<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-1491-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Transport of pollution to a remote coastal site during gap flow from
California's interior: impacts on aerosol composition, clouds,
<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>and radiative balance</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Transport of pollution to a remote coastal site}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~C. Martin et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Andrew C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff6">
          <name><surname>Cornwell</surname><given-names>Gavin C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-1282</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Atwood</surname><given-names>Samuel A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9291-2362</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>Kathryn A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5422</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Rothfuss</surname><given-names>Nicholas E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1495-1902</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>Hans</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>DeMott</surname><given-names>Paul J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-1889</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kreidenweis</surname><given-names>Sonia M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-2914</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Petters</surname><given-names>Markus D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4082-1693</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Prather</surname><given-names>Kimberly A.</given-names></name>
          <email>kprather@ucsd.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3048-9890</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Climate Atmospheric Science and Physical Oceanography, Scripps
Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Marine Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina
State University, Raleigh, NC, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: School of Chemistry, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>*</label><institution>These authors contributed equally to this work.</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Kimberly A. Prather (kprather@ucsd.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>31</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1491</fpage><lpage>1509</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>During the CalWater 2015 field campaign, ground-level observations of aerosol
size, concentration, chemical composition, and cloud activity were made at
Bodega Bay, CA, on the remote California coast. A strong anthropogenic
influence on air quality, aerosol physicochemical properties, and cloud
activity was observed at Bodega Bay during periods with special weather
conditions, known as Petaluma Gap flow, in which air from California's
interior is transported to the coast. This study applies a diverse set of
chemical, cloud microphysical, and meteorological measurements to the Petaluma
Gap flow phenomenon for the first time. It is demonstrated that the sudden
and often dramatic change in aerosol properties is strongly related to
regional meteorology and anthropogenically influenced chemical processes in
California's Central Valley. In addition, it is demonstrated that the change
in air mass properties from those typical of a remote marine environment to
properties of a continental regime has the potential to impact atmospheric
radiative balance and cloud formation in ways that must be accounted for in
regional climate simulations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The remote northern California coast experiences a Mediterranean climate
(Aschmann, 1973; Lentz and Chapman, 1989) and warm, dry summers. The vast
majority of yearly precipitation occurs during winter (Regonda et al., 2005),
when the North Pacific extratropical storm track extends southward and brings
periodic pressure falls and rain to the region (Gyakum et al.,
1989). Also during the winter
months, conditions known as channeled gap flow can transport air masses from
much further inland to the remote coast. These episodic periods result when
very low near-surface buoyancy and an onshore-directed gap-parallel pressure
gradient co-occur in one of several prominent gaps in the coastal mountain
ranges (Overland and Walter Jr., 1981; Neiman et al., 2006; Loescher et al.,
2006; Colle et al., 2006). One such prominent gap is located near the town of
Petaluma in Sonoma County, CA, and can act to channel air from the north San
Francisco Bay Area (SFBA), the Sacramento River Delta, and California's
Central Valley (CV) to coastal northern California (see schematic in Fig. 1;
Neiman et al., 2006 – hereafter N06). N06 described the regional weather
patterns and lower-tropospheric dynamic meteorology associated with Petaluma
Gap flow (PGF) using 62 cases observed during the multi-winter deployment of
a 915 MHz wind profiling radar to Bodega Bay, CA. N06 described PGF as a
near-surface shallow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500m) stably stratified quasi-Bernoulli flow
which can lead to increased static stability, increased density, lower
relative humidity, and increased anthropogenic pollutants near Bodega Bay and
offshore.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Regional map displaying the location of BML, the town of Petaluma,
CA (PTL); San Francisco, CA (SF); the Central Valley; and the Coastal Ranges.
The orange arrow depicts the direction of typical flow during PGF conditions.
Line A–B traces a path across the Petaluma Gap. The inset at bottom displays
the cross-gap terrain profile along line A–B.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Evidence presented in N06 for the proliferation of anthropogenic pollutants
at the coast during PGF included horizontal coast-normal transects and
low-troposphere vertical profiles of carbon monoxide (CO) mixing ratio from a
trace gas analyzer on board just one research flight of the National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) P-3 aircraft. During the
coast-normal transect CO mixing ratio doubled from 120 to 240 ppbv across a
20 km wide gradient that was located approximately 75 km offshore of Bodega
Bay and Point Reyes, CA. It was inferred that, when the near-surface air mass
during PGF episodes traveled from the polluted Central Valley region before
arriving at the coast, the air mass would acquire properties commensurate with
combustion, transportation, agriculture, and manufacturing (e.g., the
observation of elevated CO concentration).</p>
      <p>When transport occurs, PGF should cause large measurable impacts on the
coastal environment via an abrupt but significant change in trace gas and
aerosol chemistry. Expected impacts include the following:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>An increase in absorption of solar shortwave radiation by black carbon
(BC) aerosol, which has much greater emission sources on the continental side of
the Petaluma Gap. An increase in black carbon mass may also be associated
with more freshly emitted soot. Together, these factors may lead to a
relative decrease in both externally mixed and internally mixed
organic : elemental carbon (OC : EC) ratios. (e.g., Chung et al., 2012; Cahill et al., 2012).</p></list-item><list-item><p>A brightening in nearshore marine stratocumulus clouds through the cloud
albedo indirect effect (Twomey, 1977; Solomon, 2007), since the inferred PGF
air mass contains more numerous pollution aerosol particles, a portion of
which will serve as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN).</p></list-item><list-item><p>Increased deposition of nitrogen-containing particulate matter to the local
ecosystem, which may lead to increased eutrophication along the coastal shelf
(Paerl, 1995, 1997), because particles transported during PGF may have formed
or have been aged in a nitrous-oxide- and ammonia-enriched environment
(Seinfeld and Pandis, 2012).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>As part of the CalWater-2 experiment (Leung et al., 2014; Ralph et al., 2015),
measurements of trace gas concentrations, aerosol physicochemical properties,
and lower-tropospheric meteorology were taken at the University of
California, Davis Bodega Marine Laboratory during January, February, and
March 2015. Using this dataset, described in Sect. 2, we report the abrupt
changes in trace gases and particulate matter observed during five PGF events
and establish composite aerosol size distributions, aerosol chemical sources,
trace gas concentrations, and cloud condensation nuclei activation curves. We
also identify particle aging through the accumulation of ammonium and nitrate
during PGF using detailed single-particle mass spectrometry measurements. The
analysis methods presented in Sect. 3, and their results, presented in
Sect. 4, verify the above hypotheses and present a nuanced picture of the
secondary heterogeneous chemistry active in aerosol particles that travel to
the coast in the PGF air mass. Fine details of particle aging are location
specific, but conclusions drawn from the increase in aerosol number, changes
in aerosol source, brightening of marine clouds, and impact on aerosol
absorption are generally applicable to many other coastal regions that
periodically experience channeled offshore flow through a mountain gap.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data sources</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Bodega Marine Laboratory</title>
      <p>Measurements and samples were collected from 14 January to 9 March 2015 at
Bodega Marine Laboratory (BML; 38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
123<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) in Bodega Bay, California.
Measurements were collected continuously unless otherwise noted. BML is
located south-southwest of the northern California coastal mountain ranges
and north of Point Reyes National Seashore (Fig. 1). More detailed
information regarding instrumentation deployed to BML follows below.</p>
      <p>The sampling site at BML included two instrumented trailers located
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m east-northeast of the seashore and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m north of the
northernmost BML permanent building. The beta attenuation monitor (BAM), for
measuring particulate matter mass for particles smaller than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE; Eldred et al., 1997) filters for collecting
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and particles smaller than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were placed at an
ancillary site <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 m southwest of the trailers. The IMPROVE samples
are not used in the analysis that follows. Aerosol composition and ice-nucleating
particle concentrations were measured in the trailer owned by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB) and operated by the University of
California, San Diego (UCSD). Aerosol sizing, gas-phase tracer
concentrations, black carbon mass, and cloud condensation nuclei concentrations
were measured in the trailer owned by the National Park Service (NPS) and
operated by Colorado State University (CSU). Ambient aerosol particles were
collected nearby using filters for subsequent laboratory measurement of drop
freezing temperature. A more extensive description of these instruments and
the data processing, quality control, and archiving is given by Petters et
al. (2017). A meteorology station operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration's Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL) was located <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m north of the two
trailers. The NOAA/ESRL 449 MHz wind profiling radar, radio acoustic
sounding system (RASS), and 10 m surface meteorology tower were operated
during the two study periods and are used for the analysis presented in later
sections. Descriptions of these instruments and the NOAA/ESRL Bodega Bay
meteorology station (BBY) can be found in White et al. (2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Aerosol composition</title>
      <p>Size-resolved aerosol composition at Bodega Bay was measured with an
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ATOFMS) and an ultrafine
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer (UF-ATOFMS). The UF-ATOFMS used a
diluting stage with an approximate dilution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to increase aerosol
ionization efficiency during periodic high particle concentrations. The use
of these instruments in tandem allows the direct measurement of
single-particle composition for particles in the aerodynamic diameter range
0.15–3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The design and operating principles of these
instruments have been described elsewhere (Gard et al., 1997; Su et al.,
2004); thus we provide only a short overview here. Particles were dried prior
to introduction to the instrument with silica-diffusion dryers in order to
improve the ionization efficiency and thus improve the acquired spectra
quality. Particles enter the vacuum system through either a converging nozzle
or an aerodynamic lens, wherein they are accelerated to their terminal
velocities. After reaching this terminal velocity, they enter the sizing
region, where they travel through two continuous wave laser beams (diode-pumped,
Nd : YAG at 532 nm) separated by a vertical distance of 6 cm and
oriented orthogonal to each other. Because the distance is known, particle
velocity can be determined by measuring the time difference between the two
scattering signals. These velocities can be converted to vacuum aerodynamic
diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>va</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through a calibration curve generated with
polystyrene latex spheres (PSLs). The velocity is also used to calculate the
time when a particle will arrive in the ion source region. Upon arrival in
the source region, a 266 nm Nd : YAG laser is triggered to fire upon the
particle, desorb it, and generate positive and negative ions whose mass
spectrum are measured with a dual-polarity time-of-flight mass spectrometer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Size distributions</title>
      <p>Aerosol size distributions at BML were measured using a scanning mobility
particle sizer (SMPS, TSI Inc. Model 3936) and an aerodynamic particle sizer
(APS, TSI Inc. Model 3321). The SMPS was operated with a pump flow of
0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a sheath flow of 3.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> so that the
dynamic size range varied from 13.6 to 736.5 nm. The APS operated with a
sample flow rate of 1.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a sheath flow of
4.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and measured particle sizes from 0.6 to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m.
The APS was externally calibrated using PSLs.
Particles were not dried prior to sizing, but the relative humidity (RH) of
the sample line was monitored with a RH sensor (Vaisala, HMP110). The RH in
the sample line varied from 7.5 to 54.7 % during measurement periods with
a mean value of 35.5 %. Nearly 97 % of the sampling periods occurred
while sample line RH was below 47 % (0.4 % of local (LOCAL), 4.7 % of
control (CTL), and 0 % of PGF; refer to Sect. 3.1): the efflorescence humidity of sodium chloride particles
(Gupta et al., 2015). Because the RH was below the efflorescence point of
sodium chloride (chosen as a proxy for sea spray) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 % of the
sampling periods, the humidity likely had little bearing on the composite size
distributions used in this analysis. Assuming spherical particles, the
measured mobility diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is equivalent to physical diameter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). APS measurements were adjusted from aerodynamic diameter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assuming spherical particles and an effective
density of 1.8 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both APS and SMPS size distributions were
combined to 10 min mean distributions from their operational 1 and 5 min
scan frequency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Aerosol and BC mass concentration</title>
      <p>PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass was determined using a BAM (Met
One Instruments Inc., Model BAM 1020). The mass was recorded hourly. BC
mass concentration and attenuation were determined with a
seven-channel aethalometer (Magee Scientific Corp., Model AE16-ER-P3-F0),
operating in AE-30 mode.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Cloud activation properties</title>
      <p>Size-resolved (also referred to as “diameter scan”) cloud condensation
nuclei concentrations were measured using a streamwise cloud condensation
nuclei counter (Droplet Measurement Technologies Inc., CCN-100) coupled with
an SMPS. The SMPS (TSI 3080 long column) was operated at a sheath-to-sample
flow rate of 5 to 1.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Raw counts were recorded in Labview and
inverted as described previously (Nguyen et al., 2014; Petters et al., 2009).
The inversions account for temperature and pressure changes inside the DMA,
contribution of multiply charged particles, and losses through the inlet
system. The CCN was operated at a sample flow rate of 0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
sheath-to-sample flow ratio of 10 : 1. Supersaturation is calibrated using
atomized, dried ammonium sulfate aerosol (Christensen and Petters, 2012). The
control software cycles through an automated 12-point sequence varying
supersaturation between 0.06 and 0.67 %. Activation diameters are
obtained for normalized activation curves (Petters et al., 2009), and the
apparent hygroscopicity parameter at standard state, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated
from the supersaturation and activation diameter (Christensen and Petters,
2012; Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Gas-phase measurements</title>
      <p>Concentrations of gas-phase pollutants were determined using a suite of
gas-phase instruments, collocated with the aethalometer, CCN counter, and the
sizing instruments. A NO–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer (TEI Inc., Model 42C),
ozone analyzer (TEI Inc., Model 49C), sulfur dioxide analyzer (TEI Inc. Model
43C), and carbon monoxide monitor (Horiba Inc., APMA-370) were all utilized
in this study. Gas-phase measurements were recorded every second and
converted to 10 min mean time resolution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Remotely sensed cloud properties</title>
      <p>Level 2 MODIS cloud products (Platnick et al., 2003) are used to estimate
the range of marine stratocumulus cloud optical depth offshore from BML
during PGF episodes with clear sky above low clouds, and to verify that the
clouds in nearshore MODIS scenes are low-level cumulus or stratocumulus
clouds.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Method of compositing by measurement period</title>
      <p>Composite aerosol size distributions, trace gas and aerosol type
concentrations, indicators of secondary chemical aging, and CCN activation
spectra corresponding to PGF periods and control periods are derived as a
primary tool for addressing the hypotheses posed in this study. Herein, we
define a control period (CTL) to be any hourly period which does not fit the
definition for flow through the Petaluma Gap arriving at BML found in N06
(hereafter mPGF) and does not occur during short-lived episodes of
concentrated local anthropogenic pollution. In this study, mPGF periods that
also meet a minimum threshold for concentrated non-local anthropogenic
pollution will be called PGF. Observed causes of local anthropogenic
pollution included nearby brush fires, vehicle activity at BML, and
“sea breeze resampling”. During the third of those, high concentrations of
anthropogenic pollution either from a local source or from further inland
that was previously transported offshore returned to the measurement site via
the afternoon sea breeze. Since the polluted air mass may have up to 18 h of
modification by the nearby BML marine environment just before sea breeze
resampling episodes, these were classified as local anthropogenic pollution
and were removed from the PGF and CTL composites.</p>
      <p>We followed the methodology of N06 in identifying Petaluma Gap flow using the
BBY 449 MHz vertically profiling radar and 10 m anemometer (see Sect. 4a in
N06). Briefly, this methodology includes identifying continuous periods at
least 6 h in length during which wind speed and direction criteria are met
both at the surface (10 m anemometer at BML) and in the lowest retrieved
layer (approximately 100 to 350 m m.s.l.) of the BML 449 MHz radar. When the
conditions from the N06 methodology were met, we declared the period mPGF. It
is important to note that, while 449 MHz wind profiles are collected hourly,
all other data from the study are collected more frequently; therefore we
classified local conditions in hourly intervals.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Horizontal wind barb and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>v</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> every 100 m from 300 to
1900 m a.g.l. from NOAA/ESRL 449 MHz wind profiling radar and RASS at BBY (top),
hourly CO concentration (ppmv – green) and CN (no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> – brown)
(middle), number particles classified as EC or aged EC (black) and SS or aged
SS (blue) per 30 min interval from ATOFMS (bottom) during a 24 h period
(10 February 2015) classified as CTL. <bold>(b)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold> but for a 24 h period
(12 February 2015) classified as LOCAL. <bold>(c)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold> but for the
24 h surrounding PGF 4.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>To choose local conditions based on an indicator of anthropogenic pollution,
we examined CalWater 2015 observations of CO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SMPS number
concentration integrated from 13.6 to 736.5 nm (CN), and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(collectively, peripherals). During mPGF, the interquartile range of CO and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher than the interquartile range of the same measurements
during periods that did not fit mPGF (not shown). In addition, for indicators
of fine particulate concentration (CN, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the median value during
PGF is higher than the upper quartile value during all periods. For all
anthropogenic pollutant indicators, the maximum observation and much of the
upper quartile range are higher than any observation taken during mPGF, and
occurred during local anthropogenic pollution periods. An example is shown in
Fig. 2, which contrasts lower tropospheric horizontal wind and virtual
potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>v</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), selected peripheral measurements,
and EC and SS particle (Table 2) subtypes (see Sect. 3.3 for particle typing, later this
section) during a period when mPGF was not observed nor were anthropogenic
pollutants high (Fig. 2a), a period when it is suspected local
anthropogenic pollutants were sampled (Fig. 2b), and a mPGF period (Fig. 2c).
Note that, during the local pollutant episode, CN and CO were elevated to the
same levels as during the mPGF period for a few hours. The onset of the
elevated-pollutant period occurs near the maximum in onshore sea breeze (NNW
200 m wind near 03:00 UTC on 12 February). Pollutant concentrations
decrease again a few hours after local sunset, when the offshore land breeze
become established. The period 03:00–11:00 UTC on 12 February 2015 is an
example of a sea breeze resampling period.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Decision tree used for filtering measurement periods, and the
resulting number of hourly periods (/total) in each category.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{0.9}[0.9]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Decision criteria</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4">3 PGF criteria at BBY (Neiman et al., 2006) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Y</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">N</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO conc. greater than</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Y</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PGF (55/1248)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Local (407/1248)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (138.1 ppbv)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Onset/diffuse</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CTL (775/1248)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(11/1248)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In order to exclude local or sea breeze resampled anthropogenic pollutants
from CTL periods, we imposed an additional requirement based upon CO
concentration – hourly mean CO concentration must be above the CalWater 2015
mean plus two standard deviations (138.1 ppbv). Along with mPGF, this
requirement forms the basis of a decision table (Table 1) that allows the
separation of CalWater 2015 measurements into four composites. We choose CO
concentration as our additional discriminator because its interquartile range
during mPGF is entirely above the interquartile range from all other periods,
because its overall variability is the lowest among peripheral measurements,
and because elevated near-surface CO concentration was observed by aircraft
during a PGF event reported in N06. Table 1 allows the compositing of
observational period by PGF (mPGF and elevated CO conditions met), CTL
(neither mPGF nor elevated CO conditions met), LOCAL (mPGF not met, elevated
CO met), and diffuse (mPGF met, elevated CO not met). In this light,
Fig. 2a–c can be seen as examples of CTL, LOCAL, and PGF periods,
respectively.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of particle types determined by ATOFMS and their
characteristic ion markers.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="321.516142pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Characteristic peaks</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amines</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>58</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NHCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Angelino et al., 2001; Pratt et al., 2009; Qin et al., 2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ammonium nitrate (AN)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>62</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>97</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>125</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pastor et al., 2003; Qin et al., 2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biomass burning (BB)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Strong <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>39</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>97</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, less intense <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>62</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>125</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Silva et al., 1999)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Elemental carbon (EC)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carbon Clusters at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Moffett and Prather, 2009; Spencer and Prather, 2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Elemental carbon–organic carbon (ECOC)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>36</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CHNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Moffet and Prather 2009; Qin et al., 2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organic carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CHN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CHNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Silva and Prather, 2000; Spencer and Prather, 2006; Qin et al., 2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High-mass organic carbon (HMOC)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CHNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, differences of 14–16 past 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>62</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>97</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Denkenberger et al., 2007; Qin et al., 2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Inorganic ions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Li<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>39</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>48</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ti <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>54</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>76</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Silva et al., 2000)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust/bio</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Same as dust but also with biological markers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>42</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aged marine (aged SS)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Same as fresh marine but also with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>108</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>62</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>147</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gard et al., 1998)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fresh marine (SS)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>39</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>81</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>35</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>58</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>93</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NaCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>151</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>153</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>155</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gard et al., 1998)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Derivation of {\AA}ngstr\"{o}m absorption exponent from aethalometer
observations}?><title>Derivation of Ångström absorption exponent from aethalometer
observations</title>
      <p>The attenuation recorded by the aethalometer was used to derive the aerosol
absorption coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the instrument's native
5 min resolution following the method described in Collaud Coen et
al. (2010) (see their Eq. 2). This value was not corrected and thus not
reported directly, as techniques for correcting aethalometer measurements
require a coincident multi-channel measurement of aerosol scattering in order
to determine backscattering by the filtered particles, and this additional
measurement was not taken during CalWater 2015. It is noted that values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally fall in the range reported by previous studies
in continental regions (e.g., Table 1 in Chung et al., 2012). The hourly mean
aerosol absorption coefficient in the channels 470, 520, 590, and 660 nm
were used to derive the Ångström absorption exponent (AAE), using the
relation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AAE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. AAE is
calculated by regression to the uncorrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Note that Weingartner et al. (2003) estimated that errors in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are only a very weak function of wavelength in the
channels used; thus it is expected that instrument errors do not contribute
significantly to the estimate of AAE.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Assigning particle type to ATOFMS spectra</title>
      <p>ATOFMS and UF-ATOFMS can provide information on size and chemical composition
(via mass spectra) for an individual particle. Generally, positive spectra
reveal particle source, while negative spectra provides information on the
atmospheric processing a particle has undergone (Guazzotti et al., 2001;
Sullivan et al., 2007; Prather et al., 2008). ATOFMS, but not UF-ATOFMS,
spectra were filtered for periodic radio frequency interference caused by a
sub-optimally operating instrument component. A total of 115 416 particles
were scattered and hit during PGF events, and 1 835 387 during the control
time periods (see Sect. 3.1 for definition of PGF and control periods).</p>
      <p>Single-particle spectra and size data were loaded into Matlab (The MathWorks,
Inc.) and analyzed via the software toolkit YAADA
(<uri>http://www.yaada.org/</uri>). Particles were divided into clusters based on
their mass spectral features via an adaptive neural network (ART-2a,
vigilance factor of 0.8, learning rate of 0.05, and 20 iterations with a regroup vigilance
factor of 0.85) (Rebotier and Prather, 2007; Song et al., 1999). Greater than
95 % of ART-2a analyzed particles were grouped into 11
types based upon their characteristic mass spectra and size distributions.
Similar to previous field studies using ATOFMS (Sullivan et al., 2007; Pratt
and Prather, 2009; Cahill et al., 2012; Qin et al., 2012), particle types
were assigned by a human operator based upon similarity to known types from
previous field and laboratory studies. Calculated standard error in particle
fraction was less than 1 % for all particle types and thus was not
included in the discussion. These results are summarized in Table 2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Determining aging mechanisms using ATOFMS</title>
      <p>It is important to describe not only particle sources but also secondary
aging impacts as the aging mechanism will change the light absorption
cross section of carbonaceous aerosols. For instance, a sulfate coating can
increase the light-absorbing properties of soot by a factor of 1.6
(Moffet and Prather, 2009). Internally mixed EC and OC have greater
absorption profiles than homogeneously mixed particles of either
species (Schnaiter et al., 2005). Additionally, aging can increase particle
hygroscopicity through condensation and reaction of gases like NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2010; Mochida et al., 2006; Zuberi et al., 2005; Zhang
et al., 2008) or oxidation of carbonaceous species (Zuberi et al., 2005;
Kotzick et al., 1997). Increased particle hygroscopicity can increase the CCN
activity of particles and their growth factor, profoundly impacting radiative
effects. Finally, accumulation of nitrogen species on particles can lead to
increased deposition of nitrate and ammonium and impact oceanic biology
(Paerl, 1995, 1997).</p>
      <p>The ATOFMS is a powerful tool with which to measure particle aging because of its
ability to measure single-particle composition and directly determine the
type and extent of particle aging. For similar particles of the same type,
relative peak areas (RPAs) qualitatively reflect the amount of a species on a
particle in relation to other species (Bhave et al., 2002; Gross et al.,
2000; Prather et al., 2008) and thus can be used to investigate the mechanism
of aging (Cahill et al., 2012). During this study, the mixing state of single
particles with secondary markers was investigated by identifying and
comparing peak areas for ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, amines
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>58</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NHCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>59</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>97</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>195</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>46</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>62</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>125</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, elemental carbon
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>36</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and organic carbon
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CHN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CHNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Other
markers of heterogeneous processing were investigated, but no notable
patterns emerged. For this analysis, a particle was considered to be an
internal mixed with a species if it had an RPA greater than 0.5 % for the
characteristic ion markers, similar to the methodology employed by Cahill et
al. (2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Estimates of cloud droplet number concentration and marine stratocumulus
albedo change</title>
      <p>Size distribution, hygroscopicity, and CCN concentration measurements were
collated from periods classified as PGF and CTL. Cumulative CCN
supersaturation spectra, defined as median CCN concentration as a function
of supersaturation were constructed from the integrated CCN and size
distribution data. The spectra were fit to a two-mode hypergeometric model
(Cohard et al., 1998) to estimate cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) for a
range of updraft velocity.</p>
      <p>The albedo change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of nearshore marine stratocumulus
during PGF episodes was determined using Eq. (7) in Platnick and
Twomey (1994):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M225" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PGF</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CTL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of CDNC in PGF conditions to CDNC in CTL periods.
This analytical formulation relies upon the assumptions of conservative
scattering, nearly invariant asymmetry parameter, and constant liquid water
path. Furthermore, the estimate we present herein of albedo change during
PGF episodes assumes that marine stratocumulus clouds are present near
Bodega Bay during PGF and that they are not overtopped by higher cloud
layers. The validity of each assumption will be briefly discussed.</p>
      <p>Conservative scattering: this assumption is commonly invoked in studies that
estimate cloud albedo susceptibility or change (Twomey, 1991; Platnick and
Towmey, 1994; Hill and Dobbie, 2008; Hill
et al., 2008, 2009; Chen et al., 2011). Liquid cloud particles are generally
conservative (single scattering albedo <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0) for small to moderate
cloud optical depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>23.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As we will demonstrate, marine
cumulus and stratocumulus cloud layers are nearly always below this threshold
during PGF.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>PGF events observed during CalWater 2015 and their significant
parameters following N06. Ranks are out of 67 (62 cases from N06 plus 5 from
CalWater 2015).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Start date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Duration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jet altitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Jet maxima</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Jet dir.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Gap folding</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Vertical shear</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Precipitation at</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(MM/DD/YYYY),</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(h) (rank)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">height (m m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">across folding alt</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">BBY (mm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">time (UTC)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(rank)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(rank)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(rank)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (rank)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(rank)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">01/14/2015, 13:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31 (5)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">307 (47)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0 (16)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">622 (20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.8 (46)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0 (67)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">01/25/2015, 11:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8 (44)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1146 (1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.7 (2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1776 (1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.7 (67)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0 (67)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">01/26/2015, 12:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 (33)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">202 (47)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.6 (37)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">517 (28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.4 (48)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0 (67)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">02/04/2015, 07:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 (38)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">202 (47)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.8 (33)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">122</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">517 (28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.8 (62)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0 (67)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">03/05/2015, 13:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8 (44)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">412 (6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.6 (56)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">119</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">727 (12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.6 (50)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0 (67)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Invariant asymmetry: for visible light, cloud droplet scattering asymmetry
varies weakly with particle size (Kokhanovsky, 2004). For liquid drops, the
variation is primarily approximately 5 % over the range of effective
radius from 6 to 19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. We will demonstrate that the estimated
change in liquid drop effective radius during and near PGF periods lies well
within this range.</p>
      <p>Constant liquid water path: this is the least likely of the above-listed
assumptions to be valid. Cloud albedo is susceptible to changes in both cloud
droplet number concentration and cloud liquid water path. The latter can also
vary with cloud droplet number concentration through cloud dynamic pathways
including the so-called “evaporation entrainment” and
“sedimentation entrainment” effects (Lu et al., 2005; Wood, 2007; Hill et
al., 2009; Chen et al., 2011). The impact of these feedbacks to cloud albedo
through the dynamics that control cloud liquid water path vary strongly with
environmental conditions and in some cases can cancel the direct increase in
cloud albedo resulting from an increase in cloud droplet number
concentration. Environmental conditions during PGF (greater likelihood of
very dry air above the marine boundary layer, and an increase in large-scale
subsidence and thus increased low-level static stability) have been found to
favor competing effects on susceptibility through the entrainment effects
(e.g., Wood, 2007; Chen et al., 2011). The strength of the entrainment
feedbacks is strongly dependent on sea surface temperature as well. PGF can
occur under a wide range of sea surface temperatures arising from natural
variability in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. To disentangle the total
susceptibility which may arise from these competing liquid water path
feedbacks, a series of large-scale eddy simulations, similar to those in Lu
et al. (2005) and Chen et al. (2011), are required. This is beyond the scope
of the current study; thus we will only estimate the so-called “Twomey
effect” (or cloud albedo first aerosol indirect effect) on albedo which
corresponds to the increase in cloud albedo due to an increase in CCN
concentration when liquid water path is held fixed.</p>
      <p>The MODIS level 2 cloud products provide swath-level retrievals of liquid
cloud optical depth, liquid cloud effective radius, and cloud top pressure
twice daily during daylight hours from descending (Terra – 10:15 local time)
and ascending (Aqua – 13:45 local time) sun-synchronous orbits. The level 2
cloud products have a nominal spatial resolution of 20 km. For this study,
daytime retrievals during PGF conditions from the expanded catalog (N06 PGF
events plus Table 3 from this study) during the MODIS operational period
(2002–present) were screened to remove pixels over land or more than
75 km from the coast (offshore extent of PGF air mass found by aircraft and
reported in N06) and pixels which likely did not correspond to low-level
cumulus or stratocumulus. We followed the cloud type definitions (e.g., Fig. 2
from Rossow and Schiffer, 1999) from the International Satellite Cloud
Climatology Project (ISCCP) that rely upon thresholds of both cloud top
pressure and cloud optical depth. Pixels for which no cloud information was
retrieved were also discarded (no cloud present, or retrieval algorithm
failed). The retrieved effective radius was also retained to judge the
suitability of the invariant asymmetry assumption. The cloud albedo change
reported is thus the estimate of the Twomey effect on albedo during PGF
episodes when marine cumulus or stratocumulus are present with clear sky
above marine low-level clouds.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Description of PGF cases observed during CalWater 2015</title>
      <p>Table 3 lists all cases which fit the mPGF requirements during CalWater 2015.
Hereafter, these will be referred to as PGF(1–5). Some key parameters which
describe the PGF layer flow measured by the 449 MHz radar are also
summarized in Table 3, along with their ranking among 67 cases (62 cases from N06 plus
5 from CalWater 2015). Note that in all 5 cases both mPGF and elevated CO
are met for a majority of the period; however the listed start time and
duration in Table 3 is for mPGF, and in some cases the duration for PGF may
be shorter than that listed when the additional elevated CO constraint is
enforced.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Box-and-whisker plot displaying normalized peripheral
measurements during all (ALL – green) hourly CalWater 2015 periods, PGF (PGF
– red) periods, and CTL (CTL – blue) periods. <bold>(b)</bold> BBY 10 m wind rose diagram
for ALL. Rings represent probability of wind from displayed direction; petals
represent relative distribution of wind speeds (color bar – m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
the given direction. <bold>(c)</bold> As in <bold>(b)</bold> but for CTL periods.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Air mass properties during PGF</title>
      <p>Figure 3 shows a box-and-whisker plot for the peripheral instrument data. So
that all measurements fall on the same scale, each measurement has been
normalized according to its all-study mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>all</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and has been
plotted according to its natural logarithm. For CO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CN, the
interquartile range during PGF lies entirely above (or nearly so in the case
of CN) the interquartile range during CTL. The difference in normalized
concentration is most dramatic for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, for which the minimum hourly
concentration during PGF is nearly the median CTL concentration and the
maximum CTL concentration is nearly the median PGF concentration. Median APS
number concentration integrated from 542 to 19 810 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>APS</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
not preferentially higher during PGF, CTL, or all (ALL) hourly periods, though the
range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>APS</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each period varies slightly. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is more
likely to be elevated during PGF, but its interquartile range overlaps with
the interquartile range of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during CTL and ALL hourly periods. Mean
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during ALL hourly periods is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>14.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mean PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during CTL periods is estimated
to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>14.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This estimate increases to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>22.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>16.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during PGF, a mean increase of
64 %.</p>
      <p>Figure 3 also displays wind rose diagrams for ALL and CTL periods. The
distribution of wind directions and speeds during CTL suggests that these
periods are dominated by the land–sea breeze diurnal cycle (BML is situated
just east of a shoreline oriented NNW to SSE). The wind rose for PGF is not
shown, since wind direction was used in the algorithm for defining PGF.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Normalized aethalometer light absorption coefficient at seven
wavelengths for hourly periods classified as CTL (blue), PGF (red), and LOCAL
(black). Upper/lower box bounds represent upper/lower 25 % values,
respectively. Upper/lower whiskers represent max/min values, respectively. Box
middle represents median value. Also displayed are the AAE values found by
regression during each period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The range of normalized hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured
during PGF, CTL, and LOCAL periods is shown in Fig. 4. The normalization
method follows that used in Fig. 3. As discussed in the Methods section,
absolute values are uncorrected and thus not reported. The median and
upper/lower quartile values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were compared to published
work (Table 1, Chung et al., 2012), and it was found that they are reasonable
for the location and concentration/type of aerosols measured. It should be
noted that absorption coefficient median and interquartile ranges are highest
during PGF, followed by LOCAL and CTL, and that highest maximum values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed during LOCAL. The AAE derived from the
visible light channels for each period is reported in the figure annotation.
The AAE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during PGF is very close to 1.0, which is widely
accepted to be indicative of fresh soot (Chung et al., 2012). Figure 4 shows
that AAE during CTL (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreases when compared to PGF. AAE is expected
to decrease with soot particle age (accumulation of organic and nitrate on
the particle surfaces). A possible explanation for the decrease in CTL AAE
in comparison to PGF is that during PGF direct lower tropospheric transport through the
Petaluma Gap brings CV and SFBA brings more freshly emitted soot particles to
the measurement site. During CTL periods, fewer soot particles are present
(lower absorption coefficient), and those that are measured by the
aethalometer have been further aged. In Sect. 4.4, this conclusion is
supported by single-particle mixing state analysis, which shows that
organic : elemental carbon ratio decreases during PGF periods compared to CTL. The
AAE during LOCAL periods is highest at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value is closer
to that reported for biomass burning (BB; Clarke et al., 2007; Lewis et al.,
2008) than is the AAE during PGF or CTL.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Composite merged SMPS-APS size distribution displayed as for PGF
(red) and CTL (blue) periods. <bold>(b)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold> except displayed on a log axis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 5 shows the average merged size distributions for PGF and CTL sampling
periods. CTL periods were marked by lower particle concentrations in the
submicron mode and higher particle concentrations in the coarse mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). CTL periods often experienced westerly flows and would
be expected to be dominated by marine aerosol from the Pacific Ocean. The
marine boundary layer over the remote ocean is typified by low particle
concentrations and a significant supermicron mode (Quinn et al., 2015).
Integrated average supermicron counts on the APS during CTL periods were
14.9 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to 2.4 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for PGF periods, a decrease of
84 %. Fig. 5b is a log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
shows supermicron particle concentrations approximately an order of
magnitude greater. Single-particle composition data from the ATOFMS during
these time periods, discussed more in Sect. 4.3, confirmed that the increase
in coarse-mode particles could be attributed to greater concentrations of
marine-type particles.</p>
      <p>PGF events, in contrast, showed a large increase in the number of particles
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and a new ultrafine mode with mode
diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. Figure 5a shows this relationship more
clearly, and the corresponding decrease in coarse-mode particles. CN
increased by 110 % during PGF compared to CTL, from 311.0 to
650.9 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These results were also expected, because continental,
anthropogenically influenced air masses typically contain smaller and more
numerous particles (Tunved et al., 2005). This increase in particle number
during PGF events was correlated with the increase in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown in
Fig. 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Pie charts for sub- (top panels) and supermicron (bottom panels)
particle types for CTL (left panels) and PGF (right panels). Description of
particle classifications can be found in Table 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Aerosol particle types</title>
      <p>PGF conditions coincide with a shift in particle type away from marine and
towards continental. Figure 6 shows pie charts of the sub- and supermicron
particle populations for CTL vs. PGF. Percentages indicate the number
fraction of particles assigned to the corresponding particle type. The total
hit rate for all particles was 20.8 %. Panels a and b show the submicron
(0.2–1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) particle number fraction by type during CTL
(1 222 274 particles) and PGF (164 952 particles), respectively. PGF had
approximately the same level of submicron BB particles.
However, there was a large increase in elemental carbon–organic carbon (ECOC)
(20–28 %) and ammonium nitrate (AN) (10–28 %) particle types. These
two types have both been linked to anthropogenic activity. The ECOC type has
been observed before with the aging of fuel emissions (Hughes et al., 2000)
in the Los Angeles Basin during stagnant conditions with high pollutant
concentrations. Similarly, the California Central Valley is an area of
elevated hydrocarbon fuel emissions and frequent long-lived lower
tropospheric inversions, and it might be expected to support the formation of
ECOC particles. AN particles have been linked to the accumulation of ammonia
and nitric acid on particles (Qin et al., 2012) and nucleation by reactions
between ammonia and nitric acid (Russell and Cass, 1986; Hughes et al.,
2002), gases strongly correlated with anthropogenic activity. Marine aerosols
make up a sizable fration of submicron particles during CTL (SS and aged SS).
However, these particles are much less prominent during PGF. The increase in
ECOC and AN and decrease in marine particle types reinforce the conclusion
that PGF air masses originate continentally and have a strong anthropogenic
character.</p>
      <p>The clearest delineation in particle type was observed in the supermicron
fraction (1.0–3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). Panels c and d of Fig. 6 show that over
90 % of CTL supermicron particles (544 612 total particles) were either
fresh or aged marine particles, while less than 20 % were of marine
origin during PGF. During PGF, supermicron particles (25 457 total
particles) were primarily comprised of BB; ECOC; AN; and EC, a byproduct of fuel combustion. Additionally, the majority of PGF
marine particles showed markers of reacting with nitric acid (Gard et al.,
1998). This contrasts CTL marine particles, which were primarily unreacted.</p>
      <p>The dust and dust/bio types also increased during PGF. The CV, despite its
agricultural production, is a semiarid environment and can be a significant
source of dust. Conversely, BML air masses during CTL periods were heavily
influenced by the Pacific Ocean and thus were not expected to contain much
dust. The shift in supermicron particle composition away from marine
particles to anthropogenic and dust particle types supports the conclusion
that PGF air masses likely originate from the CV.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Particle sulfate : nitrate ion ratio distribution for CTL periods.
Values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 indicate more nitrate than sulfate, and values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 indicate more
sulfate than nitrate. Ratios representing 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 10 : 1
are shown by vertical dashed lines. Significant particle types are
represented by separate colors. <bold>(b)</bold> as in <bold>(a)</bold> but during PGF periods.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Aging processes observed through secondary species markers</title>
      <p>Figure 7 shows the sulfate : nitrate ratio (SN) of particles separated by
type. Unmodified peak ratios are dependent upon which peak is in the
denominator, i.e., whether or not the ratio is greater than 1, thus
potentially skewing the data. To account for this, we calculated the
normalized peak ratio by the following: ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, normalized peak
ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ratio</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, normalized peak
ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1; and ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, normalized peak ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.
As ratios approach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 or 1, they are exponentially increasing, while close
to 1 the RPA of each species is essentially the same. This results in a
broader range of ratios for bins near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 or 1, while the bins near 0
include a smaller range of ratios. The left panel depicts the SN for CTL
particles. The majority of particles showed higher SN ratios, indicating that
aging primarily occurred through the accumulation of sulfate. The exception
to this rule was the SS type, which can react with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species in a
displacement reaction to liberate HCl (Gard et al., 1998; Cahill et al.,
2012). PGF particles showed a SN ratio biased toward nitrate accumulation,
indicating that the primary and most important aging mechanism was through
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In addition to probing the partitioning of acidic species, basic species like
amines and ammonium were investigated. Figure 8 shows the normalized ratio
for amines : ammonium ratio (AA). The AA for CTL particles shows fairly
equal partitioning for all particle types. During PGF the average peak area
of amine peaks (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>58</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NHCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>59</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
particles actually increased, but the AA ratio shifted toward ammonium
because the ammonium content of particles increased much more. The area
surrounding BML contains animal husbandry but no industrial-scale farming.
The shift in basic species partitioning indicates that PGF particles
originate from a large source of ammonium. The CV region contains many more
industrial-scale farms where ammonium is employed, and thus this change in
aging shows that the PGF air mass likely originates within the CV.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>As in Fig. 7 except that amines : ammonium ion ratio distributions are
shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Previous studies (Cahill et al., 2012) have used the ATOFMS to determine the
internal mixing state of carbonaceous particles. Figure 9 shows the organic
carbon : soot ratio as calculated by the ATOFMS, seperated by particle
type. CTL particles appear to have relatively higher amounts of OC, most
notably in the amine particle types and, unsurprisingly, the OC type. Amines
consist of organic carbon chains bound to nitrogen atoms, so it is also
unsurprising that these particles would have high OC : EC ratios. The ratio
plot indicates that PGF particles contain more EC relative to CTL particles.
This is despite the appearance of the AN particle type, which had greater OC
character. These OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio plots agree with the aethalometer-derived
AAE, which suggest that the soot was less aged during PGF than during CTL
periods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>As in Fig. 7 except that OC : soot ion ratio distributions are shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In summary this analysis shows that the preeminent aging mechanisms
associated with PGF are the accumulation of ammonium and nitrate, in
accordance with previous studies on Central Valley particle composition (Qin
and Prather, 2006). Amine accumulation was also observed in ECOC and AN
particles but was determined to not be as significant as ammonium.
Accumulation of nitrogen species on aerosol particles is important as it
increases the risk of nitrogen deposition into coastal waters, which can lead
to ecosystem degradation (Ryther and Dunstan, 1971; Paerl, 1995, 1997). The
shift toward internal mixtures containing elemental carbon and away from
particulate matter containing primarily organic carbonaceous species during
PGF suggests that gap flow may cause increased solar absorption by near-surface
aerosols, especially in visible wavelengths. This potential impact is
corroborated by the aethalometer PGF and CTL measurements.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Left: cumulative median CCN supersaturation spectrum PGF periods
(blue) and CTL (yellow). Dashed lines approximate the interquartile range.
Right: as in left but for predicted cloud droplet number concentration as
a function of updraft velocity.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1491/2017/acp-17-1491-2017-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>CCN and cloud droplet spectra</title>
      <p>Figure 10 displays the cumulative CCN supersaturation spectrum (versus liquid
supersaturation) transformed from the size-resolved CCN data and the CDNC for updraft velocities between 0.1 and
10 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. CCN concentration is enhanced during PGF by 2.8 to 3.0 for a
wide range of supersaturations. The increase in CCN is remarkably consistent
across the range due to the confluence of two factors. First, the
hygroscopicity parameter – or the contribution of particle chemistry to CCN
activation – does not change significantly between PGF and CTL (0.21 vs.
0.20). Second, particle concentrations are larger for all sizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm
during PGF events (Fig. 5). These sizes dominate the spectra in Fig. 10a. As
a consequence CDNC increases across all considered cloud updraft speeds
during PGF episodes. Figure 10b shows that CDNC increases between 125 and
145 %, and that this relative increase is expected for all possible cloud
types. In the results to follow concerning cloud albedo change during PGF,
CDNC increases are considered as a ratio (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PGF</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CTL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In this framework, the average ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
is 2.35.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <title>Impact of PGF on marine cumulus and stratocumulus albedo</title>
      <p>During expanded catalog (see Sect. 3) PGF episodes the observed cloud albedo
ranged from 0.01 to 0.63, with upper (lower) quartile values of 0.43 (0.17).
Using the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.17) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. (7)
from Platnick and Twomey (1994) estimates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, clouds that condense on PGF CCN
without concomitant changes in liquid water path are expected to be 16 to
28 % more reflective when considering the Twomey aerosol indirect effect.
As discussed in the Methods section, the values reported here correspond to
PGF episodes where marine cumulus or stratocumulus clouds are present within 75 km
of the shoreline, and, when clear, the marine cloud layer is topped by clear
sky.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p>Measurements taken at Bodega Bay, CA, during the CalWater 2015 intensive
observing period were used to investigate the impacts of Petaluma Gap flow
on local air quality and marine cloud albedo. The kinematics of PGF and its
relation to synoptic-scale weather patterns and the Central Valley cold pool
have been perviously described in N06. This study is the first attempt to
quantify the impact of PGF on the boundary layer air mass and particle
chemistry.</p>
      <p>Vertically resolved lower tropospheric wind observations and carbon monoxide
concentration were used to identify PGF periods during the CalWater 2015
intensive observing period and separate these from CTL periods, during which
the BML air mass was influenced neither by PGF nor by heavy pollutant loads from
a local source. Five PGF events were identified during Calwater 2015 and
were compared to the PGF catalog published in N06 by means of their local
weather attributes.</p>
      <p>During Calwater 2015 PGF periods, several measures of anthropogenic
pollution – including CO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CN, and black carbon mass concentration
estimated by a multi-channel aethalometer – were consistently elevated when
compared to CTL periods. Using SMPS and APS aerosol size spectrometers, we
found that aerosol number concentrations increase by 110 % in the
submicron size range, while decreasing 84 % in the supermicron size
range. Both PGF and CTL periods presented size distributions with a similar
accumulation mode near 100 nm. The PGF period composite size distribution
contained a prominent mode below 50 nm which was not present in the CTL
composite. This fine mode indicates that particle source and/or degree of
particle chemical aging may be significantly different during PGF periods.
The particle chemistry of this fine mode could not be investigated because
the relevant sizes are below the lower detection limit of the UF-ATOFMS. PGF
periods contained 84 % fewer coarse-mode particles than did CTL periods.
The relative lack of particles at these sizes is related to a significant
change in supermicron particle chemistry found by analyzing single-particle
mass spectra. Taken together, the above results demonstrate the change in
aerosol physicochemical properties during PGF events.</p>
      <p>Single-particle chemical mixing state during PGF events was investigated
using UF-ATOFMS and ATOFMS measurements. It was found that submicron
particle populations change during PGF to favor ECOC, BB, AN, and EC types
at the expense of SS types. The large difference in supermicron particle
mixing state is likely related to the shift in prominent wind direction
during PGF. The analysis of secondary aging also showed that carbonaceous
particles are more likely to contain elemental carbon than organic carbon
during PGF episodes. Aethalometer-derived AAE also suggested that observed
soot was less aged during PGF periods, but total absorption and total black
carbon mass were greater than during CTL. The above results reinforce the
hypothesis that PGF could lead to an increase in absorption of solar
shortwave radiation by black carbon aerosol, which may be associated with
more freshly emitted soot.</p>
      <p>PGF and CTL single-particle mass spectra relative peak area ratios were used
to investigate particle aging mechanism. PGF particles were much more likely
to acquire nitrate than CTL particles, which preferentially contained
sulfate. This was especially true for AN, ECOC, BB, and EC particle types
during PGF but may not apply to SS and aged SS, which showed a preference
for nitrate aging even during CTL periods. The aging of SS by nitrate is a
well-documented phenomenon that was also regularly observed during CalWater
2015. Relative peak area analysis also showed that particles are much more
likely to chemically age by ammonium than by amines during PGF. This tendency
appeared especially strong for BB, EC, and ECOC types. While OC type particles
increased in relative number during PGF episodes, they appeared to favor the
amine aging pathway even during PGF. Together the above results reinforce the
hypothesis that PGF could lead to increased deposition of nitrogen-containing
particulate matter to the local ecosystem near and offshore of Bodega Bay.
This result may also be true in other coastal locations which are
periodically influenced by offshore gap flow originating in a NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>- and
ammonia-enriched air mass (e.g., the nearby Salinas Valley, and offshore of the
Golden Gate). If increased nitrogen deposition is occurring during PGF
episodes, it could lead to eutrophication and algal blooms, as suggested by
Paerl (1995, 1997).</p>
      <p>Particle hygroscopicity, as shown by size-resolved CCN measurements, was
nearly invariant between PGF and CTL periods. The model of Cohard et
al. (1998) was used to estimate the cloud droplet number concentration
resulting from the derived CCN activation curves (Sect. 3.5). The increase
found in CDNC was stable across a wide range of updraft velocities. The
marine cloud albedo change in response to PGF CCN was estimated using MODIS
level 2 cloud products and Eq. (7) from Platnick and Twomey (1994). To
first order (assuming constant liquid water path) it is estimated that nearshore
marine clouds will brighten by 16 to 28 % (interquartile
range) in visible wavelengths during PGF events. This finding supports the
hypothesis that PGF conditions may lead to a brightening in nearshore marine
stratocumulus clouds through the cloud albedo indirect effect.</p>
      <p>The conclusions reached in addressing the three hypotheses posed in this
study represent only the first attempt to characterize the impact of
Petaluma Gap flow on the aerosol direct effect, aerosol indirect effect, and
coastal environment in northern central California. Due to the relatively
short CalWater 2 intensive observing campaign, these results were drawn from
only five PGF events. The data necessary to investigate these hypotheses were
drawn from a large multi-agency effort including many specialized and
operator intensive measurements, which by nature must be short in duration.
Longer-term observation, perhaps by less detailed but targeted chemical
observations at similar locations, could significantly augment the findings
presented here.</p>
      <p>During this study, we attempted to detect inter-event differences in
relative peak area ratios for secondary aging indicators, but no significant
change was observed. In addition, the authors wish to comment that many of
the assumptions made (e.g., constant liquid water path) in estimating the
impact of PGF on marine cloud albedo change can only be discarded through
airborne observations or modeling studies. These were considered beyond the
scope of this study but may be valuable future investigations to fully
describe the impact of polluted offshore-directed gap flow on marine cloud
brightness.</p>
      <p>The findings presented herein demonstrate that PGF can impact aerosol
number, chemical aging pathways, shortwave absorption, and the number of CCN
available to nearshore marine clouds. These findings are the first of their
kind that result from direct observation of an intermittent weather
phenomenon that brings anthropogenic pollutants to an otherwise remote
region. While the findings follow from in situ observations representative
of a small region, we note that the meteorological factors causing Petaluma
Gap flow (pooling of cold continental air; an onshore, mountain-normal-directed
pressure gradient; a narrow low-elevation gap in the coastal
mountain range) certainly exist in other regions. Thus, the introduction of
anthropogenically influenced continental air to remote marine environments
may modify air quality and aerosol direct and indirect effects in other regions
experiencing regular offshore gap flow as well. The authors argue that
further study of the chemical composition of continental outflow in other
regions is necessary to refine current understanding of the impact of human
activities on the environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data used in this study is available at <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4246/CW3E-MARTIN_20161213_CALWATER2-DATA-BBYMD5324615234A03D12251238DE7C2CD9EEF.TAR" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4246/CW3E-MARTIN_20161213_CALWATER2-DATA-BBYMD5324615234A03D12251238DE7C2CD9EEF.TAR</ext-link>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>List of abbreviations and acronyms</title>
      <p><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acronym/abbreviation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Full name</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ammonium-to-amine ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AAE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol Ångström exponent</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Albedo change</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">APS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerodynamic particle sizer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATOFMS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BAM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beta attenuation monitor</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Black carbon</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BML</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bodega Marine Laboratory</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CARB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">California Air Resources Board</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cloud condensation nuclei</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CDNC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cloud droplet number concentration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Condensation nuclei</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carbon monoxide</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CSU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Colorado State University</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTL</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control time periods</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">California's Central Valley</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mobility diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>va</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Vacuum aerodynamic diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ESRL</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Earth System Research Laboratory</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">mPGF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Meteorological Petaluma Gap flow</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>APS</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Median APS number concentration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Neiman et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NOAA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">National Park Service</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Organic carbon to elemental carbon ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PGF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Petaluma Gap flow</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particulate matter below 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PSLs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Polystyrene latex spheres</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RASS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radio acoustic sounding system</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Relative humidity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RPA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Relative peak area</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SFBA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North San Francisco Bay Area</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ATN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol absorption coefficient</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SMPS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Scanning mobility particle sizer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sulfate to nitrate ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UCSD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">University of California, San Diego</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UF-ATOFMS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ultrafine aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank all other CalWater and ACAPEX 2015 participants, including
those from Pacific Northwest National Laboratories; The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration; NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory; the Naval
Research Laboratory; University of California, Davis; Scripps Institution of
Oceanography; Colorado State University; and North Carolina State University.
The authors would also like to thank the UC Davis Bodega Marine Laboratory
for the use of laboratory and office space, and shipping and physical plant
support while collecting data, as well as the California Air Resources Board
and the National Park Service for the trailers used for sampling. This
research was funded by NSF award number 1451347 (ACM, GCC, KAM, KAP), NSF
award number 1450690 (MDP, NR, HT), and NSF award number 1450760 (SAA, SMK,
PJD).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: H. Saathoff<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aschmann, H.: Distribution and peculiarity of Mediterranean ecosystems, in:
Mediterranean type ecosystems, Springer, 11–19, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bhave, P. V., Allen, J. O., Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Cass, G. R.,
and Prather, K. A.: A field-based approach for determining ATOFMS instrument
sensitivities to ammonium and nitrate, Environ. Sci. Tech., 36, 4868–4879,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Cahill, J. F., Suski, K., Seinfeld, J. H., Zaveri, R. A., and Prather, K. The
mixing state of carbonaceous aerosol particles in northern and southern
California measured during CARES and CalNex 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10989–11002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10989-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10989-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y.-C., Xue, L., Lebo, Z. J., Wang, H., Rasmussen, R. M., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: A comprehensive numerical study of aerosol-cloud-precipitation
interactions in marine stratocumulus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9749–9769,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9749-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9749-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Christensen, S. I. and Petters, M.: The role of temperature in cloud droplet
activation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 9706–9717, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chung, C. E., Kim, S.-W., Lee, M., Yoon, S.-C., and Lee, S.: Carbonaceous
aerosol AAE inferred from in-situ aerosol measurements at the Gosan ABC super
site, and the implications for brown carbon aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
6173–6184, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6173-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6173-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A., McNaughton, C., Kapustin, V., Shinozuka, Y., Howell, S., Dibb,
J., Zhou, J., Anderson, B., Brekhovskikh, V., Turner, H., and Pinkerton, M.: Biomass burning and pollution
aerosol over North America: Organic components and their in- fluence on
spectral optical properties and humidification response, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D12S18, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007777" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007777</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cohard, J.-M., Pinty, J.-P., and Bedos, C.: Extending Twomey's analytical
estimate of nucleated cloud droplet concentrations from CCN spectra, J.
Atmos. Sci., 55, 3348–3357, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D.,
Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G.,
Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light
absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five
correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Colle, B. A., Loescher, K. A., Young, G. S., and Winstead, N. S.: Climatology
of barrier jets along the Alaskan coast, Part II: Large-scale and sounding
composites, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 454–477, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Eldred, R. A., Cahill, T. A., and Flocchini, R. G.: Composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosols in the IMPROVE Network, J. Air Waste Ma., 47,
194–203, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Gard, E., Mayer, J. E., Morrical, B. D., Dienes, T., Fergenson, D. P., and
Prather, K. A.: Real-time analysis of individual atmospheric aerosol
particles: Design and performance of a portable ATOFMS, Anal. Chem., 69,
4083–4091, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gard, E. E., Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O.,
Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Dienes, T., Gälli, M. E., Johnson, R. J.,
Cass, G. R., Prather, K. A.: Direct observation of heterogeneous chemistry in
the atmosphere, Science, 279, 1184–1187, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gross, D. S., Gälli, M. E., Silva, P. J., and Prather, K. A.: Relative
sensitivity factors for alkali metal and ammonium cations in single-particle
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectra, Anal. Chem., 72, 416–422, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Guazzotti, S. A., Whiteaker, J. R., Suess, D., Coffee, K. R., and Prather, K.
A.: Real-time measurements of the chemical composition of size-resolved
particles during a Santa Ana wind episode, California USA, Atmos. Environ.,
35, 3229–3240, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gupta, D., Kim, H., Park, G., Li, X., Eom, H.-J., and Ro, C.-U.: Hygroscopic
properties of NaCl and NaNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixture particles as reacted inorganic
sea-salt aerosol surrogates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3379–3393,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3379-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3379-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gyakum, J. R., Anderson, J. R., Grumm, R. H., and Gruner, E. L.: North
Pacific cold-season surface cyclone activity: 1975–1983, Mon. Weather Rev.,
117, 1141–1155, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, A. and Dobbie, S.: The impact of aerosols on non-precipitating marine
stratocumulus, II: The semi-direct effect, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134,
1155–1165, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, A., Dobbie, S., and Yin, Y.: The impact of aerosols on
non-precipitating marine stratocumulus. I: Model descrip- tion and
prediction of the indirect effect, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1143–1154,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, A. A., Feingold, G., and Jiang, H.: The influence of entrainment and
mixing assumption on aerosol-cloud interactions in marine stratocumulus, J.
Atmos. Sci., 66, 1450–1464, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O., Bhave, P., Kleeman, M. J., Cass, G. R., Liu,
D.-Y., Fergenson, D. P., Morrical, B. D., and Prather, K. A.: Evolution of
atmospheric particles along trajectories crossing the Los Angeles basin,
Environ. Sci. Tech., 34, 3058–3068, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O., Salmon, L. G., Mayo, P. R., Johnson, R. J., and
Cass, G. R.: Evolution of nitrogen species air pollutants along trajectories
crossing the Los Angeles area, Environ. Sci. Tech., 36, 3928–3925, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kokhanovsky, A.: Optical properties of terrestrial clouds, Earth-Sci. Rev.,
64, 189–241, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kotzick, R., Panne, U., and Niessner, R.: Changes in condensation properties
of ultrafine carbon particles subjected to oxidation by ozone, J. Aero.
Sci., 28, 725–735, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lentz, S. J. and Chapman, D. C.: Seasonal differences in the current and
temperature variability over the northern California shelf during the Coastal
Ocean Dynamics Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 94, 12571–12592, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Leung, L., Prather, K., Ralph, F., Rosenfeld, D., Spackman, J., Fairall, C.,
DeMott, P., Fan, J., and Zhao, C.: The CalWater 2-ARM Cloud Aerosol
Precipitation Experiment (ACAPEX), AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 1, 01, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, K., Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller, H., and Wold, C. E.: Strong
spectral variation of biomass smoke light ab- sorption and single scattering
albedo observed with a novel dual-wavelength photoacoustic instrument, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D16203, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009699" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009699</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Loescher, K. A., Young, G. S., Colle, B. A., and Winstead, N. S.: Climatology
of barrier jets along the Alaskan coast, Part I: Spatial and temporal
distributions, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 437–453, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, M.-L. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Study of the aerosol indirect effect by
large-eddy simulation of marine stratocumulus, J. Atmos. Sci., 62,
3909–3932, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Mochida, M., Kuwata, M., Miyakawa, T., Takegawa, N., Kawamura, K., and Kondo,
Y.: Relationship between hy- groscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei
activity for urban aerosols in Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D23204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006980" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006980</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Moffet, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: In-situ measurements of the mixing state
and optical properties of soot with im- plications for radiative forcing
estimates, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 11872–11877, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Neiman, P. J., Ralph, F. M., White, A. B., Parrish, D. D., Holloway, J. S.,
and Bartels, D. L.: A multiwinter analysis of channeled flow through a
prominent gap along the northern California coast during CALJET and PACJET,
Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 1815–1841, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. K. V., Petters, M. D., Suda, S. R., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and
Carlton, A. G.: Trends in particle-phase liquid water during the Southern
Oxidant and Aerosol Study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10911–10930,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10911-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10911-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Overland, J. E. and Walter Jr., B. A.: Gap winds in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 2221–2233, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Paerl, H. W.: Coastal eutrophication in relation to atmospheric nitrogen
deposition: current perspectives, Ophelia, 41, 237–259, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Paerl, H. W.: Coastal eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: Importance of
atmospheric deposition and groundwa- ter as “new” nitrogen and other
nutrient sources, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1154–1165, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic
growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7,
1961–1971, doi:10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prenni, A. J., DeMott, P.
J., Collett, J. L., and Moosmüller, H.: Cloud condensation nucleation
activity of biomass burning aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D22205,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D., Taylor, H. P., Attwood, S., Kreidenweis, S. M., DeMott, P.
J., Rothfuss, N. E., Prather, K. A., and Martin, A.: Aerosol characteristics
in and around landfalling Atmospheric Rivers and marine air intrusions
observed during the Calwater 2015 campaign, J. Atmos. Sci.,
in preparation, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S. and Twomey, S.: Determining the susceptibility of cloud albedo
to changes in droplet concentration with the Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer, J. App. Meteor., 33, 334–347, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S., King, M. D., Ackerman, S., Menzel, W. P., Baum, B., Riedi, J.
C., and Frey, R.: The MODIS cloud
products: Algorithms and examples from Terra, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
41, 459–473, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Prather, K. A., Hatch, C. D., and Grassian, V. H.: Analysis of atmospheric
aerosols, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1, 485–514, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Real-time, single-particle volatility, size,
and chemical composition measurements of aged urban aerosols, Environ. Sci.
Tech., 43, 8276–8282, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, X., Pratt, K. A., Shields, L. G., Toner, S. M., and Prather, K. A.:
Seasonal comparisons of single-particle chemical mixing state in Riverside,
CA, Atmos. Environ., 59, 587–596, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, X. and Prather, K. A.: Impact of biomass emissions on particle chemistry
during the California Regional Particulate Air Quality Study, Int. J. Mass
Spectrom., 258, 142–150, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K., Collins, D. B., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Bates, T.
S.: Chemistry and related properties of freshly emitted sea spray aerosol,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4383–4399, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Ralph, F., Prather, K., Cayan, D., Spackman, J., DeMott, P., Det- tinger, M.,
Fairall, C., Leung, R., Rosenfeld, D., Rutledge, S., Waliser, D., White, A. B.,
Cordeira, J., Martin, A., Helly, J., and Intrieri, J.: CalWater Field Studies Designed to Quantify the
Roles of Atmospheric Rivers and Aerosols in Modulating US West Coast
Precipitation in a Changing Climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1209–1228, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00043.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00043.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rebotier, T. P. and Prather, K. A.: Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry
data analysis: A benchmark of clustering algorithms, Anal. Chim. Acta, 585,
38–54, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Regonda, S. K., Rajagopalan, B., Clark, M., and Pitlick, J.: Seasonal cycle
shifts in hydroclimatology over the western United States, J. Clim., 18,
372–384, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Rossow, W. B. and Schiffer, R. A.: Advances in understanding clouds from
ISCCP, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2261–2287, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, A. G. and Cass, G. R.: Verification of a Mathematical Model for
Aerosol Nitrate and Nitric Acid Formation and Its Use for Control Measure
Evaluation, Atmos. Environ., 20, 2011–2025, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ryther, J. H. and Dunstan, W. M.: Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication
in the coastal marine environment, Science, 171, 1008–1013, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Naumann, K.-H., Saathoff, H.,
Wagner, R., Schurath, U., and Wehner, B.: Absorption amplification of black
carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol, J. Geophys.
Res-Atmos., 110, D19204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006046</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 493–536, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Climate Change 2007 – the physical science basis: Working group
I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, vol. 4, Cambridge
University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Song, X.-H., Hopke, P. K., Fergenson, D. P., and Prather, K. A.:
Classification of single particles analyzed by ATOFMS using an artificial
neural network, ART-2A, Anal. Chem., 71, 860–865, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Su, Y., Sipin, M. F., Furutani, H., and Prather, K. A.: Development and
characterization of an aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer with
increased detection efficiency, Anal. Chem., 76, 712–719, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C., Guazzotti, S. A., Sodeman, D. A., and Prather, K. A.: Direct
observations of the atmospheric processing of Asian mineral dust, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 7, 1213–1236, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Tunved, P., Nilsson, E., Hansson, H.-C., Ström, J., Kulmala, M., Aalto,
P., and Viisanen, Y.: Aerosol characteristics of air masses in northern
Europe: Influences of location, transport, sinks, and sources, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D07201, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005085</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds, J.
Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: Aerosols, clouds and radiation, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen, 25,
2435–2442, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Khalizov, A. F., Zheng, J., Xu, W., Ma, Y., Lal, V., and Zhang, R.:
Atmospheric nanoparticles formed from heterogeneous reactions of organics,
Nat. Geosci., 3, 238–242, 2010.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., and
Baltensperger, U.: Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of
the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers, J. Aero. Sci., 34,
1445–1463, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
White, A., Anderson, M., Dettinger, M., Ralph, F., Hinojosa, A., Cayan, D.,
Hartman, R., Reynolds, D., Johnson, L., Schneider, T., Cifelli, R., Toth, Z.,
Gutman, S. I., King, C. W., Gehrke, F., Johnston, P. E., Walls, C., Mann, D.,
Gottas, D. J., and Coleman, T. : A twenty-first-century California observing network
for monitoring extreme weather events, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30,
1585–1603, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, R.: Cancellation of aerosol indirect effects in marine stratocumulus
through cloud thinning, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2657–2669, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P.
H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscop- icity, and optical properties of
soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105,
10291–10296, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zuberi, B., Johnson, K. S., Aleks, G. K., Molina, L. T., Molina, M. J., and
Laskin, A.: Hydrophilic properties of aged soot, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, L01807, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL021496</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Transport of pollution to a remote coastal site during gap flow from California's interior: impacts on aerosol composition, clouds, and radiative balance</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">During the CalWater 2015 field campaign, ground-level observations of aerosol
size, concentration, chemical composition, and cloud activity were made at
Bodega Bay, CA, on the remote California coast. A strong anthropogenic
influence on air quality, aerosol physicochemical properties, and cloud
activity was observed at Bodega Bay during periods with special weather
conditions, known as Petaluma Gap flow, in which air from California's
interior is transported to the coast. This study applies a diverse set of
chemical, cloud microphysical, and meteorological measurements to the Petaluma
Gap flow phenomenon for the first time. It is demonstrated that the sudden
and often dramatic change in aerosol properties is strongly related to
regional meteorology and anthropogenically influenced chemical processes in
California's Central Valley. In addition, it is demonstrated that the change
in air mass properties from those typical of a remote marine environment to
properties of a continental regime has the potential to impact atmospheric
radiative balance and cloud formation in ways that must be accounted for in
regional climate simulations.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aschmann, H.: Distribution and peculiarity of Mediterranean ecosystems, in:
Mediterranean type ecosystems, Springer, 11–19, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bhave, P. V., Allen, J. O., Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Cass, G. R.,
and Prather, K. A.: A field-based approach for determining ATOFMS instrument
sensitivities to ammonium and nitrate, Environ. Sci. Tech., 36, 4868–4879,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Cahill, J. F., Suski, K., Seinfeld, J. H., Zaveri, R. A., and Prather, K. The
mixing state of carbonaceous aerosol particles in northern and southern
California measured during CARES and CalNex 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10989–11002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10989-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10989-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y.-C., Xue, L., Lebo, Z. J., Wang, H., Rasmussen, R. M., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: A comprehensive numerical study of aerosol-cloud-precipitation
interactions in marine stratocumulus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9749–9769,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9749-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-9749-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Christensen, S. I. and Petters, M.: The role of temperature in cloud droplet
activation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 9706–9717, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chung, C. E., Kim, S.-W., Lee, M., Yoon, S.-C., and Lee, S.: Carbonaceous
aerosol AAE inferred from in-situ aerosol measurements at the Gosan ABC super
site, and the implications for brown carbon aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
6173–6184, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6173-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-6173-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Clarke, A., McNaughton, C., Kapustin, V., Shinozuka, Y., Howell, S., Dibb,
J., Zhou, J., Anderson, B., Brekhovskikh, V., Turner, H., and Pinkerton, M.: Biomass burning and pollution
aerosol over North America: Organic components and their in- fluence on
spectral optical properties and humidification response, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D12S18, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007777" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007777</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cohard, J.-M., Pinty, J.-P., and Bedos, C.: Extending Twomey's analytical
estimate of nucleated cloud droplet concentrations from CCN spectra, J.
Atmos. Sci., 55, 3348–3357, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D.,
Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G.,
Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light
absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five
correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Colle, B. A., Loescher, K. A., Young, G. S., and Winstead, N. S.: Climatology
of barrier jets along the Alaskan coast, Part II: Large-scale and sounding
composites, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 454–477, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Eldred, R. A., Cahill, T. A., and Flocchini, R. G.: Composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub>
and PM<sub>10</sub> Aerosols in the IMPROVE Network, J. Air Waste Ma., 47,
194–203, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Gard, E., Mayer, J. E., Morrical, B. D., Dienes, T., Fergenson, D. P., and
Prather, K. A.: Real-time analysis of individual atmospheric aerosol
particles: Design and performance of a portable ATOFMS, Anal. Chem., 69,
4083–4091, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gard, E. E., Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O.,
Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Dienes, T., Gälli, M. E., Johnson, R. J.,
Cass, G. R., Prather, K. A.: Direct observation of heterogeneous chemistry in
the atmosphere, Science, 279, 1184–1187, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gross, D. S., Gälli, M. E., Silva, P. J., and Prather, K. A.: Relative
sensitivity factors for alkali metal and ammonium cations in single-particle
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectra, Anal. Chem., 72, 416–422, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Guazzotti, S. A., Whiteaker, J. R., Suess, D., Coffee, K. R., and Prather, K.
A.: Real-time measurements of the chemical composition of size-resolved
particles during a Santa Ana wind episode, California USA, Atmos. Environ.,
35, 3229–3240, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gupta, D., Kim, H., Park, G., Li, X., Eom, H.-J., and Ro, C.-U.: Hygroscopic
properties of NaCl and NaNO<sub>3</sub> mixture particles as reacted inorganic
sea-salt aerosol surrogates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3379–3393,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3379-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-3379-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gyakum, J. R., Anderson, J. R., Grumm, R. H., and Gruner, E. L.: North
Pacific cold-season surface cyclone activity: 1975–1983, Mon. Weather Rev.,
117, 1141–1155, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, A. and Dobbie, S.: The impact of aerosols on non-precipitating marine
stratocumulus, II: The semi-direct effect, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134,
1155–1165, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, A., Dobbie, S., and Yin, Y.: The impact of aerosols on
non-precipitating marine stratocumulus. I: Model descrip- tion and
prediction of the indirect effect, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1143–1154,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, A. A., Feingold, G., and Jiang, H.: The influence of entrainment and
mixing assumption on aerosol-cloud interactions in marine stratocumulus, J.
Atmos. Sci., 66, 1450–1464, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O., Bhave, P., Kleeman, M. J., Cass, G. R., Liu,
D.-Y., Fergenson, D. P., Morrical, B. D., and Prather, K. A.: Evolution of
atmospheric particles along trajectories crossing the Los Angeles basin,
Environ. Sci. Tech., 34, 3058–3068, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O., Salmon, L. G., Mayo, P. R., Johnson, R. J., and
Cass, G. R.: Evolution of nitrogen species air pollutants along trajectories
crossing the Los Angeles area, Environ. Sci. Tech., 36, 3928–3925, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kokhanovsky, A.: Optical properties of terrestrial clouds, Earth-Sci. Rev.,
64, 189–241, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kotzick, R., Panne, U., and Niessner, R.: Changes in condensation properties
of ultrafine carbon particles subjected to oxidation by ozone, J. Aero.
Sci., 28, 725–735, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lentz, S. J. and Chapman, D. C.: Seasonal differences in the current and
temperature variability over the northern California shelf during the Coastal
Ocean Dynamics Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 94, 12571–12592, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Leung, L., Prather, K., Ralph, F., Rosenfeld, D., Spackman, J., Fairall, C.,
DeMott, P., Fan, J., and Zhao, C.: The CalWater 2-ARM Cloud Aerosol
Precipitation Experiment (ACAPEX), AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 1, 01, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, K., Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller, H., and Wold, C. E.: Strong
spectral variation of biomass smoke light ab- sorption and single scattering
albedo observed with a novel dual-wavelength photoacoustic instrument, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D16203, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009699" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009699</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Loescher, K. A., Young, G. S., Colle, B. A., and Winstead, N. S.: Climatology
of barrier jets along the Alaskan coast, Part I: Spatial and temporal
distributions, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 437–453, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, M.-L. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Study of the aerosol indirect effect by
large-eddy simulation of marine stratocumulus, J. Atmos. Sci., 62,
3909–3932, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Mochida, M., Kuwata, M., Miyakawa, T., Takegawa, N., Kawamura, K., and Kondo,
Y.: Relationship between hy- groscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei
activity for urban aerosols in Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D23204,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006980" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006980</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Moffet, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: In-situ measurements of the mixing state
and optical properties of soot with im- plications for radiative forcing
estimates, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 11872–11877, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Neiman, P. J., Ralph, F. M., White, A. B., Parrish, D. D., Holloway, J. S.,
and Bartels, D. L.: A multiwinter analysis of channeled flow through a
prominent gap along the northern California coast during CALJET and PACJET,
Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 1815–1841, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. K. V., Petters, M. D., Suda, S. R., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and
Carlton, A. G.: Trends in particle-phase liquid water during the Southern
Oxidant and Aerosol Study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10911–10930,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10911-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-10911-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Overland, J. E. and Walter Jr., B. A.: Gap winds in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 2221–2233, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Paerl, H. W.: Coastal eutrophication in relation to atmospheric nitrogen
deposition: current perspectives, Ophelia, 41, 237–259, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Paerl, H. W.: Coastal eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: Importance of
atmospheric deposition and groundwa- ter as “new” nitrogen and other
nutrient sources, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1154–1165, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic
growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7,
1961–1971, doi:10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prenni, A. J., DeMott, P.
J., Collett, J. L., and Moosmüller, H.: Cloud condensation nucleation
activity of biomass burning aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D22205,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD012353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D., Taylor, H. P., Attwood, S., Kreidenweis, S. M., DeMott, P.
J., Rothfuss, N. E., Prather, K. A., and Martin, A.: Aerosol characteristics
in and around landfalling Atmospheric Rivers and marine air intrusions
observed during the Calwater 2015 campaign, J. Atmos. Sci.,
in preparation, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S. and Twomey, S.: Determining the susceptibility of cloud albedo
to changes in droplet concentration with the Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer, J. App. Meteor., 33, 334–347, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S., King, M. D., Ackerman, S., Menzel, W. P., Baum, B., Riedi, J.
C., and Frey, R.: The MODIS cloud
products: Algorithms and examples from Terra, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
41, 459–473, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Prather, K. A., Hatch, C. D., and Grassian, V. H.: Analysis of atmospheric
aerosols, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1, 485–514, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Real-time, single-particle volatility, size,
and chemical composition measurements of aged urban aerosols, Environ. Sci.
Tech., 43, 8276–8282, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, X., Pratt, K. A., Shields, L. G., Toner, S. M., and Prather, K. A.:
Seasonal comparisons of single-particle chemical mixing state in Riverside,
CA, Atmos. Environ., 59, 587–596, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, X. and Prather, K. A.: Impact of biomass emissions on particle chemistry
during the California Regional Particulate Air Quality Study, Int. J. Mass
Spectrom., 258, 142–150, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Quinn, P. K., Collins, D. B., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Bates, T.
S.: Chemistry and related properties of freshly emitted sea spray aerosol,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4383–4399, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Ralph, F., Prather, K., Cayan, D., Spackman, J., DeMott, P., Det- tinger, M.,
Fairall, C., Leung, R., Rosenfeld, D., Rutledge, S., Waliser, D., White, A. B.,
Cordeira, J., Martin, A., Helly, J., and Intrieri, J.: CalWater Field Studies Designed to Quantify the
Roles of Atmospheric Rivers and Aerosols in Modulating US West Coast
Precipitation in a Changing Climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1209–1228, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00043.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00043.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rebotier, T. P. and Prather, K. A.: Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry
data analysis: A benchmark of clustering algorithms, Anal. Chim. Acta, 585,
38–54, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Regonda, S. K., Rajagopalan, B., Clark, M., and Pitlick, J.: Seasonal cycle
shifts in hydroclimatology over the western United States, J. Clim., 18,
372–384, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Rossow, W. B. and Schiffer, R. A.: Advances in understanding clouds from
ISCCP, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2261–2287, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, A. G. and Cass, G. R.: Verification of a Mathematical Model for
Aerosol Nitrate and Nitric Acid Formation and Its Use for Control Measure
Evaluation, Atmos. Environ., 20, 2011–2025, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ryther, J. H. and Dunstan, W. M.: Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication
in the coastal marine environment, Science, 171, 1008–1013, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Naumann, K.-H., Saathoff, H.,
Wagner, R., Schurath, U., and Wehner, B.: Absorption amplification of black
carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol, J. Geophys.
Res-Atmos., 110, D19204, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006046</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from
air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 493–536, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Climate Change 2007 – the physical science basis: Working group
I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, vol. 4, Cambridge
University Press, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Song, X.-H., Hopke, P. K., Fergenson, D. P., and Prather, K. A.:
Classification of single particles analyzed by ATOFMS using an artificial
neural network, ART-2A, Anal. Chem., 71, 860–865, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Su, Y., Sipin, M. F., Furutani, H., and Prather, K. A.: Development and
characterization of an aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer with
increased detection efficiency, Anal. Chem., 76, 712–719, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, R. C., Guazzotti, S. A., Sodeman, D. A., and Prather, K. A.: Direct
observations of the atmospheric processing of Asian mineral dust, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 7, 1213–1236, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Tunved, P., Nilsson, E., Hansson, H.-C., Ström, J., Kulmala, M., Aalto,
P., and Viisanen, Y.: Aerosol characteristics of air masses in northern
Europe: Influences of location, transport, sinks, and sources, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D07201, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005085" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005085</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds, J.
Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: Aerosols, clouds and radiation, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen, 25,
2435–2442, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., Khalizov, A. F., Zheng, J., Xu, W., Ma, Y., Lal, V., and Zhang, R.:
Atmospheric nanoparticles formed from heterogeneous reactions of organics,
Nat. Geosci., 3, 238–242, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., and
Baltensperger, U.: Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of
the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers, J. Aero. Sci., 34,
1445–1463, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
White, A., Anderson, M., Dettinger, M., Ralph, F., Hinojosa, A., Cayan, D.,
Hartman, R., Reynolds, D., Johnson, L., Schneider, T., Cifelli, R., Toth, Z.,
Gutman, S. I., King, C. W., Gehrke, F., Johnston, P. E., Walls, C., Mann, D.,
Gottas, D. J., and Coleman, T. : A twenty-first-century California observing network
for monitoring extreme weather events, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30,
1585–1603, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, R.: Cancellation of aerosol indirect effects in marine stratocumulus
through cloud thinning, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2657–2669, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P.
H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscop- icity, and optical properties of
soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105,
10291–10296, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zuberi, B., Johnson, K. S., Aleks, G. K., Molina, L. T., Molina, M. J., and
Laskin, A.: Hydrophilic properties of aged soot, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, L01807, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021496" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GL021496</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
