<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Wintertime aerosol chemistry and haze evolution in an extremely polluted
city of the North China Plain: significant contribution from coal and biomass
combustion</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Wintertime aerosol chemistry and haze evolution in the polluted NCP}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Haiyan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4750-7477</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Qi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-8778</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Qiang</given-names></name>
          <email>qiangzhang@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chunrong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Litao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Zhe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Shan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Parworth</surname><given-names>Caroline</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-9481</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Bo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-3445</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Canonaco</surname><given-names>Francesco</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Prévôt</surname><given-names>André S. H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Ping</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Hongliang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Wallington</surname><given-names>Timothy J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9810-6326</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4 aff9">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Kebin</given-names></name>
          <email>hekb@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 PSI Villigen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Handix LLC, Boulder, CO 8031, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Research &amp; Advanced Engineering, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI 28121, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Qiang Zhang (qiangzhang@tsinghua.edu.cn) and Kebin He (hekb@tsinghua.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>4751</fpage><lpage>4768</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The North China Plain (NCP) frequently experiences heavy haze pollution,
particularly during wintertime. In winter 2015–2016, the NCP region suffered
several extremely severe haze episodes with air pollution red alerts issued
in many cities. We have investigated the sources and aerosol evolution
processes of the severe pollution episodes in Handan, a typical
industrialized city in the NCP region, using real-time measurements from an
intensive field campaign during the winter of 2015–2016. The average
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentration of submicron aerosol (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) during
3 December 2015–5 February 2016 was
187.6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>137.5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the hourly maximum reaching
700.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Organic was the most abundant component, on
average accounting for 45 % of total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass, followed by sulfate
(15 %), nitrate (14 %), ammonium (12 %), chloride (9 %) and
black carbon (BC, 5 %). Positive matrix factorization (PMF) with the multilinear engine
(ME-2) algorithm identified four major organic aerosol (OA) sources, including traffic
emissions represented by a hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA, 7 % of total OA),
industrial and residential burning of coal represented by a coal combustion
OA (CCOA, 29 % of total OA), open and domestic combustion of wood and
crop residuals represented by a biomass burning OA (BBOA, 25 % of total
OA), and formation of secondary OA (SOA) in the atmosphere represented by an
oxygenated OA (OOA, 39 % of total OA). Emissions of primary OA (POA),
which together accounted for 61 % of total OA and 27 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, are
a major cause of air pollution during the winter. Our analysis further
uncovered that primary emissions from coal combustion and biomass burning
together with secondary formation of sulfate (mainly from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted
by coal combustion) are important driving factors for haze evolution.
However, the bulk composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed comparatively small variations
between less polluted periods (daily
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and severely polluted periods
(daily PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating relatively
synchronous increases of all aerosol species during haze formation. The case
study of a severe haze episode, which lasted 8 days starting with a steady
buildup of aerosol pollution followed by a persistently high level of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(326.7–700.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), revealed the significant influence of
stagnant meteorological conditions which acerbate air pollution in the Handan
region. The haze episode ended with a shift of wind which brought in cleaner
air masses from the northwest of Handan and gradually reduced PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Aqueous-phase reactions under higher relative humidity (RH) were found to
significantly promote the production of secondary inorganic species
(especially sulfate) but showed little influence on SOA.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Atmospheric particles are a complex mixture of species emitted
directly to the atmosphere or formed via gas-to-particle conversions.
Aerosols can reduce visibility, adversely affect human health (Pope III and
Dockery, 2006), and influence climate change directly by absorbing and
reflecting solar radiation and indirectly by modifying cloud formation and
properties (Pöschl, 2005; Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006), all of which are intrinsically linked to the chemical
composition of aerosols. Therefore, it is crucial to gain a quantitative
understanding of aerosol composition and evolution processes for accurately
assessing the environmental effects of aerosols.</p>
      <p>With the rapid economic growth and urbanization in the North China Plain (NCP),
air pollution in this region has become a severe problem and a source of
concern. Hebei Province, located in the NCP region, is known for persistent
air quality problems and extreme haze pollution events. According to the
Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) of China, 7 out of the top 10
polluted cities in China in 2015 were located in Hebei Province. During the
extremely severe haze event that occurred in the winter of 2015–2016 in the
NCP region, the hourly peak PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in southern Hebei
exceeded 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is well known that the severe air
pollution in the NCP region was caused by large anthropogenic emissions and
unfavorable meteorological conditions. Emissions of primary PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) from Hebei
in 2015 are estimated to account for 8, 6, and 7 % of China's national
total emissions, respectively (<uri>http://meicmodel.org/</uri>), with large
contributions from coal and biomass combustion.</p>
      <p>Large anthropogenic emissions in the NCP region have degraded regional air
quality significantly. Extensive studies have been conducted to explore the
sources and evolution of haze episodes in Beijing, especially with the wide
application of the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS)/Aerosol Chemical
Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for online measurement of aerosol chemical
composition (Takegawa et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2010, 2012, 2013a, b, 2014,
2015, 2016a, b; Zhang et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2016). These studies have
noted that regional air transport from the southern or eastern surrounding regions,
unfavorable synoptic conditions, and heterogeneous secondary reactions
associated with high relative humidity (RH) initiated the rapid formation and persistent
evolution of haze episodes in Beijing. During a record-breaking haze episode
in wintertime in Beijing, Sun et al. (2014) estimated that regional transport
contributed up to 66 % of the steep rise of air pollutants in Beijing.
New particle formation and growth also play an important role in haze
formation. By examining in detail the haze events under typical fall
conditions in Beijing, Guo et al. (2014) indicated that nucleation
consistently preceded a polluted period with high number concentrations of nano-sized particles and
the development of the episode involved efficient and sustained growth from
the nucleation-mode particles over multiple days. In addition, organic
aerosol (OA) was found to be a major component of aerosol particles,
accounting for more than one-third of total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass. The primary OA (POA)
from traffic, cooking, biomass burning, coal combustion, etc., and secondary
OA (SOA) have been distinguished and quantified mainly using positive matrix
factorization (PMF; Paatero and Tapper, 1994). Recently, a novel PMF
procedure, with the multilinear engine (ME-2) algorithm, was developed to
apportion the OA sources in Beijing and Xi'an, allowing for a more objective
selection of source apportionment solution (Elser et al., 2016). However, our
knowledge of the sources and aerosol evolution processes for the whole region
still remains incomplete and is especially limited for areas outside of
Beijing. For other areas in the NCP region, such as Hebei Province, only a
limited number of aerosol studies have been conducted using offline
filter-based measurement techniques (Zhao et al., 2013; Wei et al., 2014).
Due to low time resolution varying from 1 day to several days, these
studies provided relatively limited information on aerosol emission sources
and formation processes; thus it remains unclear how the rapid haze evolution
happens and what the driving sources are for the air pollution problems in
Hebei. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct research in the areas outside of
Beijing, especially many provinces subjected to high anthropogenic emissions,
which may provide critical information to help air pollution policy making to
be more direct and efficient.</p>
      <p>To fill this knowledge gap, an intensive field campaign with multiple
state-of-the-art research instruments was conducted in Handan, a major city
in southern Hebei, during the winter of 2015–2016. Handan is located in the
intersectional area of four provinces – Hebei, Shanxi, Henan, and Shandong
– all of which are heavily urbanized and industrialized (Fig. 1a). Handan
itself is also well known for heavy industrial production of steel, iron, and
cement, which results in high local emissions of air pollutants. According to
the routine monitoring of the China National Environmental Monitoring Center
(CNEMC) from 2013 to 2015, Handan is always listed as 1 of the top 10
polluted cities in China. Hence, this location and its specific conditions
allow for a detailed exploration of aerosol chemistry and haze evolution
processes under high anthropogenic emissions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Location of the sampling site in Handan in the North China
Plain. The map is color-coded by annual organic carbon emission rates modeled
by the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC,
<uri>http://www.meicmodel.org</uri>). The grid size is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Wind rose plot colored by wind speed for the
entire period. Radial scales correspond to the frequency.
<bold>(c)</bold> Compositional pie chart of submicron aerosol for the whole
study, where the total organic fraction is outlined in green.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Here, we provide both overview and evolution cycle analyses of aerosol
characteristics using aerosol data acquired with an ACSM and collocated
measurements of black carbon (BC), meteorological conditions, and gas-phase
species. The sources of OA are investigated in detail using PMF solved with
the ME-2 algorithm (Paatero, 1999). Comparison of species diurnal cycles
between weekdays and weekends, and polluted and non-polluted days, and the
variation of aerosol characteristics with increasing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
provide insights into the driving factors for haze evolution. We also examine
the impacts of meteorological conditions based on an intense evolution case
of submicron aerosol.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling site and instrumentation</title>
      <p>In situ measurements were conducted at Hebei University of Engineering
(36.57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 114.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in Handan from 3 December 2015 to
5 February 2016. Our sampling site is situated at the southeast edge of urban
Handan, on the roof of a four-story building (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 m high), surrounded
by the school and residential area, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> north of South
Ring Road, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> northeast of Handa Highway (S313). The
ambient temperature varied from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.7 to 14.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, with an average
of 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The prevailing wind came from the northeast and
southwest, characterized by low wind speeds (Fig. 1b).</p>
      <p>The mass concentrations of non-refractory submicron aerosol (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) –
including organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride – were measured
in situ using an Aerodyne ACSM. The detailed description of this instrument
can be found in Ng et al. (2011a). In brief, ambient air was sampled through
a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone to remove coarse particles with diameters exceeding
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then traversed a 2 m long, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in. (outer
diameter) stainless-steel tube at a flow rate of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using
an external pump. A Nafion dryer was installed before the ACSM to dry aerosol
samples and maintain the RH below 30 %. Subsequently, only a subset of
the flow at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was sampled through a
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> critical orifice, focusing aerosol particles between
40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the vacuum chamber via an aerodynamic
lens. In our study, the ACSM mass spectrometer was operated at a scanning
speed of 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ms</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">amu</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 to 150. By automatically switching 14 cycles
between filter mode and sample mode, the time resolution for the ACSM data in
this study was approximately 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Because of the limit of the vaporizer temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C),
the ACSM could not measure refractory species such as BC. Thus a multi-angle
absorption photometer (MAAP, Thermo Scientific model 5012) was deployed for
real-time measurement of BC concentration. The MAAP was operated at an
incident light wavelength of 670 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone and a
drying system incorporated in front of the sampling line (Petzold and
Schönlinner, 2004; Petzold et al., 2005). Online PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
concentration was measured simultaneously using a heated Tapered Element
Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM series 1400a, Thermo Scientific). Other
collocated instruments included a suite of commercial gas analyzers (Thermo
Scientific) to monitor the variations of gaseous species (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Meteorological parameters – i.e., temperature, RH, pressure, wind speed
(WS), and wind direction (WD) – were obtained by a Lufft WS500-UMB Smart Weather
Sensor. The data reported in this paper are in Beijing Time (BJT: UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>ACSM data analysis</title>
      <p>The mass concentrations of non-refractory aerosol species and the spectral
matrices of OA were processed using ACSM standard data analysis software
(v1.5.3.5) within Igor Pro version 6.37. The detailed procedures have been
described in Ng et al. (2011a). The default relative ionization efficiency
(RIE) values were used for organics (1.4), sulfate (1.19), nitrate (1.1), and
chloride (1.3), whereas the RIE of ammonium (6.28) was directly determined
via analyzing pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles. To account for the incomplete
detection of aerosol species, a default collection efficiency (CE) value of
0.5 was applied to the entire data set as aerosol particles were dried before
ACSM sampling and the ammonium nitrate fraction was always lower than 0.4
during the whole period. Although previous studies have shown that aerosol
particles may be slightly acidic during wintertime in the NCP region,
particle acidity was not high enough to affect CE values substantially (Sun
et al., 2016a). As shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, the mass
concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BC) correlated tightly with
total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass loadings measured by TEOM (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Compared to the results reported previously in this area (Sun et
al., 2013a, 2014, 2015; Zhang et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2016), the ratio of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to TEOM-determined PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in this work appeared to be a bit
higher. The difference may be due to (1) the contribution of semi-volatile
species to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied greatly among different periods and different
locations, because TEOM is heated to 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the measurement,
which might have caused significant losses of semi-volatile species, for example,
ammonium nitrate and semi-volatile organics; and (2) the contribution of
particles in the size range of 1–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
might also change among different pollution episodes and different sites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of <bold>(a)</bold> ambient air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
relative humidity (RH); <bold>(b)</bold> wind direction (WD) colored by wind
speed (WS); <bold>(c)</bold> mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<bold>(d)</bold> mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(e)</bold> mass
concentrations of organics, sulfate, and nitrate; <bold>(f)</bold> mass
concentrations of ammonium, chloride, and black carbon; <bold>(g)</bold> mass
fractional contribution of chemical species to total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the time
series of total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration plotted in black on the right
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; <bold>(h)</bold> mass fractional contribution to total OA mass of the
four factors derived from PMF analysis with the time series of organic
aerosol plotted in green on the right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis. Days violating the CNAAQS for
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are highlighted in pale green.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Positive matrix factorization analysis</title>
      <p>To determine potential sources of OA, the ACSM mass spectra were processed
using the ME-2 algorithm implemented with the toolkit SoFi (Source Finder)
developed by Canonaco et al. (2013). The so-called <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value approach allows
the user to introduce a priori information in forms of known factor profiles
or time series to obtain a rather unique solution and thus reduce the
rotational ambiguity of the PMF2 algorithm. The spectra and error matrices of
organics were prepared according to the protocol summarized by Ulbrich et
al. (2009) and Zhang et al. (2011). Given the interferences of the internal
standard of naphthalene at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 127–129 and the low signal-to-noise ratio
of larger ions, we only considered ions up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 in this study. A
reference hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA) profile, which is an average of multiple ambient data sets
taken from Ng et al. (2011b), was introduced to constrain the model
performance with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values varying from 0 to 1. Following the guidelines
presented by Canonaco et al. (2013) and Crippa et al. (2014), an optimal
solution involving four factors with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.1 was accepted. Detailed
analyses of the factor time series, mass spectra, diurnal patterns, and
correlations with external tracers can be found in the Supplement
(Figs. S2–S6). Note that, before using the ME-2 engine, we also
attempted to perform PMF analysis with the PMF2 algorithm for one to eight factors.
The solutions were thoroughly evaluated following the recommendations
outlined in Zhang et al. (2011), and the results of three- and four-factor
solutions at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">peak</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Figs. S7–S8. The
three-factor solution indicates the identification of a coal combustion OA
(CCOA), a biomass burning OA (BBOA), and an oxygenated OA (OOA). But the CCOA
factor seems to be mixed with the signals from hydrocarbon-like components
related to traffic emissions, which is especially evident given the two
noticeable peaks in the diurnal profile of the CCOA factor during morning and
evening rush hours. In the four-factor solution, the additional factor could
not be physically explained and showed indications of factor splitting.
Solutions with five to eight factors show further splitting and mixing of factors.
Our inability to separate an individual HOA factor using the PMF2 algorithm
is probably due to the minor contribution of traffic emissions in Handan,
consistent with the fact that the PMF2 algorithm tends to have difficulty in
accurately retrieving minor factors (Ulbrich et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Overview of aerosol characteristics</title>
      <p>Frequent and persistent haze episodes were observed during the campaign,
especially from 16 to 25 December 2015, when an extremely polluted and
long-lasting haze event occurred. Based on TEOM measurements, only 4 days met
the US National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS,
35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 24 h average of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 13 days
met the Chinese NAAQS (CNAAQS) Grade II (75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 24 h
average of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the whole study period of 65 days. In other words,
the daily average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations exceeded the US NAAQS and the
CNAAQS on 94 and 80 % of the days, respectively (Fig. 2). On
22 December, the daily PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration reached the highest value of
725.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to the first “red” haze alarm
(<uri>http://www.cma.gov.cn/kppd/kppdsytj/201310/t20131028_229921.html</uri>) ever
in Hebei Province. The meteorological conditions were stagnant with calm
winds throughout the study period (WS usually less than
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although relatively high WS (generally
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with cleaner air from the northwest of Handan
occasionally interrupted the haze evolution process (Fig. 2b). The RH varied
from 11.7 to 94.8 %, generally with higher values for more polluted
periods and lower values during cleaner periods. No precipitation occurred
throughout the entire campaign.</p>
      <p>Hourly PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations fluctuated dramatically from 4.2 to
700.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2g). The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
was 187.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, more than twice as high as that observed in
the well-known severe haze event occurring in Beijing in January 2013
(Sun et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). Organics constituted a major fraction
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, contributing 45 % on average during this study, followed by
sulfate (15 %), nitrate (14 %), and ammonium (12 %). The large
fraction of organics in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was comparable to previous observations in
other areas of the NCP during wintertime (Sun et al., 2013a; Zhang et al., 2013;
Huang et al., 2014). The average chloride contribution (9 %) is
relatively high compared to that previously observed in the NCP region. Submicron
nonrefractory chloride in the aerosol phase can be directly emitted from
different sources (e.g., biomass burning and coal combustion) (Lobert et
al., 1999; McCulloch et al., 1999) and formed in the atmosphere through
gas-to-particle conversion (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning) (Baek et
al., 2006). Considering that chloride demonstrated pronouncedly enhanced
peaks at night and that it showed good correlations with CCOA and BBOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.80, respectively), a large fraction of chloride during wintertime
was thought to be from primary emissions at night. On average, BC accounted
for 5 % of total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Its distinct peaks at morning and evening rush
hours suggested that BC was mainly associated with traffic emissions. In the
daytime, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was dominated by secondary species because of active
photochemistry, whereas the contributions of primary species were
significantly increased at night, probably caused by enhanced primary
emissions from fuel combustion coupled with shallow boundary layer height
(Fig. S9).</p>
      <p>Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an indicator of the intensities of anthropogenic
emissions. The hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was as high as 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
during the study period, higher than those observed in other areas of China
(Andreae et al., 2008; Quan et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2015). Interestingly,
the temporal pattern of organics tracked well with that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 2), implying that combustion emissions were a significant source
of organic aerosols in Handan, i.e., traffic, coal combustion, and biomass
burning. In addition, during severe haze episodes with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO concentrations, ozone remained at nearly zero for several days instead of
showing a regular diurnal variation, indicating active ozone titration by NO
and a strong influence of primary emissions on haze pollution in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Source apportionment of organic aerosol</title>
      <p>In this study, three POA factors (HOA, BBOA, and CCOA) and one SOA factor
(OOA) were resolved by analyzing the ACSM OA mass spectra using the ME-2
algorithm. OOA was the largest contributor to OA mass with an average
fraction of 39 % (Fig. 3). The traffic-related HOA only accounted for
7 % of total OA, which was in accordance with the fact that PMF analysis
performed with the PMF2 algorithm had difficulty retrieving it (see
Sect. 2.3 for more details). On average, primary sources dominated the OA
mass (61 %) during this winter study, consistent with the results from
previous winter studies in the NCP region (Sun et al., 2013a, 2016a; Zhang et
al., 2014; Hu et al., 2016). The discussion below focuses on the
characteristics, sources, and processes of each OA factor.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Hydrocarbon-like OA</title>
      <p>The HOA factor shows a mass spectrum highly similar to those of freshly
emitted traffic or other fossil combustion aerosols (Zhang et al., 2005a;
Lanz et al., 2007; Li et al., 2016a). Its profile is dominated by alkyl
fragment signatures, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 29, 43,
57) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27, 41, 55) ion series.
The time series of HOA correlated well with those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.74, respectively; Fig. 3e), two tracers of vehicle emissions.
The diurnal pattern of HOA (Fig. 3i) further confirmed the association of HOA
with traffic activities, as it showed two obvious peaks during morning and
evening rush hours. On average, HOA only accounted for 7 % of total OA in
Handan: a much smaller fraction than observed in the nearby megacities of
Beijing and Tianjin (Sun et al., 2013a; Wang et al., 2015). The small HOA
fraction in this study is consistent with findings from a previous source
apportionment study which revealed that transportation was a minor source of
atmospheric particles in Handan (Wang et al., 2014). Bivariate polar plots,
which present the concentrations of air pollutants as a function of WS and WD
using the OpenAir software (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012), demonstrated higher
concentrations of HOA under relatively low WS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
suggesting that HOA was substantially influenced by local emission sources,
in accordance with its primary characteristics (Fig. S10).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a–d)</bold> Mass spectra of hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA), coal
combustion OA (CCOA), biomass burning OA (BBOA), and oxygenated OA (OOA).
<bold>(e–h)</bold> Time series of OA factors and the corresponding tracer
compounds. <bold>(i–l)</bold> Diurnal patterns of OA factors.
<bold>(m)</bold> Average fractional pie chart of OA factors to total OA for the
campaign. <bold>(n)</bold> Average diurnal mass contributions of OA factors to
total OA, with the average diurnal concentration of organics on the right
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Coal combustion OA</title>
      <p>Although coal combustion has rarely been reported as an important source of
organic aerosols in the US or Europe, it is a large emitter of organics in
China (Cao et al., 2006). According to Zhang et al. (2008b), organic carbon
can contribute up to 70 % of emitted PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for different types of
coal combustion in China. During wintertime, coal is the primary fuel for
various industries (e.g., power generation, steel milling, and cement
production) as well as residential heating in the NCP region. Thus a
considerable contribution from coal combustion to OA concentration was
expected in this study. Compared to HOA and BBOA, the mass spectrum of CCOA
showed strong signals at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially a significant peak at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 115, and the temporal trend of CCOA correlated tightly with that of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 115 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 3). These findings are similar to observations
made in Beijing, Changdao, Xi'an, and Lanzhou during winter, where OA factors
representing coal combustion were determined (Hu et al., 2013; Elser et
al., 2016; Sun et al., 2016a; Xu et al., 2016). Further, a recent study by
W. Zhou et al. (2016) has shown that
the ACSM mass spectra of OA from residential coal combustion emissions tend
to present a high peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 115. In addition, CCOA was also found to
correlate relatively well with chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during this study,
consistent with the fact that coal combustion is also an important emission
source of chloride.</p>
      <p>Figure 4 compares the OA composition in this study with those of previous
winter studies in China. During wintertime, CCOA was observed to contribute a
significant fraction of the fine PM mass in regions to the north of the
Yangtze River (e.g., Beijing, Lanzhou, and Handan), due to domestic coal
combustion for heating in winter. However, little to no CCOA was observed in
areas located to the south of the Yangtze River – e.g., Nanjing, Jiaxing, and
Ziyang – mainly reflecting the lack of central heating provided by the Chinese
government in this region during winter. In this study, similar to the
results observed in Beijing and Lanzhou (Sun et al., 2013a; Hu et al., 2016;
Xu et al., 2016), CCOA on average accounted for 29 % of total OA, with a
minimum of 13 % at noon and a maximum of 32 % at midnight. However,
the average mass concentration of CCOA in Handan
(23.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was much higher than those observed in previous
studies. Given the high consumption of coal and the important role of coal
combustion for aerosol pollution in Handan, control of air pollutant
emissions from coal combustion through technology renewal is essential for
air quality improvement in this area.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Summary of the average <bold>(a)</bold> mass concentration and
<bold>(b)</bold> chemical composition of organic aerosols from winter studies in
China. The total concentration of OA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is shown on the
top of the bar in <bold>(a)</bold>. See Table S1 in the Supplement for detailed
information.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Biomass burning OA</title>
      <p>Biomass burning – including wildfires, forest and agricultural burning, and
domestic biofuel combustion – is one of the largest emission sources of
organics worldwide (Ramanathan et al., 2001). Biomass burning releases air
pollutants that have adverse effects on respiratory organs and reduce lung
function of human beings (Regalado et al., 2006). In the NCP region, during
the harvest seasons in summer and autumn with open agricultural burning,
biomass burning is a major influence on aerosol loadings and characteristics.
For example, at a suburban site near Beijing during summertime, Sun et
al. (2016b) observed that the contribution of BBOA to OA increased from
6 % during the non-biomass-burning period to 21 % during the biomass
burning period. During wintertime, as most previous studies of this region
were performed in the megacity of Beijing, where coal combustion dominates the
energy consumption, BBOA was seldom resolved or found to be a minor fraction
of total OA mass (Sun et al., 2013a, 2016a; Zhang et al., 2014; Huang et
al., 2014). However, for many small and medium-sized cities in the NCP
region, domestic combustion of wood and crop residuals for cooking and home
heating is very popular in the countryside during wintertime and could emit
large amounts of air pollutants (Zhang et al., 2008a; Ding et al., 2012). In
Hebei Province, biomass burning accounted for 52 % of primary organic
carbon emissions during the winter of 2015 according to the Multi-resolution
Emission Inventory for China (MEIC; <uri>http://meicmodel.org/</uri>).</p>
      <p>In this study, a BBOA factor with high mass concentrations was clearly
observed, the mass spectrum of which was characterized by the prominent peaks
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 and 73, two indicative tracers of biomass burning (Alfarra et
al., 2007; Aiken et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2010). The time series of BBOA
varied dramatically and correlated well with that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which was mainly emitted from combustion-related sources. BBOA showed clear
diurnal variations, with low mass concentrations occurring during daytime and
high mass concentrations arising at night. Consistent with the emission
inventory, BBOA on average accounted for 25 % of total OA mass, with an
average concentration of 20.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, much higher than that
observed in other areas of China during wintertime (Fig. 4), indicating the
important role of biomass burning emissions in aerosol pollution in Handan.
Polar plots showed that high BBOA concentrations were mainly related to local
emissions (Fig. S10), probably associated with cooking and residential
heating using biofuel.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Oxygenated OA</title>
      <p>Although two or more OOA factors with different oxidation degree and
formation pathways have been resolved in previous wintertime studies in China
(Xu et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016a), only one OOA factor was observed in our
study. The mass spectrum of OOA presented a pattern similar to those reported
before (e.g., Zhang et al., 2005b; Ng et al., 2010) with a prominent peak at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 (15.8 % of the total OOA signal). In addition, OOA showed a
temporal trend similar to those of sulfate and nitrate, and correlated
strongly with the sum of secondary inorganic species
(SIA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ammonium) (Fig. 5). The polar plots of
OOA and secondary inorganic species exhibited similar spatial distributions,
with high concentration hot spots located in the northeast, especially during
polluted periods (Fig. S10). The temporal variation profile of OOA was much
different from those of the POA factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 5). As shown in
Fig. 3, while POA varied dramatically between day and night due to the
influence of local emissions, the mass concentrations of OOA often built up
gradually and remained at high levels for several days until being swept away
by clean air masses. These results are consistent with OOA being
representative of SOA. Although the diurnal profile of OOA was overall flat
in this study, the mass fraction of OOA to total OA increased significantly
during daytime, reaching a maximum of 64 % at 14:00 BJT (Fig. 3n).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Scatterplots of <bold>(a)</bold> CO vs. POA,
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. POA, <bold>(c)</bold> BC vs. POA,
<bold>(d)</bold> SIA vs. OOA, and <bold>(e)</bold> POA vs. OOA.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Diurnal variations and insights into aerosol sources</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Weekdays versus weekends</title>
      <p>As air pollutants are mainly emitted from anthropogenic sources in Handan,
comparing the diurnal profiles of aerosol species between weekdays and
weekends would provide insights into the variations of different emission
sources and atmospheric processes. Generally speaking, weekdays span Monday
to Friday, whereas weekends include Saturday and Sunday. However, because the
physical and chemical processes in the atmosphere are not completed
instantaneously, the variations of aerosol species may be influenced by the
carryover effect of the previous day. Thus, we alternatively define weekdays
as being from Tuesday to Friday and weekends as only including Sunday. With this
classification, differences in the diurnal variations between weekdays and
weekends are more visible. Comparisons of the diurnal cycles using the
Monday–Friday and Saturday–Sunday definitions are presented in the
Supplement (Fig. S11).</p>
      <p>As displayed in Fig. 6, the diurnal variations of meteorological parameters
did not significantly change from weekdays to weekends, providing a good
opportunity to investigate the influence of anthropogenic activities. As
expected, the diurnal pattern of HOA, which is associated with traffic
emissions, presented a more distinct morning peak on weekdays. This was also
the case for BC, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are all fossil fuel combustion
tracers. However, the evening rush hour peaks of these species did not show
much of a difference between weekdays and weekends, indicating that human
activities in the evening were not significantly reduced on weekends. Other
aerosol species showed generally similar diurnal trends for weekdays and
weekends, similar to the results observed in Beijing (Sun et al., 2013a). In
contrast, stronger weekday vs. weekend differences were observed in the US,
where the mass concentrations of aerosol species are obviously lower during
weekends (Young et al., 2016; S. Zhou
et al., 2016). Results from the present study reveal that active
anthropogenic emissions tend to persist throughout the entire week in
polluted regions in Handan, leading to limited differences in the
concentrations and compositions of major air pollutants between weekdays and
weekends. The exception is traffic emissions, for which the morning rush hour
peak is more prominent during weekdays.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average diurnal profiles along with the standard deviation of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species, four OA factors identified by PMF analysis, various
gas-phase species, and meteorological parameters on weekdays (Tuesday to
Friday inclusive) and weekends (Sunday only) during the campaign.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average diurnal cycles of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species, four OA factors
identified via PMF analysis, various gas-phase species, and meteorological
parameters on polluted and non-polluted days. The mass concentrations of
aerosol species during non-polluted periods are scaled by three factors to
highlight the differences in their diurnal trends on polluted and
non-polluted days.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> composition and bivariate polar plots
of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration as a function of wind speed and wind direction for
polluted and non-polluted periods. <bold>(b)</bold> Average concentration of PM
components, gas-phase species, and average meteorological conditions during
polluted and non-polluted days, with their polluted / non-polluted ratios shown
in the top panel.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Polluted versus non-polluted periods</title>
      <p>To gain further insights into the evolution of aerosol particles throughout
the day, especially during hazy conditions, we explored the diurnal
differences of meteorological conditions and air pollutants between polluted
and non-polluted days (Fig. 7). According to the CNAAQS Grade II of daily
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), only 13 days (out
of a total of 65 days) were found to meet the requirement and are considered
to be non-polluted in this study; the rest are defined as polluted periods.
Note that of these 13 non-polluted days, only 3 days achieved the 24 h
CNAAQS Grade I level of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The temperature was relatively low throughout the period, averaging 2.1 and
0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C on polluted and non-polluted days, respectively. The RH
during polluted periods was slightly higher during daytime, favoring the
aqueous-phase processing of atmospheric pollutants. The influence of RH is
discussed in detail in Sect. 3.5. Stagnant weather conditions with lower wind
speeds were observed on polluted days, especially during nighttime, which
would aggravate the accumulation of aerosol pollution. Unsurprisingly, the
mass concentrations of aerosol components and the mixing ratios of gaseous
species were much higher on polluted days. But the diurnal differences
between polluted and non-polluted periods could provide some information
regarding their evolutionary processes. The diurnal profiles of secondary
inorganic species (i.e., sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium) were flatter on
polluted days. For example, in the diurnal profile of nitrate during polluted
periods, the maximum and minimum concentrations were different by only
13 % or 4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This behavior is consistent with the
comparison of polar plots between polluted and non-polluted days (see Fig. S10), which
indicated a significant effect of regional transport on polluted periods for
secondary species. In contrast, the diurnal trends of primary aerosol
species – e.g., HOA, BBOA, and CCOA – during polluted periods differed
substantially from those during non-polluted periods. Compared to non-polluted days, the mass
concentrations of HOA, BBOA, and CCOA were strongly enhanced at nighttime on
polluted days. This suggests that the sharp increases of primary species at
night, especially those of BBOA and CCOA, may play an important role in haze
formation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Evolution of aerosol characteristics with increasing PM${}_{{1}}$
concentration}?><title>Evolution of aerosol characteristics with increasing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration</title>
      <p>Identifying the responsible emission sources and formation pathways during
haze events is essential to effectively implement emission controls,
especially considering the increased frequency of haze events during winter. In this
study, the whole period is divided into polluted and non-polluted days, as
described in Sect. 3.3.2. The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during polluted
days (211 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was more than 3 times higher than that
during non-polluted days (49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, the average
aerosol composition did not show obvious changes between these two types of
days, indicating the synchronous increase of all aerosol species (Fig. 8a).
Indeed, during polluted days, the average mass concentrations of all aerosol
species except for BC were approximately 4 times as high as those during
non-polluted days (Fig. 8b). Sulfate, CCOA, and BBOA showed the highest
polluted / non-polluted ratios, which were 5.3, 5.0, and 5.5, respectively
(Fig. 8b). Given the higher average RH on polluted days
(average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) than on non-polluted days
(average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), aqueous-phase processing
likely has increased the production of sulfate (Wang et al., 2012;
B. Zheng et al., 2015; Elser et
al., 2016). During polluted days, the average oxidation ratio of sulfur
(molar ratio of sulfate to sum of sulfate and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was 0.27, higher
than that on non-polluted days (0.16). On the other hand, the strong
increases of CCOA and BBOA were possibly caused by enhanced gas-to-particle
partitioning associated with high PM mass loadings during polluted periods
(Mader et al., 2002). Interestingly, compared to aerosol species, CO showed a
lower polluted / non-polluted ratio of approximately 2. A possible reason is
that CO has a longer atmospheric lifetime than aerosol particles do; thus
it has a more elevated regional background concentration. Note that the
polluted / non-polluted ratios for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were also
lower than for the aerosol species. This is potentially a result of
enhanced aqueous-phase oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as
more efficient wet deposition, since the more polluted periods were generally
more humid.</p>
      <p>Figure 9 further displays the average hourly variations of the mass fractions
of aerosol species as a function of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. The nitrate
fraction went up a bit and then showed a decreasing trend with increasing
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass loading, whereas the contribution of sulfate increased from 12
to 20 % as PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration developed from 100 to
600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since it was unlikely that the emission sources
of the main gaseous precursors of these two species (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) had changed significantly during our study, the observed changes
in aerosol compositions suggest different formation mechanisms of nitrate and
sulfate during wintertime. The substantially elevated production of sulfate
during high-PM episodes was likely attributable to higher ambient RH, which
facilitated sulfate production through aqueous-phase reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Kim et al., 2017; Li et al., 2016b; Sun et al., 2013b). The oxidation ratio
of sulfur increased from 0.1 to 0.4 when PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration rose from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 to 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mass fractions of different OA
factors varied widely as PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased. The contribution
of HOA to total PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was minor and remained relatively stable across all
mass loadings. However, the mass fractions of CCOA and BBOA increased nearly
linearly, with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations rising from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 to
300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and plateaued at higher aerosol loadings. OOA, a
surrogate of SOA, showed the opposite PM-loading dependency, and its
contribution decreased slightly with increasing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. The
study of Sun et al. (2013a) in Beijing also found a growing contribution of
CCOA and a declining contribution of OOA with increasing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations during wintertime. These results reveal the important role of
POA in the development of high PM pollution during wintertime. Indeed, the
scatterplot of OA vs. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. 9c) demonstrates that
higher mass fractions of organics in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were associated with elevated
POA contributions to total OA, especially when PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were
more than 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9c). Overall, the results here
suggest that secondary formation of sulfate (mainly from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted
by coal combustion), and primary emissions of organics from coal combustion
and biomass burning are important factors driving the development of winter
haze pollution in Handan.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Variations of the mass fractions of aerosol species
as a function of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. <bold>(c)</bold> Correlation plot of
organics and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, colored by the mass fraction of POA in
total OA.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Evolution of <bold>(a)</bold> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration; <bold>(b)</bold> wind
direction (WD) and wind speed (WS); <bold>(c)</bold> temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
relative humidity (RH); <bold>(d)</bold> mixing ratios of CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<bold>(e)</bold> mass fractions of aerosol species during a severe haze cycle
from 14 to 28 December 2016. The event was divided into five stages, with
back trajectories of each stage shown on the top.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Comparisons of <bold>(a)</bold> mass concentrations of all PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
species and <bold>(b)</bold> fractional contributions of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species between
“NW_HWS” and “others” for the entire study period. “NW_HWS”
refers to high winds from the northwestern areas, and “others” refers to
the remaining.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Variations of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <bold>(c)</bold> the mass fraction of SOA in total OA plotted against
increasing RH. The data are also binned according to RH values, and the mean
(cross), median (horizontal line), 25th and 75th percentiles (lower and upper
box), and 10th and 90th percentiles (lower and upper whiskers) are shown for
each bin.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/4751/2017/acp-17-4751-2017-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>A case study on an intense haze episode and the influence of
meteorological conditions</title>
      <p>From 14 to 28 December 2015, an extremely severe haze episode occurred and
was characterized by a steady buildup of air pollutants, including fine
particles and CO, over a period of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 days (17–21 December 2015)
followed by approximately 4 days of heavy air pollution, during which the
average CO mixing ratio was 6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration was 500.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10). This episode ended
on 25 December, during which winds from the northwest brought in cleaner air,
leading to dramatic reductions of air pollutants. This type of evolutionary
process has been frequently observed in Beijing during autumn and winter, and
it is called “sawtooth cycles” by Jia et al. (2008). In this study, the whole
haze cycle was divided into five stages: (1) a clean period (Stage 1), (2) an
almost linearly increasing period of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Stage 2),
(3) a remarkably high pollution period lasting for 4 days (Stage 3),
(4) an abruptly cleaned up period (Stage 4), and (5) another clean period as
the start of a new cycle (Stage 5). As shown in Fig. 10, each stage was
initiated by a sudden change in the WD and air masses from different regions
via the HYSPLIT back trajectories (Draxler and Rolph, 2013). This indicates
that meteorological changes are important driving forces during the evolution
of haze episodes.</p>
      <p>Stage 1 was characterized by high winds from the northwest, which brought
clean air masses from Western Siberia. Aerosols associated with this air mass
origin were largely free of high anthropogenic emissions and appeared to be
aged with a high contribution of secondary species. Consistently, the CO
concentration during stage 1 was relatively low. During stage 2, the WD
changed and the WS was lower than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The air masses from
the northern and southern areas of Handan were influenced by high
anthropogenic emissions in northern Hebei and Henan Province, respectively.
Thus, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration steadily increased during this stage, with
an average of 164.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Stage 3 was dominated by
southerly and northerly winds and really stagnant conditions with low WS. On
23 December air masses from the southern and northern areas of Hebei
circulated around Handan, leading to the accumulation of air pollutants
including PM and CO. The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during stage 3 was
500.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the hourly maximum reaching as high as
700.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, much higher than that observed during the
severe haze episode in Beijing in January 2013
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Sun et al., 2014). Accompanied with a
high CO concentration (average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) during stage 3,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration remained at a very low level of almost zero and with
minimal diurnal variations, suggesting that gas-phase oxidation might not be
a dominant mechanism for haze formation. Moreover, stage 3 was characterized
with high RH, exceeding 70 % most of the time, which would promote the
aqueous-phase formation of secondary species. Indeed, a high mass fraction of
secondary species, especially a notable increase in sulfate contribution, was
observed during stage 3. During stage 4, due to the return of cleaner air
masses long-distance transported from the northwest, air pollutant concentrations in
Handan decreased dramatically and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration decreased from 443.7
to 34.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within only 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>To further evaluate the influence of air mass origins on aerosol
characteristics, we performed a cluster analysis of HYSPLIT back
trajectories for the whole study period to elucidate the relationship between
aerosol concentration or composition and different clusters. As shown in
Fig. S12, the whole NCP region was heavily polluted, with high PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations for all four clusters. Overall, the aerosol compositions were
similar among different clusters. However, we indeed observed an important
role played by winds in altering aerosol characteristics according to the
above case study. Referring to the haze cycle analysis, we attempted to apply
another classification method based on WD and WS. Periods with WS exceeding
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the northwest of Handan were denoted as
“NW_HWS”, whereas the remaining periods were classified as “others”
(Fig. 11). As expected, the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of others was more
than 6 times higher than that of NW_HWS. Secondary aerosol species
(i.e., sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and OOA) contributed 66 % of total
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for NW_HWS. As air masses associated with others were
more strongly influenced by anthropogenic sources, the main primary species
(i.e., HOA, BBOA, CCOA, and BC), accounted for a higher fraction of 32 %
for others. These results highlight the importance of high winds from the
northwest of Handan in alleviating PM levels and changing aerosol composition
during wintertime.</p>
      <p>As mentioned previously, the sulfate contribution during stage 3 was visibly
enhanced under high RH, revealing the effects of RH on aerosol processing.
Many previous studies have observed the increased production of secondary
inorganic aerosol species through aqueous-phase processing. In this study, we
used the oxidation ratios of sulfur and nitrogen, defined as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
to explore the influence of RH on aerosol formation (Fig. 12). Under
relatively dry conditions (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %), both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were almost constant. However, when RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> started to increase linearly, similar to the results observed by
G. J. Zheng et al. (2015) in Beijing.
In comparison, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a small increase at RH 60–70 % and
then decreased a bit when RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %, suggesting different roles of
aqueous-phase reactions in the formation of sulfate and nitrate. Recently,
studies of aqueous-phase chemistry have paid increasing attention to organic
components. Ge et al. (2012) observed the strong enhancement of SOA during a
fog event in the Central Valley of California during winter. Based on
high-resolution mass spectra from an AMS, Sun et al. (2016a) retrieved an
aqueous-phase-processed SOA (aq-OOA) that tracked well with RH in Beijing
during wintertime. However, the mass fraction of SOA in total OA in this
study remained relatively stable and showed no dependency on RH (Fig. 12c).
The RH-binned bulk composition of submicron aerosol also only exhibited an
obvious increase of sulfate at high RH (Fig. S13). One explanation for this
observation is that the variations of SOA contribution may be largely
interfered with by high fractions of POA across different RH values. Another
explanation is that a portion of OOA formed through aqueous-phase reactions
may be incorporated into fog droplets, which are too large to be transmitted
into the ACSM aerodynamic lens, as reported by Ge et al. (2012). This
explanation is consistent with the results obtained by studying a fog event
in London, in which no increase in OOA concentration was detected by AMS
measurement, whereas the single-particle mass spectrometry observed
aqueous-phase SOA production (Dall'Osto et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>To characterize aerosol sources and formation processes under
high anthropogenic emissions in the NCP region, a field campaign was
conducted in Handan during the extremely polluted winter of 2015–2016. For
the entire study period, only 13 out of 65 days met the Chinese NAAQS
Grade II of 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for daily PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average
concentration of submicron aerosol was 187.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
hourly values fluctuating dramatically by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150, from 4.2
to 700.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Organics dominated the bulk composition of
submicron aerosols (44.6 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass), similar to previous
observations in the NCP region during wintertime. PMF analysis identified
three primary sources of organic aerosol – i.e., traffic, coal combustion, and
biomass burning – and one SOA factor. CCOA was the largest contributor to POA,
on average accounting for 29 %, followed by BBOA (25 %). The mass
fraction of HOA in total OA was only 7 %, indicating the minor
contribution of traffic emissions in Handan. Although the aerosol
concentration during polluted days was more than 3 times higher than that
during non-polluted days, little variation was observed in the average
aerosol bulk composition, revealing the relatively synchronous increase of
all aerosol species during haze evolution. Stagnant weather conditions, with
low wind speed and high RH, and strong enhancement of primary species at
nighttime prompted haze formation during polluted days. Variation of aerosol
mass fractions with hourly increasing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration further revealed
that secondary formation of sulfate (mainly from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted by coal
combustion) and primary emissions from coal combustion and biomass burning,
are important factors driving haze formation. This is mainly related to large
emissions of air pollutants from coal and biomass combustion during
wintertime, especially for simple household stoves with low combustion
efficiency. Overall, sulfate, chloride, and CCOA on average accounted for a
total of 37 % of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass (Fig. 1c), showing the important role of
coal combustion in air pollution in Handan. Given the continuing high
consumption of coal for various industries and residential heating in winter,
technology-based emission controls on coal combustion would effectively
improve the air quality in Handan.</p>
      <p>A severe haze episode that started with a steady buildup of aerosol
pollution followed by an abrupt clean period was studied. Our results
indicate the strong influence of meteorological conditions on haze evolution.
With high anthropogenic emissions around Handan, the whole study region was
heavily polluted. However, high aerosol loadings can be rapidly alleviated by
strong winds from the northwest. Under high RH (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %), the
oxidation ratio of sulfur increased linearly, suggesting the important role
of aqueous-phase chemistry in sulfate formation during wintertime. Results
from this study provide useful insights into aerosol chemistry and haze
evolution in Hebei Province during wintertime and have important
implications for pollution control in this heavily polluted area.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>Data presented in this manuscript are available upon request to the corresponding
authors.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-17-4751-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(41571130035 and 41625020) and the Ford Motor Company. Haiyan Li was partially
supported by the Doctoral Short-Term Visiting-Abroad Foundation of Tsinghua
University, Beijing. Qi Zhang acknowledges the Changjiang Scholars program
of the Chinese Ministry of Education. We also give special acknowledgement
to lab members in the Department of Environmental Engineering, Hebei
University of Engineering, Handan, China, whose help was invaluable in
setting up this field campaign.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: A. Ding  <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R.,
Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M.,
Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J.,
Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P.,
Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis
during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban
supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source
apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer,
S., Lanz, V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.:
Identification of the mass spectral signature of organic aerosols from wood
burning emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5770– 5777, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Schmid, O., Yang, H., Chand, D., Yu, J. Z., Zeng, L. M., and
Zhang, Y. H.: Optical properties and chemical composition of the atmospheric
aerosol in urban Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6335–6350, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Baek, B. H., Koziel, J., and Aneja, V. P.: A preliminary review of
gas-to-particle conversion, monitoring, and modeling efforts in the USA,
International Journal of Global Environmental Issues (IJGENVI), 6, 204–230,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2006.010155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1504/IJGENVI.2006.010155</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use
of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment:
ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6,
3649–3661, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, G., Zhang, X., and Zheng, F.: Inventory of black carbon and organic
carbon emissions from China, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6516–6527, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, D. C. and Ropkins, K.: <italic>openair</italic> – An R package for air
quality data analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27–28, 52–61, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D.,
Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo,
P. F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M.,
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski,
S., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger,
U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25
AMS data sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source
apportionment approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Coe, H., and Williams, P.: Real-time
secondary aerosol formation during a fog event in London, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 2459–2469, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2459-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2459-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, J., Zhong, J., Yang, Y., Li, B., Shen, G., Su, Y., Wang, C., Li, W.,
Shen, H., Wang, B., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Cao, H., Zhu, Y.,
Simonich, S. L., and Tao, S.: Occurrence and exposure to polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and their derivatives in a rural Chinese home through biomass
fuelled cooking, Environ. Pollut., 169, 160–166, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (Hybrid single-particle lagrangian
integrated trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website, NOAA Air
Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD, available at:
<uri>http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ HYSPLIT.php</uri> (last access: 2014), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Elser, M., Huang, R.-J., Wolf, R., Slowik, J. G., Wang, Q., Canonaco, F., Li,
G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Cao, J.,
Baltensperger, U., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: New insights
into PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition and sources in two major cities in China
during extreme haze events using aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 3207–3225, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Ge, X. L., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., Ruehl, C. R., and Setyan, A.: Effect of
aqueous-phase processing on aerosol chemistry and size distributions in
Fresno, California, during wintertime, Environ. Chem., 9, 221–235,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN11168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN11168</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J. F., Shang, D. J., Zheng, J., Du,
Z. F., Wu, Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R. Y.:
Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 17373–17378, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1419604111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Yuan, B., Jimenez, J. L., Tang, Q., Peng, J. F., Hu, W.,
Shao, M., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Wu, Y. S., Gong, Z. H., Huang, X. F., and
He, L. Y.: Insights on organic aerosol aging and the influence of coal
combustion at a regional receptor site of central eastern China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 10095–10112, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu, Y.,
Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical composition,
sources and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing: contrast between
summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024020</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzeti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga,
A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., SchnelleKreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An,
Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prévôt,
A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during
haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Jia, Y. T., Rahn, K. A., He, K. B., Wen, T. X., and Wang, Y. S.: A novel
technique for quantifying the regional component of urban aerosol solely from
its sawtooth cycles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D21309,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010389</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Zhang, Q., Bae, G.-N., Kim, J. Y., and Lee, S. B.: Sources and
atmospheric processing of winter aerosols in Seoul, Korea: insights from
real-time measurements using a high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2009–2033, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2009-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2009-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C.,
and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of submicron organic
aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass
spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1503–1522, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., Mack, L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Malm, W., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and
Collett, J. L.: Variation of chemical smoke marker emissions during flaming
vs. smoldering phases of laboratory open burning of wildland fuels, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 44, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.499884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.499884</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Zhang, Q., Duan, F., Zheng, B., and He, K.: The “Parade Blue”:
effects of short-term emission control on aerosol chemistry, Faraday
Discuss., 189, 317–335, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Li, H., Duan, F., He, K., Ma, Y., Kimoto, T., and Huang, T: Size-dependent
characterization of atmospheric particles during winter in Beijing,
Atmosphere, 7, 36, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos7030036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos7030036</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Lobert, J. M., Keene, W. C., Logan, J. A., and Yevich, R.: Global chlorine
emissions from biomass burning: Reactive Chlorine Emissions Inventory,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 8373–8389, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998jd100077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998jd100077</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Mader, B. T. and Pankow, J. F.: Study of the effects of particle-phase carbon
on the gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the
atmosphere using controlled field experiments, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
5218–5228, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>McCulloch, A., Aucott, M. L., Benkovitz, C. M., Graedel, T. E., Kleiman, G.,
Midgley, P. M., and Li, Y. F.: Global emissions of hydrogen chloride and
chloromethane from coal combustion, incineration and industrial activities:
Reactive Chlorine Emissions Inventory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 104, 8391–8403,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999jd900025</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P.,
Onasch, T. M., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for routine monitoring
of atmospheric aerosol composition, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 770–784, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-time methods for estimating organic component mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 910–916, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld,
J. H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P.: The multilinear engine – A table-driven, least squares program
for solving multilinear problems, including the n-way parallel factor
analysis model, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 8, 854–888, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive Matrix Factorization: a non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A. and Schonlinner, M.: Multi-angle absorption photometry – a new
method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric black
carbon, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 421–441, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A., Schloesser, H., Sheridan, P. J., Arnott, W. P., Ogren, J. A.,
and Virkkula, A.: Evaluation of multiangle absorption photometry for
measuring aerosol light absorption, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 40–51, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Pope III, C. A. and Dockery, D. W.: Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air
Pollution: Lines that Connect, J. Air Waste Manage., 56, 709–742, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Composition, Transformation, Climate
and Health Effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 44, 7520–7540, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Quan, J., Tie, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Li, X., Gao, Y., and Zhao, D.:
Characteristics of heavy aerosol pollution during the 2012– 2013 winter in
Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 88, 83–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.058</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosols,
climate and the hydrological cycle, Science, 294, 2119–2124, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Regalado, J., Pérez-Padilla, R., Sansores, R., Ramirez, J. I. P., Brauer,
M., Paré, P., and Vedal, S.: The effect of biomass burning on respiratory
symptoms and lung function in rural Mexican women, Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care,
174, 901–905, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 2nd Edn.,
1232 pp., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Y. M., Ng, N. L., Sun, Y. L.,
Jayne, J. T., Zhang, X. C., Zhang, X. Y., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time- and
size-resolved characterization of submicron aerosol particles in Beijing using an
Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 44, 131–140, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne,
J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing,
China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51,
250–259, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the Sources and Evolution Processes of Severe Haze Pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Du, W., Fu, P., Wang, Q., Li, J., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, C., Ren,
L., Xu, W., Zhao, J., Han, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, Z.: Primary and
secondary aerosols in Beijing in winter: sources, variations and processes,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8309–8329, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Xu Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Li, W., Wang, F., Li,
J., Wang, P., and Li, Z.: Aerosol characterization over the North China
Plain: Haze life cycle and biomass burning impacts in summer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 2508–2521, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024261</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J.,
and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime
in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge,
X. L.: The impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution
processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Pan,
X. L., Li, J., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Long-term real-time
measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal
variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 10149–10165, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Takegawa, N., Miyakawa, T., Kuwata, M., Kondo, Y., Zhao, Y., Han, S., Kita, K.,
Miyazaki, Y., Deng, Z., Xiao, R., Hu, M., van Pinxteren, D., Herrmann, H.,
Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Wahner, A., Blake, D. R., Sugimoto, N., and Zhu, T.:
Variability of submicron aerosol observed at a rural site in Beijing in the
summer of 2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00G05, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010857</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Cheng, S., Li, J., Lang, J., Wen, W., Yang, X., and Tian, L.:
Source apportionment and seasonal variation of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> carbonaceous aerosol in the
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China, Environ. Monit. Assess., 187, 143,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4288-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-015-4288-x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L. T., Wei, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, F. F., Su, J., Meng, C. C.,
and Zhang, Q.: The 2013 severe haze over southern Hebei, China: model
evaluation, source apportionment, and policy implications, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 3151–3173, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Wang, W., Yang, L., Gao, X., Nie, W., Yu, Y., Xu, P., Zhou, Y.,
and Wang, Z.: The secondary formation of inorganic aerosols in the droplet
mode through heterogeneous aqueous reactions under haze conditions, Atmos.
Environ., 63, 68–76, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Wei, Z., Wang, L. T., Chen, M. Z., and Zheng, Y.: The 2013 severe haze over
the Southern Hebei, China: PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> composition and source apportionment,
Atmos. Pollut. Res., 5, 759–768, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Xu, J., Shi, J., Zhang, Q., Ge, X., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
Vonwiller, M., Szidat, S., Ge, J., Ma, J., An, Y., Kang, S., and Qin, D.:
Wintertime organic and inorganic aerosols in Lanzhou, China: sources,
processes, and comparison with the results during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 14937–14957, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol
characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution
aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol
composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 7307–7336, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y. R., Liu, X. G., Qu, Y., An, J. L., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y. H., Sun,
Y. L., Wu, Z. J., Zhang, F., Xu, W. Q., and Ma, Q. X.: Characteristics and
formation mechanism of continuous hazes in China: a case study during the
autumn of 2014 in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8165–8178,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Young, D. E., Kim, H., Parworth, C., Zhou, S., Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Seco,
R., Kim, S., and Zhang, Q.: Influences of emission sources and meteorology on
aerosol chemistry in a polluted urban environment: results from DISCOVER-AQ
California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5427–5451,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5427-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5427-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang,
Y. S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious
pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into
sources and processes of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3289–3311,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005</ext-link>, 2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Deconvolution and quantification of
hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4938–4952, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Jing, J., Tao, J., Hsu, S.-C., Wang, G., Cao, J., Lee, C. S. L.,
Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., and Shen, Z.: Chemical characterization and
source apportionment of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing: seasonal perspective, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 7053–7074, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Dou, H., Chang, B., Wei, Z., Qiu, W., Liu, S., Liu, W., and Tao,
S.: Emission of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Indoor Straw Burning
and Emission Inventory Updating in China, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1140, 218–227,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1454.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1196/annals.1454.006</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Schauer, J. J., Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Wei, Y., Liu, Y., and Shao,
M.: Characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese
coal combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5068–5073, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, P. S., Dong, F., He, D., Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, W. Z., Yao,
Q., and Liu, H. Y.: Characteristics of concentrations and chemical
compositions for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4631–4644, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan,
F. K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism
missing in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation
during the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
2031–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Su, H., Ma, Y. L., Cheng, Y., Zheng, B., Zhang,
Q., Huang, T., Kimoto, T., Chang, D., Pöschl, U., Cheng, Y. F., and He,
K. B.: Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing: the impact of synoptic
weather, regional transport and heterogeneous reactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 2969–2983, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2969-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2969-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, S., Collier, S., Xu, J., Mei, F., Wang, J., Lee, Y. N., Sedlacek III,
A. J., Springston, S. R., Sun, Y., and Zhang, Q.: Influences of upwind
emission sources and atmospheric processing on aerosol chemistry and
properties at a rural location in the Northeastern US, J. Geophys. Res.-Amos., 121,
6049–6065, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024568</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, W., Jiang, J., Duan, L., and Hao, J.: Evolution of submicron organic
aerosols during a complete residential coal combustion process, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 7861–7869, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Wintertime aerosol chemistry and haze evolution in an extremely polluted city of the North China Plain: significant contribution from coal and biomass combustion</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The North China Plain (NCP) frequently experiences heavy haze pollution,
particularly during wintertime. In winter 2015–2016, the NCP region suffered
several extremely severe haze episodes with air pollution red alerts issued
in many cities. We have investigated the sources and aerosol evolution
processes of the severe pollution episodes in Handan, a typical
industrialized city in the NCP region, using real-time measurements from an
intensive field campaign during the winter of 2015–2016. The average
(±1<i>σ</i>) concentration of submicron aerosol (PM<sub>1</sub>) during
3 December 2015–5 February 2016 was
187.6 (±137.5) µg m<sup>−3</sup>, with the hourly maximum reaching
700.8 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. Organic was the most abundant component, on
average accounting for 45 % of total PM<sub>1</sub> mass, followed by sulfate
(15 %), nitrate (14 %), ammonium (12 %), chloride (9 %) and
black carbon (BC, 5 %). Positive matrix factorization (PMF) with the multilinear engine
(ME-2) algorithm identified four major organic aerosol (OA) sources, including traffic
emissions represented by a hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA, 7 % of total OA),
industrial and residential burning of coal represented by a coal combustion
OA (CCOA, 29 % of total OA), open and domestic combustion of wood and
crop residuals represented by a biomass burning OA (BBOA, 25 % of total
OA), and formation of secondary OA (SOA) in the atmosphere represented by an
oxygenated OA (OOA, 39 % of total OA). Emissions of primary OA (POA),
which together accounted for 61 % of total OA and 27 % of PM<sub>1</sub>, are
a major cause of air pollution during the winter. Our analysis further
uncovered that primary emissions from coal combustion and biomass burning
together with secondary formation of sulfate (mainly from SO<sub>2</sub> emitted
by coal combustion) are important driving factors for haze evolution.
However, the bulk composition of PM<sub>1</sub> showed comparatively small variations
between less polluted periods (daily
PM<sub>2. 5</sub>  ≤  75 µg m<sup>−3</sup>) and severely polluted periods
(daily PM<sub>2. 5</sub>  &gt;  75 µg m<sup>−3</sup>), indicating relatively
synchronous increases of all aerosol species during haze formation. The case
study of a severe haze episode, which lasted 8 days starting with a steady
buildup of aerosol pollution followed by a persistently high level of PM<sub>1</sub>
(326.7–700.8 µg m<sup>−3</sup>), revealed the significant influence of
stagnant meteorological conditions which acerbate air pollution in the Handan
region. The haze episode ended with a shift of wind which brought in cleaner
air masses from the northwest of Handan and gradually reduced PM<sub>1</sub>
concentration to  &lt;  50 µg m<sup>−3</sup> after 12 h.
Aqueous-phase reactions under higher relative humidity (RH) were found to
significantly promote the production of secondary inorganic species
(especially sulfate) but showed little influence on SOA.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Salcedo, D., Cubison, M. J., Huffman, J. A., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Ulbrich, I. M., Docherty, K. S., Sueper, D., Kimmel, J. R., Worsnop, D. R.,
Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., Volkamer, R. M.,
Fortner, E., de Foy, B., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J.,
Zhang, R., Gaffney, J., Marley, N. A., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P.,
Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico City aerosol analysis
during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban
supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source
apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633–6653,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer,
S., Lanz, V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.:
Identification of the mass spectral signature of organic aerosols from wood
burning emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5770– 5777, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Schmid, O., Yang, H., Chand, D., Yu, J. Z., Zeng, L. M., and
Zhang, Y. H.: Optical properties and chemical composition of the atmospheric
aerosol in urban Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6335–6350, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baek, B. H., Koziel, J., and Aneja, V. P.: A preliminary review of
gas-to-particle conversion, monitoring, and modeling efforts in the USA,
International Journal of Global Environmental Issues (IJGENVI), 6, 204–230,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2006.010155" target="_blank">doi:10.1504/IJGENVI.2006.010155</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Canonaco, F., Crippa, M., Slowik, J. G., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use
of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment:
ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6,
3649–3661, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-6-3649-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, G., Zhang, X., and Zheng, F.: Inventory of black carbon and organic
carbon emissions from China, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6516–6527, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, D. C. and Ropkins, K.: <i>openair</i> – An R package for air
quality data analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27–28, 52–61, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Crippa, M., Canonaco, F., Lanz, V. A., Äijälä, M., Allan, J. D.,
Carbone, S., Capes, G., Ceburnis, D., Dall'Osto, M., Day, D. A., DeCarlo,
P. F., Ehn, M., Eriksson, A., Freney, E., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Hillamo, R.,
Jimenez, J. L., Junninen, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kortelainen, A.-M.,
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Mensah, A. A., Mohr, C., Nemitz, E., O'Dowd, C.,
Ovadnevaite, J., Pandis, S. N., Petäjä, T., Poulain, L., Saarikoski,
S., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Tiitta, P., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger,
U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Organic aerosol components derived from 25
AMS data sets across Europe using a consistent ME-2 based source
apportionment approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6159–6176,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-6159-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Coe, H., and Williams, P.: Real-time
secondary aerosol formation during a fog event in London, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 2459–2469, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2459-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-2459-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, J., Zhong, J., Yang, Y., Li, B., Shen, G., Su, Y., Wang, C., Li, W.,
Shen, H., Wang, B., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Cao, H., Zhu, Y.,
Simonich, S. L., and Tao, S.: Occurrence and exposure to polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and their derivatives in a rural Chinese home through biomass
fuelled cooking, Environ. Pollut., 169, 160–166, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (Hybrid single-particle lagrangian
integrated trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website, NOAA Air
Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD, available at:
<a href="http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ HYSPLIT.php" target="_blank">http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ HYSPLIT.php</a> (last access: 2014), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Elser, M., Huang, R.-J., Wolf, R., Slowik, J. G., Wang, Q., Canonaco, F., Li,
G., Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Cao, J.,
Baltensperger, U., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: New insights
into PM<sub>2. 5</sub> chemical composition and sources in two major cities in China
during extreme haze events using aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 3207–3225, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-3207-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, X. L., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., Ruehl, C. R., and Setyan, A.: Effect of
aqueous-phase processing on aerosol chemistry and size distributions in
Fresno, California, during wintertime, Environ. Chem., 9, 221–235,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN11168" target="_blank">doi:10.1071/EN11168</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J. F., Shang, D. J., Zheng, J., Du,
Z. F., Wu, Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R. Y.:
Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, 17373–17378, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1419604111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Hu, M., Yuan, B., Jimenez, J. L., Tang, Q., Peng, J. F., Hu, W.,
Shao, M., Wang, M., Zeng, L. M., Wu, Y. S., Gong, Z. H., Huang, X. F., and
He, L. Y.: Insights on organic aerosol aging and the influence of coal
combustion at a regional receptor site of central eastern China, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 10095–10112, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-10095-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu, Y.,
Chen, C., Wang, Z., Peng, J., Zeng, L., and Shao, M.: Chemical composition,
sources and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing: contrast between
summer and winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1955–1977,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024020" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015JD024020</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzeti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga,
A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., SchnelleKreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An,
Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prévôt,
A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during
haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature13774</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, Y. T., Rahn, K. A., He, K. B., Wen, T. X., and Wang, Y. S.: A novel
technique for quantifying the regional component of urban aerosol solely from
its sawtooth cycles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D21309,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010389" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD010389</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, H., Zhang, Q., Bae, G.-N., Kim, J. Y., and Lee, S. B.: Sources and
atmospheric processing of winter aerosols in Seoul, Korea: insights from
real-time measurements using a high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2009–2033, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2009-2017" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-17-2009-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lanz, V. A., Alfarra, M. R., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Hueglin, C.,
and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Source apportionment of submicron organic
aerosols at an urban site by factor analytical modelling of aerosol mass
spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1503–1522, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-1503-2007</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., Mack, L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Malm, W., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and
Collett, J. L.: Variation of chemical smoke marker emissions during flaming
vs. smoldering phases of laboratory open burning of wildland fuels, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 44, 1–5, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.499884" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.499884</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Zhang, Q., Duan, F., Zheng, B., and He, K.: The “Parade Blue”:
effects of short-term emission control on aerosol chemistry, Faraday
Discuss., 189, 317–335, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Duan, F., He, K., Ma, Y., Kimoto, T., and Huang, T: Size-dependent
characterization of atmospheric particles during winter in Beijing,
Atmosphere, 7, 36, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos7030036" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/atmos7030036</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Lobert, J. M., Keene, W. C., Logan, J. A., and Yevich, R.: Global chlorine
emissions from biomass burning: Reactive Chlorine Emissions Inventory,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 8373–8389, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998jd100077" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1998jd100077</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Mader, B. T. and Pankow, J. F.: Study of the effects of particle-phase carbon
on the gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds in the
atmosphere using controlled field experiments, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
5218–5228, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
McCulloch, A., Aucott, M. L., Benkovitz, C. M., Graedel, T. E., Kleiman, G.,
Midgley, P. M., and Li, Y. F.: Global emissions of hydrogen chloride and
chloromethane from coal combustion, incineration and industrial activities:
Reactive Chlorine Emissions Inventory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 104, 8391–8403,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900025" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1999jd900025</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P.,
Onasch, T. M., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y. L., and Jayne,
J. T.: An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for routine monitoring
of atmospheric aerosol composition, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 770–784, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-time methods for estimating organic component mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 910–916, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld,
J. H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</a>, 2011c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P.: The multilinear engine – A table-driven, least squares program
for solving multilinear problems, including the n-way parallel factor
analysis model, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 8, 854–888, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive Matrix Factorization: a non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A. and Schonlinner, M.: Multi-angle absorption photometry – a new
method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric black
carbon, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 421–441, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A., Schloesser, H., Sheridan, P. J., Arnott, W. P., Ogren, J. A.,
and Virkkula, A.: Evaluation of multiangle absorption photometry for
measuring aerosol light absorption, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 40–51, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Pope III, C. A. and Dockery, D. W.: Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air
Pollution: Lines that Connect, J. Air Waste Manage., 56, 709–742, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Composition, Transformation, Climate
and Health Effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 44, 7520–7540, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Quan, J., Tie, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Li, X., Gao, Y., and Zhao, D.:
Characteristics of heavy aerosol pollution during the 2012– 2013 winter in
Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 88, 83–89,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.058" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.058</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosols,
climate and the hydrological cycle, Science, 294, 2119–2124, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Regalado, J., Pérez-Padilla, R., Sansores, R., Ramirez, J. I. P., Brauer,
M., Paré, P., and Vedal, S.: The effect of biomass burning on respiratory
symptoms and lung function in rural Mexican women, Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care,
174, 901–905, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 2nd Edn.,
1232 pp., 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Y. M., Ng, N. L., Sun, Y. L.,
Jayne, J. T., Zhang, X. C., Zhang, X. Y., and Worsnop, D. R.: Highly time- and
size-resolved characterization of submicron aerosol particles in Beijing using an
Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 44, 131–140, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.020</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Yang, T., Li, J., Pan, X., Chen, P., and Jayne,
J. T.: Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing,
China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor, Atmos. Environ., 51,
250–259, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.013</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., and Yin, Y.:
Investigation of the Sources and Evolution Processes of Severe Haze Pollution
in Beijing in January 2013, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4380–4398, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Du, W., Fu, P., Wang, Q., Li, J., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, C., Ren,
L., Xu, W., Zhao, J., Han, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, Z.: Primary and
secondary aerosols in Beijing in winter: sources, variations and processes,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8309–8329, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-8309-2016</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Xu Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Li, W., Wang, F., Li,
J., Wang, P., and Li, Z.: Aerosol characterization over the North China
Plain: Haze life cycle and biomass burning impacts in summer, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 121, 2508–2521, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024261" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015JD024261</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J.,
and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime
in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge,
X. L.: The impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution
processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q. Q., Fu, P. Q., Pan,
X. L., Li, J., Jayne, J., and Worsnop, D. R.: Long-term real-time
measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal
variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 10149–10165, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-10149-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Takegawa, N., Miyakawa, T., Kuwata, M., Kondo, Y., Zhao, Y., Han, S., Kita, K.,
Miyazaki, Y., Deng, Z., Xiao, R., Hu, M., van Pinxteren, D., Herrmann, H.,
Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Wahner, A., Blake, D. R., Sugimoto, N., and Zhu, T.:
Variability of submicron aerosol observed at a rural site in Beijing in the
summer of 2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00G05, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010857" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd010857</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix
Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2891–2918, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Cheng, S., Li, J., Lang, J., Wen, W., Yang, X., and Tian, L.:
Source apportionment and seasonal variation of PM<sub>2. 5</sub> carbonaceous aerosol in the
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China, Environ. Monit. Assess., 187, 143,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4288-x" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4288-x</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L. T., Wei, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, F. F., Su, J., Meng, C. C.,
and Zhang, Q.: The 2013 severe haze over southern Hebei, China: model
evaluation, source apportionment, and policy implications, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 3151–3173, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Wang, W., Yang, L., Gao, X., Nie, W., Yu, Y., Xu, P., Zhou, Y.,
and Wang, Z.: The secondary formation of inorganic aerosols in the droplet
mode through heterogeneous aqueous reactions under haze conditions, Atmos.
Environ., 63, 68–76, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, Z., Wang, L. T., Chen, M. Z., and Zheng, Y.: The 2013 severe haze over
the Southern Hebei, China: PM<sub>2. 5</sub> composition and source apportionment,
Atmos. Pollut. Res., 5, 759–768, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Shi, J., Zhang, Q., Ge, X., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H.,
Vonwiller, M., Szidat, S., Ge, J., Ma, J., An, Y., Kang, S., and Qin, D.:
Wintertime organic and inorganic aerosols in Lanzhou, China: sources,
processes, and comparison with the results during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
16, 14937–14957, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-14937-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol
characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution
aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol
composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 7307–7336, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y. R., Liu, X. G., Qu, Y., An, J. L., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y. H., Sun,
Y. L., Wu, Z. J., Zhang, F., Xu, W. Q., and Ma, Q. X.: Characteristics and
formation mechanism of continuous hazes in China: a case study during the
autumn of 2014 in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8165–8178,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-8165-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Young, D. E., Kim, H., Parworth, C., Zhou, S., Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Seco,
R., Kim, S., and Zhang, Q.: Influences of emission sources and meteorology on
aerosol chemistry in a polluted urban environment: results from DISCOVER-AQ
California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5427–5451,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5427-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-5427-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J. K., Sun, Y., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Hu, B., Liu, Q., and Wang,
Y. S.: Characterization of submicron aerosols during a month of serious
pollution in Beijing, 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2887–2903,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-2887-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into
sources and processes of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3289–3311,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005</a>, 2005a.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Deconvolution and quantification of
hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass
spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4938–4952, 2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols via
factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
401, 3045–3067, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Jing, J., Tao, J., Hsu, S.-C., Wang, G., Cao, J., Lee, C. S. L.,
Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., and Shen, Z.: Chemical characterization and
source apportionment of PM<sub>2. 5</sub> in Beijing: seasonal perspective, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 7053–7074, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Dou, H., Chang, B., Wei, Z., Qiu, W., Liu, S., Liu, W., and Tao,
S.: Emission of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Indoor Straw Burning
and Emission Inventory Updating in China, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1140, 218–227,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1454.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1196/annals.1454.006</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Schauer, J. J., Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Wei, Y., Liu, Y., and Shao,
M.: Characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese
coal combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5068–5073, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, P. S., Dong, F., He, D., Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, W. Z., Yao,
Q., and Liu, H. Y.: Characteristics of concentrations and chemical
compositions for PM<sub>2. 5</sub> in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei,
China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4631–4644, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan,
F. K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism
missing in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation
during the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
2031–2049, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Su, H., Ma, Y. L., Cheng, Y., Zheng, B., Zhang,
Q., Huang, T., Kimoto, T., Chang, D., Pöschl, U., Cheng, Y. F., and He,
K. B.: Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing: the impact of synoptic
weather, regional transport and heterogeneous reactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 2969–2983, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2969-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-2969-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Collier, S., Xu, J., Mei, F., Wang, J., Lee, Y. N., Sedlacek III,
A. J., Springston, S. R., Sun, Y., and Zhang, Q.: Influences of upwind
emission sources and atmospheric processing on aerosol chemistry and
properties at a rural location in the Northeastern US, J. Geophys. Res.-Amos., 121,
6049–6065, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024568" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015JD024568</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, W., Jiang, J., Duan, L., and Hao, J.: Evolution of submicron organic
aerosols during a complete residential coal combustion process, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 7861–7869, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
