., Pan, X., Zheng, H., Li, J., Guo, X., Liu, J.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: “APEC Blue”: Secondary Aerosol Reductions from Emission
Controls in Beijing, Sci. Rep., 6, 20668, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20668" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep20668</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst,
T. E., Edney, E. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of acidity on secondary
organic aerosol formation from isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5363–5369, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M., Loza, C. L., Kwan,
A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation from
isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 107, 6640–6645,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, G., Zhu, X., Hu, B., Xin, J., Wang, L., Münkel, C., Mao, G., and Wang, Y.: Impact of emission controls
on air quality in Beijing during APEC 2014: lidar ceilometer observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12667–12680, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-12667-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Tilgner, A. and Herrmann, H.: Radical-driven carbonyl-to-acid conversion
and acid degradation in tropospheric aqueous systems studied by CAPRAM,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 5415–5422, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., Kahn, R., Levy, R., Verduzco,
C., and Villeneuve, P. J.: Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate
Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth:
Development and Application, Environ. Health Persp., 118,
847–855, 10.1289/ehp.0901623, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
van Pinxteren, D., Neusüß, C., and Herrmann, H.: On the abundance and source contributions of dicarboxylic
acids in size-resolved aerosol particles at continental sites in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3913–3928, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3913-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-3913-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Niu, S., Liu, C., and Wang, L.: Identification of dicarboxylic
acids and aldehydes of PM10 and PM2.5 aerosols in Nanjing, China,
Atmos. Environ., 36, 1941–1950, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Kawamura, K., Lee, S., Ho, K., and Cao, J.: Molecular, seasonal,
and spatial distributions of organic aerosols from fourteen Chinese cities,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4619–4625, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Kawamura, K., Umemoto, N., Xie, M., Hu, S., and Wang, Z.:
Water-soluble organic compounds in PM2.5 and size-segregated aerosols over
Mount Tai in North
China Plain, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19208,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011390" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd011390</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Xie, M., Hu, S., Gao, S., Tachibana, E., and Kawamura, K.: Dicarboxylic acids, metals and isotopic
compositions of C and N in atmospheric aerosols from inland China: implications for dust and coal burning
emission and secondary aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6087–6096, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6087-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-6087-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Kawamura, K., Cheng, C., Li, J., Cao, J., Zhang, R., Zhang, T.,
Liu, S., and Zhao, Z.: Molecular distribution and stable carbon isotopic
composition of dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids, and
alpha-dicarbonyls in size-resolved atmospheric particles from Xi'an City,
China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4783–4791, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es204322c" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es204322c</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Cheng, C., Meng, J., Huang, Y., Li, J., and Ren, Y.: Field
observation on secondary organic aerosols during Asian dust storm periods:
Formation mechanism of oxalic acid and related compounds on dust surface,
Atmos. Environ., 113, 169–176, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.013" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.013</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Wang, J., Ren, Y., and Li, J.: Chemical characterization of organic
aerosols from Beijing during the 2014 APEC, Atmos. Res., in preparation,
2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin,
Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang,
Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L.,
Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B.,
Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R.
A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London
Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 113,
13630–13635, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1616540113</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Li, Y., Chen, T., Li, L., Liu, B., Zhang, D., Sun, F., Wei, Q.,
Jiang, L., and Pan, L.: Changes in atmospheric composition during the 2014
APEC conference in Beijing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 12695–12707, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023652" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015JD023652</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, R. J., Guo, H., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.: High aerosol acidity
despite declining atmospheric sulfate concentrations over the past 15 years,
Nat. Geosci., 9, 282–285, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2665" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo2665</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, X., Gu, X., Chen, H., Cheng, T., Wang, Y., Guo, H., Bao, F., and Xiang,
K.: Multi-Scale Observations of Atmosphere Environment and Aerosol
Properties over North China during APEC Meeting Periods, Atmosphere, 7, 4, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos7010004" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/atmos7010004</a>,
2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, L., Fu, T.-M., Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Wang, G. H., Ho, K. F., Cheng, M.-C., You, C.-F., and Wang, T. J.:
Seasonal and spatial variability of the OM/OC mass ratios and high regional correlation between oxalic acid
and zinc in Chinese urban organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4307–4318, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4307-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, W. Q., Sun, Y. L., Chen, C., Du, W., Han, T. T., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Wang, Z. F., Zhao, X. J.,
Zhou, L. B., Ji, D. S., Wang, P. C., and Worsnop, D. R.: Aerosol composition, oxidation properties, and
sources in Beijing: results from the 2014 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13681–13698, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13681-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-13681-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, H., Khalizov, A. F., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R.: Effects of
coating of dicarboxylic acids on the mass- mobility relationship of soot
particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2787–2792, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J. Z., Huang, X.-F., Xu, J., and Hu, M.: When Aerosol Sulfate Goes Up,
So Does Oxalate? Implication for the Formation Mechanisms of Oxalate,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 128–133, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es049559f" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es049559f</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Suh, I., Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Fortner, E. C., Tie, X., Molina, L.
T., and Molina, M. J.: Atmospheric new particle formation enhanced by
organic acids, Science, 304, 1487–1490, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095139" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1095139</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Canagaratna, M.: A case study
of urban particle acidity and its influence on secondary organic aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3213–3219, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Khalizov, A., Wang, L., Hu, M., and Xu, W.: Nucleation and growth
of nanoparticles in the atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 112, 1957–2011,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr2001756" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr2001756</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zamora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W.,
Hu, M., and Wang, Y.: Formation of urban fine particulate matter, Chem. Rev., 115, 3803–3855, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Khalizov, A., Zhang, R., and McGraw, R.: Hydrogen-bonding
interaction in molecular complexes and clusters of aerosol nucleation
precursors,  J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 680–689, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
