<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-1653-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Contributions of nitrated aromatic compounds to the light absorption of
water-soluble and particulate brown carbon in different atmospheric
environments in Germany and China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Contributions of nitrated aromatic compounds}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Teich et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Teich</surname><given-names>Monique</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>van Pinxteren</surname><given-names>Dominik</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kecorius</surname><given-names>Simonas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zhibin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Močnik</surname><given-names>Griša</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-2381</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Herrmann</surname><given-names>Hartmut</given-names></name>
          <email>herrmann@tropos.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-2101</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, TROPOS, 04315 Leipzig,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Aerosol d.o.o., 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Condensed Physics Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana,
Slovenia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for
Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hartmut Herrmann (herrmann@tropos.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1653</fpage><lpage>1672</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The relative contributions of eight nitrated aromatic compounds
(NACs: nitrophenols and nitrated salicylic acids) to the light absorption of
aqueous particle extracts and particulate brown carbon were determined from
aerosol particle samples collected in Germany and China.</p>
    <p>High-volume filter samples were collected during six campaigns, performed at
five locations in two seasons: (I) two campaigns with strong influence of
biomass-burning (BB) aerosol  at the TROPOS institute (winter, 2014, urban
background, Leipzig, Germany) and the Melpitz research site (winter, 2014,
rural background); (II) two campaigns with strong influence from biogenic
emissions  at Melpitz (summer, 2014) and the forest site Waldstein
(summer, 2014, Fichtelgebirge, Germany); and (III) two CAREBeijing-NCP
campaigns  at Xianghe (summer, 2013, anthropogenic polluted background)
and Wangdu (summer, 2014, anthropogenic polluted background with a distinct
BB episode), both in the North China Plain.</p>
    <p>The filter samples were analyzed for NAC concentrations and the light
absorption of aqueous filter extracts was determined. Light absorption
properties of particulate brown carbon were derived from a seven-wavelength
aethalometer during the campaigns at TROPOS (winter) and Waldstein (summer).
The light absorption of the aqueous filter extracts was found to be pH
dependent, with larger values at higher pH. In general, the aqueous light absorption coefficient (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranged
from 0.21 to 21.8 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under acidic conditions and 0.63 to 27.2 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under alkaline conditions, over all campaigns. The observed
mass absorption efficiency (MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was in a range of 0.10–1.79 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.24–2.57 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for acidic and alkaline conditions, respectively. For
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the observed values were higher in winter than
in summer, in agreement with other studies. The lowest MAE was observed for
the Waldstein (summer) campaign (average of 0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that freshly emitted biogenic aerosols are only weakly
absorbing. In contrast, a strong relationship was found between the light
absorption properties and the concentrations of levoglucosan, corroborating
findings from other studies.</p>
    <p>Regarding the particulate light absorption at 370 nm, a mean particulate
light absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 54 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 6.0 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined for the TROPOS (winter) and Waldstein (summer)
campaigns, respectively, with average contributions of particulate brown
carbon to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 46 % at TROPOS (winter) and 15 % at
Waldstein (summer). Thus, the aethalometer measurements support the findings
from aqueous filter extracts of only weakly absorbing biogenic aerosols in
comparison to the more polluted and BB influenced aerosol at TROPOS
(winter).</p>
    <p>The mean contribution of NACs to the aqueous extract light absorption over
all campaigns ranged from 0.10 to 1.25 % under acidic conditions and
0.13 to 3.71 % under alkaline conditions. The high variability among
the measurement sites showed that the emission strengths of light-absorbing
compounds and the composition of brown carbon were very different for each
site. The mean contribution of NACs to the particulate brown carbon light
absorption was 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 % (acidic conditions) and 0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 % (alkaline conditions) during the Waldstein (summer) campaign and
0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21 % (acidic conditions) and 1.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.03 %
(alkaline conditions) during the TROPOS (winter) campaign.</p>
    <p>The average contribution of NACs to the aqueous extract light absorption
over all campaigns was found to be 5 times higher than their mass
contribution to water-soluble organic carbon indicating that even small
amounts of light-absorbing compounds can have a disproportionately high
impact on the light absorption properties of particles.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Organic components of atmospheric aerosols are usually treated as solely
light scattering in global climate models over the near-ultraviolet and
visible range (UV/Vis) of the solar spectrum and therefore only make a
negative contribution to radiative forcing (Feng et al., 2013). However, the
existence of light-absorbing organic carbon (OC) has become more and more
evident in the past decade and can be a regionally important phenomenon (see
reviews of Andreae and Gelencser, 2006, and, more recently, Laskin et al.,
2015, and references therein and Ulevicius et al., 2010). In contrast to
black carbon (BC), which absorbs light efficiently over the whole visible
and UV region, light absorbtion by OC exhibits a distinct wavelength
dependence. The light absorption sharply increases with decreasing
wavelength, making it an efficient absorber in the UV/Vis range. Due to its
characteristic yellowish to brownish color, light-absorbing OC is also often
addressed as brown carbon (BrC).</p>
      <p>The light absorption by BrC over the whole solar spectrum are found to be
relatively weak compared to BC (J. Liu et al., 2013). Nevertheless, at near-UV/Vis wavelengths (300–500 nm) BrC has a non-negligible effect on
radiative forcing and the regional and global climate (e.g., Bahadur et al.,
2012; Feng et al., 2013; Jo et al., 2016; Park et al., 2010). For instance,
modeling studies showed that the radiative forcing of BrC relative to BC is
up to 25 % (Feng et al., 2013). Furthermore, BrC light absorption in the
UV range of the spectrum may alter the concentrations of atmospheric oxidants
due to reduced photolysis rates (Jacobson, 1999).</p>
      <p>The light absorption of ambient particles is generally quantified by the
determination of the particulate light absorption coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (in Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be normalized by the sample
mass to give the mass absorption efficiency (MAE; in m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. MAE
can then further be used to estimate the radiative forcing of particulate
BrC, which makes it an important parameter for modeling studies. These
models start with modeled emitted mass, which is converted into
concentrations using a dispersion model. The absorption of aerosols in the
atmosphere is then determined using the appropriate MAE (Feng et al., 2013).
The wavelength dependence of light absorption of a particle sample is
described by the absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) based on the
power-law dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        BC has a weak wavelength dependence and often an AAE of 1.0 is assumed,
which is the Mie theoretical value, though measured values range between
0.8 and 1.1 (Gyawali et al., 2009). Values greater than 1.1 indicate a stronger
wavelength dependence and give evidence for the presence of absorbers at
lower wavelengths, such as BrC and mineral dust (Wang et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Several methods exist to quantify the light absorption properties of BrC.
Filter-based and multi-wavelength measurement techniques are commonly used
to assess the contribution of BrC to the total aerosol light absorption
(Moosmüller et al., 2009). One of these instruments is the
seven-wavelength aethalometer, which operates from 370 to 940 nm. Due to
the main light absorption of BrC at short wavelengths, the 370 nm channel is
of particular interest. To estimate the contributions of BrC and BC to
aerosol light absorption, a simple approach based on wavelength pairs and
assumed AAEs to distinguish between the light absorption of BC and BrC has
often been used (Lack and Langridge, 2013; Sandradewi et al., 2008).</p>
      <p>Another method is to extract aerosol particles into solvents, mostly water or
methanol (e.g., Bosch et al., 2014; Chen and Bond, 2010; Cheng et al., 2011;
J. Liu et al., 2013). The advantage of this approach is that BC is insoluble
in these solvents and therefore removed by filtration. The extracts are then
further analyzed by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. Commonly, light absorption at
365 nm is used to characterize water-soluble BrC (e.g., Bosch et al., 2014;
Cheng et al., 2011; Hecobian et al., 2010). This wavelength is in a range
where the light absorption of inorganics does not interfere, whereas the
light absorption of organics shows a sufficiently high intensity (Hecobian et
al., 2010). Observed MAE values (related to the water-soluble OC, WSOC) for
water-soluble BrC typically range between 0.41 and 1.80 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Cheng et al., 2016; Hecobian et al., 2010), where higher values are usually
found in winter.</p>
      <p>Until now, field measurements of the light absorption properties of
water-soluble BrC have been performed mostly in the US and Asia, and
measurements in Europe are scarce. Duarte et al. (2005) investigated the
optical properties of WSOC from aerosol samples collected at a rural site in
Portugal. They found a seasonal variation with a higher absorptivity in
autumn than in summer. Some studies have reported the optical properties of
humic-like substances (HULIS), which are a part of WSOC (e.g., Baduel et
al., 2010; Utry et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Sources of BrC are very diverse. Known primary sources are biomass burning
(BB; Kirchstetter and Thatcher, 2012; Lack et al., 2013; Mohr et al., 2013)
and fossil fuel and residential coal combustion (Bond, 2001; Olson et al.,
2015). Moreover, BrC can be produced by secondary reactions of anthropogenic
(Lin et al., 2015a; Nakayama et al., 2010) or biogenic precursors (Flores et
al., 2014; Kampf et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The molecular composition of BrC still remains largely unknown due to its
complex nature. Several attempts have been made to characterize BrC at a
molecular level (Lin et al., 2015a, b). Among the identified compound
groups are large macromolecules, like HULIS (Hoffer et al., 2006), aldol
condensation products (Noziere and Esteve, 2005, 2007) and
nitrogen-containing compounds formed by the reaction of atmospheric
aldehydes with ammonia or amines, e.g., imidazoles (Galloway et al., 2009;
Lin et al., 2015b; Yu et al., 2011). Nitrated aromatic compounds (NACs),
which are the focus of the present study, comprise another group of major
contributors to BrC (Jacobson, 1999; Mohr et al., 2013). Nitrophenols (NPs)
can be either emitted directly into the atmosphere, e.g., by traffic exhaust
(Nojima et al., 1983; Tremp et al., 1993) and wood burning (Hoffmann et al.,
2007), or secondarily formed by the nitration of precursor compounds like
phenol either in the gas phase or liquid phase (Bolzacchini et al., 2001;
Vione et al., 2002). NPs have been quantified at many different locations,
especially in Europe (Cecinato et al., 2005; Iinuma et al., 2010; Kahnt et
al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2010), but there is surprisingly little information
on NP concentrations in Asia (Chow et al., 2015). Nitrated salicylic acids
(NSAs) have also been recently detected in atmospheric aerosol particles
(Kitanovski et al., 2012; van Pinxteren and Herrmann, 2007). A strong
correlation with nitrate was found by Kitanovski et al. (2012) in samples
from Ljubljana, Slovenia, suggesting secondary formation from precursor
compounds such as salicylic acid, which has been found in biomass-burning
aerosols as a lignin degradation product (Iinuma et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>Studying BrC at a molecular level is considered important, since even trace
levels of a compound could have a significant impact on the light absorption
properties of particles (Kampf et al., 2012). However, little is known about
the contributions of specific light-absorbing compounds to the light
absorption of either ambient aerosols or aqueous extracts from ambient
particles. Mohr et al. (2013) estimated the relative contribution of NACs to
particulate BrC light absorption to be about 4 % at 370 nm at a
measurement site in the United Kingdom with high influence of BB aerosols.
Zhang et al. (2013) calculated a contribution of NACs to aqueous extract
light absorption of 4 % from the Los Angeles Basin (USA).</p>
      <p>The present study aims to expand the understanding of BrC and water-soluble
BrC by investigating its spatial and temporal variation in different, very
diverse environments (urban, rural, biogenic, high BB influence).
Furthermore, the contribution of individual light-absorbing organic
compounds to the BrC light absorption is included.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Measurement campaigns</title>
      <p>Measurements took place at five sampling sites (three German and two
Chinese), in six different atmospheric conditions. An overview over the
sites, sampling periods, geographical coordinates and the type of
atmospheric environment is given in Table 1. Average temperatures and wind
speeds are given as campaign averages.</p>
      <p>The Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS (winter) campaign,
2014) is located in Leipzig in eastern Germany and can be regarded as a
moderately polluted urban background site impacted by a mixture of various
sources (van Pinxteren et al., 2016). During the measurement period this
site was strongly influenced by BB aerosols, as indicated by high
levoglucosan concentrations. The first half of the campaign (24 to 31
January) was characterized by low 12 h mean temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Afterwards, the temperature gradually increased towards the end of the
campaign (up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C as 12 h mean). The periods of lower
temperatures often coincided with increased emissions from residential
heating. The average wind speed was 2.2 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The measurement site Waldstein in the Bavarian Fichtel Mountains (Waldstein
(summer) campaign, 2014; Plewka et al., 2006) is located about 180 km southwest of Leipzig in a low mountain range. The site is surrounded by forest,
where spruce is the dominant species. Measurements took place on a tower at
a height of 21 m (about 780 m above sea level). The measurement period was
characterized by low wind speeds (&lt; 1.3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
predominantly sunny weather (average temperature of 19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).
Because of the surrounding forest, the influence of freshly emitted biogenic
organics is expected to be high.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Overview over sampling sites, used terminology, sampling
period, sampling time given in local time (LT)  and according atmospheric conditions during the
sampling period.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="142.26378pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling site</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Designation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Geographic <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>coordinates</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sampling period (sampling duration per filter)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Comments</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="left">Germany </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Roof of the Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TROPOS <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(winter)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51.35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12.43<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 January to 8 February 2014 (12 h, day,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>06:00–18:00 LT, and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>night, 18:00–06:00 LT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Urban background, strong influence of biomass-burning aerosol during measurement period (van Pinxteren et al., 2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Melpitz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Melpitz<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(winter)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12.93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 January to 4 February 2014 (24 h, 00:00–24:00 LT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Rural background (Spindler et al., <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Melpitz<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(summer)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16 to 25 July 2014 (24 h, 00:00–24:00 LT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bavarian Fichtel Mountains</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Waldstein (summer)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50.14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11.87<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16 July to 25 July<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2014 (11 h, day, 07:00–<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>18:00 LT, and night, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>19:00–06:00 LT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">BayCEER Waldstein observatory, F-BEACH campaign, surrounded by forest, high local biogenic emissions <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Plewka et al., 2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="left">China </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xianghe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xianghe<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(summer)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.96<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9 to 14 July and 21<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>July 2013 to 1 August 2013 (12 h, day, 06:00–18:00 LT and night,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>18:00–06:00 LT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CAREBeijing–NCP 2013 campaign <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Kecorius et al., 2015), rural back-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ground, urban outflow</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wangdu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wangdu <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(summer)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 115.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4  to 24 June 2014<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(12 h, day, 06:00–<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>18:00 LT, and night, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>18:00–06:00 LT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CAREBeijing-NCP 2014 campaign,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>rural background, biomass burning <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>episode occurred during the measurement period (Kecorius et al., 2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Measurements at Melpitz, a rural background site, located about 50 km northeast of Leipzig, were carried out in winter (Melpitz (winter) campaign,
2014) and summer (Melpitz (summer) campaign, 2014). The Melpitz (winter)
campaign was characterized by an average temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
an average wind speed of 2.8 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Melpitz (summer) campaign was
characterized by an average temperature of 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and a mean wind
speed of 2.0 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dates in winter and summer correspond to the
measurement periods of the TROPOS (winter) and Waldstein (summer) campaigns,
respectively. Due to the proximity of TROPOS and Melpitz, the two sites are
influenced by similar regional air masses.</p>
      <p>The Chinese measurement sites Xianghe (Xianghe (summer) campaign, 2013) and
Wangdu (Wangdu (summer) campaign, 2014) are both located in the Hebei
Province in the North China Plain (NCP). The campaigns were part of the
CAREBeijing-NCP campaigns in 2013 and 2014. Xianghe is situated between the
two megacities of Beijing and Tianjin, and Wangdu is located 170 km southwest of Beijing. The average temperature and wind speed at the Xianghe
(summer) campaign were 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 0.8 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
For the Wangdu (summer) campaign a mean temperature of 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
a mean wind speed of 4 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured. Both sites can be regarded
as regional background stations for the NCP. In comparison to the summer
campaigns in Germany, the average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) concentrations were about 3 to
7 times higher at the Chinese sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sampling, chemical analysis and back trajectories</title>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was collected on quartz fiber filters with a Digitel DHA-80 high
volume filter sampler (MK 360, Munktell, Falun, Sweden; flow rate: 0.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To minimize blank content, the filters were
pre-baked for 24 h at 105 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Day and night samples (11 h or 12 h; see Table 1) were taken during each campaign except for Melpitz (winter)
and Melpitz (summer), where particles were collected for 24 h. After
sampling, filters were stored in clean aluminium tins at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
in the dark until extraction (extraction was done within a year after
sampling). It is assumed that storage at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C prevents
chemical degradation of the sample. Analysis of WSOC, levoglucosan, NACs and
UV/Vis spectrophotometry measurements was carried out using aqueous filter
extracts of different portions of filter in ultrapure water. Details on the
different methods are given below. The aqueous filter extract was always
filtered through a pre-cleaned syringe filter (0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, Acrodisc 13,
Pall, Dreieich, Germany).</p>
      <p>NACs and UV/Vis spectra were determined from the aqueous extract by
extracting 11–28 pieces of the filter (1.54 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> each) into 10 mL of
ultrapure water. NPs were analyzed according to the method described in
Teich et al. (2014) based on hollow fiber liquid-phase micro extraction for
analyte enrichment and capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization
mass spectrometry (CE-ESI-MS, Agilent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CE instrument, Bruker Esquire
3000<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion trap mass spectrometer). Samples from the Waldstein (summer)
campaign were not analyzed for NPs due to the limited availability of
filter material.</p>
      <p>NSAs were enriched by evaporating an alkalinized aliquot of the aqueous
filter extract (1.8 mL plus 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L 10 mM NaOH) to dryness in a vacuum
concentrator (miVac, Genevac Ltd., UK) and redissolving the residue into 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L
ultrapure water. Subsequent analysis was carried out by CE-MS as
described in van Pinxteren et al. (2012). Standard addition was carried out
for quantifying the NSA compounds by co-injecting a standard solution plug
at different concentration levels into the CE capillary after the sample
plug.</p>
      <p>Overall, eight NACs were determined as part of BrC: 3-nitrosalicylic acid
(3NSA) and 5-nitrosalicylic acid (5NSA), 4-nitrophenol (4NP),
2-methyl-4-nitrophenol (2M4NP), 3-methyl-4-nitrophenol (3M4NP),
2,6-dimethyl-4-nitrophenol (2,6DM4NP), 2,4-dinitrophenol (2,4DNP) and
3,4-dinitrophenol (3,4DNP). The standard compounds were purchased in high
purity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98 %) from either Fluka or Sigma-Aldrich (Munich,
Germany). As a typical BB tracer, levoglucosan can help to investigate the
influence of BB aerosols on the observed concentrations (Iinuma et al.,
2009; Simoneit, 2002). Levoglucosan was analyzed with a Dionex ICS-3000
system coupled with a pulsed amperometric detector (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). A portion of sampled filter (9.42 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was extracted in 20 mL of ultrapure water by shaking with a laboratory
orbital shaker for 120 min. Detailed chromatographic conditions and the
merits of analysis can be found elsewhere (Iinuma et al., 2009).
Levoglucosan data are available for the campaigns Xianghe (summer), Wangdu
(summer) and TROPOS (winter). No data are available for the Melpitz (winter),
Melpitz (summer) and Waldstein (summer) campaigns due to limited amount of
filter material.</p>
      <p>OC and elemental carbon (EC) were determined from the filter by a
thermal–optical method using the Sunset Laboratory Dual-Optical Carbonaceous
Analyzer (Sunset Laboratory Inc., Tigard, OR, USA) following the EUSAAR 2
temperature protocol and applying a charring correction using light
transmission (Cavalli et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>The aqueous extract for determining WSOC was prepared by extracting 21.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the filter samples from the Xianghe (summer), Wangdu (summer),
Melpitz (winter) and Melpitz (summer) campaign and 38.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for samples
from the campaigns Waldstein (summer) and TROPOS (winter) into 25 and 30 mL of ultrapure water, respectively, followed by 20 min of ultrasonication.
After filtration, the extract was injected into a TOC-V<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CPH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer
(Shimadzu, Japan) operating in the NPOC (nonpurgeable organic carbon) mode.
More details on the method can be found in van Pinxteren et al. (2009).</p>
      <p>The air mass origin was estimated by 96 h back trajectories calculated using
the HYSPLIT model (Stein et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Instrumentation for aerosol light absorption measurements</title>
      <p>Particulate light absorption was measured by a seven-wavelength
aethalometer, model AE33 (Aerosol d.o.o., Slovenia), during the TROPOS
(winter) and Waldstein (summer) campaigns. A detailed description of the
instrument is given in Drinovec et al. (2015). Briefly, aerosol particles
are collected on a filter tape. Light attenuation is measured continuously
through this aerosol laden filter (time resolution of 1 s). When a fixed
attenuation threshold is reached, the tape advances to a new filter spot.
Filter-based measurements feature nonlinear loading effects, caused by the
increasing deposition of the sample in the filter loading during the
measurement, and filter matrix light scattering effects (Weingartner et al.,
2003). The aethalometer AE33 measures the loading effect by using a
dual-spot approach, where attenuation measurements are carried out
simultaneously on two differently loaded spots. Multiple scattering effects
were compensated by normalizing the particulate light absorption coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against data from a multi-angle absorption photometer
(MAAP; Petzold and Schonlinner, 2004) which was also located at the
measurement sites. The determined normalization factor (for light scattering
effects) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was 1.69 for the TROPOS (winter) campaign and 2.06 for
the Waldstein (summer) campaign. More details are given in the Supplement
Sect. S1.</p>
      <p>The relative contribution of BrC and BC to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
determined following the method used by Kirchstetter and Thatcher (2012).
For the calculations, it was assumed that BC was the only absorbing species
at 940 nm, that OC and BC were externally mixed and that the AAE of BC was 1.0.
These assumptions are consistent with recently published studies (Martinsson
et al., 2015; Mohr et al., 2013). Using Eq. (1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was determined by extrapolating from 940 nm to 370 nm, and the contribution
of BrC was then calculated using Eq. (2):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The AAE was fitted over all seven wavelengths and is given as the average of
the wavelength dependencies with the measurement time resolution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>UV/Vis spectrophotometry</title>
      <p>Light absorption of aqueous solutions were measured with a Lambda 900
UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer) using quartz cells (Secomam,
France). The aqueous filter extracts were analyzed at pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2
(acidified with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the following also indicated with the
subscript “A”) and at pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 (addition of NaOH, in the following
also indicated with the subscript “B”). Hence, the target compounds were
either in their neutral or deprotonated state to obtain the lower and upper
limit for the contribution of NACs to the BrC light absorption In principle,
it could be possible that introducing acids or bases into the system induces
unforeseen chemical reactions influencing the total light absorption of the
aqueous extract. However, to minimize the risk of potential chemical
modification the solutions where kept in the dark and analyzed as soon as
possible after preparation by UV-Vis spectrophotometry. The influence of the
pH on MAE and the aqueous light absorption coefficient (Abs) is discussed in
Sect. 3.1.1. Spectra were recorded from 300 to 800 nm.</p>
      <p>The interpretation of the aqueous extract light absorption follows the
method described by Hecobian et al. (2010). In general, according to the
Beer–Lambert law the absorbance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a solution is
defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the intensity of the incident and
transmitted light, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the absorbing path length,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the concentration of absorbing species in solution and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength-dependent molar
extinction coefficient. The resulting data were then converted to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M94" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Abs</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>800</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>800</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference wavelength to account for any
baseline drift, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of water used for extraction
(10 mL), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of air passed through the filter
and ln(10) was used to convert the common logarithm to a natural logarithm.
The path length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was either 2 or 5 cm.</p>
      <p>Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the light absorption coefficient of the aqueous extract
solutions and is not to be mistaken for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the light
absorption coefficient of ambient particles. This nomenclature was chosen in
accordance with other studies (J. Liu et al., 2013, 2015).</p>
      <p>Using the mass concentration of WSOC (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAE was
calculated by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M103" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Abs</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The molar extinction coefficient at 370 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
was determined for each target compound by preparing a dilution series of
standard compounds in water. Subsequently, a three point curve was recorded
twice. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the slope of the regression in
an absorbance–concentration plot is proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The molar extinction coefficients for each compound under acidic and
alkaline conditions are presented in Table S2.</p>
      <p>In other studies dealing with aqueous extracts, Abs values were given for
365 nm (e.g., Bosch et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2011; Hecobian et al.,
2010). We chose 370 nm to characterize the aqueous extract light absorption
properties to match the 370 nm channel of the aethalometer.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Calculation of the contribution of nitrated aromatic compounds to light
absorption of aqueous extracts and particulate brown carbon</title>
      <p>The contribution of the target compounds to the aqueous extract light
absorption was computed by first calculating the absorbance of the single
compound using Eq. (3) and then determining the percentage on the total
aqueous solution light absorption.</p>
      <p>To assess the contribution of the NACs to particulate BrC light absorption
at 370 nm, the molar extinction coefficient of each compound was converted
to the liquid-phase molecular absorption cross section <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Jacobson, 1999):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M107" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecule</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Avogadro constant and ln(10) is used to
convert the common logarithm of the molar extinction coefficient (base 10)
to the natural logarithm. The MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of each compound was then
calculated by dividing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the mass of one molecule. The
subscript “comp” denotes the specific compound. If the MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the mass concentration in air of the compound are known,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the single compound in ambient particles can be
calculated by the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M113" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">com</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where [comp] is the mass concentration of the compound in the aerosol.</p>
      <p>By knowing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the relative
contribution of the individual compound on the particulate BrC light
absorption can be calculated.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Optical properties and calculated contribution of NACs to
the light absorption of aqueous extracts and particulate BrC. The values are
given as minimum–maximum (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation). Acidic
conditions are indicated by the letter “A” and alkaline conditions are
indicated by the letter “B”. Highest and lowest mean values for each
category are marked in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Waldstein (summer)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Melpitz<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(summer)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TROPOS<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(winter)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Melpitz <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(winter)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Xianghe <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(summer)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Wangdu <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(summer)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Optical properties </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.21–0.70 (<bold>0.51</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.57–1.34 (0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33–8.96 (3.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.49)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.75–10.6 (4.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.51)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.82–4.68 (2.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.81)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.10–21.8 (<bold>4.64</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.16)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63–1.15 (<bold>0.88</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.88–1.78 (1.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.69–14.5 (<bold>6.80</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.94)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.28–15.2 (6.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.50)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.20–9.07 (3.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.50)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.87–27.2 (6.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.55)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10–0.25 (<bold>0.17</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19–0.30 (0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41–1.30 (0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.52–1.79 (<bold>0.86</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.33)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30–0.52 (0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.31–1.01 (0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.24–0.36 (<bold>0.29</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27–0.43 (0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.86–2.21 (<bold>1.45</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84–2.57 (1.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.34–1.15 (0.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49–1.40 (0.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>b</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.72–8.59 (<bold>6.23</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.33)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.13–129.4 (<bold>54.2</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34.07)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>b</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.62–1.69 (<bold>0.94</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.25–54.4 (<bold>21.8</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Contribution to light absorption (%) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NACs to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02–0.33 (0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06–0.22 (<bold>0.13</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03–4.22 (<bold>1.21</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.82)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15–2.03 (0.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04–1.32 (0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24–1.83 (0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NACs to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02–0.25 (<bold>0.13</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10–0.48 (0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.97–9.71 (<bold>3.35</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47–5.00 (2.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.45)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21–2.85 (0.1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0.54)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56–4.44 (1.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NACs to <italic>b</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (A)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01–0.22 (<bold>0.10</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01–1.13 (<bold>0.25</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NACs to <italic>b</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (B)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02–0.31 (<bold>0.13</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01–5.42 (<bold>1.13</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results/discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Optical properties of water-soluble and particulate brown carbon</title>
      <p>In the following section, the general optical properties of water-soluble
and particulate BrC are presented. Optical properties of water-soluble BrC
(represented by the aqueous extract light absorption) are given as
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Particulate BrC was characterized by the particulate light absorption
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the AAE. The results of the optical
properties are summarized in Table 2.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Influence of acidic and alkaline conditions on the mass absorption
efficiency and the aqueous light absorption coefficient</title>
      <p>Values for MAE and Abs have usually been directly derived from filtered
aqueous filter extract without considering the pH of the solutions (e.g.,
Bosch et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2011; Hecobian et al., 2010). However,
depending on the nature of the absorbing species, pH alters the
absorptivity. Alif et al. (1987, 1990, 1991) showed for NPs that their anionic
form is a much stronger absorber than their neutral form. Moreover, the
absorption maximum shifts towards longer wavelengths under alkaline
conditions. The dissociation in a solution depends on the pK<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value of
the compound and at different pH levels different mixtures of
neutral/ionized compounds exist. Generally, ambient particles are estimated
to be more acidic (pH &lt; 4, Scheinhardt et al., 2013), making the
findings under acidic conditions more relevant for ambient conditions.
However, Hinrichs et al. (2016) reported that NPs adsorbed to a particle
surface exhibit a significant red shift similar to the aqueous light
absorption spectrum of their deprotonated form. Hence, under certain
conditions the deprotonated forms can also be important.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Temporal variation of the concentrations of nitrated aromatic
compounds and levoglucosan (Levo) at each measurement site <bold>(a–f)</bold> and their
optical properties. The aqueous light absorption coefficient (Abs) and mass
absorption efficiency (MAE) are given at 370 nm for acidic conditions
(indicated by the subscript “A”) and for alkaline conditions (indicated by
the subscript “B”).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1653/2017/acp-17-1653-2017-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Comparing alkaline and acidic conditions, strong correlations have been
found for Abs, MAE and the relative contribution of the individual compounds
to Abs over all campaigns (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Fig. S3). On average,
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by a factor of 1.4 and MAE by a factor of 1.6 under
alkaline conditions compared to the acidic conditions. As indicated by the
good correlation, this factor is quite consistent and independent of the
measurement site.</p>
      <p>The molar extinction coefficient at 370 nm increases with pH for the
individual compounds (see Table S2). A higher pH leads to deprotonation of
hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, which may lead to a shift of the absorption
maximum towards longer wavelengths. The light absorption of the aqueous
extracts is a sum of many different light-absorbing species. Therefore, the
relative contribution to the aqueous extract light absorption for individual
compounds is affected differently. For example, the relative contribution of
3NSA and 2,6DM4NP to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases at pH 10. No difference in the
contribution to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed for 5NSA. The highest increase in
the contribution to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was found for 2,4DNP with a factor of 6.8.
The observed differences in the contribution to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are related to
both the molar extinction coefficient, which alters with the pH, and the
composition of the solution. A decrease in the relative contribution to the
light absorption at higher pH is most likely due to greater contributions of
other, now overlapping light-absorbing compounds at this specific
wavelength.</p>
      <p>The increase of Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with higher pH is relatively modest (a factor of
1.4) compared to the increase of the molar extinction coefficient of
individual NACs (an average factor of 4.5). This might indicate that the
absorption properties of the majority of light-absorbing compounds are
barely affected by the pH. These findings are only valid for the
investigated wavelength of 370 nm and are likely to differ over the whole
spectral range.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Scatter plot of the aqueous light absorption coefficient
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with levoglucosan concentration for the campaigns <bold>(a)</bold> TROPOS
(winter,), <bold>(b)</bold> Xianghe (summer), <bold>(c)</bold> Wangdu (summer, BB episode) and <bold>(d)</bold>
Wangdu (summer, non-BB episode). Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is given for acidic
conditions (indicated by the subscript “A”, black squares) and for
alkaline conditions (indicated by the subscript “B”, red dots). Note
different axis scales.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1653/2017/acp-17-1653-2017-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Due to the close relationship between MAE and Abs under alkaline and acidic
conditions, only the values for the acidic conditions are discussed in the
following section (Sect. 3.1.2), while both of them are always displayed in
the figures and tables.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Mass absorption efficiency and aqueous light absorption coefficient
of water-soluble brown carbon</title>
      <p>The temporal evolution of Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
measurement site is shown in Fig. 1. The highest mean MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were found for the campaigns Melpitz (winter,
0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.33 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TROPOS (winter, 0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
followed by Wangdu (summer, 0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Xianghe
(summer, 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The lowest values were observed
under summer conditions in Germany, where the values for the Melpitz
(summer) campaign slightly exceeded the MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed at the
Waldstein (summer) campaign (0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Measured MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for China
are in the same range or slightly lower than values reported in other
studies. For instance, several studies were conducted in Beijing in summer,
where Cheng et al. (2011) determined an average MAE of 0.7 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Du et al. (2014) found 0.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Yan et al. (2015) observed
0.7 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (all values determined at 365 nm). The findings for
the TROPOS (winter) and Melpitz (winter) campaigns suggest regional behavior
and are comparable to observed MAEs from urban sites in the US (Hecobian et al. (2010), 0.47–0.87 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, annual mean, determined
at 365 nm). Low MAE values, similar to the observed MAEs at the
Melpitz (summer) and Waldstein (summer) campaigns, have been found at urban
and rural sites in the US (0.21 and 0.12 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
determined at 365 nm) when the concentration of levoglucosan was low
(&lt; 50 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the average Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar
for the campaigns of Wangdu (summer), TROPOS (winter) and Melpitz (winter)
(4.64, 3.92 and 4.13 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), the observed mean
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Wangdu (summer) campaign is lower, indicating that
despite higher concentrations of OC and WSOC during the Wangdu (summer)
campaign (see Table S3), fewer light-absorbing compounds were present.</p>
      <p>A correlation between levoglucosan and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was found during the
TROPOS (winter) campaign (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and during the BB episode of the
Wangdu (summer) campaign (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), when BB aerosol was abundant
(see Fig. 2). This correlation suggests that BB aerosol is a major
contributor to the aqueous extract light absorption. The connection between
BB and light-absorbing BrC was also observed in a number of other studies
(e.g., Desyaterik et al., 2013; Hoffer et al., 2006; Lack et al., 2013; Mohr
et al., 2013). During non-BB episodes of the Wangdu (summer) campaign and
the Xianghe (summer) campaign, only a weak or no correlation at all was
observed between levoglucosan and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 2). This indicates
the presence of sources for light-absorbing compounds other than BB
aerosols. A decay of levoglucosan more rapid than the decay of NACs might
also be a cause for this observation (Hoffmann et al., 2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Temporal evolution of the particulate light absorption coefficient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370 nm derived from the aethalometer measurements
during <bold>(a)</bold> the TROPOS (winter) campaign and <bold>(b)</bold> the Waldstein (summer)
campaign. The fractions of black carbon (dark grey area) and brown carbon
(light grey area) to the total measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated
as described in Eq. (2).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1653/2017/acp-17-1653-2017-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Regarding seasonal differences, the aqueous extract light absorption was
much lower in summer compared to winter samples. This is a general trend,
observed at many measurement sites (e.g., Du et al., 2014; Hecobian et al.,
2010; Kim et al., 2016). Kim et al. (2016) suggested that this is either
because the amount of emitted BrC is much higher during winter or that
summer BrC is less water soluble. By comparing aqueous extract light
absorption to ambient particle light absorption measurements, this issue will
be further explored and discussed in the following section.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Particulate light absorption coefficient and absorption
{\AA}ngstr\"{o}m exponent of particulate brown carbon}?><title>Particulate light absorption coefficient and absorption
Ångström exponent of particulate brown carbon</title>
      <p>The temporal evolution of the measured particulate light absorption
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370 nm as well as the determined
contributions of particulate BrC and BC to the light absorption at 370 nm
are shown in Fig. 3. Normalizing the determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for particulate
BrC by the according OC content gives the mass absorption efficiency for BrC
in the particle (MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">particle</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The temporal variation of
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">particle</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is displayed in Fig. S4. The AAE (as campaign
average) obtained by fitting over all aethalometer wavelengths was
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 and 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 for the campaigns TROPOS (winter) and
Waldstein (summer), respectively. An AAE close to 1 indicates that BC is
the dominant species (Kirchstetter et al., 2004). The increased AAE values
indicate that BrC plays a larger role for the TROPOS (winter) campaign than
for the Waldstein (summer) campaign, where its contribution is minor.</p>
      <p>During the BB influenced TROPOS (winter) campaign, the mean total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 54 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Particulate BrC contributed about
40 % to the overall light absorption at 370 nm and an average
MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">particle</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.95 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated. The
influence of BB on the light absorption of ambient particles has also been
observed in other studies. For instance, Kirchstetter and Thatcher (2012)
estimated that the contribution of BrC to the light absorption of wood smoke
is 49 % below 400 nm from samples collected in wintertime California
(USA). Mohr et al. (2013) found a BrC contribution of 46 % to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a UK site that was highly influenced by BB. Our
findings on the contribution of BrC to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn> 370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
TROPOS (winter) campaign are consistent with these earlier measurements. The
light absorption was observed to be higher for easterly air masses than
those from the west, a trend also seen in the NAC concentrations of the
TROPOS (winter) campaign (see Sect. 3.2). Easterly winds were often
accompanied by lower temperatures or thermal inversion layers or both.
Therefore, higher concentrations of light-absorbing compounds (and higher
particulate light absorption) might be a result of both increased emissions
(locally and in the source region) and lower dispersion of absorbing
pollutants due to the thermal inversion layer.</p>
      <p>In contrast, the light absorption of aerosol particles was much lower during
the Waldstein (summer) campaign with a mean total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
6 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">particle</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.21 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and a BrC contribution to the particulate light absorption of about 15 %
at 370 nm. The measurements at Waldstein (which is surrounded by a mixed
forest) were carried out in a sunny summer period when high biogenic
emissions would strongly influence the results. Several laboratory studies
have shown that the formation of light-absorbing compounds from biogenic
precursors is negligible (e.g., P. F. Liu et al., 2013; Nakayama et al.,
2010; Song et al., 2013). However, a few studies have suggested that BrC
might be formed in the presence of high ammonia concentrations (Flores et
al., 2014; Updyke et al., 2012) or from isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX; Lin et
al., 2014). Findings from field measurements in the Amazon Basin confirmed
that the light absorption by biogenic aerosol is much lower than the light
absorption of BB aerosols or BC (Rizzo et al., 2011). Compared to the TROPOS
(winter) campaign, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BrC is very small for the Waldstein
(summer) campaign, with an average of 0.94 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to
21.8 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our findings corroborate those of Rizzo et al. (2011) and
laboratory studies stating that biogenic aerosols alone produce only small
amounts of light-absorbing compounds.</p>
      <p>The relative contribution of light-absorbing WSOC to particulate light
absorption can be estimated by applying a conversion factor. Based on Mie
theory calculations, J. Liu et al. (2013) suggested a factor of 2 to
convert the aqueous extract light absorption coefficient (Abs) into the
particulate light absorption coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The temporal
variation of the fraction of the converted Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the particulate BrC
light absorption is given in Fig. S4. For our data, a good agreement between
the Waldstein (summer) average Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.51 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the Waldstein (summer) average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(0.94 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was achieved, suggesting that the observed particulate
light absorption is mainly associated with water-soluble compounds during
this campaign. For the TROPOS (winter) campaign, doubling the average
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gives a value of 7.8 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is still much
lower than the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (21.8 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, a
large fraction of non-water-soluble OC likely exists as well, which is highly
light absorbing at 370 nm.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Concentrations of nitrated aromatic compounds under different
atmospheric conditions</title>
      <p>This section presents an overview and a comparison of the NAC concentrations
for all campaigns. Table 3 summarizes the measured concentrations in
comparison with other studies at similar locations. The results of the
temporal variation of the target compounds for each campaign are displayed
in Fig. 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Measured concentrations of nitrophenols and nitrated
salicylic acids for each campaign in comparison to other studies. The
concentrations are given as minimum–maximum (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard
deviation).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="113.811024pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="42.679134pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col9" align="center">Concentration in ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4NP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2M4NP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3M4NP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2,6DM4NP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2,4DNP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3,4DNP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3NSA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5NSA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col10" align="left">Europe </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TROPOS (winter), Germany,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Jan–Feb 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.08–27.2 (7.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.75–12.3 (3.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.50–8.58 (2.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.22)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11–2.29 (0.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.58)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01–3.72 (1.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02–2.95 (0.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Melpitz (winter), Germany, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Jan–Feb 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.51–10.3 (4.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.27)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.29–8.90 (3.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15–6.40 (2.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.04–2.74 (0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.003–0.01 (0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09–2.30 (0.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.69)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.06–0.77 (0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Detling, UK, Jan–Feb 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(0.02)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">(5.0)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">(3.0)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center">(3.0)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Mohr et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ljubljana, Slovenia, Dec 2010 to Jan 2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5–3.7 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(1.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31–1.5 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(0.75)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25–1.2 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(0.61)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02–0.05 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1–3.9 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(1.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.2–3.4 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(1.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Kitanovski et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mainz, Germany, Winter<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2006/2007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(5.5)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Zhang et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rome, Italy, Feb to Apr 2003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(17.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(7.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(5.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Cecinato et <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2005)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hamme, Belgium, winter<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2010/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.92–3.0 (1.19)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Kahnt et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Melpitz (summer), Germany,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Jul 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01–0.12 (0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03–0.04 (0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02–0.03 (0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07–0.42 (0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02–0.24 (0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waldstein (summer), Germany, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Jul 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01–0.35 (0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.06–0.51 (0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ljubljana, Slovenia, Aug 2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.12–0.17 (0.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 0.03–0.05 (0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&lt; 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.06–0.12 (0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.14–0.24 (0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Kitanovski et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mainz, Germany, summer 2006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(2.8)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Zhang et <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hamme, Belgium, summer<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2010/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.17–0.62 (0.29)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Kahnt et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col10" align="left">China </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xianghe (summer), China,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Jul–Aug 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13–4.49 (0.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01–0.85 (0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.004–0.46 (0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01–0.23 (0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.10 (0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.004–0.17 (0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.13–8.99 (1.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.45)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.11–2.70 (0.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wangdu (summer), China,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Jun 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.55–15.0 (2.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.66)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01–4.35 (0.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01–2.03 (0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.47 (0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.002–0.41 (0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.003–0.02 (0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.37–11.3 (3.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.43–3.27 (1.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hong Kong, summer <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2010–2012<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(0.3)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(0.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(0.009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Chow et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Estimated from graph.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Sum of corresponding m/z ratios, including all isomers.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrations are given as the average of three years.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>n.d.: not detected</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>A general concentration trend of 4NP &gt; 3M4NP &gt; 2M4NP
&gt; 2,6DM4NP &gt; 2,4DNP &gt; 3,4DNP and 3NSA
&gt; 5NSA was observed for all campaigns of the present study and is
in good agreement with findings from most other studies. Regarding the sum
of NPs, the mean concentrations were highest during the TROPOS (winter)
campaign (14.0 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed by the Melpitz (winter) campaign
(11.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These concentrations are a factor of 3 to 10 higher than those
observed during the campaigns Wangdu (summer) and Xianghe (summer) (4.4 and 1.4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). During the Melpitz (summer)
campaign, the NP concentration was 100 times lower (average of 0.1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than during the Melpitz (winter) campaign. For the sum of NSAs,
the highest mean concentrations were found at the Wangdu (summer) campaign
(4.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed by the campaigns Xianghe (summer) and TROPOS
(winter) (average of 2.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, each). Average concentrations for NSAs
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed at the campaigns Melpitz (winter,
1.0 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Waldstein (summer, 0.4 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Melpitz (summer,
0.2 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>A clear seasonality can be seen in the data from the German sites. The
observed concentrations of the different species are generally lower in
summer than in winter because the sources of NACs are stronger during winter
and generally connected to polluted air, as discussed in the Sect. 1.</p>
      <p>The campaigns Melpitz (winter) and TROPOS (winter) were carried out in the
same period and the two sites are directly comparable due to their
geographic proximity. Concentrations of the NACs are in the same range at
both sites and show a common pattern. Two periods with concentration maxima
were found. The first period occurred around 25 January and the second peak
was around 30 January 2014 (see Fig. 1a and b). Both periods are
characterized by prevailing easterly winds and shorter mean lengths of
96 h back trajectories. In contrast, air masses during other periods
originated from the southwest and had longer trajectories and increased
residence times over the Atlantic Ocean. Higher concentrations of PM and
many of its constituents with easterly winds are often observed at Melpitz
(Spindler et al., 2010). The long residence time above the continent results
in increased concentrations of pollutants in those air masses. Furthermore,
as described in Sect. 3.1.3, the temperature was generally lower when the
air mass originated from the east, which likely led to higher emissions from
residential heating both locally and in the air mass source regions.</p>
      <p>The campaigns Melpitz (summer) and Waldstein (summer) were also conducted in
the same time period. The concentrations of NSAs are comparable at both
sites (0.01–0.51 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are very low compared to the winter
measurements. NPs were not analyzed from the Waldstein (summer) campaign as
explained above.</p>
      <p>Day and night samples were collected during the campaigns TROPOS (winter),
Waldstein (summer), Xianghe (summer) and Wangdu (summer). Nighttime
concentrations of the sum of NACs were found to be slightly higher than
during the day (not statistically significant at 95 % confidence level).
The lower daytime concentrations are probably caused by the higher boundary
layer heights during the day, i.e., dilution effects, and/or lower
emission/formations rates during daytime or photolysis processes.</p>
      <p>The sum of all target compounds at the TROPOS (winter) campaign was only
weakly correlated with levoglucosan (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S5), indicating
that BB was not the dominant source of NACs during the campaign. As
mentioned above, the formation or decay processes of levoglucosan and NACs
might be very different, which resulted in no correlation of those species.
It is also known that the sources of NACs are very diverse (see Sect. 1).</p>
      <p>At the Wangdu (summer) campaign, a BB episode was observed between 11 June
and 19 June (see Fig. 1f), indicated by a peak in measured levoglucosan
concentrations. During that period, increased concentrations of NACs were
found. Although the NAC concentration generally increased with increasing
levoglucosan concentration, no clear connection between NACs and BB aerosols
was found. For the Xianghe (summer) campaign, levoglucosan concentrations
(average of 109 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were lower than for the Wangdu (summer) or
TROPOS (winter) campaign, suggesting that BB played a minor role at this
site during the time of measurements. No correlation was found between the
sum of NACs and levoglucosan. This implies that BB was neither the major
source of NACs in the Wangdu (summer) nor in the Xianghe (summer) campaign.
It was found that NACs can be a product of the photochemical processing of
anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (Jaoui et al., 2008), which might be
a possible source for NACs at the Chinese sites besides BB.</p>
      <p>NACs seem to be ubiquitous and are found at each site in measurable amounts
although they are highly variable at the different measurement sites. The
sum of NAC concentrations at the different campaigns followed the order
TROPOS (winter) &gt; Melpitz (winter) &gt; Wangdu (summer)
&gt; Xianghe (summer) &gt; Waldstein (summer)
&gt;
Melpitz (summer). This trend might be considered surprising, since the
average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC values were higher at the Chinese sites than at the
German sites (see Table S3). However, the seasonality and influence of BB
aerosol seem to play a large role in the NAC concentration resulting in
lower concentrations at the Chinese summer sites than at the German winter
sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Contribution of nitrated aromatic compounds to water-soluble and
particulate brown carbon</title>
      <p>In this section, the contribution of NACs to the aqueous extract light
absorption and then the contribution of NACs to the particulate BrC light
absorption are discussed. The relative contribution of NACs to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
is shown in Fig. 4 together with the contribution of NACs to the WSOC
concentration. Table 2 summarizes the contribution of NSAs and NPs to
aqueous extract light absorption (Abs) and particulate BrC light absorption
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The focus is on the relative contribution to the
aqueous extract light absorption at the wavelength of 370 nm to match the
370 nm channel of the aethalometer. To give additional information, the
relative contribution of NACs to Abs (acidic conditions) over a spectral
range of 300 to 500 nm is presented in Fig. 5 as their campaign averages.</p>
      <p>The relative NAC contribution to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied greatly across the
different sites, ranging from 0.02 to 4.41 % for acidic conditions and
from 0.02 to 9.86 % for alkaline conditions. This result likely reflects
the dependence of NAC source strength on location and seasonality. The
maximum contribution of NACs to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was found for the TROPOS
(winter) campaign. The contribution of NACs to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was low for the
campaigns Waldstein (summer) and Melpitz (summer). For the Waldstein
(summer) campaign, a mean contribution of 0.15 % (acidic) or 0.13 %
(alkaline) was observed. Average values of 0.13 % (acidic) and 0.24 %
(alkaline) were obtained from the Melpitz (summer) campaign. This result is
not surprising due to the low influence of BB aerosols or traffic and thus
low NAC concentrations. A recent study by Nguyen et al. (2013) suggested the
formation of BrC from ketoaldehydes derived from biogenic monoterpenes in
the presence of ammonium ions. Thus, this reaction may play a role in
regions with higher influence of biogenic emissions and might be one
explanation for the observed absorption at the Melpitz (summer) and
Waldstein (summer) campaigns. The formed species were suggested to consist
of conjugated aldol condensates, secondary imines and nitrogen containing
heterocycles, The results for the Xianghe (summer) and Wangdu (summer)
campaigns are about half the values of the TROPOS (winter) or Melpitz
(winter) campaigns. This shows that NACs in the present study had a much
higher impact on the light absorption properties during the German winter
campaigns than during the Chinese summer campaigns and indicates that other
compounds play a larger role in particle light absorption at the Chinese
sites. More studies are needed to resolve the molecular identity and
abundance of these light-absorbing compounds.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Top and center: contribution of the sum of NACs to the aqueous
extract light absorption at each site under acidic <bold>(a)</bold> and alkaline <bold>(b)</bold>
conditions. Bottom: mass contributions of the sum of NACs to the WSOC <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1653/2017/acp-17-1653-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The relative contribution of NACs to Abs is wavelength dependent. Under
acidic conditions, the contribution of NACs to the aqueous extract light
absorption increases towards lower wavelength, reaching a maximum that was
found to generally lie in the range of 330–350 nm (see Fig. 5). Moreover,
it can be seen that maximum values differ for individual compounds. Under
alkaline conditions, this maximum shifts towards the range of 400–420 nm
(see Fig. S6). As stated above, the results for acidic conditions are likely
to be more atmospherically relevant. Therefore, a higher influence of NACs
towards shorter wavelengths suggests that they can be more important in
terms of their influence on atmospheric photochemistry, e.g., O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
photolysis (Jacobson, 1999).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relative contribution of NACs to Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
spectral range of 300 to 500 nm for each measurement campaign <bold>(a–f)</bold> under
acidic conditions. The data are presented as campaign averages. Due to
instrumental issues, data for lower wavelengths are not always available.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1653/2017/acp-17-1653-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The relative mass contribution of NACs to the WSOC concentration at the
different campaigns follows the same pattern as the contribution of NACs to
the aqueous extract light absorption and also the same pattern as the NAC
concentrations (see Sect. 3.2 and Fig. 4). The highest mass contributions of
NACs were found during the TROPOS (winter) campaign followed by the Melpitz
(winter) campaign, and lowest values were observed for the campaigns
Waldstein (summer) and Melpitz (summer). The average mass contribution of
NACs to WSOC is less than 0.2 % at each site. In contrast, NACs have a
mean contribution to aqueous extract light absorption of 1 %, which is a
factor of 5 larger than their mass contribution to WSOC. Our results
corroborate the findings of other studies, which show that even small
amounts of light-absorbing compounds can significantly impact the light
absorption properties of particles. As a result, a detailed investigation of
the molecular composition of BrC is important (Kampf et al., 2012; Laskin et
al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The correlation between NAC concentrations and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for each campaign
is displayed in Fig. 6. The correlation is good for the TROPOS (winter) and
Melpitz (winter) campaign (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, each) and weaker for the Wangdu
(summer) campaign (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). No correlation was found for the
campaigns Xianghe (summer), Melpitz (summer) and Waldstein (summer). In
general, the presence of high NAC concentrations also indicates higher
values for Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than at sites with lower NAC concentrations. However,
due to the diverse sources and sinks (e.g., photobleaching, Zhao et al.,
2015) of NACs and BrC, NACs cannot be considered as the only tracers for
BrC for very different atmospheric conditions.</p>
      <p>The average contribution of NACs to particulate BrC light absorption was
found to be 0.10 % for the Waldstein (summer) campaign and 0.25 % for
the TROPOS (winter) campaign for the protonated forms and 0.13 and
1.18 %, respectively, for their deprotonated forms. The contribution
during the Waldstein (summer) campaign is similar for the aqueous extract
and aerosol light absorption, which is consistent with the assumption
discussed above that the observed light absorption is mostly derived from
WSOC and no further water-insoluble BrC was present at this site.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Scatter plots of the sum of NACs concentrations with the aqueous
light absorption coefficient (Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each campaign: <bold>(a)</bold> Melpitz
(winter), <bold>(b)</bold> TROPOS (winter,), <bold>(c)</bold> Melpitz (summer), <bold>(d)</bold> Waldstein
(summer), <bold>(e)</bold> Xianghe (summer) and <bold>(f)</bold> Wangdu (summer). The aqueous light
absorption coefficient is given at 370 nm for acidic conditions (indicated
by the subscript “A”, black squares) and for alkaline conditions
(indicated by the subscript “B”, red dots).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1653/2017/acp-17-1653-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>To the best of the author's knowledge, up to now only two other field
studies have determined the contribution of individual compounds to BrC
light absorption. Zhang et al. (2013) estimated the contribution of eight
NACs to aqueous extract light absorption in Los Angeles to be about 4 %
at 365 nm, while Mohr et al. (2013) estimated a NAC contribution of 4 %
to particulate BrC light absorption at 370 nm at a BB influenced site in the
UK. The findings from Zhang et al. (2013) are in the same range as our
findings for the TROPOS (winter) campaign (for Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the
estimated contribution of NACs to particulate BrC light absorption by Mohr
et al. (2013) is a factor of 16 larger than our observed contributions. One
possible reason for this discrepancy is that the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured in the present study is about twice as
high as observed by Mohr et al. (2013) (10 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while the
concentrations of NACs are in the same range in both studies. Moreover, Mohr
et al. (2013) considered a different suite of NACs than the present study.
Another important point is that the calculation by Mohr et al. (2013) used
values based on the absorption maxima of the individual species, which
usually lie below 370 nm (for their protonated form). In contrast, in the
present study the molar extinction coefficient of each compound was directly
determined at 370 nm. When calculations were made based on the absorption
maxima of protonated NACs, an average contribution to the particulate BrC
light absorption of 1 % was found for the present study, i.e., a factor of 4 higher than the calculation at 370 nm.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In the present study, the contributions of eight NACs to the light
absorption of aqueous particle extracts and particulate BrC were determined
in Germany and China at five measurement sites under six different
atmospheric conditions.</p>
      <p>The effect of pH on the aqueous extracts light absorption was investigated.
Absorption of extracts at 370 nm, Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, increased by a factor of 1.4
and MAE by a factor of 1.6 when the pH was increased from 2 to 10. A general
seasonal trend of MAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> being higher in winter than in
summer was observed, which is in agreement with other studies. The MAE
values during winter times impacted by BB in Germany exceeded those of the
Chinese background stations during summer. Very low MAE and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed at the forest site Waldstein in summer,
indicating that freshly emitted biogenic aerosols are only weakly absorbing.
In contrast, a strong relationship was found between the light absorption
properties and BB aerosol concentrations, corroborating findings from other
studies. An average contribution of particulate BrC to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 46 % was observed during the TROPOS (winter)
campaign and 15 % during the Waldstein (summer) campaign. The AAE of
particulate BrC was found to be 1.5 and 1.2 for the campaigns TROPOS
(winter) and Waldstein (summer), respectively.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The relative contribution of NACs to the aqueous extract light absorption
was highly variable depending on the measurement site, ranging from 0.02 to 4.41 % under acidic conditions and 0.02 to 9.86 % under
alkaline conditions. This indicates that the emission strength of light-absorbing compounds and the composition of BrC differed between the sites.
In addition, the formation and decay processes might be very different in
the respective environments. The mean contribution of NACs to the
particulate BrC light absorption was 0.10 % (acidic conditions) and 0.13 %
(alkaline conditions) during the Waldstein (summer) campaign and 0.23 % (acidic conditions) and 1.15 % (alkaline conditions) during the
TROPOS (winter) campaign. A correlation between the NAC concentration and
Abs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed during the campaigns TROPOS (winter) and Melpitz
(winter), at other sites the correlation was weak or nonexistent.</p>
      <p>The mass contribution of NACs to WSOC was 5 times lower than their
contribution to the aqueous extract light absorption. This corroborates
conclusions of other studies that even small amounts of light-absorbing
compounds can have a disproportionately high impact on the aerosol light
absorption properties (Kampf et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Field studies on the molecular composition of BrC are still scarce,
especially for sites that have no or little influence of BB aerosols.
Therefore, more efforts are needed to assess BrC on a molecular level, since
a deeper knowledge of the present light-absorbing compounds can improve the
understanding and prediction of BrC aging processes and its radiative
forcing (Laskin et al., 2015). A further investigation of BrC compounds may
also result in finding tracer compounds for specific BrC sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The dataset is available upon request to the corresponding author.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1653-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-17-1653-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was part of the “BranKo” project,
supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under contracts PI
1102/3-1 and HE 3086/26-1. Traveling and accommodation costs for
CAREBeijing-NCP 2013 and CAREBeijing-NCP 2014 were funded by the EU project
AMIS 295132 and the Sino-German Science Center project no. GZ663, respectively. The
authors would like to thank Gerald Spindler and Yoshiteru Iinuma for
providing OC/EC and levoglucosan concentrations, respectively. Dean Venables
is thanked for language corrections and providing useful suggestions. The
analytical work of the technical staff in the laboratories of TROPOS ACD is
also acknowledged. G. Močnik is employed by the company Aerosol d.o.o.
where the aethalometer AE33 was developed and is manufactured.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: A. Laskin<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alif, A., Boule, P., and Lemaire, J.: Photochemical Behavior of
4-Nitrophenol in Aqueous-Solution, Chemosphere, 16, 2213–2223, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(87)90280-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0045-6535(87)90280-3</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alif, A., Boule, P., and Lemaire, J.: Photochemistry and Environment .12.
Phototransformation of 3-Nitrophenol in Aqueous-Solution, J. Photoch.
Photobio. A, 50, 331–342, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(90)87022-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1010-6030(90)87022-4</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Alif, A., Pilichowski, J. F., and Boule, P.: Photochemistry and Environment
.13. Phototransformation of 2-Nitrophenol in Aqueous-Solution, J. Photoch.
Photobio. A, 59, 209–219, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(91)87009-K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1010-6030(91)87009-K</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature
of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Baduel, C., Voisin, D., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: Seasonal variations of
concentrations and optical properties of water soluble HULIS collected in
urban environments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4085–4095,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4085-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4085-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bahadur, R., Praveen, P. S., Xu, Y. Y., and Ramanathan, V.: Solar absorption
by elemental and brown carbon determined from spectral observations, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 17366–17371, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205910109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1205910109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bolzacchini, E., Bruschi, M., Hjorth, J., Meinardi, S., Orlandi, M., Rindone,
B., and Rosenbohm, E.: Gas-phase reaction of phenol with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 35, 1791–1797, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es001290m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es001290m</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4075–4078,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001gl013652</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bosch, C., Andersson, A., Kirillova, E. N., Budhavant, K., Tiwari, S.,
Praveen, P. S., Russell, L. M., Beres, N. D., Ramanathan, V., and Gustafsson,
O.: Source-diagnostic dual-isotope composition and optical properties of
water-soluble organic carbon and elemental carbon in the South Asian outflow
intercepted over the Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 11743–11759,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022127</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K. E., Genberg, J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Toward
a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and
elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 79–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-79-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cecinato, A., Di Palo, V., Pomata, D., Tomasi Sciano, M. C., and Possanzini,
M.: Measurement of phase-distributed nitrophenols in Rome ambient air,
Chemosphere, 59, 679–683, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Zheng, M., Duan, F.-K., Du, Z.-Y., Ma, Y.-L., Tan,
J.-H., Yang, F.-M., Liu, J.-M., Zhang, X.-L., Weber, R. J., Bergin, M. H.,
and Russell, A. G.: Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and
water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
11497–11510, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K. B., Du, Z. Y., Engling, G., Liu, J. M., Ma, Y. L., Zheng,
M., and Weber, R. J.: The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during
winter in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 127, 355–364,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chow, K. S., Huang, X. H. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Quantification of nitroaromatic
compounds in atmospheric fine particulate matter in Hong Kong over 3 years:
field measurement evidence for secondary formation derived from biomass
burning emissions, Environ. Chem., 13, 665–673, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN15174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN15174</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X. H., Lee, T. Y., Wang, X. F., Wang, T., and
Collett, J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
7389–7399, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50561</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Mocnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C.,
Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and
Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of
aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Du, Z. Y., He, K. B., Cheng, Y., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., Liu, J. M., Zhang,
X. L., Zheng, M., and Weber, R.: A yearlong study of water-soluble organic
carbon in Beijing II: Light absorption properties, Atmos. Environ., 89,
235–241, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Duarte, R. M. B. O., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.: Spectroscopic study of
the water-soluble organic matter isolated from atmospheric aerosols collected
under different atmospheric conditions, Anal. Chim. Acta, 530, 7–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant
atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Flores, J. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Adler, G., Lee, H. J., Segev, L., Laskin,
J., Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.: Complex
refractive indices in the near-ultraviolet spectral region of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol aged with ammonia, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16,
10629–10642, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01009d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c4cp01009d</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gyawali, M., Arnott, W. P., Lewis, K., and Moosmüller, H.: In situ aerosol
optics in Reno, NV, USA during and after the summer 2008 California wildfires
and the influence of absorbing and non-absorbing organic coatings on spectral
light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8007–8015,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8007-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8007-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R.
J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption
characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United
States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hinrichs, R. Z., Buczek, P., and Trivedi, J. J.: Solar Absorption by
Aerosol-Bound Nitrophenols Compared to Aqueous and Gaseous Nitrophenols,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5661–5667, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b00302</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P.,
Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances
(HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, D., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Development of a method for fast
analysis of phenolic molecular markers in biomass burning particles using
high performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical
ionisation mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1143, 168–175,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, D., Tilgner, A., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Atmospheric
Stability of Levoglucosan: A Detailed Laboratory and Modeling Study, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 44, 694–699, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Andreae, M. O.,
Helas, G., Parmar, R., and Herrmann, H.: Source characterization of biomass
burning particles: The combustion of selected European conifers, African
hardwood, savanna grass, and German and Indonesian peat, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D08209, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007120</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Engling, G., Puxbaum, H., and Herrmann, H.: A highly resolved
anion-exchange chromatographic method for determination of saccharidic
tracers for biomass combustion and primary bio-particles in atmospheric
aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1367–1371, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.020</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Gräfe, R., and Herrmann, H.:
Methyl-nitrocatechols: atmospheric tracer compounds for biomass burning
secondary organic aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8453–8459,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es102938a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/Es102938a</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Isolating nitrated and aromatic aerosols and nitrated
aromatic gases as sources of ultraviolet light absorption, J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 3527–3542, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998jd100054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998jd100054</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Jaoui, M., Edney, E. O., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J.
H., Surratt, J. D., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation of secondary organic
aerosol from irradiated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene/toluene/NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixtures and the
effect of isoprene and sulfur dioxide, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D09303, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009426" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009426</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global
simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct
radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kahnt, A., Behrouzi, S., Vermeylen, R., Shalamzari, M. S., Vercauteren, J.,
Roekens, E., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.: One-year study of nitro-organic
compounds and their relation to wood burning in PM10 aerosol from a rural
site in Belgium, Atmos. Environ., 81, 561–568,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kampf, C. J., Jakob, R., and Hoffmann, T.: Identification and
characterization of aging products in the glyoxal/ammonium sulfate system –
implications for light-absorbing material in atmospheric aerosols, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 6323–6333, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kecorius, S., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., Gross, J., Ma, N., Wu, Z., Ran, L., Hu,
M., Wang, P., Ulevicius, V., and Wiedensohler, A.: Nocturnal Aerosol Particle
Formation in the North China Plain, Lith. J. Phys., 55, 44–53,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3952/physics.v55i1.3057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3952/physics.v55i1.3057</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kecorius, S., Ma, N., Teich, M., Zhang, S., Größ, J., Spindler, G.,
Müller, K., Iinuma, Y., van Pinxteren, D., Hu, M., Herrmann, H., and
Wiedensohler, A.: Influence of biomass burning on mixing state of ultrafine
particles in the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., submitted, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Kim, J. Y., Jin, H. C., Lee, J. Y., and Lee, S. P.: Seasonal
variations in the light-absorbing properties of water-soluble and insoluble
organic aerosols in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Environ., 129, 234–242,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.042</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to
wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D21208, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kitanovski, Z., Grgic, I., Vermeylen, R., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.:
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for characterization of
monoaromatic nitro-compounds in atmospheric particulate matter, J.
Chromatogr. A, 1268, 35–43, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown
carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Bahreini, R., Langridge, J. M., Gilman, J. B., and Middlebrook,
A. M.: Brown carbon absorption linked to organic mass tracers in biomass
burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2415–2422,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Liu, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Kathmann, S. M., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon (BrC) chromophores in
secondary organic aerosol generated from photo-oxidation of toluene, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 23312–23325, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP02563J</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Laskin, A.: Revealing Brown
Carbon Chromophores Produced in Reactions of Methylglyoxal with Ammonium
Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14257–14266,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03608" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b03608</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y. H., Budisulistiorini, H., Chu, K., Siejack, R. A., Zhang, H. F.,
Riva, M., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Kautzman, K. E., and Surratt, J. D.:
Light-absorbing oligomer formation in secondary organic aerosol from reactive
uptake of isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12012–12021,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es503142b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es503142b</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber,
R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol
extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light
absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Diskin, G. S., Ziemba, L. D., Thornhill, K.
L., Anderson, B. E., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Devi, J. J., Bergin, M.,
Perring, A. E., Markovic, M. Z., Schwarz, J. P., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D.
A., Jimenez, J. L., and Weber, R. J.: Brown carbon aerosol in the North
American continental troposphere: sources, abundance, and radiative forcing,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7841–7858, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P. F., Zhang, Y., and Martin, S. T.: Complex refractive indices of thin
films of secondary organic materials by spectroscopic ellipsometry from 220
to 1200 nm, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 13594–13601, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es403411e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es403411e</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Martinsson, J., Eriksson, A. C., Nielsen, I. E., Malmborg, V. B., Ahlberg,
E., Andersen, C., Lindgren, R., Nystrom, R., Nordin, E. Z., Brune, W. H.,
Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Boman, C., and Pagels, J. H.: Impacts of
Combustion Conditions and Photochemical Processing on the Light Absorption of
Biomass Combustion Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14663–14671,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b03205</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prevot, A. S., Xu, L., Ng, N.
L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser, M. S.,
Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J., Dubey, M.
K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of nitrated phenols to
wood burning brown carbon light absorption in Detling, United Kingdom during
winter time, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6316–6324, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400683v</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R. K., and Arnott, W. P.: Aerosol light
absorption and its measurement: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110,
844–878, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., Sato, K., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and
Uchiyama, A.: Laboratory studies on optical properties of secondary organic
aerosols generated during the photooxidation of toluene and the ozonolysis of
alpha-pinene, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014387</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Brown carbon
formation from ketoaldehydes of biogenic monoterpenes, Faraday Discuss., 165,
291–315, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00036B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3FD00036B</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Nojima, K., Kawaguchi, A., Ohya, T., Kanno, S., and Hirobe, M.: Studies on
Photochemical-Reaction of Air-Pollutants .10. Identification of Nitrophenols
in Suspended Particulates, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 31, 1047–1051,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.31.1047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1248/cpb.31.1047</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Noziere, B. and Esteve, W.: Organic reactions increasing the absorption index
of atmospheric sulfuric acid aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03812,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021942" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004gl021942</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Noziere, B. and Esteve, W.: Light-absorbing aldol condensation products in
acidic aerosols: Spectra, kinetics, and contribution to the absorption index,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 1150–1163, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Olson, M. R., Garcia, M. V., Robinson, M. A., Van Rooy, P., Dietenberger, M.
A., Bergin, M., and Schauer, J. J.: Investigation of black and brown carbon
multiple-wavelength-dependent light absorption from biomass and fossil fuel
combustion source emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 6682–6697,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022970</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Park, R. J., Kim, M. J., Jeong, J. I., Youn, D., and Kim, S.: A contribution
of brown carbon aerosol to the aerosol light absorption and its radiative
forcing in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1414–1421,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A. and Schonlinner, M.: Multi-angle absorption photometry – a new
method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric black
carbon, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 421–441, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Plewka, A., Gnauk, T., Bruggemann, E., and Herrmann, H.: Biogenic
contributions to the chemical composition of airborne particles in a
coniferous forest in Germany, Atmos. Environ., 40, S103–S115,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.090</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Rizzo, L. V., Correia, A. L., Artaxo, P., Procópio, A. S., and Andreae, M.
O.: Spectral dependence of aerosol light absorption over the Amazon Basin,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8899–8912, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8899-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8899-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Sandradewi, S., Prevot, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Perron, N., Alfarra, M. A.
Lanz, V. A., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Using Aerosol Light
Absorption Measurements for the Quantitative Determination of Wood Burning
and Traffic Emission Contributions to Particulate Matter, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 3316–3323, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es702253m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es702253m</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Scheinhardt, S., Müller, K., Spindler, G., and Herrmann, H.: Complexation
of trace metals in size-segregated aerosol particles at nine sites in
Germany, Atmos. Environ., 74, 102–109, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.023</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Simoneit, B. R. T.: Biomass burning –  A review of organic tracers for smoke
from incomplete combustion, Appl. Geochem., 17, 129–162,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Song, C., Gyawali, M., Zaveri, R. A., Shilling, J. E., and Arnott, W. P.:
Light absorption by secondary organic aerosol from alpha-pinene: Effects of
oxidants, seed aerosol acidity, and relative humidity, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
741–749, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50767" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50767</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Spindler, G., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Grüner, A., Müller, K.,
and Herrmann, H.: A four-year size-segregated characterization study of
particles PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) depending on air mass origin at Melpitz,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 164–173, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.015</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R, Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.:
NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Teich, M., van Pinxteren, D., and Herrmann, H.: Determination of
nitrophenolic compounds from atmospheric particles using hollow-fiber
liquid-phase microextraction and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry
analysis, Electrophoresis, 35, 1353–1361, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201300448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/elps.201300448</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Tremp, J., Mattrel, P., Fingler, S., and Giger, W.: Phenols and Nitrophenols
as Tropospheric Pollutants – Emissions from Automobile Exhausts and
Phase-Transfer in the Atmosphere, Water Air Soil Poll., 68, 113–123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/Bf00479396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/Bf00479396</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Ulevicius, V., Bycenkiene, S., Remeikis, V., Garbaras, A., Kecorius, S.,
Andriejauskiene, J., Jasineviciene, D., and Mocnik, G.: Characterization of
pollution events in the East Baltic region affected by regional biomass fire
emissions, Atmos. Res., 98, 190–200, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Updyke, K. M., Nguyen, T. B., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Formation of brown
carbon via reactions of ammonia with secondary organic aerosols from biogenic
and anthropogenic precursors, Atmos. Environ., 63, 22–31,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Utry, N., Ajtai, T., Filep, A., Pinter, M. D., Hoffer, A., Bozoki, Z., and
Szabo, G.: Mass specific optical absorption coefficient of HULIS aerosol
measured by a four-wavelength photoacoustic spectrometer at NIR, VIS and UV
wavelengths, Atmos. Environ., 69, 321–324,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.003</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>van Pinxteren, D. and Herrmann, H.: Determination of functionalised
carboxylic acids in atmospheric particles and cloud water using capillary
electrophoresis/mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1171, 112–123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.021</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>van Pinxteren, D., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Iinuma, Y., Müller,
K., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., and Herrmann, H.: Size- and
time-resolved chemical particle characterization during CAREBeijing-2006:
Different pollution regimes and diurnal profiles, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D00G09, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010890" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010890</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>van Pinxteren, D., Teich, M., and Herrmann, H.: Hollow fibre liquid-phase
microextraction of functionalised carboxylic acids from atmospheric particles
combined with capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometric analysis, J.
Chromatogr. A, 1267, 178–188, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.097</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>van Pinxteren, D., Fomba, K. W., Spindler, G., Muller, K., Poulain, L.,
Iinuma, Y., Loschau, G., Hausmann, A., and Herrmann, H.: Regional air quality
in Leipzig, Germany: detailed source apportionment of size-resolved aerosol
particles and comparison with the year 2000, Faraday Discuss., 189, 291–315,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00228A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5FD00228A</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Vione, D., Maurino, V., Minero, C., and Pelizzetti, E.: Phenol
photonitration, Ann. Chim., 92, 919–929, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Li, Z. Q., Tian, Q. J., Ma, Y., Zhang, F. X., Zhang, Y., Li, D. H.,
Li, K. T., and Li, L.: Estimate of aerosol absorbing components of black
carbon, brown carbon, and dust from ground-based remote sensing data of
sun-sky radiometers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6534–6543, 2013.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., and
Baltensperger, U.: Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of
the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers, J. Aerosol Sci., 34,
1445–1463, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Yan, C. Q., Zheng, M., Sullivan, A. P., Bosch, C., Desyaterik, Y., Andersson,
A., Li, X. Y., Guo, X. S., Zhou, T., Gustafsson, O., and Collett, J. L.:
Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble
organic carbon in Beijing: Biomass burning contributions, Atmos. Environ.,
121, 4–12, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in aqueous ammonium sulfate solutions: products,
kinetics and hydration effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es200989n</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. L., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources,
composition and absorption Angstrom exponent of light-absorbing organic
components in aerosol extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es305047b</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. Y., Müller, L., Winterhalter, R., Moortgat, G. K., Hoffmann, T.,
and Pöschl, U.: Seasonal cycle and temperature dependence of pinene
oxidation products, dicarboxylic acids and nitrophenols in fine and coarse
air particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7859–7873,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7859-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7859-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Huang, L., Li, X., Yang, F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Photochemical processing of aqueous atmospheric brown carbon, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6087–6100, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Contributions of nitrated aromatic compounds to the light absorption of water-soluble and particulate brown carbon in different atmospheric environments in Germany and China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The relative contributions of eight nitrated aromatic compounds
(NACs: nitrophenols and nitrated salicylic acids) to the light absorption of
aqueous particle extracts and particulate brown carbon were determined from
aerosol particle samples collected in Germany and China.</p><p class="p">High-volume filter samples were collected during six campaigns, performed at
five locations in two seasons: (I) two campaigns with strong influence of
biomass-burning (BB) aerosol  at the TROPOS institute (winter, 2014, urban
background, Leipzig, Germany) and the Melpitz research site (winter, 2014,
rural background); (II) two campaigns with strong influence from biogenic
emissions  at Melpitz (summer, 2014) and the forest site Waldstein
(summer, 2014, Fichtelgebirge, Germany); and (III) two CAREBeijing-NCP
campaigns  at Xianghe (summer, 2013, anthropogenic polluted background)
and Wangdu (summer, 2014, anthropogenic polluted background with a distinct
BB episode), both in the North China Plain.</p><p class="p">The filter samples were analyzed for NAC concentrations and the light
absorption of aqueous filter extracts was determined. Light absorption
properties of particulate brown carbon were derived from a seven-wavelength
aethalometer during the campaigns at TROPOS (winter) and Waldstein (summer).
The light absorption of the aqueous filter extracts was found to be pH
dependent, with larger values at higher pH. In general, the aqueous light absorption coefficient (Abs<sub>370</sub>) ranged
from 0.21 to 21.8 Mm<sup>−1</sup> under acidic conditions and 0.63 to 27.2 Mm<sup>−1</sup> under alkaline conditions, over all campaigns. The observed
mass absorption efficiency (MAE<sub>370</sub>) was in a range of 0.10–1.79 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> and 0.24–2.57 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> for acidic and alkaline conditions, respectively. For
MAE<sub>370</sub> and Abs<sub>370</sub>, the observed values were higher in winter than
in summer, in agreement with other studies. The lowest MAE was observed for
the Waldstein (summer) campaign (average of 0.17 ± 0.03 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>), indicating that freshly emitted biogenic aerosols are only weakly
absorbing. In contrast, a strong relationship was found between the light
absorption properties and the concentrations of levoglucosan, corroborating
findings from other studies.</p><p class="p">Regarding the particulate light absorption at 370 nm, a mean particulate
light absorption coefficient <i>b</i><sub>abs, 370</sub> of 54 Mm<sup>−1</sup> and 6.0 Mm<sup>−1</sup> was determined for the TROPOS (winter) and Waldstein (summer)
campaigns, respectively, with average contributions of particulate brown
carbon to <i>b</i><sub>abs, 370</sub> of 46 % at TROPOS (winter) and 15 % at
Waldstein (summer). Thus, the aethalometer measurements support the findings
from aqueous filter extracts of only weakly absorbing biogenic aerosols in
comparison to the more polluted and BB influenced aerosol at TROPOS
(winter).</p><p class="p">The mean contribution of NACs to the aqueous extract light absorption over
all campaigns ranged from 0.10 to 1.25 % under acidic conditions and
0.13 to 3.71 % under alkaline conditions. The high variability among
the measurement sites showed that the emission strengths of light-absorbing
compounds and the composition of brown carbon were very different for each
site. The mean contribution of NACs to the particulate brown carbon light
absorption was 0.10 ± 0.06 % (acidic conditions) and 0.13 ± 0.09 % (alkaline conditions) during the Waldstein (summer) campaign and
0.25 ± 0.21 % (acidic conditions) and 1.13 ± 1.03 %
(alkaline conditions) during the TROPOS (winter) campaign.</p><p class="p">The average contribution of NACs to the aqueous extract light absorption
over all campaigns was found to be 5 times higher than their mass
contribution to water-soluble organic carbon indicating that even small
amounts of light-absorbing compounds can have a disproportionately high
impact on the light absorption properties of particles.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alif, A., Boule, P., and Lemaire, J.: Photochemical Behavior of
4-Nitrophenol in Aqueous-Solution, Chemosphere, 16, 2213–2223, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(87)90280-3" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0045-6535(87)90280-3</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alif, A., Boule, P., and Lemaire, J.: Photochemistry and Environment .12.
Phototransformation of 3-Nitrophenol in Aqueous-Solution, J. Photoch.
Photobio. A, 50, 331–342, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(90)87022-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/1010-6030(90)87022-4</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alif, A., Pilichowski, J. F., and Boule, P.: Photochemistry and Environment
.13. Phototransformation of 2-Nitrophenol in Aqueous-Solution, J. Photoch.
Photobio. A, 59, 209–219, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(91)87009-K" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/1010-6030(91)87009-K</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature
of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Baduel, C., Voisin, D., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: Seasonal variations of
concentrations and optical properties of water soluble HULIS collected in
urban environments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4085–4095,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4085-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-4085-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bahadur, R., Praveen, P. S., Xu, Y. Y., and Ramanathan, V.: Solar absorption
by elemental and brown carbon determined from spectral observations, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 17366–17371, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205910109" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1205910109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bolzacchini, E., Bruschi, M., Hjorth, J., Meinardi, S., Orlandi, M., Rindone,
B., and Rosenbohm, E.: Gas-phase reaction of phenol with NO<sub>3</sub>, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 35, 1791–1797, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es001290m" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es001290m</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4075–4078,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013652" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001gl013652</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bosch, C., Andersson, A., Kirillova, E. N., Budhavant, K., Tiwari, S.,
Praveen, P. S., Russell, L. M., Beres, N. D., Ramanathan, V., and Gustafsson,
O.: Source-diagnostic dual-isotope composition and optical properties of
water-soluble organic carbon and elemental carbon in the South Asian outflow
intercepted over the Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 11743–11759,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022127" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JD022127</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K. E., Genberg, J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Toward
a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and
elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 79–89,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-3-79-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cecinato, A., Di Palo, V., Pomata, D., Tomasi Sciano, M. C., and Possanzini,
M.: Measurement of phase-distributed nitrophenols in Rome ambient air,
Chemosphere, 59, 679–683, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.045</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood
combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., He, K.-B., Zheng, M., Duan, F.-K., Du, Z.-Y., Ma, Y.-L., Tan,
J.-H., Yang, F.-M., Liu, J.-M., Zhang, X.-L., Weber, R. J., Bergin, M. H.,
and Russell, A. G.: Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and
water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
11497–11510, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-11497-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., He, K. B., Du, Z. Y., Engling, G., Liu, J. M., Ma, Y. L., Zheng,
M., and Weber, R. J.: The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during
winter in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 127, 355–364,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, K. S., Huang, X. H. H., and Yu, J. Z.: Quantification of nitroaromatic
compounds in atmospheric fine particulate matter in Hong Kong over 3 years:
field measurement evidence for secondary formation derived from biomass
burning emissions, Environ. Chem., 13, 665–673, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN15174" target="_blank">doi:10.1071/EN15174</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Desyaterik, Y., Sun, Y., Shen, X. H., Lee, T. Y., Wang, X. F., Wang, T., and
Collett, J. L.: Speciation of “brown” carbon in cloud water impacted by
agricultural biomass burning in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
7389–7399, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50561" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50561</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Drinovec, L., Mocnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C.,
Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and
Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of
aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
8, 1965–1979, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Du, Z. Y., He, K. B., Cheng, Y., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., Liu, J. M., Zhang,
X. L., Zheng, M., and Weber, R.: A yearlong study of water-soluble organic
carbon in Beijing II: Light absorption properties, Atmos. Environ., 89,
235–241, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.022" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.022</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, R. M. B. O., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.: Spectroscopic study of
the water-soluble organic matter isolated from atmospheric aerosols collected
under different atmospheric conditions, Anal. Chim. Acta, 530, 7–14,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant
atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Flores, J. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Adler, G., Lee, H. J., Segev, L., Laskin,
J., Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.: Complex
refractive indices in the near-ultraviolet spectral region of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol aged with ammonia, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16,
10629–10642, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01009d" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c4cp01009d</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R.
C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate
seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and
irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gyawali, M., Arnott, W. P., Lewis, K., and Moosmüller, H.: In situ aerosol
optics in Reno, NV, USA during and after the summer 2008 California wildfires
and the influence of absorbing and non-absorbing organic coatings on spectral
light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8007–8015,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8007-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-8007-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R.
J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption
characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United
States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hinrichs, R. Z., Buczek, P., and Trivedi, J. J.: Solar Absorption by
Aerosol-Bound Nitrophenols Compared to Aqueous and Gaseous Nitrophenols,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5661–5667, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00302" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00302</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Guyon, P., Kiss, G., Schmid, O., Frank, G. P.,
Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Optical properties of humic-like substances
(HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3563–3570,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-3563-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, D., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Development of a method for fast
analysis of phenolic molecular markers in biomass burning particles using
high performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical
ionisation mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1143, 168–175,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.035</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, D., Tilgner, A., Iinuma, Y., and Herrmann, H.: Atmospheric
Stability of Levoglucosan: A Detailed Laboratory and Modeling Study, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 44, 694–699, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Andreae, M. O.,
Helas, G., Parmar, R., and Herrmann, H.: Source characterization of biomass
burning particles: The combustion of selected European conifers, African
hardwood, savanna grass, and German and Indonesian peat, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D08209, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007120" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007120</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Engling, G., Puxbaum, H., and Herrmann, H.: A highly resolved
anion-exchange chromatographic method for determination of saccharidic
tracers for biomass combustion and primary bio-particles in atmospheric
aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1367–1371, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.020" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.020</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Gräfe, R., and Herrmann, H.:
Methyl-nitrocatechols: atmospheric tracer compounds for biomass burning
secondary organic aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8453–8459,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/Es102938a" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/Es102938a</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Isolating nitrated and aromatic aerosols and nitrated
aromatic gases as sources of ultraviolet light absorption, J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 3527–3542, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998jd100054" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1998jd100054</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoui, M., Edney, E. O., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J.
H., Surratt, J. D., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Formation of secondary organic
aerosol from irradiated <i>α</i>-pinene/toluene/NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> mixtures and the
effect of isoprene and sulfur dioxide, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D09303, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009426" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009426</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global
simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct
radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kahnt, A., Behrouzi, S., Vermeylen, R., Shalamzari, M. S., Vercauteren, J.,
Roekens, E., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.: One-year study of nitro-organic
compounds and their relation to wood burning in PM10 aerosol from a rural
site in Belgium, Atmos. Environ., 81, 561–568,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.041</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kampf, C. J., Jakob, R., and Hoffmann, T.: Identification and
characterization of aging products in the glyoxal/ammonium sulfate system –
implications for light-absorbing material in atmospheric aerosols, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 6323–6333, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6323-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kecorius, S., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., Gross, J., Ma, N., Wu, Z., Ran, L., Hu,
M., Wang, P., Ulevicius, V., and Wiedensohler, A.: Nocturnal Aerosol Particle
Formation in the North China Plain, Lith. J. Phys., 55, 44–53,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3952/physics.v55i1.3057" target="_blank">doi:10.3952/physics.v55i1.3057</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kecorius, S., Ma, N., Teich, M., Zhang, S., Größ, J., Spindler, G.,
Müller, K., Iinuma, Y., van Pinxteren, D., Hu, M., Herrmann, H., and
Wiedensohler, A.: Influence of biomass burning on mixing state of ultrafine
particles in the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., submitted, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, H., Kim, J. Y., Jin, H. C., Lee, J. Y., and Lee, S. P.: Seasonal
variations in the light-absorbing properties of water-soluble and insoluble
organic aerosols in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Environ., 129, 234–242,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.042" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.042</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to
wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D21208, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004999" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004jd004999</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kitanovski, Z., Grgic, I., Vermeylen, R., Claeys, M., and Maenhaut, W.:
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for characterization of
monoaromatic nitro-compounds in atmospheric particulate matter, J.
Chromatogr. A, 1268, 35–43, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.021</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown
carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Bahreini, R., Langridge, J. M., Gilman, J. B., and Middlebrook,
A. M.: Brown carbon absorption linked to organic mass tracers in biomass
burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2415–2422,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-2415-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Liu, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Kathmann, S. M., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular characterization of brown carbon (BrC) chromophores in
secondary organic aerosol generated from photo-oxidation of toluene, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 23312–23325, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02563J" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C5CP02563J</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Laskin, A.: Revealing Brown
Carbon Chromophores Produced in Reactions of Methylglyoxal with Ammonium
Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14257–14266,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03608" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03608</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y. H., Budisulistiorini, H., Chu, K., Siejack, R. A., Zhang, H. F.,
Riva, M., Zhang, Z. F., Gold, A., Kautzman, K. E., and Surratt, J. D.:
Light-absorbing oligomer formation in secondary organic aerosol from reactive
uptake of isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12012–12021,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es503142b" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es503142b</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber,
R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol
extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light
absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Diskin, G. S., Ziemba, L. D., Thornhill, K.
L., Anderson, B. E., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Devi, J. J., Bergin, M.,
Perring, A. E., Markovic, M. Z., Schwarz, J. P., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D.
A., Jimenez, J. L., and Weber, R. J.: Brown carbon aerosol in the North
American continental troposphere: sources, abundance, and radiative forcing,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7841–7858, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P. F., Zhang, Y., and Martin, S. T.: Complex refractive indices of thin
films of secondary organic materials by spectroscopic ellipsometry from 220
to 1200 nm, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 13594–13601, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es403411e" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es403411e</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, J., Eriksson, A. C., Nielsen, I. E., Malmborg, V. B., Ahlberg,
E., Andersen, C., Lindgren, R., Nystrom, R., Nordin, E. Z., Brune, W. H.,
Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Boman, C., and Pagels, J. H.: Impacts of
Combustion Conditions and Photochemical Processing on the Light Absorption of
Biomass Combustion Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14663–14671,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03205" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03205</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prevot, A. S., Xu, L., Ng, N.
L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser, M. S.,
Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J., Dubey, M.
K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of nitrated phenols to
wood burning brown carbon light absorption in Detling, United Kingdom during
winter time, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6316–6324, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es400683v</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R. K., and Arnott, W. P.: Aerosol light
absorption and its measurement: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110,
844–878, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.035</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., Sato, K., Imamura, T., Yamazaki, A., and
Uchiyama, A.: Laboratory studies on optical properties of secondary organic
aerosols generated during the photooxidation of toluene and the ozonolysis of
alpha-pinene, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24204, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014387" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010jd014387</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Brown carbon
formation from ketoaldehydes of biogenic monoterpenes, Faraday Discuss., 165,
291–315, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00036B" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C3FD00036B</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Nojima, K., Kawaguchi, A., Ohya, T., Kanno, S., and Hirobe, M.: Studies on
Photochemical-Reaction of Air-Pollutants .10. Identification of Nitrophenols
in Suspended Particulates, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 31, 1047–1051,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.31.1047" target="_blank">doi:10.1248/cpb.31.1047</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Noziere, B. and Esteve, W.: Organic reactions increasing the absorption index
of atmospheric sulfuric acid aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03812,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021942" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004gl021942</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Noziere, B. and Esteve, W.: Light-absorbing aldol condensation products in
acidic aerosols: Spectra, kinetics, and contribution to the absorption index,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 1150–1163, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Olson, M. R., Garcia, M. V., Robinson, M. A., Van Rooy, P., Dietenberger, M.
A., Bergin, M., and Schauer, J. J.: Investigation of black and brown carbon
multiple-wavelength-dependent light absorption from biomass and fossil fuel
combustion source emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 6682–6697,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022970" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JD022970</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Park, R. J., Kim, M. J., Jeong, J. I., Youn, D., and Kim, S.: A contribution
of brown carbon aerosol to the aerosol light absorption and its radiative
forcing in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1414–1421,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.042</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A. and Schonlinner, M.: Multi-angle absorption photometry – a new
method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric black
carbon, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 421–441, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Plewka, A., Gnauk, T., Bruggemann, E., and Herrmann, H.: Biogenic
contributions to the chemical composition of airborne particles in a
coniferous forest in Germany, Atmos. Environ., 40, S103–S115,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.090" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.090</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rizzo, L. V., Correia, A. L., Artaxo, P., Procópio, A. S., and Andreae, M.
O.: Spectral dependence of aerosol light absorption over the Amazon Basin,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8899–8912, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8899-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-8899-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sandradewi, S., Prevot, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Perron, N., Alfarra, M. A.
Lanz, V. A., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Using Aerosol Light
Absorption Measurements for the Quantitative Determination of Wood Burning
and Traffic Emission Contributions to Particulate Matter, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 3316–3323, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es702253m" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es702253m</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Scheinhardt, S., Müller, K., Spindler, G., and Herrmann, H.: Complexation
of trace metals in size-segregated aerosol particles at nine sites in
Germany, Atmos. Environ., 74, 102–109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.023" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.023</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Simoneit, B. R. T.: Biomass burning –  A review of organic tracers for smoke
from incomplete combustion, Appl. Geochem., 17, 129–162,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Song, C., Gyawali, M., Zaveri, R. A., Shilling, J. E., and Arnott, W. P.:
Light absorption by secondary organic aerosol from alpha-pinene: Effects of
oxidants, seed aerosol acidity, and relative humidity, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
741–749, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50767" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50767</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Spindler, G., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Grüner, A., Müller, K.,
and Herrmann, H.: A four-year size-segregated characterization study of
particles PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) depending on air mass origin at Melpitz,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 164–173, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.015" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.015</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R, Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.:
NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Teich, M., van Pinxteren, D., and Herrmann, H.: Determination of
nitrophenolic compounds from atmospheric particles using hollow-fiber
liquid-phase microextraction and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry
analysis, Electrophoresis, 35, 1353–1361, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201300448" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/elps.201300448</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tremp, J., Mattrel, P., Fingler, S., and Giger, W.: Phenols and Nitrophenols
as Tropospheric Pollutants – Emissions from Automobile Exhausts and
Phase-Transfer in the Atmosphere, Water Air Soil Poll., 68, 113–123,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/Bf00479396" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/Bf00479396</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Ulevicius, V., Bycenkiene, S., Remeikis, V., Garbaras, A., Kecorius, S.,
Andriejauskiene, J., Jasineviciene, D., and Mocnik, G.: Characterization of
pollution events in the East Baltic region affected by regional biomass fire
emissions, Atmos. Res., 98, 190–200, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Updyke, K. M., Nguyen, T. B., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Formation of brown
carbon via reactions of ammonia with secondary organic aerosols from biogenic
and anthropogenic precursors, Atmos. Environ., 63, 22–31,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Utry, N., Ajtai, T., Filep, A., Pinter, M. D., Hoffer, A., Bozoki, Z., and
Szabo, G.: Mass specific optical absorption coefficient of HULIS aerosol
measured by a four-wavelength photoacoustic spectrometer at NIR, VIS and UV
wavelengths, Atmos. Environ., 69, 321–324,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.003</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
van Pinxteren, D. and Herrmann, H.: Determination of functionalised
carboxylic acids in atmospheric particles and cloud water using capillary
electrophoresis/mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1171, 112–123,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.021" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.021</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
van Pinxteren, D., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Iinuma, Y., Müller,
K., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., and Herrmann, H.: Size- and
time-resolved chemical particle characterization during CAREBeijing-2006:
Different pollution regimes and diurnal profiles, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D00G09, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010890" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd010890</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
van Pinxteren, D., Teich, M., and Herrmann, H.: Hollow fibre liquid-phase
microextraction of functionalised carboxylic acids from atmospheric particles
combined with capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometric analysis, J.
Chromatogr. A, 1267, 178–188, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.097" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.097</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
van Pinxteren, D., Fomba, K. W., Spindler, G., Muller, K., Poulain, L.,
Iinuma, Y., Loschau, G., Hausmann, A., and Herrmann, H.: Regional air quality
in Leipzig, Germany: detailed source apportionment of size-resolved aerosol
particles and comparison with the year 2000, Faraday Discuss., 189, 291–315,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00228A" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/C5FD00228A</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Vione, D., Maurino, V., Minero, C., and Pelizzetti, E.: Phenol
photonitration, Ann. Chim., 92, 919–929, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., Li, Z. Q., Tian, Q. J., Ma, Y., Zhang, F. X., Zhang, Y., Li, D. H.,
Li, K. T., and Li, L.: Estimate of aerosol absorbing components of black
carbon, brown carbon, and dust from ground-based remote sensing data of
sun-sky radiometers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6534–6543, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., and
Baltensperger, U.: Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of
the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers, J. Aerosol Sci., 34,
1445–1463, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, C. Q., Zheng, M., Sullivan, A. P., Bosch, C., Desyaterik, Y., Andersson,
A., Li, X. Y., Guo, X. S., Zhou, T., Gustafsson, O., and Collett, J. L.:
Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble
organic carbon in Beijing: Biomass burning contributions, Atmos. Environ.,
121, 4–12, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in aqueous ammonium sulfate solutions: products,
kinetics and hydration effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es200989n</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. L., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., and Weber, R. J.: Sources,
composition and absorption Angstrom exponent of light-absorbing organic
components in aerosol extracts from the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 47, 3685–3693, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es305047b" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es305047b</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. Y., Müller, L., Winterhalter, R., Moortgat, G. K., Hoffmann, T.,
and Pöschl, U.: Seasonal cycle and temperature dependence of pinene
oxidation products, dicarboxylic acids and nitrophenols in fine and coarse
air particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7859–7873,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7859-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-7859-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, R., Lee, A. K. Y., Huang, L., Li, X., Yang, F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Photochemical processing of aqueous atmospheric brown carbon, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6087–6100, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-6087-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
