<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Trace gas composition in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone: <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> a case study
based on aircraft observations and model simulations</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Trace gas composition in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K.-D.~Gottschaldt et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gottschaldt</surname><given-names>Klaus-D.</given-names></name>
          <email>klaus-dirk.gottschaldt@dlr.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2046-6137</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schlager</surname><given-names>Hans</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Baumann</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6611-5343</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bozem</surname><given-names>Heiko</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-9864</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Eyring</surname><given-names>Veronika</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6887-4885</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hoor</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-6864</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jöckel</surname><given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-1394</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jurkat</surname><given-names>Tina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Voigt</surname><given-names>Christiane</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-7731</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zahn</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ziereis</surname><given-names>Helmut</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-5669</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Klaus-D. Gottschaldt (klaus-dirk.gottschaldt@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>6091</fpage><lpage>6111</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>We present in situ measurements of the trace gas composition of
the upper tropospheric (UT) Asian summer monsoon anticyclone (ASMA)
performed with the High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) in
the frame of the Earth System Model Validation (ESMVal) campaign. Air masses
with enhanced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were encountered after entering the ASMA
at its southern edge at about 150 hPa on 18 September 2012. This is in
contrast to the presumption that the anticyclone's interior is dominated by
recently uplifted air with low O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the monsoon season. We also
observed enhanced CO and HCl in the ASMA, which are tracers for boundary layer
pollution and tropopause layer (TL) air or stratospheric in-mixing respectively. In addition, reactive nitrogen was enhanced in the ASMA. Along
the HALO flight track across the ASMA boundary, strong gradients of these
tracers separate anticyclonic from outside air.</p>
    <p>Lagrangian trajectory calculations using HYSPLIT show that HALO sampled
a filament of UT air three times, which included air masses uplifted from
the lower or mid-troposphere north of the Bay of Bengal. The trace gas
gradients between UT and uplifted air masses were preserved during transport
within a belt of streamlines fringing the central part of the anticyclone
(fringe), but are smaller than the gradients across the ASMA boundary. Our
data represent the first in situ observations across the southern part and
downstream of the eastern ASMA flank. Back-trajectories starting
at the flight track furthermore indicate that HALO transected the ASMA where
it was just splitting into a Tibetan and an Iranian part. The O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich
filament is diverted from the fringe towards the interior of the original
anticyclone, and is at least partially bound to become part of the new Iranian
eddy.</p>
    <p>A simulation with the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model is
found to reproduce the observations reasonably well. It shows that
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich air is entrained by the outer streamlines of the anticyclone at
its eastern flank. Back-trajectories and increased HCl mixing ratios
indicate that the entrained air originates in the stratospherically
influenced TL. Photochemical ageing of air masses in the ASMA additionally
increases O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in originally O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-poor, but CO-rich air. Simulated
monthly mean trace gas distributions show decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA
centre only at the 100 hPa level in July and August, but at lower altitudes
and in September the ASMA is dominated by increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The combination
of entrainment from the tropopause region, photochemistry and dynamical
instabilities can explain the in situ observations, and might have a larger
impact on the highly variable trace gas composition of the anticyclone than
previously thought.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The Earth System Model Validation (ESMVal) field experiment with the High
Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO, <uri>http://www.halo.dlr.de</uri>) was
conducted during 10–24 September 2012 in close cooperation with the HALO
TACTS mission (Jurkat et al., 2014; Vogel et al., 2015; Müller et
al., 2016). During the 65 HALO flight hours of the ESMVal campaign, trace
gas distributions were sampled from the ground to a maximum altitude of 15.3 km
along the following route: Oberpfaffenhofen (Germany), Sal (Cape Verde), Cape Town (South Africa), boundary of Antarctica, Cape Town, Male
(Maldives), Larnaca (Cyprus), Oberpfaffenhofen, Spitzbergen (Norway)
and again to Oberpfaffenhofen. The goal was to gather in situ observations for the
evaluation of Earth system models and to improve process understanding.
Specific areas of interest included regions impacted by deep convection,
lightning and biomass burning in West- and South Africa, anthropogenic
pollution in Europe and the Mediterranean, the northern and southern polar
regions, and the northern African and Asian monsoons.</p>
      <p>The Asian summer monsoon (also known as Indian or south-west monsoon), sensu
stricto, is a prevailing sea breeze, lasting from June to September
(Gettelman et al., 2004; Lawrence and Lelieveld, 2010).
Different mechanisms may contribute to the formation of a conduit of rising
air, centred over the southern Tibetan Plateau (Bergman et al.,
2013) during Northern Hemisphere summer. A high-pressure area forms in the convective
detrainment altitudes, sustaining a coherent anticyclone, centred at 200 to
100 hPa (Dunkerton, 1995; Randel and Park, 2006; Garny and Randel, 2016).</p>
      <p>Polluted boundary layer air is entrained from throughout the region. It is
effectively uplifted first in the narrow conduit to detrainment altitudes of
about 200 hPa, later by large-scale upward motion at the eastern side of the
anticyclone and then confined by the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone (ASMA)
(Lelieveld et al., 2001; Li et al., 2005; Randel and Park, 2006; Park et
al., 2007, 2008, 2009; Chen et al., 2012; Bergman
et al., 2013; Vogel et al., 2015; Ploeger et al., 2015). As a consequence,
trace gas mixing ratios within the anticyclone are mainly shifted towards
lower-tropospheric values, e.g. relatively increased carbon monoxide (CO)
(Li et al., 2005; Park et al., 2008) and decreased ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Randel and Park, 2006; Park et al., 2007, 2008; Kunze et
al., 2010). The in situ measurements considered in our study also show
enhanced CO mixing ratios in the ASMA, but instead of decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> we
found significantly increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios – relative to the UT air
encountered south of the anticyclone.</p>
      <p>While several studies looked into the boundary layer sources for ASMA air,
entrainment of stratospheric or TL air has received much less attention. We
are not aware of a study focusing on it, although the possibility of
stratospheric entrainment at the eastern flank of the ASMA has already been
recognised (Plumb, 2005; Randel and Park, 2006; Ren et al., 2014).
Park et al. (2007) found a relatively high frequency of TL air
at 100 hPa (MLS satellite data, July–August 2005) at the eastern ASMA
flank, and interpreted this as an indicator of frequent
stratosphere–troposphere exchange. This is consistent with
Konopka et al. (2010), who found that the ASMA enhances
horizontal transport of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich air from the extratropics into the
stratospheric part of the tropical tropopause layer. Other studies
(Cristofanelli et al., 2010; Barret et al., 2016) indicate the near
absence of stratospheric intrusions during the monsoon season. At least the
entrainment of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich TL air is supported by the HALO ESMVal in situ
observations considered here. Enhanced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was also found in CARIBIC
(<uri>http://www.caribic-atmospheric.com</uri>) in situ measurements in the monsoon
region. Trace gas signatures from the northern part of the ASMA were
interpreted as photochemically older than those from the more central
region, sampled at the southernmost parts of the CARIBIC flights (Baker
et al., 2011; Rauthe-Schöch et al., 2016). However, the origin of
enhanced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the old air is not entirely clear, and
Baker et al. (2011) also mentioned the possibility of
stratospheric influences. Whether O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in air originating in the ASMA is
generally enhanced or depleted was pointed out as one of the major open
questions related to the Asian monsoon already by Lawrence and
Lelieveld (2010).</p>
      <p>Here we present a unique set of upper troposphere (UT) in situ measurements
in the ASMA, obtained during the HALO ESMVal campaign. The focus is on the
measurements, their representation in a global chemistry climate simulation
and the origin of air masses. We pinpoint the processes that led to the
observed trace gas signatures using a more detailed analysis of an exemplary
flight segment, and conclude showing how the present measurements could be
reconciled with previous, seemingly contradictory studies. In a follow-up
study the processes that determine the ASMA composition are further analysed
by putting the HALO ESMVal measurements into a regional, seasonal and
multi-annual perspective. We refer to that study
(Gottschaldt et al., 2017) as accompanying paper
in the following. The accompanying paper is mainly based on EMAC
simulations, which also show that our in situ data reflect rather common
processes in the ASMA. Both studies shall help to explain the highly
variable composition of the ASMA and its outflow, addressing the following
key aspects of the ASMA that were recently identified as poorly understood
(Randel et al., 2016): dynamical and chemical coupling with
convection, composition/reactive chemistry in the monsoon region, mixing of
higher-latitude lower-stratospheric air into the tropical TL by the ASMA.</p>
      <p>The paper is structured as follows: Sect. 2 provides a description of the
instruments and techniques used for the in situ measurements of selected
tracers during the ESMVal campaign, the Eulerian global chemistry climate
simulation hindcasting the synoptic situation of the measurements, and the
trajectory model. The transport pathways of air masses that contributed
to the observed chemical composition and periods of interest from the
measured time series are identified in Sect. 3. Section 4 shows that the
EMAC global simulation may be used for the interpretation of the in situ
measurements, because the main features are reproduced well. Section 5 is
dedicated to the discussion of selected tracer–tracer relations in the
in situ data. The eastern flank of the ASMA is found to be crucial for the
generation of the observed trace gas signatures, which is discussed in
Sect. 6 for that part of the flight providing the most direct observations
of it. In Sect. 7 we reconcile the HALO ESMVal observations of increased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with previous studies that found decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA, and
then conclude with a summary in Sect. 8.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>In situ measurement techniques</title>
      <p>All in situ data used in our analyses are based on a synchronised data set,
created by merging the data with their individual time resolution to a
common time axis with a resolution of 10 s. This data set is available
from the HALO database (<uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de</uri>).</p>
      <p>Carbon monoxide (CO) was measured with the three-channel quantum cascade
laser infrared absorption spectrometer TRIHOP. CO data were sampled every
8 s with an integration time of 1.5 s and a total
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty of 1.8 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schiller et al., 2008; Müller et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p>A newly designed atmospheric chemical ionisation mass spectrometer (AIMS)
with an electrical discharge source and in-flight calibration provided HCl
mixing ratios with a 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limit of 10–15 pmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and an
accuracy of 12 % (Jurkat et al., 2014, 2016; Voigt et al., 2014).
AIMS measurements compared well in general to remote sensing
techniques on board HALO, like the Gimballed
Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging
of the Atmosphere – GLORIA
(Ungermann et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Total reactive nitrogen, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is the sum of all reactive nitrogen
species in the atmosphere. Besides NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), HONO, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the most abundant species of the odd nitrogen
family. NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured during the ESMVal campaign by the
AtmosphEric Nitrogen oxides mEAsurement System (AENEAS) – a two-channel NO-chemiluminescence detector
in combination with a gold converter installed in one channel
(Ziereis et al., 2000). The detection limit is about 8 pmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
an integration time of 1 s. Its overall uncertainty is about 8 % (6.5 %)
for volume mixing ratios of 0.5 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The Fast Airborne Ozone instrument
(FAIRO) deployed during the ESMVal campaign is based on a chemiluminescence
sensor plus an UV photometer (Zahn et al., 2012), achieving at
least an accuracy of 1.5 % at 10 Hz.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Atmospheric dynamics and chemistry simulations</title>
      <p>The Eulerian simulation used for this study was performed with the EMAC
model (Jöckel et al., 2010) within the project Earth
System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo), as a German contribution
to the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative (CCMI). This simulation has been
described and evaluated in detail by Jöckel et al. (2016)
as RC1SD-base-10a. Its set-up is based on the CCMI transient hindcast
reference simulation in specified dynamics mode
(Eyring et al., 2013). Here
we just refer to it as the “simulation”. Key characteristics of the simulation
are a representation of the global domain, with a spherical truncation of T42
and 90 vertical hybrid pressure levels up to 0.01 hPa, and a nudging of dynamics
towards ERA-Interim reanalyses data (Dee et al., 2011)
from the free troposphere to a pressure altitude of 10 hPa. The simulation
also includes complex interactive chemistry with online feedback on
dynamics. This set-up reproduces the synoptic situation during the aircraft
campaign (ESMVal and all other campaigns of the simulated period), allowing
direct comparisons of simulated and measured data. In particular, it was
shown by Nützel et al. (2016) that the climatological
representation of key dynamical features of the ASMA in ERA-Interim is in
line with most other reanalysis data sets. However, some processes cannot
be explicitly resolved on the coarse grid of the global simulation. These
subgrid-scale processes are accounted for by parameterisations that are
expected to reproduce climatological characteristics rather than individual
events. This pertains in particular to convection and convective transport,
thereby negatively affecting the non-climatological comparability of
simulated versus observed atmospheric trace gas mixing ratios
(Tost et al., 2010). Global fields are output with a frequency
of 10 h, but data along the HALO flight track were sampled with the model
time step resolution of 12 min (see description of S4D by
Jöckel et al., 2010). In addition to the nitrogen
oxides listed in Sect. 2.1, the EMAC tracers NHOH, HNO, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OH are also included in simulated NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is calculated as the
mixing ratio of nitrogen atoms in the sum of the listed NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds,
which is consistent with what is measured by the corresponding in situ
instrument. Net photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates are calculated from
the diagnostic tracers ProdO3 and LossO3 (Jöckel et al.,
2016). Unless stated otherwise, the tropopause is diagnosed in our EMAC
simulations according to the WMO definition between 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and by PV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 PVU elsewhere
(Jöckel et al., 2006).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The left panel shows mixing ratios of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, CO, NO and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the HALO flight track from Male to Larnaca on 18 September
2012. Black: in situ measurements in 10 s resolution, Blue: interval
averages of the in situ data, corresponding to 12 min simulation time steps,
Red: simulation results. Yellow shadings mark the periods of interest, see
text. Corresponding curtains simulated with EMAC along the flight track are
shown on the right. The pipe follows the HALO flight altitude, filled with
measured trace gas mixing ratios in the same colour coding (legends
integrated in corresponding left panels). Black <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> missing. A thin white
line indicates the simulated tropopause.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Lagrangian trajectory calculations</title>
      <p>The HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model
(Draxler and Hess, 1998; Draxler and Rolph, 2015) was
used to calculate backward-trajectories, starting at the flight track. The
same starting time is used for all back-trajectories of the selected flight
segment; i.e. the time lag between different positions along the track is
neglected. Thus smaller flight segments need to be chosen if the wind
fields are more dynamic. HYSPLIT is driven kinematically, by meteorological
fields of the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS), in 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
horizontal resolution, 23 vertical levels between 1000 and
20 hPa, as provided by NCEP (National Weather Service's National Centers for
Environmental Prediction, <uri>http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/gdas1.php</uri>) at 3 h
time steps. Convection is represented indirectly, as smoothed vertical
velocity components in the reanalysis fields. HYSPLIT trajectories only
capture advection and stirring. Note that, in contrast, EMAC captures
convection directly (although parameterised), as well as mixing in the form of
diffusion (Roeckner et al., 2006).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Air masses observed and transport pathways</title>
      <p>An air mass with enhanced mixing ratios of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCl
(Fig. 1) was sampled during a flight on 18 September 2012 from the Maldives
to Cyprus over the Arabian Sea. Here, HALO flew at an altitude of 160 to 170 hPa,
just before reaching the Oman coast (Fig. 2). We attribute the sudden
increase of the above-mentioned trace gases at 07:46 UTC to entering
the ASMA from the south. The sampling of this air mass was interrupted by a
dive to probe the lower boundary of the ASMA, but after that HALO continued
to fly in UT air related to the ASMA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mixing ratios of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, as simulated by EMAC
for 06:00 UTC on 18 September 2012, at 168 hPa. Beads along the flight
track are separated by 1 h, and the tail end of the HALO silhouette marks
the actual position. Black circles in panel <bold>(a)</bold> indicate the HALO
position during the periods of interest, which represent the ASMA
measurements. During POI3 HALO was flying in an altitude range containing the
shown pressure level. Arrows illustrate the wind field <bold>(c)</bold> and also
highlight a filament of TP layer entrainment into the free troposphere at the
eastern ASMA flank, indicated by anti-correlated mixing ratios of HCl and CO
(<bold>b</bold> and <bold>d</bold>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Periods of interest for the measurements during the HALO ESMVal
flight from Male to Larnaca on 18 September 2012. Column UTC shows the time
periods of the measurements, figure lists the corresponding trajectory
figures.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="110pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="30pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="240pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Classification</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">UTC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Remarks</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Fig.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POI1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ascent from Male <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>UT south of ASMA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">05:36 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>06:40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Clean air, not related to ASMA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POI2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Southern ASMA <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>boundary region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06:40 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>07:46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Back-trajectories related to ASMA, but clean air dominates</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POI3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Outer ASMA <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>streamlines</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">07:46 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>08:21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">UT ASMA circulation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> air uplifted at eastern flank; 3 days after passing eastern flank</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3, A2, S5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POI4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dive over Arabian <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Peninsula</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">08:21 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>09:05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">lower ASMA boundary (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 180 hPa) to 650 hPa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POI5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Outer ASMA <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>streamlines</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">09:05 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>10:50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">As POI3, but filament curled in; 6 days after passing eastern flank</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POI6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Outer ASMA <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>streamlines</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10:50 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>11:53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">As POI3, but less uplifted air; 5 days after passing eastern flank</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POI7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Descent into Larnaca</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11:52 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>12:29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Lower ASMA boundary to ground</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>We divide the ESMVal-flight from Male to Larnaca pragmatically into seven
parts (Table 1), called periods of interest (POI) in the following. Thereby
we refer to the central region as the “interior”, and to the boundary region,
i.e. the outer streamlines of the ASMA circulation, as the “fringe”. The terms
“interior” and “fringe” characterise actual positions of streamlines
within the anticyclone, independent of the trace gas signatures they carry.
Streamlines represent an instantaneous snapshot of transport barriers,
because there is no large-scale transport perpendicular to streamlines.
Figure 3 illustrates the evolution of the ASMA circulation at flight
altitude from 9 days before to 1 day after our measurements. Besides
streamlines, Fig. 3 shows geopotential height, because increased geopotential
is a proxy for characterising the extent of the ASMA on pressure levels
(Barret et al., 2016). Alternatively, PV has been proposed to delineate
the ASMA in isentropic coordinates (Ploeger et al., 2015)
and the corresponding equivalent to Fig. 3 is provided in the Supplement S1. However, the above ASMA boundary definitions (Ploeger et
al., 2015; Barret et al., 2016) and another one based on maximal wind speed,
used by Pan et al. (2016), emphasise concepts of a closed
ASMA volume or transport barriers on monthly or seasonal timescales. In
contrast, our analyses rather aim to explain observed UT tracer
distributions resulting from daily-scale dynamics. The latter is best
captured by Lagrangian trajectories, which unlike the above Eulerian
approaches inherently reflect the time dependence of the flow. Our choice of
POIs and the delineation of the ASMA are thus based on back-trajectories
from the flight path and the observed trace gas signatures.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Streamlines and geopotential height (GPH) at the 168 hPa
pressure level as simulated by EMAC for selected output time steps in
September 2012.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>HYSPLIT-simulated backward trajectories starting at the HALO
flight track (red arrows). The integration length is noted in the upper-right corner of each lat–lon panel. All trajectories of one panel start at
the same time, approximately in the middle of the period corresponding to
the respective flight segments <bold>(d)</bold>. Colours in panel a relate the
previous positions of the measured air parcels to calendar days. Colours in
<bold>(b)</bold> show pressure altitude, which is supplemented by altitude vs. time in
<bold>(d)</bold>. Individual trajectories are colour coded according to the time of
measurement at their respective starting positions in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>. Panels
a show the same map section here and throughout Appendix A, while all other
panels are scaled individually.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Clearly ASMA-related air masses (POI3/5/6) are marked in shades of yellow in
the left column of Fig. 1, and indicated by three black ovals in Fig. 2a.
For the sake of brevity we focus on POI3 in the following, while more
information about the other flight segments is available in Appendix A.</p>
      <p>The flight segment POI3 is characterised by
almost parallel back-trajectories along the southern ASMA fringe (Fig. 4c).
The outer trajectories show air masses circling around the ASMA within 10 days
(Fig. 4a) at 160–170 hPa (Fig. 4b), while the inner trajectories were
first uplifted at the southern/south-western flanks of the Himalayas, then
the Tibetan conduit to merge with the UT ASMA circulation at its eastern
flank (Fig. 4d). The back-trajectories of POI3 mainly encompass South Asia
and the Arabian Peninsula. We define the start of POI3 by a sudden increase
of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, HCl and nitrogen oxide mixing ratios, compared to the clean
air encountered before (POI2). The transition from POI2 to POI3 is not
clearly reflected in the back-trajectories, because the northernmost
back-trajectories of POI2 resemble the adjoining, southernmost
back–trajectories of POI3 (see Appendix A, Fig. A1). We consider this to
be an artefact of very dynamic wind fields that are not well represented in
the trajectory calculations (see also discussion of POI2 in Appendix A). The
problem is most likely related to the combination of the rapidly splitting
ASMA (Fig. 3) and the strongly divergent flow at the eastern ASMA boundary
(Fig. A2), where the southbound ASMA circulation separates from the eastward
subtropical jet. POI3 ended when HALO started to descend for a dive over
Oman. Almost immediately below the flight altitude of POI3 the
back-trajectories no longer clearly indicate direct transport of air from
the eastern ASMA flank.</p>
      <p>During POI3 the fringe was transected from the outer to the inner streamlines. Deep convection at the
eastern ASMA flank contributed considerably to POI5 (Fig. A4d), and very
little to POI6 (Fig. A5d). POI3 passed the eastern ASMA flank on 15
September (Fig. 4a), POI5 on 12 September (Fig. A4a), POI6 on 13 September
2012 (Fig. A5a). Note that the eastern ASMA flank moved eastward during that
period, and the area enclosed by the back-trajectories did shrink (Figs. 3,
4a, A4a, A5a). A schematic of the synoptic situation for POI3/5/6 is given
in Fig. 5. All three POIs are part of a filament that spent at least 10 days
in the UT of the ASMA region, and was entrained by updraughts at the eastern
ASMA flank. The curled-in structure of the filament indicates that the ASMA
split into a Tibetan and an Iranian part around 18 September 2012 (Fig. 3).
It is not clear whether the steep O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient, chosen as the beginning of POI3,
corresponds to where outside flow later separates from the ASMA circulation.
Thus we do not attempt to estimate whether or how much outside air becomes part of
the ASMA circulation by entrainment at the southern edge. This uncertainty
is not important for the present study, but might need to be addressed
before quantitatively estimating trace gas budgets within the ASMA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Schematic of the filament of UT ASMA air that was
transected by HALO during the ESMVal campaign. The encountered air parcels
all had a similar genesis: UT air travelling in the ASMA fringe was to
different degrees entrained by deep convection at the eastern ASMA flank,
then continuing along the southern flank of the anticyclone to the
respective measurement locations. POI3 provides the most direct view of the
eastern ASMA flank. The schematic is in ASMA centred coordinates, with
relative positions of air masses (grey arrows) and convection (orange
clouds) indicated. The interior trajectory of the filament and corresponding
times of measurement are indicated by dark blue and the exterior trajectory
is light blue. Grey shades and white indicate the air masses encountered
during the respective three periods of interest (POI3/5/6), and to the
corresponding date they passed the eastern flank.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Six-hourly satellite images show no signs of fresh convection in the
vicinity of the HALO track on the days before the flight, in contrast to the
eastern ASMA edge and the Himalayas (see Supplement Fig. S8).
Shorter-lived, localised convective events were identified in 15 min
satellite images (not shown) over the Hajar mountains (Oman) and east of the
Strait of Hormuz on 17 and 18 September 2012, afternoon. We set a more
detailed discussion of this aspect aside here, since dispersion calculations
(not shown) indicate that the UT ASMA measurements during the ESMVal
campaign (POI3/5/6) were not affected by those convective plumes.
Furthermore, videos from the cockpit camera show that HALO did not transect
the convective region over the Hajar mountains on 18 September 2012.</p>
      <p>POI3 is less affected by stirring during transport from the eastern ASMA
flank to the measurement location than POI5/6 and thus provides a more
direct view of the remote and so far unsampled eastern flank. In addition to
stirring, diffusion may also act to conceal features of trace gas
distributions during transport. However, assuming a diffusion coefficient of
15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schumann et al., 1995), purely
diffusive mixing is negligible here. It acts on a scale of about 1 km per
day, and air parcels needed less than a week from the eastern flank to their
respective measurement locations (Figs. 4a, A4a, A5a). For comparison, two
measurement points in 10 s time resolution at typical HALO speed are about
2.5 km apart.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Representation of the in situ measurements in EMAC</title>
      <p>Here we discuss to what extent the aforementioned (Sect. 2.2) simulation
with the EMAC model can reproduce the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, CO, NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements in order to use that simulation for further interpretation of
the measurements.</p>
      <p>The EMAC simulation has a horizontal grid resolution of about 300 km in the
ASMA region, and the time step length is 12 min. Processes acting on
smaller, unresolved scales need to be parameterised. This is compared to
in situ data with a time resolution of 10 s, corresponding to a spacing of
about 2.5 km. Due to the different resolutions, a perfect match between
the simulation and observations cannot be expected. Additional differences
might be caused by non-perfect representations of emissions, physical and
chemical processes.</p>
      <p>EMAC in the set-up used here is known to simulate a high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bias in the
tropics, more specifically of 5–25 % at 100–250 hPa, compared to ozonesonde data, and 30–50 % in the tropospheric column compared to satellite
data (Jöckel et al., 2016). However, the relative
enhancement observed during the POIs is reproduced by the simulation (Fig. 1a).</p>
      <p>The HCl mixing ratios encountered during the flight from Male to Larnaca
were at the detection limit of the AIMS instrument; therefore they had enhanced
noise. They were interrupted by missing value periods due to calibrations
and background measurements. In order to carve out variations on a timescale relevant for this study, we smoothed the HCl in situ data as follows:
each original value of the time series is substituted by the average of two
means – the mean of all values 150 s before and the mean 150 s after the
original value. Missing values are ignored for calculating the mean, but the
average is missing if at least one missing value is present. Each operation is based on equal weights. This procedure gives values in periods of sparse data
greater weight, but was found to preserve the shape of the time series
better than a conventional running mean filter. Note that the time series
technically is still in 10 s resolution after the smoothing, but with regard
to contents, time resolution has been traded for a better signal-to-noise
ratio. In situ measurements in the subtropical UTLS over North America
(Marcy et al., 2004) indicate that UT
background mixing ratios of HCl may be of the order of 5 pmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Such low
values are found in our data (Fig. 1c) during clean-air-dominated POI2 and
in the middle of POI5, where back-trajectories point to lower-tropospheric
air (Fig. A4c, d). Relative HCl enhancements in other sections of the flight
are also clearly visible in Fig. 1c, indicating in-mixing of stratospheric or
TL air. The simulation reproduces the magnitude of measured HCl and also
the rough time evolution during the POIs. We consider the agreement as
reasonable, given the uncertainties of the measurements, as well as the
possibility of spurious washing out and slightly misrepresented gradients of
trace gas mixing ratios (Figs. 1d, 2b) in the simulation. The relative
minimum in free tropospheric HCl is best seen in the curtain (Fig. 1d),
together with a filament of increased HCl extending from the tropopause to
the flight track around 08:00 UTC.</p>
      <p>Considering the use of monthly instead of daily resolved biomass burning
emission data, there is a surprisingly good agreement between measured and
simulated CO. The air masses encountered during the measurements might have
experienced sufficient mixing since last boundary layer contact to lose
memory of any high-frequency emission variations, making monthly emissions
in the simulation a viable approximation here. There is a negative bias of
simulated CO of about 10 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during POI5/6 (Fig. 1e). Figure 2d shows
that POI5/6 coincide with a region of strong CO gradients. This may result
in some inaccuracies in the simulated values along the flight path, even if
the synoptic situation is captured well by the simulation. Uncertainties in
the chemical mechanism also have the potential to cause a low bias of CO and
a high bias of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gottschaldt et al., 2013; Righi et al., 2015). In
any case, caution is needed when interpreting those measurements based on
the simulation. We focus on the best represented flight section (POI3)
whenever possible.</p>
      <p>The relative changes of observed NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1i, j) and NO (Fig. 1g, h)
mixing ratios are captured by the simulation, in particular the enhancements
of those trace gases in the ASMA. However, observed short timescale
variations during POI5/6 are smoothed out in the simulated data because of
the coarser temporal resolution of the output (direct) and the
representation of processes is limited by the grid resolution (indirect).
The representation of nitrogen oxides in the simulation also depends on the
quality of the corresponding emission inventories, and is further
complicated by the shorter photochemical lifetime compared to CO and
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. NO – and to a lesser degree also NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> – mixing ratios have
steep vertical gradients at the flight altitude during POI5/6 (Fig. 1h, j).
We do not expect a global simulation to perfectly reproduce the time and
location of such features, and the corresponding inaccuracies are most
likely to print through in the vicinity of steep gradients. Also,
parameterisations of subgrid-scale processes are mainly designed to
reproduce climatological characteristics and individual convective events in
the simulation may not be triggered at the same times and locations as in
reality. There are regions of over- and underestimated NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively, and we don't expect any systematic bias in the representation
of nitrogen oxides in the simulation. In particular, we note that the
magnitude of measured NO mixing ratios is reproduced by the simulation,
despite most UT NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA being produced by lightning (see
accompanying paper for details) and estimates of lightning NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions include large uncertainties (Schumann and Huntrieser,
2007).</p>
      <p>To summarise, the limited resolution of the simulation is at the core of most
of the deviations between observed and simulated trace gas mixing ratios.
This means that, in return, a large-scale feature like the ASMA is likely to
be represented well by the specified dynamics simulation set-up, which is
also well suited to reproduce the corresponding trace gas distributions.
Overall, we are confident that the simulation reproduces the atmospheric
situation well enough to be utilised for interpreting the in situ data of
the POIs. The overall agreement between observed and simulated data is best
for POI3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Tracer–tracer relations</title>
      <p>Enhanced tropospheric tracers (CO) fit the climatological picture of the
ASMA, but at the same time enhanced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCl is notable and indicate
enhanced in situ production, or contributions of stratospherically affected
air, e.g. from the TL. In this section we determine the origins of the
measured trace gas signatures with the help of tracer relations. The
following analysis focuses on CO vs. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and is supplemented by other
relations (HCl vs. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO vs. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
vs. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. POI3, POI5 and POI6 are part of one filament, and all are
characterised by mixing of UT air with uplifted lower-tropospheric air at
the eastern ASMA flank (Fig. 5). In the following, we exemplify
tracer–tracer relations in the filament by a discussion of POI3. We focus on
that period, because it is best represented in the simulation and the
dynamics are less complicated than for POI5 and POI6. The latter means that
POI3 provides the most direct view of the eastern flank and the relevant
processes of that key region are least concealed by stirring. Furthermore,
the air encountered during POI5/6 has more remote source regions (Figs. A4a,
A5a) and was subject to longer transport since passing the eastern ASMA
flank. Thus, it is easier to disentangle the relevant processes for POI3.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Mixing of different reservoirs during POI3</title>
      <p>All measurements from 07:47 to 08:15 UTC (dots) lay on one mixing line in the
CO vs. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plot for POI3 (Fig. 6a). It connects a CO-poor &amp;
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich reservoir (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a CO-rich
&amp; O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-poor reservoir (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
“&amp;” notation is used in the following to express “and at the same
time”. Rich and poor are meant relative to the ranges observed during that
flight section. Park et al. (2007) proposed thresholds of CO &gt; 60 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 300 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to characterise
tropospheric air in the ASMA. According to that criterion, absolute mixing
ratios of POI3 are completely tropospheric. However, the lowest O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios in POI3 (about 68 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) still represent a significant
enhancement with respect to 30 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end of POI2 and also compared
to 40 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> encountered below the ASMA during POI4 (Fig. 1a). The term
reservoir is used here for the current state rather than for hypothetical
end members. The negative slope indicates either an ozone-depleting
photochemical regime (Baker et al., 2011), or that both
reservoirs have seen different stratospheric or TL influences. The latter is
supported by relatively enhanced HCl mixing ratios in CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and accordingly depleted HCl at the end of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6c). A positive correlation between O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
HCl inside the ASMA has also been found by
Park et al. (2008), based on ACE-FTS satellite
data, and attributed to a common stratospheric origin of both species. The
negative correlation between CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ESMVal in situ data is
consistent with MLS observations in the ASMA region (at 215 hPa), which cover
several complete years (Livesey et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Tracer–tracer relations, as observed
during one transect through the ASMA fringe. Colours indicate the time of
measurement, filled circles highlight the first period of interest (POI3),
grey lines are linear fits to those data <bold>(a, c, d)</bold> or hand-drawn
markings discussed in the text <bold>(b)</bold>, and crosses show data just before
and after POI3. Reservoirs referred to in the text are marked by grey
boxes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>According to Fig. 4a, b, c, d, trajectories carrying signature CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> make up the outer fringe of the ASMA, travelling along
almost closed streamlines at an altitude of about 160 hPa, which is in the
tropopause region on the northern flank, and well within the troposphere on the
southern flank of the ASMA. The inner (with respect to ASMA) streamlines of
the filament are dominated by signature CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The corresponding back-trajectories indicate air masses uplifted from the
boundary layer at the southern flanks of the Himalayas, and mid-tropospheric
air uplifted over the south-western flanks of the Himalayas. Both meet at
about 300 hPa over the Tibetan Plateau, to be further uplifted to the UT,
and merged with the anticyclone at its eastern flank. The line connecting
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
forms a linear correlation with a correlation coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This is very compact, indicating homogenous reservoirs. Freshly uplifted air
did not seem to carry much small-scale heterogeneity through the Tibetan
conduit. This might explain that the simulation results compared rather well
for this flight segment, because small-scale differences between real and
simulated (inventory) biomass burning could not print through to UT trace
gas signatures. Independently of that, UT lightning NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions still
introduce differences between simulated and observed trace gas mixing ratios
in the ASMA. Feeding of the inner trajectories of the filament through the
Tibetan conduit defines reservoir CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Reservoir CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is air circling in the ASMA
fringe in the UT. The mixing situation, as it occurred at the eastern ASMA
flank, is carried by almost parallel streamlines to where it was encountered
by HALO (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, shearing has been small in the air mass
considered here, as indicated by little differential velocities (Fig. 4a).
The strong correlation of the measurement time stamp (corresponding to the
radial position in the fringe) with the location of the corresponding data
in CO vs. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> space is also indicative of almost parallel streamlines.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Processes reflected by nitrogen oxides during POI3</title>
      <p>Consider the hypothetical case of a fixed NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning (ratio):
variations of NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are reflected by positive slopes
in NO vs. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> space. Neighbouring measurements indeed seem to lie on
multiple parallel lines corresponding to NO proportional to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(indicated by grey lines connecting consecutive times/colours in Fig. 6b).
Different lines correspond to different NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. The observed
NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio decreases from about 0.33 in the outer streamlines of the
filament (blueish dots throughout Fig. 6), to about 0.27 (reddish dots) at
the end of POI1. As long as nitrogen species are not removed from the
atmosphere, for example by rainout or washout, photochemical processes tend
to convert NO to other NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species and therefore change the NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio. Concurrently O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO mixing ratios also change along the
transect of the filament (Fig. 6a). Increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (blueish dots, Fig. 6a, d)
is expected to shift NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemically towards NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is part of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> should decrease the
NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio by lowering NO. The opposite was observed: increased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to increased NO (Fig. 6d), while corresponding NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios are almost constant (Fig. 6b). The positive, linear
correlation of NO vs. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements (Fig. 6d) might in itself be
attributed to enhanced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production due to increased NO. Such an
interpretation would require a positive correlation of NO vs. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the entire range of NO mixing ratios. However, positive correlations between
NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were only observed for subsets of the data (grey lines in
Fig. 6b). To sum up, we interpret the distribution of measurements in NO vs.
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> space (Fig. 6b) as the overlay of small variations (noise, scatter)
of nitrogen oxide mixing ratios on top of a decreasing NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
from outer streamlines towards more inside the ASMA. The latter variation
seems to be mainly due to the mixing of reservoirs with different NO mixing
ratios, namely a NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir at inner
streamlines with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at outer streamlines. This
is consistent with backward trajectories, which also indicate two different
reservoirs (Fig. 4a, b, c, d). Lightning is the most likely source of increased
NO in older UT ASMA air (see accompanying paper for details), compared to
NO-poor, freshly uplifted air.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Synthesis for POI3 and related UT measurements</title>
      <p>A decreased CO &amp; decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicated by crosses in Fig. 6) contributed to the outer ASMA
streamlines, diluting increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures there. According to the
backward trajectories, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> originates from
mid-tropospheric air, transported in cyclonic motion below the ASMA, then
rapidly uplifted over Myanmar. A medium CO-increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir
(CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↕</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contributed to the inner edge of the
filament, which is mainly UT air originating from the interior of the ASMA.
Note that both reservoirs with increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↕</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not directly connected
across parallel trajectories, since CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↕</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixes towards the opposite end (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
central mixing line. The gradient between the inner and the outer edge might
have been flattened by mixing during transport from the eastern ASMA flank
to the measurement location, thereby just shortening the mixing line.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Schematic of the synoptic situation and CO-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trace gas
signatures that contributed to the HALO in situ measurements transecting the
southern ASMA fringe during the ESMVal campaign (POI3). The foreshortened
cuboid is seen from the SW corner. It approximately covers 15–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
40–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, and surface to 100 hPa, with features not drawn to scale.
Recent contributions of stratospheric
intrusions (STE) were not detected in the measurements, but might have
contributed to the fringe's trace gas signatures earlier. See text for
details.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 7 shows a schematic for POI3 and summarises the main aspects discussed
above. The fringe is essentially a transport barrier, separating the ASMA
interior from the outside UT. Nevertheless, it interacts with the interior
at its inner edge, and with the surroundings at its outer edge, resulting in
trace gas gradients perpendicular to the streamlines of the fringe. The
outer edge scrapes along the declining tropopause in the north and may
entrain the TL when veering into the free troposphere at the eastern flank.
Stratospheric intrusions from the tropopause folding hotspot over the
eastern Mediterranean (Akritidis et al., 2016) may potentially also
contribute to the chemical composition of the fringe, but were not detected
in the ESMVal measurements. Air uplifted from the lower and middle
troposphere dominates the inner edge of the fringe. The trace gas signatures
encountered by HALO before entering the fringe, and after leaving it towards
the ASMA interior are again different, i.e. not the end members of the
gradient in the fringe. Thus the fringe signatures must have been generated
somewhere else, most likely at the eastern flank.</p>
      <p>The corresponding detailed tracer–tracer relations for POI5 and POI6 are
shown in the Supplement (Figs. S6, S7), but we do not discuss them in
detail. They belong to different sections of a filament of UT ASMA air that
was more or less entrained by deep convection at the eastern ASMA flank. The
mixing lines of POI6 may even be dominated by different amounts of in-mixing
from the tropopause region, rather than by air from the lower troposphere. A
detailed quantification of the different processes' contribution to
individual measurements would, however, require more sophisticated analyses
along back-trajectories.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Origins of observed ASMA trace gas signatures</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <title>Entraining the TL</title>
      <p>During the POIs HALO was flying well below the tropopause. All observed
tracer mixing ratios are clearly tropospheric, and all back-trajectory end
points are in the troposphere. There is no indication of back-trajectories
crossing the TP, which steeply slopes over the Tibetan Plateau and is hard
to define accurately there (Ren et al., 2014). Here it is
only important to note that backward trajectories do not indicate any
contribution from high above the tropopause region. This TL is subject to
mixing, small-scale stirring, convection (mainly tropical TL) and isentropic
transport (mainly extra-tropical TL). All these processes involve
cross-tropopause trajectories, but our Lagrangian calculations would only
capture large-scale transport. The Eulerian EMAC simulations also reproduce
large-scale transport, but additionally capture small-scale stirring/mixing
as diffusive processes and convective transport. The latter is controlled by
the convection parameterisation.</p>
      <p>There is a conspicuous filament of increased HCl &amp; decreased CO
signatures extruding from the tropopause trough at the eastern ASMA flank
(black arrows in Fig. 2b, d). This indicates entrainment of TL air, which has
a more stratospheric signature compared to the surrounding upper
tropospheric air. The filament is hardly recognisable in the snapshot of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from our simulation (Fig. 2a), because there are no big differences
between O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the fringe and those in the interior.</p>
      <p>Figure 4 shows that air in the fringe travels at almost constant altitude.
It is scraping along the tropopause in the north, entraining the TL mixing
zone. A filament with increased mixing ratios of HCl and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is dragged
into the troposphere (away from the TP) at the eastern ASMA flank, but at
the same time the decreased NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> zone at the tropopause is not disrupted
(Fig. 2c). There is entrainment from the TL, but not from far above the TP.
This process obviously contributes to increased HCl &amp; O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios in the ASMA fringe.</p>
      <p>In situ measurements across the TP at eastern ASMA flank would be desirable,
but we are not aware of any such measurements from that region. In fact,
POI3 of the HALO ESMVal campaign seems to provide the closest snapshot so
far of trace gases from that region of interest. The trace gas signatures
acquired by the outer ASMA streamlines at the eastern ASMA flank were
carried almost unperturbed along the southern flank to the measurement
location. The preservation of trace gas gradients (Figs. 1, 6) indicates
little mixing. In the following, we therefore take a closer look at the
eastern flank as simulated by EMAC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <title>Air masses of POI3 at the eastern ASMA flank</title>
      <p>The signature of the air mass observed during POI3 was formed when it passed
the eastern ASMA flank 3 days before the HALO flight (see 72 h
back-trajectories in the Supplement Fig. S5). The back-trajectories
(Fig. 4b) also show that the UT part of air mass encountered during POI3 had
been travelling at an almost constant altitude for the time of circling the
entire ASMA. Only when the flow is forced southwards at the eastern ASMA
flank, trajectories briefly follow the steeply ascending TP (Fig. 4b: deep
blue shadings in the NE part of the ASMA). Ascending trajectories in that
region could also be the result of convective activity that is not
explicitly resolved in the reanalysis data, but still represented as
regional uplift). The trajectories, however, descend to their original
altitudes after separation from the TP trough at the eastern ASMA flank,
implying the existence of a flow component perpendicular to the TP when
veering away. The flow field is also strongly divergent in the horizontal
(see forward and backward trajectories from the eastern ASMA flank in
Appendix A, Fig. A2). As a result, air from the TL is dragged southwards
into the UT.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Mixing ratios of HCl, CO, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and net photochemical
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production as simulated by EMAC for 08:00 UTC on 15 September 2012.
Black bars in the right column indicate the air mass to be encountered by
HALO 3 days later. That air mass was passing the eastern flank of the
anticyclone at the pictured time. Its eastern part was entrained by uplifted
air there, creating a trace gas gradient in the fringe. Zonal and meridional
curtains are shown on the right, and positions of the respective two
panels are marked by dashed lines in each panel. Arrows and circles indicate
features discussed in the text.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 8 zooms into the simulated distribution of different trace gases on
15 September 2012, 08:00 UTC, at the eastern ASMA flank. A TP trough develops at
the eastern flank at that time. TL air is entrained there into the ASMA
fringe, as indicated by a filament with characteristic trace gas signatures:
increased HCl (white arrow in Fig. 8a), decreased CO (Fig. 8d) and increased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8g) are all relative to the surrounding UT air. Rising air from
the Tibetan conduit arrives at the pictured altitude at the inner
streamlines of the filament, contributing air enriched in CO, but depleted
in HCl and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This lower-tropospheric air mass determines the inner
streamlines of the ASMA fringe. Meridional curtains (middle column of Fig. 8)
contain the centre of the air mass that was encountered by HALO during
POI3. Going back 72 h from POI3, the HALO flight path corresponds
approximately to an inclined zonal transect at 27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (see
Supplement Fig. S5). Those simulated zonal transects (black bars in
right column of Fig. 8) nicely reflect the trace gas gradients observed
during POI3. We note that O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is positively correlated with HCl, and
both are anti-correlated with CO at the eastern ASMA flank. This is
consistent with a common origin of increased-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &amp; increased-HCl
signatures, supporting the hypothesis of TL contributions to the UT ASMA
air. The plume of uplifted air that dominates the inner streamlines
encountered during POI3 is in contrast characterised by increased CO and
decreased HCl &amp; O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (circled in Fig. 8b, e, h).</p>
      <p>The trace gas signatures of outer and inner streamlines of POI3 are shaped
simultaneously at the eastern ASMA flank. However, the outer parts of the
ASMA fringe that mainly entrained the TL at the eastern flank were only
marginally part of the filament which was transected by HALO. The air mass
to be observed (centred at crosshairs in Fig. 8) was too far west of the
eastern ASMA edge (arrows in Fig. 8a, g, j). We cannot quantify, from our
analysis, how much TL entrainment contributed to the decreased-CO &amp;
increased-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signature (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at
the beginning of POI3. The small amount of scatter on the mixing line between
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 6a) indicates that only two reservoirs contributed, and that
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> had been the signature of the fringe
before arriving at the eastern flank already. In that case, the
corresponding streamlines would not have acquired a modified signature at
the eastern ASMA edge, but only have veered away from the TP there. Then the
gradient between CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during POI3 is a consequence just of adding
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the inner edge of the filament.
However, even if the TL air entrained by the more outer streamlines around
15 September (Fig. 8) did not contribute to the HALO measurements, it still
becomes part of the outer streamlines of the ASMA circulation. Increased HCl
mixing ratios in the measurements indicate that earlier such events indeed
have contributed to the trace gas signatures of the UT air that was already
circling in the fringe before arriving at the eastern ASMA edge.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Photochemical O${}_{{3}}$ production}?><title>Photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production</title>
      <p>How did photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production affect the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient between
inner and outer edge of the POI3-filament? According to EMAC, photochemical
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production is expected to be enhanced towards the ASMA interior
(Fig. 8n, o, p), where measurements of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were lower than at streamlines
during POI3. Increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were measured at the outer edge
of the filament, where aged UT air dominates. Thus the measured mixing line
cannot be explained by photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production after the air mass
had passed the eastern ASMA flank. On the contrary, integral photochemical
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production along the transport path acts to level the gradient.</p>
      <p>The distributions of both main O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, print
through as locally enhanced net O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production in Fig. 8n. Net O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production seems to depend more on CO (and related precursors) than on
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 8f, m, p again show that O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production is maximal in the
altitude range, where increased CO meets increased NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios.
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is limited below, CO and volatile organic compounds above.</p>
      <p>Could the high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signature of the aged UT air (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> be due to in situ photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production
alone? Opposite gradients of net ozone production and ozone mixing ratios
could also be explained by aged air (decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, increased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> circling in the fringe, and entrainment of young air (increased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the inner edge of the filament. No
TP entrainment would be needed in such a scenario of ageing uplifted air to
explain increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios. It is, however, inconsistent with the
HCl and CO gradients in the transected filament, which have been observed
(Fig. 6) and simulated (Figs. 2, 6). Thus entrainment from the TL – either
on 15 September at the eastern ASMA flank or before – did contribute to the
signature of the fringe filament encountered by HALO. Photochemical ageing
certainly also has contributed to raise O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, at least for 9 days of
circling in the fringe.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Is O${}_{{3}}$ enhanced or decreased in the ASMA?}?><title>Is O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced or decreased in the ASMA?</title>
      <p>Based on the general picture provided by previous studies, we had expected
to find decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA compared to the surrounding UT, but
found increased mixing ratios instead. Thus either our presumption of
generally decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA is wrong, or HALO encountered an
unusual situation. In the following we revisit studies that advocated the
picture of decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA (Randel and Park, 2006; Park et
al., 2007, 2008; Kunze et al., 2010, 2016), while
the frequency of occurrence of the processes needed to explain the in situ
data is further discussed in the accompanying paper.</p>
      <p>Randel and Park (2006) and Kunze et al. (2010) base their
analyses of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on isentropic vertical coordinates, mainly the 360 K
potential temperature level. Kunze et al. (2016) find a quite
persistent pattern of decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during strong monsoon
seasons on the isentropic levels 360 to 380 K. Isentropes tend to form a
trough in the ASMA, when viewed in pressure coordinates, due to diabatic
heating over the Tibetan Plateau (Ren et al., 2014). Thus
it is more likely to find lower-tropospheric trace gas signatures in the
ASMA interior on potential temperature surfaces than on pressure levels.
EMAC simulated O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA is indeed decreased on isentropic levels,
but at the same time increased on various UT pressure levels in the same
altitude range (see Supplement S4).</p>
      <p>However, Park et al. (2007) report an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum in the
ASMA at the pressure level of 100 hPa, for July and August 2005. That is
based on MLS retrievals, which were recently found to have some low O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
bias at around 100 hPa (Yan et al., 2016). Our simulation,
nevertheless, reproduces an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum at 100 hPa in the ASMA for July
and August in 2005 and 2012 (see Supplement Figs. S2 and
S3). No O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum is simulated for September (2005, 2012), and neither
for 150 nor 200 hPa in any month during the monsoon season.</p>
      <p>Park et al. (2008) report an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum
inside the ASMA based on retrievals from another space borne sensor
(ACE-FTS). They flag profiles as being “inside” the ASMA, if CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 nmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 16.5 km. Co-located retrievals then show decreased mixing ratios
of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and stratospheric tracers (e.g. HCl) for the inside bin in contrast to the outside bin. This approach rather identifies an
anti-correlation of CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT than generally decreased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inside the ASMA. Such an anti-correlation is also indicated in the
EMAC simulated snapshot shown in Fig. 2.</p>
      <p>Summarising this section, our simulation is able to reproduce decreased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA for those special circumstances it has been reported by
other studies. At the same time, we found no indication in our simulation to
expect decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA at about 150 hPa in September. The
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements taken during HALO ESMVal in the fringe (POI3) and more
inside the ASMA (POI5, POI6) are consistent with that simulated September
mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution, although only two analysed seasons strictly may
provide not more than a strong indication of climatological trace gas
signatures in the ASMA. Rather than attributing the trace gas signatures
measured by HALO to an unusual situation, we assume that presumptions
dominated by midsummer data might not be valid towards the end of the
monsoon season. Possible reasons for the differences between July/August
versus September might include the longer time available for photochemical
build-up of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ASMA, decreasing resupply of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-poor air
towards the end of the monsoon season, more in-mixing of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich TL air
into the decaying ASMA (dynamical instabilities), and changes to the
altitudes of maximum O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p>Our study contributes to the so far sparse ASMA in situ measurements,
allowing us to address some of the aspects of this important UT phenomenon
that were recently identified as poorly understood (Randel et al.,
2016): dynamical and chemical coupling with convection, composition/reactive
chemistry in the monsoon region, and mixing of higher latitude lower-stratospheric air into the tropical TL by the ASMA.</p>
      <p>Data from the HALO ESMVal campaign that were gathered during a flight from
Male (Maldives) to Larnaca (Cyprus) on 18 September 2012 are presented and
analysed. That region is particularly unexplored by in situ measurements.
HYSPLIT backward trajectories show that HALO was in an UT
filament most of the time, which had been part of the UT ASMA circulation for at least 10 days,
thereby circulating around the anticyclone. Uplifted air was entrained
into the UT filament at the eastern ASMA flank, which was then transported
by almost unperturbed, parallel streamlines in the southern ASMA fringe
(Fig. 4). Back-trajectories indicate that HALO crossed the filament three
times (Fig. 5) in the zone where an originally larger ASMA was just
splitting into an Iranian and a Tibetan part (Figs. 3, A2). At least a part
of the filament from the eastern ASMA flank is diverted into the new Iranian
anticyclone. Based on the in situ measurement data, the first transect of
the fringe filament provides the hitherto most direct view of the upstream
eastern ASMA flank, where several processes act that have the potential to
strongly modify UT trace gas mixing ratios.</p>
      <p>A global simulation with the EMAC model is in reasonable agreement with
observed trace gas mixing ratios along the HALO flight track. The specified
dynamics set-up (nudging) certainly enforces a better agreement between
simulation and observations, compared to what could be expected from a
free-running simulation. The synoptic scale of the ASMA acts to alleviate
discrepancies that are related to the limited spatial and temporal
resolution of the simulation, but a perfect agreement cannot be expected.
Overall we find that this simulation is well suited to be used for further
interpretation of the measurements. An ASMA splitting event indicated by
back-trajectories is also reproduced by the EMAC simulation (Fig. 3) and
further analysed in the accompanying paper.</p>
      <p>Based on the general picture provided by previous studies, depleted O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mixing ratios were expected in the ASMA compared to the surrounding UT.
However, enhanced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was found in the ASMA filament encountered by
HALO. In order to identify the processes that generated this O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
signature, additional tracers are considered for further analyses: CO as
marker for lower-tropospheric air, HCl for stratospheric or TL origins, NO
and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as important players in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemistry. All above-mentioned tracers were measured in situ, and their mixing ratios steeply
increase across the boundary of the ASMA filament compared to the adjoining
clean air in the south.</p>
      <p>Tracer–tracer relations of the in situ data are consistent with a mix of UT
and lower-tropospheric air in the ASMA fringe. Two effects likely have
contributed to the observed signatures of increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: photochemical
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production and entrainment of stratospheric or TL air. The EMAC
simulation indicates that net photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production is maximal,
where uplifted air with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors originating in boundary layer
pollution (e.g. CO) mixes with UT air that is enriched in (lightning) NO,
another precursor. Besides increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, mixing ratios of the
stratospheric tracer HCl are also relatively enhanced in air that had been
part of the UT ASMA for longer. This trace gas signature cannot be
explained by photochemical ageing of uplifted, lower-tropospheric air alone.
The EMAC simulation indeed shows that a TL filament with more stratospheric
trace gas signatures than the surrounding UT air is entrained into the ASMA
fringe at a tropopause trough at the eastern flank of the anticyclone
(Figs. 2 and 7). It is dragged away from the TP and deeper into the
troposphere, circling around the ASMA interior. That particular event
hardly contributed to the simulated data on the flight track, but timing and
location are such that – given the uncertainties of the simulation – in reality the
corresponding event might still have contributed to the observed
air composition. If this is not the case, then earlier such entrainment events
contributed to the ASMA trace gas signatures – in both the simulation and
the measurements.</p>
      <p>Dynamical instabilities, like the ASMA splitting event encountered by HALO,
provide a means to overcome the radial transport barriers presented by
closed streamlines and to effectively stir the previously entrained TL air
into the ASMA interior.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Our current study focuses on the detailed analysis of a single transect of
in situ data through one part of the ASMA, close to the end of the monsoon
season. The relevance of the involved processes – entrainment of TL air into
the ASMA fringe, photochemistry and stirring – for the trace gas
distributions in the ASMA is further explored in the accompanying paper. We
nevertheless found that the EMAC simulation is able to reproduce decreased
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the ASMA at 100 hPa for July and August as reported
by previous studies, but it also reproduces increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as observed
during the HALO ESMVal campaign. Decreased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was found in the
simulation neither for lower altitudes nor September monthly mean values,
and the apparent contradiction to previous studies vanishes in this more
differentiated view. The incidence of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich air in the ASMA – as seen
in the simulated monthly mean data – indicates that the ESMVal in situ
measurements could even represent a common composition of the ASMA at about
150 hPa.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The simulation results analysed here are archived at the
German Climate Computing Center (DKRZ) and are available on request. It is
planned to move them to the Climate and Environmental Retrieval and Archive
(CERA) database at the German Climate Computing Centre (DKRZ;
<uri>http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Index.jsp</uri>). The corresponding digital
object identifiers (doi) will be published on the MESSy consortium web page
(<uri>http://www.messy-interface.org</uri>). The observational data of the HALO
ESMVal flight used here are available from the HALO database:
<uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/dataset/830</uri>. Registration is needed to
access the data (<uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/account/register</uri>).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Other flight segments</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As Fig. 3, but for POI2. This flight segment covers the time
after take-off and ascent until increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios are encountered.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f09.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Four-day backward <bold>(a)</bold> and four-day forward <bold>(b)</bold>
trajectories, starting between 12 and 14 km altitude. The trajectories start
from a plane intersecting the eastern ASMA edge when the air mass measured
by HALO during POI3 was there. The wind field is strongly divergent at the
eastern ASMA flank, where the subtropical jet separates from the
anticyclone. During the time covered by the trajectories the anticyclone
split into a Tibetan and an Iranian part, just where HALO was passing
through.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f10.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>POI1</title>
      <p>The first part of the flight consists of the take-off and ascent
from Male. It is not directly related to the ASMA and not further
discussed here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <title>POI2</title>
      <p>HALO was flying in the UT in a north-westerly direction
towards the Arabian Peninsula. POI2 ends south-east of the Oman coast with
the sudden increase of measured O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other trace gas mixing ratios
(Fig. 1). The corresponding back-trajectories (Fig. A1) indicate that air
masses came from the Far East Pacific coast, from the boundary layer of
south-east Asia, and from the ASMA. Mixing ratios of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, HCl and
nitrogen oxides are significantly decreased compared to the following flight
segment, indicating that POI2 is dominated by clean air. We do not consider
this adjoining air part of the ASMA, although it may get entrained
occasionally. The back-trajectories for this flight segment depend
critically on the HYSPLIT start time, indicating very dynamic wind fields
and possibly inaccurate trajectories. This might also be the reason that
EMAC simulation results for some tracers showed different gradients than
observed. We therefore decided not to analyse this flight segment in greater
detail here, although it might be interesting for characterising the southern
boundary region of the ASMA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <title>POI3</title>
      <p>This flight segment is discussed in Sect. 3.
Here (Fig. A2) only backward and forward trajectories starting at the eastern ASMA
flank are shown to illustrate the strongly divergent flows that may have
affected the transition from POI2 to POI3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As Fig. 3, but for POI4. This flight segment covers the dive from
the UT into the mid-troposphere. The interval for POI4 is chosen such
that anticyclonic motion is much slower compared to the ASMA circulation
above: air from the highest altitudes of POI4 does not quite circle the
ASMA within 300 h, while air from POI3/5 needs about 200 and 280 h (Figs. 3, A4). The source regions contributing to POI4
primarily depend on the actual flight altitude; i.e. the sequence of air
masses encountered during descent is mirrored during the following ascent.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As Fig. 3, but for POI5. This flight segment is dominated
by UT ASMA air, entrained by convection.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As Fig. 3, but for POI6. This flight segment is dominated
by UT ASMA air.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f13.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As Fig. 3, but for POI7. This flight segment covers the
descent into Larnaca.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/6091/2017/acp-17-6091-2017-f14.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS4">
  <title>POI4</title>
      <p>Back-trajectories from the following dive over Oman are
shown in Fig. A3. The dive was intended to explore the vertical structure of
the ASMA and its lower boundary. However, almost immediately below the
flight altitude of POI3 the back-trajectories no longer clearly indicate
direct transport of air from the eastern ASMA flank. The flight segments at
the beginning and at the end of the dive, each covering the altitude range
from about 180 to 400 hPa, show a more or less curled-in structure
similar to POI5 (Fig. 5) near the HALO track. This indicates complex
stirring. The anticyclonic motion in the upper parts of POI4 is much slower
than in the ASMA above, which was sampled during neighbouring POI3/5: air
masses of POI5 travelled almost twice as far as those of POI4 within 11 days
(Fig. A4 vs. Fig. A3). Just for reproducibility, the lower boundary of the
ASMA was defined as the region where no back-trajectory was circling the
entire ASMA and reaching the southern flank within 280 h anymore. There is
almost no transition between fast and slow air masses, indicating a sharp
lower boundary of the ASMA in terms of wind speeds. However, our pragmatic
criterion might not work in general and should not be applied to other cases
without further analysis. The two high-altitude parts of POI4 might, in
principle, be useful for characterising the lower boundary of the ASMA, but
that would require a dedicated analysis and is not the focus of our study.
At lower altitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 to 650 hPa), the origin of air
encountered during the dive shifts towards the Mediterranean and Europe,
which is also not further analysed here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS5">
  <title>POI5 and POI6 (POI5/6)</title>
      <p>The next two flight segments lead from
the Persian Gulf to the eastern Mediterranean (5 and 6 in Fig. 2a).
Like POI3, they are characterised by almost parallel streamlines from the
eastern ASMA flank, along the southern fringe, to the measurement location.
The filament of UT air was curled in horizontally in such a way that the
(former) ASMA fringe was transected during POI5 (Fig. A4) outside-in, then
inside-out during POI6 (Fig. A5). This complex structure of the streamlines
is a consequence of an ASMA splitting or eddy shedding event that occurred
during the ESMVal campaign (discussed in more detail in the accompanying
study). The original ASMA encompassed South Asia and the Arabian Peninsula
(Fig. 4a, b, c). HALO crossed the zone where the original ASMA separated into
two smaller anticyclones, one centred over the Iranian Plateau and one
centred over Tibet. The air masses contributing to POI3/5/6 all passed the
eastern ASMA edge over South Asia, but at least POI5 is bound to become part
of the Iranian anticyclone after the splitting. The transition from POI5 to
POI6 was chosen according to the initial direction of back-trajectories
changing from right to left of the HALO track. We regard the transition from
POI5 to POI6 as a pragmatic estimate only, as it is essentially the same air
mass. According to a zoomed-in image (not shown) the back-trajectories were also curled
in vertically at the transition from POI5 to POI6 to some degree, indicating
complex small-scale dynamics. The back-trajectories for POI5/6 show that the
anticyclonic motion encompassed northern Africa earlier in September 2012,
which also applies to POI2. However, unlike for POI2 it did not extend far
into East Asia. UT air contributing to POI3/5/6 passed the eastern ASMA
flank mainly over South Asia. We also note that the outer ASMA edge was only
crossed during the beginning of POI3, and we pragmatically chose a steep
gradient of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios to distinguish the ASMA from outside air.
The flight path could have transected the former outer ASMA edge two more
times, due to the curled-in structure of the filament (Fig. 5). However,
HALO dived below the ASMA at the beginning of POI5 and at the end of POI6.
Measurements at the original flight level might have provided more
information about the ASMA boundary, because the separation of ASMA air from
outside air had already taken place for those older parts of the filament.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS6">
  <title>POI7</title>
      <p>The descent into Larnaca (Fig. A6) shows some
similarities to the dive over Oman. As in POI4, the anticyclonic motion
becomes slower with decreasing altitude and the air encountered above about
400 hPa has a mainly South Asian origin. Back-trajectories starting at the
flight track at the north-western flank of the ASMA below a pressure
altitude of about 130 hPa do not encircle the anticyclone within 280 h. In
contrast, those starting at higher altitudes do. POI7 is not further
discussed here, but might be considered in future studies to characterise
the lower ASMA boundary.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-17-6091-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>K. Gottschaldt analysed the EMAC and in situ data, conducted the Lagrangian
calculations, produced the plots and drafted the paper. H. Schlager
conceived the study, led the ESMVal HALO campaign, interpreted EMAC and
in situ data. R. Baumann wrote and helped with the code that facilitated the
HYSPLIT calculations. V. Eyring conceived and led the ESMVal project.
H. Bozem and P. Hoor supplied the CO in situ measurements. P. Jöckel led
the ESCiMo project, coordinated the preparation of and conducted the EMAC
simulations. T. Jurkat and C. Voigt supplied the HCl measurements. A. Zahn
was responsible for the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. H. Ziereis contributed the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. All authors contributed to the text.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors gratefully thank H. Garny and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript, B. Brötz, F. Frank,
K. Graf, V. Grewe, H. Huntrieser, P. Konopka, R. Müller, M. Nützel,
L. Pan, R. Ren, and B. Vogel for helpful discussions.</p><p>We thank the German Science Foundation DFG for funding within HALO-SPP 1294
under contracts JU 3059/1-1, SCHL 1857/2-2, SCHL 1857/4-1, VO 1504/2-1 and
VO 1504/4-1. The ESMVal aircraft campaign was funded by the DLR-Project
ESMVal. KG and HS appreciate support by the EU project StratoClim (grant no.
603557) and BMBF project Spitfire (grant no. 01LG1205B). C. Voigt and T. Jurkat thank
financing by the Helmholtz Association under contract no. VH-NG-309 and
under contract No. W2/W3-60. In addition we thank the flight department of
DLR for their great support during the campaign. S. Müller contributed
to the CO measurements and S. Kaufmann supervised the HCl measurements
during the flight.</p><p>The EMAC model simulations were performed at the German Climate Computing
Centre (DKRZ) through support from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und
Forschung (BMBF). DKRZ and its scientific steering committee are gratefully
acknowledged for providing the HPC and data archiving resources for the
projects 853 (ESCiMo – Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling) and 854
(ESMVal – Erdsystemmodellevaluierung).</p><p>We used the NCAR Command Language (NCL) for data analysis and to create some
of the figures of this study. NCL is developed by UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD and
available online: <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5065/D6WD3XH5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6WD3XH5</ext-link>.</p><p>The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered
by a Research Centre of the Helmholtz Association.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
publication  were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: M. von Hobe<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Akritidis, D., Pozzer, A., Zanis, P., Tyrlis, E., Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M.,
and Lelieveld, J.: On the role of tropopause folds in summertime tropospheric
ozone over the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 14025–14039, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14025-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14025-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Baker, A. K., Schuck, T. J., Slemr, F., van Velthoven, P.,
Zahn, A., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Characterization of non-methane hydrocarbons
in Asian summer monsoon outflow observed by the CARIBIC aircraft,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 503–518, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-503-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-503-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Barret, B., Sauvage, B., Bennouna, Y., and Le Flochmoen, E.: Upper-tropospheric
CO and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget during the Asian summer monsoon, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 9129–9147, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9129-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-9129-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bergman, J. W., Fierli, F., Jensen, E. J., Honomichl, S., and Pan, L. L.:
Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to
a vertical conduit, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
2560–2575, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50142</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chen, B., Xu, X. D., Yang, S., and Zhao, T. L.: Climatological perspectives of air
transport from atmospheric boundary layer to tropopause layer over Asian monsoon
regions during boreal summer inferred from Lagrangian approach,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5827–5839, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5827-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5827-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cristofanelli, P., Bracci, A., Sprenger, M., Marinoni, A., Bonafè, U.,
Calzolari, F., Duchi, R., Laj, P., Pichon, J. M., Roccato, F., Venzac, H.,
Vuillermoz, E., and Bonasoni, P.: Tropospheric ozone variations at the Nepal
Climate Observatory-Pyramid (Himalayas, 5079 m a.s.l.) and influence of deep
stratospheric intrusion events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6537–6549, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6537-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-6537-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N.,
Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S.
B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P.,
Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M.,
Morcrette, J. J., Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C.,
Thépaut, J. N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis:
configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4
modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition, Aust. Met.
Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory) model access via NOAA ARL READY website, NOAA Air
Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring,
<uri>http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html</uri>, last access: 26 June 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Dunkerton, T. J.: Evidence of meridional motion in the summer lower
stratosphere adjacent to monsoon regions, J. Geophys. Res.,
100, 16675–16688, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JD01263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD01263</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Eyring, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Hess, P., Arfeuille, F., Bowman, K.,
Chipperfield, M. P., Duncan, B., Fiore, A., Gettelman, A., Giorgetta, M. A.,
Granier, C., Hegglin, M., Kinnison, D., Kunze, M., Langematz, U., Luo, B.,
Martin, R., Matthes, K., Newman, P. A., Peter, T., Robock, A., Ryerson, T.,
Saiz-Lopez, A., Salawitch, R., Schultz, M., Shepherd, T. G., Shindell, D.,
Stähelin, J., Tegtmeier, S., Thomason, L., Tilmes, S., Vernier, J.-P.,
Waugh, D. W., and Young, P. J.: Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate
Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone
and Climate Assessments, SPARC Newsletter, 40, 48–66, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.: Transport pathways from the Asian monsoon anticyclone
to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2703–2718, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A., Kinnison, D. E., Dunkerton, T. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: Impact
of monsoon circulations on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D22101, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004878</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gottschaldt, K., Voigt, C., Jöckel, P., Righi, M., Deckert, R., and Dietmüller, S.:
Global sensitivity of aviation NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> effects to the HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-forming channel
of the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> + NO reaction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3003–3025, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3003-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3003-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gottschaldt, K., Schlager, H., Baumann, R., Cai, D. S., Eyring, V., Graf, P.,
Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.:
Interplay of dynamics and composition in the Asian summer monsoon
anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., submitted, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L.,
Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M. G., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller, G.,
Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The atmospheric
chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone
from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5067–5104, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H.,
Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular
Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D.,
Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S.,
Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R.,
Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo)
with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev.,
9, 1153–1200, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kaufmann, S., Zahn, A., Sprenger, M., Hoor, P.,
Bozem, H., Müller, S., Dörnbrack, A., Schlager, H., Bönisch, H.,
and Engel, A.: A quantitative analysis of stratospheric HCl, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the tropopause region near the subtropical jet, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 3315–3321, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013gl059159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013gl059159</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Schäuble, D., Jeßberger, P.,
and Ziereis, H.: The airborne mass spectrometer AIMS – Part 2: Measurements of trace
gases with stratospheric or tropospheric origin in the UTLS, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
9, 1907–1923, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Pommrich, R.,
Müller, R., and Livesey, N.: Annual cycle of ozone at and above the tropical tropopause:
observations versus simulations with the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS),
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 121–132, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-121-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-121-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Kunze, M., Braesicke, P., Langematz, U., Stiller, G., Bekki, S., Brühl,
C., Chipperfield, M., Dameris, M., Garcia, R., and Giorgetta, M.: Influences
of the Indian Summer Monsoon on Water Vapor and Ozone Concentrations in the
UTLS as Simulated by Chemistry–Climate Models, J. Climate, 23,
3525–3544, 10.1175/2010jcli3280.1, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Kunze, M., Braesicke, P., Langematz, U., and Stiller, G.: Interannual variability
of the boreal summer tropical UTLS in observations and CCMVal-2 simulations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8695–8714, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8695-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8695-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, M. G. and Lelieveld, J.: Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia:
a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11017–11096, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Crutzen, P. J., Ramanathan, V., Andreae, M. O.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Campos, T., Cass, G. R., Dickerson, R. R.,
Fischer, H., de Gouw, J. A., Hansel, A., Jefferson, A., Kley, D., de Laat,
A. T. J., Lal, S., Lawrence, M. G., Lobert, J. M., Mayol-Bracero, O. L.,
Mitra, A. P., Novakov, T., Oltmans, S. J., Prather, K. A., Reiner, T.,
Rodhe, H., Scheeren, H. A., Sikka, D., and Williams, J.: The Indian Ocean
Experiment: Widespread Air Pollution from South and Southeast Asia, Science,
291, 1031–1036, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1057103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1057103</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q., Jiang, J. H., Wu, D. L., Read, W. G., Livesey, N. J., Waters, J. W.,
Zhang, Y., Wang, B., Filipiak, M. J., Davis, C. P., Turquety, S., Wu, S.,
Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., and Jacob, D. J.: Convective outflow of South
Asian pollution: A global CTM simulation compared with EOS MLS observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14826, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl022762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005gl022762</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Livesey, N. J., Logan, J. A., Santee, M. L., Waters, J. W., Doherty, R. M., Read, W. G.,
Froidevaux, L., and Jiang, J. H.: Interrelated variations of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO and deep convection
in the tropical/subtropical upper troposphere observed by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS)
during 2004–2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 579–598, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-579-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-579-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Marcy, T. P., Fahey, D. W., Gao, R. S., Popp, P. J., Richard, E. C.,
Thompson, T. L., Rosenlof, K. H., Ray, E. A., Salawitch, R. J., Atherton, C.
S., Bergmann, D. J., Ridley, B. A., Weinheimer, A. J., Loewenstein, M.,
Weinstock, E. M., and Mahoney, M. J.: Quantifying Stratospheric Ozone in the
Upper Troposphere with in Situ Measurements of HCl, Science, 304, 261–265,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1093418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1093418</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Müller, S., Hoor, P., Bozem, H., Gute, E., Vogel, B., Zahn, A.,
Bönisch, H., Keber, T., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Riese, M., Schlager,
H., and Engel, A.: Impact of the Asian monsoon on the extratropical lower
stratosphere: trace gas observations during TACTS over Europe 2012, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 10573–10589, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10573-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10573-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Nützel, M., Dameris, M., and Garny, H.: Movement, drivers and bimodality
of the South Asian High, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14755–14774,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14755-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14755-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Kinnison, D., Abalos, M., Randel, W. J.,
Bergman, J. W., and Bian, J.: Transport of chemical tracers from the boundary
layer to stratosphere associated with the dynamics of the Asian summer
monsoon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025616</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Gettelman, A., Massie, S. T., and Jiang, J. H.:
Transport above the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone inferred from Aura
Microwave Limb Sounder tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16309,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd008294</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., Bernath, P. F., Walker, K. A., and
Boone, C. D.: Chemical isolation in the Asian monsoon anticyclone observed in
Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE-FTS) data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
757–764, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-757-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-757-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.: Transport
pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model
of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART), J. Geophys. Res., 114, D08303,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010621</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G.,
Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J.,
Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.: A potential vorticity-based determination of the
transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Plumb, R. A.: Dynamical constraints on monsoon circulations, in: The Global
Circulation of the Atmosphere, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 252–266,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J. and Park, M.: Deep convective influence on the Asian summer
monsoon anticyclone and associated tracer variability observed with
Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12314,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006490</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J., Pan, L. L., and Bian, J.: Workshop on dynamics, transport and
chemistry of the UTLS Asian Monsoon, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1096–1098,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6169-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-016-6169-9</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Rauthe-Schöch, A., Baker, A. K., Schuck, T. J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Zahn, A., Hermann, M., Stratmann, G., Ziereis, H., van Velthoven, P. F. J.,
and Lelieveld, J.: Trapping, chemistry, and export of trace gases in the
South Asian summer monsoon observed during CARIBIC flights in 2008, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 3609–3629, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3609-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3609-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Ren, R., Wu, G., Cai, M., Sun, S., Liu, X., and Li, W.: Progress in Research
of Stratosphere-Troposphere Interactions: Application of Isentropic Potential
Vorticity Dynamics and the Effects of the Tibetan Plateau, J. Meteor. Res.,
28, 714–731, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13351-014-4026-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13351-014-4026-2</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Righi, M., Eyring, V., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Klinger, C., Frank, F.,
Jöckel, P., and Cionni, I.: Quantitative evaluation of ozone and selected
climate parameters in a set of EMAC simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 8,
733–768, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-733-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-733-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M. A., Hagemann, S.,
Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of
simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5
atmosphere model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Schiller, C. L., Bozem, H., Gurk, C., Parchatka, U., Königstedt, R.,
Harris, G. W., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Applications of quantum
cascade lasers for sensitive trace gas measurements of CO, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
HCHO, Appl. Phys. B, 92, 419–430, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides
source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U., Konopka, P., Baumann, R., Busen, R., Gerz, T., Schlager, H.,
Schulte, P., and Volkert, H.: Estimate of diffusion parameters of aircraft
exhaust plumes near the tropopause from nitric oxide and turbulence
measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14147–14162, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Tost, H., Lawrence, M. G., Brühl, C., Jöckel, P., The GABRIEL Team,
and The SCOUT-O3-DARWIN/ACTIVE Team: Uncertainties in atmospheric chemistry
modelling due to convection parameterisations and subsequent scavenging,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1931–1951, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Ungermann, J., Blank, J., Dick, M., Ebersoldt, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Giez,
A., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, M., Kaufmann, S.,
Kleinert, A., Krämer, M., Latzko, T., Oelhaf, H., Olchewski, F., Preusse,
P., Rolf, C., Schillings, J., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Tan, V., Thomas, N.,
Voigt, C., Zahn, A., Zöger, M., and Riese, M.: Level 2 processing for the
imaging Fourier transform spectrometer GLORIA: derivation and validation of
temperature and trace gas volume mixing ratios from calibrated dynamics mode
spectra, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2473–2489, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2473-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2473-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., and Riese, M.:
Impact of different Asian source regions on the composition of the Asian
monsoon anticyclone and of the extratropical lowermost stratosphere, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 13699–13716, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13699-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13699-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Jessberger, P., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Baumann, R., Schlager,
H., Bobrowski, N., Giuffrida, G., and Salerno, G.: Evolution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the volcanic plumes from Etna, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2196–2203, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL058974</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Yan, X., Wright, J. S., Zheng, X., Livesey, N. J., Vömel, H., and Zhou, X.:
Validation of Aura MLS retrievals of temperature, water vapour and ozone in
the upper troposphere and lower-middle stratosphere over the Tibetan Plateau
during boreal summer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3547–3566,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3547-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-3547-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Zahn, A., Weppner, J., Widmann, H., Schlote-Holubek, K., Burger, B.,
Kühner, T., and Franke, H.: A fast and precise chemiluminescence ozone
detector for eddy flux and airborne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5,
363–375, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-363-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Ziereis, H., Schlager, H., and Schulte, P.: Distributions of NO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere between 28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N during POLINAT 2, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3653–3664,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900870</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Trace gas composition in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone:  a case study based on aircraft observations and model simulations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">We present in situ measurements of the trace gas composition of
the upper tropospheric (UT) Asian summer monsoon anticyclone (ASMA)
performed with the High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) in
the frame of the Earth System Model Validation (ESMVal) campaign. Air masses
with enhanced O<sub>3</sub> mixing ratios were encountered after entering the ASMA
at its southern edge at about 150 hPa on 18 September 2012. This is in
contrast to the presumption that the anticyclone's interior is dominated by
recently uplifted air with low O<sub>3</sub> in the monsoon season. We also
observed enhanced CO and HCl in the ASMA, which are tracers for boundary layer
pollution and tropopause layer (TL) air or stratospheric in-mixing respectively. In addition, reactive nitrogen was enhanced in the ASMA. Along
the HALO flight track across the ASMA boundary, strong gradients of these
tracers separate anticyclonic from outside air.</p><p class="p">Lagrangian trajectory calculations using HYSPLIT show that HALO sampled
a filament of UT air three times, which included air masses uplifted from
the lower or mid-troposphere north of the Bay of Bengal. The trace gas
gradients between UT and uplifted air masses were preserved during transport
within a belt of streamlines fringing the central part of the anticyclone
(fringe), but are smaller than the gradients across the ASMA boundary. Our
data represent the first in situ observations across the southern part and
downstream of the eastern ASMA flank. Back-trajectories starting
at the flight track furthermore indicate that HALO transected the ASMA where
it was just splitting into a Tibetan and an Iranian part. The O<sub>3</sub>-rich
filament is diverted from the fringe towards the interior of the original
anticyclone, and is at least partially bound to become part of the new Iranian
eddy.</p><p class="p">A simulation with the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model is
found to reproduce the observations reasonably well. It shows that
O<sub>3</sub>-rich air is entrained by the outer streamlines of the anticyclone at
its eastern flank. Back-trajectories and increased HCl mixing ratios
indicate that the entrained air originates in the stratospherically
influenced TL. Photochemical ageing of air masses in the ASMA additionally
increases O<sub>3</sub> in originally O<sub>3</sub>-poor, but CO-rich air. Simulated
monthly mean trace gas distributions show decreased O<sub>3</sub> in the ASMA
centre only at the 100 hPa level in July and August, but at lower altitudes
and in September the ASMA is dominated by increased O<sub>3</sub>. The combination
of entrainment from the tropopause region, photochemistry and dynamical
instabilities can explain the in situ observations, and might have a larger
impact on the highly variable trace gas composition of the anticyclone than
previously thought.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Akritidis, D., Pozzer, A., Zanis, P., Tyrlis, E., Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M.,
and Lelieveld, J.: On the role of tropopause folds in summertime tropospheric
ozone over the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 14025–14039, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14025-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-14025-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, A. K., Schuck, T. J., Slemr, F., van Velthoven, P.,
Zahn, A., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Characterization of non-methane hydrocarbons
in Asian summer monsoon outflow observed by the CARIBIC aircraft,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 503–518, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-503-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-503-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barret, B., Sauvage, B., Bennouna, Y., and Le Flochmoen, E.: Upper-tropospheric
CO and O<sub>3</sub> budget during the Asian summer monsoon, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 9129–9147, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9129-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-9129-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bergman, J. W., Fierli, F., Jensen, E. J., Honomichl, S., and Pan, L. L.:
Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to
a vertical conduit, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
2560–2575, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50142</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, B., Xu, X. D., Yang, S., and Zhao, T. L.: Climatological perspectives of air
transport from atmospheric boundary layer to tropopause layer over Asian monsoon
regions during boreal summer inferred from Lagrangian approach,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5827–5839, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5827-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-5827-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cristofanelli, P., Bracci, A., Sprenger, M., Marinoni, A., Bonafè, U.,
Calzolari, F., Duchi, R., Laj, P., Pichon, J. M., Roccato, F., Venzac, H.,
Vuillermoz, E., and Bonasoni, P.: Tropospheric ozone variations at the Nepal
Climate Observatory-Pyramid (Himalayas, 5079 m a.s.l.) and influence of deep
stratospheric intrusion events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6537–6549, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6537-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-6537-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N.,
Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S.
B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P.,
Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M.,
Morcrette, J. J., Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C.,
Thépaut, J. N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis:
configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/qj.828</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4
modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition, Aust. Met.
Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory) model access via NOAA ARL READY website, NOAA Air
Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring,
<a href="http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html" target="_blank">http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html</a>, last access: 26 June 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dunkerton, T. J.: Evidence of meridional motion in the summer lower
stratosphere adjacent to monsoon regions, J. Geophys. Res.,
100, 16675–16688, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JD01263" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/95JD01263</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Eyring, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Hess, P., Arfeuille, F., Bowman, K.,
Chipperfield, M. P., Duncan, B., Fiore, A., Gettelman, A., Giorgetta, M. A.,
Granier, C., Hegglin, M., Kinnison, D., Kunze, M., Langematz, U., Luo, B.,
Martin, R., Matthes, K., Newman, P. A., Peter, T., Robock, A., Ryerson, T.,
Saiz-Lopez, A., Salawitch, R., Schultz, M., Shepherd, T. G., Shindell, D.,
Stähelin, J., Tegtmeier, S., Thomason, L., Tilmes, S., Vernier, J.-P.,
Waugh, D. W., and Young, P. J.: Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate
Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone
and Climate Assessments, SPARC Newsletter, 40, 48–66, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.: Transport pathways from the Asian monsoon anticyclone
to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2703–2718, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A., Kinnison, D. E., Dunkerton, T. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: Impact
of monsoon circulations on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D22101, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004878" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004jd004878</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gottschaldt, K., Voigt, C., Jöckel, P., Righi, M., Deckert, R., and Dietmüller, S.:
Global sensitivity of aviation NO<sub>x</sub> effects to the HNO<sub>3</sub>-forming channel
of the HO<sub>2</sub> + NO reaction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3003–3025, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3003-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-3003-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gottschaldt, K., Schlager, H., Baumann, R., Cai, D. S., Eyring, V., Graf, P.,
Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.:
Interplay of dynamics and composition in the Asian summer monsoon
anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., submitted, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L.,
Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M. G., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller, G.,
Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The atmospheric
chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone
from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5067–5104, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H.,
Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular
Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D.,
Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S.,
Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R.,
Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo)
with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev.,
9, 1153–1200, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kaufmann, S., Zahn, A., Sprenger, M., Hoor, P.,
Bozem, H., Müller, S., Dörnbrack, A., Schlager, H., Bönisch, H.,
and Engel, A.: A quantitative analysis of stratospheric HCl, HNO<sub>3</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> in
the tropopause region near the subtropical jet, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 3315–3321, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013gl059159" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013gl059159</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Schäuble, D., Jeßberger, P.,
and Ziereis, H.: The airborne mass spectrometer AIMS – Part 2: Measurements of trace
gases with stratospheric or tropospheric origin in the UTLS, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
9, 1907–1923, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-9-1907-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Pommrich, R.,
Müller, R., and Livesey, N.: Annual cycle of ozone at and above the tropical tropopause:
observations versus simulations with the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS),
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 121–132, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-121-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-121-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Kunze, M., Braesicke, P., Langematz, U., Stiller, G., Bekki, S., Brühl,
C., Chipperfield, M., Dameris, M., Garcia, R., and Giorgetta, M.: Influences
of the Indian Summer Monsoon on Water Vapor and Ozone Concentrations in the
UTLS as Simulated by Chemistry–Climate Models, J. Climate, 23,
3525–3544, 10.1175/2010jcli3280.1, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kunze, M., Braesicke, P., Langematz, U., and Stiller, G.: Interannual variability
of the boreal summer tropical UTLS in observations and CCMVal-2 simulations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8695–8714, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8695-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-8695-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, M. G. and Lelieveld, J.: Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia:
a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11017–11096, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J., Crutzen, P. J., Ramanathan, V., Andreae, M. O.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Campos, T., Cass, G. R., Dickerson, R. R.,
Fischer, H., de Gouw, J. A., Hansel, A., Jefferson, A., Kley, D., de Laat,
A. T. J., Lal, S., Lawrence, M. G., Lobert, J. M., Mayol-Bracero, O. L.,
Mitra, A. P., Novakov, T., Oltmans, S. J., Prather, K. A., Reiner, T.,
Rodhe, H., Scheeren, H. A., Sikka, D., and Williams, J.: The Indian Ocean
Experiment: Widespread Air Pollution from South and Southeast Asia, Science,
291, 1031–1036, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1057103" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1057103</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Q., Jiang, J. H., Wu, D. L., Read, W. G., Livesey, N. J., Waters, J. W.,
Zhang, Y., Wang, B., Filipiak, M. J., Davis, C. P., Turquety, S., Wu, S.,
Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., and Jacob, D. J.: Convective outflow of South
Asian pollution: A global CTM simulation compared with EOS MLS observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14826, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl022762" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005gl022762</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Livesey, N. J., Logan, J. A., Santee, M. L., Waters, J. W., Doherty, R. M., Read, W. G.,
Froidevaux, L., and Jiang, J. H.: Interrelated variations of O<sub>3</sub>, CO and deep convection
in the tropical/subtropical upper troposphere observed by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS)
during 2004–2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 579–598, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-579-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-579-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Marcy, T. P., Fahey, D. W., Gao, R. S., Popp, P. J., Richard, E. C.,
Thompson, T. L., Rosenlof, K. H., Ray, E. A., Salawitch, R. J., Atherton, C.
S., Bergmann, D. J., Ridley, B. A., Weinheimer, A. J., Loewenstein, M.,
Weinstock, E. M., and Mahoney, M. J.: Quantifying Stratospheric Ozone in the
Upper Troposphere with in Situ Measurements of HCl, Science, 304, 261–265,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1093418" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1093418</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, S., Hoor, P., Bozem, H., Gute, E., Vogel, B., Zahn, A.,
Bönisch, H., Keber, T., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Riese, M., Schlager,
H., and Engel, A.: Impact of the Asian monsoon on the extratropical lower
stratosphere: trace gas observations during TACTS over Europe 2012, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 10573–10589, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10573-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-10573-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Nützel, M., Dameris, M., and Garny, H.: Movement, drivers and bimodality
of the South Asian High, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14755–14774,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14755-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-14755-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Kinnison, D., Abalos, M., Randel, W. J.,
Bergman, J. W., and Bian, J.: Transport of chemical tracers from the boundary
layer to stratosphere associated with the dynamics of the Asian summer
monsoon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1–16, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025616" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2016JD025616</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Gettelman, A., Massie, S. T., and Jiang, J. H.:
Transport above the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone inferred from Aura
Microwave Limb Sounder tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16309,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008294" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006jd008294</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., Bernath, P. F., Walker, K. A., and
Boone, C. D.: Chemical isolation in the Asian monsoon anticyclone observed in
Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE-FTS) data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
757–764, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-757-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-757-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.: Transport
pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model
of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART), J. Geophys. Res., 114, D08303,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010621" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd010621</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G.,
Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J.,
Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.: A potential vorticity-based determination of the
transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Plumb, R. A.: Dynamical constraints on monsoon circulations, in: The Global
Circulation of the Atmosphere, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 252–266,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J. and Park, M.: Deep convective influence on the Asian summer
monsoon anticyclone and associated tracer variability observed with
Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12314,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006490" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005jd006490</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Randel, W. J., Pan, L. L., and Bian, J.: Workshop on dynamics, transport and
chemistry of the UTLS Asian Monsoon, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1096–1098,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6169-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00376-016-6169-9</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Rauthe-Schöch, A., Baker, A. K., Schuck, T. J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Zahn, A., Hermann, M., Stratmann, G., Ziereis, H., van Velthoven, P. F. J.,
and Lelieveld, J.: Trapping, chemistry, and export of trace gases in the
South Asian summer monsoon observed during CARIBIC flights in 2008, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 3609–3629, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3609-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-3609-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Ren, R., Wu, G., Cai, M., Sun, S., Liu, X., and Li, W.: Progress in Research
of Stratosphere-Troposphere Interactions: Application of Isentropic Potential
Vorticity Dynamics and the Effects of the Tibetan Plateau, J. Meteor. Res.,
28, 714–731, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13351-014-4026-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s13351-014-4026-2</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Righi, M., Eyring, V., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Klinger, C., Frank, F.,
Jöckel, P., and Cionni, I.: Quantitative evaluation of ozone and selected
climate parameters in a set of EMAC simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 8,
733–768, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-733-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-8-733-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M. A., Hagemann, S.,
Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of
simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5
atmosphere model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Schiller, C. L., Bozem, H., Gurk, C., Parchatka, U., Königstedt, R.,
Harris, G. W., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Applications of quantum
cascade lasers for sensitive trace gas measurements of CO, CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and
HCHO, Appl. Phys. B, 92, 419–430, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00340-008-3125-0</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides
source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U., Konopka, P., Baumann, R., Busen, R., Gerz, T., Schlager, H.,
Schulte, P., and Volkert, H.: Estimate of diffusion parameters of aircraft
exhaust plumes near the tropopause from nitric oxide and turbulence
measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14147–14162, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Tost, H., Lawrence, M. G., Brühl, C., Jöckel, P., The GABRIEL Team,
and The SCOUT-O3-DARWIN/ACTIVE Team: Uncertainties in atmospheric chemistry
modelling due to convection parameterisations and subsequent scavenging,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1931–1951, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-1931-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Ungermann, J., Blank, J., Dick, M., Ebersoldt, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Giez,
A., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, M., Kaufmann, S.,
Kleinert, A., Krämer, M., Latzko, T., Oelhaf, H., Olchewski, F., Preusse,
P., Rolf, C., Schillings, J., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Tan, V., Thomas, N.,
Voigt, C., Zahn, A., Zöger, M., and Riese, M.: Level 2 processing for the
imaging Fourier transform spectrometer GLORIA: derivation and validation of
temperature and trace gas volume mixing ratios from calibrated dynamics mode
spectra, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2473–2489, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2473-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-8-2473-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., and Riese, M.:
Impact of different Asian source regions on the composition of the Asian
monsoon anticyclone and of the extratropical lowermost stratosphere, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 13699–13716, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13699-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-13699-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Jessberger, P., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Baumann, R., Schlager,
H., Bobrowski, N., Giuffrida, G., and Salerno, G.: Evolution of CO<sub>2</sub>,
SO<sub>2</sub>, HCl, and HNO<sub>3</sub> in the volcanic plumes from Etna, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2196–2203, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058974" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013GL058974</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, X., Wright, J. S., Zheng, X., Livesey, N. J., Vömel, H., and Zhou, X.:
Validation of Aura MLS retrievals of temperature, water vapour and ozone in
the upper troposphere and lower-middle stratosphere over the Tibetan Plateau
during boreal summer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3547–3566,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3547-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-9-3547-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Zahn, A., Weppner, J., Widmann, H., Schlote-Holubek, K., Burger, B.,
Kühner, T., and Franke, H.: A fast and precise chemiluminescence ozone
detector for eddy flux and airborne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5,
363–375, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-5-363-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ziereis, H., Schlager, H., and Schulte, P.: Distributions of NO, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and
NO<sub><i>y</i></sub> in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere between 28°
and 61° N during POLINAT 2, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3653–3664,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900870" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1999JD900870</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
