ACPAtmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsACPAtmos. Chem. Phys.1680-7324Copernicus PublicationsGöttingen, Germany10.5194/acp-17-3987-2017Satellite retrievals of dust aerosol over the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf (2005–2015)BanksJamie R.banks@tropos.dehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6701-7144BrindleyHelen E.StenchikovGeorgiyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9033-4925SchepanskiKerstinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1027-6786Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, GermanySpace and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College London, London, UKSpace and Atmospheric Physics Group, and NERC National Centre for Earth Observation, Imperial College London, London, UKDivision of Physical Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi ArabiaJamie R. Banks (banks@tropos.de)24March20171763987400329September20167November20163February20173March2017This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/3987/2017/acp-17-3987-2017.htmlThe full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/3987/2017/acp-17-3987-2017.pdf
The inter-annual variability of the dust aerosol presence over the
Red Sea and the Persian Gulf is analysed over the period 2005–2015.
Particular attention is paid to the variation in loading across the Red Sea,
which has previously been shown to have a strong, seasonally dependent
latitudinal gradient. Over the 11 years considered, the July mean 630 nm
aerosol optical depth (AOD) derived from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and
InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI) varies between 0.48 and 1.45 in the southern half of
the Red Sea. In the north, the equivalent variation is between 0.22 and 0.66.
The temporal and spatial pattern of variability captured by SEVIRI is also
seen in AOD retrievals from the MODerate Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS),
but there is a systematic offset between the two records. Comparisons of both
sets of retrievals with ship- and land-based AERONET measurements show a high
degree of correlation with biases of < 0.08. However, these comparisons
typically only sample relatively low aerosol loadings. When both records are
stratified by AOD retrievals from the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer
(MISR), opposing behaviour is revealed at high MISR AODs (> 1), with
offsets of +0.19 for MODIS and -0.06 for SEVIRI. Similar behaviour is also
seen over the Persian Gulf. Analysis of the scattering angles at which
retrievals from the SEVIRI and MODIS measurements are typically performed in
these regions suggests that assumptions concerning particle sphericity may be
responsible for the differences seen.
Introduction
Desert dust aerosols have a substantial influence on the atmospheric
environment of the Middle East
e.g.
and on the maritime environment of the Red Sea
e.g.. The latter is pinned between two of the
largest sandy desert regions in the world, with the Sahara of northern Africa to
the west and the Arabian and Syrian deserts to the east. Of broader
scientific, environmental, and cultural interest in this region is the
biodiversity of the Red Sea and its substantial coral reef systems, which are
at risk of increasing global ocean temperatures and which have experienced
substantial degradation and “bleaching” in recent times
e.g.. Over land, the Middle East and the
Arabian Peninsula have seen a recent increase in dust activity over the past
10 years , a situation aggravated by drought conditions in
the semi-arid regions of Syria and Iraq in the north (the Levant). It is an
open question as to whether this increase in activity has propagated through
to increased atmospheric dust loadings over the Red Sea, and similarly over
the Persian Gulf to the east of the Arabian Peninsula.
Despite the region's vulnerability to the impacts of desert dust aerosol, it
is relatively little monitored compared to the Mediterranean to the north and
to the neighbouring desert regions. The Sahara, for example, has been
investigated over the past 10 years by numerous field campaigns such as
AMMA, SAMUM, GERBILS, and Fennec
(; ; ). Aerosol
Robotic Network (AERONET) sunphotometers , which are part
of a global network aiming to provide long-term observations of atmospheric
aerosol loading, are currently only located on the Red Sea coast at Eilat in
Israel (at the far north of the Red Sea) and the King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology (KAUST) in Saudi Arabia at 22.3∘ N, and the
latter was only established in February 2012.
Nevertheless, (subsequently denoted B15) recently
investigated the performance of satellite retrievals over the Red Sea, making
use of ship cruise data taken under the framework of the Maritime AERONET
Network . They found close agreement between dust aerosol
retrievals from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI)
and the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments.
SEVIRI-MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) offsets were found to be +0.02, with correlations of 0.93
and 0.95 for the two sets of cruises considered, with similar statistics
obtained when considering the agreement between the two sets of retrievals
and the ship-based measurements. The same study identified a strong
seasonality in dust loading over the sea and a particularly marked
latitudinal gradient in summertime dust AOD. This differential loading was
shown to propagate to significantly enhanced surface radiative cooling in the
southern part of the basin relative to the north.
However, the B15 study was limited to a 5-year period from 2008 to 2012 and
used MODIS Collection 5 data, which have since been superseded by
Collection 6 . More critically, the ship-based cruise data
used to evaluate the retrievals did not sample conditions typical of the
summertime southern Red Sea. identified systematic
differences between dust retrievals over the Sahara, influenced by such
factors as dust loading, atmospheric moisture, and surface emissivity. It is
to be expected that, over a longer time period and given sufficiently high
dust loadings, the retrievals over the Red Sea may also exhibit systematic
differences.
Hence, in this paper, we extend the B15 analysis and investigate in greater
detail the latitudinal structure of dust aerosol presence over the Red Sea,
as inferred from SEVIRI and MODIS Collection 6 retrievals. The 11-year
pattern in dust activity is presented and discussed, with reference to both
the temporal and spatial structure. We make use of all the ship-based cruises
now available over the Red Sea (from 2010 to 2015) and the KAUST AERONET
measurements to evaluate the SEVIRI and MODIS AOD retrievals. To deepen our
understanding of the differences that we find between the SEVIRI and MODIS
retrievals, we also make use of AOD measurements from the Multi-angle Imaging
SpectroRadiometer (MISR) satellite instrument, and explore the performance of
the retrievals over the Persian Gulf in comparison with that over the Red
Sea.
Satellite retrievals
Examining retrievals over sea/ocean only, the “wider” region investigated
here is within the bounds of 12–30∘ N, 32–56∘ E,
encapsulating both the Red Sea and nearby waters including the Persian Gulf
and parts of the Arabian Sea. This wider region is used to set activity over
the Red Sea into context. Meanwhile, the Red Sea itself (referred to as “the Sea” hereafter) is located
within the region bounded by 12–30∘ N, 32–44∘ E. Egypt,
the Republic of the Sudan, Eritrea, and Djibouti border it to the west, Israel and Jordan to the
north, and Saudi Arabia and Yemen to the east. The southernmost point at
12.58∘ N is the Bab-el-Mandeb, a narrow strait between Yemen and
Djibouti. At the northern end, the Red Sea again narrows considerably where it
splits into two, the gulfs of Suez (west) and Aqaba (east), ending at
29.97∘ N. The total length of the Red Sea from the Bab-el-Mandeb to
the northern end of the Gulf of Suez is approximately 2200 km, but the
maximum width of the Sea is less than 400 km. This narrow width of the Sea
is such that it can effectively be subdivided into latitude bands to describe
the various subdomains within the basin. A map of the region and its
topography is presented in Fig. . The Persian Gulf
is a similarly nearly enclosed sea which is susceptible to dust activity and
is located to the east of the Arabian Peninsula; in the context of this
study, it is bounded by the longitudes 48 and 56∘ E, and the latitudes 24
and 30∘ N.
Map of the Middle Eastern domain of interest on the SEVIRI
projection: the KAUST AERONET site on the Red Sea coast is marked as a red
spot, as is the Abu Al Bukhoosh site in the Persian Gulf. The colour contours
represent the surface elevation (as developed by the EUMETSAT Satellite
Application Facility for Nowcasting; ). Elevation data
are truncated at the 70∘ viewing zenith angle contour. Note also the
increasing curvature of the SEVIRI projection towards the northeast of the
field of view.
SEVIRI AOD retrievals
In geostationary orbit above the equatorial east Atlantic, the Meteosat Second
Generation series of satellites carry the SEVIRI
instruments. Every 15 min, SEVIRI images the facing disc of the Earth in
11 visible and IR channels, viewing Africa, Europe, much of the Middle
East, and parts of the Americas. A 12th channel provides higher-resolution
visible image data over a more limited geographical area. At nadir, the
spatial sampling rate is 3 km; towards the limb of the Earth's disc over
Saudi Arabia and the Red Sea, a more typical spatial sampling rate is
∼ 4.5 km. Over the Red Sea, the SEVIRI viewing zenith angle is
∼ 50∘, whereas over the Persian Gulf the viewing zenith angles
are even higher, exceeding 62∘.
SEVIRI retrievals over ocean make use of the visible
reflectance channels at 0.6 and 0.8 µm, and the near-IR reflectance
channel at 1.6 µm. A look-up table (LUT) approach is used to simulate
the oceanic surface reflectance (ρsfc), which
contains contributions from ocean glint, whitecaps, and underlight. The LUT
is also used to simulate the aerosol contribution to the reflectance, as a
function of AOD. Output AOD retrievals are provided
at 630, 830, and 1610 nm; in this study, we make use of the 630 nm
AOD retrievals.
Aerosol retrievals are only taken during the daytime when there is sufficient
solar illumination above a solar elevation angle of 20∘ and below a
viewing zenith angle of 70∘. Sun glint off the oceanic surface is
also an issue for the visible retrievals, at those angles where the SEVIRI
detector is affected by specular reflection off the sea surface, since the
enhanced apparent brightness of the sea surface reduces the contrast with any
aerosol present. The minimum allowable glint angle is 30∘.
Retrievals are also only carried out in the absence of clouds; clouds must
first be flagged , although this procedure is known to be
conservative and may flag dust as clouds . This can be
corrected using IR channels to carry out dust flagging ,
in order to reinstate dusty pixels previously misidentified as clouds.
Previous validation efforts of SEVIRI retrievals over the Red Sea against
ship-based measurements (B15) in 2011 and 2013 indicate SEVIRI biases for the
two individual years of +0.03 and +0.04, and root mean square differences
(RMSDs) for both years of 0.06. The maximum AOD measured at 675 nm during
this time period was less than 1.1.
MODIS retrievals of AOD
Carried by the polar-orbiting NASA Aqua and Terra satellites, the MODIS
instruments observe any point on the Earth's surface nearly twice daily, at
night and during the day. In daylight, the local Equator crossing times are
∼ 10:30 LT for Terra and ∼ 13:30 LT for Aqua. Three algorithms have
been developed to retrieve aerosol quantities and properties: two of these
are often referred to as the “Dark Target”
algorithms, which are typically
used to retrieve aerosol over water and over dark and vegetated surfaces. The
two algorithms are distinct for land and for ocean, and make different
assumptions about surface and aerosol properties. Over ocean, the algorithm
uses six visible and near-IR MODIS channels with wavelengths between 550 and
2110 nm, and makes use of look-up tables which relate measured reflectances
with angles, aerosol size distributions, and optical depths; this is the MODIS
AOD product considered in this study. Over brighter, e.g. desert surfaces,
the “Deep Blue” algorithm has enhanced performance for
retrieving aerosol, using the near-UV channels of the instrument. At nadir,
the MODIS spatial resolution ranges from 250 m to 1 km depending on the
channel, becoming larger towards the edges of the MODIS swath. AODs are
reported, among other wavelengths, at 550 nm and at a spatial resolution of
∼ 10 km in the L2 dataset. Other relevant aerosol information retrieved
by MODIS includes the Ångström coefficient, useful for re-scaling the
MODIS AOD retrievals to the same wavelength as the SEVIRI AOD retrievals.
In this study, we use the Collection 6 (C6) algorithm, the most recent
iteration of the MODIS AOD dataset , using
Dark Target retrievals over ocean, from both the Terra and Aqua satellites.
As opposed to the previous Collection 5 Dark Target retrievals, the
philosophy behind C6 has been described as a “maintenance and modest
improvement” upgrade by , involving updates to such processes
as calibration (which affects the measured channel reflectances),
cloud-masking, geolocation and land/sea discrimination, and assumptions in
radiative transfer modelling. Additionally, over ocean, there are changed
assumptions about surface wind speed (which affects ocean glint patterns) and
“sedimented” regions, e.g. treatment of river outflow or shallow coastal sea
regions. Given the long length of coastline with respect to the area of the
Red Sea, this latter update may have implications for the retrieval of dust
in this region. Pixels retrieved may have four levels of quality assurance
(QA) from 0 (no confidence) to 3 (high confidence). In this paper, we use
pixels with QA values of 1–3, as recommended by for MODIS
AOD retrievals over ocean. As for retrieval performance,
claim that 76 % of MODIS C6 ocean points fall within an “expected
error” envelope (+(0.04 + 10 %), -(0.02 + 10 %)) with respect to AERONET AOD
measurements, asymmetric due to high MODIS biases at low AOD. By contrast,
71 % of MODIS C5 ocean points fall within this envelope.
MISR retrievals of AOD
The MISR instrument is also carried onboard Terra, and AOD retrieval products
are also available from this instrument . With a
swath width of ∼ 400 km, the MISR track is much narrower than that of
MODIS (2330 km); however, MISR has the advantage of multi-angle scanning,
with nine cameras viewing the Earth in the along-track direction between
±70.5∘ and including one at nadir. Retrieved AODs and estimates
of aerosol properties in the MISR version 22 dataset are reported at
17.6× 17.6 km spatial resolution, at wavelengths of 446, 558, 672, and
866 nm. The LUT in this algorithm includes eight component particle types
subdivided into 74 aerosol mixtures . Of the
eight components, two are non-spherical dust analogues, with one being
medium-mode aggregated angular shapes, while the other represents coarse-mode
ellipsoids. This treatment of non-spherical particles is a distinct advantage
that the MISR aerosol retrieval has over both SEVIRI and MODIS Dark Target,
which both treat aerosols purely as spheres, an assumption which is
questionable for mineral dust. The MISR retrieval is not unique in accounting
for non-spherical particles, the Deep Blue algorithm also does not assume
particle sphericity. Similarly as with MODIS, the MISR team quote that
70–75 % of the AOD retrievals fall within an envelope defined by the larger
of 0.05 or 20 % of AERONET AOD . Within this range,
report that at higher AODs the MISR retrieval often
underestimates the AOD especially over land, due in part to overestimated
single-scattering albedo in the retrieval algorithm.
A decade of dust activity over the Red Sea
An advantage of the duration that MSG-SEVIRI and the MODIS instruments have
now been in orbit for is that we can set the inter-annual variability of dust
activity into context, and extend the 5-year record presented by B15. It
has been noted before that the southern part of the Sea is often dustier than
the north, for example by B15, and we extend this previous work by
investigating the latitudinal variations in dust loading over the Sea over a
longer time period. Figure shows a time series
of monthly mean SEVIRI AODs at 630 nm over the Red Sea from 2005 to 2015. The
Sea is here subdivided into north and south, divided by the line of
20∘ N which splits the Sea into very closely equal regions by area
(13 725 pixels in the north, 13 915 in the south).
Time series of monthly average AOD at 630 nm from SEVIRI in the Red
Sea. Colours represent individual years, and south and north are
divided by the line of 20∘ N.
The annual cycle is clear and consistent: dust activity peaks in summer,
particularly in July, and is concentrated in the southern half of the Sea.
The north has an annual cycle, generally peaking in summer, but the amplitude
is much less pronounced than it is in the south. Looking for exceptions to
the general pattern, 2015 is a somewhat unusual year in that there is no one
dominant peak; instead, dust activity is spread between the months of April,
June, and August. In general, the annual cycle is as described in Fig. 5 of
B15, but we see further interesting features in the breakdown into halves of
the Sea and in the extension of the record. Looking at the southern end of
the Sea, 2005–2007 is a relatively quiet period, transitioning during 2008 to
the dusty period of 2009–2013. This may be associated with the consequences
of the Levantine drought period which resulted in enhanced dust activity over
the Arabian Peninsula from 2008/2009 onwards . Latterly,
however, the enhanced summer dust activity seems to have tailed off in 2014
and 2015.
Only in July 2010 and August 2015 does the mean AOD in the north exceed 0.5.
In the south, dust flows can be trapped above the Sea due to the mountainous
topography to either side in both Africa and the Arabian Peninsula (see Fig. ). By contrast, in the north, the relatively flat
topography of the land to either side is less of a hindrance to dust
transport, and hence dust has less of a tendency to persist for extended
periods of time in the atmosphere above the northern part of the Sea.
Spatially, on the decadal timescale, as indicated in Fig. , a sharp gradient in dust loading across the Sea
is most strongly apparent in summer (represented here by July). This is also
the only season when there is any significant dust activity over the Arabian
Sea. For the most part, this timescale disguises specific geographical
features. An exception to this is that dust outflows into the southern Red
Sea from the Tokar Gap in the Republic of the Sudan
e.g. are readily apparent
in summer (Fig. c), just south of the
20∘ line of latitude. As well as being a dust source, the
mountain-gap wind jet in this location during summer affects the eddy mixing
and circulation of the Sea itself . Further south,
there are more dust sources on the Eritrean coastal plain which contribute
to the high southern dust loading, but in general much of the dust actually
originates from the central Arabian Peninsula and the Republic of the Sudan.
Maps of “climatological” (2005–2015) monthly average AOD from
SEVIRI at 630 nm. Panel (a) indicates measurements for January, (b) April,
(c) July, and (d) October.
Cloud cover only tends to have a significant effect on the retrieval quantity
in summer for one or two months around July during the monsoon period
e.g., when there is persistent cloud presence in the
south, coincident with the typical maximum of dust activity; the fraction of
successful retrievals with respect to the total number of attempted
retrievals over the southern half of the Sea can be as low as 20 %. Cloud
cover in the north is typically quite sparse year round.
The latitudinal gradient in dust loading
B15 postulate that the summertime north–south gradient in dust loading over
the Red Sea may have important consequences for atmospheric and oceanic
circulation patterns. Exploring this gradient in more detail, we find that
the imbalance between the AODs in the northern and southern parts of the Red
Sea basin has a marked inter-annual variability. In order to analyse this
further, we subdivide the Sea into nine 2∘ latitude bands from 12 to
30∘ N. Monthly averages are then made on the cloud-free SEVIRI pixels
of the Sea within these latitude ranges. The grid cells must be sea only, so
the narrow stretches of the gulfs of Suez and Aqaba (28–30∘ N), and
the narrow, island-studded section of the southernmost Red Sea
(12–14∘ N) have very few retrievals.
Figure describes the latitudinal gradient in SEVIRI
AOD over the Sea for the 4 months of January, April, July, and October,
for each year of the 11-year period. In winter and autumn, the gradient is
very flat, with a low mean AOD of ∼ 0.3 across the Sea, and very little
inter-annual variability. July, by contrast, has a significant disparity
between north and south, with southern AODs marked by a high level of
inter-annual variability: for example, at 15∘ N, this varies from
∼ 0.5 in 2007 to ∼ 1.7 in 2009. Such variability is not seen in the
north, with July 2010 being the sole outlier with relatively high AODs up to
∼0.7 at 23∘ N. Over the 11-year period, April tends to hold
the same “flat” pattern as January and October, although unlike these
months, there are two April periods (2015 and, to a lesser extent, 2008) which break away from
the pattern: April 2015 especially is marked by substantial dust loading in
the south with band mean AODs of up to ∼ 0.7 between 14 and
20∘ N, due to a handful of large Arabian dust storms which
transported large quantities of dust into the atmosphere of the southern Red
Sea.
Monthly average AOD from SEVIRI by latitude band in the Red Sea.
Colours represent individual years, and the dashed line at 22.3∘ N
is the latitude of KAUST.
Where does dust over the Red Sea originate? To derive a quantitative estimate
of dust transport over the Red Sea, fields of dust concentration and winds
were taken from the Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC)
reanalysis dataset in order to calculate monthly mean
(January, April, July, and October) zonal dust transport fluxes for 2007 and
2009, with the “low” and “high” summertime AOD years revealed in Fig. . The MACC reanalysis dataset includes a 4D-Var
assimilation scheme, and the satellite retrieval data used for aerosols are
the MODIS Dark Target AODs . MACC provides fields of
atmospheric parameters and aerosol concentrations at 6-hourly resolution. The
simulation data used were obtained for each model level and at 1∘
horizontal resolution. Zonal dust fluxes (M) were then calculated following
Eq. () for each level, k, and at each grid
cell in the middle of the Red Sea, i, as
Mi,k=ci,k×ui,k.
Here, c is the total dust concentration (particle size: 0.03–20 µm)
and u is the zonal wind. As dust originating from both north African and
Arabian dust sources is contributing to the dust burden over the Red Sea
basin, zonal dust fluxes are calculated separately for eastward and westward
transport directions. The computed dust mass fluxes for 2007 and 2009 are
presented in Fig. by latitude, analogously to Fig. , and presents fluxes in the eastward and westward
directions, subdivided also by dust layer height range. Panels (a) and (b)
represent the transport between 2 and 15 km in altitude, panels (c) and (d) are between
0 and 2 km. A caveat to include here is that for simplicity we only compute the
zonal dust transport, and hence it is important to note that there will also
be a meridional component to the dust transport that is not considered within
this analysis. The more significant dust transport is, however, in the zonal
direction between the two deserts to the west and east.
Monthly mean dust mass transport by 1∘ latitude band in the
Red Sea, integrated over segments of the atmospheric column. Colours
represent individual months, the solid lines represent 2007, and the dashed
lines represent 2009. Panel (a) indicates eastward dust flux, from Africa, at 2–15 km altitude;
(b) westward dust flux, from the Arabian Peninsula, 2–15 km;
(c) eastward dust flux, 0–2 km altitude;
(d) westward dust flux, 0–2 km.
Large-scale dust events from the Arabian Peninsula and the Republic of the Sudan are major contributors to the
dust loading over the southern Red Sea in July, along with local sources from
Eritrea and the Tokar Gap. Not all Arabian dust events reach the southern Red
Sea: a major barrier to dust transport in the southwestern Arabian Peninsula
is a chain of mountains along the coast, exceeding 2000 m in height. Hence,
dust which crosses this region must either be lofted above such altitudes or
make its way through valleys and mountain passes, and in
consequence Arabian dust is only present over much of the Red Sea at
altitudes > 2 km as in Fig. b. By contrast,
dust outflow from the Tokar Gap in the Republic of the Sudan (18–19∘) provides up to 0.6 g m-1 s-1 from Africa predominantly in the lowest layer of the
atmosphere (Fig. c); this is consistent spatially
with the AODs in Fig. c, as well as with dust
simulations carried out by , who also noted the low
altitude of Sudanese dust in this region. Figure c
also shows the signature of Eritrean coastal dust sources in the far south,
principally active in summer.
Outside of summer, there is less simulated dust transport, and the little
dust that is transported has a tendency to be transported at higher altitudes. April is the outlier to
this, when in both years there is a very strong simulated flow of dust
travelling eastwards from Africa over the north of the Sea. This is a
well-known feature in spring when Sharav cyclones along the African
Mediterranean coast emit dust from the northeastern Sahara and transport
these dust outbreaks to Saudi Arabia and the Middle East
e.g.. These track from west to east at speeds
often greater than 10 m s-1e.g.; hence, due to
quick transit times across the Sea, this does not result in particularly
elevated dust AODs in the north (Fig. b).
Validation over the Red Sea using surface-based sunphotometer measurements
In order to verify these patterns in the SEVIRI dust observational record
over the Red Sea, it is vital to validate and compare these retrievals against
other data sources such as recent ship cruise data. From October 2010 to
September 2015, multiple research ship cruises organised by KAUST have taken
place on the Red Sea, principally based out of KAUST itself, and Georgiy
Stenchikov is the PI of the ship-based aerosol observation campaign. Aerosol
measurements were made using a handheld Microtops sunphotometer, carried out
following the framework of the Maritime AERONET of ship-based aerosol
measurement campaigns . B15 carried out validation of
SEVIRI and MODIS retrievals using these data, but only for 2011 and 2013, and
only for MODIS Collection 5 data. We repeat this process here using the
updated Collection 6 data and including 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2015. As of
the end of 2015, there were 23 ship cruise legs available in the Red Sea at
Level 2 quality. Otherwise, the same co-location criteria were used: all three
instruments must make a successful retrieval, averaged for satellite pixels
within a 50 km radius of the ship and for retrievals within an hour to either
side of the sunphotometer measurement. As stated earlier, we only use MODIS
AOD retrievals with QA values from 1 to 3. For consistency with the SEVIRI
retrievals, the AERONET and MODIS AOD values are scaled to a wavelength of
630 nm using the retrieved Ångström exponent. B15 found 111 co-locations; over the expanded
dataset for the Red Sea, we now find 255 co-locations. Note an imbalance in the number of measurements between the
northern (> 20∘ N) and southern parts of the Sea: there are 220 co-locations in the north, compared to just 35 in the south. Due to political
considerations, it was more difficult for the ship cruises to spend much time
at the southern end of the Sea. Validation statistics are listed in Table .
During this period, few major dust events have been observed from the
ship-based measurements over the Sea. The co-located maximum measured AOD at
630 nm by the sunphotometers at sea level was 0.86 in July 2011, at a
latitude of 26.3∘ N. The mean AOD measured was 0.28 with an
associated standard deviation of 0.15. The sea-based measurements correlate
with both the SEVIRI and MODIS AODs to a value of 0.92. Meanwhile, the
respective satellite retrieval biases with respect to the ship-based
measurements are +0.010 for SEVIRI and +0.029 for MODIS. The
RMSDs are 0.059 for SEVIRI and 0.066 for MODIS.
Thus, the agreement between all three data sources is good, although there is
a tendency for the MODIS Dark Target AODs to be positively biased against
both the sea-based and the SEVIRI data. The correlations and RMSDs are
broadly in line with previous statistics calculated by B15; however, the
previous work suggested a slightly higher positive bias by SEVIRI against
MODIS, indicating that the average MODIS AODs may have nudged slightly higher
(by ∼ 0.01–0.02) from Collection 5 to Collection 6.
Validation statistics between AODs at 630 nm from ship cruise data
and from AERONET at KAUST and at Abu Al Bukhoosh against SEVIRI and MODIS.
Sunphotometer mean AODs include the associated standard deviations. Biases
are satellite retrieval AOD – AERONET AOD.
A similar picture is present when we look at AERONET
sunphotometer data taken at the KAUST campus (22.31∘ N,
39.10∘ E), here analysed for the years 2012–2015. This site has
also been established and organised by KAUST, with Georgiy Stenchikov as the
PI (http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/new_web/photo_db/KAUST_Campus.html). Scatterplots of satellite retrieval
AODs against AERONET AODs are shown in Fig. a and c. The Abu Al Bukhoosh site (panels b and d, at
25.50∘ N, 53.15∘ E) will be discussed in further detail in
Sect. . A caveat for the KAUST site is that we are
comparing AERONET measurements taken over land, albeit very close to the
shoreline, with satellite retrievals taken over sea. The same spatial
matching criteria are applied as for the ship-based measurements, although
due to the higher frequency of observations on land we restrict the temporal
matching to within half an hour on either side. Level 2 AERONET data are used
for KAUST, which are cloud-screened following the technique described by
. Given the urban/industrial environment at Jeddah
∼ 80 km down the coast from KAUST, we also apply the criterion that the
AERONET Ångström coefficient must be less than 0.6, in order to
distinguish dust as being the dominant aerosol
e.g.. Over the 4 years
considered, there are 595 points when all of the three instruments made a
simultaneous successful retrieval over KAUST, in which the AERONET
measurements had a mean AOD of 0.47 ± 0.34. The SEVIRI retrievals were
correlated with AERONET to a value of 0.96, and MODIS was correlated with
AERONET to a value of 0.92. Meanwhile, the respective biases were 0.000 and
+0.080, and the RMSDs were 0.095 and 0.210. The MODIS RMSD is particularly
high due to a handful of points at AERONET AODs > 2 where MODIS retrieves
AODs > 4 (Fig. a), which contributes to MODIS'
high positive bias. Hence, while the overall picture is consistent with the
ship-based measurements, there seem to be higher RMSDs when sea pixels near
the coast are considered, perhaps due to the higher mean AODs but perhaps
also due to the higher variability in the sea-surface reflectance in coastal
waters as opposed to the open ocean. Another possible factor is the extra
distance between the site and the satellite-retrieved pixels given that the
retrievals avoid pixels over land and coastal waters.
Satellite retrieval comparisons against L2 AERONET AODs measured at
the KAUST campus (2012–2015) and Abu Al Bukhoosh (2006–2008) at a wavelength of
630 nm. Colours represent scattering angles to the satellite
instruments.
Time series of monthly average MODIS/SEVIRI AOD statistics over the
Red Sea (left column: a, c, e) and the Persian
Gulf (right column: b, d, f). (a, b) Average AOD at 630 nm: solid lines represent SEVIRI; dashed lines
represent MODIS; in the Red Sea, black indicates the northern half of the Sea
and orange represents the south. (c, d) MODIS-SEVIRI offset.
(e, f) MODIS-SEVIRI RMSD.
Intercomparisons between retrievals
From Figs. and , it is
apparent that the climatological monthly summertime SEVIRI AOD over the Red
Sea often exceeds 1, a range not encapsulated by the ship cruise
measurements. It is important to check the agreement of the SEVIRI AODs with
other retrievals such as MODIS in this regime, given that the higher the AOD,
the larger the impact of dust will be on the radiative energy budget at the
surface, within the atmosphere and at the top of the atmosphere. Figure
adapts Fig. to compare MODIS AOD retrievals with the
coincident SEVIRI retrievals (averaged at 07:00, 08:00, and 09:00 UTC for Terra
and at 10:00, 11:00, and 12:00 UTC for Aqua), along with statistics of the
inter-retrieval offset and root mean square difference. The approximate daily
overpass times are 08:00 and 11:00 UTC for Terra and Aqua over the
longitude of the Red Sea; averages of the SEVIRI retrievals are taken on either
side of the main overpass times in order to provide successful retrievals
when sun glint may prevent SEVIRI retrievals, as is the case for coincident
Terra overpasses in the morning in midsummer. These monthly statistics are
calculated by investigating the coincident and binned 0.125∘ MODIS
and SEVIRI grid cells, when and where both instruments make a successful
aerosol retrieval. Note that the original MODIS AOD retrievals at 550 nm
have been scaled using the retrieved Ångström coefficient to 630 nm in
order to match the wavelength retrieved by SEVIRI.
Density plots of MODIS AOD against SEVIRI AOD over the Red Sea (2005–2015).
For almost all months, the MODIS retrievals have higher values than the
SEVIRI retrievals, with the largest values of offsets and RMSDs when the dust
loading is largest. Consequently, the offsets and RMSDs tend to be larger in
the south of the Sea than in the north. The correlations are also slightly
worse in the south: the average monthly correlation is 0.93 in the north and
0.91 in the south. MODIS-SEVIRI offsets at the basin scale can be much larger
than at the ship-point scale, exceeding +0.3 in the southern Red Sea for the
July periods of 2009, 2011, and 2013. A caveat to this general pattern is in the
autumn to early-spring months when the mean AOD is low, and there are months
when there is a very slight negative MODIS offset. Given this behaviour, the
latitudinal gradient in the AODs is also readily apparent in the MODIS-SEVIRI
comparison statistics (Fig. c, e). The
AOD offsets and RMSDs are quite negligible in autumn and winter (below
±0.05 of offset and below ∼ 0.1 of RMSD), but show much more
variability in July in the south, when there is the most variability in the
intensity of large dust outbreaks. Outside of the summer months, retrievals
over the southern part of the Sea in April 2015 also show large deviations, a
reflection of the relatively high dust loadings seen in this month and
location.
The discrepancy between MODIS and SEVIRI at high AODs is systematic, as can
be seen in Fig. , which considers all of the
co-located SEVIRI and MODIS retrievals over the 11-year period. Comparing
MODIS against SEVIRI, the correlation coefficient exceeds 0.9 for all months,
with the RMSDs and offsets peaking when the AOD is highest. Strikingly, the
2-D histogram curves further away from the 1:1 line as the AOD
increases, as SEVIRI appears to become less sensitive to the increases in AOD
that MODIS seems to observe. Hence, in April and July, when the tail of high
AODs is extended, the two retrieval datasets diverge the furthest. Very
similar patterns are seen in comparisons between Terra-MODIS and SEVIRI, and
Aqua-MODIS and SEVIRI (not shown), indicating broad consistency between the
separate MODIS instruments.
An implication of this is that there are two regimes for the MODIS/SEVIRI
comparisons, which can be seen more precisely if we compare MODIS AODs
against the MODIS-SEVIRI offset. At low AODs < 1, the MODIS-SEVIRI offset
is small, and neither instrument retrieval is consistently reporting higher
AODs than the other. Consequently, the correlation between the MODIS AOD and
the MODIS-SEVIRI offset in January and October is weak, at 0.47 and 0.41 for
the respective months. In spring and summer, however, there is a marked
increase in the correlation between MODIS and its offset against SEVIRI,
increasing to 0.83 and 0.85 in April and July.
Examining the MODIS-retrieved Ångström coefficients over this period
provides more detail as to what is occurring here. At low AODs < 1, the
mean Ångström coefficient is 0.67, while at AODs > 1, the mean is
0.14. The low value of the latter is a clear signature of desert dust
, given that sea salt alone would not result in such high
AODs. Hence, it is clear that the substantial majority of the points at the
tail end in Fig. b and c are composed
of desert dust, and so it is dust in some form which is responsible for the
high-AOD discrepancy between the SEVIRI and MODIS retrievals. Contamination
by other aerosol types is much more likely at lower AODs, when
urban/industrial pollution from the major centres along the Red Sea coast
(e.g. Jeddah, Port Sudan) may contribute more to the overall signal.
This positive offset behaviour exhibited by MODIS with respect to SEVIRI
leads naturally to the question of which retrieval is more accurate at the
highest AODs. It is difficult to assess this using data from the ground or
from the sea surface given the paucity of measurements made at the surface of
such intense events. The ship-board sunphotometers only measured a maximum
AOD of 0.86, while the AERONET site at the KAUST campus has only made co-located
measurements of AODs > 1 for 42 points out of 595 (7 %). Within this
subset of high-AOD data, the MODIS bias with respect to AERONET is +0.313,
while the SEVIRI bias is -0.075; this is in comparison to the biases at low
dust loadings of +0.063 for MODIS and +0.006 for SEVIRI. Hence, as the dust
loading increases, so does the MODIS bias with respect to the AERONET
validation dataset while SEVIRI becomes slightly negatively biased. However,
this is a relatively small subset of cases from which it is dangerous to draw
any substantiative conclusions. With this in mind, we introduce the use of
MISR aerosol retrievals to investigate whether they show more coherent
behaviour with one of the MODIS or SEVIRI sets of AOD retrievals. It
is important to note that MISR has quoted uncertainties of equivalent
magnitude to the MODIS and SEVIRI retrievals (see Sect. ), and
so they are included here simply for another point of comparison.
As previously reported in comparisons between MISR and Terra MODIS Collection 5
retrievals for all aerosol types over the global ocean for January 2006
, MISR retrieves higher AODs than MODIS when the AOD is
low, whereas when the AOD is greater than 0.2–0.3 the MODIS AODs become
“systematically” higher than the MISR AODs. A similar picture can be found
over the Red Sea when we look at scatterplots of MISR/MODIS comparisons for
the months of January, April, July, and October for the years 2008–2011
(Fig. b). In this case, the
datasets have been gridded at 0.25∘ resolution to take into account
the 17.6 km spatial resolution of the MISR aerosol product. These have been
co-located with successful SEVIRI retrievals, with the MODIS and SEVIRI AOD
datasets reported at, or scaled to, 550 nm, while the MISR AODs used are
reported at 558 nm. MODIS and SEVIRI have been retrieved from Aqua or at the
Aqua time, due to persistent sun glint affecting both instrument retrievals
along the MISR track at the Terra morning time during the spring and summer
months. This persistent sun glint issue has been noted before by
, in their Fig. 4c, which indicates consistent failure of
co-located AOD retrievals between MISR and Terra-MODIS in the northern
tropics in July.
Scatterplots of MISR AOD against SEVIRI and MODIS AODs over the Red
Sea (2008–2011). Points are colour coded by month.
The temporal discrepancy accounts for much of the scatter in Fig. , especially in July. At lower
AODs in the winter months, there is more temporal stability in the daytime AOD
values and hence less scatter. In all 4 months, the overall offset of AOD
retrievals from Aqua-MODIS is negative when compared to MISR. However,
consistent with this masks contrasting behaviour in
different AOD regimes which is most obviously manifested in July, the month
which has the smallest overall offset. Over the whole dataset, positive
offsets at higher AODs (+0.188 when MISR AOD > 1) are obscured by negative
offsets at lower values (-0.045 when MISR AOD < 1).
Taking MISR AOD retrievals as our reference, and benefitting from its
multi-angle viewing capabilities e.g., Fig. a indicates that SEVIRI also has
a negative offset as compared with the MISR retrievals but that this offset
is consistently in one direction regardless of the MISR AOD. Using a MISR AOD
equal to 1 as an arbitrary cut-off between high and low dust loading, SEVIRI
has a negative offset of 0.062 (high AOD) and of 0.071 (low AOD) relative to
MISR. Thus, the discrepancy between regimes is much reduced compared to MODIS.
While it is impossible to state which, if any, of the retrievals are correct,
it is clear that there are substantial, and in some cases obviously
systematic, differences between all of the retrievals when elevated dust
optical depths are seen over the Red Sea.
There are a number of possible explanations for the discrepancies seen
between MODIS and SEVIRI at high AODs. The aerosol model used in the SEVIRI
retrievals assumes a purely scattering aerosol. While measurement campaigns
indicate that dust typically has a high single-scattering albedo (SSA) in the
visible, some absorption is always observed. For example, aircraft
measurements during the GERBILS campaign in June 2007 indicate SSA values
between 0.92 and 0.99 ; more recent values derived from
Fennec campaign measurements indicate rather lower values, ranging from 0.70
to 0.97 . Hence, one might anticipate that SEVIRI would
retrieve a smaller AOD than that which would be obtained using a model with a
lower SSA, all other aspects remaining the same. Similarly, another
contributor to the discrepancy may be the different spectral ranges used by
the retrievals: while SEVIRI only uses the 630 nm channel for this AOD
dataset, the MODIS ocean AODs are retrieved using a combination of six of the
MODIS channels between 550 and 2110 nm, which may increase the information
content of the MODIS retrieval. With six possible wavelengths
e.g. used to minimise the error of the observed to
modelled reflectances, there may be more scope for matching with wavelengths
more sensitive to larger particles. Another candidate is the particle
sphericity assumptions made by both the MODIS and SEVIRI retrievals. MISR is
the exception in this regard, since, as was pointed out in Sect. , of the eight particle components in the MISR retrieval,
two are non-spherical dust analogues. Moreover, the fact that MISR
measurements are made at multiple viewing angles allows for increased
resolution of the observed aerosol particle scattering and hence a more
constrained knowledge of the phase function. The spherical assumption implies
that light scattering occurs due to Mie scattering, which may lead to larger
errors at specific scattering angles. Looking again at the AERONET
comparisons in Fig. , the points have been
colour coded by scattering angle between the Sun and the satellite detectors.
Note that the colour coding is different between MODIS and SEVIRI due to the
very different scattering angle ranges observed by each. While SEVIRI reveals
no apparent pattern in retrieval quality with respect to scattering angle, at
high AERONET AODs, the MODIS retrievals show more divergence due to scattering
angle, between the high bias of the points at ∼ 100∘ and the low
bias of those at ∼ 160∘. Meanwhile, the one clear outlier in the
MODIS retrievals with respect to the Abu Al Bukhoosh AERONET data (Fig. b) is also within the 96–110∘ range. Given
the limited sample size, it is hard to draw too strong a conclusion from this.
To increase the sample size of the scattering angle range, Fig. revisualises Fig. to learn more about the MODIS and SEVIRI
scattering angles with respect to high MODIS and SEVIRI AODs. Looking at
April, for SEVIRI AOD retrievals in excess of ∼ 0.5, there is a systematic
tendency for the co-located MODIS AODs to increase with reducing MODIS
scattering angle, which may result in the positive MODIS versus SEVIRI
offsets seen in Figs. and
at high AODs. The scattering angle range of
100–120∘ has previously been diagnosed as a potential source of
positive offsets when spherical dust assumptions are used by satellite
retrievals e.g.. Examples of the differences in the
phase functions between spherical and non-spherical dust can be seen in
Fig. 4 of and Fig. 2 of , both of
which indicate that up to a scattering angle of ∼ 80∘ there is
very little difference in the phase functions (at 870 and 550 nm,
respectively). The phase functions diverge at higher angles, with the
spherical phase functions having the smaller values between
∼ 80–130∘, and the larger values at angles
≳ 150∘. At ∼ 120∘ is the maximum underestimation
of the spherical phase function with respect to the non-spherical values,
which may lead to a corresponding overestimation of the AOD, especially
apparent in Fig. a; simultaneously, the
SEVIRI scattering angles are at their highest (Fig. b) in a range where the phase functions may
be overestimated and hence the AODs underestimated. This combination of
potentially overestimated MODIS AODs and potentially underestimated SEVIRI
AODs may contribute to the diversion between the two AOD datasets in this regime.
MODIS AOD against SEVIRI AOD over the Red Sea during April
(2005–2015) colour coded by (a) mean MODIS scattering angle and
(b) mean SEVIRI scattering angle.
The AERONET and MODIS retrievals can provide more information about the
aerosol content; for example, both retrieve the aerosol Ångström
coefficient. For the AERONET comparisons described in Sect. ,
the mean Ångström coefficients for MODIS and
AERONET over KAUST are 0.45 and 0.36, respectively, while over Abu Al
Bukhoosh they are 0.51 and 0.35; the greater Ångström coefficients
retrieved by MODIS implies that the MODIS retrieval is assuming a smaller
aerosol size than AERONET. That the MODIS-retrieved Ångström
coefficients are persistently high has also been noted by .
The correlations are quite weak at 0.42 and 0.22. Could the possible
overestimation of the MODIS Ångström coefficients have an impact on the
AOD comparisons, given that the Ångström coefficient is used to scale
the MODIS AODs? The MODIS AOD at 550 nm is multiplied by a factor of
(550/630)α, where α is the Ångström
coefficient. If we consider the mean Ångström coefficients at KAUST and if
we use the mean MODIS value of 0.45 then this factor is 0.941; if we use the
mean AERONET value of 0.36, then the factor is 0.952. Hence, the MODIS
“overestimation” of the Ångström coefficient implies an underestimation of
the AOD at 630 nm. The Ångström coefficient does not contribute to the
elevated MODIS AODs.
Exploring the aerosol size further, the retrievals can also be subdivided
into the aerosol fine and coarse modes using output from the AERONET
spectral deconvolution algorithm (SDA; ), and retrievals of fine
and coarse-mode MODIS AODs derived from the retrieved fine-mode fraction
e.g.. These comparisons are carried out at 500 nm
and are listed in Table . Quickly
apparent is the strength of the agreement between the coarse-mode retrievals
as compared with the fine-mode retrievals, indicative of the dominance of the
coarse-mode dust to the AOD over these AERONET sites. Strikingly, the MODIS
biases are greater for the fine mode than for the coarse mode despite the
fine-mode AERONET AODs being of an order 2–3 times less than the coarse-mode
AODs. This MODIS overestimation of the fine-mode AODs with respect to the
AERONET SDA algorithm has been noted before by , who
observed an overestimation of the MODIS fine-mode fraction of the order of 0.1
for dust-dominated conditions. Similarly, noted that the
MODIS AOD retrieval has a tendency to underestimate the size distribution.
This may also be related to the higher MODIS Ångström coefficients
mentioned earlier. The overestimation in the MODIS fine-mode fraction
contributes over half of the bias in the total AODs; in contrast, the MODIS
and AERONET coarse-mode AODs are more highly correlated with each other and
are a smaller contributor to the overall bias.
Comparison statistics between fine- and coarse-mode AERONET and
MODIS AODs at 500 nm, at KAUST and at Abu Al
Bukhoosh.
KAUSTAbu AlcampusBukhooshn1074773TotalAOD‾0.53 ± 0.330.56 ± 0.31Correlation0.930.92Bias+0.097+0.191RMSD0.1930.311Fine modeAOD‾0.18 ± 0.080.13 ± 0.06Correlation0.560.68Bias+0.052+0.152RMSD0.1100.183Coarse modeAOD‾0.35 ± 0.290.43 ± 0.26Correlation0.900.90Bias+0.045+0.039RMSD0.1560.203Contrast with the Persian Gulf
A striking feature of Fig. is the contrast in
dust loading between the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf (referred to as “the Gulf” hereafter), both
largely enclosed basins on either side of the Arabian Peninsula. The Persian
Gulf, also known as the Arabian Gulf, is subject to atmospheric flows and
dust storms emanating from Iraq
e.g. and Saudi Arabia and
occasionally also from Iran. Closer to the active source areas, the Gulf is
often affected by Middle Eastern dust storms earlier during their life cycle
than is the Red Sea. As with the Red Sea, the Gulf has quiet dust activity
during autumn and winter, but there is a high baseline of dust presence
throughout the Gulf in spring and summer. This is less intense than in the
southern Red Sea in summer, but is a more prolonged feature, and has a more
homogeneous spatial pattern within its basin. Due to its closer geographical
proximity to the northern Syrian and Iraqi dust sources which flow directly
into it, and due to the wind patterns in this region
, the Gulf is more heavily influenced by the
springtime dust events from the Middle East than the Red Sea.
As presented in Fig. b, dust activity
peaked in the Gulf in spring/summer 2009 and in March 2012. The former period
was a period of intense dust activity for Iraq and Iran, especially in July
2009: high PM10 (particulate matter less than 10 µm in diameter)
concentrations in Tehran were recorded at over 250 µg m-3 during
this dusty period . Meanwhile, the latter peak in the Gulf
was the month of a large dust event which swept down over the Arabian Peninsula and
eventually to the Red Sea, originating in Syria and Iraq. Simulations
suggest that this particular event deposited 3.0 Mt
of dust to the Arabian Sea, 2.2 Mt to the Gulf, and 1.2 Mt to the Red Sea.
This contrast between the Gulf and the Red Sea is broadly supported by the
March 2012 monthly mean AODs; from SEVIRI, these are 0.99 over the Gulf and
0.42 over the Red Sea.
How does this contrast affect the satellite retrievals? The SEVIRI/MODIS
comparison statistics across the entire Persian Gulf show broad similarity
with the Red Sea statistics in Fig. . Over
the Gulf, the SEVIRI-MODIS offset at MODIS AODs < 1 is -0.010 and at higher
AODs it is -0.378; over the Red Sea, these are -0.010 and -0.416. The
individual monthly statistics for both seas are much the same except for a
greater prevalence of intense dust events in January over the Gulf than over
the Red Sea. For January, April, July, and October, the respective offsets are
-0.002, -0.012, -0.040, and -0.0004. What this therefore suggests is that both
retrievals' performance over the Gulf are broadly in line with their
performance over the Red Sea. This is particularly reassuring for SEVIRI
given its geostationary orbit, which is at the limit of its viewing
capabilities over the Persian Gulf, with viewing zenith angles
> 60∘.
The Abu Al Bukhoosh AERONET site provides additional information to support
this argument as a maritime site located far from shore on an oil platform
in the southern Persian Gulf (25.50∘ N, 53.15∘ E) with L2
data available in the 2005–2015 period from November 2006 to September 2008.
MODIS and SEVIRI validation statistics and scatterplots reveal a similar
picture (Fig. b and d) as is present over
KAUST, although there are fewer substantial dust events observed. The RMSDs
show very minor differences to those seen at KAUST, although it is
interesting to note that the biases are somewhat higher: for MODIS, these are
+0.08 at KAUST and +0.13 at Abu Al Bukhoosh, while for SEVIRI, these are +0.00
and +0.08. That both retrievals see this increase in bias suggests some
common factor influencing the retrievals, perhaps due to local environmental
conditions or due to the nature of the aerosol present. The mean MODIS Ångström coefficient is 0.51, as opposed to 0.45 over KAUST. This implies
firstly that MODIS is assuming smaller dust particles over Abu Al Bukhoosh
than over KAUST, and that the MODIS AOD-scaling process multiplies the
550 nm AOD by a smaller value than over KAUST.
The difference in aerosol type between the two seas becomes more apparent
when we compare the MODIS-retrieved Ångström coefficients across the
entirety of the two seas. For the 11-year period of 2005–2015, over the Red Sea,
the mean Ångström coefficient is 0.66 (0.67 for low AODs < 1, 0.14
for high AODs > 1, as discussed in Sect. ). In contrast, over the Persian Gulf, the
mean is 0.96; for low AODs it is 0.99 and for high AODs it is 0.26. For
clarity, the basin-scale comparisons are not filtered by Ångström
coefficient values < 0.6 as are the AERONET comparisons. The Persian Gulf
is clearly a more industrial environment than is the Red Sea, as a centre of
global oil extraction both on the surrounding land and within the Gulf
itself. As a result, smaller industrial aerosols are a greater contributor to
the aerosol loading over the Persian Gulf than over the Red Sea, as evidenced
by higher Ångström coefficients, consistent with previous AERONET
measurements of the Ångström coefficient from Bahrain, as reported by
.
Conclusions
Satellite retrievals of AOD from SEVIRI over the Red Sea show a clear
climatological pattern of high summertime atmospheric dust loading over the
southern part of the basin, which contrasts with much reduced activity in the
north. This pattern induces marked differential radiative heating over the
Sea (B15). In this study, we have extended the temporal range of the AOD
observations over the Sea to cover the 11 years from 2005 to 2015 and,
importantly, evaluated their performance against an expanded set of
“ground-truth” measurements. In addition, in light of previously
identified biases between different aerosol retrieval algorithms in the
presence of dust e.g., we have compared
retrievals from MODIS Collection 6 and MISR with the SEVIRI observations.
There is a high degree of inter-annual variability present in this summertime
latitudinal gradient of dust presence over the Red Sea, manifested most
clearly in the south in July, where band monthly mean AODs range from
∼ 0.5 in 2007 to ∼ 1.8 in 2009. The MACC reanalysis dataset for these
two years provides the suggestion that July dust transport over the Sea is
dominated by dust sources in the Arabian Peninsula at high-altitude atmospheric layers,
whereas near-surface dust tends to be African in origin. Over the past 11 years
of the satellite records, some patterns in dust activity can be
discerned. The increase in dust activity over the Arabian Peninsula from
2007 to 2013 can be argued to have had an impact on dust
loadings over the Red Sea, but unlike over the neighbouring desert regions to
the east, this cannot be said to have been a “regime shift”. The summers of
2008–2013 have been particularly dusty over the southern Red Sea, judging by
the SEVIRI-retrieved AODs, but recently this has tapered off slightly in 2014
and 2015. Similarly, the Persian Gulf has seen a number of increases in dust
activity, such as in 2008–2009 and 2012. This is consistent with the analysis
of , who identified a positive dust AOD trend over
Saudi Arabia and the wider Middle East from 2000 to 2012, a trend which has been
interrupted by reduced AODs over the last few years. However, we also note a
recent uptick in dust AODs over both seas in spring 2015.
Over the Red Sea, there is broad agreement between SEVIRI, MODIS, and the
surface datasets, although there has been a marginal increase in MODIS AODs
by ∼ 0.01–0.02 from the previous Collection 5 dataset (B15). The
11-year satellite retrieval record has enabled the identification of a
pronounced positive AOD offset by MODIS with respect to SEVIRI. At lower AODs
of < 1, SEVIRI and MODIS are in good agreement, with a MODIS-SEVIRI offset
of +0.01. At higher AODs of > 1, the retrieved AODs diverge substantially,
leading to inter-retrieval offsets of +0.42: at such high loadings the
offsets appear to have a pronounced and systematic optical depth dependence.
This may be a consequence of the spherical dust assumptions used by the
retrievals, leading to variable sensitivity to dust presence at different
sun–dust–satellite scattering angles, an issue which merits further
investigation in future studies. Leading on from this, a related open
question for future studies is whether this sensitivity is influenced by the
origin of the dust, whether from Africa or from the Arabian Peninsula; particle shape and mineralogy
may be different between the two source regions. Comparisons with co-located
MISR measurements at high AODs indicate that SEVIRI is offset to a value of
-0.06 with respect to MISR, while MODIS is offset to a value of +0.19: these
are broadly opposite and similar in magnitude, although SEVIRI does show more
consistency between AOD regimes. Meanwhile, inter-retrieval comparisons
carried out over the Persian Gulf indicate the consistency of the behaviour
of the retrievals over a similar enclosed sea affected by dust outbreaks from
its neighbouring deserts. Despite the Gulf's proximity to the far edge of
SEVIRI's field of view, SEVIRI and MODIS display very similar patterns with
respect to each other as they do over the Red Sea, indicating that over both
seas the dominant source of any discrepancies between the two retrievals
arises simply from the magnitude of the dust activity. Whichever retrieval is
most accurate, these differences in behaviour at such high dust loadings will
have consequences for the magnitude of the associated differential radiative
heating of the surface and atmosphere over the Red Sea and hence the
atmospheric and oceanic circulation response.
AERONET data are available from the NASA GSFC at
http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (Holben et al., 1998), and the ship
cruise data are available from the Maritime AERONET programme at
http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/new_web/maritime_aerosol_network.html
(Smirnov et al., 2009). MODIS Collection 6 data were provided by the NASA
GSFC Level 1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System and are available at
http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD04_L2.006 and
http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD04_L2.006 (Levy et al., 2015). MISR version 22 data were provided
by the NASA Atmospheric Science Data Center and are available at
https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/misr/version/pge9 (Kahn et al., 2009). SEVIRI AOD
data are stored within the GERB dataset, which is available through the British
Atmospheric Data Centre at
http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/d8a5e58e59eb31620082dc4fd10158e2
(EUMETSAT, 2002). ECMWF MACC-II data
(http://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/projects/macc-ii, Inness et al., 2013) are accessible
in the ECMWF archive at http://apps.ecmwf.int/archive-catalogue/?class=mc.
The IDL code used to analyse the data is available upon request from the lead
author.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.
Acknowledgements
Jamie Banks and Kerstin Schepanski acknowledge funding through the Leibniz Association for the
project “Dust at the Interface – modelling and remote sensing”. Jamie Banks
and Helen Brindley have been partially supported for this work by research
grant KAUST CRG-1-2012-STE-IMP. Georgiy Stenchikov was supported by the King
Abdullah University of Science and Technology. The KAUST Campus AERONET site
has been established by KAUST, and Georgiy Stenchikov is the site PI; the authors also thank
the site managers, Jish Prakash and Illia Shevchenko, for maintaining
the AERONET facility. We thank also the PI and staff of the Abu Al Bukhoosh
AERONET site for establishing and maintaining this facility. The ship cruises
were also organised by KAUST, within the framework of the Maritime AERONET
program, and Georgiy Stenchikov is the PI for the aerosol measurements. We
thank also colleagues at the Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium for
the provision of the GERB-like dataset which stores the SEVIRI AOD retrievals,
and also for the surface elevation data plotted in Fig. 1. We thank the
MACC-II project, which has received funding from the EU FP7 under grant
agreement number 283576 and was coordinated by the ECMWF for providing the
MACC-II reanalysis dataset. We would also like to thank Andrew Sayer (at
GESTAR/USRA at the NASA GSFC) and another anonymous reviewer for their
perceptive comments during the preparation of this paper.
Edited by: R. Müller
Reviewed by: G. McGarragh and A. M. Sayer
ReferencesAbdou, W. A., Diner, D. J., Martonchik, J. V., Bruegge, C. J., Kahn, R. A.,
Gaitley, B. J., and Crean, K. A.: Comparison of coincident Multiangle
Imaging Spectroradiometer and Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer aerosol optical depths over land and ocean scenes
containing Aerosol Robotic Network sites, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10S07,
10.1029/2004JD004693, 2005.Abed, A. M., Al-Kuisi, M., and Khair, H. A.: Characterization of the
Khamaseen (spring) dust in Jordan, Atmos. Environ., 43, 2868–2876,
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.015, 2009.Alpert, P. and Ziv, B.: The Sharav Cyclone: Observations and some
theoretical considerations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 94, 18495–18514,
10.1029/JD094iD15p18495, 1989.Banks, J. R. and Brindley, H. E.: Evaluation of MSG-SEVIRI mineral dust
retrieval products over North Africa and the Middle East, Remote
Sens. Environ., 128, 58–73, 10.1016/j.rse.2012.07.017, 2013.Banks, J. R., Brindley, H. E., Flamant, C., Garay, M. J., Hsu, N. C.,
Kalashnikova, O. V., Klüser, L., and Sayer, A. M.: Intercomparison of
satellite dust retrieval products over the west African Sahara during the
Fennec campaign in June 2011, Remote Sens. Environ., 136, 99–116,
10.1016/j.rse.2013.05.003, 2013.Brindley, H., Osipov, S., Bantges, R., Smirnov, A.,
Banks, J., Levy, R., Jish Prakash, P., and Stenchikov, G.: An asessment of
the quality of aerosol retrievals over the Red Sea and evaluation of the
climatological cloud-free dust direct radiative effect in the region, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10862–10878, 10.1002/2015JD023282, 2015.
Brindley, H. E. and Ignatov, A.: Retrieval of mineral aerosol optical depth
and size information from Meteosat Second Generation SEVIRI solar
reflectance bands, Remote Sens. Environ., 102, 344–363, 2006.
Brindley, H. E. and Russell, J. E.: Improving GERB scene identification
using SEVIRI: Infrared dust detection strategy, Remote Sens. Environ.,
104, 426–446, 2006.Cantin, N. E., Cohen, A. L., Karnauskas, K. B.,
Tarrant, A. M., and McCorkle, D. C.: Ocean Warming Slows Coral Growth
in the Central Red Sea, Science, 329, 322–325,
10.1126/science.1190182, 2010.Carboni, E., Thomas, G. E., Sayer, A.
M., Siddans, R., Poulsen, C. A., Grainger, R. G., Ahn, C., Antoine, D.,
Bevan, S., Braak, R., Brindley, H., DeSouza-Machado, S., Deuzé, J. L.,
Diner, D., Ducos, F., Grey, W., Hsu, C., Kalashnikova, O. V., Kahn, R.,
North, P. R. J., Salustro, C., Smith, A., Tanré, D., Torres, O., and
Veihelmann, B.: Intercomparison of desert dust optical depth from satellite
measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1973–2002, 10.5194/amt-5-1973-2012,
2012.Cuevas, E., Camino, C., Benedetti, A.,
Basart, S., Terradellas, E., Baldasano, J. M., Morcrette, J. J., Marticorena,
B., Goloub, P., Mortier, A., Berjón, A., Hernández, Y., Gil-Ojeda,
M., and Schulz, M.: The MACC-II 2007–2008 reanalysis: atmospheric dust
evaluation and characterization over northern Africa and the Middle East,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3991–4024, 10.5194/acp-15-3991-2015, 2015.De Paepe, B., Ignatov, A., Dewitte, S., and Ipe, A.:
Aerosol retrieval over ocean from SEVIRI for the use in GERB Earth's
radiation budget analyses, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 2455–2468,
10.1016/j.rse.2007.11.005, 2008.Diner, D. J., Braswell, B. H., Davies, R., Gobron, N.,
Hu, J., Jin, Y., Kahn, R. A., Knyazikhin, Y., Loeb, N., Muller, J.-P., Nolin,
A. W., Pinty, B., Schaaf, C. B., Seiz, G., and Stroeve, J.: The value of
multiangle measurements for retrieving structurally and radiatively
consistent properties of clouds, aerosols, and surfaces, Remote Sens.
Environ., 97, 495–518, 10.1016/j.rse.2005.06.006, 2005.Dubovik, O., Holben,
B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M. D., Tanré, D., and
Slutsker, I.: Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key
Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations, J. Atmos. Sci., 59,
590–608,
10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0590:VOAAOP>2.0.CO;2,
2002a.Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N.,
Lapyonok, T., Sinyuk, A., Mishchenko, M. I., Yang, P., and Slutsker, I.:
Non-spherical aerosol retrieval method employing light scattering by
spheroids, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2001GL014506,
2002b.EUMETSAT: Harries, J. E., Russell, J. E., Hanafin, J. A., Brindley, H. E.,
Futyan, J., Rufus, J., Kellock, S., Matthews, G., Wrigley, R., Last, A.,
Mueller, J., Mossavati, R., Ashmall, J., Sawyer, E., Parker, D. E., Caldwell,
M., Allan, P. M., Smith, A., Bates, M. J., Coan, B., Stewart, B. C., Lepine,
D. R., Cornwall, L. A., Corney, D. R., Ricketts, M. J., Drummond, D., Smart,
D., Cutler, R., Dewitte, S., Clerbaux, N., Gonzalez, L., Ipe, A., Bertrand,
C., Joukoff, A., Crommelynck, D., Nelms, N., Llewellyn-Jones, D. T., Butcher,
G., Smith, G. L., Szewczyk, Z. P., Mlynczak, P. E., Slingo, A., Allan, R. P.,
and Ringer, M. A.: Solar and Thermal Radiation Data from the Geostationary
Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) Experiment, NCAS British Atmospheric Data
Centre, available at:
http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/d8a5e58e59eb31620082dc4fd10158e2 (last
access: 20 March 2017), 2002.Farley Nicholls, J., Toumi, R., and
Stenchikov, G.: Effects of unsteady mountain-gap winds on eddies in the Red
Sea, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 16, 279–284, 10.1002/asl2.554, 2015.Giannakopoulou, E. M. and Toumi, R.: The Persian Gulf summertime
low-level jet over sloping terrain, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 145–157,
10.1002/qj.901, 2011.Givehchi, R., Arhami, M., and Tajrishy, M.: Contribution of the Middle
Eastern dust source areas to PM10 levels in urban receptors: Case
study of Tehran, Iran, Atmos. Environ., 75, 287–295,
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.039, 2013.Haywood, J. M., Johnson, B. T., Osborne, S. R., Baran,
A. J., Brooks, M., Milton, S. F., Mulcahy, J., Walters, D., Allan, R. P.,
Klaver, A., Formenti, P., Brindley, H. E., Christopher, S., and Gupta, P.:
Motivation, rationale and key results from the GERBILS Saharan dust
measurement campaign, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1106–1116,
10.1002/qj.797, 2011.Heintzenberg, J.: The SAMUM-1 experiment over Southern Morocco:
overview and introduction, Tellus B, 61, 2–11,
10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00403.x, 2009.Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D.,
Buis, J. P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J.,
Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A
Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol
Characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16,
10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5, 1998 (data available at: http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/, last access: 20 March 2017).Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S.-C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.: Aerosol Properties
Over Bright-Reflecting Source Regions, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 42,
557–569, 10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067, 2004.Hsu, N. C., Jeong, M.-J., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer,
A. M., Hansell, R., Seftor, C. S., Huang, J., and Tsay, S.-C.: Enhanced
Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1–20, 10.1002/jgrd.50712, 2013.Inness, A., Baier, F.,
Benedetti, A., Bouarar, I., Chabrillat, S., Clark, H., Clerbaux, C., Coheur,
P., Engelen, R. J., Errera, Q., Flemming, J., George, M., Granier, C.,
Hadji-Lazaro, J., Huijnen, V., Hurtmans, D., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W.,
Kapsomenakis, J., Lefever, K., Leitão, J., Razinger, M., Richter, A.,
Schultz, M. G., Simmons, A. J., Suttie, M., Stein, O., Thépaut, J.-N.,
Thouret, V., Vrekoussis, M., Zerefos, C., and the MACC team: The MACC
reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
13, 4073–4109, 10.5194/acp-13-4073-2013, 2013 (data available at: http://apps.ecmwf.int/archive-catalogue/?class=mc, last access:
20 March 2017).Ipe, A., Bertrand, C., Clerbaux, N., Dewitte, S., and
Gonzalez, L.: Validation and homogenization of cloud optical depth and cloud
fraction retrievals for GERB/SEVIRI scene identification using Meteosat-7
data, Atmos. Res., 72, 17–37, 10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.03.010, 2004.Jiang, H., Farrar, J. T., Beardsley, R. C., Chen, R., and
Chen, C.: Zonal surface wind jets across the Red Sea due to mountain gap
forcing along both sides of the Red Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19605,
10.1029/2009GL040008, 2009.Jish Prakash, P., Stenchikov, G.,
Kalenderski, S., Osipov, S., and Bangalath, H.: The impact of dust storms on
the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 199–222,
10.5194/acp-15-199-2015, 2015.Kahn, R. A., Nelson, D. L., Garay,
M. J., Levy, R. C., Bull, M. A., Diner, D. J., Martonchik, J. V., Paradise,
S. R., Hansen, E. G., and Remer, L. A.: MISR Aerosol Product
Attributes and Statistical Comparisons With MODIS, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote, 47, 4095–4114, 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2023115, 2009 (data available at: https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/misr/version/pge9, last access:
20 March 2017).Kahn, R. A., Gaitley, B. J., Garay, M. J., Diner, D. J.,
Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., and Holben, B. N.: Multiangle Imaging
SpectroRadiometer global aerosol product assessment by comparison with
the Aerosol Robotic Network, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D23209,
10.1029/2010JD014601, 2010.Kalashnikova, O. V., Kahn, R., Sokolik, I. N., and Li,
W.-H.: The ability of multi-angle remote sensing observations to identify and
distinguish mineral dust types: Part 1. Optical models and retrievals of
optically thick plumes, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18S14, 10.1029/2004JD004550,
2005.Kalenderski, S. and Stenchikov, G.: High-resolution regional modeling of
summertime transport and impact of African dust over the Red Sea and
Arabian Peninsula, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 6435–6458,
10.1002/2015JD024480, 2016.Kleidman, R. G., O'Neill, N. T., Remer,
L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Eck, T. F., Tanré, D., Dubovik, O., and Holben,
B. N.: Comparison of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
(MODIS) and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) remote-sensing
retrievals of aerosol fine mode fraction over ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D22205,
10.1029/2005JD005760, 2005.Klingmüller, K., Pozzer, A., Metzger,
S., Stenchikov, G. L., and Lelieveld, J.: Aerosol optical depth trend over
the Middle East, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5063–5073,
10.5194/acp-16-5063-2016, 2016.Koepke, P., Gasteiger, J., and Hess, M.: Technical Note: Optical properties
of desert aerosol with non-spherical mineral particles: data incorporated to
OPAC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5947–5956, 10.5194/acp-15-5947-2015, 2015.Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A.,
Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Ichoku, C., Holben, B. N., Livingston, J. M.,
Russell, P. B., and Maring, H.: Evaluation of the Moderate-Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) retrievals of dust aerosol over the
ocean during PRIDE, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8594, 10.1029/2002JD002460,
2003.Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Mattoo, S., Vermote, E. F.,
and Kaufman, Y. J.: Second-generation operational algorithm: Retrieval of
aerosol properties over land from inversion of Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer spectral reflectance, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D13211,
10.1029/2006JD007811, 2007.Levy, R. C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L. A., Remer, L. A., Sayer,
A. M., Patadia, F., and Hsu, N. C.: The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products
over land and ocean, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2989–3034,
10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013, 2013.Levy, R., Hsu, C., et al.: MODIS Atmosphere L2 Aerosol Product, NASA MODIS
Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA,
10.5067/MODIS/MOD04_L2.006 (last access: 20 March 2017), 2015.
MétéoFrance: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for “Cloud
Products” (CMa-PGE01 v3.2, CT-PGE02 v2.2 & CTTH-PGE03 v2.2),
Tech. Rep. SAF/NWC/CDOP/MFL/SCI/ATBD/01, MétéoFrance, Paris, France,
2013.Notaro, M., Alkolibi, F., Fadda, E., and Bakhrjy, F.: Trajectory analysis of
Saudi Arabian dust storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6028–6043,
10.1002/jgrd.50346, 2013.Notaro, M., Yu, Y., and Kalashnikova, O. V.: Regime shift in Arabian dust
activity, triggered by persistent Fertile Crescent drought, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 10229–10249, 10.1002/2015JD023855, 2015.O'Neill, N. T., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Holben,
B. N., and Thulasiraman, S.: Spectral discrimination of coarse and fine mode
optical depth, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4559, 10.1029/2002JD002975,
2003.Osipov, S., Stenchikov, G., Brindley, H., and Banks, J.:
Diurnal cycle of the dust instantaneous direct radiative forcing over the
Arabian Peninsula, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9537–9553,
10.5194/acp-15-9537-2015, 2015.Pandolfi, J. M., Sala, R. H. B. E., Hughes, T. P., Bjorndal, K. A., Cooke,
R. G., McArdle, D., McClenachan, L., Newman, M. J. H., Paredes, G., Warner,
R. R., and Jackson, J. B. C.: Global Trajectories of the Long-Term
Decline of Coral Reef Ecosystems, Science, 301, 955–958,
10.1126/science.1085706, 2003.Patzert, W. C.: Wind-induced reversal in Red Sea circulation, Deep-Sea
Res., 21, 109–121, 10.1016/0011-7471(74)90068-0, 1974.Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson,
S. E., and Gill, T. E.: Environmental characteristics of global sources of
atmospheric soil dust identified with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone
Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) Absorbing Aerosol Product, Rev.
Geophys., 40, 1002, 10.1029/2000RG000095, 2002.Redelsperger, J.-L., Thorncroft,
C. D., Diedhiou, A., Lebel, T., Parker, D. J., and Polcher, J.: African
Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis: An International Research
Project and Field Campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1739–1746,
10.1175/BAMS-87-12-1739, 2006.Remer, L. A.,
Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A., Martins, J. V., Li,
R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kleidman, R. G., Eck, T. F., Vermote, E., and
Holben, B. N.: The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and
Validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 947–973, 10.1175/JAS3385.1, 2005.Remer, L. A., Kleidman,
R. G., Levy, R. C., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Martins, J. V.,
Ichoku, C., Koren, I., Yu, H., and Holben, B. N.: Global aerosol climatology
from the MODIS satellite sensors, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14S07,
10.1029/2007JD009661, 2008.Ryder, C. L., Highwood, E. J., Rosenberg, P. D.,
Trembath, J., Brooke, J. K., Bart, M., Dean, A., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J.,
Brindley, H., Banks, J., Marsham, J. H., McQuaid, J. B., Sodemann, H., and
Washington, R.: Optical properties of Saharan dust aerosol and contribution
from the coarse mode as measured during the Fennec 2011 aircraft campaign,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 303–325, 10.5194/acp-13-303-2013, 2013.
Ryder, C. L., McQuaid, J. B., Flamant, C., Rosenberg, P.
D., Washington, R., Brindley, H. E., Highwood, E. J., Marsham, J. H., Parker,
D. J., Todd, M. C., Banks, J. R., Brooke, J. K., Engelstaedter, S., Estelles,
V., Formenti, P., Garcia-Carreras, L., Kocha, C., Marenco, F., Sodemann, H.,
Allen, C. J. T., Bourdon, A., Bart, M., Cavazos-Guerra, C., Chevaillier, S.,
Crosier, J., Darbyshire, E., Dean, A. R., Dorsey, J. R., Kent, J.,
O'Sullivan, D., Schepanski, K., Szpek, K., Trembath, J., and Woolley, A.:
Advances in understanding mineral dust and boundary layer processes over the
Sahara from Fennec aircraft observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8479–8520,
10.5194/acp-15-8479-2015, 2015.Sayer, A. M., Hsu, N. C., Bettenhausen, C., and
Jeong, M.-J.: Validation and uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6
Deep Blue aerosol data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7864–7872,
10.1002/jgrd.50600, 2013.Schepanski, K., Tegen, I., Laurent, B., Heinold, B.,
and Macke, A.: A new Saharan dust source activation frequency map derived
from MSG-SEVIRI IR-channels, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L18803,
10.1029/2007GL030168, 2007.Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann,
J., Rota, S., and Ratier, A.: An introduction to Meteosat Second
Generation (MSG), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 977–992,
10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0977:AITMSG>2.3.CO;2,
2002.Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Dubovik, O.,
and Slutsker, I.: Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for
the AERONET Database, Remote Sens. Environ., 73, 337–349,
10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00109-7, 2000.Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N.,
Dubovik, O., O'Neill, N. T., Eck, T. F., Westphal, D. L., Goroch, A. K.,
Pietras, C., and Slutsker, I.: Atmospheric Aerosol Optical Properties
in the Persian Gulf, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 620–634,
10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0620:AAOPIT>2.0.CO;2,
2002.Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N.,
Slutsker, I., Giles, D. M., McClain, C. R., Eck, T. F., Sakerin, S. M.,
Macke, A., Croot, P., Zibordi, G., Quinn, P. K., Sciare, J., Kinne, S.,
Harvey, M., Smyth, T. J., Piketh, S., Zielinski, T., Proshutinsky, A., Goes,
J. I., Nelson, N. B., Larouche, P., Radionov, V. F., Goloub, P., Moorthy,
K. K., Matarrese, R., Robertson, E. J., and Jourdin, F.: Maritime Aerosol
Network as a component of Aerosol Robotic Network, J. Geophys. Res.,
114, D06204, 10.1029/2008JD011257, 2009 (data available at: http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/new_web/maritime_aerosol_network.html, last access:
20 March 2017).
Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Herman, M., and Mattoo,
S.: Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the MODIS/EOS
spectral radiances, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16971–16988, 1997.Wang, J., Liu, X., Christopher, S. A., Reid, J. S.,
Reid, E., and Maring, H.: The effects of non-sphericity on geostationary
satellite retrievals of dust aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2293,
10.1029/2003GL018697, 2003.