<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-14821-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Open burning of rice, corn and wheat straws: primary emissions, photochemical aging, and secondary organic aerosol formation</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Open burning of rice, corn and wheat straws}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z. Fang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Zheng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-3150</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yanli</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-2096</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>Xiang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-1879</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Mingjin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-8445</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Tengyu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Qihou</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-3724</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Ming</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zhaoyi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Weiqiang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Zhonghui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bi</surname><given-names>Xinhui</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-5470</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Jianmin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Yele</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-0221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>George</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-7056</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xinming</given-names></name>
          <email>wangxm@gig.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0928</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key
Laboratory of Environment Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640,
China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute
of Urban Environment,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and
Prevention, Department of Environmental Science &amp; Engineering, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200433, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Institut de Recherches sur la Catalyse et l'Environment de Lyon
(IRCELYON), CNRS, UMR5256,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Villeurbanne 69626, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xinming Wang (wangxm@gig.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>24</issue>
      <fpage>14821</fpage><lpage>14839</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>4</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e263">Agricultural residues are among the most abundant biomass burned globally,
especially in China. However, there is little information on primary
emissions and photochemical evolution of agricultural residue burning. In
this study, indoor chamber experiments were conducted to investigate primary
emissions from open burning of rice, corn and wheat straws and their
photochemical aging as well. Emission factors of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 67 non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs), particulate matter (PM),
organic aerosol (OA) and black carbon (BC) under ambient dilution conditions
were determined. Olefins accounted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % of the total speciated
NMHCs emission (2.47 to 5.04 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating high ozone formation
potential of straw burning emissions. Emission factors of PM (3.73 to
6.36 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and primary organic carbon (POC, 2.05 to
4.11 gC kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured at dilution ratios of 1300 to 4000, were lower
than those reported in previous studies at low dilution ratios, probably due
to the evaporation of semi-volatile organic compounds under high dilution
conditions. After photochemical aging with an OH exposure range of
(1.97–4.97) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s in the chamber, large amounts of secondary organic aerosol (SOA)
were produced with OA mass enhancement ratios (the mass ratio of total OA to
primary OA) of 2.4–7.6. The 20 known precursors could only explain
5.0–27.3 % of the observed SOA mass, suggesting that the major
precursors of SOA formed from open straw burning remain unidentified. Aerosol
mass spectrometry (AMS) signaled that the aged OA contained less hydrocarbons
but more oxygen- and nitrogen-containing compounds than primary OA, and
carbon oxidation state (OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated with AMS resolved O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C
and H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios increased linearly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001) with OH exposure
with quite similar slopes.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e422">On the global scale, biomass burning (BB) is the main source of primary
organic carbon (OC) (Bond et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2015), black carbon
(BC) (Bond et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2016), and brown carbon (BrC) (Laskin
et al., 2015). It is also the second largest source of non-methane organic
gases (NMOGs) in the atmosphere (Yokelson et al., 2008; Stockwell et al.,
2014). In addition, atmospheric aging of biomass burning plumes produces
substantial secondary pollutants. The increase in tropospheric ozone
(O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in aged biomass burning plumes could last for days and even months
(Thompson et al., 2001; Duncan et al., 2003; Real et al., 2007) with complex
atmospheric chemistry (Arnold et al., 2015; Müller et al., 2016).
Moreover, biomass and biofuel burning could contribute up to 70 % of the
global secondary organic aerosol (SOA) burden (Shrivastava et al., 2015) and
hence influence the seasonal variation of global SOA (Tsigaridis et al.,
2014). Since it produces large amounts of primary and secondary pollutants,
it is essential to characterize primary emissions and photochemical evolution
of biomass burning in order to better understand its impacts on air quality
(Huang et al., 2014), human health (Alves et al., 2015) and climate change
(Andreae et al., 2004; Koren et al., 2004; Laskin et al., 2015; X. Huang et al.,
2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e437">Open burning of agricultural residues, a convenient and inexpensive way to
prepare for the next crop planting, could induce severe regional haze events
(Cheng et al., 2013; Tariq et al., 2016). Among all the biomass burning
types, agricultural residue burning in the field is estimated to contribute
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % of the total mass burned globally (Andreae and Merlet,
2001), and its relative contribution is even larger in Asia
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34 %), and especially in China (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 %) (Streets et al.,
2003), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 million people live in the countryside (NBSPRC, 2015).
Agricultural residues burned in China were estimated to be up to 160 million
ton in 2012, accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % of the global agricultural
residues burned (J. Li et al., 2016). As estimated by Tian et al. (2011),
agricultural residue burning contributed 70–80 % of non-methane
hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and particulate matter (PM) emitted by biomass burning
in China during 2000–2007. A better understanding of the role agricultural
residual burning plays in air pollution in China and elsewhere requires
better characterization of primary emission and atmospheric aging of emitted
trace gases and particles for different types of agricultural residues under
different burning conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e475">In the past 2 decades, there have been increasing numbers of
characterizations of biomass burning emissions. Andreae and Merlet (2001)
summarized emission factors (EFs) for both gaseous and particulate compounds
from seven types of biomass burning. Akagi et al. (2011) updated the emission
data for 14 types of biomass burning, and newly identified species were
included. Since biomass types and combustion conditions may differ in
different studies, reported emission factors are highly variable, especially
for agricultural residue burning (Li et al., 2007, 2009, 2017; Cao et al.,
2008; Zhang et al., 2008; Yokelson et al., 2011; Brassard et al., 2014;
Sanchis et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014; Ni et al., 2015; Kim Oanh et al.,
2015; Stockwell et al., 2016; Bruns et al., 2017; Tkacik et al., 2017). Moreover,
previous studies on agricultural residue burning were mostly carried out near
fire spots or in chambers with low dilution ratios. Since biomass burning
organic aerosols (BBOAs) are typically semi-volatile (Grieshop et al., 2009b;
May et al., 2013), it is expected that measured BBOA emission factors would
be affected by dilution processes (Lipsky and Robinson, 2006), and BBOA emission factors
under ambient dilution conditions are still unclear. Furthermore, knowledge
on NMOGs emitted from agricultural residue burning is very limited. As
reported by Stockwell et al. (2015), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21 % (in weight) of NMOGs in
biomass burning plumes have not been identified yet. Therefore, comprehensive
measurement and characterization of gaseous and particulate species emitted
by agricultural residue burning under ambient dilution conditions are
urgently needed.</p>
      <p id="d1e485">Great attention has been drawn to SOA formation and transformation in biomass
burning plumes recently, since a significant increase in mass and apparent
change in physicochemical characteristics of aerosols have been observed
during atmospheric aging of biomass burning plumes in both field and
laboratory studies (Grieshop et al., 2009a, b; Hennigan et al., 2011; Heringa
et al., 2011; Lambe et al., 2011; Jolleys et al., 2012; Giordano et al.,
2013; Martin et al., 2013; Ortega et al., 2013; Ding et al., 2016a, b, 2017).
For agricultural residue burning, evolution processes have not been well
characterized yet. To our knowledge, up to now there has only been a chamber
study (Li et al., 2015) which has investigated the evolution of aerosol
particles emitted by wheat straw burning under dark conditions. Although
field studies (Adler et al., 2011; X. X. Liu et al., 2016) witnessed the evolution
in mass concentrations, size distribution, oxidation state and optical
properties of aerosol particles emitted by agricultural residue burning,
these changes could be also influenced by other emission sources and
meteorological conditions as well. Since NMOGs emitted by agricultural
residue burning are not fully quantified, it is still challenging to predict
the concentration and physicochemical properties of SOA that resulted from
biomass burning (Spracklen et al., 2011; Jathar et al., 2014; Shrivastava et
al., 2015; Hatch et al., 2017). Bruns et al. (2016) suggested that the 22
major NMOGs identified in residential wood combustion could explain the
majority of observed SOA, but it remains unclear whether identified NMOGs
emitted by agricultural residue burning could fully (or at least largely)
explain the SOA formed. In addition, aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) has been
widely used to characterize sources and evolution of ambient OA (Q. Zhang et
al., 2011). Although agricultural residue burning is an important type of
biomass burning in Asia and especially in China, the lack of AMS spectra for
primary and aged OA from agricultural residue burning significantly limits
further application of AMS in BBOA research.</p>
      <p id="d1e489">In this study, plumes from agricultural residue open burning were
directly introduced into a large indoor chamber to firstly characterize
primary emissions and then investigate their photochemical evolution under
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % relative humidity. Corn, rice and
wheat straws, which account for more than 90 % of the crop residues
burned in China (FAO, 2017), were chosen. A suite of advanced online and
offline techniques were utilized to measure gaseous and particulate species,
enabling comprehensive measurements of emission factors of gaseous and
particulate compounds for burning of each type of straw under ambient
dilution conditions. In addition, the corresponding formation and
transformation of SOA during photochemical aging were investigated using a
large indoor smog chamber. This work would help improve our understanding of
primary emission, SOA formation and thus environmental impacts of
agricultural residue burning.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Experimental setup</title>
      <p id="d1e526">Photochemical aging was investigated in a smog chamber at the Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GIG-CAS). The GIG-CAS
smog chamber is a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP)
reactor housed in a temperature-controlled room. Details of the chamber setup
and associated facilities are provided elsewhere (Wang et al., 2014; Liu et
al., 2015; Deng et al., 2017). Briefly, 135 black lamps (1.2 m long,
60 W Philips, Royal Dutch Philips Electronics Ltd, the Netherlands) are used
as light sources, giving a NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis rate of approximately
0.25 min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two Teflon-coated fans are installed inside the reactor to
ensure introduced gaseous and particulate species mixed well within 2 min.
Prior to each experiment, the reactor was flushed with the purified dry air
at a rate of 100 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for at least 48 h. The compressed indoor air
is forced through an air dryer (FXe1; Atlas Copco; Sweden) and a series of
gas scrubbers containing activated carbon, Purafil, Hopcalite and allochroic
silica gel, followed by a PTFE filter to provide the source of the purified
air. The purified dry air contains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 ppb NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and carbonyl
compounds, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 ppb NMHCs and no detectable particles with relative
humidity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e618">Corn, rice and wheat straws were collected from Henan, Hunan and Guangdong
provinces, respectively. Since moisture content in straws would affect
emission factors of atmospheric pollutants (Sanchis et al., 2014; Ni et al.,
2015), all the agricultural residues used in this study were dried in a stove
at 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 24 h before being burned. After baking, the water
content in the crop residues was less than 1 %. The water content of crop
residues was measured by using the method recommended by Liao et
al. (2004). Straws were
weighed before and after baking in a stove at 105<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 24 h, and the
difference in weights was calculated to be the weight of the water in the
crop residues. Water content was the quotient of the water weight and the
whole weight of the straws. In each experiment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 g straws were
burned and the burning typically lasted for 3–5 min. Straws were ignited by
a butane-fueled lighter and burned under open field burning conditions. The
resulting smoke was collected by an inverted funnel and introduced into the
chamber using an oil-free pump (Gast Manufacturing, Inc, USA) at a flow rate
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> through a 5.5 m long copper tube (inner
diameter: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inch), and the residence time in the tube was estimated to be
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 s. Before each experiment, the transfer tube was pre-flushed for
15 min with ambient air and 2 min with smokes (not introduced into the
chamber reactor). During the whole process, the tube was heated at
80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to reduce the losses of organic vapors. Based on the volumes
of the smoke introduced and the chamber reactor, the dilution ratios were
estimated to be 1300–4000, falling into the typical range (1000–10000)
under ambient dilution conditions (Robinson et al., 2007). After being
characterized in the dark for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 min, black lamps were turned on and
the diluted smokes were photochemically aged for 5 h. At the end, the black
lamps were switched off and the aged aerosols were characterized in the next
1 h to determine the particle wall loss. The particle size evolved through
the course of photo-oxidation, and the differences in particle wall-loss
rates during photoreaction and after the lamps were off brought about by the
size evolving are estimated to be within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 % (Fig. S1 in the
Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e708">In total 20 experiments were conducted (9 for rice straw, 6 for corn straw
and 5 for wheat straw), among which 14 experiments were conducted only in the
dark to measure primary emissions and 6 experiments were carried out both in
the dark and under irradiation to investigate photochemical evolution of open
straw burning emissions. Tables 1 and 2 summarize important experimental
conditions and key results for all the experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e717">Commercial instruments were used for online monitoring of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (EC9841T,
Ecotech, Australia), NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Model 911-0016, Los Gatos Research, USA) and
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Model 43i, Thermo Scientific, USA). CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO were analyzed
offline using gas chromatography (Agilent 6980GC, USA) coupled with a flame
ionization detector and a packed column (5A molecular sieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mesh,
3 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inch) (Zhang et al., 2012), and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was analyzed
using a HP 4890D gas chromatograph (Yi et al., 2007). The detection limits
were all less than 30 ppbv for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relative
standard deviations (RSDs) of CO and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were both less
than 3 % based on seven duplicate injection of 1.0 ppmv standards
(Spectra Gases Inc, USA). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were continuously
measured using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer
(PTR-TOF-MS; Model 2000, Ionicon Analytik GmbH, Austria). Calibration of the
PTR-TOF-MS was performed every few weeks using a certified custom-made
standard mixture of VOCs (Ionicon Analytik Gmbh, Austria) that were
dynamically diluted to six levels (2, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 ppbv). Methanol,
acetonitrile, acetaldehyde, acrolein, acetone, isoprene, crotonaldehyde,
2-butanone, benzene, toluene, o-xylene, chlorobenzene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
were included in the calibration mixture. Their sensitivities, indicated by
the ratio of the normalized counts per second to the concentration levels of
the VOCs in ppbv, were used to convert the raw PTR-TOF-MS signal to
concentration (Z. Huang et al., 2016). Quantification of the compounds that were
not included in the mixture was performed by using calculated mass-dependent
sensitivities based on the measured sensitivities (Stockwell et al., 2015).
Mass-dependent sensitivities were linearly fitted for oxygen-containing
compounds and the remaining compounds separately. The decay of toluene
measured by PTR-TOF-MS was used to derive the OH radical concentrations for
every 2 min during each experiment, and the OH exposure was calculated as
the product of the OH concentration and the time interval. Continuous
monitoring of 20 SOA precursors (including 9 NMHCs and 11 oxygen-containing
VOCs) from PTR-TOF-MS provided us with data to do the SOA prediction
discussed in the Sects. 2.3.5 and 3.3.2. Air samples were also collected from
the chamber reactor using 2 L electro-polished stainless-steel canisters
before and after smoke injection. In total 67 C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> NMHCs were
measured (Table S1 in the Supplement) using an Agilent 5973N gas
chromatography mass-selective detector/flame ionization detector (GC-MSD/FID;
Agilent Technologies, USA) coupled to a Preconcentrator (Model 7100, Entech
Instruments Inc., USA), and analytical procedures have been detailed
elsewhere (Wang and Wu, 2008; Zhang et al., 2010, 2012). Results from
GC-MSD/FID were used to quantify the emission factors of 67 NMHCs discussed
in the Sect. 3.1.</p>
      <p id="d1e850">Particle number/volume concentrations and size distribution were measured
with a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS; Classifier model 3080, CPC
model 3775, TSI Incorporated, USA). The SMPS was operated with a sheath flow
of 3.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a sampling flow of 0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, allowing for
a size scanning range of 14 to 760 nm within 255 s. A high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-TOF-AMS; Aerodyne Research
Incorporated, USA) was used to measure chemical compositions of
non-refractory aerosols (DeCarlo et al., 2006). The HR-ToF-AMS was operated
by alternating every other minute between the high
sensitivity V mode and the high-resolution W mode. Toolkit Squirrel 1.57I
was used to obtain
real-time concentration variations of sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, chloride
and organics, and toolkit Pika 1.16I was used to determine the detailed
compositions of OA (Aiken et al., 2007, 2008; Canagaratna et al., 2015). The
AMS signal at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 was corrected for the contribution from gaseous
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ionization efficiency of the AMS was calibrated routinely by
measuring 300 nm monodisperse ammonium nitrate aerosols. Considering the
underestimation of particulate matter by the AMS, aerosol mass measured by
AMS was corrected with the data from the SMPS and the aethalometer.
Conductive silicon tubes were used for aerosol sampling to reduce
electrostatic losses of particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e898">BC was measured with a seven-channel aethalometer (Model AE-31, Magee
Scientific, USA). Cheng et al. (2016) measured the mass absorption efficiency
(MAE) of BC from biomass burning at wavelengths of 532 and 1047 nm,
respectively, and the absorption Ängström exponents (AAEs) were
estimated to be in the range of 0.9–1.1. Based on the relationship between
MAE and wavelength, a MAE value of 4.7 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated for
880 nm by assuming the AAE to be 1.0. The MAE value was then applied to
convert absorption data in 880 nm to BC mass concentrations. Aethalometer
attenuation measurements were corrected for particle loading effects and the
scattering of filter fibers using the method developed by Kirchstetter and
Novakov (2007) and Schmid et al. (2006).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Particle effective density</title>
      <p id="d1e933">Assuming that particles are spherical and non-porous, the effective density
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated by Eq. (1) (DeCarlo et al., 2004; Schmid
et al., 2007):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">va</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard density (1.0 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>va</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the AMS-measured vacuum aerodynamic
diameter and SMPS-measured mobility diameter. The input diameters to this
equation were determined by comparing distributions of vacuum aerodynamic and
electric mobility diameters, using the AMS and SMPS, respectively. Derived
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to convert volume concentrations of aerosol
particles measured by the SMPS to mass concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Emission factors and modified combustion efficiency</title>
      <p id="d1e1051">The carbon mass balance approach (Ward et al., 1992; Andreae and Merlet,
2001) was used to calculate fuel-based emission factors (EFs) for each
compound (g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dry fuel). The emission factor for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th species,
EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated by Eq. (2):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration (g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th species;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[CO], and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[HC] are the
background-corrected carbon mass concentration (g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and speciated hydrocarbons, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] is the background-corrected carbon in the particle phase
(g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the emission factor of carbon into the
air determined by elemental and gravitational analyses, given by Eq. (3):</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1290">Primary emission factors measured for agricultural residue burning.
All the units are g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, except that the unit for particle number (PN)
is 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> particle kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. MCE: modified combustion efficiency;
NMHCs: non-methane hydrocarbons; POA: primary organic aerosol; POC primary
organic carbon; BC: black carbon.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Rice </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Corn </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Wheat </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">This study (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Others</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">This study (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Others</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Others</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MCE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.926 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.049</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.953 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.019</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.949 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.035</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1262 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1423 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">63.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.52<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NMHCs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.018 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.017 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.010 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1326"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Stockwell et al. (2015); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Li et
al. (2007), PM corresponds to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Christian et
al. (2010); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Cao et al. (2008);
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Kim Oanh et al. (2015), PM corresponds to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Wang et al. (2014), 56 NMHCs species summarized; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Li
et al. (2009), 52 NMHCs species summarized; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>h</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Ni et al. (2015), PM
corresponds to PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Li et al. (2017), PM corresponds to
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>j</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Zhang et al. (2008).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3026"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M237" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fuel</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fuel</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ash</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ash</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fuel</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fuel</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ash</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are mass fractions of
carbon in the dry fuel and its ash, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fuel</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ash</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the mass of dry fuel and its ash. The modified
combustion efficiency (MCE) is defined by Eq. (4) (Heringa et al., 2011;
Hennigan et al., 2011; Ni et al., 2015):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M242" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MCE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3172"><bold>(a–c)</bold> Non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) compositions and
<bold>(d–f)</bold> their relative contribution to ozone formation potential
(OFP) for open burning of rice, corn and wheat straw.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Ozone formation potential</title>
      <p id="d1e3192">The ozone formation potential (OFP) of the speciated NMHCs was calculated
from the emission factor and maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) of each
individual NMHC, using Eq. (5):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M243" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OFP</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MIR</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where OFP is the ozone formation potential of NMHCs emitted per unit of
biomass (unit: g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and MIR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the MIR of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th NMHC
(unit: g O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> g NHMC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Carter, 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>Wall-loss corrections</title>
      <p id="d1e3294">Due to the loss of particles and vapors to chamber walls, measured data in
chamber studies need to be corrected for wall loss. For this purpose, in our
study 1 h dark decay of aged aerosols was undertaken after photochemical
aging was terminated. The loss of particles on the chamber wall is a
first-order process (McMurry and Grosjean, 1985). The wall-loss rates of
AMS-measured organics, sulfate, nitrate, chloride and ammonium were
determined using the dark decay data and were applied to wall-loss correction
for the entire experiment. By assuming that the condensed materials on the
wall remain completely in equilibrium with the gas phase, we used the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case to correct the OA mass, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a proportionality factor
of organic vapor partitioning to chamber walls and suspended particles
(Weitkamp et al., 2007; Henry et al., 2012). For SMPS measurements, the
number concentration in each size channel (110 channels in total) was
corrected for wall loss separately, since wall-loss rates of aerosol
particles are size-dependent (Takekawa et al., 2003).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5">
  <title>OA production prediction</title>
      <p id="d1e3323">In this study, 20 NMOGs which have been used to estimate SOA yields by
previous work (Ng et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2009, 2010; Hildebrandt et al.,
2009; Gómez Alvarez et al., 2009; Shakya and Griffin, 2010; Chhabra et
al., 2011; Nakao et al., 2011; Borras and Tortajada-Genaro, 2012; Yee et al.,
2013; Lim et al., 2013) were quantified using PTR-TOF-MS, and the applied SOA
yields are summarized in Table S2. The mass concentration of SOA
([SOA]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">predicted</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed from these 20
precursors can be estimated using Eq. (6):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M254" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">predicted</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reacted amount of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th gas-phase precursor and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the corresponding SOA yield.</p>
      <p id="d1e3463">Assuming that primary OA (POA) levels stayed constant during aging processes,
the mass concentration of SOA formed could be estimated as the difference in
OA mass concentrations before and after photochemical aging. It should be
noted that POA would decrease during aging processes (Tiitta et al., 2016),
probably leading to the underestimation of the formed SOA. In papers where
those SOA yields were borrowed from, no organic vapor wall loss was accounted
for when calculating the mass concentration of the formed SOA, so the same
wall-loss correction method was used when comparing the predicted SOA and the
formed SOA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Emissions of gaseous pollutants</title>
      <p id="d1e3479">Table 1 compares emission factors of gaseous and particulate species measured
in our and previous studies. In our study, the emission factors of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
were 1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61, 5.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.94, and
3.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.93 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for rice, corn, and wheat straw, and NO
accounted for 84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 % of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> primary emission for all
experiments. Emission factors of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured to be
0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15, 0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30 and 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
rice, corn and wheat straw. Our measured emission factors of reactive
nitrogen species were comparable to those reported by previous studies (Li et
al., 2007; Tian et al., 2011). Emission factors of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07, 0.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.53 and 0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
rice, corn and wheat straw. Our measured emission factors of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
lower than those reported by Cao et al. (2008) and Kim Oanh et al. (2015) for
rice straw, but higher than those reported by Cao et al. (2008) for corn and
wheat straw. Due to low sulfur contents in crop straws, the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
factors for open burning of crop residues were much lower than those for
domestic coal combustion, which were determined to be
2.43–5.36 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for raw bituminous coal (Du et al., 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3659">Emission factors (EFs) of NMHCs for straw burning of rice, corn and
wheat. Only species with emission factors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown.
The order of NMHC species is the same as Table S1, in which a comprehensive
dataset of emission factors measured in this work is included.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3687"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Emission factors of the total speciated NMHCs analyzed by the GC-MSD/FID system were 5.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.04,
2.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.11 and 3.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.43 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for rice, corn and
wheat straw, respectively (Table 1). Our results were higher than those
reported by previous studies (Li et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2014), partly due
to the fact that more NMHCs were analyzed in our study (67 species in total).
As shown in Fig. 1a–c, olefins and acetylene accounted for 56–58 % of
the total speciated NMHCs, followed by alkanes (22–28 %) and aromatic
hydrocarbons (16–21 %). Table S1 and Fig. 2 show the emission factors of
each NMHC for open burning of different straws. Emission factors of
unsaturated hydrocarbons ranged from 1.37 (corn) to 2.91 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(rice), with the majority being ethene, acetylene and propene. Emission
factors of alkanes ranged from 0.69 (corn) to 1.09 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (rice), with
ethane and propane being the two most abundant compounds. The emission
factors of aromatic hydrocarbons were in the range of 0.42 (corn) to 1.04
(rice), and benzene and toluene are dominant species. It is worth noting that
major compounds in the three groups (alkanes, alkenes and aromatic
hydrocarbons) were all negatively correlated with the modified combustion
efficiency (Fig. S2), suggesting that more efficient combustion would reduce
their emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3749">Based on their emission factors, we calculated the ozone formation potential
for each NMHC. The summed ozone formation potentials were 22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.1,
13.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.4 and 16.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.5 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for open burning of
rice, corn and wheat straw, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1d–e, the
relative contributions of olefins to the total ozone formation potential
could reach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %. Ethene was the largest ozone precursor
(35–42 %), followed by propene (16–28 %), and these two compounds
contributed 58–64 % of the total ozone formation potential. Although the
emission factors of aromatic hydrocarbons were lower than those of alkanes,
their ozone formation potential was dominant over those of alkanes, with
toluene being the largest contributor among all the aromatic hydrocarbons.
The contribution of alkanes to the total ozone formation potential was minor
(2–3 %). It is noted that oxygen-containing organic vapors in
agricultural residue burning plumes could also have large ozone formation
potentials. For example, the OFPs of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde for all
experiments were 0.57–2.46 times those of the 67 speciated NMHCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Emission of particulate matter</title>
      <p id="d1e3798">The emission factors of particulate matter were 3.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.28,
5.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.43 and 6.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.98 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for rice, corn and
wheat straw, lower than those reported in the previous studies (Table 1). As
suggested by Robinson et al. (2007), the POA emission factors would decrease
with increasing dilution ratios, due to evaporation of semi-volatile organic
compounds. In this study, the dilution ratios ranged from 1300 to 4000, which
were within the typical range of ambient dilution ratios (1000–10 000)
(Robinson et al., 2007). Therefore, it can be expected that emission factors
of primary organic carbon (POC) measured in our study
(2.05–4.11 gC kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were lower than those measured by previous work
with dilution ratios of 5–20 (Li et al., 2007; Ni et al., 2015). Moreover,
it has been shown that the modified combustion efficiency could affect
emission factors (Heringa et al., 2011; Stockwell et al., 2015). Figure S3
shows negative correlations of the modified combustion efficiency with
emission factors of PM and POC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 for both cases), indicating
that enhancement of combustion efficiency could reduce the emissions of PM
and POC. In our study, all straws were pre-baked to reduce the moisture
content to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %, and this treatment could increase the modified
combustion efficiency and thus reduce emission factors of particulate matters
(Ni et al., 2015). In addition, the amount of straw burned each time in our
experiments was much less than that in the fields, which is expected to avoid
oxygen deficit during burning to some extent and thus increase the modified
combustion efficiency as well.</p>
      <p id="d1e3871">While POA emission factors showed large variability for different types of
straw, BC emission factors were relatively constant
(0.22–0.27 gC kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since BC is a mixture of non-volatile compounds
in particulate matters, as expected, its emission factors measured in our
work were comparable to those reported under lower dilution conditions (Li et
al., 2007; Ni et al., 2015). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[POA] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>[CO] ratios
ranged from 0.022 to 0.133 in our study, larger than those (0.001–0.067)
measured in chamber studies for hard- and soft-wood fires (Grieshop et al.,
2009b) and vegetation commonly burned in North American wildfires (Heringa et
al., 2011), but lower than those (0.051–0.329) obtained in field campaigns
(Jolleys et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e3910">For particle numbers, the emission factors were
(2.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
(7.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.17) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (5.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.89) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> particle kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for rice, corn, and wheat straw, respectively
(Table 1). Our results were comparable to that
(1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> particle kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for crop residue burning
(Andreae and Merlet, 2001) and those
(3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> particle kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for wood burning (Hosseini et al., 2013), but 2 magnitudes larger than those
for crop residue burning in a sealed stove (Zhang et al., 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Evolution of particles</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Growth of particle size</title>
      <p id="d1e4080">Figure 3 shows the evolution of particle size distribution after
photochemical aging of 0, 0.5, 2.5 and 5 h. Aerosol particles emitted from
open straw burning peaked at 50–90 nm under ambient dilution conditions.
The geometric mean diameters for primarily emitted particles in this study
were smaller than those (100–150 nm) reported for crop residual burning
under low dilution conditions (H. Zhang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2015), probably
due to evaporation of organic vapors under the high dilution conditions
(Lipsky et al., 2006) and coagulation of fine particles under the low
dilution conditions (Hossain et al., 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e4085">Particle size distributions in different burnings.
<bold>(a)</bold> Burn 2: rice straw; <bold>(b)</bold> Burn 3: corn straw;
<bold>(c)</bold> Burn 5: wheat straw.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=219.08622pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4103">After switching on black lamps, apparent growth of particle size was
observed. In all the aging experiments, growth rates of particle diameters in
the first 0.5 h were 10 times larger than those afterwards, and after 5 h
aging the geometric mean diameters peaked at 60–120 nm. For instance, in
the photochemical aging experiment for wheat straw burning (Fig. 3c), the
growth rate of particles was 18 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the first 0.5 h and
decreased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 nm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the following 4.5 h. The size
distribution of aged aerosol particles in our study is similar to those of
ambient particles under the severe biomass burning impact during haze events
(Betha et al., 2014; Niu et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Particle mass enhancement</title>
      <p id="d1e4143">Figure 4 shows the chemical evolution of aerosol particles during the 5 h
photochemical aging of wheat straw burning. During the whole process, OA kept
increasing and was dominant over inorganic species. After 3 h of
photochemical aging, the levels of all the inorganic species were constant,
and nitrate was the second most abundant component, with a mass fraction of
7 %, followed by chloride (2 %), ammonium (1 %) and sulfate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %). Figure 4b depicts [OA] evolution as a function of OH
exposure. OA increased slowly in the first <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 h, and then increased
rapidly with OH exposure.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e4162"><bold>(a)</bold> The evolution of particulate matter components
(Burn 2). <bold>(b)</bold> OA mass growth as a function of OH exposure (Burn 5).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=219.08622pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4176">The OA enhancement ratio, defined as the mass ratio of aged OA at the end of
each aging experiment to POA, was calculated. In the six aging experiments,
the OH exposure and OA enhancement ratios ranged from
(1.87–4.97) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s to 2.4–7.6,
respectively. Assuming an average OH concentration of
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ambient air (Hayes et
al., 2013), this means that rapid SOA formation would occur in 3.5–9.2 h
during the daytime after straw burning. The OA enhancement ratios determined
in our study were higher than those (0.7–2.9) for the combustion of
vegetation commonly burned in North American wildfires (Hennigan et al.,
2011), and comparable to those (0.7–6.9) for wood burning (Grieshop et al.,
2009b; Heringa et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e4236">Recently, Bruns et al. (2016) found that 22 NMOGs emitted from residential
wood burning could explain the majority of the formed SOA. In our study, 20
of the 22 NMOGs were detected and quantified with the PTR-TOF-MS.
Concentration differences of each compound before and after photo-oxidation
were calculated to estimate the SOA formed from these precursors. Since SOA
formation highly depends on oxidation conditions, SOA yields for a certain
precursor vary with VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. In our work, we chose a set of
SOA yields for these NMOGs based on the observed VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in
the chamber experiments. More specifically, if the observed
VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for a certain precursor in the chamber was within
the VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range reported in the literature, the mean value of
the highest and lowest yields within the VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range in the
literature was used to estimate the SOA formed from the precursor in the
chamber; if the observed VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for a certain precursor was
higher than the maximum VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio reported in the literature,
we chose the yield reported at the maximum VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio; if the
observed VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was lower than the minimum
VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio reported in the literature, we chose the yield
reported at the minimum VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio.</p>
      <p id="d1e4419">Figure 5a shows the time series of POA, SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">predicted</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
unexplained SOA in a typical aging experiment. The contribution of
SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">predicted</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by the 20 NMOGs was minor, and large fractions of
observed SOA could not be explained. In all the experiments, only
5.0–27.3 % of the observed SOA mass could be explained by the 20 NMOGs
(Fig. 5b). Even if the highest SOA yield for each precursor reported in the
literature were used, 60–90 % of the observed SOA mass could still not
be explained. It has been suggested that aqueous-phase oxidation of alkenes
could produce substantial SOA (Ervens et al., 2011). Considering large
emissions of olefins from straw burning (Fig. 1a–c), we also estimated the
SOA formed from the three most abundant alkenes (ethene, acetylene, and
propene) with their newly developed SOA yields (Ge et al., 2016, 2017; Jia
and Xu, 2016), and their total contribution to the observed SOA was found to
be negligible (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 %). It is noted that although over 80 VOCs
species were quantified by the GC-MSD/FID and the PTR-TOF-MS in this study,
only 20 species among them were taken into the SOA prediction because of the
lack of published data for SOA yields. The unaccounted VOC species might be a
reason for the discrepancy. On the other hand, as indicated by Deng et
al. (2017), SOA yields obtained from chamber studies in purified air matrix
might be lower than that in a real ambient air matrix. Consequently, using
SOA yields from studies in a purified air matrix might also underpredict SOA
yields in the complex biomass burning plume matrix. Moreover, oxidation of
particulate organic matter (POM), like semi-volatile organic compounds
(SVOCs) and intermediate volatility organic compounds (IVOCs), would also
contribute substantially to SOA formation (Presto et al., 2009; Zhao et al.,
2014), yet this is not accounted for in our prediction. Above all, there are
still unknown precursors and/or physicochemical processes contributing the
majority of SOA formed from open straw burning.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e4449"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series plots of concentrations of POA, secondary
organic aerosol that can be explained by the reacted precursors
(SOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">predicted</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the difference between the formed SOA and the
predicted SOA (unexplained SOA) in Burn 6. <bold>(b)</bold> Contribution of
20 NMOGs to the formed SOA at the end of photoreactions. Error bars
correspond to the range of contributions when the lowest/highest SOA yields
in references were used for all precursors.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=204.859843pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>OA mass spectrum evolution</title>
      <p id="d1e4481">In the high-resolution W mode of AMS, ions generated from particles could be
identified by their exact mass–charge ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then grouped into
the CHON, CHO, CHN and CH families. Figure 6 presents the evolution of OA
mass spectra. For POA (Fig. 6a), the CH-family was the major component, with
a mass fraction of 68 %, followed by CHO (23 %), CHN (6 %), and
CHON (2 %). The ions at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43, 41 and 55 were the dominant peaks in
the POA mass spectrum. The major ions at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27, 39, 41, 55, 57, 67 and 69
belonged to the CH-family and could be the fragments of hydrocarbons (Weimer
et al., 2008). The peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 28, 29, 43, 44 and 55 contained
considerable CHO ions, and the corresponding ions (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, CHO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be the
fragments of aldehydes, ketones and carboxylic acid (Ng et al., 2011a). The
peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 was mainly attributed to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, possibly
originating from aromatic compounds.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e4656"><bold>(a)</bold> Mass spectrum of POA; <bold>(b)</bold> mass spectrum of
aged OA; <bold>(c)</bold> difference in mass spectra between aged OA and POA. The
data were all taken from Burn 5.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=230.467323pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4673">The mass spectra of aged OA were quite different from those of POA
(Fig. 6b–c). The mass fraction of the CH-family decreased to 46 % and
was comparable to that of the CHO-family, while the contribution of
N-containing OA (CHN and CHON) increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 %. The ions at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 and 43, mainly coming from the CHO-family, became the dominant
peaks for the aged OA. The fractions of two major masses at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in OA can be used to generate an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> triangular space, in which oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA)
moves towards the apex during the aging process (Ng et al., 2010). In
addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ambient air was suggested to be 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04
for semi-volatile OOA (SV-OOA) and 0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 for low-volatility OOA
(LV-OOA), respectively (Ng et al., 2010). Figure 7a plots <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the POA and the aged OA in all six experiments. Most of the data
are within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> triangular space and close to the left
margin. Photochemical aging led to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all the
experiments, suggesting transformation of OA from SV-OOA to LV-OOA. For
comparison, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did not change significantly in all the experiments.
The main ions at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 were C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
It can be observed in Fig. 6c that the increased contribution of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the decreased contribution of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
were comparable during photoreaction.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e4973"><bold>(a)</bold> Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined in our
work with those for the ambient BBOA data sets (Ng et al., 2011b) and the
ambient OOA range (Ng et al., 2010). The typical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges of ambient
SV-OOA and LV-OOA are indicated with the vertical arrows.
<bold>(b)</bold> Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for straw burning OA with
those for other types of biomass burning OA (Alfarra et al., 2007; Hennigan
et al., 2011; Cubison et al., 2011; Brito et al., 2014; May et al., 2015).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=219.08622pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5046">Overview of important experimental conditions and key results in the
photochemical oxidation experiments. The unit for OH exposure is
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s. NA: data were not available because no
data were recorded in the W-mode.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Straw type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Temp (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RH (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center" colsep="1">POA </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col11" align="center">Aged OA </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">OA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">exposure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">ER</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Burn 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Burn 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">7.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Burn 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Corn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Burn 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Corn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Burn 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wheat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Burn 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wheat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e5616">The ion at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60, mainly consisting of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
regarded as a BBOA marker, and the mass fraction of this ion in OA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
is widely used to probe the evolution of BBOA (Brito et al., 2014; May et
al., 2015). Figure 7b plots the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all the
experiments conducted in this study, in order to compare them with
measurements in aging biomass burning plumes (Cubison et al., 2011) and those
in the POA from different types of biomass burning (Alfarra et al., 2007;
Brito et al., 2014; May et al., 2015). Photo-oxidation caused an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this is consistent with the general
evolution of OA in ambient biomass burning plumes (Cubison et al., 2011).
However, our measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.003–0.006 in the POA from open straw
burning and 0.002–0004 in aged OA, were all lower than those from other
field campaigns and quite near the background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level of 0.003 for
ambient OA (Cubison et al., 2011; Fig. 7b). Low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(0.005–0.02) were also reported by Hennigan et al. (2011) in a chamber study
for fuels commonly burned in wildfires. In their study, biomass burning took
place in a 3000 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion chamber, and the smokes were then
injected into another chamber for aging experiments with a dilution ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25. Previous studies have demonstrated that levoglucosan is a
semi-volatile compound with a saturation concentration of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 293 K (Grieshop et al., 2009b; Huffman
et al., 2009; Hennigan et al., 2011). As a result, the high dilution
conditions used in our study would cause levoglucosan to evaporate, and this
may at least partly explain the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the POA from straw
burning. From previous studies, the levoglucosan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios of straw
burning ranging from 4.92 to 16.8 % (4 types of vegetation summarized;
Dhammapala et al., 2007; Kim Oanh et al., 2011; Hall et al., 2012) were not
significantly (two-sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) lower than those of
prescribed fuel burning, wildfire and wood burning ranging from 1.46 to
13.5 % (20 types of vegetation summarized; Hosseini et al., 2013; Shahid
et al., 2015). So the difference in fuel type cannot explain the lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in our study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>Elemental ratio and oxidation state of OA</title>
      <p id="d1e5850">In this study, the O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios in the POA from different
straws burning were in the ranges of 0.20–0.38 and 1.58–1.74, respectively.
After 5 h aging, O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C increased and H/C decreased (Table 2). Kroll et
al. (2011) proposed a metric, the average carbon oxidation state
(OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to describe the degree of oxidation of atmospheric organic
species. OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> could be calculated from the elemental composition of
OA measured by AMS, given by Eq. (7):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M469" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            In this study, the OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the fresh POA from open straw
burning ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.25 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89, consistent with those suggested for
BBOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7) (Kroll et al., 2011). During photochemical aging, the
OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values increased linearly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001) with OH exposure
(Fig. 8), and the slopes were quite near each other even for different types
of straws, implying AMS measured OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> might be a good indicator of
OH exposure and thereby of photochemical aging.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e6006">The growth of the OA carbon oxidation state with OH exposure for
burning corn (Burns 3 and 4) and wheat (Burns 5 and 6) straws. Data for
burning rice straws were not included since in Burn 1 AMS was then not run in
W-mode.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6015">Figure 9 shows the Van Krevelen diagram of OA. In this study, the slopes of
linear correlations between H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.24 for the five experiments. Slopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1, 0.5 and 0 in the Van
Krevelen diagrams indicate addition of carboxylic acids without
fragmentation, addition of carboxylic acids with fragmentation, and addition
of alcohols/peroxides, respectively (Heald et al., 2010; Ng et al., 2011a).
Therefore, the slopes determined in our study suggest that open straw burning
OA aging resulted in net changes in chemical composition equivalent to
addition of carboxylic acid groups with C–C bond breakage and addition of
alcohol/peroxide functional groups.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e6056">Van Krevelen diagram for the OA. Each slope corresponds to the
addition of a specific functional group to an aliphatic carbon.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/14821/2017/acp-17-14821-2017-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e6073">In this study, primary emissions of open burning of rice, corn and wheat
straw and their photochemistry were investigated using a large indoor
chamber. Emission factors of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 67 NMHCs, PM and
particle number were measured under dilution ratios ranging from 1300 to
4000. Emission factors of PM (3.73–6.36 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and POC
(2.05–4.11 gC kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were lower than those reported in previous
studies conducted at lower dilution ratios, probably due to the evaporation
of semi-volatile organic compounds. Emission factors of POC, PM and major
NMHC compounds were all negatively correlated with the modified combustion
efficiency, suggesting that incomplete burning of agricultural residues could
lead to larger primary emission.</p>
      <p id="d1e6133">Both agricultural residue burning and domestic coal combustion have been
recognized as contributing substantially to the deteriorating regional air
quality, especially in rural areas of China (Pan et al., 2015; J. Liu et al.,
2016; Zhu et al., 2016). The emission factors of the speciated NMHCs, PM,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from combustion of raw bituminous coal, which is currently prevalent
for cooking and heating in rural areas, have been reported to be 0.56–5.40,
25.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.30, 0.97 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, 208 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 and
2.43–5.36 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Du et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Liu
et al., 2017). Annually burned crop residues and domestic coals were
estimated to be 160 Tg (Q. Li et al., 2016) and 99.6 Tg (NBSPRC, 2014) in
China. Therefore, with the emission factors of the speciated NMHCs
(2.47–5.04 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM (3.73–6.36 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(1.47–5.00 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO (46.1–63.5 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(0.07–0.99 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured for agricultural residue burning in this
study, agricultural residue burning might emit more NMHCs and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but
less primary PM, CO and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than domestic coal burning on a national
scale.</p>
      <p id="d1e6300">Photochemical aging of primary emissions was investigated with OH exposure
equal to 3.2–9.2 h under typical ambient conditions, and at the end of
experiments the OA mass concentrations increased by a factor of 2.4–7.6,
suggesting that SOA could be rapidly produced within several hours. Our
estimation suggests that phenols are the most important identified SOA
precursors, and more than 70 % of the formed OA still cannot be explained
by the oxidation of known precursors. Measurements using HR-TOF-AMS reveal
that after photochemical aging, signals for oxygen- and nitrogen-containing
compounds were largely increased, with OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased in a highly
significant linear way with OH exposure.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e6317">The data used in this publication are available to the community and can be
accessed by request to the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6320"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14821-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14821-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e6326">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6332">This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the
Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB05010200), the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (grant no.
41530641/41571130031/41673116/41503105), the National Key Research and
Development Program (2016YFC0202204) and the Guangzhou Science Technology and
Innovation Commission (201505231532347).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Aijun Ding<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adler, G., Flores, J. M., Abo Riziq, A., Borrmann, S., and Rudich, Y.:
Chemical, physical, and optical evolution of biomass burning aerosols: a case
study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1491–1503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Elemental analysis of
organic species with electron ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 79, 8350–8358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071150w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac071150w</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Aiken, A. C., Decarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C and
OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 4478–4485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es703009q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S.,
Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and
domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 4039–4072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer, S.,
Lanz, V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Identification
of the mass spectral signature of organic aerosols from wood burning
emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5770–5777, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062289b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es062289b</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Alves, N. d. O., Brito, J., Caumo, S., Arana, A., Hacon, S. d. S., Artaxo,
P., Hillamo, R., Teinila, K., Batistuzzo de Medeiros, S. R., and
Vasconcellos, P. d. C.: Biomass burning in the Amazon region: Aerosol source
apportionment and associated health risk assessment, Atmos. Environ., 120,
277–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.059</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from
biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GB001382</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P., Longo,
K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking Rain Clouds over the Amazon,
Science, 303, 1337–1342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092779" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092779</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, S. R., Emmons, L. K., Monks, S. A., Law, K. S., Ridley, D. A.,
Turquety, S., Tilmes, S., Thomas, J. L., Bouarar, I., Flemming, J., Huijnen,
V., Mao, J., Duncan, B. N., Steenrod, S., Yoshida, Y., Langner, J., and Long,
Y.: Biomass burning influence on high-latitude tropospheric ozone and
reactive nitrogen in summer 2008: a multi-model analysis based on POLMIP
simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6047–6068,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6047-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6047-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Betha, R., Zhang, Z., and Balasubramanian, R.: Influence of trans-boundary
biomass burning impacted air masses on submicron particle number
concentrations and size distributions, Atmos. Environ., 92, 9–18,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.002</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Nelson, S. M., Woo, J. H., and
Klimont, Z.: A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon
emissions from combustion, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D14203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003697</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kaercher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S.,
Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Borras, E. and Tortajada-Genaro, L. A.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from the photo-oxidation of benzene, Atmos. Environ., 47, 154–163,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.020</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Brassard, P., Palacios, J. H., Godbout, S., Bussieres, D., Lagace, R.,
Larouche, J. P., and Pelletier, F.: Comparison of the gaseous and particulate
matter emissions from the combustion of agricultural and forest biomasses,
Bioresour. Technol., 155, 300–306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.027</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Brito, J., Rizzo, L. V., Morgan, W. T., Coe, H., Johnson, B., Haywood, J.,
Longo, K., Freitas, S., Andreae, M. O., and Artaxo, P.: Ground-based aerosol
characterization during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA)
field experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12069–12083,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Kilic, D., Klein, F.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Identification of significant
precursor gases of secondary organic aerosols from residential wood
combustion, Sci. Rep., 6, 27881, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep27881</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., Kilic, D., Klein, F., Dommen, J.,
Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A.
S. H.: Characterization of gas-phase organics using proton transfer reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometry: fresh and aged residential wood combustion
emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 705–720,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-705-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-705-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Cao, G., Zhang, X., Gong, S., and Zheng, F.: Investigation on emission
factors of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants from crop residue
burning, J. Environ. Sci., 20, 50–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60007-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60007-8</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Reactivity estimates for selected consumer product
compounds, Air resources Board, California, Contract No. 06-408, 72–99,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Chan, A. W. H., Kautzman, K. E., Chhabra, P. S., Surratt, J. D., Chan, M. N.,
Crounse, J. D., Kürten, A., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from photooxidation of naphthalene
and alkylnaphthalenes: implications for oxidation of intermediate volatility
organic compounds (IVOCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3049–3060,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Chan, A. W. H., Chan, M. N., Surratt, J. D., Chhabra, P. S., Loza, C. L.,
Crounse, J. D., Yee, L. D., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Role of aldehyde chemistry and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in secondary organic
aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7169–7188,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Engling, G., He, K.-B., Duan, F.-K., Ma, Y.-L., Du, Z.-Y., Liu,
J.-M., Zheng, M., and Weber, R. J.: Biomass burning contribution to Beijing
aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7765–7781,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7765-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7765-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Engling, G., Moosmaller, H., Arnott, W. P., Chen, L. W. A., Wold,
C. E., Hao, W. M., and He, K. B.: Light absorption by biomass burning source
emissions, Atmos. Environ., 127, 347–354,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.045</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Chhabra, P. S., Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L.
M., Worsnop, D. R., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Elemental composition
and oxidation of chamber organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8827–8845,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8827-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8827-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Christian, T. J., Yokelson, R. J., Cárdenas, B., Molina, L. T., Engling,
G., and Hsu, S.-C.: Trace gas and particle emissions from domestic and
industrial biofuel use and garbage burning in central Mexico, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 565–584, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-565-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-565-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle morphology and density characterization by combined mobility
and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
38, 1185–1205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290903907</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac061249n</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Deng, W., Liu, T., Zhang, Y., Situ, S., Hu, Q., He, Q., Zhang, Z., Lü,
S., Bi, X., Wang, X., Boreave, A., George, C., Ding, X., and Wang, X.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from photo-oxidation of toluene with
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: Chamber simulation with purified air versus urban
ambient air as matrix, Atmos. Environ., 150, 67–76,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.047</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Dhammapala, R., Claiborn, C., Jimenez, J., Corkill, J., Gullett, B., Simpson,
C., and Paulsen, M.: Emission factors of PAHs, methoxyphenols, levoglucosan,
elemental carbon and organic carbon from simulated wheat and Kentucky
bluegrass stubble burns, Atmos. Environ., 41, 2660–2669,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.023</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Shen, R.-Q., Yu, Q.-Q., Zhang, Y.-Q., Xin, J.-Y., Wen,
T.-X., and Wang, X.-M.: Spatial and seasonal variations of isoprene secondary
organic aerosol in China: Significant impact of biomass burning during
winter, Sci. Rep., 6, 20411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep20411</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., Zhang, Y.-Q., He, Q.-F., Yu, Q.-Q., Shen, R.-Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang,
Z., Lyu, S.-J., Hu, Q.-H., Wang, Y.-S., Li, L.-F., Song, W., and Wang, X.-M.:
Spatial and seasonal variations of secondary organic aerosol from terpenoids
over China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 14661–14678,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025467" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025467</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., Zhang, Y.-Q., He, Q.-F., Yu, Q.-Q., Wang, J.-Q., Shen, R.-Q., Song,
W., Wang, Y.-S., and Wang, X.-M.: Significant increase of aromatics-derived
secondary organic aerosol during fall to winter in China, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 51, 7432–7441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b06408</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Du, Q., Zhang, C., Mu, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Song, M., Tian, D.,
Liu, P., Liu, J., Xue, C., and Ye, C.: An important missing source of
atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: Domestic coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 8720–8727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl070075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016gl070075</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., Bey, I., Chin, M., Mickley, L. J., Fairlie, T. D., Martin, R.
V., and Matsueda, H.: Indonesian wildfires of 1997: Impact on tropospheric
chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd003195</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation): Emissions of methane
and nitrous oxide from the on-site combustion of crop residues, available at:
<uri>http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/G1/GB/E</uri>, last access: 6 April 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Ge, S., Xu, Y., and Jia, L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from ethyne
in the presence of NaCl in a smog chamber, Environ. Chem., 13, 699–710,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/en15155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/en15155</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Ge, S., Xu, Y., and Jia, L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from
propylene irradiations in a chamber study, Atmos. Environ., 157, 146–155,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Giordano, M. R., Short, D. Z., Hosseini, S., Lichtenberg, W., and Asa-Awuku,
A. A.: Changes in droplet surface tension affect the observed hygroscopicity
of photochemically aged biomass burning aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
10980–10986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401867j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es401867j</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Gómez Alvarez, E., Borras, E., Viidanoja, J., and Hjorth, J.: Unsaturated
dicarbonyl products from the OH-initiated photo-oxidation of furan,
2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1603–1612,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.019</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Laboratory
investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires
2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2227–2240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Grieshop, A. P., Logue, J. M., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Laboratory investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from
wood fires 1: measurement and simulation of organic aerosol evolution, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 1263–1277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1263-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1263-2009</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Hall, D., Wu, C. Y., Hsu, Y. M., Stormer, J., Engling, G., Capeto, K., Wang,
J., Brown, S., Li, H. W., and Yu, K. M.: PAHs, carbonyls, VOCs and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission factors for pre-harvest burning of Florida sugarcane, Atmos.
Environ., 55, 164–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.034</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Hatch, L. E., Yokelson, R. J., Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Simpson, I.
J., Blake, D. R., Orlando, J. J., and Barsanti, K. C.: Multi-instrument
comparison and compilation of non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass
burning and implications for smoke-derived secondary organic aerosol
precursors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1471–1489,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Hayes, P. L., Ortega, A. M., Cubison, M. J., Froyd, K. D., Zhao, Y., Cliff,
S. S., Hu, W. W., Toohey, D. W., Flynn, J. H., Lefer, B. L., Grossberg, N.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglueck, B., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Holloway, J. S.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., De Gouw, J. A., Massoli, P., Zhang, X., Liu,
J., Weber, R. J., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Isaacman, G., Worton, D.
R., Kreisberg, N. M., Goldstein, A. H., Thalman, R., Waxman, E. M., Volkamer,
R., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H.,
Dusanter, S., Griffith, S., Stevens, P. S., Brioude, J., Angevine, W. M., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena,
California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9233–9257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50530</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Kroll, J. H., Jimenez, J. L., Docherty, K. S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Aiken, A. C., Chen, Q., Martin, S. T., Farmer, D. K., and Artaxo, P.: A
simplified description of the evolution of organic aerosol composition in the
atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L08803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010gl042737</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Engelhart, G. J., May, A. A., Presto, A.
A., Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., McMeeking, G. R., Coe, H., Wold, C. E., Hao,
W.-M., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J., Schichtel, B. A., Collett
Jr., J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Chemical and physical
transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass
burning emissions in an environmental chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
7669–7686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Henry, K. M., Lohaus, T., and Donahue, N. M.: Organic aerosol yields from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene oxidation: bridging the gap between first-generation yields
and aging chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 12347–12354,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302060y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302060y</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Heringa, M. F., DeCarlo, P. F., Chirico, R., Tritscher, T., Dommen, J.,
Weingartner, E., Richter, R., Wehrle, G., Prévôt, A. S. H., and
Baltensperger, U.: Investigations of primary and secondary particulate matter
of different wood combustion appliances with a high-resolution time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5945–5957,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5945-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5945-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: High formation of
secondary organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of toluene, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2973–2986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Hossain, A., Park, S., Kim, J. S., and Park, K.: Volatility and mixing states
of ultrafine particles from biomass burning, J. Hazard. Mater., 205,
189–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.061</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Hosseini, S., Urbanski, S. P., Dixit, P., Qi, L., Burling, I. R., Yokelson,
R. J., Johnson, T. J., Shrivastava, M., Jung, H. S., Weise, D. R., Miller, J.
W., and Cocker, D. R.: Laboratory characterization of PM emissions from
combustion of wildland biomass fuels, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9914–9929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50481" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50481</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R. J., Zhang, Y. L., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y. M.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga,
A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An,
Z. S., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prevot, A. S. H.:
High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze
events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Ding, A., Liu, L., Liu, Q., Ding, K., Niu, X., Nie, W., Xu, Z.,
Chi, X., Wang, M., Sun, J., Guo, W., and Fu, C.: Effects of aerosol-radiation
interaction on precipitation during biomass-burning season in East China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10063–10082,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Shen, H. Z., Chen, Y. L., Zhong, Q. R., Chen, H., Wang, R., Shen,
G. F., Liu, J. F., Li, B. G., and Tao, S.: Global organic carbon emissions
from primary sources from 1960 to 2009, Atmos. Environ., 122, 505–512,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.017</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., Yan, Q., Zhang, Z., and Wang, X.: Real-time monitoring
of respiratory absorption factors of volatile organic compounds in ambient
air by proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry, J. Hazard.
Mater., 320, 547–555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.064</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Mohr, C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M.,
Ziemann, P. J., Onasch, T. B., and Jimenez, J. L.: Chemically-resolved
volatility measurements of organic aerosol from different sources, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 5351–5357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803539d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803539d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O. T., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
10473–10478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1323740111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Jia, L. and Xu, Y.: Ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation from
Ethylene-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-NaCl irradiations under different relative humidity
conditions, J. Atmos. Chem., 73, 81–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Jolleys, M. D., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Capes, G., Allan, J. D., Crosier, J.,
Williams, P. I., Allen, G., Bower, K. N., Jimenez, J. L., Russell, L. M.,
Grutter, M., and Baumgardner, D.: Characterizing the aging of biomass burning
organic aerosol by use of mixing ratios: a meta-analysis of four regions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 13093–13102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302386v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302386v</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Kim Oanh, N. T., Ly, B. T., Tipayarom, D., Manandhar, B. R., Prapat, P.,
Simpson, C. D., and Sally Liu, L. J.: Characterization of particulate matter
emission from open burning of rice straw, Atmos. Environ., 45, 493–502,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Kim Oanh, N. T., Tipayarom, A., Bich, T. L., Tipayarom, D., Simpson, C. D.,
Hardie, D., and Sally Liu, L. J.: Characterization of gaseous and
semi-volatile organic compounds emitted from field burning of rice straw,
Atmos. Environ., 119, 182–191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W. and Novakov, T.: Controlled generation of black carbon
particles from a diffusion flame and applications in evaluating black carbon
measurement methods, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1874–1888,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.067</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Remer, L. A., and Martins, J. V.: Measurement of
the effect of Amazon smoke on inhibition of cloud formation, Science, 303,
1342–1345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089424" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1089424</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., and
Bluhm, H.: Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nchem.948</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Slowik, J. G., Wong, J. P. S.,
Abbatt, J. P. D., Brune, W. H., Ng, N. L., Wright, J. P., Croasdale, D. R.,
Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Characterization of
aerosol photooxidation flow reactors: heterogeneous oxidation, secondary
organic aerosol formation and cloud condensation nuclei activity
measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 445–461,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-445-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-445-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Wang, X., Ye, X., Wang, L., Yang, X., Kan, H.,
Donaldson, D. J., and Mellouki, A.: Evolution of biomass burning smoke
particles in the dark, Atmos. Environ., 120, 244–252,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Hu, Y., Zhang, F., Chen, J., Ma, Z., Ye, X., Yang, X., Wang, L.,
Tang, X., Zhang, R., Mu, M., Wang, G., Kan, H., Wang, X., and Mellouki, A.:
Multi-pollutant emissions from the burning of major agricultural residues in
China and the related health-economic effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
4957–4988, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Bo, Y., and Xie, S. D.: Estimating emissions from crop residue open
burning in China based on statistics and MODIS fire products, J. Environ.
Sci., 44, 158–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.08.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2015.08.024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q., Li, X. H., Jiang, J. K., Duan, L., Ge, S., Zhang, Q., Deng, J. G.,
Wang, S. X., and Hao, J. M.: Semi-coke briquettes: towards reducing emissions
of primary PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, particulate carbon, and carbon monoxide from household
coal combustion in China, Sci. Rep., 6, 19306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep19306</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Li, X. G., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., Hao, J., Li, C., Chen, Y. S., and Yang, L.:
Particulate and trace gas emissions from open burning of wheat straw and corn
stover in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6052–6058,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0705137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0705137</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Li, X. H., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., and Hao, J. M.: Characterization of
non-methane hydrocarbons emitted from open burning of wheat straw and corn
stover in China, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044015,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044015</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Liao, C. P., Wu, C. Z., Yan, Y. J., and Huang, H. T.:
Chemical elemental characteristics of biomass fuels in China, Biomass Bioenergy, 27, 119–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.01.002</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., and Turpin, B. J.: Chemical insights, explicit
chemistry, and yields of secondary organic aerosol from OH radical oxidation
of methylglyoxal and glyoxal in the aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8651–8667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Lipsky, E. M. and Robinson, A. L.: Effects of dilution on fine particle mass
and partitioning of semivolatile organics in diesel exhaust and wood smoke,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 155–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es050319p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es050319p</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Liu, C., Zhang, C., Mu, Y., Liu, J., and Zhang, Y.: Emission of volatile
organic compounds from domestic coal stove with the actual alternation of
flaming and smoldering combustion processes, Environ. Pollut., 221, 385–391,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.089</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Peng, W., Klimont,
Z., Qiu, X., Zhang, S., Hu, M., Lin, W., Smith, K. R., and Zhu, T.: Air
pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated
ambient pollution source, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 7756–7761,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604537113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1604537113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Liu, T., Wang, X., Deng, W., Hu, Q., Ding, X., Zhang, Y., He, Q., Zhang, Z.,
Lü, S., Bi, X., Chen, J., and Yu, J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from photochemical aging of light-duty gasoline vehicle exhausts in a smog
chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9049–9062,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X. X., Zhang, Y., Huey, L. G., Yokelson, R. J., Wang, Y., Jimenez, J.
L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Beyersdorf, A. J., Blake, D. R., Choi, Y., St Clair,
J. M., Crounse, J. D., Day, D. A., Diskin, G. S., Fried, A., Hall, S. R.,
Hanisco, T. F., King, L. E., Meinardi, S., Mikoviny, T., Palm, B. B.,
Peischl, J., Perring, A. E., Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Sachse, G.,
Schwarz, J. P., Simpson, I. J., Tanner, D. J., Thornhill, K. L., Ullmann, K.,
Weber, R. J., Wennberg, P. O., Wisthaler, A., Wolfe, G. M., and Ziemba, L.
D.: Agricultural fires in the southeastern US during SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS: Emissions
of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and
organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 7383–7414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd025040</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Martin, M., Tritscher, T., Juranyi, Z., Heringa, M. F., Sierau, B.,
Weingartner, E., Chirico, R., Gysel, M., Prevot, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U.,
and Lohmann, U.: Hygroscopic properties of fresh and aged wood burning
particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 56, 15–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.006</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T., Collett,
J. L., Jr., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass
burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11327–11338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50828</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Lee, T., McMeeking, G. R., Akagi, S., Sullivan, A. P., Urbanski,
S., Yokelson, R. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Observations and analysis of
organic aerosol evolution in some prescribed fire smoke plumes, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6323–6335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6323-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6323-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>McMurry, P. H. and Grosjean, D.: Gas and aerosol wall losses in Teflon film
smog chambers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 1176–1182,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00142a006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00142a006</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Müller, M., Anderson, B. E., Beyersdorf, A. J., Crawford, J. H., Diskin,
G. S., Eichler, P., Fried, A., Keutsch, F. N., Mikoviny, T., Thornhill, K.
L., Walega, J. G., Weinheimer, A. J., Yang, M., Yokelson, R. J., and
Wisthaler, A.: In situ measurements and modeling of reactive trace gases in a
small biomass burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3813–3824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3813-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3813-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Nakao, S., Clark, C., Tang, P., Sato, K., and Cocker III, D.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from phenolic compounds in the absence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10649–10660,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10649-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10649-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
NBSPRC (National bureau of statistics of people's republic of China): China Energy
Statistical Yearbook 2013, China Stat. Press, Beijing, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>NBSPRC (National bureau of statistics of people's republic of China): The statistical
communiqu on national economy and social development in 2015, available at:
<uri>http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201602/t20160229_1323991.html</uri> (last
access: 27 September 2017), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-xylene,
toluene, and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3909–3922,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D.
R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-Time Methods for estimating organic cComponent mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 910–916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102951k</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Ni, H. Y., Han, Y. M., Cao, J. J., Chen, L. W. A., Tian, J., Wang, X. L.,
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Wang, Q. Y., Wang, P., Li, H., and Huang, R. J.:
Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open
burning of crop residues in China, Atmos. Environ., 123, 399–406,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.007</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Niu, H. Y., Cheng, W. J., Hu, W., and Pian, W.: Characteristics of individual
particles in a severe short-period haze episode induced by biomass burning in
Beijing, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 7, 1072–1081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.011</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Cubison, M. J., Brune, W. H., Bon, D., de Gouw, J.
A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation and primary
organic aerosol oxidation from biomass-burning smoke in a flow reactor during
FLAME-3, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11551–11571,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11551-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11551-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Pan, X., Kanaya, Y., Tanimoto, H., Inomata, S., Wang, Z., Kudo, S., and Uno,
I.: Examining the major contributors of ozone pollution in a rural area of
the Yangtze River Delta region during harvest season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6101–6111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6101-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6101-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Presto, A. A., Miracolo, M. A., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Robinson, A.
L., and Donahue, N. M.: Intermediate-volatility organic compounds: A
potential source of ambient oxidized organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
43, 4744–4749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803219q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803219q</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Real, E., Law, K. S., Weinzierl, B., Fiebig, M., Petzold, A., Wild, O.,
Methven, J., Arnold, S., Stohl, A., Huntrieser, H., Roiger, A., Schlager, H.,
Stewart, D., Avery, M., Sachse, G., Browell, E., Ferrare, R., and Blake, D.:
Processes influencing ozone levels in Alaskan forest fire plumes during
long-range transport over the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
D10S41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007576" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007576</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Sanchis, E., Ferrer, M., Calvet, S., Coscolla, C., Yusa, V., and
Cambra-Lopez, M.: Gaseous and particulate emission profiles during controlled
rice straw burning, Atmos. Environ., 98, 25–31,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.062</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, O., Artaxo, P., Arnott, W. P., Chand, D., Gatti, L. V., Frank, G. P.,
Hoffer, A., Schnaiter, M., and Andreae, M. O.: Spectral light absorption by
ambient aerosols influenced by biomass burning in the Amazon Basin. I:
Comparison and field calibration of absorption measurement techniques, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 3443–3462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, O., Karg, E., Hagen, D. E., Whitefield, P. D., and Ferron, G. A.: On
the effective density of non-spherical particles as derived from combined
measurements of aerodynamic and mobility equivalent size, J. Aerosol Sci.,
38, 431–443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.01.002</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Shahid, I., Kistler, M., Mukhtar, A., Cruz, C. R. S., Bauer, H., and Puxbaum,
H.: Chemical composition of particles from traditional burning of Pakistani
wood species, Atmos. Environ., 121, 35–41,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.041</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Shakya, K. M. and Griffin, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol from
photooxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
44, 8134–8139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es1019417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es1019417</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Easter, R. C., Liu, X. H., Zelenyuk, A., Singh, B., Zhang,
K., Ma, P. L., Chand, D., Ghan, S., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Fast, J.,
Rasch, P. J., and Tiitta, P.: Global transformation and fate of SOA:
Implications of low-volatility SOA and gas-phase fragmentation reactions, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 4169–4195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd022563</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Jimenez, J. L., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Evans, M.
J., Mann, G. W., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J., Coe, H.,
McFiggans, G., Rap, A., and Forster, P.: Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint
on the global secondary organic aerosol budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12109–12136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12109-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12109-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Robinson, A. L.,
DeMott, P. J., Sullivan, R. C., Reardon, J., Ryan, K. C., Griffith, D. W. T.,
and Stevens, L.: Trace gas emissions from combustion of peat, crop residue,
domestic biofuels, grasses, and other fuels: configuration and Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR) component of the fourth Fire Lab at Missoula
Experiment (FLAME-4), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9727–9754,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Williams, J., and Yokelson, R. J.:
Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop
residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 845–865,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-845-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Stockwell, C. E., Christian, T. J., Goetz, J. D., Jayarathne, T., Bhave, P.
V., Praveen, P. S., Adhikari, S., Maharjan, R., DeCarlo, P. F., Stone, E. A.,
Saikawa, E., Blake, D. R., Simpson, I. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Panday, A.
K.: Nepal Ambient Monitoring and Source Testing Experiment (NAMaSTE):
emissions of trace gases and light-absorbing carbon from wood and dung
cooking fires, garbage and crop residue burning, brick kilns, and other
sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11043–11081,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11043-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11043-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Woo, J. H., and Carmichael, G. R.: Biomass
burning in Asia: Annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1099, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003gb002040</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Takekawa, H., Minoura, H., and Yamazaki, S.: Temperature dependence of
secondary organic aerosol formation by photo-oxidation of hydrocarbons,
Atmos. Environ., 37, 3413–3424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00359-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00359-5</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Tariq, S., ul-Haq, Z., and Ali, M.: Satellite and ground-based remote sensing
of aerosols during intense haze event of October 2013 over lahore, Pakistan,
Asia-Pac, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 25–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-015-0084-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13143-015-0084-3</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Tkacik, D. S., Robinson, E. S., Ahern, A., Saleh, R., Stockwell, C., Veres,
P., Simpson, I. J., Meinardi, S., Blake, D. R., Yokelson, R. J., Presto, A.
A., Sullivan, R. C., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: A dual-chamber
method for quantifying the effects of atmospheric perturbations on secondary
organic aerosol formation from biomass burning emissions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 122, 6043–6058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025784</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, A. M., Witte, J. C., Hudson, R. D., Guo, H., Herman, J. R., and
Fujiwara, M.: Tropical tropospheric ozone and biomass burning, Science, 291,
2128–2132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5511.2128" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.291.5511.2128</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, H., Zhao, D., and Wang, Y.: Emission inventories of atmospheric
pollutants discharged from biomass burning in China, Acta Sci. Circumst., 31,
349–357, 2011 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Tiitta, P., Leskinen, A., Hao, L., Yli-Pirilä, P., Kortelainen, M.,
Grigonyte, J., Tissari, J., Lamberg, H., Hartikainen, A., Kuuspalo, K.,
Kortelainen, A.-M., Virtanen, A., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Komppula, M., Pieber,
S., Prévôt, A. S. H., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Czech, H.,
Zimmermann, R., Jokiniemi, J., and Sippula, O.: Transformation of logwood
combustion emissions in a smog chamber: formation of secondary organic
aerosol and changes in the primary organic aerosol upon daytime and nighttime
aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13251–13269,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13251-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13251-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>Tsigaridis, K., Daskalakis, N., Kanakidou, M., Adams, P. J., Artaxo, P.,
Bahadur, R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Benedetti, A.,
Bergman, T., Berntsen, T. K., Beukes, J. P., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin,
M., Curci, G., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Gong, S. L., Hodzic,
A., Hoyle, C. R., Iversen, T., Jathar, S., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, J. W.,
Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D., Kokkola, H., Lee, Y. H., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo,
G., Ma, X., Mann, G. W., Mihalopoulos, N., Morcrette, J.-J., Müller,
J.-F., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ng, N. L., O'Donnell, D., Penner, J.
E., Pozzoli, L., Pringle, K. J., Russell, L. M., Schulz, M., Sciare, J.,
Seland, Ø., Shindell, D. T., Sillman, S., Skeie, R. B., Spracklen, D.,
Stavrakou, T., Steenrod, S. D., Takemura, T., Tiitta, P., Tilmes, S., Tost,
H., van Noije, T., van Zyl, P. G., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Wang, Z., Wang,
Z., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.: The
AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845–10895,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Lou, S., Huang, C., Qiao, L., Tang, X., Chen, C., Zeng, L., Wang,
Q., Zhou, M., Lu, S., and Yu, X.: Source profiles of volatile organic
compounds from biomass burning in Yangtze River Delta, China, Aerosol Air
Qual. Res., 14, 818–828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X. and Wu, T.: Release of isoprene and monoterpenes during the aerobic
decomposition of orange wastes from laboratory incubation experiments,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3265–3270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es702999j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es702999j</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Liu, T., Bernard, F., Ding, X., Wen, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., He,
Q., Lü, S., Chen, J., Saunders, S., and Yu, J.: Design and
characterization of a smog chamber for studying gas-phase chemical mechanisms
and aerosol formation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 301–313,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-301-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-301-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Ward, D. E., Susott, R. A., Kauffman, J. B., Babbitt, R. E., Cummings, D. L.,
Dias, B., Holben, B. N., Kaufman, Y. J., Rasmussen, R. A., and Setzer, A. W.:
Smoke and fire characteristics for cerrado and deforestation burns in Brazil:
BASE-B Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 14601–14619,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD01218</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Weimer, S., Alfarra, M. R., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., Prevot, A. S. H., and
Baltensperger, U.: Organic aerosol mass spectral signatures from wood-burning
emissions: Influence of burning conditions and wood type, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D10304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009309" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009309</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Weitkamp, E. A., Sage, A. M., Pierce, J. R., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A.
L.: Organic aerosol formation from photochemical oxidation of diesel exhaust
in a smog chamber, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6969–6975,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070193r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070193r</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>Yee, L. D., Kautzman, K. E., Loza, C. L., Schilling, K. A., Coggon, M. M.,
Chhabra, P. S., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P., Crounse, J. D.,
Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic
aerosol formation from biomass burning intermediates: phenol and
methoxyphenols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8019–8043,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Yi, Z. G., Wang, X. M., Sheng, G. Y., Zhang, D. Q., Zhou, G. Y., and Fu, J.
M.: Soil uptake of carbonyl sulfide in subtropical forests with different
successional stages in south China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D08302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd008048</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>Yokelson, R. J., Christian, T. J., Karl, T. G., and Guenther, A.: The
tropical forest and fire emissions experiment: laboratory fire measurements
and synthesis of campaign data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3509–3527,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>Yokelson, R. J., Burling, I. R., Urbanski, S. P., Atlas, E. L., Adachi, K.,
Buseck, P. R., Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Toohey, D. W., and Wold, C. E.:
Trace gas and particle emissions from open biomass burning in Mexico, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 6787–6808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6787-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6787-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Ye, X., Cheng, T., Chen, J., Yang, X., Wang, L., and Zhang, R.: A
laboratory study of agricultural crop residue combustion in China: Emission
factors and emission inventory, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8432–8441,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.015</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Hu, D., Chen, J., Ye, X., Wang, S. X., Hao, J. M., Wang, L.,
Zhang, R., and An, Z.: Particle size distribution and polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons emissions from agricultural crop residue burning, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 5477–5482, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es1037904" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es1037904</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y. L.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols
via factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem., 401, 3045–3067, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Guo, H., Wang, X. M., Simpson, I. J., Barletta, B., Blake, D.
R., Meinardi, S., Rowland, F. S., Cheng, H. R., Saunders, S. M., and Lam, S.
H. M.: Emission patterns and spatiotemporal variations of halocarbons in the
Pearl River Delta region, southern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
D15309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013726</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Wang, X. M., Blake, D. R., Li, L. F., Zhang, Z., Wang, S. Y.,
Guo, H., Lee, F. S. C., Gao, B., Chan, L. Y., Wu, D., and Rowland, F. S.:
Aromatic hydrocarbons as ozone precursors before and after outbreak of the
2008 financial crisis in the Pearl River Delta region, south China, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jd017356</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. L., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Intermediate-volatility organic compounds: A large source of secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5035188</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y. H., Yang, L. X., Chen, J. M., Wang, X. F., Xue, L. K., Sui, X., Wen,
L., Xu, C. H., Yao, L., Zhang, J. M., Shao, M., Lu, S. H., and Wang, W. X.:
Characteristics of ambient volatile organic compounds and the influence of
biomass burning at a rural site in Northern China during summer 2013, Atmos.
Environ., 124, 156–165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Open burning of rice, corn and wheat straws: primary emissions, photochemical aging, and secondary organic aerosol formation</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Agricultural residues are among the most abundant biomass burned globally,
especially in China. However, there is little information on primary
emissions and photochemical evolution of agricultural residue burning. In
this study, indoor chamber experiments were conducted to investigate primary
emissions from open burning of rice, corn and wheat straws and their
photochemical aging as well. Emission factors of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>,
SO<sub>2</sub>, 67 non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs), particulate matter (PM),
organic aerosol (OA) and black carbon (BC) under ambient dilution conditions
were determined. Olefins accounted for  &gt;  50 % of the total speciated
NMHCs emission (2.47 to 5.04 g kg<sup>−1</sup>), indicating high ozone formation
potential of straw burning emissions. Emission factors of PM (3.73 to
6.36 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) and primary organic carbon (POC, 2.05 to
4.11 gC kg<sup>−1</sup>), measured at dilution ratios of 1300 to 4000, were lower
than those reported in previous studies at low dilution ratios, probably due
to the evaporation of semi-volatile organic compounds under high dilution
conditions. After photochemical aging with an OH exposure range of
(1.97–4.97)  ×  10<sup>10</sup> molecule cm<sup>−3</sup> s in the chamber, large amounts of secondary organic aerosol (SOA)
were produced with OA mass enhancement ratios (the mass ratio of total OA to
primary OA) of 2.4–7.6. The 20 known precursors could only explain
5.0–27.3 % of the observed SOA mass, suggesting that the major
precursors of SOA formed from open straw burning remain unidentified. Aerosol
mass spectrometry (AMS) signaled that the aged OA contained less hydrocarbons
but more oxygen- and nitrogen-containing compounds than primary OA, and
carbon oxidation state (OS<sub>c</sub>) calculated with AMS resolved O ∕ C
and H ∕ C ratios increased linearly (<i>p</i>  &lt;  0.001) with OH exposure
with quite similar slopes.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, G., Flores, J. M., Abo Riziq, A., Borrmann, S., and Rudich, Y.:
Chemical, physical, and optical evolution of biomass burning aerosols: a case
study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1491–1503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1491-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Elemental analysis of
organic species with electron ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 79, 8350–8358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071150w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071150w</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Decarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy,
J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O ∕ C and
OM ∕ OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 42, 4478–4485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S.,
Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and
domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 4039–4072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Sandradewi, J., Weimer, S.,
Lanz, V. A., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Identification
of the mass spectral signature of organic aerosols from wood burning
emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 5770–5777, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062289b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es062289b</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Alves, N. d. O., Brito, J., Caumo, S., Arana, A., Hacon, S. d. S., Artaxo,
P., Hillamo, R., Teinila, K., Batistuzzo de Medeiros, S. R., and
Vasconcellos, P. d. C.: Biomass burning in the Amazon region: Aerosol source
apportionment and associated health risk assessment, Atmos. Environ., 120,
277–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.059</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from
biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001382</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P., Longo,
K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking Rain Clouds over the Amazon,
Science, 303, 1337–1342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092779" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092779</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Arnold, S. R., Emmons, L. K., Monks, S. A., Law, K. S., Ridley, D. A.,
Turquety, S., Tilmes, S., Thomas, J. L., Bouarar, I., Flemming, J., Huijnen,
V., Mao, J., Duncan, B. N., Steenrod, S., Yoshida, Y., Langner, J., and Long,
Y.: Biomass burning influence on high-latitude tropospheric ozone and
reactive nitrogen in summer 2008: a multi-model analysis based on POLMIP
simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6047–6068,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6047-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6047-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Betha, R., Zhang, Z., and Balasubramanian, R.: Influence of trans-boundary
biomass burning impacted air masses on submicron particle number
concentrations and size distributions, Atmos. Environ., 92, 9–18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.002</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Nelson, S. M., Woo, J. H., and
Klimont, Z.: A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon
emissions from combustion, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D14203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003697</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kaercher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S.,
Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Borras, E. and Tortajada-Genaro, L. A.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from the photo-oxidation of benzene, Atmos. Environ., 47, 154–163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.020</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Brassard, P., Palacios, J. H., Godbout, S., Bussieres, D., Lagace, R.,
Larouche, J. P., and Pelletier, F.: Comparison of the gaseous and particulate
matter emissions from the combustion of agricultural and forest biomasses,
Bioresour. Technol., 155, 300–306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.027</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Brito, J., Rizzo, L. V., Morgan, W. T., Coe, H., Johnson, B., Haywood, J.,
Longo, K., Freitas, S., Andreae, M. O., and Artaxo, P.: Ground-based aerosol
characterization during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA)
field experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12069–12083,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12069-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bruns, E. A., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Kilic, D., Klein, F.,
Baltensperger, U., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Identification of significant
precursor gases of secondary organic aerosols from residential wood
combustion, Sci. Rep., 6, 27881, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27881</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Bruns, E. A., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., Kilic, D., Klein, F., Dommen, J.,
Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A.
S. H.: Characterization of gas-phase organics using proton transfer reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometry: fresh and aged residential wood combustion
emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 705–720,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-705-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-705-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H.,
Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K.
R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass
spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, G., Zhang, X., Gong, S., and Zheng, F.: Investigation on emission
factors of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants from crop residue
burning, J. Environ. Sci., 20, 50–55, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60007-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60007-8</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: Reactivity estimates for selected consumer product
compounds, Air resources Board, California, Contract No. 06-408, 72–99,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, A. W. H., Kautzman, K. E., Chhabra, P. S., Surratt, J. D., Chan, M. N.,
Crounse, J. D., Kürten, A., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from photooxidation of naphthalene
and alkylnaphthalenes: implications for oxidation of intermediate volatility
organic compounds (IVOCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3049–3060,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3049-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, A. W. H., Chan, M. N., Surratt, J. D., Chhabra, P. S., Loza, C. L.,
Crounse, J. D., Yee, L. D., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Role of aldehyde chemistry and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> concentrations in secondary organic
aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7169–7188,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7169-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., Engling, G., He, K.-B., Duan, F.-K., Ma, Y.-L., Du, Z.-Y., Liu,
J.-M., Zheng, M., and Weber, R. J.: Biomass burning contribution to Beijing
aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7765–7781,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7765-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7765-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., Engling, G., Moosmaller, H., Arnott, W. P., Chen, L. W. A., Wold,
C. E., Hao, W. M., and He, K. B.: Light absorption by biomass burning source
emissions, Atmos. Environ., 127, 347–354,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.045</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Chhabra, P. S., Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L.
M., Worsnop, D. R., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Elemental composition
and oxidation of chamber organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8827–8845,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8827-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8827-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Christian, T. J., Yokelson, R. J., Cárdenas, B., Molina, L. T., Engling,
G., and Hsu, S.-C.: Trace gas and particle emissions from domestic and
industrial biofuel use and garbage burning in central Mexico, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 565–584, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-565-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-565-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner,
M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E.,
Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W.,
Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J.
L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in
aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle morphology and density characterization by combined mobility
and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
38, 1185–1205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290903907</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Deng, W., Liu, T., Zhang, Y., Situ, S., Hu, Q., He, Q., Zhang, Z., Lü,
S., Bi, X., Wang, X., Boreave, A., George, C., Ding, X., and Wang, X.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from photo-oxidation of toluene with
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>: Chamber simulation with purified air versus urban
ambient air as matrix, Atmos. Environ., 150, 67–76,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.047</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Dhammapala, R., Claiborn, C., Jimenez, J., Corkill, J., Gullett, B., Simpson,
C., and Paulsen, M.: Emission factors of PAHs, methoxyphenols, levoglucosan,
elemental carbon and organic carbon from simulated wheat and Kentucky
bluegrass stubble burns, Atmos. Environ., 41, 2660–2669,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.023</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Shen, R.-Q., Yu, Q.-Q., Zhang, Y.-Q., Xin, J.-Y., Wen,
T.-X., and Wang, X.-M.: Spatial and seasonal variations of isoprene secondary
organic aerosol in China: Significant impact of biomass burning during
winter, Sci. Rep., 6, 20411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20411</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Zhang, Y.-Q., He, Q.-F., Yu, Q.-Q., Shen, R.-Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang,
Z., Lyu, S.-J., Hu, Q.-H., Wang, Y.-S., Li, L.-F., Song, W., and Wang, X.-M.:
Spatial and seasonal variations of secondary organic aerosol from terpenoids
over China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 14661–14678,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025467" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025467</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, X., Zhang, Y.-Q., He, Q.-F., Yu, Q.-Q., Wang, J.-Q., Shen, R.-Q., Song,
W., Wang, Y.-S., and Wang, X.-M.: Significant increase of aromatics-derived
secondary organic aerosol during fall to winter in China, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 51, 7432–7441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06408</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Du, Q., Zhang, C., Mu, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Song, M., Tian, D.,
Liu, P., Liu, J., Xue, C., and Ye, C.: An important missing source of
atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: Domestic coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 8720–8727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl070075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl070075</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Duncan, B. N., Bey, I., Chin, M., Mickley, L. J., Fairlie, T. D., Martin, R.
V., and Matsueda, H.: Indonesian wildfires of 1997: Impact on tropospheric
chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003195" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003195</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation): Emissions of methane
and nitrous oxide from the on-site combustion of crop residues, available at:
<a href="http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/G1/GB/E" target="_blank">http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/G1/GB/E</a>, last access: 6 April 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, S., Xu, Y., and Jia, L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from ethyne
in the presence of NaCl in a smog chamber, Environ. Chem., 13, 699–710,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/en15155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/en15155</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, S., Xu, Y., and Jia, L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from
propylene irradiations in a chamber study, Atmos. Environ., 157, 146–155,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.019</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Giordano, M. R., Short, D. Z., Hosseini, S., Lichtenberg, W., and Asa-Awuku,
A. A.: Changes in droplet surface tension affect the observed hygroscopicity
of photochemically aged biomass burning aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
10980–10986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401867j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es401867j</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Gómez Alvarez, E., Borras, E., Viidanoja, J., and Hjorth, J.: Unsaturated
dicarbonyl products from the OH-initiated photo-oxidation of furan,
2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1603–1612,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.019</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Laboratory
investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from wood fires
2: analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
2227–2240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2227-2009</a>, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Grieshop, A. P., Logue, J. M., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Laboratory investigation of photochemical oxidation of organic aerosol from
wood fires 1: measurement and simulation of organic aerosol evolution, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 1263–1277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1263-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1263-2009</a>, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, D., Wu, C. Y., Hsu, Y. M., Stormer, J., Engling, G., Capeto, K., Wang,
J., Brown, S., Li, H. W., and Yu, K. M.: PAHs, carbonyls, VOCs and PM<sub>2.5</sub>
emission factors for pre-harvest burning of Florida sugarcane, Atmos.
Environ., 55, 164–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.034</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Hatch, L. E., Yokelson, R. J., Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Simpson, I.
J., Blake, D. R., Orlando, J. J., and Barsanti, K. C.: Multi-instrument
comparison and compilation of non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass
burning and implications for smoke-derived secondary organic aerosol
precursors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1471–1489,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, P. L., Ortega, A. M., Cubison, M. J., Froyd, K. D., Zhao, Y., Cliff,
S. S., Hu, W. W., Toohey, D. W., Flynn, J. H., Lefer, B. L., Grossberg, N.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglueck, B., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Holloway, J. S.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., De Gouw, J. A., Massoli, P., Zhang, X., Liu,
J., Weber, R. J., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Isaacman, G., Worton, D.
R., Kreisberg, N. M., Goldstein, A. H., Thalman, R., Waxman, E. M., Volkamer,
R., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H.,
Dusanter, S., Griffith, S., Stevens, P. S., Brioude, J., Angevine, W. M., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena,
California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9233–9257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50530</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Kroll, J. H., Jimenez, J. L., Docherty, K. S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Aiken, A. C., Chen, Q., Martin, S. T., Farmer, D. K., and Artaxo, P.: A
simplified description of the evolution of organic aerosol composition in the
atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L08803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042737</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Engelhart, G. J., May, A. A., Presto, A.
A., Lee, T., Sullivan, A. P., McMeeking, G. R., Coe, H., Wold, C. E., Hao,
W.-M., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J., Schichtel, B. A., Collett
Jr., J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Chemical and physical
transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass
burning emissions in an environmental chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
7669–7686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7669-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Henry, K. M., Lohaus, T., and Donahue, N. M.: Organic aerosol yields from
<i>α</i>-pinene oxidation: bridging the gap between first-generation yields
and aging chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 12347–12354,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302060y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es302060y</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Heringa, M. F., DeCarlo, P. F., Chirico, R., Tritscher, T., Dommen, J.,
Weingartner, E., Richter, R., Wehrle, G., Prévôt, A. S. H., and
Baltensperger, U.: Investigations of primary and secondary particulate matter
of different wood combustion appliances with a high-resolution time-of-flight
aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5945–5957,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5945-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5945-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: High formation of
secondary organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of toluene, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2973–2986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2973-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Hossain, A., Park, S., Kim, J. S., and Park, K.: Volatility and mixing states
of ultrafine particles from biomass burning, J. Hazard. Mater., 205,
189–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.061</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Hosseini, S., Urbanski, S. P., Dixit, P., Qi, L., Burling, I. R., Yokelson,
R. J., Johnson, T. J., Shrivastava, M., Jung, H. S., Weise, D. R., Miller, J.
W., and Cocker, D. R.: Laboratory characterization of PM emissions from
combustion of wildland biomass fuels, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
9914–9929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50481" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50481</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R. J., Zhang, Y. L., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y. M.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga,
A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An,
Z. S., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and Prevot, A. S. H.:
High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze
events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, X., Ding, A., Liu, L., Liu, Q., Ding, K., Niu, X., Nie, W., Xu, Z.,
Chi, X., Wang, M., Sun, J., Guo, W., and Fu, C.: Effects of aerosol-radiation
interaction on precipitation during biomass-burning season in East China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10063–10082,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Shen, H. Z., Chen, Y. L., Zhong, Q. R., Chen, H., Wang, R., Shen,
G. F., Liu, J. F., Li, B. G., and Tao, S.: Global organic carbon emissions
from primary sources from 1960 to 2009, Atmos. Environ., 122, 505–512,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.017</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., Yan, Q., Zhang, Z., and Wang, X.: Real-time monitoring
of respiratory absorption factors of volatile organic compounds in ambient
air by proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry, J. Hazard.
Mater., 320, 547–555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.064</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Mohr, C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M.,
Ziemann, P. J., Onasch, T. B., and Jimenez, J. L.: Chemically-resolved
volatility measurements of organic aerosol from different sources, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 5351–5357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803539d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803539d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Hennigan, C. J., Pye, H. O. T., Pouliot, G.,
Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Unspeciated organic
emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary
organic aerosol budget in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
10473–10478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323740111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, L. and Xu, Y.: Ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation from
Ethylene-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-NaCl irradiations under different relative humidity
conditions, J. Atmos. Chem., 73, 81–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9317-1</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Jolleys, M. D., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Capes, G., Allan, J. D., Crosier, J.,
Williams, P. I., Allen, G., Bower, K. N., Jimenez, J. L., Russell, L. M.,
Grutter, M., and Baumgardner, D.: Characterizing the aging of biomass burning
organic aerosol by use of mixing ratios: a meta-analysis of four regions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 13093–13102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302386v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es302386v</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Kim Oanh, N. T., Ly, B. T., Tipayarom, D., Manandhar, B. R., Prapat, P.,
Simpson, C. D., and Sally Liu, L. J.: Characterization of particulate matter
emission from open burning of rice straw, Atmos. Environ., 45, 493–502,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Kim Oanh, N. T., Tipayarom, A., Bich, T. L., Tipayarom, D., Simpson, C. D.,
Hardie, D., and Sally Liu, L. J.: Characterization of gaseous and
semi-volatile organic compounds emitted from field burning of rice straw,
Atmos. Environ., 119, 182–191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W. and Novakov, T.: Controlled generation of black carbon
particles from a diffusion flame and applications in evaluating black carbon
measurement methods, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1874–1888,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.067</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Remer, L. A., and Martins, J. V.: Measurement of
the effect of Amazon smoke on inhibition of cloud formation, Science, 303,
1342–1345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089424" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089424</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna, M.
R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S., and
Bluhm, H.: Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.948</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Slowik, J. G., Wong, J. P. S.,
Abbatt, J. P. D., Brune, W. H., Ng, N. L., Wright, J. P., Croasdale, D. R.,
Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Characterization of
aerosol photooxidation flow reactors: heterogeneous oxidation, secondary
organic aerosol formation and cloud condensation nuclei activity
measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 445–461,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-445-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-445-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown
carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Wang, X., Ye, X., Wang, L., Yang, X., Kan, H.,
Donaldson, D. J., and Mellouki, A.: Evolution of biomass burning smoke
particles in the dark, Atmos. Environ., 120, 244–252,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Hu, Y., Zhang, F., Chen, J., Ma, Z., Ye, X., Yang, X., Wang, L.,
Tang, X., Zhang, R., Mu, M., Wang, G., Kan, H., Wang, X., and Mellouki, A.:
Multi-pollutant emissions from the burning of major agricultural residues in
China and the related health-economic effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
4957–4988, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Bo, Y., and Xie, S. D.: Estimating emissions from crop residue open
burning in China based on statistics and MODIS fire products, J. Environ.
Sci., 44, 158–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.08.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.08.024</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Q., Li, X. H., Jiang, J. K., Duan, L., Ge, S., Zhang, Q., Deng, J. G.,
Wang, S. X., and Hao, J. M.: Semi-coke briquettes: towards reducing emissions
of primary PM<sub>2.5</sub>, particulate carbon, and carbon monoxide from household
coal combustion in China, Sci. Rep., 6, 19306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19306</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. G., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., Hao, J., Li, C., Chen, Y. S., and Yang, L.:
Particulate and trace gas emissions from open burning of wheat straw and corn
stover in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6052–6058,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0705137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0705137</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. H., Wang, S. X., Duan, L., and Hao, J. M.: Characterization of
non-methane hydrocarbons emitted from open burning of wheat straw and corn
stover in China, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044015,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044015</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Liao, C. P., Wu, C. Z., Yan, Y. J., and Huang, H. T.:
Chemical elemental characteristics of biomass fuels in China, Biomass Bioenergy, 27, 119–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.01.002</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, Y. B., Tan, Y., and Turpin, B. J.: Chemical insights, explicit
chemistry, and yields of secondary organic aerosol from OH radical oxidation
of methylglyoxal and glyoxal in the aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
8651–8667, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8651-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Lipsky, E. M. and Robinson, A. L.: Effects of dilution on fine particle mass
and partitioning of semivolatile organics in diesel exhaust and wood smoke,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 155–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es050319p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es050319p</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, C., Zhang, C., Mu, Y., Liu, J., and Zhang, Y.: Emission of volatile
organic compounds from domestic coal stove with the actual alternation of
flaming and smoldering combustion processes, Environ. Pollut., 221, 385–391,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.089</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Peng, W., Klimont,
Z., Qiu, X., Zhang, S., Hu, M., Lin, W., Smith, K. R., and Zhu, T.: Air
pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated
ambient pollution source, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 7756–7761,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604537113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604537113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, T., Wang, X., Deng, W., Hu, Q., Ding, X., Zhang, Y., He, Q., Zhang, Z.,
Lü, S., Bi, X., Chen, J., and Yu, J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation
from photochemical aging of light-duty gasoline vehicle exhausts in a smog
chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9049–9062,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9049-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. X., Zhang, Y., Huey, L. G., Yokelson, R. J., Wang, Y., Jimenez, J.
L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Beyersdorf, A. J., Blake, D. R., Choi, Y., St Clair,
J. M., Crounse, J. D., Day, D. A., Diskin, G. S., Fried, A., Hall, S. R.,
Hanisco, T. F., King, L. E., Meinardi, S., Mikoviny, T., Palm, B. B.,
Peischl, J., Perring, A. E., Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Sachse, G.,
Schwarz, J. P., Simpson, I. J., Tanner, D. J., Thornhill, K. L., Ullmann, K.,
Weber, R. J., Wennberg, P. O., Wisthaler, A., Wolfe, G. M., and Ziemba, L.
D.: Agricultural fires in the southeastern US during SEAC<sup>4</sup>RS: Emissions
of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and
organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 7383–7414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025040</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, M., Tritscher, T., Juranyi, Z., Heringa, M. F., Sierau, B.,
Weingartner, E., Chirico, R., Gysel, M., Prevot, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U.,
and Lohmann, U.: Hygroscopic properties of fresh and aged wood burning
particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 56, 15–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.006</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T., Collett,
J. L., Jr., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass
burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11327–11338, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
May, A. A., Lee, T., McMeeking, G. R., Akagi, S., Sullivan, A. P., Urbanski,
S., Yokelson, R. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Observations and analysis of
organic aerosol evolution in some prescribed fire smoke plumes, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 6323–6335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6323-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6323-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
McMurry, P. H. and Grosjean, D.: Gas and aerosol wall losses in Teflon film
smog chambers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 1176–1182,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00142a006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00142a006</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, M., Anderson, B. E., Beyersdorf, A. J., Crawford, J. H., Diskin,
G. S., Eichler, P., Fried, A., Keutsch, F. N., Mikoviny, T., Thornhill, K.
L., Walega, J. G., Weinheimer, A. J., Yang, M., Yokelson, R. J., and
Wisthaler, A.: In situ measurements and modeling of reactive trace gases in a
small biomass burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3813–3824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3813-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3813-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Nakao, S., Clark, C., Tang, P., Sato, K., and Cocker III, D.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from phenolic compounds in the absence of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10649–10660,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10649-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10649-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
NBSPRC (National bureau of statistics of people's republic of China): China Energy
Statistical Yearbook 2013, China Stat. Press, Beijing, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
NBSPRC (National bureau of statistics of people's republic of China): The statistical
communiqu on national economy and social development in 2015, available at:
<a href="http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201602/t20160229_1323991.html" target="_blank">http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201602/t20160229_1323991.html</a> (last
access: 27 September 2017), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from <i>m</i>-xylene,
toluene, and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3909–3922,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich,
I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy,
S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D.
R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from
Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J.
H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging
inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Ulbrich, I. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Real-Time Methods for estimating organic cComponent mass
concentrations from aerosol mass spectrometer data, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 910–916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102951k</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Ni, H. Y., Han, Y. M., Cao, J. J., Chen, L. W. A., Tian, J., Wang, X. L.,
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Wang, Q. Y., Wang, P., Li, H., and Huang, R. J.:
Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open
burning of crop residues in China, Atmos. Environ., 123, 399–406,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.007</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Niu, H. Y., Cheng, W. J., Hu, W., and Pian, W.: Characteristics of individual
particles in a severe short-period haze episode induced by biomass burning in
Beijing, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 7, 1072–1081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.011</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Cubison, M. J., Brune, W. H., Bon, D., de Gouw, J.
A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation and primary
organic aerosol oxidation from biomass-burning smoke in a flow reactor during
FLAME-3, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11551–11571,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11551-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11551-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, X., Kanaya, Y., Tanimoto, H., Inomata, S., Wang, Z., Kudo, S., and Uno,
I.: Examining the major contributors of ozone pollution in a rural area of
the Yangtze River Delta region during harvest season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
6101–6111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6101-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6101-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Presto, A. A., Miracolo, M. A., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Robinson, A.
L., and Donahue, N. M.: Intermediate-volatility organic compounds: A
potential source of ambient oxidized organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
43, 4744–4749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es803219q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es803219q</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Real, E., Law, K. S., Weinzierl, B., Fiebig, M., Petzold, A., Wild, O.,
Methven, J., Arnold, S., Stohl, A., Huntrieser, H., Roiger, A., Schlager, H.,
Stewart, D., Avery, M., Sachse, G., Browell, E., Ferrare, R., and Blake, D.:
Processes influencing ozone levels in Alaskan forest fire plumes during
long-range transport over the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
D10S41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007576" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007576</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Sanchis, E., Ferrer, M., Calvet, S., Coscolla, C., Yusa, V., and
Cambra-Lopez, M.: Gaseous and particulate emission profiles during controlled
rice straw burning, Atmos. Environ., 98, 25–31,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.062</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, O., Artaxo, P., Arnott, W. P., Chand, D., Gatti, L. V., Frank, G. P.,
Hoffer, A., Schnaiter, M., and Andreae, M. O.: Spectral light absorption by
ambient aerosols influenced by biomass burning in the Amazon Basin. I:
Comparison and field calibration of absorption measurement techniques, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 3443–3462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3443-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, O., Karg, E., Hagen, D. E., Whitefield, P. D., and Ferron, G. A.: On
the effective density of non-spherical particles as derived from combined
measurements of aerodynamic and mobility equivalent size, J. Aerosol Sci.,
38, 431–443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.01.002</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Shahid, I., Kistler, M., Mukhtar, A., Cruz, C. R. S., Bauer, H., and Puxbaum,
H.: Chemical composition of particles from traditional burning of Pakistani
wood species, Atmos. Environ., 121, 35–41,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.041</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Shakya, K. M. and Griffin, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol from
photooxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
44, 8134–8139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es1019417" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es1019417</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Easter, R. C., Liu, X. H., Zelenyuk, A., Singh, B., Zhang,
K., Ma, P. L., Chand, D., Ghan, S., Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, Q., Fast, J.,
Rasch, P. J., and Tiitta, P.: Global transformation and fate of SOA:
Implications of low-volatility SOA and gas-phase fragmentation reactions, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 4169–4195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022563</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Spracklen, D. V., Jimenez, J. L., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Evans, M.
J., Mann, G. W., Zhang, Q., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J., Coe, H.,
McFiggans, G., Rap, A., and Forster, P.: Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint
on the global secondary organic aerosol budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
12109–12136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12109-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12109-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Stockwell, C. E., Yokelson, R. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Robinson, A. L.,
DeMott, P. J., Sullivan, R. C., Reardon, J., Ryan, K. C., Griffith, D. W. T.,
and Stevens, L.: Trace gas emissions from combustion of peat, crop residue,
domestic biofuels, grasses, and other fuels: configuration and Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR) component of the fourth Fire Lab at Missoula
Experiment (FLAME-4), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9727–9754,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Stockwell, C. E., Veres, P. R., Williams, J., and Yokelson, R. J.:
Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop
residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction
time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 845–865,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Stockwell, C. E., Christian, T. J., Goetz, J. D., Jayarathne, T., Bhave, P.
V., Praveen, P. S., Adhikari, S., Maharjan, R., DeCarlo, P. F., Stone, E. A.,
Saikawa, E., Blake, D. R., Simpson, I. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Panday, A.
K.: Nepal Ambient Monitoring and Source Testing Experiment (NAMaSTE):
emissions of trace gases and light-absorbing carbon from wood and dung
cooking fires, garbage and crop residue burning, brick kilns, and other
sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11043–11081,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11043-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11043-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Woo, J. H., and Carmichael, G. R.: Biomass
burning in Asia: Annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1099, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002040</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Takekawa, H., Minoura, H., and Yamazaki, S.: Temperature dependence of
secondary organic aerosol formation by photo-oxidation of hydrocarbons,
Atmos. Environ., 37, 3413–3424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00359-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00359-5</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Tariq, S., ul-Haq, Z., and Ali, M.: Satellite and ground-based remote sensing
of aerosols during intense haze event of October 2013 over lahore, Pakistan,
Asia-Pac, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 25–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-015-0084-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-015-0084-3</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Tkacik, D. S., Robinson, E. S., Ahern, A., Saleh, R., Stockwell, C., Veres,
P., Simpson, I. J., Meinardi, S., Blake, D. R., Yokelson, R. J., Presto, A.
A., Sullivan, R. C., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: A dual-chamber
method for quantifying the effects of atmospheric perturbations on secondary
organic aerosol formation from biomass burning emissions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 122, 6043–6058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025784" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025784</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, A. M., Witte, J. C., Hudson, R. D., Guo, H., Herman, J. R., and
Fujiwara, M.: Tropical tropospheric ozone and biomass burning, Science, 291,
2128–2132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5511.2128" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5511.2128</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, H., Zhao, D., and Wang, Y.: Emission inventories of atmospheric
pollutants discharged from biomass burning in China, Acta Sci. Circumst., 31,
349–357, 2011 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Tiitta, P., Leskinen, A., Hao, L., Yli-Pirilä, P., Kortelainen, M.,
Grigonyte, J., Tissari, J., Lamberg, H., Hartikainen, A., Kuuspalo, K.,
Kortelainen, A.-M., Virtanen, A., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Komppula, M., Pieber,
S., Prévôt, A. S. H., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Czech, H.,
Zimmermann, R., Jokiniemi, J., and Sippula, O.: Transformation of logwood
combustion emissions in a smog chamber: formation of secondary organic
aerosol and changes in the primary organic aerosol upon daytime and nighttime
aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13251–13269,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13251-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13251-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Tsigaridis, K., Daskalakis, N., Kanakidou, M., Adams, P. J., Artaxo, P.,
Bahadur, R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Benedetti, A.,
Bergman, T., Berntsen, T. K., Beukes, J. P., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin,
M., Curci, G., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Gong, S. L., Hodzic,
A., Hoyle, C. R., Iversen, T., Jathar, S., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, J. W.,
Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D., Kokkola, H., Lee, Y. H., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo,
G., Ma, X., Mann, G. W., Mihalopoulos, N., Morcrette, J.-J., Müller,
J.-F., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ng, N. L., O'Donnell, D., Penner, J.
E., Pozzoli, L., Pringle, K. J., Russell, L. M., Schulz, M., Sciare, J.,
Seland, Ø., Shindell, D. T., Sillman, S., Skeie, R. B., Spracklen, D.,
Stavrakou, T., Steenrod, S. D., Takemura, T., Tiitta, P., Tilmes, S., Tost,
H., van Noije, T., van Zyl, P. G., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Wang, Z., Wang,
Z., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.: The
AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845–10895,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H., Lou, S., Huang, C., Qiao, L., Tang, X., Chen, C., Zeng, L., Wang,
Q., Zhou, M., Lu, S., and Yu, X.: Source profiles of volatile organic
compounds from biomass burning in Yangtze River Delta, China, Aerosol Air
Qual. Res., 14, 818–828, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.05.0174</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X. and Wu, T.: Release of isoprene and monoterpenes during the aerobic
decomposition of orange wastes from laboratory incubation experiments,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3265–3270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es702999j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es702999j</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Liu, T., Bernard, F., Ding, X., Wen, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., He,
Q., Lü, S., Chen, J., Saunders, S., and Yu, J.: Design and
characterization of a smog chamber for studying gas-phase chemical mechanisms
and aerosol formation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 301–313,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-301-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-301-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, D. E., Susott, R. A., Kauffman, J. B., Babbitt, R. E., Cummings, D. L.,
Dias, B., Holben, B. N., Kaufman, Y. J., Rasmussen, R. A., and Setzer, A. W.:
Smoke and fire characteristics for cerrado and deforestation burns in Brazil:
BASE-B Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 14601–14619,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01218</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Weimer, S., Alfarra, M. R., Schreiber, D., Mohr, M., Prevot, A. S. H., and
Baltensperger, U.: Organic aerosol mass spectral signatures from wood-burning
emissions: Influence of burning conditions and wood type, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D10304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009309" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009309</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Weitkamp, E. A., Sage, A. M., Pierce, J. R., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A.
L.: Organic aerosol formation from photochemical oxidation of diesel exhaust
in a smog chamber, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6969–6975,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070193r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es070193r</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Yee, L. D., Kautzman, K. E., Loza, C. L., Schilling, K. A., Coggon, M. M.,
Chhabra, P. S., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P., Crounse, J. D.,
Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic
aerosol formation from biomass burning intermediates: phenol and
methoxyphenols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8019–8043,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8019-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Yi, Z. G., Wang, X. M., Sheng, G. Y., Zhang, D. Q., Zhou, G. Y., and Fu, J.
M.: Soil uptake of carbonyl sulfide in subtropical forests with different
successional stages in south China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D08302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008048</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Yokelson, R. J., Christian, T. J., Karl, T. G., and Guenther, A.: The
tropical forest and fire emissions experiment: laboratory fire measurements
and synthesis of campaign data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3509–3527,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Yokelson, R. J., Burling, I. R., Urbanski, S. P., Atlas, E. L., Adachi, K.,
Buseck, P. R., Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Toohey, D. W., and Wold, C. E.:
Trace gas and particle emissions from open biomass burning in Mexico, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 6787–6808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6787-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6787-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Ye, X., Cheng, T., Chen, J., Yang, X., Wang, L., and Zhang, R.: A
laboratory study of agricultural crop residue combustion in China: Emission
factors and emission inventory, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8432–8441,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.015</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Hu, D., Chen, J., Ye, X., Wang, S. X., Hao, J. M., Wang, L.,
Zhang, R., and An, Z.: Particle size distribution and polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons emissions from agricultural crop residue burning, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 5477–5482, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es1037904" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es1037904</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Ng, N. L.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y. L.: Understanding atmospheric organic aerosols
via factor analysis of aerosol mass spectrometry: a review, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem., 401, 3045–3067, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5355-y</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Guo, H., Wang, X. M., Simpson, I. J., Barletta, B., Blake, D.
R., Meinardi, S., Rowland, F. S., Cheng, H. R., Saunders, S. M., and Lam, S.
H. M.: Emission patterns and spatiotemporal variations of halocarbons in the
Pearl River Delta region, southern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
D15309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013726</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Wang, X. M., Blake, D. R., Li, L. F., Zhang, Z., Wang, S. Y.,
Guo, H., Lee, F. S. C., Gao, B., Chan, L. Y., Wu, D., and Rowland, F. S.:
Aromatic hydrocarbons as ozone precursors before and after outbreak of the
2008 financial crisis in the Pearl River Delta region, south China, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd017356</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y. L., Hennigan, C. J., May, A. A., Tkacik, D. S., de Gouw, J. A.,
Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Borbon, A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Intermediate-volatility organic compounds: A large source of secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13743–13750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5035188</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y. H., Yang, L. X., Chen, J. M., Wang, X. F., Xue, L. K., Sui, X., Wen,
L., Xu, C. H., Yao, L., Zhang, J. M., Shao, M., Lu, S. H., and Wang, W. X.:
Characteristics of ambient volatile organic compounds and the influence of
biomass burning at a rural site in Northern China during summer 2013, Atmos.
Environ., 124, 156–165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.097</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
