<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for
the global mercury budget</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H. M. Horowitz et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Horowitz</surname><given-names>Hannah M.</given-names></name>
          <email>hmhorow@post.harvard.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-3917</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Jacob</surname><given-names>Daniel J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yanxu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Dibble</surname><given-names>Theodore S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-8233</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Slemr</surname><given-names>Franz</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Amos</surname><given-names>Helen M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>Johan A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7297-3851</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Corbitt</surname><given-names>Elizabeth S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Marais</surname><given-names>Eloïse A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-8051</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff6">
          <name><surname>Sunderland</surname><given-names>Elsie M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0386-9548</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth &amp; Planetary Sciences, Harvard University,
Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Chemistry Department, State University of New York – Environmental
Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (MPI-C), Department of Atmospheric
Chemistry, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken
5, 2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Environmental Health, T. H. Chan School of
Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hannah M. Horowitz (hmhorow@post.harvard.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>6353</fpage><lpage>6371</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Mercury (Hg) is emitted to the atmosphere mainly as
volatile elemental Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Oxidation to water-soluble Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a
major role in Hg deposition to ecosystems. Here, we implement a new
mechanism for atmospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> redox chemistry in the
GEOS-Chem global model and examine the implications for the global
atmospheric Hg budget and deposition patterns. Our simulation includes a new
coupling of GEOS-Chem to an ocean general circulation model (MITgcm),
enabling a global 3-D representation of atmosphere–ocean Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycling. We find that atomic bromine (Br) of marine organobromine origin is
the main atmospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidant and that second-stage HgBr oxidation
is mainly by the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals. The resulting chemical
lifetime of tropospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against oxidation is 2.7 months, shorter
than in previous models. Fast Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atmospheric reduction must occur
in order to match the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6-month lifetime of Hg against
deposition implied by the observed atmospheric variability of total gaseous
mercury (TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(g)). We implement this reduction
in GEOS-Chem as photolysis of aqueous-phase Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–organic complexes in
aerosols and clouds, resulting in a TGM lifetime of 5.2 months against
deposition and matching both mean observed TGM and its variability. Model
sensitivity analysis shows that the interhemispheric gradient of TGM,
previously used to infer a longer Hg lifetime against deposition, is
misleading because Southern Hemisphere Hg mainly originates from oceanic
emissions rather than transport from the Northern Hemisphere. The model
reproduces the observed seasonal TGM variation at northern midlatitudes
(maximum in February, minimum in September) driven by chemistry and oceanic
evasion, but it does not reproduce the lack of seasonality observed at southern
hemispheric marine sites. Aircraft observations in the lowermost
stratosphere show a strong TGM–ozone relationship indicative of fast
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, but we show that this relationship provides only a weak
test of Hg chemistry because it is also influenced by mixing. The model
reproduces observed Hg wet deposition fluxes over North America, Europe, and
China with little bias (0–30 %). It reproduces qualitatively the observed
maximum in US deposition around the Gulf of Mexico, reflecting a combination
of deep convection and availability of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals for
second-stage HgBr oxidation. However, the magnitude of this maximum is
underestimated. The relatively low observed Hg wet deposition over rural
China is attributed to fast Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in the presence of high
organic aerosol concentrations. We find that 80 % of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition
is to the global oceans, reflecting the marine origin of Br and low
concentrations of organic aerosols for Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction. Most of that
deposition takes place to the tropical oceans due to the availability of
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for second-stage HgBr oxidation.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Atmospheric mercury (Hg) cycles between two stable redox forms, elemental
(Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and divalent (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most Hg emissions are as gaseous
elemental Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is relatively inert and sparingly soluble in
water. Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is oxidized in the atmosphere to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by loss of its
two 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> electrons. Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> salts are water-soluble, partition into the
aerosol, and are efficiently removed from the atmosphere by wet and dry
deposition, but they can also be reduced back to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Understanding
atmospheric Hg redox chemistry is critical for determining where Hg will be
deposited globally. Here we propose an updated Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> redox
mechanism, incorporating recent kinetic data and other observational
constraints, for use in atmospheric models. We implement the mechanism in
the GEOS-Chem global model (Bey et al., 2001; Holmes et al., 2010) and
examine the implications for the global atmospheric Hg budget and deposition
patterns.</p>
      <p>Previous work assumed gas-phase OH and ozone to be the dominant Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidants (Bergan and Rodhe, 2001; Dastoor and Larocque, 2004; Selin et al.,
2007; Bullock et al., 2008; Travnikov and Ilyin, 2009; De Simone et al.,
2014; Gencarelli et al., 2014). It is now well established that the
corresponding HgOH and HgO products are too thermally unstable to enable
oxidation to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under atmospheric conditions (Shepler and
Peterson, 2003; Goodsite et al., 2004; Calvert and Lindberg, 2005; Hynes et
al., 2009; Jones et al., 2016). OH and ozone could still potentially be
important oxidants on aerosols (Ariya et al., 2015). The importance of Br
atoms for Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation was first recognized to explain atmospheric
mercury depletion events occurring in the Arctic boundary layer in spring
(Schroeder et al., 1998), where sea salt photochemistry provides a large Br
source (Fan and Jacob, 1992; Steffen et al., 2008; Simpson et al., 2015).
Oxidation of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by Br is a two-stage exothermic
mechanism whereby the second-stage conversion of HgBr to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be carried out by a number of radical oxidants (Goodsite et al., 2004; Dibble
et al., 2012). Holmes et al. (2006) first suggested Br atoms could be the
main Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidant on a global scale, with Br originating principally from
photochemical decomposition of bromoform emitted by phytoplankton (Yang et
al., 2005). More recent observations of background tropospheric BrO point to
ubiquitous Br radical chemistry in the troposphere (Theys et al., 2011; Wang
et al., 2015). Recent aircraft observations of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and BrO over
the southeastern US are consistent with Br atoms acting as the main Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidant (Gratz et al., 2015; Shah et al., 2016).</p>
      <p>Atmospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> can be deposited or alternatively reduced back
to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Competition between these two processes determines the global
patterns of Hg deposition as well as the regional fate of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
emitted directly by combustion. Atmospheric reduction mechanisms for
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are poorly understood, but photoreduction in aquatic systems
has been widely observed (Costa and Liss, 1999; Amyot et al., 2000; Mason et
al., 2001). Fast in-plume reduction of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted by coal-fired
power plants was first reported by Edgerton et al. (2006) and Lohman et
al. (2006), but more recent field observations suggest that on average only
5 % (range 0–55 %) of emitted Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced in the plume
(Deeds et al., 2013; Landis et al., 2014). Recent aircraft observations
(Weigelt et al., 2016) and emission inventories (Zhang et al., 2016) suggest
that previous reports of in-plume reduction of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> may reflect
in part an overestimate of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Chemical mechanism for atmospheric mercury.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reaction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rate expression<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reference<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gas phase</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>][Br][<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> exp(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7801</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) [HgBr][<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [HgBr][Br]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BrNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> exp(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">391</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) [HgBr][NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [HgBr][Br]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(3)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBrNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [HgBr][NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [HgBr][<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HgCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> exp(680(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>))[Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>][Cl][<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(5)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> exp(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5942</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)[HgCl][Cl]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(6)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBrCl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [HgCl][Br]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(3)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgClNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [HgCl][NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [HgCl][<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aqueous phase<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)][O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(7)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HOCl(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)][HOCl(aq)]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(8), (9)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> [Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)][OH(aq)]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(10), (11)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>[OA][Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">This work<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Rate expressions for gas-phase reactions have units
of molecule cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, where [ ] denotes concentration in
number density units of molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>] is the number density of
air, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature in K. Rate expressions for aqueous-phase
reactions have units of M s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and [(aq)] denotes concentration in M
(mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Henry's law coefficients (M atm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relating gas-phase
and aqueous-phase concentrations are 1.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>exp(2482(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) for Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sanemasa, 1975), 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>exp(2400(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jacob, 1986), 6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>exp(5900(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) for HOCl (Huthwelker et al., 1995), and 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Lindqvist and Rodhe, 1985). The concentration
of OH(aq) is estimated as given in the text. Lifetimes of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
species are sufficiently short that steady-state can be assumed at all
times.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (1) Donohoue et al. (2006); (2) Dibble
et al. (2012); (3) Balabanov et al. (2005); (4) Jiao and Dibble (2017);
(5) Donohoue et al. (2005); (6) Wilcox (2009); (7) Munthe (1992); (8) Lin and
Pehkonen (1998); (9) Wang and Pehkonen (2004); (10) Lin and Pehkonen (1997);
(11) Buxton et al. (1988).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> This is an effective
rate constant for intermediate pressures most relevant for atmospheric
oxidation and uses a higher level of theory than Goodsite et
al. (2004).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are tabulated by Jiao and Dibble (2017)
for different temperatures. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">260</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">280</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.09</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.9</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.64</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.99</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.11</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> We assume that the rate coefficient determined for
HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> holds more generally for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH,
Cl, BrO, and ClO based on the similarity in their elementary reactions with
HgBr and estimates from Wang et al. (2014).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Abstraction alone competes with oxidation to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
HgCl as the rate of HgCl thermal dissociation is negligibly slow (Holmes et
al., 2009).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> HgCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> rate coefficients are
assumed to be the same as HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. ClHg–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and BrHg–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have
similar bond energies (Dibble et al., 2012).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Oxidation of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) takes place in clouds only, with
concentrations of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) and aqueous-phase oxidants determined by
Henry's law equilibrium (footnote a). Aerosol liquid water contents under
non-cloud conditions are too low for these reactions to be significant.
Photoreduction of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) takes place in both aqueous aerosols
and clouds, with gas-aerosol partitioning of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as given by
Amos et al. (2012) outside of clouds and Henry's law equilibrium for
HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in cloud (footnote a). The aerosol is assumed aqueous if RH
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> OCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> has similar kinetics to
HOCl but is negligible for typical cloud and aerosol pH given the
HOCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> pK<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Harris, 2002).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Parameterization for photoreduction of aqueous-phase
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–organic complexes. Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the local photolysis rate constant for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> intended to be representative
of the near-UV actinic flux, [OA] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP) is the mass
concentration of organic aerosol under standard conditions of temperature and
pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is a coefficient adjusted in
GEOS-Chem to match observed TGM concentrations (see text).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The speciation of atmospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is unknown (Jaffe et al.,
2014; Gustin et al., 2015; Jones et al., 2016). It is generally assumed from
chemical equilibrium considerations that the main Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> species
are HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the gas phase and Hg–chloride complexes in the aqueous
phase (Hedgecock and Pirrone, 2001; Selin et al., 2007; Holmes et al., 2009).
Hg–chloride complexes are relatively resistant to photoreduction (Allard and
Arsenie, 1991; Pehkonen and Lin, 1998). Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> also strongly binds
to organic ligands, including to reduced sulfur complexes and carboxyl groups
(Pehkonen and Lin, 1998; Haitzer et al., 2002; Ravichandran, 2004; Zheng and
Hintelmann, 2009). Photoreduction of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> bound to dissolved
organic carbon (DOC) and other organic matter has been widely reported in
aquatic environments (Amyot et al., 1994; Xiao et al., 1995; O'Driscoll et
al., 2006; Whalin and Mason, 2006) and could also possibly take place in
organic aerosols (OA). Bash et
al. (2014) found that including in-cloud aqueous photoreduction via organic
acids based on the mechanism proposed by Si and Ariya (2008) improved the
simulation of Hg wet deposition in their regional air quality model. Observed
photochemically driven shifts in the abundance of naturally occurring Hg
isotopes in the atmosphere and precipitation support the occurrence of
aqueous-phase photoreduction involving Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–organic complexes
(Gratz et al., 2010; Sonke, 2011; Sonke et al., 2015).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Reactions not included in chemical
mechanism<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="241.848425pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reaction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reference<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Note</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Balabanov et al. (2005); Auzmendi-Murua et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Auzmendi-Murua et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> I<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Auzmendi-Murua et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Auzmendi-Murua et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Auzmendi-Murua et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> I<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HgI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Auzmendi-Murua et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hynes et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgOH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Goodsite et al. (2004); Hynes et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgOH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shepler and Peterson (2003); Hynes et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgOOH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dibble et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgONO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dibble et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> I <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Greig et al. (1970); Goodsite et al. (2004); Subir et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BrO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBrO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Balabanov and Peterson (2003); Balabanov et al. (2005); Dibble et al. (2012, 2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ClO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgClO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Balabanov and Peterson (2003); Dibble et al. (2012, 2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hall and Bloom (1993); Subir et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">see note</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> I <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBrI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">see note</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgBr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> HgBrOI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">see note</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HOBr(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wang and Pehkonen (2004); Hynes et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OBr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wang and Pehkonen (2004); Hynes et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wang and Pehkonen (2004); Hynes et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gårdfeldt and Jonsson (2003)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HgSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> products</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">van Loon et al. (2001)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> These reactions have been reported in the past
literature but are now thought to be too slow to be of atmospheric
relevance.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> References supporting non-inclusion
in the chemical mechanism.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Reaction reported in
laboratory studies by Ariya et al. (2002), Yan et al. (2005, 2009), Liu et
al. (2007), Raofie et al. (2008), and Qu et al. (2010) but not supported by
theory.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Endothermic reaction.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds are weakly bound and thermally
dissociate too fast to allow for second step of oxidation to
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Peleg et al. (2015) find a
strong correlation between observed nighttime gaseous Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical concentrations in Jerusalem. There is theoretical evidence
against NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> initiation of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation (Dibble et al., 2012), and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may instead serve as the second-stage oxidant of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This would be important only in warm urban environments where nighttime
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is high.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Found to be negligibly slow.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>h</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The formation of compounds with structural
formulae BrHgO and ClHgO requires a prohibitively high activation energy.
Note that e applies to compounds with structural formulae HgBrO, HgOBr,
HgClO, and HgOCl.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The direct formation of
HgO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(s)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from this reaction is energetically unfavorable (Calvert and
Lindberg, 2005; Tossell, 2006). It has been postulated that intermediate
products like HgO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could lead to the formation of stable (HgO)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oligomers or HgO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(s)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> via decomposition to OHgOO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(g)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Subir et al., 2011), but these must be stabilized through heterogeneous
reactions on atmospheric aerosols (Calvert and Lindberg, 2005), and the
associated mechanism is unlikely to be significant in the atmosphere (Hynes
et al., 2009). A gas-phase reaction has been reported in chamber studies
(Hall, 1995; Pal and Ariya, 2004; Sumner et al., 2005; Snider et al., 2008;
Rutter et al., 2012), but this is likely to have been influenced by the walls
of the chamber (as seen in Pal and Ariya, 2004) and presence of secondary
organic aerosols (in Rutter et al., 2012).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>j</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Atmospheric concentrations of I and IO (Dix et al., 2013;
Prados-Roman et al., 2015; Volkamer et al., 2015) are too low for these
reactions to be significant.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>k</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Rates are too slow to
be of relevance.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>l</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrations of HgSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
under typical atmospheric SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are expected to be very low.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The GEOS-Chem model is widely used for global studies of atmospheric
chemistry and has been applied in particular to simulations of atmospheric
Hg and biogeochemical cycling with a focus on interpreting observations
(e.g., Strode et al., 2008; Weiss-Penzias et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016).
The Hg chemical mechanism in the current standard version of GEOS-Chem
(<uri>www.geos-chem.org</uri>) is based on Holmes et al. (2010). Our updated
mechanism includes more recent information and is applied here with an
improved GEOS-Chem simulation of halogen chemistry (Schmidt et al., 2016). As
part of this work, we also introduce a new coupling of GEOS-Chem to a global
3-D ocean model (Y. X. Zhang et al., 2015) to better interpret observed seasonal
variations of atmospheric Hg in the context of both atmospheric chemistry and
oceanic drivers of air–sea exchange (Soerensen et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Chemical mechanism</title>
      <p>Table 1 lists the new chemical mechanism implemented in GEOS-Chem. Table 2
lists reactions proposed in the literature but subsequently estimated to be
too slow to be of atmospheric relevance. Oxidation of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the gas phase involves a two-stage process (Reactions R1,
R4) with competing Reactions (R2, R3): <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M460" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Hg</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the first-stage Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the second-stage
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidant, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a molecule of air (Goodsite et al., 2004;
Donohoue et al., 2006; Dibble et al., 2012). The Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> intermediate
has a lifetime of less than a minute anywhere in the troposphere, so local
steady state can be assumed. Goodsite et al. (2004) found that HgBr is
sufficiently stable for the Br atom to be an effective first-stage Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidant and proposed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Br as effective radicals to
carry out the second stage of oxidation to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Cl atom can
also oxidize Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce HgCl (Balabanov and Peterson, 2003; Donohoue
et al., 2005). Dibble et al. (2012) found that a broad range of radical
oxidants could oxidize HgBr and HgCl including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the most abundant atmospheric radicals, as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ClO, and Cl. Other proposed first-stage gas-phase Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidants appear to be unimportant, including OH, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, I, I<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, BrO, ClO, HCl, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 2). Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
is sparingly soluble in water, but it has been suggested that fast
aqueous-phase oxidation could take place in cloud droplets (Munthe and
McElroy, 1992; Lin and Pehkonen, 1997, 1998; Whalin et al.,
2007).
We include these processes in our mechanism with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq),
HOCl(aq), and OH(aq) as oxidants.</p>
      <p>Strong complexes between Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and organic acids may allow
electrons to be transferred to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during photolysis (Pehkonen
and Lin, 1998). Gårdfeldt and Jonsson (2003) found that direct photolysis
of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–oxalate resulted in
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction, and Si and Ariya (2008) reported the same for
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–dicarboxylates. O'Driscoll
et al. (2004) reported a linear increase in the efficiency of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> photoreduction in freshwater with increasing DOC
concentrations. We assume here that Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> photoreduction is
dependent on the local concentration of OA and on the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis
frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) taken as a proxy for the UV actinic flux; we
further assume the aerosol to be aqueous only at relative humidity greater
than 35 %. The scaling factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the reaction (Table 1) is
adjusted in GEOS-Chem such that simulated total gaseous mercury (TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(g)) concentrations match the global mean
observed at land stations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>GEOS-Chem model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>General description</title>
      <p>We start from the standard version v9-02 of the GEOS-Chem Hg model
(<uri>www.geos-chem.org</uri>; Amos et al., 2012; Song et al., 2015) and implement
a new 2010 inventory for speciated anthropogenic emissions (Zhang et al.,
2016) including contributions from commercial products (Horowitz et al.,
2014). We then add original updates, described below, for atmospheric chemistry
and atmosphere–ocean coupling. The standard v9-02 model includes cycling of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between the atmosphere, land, and the surface
mixed layer of the ocean (Selin et al., 2008; Soerensen et al., 2010). The
atmospheric model transports Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as separate
tracers. Gas–particle partitioning of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is parameterized
following Amos et al. (2012) as a thermodynamic equilibrium function of local
temperature and mass concentration of fine particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This parameterization is based on observed relationships between the
gas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> particle Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration ratio and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and it does
not resolve effects from particle composition or surface area.</p>
      <p>Holmes et al. (2010) presented the last detailed global atmospheric budget
analysis of Hg in GEOS-Chem, and we use it as a point of comparison for this
study. Their model version included Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by Br atoms, with Br
concentrations specified in the troposphere and stratosphere from the
p-TOMCAT and NASA Global Modeling Initiative models, respectively (Yang et
al., 2005; Strahan et al., 2007). The standard v9-02 model uses Br
concentration fields from the GEOS-Chem tropospheric bromine simulation by
Parrella et al. (2012) and features other model updates relative to Holmes
et al. (2010), including the gas–particle Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> equilibrium
partitioning described above, a corrected washout algorithm (Amos et al.,
2012), and improvements to the 2-D surface ocean model (Soerensen et al.,
2010). In this work we update the Br concentration fields to a more recent
version of GEOS-Chem (Schmidt et al., 2016), as discussed further in Sect. 3.2.</p>
      <p>We conduct a 3-year simulation for 2009–2011 driven by
GEOS-5 assimilated meteorological
data from the NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) with native
horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 72
vertical levels extending up to the mesosphere. The GEOS-Chem simulation is
conducted at 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution by
regridding the GEOS-5 meteorological data. We use anthropogenic Hg emissions
for the year 2010 from Zhang et al. (2016). The spatial distribution of soil
Hg is determined following the method of Selin et al. (2008), with updated
soil respiration emissions (910 Mg Hg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for consistency with the
mechanistic terrestrial model developed by Smith-Downey et al. (2010).
Emissions from snow and re-emission of deposited Hg follow Selin et
al. (2008). The model is initialized with a 15-year simulation to equilibrate
the stratosphere. We present model results as averages for the three
simulation years (2009–2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Atmospheric chemistry</title>
      <p>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> redox chemistry in the standard GEOS-Chem v9-02
model includes Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by Br atoms and Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in-cloud
photoreduction as described by Holmes et al. (2010), with Br concentration
fields from Parrella et al. (2012). Shah et al. (2016) updated that chemistry
following Dibble et al. (2012) to include second-stage oxidation of HgBr by
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BrO, as well as new kinetics for HgBr dissociation.
Here we further expand and update the chemistry using the mechanism described
in Table 1. Br and Cl radical concentrations are taken from a new GEOS-Chem
simulation of tropospheric oxidant–aerosol chemistry by Schmidt et
al. (2016). Unlike Parrella et al. (2012), this simulation does not include a
bromine radical source from sea salt debromination as recent evidence
suggests that BrO concentrations in the marine boundary layer (MBL) are
generally sub-ppt (Gómez Martín et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015).
Simulated concentrations of Br in the free troposphere are, on the other hand,
a factor of 2 higher than Parrella et al. (2012), reflecting more extensive
heterogeneous chemistry. Schmidt et al. (2016) show that their simulation
provides a better simulation of aircraft and satellite observations of
tropospheric BrO. Stratospheric concentrations of Br and Cl species are from
the GEOS Chemistry Climate Model (Liang et al., 2010) and Global Modeling
Initiative (Considine et al., 2008; Murray et al., 2012), respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annual (2009–2011) zonal mean mixing ratios of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in GEOS-Chem, and
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation rates in number density and mixing
ratio units.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We use the global 3-D monthly archive of oxidant and radical concentrations
from the GEOS-Chem simulation of Schmidt et al. (2016) that included detailed
gas and aerosol chemistry. We apply diurnal scaling following Holmes et
al. (2010) to the monthly mean concentrations of Br, BrO, Cl, ClO, and HOCl;
a cosine function of the solar zenith angle for OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; and
NO–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemical equilibrium for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Schmidt et
al. (2016) evaluated their simulated tropospheric BrO concentrations (global
daytime mean of 0.96 ppt) with observations from satellite and aircraft and
found no systematic bias. GEOS-Chem concentrations of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (proxy for HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been evaluated successfully in a
number of aircraft campaigns (Martin et al., 2006; Hudman et al., 2007; Singh
et al., 2007; Lin and McElroy, 2010; Mao et al., 2010; Travis et al., 2016).
GEOS-Chem NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns have also been evaluated against satellite
observations over China (Lin et al., 2012), North America (e.g., Lamsal et
al., 2014), and Africa (Marais et al., 2012). Fast Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in the
polar spring boundary layer is simulated by specifying high BrO
concentrations when conditions for temperature, sea ice cover, sunlight, and
atmospheric stability are met (Holmes et al., 2010). Monthly mean OA
concentrations are archived from a separate v9-02 GEOS-Chem
simulation including primary emissions from combustion and secondary
production from biogenic and anthropogenic hydrocarbons (Pye et al., 2010).
An evaluation of modeled OA against aircraft observations globally is
presented in Heald et al. (2011), which showed no systematic bias in remote
environments but an underestimate of median concentrations in polluted
regions. Aqueous-phase concentrations of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and HOCl are
determined from the gas-phase partial pressures and Henry's law coefficients
(Table 1). We estimate aqueous in-cloud OH concentrations following Jacob et
al. (2005) as [OH(aq)] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [OH(g)], with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Atmosphere–ocean coupling</title>
      <p>GEOS-Chem v9-02 uses a 2-D surface–slab ocean model with no lateral transport
and with fixed subsurface ocean concentration boundary conditions (Soerensen
et al., 2010). Oceanic circulation and mixing between the surface mixed layer
and deeper ocean strongly impact Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the surface
ocean through the supply of reducible Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, driving changes in
oceanic evasion (Soerensen et al., 2013, 2014). Here we
present a new two-way coupling of the GEOS-Chem atmospheric Hg simulation to
the MITgcm 3-D oceanic general circulation model with embedded ecology
(Y. X. Zhang et al., 2015). First, the GEOS-Chem Hg model with the 2-D slab
ocean is initialized over 15 years of repeated present-day emissions and
meteorological data (15 years is required to equilibrate the stratosphere).
Starting from these initial conditions, we conduct the GEOS-Chem simulation
for the desired period (here 3 years: 2009–2011) and archive monthly
surface air Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and total Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition
fluxes. We then initialize the Y. X. Zhang et al. (2015) ocean model for
20 years with these archived surface boundary conditions to equilibrate the
upper several hundred meters of the ocean. The monthly mean surface ocean
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from the final year of the simulation are then input
to GEOS-Chem, replacing the 2-D slab ocean model concentrations. The 15-year
GEOS-Chem simulation is repeated with this new input. This process is
iterated until convergence of results is achieved. We find that two
iterations are sufficient.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Global budget of atmospheric mercury</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Budget and lifetimes</title>
      <p>Figure 1 (top panel) shows the simulated vertical and latitudinal
distributions of annual zonal mean Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios. The fraction of tropospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aerosol phase
ranges from less than 10 to more than 90 % (Amos et al., 2012). Modeled
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases rapidly in the stratosphere, while Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases with altitude and dominates total Hg in the stratosphere. This
vertical structure is driven by chemistry (Selin et al., 2007; Holmes et al.,
2010), and these general vertical trends in the two species are consistent
with limited available observations (Murphy et al., 2006; Talbot et al.,
2007; Lyman and Jaffe, 2012). The exact partitioning of total Hg in the
stratosphere between Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is uncertain, and GEOS-Chem
predicts a higher Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction relative to other models (Bieser
et al., 2016). Photodissociation of gas-phase Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> halides may be
possible at ultraviolet wavelengths (Maya, 1977), but whether this is
important in the mid-to-upper stratosphere requires further investigation.
The stratosphere in the model accounts for 12 % of total Hg atmospheric
mass and is in a very different redox regime from the troposphere. Here we
focus on tropospheric budgets, which are most relevant to Hg deposition. The
stratosphere is discussed further in Sect. 4.4.</p>
      <p>Figure 2 shows the global tropospheric Hg budget from our GEOS-Chem
simulation, including the rates of the major Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycling pathways. The global tropospheric Hg reservoir is 3900 Mg, including
3500 Mg as Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 400 Mg as Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, smaller than the
4500 Mg reservoir in Holmes et al. (2010). In both cases, the reservoir was
adjusted through the Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> photoreduction rate coefficient to
match the observed annual mean TGM at long-term monitoring sites, mainly
located at northern midlatitudes (Fig. 3). Holmes et al. (2010) used
observations for 2000–2008 averaging 1.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.00 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sites), whereas we use observations for
2007–2013 averaging 1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Observed
atmospheric concentrations in North America and Europe have declined on
average by 1–2 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> since
1990, which has been attributed to the phase-out of Hg from commercial
products and declines in coal Hg emissions as a co-benefit of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission controls (Zhang et al., 2016). Observations used in Holmes
et al. (2010) also included very high concentrations at four East Asian sites
(3–7 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP; Nguyen et al., 2007; Sakata and Asakura, 2007; Feng
et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2009), whereas the more recent observations over
East Asia used here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are all less than 3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP (Sheu et
al., 2010; Fu et al., 2012a, b; H. Zhang et al., 2015). Only one site (Mt.
Changbai, China) has data available during both time periods, and observed TGM
concentrations decreased there by a factor of 2 (Fu et al., 2012b). Thus,
our atmospheric loadings may be more representative of recent (ca. 2010)
conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Global budget of tropospheric mercury in GEOS-Chem.
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> includes gaseous and particulate forms in local
thermodynamic equilibrium (Amos et al., 2012). The bottom panel identifies
the major chemical reactions from Table 1 cycling Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Reactions with global rates lower than 100 Mg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are not shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We calculate several atmospheric lifetimes to understand the processes
driving Hg deposition: the chemical lifetime of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against oxidation,
the chemical lifetime of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against reduction, the lifetime of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against deposition, and the lifetime of total gaseous
mercury (TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(g)) against
deposition. We find that the lifetime of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against oxidation to
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the troposphere is 2.7 months, with
Br atom-initiated pathways
contributing 97 % of total oxidation. This chemical lifetime is smaller
than most prior model estimates, e.g., 6 months in Holmes et al. (2010),
which used lower Br concentrations. The addition of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as
second-stage oxidants is also important in increasing the rate of HgBr
conversion to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, more than compensating for faster thermal
decomposition of HgBr relative to Holmes et al. (2010). Our results are
consistent with Shah et al. (2016), who estimated a global annual
tropospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime against oxidation to Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by Br
atoms of 1.2 to 2.8 months, based on their simulation of measurements of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the southeastern US in summer during the
Nitrogen, Oxidants, Mercury and Aerosol Distributions, Sources and Sinks (NOMADSS) campaign (Gratz et al.,
2015). The dominance of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as HgBr oxidants reflects their
high atmospheric abundance and is consistent with results from a box modeling
study over the Pacific (Wang et al., 2014). We find Cl atoms contribute less
than 1 % of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation globally because the supply of Cl atoms
(mean tropospheric mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppt) is limited by fast
conversion to the stable reservoir HCl. Aqueous-phase pathways in clouds
contribute 2 %. Our work suggests that the dominant Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
species produced in the gas phase are BrHgONO and BrHgOOH, though the actual
speciation of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere would likely be modified
through cycling in aerosols and clouds (Hedgecock and Pirrone, 2001; Lin et
al., 2006). We did not consider heterogeneous Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation on particle
surfaces (e.g., Vidic et al., 1998; Flora et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2004) due
to inadequate information to formulate atmospheric rates. Further study of
heterogeneous Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation is needed (Ariya et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The vertical distribution of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation rates is
shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 1 in units of number density (relevant to
the mass budget) and mixing ratio (relevant to transport). Only 1 % of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation occurs in the stratosphere, consistent with previous work
(Holmes et al., 2010). Most Hg oxidation by mass occurs in the extratropical
free troposphere, consistent with the Br distribution (Schmidt et al., 2016),
and is faster in the Northern Hemisphere because of higher NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations. Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in Holmes et al. (2010) was fastest in the
Southern Ocean MBL due to high Br concentrations from sea salt aerosol
debromination, but debromination in that region is unlikely since the sea
salt aerosol remains alkaline (Murphy et al., 1998; Alexander et al., 2005;
Schmidt et al., 2016). In general, the addition of second-stage oxidants
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shifts Hg oxidation to lower latitudes relative to
Holmes et al. (2010). This has implications for Hg deposition, which we
discuss in Sect. 5. Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in terms of mixing ratio features a
secondary maximum in the tropical upper troposphere, where the Br <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BrO
ratio is high (Parrella et al., 2012; Fernandez et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>We find that the shorter chemical lifetime of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in our simulation
relative to Holmes et al. (2010) must be balanced by faster atmospheric
reduction to reproduce observed TGM concentrations. This is implemented by
adjusting the photoreduction coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Table 1. The resulting
mean lifetime of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against reduction in the troposphere is
13 days. Shah et al. (2016) similarly found that faster Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation as
needed to match NOMADSS observations required faster Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduction, with a tropospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime against reduction of
19 days. The lifetime of tropospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> against deposition is
relatively long, 26 days (see Fig. 2), because most Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
production occurs in the free troposphere, where precipitation is infrequent
(Fig. 1). Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in the model is faster in the Northern
Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere because of higher OA
concentrations. Hence Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are higher in the
Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>We find here that the Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime against reduction is shorter
than against deposition, emphasizing the importance of reduction in
controlling the atmospheric Hg budget. By contrast, Holmes et al. (2010)
found an Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric lifetime of 50 days against reduction
and 36 days against deposition, which led them to conclude that no reduction
would be needed if Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
kinetics were decreased within their uncertainty. This is no longer possible
in our simulation because of the much faster Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation. We conclude
that atmospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction must take place, although the
mechanism is not established. With Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction, the overall
lifetime of tropospheric TGM against deposition in our simulation is
5.2 months, similar to the estimate of 6.1 months in Holmes et al. (2010). We
discuss the consistency of this estimate with observations in the next
section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Global distribution</title>
      <p>Figure 3 compares our simulation to observed 2007–2013 TGM surface
concentrations. TGM includes Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the gaseous component of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Observations include annual means at 37 land sites plus
ship cruises. The spatial correlation coefficient between model and
observations is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mean at land stations is 1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP in the observations and
1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP in the model, with the good agreement in
the mean reflecting the adjustment of the Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> photoreduction
rate coefficient as explained above.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Global distribution of total gaseous mercury (TGM)
concentrations in surface air in units of ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K). Model values (background)
are annual means for 2009–2011. Observations (symbols) are for 2007–2013.
Data for land sites (diamonds) are annual means for 2007–2013 as previously
compiled by Song et al. (2015) and Zhang et al. (2016). Observations from
2007–2013 ship cruises (circles) are from Soerensen et al. (2013, 2014).
Note the change in the linear color scale at 1.50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Beyond this simulation of the mean, we successfully reproduce the observed
standard deviation of TGM concentrations, which places an independent
constraint on the atmospheric lifetime of Hg against deposition (Junge, 1974;
Hamrud, 1983). This constraint had previously been expressed in terms of the
interhemispheric gradient of TGM from ship cruises, leading to TGM lifetime
estimates ranging from 4.4 months to 2 years (Slemr et al., 1981; Fitzgerald
et al., 1983; Lindqvist and Rodhe, 1985; Lamborg et al., 2002). However, we
find the interhemispheric gradient in surface concentrations is not a
sensitive diagnostic of lifetime because surface atmospheric Hg in the
Southern Hemisphere is controlled more by atmosphere–ocean exchange than by
transport from the Northern Hemisphere. For example, changing the simulation
of atmosphere–ocean exchange from the slab ocean to the MITgcm (Sect. 3.3)
increases the TGM lifetime while also increasing the interhemispheric
gradient due to changed ocean emissions. We conducted a sensitivity
simulation doubling the tropospheric TGM lifetime in the model (to
10.4 months) by decreasing the rate of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation. This produced less
than 20 % of a decline in the interhemispheric gradient, but the relative
standard deviation of TGM concentrations across land stations decreased by
40 %. Thus the overall variability of TGM concentrations provides a more
sensitive constraint on the TGM atmospheric lifetime, while the
interhemispheric gradient can be misleading. The model's ability to reproduce
the observed standard deviation across land sites supports our simulated TGM
atmospheric lifetime of 5.2 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Seasonality</title>
      <p>Figure 4 compares simulated and observed seasonal cycles of TGM
concentrations at land stations at northern midlatitudes (30 to
60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and in the Southern Hemisphere (see Fig. 3 for site locations). Also
shown are results from a sensitivity simulation with the 2-D surface–slab
ocean model (Soerensen et al., 2010). The observed seasonal cycle is
successfully reproduced in the Northern Hemisphere. The February maximum and
September minimum are driven in the model in part by Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and
in part by ocean evasion. Seasonality in radical oxidant concentrations
outweighs temperature effects, leading to fastest oxidation in summer and
slowest in winter. Modeled oceanic Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> evasion from the North Atlantic
Ocean peaks in winter and early spring, because higher wind speeds increase
mixing and entrainment of reducible Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from subsurface waters
and enhance the rate of air–sea exchange, and Hg removal via particle
settling during this time is low (Sorensen et al., 2010, 2013). Similar to
Song et al. (2015), we find that the 2-D slab ocean overestimates the
observed seasonality at northern midlatitude sites (Fig. 4). Atlantic and
Pacific Ocean seawater Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements indicate this overestimate
results from oversimplified ocean physics and the fixed boundary condition
for subsurface ocean concentrations in the slab ocean model (Soerensen et
al., 2014). Previous work shows one-way coupling to the MITgcm ocean
simulation improves simulated surface ocean Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations compared
to observations (Soerensen et al., 2014). Here, the two-way coupling to the
MITgcm also improves the seasonality in atmospheric Hg.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Mean seasonal variation and spatial standard deviation of
total gaseous mercury (TGM) concentrations for northern midlatitude sites
(see Fig. 3) and Southern Hemisphere sites (Amsterdam Island and Cape
Point). Observations are compared to our standard GEOS-Chem simulation
coupled to the MITgcm 3-D ocean model and to a sensitivity simulation
coupled to the 2-D surface–slab ocean model in GEOS-Chem.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In the Southern Hemisphere, Amsterdam Island in the Indian Ocean and Cape
Point on the South African coast have similar monthly average concentrations
and show no significant seasonal variation (Angot et al., 2014; Slemr et al.,
2015). By contrast, the model at those sites has strong seasonality, as
previously shown for the standard model version v9-02 (Song et al., 2015). We
find a modest improvement in moving from the slab ocean simulation to the
MITgcm, but the seasonal bias is still large. Long-range transport of
atmospheric Hg from Antarctica could influence observed seasonality at these
sites (Angot et al., 2016). Capturing the seasonality of atmospheric Hg in
the Arctic using GEOS-Chem required parameterization of unique sea ice,
oceanic, and riverine dynamics (Fisher et al., 2012, 2013; Y. Zhang et al.,
2015); a similar analysis for the Southern Ocean region, with its distinct
productivity dynamics impacting Hg cycling (e.g., Cossa et al., 2011;
Gionfriddo et al., 2016), has not yet been performed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Relationship between total gaseous mercury (TGM) and ozone
concentrations in the lower stratosphere. TGM is shown as the decimal
logarithm of the concentration in units of ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> STP. Observations are from
CARIBIC commercial aircraft in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere for
April 2014–January 2015 (Slemr et al., 2015). Tropospheric data as diagnosed
by [O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CO] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25 mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are excluded. Model
points are data for individual flights sampled along the CARIBIC flight
tracks on the GEOS-Chem 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> model grid. Also
shown are results from a model sensitivity simulation with a doubled Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation rate in the stratosphere. Reduced-major-axis (RMA) regressions for
the log(TGM)–ozone relationship are shown with slopes and correlation
coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Errors on the slopes are estimated by the bootstrap
method.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annual Hg wet deposition fluxes over North America, Europe, and
China. Model values for 2009–2011 (background contours) are compared to
2007–2013 observations from the Mercury Deposition Network (MDN, National
Atmospheric Deposition Program, <uri>http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/mdn/</uri>) over
North America (58 sites), the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme
(EMEP) over Europe (20 sites), and data from Fu et al. (2015, 2016) over
China (9 sites). In the China panel, circles represent rural sites, and
diamonds represent urban sites as identified in Fu et al. (2015, 2016). For
the MDN and EMEP networks, which collect weekly or monthly integrated
samples, we only include sites with at least 75 % of annual data for at
least 1 year between 2007 and 2013; for China we only include sites with at
least 9 months of data over the 2007–2013 period. MDN data are formally
quality-controlled, while for EMEP data we rely on a subset of sites that
have been quality-controlled (O. Travnikov, personal communication, 2016).
Legends give the normalized mean bias (NMB) for all sites, excluding urban
sites in China.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Vertical distribution and the stratosphere</title>
      <p>Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the model drop rapidly above the tropopause
(Fig. 1), consistent with observations (Talbot et al., 2007; Slemr et al.,
2009). Modeled Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in the lower stratosphere is almost
exclusively from Br atoms. There is no significant Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction
there because OA concentrations and relative humidity are very low. Extensive
TGM observations in the lowermost stratosphere at northern extratropical
latitudes are available from the Civil Aircraft for the Regular Investigation
of the atmosphere Based on an Instrument Container (CARIBIC) program, which collects measurements
aboard commercial aircraft (Slemr et al., 2009, 2014, 2016). The early
stratospheric data were biased low, and we focus on corrected data available
for April 2014–January 2015 (Slemr et al., 2016). TGM in the stratosphere is
expected to be mainly Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> because Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is incorporated into
aerosol (Murphy et al., 2006; Lyman and Jaffe, 2012).</p>
      <p>Figure 5 compares the stratospheric TGM concentrations measured in CARIBIC to
model values sampled along the flight tracks. The CARIBIC data also include
ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO concentrations (Brenninkmeijer et al., 2007). Here we
use O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration as a chemical coordinate for depth into the
stratosphere and exclude tropospheric data as diagnosed by [O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CO]
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25 mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hudman et al., 2007). We correlate the logarithm
of TGM concentrations, as a measure of first-order loss, to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations. The observations reach higher ozone than the model,
indicating that they sample air with greater stratospheric influence. The
model underestimates the log(TGM)–ozone slope by a factor of 2. To test
whether this underestimate is due to slow Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, we performed a
sensitivity simulation doubling the stratospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation rate
(green line in Fig. 5). The model slope increased by only 32 %. This
suggests that the log(TGM)–ozone relationship in the lowermost stratosphere
is set in part by mixing rather than solely by chemistry (Xiao et al., 2007).
The model underestimate of the log(TGM)–ozone slope could reflect excessive
dynamical mixing in the lower stratosphere, a well-known problem in
stratospheric transport models (Schoeberl et al., 2003; Tan et al., 2004), or
errors in the timescales of air transit across the tropopause, which vary on
the order of months to years (Orbe et al., 2014; Ploeger and Birner, 2016).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Implications for global Hg deposition</title>
      <p>Figure 6 compares simulated and observed annual Hg wet deposition at sites in
North America, Europe, and China for 2007–2013. The model captures the
spatial variability across sites in North America relatively well (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Some of this variability is driven by precipitation amount, which
leads to higher modeled deposition along the northwest coast and over the
North Atlantic. The maximum along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico is due to
deep convection scavenging upper-tropospheric air enriched in
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Guentzel et al., 2001; Selin and Jacob, 2008; Holmes et
al., 2016). Previous GEOS-Chem simulations with Br-initiated oxidation of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> failed to capture this maximum because Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> production
favored higher latitudes (Holmes et al., 2010; Amos et al., 2012). The
inclusion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as second-stage oxidants in our simulation
shifts Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> production to lower latitudes and matches the general
location of the Gulf of Mexico maximum, although the magnitude is still
underestimated. Increasing horizontal resolution in the model could improve
the definition of the maximum (Zhang et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Over Europe, deposition is fairly uniform and low in the model and
observations. This reflects decreased anthropogenic Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions in the region from emissions controls on coal-fired power plants
(Klimont et al., 2013; Muntean et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016). There is no
area of frequent deep convection, unlike the Gulf of Mexico for the US.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Annual 2009–2011 Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition fluxes in
GEOS-Chem.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6353/2017/acp-17-6353-2017-f07.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Observations of Hg wet deposition over China have recently become available
(Fu et al., 2015, 2016). Values at urban sites are high, likely reflecting
local Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, and are correlated with high concentrations
of particulate Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fu et al., 2016). Values at rural sites are
much lower and comparable to wet deposition observed in North America and
Europe despite higher TGM concentrations in China (see Fig. 3). We simulate
these low values successfully in our model, whereas a simulation with the
standard GEOS-Chem v9-02 overestimates them by a factor of 4. This reflects
in part our dependence of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction on OA concentrations,
which are particularly high in China (Heald et al., 2011). Decreasing wet
deposition in this region in the model has implications for the long-range
transport of atmospheric Hg from East Asia (Weiss-Penzias et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>Figure 7 shows the global distribution of wet and dry Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
deposition in the model. This deposition is the main Hg source to the open
ocean (Sunderland and Mason, 2007; Soerensen et al., 2010). We find that
80 % of global Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition is to the oceans, compared to
71 % in Holmes et al. (2010), and that 60 % of this deposition is
wet. Even though surface Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are higher over land, most
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation takes place in the free troposphere and is globally
distributed (Fig. 1). Concentrations of Br atoms are higher over oceans,
reflecting their marine origin (Schmidt et al., 2016). The dependence of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in our mechanism on the formation of Hg–organic
complexes further shifts Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition away from continents
where OA concentrations are highest (Heald et al., 2011). The change in Br
distribution and dominance of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as second-stage oxidants
for HgBr shifts Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition to lower latitudes relative to
the simulation by Holmes et al. (2010), where most deposition occurred over
high-latitude oceans. We now find 49 % of global total Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
deposition is to tropical oceans (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). The global
ocean is a net sink for total atmospheric Hg of
1700 Mg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2), with
approximately half taken up by tropical oceans. A large Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
deposition flux to the tropical oceans is suggested by recent cruise
observations of high oceanic Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations across the Intertropical
Convergence Zone (ITCZ), which GEOS-Chem previously underestimated (Soerensen
et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The atmospheric redox chemistry of mercury (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determines
the global patterns of Hg deposition to surface ecosystems. Here we
developed an updated chemical mechanism for use in atmospheric models and
evaluated it in the GEOS-Chem global model to gain new insights into the
global Hg budget and the patterns of Hg deposition. As part of this work we
also developed a new coupling between GEOS-Chem and a 3-D ocean general
circulation model (MITgcm), resulting in a fully resolved simulation of Hg
transport and chemistry in the atmosphere–ocean system.</p>
      <p>The updated atmospheric Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> redox mechanism includes
gas-phase Br as the main Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidant in the troposphere and
stratosphere, and second-stage oxidation of HgBr by a number of radical
oxidants including NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Br concentrations in GEOS-Chem are
from the recent simulation of Schmidt et al. (2016), and they are higher than
previous models and more consistent with recent aircraft and satellite
observations of BrO. Atmospheric reduction of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
hypothesized to take place by photolysis of aqueous-phase
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–organic complexes. This is parameterized in GEOS-Chem as a
function of the local concentration of organic aerosol.</p>
      <p>The global mass of atmospheric Hg simulated by GEOS-Chem is 4400 Mg,
including 3900 Mg in the troposphere. The tropospheric lifetime of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
against oxidation is 2.7 months. Observations of the atmospheric variability
of total gaseous mercury (TGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(g))
suggest an atmospheric lifetime against deposition of about 6 months. Thus,
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> must be reduced in the atmosphere, which is consistent with
recent observations of atmospheric Hg isotope fractionation. Matching the
observed mean surface TGM concentrations in GEOS-Chem implies a tropospheric
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime of 13 days against reduction and 26 days against
deposition. This results in an overall tropospheric lifetime for TGM of
5.2 months against deposition and enables a successful simulation of the
observed relative standard deviation of TGM concentrations across terrestrial
sites. The interhemispheric difference in TGM concentrations had previously
been interpreted to suggest a longer TGM lifetime against deposition, but we
show this is misleading because TGM in the Southern Hemisphere is mostly
controlled by oceanic emissions rather than transport from the Northern
Hemisphere.</p>
      <p>The observed seasonality of TGM concentrations at northern midlatitudes
(maximum in February, minimum in September) is reproduced by the model,
where it is attributed to photochemical oxidation of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and oceanic
evasion, both with similar seasonal effects on TGM concentrations. Coupling
GEOS-Chem to the MITgcm 3-D ocean model improves simulation of the seasonal
amplitude by lowering oceanic evasion over the North Atlantic due to
elimination of the static subsurface ocean boundary condition in the
GEOS-Chem slab ocean and more realistic ocean physics. Observations at
Southern Hemisphere sites show little seasonality, whereas the model features
a spring maximum. More work is needed to understand this discrepancy.</p>
      <p>Observations show a rapid depletion of TGM above the tropopause, and we
examined whether this could provide a test for Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry. For that
purpose we used extensive lowermost-stratospheric observations from the
CARIBIC program aboard commercial aircraft and characterized TGM
first-order loss as the slope of the log(TGM)–ozone relationship. We find
that the model underestimates the observed log(TGM)–ozone slope by a factor of 2 but that this slope is only moderately sensitive to the rate of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and appears to be driven in part by mixing of air parcels
with different stratospheric ages. This mixing is likely too fast in
GEOS-Chem, which may explain the weaker TGM–ozone slope.</p>
      <p>Hg wet deposition fluxes in the model are consistent with spatial patterns
observed in North America and Europe. Inclusion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as
second-stage HgBr oxidants in the model shifts Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> production to
lower latitudes as compared to previous versions of GEOS-Chem and enables the
model to capture the location of the observed maximum in wet deposition along
the Gulf Coast of the US. However, the magnitude of this Gulf Coast maximum
is still underestimated. In rural areas of China, wet deposition is observed
to be low despite very high TGM concentrations. This is reproduced by the
model, where it is due to fast Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction, driven in part by
very high OA concentrations.</p>
      <p>We find that 80 % of global Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition takes place over
the oceans, reflecting in part the marine origin of Br as well as the
relatively low marine OA concentrations and hence slow Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
reduction. More Hg is deposited to the tropical oceans (49 % of total
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition) than in previous versions of GEOS-Chem, where
debromination of sea salt aerosol drove fast Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and
deposition to the Southern Ocean. Observations of the latitudinal gradient of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wet deposition over the ocean would provide a sensitive test
of Hg chemistry and improve understanding of Hg inputs to different ocean
regions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability">

      <p>Model code used in this study will be made publicly
available at <uri>http://www.geos-chem.org</uri> in an upcoming version through
the standard GEOS-Chem procedures. Observational data and code to create
model–observation comparison figures are available for download at
<uri>https://github.com/GC-Hg/HgBenchmark/</uri>. Aircraft data from CARIBIC are
available through the Global Mercury Observing System (GMOS) at
<uri>http://sdi.iia.cnr.it/geoint/publicpage/GMOS/gmos_aircraft.zul</uri>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was funded by the Atmospheric Chemistry, Chemical Oceanography, and
Environmental Chemical Sciences programs of the US National Science
Foundation. We thank Oleg Travnikov for providing quality-controlled EMEP wet
deposition measurements and the CARIBIC team
(<uri>www.caribic-atmospheric.com</uri>) for maintaining this valuable measurement
program. We thank Jeroen Sonke for helpful discussions. We thank the editor,
Ian Hedgecock, and three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful
suggestions.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: R.
Ebinghaus<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: I. M. Hedgecock and three anonymous
referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Li, Q. B., Yantosca, R. M.,
Savarino, J., Lee, C. C. W., and Thiemens, M. H.: Sulfate formation in
sea-salt aerosols: Constraints from oxygen isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D10307, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005659</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Allard, B. and Arsenie, I.: Abiotic reduction of mercury by humic substances
in aquatic system – an important process for the mercury cycle, Water Air
Soil Pollut., 56, 457–464, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00342291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00342291</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Holmes, C. D., Fisher, J. A., Wang, Q., Yantosca,
R. M., Corbitt, E. S., Galarneau, E., Rutter, A. P., Gustin, M. S., Steffen,
A., Schauer, J. J., Graydon, J. A., Louis, V. L. St., Talbot, R. W.,
Edgerton, E. S., Zhang, Y., and Sunderland, E. M.: Gas-particle partitioning
of atmospheric Hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 591–603, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-591-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-591-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Amyot, M., Mierle, G., Lean, D., and McQueen, D.: Sunlight-Induced Formation
of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury in Lake Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28,
2366–2371, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00062a022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00062a022</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Amyot, M., Lean, D. R. S., Poissant, L., and Doyon, M. R.: Distribution and
transformation of elemental mercury in the St. Lawrence River and Lake
Ontario, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 57, 155–163,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/Cjfas-57-S1-155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/Cjfas-57-S1-155</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Angot, H., Barret, M., Magand, O., Ramonet, M., and Dommergue, A.: A 2-year
record of atmospheric mercury species at a background Southern Hemisphere
station on Amsterdam Island, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11461–11473,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Angot, H., Dastoor, A., De Simone, F., Gårdfeldt, K., Gencarelli, C. N.,
Hedgecock, I. M., Langer, S., Magand, O., Mastromonaco, M. N., Nordstrøm,
C., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Pirrone, N., Ryjkov, A., Selin, N. E., Skov, H., Song,
S., Sprovieri, F., Steffen, A., Toyota, K., Travnikov, O., Yang, X., and
Dommergue, A.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury in
polar regions: review of recent measurements and comparison with models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10735–10763, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10735-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10735-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ariya, P. A., Khalizov, A., and Gidas, A.: Reactions of gaseous mercury with
atomic and molecular halogens: Kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric
implications, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 7310–7320, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp020719o" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp020719o</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ariya, P. A., Amyot, M., Dastoor, A., Deeds, D., Feinberg, A., Kos, G.,
Poulain, A., Ryjkov, A., Semeniuk, K., Subir, M., and Toyota, K.: Mercury
Physicochemical and Biogeochemical Transformation in the Atmosphere and at
Atmospheric Interfaces: A Review and Future Directions, Chem. Rev., 115,
3760–3802, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500667e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500667e</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Auzmendi-Murua, I., Castillo, A., and Bozzelli, J.: Mercury Oxidation via
Chlorine, Bromine, and Iodine under Atmospheric Conditions: Thermochemistry
and Kinetics, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 2959–2975, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp412654s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp412654s</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Balabanov, N. and Peterson, K.: Mercury and reactive halogens: The
thermochemistry of Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="" open="{"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl-2, Br-2, BrCl, ClO, and
BrO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="." close="}"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 7465–7470,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp035547p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp035547p</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Balabanov, N., Shepler, B., and Peterson, K.: Accurate global potential
energy surface and reaction dynamics for the ground state of HgBr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 109, 8765–8773, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp053415l" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp053415l</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Bash, J., Carlton, A., Hutzell, W., and Bullock, O.: Regional Air Quality
Model Application of the Aqueous-Phase Photo Reduction of Atmospheric
Oxidized Mercury by Dicarboxylic Acids, Atmosphere, 5, 1–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos5010001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos5010001</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Bergan, T. and Rodhe, H.: Oxidation of elemental mercury in the atmosphere;
Constraints imposed by global scale modelling, J. Atmos. Chem., 40, 191–212,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1011929927896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1011929927896</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A.
M., Li, Q. B., Liu, H. G. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global
modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model
description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23073–23095,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd000807</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Bieser, J., Slemr, F., Ambrose, J., Brenninkmeijer, C., Brooks, S., Dastoor,
A., DeSimone, F., Ebinghaus, R., Gencarelli, C., Geyer, B., Gratz, L. E.,
Hedgecock, I. M., Jaffe, D., Kelley, P., Lin, C.-J., Matthias, V., Ryjkov,
A., Selin, N., Song, S., Travnikov, O., Weigelt, A., Luke, W., Ren, X., Zahn,
A., Yang, X., Zhu, Y., and Pirrone, N.: Multi-model study of mercury
dispersion in the atmosphere: Vertical distribution of mercury species,
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2016-1074</ext-link>, in review, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Crutzen, P., Boumard, F., Dauer, T., Dix, B.,
Ebinghaus, R., Filippi, D., Fischer, H., Franke, H., Frieß, U.,
Heintzenberg, J., Helleis, F., Hermann, M., Kock, H. H., Koeppel, C.,
Lelieveld, J., Leuenberger, M., Martinsson, B. G., Miemczyk, S., Moret, H.
P., Nguyen, H. N., Nyfeler, P., Oram, D., O'Sullivan, D., Penkett, S., Platt,
U., Pupek, M., Ramonet, M., Randa, B., Reichelt, M., Rhee, T. S., Rohwer, J.,
Rosenfeld, K., Scharffe, D., Schlager, H., Schumann, U., Slemr, F., Sprung,
D., Stock, P., Thaler, R., Valentino, F., van Velthoven, P., Waibel, A.,
Wandel, A., Waschitschek, K., Wiedensohler, A., Xueref-Remy, I., Zahn, A.,
Zech, U., and Ziereis, H.: Civil Aircraft for the regular investigation of
the atmosphere based on an instrumented container: The new CARIBIC system,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4953–4976, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4953-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4953-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Bullock, O. R., Atkinson, D., Braverman, T., Civerolo, K., Dastoor, A.,
Davignon, D., Ku, J. Y., Lohman, K., Myers, T. C., Park, R. J., Seigneur, C.,
Selin, N. E., Sistla, G., and Vijayaraghavan, K.: The North American Mercury
Model Intercomparison Study (NAMMIS): Study description and model-to-model
comparisons, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D17310, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009803</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Buxton, G., Greenstock, C., Helman, W., and Ross, A.: Critical Review of rate
constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl
radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OH/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Aqueous Solution, J. Phys. Chem.
Ref. Data, 17, 513–886, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Calvert, J. G. and Lindberg, S. E.: Mechanisms of mercury removal by O-3 and
OH in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3355–3367,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.055</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Considine, D. B., Logan, J. A., and Olsen, M. A.: Evaluation of
near-tropopause ozone distributions in the Global Modeling Initiative
combined stratosphere/troposphere model with ozonesonde data, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 2365–2385, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Cossa, D., Heimbürger, L.-E., Lannuzel, D., Rintoul, S. R., Butler, E. C.
V., Bowie, A. R., Averty, B., Watson, R. J., and Remenyi, T.: Mercury in the
Southern Ocean, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 4037–4052,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.001</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Costa, M. and Liss, P. S.: Photoreduction of mercury in sea water and its
possible implications for Hg(0) air-sea fluxes, Mar. Chem., 68, 87–95,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00067-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00067-5</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Dastoor, A. P. and Larocque, Y.: Global circulation of atmospheric mercury: a
modelling study, Atmos. Environ., 38, 147–161,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.037</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Deeds, D., Banic, C., Lu, J., and Daggupaty, S.: Mercury speciation in a
coal-fired power plant plume: An aircraft-based study of emissions from the
3640 MW Nanticoke Generating Station, Ontario, Canada, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 4919–4935, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50349</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
De Simone, F., Gencarelli, C. N., Hedgecock, I. M., and Pirrone, N.: Global
atmospheric cycle of mercury: a model study on the impact of oxidation
mechanisms, Environ Sci Pollut R, 21, 4110-4123, 10.1007/s11356-013-2451-x,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Dibble, T. S., Zelie, M. J., and Mao, H.: Thermodynamics of reactions of ClHg
and BrHg radicals with atmospherically abundant free radicals, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10271–10279, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Dibble, T. S., Zelie, M. J., and Mao, H.: Corrigendum to “Thermodynamics of
reactions of ClHg and BrHg radicals with atmospherically abundant free
radicals” published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 10271–10279, 2012, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 9211–9212, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9211-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9211-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Dix, B., Baidara, S., Bresch, J., Hall, S., Schmidt, K., Wang, S., and
Volkamer, R.: Detection of iodine monoxide in the tropical free troposphere,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2035–2040, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212386110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1212386110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Donohoue, D., Bauer, D., Cossairt, B., and Hynes, A.: Temperature and
pressure dependent rate coefficients for the reaction of Hg with Br and the
reaction of Br with Br: A pulsed laser photolysis-pulsed laser induced
fluorescence study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 6623–6632, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp054688j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp054688j</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Donohoue, D. L., Bauer, D., and Hynes, A. J.: Temperature and pressure
dependent rate coefficients for the reaction of Hg with Cl and the reaction
of Cl with Cl: A pulsed laser photolysis-pulsed laser induced fluorescence
study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 7732–7741, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp054688j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp054688j</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Edgerton, E. S., Hartsell, B. E., and Jansen, J. J.: Mercury speciation in
coal-fired power plant plumes observed at three surface sites in the
southeastern US, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4563–4570,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0515607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0515607</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, S.-M. and Jacob, D. J.: Surface ozone depletion in Arctic spring
sustained by bromine reactions on aerosols, Nature, 359, 522–524, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Feng, X., Wang, S., Qiu, G., He, T., Li, G., Li, Z., and Shang, L.: Total
gaseous mercury exchange between water and air during cloudy weather
conditions over Hongfeng Reservoir, Guizhou, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, D15309, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009600</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Fernandez, R. P., Salawitch, R. J., Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque, J.-F., and
Saiz-Lopez, A.: Bromine partitioning in the tropical tropopause layer:
implications for stratospheric injection, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
13391–13410, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13391-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13391-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Fisher, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, A. L., Amos, H. M., Steffen, A., and
Sunderland, E. M.: Riverine source of Arctic Ocean mercury inferred from
atmospheric observations, Nat. Geosci., 5, 499–504, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1478" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1478</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Fisher, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, A. L., Amos, H. M., Corbitt, E. S.,
Streets, D. G., Wang, Q. Q., Yantosca, R. M., and Sunderland, E. M.: Factors
driving mercury variability in the Arctic atmosphere and ocean over the past
30 years, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1226–1235, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GB004689</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W., Gill, G. A., and Hewitt, A. D.: Air-sea exchange of mercury,
in: Trace metals in sea water, edited by: Wong, C. S., Boyle, E., Bruland, K.
W., Burton, J. D., and Goldberg, E. D., Plenum Publishing Company, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Flora, J. R. V., Vidic, R. D., Liu, W., and Thurnau, R. C.: Modeling powdered
activated carbon injection for the uptake of elemental mercury vapors, J. Air
Waste Manage. Assoc., 48, 1051–1059, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Liang, P., Deliger, Zhang, H., Ji, J., and Liu, P.:
Temporal trend and sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at Waliguan GAW
station, Northwestern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1951–1964,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Shang, L. H., Wang, S. F., and Zhang, H.: Two years of
measurements of atmospheric total gaseous mercury (TGM) at a remote site in
Mt. Changbai area, Northeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4215–4226,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X. W., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X. B.:
Observations of atmospheric mercury in China: a critical review, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 9455–9476, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Fu, X., Yang, X., Lang, X., Zhou, J., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Yan, H., Lin, C.-J.,
and Feng, X.: Atmospheric wet and litterfall mercury deposition at urban and
rural sites in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11547–11562,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11547-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11547-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Gårdfeldt, K. and Jonsson, M.: Is bimolecular reduction of Hg(II)
complexes possible in aqueous systems of environmental importance, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 107, 4478–4482, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp0275342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp0275342</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Gencarelli, C. N., De Simone, F., Hedgecock, I. M., Sprovieri, F., and
Pirrone, N.: Development and application of a regional-scale atmospheric
mercury model based on WRF/Chem: a Mediterranean area investigation, Environ.
Sci. Pollut. R, 21, 4095–4109, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2162-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-013-2162-3</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Gionfriddo, C. M., Tate, M. T., Wick, R. R., Schultz, M. B., Zemla, A.,
Thelen, M. P., Schofield, R., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Holt, K. E., and Moreau, J.
W.: Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic sea ice, Nature Microbiology,
1, 16127, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.127</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Gómez Martín, J. C., Mahajan, A. S., Hay, T. D., Prados-Roman, C.,
Ordonez, C., MacDonald, S. M., Plane, J. M. C., Sorribas, M., Gil, M., Mora,
J. F. P., Reyes, M. V. A., Oram, D. E., Leedham, E., and Saiz-Lopez, A.:
Iodine chemistry in the eastern Pacific marine boundary layer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 887–904, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50132</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Goodsite, M., Plane, J., and Skov, H.: A theoretical study of the oxidation
of Hg-0 to HgBr2 in the troposphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1772–1776,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es034680s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es034680s</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Gratz, L., Keeler, G., Blum, J., and Sherman, L.: Isotopic Composition and
Fractionation of Mercury in Great Lakes Precipitation and Ambient Air,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7764–7770, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es100383w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es100383w</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Shah, V., Jaegle, L., Stutz, J.,
Festa, J., Spolaor, M., Tsai, C., Selin, N. E., Song, S., Zhou, X.,
Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D. D., Flocke, F. M., Campos, T.
L., Apel, E., Hornbrook, R., Blake, N. J., Hall, S., Tyndall, G. S., Reeves,
M., Stechman, D., and Stell, M.: Oxidation of mercury by bromine in the
subtropical Pacific free troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10494–10502,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066645" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL066645</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Greig, G., Gunning, H. E., and Strausz, O. P.: Reactions of Metal Atoms .3.
Combination of Mercury and Iodine Atoms and Spectrum of HgI, J. Chem. Phys.,
52, 4569, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1673687" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1673687</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Guentzel, J. L., Landing, W. M., Gill, G. A., and Pollman, C. D.: Processes
influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 35, 863–873, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es001523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es001523</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Gustin, M. S., Amos, H. M., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., and Heidecorn, K.:
Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 5697–5713, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Haitzer, M., Aiken, G. R., and Ryan, J. N.: Binding of mercury(II) to
dissolved organic matter: The role of the mercury-to-DOM concentration ratio,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3564–3570, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es025699i" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es025699i</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, B.: The gas phase oxidation of elemental mercury by ozone, Water Air
Soil Poll., 80, 301–315, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, B. and Bloom, N.: Report to EPRI, Electric Power Research Institute,
Palo Alto, CA, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Hamrud, M.: Residence Time and Spatial Variability for Gases in the
Atmosphere, Tellus B, 35, 295–303, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, D. C.: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, W. H. Freeman and Co., New
York, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Coe, H., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Bahreini, R.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Russell, L. M., Jolleys, M., Fu, T.-M., Allan, J. D.,
Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Morgan, W. T., Robinson, N. H.,
Williams, P. I., Cubison, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., and Dunlea, E. J.: Exploring
the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft
field campaigns with a global model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12673–12696,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Hedgecock, I. and Pirrone, N.: Mercury and photochemistry in the marine
boundary layer-modelling studies suggest the in situ production of reactive
gas phase mercury, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3055–3062,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00109-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00109-1</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., and Yang, X.: Global lifetime of elemental
mercury against oxidation by atomic bromine in the free troposphere, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L20808, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl027176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl027176</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Mason, R. P., and Jaffe, D. A.: Sources and
deposition of reactive gaseous mercury in the marine atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 2278–2285, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.051</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Corbitt, E. S., Mao, J., Yang, X., Talbot, R.,
and Slemr, F.: Global atmospheric model for mercury including oxidation by
bromine atoms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 12037–12057,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Krishnamurthy, N. P., Caffrey, J. M., Landing, W. M.,
Edgerton, E. S., Knapp, K. R., and Nair, U. S.: Thunderstorms Increase
Mercury Wet Deposition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9343–9350,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02586</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Horowitz, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Amos, H. M., Streets, D. G., and Sunderland,
E. M.: Historical Mercury Releases from Commercial Products: Global
Environmental Implications, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 10242–10250,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es501337j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es501337j</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Hudman, R. C., Jacob, D. J., Turquety, S., Leibensperger, E. M., Murray, L.
T., Wu, S., Gilliland, A. B., Avery, M., Bertram, T. H., Brune, W., Cohen, R.
C., Dibb, J. E., Flocke, F. M., Fried, A., Holloway, J., Neuman, J. A.,
Orville, R., Perring, A., Ren, X., Sachse, G. W., Singh, H. B., Swanson, A.,
and Wooldridge, P. J.: Surface and lightning sources of nitrogen oxides over
the United States: Magnitudes, chemical evolution, and outflow, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D12S05, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007912" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007912</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Huthwelker, T., Peter, T., Luo, B. P., Clegg, S. L., Carslaw, K. S., and
Brimblecombe, P.: Solubility of HOCl in Water and Aqueous H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
Stratospheric Temperatures, J. Atmos. Chem., 21, 81–95,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/Bf00712439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/Bf00712439</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Hynes, A. J., Donohoue, D. L., Goodsite, M. E., and Hedgecock, I. M.: Our
Current Understanding of Major Chemical and Physical Processes Affecting
Mercury Dynamics in the Atmosphere and At the Air-Water/Terrestrial
Interfaces, in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere, edited
by: Pirrone, N., and Mason, R., Springer Science<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Business Media, LLC,
427–457, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Jacob, D., Field, B., Li, Q., Blake, D., de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., Hansel,
A., Wisthaler, A., Singh, H., and Guenther, A.: Global budget of methanol:
Constraints from atmospheric observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,
D08303, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005172</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Jacob, D. J.: Chemistry of OH in Remote Clouds and Its Role in the Production
of Formic-Acid and Peroxymonosulfate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 91,
9807–9826, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/Jd091id09p09807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/Jd091id09p09807</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Jaffe, D. A., Lyman, S., Amos, H. M., Gustin, M. S., Huang, J. Y., Selin, N.
E., Levin, L., ter Schure, A., Mason, R. P., Talbot, R., Rutter, A., Finley,
B., Jaegle, L., Shah, V., McClure, C., Arnbrose, J., Gratz, L., Lindberg, S.,
Weiss-Penzias, P., Sheu, G. R., Feddersen, D., Horvat, M., Dastoor, A.,
Hynes, A. J., Mao, H. T., Sonke, J. E., Slemr, F., Fisher, J. A., Ebinghaus,
R., Zhang, Y. X., and Edwards, G.: Progress on Understanding Atmospheric
Mercury Hampered by Uncertain Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
7204–7206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es5026432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5026432</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Jiao, Y. and Dibble, T. S.: First kinetic study of the atmospherically
important reactions BrHg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
BrHg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HOO, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19, 1826–1838,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6cp06276h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c6cp06276h</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Jones, C. P., Lyman, S. N., Jaffe, D. A., Allen, T., and O'Neil, T. L.:
Detection and quantification of gas-phase oxidized mercury compounds by
GC/MS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2195–2205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2195-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-2195-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E.: Residence Time and Variability of Tropospheric Trace Gases,
Tellus, 26, 477–488, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Klimont, Z., Smith, S. J., and Cofala, J.: The last decade of global
anthropogenic sulfur dioxide: 2000–2011 emissions, Environ. Res. Lett., 8,
014003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014003</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Lamborg, C., Fitzgerald, W., O'Donnell, J., and Torgersen, T.: A non-steady
state box model of global-scale mercury biogeochemistry with interhemispheric
atmospheric gradients, Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society,
223, U520–U520, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Lamsal, L. N., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H., Pickering, K.
E., Bucsela, E. J., Gleason, J. F., Martin, R. V., Philip, S., Irie, H.,
Cede, A., Herman, J., Weinheimer, A., Szykman, J. J., and Knepp, T. N.:
Evaluation of OMI operational standard NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrievals using in situ
and surface-based NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11587–11609,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Landis, M., Ryan, J., ter Schure, A., and Laudal, D.: Behavior of Mercury
Emissions from a Commercial Coal-Fired Power Plant: The Relationship between
Stack Speciation and Near-Field Plume Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 13540–13548, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es500783t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es500783t</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Lee, T. G., Biswas, P., and Hedrick, E.: Overall kinetics of heterogeneous
elemental mercury reactions on TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sorbent particles with UV irradiation,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 1411–1417, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0303707" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ie0303707</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Liang, Q., Stolarski, R. S., Kawa, S. R., Nielsen, J. E., Douglass, A. R.,
Rodriguez, J. M., Blake, D. R., Atlas, E. L., and Ott, L. E.: Finding the
missing stratospheric Bry: a global modeling study of CHBr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Br<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2269–2286,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2269-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2269-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Lin, C. and Pehkonen, S.: Aqueous free radical chemistry of mercury in the
presence of iron oxides and ambient aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 31, 4125–4137,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00269-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00269-0</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Lin, C. and Pehkonen, S.: Oxidation of elemental mercury by aqueous chlorine
(HOCl/OCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>): Implications for tropospheric mercury chemistry, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 103, 28093–28102, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jd02304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98jd02304</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Lin, C. J., Pongprueksa, P., Lindberg, S. E., Pehkonen, S. O., Byun, D., and
Jang, C.: Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: Model
science evaluation, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2911–2928,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.009</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J. T. and McElroy, M. B.: Impacts of boundary layer mixing on pollutant
vertical profiles in the lower troposphere: Implications to satellite remote
sensing, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1726–1739, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.009</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J.-T., Liu, Z., Zhang, Q., Liu, H., Mao, J., and Zhuang, G.: Modeling
uncertainties for tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns affecting
satellite-based inverse modeling of nitrogen oxides emissions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 12255–12275, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12255-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12255-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Lindqvist, O. and Rodhe, H.: Atmospheric mercury – a review, Tellus B, 37,
136–159, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S. H., Yan, N. Q., Liu, Z. R., Qu, Z., Wang, P., Chang, S. G., and
Miller, C.: Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of
coal-fired power plants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 1405–1412,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es061705p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es061705p</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Lohman, K., Seigneur, C., Edgerton, E., and Jansen, J.: Modeling mercury in
power plant plumes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3848–3854,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es051556v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es051556v</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Lyman, S. and Jaffe, D.: Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere, Nat. Geosci., 5, 114–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1353</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Jacob, D. J., Evans, M. J., Olson, J. R., Ren, X., Brune, W. H.,
Clair, J. M. St., Crounse, J. D., Spencer, K. M., Beaver, M. R., Wennberg, P.
O., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J. L., Fried, A., Weibring, P., Walega, J. G.,
Hall, S. R., Weinheimer, A. J., Cohen, R. C., Chen, G., Crawford, J. H.,
McNaughton, C., Clarke, A. D., Jaeglé, L., Fisher, J. A., Yantosca, R.
M., Le Sager, P., and Carouge, C.: Chemistry of hydrogen oxide radicals
(HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Arctic troposphere in spring, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
5823–5838, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5823-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5823-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Mason, R. P., Lawson, N. M., and Sheu, G. R.: Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean:
factors controlling air-sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the
upper waters, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 2829–2853,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Kurosu, T. P., Chance, K., Murphy, J. G.,
Reeves, C., Mills, G., Casadio, S., Millet, D. B., Barkley, M. P., Paulot,
F., and Mao, J.: Isoprene emissions in Africa inferred from OMI observations
of formaldehyde columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6219–6235,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6219-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6219-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Martin, R. V., Sioris, C. E., Chance, K., Ryerson, T. B., Bertram, T. H.,
Wooldridge, P. J., Cohen, R. C., Neuman, J. A., Swanson, A., and Flocke, F.
M.: Evaluation of space-based con- straints on global nitrogen oxide
emissions with regional aircraft measurements over and downwind of eastern
North America, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D15308, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006680" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006680</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Maya, J.: Ultraviolet absorption cross sections of HgI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HgBr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
tin (II) valid vapors, J. Chem. Phys., 67, 4976–4980, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Muntean, M., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Song, S. J., Selin, N. E., Olivier, J. G.
J., Guizzardi, D., Maas, R., and Dentener, F.: Trend analysis from 1970 to
2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury
emissions, Sci. Total Environ., 494, 337–350,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Munthe, J.: Aqueous oxidation of elemental Hg by O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ.
A-Gen., 26, 1461–1468, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90131-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(92)90131-4</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Munthe, J. and McElroy, W. J.: Some aqueous reactions of potential importance
in the atmospheric chemistry of mercury, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 26,
553–557, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90168-k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(92)90168-k</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Anderson, J. R., Quinn, P. K., McInnes, L. M., Brechtel, F.
J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Posfai, M., Thomson, D. S., and
Buseck, P. R.: Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in the
Southern Ocean marine boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/32138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/32138</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Hudson, P. K., Thomson, D. S., Sheridan, P. J., and Wilson, J.
C.: Observations of mercury-containing aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40,
3163–3167, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es052385x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052385x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C., and Koshak, W. J.:
Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global
chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 117, D20307, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jd017934</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, H. T., Kim, K.-H., Kim, M.-Y., Hong, S., Youn, Y.-H., Shon, Z.-H.,
and Lee, J. S.: Monitoring of atmospheric mercury at a global atmospheric
watch (GAW) site on An-Myun Island, Korea, Water Air Soil Poll., 185,
149–164, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9438-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11270-007-9438-5</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>O'Driscoll, N., Siciliano, S., Lean, D., and Amyot, M.: Gross photoreduction
kinetics of mercury in temperate freshwater lakes and rivers: Application to
a general model of DGM dynamics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 837–843,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es051062y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es051062y</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>O'Driscoll, N. J., Lean, D. R. S., Loseto, L. L., Carignan, R., and
Siciliano, S. D.: Effect of dissolved organic carbon on the photoproduction
of dissolved gaseous mercury in lakes: Potential impacts of forestry,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2664–2672, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es034702a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es034702a</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Orbe, C., Holzer, M., Polvani, L. M., Waugh, D. W., Li, F., Oman, L. D., and
Newman, P. A.: Seasonal ventilation of the stratosphere: Robust diagnostics
from one-way flux distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 293–306,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020213</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Pal, B. and Ariya, P. A.: Gas-phase HO center dot-Initiated reactions of
elemental mercury: Kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric implications,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 5555–5566, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0494353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0494353</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Parrella, J. P., Jacob, D. J., Liang, Q., Zhang, Y., Mickley, L. J., Miller,
B., Evans, M. J., Yang, X., Pyle, J. A., Theys, N., and Van Roozendael, M.:
Tropospheric bromine chemistry: implications for present and pre-industrial
ozone and mercury, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6723–6740,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6723-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6723-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Pehkonen, S. O. and Lin, C. J.: Aqueous photochemistry of mercury with
organic acids, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 48, 144–150, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Peleg, M., Tas, E., Obrist, D., Matveev, V., Moore, C., Gabay, M., and Luria,
M.: Observational Evidence for Involvement of Nitrate Radicals in Nighttime
Oxidation of Mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14008–14018,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03894" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b03894</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F. and Birner, T.: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of lower
stratospheric age of air spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10195–10213,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Prados-Roman, C., Cuevas, C. A., Hay, T., Fernandez, R. P., Mahajan, A. S.,
Royer, S.-J., Galí, M., Simó, R., Dachs, J., Großmann, K.,
Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque, J.-F., and Saiz-Lopez, A.: Iodine oxide in the
global marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 583–593,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-583-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-583-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Chan, A. W. H., Barkley, M. P., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global
modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11261–11276, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Qu, Z., Yan, N. Q., Liu, P., Jia, J. P., and Yang, S. J.: The role of iodine
monochloride for the oxidation of elemental mercury, J. Hazard. Mater., 183,
132–137, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.126</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Raofie, F., Snider, G., and Ariya, P. A.: Reaction of gaseous mercury with
molecular iodine, atomic iodine, and iodine oxide radicals – Kinetics,
product studies, and atmospheric implications, Can. J. Chemistry, 86,
811–820, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/V08-088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/V08-088</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Ravichandran, M.: Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter
– a review, Chemosphere, 55, 319–331,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Rutter, A. P., Shakya, K. M., Lehr, R., Schauer, J. J., and Griffin, R. J.:
Oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury in the presence of secondary organic
aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 59, 86–92, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.009</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Sakata, M. and Asakura, K.: Estimating contribution of precipitation
scavenging of atmospheric particulate mercury to mercury wet deposition in
Japan, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1669–1680, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.031</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Sanemasa, I.: Solubility of Elemental Mercury-Vapor in Water, B. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 48, 1795–1798, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1246/Bcsj.48.1795" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1246/Bcsj.48.1795</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Horowitz, H. M., Hu, L., Sherwen, T., Evans, M.
J., Liang, Q., Suleiman, R. M., Oram, D. E., Le Breton, M., Percival, C. J.,
Wang, S., and Volkamer, R.: Modeling the observed tropospheric BrO
background: Importance of multiphase chemistry and implications for ozone,
OH, and mercury, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 11819–11835,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024229" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024229</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., Zhu, Z. X., and Pawson, S.: A comparison
of the lower stratospheric age spectra derived from a general circulation
model and two data assimilation systems, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4113,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002652</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>Schroeder, W. H., Anlauf, K. G., Barrie, L. A., Lu, J. Y., Steffen, A.,
Schneeberger, D. R., and Berg, T.: Arctic springtime depletion of mercury,
Nature, 394, 331–332, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/28530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/28530</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Selin, N. E. and Jacob, D. J.: Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet
deposition in the United States: Constraints on the contribution from North
American anthropogenic sources, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5193–5204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.069</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S., Jaegle,
L., and Jaffe, D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury:
Global constraints from observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D02308,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007450</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S., Jaegle, L., and
Sunderland, E. M.: Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury:
Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors
for deposition, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB2011, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gb003040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gb003040</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Selin,
N. E., Song, S., Campos, T. L., Flocke, F. M., Reeves, M., Stechman, D.,
Stell, M., Festa, J., Stutz, J., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D.
D., Tyndall, G. S., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A. J., Riemer, D.
D., Blake, N. J., Cantrell, C. A., and Mauldin III, R. L.: Origin of oxidized
mercury in the summertime free troposphere over the southeastern US, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 1511–1530, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Shepler, B. C. and Peterson, K. A.: Mercury monoxide: A systematic
investigation of its ground electronic state, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107,
1783–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp027512f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp027512f</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>Sheu, G. R., Lin, N. H., Wang, J. L., Lee, C. T., Yang, C. F. O., and Wang,
S. H.: Temporal distribution and potential sources of atmospheric mercury
measured at a high-elevation background station in Taiwan, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 2393–2400, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.009</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Si, L. and Ariya, P. A.: Reduction of oxidized mercury species by
dicarboxylic acids (C(2)–C(4)): Kinetic and product studies, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 5150–5155, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es800552z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es800552z</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, W. R., Brown, S. S., Saiz-Lopez, A., Thornton, J. A., and von
Glasow, R.: Tropospheric Halogen Chemistry: Sources, Cycling, and Impacts,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4035–4062, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr5006638" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006638</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>Singh, H. B., Salas, L., Herlth, D., Kolyer, R., Czech, E., Avery, M.,
Crawford, J. H., Pierce, R. B., Sachse, G. W., Blake, D. R., Cohen, R. C.,
Bertram, T. H., Perring, A., Wooldridge, P. J., Dibb, J., Huey, G., Hudman,
R. C., Turquety, S., Emmons, L. K., Flocke, F., Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R.,
and Horowitz, L. W.: Reactive nitrogen distribution and partitioning in the
North American troposphere and lowermost stratosphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D12S04, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007664" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007664</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Seiler, W., and Schuster, G.: Latitudinal distribution of mercury
over the Atlantic-Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 86, 1159–1166,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC02p01159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC086iC02p01159</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Ebinghaus, R., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Hermann, M., Kock, H. H.,
Martinsson, B. G., Schuck, T., Sprung, D., van Velthoven, P., Zahn, A., and
Ziereis, H.: Gaseous mercury distribution in the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere observed onboard the CARIBIC passenger aircraft, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 1957–1969, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1957-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1957-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Weigelt, A., Ebinghaus, R., Brenninkmeijer, C., Baker, A., Schuck,
T., Rauthe-Schoch, A., Riede, H., Leedham, E., Hermann, M., van Velthoven,
P., Oram, D., O'Sullivan, D., Dyroff, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Mercury
Plumes in the Global Upper Troposphere Observed during Flights with the
CARIBIC Observatory from May 2005 until June 2013, Atmosphere, 5, 342–369,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos5020342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos5020342</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Angot, H., Dommergue, A., Magand, O., Barret, M., Weigelt, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Brunke, E.-G., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Edwards, G., Howard, D.,
Powell, J., Keywood, M., and Wang, F.: Comparison of mercury concentrations
measured at several sites in the Southern Hemisphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
3125–3133, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>Slemr, F., Weigelt, A., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., Bödewadt, J.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Rauthe-Schöch, A., Weber, S., Hermann, M.,
Becker, J., Zahn, A., and Martinsson, B.: Atmospheric mercury measurements
onboard the CARIBIC passenger aircraft, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2291–2302,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2291-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-2291-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>Smith-Downey, N. V., Sunderland, E. M., and Jacob, D. J.: Anthropogenic
impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils:
Insights from a new global model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 115, G03008,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jg001124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jg001124</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>Soerensen, A. L., Sunderland, E. M., Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca,
R. M., Skov, H., Christensen, J. H., Strode, S. A., and Mason, R. P.: An
Improved Global Model for Air-Sea Exchange of Mercury: High Concentrations
over the North Atlantic, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8574–8580,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es102032g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es102032g</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>Snider, G., Raofie, F., and Ariya, P.: Effects of relative humidity and CO(g)
on the O(3)-initiated oxidation reaction of Hg(0)(g): kinetic &amp; product
studies, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 5616–5623, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b801226a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b801226a</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P., Balcom, P. H., and Sunderland, E. M.: Drivers
of Surface Ocean Mercury Concentrations and Air-Sea Exchange in the West
Atlantic Ocean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7757–7765,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es401354q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es401354q</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P., Balcom, P. H., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y. X.,
Kuss, J., and Sunderland, E. M.: Elemental Mercury Concentrations and Fluxes
in the Tropical Atmosphere and Ocean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11312–11319, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es503109p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es503109p</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>Song, S., Selin, N. E., Soerensen, A. L., Angot, H., Artz, R., Brooks, S.,
Brunke, E.-G., Conley, G., Dommergue, A., Ebinghaus, R., Holsen, T. M.,
Jaffe, D. A., Kang, S., Kelley, P., Luke, W. T., Magand, O., Marumoto, K.,
Pfaffhuber, K. A., Ren, X., Sheu, G.-R., Slemr, F., Warneke, T., Weigelt, A.,
Weiss-Penzias, P., Wip, D. C., and Zhang, Q.: Top-down constraints on
atmospheric mercury emissions and implications for global biogeochemical
cycling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7103–7125, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>Sonke, J.: A global model of mass independent mercury stable isotope
fractionation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 4577–4590,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>
Sonke, J. E., Marusczak, N., and Fu, X. W.: A stable isotope view of the
atmospheric Hg cycle, Goldschmidt, Prague, Czech Republic, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>Steffen, A., Douglas, T., Amyot, M., Ariya, P., Aspmo, K., Berg, T.,
Bottenheim, J., Brooks, S., Cobbett, F., Dastoor, A., Dommergue, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Ferrari, C., Gardfeldt, K., Goodsite, M. E., Lean, D.,
Poulain, A. J., Scherz, C., Skov, H., Sommar, J., and Temme, C.: A synthesis
of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1445–1482, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation>Strahan, S. E., Duncan, B. N., and Hoor, P.: Observationally derived
transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to
the GMI chemistry and transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation>Strode, S. A., Jaegle, L., Jaffe, D. A., Swartzendruber, P. C., Selin, N. E.,
Holmes, C., and Yantosca, R. M.: Trans-Pacific transport of mercury, J.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D15305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009428</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation>Subir, M., Ariya, P. A., and Dastoor, A. P.: A review of uncertainties in
atmospheric modeling of mercury chemistry I. Uncertainties in existing
kinetic parameters – Fundamental limitations and the importance of
heterogeneous chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 45, 5664–5676,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.046</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation>
Sumner, A. L., Spicer, C. W., Statola, J., Mangaraj, R., Cowen, K. A., and
Landis, M. S.: Environmental chamber studies of mercury reactions in the
atmosphere, in: Dynamics of Mercury Pollution on Regional and Global Scales:
Atmospheric Processes and Human Exposures Around the World, edited by:
Pirrone, N., and Mahaffey, K. R., Springer, USA, 193–212, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation>Sunderland, E. M. and Mason, R. P.: Human impacts on open ocean mercury
concentrations, Global Biogeochem. Cyc., 21, GB4022,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gb002876</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation>Talbot, R., Mao, H., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., and Avery, M.: Total depletion of
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere-lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L23804, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl031366</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation>Tan, W. W., Geller, M. A., Pawson, S., and da Silva, A.: A case study of
excessive subtropical transport in the stratosphere of a data assimilation
system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D11102, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004057</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation>Theys, N., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Yang, X., De Smedt, I., Richter,
A., Begoin, M., Errera, Q., Johnston, P. V., Kreher, K., and De Mazière,
M.: Global observations of tropospheric BrO columns using GOME-2 satellite
data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1791–1811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1791-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1791-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation>Tossell, J. A.: Calculation of the energetics for the oligomerization of gas
phase HgO and HgS and for the solvolysis of crystalline HgO and HgS, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 110, 2571–2578, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp056280s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp056280s</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation>Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu,
L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Thompson, A.
M., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Cohen, R. C.,
Laughner, J. L., Dibb, J. E., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Wolfe, G. M.,
Pollack, I. B., Peischl, J., Neuman, J. A., and Zhou, X.: Why do models
overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 13561–13577, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation>Travnikov, O. and Ilyin, I.: The EMEP/MSC-E Mercury Modeling System, Mercury
Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere, 47, 571–587,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_20" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_20</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation>van Loon, L. L., Mader, E. A., and Scott, S. L.: Sulfite stabilization and
reduction of the aqueous mercuric ion: Kinetic determination of sequential
formation constants, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 3190–3195,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp003803h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp003803h</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation>
Vidic, R. D., Chang, M. T., and Thurnau, R. C.: Kinetics of vapor-phase
mercury uptake by virgin and sulfur-impregnated activated carbons, J. Air
Waste Manage. As., 48, 247–255, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Baidar, S., Campos, T. L., Coburn, S., DiGangi, J. P., Dix, B.,
Eloranta, E. W., Koenig, T. K., Morley, B., Ortega, I., Pierce, B. R.,
Reeves, M., Sinreich, R., Wang, S., Zondlo, M. A., and Romashkin, P. A.:
Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with
aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8,
2121–2148, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation>Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Han, S., and Xu, H.:
Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China I. The
seasonal distribution pattern of total gaseous mercury and its potential
sources, Environ. Res., 109, 201–206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.001</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation>Wang, F., Saiz-Lopez, A., Mahajan, A. S., Gómez Martín, J. C.,
Armstrong, D., Lemes, M., Hay, T., and Prados-Roman, C.: Enhanced production
of oxidised mercury over the tropical Pacific Ocean: a key missing oxidation
pathway, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1323–1335, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S. Y., Schmidt, J. A., Baidar, S., Coburn, S., Dix, B., Koenig, T. K.,
Apel, E., Bowdalo, D., Campos, T. L., Eloranta, E., Evans, M. J., DiGangi, J.
P., Zondlo, M. A., Gao, R. S., Haggerty, J. A., Hall, S. R., Hornbrook, R.
S., Jacob, D., Morley, B., Pierce, B., Reeves, M., Romashkin, P., ter Schure,
A., and Volkamer, R.: Active and widespread halogen chemistry in the tropical
and subtropical free troposphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 9281–9286,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505142112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1505142112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z. and Pehkonen, S.: Oxidation of elemental mercury by aqueous bromine:
atmospheric implications, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3675–3688,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.059</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation>Weigelt, A., Slemr, F., Ebinghaus, R., Pirrone, N., Bieser, J., Bödewadt,
J., Esposito, G., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.: Mercury emissions of a
coal-fired power plant in Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13653–13668,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13653-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13653-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation>Weiss-Penzias, P., Jaffe, D., Swartzendruber, P., Hafner, W., Chand, D., and
Prestbo, E.: Quantifying Asian and biomass burning sources of mercury using
the Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO ratio in pollution plumes observed at the Mount Bachelor
Observatory, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4366–4379,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.058</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation>Weiss-Penzias, P., Amos, H. M., Selin, N. E., Gustin, M. S., Jaffe, D. A.,
Obrist, D., Sheu, G.-R., and Giang, A.: Use of a global model to understand
speciated atmospheric mercury observations at five high-elevation sites,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1161–1173, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation>Whalin, L. and Mason, R.: A new method for the investigation of mercury redox
chemistry in natural waters utilizing deflatable Teflon (R) bags and
additions of isotopically labeled mercury, Anal. Chim. Ac., 558, 211–221,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.070</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation>Whalin, L., Kim, E. H., and Mason, R.: Factors influencing the oxidation,
reduction, methylation and demethylation of mercury species in coastal
waters, Mar. Chem., 107, 278–294, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2007.04.002</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation>Wilcox, J.: A Kinetic Investigation of High-Temperature Mercury Oxidation by
Chlorine, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 6633–6639, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp901050d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp901050d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, Y., Jacob, D. J., and Turquety, S.: Atmospheric acetylene and its
relationship with CO as an indicator of air mass age, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D12305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008268" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008268</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, Z. F., Stromberg, D., and Lindqvist, O.: Influence of Humic Substances
on Photolysis of Divalent Mercury in Aqueous-Solution, Water Air Soil
Pollut., 80, 789–798, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/Bf01189730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/Bf01189730</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation>Yan, N. Q., Liu, S. H., Chang, S. G., and Miller, C.: Method for the study of
gaseous oxidants for the oxidation of mercury gas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44,
5567–5574, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie050377j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ie050377j</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation>Yan, N. Q., Qu, Z., Chi, Y., Qiao, S. H., Dod, R. L., Chang, S. G., and
Miller, C.: Enhanced Elemental Mercury Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas by
Sulfur-Chlorine Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 5410–5415,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es801910w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es801910w</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Cox, R., Warwick, N., Pyle, J., Carver, G., O'Connor, F., and
Savage, N.: Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on ozone: A model
study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D23311, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006244</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Fu, X. W., Lin, C.-J., Wang, X., and Feng, X. B.: Observation and
analysis of speciated atmospheric mercury in Shangri-La, Tibetan Plateau,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 653–665, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-653-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-653-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Jaeglé, L., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Holmes, C. D.,
Amos, H. M., Wang, Q., Talbot, R., Artz, R., Brooks, S., Luke, W., Holsen, T.
M., Felton, D., Miller, E. K., Perry, K. D., Schmeltz, D., Steffen, A.,
Tordon, R., Weiss-Penzias, P., and Zsolway, R.: Nested-grid simulation of
mercury over North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6095–6111,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6095-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6095-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. X., Jacob, D., Dutkiewicz, S., Amos, H., Long, M., and Sunderland,
E.: Biogeochemical drivers of the fate of riverine mercury discharged to the
global and Arctic oceans, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 854–864,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015gb005124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gb005124</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib176"><label>176</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. X., Jacob, D. J., Horowitz, H. M., Chen, L., Amos, H. M.,
Krabbenhoft, D. P., Slemr, F., St Louis, V. L., and Sunderland, E. M.:
Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in
anthropogenic emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 526–531,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516312113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1516312113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib177"><label>177</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, W. and Hintelmann, H.: Mercury isotope fractionation during
photoreduction in natural water is controlled by its Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DOC ratio,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 6704–6715, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.08.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2009.08.016</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Mercury (Hg) is emitted to the atmosphere mainly as
volatile elemental Hg<sup>0</sup>. Oxidation to water-soluble Hg<sup>II</sup> plays a
major role in Hg deposition to ecosystems. Here, we implement a new
mechanism for atmospheric Hg<sup>0</sup> ∕ Hg<sup>II</sup> redox chemistry in the
GEOS-Chem global model and examine the implications for the global
atmospheric Hg budget and deposition patterns. Our simulation includes a new
coupling of GEOS-Chem to an ocean general circulation model (MITgcm),
enabling a global 3-D representation of atmosphere–ocean Hg<sup>0</sup> ∕ Hg<sup>II</sup>
cycling. We find that atomic bromine (Br) of marine organobromine origin is
the main atmospheric Hg<sup>0</sup> oxidant and that second-stage HgBr oxidation
is mainly by the NO<sub>2</sub> and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals. The resulting chemical
lifetime of tropospheric Hg<sup>0</sup> against oxidation is 2.7 months, shorter
than in previous models. Fast Hg<sup>II</sup> atmospheric reduction must occur
in order to match the  ∼  6-month lifetime of Hg against
deposition implied by the observed atmospheric variability of total gaseous
mercury (TGM  ≡  Hg<sup>0</sup> + Hg<sup>II</sup>(g)). We implement this reduction
in GEOS-Chem as photolysis of aqueous-phase Hg<sup>II</sup>–organic complexes in
aerosols and clouds, resulting in a TGM lifetime of 5.2 months against
deposition and matching both mean observed TGM and its variability. Model
sensitivity analysis shows that the interhemispheric gradient of TGM,
previously used to infer a longer Hg lifetime against deposition, is
misleading because Southern Hemisphere Hg mainly originates from oceanic
emissions rather than transport from the Northern Hemisphere. The model
reproduces the observed seasonal TGM variation at northern midlatitudes
(maximum in February, minimum in September) driven by chemistry and oceanic
evasion, but it does not reproduce the lack of seasonality observed at southern
hemispheric marine sites. Aircraft observations in the lowermost
stratosphere show a strong TGM–ozone relationship indicative of fast
Hg<sup>0</sup> oxidation, but we show that this relationship provides only a weak
test of Hg chemistry because it is also influenced by mixing. The model
reproduces observed Hg wet deposition fluxes over North America, Europe, and
China with little bias (0–30 %). It reproduces qualitatively the observed
maximum in US deposition around the Gulf of Mexico, reflecting a combination
of deep convection and availability of NO<sub>2</sub> and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals for
second-stage HgBr oxidation. However, the magnitude of this maximum is
underestimated. The relatively low observed Hg wet deposition over rural
China is attributed to fast Hg<sup>II</sup> reduction in the presence of high
organic aerosol concentrations. We find that 80 % of Hg<sup>II</sup> deposition
is to the global oceans, reflecting the marine origin of Br and low
concentrations of organic aerosols for Hg<sup>II</sup> reduction. Most of that
deposition takes place to the tropical oceans due to the availability of
HO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> for second-stage HgBr oxidation.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Li, Q. B., Yantosca, R. M.,
Savarino, J., Lee, C. C. W., and Thiemens, M. H.: Sulfate formation in
sea-salt aerosols: Constraints from oxygen isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D10307, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005659" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004jd005659</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allard, B. and Arsenie, I.: Abiotic reduction of mercury by humic substances
in aquatic system – an important process for the mercury cycle, Water Air
Soil Pollut., 56, 457–464, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00342291" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/bf00342291</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Holmes, C. D., Fisher, J. A., Wang, Q., Yantosca,
R. M., Corbitt, E. S., Galarneau, E., Rutter, A. P., Gustin, M. S., Steffen,
A., Schauer, J. J., Graydon, J. A., Louis, V. L. St., Talbot, R. W.,
Edgerton, E. S., Zhang, Y., and Sunderland, E. M.: Gas-particle partitioning
of atmospheric Hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 591–603, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-591-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-591-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Amyot, M., Mierle, G., Lean, D., and McQueen, D.: Sunlight-Induced Formation
of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury in Lake Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28,
2366–2371, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00062a022" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es00062a022</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Amyot, M., Lean, D. R. S., Poissant, L., and Doyon, M. R.: Distribution and
transformation of elemental mercury in the St. Lawrence River and Lake
Ontario, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 57, 155–163,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/Cjfas-57-S1-155" target="_blank">doi:10.1139/Cjfas-57-S1-155</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Angot, H., Barret, M., Magand, O., Ramonet, M., and Dommergue, A.: A 2-year
record of atmospheric mercury species at a background Southern Hemisphere
station on Amsterdam Island, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11461–11473,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Angot, H., Dastoor, A., De Simone, F., Gårdfeldt, K., Gencarelli, C. N.,
Hedgecock, I. M., Langer, S., Magand, O., Mastromonaco, M. N., Nordstrøm,
C., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Pirrone, N., Ryjkov, A., Selin, N. E., Skov, H., Song,
S., Sprovieri, F., Steffen, A., Toyota, K., Travnikov, O., Yang, X., and
Dommergue, A.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury in
polar regions: review of recent measurements and comparison with models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10735–10763, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10735-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-10735-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ariya, P. A., Khalizov, A., and Gidas, A.: Reactions of gaseous mercury with
atomic and molecular halogens: Kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric
implications, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 7310–7320, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp020719o" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp020719o</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ariya, P. A., Amyot, M., Dastoor, A., Deeds, D., Feinberg, A., Kos, G.,
Poulain, A., Ryjkov, A., Semeniuk, K., Subir, M., and Toyota, K.: Mercury
Physicochemical and Biogeochemical Transformation in the Atmosphere and at
Atmospheric Interfaces: A Review and Future Directions, Chem. Rev., 115,
3760–3802, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500667e" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr500667e</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Auzmendi-Murua, I., Castillo, A., and Bozzelli, J.: Mercury Oxidation via
Chlorine, Bromine, and Iodine under Atmospheric Conditions: Thermochemistry
and Kinetics, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 2959–2975, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp412654s" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp412654s</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Balabanov, N. and Peterson, K.: Mercury and reactive halogens: The
thermochemistry of Hg<sup>+</sup> <mfenced open="{" close=""/>Cl-2, Br-2, BrCl, ClO, and
BrO<mfenced open="." close="}"/>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 7465–7470,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp035547p" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp035547p</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Balabanov, N., Shepler, B., and Peterson, K.: Accurate global potential
energy surface and reaction dynamics for the ground state of HgBr<sub>2</sub>, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 109, 8765–8773, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp053415l" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp053415l</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bash, J., Carlton, A., Hutzell, W., and Bullock, O.: Regional Air Quality
Model Application of the Aqueous-Phase Photo Reduction of Atmospheric
Oxidized Mercury by Dicarboxylic Acids, Atmosphere, 5, 1–15,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos5010001" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/atmos5010001</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bergan, T. and Rodhe, H.: Oxidation of elemental mercury in the atmosphere;
Constraints imposed by global scale modelling, J. Atmos. Chem., 40, 191–212,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1011929927896" target="_blank">doi:10.1023/a:1011929927896</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A.
M., Li, Q. B., Liu, H. G. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global
modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model
description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23073–23095,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000807" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001jd000807</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bieser, J., Slemr, F., Ambrose, J., Brenninkmeijer, C., Brooks, S., Dastoor,
A., DeSimone, F., Ebinghaus, R., Gencarelli, C., Geyer, B., Gratz, L. E.,
Hedgecock, I. M., Jaffe, D., Kelley, P., Lin, C.-J., Matthias, V., Ryjkov,
A., Selin, N., Song, S., Travnikov, O., Weigelt, A., Luke, W., Ren, X., Zahn,
A., Yang, X., Zhu, Y., and Pirrone, N.: Multi-model study of mercury
dispersion in the atmosphere: Vertical distribution of mercury species,
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1074" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-2016-1074</a>, in review, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Crutzen, P., Boumard, F., Dauer, T., Dix, B.,
Ebinghaus, R., Filippi, D., Fischer, H., Franke, H., Frieß, U.,
Heintzenberg, J., Helleis, F., Hermann, M., Kock, H. H., Koeppel, C.,
Lelieveld, J., Leuenberger, M., Martinsson, B. G., Miemczyk, S., Moret, H.
P., Nguyen, H. N., Nyfeler, P., Oram, D., O'Sullivan, D., Penkett, S., Platt,
U., Pupek, M., Ramonet, M., Randa, B., Reichelt, M., Rhee, T. S., Rohwer, J.,
Rosenfeld, K., Scharffe, D., Schlager, H., Schumann, U., Slemr, F., Sprung,
D., Stock, P., Thaler, R., Valentino, F., van Velthoven, P., Waibel, A.,
Wandel, A., Waschitschek, K., Wiedensohler, A., Xueref-Remy, I., Zahn, A.,
Zech, U., and Ziereis, H.: Civil Aircraft for the regular investigation of
the atmosphere based on an instrumented container: The new CARIBIC system,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4953–4976, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4953-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-4953-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Bullock, O. R., Atkinson, D., Braverman, T., Civerolo, K., Dastoor, A.,
Davignon, D., Ku, J. Y., Lohman, K., Myers, T. C., Park, R. J., Seigneur, C.,
Selin, N. E., Sistla, G., and Vijayaraghavan, K.: The North American Mercury
Model Intercomparison Study (NAMMIS): Study description and model-to-model
comparisons, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D17310, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009803" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd009803</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Buxton, G., Greenstock, C., Helman, W., and Ross, A.: Critical Review of rate
constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl
radicals (⚫OH/⚫O<sup>−</sup>) in Aqueous Solution, J. Phys. Chem.
Ref. Data, 17, 513–886, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, J. G. and Lindberg, S. E.: Mechanisms of mercury removal by O-3 and
OH in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3355–3367,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.055" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.055</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Considine, D. B., Logan, J. A., and Olsen, M. A.: Evaluation of
near-tropopause ozone distributions in the Global Modeling Initiative
combined stratosphere/troposphere model with ozonesonde data, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 2365–2385, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cossa, D., Heimbürger, L.-E., Lannuzel, D., Rintoul, S. R., Butler, E. C.
V., Bowie, A. R., Averty, B., Watson, R. J., and Remenyi, T.: Mercury in the
Southern Ocean, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 4037–4052,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.001</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Costa, M. and Liss, P. S.: Photoreduction of mercury in sea water and its
possible implications for Hg(0) air-sea fluxes, Mar. Chem., 68, 87–95,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00067-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00067-5</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Dastoor, A. P. and Larocque, Y.: Global circulation of atmospheric mercury: a
modelling study, Atmos. Environ., 38, 147–161,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.037" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.037</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Deeds, D., Banic, C., Lu, J., and Daggupaty, S.: Mercury speciation in a
coal-fired power plant plume: An aircraft-based study of emissions from the
3640 MW Nanticoke Generating Station, Ontario, Canada, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 4919–4935, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50349" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50349</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
De Simone, F., Gencarelli, C. N., Hedgecock, I. M., and Pirrone, N.: Global
atmospheric cycle of mercury: a model study on the impact of oxidation
mechanisms, Environ Sci Pollut R, 21, 4110-4123, 10.1007/s11356-013-2451-x,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Dibble, T. S., Zelie, M. J., and Mao, H.: Thermodynamics of reactions of ClHg
and BrHg radicals with atmospherically abundant free radicals, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10271–10279, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10271-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Dibble, T. S., Zelie, M. J., and Mao, H.: Corrigendum to “Thermodynamics of
reactions of ClHg and BrHg radicals with atmospherically abundant free
radicals” published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 10271–10279, 2012, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 9211–9212, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9211-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-9211-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Dix, B., Baidara, S., Bresch, J., Hall, S., Schmidt, K., Wang, S., and
Volkamer, R.: Detection of iodine monoxide in the tropical free troposphere,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2035–2040, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212386110" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1212386110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Donohoue, D., Bauer, D., Cossairt, B., and Hynes, A.: Temperature and
pressure dependent rate coefficients for the reaction of Hg with Br and the
reaction of Br with Br: A pulsed laser photolysis-pulsed laser induced
fluorescence study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 6623–6632, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp054688j" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp054688j</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Donohoue, D. L., Bauer, D., and Hynes, A. J.: Temperature and pressure
dependent rate coefficients for the reaction of Hg with Cl and the reaction
of Cl with Cl: A pulsed laser photolysis-pulsed laser induced fluorescence
study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 7732–7741, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp054688j" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp054688j</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Edgerton, E. S., Hartsell, B. E., and Jansen, J. J.: Mercury speciation in
coal-fired power plant plumes observed at three surface sites in the
southeastern US, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4563–4570,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0515607" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es0515607</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, S.-M. and Jacob, D. J.: Surface ozone depletion in Arctic spring
sustained by bromine reactions on aerosols, Nature, 359, 522–524, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, X., Wang, S., Qiu, G., He, T., Li, G., Li, Z., and Shang, L.: Total
gaseous mercury exchange between water and air during cloudy weather
conditions over Hongfeng Reservoir, Guizhou, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, D15309, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009600" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009600</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Fernandez, R. P., Salawitch, R. J., Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque, J.-F., and
Saiz-Lopez, A.: Bromine partitioning in the tropical tropopause layer:
implications for stratospheric injection, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
13391–13410, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13391-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-13391-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Fisher, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, A. L., Amos, H. M., Steffen, A., and
Sunderland, E. M.: Riverine source of Arctic Ocean mercury inferred from
atmospheric observations, Nat. Geosci., 5, 499–504, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1478" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo1478</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Fisher, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, A. L., Amos, H. M., Corbitt, E. S.,
Streets, D. G., Wang, Q. Q., Yantosca, R. M., and Sunderland, E. M.: Factors
driving mercury variability in the Arctic atmosphere and ocean over the past
30 years, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1226–1235, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004689" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013GB004689</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, W., Gill, G. A., and Hewitt, A. D.: Air-sea exchange of mercury,
in: Trace metals in sea water, edited by: Wong, C. S., Boyle, E., Bruland, K.
W., Burton, J. D., and Goldberg, E. D., Plenum Publishing Company, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Flora, J. R. V., Vidic, R. D., Liu, W., and Thurnau, R. C.: Modeling powdered
activated carbon injection for the uptake of elemental mercury vapors, J. Air
Waste Manage. Assoc., 48, 1051–1059, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Liang, P., Deliger, Zhang, H., Ji, J., and Liu, P.:
Temporal trend and sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at Waliguan GAW
station, Northwestern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1951–1964,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-1951-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X. W., Feng, X., Shang, L. H., Wang, S. F., and Zhang, H.: Two years of
measurements of atmospheric total gaseous mercury (TGM) at a remote site in
Mt. Changbai area, Northeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4215–4226,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-4215-2012</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X. W., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X. B.:
Observations of atmospheric mercury in China: a critical review, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 9455–9476, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, X., Yang, X., Lang, X., Zhou, J., Zhang, H., Yu, B., Yan, H., Lin, C.-J.,
and Feng, X.: Atmospheric wet and litterfall mercury deposition at urban and
rural sites in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11547–11562,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11547-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-11547-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Gårdfeldt, K. and Jonsson, M.: Is bimolecular reduction of Hg(II)
complexes possible in aqueous systems of environmental importance, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 107, 4478–4482, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp0275342" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp0275342</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Gencarelli, C. N., De Simone, F., Hedgecock, I. M., Sprovieri, F., and
Pirrone, N.: Development and application of a regional-scale atmospheric
mercury model based on WRF/Chem: a Mediterranean area investigation, Environ.
Sci. Pollut. R, 21, 4095–4109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2162-3" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11356-013-2162-3</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Gionfriddo, C. M., Tate, M. T., Wick, R. R., Schultz, M. B., Zemla, A.,
Thelen, M. P., Schofield, R., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Holt, K. E., and Moreau, J.
W.: Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic sea ice, Nature Microbiology,
1, 16127, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.127" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.127</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Gómez Martín, J. C., Mahajan, A. S., Hay, T. D., Prados-Roman, C.,
Ordonez, C., MacDonald, S. M., Plane, J. M. C., Sorribas, M., Gil, M., Mora,
J. F. P., Reyes, M. V. A., Oram, D. E., Leedham, E., and Saiz-Lopez, A.:
Iodine chemistry in the eastern Pacific marine boundary layer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 887–904, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50132" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50132</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Goodsite, M., Plane, J., and Skov, H.: A theoretical study of the oxidation
of Hg-0 to HgBr2 in the troposphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1772–1776,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es034680s" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es034680s</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Gratz, L., Keeler, G., Blum, J., and Sherman, L.: Isotopic Composition and
Fractionation of Mercury in Great Lakes Precipitation and Ambient Air,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7764–7770, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es100383w" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es100383w</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Shah, V., Jaegle, L., Stutz, J.,
Festa, J., Spolaor, M., Tsai, C., Selin, N. E., Song, S., Zhou, X.,
Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D. D., Flocke, F. M., Campos, T.
L., Apel, E., Hornbrook, R., Blake, N. J., Hall, S., Tyndall, G. S., Reeves,
M., Stechman, D., and Stell, M.: Oxidation of mercury by bromine in the
subtropical Pacific free troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10494–10502,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066645" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015GL066645</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Greig, G., Gunning, H. E., and Strausz, O. P.: Reactions of Metal Atoms .3.
Combination of Mercury and Iodine Atoms and Spectrum of HgI, J. Chem. Phys.,
52, 4569, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1673687" target="_blank">doi:10.1063/1.1673687</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Guentzel, J. L., Landing, W. M., Gill, G. A., and Pollman, C. D.: Processes
influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 35, 863–873, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es001523" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es001523</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Gustin, M. S., Amos, H. M., Huang, J., Miller, M. B., and Heidecorn, K.:
Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 5697–5713, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Haitzer, M., Aiken, G. R., and Ryan, J. N.: Binding of mercury(II) to
dissolved organic matter: The role of the mercury-to-DOM concentration ratio,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3564–3570, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es025699i" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es025699i</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, B.: The gas phase oxidation of elemental mercury by ozone, Water Air
Soil Poll., 80, 301–315, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, B. and Bloom, N.: Report to EPRI, Electric Power Research Institute,
Palo Alto, CA, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Hamrud, M.: Residence Time and Spatial Variability for Gases in the
Atmosphere, Tellus B, 35, 295–303, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, D. C.: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, W. H. Freeman and Co., New
York, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Coe, H., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Bahreini, R.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Russell, L. M., Jolleys, M., Fu, T.-M., Allan, J. D.,
Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Morgan, W. T., Robinson, N. H.,
Williams, P. I., Cubison, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., and Dunlea, E. J.: Exploring
the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft
field campaigns with a global model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12673–12696,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Hedgecock, I. and Pirrone, N.: Mercury and photochemistry in the marine
boundary layer-modelling studies suggest the in situ production of reactive
gas phase mercury, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3055–3062,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00109-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00109-1</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., and Yang, X.: Global lifetime of elemental
mercury against oxidation by atomic bromine in the free troposphere, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L20808, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl027176" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006gl027176</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Mason, R. P., and Jaffe, D. A.: Sources and
deposition of reactive gaseous mercury in the marine atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 2278–2285, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.051" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.051</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Corbitt, E. S., Mao, J., Yang, X., Talbot, R.,
and Slemr, F.: Global atmospheric model for mercury including oxidation by
bromine atoms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 12037–12057,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Krishnamurthy, N. P., Caffrey, J. M., Landing, W. M.,
Edgerton, E. S., Knapp, K. R., and Nair, U. S.: Thunderstorms Increase
Mercury Wet Deposition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 9343–9350,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02586" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02586</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Horowitz, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Amos, H. M., Streets, D. G., and Sunderland,
E. M.: Historical Mercury Releases from Commercial Products: Global
Environmental Implications, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 10242–10250,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es501337j" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es501337j</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Hudman, R. C., Jacob, D. J., Turquety, S., Leibensperger, E. M., Murray, L.
T., Wu, S., Gilliland, A. B., Avery, M., Bertram, T. H., Brune, W., Cohen, R.
C., Dibb, J. E., Flocke, F. M., Fried, A., Holloway, J., Neuman, J. A.,
Orville, R., Perring, A., Ren, X., Sachse, G. W., Singh, H. B., Swanson, A.,
and Wooldridge, P. J.: Surface and lightning sources of nitrogen oxides over
the United States: Magnitudes, chemical evolution, and outflow, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D12S05, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007912" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006jd007912</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Huthwelker, T., Peter, T., Luo, B. P., Clegg, S. L., Carslaw, K. S., and
Brimblecombe, P.: Solubility of HOCl in Water and Aqueous H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> to
Stratospheric Temperatures, J. Atmos. Chem., 21, 81–95,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/Bf00712439" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/Bf00712439</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Hynes, A. J., Donohoue, D. L., Goodsite, M. E., and Hedgecock, I. M.: Our
Current Understanding of Major Chemical and Physical Processes Affecting
Mercury Dynamics in the Atmosphere and At the Air-Water/Terrestrial
Interfaces, in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere, edited
by: Pirrone, N., and Mason, R., Springer Science+Business Media, LLC,
427–457, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D., Field, B., Li, Q., Blake, D., de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., Hansel,
A., Wisthaler, A., Singh, H., and Guenther, A.: Global budget of methanol:
Constraints from atmospheric observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,
D08303, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005172" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004jd005172</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D. J.: Chemistry of OH in Remote Clouds and Its Role in the Production
of Formic-Acid and Peroxymonosulfate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 91,
9807–9826, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/Jd091id09p09807" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/Jd091id09p09807</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffe, D. A., Lyman, S., Amos, H. M., Gustin, M. S., Huang, J. Y., Selin, N.
E., Levin, L., ter Schure, A., Mason, R. P., Talbot, R., Rutter, A., Finley,
B., Jaegle, L., Shah, V., McClure, C., Arnbrose, J., Gratz, L., Lindberg, S.,
Weiss-Penzias, P., Sheu, G. R., Feddersen, D., Horvat, M., Dastoor, A.,
Hynes, A. J., Mao, H. T., Sonke, J. E., Slemr, F., Fisher, J. A., Ebinghaus,
R., Zhang, Y. X., and Edwards, G.: Progress on Understanding Atmospheric
Mercury Hampered by Uncertain Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
7204–7206, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es5026432" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es5026432</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Jiao, Y. and Dibble, T. S.: First kinetic study of the atmospherically
important reactions BrHg<sup>⚫</sup> + NO<sub>2</sub> and
BrHg<sup>⚫</sup> + HOO, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19, 1826–1838,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6cp06276h" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c6cp06276h</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, C. P., Lyman, S. N., Jaffe, D. A., Allen, T., and O'Neil, T. L.:
Detection and quantification of gas-phase oxidized mercury compounds by
GC/MS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2195–2205, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2195-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-9-2195-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E.: Residence Time and Variability of Tropospheric Trace Gases,
Tellus, 26, 477–488, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Klimont, Z., Smith, S. J., and Cofala, J.: The last decade of global
anthropogenic sulfur dioxide: 2000–2011 emissions, Environ. Res. Lett., 8,
014003, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014003" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014003</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Lamborg, C., Fitzgerald, W., O'Donnell, J., and Torgersen, T.: A non-steady
state box model of global-scale mercury biogeochemistry with interhemispheric
atmospheric gradients, Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society,
223, U520–U520, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Lamsal, L. N., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H., Pickering, K.
E., Bucsela, E. J., Gleason, J. F., Martin, R. V., Philip, S., Irie, H.,
Cede, A., Herman, J., Weinheimer, A., Szykman, J. J., and Knepp, T. N.:
Evaluation of OMI operational standard NO<sub>2</sub> column retrievals using in situ
and surface-based NO<sub>2</sub> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11587–11609,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Landis, M., Ryan, J., ter Schure, A., and Laudal, D.: Behavior of Mercury
Emissions from a Commercial Coal-Fired Power Plant: The Relationship between
Stack Speciation and Near-Field Plume Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 13540–13548, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es500783t" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es500783t</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, T. G., Biswas, P., and Hedrick, E.: Overall kinetics of heterogeneous
elemental mercury reactions on TiO<sub>2</sub> sorbent particles with UV irradiation,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 1411–1417, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0303707" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ie0303707</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, Q., Stolarski, R. S., Kawa, S. R., Nielsen, J. E., Douglass, A. R.,
Rodriguez, J. M., Blake, D. R., Atlas, E. L., and Ott, L. E.: Finding the
missing stratospheric Bry: a global modeling study of CHBr<sub>3</sub> and
CH<sub>2</sub>Br<sub>2</sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2269–2286,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2269-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-2269-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C. and Pehkonen, S.: Aqueous free radical chemistry of mercury in the
presence of iron oxides and ambient aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 31, 4125–4137,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00269-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00269-0</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C. and Pehkonen, S.: Oxidation of elemental mercury by aqueous chlorine
(HOCl/OCl<sup>−</sup>): Implications for tropospheric mercury chemistry, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 103, 28093–28102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jd02304" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/98jd02304</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C. J., Pongprueksa, P., Lindberg, S. E., Pehkonen, S. O., Byun, D., and
Jang, C.: Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: Model
science evaluation, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2911–2928,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.009</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J. T. and McElroy, M. B.: Impacts of boundary layer mixing on pollutant
vertical profiles in the lower troposphere: Implications to satellite remote
sensing, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1726–1739, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.009</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J.-T., Liu, Z., Zhang, Q., Liu, H., Mao, J., and Zhuang, G.: Modeling
uncertainties for tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns affecting
satellite-based inverse modeling of nitrogen oxides emissions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 12255–12275, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12255-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-12255-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Lindqvist, O. and Rodhe, H.: Atmospheric mercury – a review, Tellus B, 37,
136–159, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S. H., Yan, N. Q., Liu, Z. R., Qu, Z., Wang, P., Chang, S. G., and
Miller, C.: Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of
coal-fired power plants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 1405–1412,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es061705p" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es061705p</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Lohman, K., Seigneur, C., Edgerton, E., and Jansen, J.: Modeling mercury in
power plant plumes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3848–3854,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es051556v" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es051556v</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Lyman, S. and Jaffe, D.: Formation and fate of oxidized mercury in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere, Nat. Geosci., 5, 114–117,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1353" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo1353</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, J., Jacob, D. J., Evans, M. J., Olson, J. R., Ren, X., Brune, W. H.,
Clair, J. M. St., Crounse, J. D., Spencer, K. M., Beaver, M. R., Wennberg, P.
O., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J. L., Fried, A., Weibring, P., Walega, J. G.,
Hall, S. R., Weinheimer, A. J., Cohen, R. C., Chen, G., Crawford, J. H.,
McNaughton, C., Clarke, A. D., Jaeglé, L., Fisher, J. A., Yantosca, R.
M., Le Sager, P., and Carouge, C.: Chemistry of hydrogen oxide radicals
(HO<sub><i>x</i></sub>) in the Arctic troposphere in spring, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
5823–5838, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5823-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-5823-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, R. P., Lawson, N. M., and Sheu, G. R.: Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean:
factors controlling air-sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the
upper waters, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 2829–2853,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Kurosu, T. P., Chance, K., Murphy, J. G.,
Reeves, C., Mills, G., Casadio, S., Millet, D. B., Barkley, M. P., Paulot,
F., and Mao, J.: Isoprene emissions in Africa inferred from OMI observations
of formaldehyde columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6219–6235,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6219-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6219-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, R. V., Sioris, C. E., Chance, K., Ryerson, T. B., Bertram, T. H.,
Wooldridge, P. J., Cohen, R. C., Neuman, J. A., Swanson, A., and Flocke, F.
M.: Evaluation of space-based con- straints on global nitrogen oxide
emissions with regional aircraft measurements over and downwind of eastern
North America, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D15308, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006680" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006680</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Maya, J.: Ultraviolet absorption cross sections of HgI<sub>2</sub>, HgBr<sub>2</sub>, and
tin (II) valid vapors, J. Chem. Phys., 67, 4976–4980, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Muntean, M., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Song, S. J., Selin, N. E., Olivier, J. G.
J., Guizzardi, D., Maas, R., and Dentener, F.: Trend analysis from 1970 to
2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury
emissions, Sci. Total Environ., 494, 337–350,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.014" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Munthe, J.: Aqueous oxidation of elemental Hg by O<sub>3</sub>, Atmos. Environ.
A-Gen., 26, 1461–1468, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90131-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0960-1686(92)90131-4</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Munthe, J. and McElroy, W. J.: Some aqueous reactions of potential importance
in the atmospheric chemistry of mercury, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 26,
553–557, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90168-k" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0960-1686(92)90168-k</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Anderson, J. R., Quinn, P. K., McInnes, L. M., Brechtel, F.
J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Posfai, M., Thomson, D. S., and
Buseck, P. R.: Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in the
Southern Ocean marine boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/32138" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/32138</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Hudson, P. K., Thomson, D. S., Sheridan, P. J., and Wilson, J.
C.: Observations of mercury-containing aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40,
3163–3167, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es052385x" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es052385x</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C., and Koshak, W. J.:
Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global
chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 117, D20307, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017934" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012jd017934</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, H. T., Kim, K.-H., Kim, M.-Y., Hong, S., Youn, Y.-H., Shon, Z.-H.,
and Lee, J. S.: Monitoring of atmospheric mercury at a global atmospheric
watch (GAW) site on An-Myun Island, Korea, Water Air Soil Poll., 185,
149–164, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9438-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9438-5</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
O'Driscoll, N., Siciliano, S., Lean, D., and Amyot, M.: Gross photoreduction
kinetics of mercury in temperate freshwater lakes and rivers: Application to
a general model of DGM dynamics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 837–843,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es051062y" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es051062y</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
O'Driscoll, N. J., Lean, D. R. S., Loseto, L. L., Carignan, R., and
Siciliano, S. D.: Effect of dissolved organic carbon on the photoproduction
of dissolved gaseous mercury in lakes: Potential impacts of forestry,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2664–2672, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es034702a" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es034702a</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Orbe, C., Holzer, M., Polvani, L. M., Waugh, D. W., Li, F., Oman, L. D., and
Newman, P. A.: Seasonal ventilation of the stratosphere: Robust diagnostics
from one-way flux distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 293–306,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020213" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013JD020213</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Pal, B. and Ariya, P. A.: Gas-phase HO center dot-Initiated reactions of
elemental mercury: Kinetics, product studies, and atmospheric implications,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 5555–5566, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0494353" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es0494353</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Parrella, J. P., Jacob, D. J., Liang, Q., Zhang, Y., Mickley, L. J., Miller,
B., Evans, M. J., Yang, X., Pyle, J. A., Theys, N., and Van Roozendael, M.:
Tropospheric bromine chemistry: implications for present and pre-industrial
ozone and mercury, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6723–6740,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6723-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6723-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Pehkonen, S. O. and Lin, C. J.: Aqueous photochemistry of mercury with
organic acids, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 48, 144–150, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Peleg, M., Tas, E., Obrist, D., Matveev, V., Moore, C., Gabay, M., and Luria,
M.: Observational Evidence for Involvement of Nitrate Radicals in Nighttime
Oxidation of Mercury, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14008–14018,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03894" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03894</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F. and Birner, T.: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of lower
stratospheric age of air spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10195–10213,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Prados-Roman, C., Cuevas, C. A., Hay, T., Fernandez, R. P., Mahajan, A. S.,
Royer, S.-J., Galí, M., Simó, R., Dachs, J., Großmann, K.,
Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque, J.-F., and Saiz-Lopez, A.: Iodine oxide in the
global marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 583–593,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-583-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-583-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T., Chan, A. W. H., Barkley, M. P., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global
modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and
NO<sub>3</sub>), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11261–11276, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Qu, Z., Yan, N. Q., Liu, P., Jia, J. P., and Yang, S. J.: The role of iodine
monochloride for the oxidation of elemental mercury, J. Hazard. Mater., 183,
132–137, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.126" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.126</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Raofie, F., Snider, G., and Ariya, P. A.: Reaction of gaseous mercury with
molecular iodine, atomic iodine, and iodine oxide radicals – Kinetics,
product studies, and atmospheric implications, Can. J. Chemistry, 86,
811–820, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/V08-088" target="_blank">doi:10.1139/V08-088</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Ravichandran, M.: Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter
– a review, Chemosphere, 55, 319–331,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Rutter, A. P., Shakya, K. M., Lehr, R., Schauer, J. J., and Griffin, R. J.:
Oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury in the presence of secondary organic
aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 59, 86–92, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.009</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Sakata, M. and Asakura, K.: Estimating contribution of precipitation
scavenging of atmospheric particulate mercury to mercury wet deposition in
Japan, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1669–1680, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.031" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.031</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Sanemasa, I.: Solubility of Elemental Mercury-Vapor in Water, B. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 48, 1795–1798, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1246/Bcsj.48.1795" target="_blank">doi:10.1246/Bcsj.48.1795</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Horowitz, H. M., Hu, L., Sherwen, T., Evans, M.
J., Liang, Q., Suleiman, R. M., Oram, D. E., Le Breton, M., Percival, C. J.,
Wang, S., and Volkamer, R.: Modeling the observed tropospheric BrO
background: Importance of multiphase chemistry and implications for ozone,
OH, and mercury, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 11819–11835,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024229" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015JD024229</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., Zhu, Z. X., and Pawson, S.: A comparison
of the lower stratospheric age spectra derived from a general circulation
model and two data assimilation systems, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4113,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002652" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002jd002652</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Schroeder, W. H., Anlauf, K. G., Barrie, L. A., Lu, J. Y., Steffen, A.,
Schneeberger, D. R., and Berg, T.: Arctic springtime depletion of mercury,
Nature, 394, 331–332, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/28530" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/28530</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Selin, N. E. and Jacob, D. J.: Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet
deposition in the United States: Constraints on the contribution from North
American anthropogenic sources, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5193–5204,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.069" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.069</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S., Jaegle,
L., and Jaffe, D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury:
Global constraints from observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D02308,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007450" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006jd007450</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S., Jaegle, L., and
Sunderland, E. M.: Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury:
Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors
for deposition, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB2011, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gb003040" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007gb003040</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Gratz, L. E., Ambrose, J. L., Jaffe, D. A., Selin,
N. E., Song, S., Campos, T. L., Flocke, F. M., Reeves, M., Stechman, D.,
Stell, M., Festa, J., Stutz, J., Weinheimer, A. J., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D.
D., Tyndall, G. S., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A. J., Riemer, D.
D., Blake, N. J., Cantrell, C. A., and Mauldin III, R. L.: Origin of oxidized
mercury in the summertime free troposphere over the southeastern US, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 1511–1530, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Shepler, B. C. and Peterson, K. A.: Mercury monoxide: A systematic
investigation of its ground electronic state, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107,
1783–1787, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp027512f" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp027512f</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Sheu, G. R., Lin, N. H., Wang, J. L., Lee, C. T., Yang, C. F. O., and Wang,
S. H.: Temporal distribution and potential sources of atmospheric mercury
measured at a high-elevation background station in Taiwan, Atmos. Environ.,
44, 2393–2400, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.009</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Si, L. and Ariya, P. A.: Reduction of oxidized mercury species by
dicarboxylic acids (C(2)–C(4)): Kinetic and product studies, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 5150–5155, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es800552z" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es800552z</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Simpson, W. R., Brown, S. S., Saiz-Lopez, A., Thornton, J. A., and von
Glasow, R.: Tropospheric Halogen Chemistry: Sources, Cycling, and Impacts,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4035–4062, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr5006638" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr5006638</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Singh, H. B., Salas, L., Herlth, D., Kolyer, R., Czech, E., Avery, M.,
Crawford, J. H., Pierce, R. B., Sachse, G. W., Blake, D. R., Cohen, R. C.,
Bertram, T. H., Perring, A., Wooldridge, P. J., Dibb, J., Huey, G., Hudman,
R. C., Turquety, S., Emmons, L. K., Flocke, F., Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R.,
and Horowitz, L. W.: Reactive nitrogen distribution and partitioning in the
North American troposphere and lowermost stratosphere, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D12S04, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007664" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006jd007664</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Seiler, W., and Schuster, G.: Latitudinal distribution of mercury
over the Atlantic-Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 86, 1159–1166,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC02p01159" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/JC086iC02p01159</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Ebinghaus, R., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Hermann, M., Kock, H. H.,
Martinsson, B. G., Schuck, T., Sprung, D., van Velthoven, P., Zahn, A., and
Ziereis, H.: Gaseous mercury distribution in the upper troposphere and lower
stratosphere observed onboard the CARIBIC passenger aircraft, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 1957–1969, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1957-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-1957-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Weigelt, A., Ebinghaus, R., Brenninkmeijer, C., Baker, A., Schuck,
T., Rauthe-Schoch, A., Riede, H., Leedham, E., Hermann, M., van Velthoven,
P., Oram, D., O'Sullivan, D., Dyroff, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Mercury
Plumes in the Global Upper Troposphere Observed during Flights with the
CARIBIC Observatory from May 2005 until June 2013, Atmosphere, 5, 342–369,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos5020342" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/atmos5020342</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Angot, H., Dommergue, A., Magand, O., Barret, M., Weigelt, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Brunke, E.-G., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Edwards, G., Howard, D.,
Powell, J., Keywood, M., and Wang, F.: Comparison of mercury concentrations
measured at several sites in the Southern Hemisphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
3125–3133, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-3125-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>
Slemr, F., Weigelt, A., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., Bödewadt, J.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Rauthe-Schöch, A., Weber, S., Hermann, M.,
Becker, J., Zahn, A., and Martinsson, B.: Atmospheric mercury measurements
onboard the CARIBIC passenger aircraft, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2291–2302,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2291-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-9-2291-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>
Smith-Downey, N. V., Sunderland, E. M., and Jacob, D. J.: Anthropogenic
impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils:
Insights from a new global model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 115, G03008,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009jg001124" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009jg001124</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>
Soerensen, A. L., Sunderland, E. M., Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca,
R. M., Skov, H., Christensen, J. H., Strode, S. A., and Mason, R. P.: An
Improved Global Model for Air-Sea Exchange of Mercury: High Concentrations
over the North Atlantic, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8574–8580,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es102032g" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es102032g</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>
Snider, G., Raofie, F., and Ariya, P.: Effects of relative humidity and CO(g)
on the O(3)-initiated oxidation reaction of Hg(0)(g): kinetic &amp; product
studies, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 5616–5623, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b801226a" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/b801226a</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>
Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P., Balcom, P. H., and Sunderland, E. M.: Drivers
of Surface Ocean Mercury Concentrations and Air-Sea Exchange in the West
Atlantic Ocean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 7757–7765,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es401354q" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es401354q</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>
Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P., Balcom, P. H., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y. X.,
Kuss, J., and Sunderland, E. M.: Elemental Mercury Concentrations and Fluxes
in the Tropical Atmosphere and Ocean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11312–11319, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es503109p" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es503109p</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>
Song, S., Selin, N. E., Soerensen, A. L., Angot, H., Artz, R., Brooks, S.,
Brunke, E.-G., Conley, G., Dommergue, A., Ebinghaus, R., Holsen, T. M.,
Jaffe, D. A., Kang, S., Kelley, P., Luke, W. T., Magand, O., Marumoto, K.,
Pfaffhuber, K. A., Ren, X., Sheu, G.-R., Slemr, F., Warneke, T., Weigelt, A.,
Weiss-Penzias, P., Wip, D. C., and Zhang, Q.: Top-down constraints on
atmospheric mercury emissions and implications for global biogeochemical
cycling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7103–7125, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7103-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>
Sonke, J.: A global model of mass independent mercury stable isotope
fractionation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 4577–4590,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.027</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>
Sonke, J. E., Marusczak, N., and Fu, X. W.: A stable isotope view of the
atmospheric Hg cycle, Goldschmidt, Prague, Czech Republic, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>
Steffen, A., Douglas, T., Amyot, M., Ariya, P., Aspmo, K., Berg, T.,
Bottenheim, J., Brooks, S., Cobbett, F., Dastoor, A., Dommergue, A.,
Ebinghaus, R., Ferrari, C., Gardfeldt, K., Goodsite, M. E., Lean, D.,
Poulain, A. J., Scherz, C., Skov, H., Sommar, J., and Temme, C.: A synthesis
of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1445–1482, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-1445-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation>
Strahan, S. E., Duncan, B. N., and Hoor, P.: Observationally derived
transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to
the GMI chemistry and transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation>
Strode, S. A., Jaegle, L., Jaffe, D. A., Swartzendruber, P. C., Selin, N. E.,
Holmes, C., and Yantosca, R. M.: Trans-Pacific transport of mercury, J.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D15305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009428" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007jd009428</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation>
Subir, M., Ariya, P. A., and Dastoor, A. P.: A review of uncertainties in
atmospheric modeling of mercury chemistry I. Uncertainties in existing
kinetic parameters – Fundamental limitations and the importance of
heterogeneous chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 45, 5664–5676,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.046" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.046</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation>
Sumner, A. L., Spicer, C. W., Statola, J., Mangaraj, R., Cowen, K. A., and
Landis, M. S.: Environmental chamber studies of mercury reactions in the
atmosphere, in: Dynamics of Mercury Pollution on Regional and Global Scales:
Atmospheric Processes and Human Exposures Around the World, edited by:
Pirrone, N., and Mahaffey, K. R., Springer, USA, 193–212, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation>
Sunderland, E. M. and Mason, R. P.: Human impacts on open ocean mercury
concentrations, Global Biogeochem. Cyc., 21, GB4022,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002876" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006gb002876</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation>
Talbot, R., Mao, H., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., and Avery, M.: Total depletion of
Hg<sup>0</sup> in the upper troposphere-lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L23804, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031366" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007gl031366</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, W. W., Geller, M. A., Pawson, S., and da Silva, A.: A case study of
excessive subtropical transport in the stratosphere of a data assimilation
system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D11102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004057" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003jd004057</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation>
Theys, N., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Yang, X., De Smedt, I., Richter,
A., Begoin, M., Errera, Q., Johnston, P. V., Kreher, K., and De Mazière,
M.: Global observations of tropospheric BrO columns using GOME-2 satellite
data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1791–1811, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1791-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-1791-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation>
Tossell, J. A.: Calculation of the energetics for the oligomerization of gas
phase HgO and HgS and for the solvolysis of crystalline HgO and HgS, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 110, 2571–2578, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp056280s" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp056280s</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation>
Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu,
L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Thompson, A.
M., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Cohen, R. C.,
Laughner, J. L., Dibb, J. E., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Wolfe, G. M.,
Pollack, I. B., Peischl, J., Neuman, J. A., and Zhou, X.: Why do models
overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 13561–13577, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation>
Travnikov, O. and Ilyin, I.: The EMEP/MSC-E Mercury Modeling System, Mercury
Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere, 47, 571–587,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_20" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_20</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation>
van Loon, L. L., Mader, E. A., and Scott, S. L.: Sulfite stabilization and
reduction of the aqueous mercuric ion: Kinetic determination of sequential
formation constants, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 3190–3195,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp003803h" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp003803h</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation>
Vidic, R. D., Chang, M. T., and Thurnau, R. C.: Kinetics of vapor-phase
mercury uptake by virgin and sulfur-impregnated activated carbons, J. Air
Waste Manage. As., 48, 247–255, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Baidar, S., Campos, T. L., Coburn, S., DiGangi, J. P., Dix, B.,
Eloranta, E. W., Koenig, T. K., Morley, B., Ortega, I., Pierce, B. R.,
Reeves, M., Sinreich, R., Wang, S., Zondlo, M. A., and Romashkin, P. A.:
Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, NO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> and
aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with
aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8,
2121–2148, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation>
Wan, Q., Feng, X., Lu, J., Zheng, W., Song, X., Han, S., and Xu, H.:
Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain area, northeastern China I. The
seasonal distribution pattern of total gaseous mercury and its potential
sources, Environ. Res., 109, 201–206, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.001</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, F., Saiz-Lopez, A., Mahajan, A. S., Gómez Martín, J. C.,
Armstrong, D., Lemes, M., Hay, T., and Prados-Roman, C.: Enhanced production
of oxidised mercury over the tropical Pacific Ocean: a key missing oxidation
pathway, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1323–1335, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-1323-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S. Y., Schmidt, J. A., Baidar, S., Coburn, S., Dix, B., Koenig, T. K.,
Apel, E., Bowdalo, D., Campos, T. L., Eloranta, E., Evans, M. J., DiGangi, J.
P., Zondlo, M. A., Gao, R. S., Haggerty, J. A., Hall, S. R., Hornbrook, R.
S., Jacob, D., Morley, B., Pierce, B., Reeves, M., Romashkin, P., ter Schure,
A., and Volkamer, R.: Active and widespread halogen chemistry in the tropical
and subtropical free troposphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 9281–9286,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505142112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1505142112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z. and Pehkonen, S.: Oxidation of elemental mercury by aqueous bromine:
atmospheric implications, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3675–3688,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.059" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.059</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation>
Weigelt, A., Slemr, F., Ebinghaus, R., Pirrone, N., Bieser, J., Bödewadt,
J., Esposito, G., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.: Mercury emissions of a
coal-fired power plant in Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13653–13668,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13653-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-13653-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Jaffe, D., Swartzendruber, P., Hafner, W., Chand, D., and
Prestbo, E.: Quantifying Asian and biomass burning sources of mercury using
the Hg ∕ CO ratio in pollution plumes observed at the Mount Bachelor
Observatory, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4366–4379,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.058" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.058</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss-Penzias, P., Amos, H. M., Selin, N. E., Gustin, M. S., Jaffe, D. A.,
Obrist, D., Sheu, G.-R., and Giang, A.: Use of a global model to understand
speciated atmospheric mercury observations at five high-elevation sites,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1161–1173, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation>
Whalin, L. and Mason, R.: A new method for the investigation of mercury redox
chemistry in natural waters utilizing deflatable Teflon (R) bags and
additions of isotopically labeled mercury, Anal. Chim. Ac., 558, 211–221,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.070" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.070</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation>
Whalin, L., Kim, E. H., and Mason, R.: Factors influencing the oxidation,
reduction, methylation and demethylation of mercury species in coastal
waters, Mar. Chem., 107, 278–294, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.04.002" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2007.04.002</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation>
Wilcox, J.: A Kinetic Investigation of High-Temperature Mercury Oxidation by
Chlorine, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 6633–6639, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp901050d" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/jp901050d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, Y., Jacob, D. J., and Turquety, S.: Atmospheric acetylene and its
relationship with CO as an indicator of air mass age, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D12305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008268" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD008268</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, Z. F., Stromberg, D., and Lindqvist, O.: Influence of Humic Substances
on Photolysis of Divalent Mercury in Aqueous-Solution, Water Air Soil
Pollut., 80, 789–798, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/Bf01189730" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/Bf01189730</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, N. Q., Liu, S. H., Chang, S. G., and Miller, C.: Method for the study of
gaseous oxidants for the oxidation of mercury gas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44,
5567–5574, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie050377j" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ie050377j</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, N. Q., Qu, Z., Chi, Y., Qiao, S. H., Dod, R. L., Chang, S. G., and
Miller, C.: Enhanced Elemental Mercury Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas by
Sulfur-Chlorine Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 5410–5415,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es801910w" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es801910w</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X., Cox, R., Warwick, N., Pyle, J., Carver, G., O'Connor, F., and
Savage, N.: Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on ozone: A model
study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D23311, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006244" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005jd006244</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Fu, X. W., Lin, C.-J., Wang, X., and Feng, X. B.: Observation and
analysis of speciated atmospheric mercury in Shangri-La, Tibetan Plateau,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 653–665, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-653-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-653-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Jaeglé, L., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Holmes, C. D.,
Amos, H. M., Wang, Q., Talbot, R., Artz, R., Brooks, S., Luke, W., Holsen, T.
M., Felton, D., Miller, E. K., Perry, K. D., Schmeltz, D., Steffen, A.,
Tordon, R., Weiss-Penzias, P., and Zsolway, R.: Nested-grid simulation of
mercury over North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6095–6111,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6095-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6095-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. X., Jacob, D., Dutkiewicz, S., Amos, H., Long, M., and Sunderland,
E.: Biogeochemical drivers of the fate of riverine mercury discharged to the
global and Arctic oceans, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 854–864,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015gb005124" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015gb005124</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib176"><label>176</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. X., Jacob, D. J., Horowitz, H. M., Chen, L., Amos, H. M.,
Krabbenhoft, D. P., Slemr, F., St Louis, V. L., and Sunderland, E. M.:
Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in
anthropogenic emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 526–531,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516312113" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1516312113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib177"><label>177</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, W. and Hintelmann, H.: Mercury isotope fractionation during
photoreduction in natural water is controlled by its Hg ∕ DOC ratio,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 6704–6715, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.08.016" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.gca.2009.08.016</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
