<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-4931-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Contributions of surface solar radiation and precipitation to the
spatiotemporal patterns of surface and air warming in China from 1960 to
2003</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Warming pattern in China}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~Du et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Jizeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Kaicun</given-names></name>
          <email>kcwang@bnu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7414-5400</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jiankai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Qian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal
University, Beijing, 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Chinese Meteorological Administration, Beijing, 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Kaicun Wang (kcwang@bnu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>4931</fpage><lpage>4944</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Although global warming has been attributed to increases in
atmospheric greenhouses gases, the mechanisms underlying spatiotemporal
patterns of warming trends remain under debate. Herein, we analyzed surface
and air warming observations recorded at 1977 stations in China from 1960 to
2003. Our results showed a significant spatial pattern for the warming of the
daily maximum surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
temperatures, and the pattern was stronger in northwest and northeast China
and weaker or negative in South China and the North China Plain. These
warming spatial patterns were attributed to surface shortwave solar radiation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which play a key role in the
surface energy budget. During the study period, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in China, which reduced the
trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by about 0.139 and
0.053 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. More importantly, the
decreasing rates in South China and the North China Plain were stronger than
those in other parts of China. The spatial contrasts in the trends of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China were significantly reduced
after adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, after
adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the difference in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values between the North China Plain
and the Loess Plateau was reduced by 97.8 and 68.3 %, respectively; the
seasonal contrast in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by 45.0
and 17.2 %, respectively; and the daily contrast in the warming rates of
the surface and air temperature decreased by 33.0 and 29.1 %,
respectively. This study shows that the land energy budget plays an essential
role in the identification of regional warming patterns.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Increases in observational data and rapid developments in simulation
capacity of climate models have provided evidence for the phenomenon of
global warming (Hartmann et al., 2013), and the increases in
anthropogenic greenhouse gases and other anthropogenic effects are
considered as the primary causes. However, significant spatial and temporal
heterogeneities in climate warming have been observed. For example, faster
warming rates occur in semiarid regions and a “warming hole” has been
identified in the central United States (Boyles and Raman, 2003; Huang et
al., 2012). These spatiotemporal heterogeneities represent a major barrier
to the reliable detection and attribution of global warming (Tebaldi et
al., 2005; Mahlstein and Knutti, 2010). Furthermore, uncertainties in model
simulations generally increase from global to regional scales because of
uncertainty in regional climatic responses to global change (Hingray et
al., 2007; Mariotti et al., 2011). Therefore, investigations of the spatial
and temporal patterns of regional climate changes and regional climatic
response mechanisms to global change are crucial for increasing the accuracy
of models designed to detect and explain the causes of global climate change
and predictions of future regional climate change.</p>
      <p>The spatial heterogeneity of climate warming can be attributed to local
climate factors and anthropogenic factors (Karl et
al., 1991). For the local climate factors, determining factors such as cloud
cover and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can significantly influence the speed of regional
warming (Hegerl and Zwiers, 2007; Lauritsen and Rogers, 2012).
Spatial heterogeneities in climate-factor trends have an important influence
on various changes in the land surface energy balance. Studies have
demonstrated that an increase in cloud cover can diminishes the surface
solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and therefore reduces the daytime temperature
(Dai et al., 1997; Zhou et al., 2010; Taylor et al., 2011), although it
has the potential to increase nighttime temperature by intercepting
outgoing longwave radiation (Campbell and VonderHaar, 1997; Shen et al.,
2014).</p>
      <p>Precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can alter the proportion of surface absorbed energy
partitioned into sensible heat flux and latent heat flux; therefore, it has
an inevitable effect on both land surface and near-surface air temperatures
(Wang and Dickinson, 2012; Wang and Zhou, 2015). Additionally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has a
significant effect on soil thermal inertia and the response of surface
vegetation, which results in an important feedback for regional and global
warming (Seneviratne et al., 2010; Wang and Dickinson, 2012; Ait-Mesbah
et al., 2015; Shen et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>In addition to local climate factors, regional climate systems are
significantly affected by the anthropogenic emissions of aerosols. Studies
have indicated that improvements in air quality in recent decades over North
America and Europe have led to a brightening effect (Vautard et al., 2009;
Wild, 2012), whereas East Asia and India have experienced declines in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Xia, 2010; Menon et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2012, 2015).
Consequently, variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may have an effect on both local and
global climate change (Wild et al., 2007; Wang and Dickinson, 2013a).</p>
      <p>Changes in land cover can also alter the energy exchange between the land
surface and the atmosphere, and such changes have the potential to affect
regional climates (Bounoua et al., 1999; Zhou et al., 2004; Falge et al.,
2005). Previous studies have suggested that urbanization and other land-use
changes contribute to promoting the warming effect caused by greenhouse
gases (Kalnay and Cai, 2003; Lim et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2015).
Overall, the effects of these factors on climate change may be very
important at the regional scale and could lead to marked spatial differences
in regional climate change; however, they are usually omitted from the
detection and attribution of climate change at the global scale
(Karoly and Stott, 2006).</p>
      <p>China is a vast territory that has an abundance of climactic zones
stretching from tropical to cold temperate, and a special alpine climate is
observed over the Tibetan Plateau. Additionally, the dramatic economic
development and explosive population growth in China in recent decades have
caused significant changes in land cover and severe air pollution, including
frequent haze events (Yin et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2014; Wang et al.,
2016). The climatic diversity and intensive human activity in this region
will likely lead to a unique response to global warming with obvious spatial
differences in climate change.</p>
      <p>Karl et al. (1991) analyzed the observational records
for the period 1951–1989 and found that warming trends in China were faster
than those of the United States but slower than those of the former Soviet
Union. Several studies have revealed that the warming rate in Northwest
China was approximately 0.33–0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
second half of the last century (Zhang et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012),
which was significantly higher than the average warming rate over China of
0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ren et al., 2005) or the
average global rate of 0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hegerl and
Zwiers, 2007). The air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Tibetan Plateau has
increased by 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the last 30 years
(Duan and Xiao, 2015), and this rate is considerably faster than the
overall warming rate in the Northern Hemisphere (0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and worldwide (0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Hartmann et al., 2013). To provide insights into global warming and
improve the accuracy of future climate change predictions, understanding the
characteristics and mechanisms of regional climate change is critical.</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a common metric for determining climate change on the global or
regional scales. The land surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also important in
climate change research because of its direct relationship with the land
surface energy budget. Previously, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values used in regional climate
research are primarily derived from satellite retrievals or reanalysis
datasets (Weng et al., 2004; Peng et al., 2014), which both have
satisfactory global coverage but questionable accuracy and integrity.
Furthermore, satellite-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are only available under
clear-sky conditions, thus limiting their applicability in climate change studies.</p>
      <p>In China, both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are measured as conventional meteorological
observation parameters by nearly all weather stations. An analysis of the
spatiotemporal patterns of these parameters identified a close relationship
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which indicates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> present
equivalent accuracy when used to determine the characteristics of climate
change. More importantly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more sensitive than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the local
land surface energy budget.</p>
      <p>It is well known that the diurnal cycles in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are primarily
determined by the surface energy budget. After sunrise, the surface absorbs
solar radiation, and the surface net radiation becomes positive and heats
the surface first. As a result, the air above the surface becomes unstable.
Surface net radiation can be partitioned into three parts: ground heat flux,
sensible heat flux, and latent heat flux. Ground heat flux heats the surface
and stores energy during the daytime, and this energy may be re-emitted at
night. Sensible heat flux directly heats the air above the surface. Latent
heat flux is the energy employed to vaporize water during the surface water
evaporation and vegetation transpiration processes. How surface net
radiation partitions into ground heat flux, sensible heat flux, and latent
heat flux is determined by both surface and atmospheric conditions (Wang
et al., 2010a, b; Wang and Dickinson, 2012), i.e., surface
wetness. Daytime surface net radiation is primarily determined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Wang and Liang, 2008) and precipitation or surface wetness
control partition of surface net radiation into latent and sensible fluxes
(Wang and Liang, 2008). Therefore, it is expected that changes
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> play a key role in the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Hartmann et al., 1986; Wild, 2012; Manara et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>However, quantitative assessments of the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are still lack due the paucity of high quality of long-term
estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study, we used sunshine-duration-derived
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang, 2014; Wang et al., 2015) to quantify the impact of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the spatial pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To our knowledge, this
study presents the first analysis of the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  based on their spatiotemporal patterns and we
further quantified the effect of variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China for the period 1960–2003.</p>
      <p>This article is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the data and
methods used in the study. Section 3 describes the spatial and temporal
patterns of climate warming over China, analyses the effect of the variation
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and examines the spatial and temporal
patterns of the warming trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after adjusting for the
effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which eliminated the effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on
warming and highlighted the effects of large-scale warming caused by
elevated concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases. Moreover, the
spatial contrast in the warming trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China was
substantially reduced after adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
this result is consistent with the expectations under global warming.
Finally, Sect. 4 presents a summary and discussion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Data</title>
      <p>The meteorological observational data used in this study are included
recently released daily meteorological datasets, such as the China National
Stations' Fundamental Elements Datasets V3.0 (CNSFED V3.0), and they were
downloaded from China's National Meteorological Information Center
(<uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/</uri>) (Cao et al., 2016).
These datasets included observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, barometric pressure,
relative humidity, and sunshine duration. All of the data acquisition and compilation of the climate variables were subjected to quality control measures.</p>
      <p>As shown in Fig. 1, the number of stations used in this study (1977
stations selected from a total of 2479 stations) was significantly higher
than that of previous studies (i.e., 57–852 stations) (Kukla and Karl,
1993; Shen and Varis, 2001; Liu et al., 2004; Li et al., 2015). Therefore,
the observational data provided better spatial coverage and higher
confidence in the detection of regional climate change than in previous
studies (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>Observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from weather stations are different from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data
retrieved via other approaches, such as satellite images and reanalysis. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations were performed in 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 m bare land
plots proximal to the weather stations. The surface of the observational
fields was loose, grassless and flat, and at the same level as the ground
surface of the weather station. Three thermometers, including a surface
thermometer, a surface maximum thermometer, and a surface minimum
thermometer were placed horizontal to the surface of the observational
field, with half of each thermometer embedded in the soil and the other half
exposed to the air. When the observational field was covered by snow, the
thermometers were placed on the snow surface. Additionally, the exposed
parts of the thermometers were cleaned to remove dust and dew.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Elevation map of mainland China and spatial distribution of the
1977 meteorological stations used in this study. The datasets were provided
by China's National Meteorological Information Center (You et al., 2016)
(<uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/</uri>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We verified the reliability of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observational records by analyzing
the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during 1960–2003. As shown in
Fig. S1 in the Supplement, the mean Pearson correlation coefficients between daily maximum
land surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and daily maximum air temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated from the monthly anomalies were 0.775, 0.843, and
0.806 for the annual, warm, and cold seasonal scales, respectively, and
these values were statistically significant (99 % confidence level) for
all stations. The mean correlation coefficients between the daily minimum
land surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and daily minimum air temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.861, 0.842, and 0.865 for the annual, warm, and cold
seasonal scales, respectively, and these values were statistically
significant (99 % confidence level) for all stations. The high
correlations indicated that observations of either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be
used for climate change detection.</p>
      <p>The most fundamental energy resource for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
most previous studies, the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been used to analyze the
relation between the variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over China. However,
fewer sites were used for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations than for other climatic
variables; for example, only 85 sites were used for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations in
Liu et al. (2004) and only 90 sites were used in Li et al. (2015).</p>
      <p>Importantly, sensitivity drift the instruments used for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
observations led to a faster dimming rate before 1990, and instrument
replacements from 1990 to 1993 resulted in a false sharp increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang, 2014; Wang et al., 2015). The limited distribution and low
quality of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations have impeded the wide scientific application
of this parameter.</p>
      <p>Therefore, we used sunshine-duration-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is based on an
effective hybrid model developed by Yang et al. (2006). This
model has subsequently been improved (Wang, 2014; Vose et al., 2005) and
it has performed well in regional and global applications (Tang et al.,
2011; Wang et al., 2012). Sunshine-duration-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> not only
accurately reflects the effects of clouds and aerosols on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but
also more exactly reveals long-term trends (Wang, 2014; Wang et al.,
2015). Additionally, sunshine-duration-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are better
correlated with the satellite retrievals, reanalysis, and climate model
simulations than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed from observation (Wang et
al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The data are collected by a total of 2474 meteorological stations; however,
the lengths of the effective observation records for the stations are
different. Additionally, only a small number of stations were installed
before 1960, and the observational records of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at many stations were
anomalous after 2003 because of automation. Therefore, in our analysis, we
selected 1977 meteorological stations (see Fig. 1) for which the
observation records with valid data were longer than 30 years during the 43
years between 1960 and 2003.</p>
      <p>The monthly anomalies relative to the 1961–1990 climatology were calculated
based on a monthly mean value of the daily values, and when a month was
missing more than seven daily values, that month was classified as a missing
value (Li et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016). For the annual anomalies, the
monthly anomalies were averaged for the entire year. The anomalies in the
warm seasons were the averages of the monthly anomalies from May to October,
and the anomalies in the cold seasons were the averages of the monthly
anomalies from November to the next April.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Warming rates (unit: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
annual, warm and cold seasonal scales. “Raw” and “Adjusted” represent the
warming rates calculated for the data before and after adjusting for the
effect of surface solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. In Method I, the national mean anomalies were calculated first
and then the national mean trend based on this time series was calculated.
In Method II, the trend of each grid was calculated first and then the
national mean value of the trends of all grids was calculated using the
area-weight average method. We calculated the national mean trends of the
temperatures using both methods.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="5">Method I</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="2">Raw</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Annual</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.227 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.091</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.315 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.058</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.167 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.356 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.057</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Warm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.172 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.103</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.221 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.054</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.091 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.056</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.245 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.049</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cold</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.149</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.447 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.101</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.294 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.123</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.505 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.098</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="2">Adjusted</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Annual</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.373 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.222 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.062</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Warm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.046</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cold</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.119</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.329 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.114</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="5">Method II</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="2">Raw</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Annual</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.254 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.197</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.328 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.094</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.183 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.103</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.368 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.082</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Warm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.285</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.095</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.104 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.109</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.256 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.081</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cold</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.321 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.267</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.415 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.159</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.264 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.167</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.476 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.139</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="2">Adjusted</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Annual</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.401 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.137</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.239 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.086</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Warm</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.374 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.173</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.174 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.082</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cold</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.432 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.208</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.304 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.152</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Units: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>95 % confidence interval. </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p>As shown in Fig. 1, the spatial distribution of the weather stations
throughout China is extraordinarily asymmetric and the density of weather
stations in east China is far greater than that in west China. We used the
area-weight average method to reduce these biases when calculating the
national mean. First, we divided the study region into 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grids (see Fig. S2) for a total 953 grids covering
China. Second, we assigned all selected stations to the grids, and this
resulted in 627 grids containing stations, which accounted for 65.79 % of
the total. Finally, the grid box value was the average of all stations in
the grid, and the national mean was the area-weight average of all effective
grids (Jones and Moberg, 2003).</p>
      <p>The linear trends reported in this study were calculated via linear
regression based on the monthly anomalies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two national
mean trends were calculated from the anomalies of the grids. In the first
method (Method I), the national mean monthly anomalies were calculated using
the area weight of each grid first, and then the national mean trend based
on the time series of the national average anomalies was calculated. In the
second method (Method II), the trend at each grid was calculated first, and
then the national mean trend was calculated from the grid trends.</p>
      <p>In our study, we calculated the national mean trends of the temperatures
using Method I and II because both methods have been used in previous
studies (Gettelman and Fu, 2008). The results for the two
methods are expected to be the same when the time series of all grids is
integrated and data are not missing (Zhou et al., 2009);
however, when data are missing, small differences may occur (See Table 1).
As shown in Table 1, the absolute value of the difference between Method I
and Method II ranged from 0.011 to 0.033 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
represents 3.4 to 14.3 % of the trends (using the results of Method I
as the reference). For purposes of clarification, the trends derived from
Method I are discussed in the main text, whereas the results from both
methods are shown in Table 1.</p>
      <p>The effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined via a
multiple linear regression (Roy and Haigh, 2011) of the
monthly anomalies using the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M187" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the monthly anomalies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the monthly anomalies of
surface solar radiation and precipitation, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the sensitivities of temperatures to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the constant term; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the
residuals of the equation, which represents the contribution from other
factors such as longwave radiation flux and internal variability. The
coefficients of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the multilinear regression
equation (Eq. 1) are shown in Fig. S3, and they indicate the portion of the
variance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that could be attributed to that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. High
coefficients of determination were obtained, which showed that the linear
regression performed well, particularly for South China and the North China
Plain. To separate the contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we further calculated
the partial correlation coefficients between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
are shown in Figs. S4 and S5.</p>
      <p>To determine the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the analyzed temperatures, we
removed their effects from their original time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the multilinear relationship calculated in Eq. (1). Then,
we calculated the trends from both the original and adjusted time series. By
comparing the derived trends of the original and adjusted time series, we
quantitatively assessed the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly for the spatiotemporal pattern of their trends.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Trends of surface temperature and air temperature</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Temporal patterns in temperature variability</title>
      <p>The long-term changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max </mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1960 to 2003 are shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively.
In addition to the annual variability (Figs. 2a and 3a), the temperature
variability in both warm seasons (May–October; Figs. 2b and 3b) and cold
seasons (November to the following April; Figs. 2c and 3c) were
analyzed. In the annual records, all temperatures exhibited an obvious
warming trend throughout China (Figs. 2a and 3a).</p>
      <p>As shown in Table 1, the national mean warming rate from 1960 to 2003 for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.227 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.091 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 %
confidence level) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.167 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level). The warming rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the 1977 stations examined in the current study was
slightly higher than the global average (0.141 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1950 to 2004 (Vose et al., 2005) and the
rate obtained from a previous analysis (0.127 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of temperatures from 1955 to 2000 based on 305 stations in
China (Liu et al., 2004). Additionally, the increases in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the cold seasons were much larger than those in
the warm seasons, which is consistent with previous studies of China and
other regions (Vose et al., 2005; Ren et al., 2005; Shen et al., 2014).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Similarly, the warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the warm
seasons were also clearly lower than those in the cold seasons. As shown in
Fig. 3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by 0.315 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.058 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by
0.356 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.057 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level)
(see Fig. 3a) from 1960 to 2003. The warming trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is generally
consistent with earlier studies (Liu et al., 2004; Shen et al., 2014; Li
et al., 2015); however, these trends are considerably larger than the rates
reported for the global average (0.204 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Vose et al., 2005). For the seasonal scales, the warming rate
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the cold seasons was almost double that of
the warm seasons from 1960 to 2003 (see Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>National mean yearly anomalies of daily maximum land surface
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue line) and daily maximum air temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red line) for the annual <bold>(a)</bold>, warm <bold>(b)</bold>, and cold <bold>(c)</bold> seasonal
scales for the reference period from 1961 to 1990.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The warming rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly faster than
that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the warming rates of all temperatures in
the cold seasons were substantially greater than those in the warm seasons
(Easterling et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2004; Li et al., 2015). Although
previous studies have indicated that the microclimate (e.g., urban heat
island) has a larger effect on minimum temperatures because of the lower and
more stable boundary layer at night (Christy et al., 2009; Zhou and Ren,
2011), many investigators argue that variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the primary
reason for the daily contrast in warming rates (Makowski et al., 2009;
Sanchez-Lorenzo and Wild, 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Spatial patterns in temperature variability</title>
      <p>As shown in Fig. 4, clear spatial heterogeneity was demonstrated in the
warming rates for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China from 1960 to 2003. The
trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were statistically higher for the
Tibetan
Plateau as well as Northwest and Northeast China (see Fig. S6) compared with the
North China Plain and South China. Cooling trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> even
detected for the Sichuan Basin, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River
Delta. Lower rates of warming of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in South China and the North
China Plain have also been previously reported (Liu et al., 2004; Li et
al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in South China and the North
China Plain in the warm seasons were considerably lower than those in the
cold seasons, which resulted in stronger spatial heterogeneity in the warm
seasons (Fig. 4b and h). The spatial and seasonal patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
were similar, although they were not as similar as the patterns of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spatial contrast in the trends between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was much less than that between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
although a strong dependence on latitude was observed (Fig. 4d and j).
Related studies suggested that this dependence was strongly associated with
the mode variability in large-scale circulation, such as a negative trend in
the North Atlantic Oscillation during this period (Wallace et al., 2012;
Ding et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>National mean yearly anomalies of daily minimum land surface
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue line) and daily minimum air temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red line) for the annual <bold>(a)</bold>, warm <bold>(b)</bold>, and cold <bold>(c)</bold> seasonal
scales for the reference period 1961–1990.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Maps of the trends of the monthly anomalies for daily maximum land
surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(a–c)</bold>), daily minimum land surface
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d–f)</bold>), daily maximum air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(g–i)</bold>), and daily minimum air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(j–l)</bold>) for the annual,
warm (May–October), and cold (November–next April) seasonal scales. All
trends reported here were calculated using a linear regression
based on the least-squares method.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was highly significant. Based on
the time series of the national mean yearly anomalies (see Figs. 2 and 3), the correlation coefficient between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.877
and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.976 on the annual scale. In
the spatial pattern of the trends (Fig. 4), the correlation coefficient
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.488 and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.638 on the annual scale. All of these correlations between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were significant at the 95 % significance level, which
indicated a close relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both interannual
fluctuations and secular trends.</p>
      <p>The correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly higher
than that between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is closely related
to the land–atmosphere longwave wave radiation balance at night, which is
closely associated with the atmospheric greenhouse effect
(Dai et al., 1999). During the day, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is directly
determined by the land surface energy balance, i.e., the incoming energy
(including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and atmospheric longwave radiation (Wang and
Dickinson, 2013b), and it is partitioned into latent and sensible heat
fluxes (Zhou and Wang, 2016). Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is dependent on the
land–atmosphere sensible heat flux, it is also affected by local and/or
large-scale circulation. Thus, the changes in the land surface energy
balance caused by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have different levels of effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the day, which most likely caused the lower correlation between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than that between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effect of $R_{\mathrm{s}}$ and $P$ on temperatures}?><title>Effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on temperatures</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effect of $R_{\mathrm{s}}$}?><title>Effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>As shown in Fig. S4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is closely linked with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but not with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher than that between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the seasonal scales, the partial correlation
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the warm seasons was
stronger than that in the cold seasons, and this correlation was stronger in
South China and the North China Plain. South China has high soil moisture;
therefore, the relationship between the energy used for evapotranspiration
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximately linear (Zhou et al., 2007; Wang and
Dickinson, 2013a). However, northwest China presents dry soil over most of
the year; thus, the energy used for evapotranspiration is more dependent on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a result, the energy available for heating the surface and air
temperatures is not as closely correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the
correlation coefficients between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
lower in the northwest China.</p>
      <p>To quantify the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on temperature, the sensitivity of the
studied temperatures to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated (Eq. 1). As shown
in Fig. S7, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the most sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the national means for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.092 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.018 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.035 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.010 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were not sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because these temperatures are
primarily affected by atmospheric longwave radiation at night.</p>
      <p>Based on the above analysis, we calculated the effect of changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the studied temperatures. From 1960 to 2003, the calculations of
the monthly anomalies at 1977 stations indicated that the national mean
rate of decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.502 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level), and the trend was significant in
most regions of China (see Fig. S8). Our rate of decrease was considerably
less than the global average diminishing rate (form approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.1 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the 1960s and the 1990s
(Gilgen et al., 1998; Stanhill and Cohen, 2001; Liepert, 2002; Ohmura,
2006) and the national mean dimming rate across China (from approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.9 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the 1960s and the
2000s based on radiation station observations (Che et al., 2005; Liang
and Xia, 2005; Shi et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>As noted in the data section, the sensitivity drift and replacement of
instruments used for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations resulted in a significant
homogenization of the station observation records (Wang, 2014; Wang et
al., 2015), which introduced considerable uncertainty into the trend
estimations. Tang et al. (2011) used quality-controlled
observational data from 72 stations and two radiation models based on 479
stations to determine that the rate in China decreased from approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during 1961–2000, and they
also showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values have remained essentially unchanged since
2000. These findings are generally consistent with our results.</p>
      <p>Because of the decreasing trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the national mean warming trends
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by 0.139 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.053 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
Spatially, the decreasing rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in South China and the North China
Plain was significantly higher than that in other regions, particularly in
the warm seasons (Fig. 5b). Therefore, the cooling effect of decreasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was more significant in South China and
the China North Plain, and it resulted in significantly lower warming rates
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in those regions than in the other regions (see
Fig. 4). The spatial consistency between the decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend and the
slowdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> warming implies that variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were the primary reason for the spatial heterogeneity of the warming
rate in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Maps of the trends in surface solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(a–c)</bold>) and
their effect on the warming rates of daily maximum land surface temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d–f)</bold>) and daily maximum air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(g–i)</bold>). The
first line <bold>(a–c)</bold> is the trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1960 to 2003; the second line
<bold>(d–f)</bold> and the third line <bold>(g–i)</bold> are the trend changes caused by secular
variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Equation (1) was used to strip
away the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on temperatures, and we calculated the trend
difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>Trend, <bold>(d–i)</bold>) between the time series of temperatures
before and after adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Finally, the effect of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was quantified and
analyzed (Sect. 3.2.1).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effect of $P$}?><title>Effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>As shown in Fig. S5, a significant negative correlation was detected between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the correlation was more significant in the warm
seasons than in the cold seasons. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> negatively correlated with temperature
because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reduces temperatures by increasing the surface evaporative
cooling (Dai et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2006). The national mean
sensitivities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.321 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.098 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.054 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
10 mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level), respectively. As shown in
Fig. S9, seasonal and spatial changes in the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were apparent (Fig. S9a–c and g–i). The
sensitivities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were significantly higher in arid
regions (dry seasons) than humid regions (rainy seasons) (Wang
and Dickinson, 2013a). As expected, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were both less
sensitive to variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1960 to 2003 over the 1977 stations showed obvious
spatial heterogeneities. A slight increasing trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in China
during this period at rate of 0.112 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.718 mm 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 %
confidence level). An increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trend was observed in northwestern China
and southeastern China, whereas a decreasing trend was observed in the North
China Plain, the Sichuan Basin, and parts of northeastern China. However,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends were not significant in most regions (see Fig. S8). Variations
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly differed by season (see Fig. 6b and 6c). The seasonal
and spatial variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are consistent with those of previous studies
(Zhai et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the warming trend in the North China Plain,
the Sichuan Basin, and parts of northeastern China was aggravated by the
reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the warming trends in northwestern China and in the
Mongolian Plateau were slowed by increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6d). For the national
average, the effect of increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted in decreases in the warming
trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.007 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.002 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
However, the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately an order of
magnitude less than that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Maps of the trends in precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a–c)</bold> and their effect on
the warming rates for daily maximum land surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(d–f)</bold>) and daily maximum air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(g–i)</bold>). The first line
<bold>(a–c)</bold> is the trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during 1960–2003; the second line <bold>(d–f)</bold> and the third
line <bold>(g–i)</bold> are the trend changes caused by secular variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We used Eq. (1) to remove the effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the
temperatures, then calculated the trend difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>Trend,
<bold>(d–i)</bold>
between the time series of temperatures before and after adjusting for the
effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Finally, the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max </mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was quantified and analyzed (Sect. 3.2.2).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Regional average anomalies of daily maximum land surface
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue line) and daily maximum air temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red line) for the annual <bold>(a)</bold>, warm <bold>(b)</bold>, and cold <bold>(c)</bold> seasonal
scales for the reference period from 1961 to 1990. We used Eq. (1) to
simultaneously adjust for the effects of surface solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then analyzed the
changes in the interannual variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Sect. 3.3).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Trends of surface and air temperature after adjusting for the
effect of $R_{{\mathrm{s}}}$ and
$P$}?><title>Trends of surface and air temperature after adjusting for the
effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Based on the above analysis of the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on temperatures, we
found that variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> had little effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> had an important effect on the trends of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. S3), particularly in central and South
China, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were more closely related to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. S4). Therefore, only the effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max </mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were analyzed. After adjusting for the effect of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7), the warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by
0.146 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (64.3 %) and 0.055 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (33.0 %), respectively. Additionally, the increasing
amplitude of warming rates in the warm seasons was significantly higher than
that in the cold seasons, which resulted in a seasonal contrast in warming
rates, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreasing by 45.0 and
17.2 %, respectively (see Table 1).</p>
      <p>More importantly, after adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the spatial
coherence of the warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in South China
and the North China Plain clearly improved (Fig. 8). The regional
differences among the North China Plain, South China, and other regions in
China significantly decreased because of the increase in warming rates in
South China and the North China Plain. Additionally, the warming trends of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> became more statistically significant in the North
China Plain and South China (see Fig. S10).</p>
      <p>To clearly illustrate these changes, we selected two regions in China for
further investigation: R1 primarily included the North China Plain and R2
primarily included the Loess Plateau (see Fig. 9a). Although these regions
share the same latitudes, the trend for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were substantially different
(see Fig. 9b). After adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the annual
trends for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in R1 increased by 0.304 and
0.118 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, whereas those in R2 increased by
only 0.025 and 0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Therefore,
after the adjustment, the contrasts in the warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between R1 and R2 were significantly reduced (see Fig. 9d).</p>
      <p>After the adjustment in R1, the seasonal and diurnal contrasts in the
warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly decreased. The
contrasts in warming rates between the warm seasons and cold seasons
decreased by 68.7 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and by 50.8 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after
the adjustment. Additionally, the contrasts in the warming rates between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by 93.4 % and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreased by 59.6 % in R1. In R2, the adjustment did not significantly
change the seasonal and diurnal contrasts in temperatures. Overall, the
trends for R1 and R2 became more consistent after adjusting for difference
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 9d).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions and discussion</title>
      <p>Although a general warming trend has been observed throughout China, the
regional warming trends show significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity.
In this study, we analyzed the spatial and temporal patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1960 to 2003 and further analyzed and quantified the effects of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on these temperatures. The primary results of the study are as
follows.</p>
      <p>The national mean warming rates from 1960 to 2003 of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.227 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.091,
0.315 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.058, 0.167 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068, and 0.356 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.057 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in South China and the North China Plain were significantly lower
than those in the other regions, and the spatial heterogeneity in the warm
seasons was greater than that in the cold seasons.</p>
      <p>During the study period, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value decreased by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.502 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.042 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % confidence level), and higher dimming rates
were observed in South China and the North China Plain. Using a partial
regression analysis, we found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a distinctly important role
in the spatial warming patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>After adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the warming rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in South China and the North China Plain
significantly increased and the regional differences in warming rates in
China clearly decreased (see Fig. 8). After the adjustments, the warming
rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the North China Plain increased by
0.304 and 0.118 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, whereas those on the
Loess Plateau increased only by 0.025 and 0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. Therefore, the differences in warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the North China Plain and the Loess Plateau were almost
eliminated (see Fig. 9d).</p>
      <p>After adjusting for the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the warming trend of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by 0.146 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and that of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by 0.055 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition,
the trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max </mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> became 0.373 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068 and
0.222 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.062 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted in decreases in the warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 0.139 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.053 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 10 yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, which accounted for 95.0 and 95.8 % of
the total effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. For the seasonal contrast,
the warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by 45.0 and
17.2 %, respectively. For the daily contrast, the warming rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by 33.0 and 29.1 %, respectively.</p>
      <p>In addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature warming rates may be affected by
many other factors, such as land cover and land use changes; however, those
factors have not been discussed in this study because of lack of data
(Liu et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2016). After adjusting for the effect of
changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes, the spatial differences in the warming
trends clearly decreased; however, certain regional differences remained.
The warming rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Sichuan Basin remained significantly
lower than that in other regions after adjusting for these effects.
Additionally, the differences in the warming rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the northern and southern areas were not explained by the
effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; further study is required.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Maps of the trends of the monthly anomalies for the daily maximum
land surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(a, c, e)</bold>) and daily maximum air
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b, d, f)</bold>) for the annual, warm, and cold seasonal
scales after adjusting for the effects of surface solar radiation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We used Eq. (1) to simultaneously adjust the
effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then analyzed the
changes in the secular trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a-max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. 3.3).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f08.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Maps of the trends of surface solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
location of the regions selected for further analysis: R1 (latitude:
30–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; longitude: 110–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)
and R2 (latitude: 30–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; longitude: 100–110<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). <bold>(b)</bold> National mean trends for R1 and R2. <bold>(c)</bold> Annual,
warm, and cold seasonal-scale trends calculated based on the data before
adjusting the effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(d)</bold> Annual, warm, and cold
seasonal-scale trends calculated based on the data after adjusting the effect of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. All error bars indicate the 95 % confidence interval.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4931/2017/acp-17-4931-2017-f09.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The meteorological observational data used in this study
are included in recently released daily meteorological datasets, such as the
China National Stations' Fundamental Elements Datasets V3.0 (CNSFED V3.0),
and they were downloaded from China's National Meteorological Information
Centre (<uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/</uri>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4931-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-17-4931-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.
41525018 and 91337111) and the National Basic Research Program of China
funded this study (grant no. 2012CB955302). The land surface temperatures
and sunshine duration datasets that include data from approximately 2400
meteorological stations in China from 1960 to 2003 are obtained from the
China Meteorological Administration (CMA, <uri>http://data.cma.gov.cn/data</uri>).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: J.-Y. C. Chiu<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ait-Mesbah, S., Dufresne, J. L., Cheruy, F., and Hourdin, F.: The role of
thermal inertia in the representation of mean and diurnal range of surface
temperature in semiarid and arid regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7572–7580,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl065553</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bounoua, L., Collatz, G. J., Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., Dazlich, D. A.,
Los, S. O., Berry, J. A., Fung, I., Tucker, C. J., Field, C. B., and Jensen,
T. G.: Interactions between vegetation and climate: Radiative and
physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J Climate, 12, 309–324,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;0309:ibvacr&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;0309:ibvacr&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Boyles, R. P. and Raman, S.: Analysis of climate trends in North Carolina
(1949–1998), Environ. Int., 29, 263–275, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00185-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00185-x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Campbell, G. G. and VonderHaar, T. H.: Comparison of surface temperature
minimum and maximum and satellite measured cloudiness and radiation budget,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16639–16645, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96jd02718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96jd02718</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cao, L., Zhu, Y., Tang, G., Yuan, F., and Yan, Z.: Climatic warming in China
according to a homogenized data set from 2419 stations, Int. J. Climatol., 36,
4384–4392, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.4639" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4639</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Che, H. Z., Shi, G. Y., Zhang, X. Y., Arimoto, R., Zhao, J. Q., Xu, L.,
Wang, B., and Chen, Z. H.: Analysis of 40 years of solar radiation data from
China, 1961–2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L06803, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004gl022322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004gl022322</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, H. S., Ma, H. D., Li, X., and Sun, S. L.: Solar influences on spatial
patterns of Eurasian winter temperature and atmospheric general circulation
anomalies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8642–8657, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd023415</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Z., Wang, S., Fu, X., Watson, J. G., Jiang, J., Fu, Q., Chen, C., Xu,
B., Yu, J., Chow, J. C., and Hao, J.: Impact of biomass burning on haze
pollution in the Yangtze River delta, China: a case study in summer 2011,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4573–4585, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Christy, J. R., Norris, W. B., and McNider, R. T.: Surface Temperature
Variations in East Africa and Possible Causes, J. Climate, 22, 3342–3356,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2726.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008jcli2726.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Dai, A., DelGenio, A. D., and Fung, I. Y.: Clouds, precipitation and
temperature range, Nature, 386, 665–666, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/386665b0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/386665b0</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dai, A., Trenberth, K. E., and Karl, T. R.: Effects of clouds, soil moisture,
precipitation, and water vapor on diurnal temperature range, J. Climate, 12,
2451–2473,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;2451:eocsmp&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;2451:eocsmp&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ding, Q., Wallace, J. M., Battisti, D. S., Steig, E. J., Gallant, A. J. E.,
Kim, H.-J., and Geng, L.: Tropical forcing of the recent rapid Arctic warming
in northeastern Canada and Greenland, Nature, 509, 209–212,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13260</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Duan, A. and Xiao, Z.: Does the climate warming hiatus exist over the Tibetan
Plateau?, Sci. Rep., 5, 13711, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13711" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep13711</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Easterling, D. R., Horton, B., Jones, P. D., Peterson, T. C., Karl, T. R.,
Parker, D. E., Salinger, M. J., Razuvayev, V., Plummer, N., Jamason, P., and
Folland, C. K.: Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe,
Science, 277, 364–367, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5324.364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.277.5324.364</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Falge, E., Reth, S., Bruggemann, N., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Goldberg, V.,
Oltchev, A., Schaaf, S., Spindler, G., Stiller, B., Queck, R., Kostner, B.,
and Bernhofer, C.: Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy
flux data in forest and grassland ecosystems of Germany, Ecol. Model., 188,
174–216, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.057</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A. and Fu, Q.: Observed and simulated upper-tropospheric water
vapor feedback, J. Climate, 21, 3282–3289, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007jcli2142.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007jcli2142.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gilgen, H., Wild, M., and Ohmura, A.: Means and trends of shortwave
irradiance at the surface estimated from global energy balance archive data,
J. Climate, 11, 2042–2061, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442-11.8.2042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442-11.8.2042</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hartmann, D. L., Ramanathan, V., Berroir, A., and Hunt, G. E.: Earth
radiation budget data and climate research, Rev. Geophys., 24, 439–468,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RG024i002p00439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG024i002p00439</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hartmann, D. L., Tank, A. M. G. K., and Rusticucci, M.: Observation:
Atmosphere and surface, IPCC, 2, 161–218, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hegerl, G. C. and Zwiers, F. W.: Climate change 2007: Understanding and
attributing climate change, IPCC, 9, 665–744, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511546013</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hingray, B., Mezghani, A., and Buishand, T. A.: Development of probability
distributions for regional climate change from uncertain global mean warming
and an uncertain scaling relationship, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11,
1097–1114, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1097-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-11-1097-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Huang, J., Guan, X., and Ji, F.: Enhanced cold-season warming in semi-arid
regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5391–5398, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5391-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5391-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Jones, P. D. and Moberg, A.: Hemispheric and large-scale surface air
temperature variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2001, J.
Climate, 16, 206–223,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0206:halssa&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0206:halssa&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E. and Cai, M.: Impact of urbanization and land-use change on
climate, Nature, 423, 528–531, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01675" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature01675</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Karl, T. R., Kukla, G., Razuvayev, V. N., Changery, M. J., Quayle, R. G.,
Heim, R. R., Easterling, D. R., and Fu, C. B.: Global warming - evidence for
asymmetric diurnal temperature-change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2253–2256,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91gl02900" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91gl02900</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Karoly, D. J. and Stott, P. A.: Anthropogenic warming of central England
temperature, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 7, 81–85, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asl.136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/asl.136</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kukla, G. and Karl, T. R.: Nighttime warming and the greenhouse-effect,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 1468–1474, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00045a001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00045a001</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Lauritsen, R. G. and Rogers, J. C.: US Diurnal Temperature Range Variability
and Regional Causal Mechanisms, 1901–2002, J. Climate, 25, 7216–7231,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00429.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-11-00429.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Li, B. F., Chen, Y. N., and Shi, X.: Why does the temperature rise faster in
the arid region of northwest China?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D16115,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017953" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jd017953</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q. X., Yang, S., Xu, W. H., Wang, X. L. L., Jones, P., Parker, D., Zhou,
L. M., Feng, Y., and Gao, Y.: China experiencing the recent warming hiatus,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 889–898, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062773" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl062773</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Liang, F. and Xia, X. A.: Long-term trends in solar radiation and the
associated climatic factors over China for 1961–2000, Ann. Geophys., 23,
2425–2432, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-2425-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-23-2425-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liepert, B. G.: Observed reductions of surface solar radiation at sites in
the United States and worldwide from 1961 to 1990, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29,
1421, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002gl014910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002gl014910</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. K., Cai, M., Kalnay, E., and Zhou, L. M.: Observational evidence of
sensitivity of surface climate changes to land types and urbanization,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L22712, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl024267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005gl024267</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Liu, B. H., Xu, M., Henderson, M., Qi, Y., and Li, Y. Q.: Taking China's
temperature: Daily range, warming trends, and regional variations,
1955–2000, J. Climate, 17, 4453–4462, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/3230.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/3230.1</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J. Y., Liu, M. L., Tian, H. Q., Zhuang, D. F., Zhang, Z. X., Zhang, W.,
Tang, X. M., and Deng, X. Z.: Spatial and temporal patterns of China's
cropland during 1990–2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data, Remote
Sens. Environ., 98, 442–456, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Mahlstein, I. and Knutti, R.: Regional climate change patterns identified by
cluster analysis, Clim. Dynam., 35, 587–600, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0654-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-009-0654-0</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Makowski, K., Jaeger, E. B., Chiacchio, M., Wild, M., Ewen, T., and Ohmura,
A.: On the relationship between diurnal temperature range and surface solar
radiation in Europe, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00D07,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011104</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Manara, V., Beltrano, M. C., Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Sanchez-Lorenzo, A.,
Simolo, C., and Sorrenti, S.: Sunshine duration variability and trends in
Italy from homogenized instrumental time series (1936–2013), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 3622–3641, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022560" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd022560</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Mariotti, L., Coppola, E., Sylla, M. B., Giorgi, F., and Piani, C.: Regional
climate model simulation of projected 21st century climate change over an
all-Africa domain: Comparison analysis of nested and driving model results,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D15111, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd015068</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Menon, S., Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., and Luo, Y. F.: Climate effects of
black carbon aerosols in China and India, Science, 297, 2250–2253,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1075159</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Ohmura, A.: Observed long-term variations of solar irradiance at the earth's
surface, Space Sci. Rev., 125, 111–128, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9050-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-006-9050-9</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Peng, S. S., Piao, S. L., Zeng, Z. Z., Ciais, P., Zhou, L. M., Li, L. Z. X.,
Myneni, R. B., Yin, Y., and Zeng, H.: Afforestation in China cools local land
surface temperature, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 2915–2919,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315126111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1315126111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ren, G., Xu, M., Chu, Z., Guo, J., Li, Q., Liu, X., and Wang, Y.: Changes of
Surface Air Temperature in China During 1951–2004, Climatic and
Environmental Research, 10, 717–727, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Ren, Z. H., Zhou, F. L., Yu, Y., Wang, G. A., Zhou, Z. F., Feng, S. H., Zhang, Z. Q., and  Sun, C.: China National
Stations'
Fundamental Elements Datasets V3.0, China's National Meteorological Information Centre, available at: <uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/</uri> (last access: 27 May 2015), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Roy, I. and Haigh, J. D.: The influence of solar variability and the
quasi-biennial oscillation on lower atmospheric temperatures and sea level
pressure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11679–11687,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11679-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11679-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Sanchez-Lorenzo, A. and Wild, M.: Decadal variations in estimated surface
solar radiation over Switzerland since the late 19th century, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 8635–8644, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8635-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8635-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Seneviratne, S. I., Corti, T., Davin, E. L., Hirschi, M., Jaeger, E. B.,
Lehner, I., Orlowsky, B., and Teuling, A. J.: Investigating soil
moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review, Earth-Sci.
Rev, 99, 125–161, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Shen, D. J. and Varis, O.: Climate change in China, Ambio, 30, 381–383,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0381:ccic]2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0381:ccic]2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Shen, M. G., Piao, S. L., Jeong, S. J., Zhou, L. M., Zeng, Z. Z., Ciais, P.,
Chen, D. L., Huang, M. T., Jin, C. S., Li, L. Z. X., Li, Y., Myneni, R. B.,
Yang, K., Zhang, G. X., Zhang, Y. J., and Yao, T. D.: Evaporative cooling
over the Tibetan Plateau induced by vegetation growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 112, 9299–9304, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504418112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1504418112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Shen, X. J., Liu, B. H., Li, G. D., Wu, Z. F., Jin, Y. H., Yu, P. J., and
Zhou, D. W.: Spatiotemporal change of diurnal temperature range and its
relationship with sunshine duration and precipitation in China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 13163–13179, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd022326</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Shi, G. Y., Hayasaka, T., Ohmura, A., Chen, Z. H., Wang, B., Zhao, J. Q.,
Che, H. Z., and Xu, L.: Data quality assessment and the long-term trend of
ground solar radiation in China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 1006–1016,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007jamc1493.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007jamc1493.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Stanhill, G. and Cohen, S.: Global dimming: a review of the evidence for a
widespread and significant reduction in global radiation with discussion of
its probable causes and possible agricultural consequences, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 107, 255–278, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00241-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00241-0</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Zhang, X. B., Ren, G. Y., Zwiers, F. W., and Hu, T.: Contribution of
urbanization to warming in China, Nature Climate Change, 6, 706–709,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2956</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Tang, W.-J., Yang, K., Qin, J., Cheng, C. C. K., and He, J.: Solar radiation
trend across China in recent decades: a revisit with quality-controlled data,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 393–406, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-393-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-393-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, J. R., Randel, W. J., and Jensen, E. J.: Cirrus cloud-temperature
interactions in the tropical tropopause layer: a case study, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 10085–10095, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10085-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10085-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Tebaldi, C., Smith, R. L., Nychka, D., and Mearns, L. O.: Quantifying
uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: A Bayesian approach
(vol 18, pg 1524, 2005), J. Climate, 18, 3405–3405, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI9001.1a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI9001.1a</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Vautard, R., Yiou, P., and van Oldenborgh, G. J.: Decline of fog, mist and
haze in Europe over the past 30 years, Nat. Geosci., 2, 115–119,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo414</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Vose, R. S., Easterling, D. R., and Gleason, B.: Maximum and minimum
temperature trends for the globe: An update through 2004, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 32, L23822, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl024379" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005gl024379</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Wallace, J. M., Fu, Q., Smoliak, B. V., Lin, P., and Johanson, C. M.:
Simulated versus observed patterns of warming over the extratropical Northern
Hemisphere continents during the cold season, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109,
14337–14342, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204875109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1204875109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. and Dickinson, R. E.: Contribution of solar radiation to decadal
temperature variability over land, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
14877–14882, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311433110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1311433110</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. and Dickinson, R. E.: Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation
at the surface from ground-based observations, satellite retrievals, and
reanalyses, Rev. Geophys., 51, 150–185, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rog.20009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rog.20009</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K., Dickinson, R. E., Wild, M., and Liang, S.: Evidence for decadal
variation in global terrestrial evapotranspiration between 1982 and 2002: 1.
Model development, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20112,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013847" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD013847</ext-link>, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K., Dickinson, R. E., Wild, M., and Liang, S.: Evidence for decadal
variation in global terrestrial evapotranspiration between 1982 and 2002: 2.
Results, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20113, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013671</ext-link>,
2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K., Ma, Q., Li, Z., and Wang, J.: Decadal variability of surface
incident solar radiation over China: Observations, satellite retrievals, and
reanalyses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 6500–6514,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd023420</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. C.: Measurement Biases Explain Discrepancies between the Observed
and Simulated Decadal Variability of Surface Incident Solar Radiation, Sci.
Rep., 4, 6144, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06144" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep06144</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. C. and Dickinson, R. E.: A review of global terrestrial
evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic
variability, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011rg000373" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011rg000373</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. C. and Liang, S. L.: Estimation of Daytime Net Radiation from
Shortwave Radiation Measurements and Meteorological Observations, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 48, 634–643, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008jamc1959.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008jamc1959.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. C. and Zhou, C. L. E.: Regional Contrasts of the Warming Rate over
Land Significantly Depend on the Calculation Methods of Mean Air Temperature,
Sci. Rep., 5, 12324, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep12324</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. C., Li, Z. Q., and Cribb, M.: Estimation of evaporative fraction
from a combination of day and night land surface temperatures and NDVI: A new
method to determine the Priestley-Taylor parameter, Remote Sens. Environ.,
102, 293–305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.007</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. C., Dickinson, R. E., Wild, M., and Liang, S.: Atmospheric impacts
on climatic variability of surface incident solar radiation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9581–9592, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9581-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9581-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Wang, K., and Su, L.: Contribution of Atmospheric Diffusion
Conditions to the Recent Improvement in Air Quality in China, Sci. Rep., 6,
36404, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep36404</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Weng, Q. H., Lu, D. S., and Schubring, J.: Estimation of land surface
temperature-vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies,
Remote Sens. Environ., 89, 467–483, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wild, M.: Enlightening global dimming and brightening, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
93, 27–37, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-11-00074.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-11-00074.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Wild, M., Ohmura, A., and Makowski, K.: Impact of global dimming and
brightening on global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04702,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl028031</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Xia, X.: A closer looking at dimming and brightening in China during
1961–2005, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1121–1132, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1121-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-28-1121-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Yang, K., Koike, T., and Ye, B. S.: Improving estimation of hourly, daily,
and monthly solar radiation by importing global data sets, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 137, 43–55, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.02.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.02.001</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Yin, Z., Wang, H., and Chen, H.: Understanding severe winter haze events in
the North China Plain in 2014: roles of climate anomalies, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 1641–1651, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1641-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1641-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>You, Q. L., Min, J. Z., Jiao, Y., Sillanpaa, M., and Kang, S. C.: Observed
trend of diurnal temperature range in the Tibetan Plateau in recent decades,
Int. J. Climatol., 36, 2633–2643, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.4517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4517</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zhai, P. M., Zhang, X. B., Wan, H., and Pan, X. H.: Trends in total
precipitation and frequency of daily precipitation extremes over China, J.
Climate, 18, 1096–1108, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-3318.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-3318.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Sun, Y., Mao, W., Liu, Y., and Ren, Y.: Regional Response of
Temperature Change in the Arid Regions of China to Global Warming, Arid. Zone
Res., 27, 592–599, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z. X., Li, N., Wang, X., Liu, F., and Yang, L. P.: A Comparative Study
of Urban Expansion in Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan from the 1970s to 2013,
Remote. Sen., 8, 496, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8060496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs8060496</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, C. L. and Wang, K. C.: Coldest Temperature Extreme Monotonically
Increased and Hottest Extreme Oscillated over Northern Hemisphere Land during
Last 114 Years, Sci. Rep., 6, 25721, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep25721</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L. M., Dickinson, R. E., Tian, Y. H., Fang, J. Y., Li, Q. X., Kaufmann,
R. K., Tucker, C. J., and Myneni, R. B.: Evidence for a significant
urbanization effect on climate in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101,
9540–9544, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400357101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0400357101</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L. M., Dickinson, R. E., Tian, Y. H., Vose, R. S., and Dai, Y. J.:
Impact of vegetation removal and soil aridation on diurnal temperature range
in a semiarid region: Application to the Sahel, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104,
17937–17942, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700290104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0700290104</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L. M., Dai, A., Dai, Y. J., Vose, R., Zou, C. Z., Tian, Y. H., and
Chen, H. S.: Spatial dependence of diurnal temperature range trends on
precipitation from 1950 to 2004, Clim. Dynam., 32, 429–440,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0387-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-008-0387-5</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L. M., Dickinson, R. E., Dai, A. G., and Dirmeyer, P.: Detection and
attribution of anthropogenic forcing to diurnal temperature range changes
from 1950 to 1999: comparing multi-model simulations with observations, Clim.
Dynam., 35, 1289–1307, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0644-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-009-0644-2</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y. Q. and Ren, G. Y.: Change in extreme temperature event frequency
over mainland China, 1961–2008, Climate Res., 50, 125–139,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr01053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/cr01053</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Contributions of surface solar radiation and precipitation to the spatiotemporal patterns of surface and air warming in China from 1960 to 2003</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Although global warming has been attributed to increases in
atmospheric greenhouses gases, the mechanisms underlying spatiotemporal
patterns of warming trends remain under debate. Herein, we analyzed surface
and air warming observations recorded at 1977 stations in China from 1960 to
2003. Our results showed a significant spatial pattern for the warming of the
daily maximum surface (<i>T</i><sub>s-max</sub>) and air (<i>T</i><sub>a-max</sub>)
temperatures, and the pattern was stronger in northwest and northeast China
and weaker or negative in South China and the North China Plain. These
warming spatial patterns were attributed to surface shortwave solar radiation
(<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>) and precipitation (<i>P</i>), which play a key role in the
surface energy budget. During the study period, <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> decreased by
−1.50 ± 0.42 W m<sup>−2</sup> 10 yr<sup>−1</sup> in China, which reduced the
trends of <i>T</i><sub>s-max</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>a-max</sub> by about 0.139 and
0.053 °C 10 yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. More importantly, the
decreasing rates in South China and the North China Plain were stronger than
those in other parts of China. The spatial contrasts in the trends of
<i>T</i><sub>s-max</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>a-max</sub> in China were significantly reduced
after adjusting for the effect of <i>R</i><sub>s</sub>and <i>P</i>. For example, after
adjusting for the effect of <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> and <i>P</i>, the difference in the
<i>T</i><sub>s-max</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>a-max</sub> values between the North China Plain
and the Loess Plateau was reduced by 97.8 and 68.3 %, respectively; the
seasonal contrast in <i>T</i><sub>s-max</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>a-max</sub> decreased by 45.0
and 17.2 %, respectively; and the daily contrast in the warming rates of
the surface and air temperature decreased by 33.0 and 29.1 %,
respectively. This study shows that the land energy budget plays an essential
role in the identification of regional warming patterns.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ait-Mesbah, S., Dufresne, J. L., Cheruy, F., and Hourdin, F.: The role of
thermal inertia in the representation of mean and diurnal range of surface
temperature in semiarid and arid regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7572–7580,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065553" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015gl065553</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bounoua, L., Collatz, G. J., Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., Dazlich, D. A.,
Los, S. O., Berry, J. A., Fung, I., Tucker, C. J., Field, C. B., and Jensen,
T. G.: Interactions between vegetation and climate: Radiative and
physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, J Climate, 12, 309–324,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;0309:ibvacr&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;0309:ibvacr&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Boyles, R. P. and Raman, S.: Analysis of climate trends in North Carolina
(1949–1998), Environ. Int., 29, 263–275, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00185-x" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00185-x</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Campbell, G. G. and VonderHaar, T. H.: Comparison of surface temperature
minimum and maximum and satellite measured cloudiness and radiation budget,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16639–16645, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96jd02718" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/96jd02718</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, L., Zhu, Y., Tang, G., Yuan, F., and Yan, Z.: Climatic warming in China
according to a homogenized data set from 2419 stations, Int. J. Climatol., 36,
4384–4392, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.4639" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/joc.4639</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Che, H. Z., Shi, G. Y., Zhang, X. Y., Arimoto, R., Zhao, J. Q., Xu, L.,
Wang, B., and Chen, Z. H.: Analysis of 40 years of solar radiation data from
China, 1961–2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L06803, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004gl022322" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004gl022322</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H. S., Ma, H. D., Li, X., and Sun, S. L.: Solar influences on spatial
patterns of Eurasian winter temperature and atmospheric general circulation
anomalies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8642–8657, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023415" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015jd023415</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Z., Wang, S., Fu, X., Watson, J. G., Jiang, J., Fu, Q., Chen, C., Xu,
B., Yu, J., Chow, J. C., and Hao, J.: Impact of biomass burning on haze
pollution in the Yangtze River delta, China: a case study in summer 2011,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4573–4585, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-4573-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Christy, J. R., Norris, W. B., and McNider, R. T.: Surface Temperature
Variations in East Africa and Possible Causes, J. Climate, 22, 3342–3356,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2726.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2008jcli2726.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, A., DelGenio, A. D., and Fung, I. Y.: Clouds, precipitation and
temperature range, Nature, 386, 665–666, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/386665b0" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/386665b0</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, A., Trenberth, K. E., and Karl, T. R.: Effects of clouds, soil moisture,
precipitation, and water vapor on diurnal temperature range, J. Climate, 12,
2451–2473,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;2451:eocsmp&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;2451:eocsmp&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, Q., Wallace, J. M., Battisti, D. S., Steig, E. J., Gallant, A. J. E.,
Kim, H.-J., and Geng, L.: Tropical forcing of the recent rapid Arctic warming
in northeastern Canada and Greenland, Nature, 509, 209–212,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13260" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature13260</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, A. and Xiao, Z.: Does the climate warming hiatus exist over the Tibetan
Plateau?, Sci. Rep., 5, 13711, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13711" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep13711</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Easterling, D. R., Horton, B., Jones, P. D., Peterson, T. C., Karl, T. R.,
Parker, D. E., Salinger, M. J., Razuvayev, V., Plummer, N., Jamason, P., and
Folland, C. K.: Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe,
Science, 277, 364–367, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5324.364" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.364</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Falge, E., Reth, S., Bruggemann, N., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Goldberg, V.,
Oltchev, A., Schaaf, S., Spindler, G., Stiller, B., Queck, R., Kostner, B.,
and Bernhofer, C.: Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy
flux data in forest and grassland ecosystems of Germany, Ecol. Model., 188,
174–216, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.057" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.057</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A. and Fu, Q.: Observed and simulated upper-tropospheric water
vapor feedback, J. Climate, 21, 3282–3289, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007jcli2142.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2007jcli2142.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gilgen, H., Wild, M., and Ohmura, A.: Means and trends of shortwave
irradiance at the surface estimated from global energy balance archive data,
J. Climate, 11, 2042–2061, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442-11.8.2042" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0442-11.8.2042</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, D. L., Ramanathan, V., Berroir, A., and Hunt, G. E.: Earth
radiation budget data and climate research, Rev. Geophys., 24, 439–468,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RG024i002p00439" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/RG024i002p00439</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, D. L., Tank, A. M. G. K., and Rusticucci, M.: Observation:
Atmosphere and surface, IPCC, 2, 161–218, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324" target="_blank">doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hegerl, G. C. and Zwiers, F. W.: Climate change 2007: Understanding and
attributing climate change, IPCC, 9, 665–744, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546013" target="_blank">doi:10.1017/CBO9780511546013</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hingray, B., Mezghani, A., and Buishand, T. A.: Development of probability
distributions for regional climate change from uncertain global mean warming
and an uncertain scaling relationship, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11,
1097–1114, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1097-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-11-1097-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, J., Guan, X., and Ji, F.: Enhanced cold-season warming in semi-arid
regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5391–5398, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5391-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-5391-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, P. D. and Moberg, A.: Hemispheric and large-scale surface air
temperature variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2001, J.
Climate, 16, 206–223,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0206:halssa&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0206:halssa&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E. and Cai, M.: Impact of urbanization and land-use change on
climate, Nature, 423, 528–531, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01675" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature01675</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Karl, T. R., Kukla, G., Razuvayev, V. N., Changery, M. J., Quayle, R. G.,
Heim, R. R., Easterling, D. R., and Fu, C. B.: Global warming - evidence for
asymmetric diurnal temperature-change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2253–2256,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91gl02900" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/91gl02900</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Karoly, D. J. and Stott, P. A.: Anthropogenic warming of central England
temperature, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 7, 81–85, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asl.136" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/asl.136</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kukla, G. and Karl, T. R.: Nighttime warming and the greenhouse-effect,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 1468–1474, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00045a001" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es00045a001</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Lauritsen, R. G. and Rogers, J. C.: US Diurnal Temperature Range Variability
and Regional Causal Mechanisms, 1901–2002, J. Climate, 25, 7216–7231,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00429.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00429.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Li, B. F., Chen, Y. N., and Shi, X.: Why does the temperature rise faster in
the arid region of northwest China?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D16115,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017953" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012jd017953</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Q. X., Yang, S., Xu, W. H., Wang, X. L. L., Jones, P., Parker, D., Zhou,
L. M., Feng, Y., and Gao, Y.: China experiencing the recent warming hiatus,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 889–898, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062773" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014gl062773</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, F. and Xia, X. A.: Long-term trends in solar radiation and the
associated climatic factors over China for 1961–2000, Ann. Geophys., 23,
2425–2432, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-2425-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-23-2425-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Liepert, B. G.: Observed reductions of surface solar radiation at sites in
the United States and worldwide from 1961 to 1990, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29,
1421, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002gl014910" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002gl014910</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, Y. K., Cai, M., Kalnay, E., and Zhou, L. M.: Observational evidence of
sensitivity of surface climate changes to land types and urbanization,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L22712, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl024267" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005gl024267</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, B. H., Xu, M., Henderson, M., Qi, Y., and Li, Y. Q.: Taking China's
temperature: Daily range, warming trends, and regional variations,
1955–2000, J. Climate, 17, 4453–4462, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/3230.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/3230.1</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J. Y., Liu, M. L., Tian, H. Q., Zhuang, D. F., Zhang, Z. X., Zhang, W.,
Tang, X. M., and Deng, X. Z.: Spatial and temporal patterns of China's
cropland during 1990–2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data, Remote
Sens. Environ., 98, 442–456, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mahlstein, I. and Knutti, R.: Regional climate change patterns identified by
cluster analysis, Clim. Dynam., 35, 587–600, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0654-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0654-0</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Makowski, K., Jaeger, E. B., Chiacchio, M., Wild, M., Ewen, T., and Ohmura,
A.: On the relationship between diurnal temperature range and surface solar
radiation in Europe, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00D07,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011104" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD011104</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Manara, V., Beltrano, M. C., Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Sanchez-Lorenzo, A.,
Simolo, C., and Sorrenti, S.: Sunshine duration variability and trends in
Italy from homogenized instrumental time series (1936–2013), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 3622–3641, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022560" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014jd022560</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mariotti, L., Coppola, E., Sylla, M. B., Giorgi, F., and Piani, C.: Regional
climate model simulation of projected 21st century climate change over an
all-Africa domain: Comparison analysis of nested and driving model results,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D15111, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015068" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010jd015068</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Menon, S., Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., and Luo, Y. F.: Climate effects of
black carbon aerosols in China and India, Science, 297, 2250–2253,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075159" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1075159</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Ohmura, A.: Observed long-term variations of solar irradiance at the earth's
surface, Space Sci. Rev., 125, 111–128, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9050-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11214-006-9050-9</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, S. S., Piao, S. L., Zeng, Z. Z., Ciais, P., Zhou, L. M., Li, L. Z. X.,
Myneni, R. B., Yin, Y., and Zeng, H.: Afforestation in China cools local land
surface temperature, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 2915–2919,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315126111" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1315126111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ren, G., Xu, M., Chu, Z., Guo, J., Li, Q., Liu, X., and Wang, Y.: Changes of
Surface Air Temperature in China During 1951–2004, Climatic and
Environmental Research, 10, 717–727, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ren, Z. H., Zhou, F. L., Yu, Y., Wang, G. A., Zhou, Z. F., Feng, S. H., Zhang, Z. Q., and  Sun, C.: China National
Stations'
Fundamental Elements Datasets V3.0, China's National Meteorological Information Centre, available at: <a href="http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/" target="_blank">http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/</a> (last access: 27 May 2015), 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Roy, I. and Haigh, J. D.: The influence of solar variability and the
quasi-biennial oscillation on lower atmospheric temperatures and sea level
pressure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11679–11687,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11679-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-11679-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Sanchez-Lorenzo, A. and Wild, M.: Decadal variations in estimated surface
solar radiation over Switzerland since the late 19th century, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 8635–8644, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8635-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-8635-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Seneviratne, S. I., Corti, T., Davin, E. L., Hirschi, M., Jaeger, E. B.,
Lehner, I., Orlowsky, B., and Teuling, A. J.: Investigating soil
moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review, Earth-Sci.
Rev, 99, 125–161, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, D. J. and Varis, O.: Climate change in China, Ambio, 30, 381–383,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0381:ccic]2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0381:ccic]2.0.co;2</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, M. G., Piao, S. L., Jeong, S. J., Zhou, L. M., Zeng, Z. Z., Ciais, P.,
Chen, D. L., Huang, M. T., Jin, C. S., Li, L. Z. X., Li, Y., Myneni, R. B.,
Yang, K., Zhang, G. X., Zhang, Y. J., and Yao, T. D.: Evaporative cooling
over the Tibetan Plateau induced by vegetation growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 112, 9299–9304, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504418112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1504418112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, X. J., Liu, B. H., Li, G. D., Wu, Z. F., Jin, Y. H., Yu, P. J., and
Zhou, D. W.: Spatiotemporal change of diurnal temperature range and its
relationship with sunshine duration and precipitation in China, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 13163–13179, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022326" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014jd022326</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, G. Y., Hayasaka, T., Ohmura, A., Chen, Z. H., Wang, B., Zhao, J. Q.,
Che, H. Z., and Xu, L.: Data quality assessment and the long-term trend of
ground solar radiation in China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 1006–1016,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2007jamc1493.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2007jamc1493.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Stanhill, G. and Cohen, S.: Global dimming: a review of the evidence for a
widespread and significant reduction in global radiation with discussion of
its probable causes and possible agricultural consequences, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 107, 255–278, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00241-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00241-0</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Zhang, X. B., Ren, G. Y., Zwiers, F. W., and Hu, T.: Contribution of
urbanization to warming in China, Nature Climate Change, 6, 706–709,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2956" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nclimate2956</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, W.-J., Yang, K., Qin, J., Cheng, C. C. K., and He, J.: Solar radiation
trend across China in recent decades: a revisit with quality-controlled data,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 393–406, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-393-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-393-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, J. R., Randel, W. J., and Jensen, E. J.: Cirrus cloud-temperature
interactions in the tropical tropopause layer: a case study, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 10085–10095, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10085-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-10085-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Tebaldi, C., Smith, R. L., Nychka, D., and Mearns, L. O.: Quantifying
uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: A Bayesian approach
(vol 18, pg 1524, 2005), J. Climate, 18, 3405–3405, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI9001.1a" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI9001.1a</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Vautard, R., Yiou, P., and van Oldenborgh, G. J.: Decline of fog, mist and
haze in Europe over the past 30 years, Nat. Geosci., 2, 115–119,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo414" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo414</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Vose, R. S., Easterling, D. R., and Gleason, B.: Maximum and minimum
temperature trends for the globe: An update through 2004, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 32, L23822, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005gl024379" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005gl024379</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wallace, J. M., Fu, Q., Smoliak, B. V., Lin, P., and Johanson, C. M.:
Simulated versus observed patterns of warming over the extratropical Northern
Hemisphere continents during the cold season, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109,
14337–14342, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204875109" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1204875109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. and Dickinson, R. E.: Contribution of solar radiation to decadal
temperature variability over land, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
14877–14882, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311433110" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1311433110</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. and Dickinson, R. E.: Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation
at the surface from ground-based observations, satellite retrievals, and
reanalyses, Rev. Geophys., 51, 150–185, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rog.20009" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/rog.20009</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Dickinson, R. E., Wild, M., and Liang, S.: Evidence for decadal
variation in global terrestrial evapotranspiration between 1982 and 2002: 1.
Model development, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20112,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013847" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JD013847</a>, 2010a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Dickinson, R. E., Wild, M., and Liang, S.: Evidence for decadal
variation in global terrestrial evapotranspiration between 1982 and 2002: 2.
Results, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20113, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013671" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD013671</a>,
2010b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K., Ma, Q., Li, Z., and Wang, J.: Decadal variability of surface
incident solar radiation over China: Observations, satellite retrievals, and
reanalyses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 6500–6514,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023420" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015jd023420</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. C.: Measurement Biases Explain Discrepancies between the Observed
and Simulated Decadal Variability of Surface Incident Solar Radiation, Sci.
Rep., 4, 6144, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06144" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep06144</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. C. and Dickinson, R. E.: A review of global terrestrial
evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic
variability, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2005, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011rg000373" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011rg000373</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. C. and Liang, S. L.: Estimation of Daytime Net Radiation from
Shortwave Radiation Measurements and Meteorological Observations, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 48, 634–643, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008jamc1959.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2008jamc1959.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. C. and Zhou, C. L. E.: Regional Contrasts of the Warming Rate over
Land Significantly Depend on the Calculation Methods of Mean Air Temperature,
Sci. Rep., 5, 12324, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12324" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep12324</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. C., Li, Z. Q., and Cribb, M.: Estimation of evaporative fraction
from a combination of day and night land surface temperatures and NDVI: A new
method to determine the Priestley-Taylor parameter, Remote Sens. Environ.,
102, 293–305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.007</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, K. C., Dickinson, R. E., Wild, M., and Liang, S.: Atmospheric impacts
on climatic variability of surface incident solar radiation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9581–9592, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9581-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-9581-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Wang, K., and Su, L.: Contribution of Atmospheric Diffusion
Conditions to the Recent Improvement in Air Quality in China, Sci. Rep., 6,
36404, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36404" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep36404</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Weng, Q. H., Lu, D. S., and Schubring, J.: Estimation of land surface
temperature-vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies,
Remote Sens. Environ., 89, 467–483, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wild, M.: Enlightening global dimming and brightening, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
93, 27–37, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-11-00074.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00074.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Wild, M., Ohmura, A., and Makowski, K.: Impact of global dimming and
brightening on global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04702,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028031" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006gl028031</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Xia, X.: A closer looking at dimming and brightening in China during
1961–2005, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1121–1132, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1121-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-28-1121-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, K., Koike, T., and Ye, B. S.: Improving estimation of hourly, daily,
and monthly solar radiation by importing global data sets, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 137, 43–55, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.02.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.02.001</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, Z., Wang, H., and Chen, H.: Understanding severe winter haze events in
the North China Plain in 2014: roles of climate anomalies, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 1641–1651, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1641-2017" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-17-1641-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
You, Q. L., Min, J. Z., Jiao, Y., Sillanpaa, M., and Kang, S. C.: Observed
trend of diurnal temperature range in the Tibetan Plateau in recent decades,
Int. J. Climatol., 36, 2633–2643, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.4517" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/joc.4517</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zhai, P. M., Zhang, X. B., Wan, H., and Pan, X. H.: Trends in total
precipitation and frequency of daily precipitation extremes over China, J.
Climate, 18, 1096–1108, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jcli-3318.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/jcli-3318.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Sun, Y., Mao, W., Liu, Y., and Ren, Y.: Regional Response of
Temperature Change in the Arid Regions of China to Global Warming, Arid. Zone
Res., 27, 592–599, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z. X., Li, N., Wang, X., Liu, F., and Yang, L. P.: A Comparative Study
of Urban Expansion in Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan from the 1970s to 2013,
Remote. Sen., 8, 496, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8060496" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/rs8060496</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, C. L. and Wang, K. C.: Coldest Temperature Extreme Monotonically
Increased and Hottest Extreme Oscillated over Northern Hemisphere Land during
Last 114 Years, Sci. Rep., 6, 25721, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25721" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep25721</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L. M., Dickinson, R. E., Tian, Y. H., Fang, J. Y., Li, Q. X., Kaufmann,
R. K., Tucker, C. J., and Myneni, R. B.: Evidence for a significant
urbanization effect on climate in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101,
9540–9544, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400357101" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0400357101</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L. M., Dickinson, R. E., Tian, Y. H., Vose, R. S., and Dai, Y. J.:
Impact of vegetation removal and soil aridation on diurnal temperature range
in a semiarid region: Application to the Sahel, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104,
17937–17942, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700290104" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0700290104</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L. M., Dai, A., Dai, Y. J., Vose, R., Zou, C. Z., Tian, Y. H., and
Chen, H. S.: Spatial dependence of diurnal temperature range trends on
precipitation from 1950 to 2004, Clim. Dynam., 32, 429–440,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0387-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0387-5</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L. M., Dickinson, R. E., Dai, A. G., and Dirmeyer, P.: Detection and
attribution of anthropogenic forcing to diurnal temperature range changes
from 1950 to 1999: comparing multi-model simulations with observations, Clim.
Dynam., 35, 1289–1307, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0644-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0644-2</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y. Q. and Ren, G. Y.: Change in extreme temperature event frequency
over mainland China, 1961–2008, Climate Res., 50, 125–139,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr01053" target="_blank">doi:10.3354/cr01053</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
