<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-12475-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Sub-micrometer refractory carbonaceous particles in the polar stratosphere</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sub-micrometer refractory carbonaceous particles in the polar stratosphere}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K. Sch\"{u}tze et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Schütze</surname><given-names>Katharina</given-names></name>
          <email>schuetze@geo.tu-darmstadt.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>James Charles</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weinbruch</surname><given-names>Stephan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Benker</surname><given-names>Nathalie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ebert</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Günther</surname><given-names>Gebhard</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4111-6221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Weigel</surname><given-names>Ralf</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-0292</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Borrmann</surname><given-names>Stephan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-9380</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institut für Angewandte Geowissenschaften, Technische
Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Johannes
Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of
Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute for Energy and Climate Research (IEK-7), Research Center
Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Partikelchemie, Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Katharina Schütze (schuetze@geo.tu-darmstadt.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>October</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>12475</fpage><lpage>12493</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Eleven particle samples collected in the polar
stratosphere during SOLVE (SAGE III Ozone loss and validation experiment)
from January until March 2000 were characterized in detail by
high-resolution transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM/SEM)
combined with energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis. A total of 4202
particles (TEM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3872; SEM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 330) were analyzed from these samples, which were
collected mostly inside the polar vortex in the altitude range between 17.3
and 19.9 km. Particles that were volatile in the microscope beams contained
ammonium sulfates and hydrogen sulfates and dominated the samples. Some
particles with diameters ranging from 20 to 830 nm were refractory in the
electron beams. Carbonaceous particles containing additional elements to C
and O comprised from 72 to 100 % of the refractory particles. The rest
were internal mixtures of these materials with sulfates. The median number
mixing ratio of the refractory particles, expressed in units of particles
per milligram of air, was 1.1 (mg air)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and varied between 0.65 and
2.3 (mg air)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
    <p>Most of the refractory carbonaceous particles are completely amorphous, a
few of the particles are partly ordered with a graphene sheet separation
distance of 0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 nm (mean value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation).
Carbon and oxygen are the only detected major elements with an atomic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio of 0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07. Minor elements observed include Si, S, Fe, Cr
and Ni with the following atomic ratios relative to C: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.010 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.011; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
0.0007 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0015; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.0052 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0074; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.0012 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0017; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.0006 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0011 (all mean values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation).</p>
    <p>High-resolution element distribution images reveal that the minor elements
are distributed within the carbonaceous matrix; i.e., heterogeneous
inclusions are not observed. No difference in size, nanostructure and
elemental composition was found between particles collected inside and
outside the polar vortex.</p>
    <p>Based on chemistry and nanostructure, aircraft exhaust, volcanic emissions
and biomass burning can certainly be excluded as sources. The same is true
for the less probable but globally important sources: wood burning, coal
burning, diesel engines and ship emissions.</p>
    <p>Recondensed organic matter and extraterrestrial particles, potentially
originating from ablation and fragmentation, remain as possible sources of
the refractory carbonaceous particles studied. However, additional work is
required in order to identify the sources unequivocally.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The chemistry of stratospheric aerosols has been studied for more than half
a century (Junge et al., 1961; Junge, 1963), and it was discovered that
sulfur is the main element in the particles. Junge and Manson (1961)
supposed the particles to consist of ammonium sulfate, and Bigg et al. (1970) suggested sulfuric acid with varying amounts of ammonia.
Rosen (1971) strengthened the evidence for the material to be sulfuric acid as
most of the material evaporated at the temperature expected for this
substance. According to Bigg (1975), the majority of the particles is
composed of sulfuric acid with varying amounts of ammonium sulfate. A
comprehensive summary of stratospheric aerosol and sulfur chemistry is given
by Kremser et al. (2016).</p>
      <p>In addition to the dominating sulfur-rich particles (sulfuric acid,
sulfates), refractory particles were reported frequently. Dense,
mineral-rich particles presumably originating from the eruption of the Mt.
Agung volcano were observed by Mossop (1963, 1965) using scanning electron
microscopy. However, due to the lack of instrumentation, the chemistry of
the particles could not be investigated. Refractory particles with diameters
&gt; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m were studied in more detail by Zolensky and
Mackinnon (1985), and several particle groups were distinguished: chondrite,
silicate, aluminum (Al), aluminum with variable amounts of other elements,
iron (Fe) with or without sulfate (S), calcium (Ca)–Al silicates and
“other” particles. The silicate particles were dominant and interpreted to
be volcanic, probably from the Mt. St. Helens eruption in 1980. In contrast
to prior findings, a large number of refractory stratospheric particles were
recognized by Zolensky et al. (1989). The particles they analyzed had
diameters of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The authors assumed that
this increase was caused by solid rocket exhaust or the re-entry of debris
associated to human space flight activity (inoperative satellites, burnt out
rocket stages, tools, etc.). According to Sheridan et al. (1994)
approximately 97 % of all analyzed stratospheric particles were sulfuric
acid. Also non-sulfate materials, soot, other C-rich substances and crustal
material were detected. Carbonaceous aerosol was found to contribute to the
aerosol population at all latitudes in the stratosphere and interplanetary
dust was significantly abundant above 30 km for particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Renard et al., 2008). Della Corte et al. (2013) found
calcium-oxygen (CaO)-rich particles probably originating from a bolide that
penetrated the Earth's atmosphere. Single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS)
brought new insights into the chemistry of stratospheric particles (e.g.,
Murphy et al., 1998, 2007, 2013). The method is capable to measure particles
in the size range of 120 nm–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (with a very low detection
efficiency for particles &lt; 20 nm; Murphy et al., 2007). According
to these authors, stratospheric particles are dominated by pure sulfuric
acid, sulfuric acid internally mixed with material from ablated meteoroids,
and mixtures of organic-sulfate particles. A recent SEM study by Ebert et al. (2016) focused on refractory particles in the late winter stratospheric
polar vortex. The main particle groups encountered included Fe-rich,
Si-rich, Ca-rich, metal mixtures and carbon (C)/Si-rich particles.</p>
      <p>Refractory particles in the UT/LS (upper troposphere/lower stratosphere)
can act as condensation nuclei for cirrus clouds (Kojima et al., 2004, 2005;
Cziczo et al., 2013) and as surfaces for heterogeneous chemical reactions in
the polar stratosphere which play a significant role in polar ozone
depletion (e.g., Peter, 1997; Solomon, 1999; Peter and Grooß, 2012). In
addition, the particles can serve as surfaces for the heterogeneous
condensation of saturated gases in the polar stratosphere (Saunders et al.,
2010, 2012; Voigt et al., 2005). Due to the acidic environment, the particles
can (partially) dissolve in the acidic solution droplets (binary
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O or ternary HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and, thus,
change their freezing properties. Therefore, the dissolved particles in a
ternary HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O solution could have an important
impact on the formation of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs). As gaseous
compounds will condense on refractory particles, they will grow, both in
size and mass, which leads to a change in their sedimentation velocity
(Fromm et al., 2000; Jost et al., 2004). Therefore, the gaseous compounds can
both be redistributed in the stratospheric region and sediment out more
quickly.</p>
      <p>There are multiple sources which contribute to the stratospheric refractory
particle load. Interplanetary dust particles are considered to be the major
component of refractory material (Murphy et al., 1998, 2007; Plane, 2012).
Another important source of stratospheric refractory particles is volcanic
eruptions, which may either eject material directly into the stratosphere
(Vernier et al., 2011) or lead to particle transport through the tropical
transition layer (TTL) (Mattis et al., 2010). Further potential sources of
stratospheric refractory particles are high-flying aircraft (Fahey et al.,
1995; Pueschel et al., 1997; Petzold et al., 1999), rockets (Newman et al.,
2001), ablated material from meteorites (Hunten et al., 1980; Turco et al.,
1981; Murphy et al., 1998; Cziczo et al., 2001) and all kinds of terrestrial
material being lifted and entrained into the stratosphere by the
Brewer–Dobson circulation (Holton et al., 1995; Austin and Li, 2006). As the
frequency of particle emissions from the listed sources is highly variable,
the individual contribution of the various sources is, in general, not
quantifiable.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sampling conditions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="28.452756pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling con-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ditions date<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(yyyy-mm-dd_no.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sample in vortex/out of vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Characteristics  of flight<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>nitrogen-con-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>taining PSCs <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>sampled</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PV at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(PVU)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Altitude (km)/<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>pressure (hPa)/ <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>potential tem-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>perature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(K)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CPC aerosol <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>number mix-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ing ratio, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>number per <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>milligram of air (mg air)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, age of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>air</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-01-20_07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PSC survey<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/PSCs sampled</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.7/57/433</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">not available</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">165 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.3 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-01-20_11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">B <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PSC survey<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>/PSCs sampled</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.4/60/431</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">not available</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">171 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.2 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-01-23_18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">vortex, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>sunrise/PSCs sampled</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.8/56/438</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">153 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.5 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-01-27_15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">D <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>out of vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">edge survey/no PSCs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.9/56/448</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">227 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>3.6 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-01-31_18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">E <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">vortex <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>survey/PSCs sampled</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.7/59/437</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">171 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.2 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-02-02_19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">vortex<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>survey/PSC unknown</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.6/68/425</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">167 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.3 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-02-03_15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">G <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">multiple level/PSCs sampled</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.4/83/400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">209 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>3.7 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-02-26_12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">H <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">vortex <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>survey/no PSCs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.1/62/430</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">143 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.6 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-02-26_14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">vortex <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>survey/no PSCs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.3/64/431</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">137 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.7 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-03-05_19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">J <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">vortex survey <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>PSC unknown</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.2/64/424</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">150 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.5 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000-03-11_19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">K <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>in vortex</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">vortex edge <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>PSCs unknown</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.7/66/430</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">136 ppbv <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.7 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> According to Newman et al. (2002). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> During sampling. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> No particles out of PSCs were analyzed. PV: potential
vorticity; PVU: potential vorticity unit
(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>In summary, a variety of different refractory particle types is observed in
the stratosphere. Due to the still limited number of sampling and
measurement campaigns, the occurrence as well as the sources of refractory
particles is not known precisely. The present paper first aims at improving
the database on the observed particle groups. Second, it is attempted to
infer potential sources by a detailed characterization using high-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
and energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Sampling</title>
      <p>Stratospheric particles were sampled on board of the NASA ER-2 aircraft
during the SAGE III Ozone loss and validation experiment (SOLVE), which was
conducted in January–March 2000 in Kiruna (Sweden). The Multi-Sample Aerosol
Collection System (MACS) (Kojima et al., 2004), a thin-plate low-pressure
impactor, was used for sampling. The particles were deposited on TEM copper
(Cu) grids covered with a formvar film. MACS is designed to collect up to 23
samples per flight. The first sample is not exposed to flow and serves as a
blank sample. The MACS was designed to sample and transmit all particles in
the diameter range from 20 to 1000 nm to the impactor. Particles larger than
approximately 20 nm are collected on the impactor in the pressure range
shown in Table 1. In situ measurements of aerosol abundance were obtained
with a condensation particle counter (Wilson et al., 1983) simultaneously
with the samples. Sampling date, flight characteristics, potential vorticity
(PV), pressure altitude, pressure, potential temperature and ambient aerosol
number mixing ratio (particles per milligram of air) for the analyzed
samples are shown in Table 1. In situ detection of nitrogen oxides on
particles (Fahey et al., 2001) was used to determine if samples were
collected when the aircraft was in polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs)
containing nitrogen. Measurements of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O provide insight into the
residence time of the air parcel in the stratosphere, called age of air
(Wilson et al., 2008). These values are also shown in Table 1.</p>
      <p>The meteorological conditions of the early winter (November–January)
northern hemispheric polar vortex of 1999/2000 are described in detail by
Manney and Sabutis (2000). The early winter (November–January) northern
hemispheric polar vortex of 1999/2000 had much lower averaged temperatures
compared to any previously observed Arctic winter. The vortex was weaker
than the early winter polar vortices of the previous years. It was
discontinuous in the middle of December, with a large extent in the upper
and small extent in the lower stratosphere. During the period of airborne
measurement operations, from mid-January on, the vortex evolved to be
continuous and stable until mid-March (Greenblatt et al., 2002). Jost et al. (2002) describe anomalous single mixing events occurring during that time at
the potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range of 350–500 K. These events are
probably the result of mixing between deep vortex and extra vortex air.</p>
      <p>The stratospheric particle samples (deposited on TEM grids) taken within the
polar vortex were packed into single plastic boxes and stored in a
desiccator prior to analysis, starting in 2014. Based on the investigation
of blank samples, contamination of the samples during the time of storage
(e.g., by vapors from the plastic boxes) can be excluded. Furthermore, a
change in particle morphology and nanostructure is not expected, since the
particles found are either amorphous or show very little ordering. This
conclusion is based on the fact that graphitization of carbonaceous material
is an irreversible process (Diessel et al., 1978; Itaya, 1981; Pesquera and
Velasco, 1988). In any case, it should be kept in mind that other parameters
(chemical composition, mixing state) may be changed to a variable extent by
aging. In total, 122 samples from 15 sampling days were collected.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Electron microscopy</title>
      <p>A total of 4202 particles (3872 TEM; 330 SEM) from 11 samples were
investigated by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. The samples
were selected according to meteorological conditions and suitability for
electron microscopy (i.e., substrate area covered by particles). Table 2
gives an overview of how many particles were investigated with which method.</p>
      <p>The objective of this study is the detailed characterization of refractory
stratospheric particles. Similar to Ebert et al. (2016), we have classified
all particles that are stable (no visible morphological change) under the
high-vacuum conditions and electron beam excitation in the SEM and TEM as
refractory.</p>
      <p>The size, morphology, mixing state, nanostructure and chemical composition
of 60 refractory particles per sample were studied by TEM using a Philips
CM20 instrument (FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) operated at 200 kV
electron accelerating voltage. The chemical composition of the particles
(all elements with an atomic number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was determined by EDX using
a silicon-drift X-ray detector (Oxford Instruments, Oxfordshire, United
Kingdom) and a measurement time of 20 s. Particle size and graphene
sheet separation distance were analyzed by the ImageJ software (1.48v;
Rasband, 1997–2016). Element
distribution images were acquired with a JEOL JEM 2100F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan)
operated in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) mode at an
electron acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The instrument is equipped with the
same type of EDX detector as the Philips CM20 instrument.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Overview of particle parameters investigated.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="71.13189pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="42.679134pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="28.452756pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Information</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>particles investigated</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Applied in <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>figure/ <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>table</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Method</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Size, morphology,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>chemical composition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">529</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fig. 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TEM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mixing state,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>morphology</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3316</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nanostructure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table 4,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Fig. 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Distribution of <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>elements within <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>the particles</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fig. 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">STEM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Size, morphology, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>chemical composition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">330</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Figs. 3, 4, 6, and 8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SEM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sum of total<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>particles</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4202</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In order to detect elements present at low abundance, additional 30
refractory particles per sample were analyzed by SEM using a Quanta 200 FEG
instrument (FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) equipped with an EDX detector
(EDAX, Tilburg, the Netherlands) operated at 15 kV electron accelerating
voltage. X-ray spectra were accumulated over 15 min per particle to
obtain a low detection limit. These long exposures were not feasible in the
TEM due to its higher beam energy and resulting particle evaporation.
Element concentrations were obtained from the X-ray count rates by applying
a “standard-less” ZAF correction. Detection limits of element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon
ratios (at % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> at %) for the long-time measurements are as follows:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0034; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0010; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0008; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0008; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0009; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0011.</p>
      <p>The particles were studied by TEM and SEM without coating.</p>
      <p>Potential contamination of the samples was checked by investigating blanks
(samples transported in the MACS but not exposed to stratospheric air
flowing through the impactor orifice) for each sampling day. A few titanium
(Ti) and zinc (Zn) oxide particles, as well as few pure C particles were
encountered on the blank samples. They look similar to some carbonaceous
particles being described as contaminants on TEM grids (Harris et al.,
2001). However, these particles are different in both size and morphology
compared to the carbonaceous particles observed in the impaction spot of the
samples.</p>
      <p>In order to verify that the small amounts of Fe, chromium (Cr) and nickel
(Ni) detected during long-term SEM measurements are not artifacts from the
substrate, five points on each substrate far away from particles were
analyzed. These three elements were not detected in the measurements of the
clean substrates.</p>
      <p>Another artifact can result from scattered radiation within the SEM. This
could lead to the detection of chemical elements in the vacuum chamber's
housing material. To test this possibility, one sample was measured at
larger sample chamber pressures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 200 and 500 Pa) which result
in increased scattering of beam electrons in the sample chamber. According
to Stokes (2008), scattering varies between 40 and 80 % at 200 Pa and 70 and 98 % at 500 Pa. Fe, Cr, and Ni did not show increased concentrations
at higher pressure, but rather their count rates decreased. The small Fe, Cr
and Ni concentrations detected in individual particles were not the result
of stray radiation.</p>
      <p>The elemental composition of the particles was determined by EDX in TEM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">529</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as SEM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">330</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Due to the small size of the particles,
TEM is the preferred method of analysis. As mentioned above, particles were
additionally analyzed by SEM. Both measurements led to small but systematic
differences in the ratios of O, Si, S, Mg (magnesium), Fe and Al to C. For
example, the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is 0.236 for TEM and 0.117 for SEM (Figs. S1
and S2 of the Supplement). For all elements TEM-EDX yielded
somewhat higher elemental ratios relative to carbon than SEM-EDX. These
differences most likely result from differences in the detectors, such as
thickness of detector windows, and the different acceleration voltages (15 kV in SEM versus 200 kV in TEM). However, as the differences are small
(Fig. S2 of the Supplement), our conclusions are independent of
the method used. SEM-EDX data are reported here since the counting time on
each particle was much longer in SEM (15 min) than in TEM (20 s),
leading to higher precision as well as lower detection limits. The much
lower detection limits of SEM-EDX are important for source identification as
minor elements may serve as fingerprint for several anthropogenic and
natural sources. Thus, the SEM-EDX data are preferred despite the lower
number of particles investigated with this technique. In addition, the
chemical composition of particles could not be analyzed by TEM-EDX on two
samples (labeled as G and K) due to the inappropriate position of the
impaction spot on the substrate (too close to the Cu grid, leading to a very
high count rate for Cu).</p>
      <p>In order to assess the mixing state of the refractory particles, additional
image analysis was performed in TEM. For this purpose image series before
and after TEM analysis were prepared.</p>
      <p>All particles which showed no signs of destruction or morphological change
were defined as refractory. Particles which changed under the electron beam
were deemed volatile, allowing quantification of the fraction of aerosol
which is volatile. In total 3316 particles were analyzed by this method.</p>
      <p>To ensure unbiased results, the individual images as well as particles for
EDX analysis were randomly taken in inner and outer areas of the impaction
spot.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p>Censored box plots show data taking into account the fraction of values below
detection limit. Lower and upper quartiles appear as a box, and minimum and
maximum values as whiskers.</p>
      <p>The differences in element ratios between samples collected inside and
outside the vortex were tested with the generalized Wilcoxon test (Helsel,
2012) applying a significance level of 5 %. Furthermore, the differences
in size, projected area diameter and element ratios between the various
samples were tested with the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test (uncensored data)
and the generalized Wilcoxon test (censored data). In all individual tests,
a significance level of 5 % was applied.</p>
      <p>The detection limits for EDX data were calculated from counting statistics
(background counts plus 3 times standard deviation of background
counts).</p>
      <p>All statistical calculations were performed with R (version 3.3.0; R Core
Team, 2016) and using the contributed package NADA (version 1.5–6; Lee,
2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>All collected particles are located within a characteristic impaction spot
having a diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. As TEM bright-field
images show (Fig. 1), volatile particles (initially deposited as droplets)
cover a relatively larger area compared to refractory particles. They show
high abundances of sulfur and oxygen. Sometimes, a minor nitrogen peak is
also observed in the X-ray spectra. These particles are highly unstable
under electron bombardment. They most likely consist of ammonium
sulfate/hydrogen sulfate and formed from sulfuric/nitric acid. As the
presence of sulfates in stratospheric samples is well known (e.g., Sheridan
et al., 1994; Arnold et al., 1998; Murphy et al., 2007; Kremser et al.,
2016), these particles are not investigated further. In addition to the
sulfates, carbonaceous particles stable under electron bombardment are
frequently observed either as individual particles or embedded in the
sulfates (Figs. 1 and 2).</p>
      <p>As the refractory carbonaceous particles in Fig. 2a have no distinct shape
and surface morphology, only one TEM image is shown.</p>
      <p>Given the size of the refractory particles and the performance of the
impactor, all similar particles in the sampled air were likely delivered to
the impactor and collected there. Since the amount of air drawn through the
impactor is known, the atmospheric abundance of these particles can be
estimated from the number of particles in the impactor sample. That number
was estimated from electron micrographs sampling the impaction spot and the
size if the impaction spot. The ambient number mixing ratio of the
refractory carbonaceous particles varies between 0.65 and
2.3 (mg air)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a median for all samples of 1.1 (mg air)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table 1). When compared with CPC measurements in Table 1, the carbonaceous
particles comprised a few percent of the total number of particles in the
air.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>TEM analysis of the size distribution of the particles</title>
      <p>The size distribution of the refractory carbonaceous particles is indicated
in Fig. 3. Approximately 98 % of the particles have an equivalent
projected area diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pa</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below 500 nm (range 20–830 nm). The
size of the particles slightly increases with time during the campaign;
sample J shows the largest median particle sizes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>TEM bright-field image of a typical sample (sample I;
17.3 km altitude), before <bold>(a)</bold> and after evaporation <bold>(b)</bold>. Particles
evaporating under electron bombardment are marked with blue circles. They
consist of sulfates/hydrogen sulfates. Red circles indicate stable
carbonaceous particles. Green circles show refractory carbonaceous particle
internally mixed with volatile sulfates/hydrogen sulfates.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>TEM bright-field image <bold>(a)</bold> of a typical refractory
carbonaceous particle from sample H (19.1 km altitude). The image is
representative of all refractory carbonaceous particles. The morphology is
not depending on chemical composition, size, morphology or nanostructure.
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectra of <bold>(a)</bold> a typical refractory carbonaceous
particle with Fe, Cr and Ni, <bold>(c)</bold> Fe and Cr, <bold>(d)</bold> Fe and <bold>(e)</bold> without any other
minor constitute. The particle predominantly consists of C and O. Minor
amounts of Si are always present and may partly be an artifact of the
substrate. Cu is an artifact from the TEM grid. K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> denote different X-ray peaks
emitted from the same element.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=193.47874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Box plot of particle size (equivalent projected area
diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pa</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lower and upper quartiles appear as a box, and minimum and
maximum values as whiskers.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>SEM analysis of the chemical composition of the refractory carbonaceous particles</title>
      <p>Besides C, the refractory carbonaceous particles always contain O and Si
(Figs. 2, 4 and 5), and in most cases also S. The element Si may at least
partly be an artifact of the substrate. The S X-ray peak in EDX spectra
originates either from sulfates internally mixed with the carbonaceous
particles or from stray radiation. Please note that the heights of the
individual peaks in Fig. 2 are not proportional to the element
concentrations but give a rough estimate of the element abundance. The
elements Cr, Fe, and Ni are often found as minor components (Fig. 4). These
three elements exclusively occur within the carbonaceous matrix, and are not
abrasion products from ice particles hitting the aerosol inlet as the
metallic particles described by Murphy et al. (2004) and Martinsson et al. (2014). Furthermore, none of the samples was collected during the existence
of ice particles which could potentially remove material from the impactors'
inlet. During collection of samples A, B, E and G, polar stratospheric cloud
particles (PSCs) containing oxides of nitrogen, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, were abundant. As
we found the refractory carbonaceous particles in all samples independent of
the occurrence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, they are not artifacts from the removal of
material from the inlet system. As the TEM substrates are made of a formvar
foil predominantly consisting of C, O, and traces of Si, these three
elements may – at least partly – be an artifact of the substrate. However,
there are three points of evidence which clearly show that the refractory
carbonaceous particles observed are not an artifact of the substrate:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p>Much higher carbon X-ray count rates were obtained when measuring particles
compared to the pure substrate.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Graphene sheets within the particles were observed by high-resolution TEM.
In contrast, the substrate is always completely amorphous.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>The refractory carbonaceous particles only occur within the impaction spot.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>The refractory carbonaceous particles have a different morphology than the
few carbonaceous particles found on blank samples. In addition, the
carbonaceous particles encountered on blank samples are often much larger
with a size of several micrometers. Please note that a different foil with
much higher O and Si contents was used for sample K. Thus this sample was
excluded from Figs. 4, 6 and 8. The TEM grids consist of Cu, leading to
strong Cu X-ray peaks in the spectra (Fig. 2). Consequently, Cu is
excluded from the further analysis and discussion. Mg is only present in a
few particles. S is the major component of the volatile material surrounding
the carbonaceous particles. Fe is found as a minor element in the majority
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 %), Cr in about 87 % and Ni in about 49 % of
refractory particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Median chemical subcomposition (atom %, without C and
O) of refractory carbonaceous particles determined by SEM-EDX (30 particles
per sample). Sample K was excluded from the figure due to a different
substrate with higher Si content.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>STEM image (upper left) and element distribution images
of a refractory carbonaceous particle from sample C (19.8 km altitude).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The spatial distribution of minor elements within the carbonaceous particles
was investigated by element distribution images in STEM (Fig. 5) with a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">256</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">256</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixel resolution as well as by measuring several points on the same
particle. With both approaches it is possible to obtain highly resolved
information on the spatial distribution of elements within a nanometer-scale
particle. C is the most abundant element and is found in the whole particle.
The elements O, Si, Cr and Fe only occur in some regions of the particles.
The element Al is only detected in few particles. Due to the low number of
X-ray counts, the distribution of Mg and Ni is difficult to assess. S seems
to occur in the whole particle and is assumed to come from stray radiation
of the surrounding sulfates. The heterogeneous element distribution was also
observed in multiple point measurements (up to 20 points on one particle).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Absolute number of refractory particles as a function of
particle group.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle group</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col12" align="center">Sample </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">B</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">F</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">G</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">H</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">J</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">K</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C, O, Si</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cr, Fe, Ni</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cr, Fe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Based on elemental composition, the refractory carbonaceous particles
(number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">330</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were classified into four groups (Table 3). Only a few
particles consist of C, O, and Si only. Many particles contain additional
Cr, Fe and Ni (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or Cr and Fe (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Particles only
containing additional Fe are rare (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Please note that the element S
was not used for particle classification, because this element is found in
most spectra, either due to scattering from surrounding volatile particles
or because the refractory carbonaceous particles are embedded in sulfates.</p>
      <p>Element ratios relative to C (at % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> at %) are shown in Fig. 6 for all
samples. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio varies between 0.052 and 0.129. The median
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios vary between 0.003 and 0.012, but may be influenced by the
substrate. For all other elements, the respective median ratios are
generally very low (&lt; 0.005). Sample K is not shown due to the
different substrate used (with lower C and higher Si content). The
differences between the various samples are for all element ratios
statistically significant on the 5 % level. Most obvious, sample G has
lower element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratios than the other samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Censored box plots of element ratios relative to C (atom %) determined by SEM-EDX (30 particles per sample). Sample K is not shown
due to the different substrate used. Lower and upper quartiles appear as a
box, and minimum and maximum values as whiskers. Values below detection limit
(horizontal line) are not shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>TEM analysis of the particle nanostructure</title>
      <p>The nanostructure was investigated by high-resolution TEM. All particles are
either completely amorphous (Fig. 7a, b) or show only very small regions
(fewer than 10 graphene sheets) with ordering (Fig. 7c, d). In the latter
case, the graphene sheet separation distance was determined (Table 4). As
these measurements are very time-consuming, only 23 particles from 5 samples
were investigated. The graphene sheet separation distance varies between
0.19 and 0.60 nm, the mean values of different grains between 0.25 and
0.47 nm. This range is slightly larger than typically observed for soot (Vander
Wal et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011; Liati et al., 2014; Weinbruch et al.,
2016).</p>
      <p>All samples, with the exception of one (sample D), were collected inside the
polar vortex. Element ratios of the samples inside and outside the vortex
are compared in Fig. 8. There are no statistically significant differences
on the 5 % level in element ratios and particle size (Fig. 3) between
these two cases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>High-resolution TEM image of individual refractory
carbonaceous particles from sample G (17.4 km altitude): <bold>(a, b)</bold> completely
amorphous particles and <bold>(c, d)</bold> particles showing small regions with ordering.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p>Graphene sheet separation distance.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Separation distance (nm) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">minimum–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">maximum</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35–0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23–0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33–0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35–0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37–0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32–0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.34–0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33–0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C-7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35–0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.34–0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37–0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G-3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38–0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G-4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.40–0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G-5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.36–0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G-6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19–0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G-7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38–0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31–0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.24–0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I-3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.25–0.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I-4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23–0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I-5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.44–0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I-6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28–0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I-7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32–0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sample-particle</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Occurrence of refractory carbonaceous particles in the
stratosphere</title>
      <p>We find that all of the refractory particles are carbonaceous and typically
contain minor amounts of Fe, Cr and Ni distributed within the particles.
Most of the refractory carbonaceous particles are not included in or coated
by sulfate. This is surprising, as the particles were sampled in air having
low abundance of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and therefore long residence times in the
stratosphere (Table 1). Therefore, one would expect that all refractory
particles occurring in the polar stratosphere are covered by sulfuric or
nitric acid. The low abundance of refractory particles internally mixed with
sulfates contradicts expectations based on the models by Mills et
al. (2005)
as well as the findings of Sheridan et al. (1994) and Murphy et al. (2013),
which suggest that most or all stratospheric refractory particles should be
embedded in or coated with sulfuric acid. The results of our study can
partly be explained by the evaporation of the sulfate component in the
electron beam prior to its identification. The mixing state of the
refractory carbonaceous particles may also be caused by splattering of
volatile material of previously internally mixed refractory/volatile
material. However, the reason for most of the refractory carbonaceous
particles to be externally mixed remains open.</p>
      <p>Refractory carbonaceous particles in the polar stratosphere were identified
in several earlier studies (discussed below). Depending on the applied
technique different terms were used for such particles. In the present
contribution the following nomenclature is used: all particles consisting
predominantly of the element carbon are termed carbonaceous; i.e., only the
chemical composition is used for classification. The term soot is used for
agglomerates of primary particles (20–50 nm size) predominantly
consisting of carbon which show a specific, onion-shell-like nanostructure
(Buseck et al., 2012). Black carbon (BC) is used for particles strongly
absorbing light in a wide spectrum of the visible wavelength (Petzold et
al., 2013) with at least 5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at a wavelength of 550 nm (Bond
et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Censored box plots of element ratios (atom %) relative
to C, separately for outside and inside the polar vortex. Sample K was
excluded from the analysis due to the different substrate used. Lower and
upper quartiles appear as a box, and minimum and maximum values as whiskers.
Values below detection limit (horizontal line) are not shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/12475/2017/acp-17-12475-2017-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Soot in the stratosphere was previously identified by scanning and
transmission electron microscopy in accordance with the nomenclature
outlined above (Pueschel et al., 1992 (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2–0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m),
1997 (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m); Sheridan et al., 1994 (diameter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m); Blake and Kato, 1995 (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m); Strawa et al., 1999 (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3–0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m); Ebert
et al., 2016 (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)). Carbonaceous particles
(diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) which might be soot although they
were not unequivocally identified as such, due to the lack of high-resolution images, were found by Chuan and Woods (1984). Testa et al. (1990)
found seven poorly graphitized carbon particles in their samples and
regarded them as artifacts of carbon films from the TEM grids. As they did
not provide images of these particles, they cannot be compared to our
findings. However, we can exclude that our particles are substrate
contaminants, since such particles did not occur on the blank samples. In
addition, the refractory carbonaceous particles were only observed within
the impaction spot and not on the clean substrate.</p>
      <p>Carbonaceous particles partly containing heterogeneous metallic inclusions
were found by Chen et al. (1998) (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). Some of
these particles were called soot without providing a more precise
description. Thus, it is not clear if they are similar to particles we
identified as soot. According to these authors, the “soot particles” most
likely stem from aircraft exhaust, as the samples were – at least partly –
collected in the exhaust of an aircraft in the lower stratosphere.</p>
      <p>Mixed carbon–sulfur particles were observed by Nguyen et al. (2008)
(diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) at 10 km altitude between 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. These particles were assumed to have formed from condensed
organic matter. The differences between these particles and those found in
the current study might result from differences in sampling altitudes and
regions. Therefore we cannot totally exclude the particles to be different,
taking into account that the particles might have evolved from condensed
organic matter. However, we do not know if secondary organic particles
become refractory as a result of atmospheric processes.</p>
      <p>Stratospheric carbonaceous particles were also often detected by means of
mass spectrometry (MS). For example, Murphy et al. (1998, 2013) identified
carbonaceous particles, with a lower abundance in the stratosphere compared
to the upper troposphere (Murphy et al., 2013; diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3–0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m; tropics and midlatitudes). The same group (Murphy et al., 2007)
reported the presence of a small fraction of carbonaceous particles
(diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 nm) within the stratosphere. As some of these particles
contained potassium, they were assumed to originate from biomass burning.
Particles from rocket and space shuttle exhaust (collected in the
stratosphere) were investigated by Cziczo et al. (2002) with the same
instrument. In solid-fuel rocket exhaust (Athena rocket and space shuttle
boosters) the most frequent observed signals stem from different aluminum
oxide species (often with minor amounts of Fe). About 17 % of the
particles (Athena rocket) were classified as carbonaceous as compared to
1 % from space shuttle exhaust. In principle, the carbonaceous particles
found by MS could be similar to the carbonaceous particles of the present
study. Since MS does not yield images of the particle morphology or
information on the nanostructure, no definite conclusion can be drawn.</p>
      <p>Stratospheric carbonaceous particles were also identified by optical
measurements. For example, a single-particle soot photometer (SP2) was
applied by Baumgardner et al. (2004) (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) on
board of an aircraft in order to identify ozone loss processes in the polar
vortex. In total, 60 % of the light absorbing particles incandesce at
temperatures above 3500 K and are, thus, interpreted as BC. According to
Baumgardner et al. (2004) these particles originate from tropospheric
sources rather than aircraft emissions. The same technique was applied by
Schwarz et al. (2006) (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15–0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) to identify BC in
midlatitudes from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere. Only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % of the particles were classified as BC and no potential source was
specified.</p>
      <p>Local enhancements of carbonaceous material at altitudes around 25 km were
also deduced from simultaneous measurements of a spectrometer on board a
satellite as well as from radiance and particle counter data (Renard et al.,
2008) (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) obtained on a stratospheric
balloon. This material was thought to be injected into the stratosphere by
the pyro-convective effect (i.e., fire-started or fire-added convection).
Some of the particles with submicron size were supposed to originate from
vaporized interplanetary material (Renard et al., 2008). Due to the lack of
information on morphology, chemistry and microstructure of the particles, a
direct comparison of the carbonaceous material deduced from optical
measurements with the particles encountered in the present study is not
possible.</p>
      <p>In the present study, only carbonaceous particles and sulfates were observed
similar to previous findings (Pueschel et al., 1992; Blake and Kato, 1995;
Strawa et al., 1999; Nguyen et al., 2008). There are, however, several
previous publications which describe the presence of a variety of other
refractory particle groups in addition to carbonaceous particles. These
additional particle groups include metallic particles (Chuan and Woods,
1984; Sheridan et al., 1994; Chen et al., 1998; Baumgardner et al., 2004;
Ebert et al., 2016), meteoritic particles (Murphy et al., 1998, 2007, 2013;
Renard et al., 2008, Ebert et al., 2016), silicates (Testa et al., 1990;
Ebert et al., 2016), crustal-type particles (Sheridan et al., 1994; Chen et
al., 1998), and Ca-bearing particles (Della Corte et al., 2013; Ebert
et al., 2016).</p>
      <p>In summary, the sole occurrence of refractory carbonaceous particles and
sulfates in stratospheric samples was reported in previous literature but
seems to be uncommon. The median number mixing ratio (1.1 mg air<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
carbonaceous particles is smaller by an order of magnitude than the
abundance of non-volatile particles reported by, e.g., Weigel et al. (2014)
for measurements in the winter stratospheric polar vortex in 2003, 2010 and
2011. The method described by Weigel et al. involves exposure of particles
to a temperature &gt; 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and determination (with a
CPC) of the number of particles that did not evaporate to sizes below the
detection limit of the CPC. They concluded that up to 80 % of the
particles present were non-volatile by this criterion. Following our
definition only a few percent of the SOLVE particles are non-volatile in the
electron microscope. This discrepancy may be caused by the different
definitions of a non-volatile particle.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Potential sources</title>
      <p>The most likely sources of refractory carbonaceous particles found in the
current study include aircraft emissions, extraterrestrial sources, rocket
exhaust and explosive volcanic eruptions as these sources emit material
directly into the stratosphere. In addition, biomass burning can be
considered as a possible source, as it was shown by several authors that
large fires have sufficient energy to inject particles into the lower
stratosphere (Fromm et al., 2000, 2006; Siebert et al., 2000; Fromm and
Servranckx, 2003; Jost et al., 2004; Siddaway et al., 2011). Domestic wood
burning, coal combustion, diesel engines and ship exhaust are not expected
to significantly contribute to the stratospheric particle load. However, as
these sources emit large amounts of carbonaceous material on a global scale
(Bond et al., 2004; Gaffney and Marley, 2009; Corbett and Koehler, 2003;
Lauer et al., 2007), they will be discussed shortly. For example, Thornberry
et al. (2010) show that tropical tropospheric particles contain high amounts
of thermostable carbonaceous material, and it is possible that these
particles become mixed within stratospheric air. Although the vertical
exchange may be less effective than the direct injection processes, however,
it is conceivable that fractions of carbonaceous aerosol material released
in the troposphere are vertically transported into the stratosphere by
processes such as tropical convection (and lifted further via the
Brewer–Dobson circulation), cyclogeneses, warm conveyor belts, tropopause
folds and/or isentropic transport.</p>
      <p>Most particle groups discussed in the following were collected close to
their emission source. We are aware of the fact that particles collected in
the polar stratosphere may in principle change their properties during their
atmospheric lifetime. However, ordering of carbonaceous material is an
irreversible process leading always to a higher degree of ordering (Diessel
et al., 1978; Itaya, 1981; Pesquera and Velasco, 1988). As most of the
particles analyzed show no or only very little ordering, it is assumed that
the particles did not change their nanostructure during their atmospheric
lifetime. On the other hand, several electron microscopy studies describe
soot particles in the stratosphere (Pueschel et al., 1992, 1997; Sheridan et
al., 1994; Strawa et al., 1999; Ebert et al., 2016). Thus, it can be
expected that soot particles – once injected into the stratosphere – do not
change their typical nanostructure under stratospheric conditions.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Aircraft exhaust</title>
      <p>High-flying aircraft can contribute significantly to the stratospheric
aerosol burden. Soot is described as the main particulate exhaust component
(Twohy and Gandrud, 1998; Popovitcheva et al., 2000; Smekens et al., 2005;
Vander Wal et al., 2010; Liati et al., 2014). The observed soot consisted of
primary particles 10–50 nm in diameter which formed aggregates with
diameters of up to approximately 450 nm (Twohy and Gandrud, 1998;
Popovitcheva et al., 2000; Smekens et al., 2005; Liati et al., 2014). The
nanostructure of the primary particles varied from an onion-shell structure
with partial ordering (Popovitcheva et al., 2000; Vander Wal et al., 2010)
to completely amorphous (Twohy and Gandrud, 1998). The mean graphene sheet
separation distance of the partly ordered primary particles varied between
0.36 and 0.41 nm (Vander Wal et al., 2010; Liati et al., 2014). An atomic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.32 was reported by Vander Wal et al. (2010). The elements S,
Na (sodium), N (nitrogen), Zn (zinc), Ba (barium), Cl (chlorine), K
(potassium), Fe and Si were detected in minor concentrations (Vander Wal et
al., 2010; Mazaheri et al., 2013). In addition to soot agglomerates, single
carbon spheres were found by Mazaheri et al. (2013) in aircraft exhaust. The
particles have diameters between 5 and 100 nm with a median of 35.4 nm. Besides
C, minor O, S, Cl, K, Fe and Si were detected by TEM-EDX and proton-induced
X-ray emission (PIXE) analysis. Aircraft exhaust is excluded as a source of
the carbonaceous particles encountered in the present study, as we did not
observe soot agglomerates. In addition, the chemistry and morphology
(basically rounded shapes) of the single carbon particles described by
Mazaheri et al. (2013) are different from our particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Extraterrestrial particles</title>
      <p>With an input of 5–270 t per day (Plane, 2012), extraterrestrial material
is expected to be the major source of refractory stratospheric particles
(Murphy et al., 1998, 2007). Carbonaceous material is observed in chondrites
(dominant meteorite fraction) as well as in interplanetary dust particles
(IDPs).</p>
      <p>In carbonaceous chondrites, a variety of different carbonaceous constituents
is described in previous literature. For example, nanometer-sized
carbon-rich flakes, spheres and tubes as well as hollow carbon-rich
nanospheres were found (Garvie and Buseck, 2004; Garvie, 2006; Garvie et
al., 2008). Most carbonaceous nanospheres are amorphous. Besides C, the only
other elements detected are S, N and O. Carbonaceous material in
carbonaceous chondrites was also investigated by Aoki and Akai (2008).
Different morphologies like “ribbon-film-like carbonaceous material”,
“spherical carbonaceous globules”, “concentric-sphere-type carbon
material”, and “featureless carbon material” were observed. They also
describe the occurrence of minor amounts of Cl in many of these particles,
an element never observed in our study. Neither morphology nor shape or
chemical composition of the particles described above matches the refractory
carbonaceous particles encountered in the present study. Carbon
nanoparticles with diameters between 2 and 10 nm were observed in carbonaceous
material isolated from the Allende carbonaceous chondrite (Harris et al.,
2000). The particles had either a single outer wall or were surrounded by
multiple walls. However, as the particles were mobile under the electron
beam, no photographs are shown. A comparison to our particles is thus
impossible. Since the authors did not find any other elements except C, most
of our particles differ in chemical composition as they contain Fe, Cr,
and/or Ni as minor elements.</p>
      <p>Carbonaceous material was also found in IDPs (Matrajt et al., 2012). Some of
the material observed is similar in size, morphology and nanostructure to
our particles. However, in Matrajt et al. (2012) minor elements were not
investigated and this parameter cannot be compared.</p>
      <p>In summary, the carbonaceous components observed in chondrites differ in
chemical composition from most of our particles. Carbonaceous material
contained in IDPs cannot be excluded as a source of the refractory particles
encountered in the present study, as the minor element concentration of the
former is not known. However, if we expect extraterrestrial material to be
the major source of our particles, we would also expect to find Mg-rich
silicates in our samples, which was not the case. Furthermore, the
occurrence of Fe, Cr and Ni as minor elements in our refractory carbonaceous
particles is regarded as hint for an anthropogenic origin. This
interpretation is supported by the fact that the observed average atomic
ratios of these three elements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.249, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.167, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
1.145) are significantly higher than the cosmic element ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
0.015, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.056, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.278; Palme and Jones, 2005).</p>
      <p>The chemical composition of extraterrestrial material may be strongly
fractionated by frictional heating during atmospheric entry (e.g.,
Carrillo-Sánchez et al., 2016; Gómez- Martin et al., 2017). The
processes taking place during atmospheric entry include ablation by
sputtering and thermal evaporation as well as fragmentation. Meteorite
ablation particles usually occur as iron, glass or silicate spheres (e.g.,
Blanchard et al., 1980; Murrell et al., 1980). Submicrometer refractory
carbonaceous particles resulting from meteoric ablation and fragmentation
have – to the best of our knowledge – not been described in previous
literature. However, it is conceivable that such particles originate from
carbonaceous material contained in meteorites or interplanetary dust
particles. The observed non-chondritic ratios of the minor elements Fe, Cr
and Ni are not a strong argument against such an origin, as the volatility of
these elements depends on the minerals in which they are contained. Most of
extraterrestrial Fe occurs as metal, silicate or oxide, most of Ni as metal
(Papike, 1998). Cr may occur as oxide, sulfide or nitride as well as a
minor component in metal and silicates (Bunch and Olsen, 1975). Depending on
the relative abundance of the different mineral phases, substantial
fractionation during evaporation can be expected (see also Floss et al.,
1996). In summary, meteoric ablation and fragmentation particles are a
possible source of the particles encountered in the present study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Rocket exhaust</title>
      <p>Rocket exhaust is also a possible source of stratospheric particles.
However, literature on particles emitted by rockets is sparse (e.g., Zolensky
et al., 1989), and there are – to the best of our knowledge – no studies
available on carbonaceous particles by electron microscopy. According to
Ross and Sheaffer (2014), five different propellant types which use a
combination of different oxidizers and fuels are in use: O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> kerosene,
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>ClO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Al, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> solid hydrocarbons. Solid rocket motors (SRMs) emit characteristic
Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spheres (Strand et al., 1981; Zolensky et al., 1989; Cofer
III et al., 1991) and can, thus, be excluded as the source of the carbonaceous
particles encountered in the present study. Hydrocarbon-fired rockets are
powered by kerosene or syntin and can be expected to emit soot. For example,
soot particles most likely emitted by a Russian Soyuz booster rocket were
found in an aerosol cloud at 20 km (Newman et al., 2001). The soot particles
contribute approximately one-fourth to the total particle number, the rest were
volatile sulfate particles. The occurrence of carbonaceous material from
rocket exhaust was also reported by Cziczo et al. (2002). In the exhaust of
an Athena II rocket, the carbonaceous fraction of material was found to be
17 % by number (Cziczo et al., 2002). As the refractory carbonaceous
particles observed by us are not soot, their origin from rocket exhaust is
unlikely. However, as carbonaceous rocket exhaust particles were not
investigated previously by electron microscopy this source cannot be
excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Volcanic emissions</title>
      <p>Volcanic eruptions are generally not considered to emit carbonaceous
material. However, carbonaceous material was found in samples from the
Kasatochi (Alaska, 2008), Sarychev (Russia, 2009) as well as
Eyafjallajökull (Iceland, 2010) eruptions (Martinsson et al., 2009;
Schmale et al., 2010; Andersson et al., 2013). The carbonaceous material
most probably originates from air entrained into the volcanic cloud. The
carbonaceous mass fraction in plumes from two volcanoes in Ecuador and
Columbia was found to vary between 19 and 38 % (measured by MS; Carn et al.,
2011). Sulfur-carbonaceous mixed particles occurred predominantly in the
size range below 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. In 1999, the year before the campaign, there
were four volcanic eruptions with a VEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 (volcanic explosivity
index): Soufrière Hills (West Indies) in January, Shiveluch (Russia) in
August as well as Guagua Pichincha (Ecuador) and Tungurahua (Ecuador) in
October (NOAA, 2017). Still, volcanism seems an unlikely source for our
samples, as volcanic eruptions will emit large amounts of silicate
particles, which we did not observe.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>Biomass burning</title>
      <p>A further source of carbonaceous particles in the stratosphere is biomass
burning (BB). Particles originating from BB can be lifted to the
stratosphere by either the tropical upper tropospheric upwelling or the
pyroconvective effect (Fromm et al., 2000; Jost et al., 2004). Three
different types of carbonaceous BB particles were described in previous
literature (e.g., Pósfai et al., 2003, 2004; Kis et al., 2006; Li and
Shao, 2009): organic particles with inorganic inclusions, tar ball particles
and soot. Organic particles (no specific morphology) contain C and minor O,
and are stable under the electron beam. They do not show the typical
microstructure of soot (see below). The inorganic inclusions mostly consist
of KCl and K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Tar balls have a typical spherical shape and
mainly consist of C and O with minor K, S, Cl and Si contents. Soot consists
of chain-like agglomerates of primary particles (10–100 nm) with a
typical onion shell microstructure (graphene sheet separation distance
between 0.133 and 0.137 nm). As our particles do not show the
characteristics of all types of carbonaceous BB particles described above,
this source can be excluded.</p>
      <p>The most probable potential sources for carbonaceous particles were already
discussed above. For these sources the transport mechanisms into the
stratosphere are well known. There are further strong tropospheric sources
for carbonaceous particles, which predominately emit particles at ground
level. An effective transport to the stratosphere of these particles is
unlikely. Still, they will be discussed briefly, as they are – on a global
scale – major sources of carbonaceous material in the lower atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS6">
  <title>Wood burning</title>
      <p>Soot is a major component emitted by wood burning. Similar to biomass
burning, soot from wood burning consists of agglomerates of spherical
primary particles (20–80 nm diameter) with an onion-shell nanostructure
(Kocbach et al., 2005; Torvela et al., 2014, 2010). Some
primary particles are amorphous (Tumolva et al., 2010). The particles may
have a surface coating which is volatile under electron bombardment (Torvela
et al., 2014). Carbon is the major element of wood burning soot, O, Na, Si,
S, Cl, K, and Ca occur as minor elements (Kocbach et al., 2005; Tumolva et
al., 2010). In addition to soot, particulate organic matter (POM) was found
in wood burning (Torvela et al., 2014). The POM particles, sometimes
described as tar balls, are 30–600 nm in diameter. Judged from the
properties described above, both soot and POM are different to the particles
observed in our study. Thus, wood burning can be excluded as a source for
the refractory carbonaceous stratospheric particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS7">
  <title>Coal burning</title>
      <p>A variety of different carbonaceous particles was observed during coal
burning. Most carbonaceous particles are soot particles, i.e., fractal-like
agglomerates (0.1–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m size) consisting of 10–50 nm diameter
primary particles. The primary particles show a characteristic onion-shell
structure (Chen et al., 2004, 2005). Some of the soot agglomerates have
inorganic inclusions or inorganic particles on their surface, containing Mg,
Ca, Sr (strontium), Ba (barium) and Na (Chen et al., 2005). Char particles
associated with ultrafine titanium oxide particles were also found (Chen et
al., 2005). Sometimes ultrafine Ti, Al, Fe and Ca particles were embedded in
large char particles. In addition, graphitic fiber structures that are
either straight or curved were encountered. Two of the three types of
carbonaceous particles described for coal combustion (soot agglomerates and
graphitic fibers) are certainly different from our particles. As images of
char particles were not provided by Chen et al. (2005) we cannot compare
their results to the refractory carbonaceous particles of the present study.
However, we regard coal combustion as an implausible source.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS8">
  <title>Diesel engines</title>
      <p>Diesel engines are another important source of carbonaceous particles and
above all soot particles. Again, soot agglomerates consist of spherical
primary particles (5–50 nm diameter) with onion-shell nanostructure
(e.g., Tumolva et al., 2010; Wentzel et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011; Song,
2004; Weinbruch et al., 2016). The graphene sheet separation distance varies
between 0.31 and 0.48 nm; (Vander Wal et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011;
Weinbruch et al., 2016), and the intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio between 0.049 and 0.079
(Weinbruch et al., 2016). Compared to our particles, the chemical
composition, morphology and primary particle size of diesel exhaust
particles are significantly different. Thus, we can certainly exclude this
source.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS9">
  <title>Ship emissions</title>
      <p>Ship emissions also contain soot agglomerates (Popovicheva et al., 2012;
Lieke et al., 2013). Their chemical composition is dominated by C and O,
with small amounts (&lt; 1 wt %) of additional elements, e.g., V, S,
Cl, Ca and Si (Popovicheva et al., 2012). Furthermore, spherical char
particles with diameters of 0.2–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m are found to be
characteristic for ship emissions (Popovicheva et al., 2012). The morphology
of these particles shown in SEM photomicrographs is different to the
particles found in our study. Lieke et al. (2013) found amorphous
carbonaceous material filling cavities of larger soot aggregates. The
characteristics described for ship exhaust particles are significantly
different to the particles found in our study, leading to the conclusion
that that ship exhaust can be excluded as a source.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p>The major finding of the present study is that the refractory component
consists of carbonaceous particles only, with a number mixing ratio of 1.1 (mg air)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (median for all samples). Most carbonaceous particles are
not internally mixed with or coated by sulfates. The particles were sampled
in air having low abundance of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and therefore long residence times
in the stratosphere. Thus, one would expect them to be covered with
condensed sulfuric acid resulting from the oxidation of carbonyl sulfide (Wilson et al.,
2008). The reason for this discrepancy is not known.</p>
      <p>As major elements only C and O were detected. Most of the carbonaceous
particles show small and variable amounts of Fe, Cr and Ni. These minor
elements are distributed in the carbonaceous matrix; i.e., they do not occur
as heterogeneous inclusions. Most carbonaceous particles are completely
amorphous.</p>
      <p>The exact source of the refractory carbonaceous particles remains unclear
and can only be confined by exclusion. Based on the investigated physical
properties and chemical composition of the particles, aircraft exhaust,
volcanic emissions and biomass burning can be certainly excluded as sources.
The same is true for the even more unlikely sources wood burning, coal
burning, diesel engines and ship emissions. It is expected that
rockets powered by kerosene or other hydrocarbons emit soot, but due to the
lack of available electron microscopy studies of these emissions, rocket
exhaust cannot be excluded as a possible source of the refractory
carbonaceous particles found. Carbonaceous material from IDPs and
extraterrestrial particles, likely originating from meteoric ablation and
fragmentation, remain as the most probable source for the particles
encountered in the current study.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data set is available for the community and can be
accessed by request to Katharina Schütze (schuetze@geo.tu-darmstadt.de)
of the Technische Universität Darmstadt.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12475-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12475-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>KS analyzed the samples,
interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. NB supported
the TEM analysis. ME came up with suggestions for and supported
the SEM analysis. SW contributed to the preparation of the
manuscript as well as interpretation and data analysis. SB and
RW supported the scope of the analysis as well as interpretation of
data and writing. JCW provided the samples as well as any
necessary data regarding the sampling campaign, contributed to the data
analysis, interpretation and writing. GG conducted
calculations on the meteorological situation of the collected samples.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the two anonymous reviewers and
Alexander D. James for their helpful comments that considerably improved the
manuscript. Our research was funded by the European Research Council under
FP7 (FP/2007–2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 321040 (EXCATRO). This work was
partly supported by the project ROMIC-SPITFIRE sponsored by the Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01LG1205D) and by STRATOCLIM
sponsored by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), project
reference 603557.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Harald Saathoff<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Andersson, S. M., Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Rauthe-Schöch, A., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.:
Composition and evolution of volcanic aerosol from eruptions of Kasatochi,
Sarychev and Eyjafjallajökull in 2008–2010 based on CARIBIC observations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1781–1796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aoki, T. and Akai, J.: Carbon materials in Antarctic and nonAntarctic
carbonaceous chondrites: high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, J.
Miner. Petrol. Sci., 103, 173–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2465/jmps.070301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2465/jmps.070301</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, F., Curtius, J., Spreng, S., and Deshler, T.: Stratospheric aerosol
sulfuric acid: First direct in situ measurements using a novel balloon-based
mass spectrometer apparatus, J. Atmos. Chem., 30, 3–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006067511568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006067511568</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Austin, J. and Li, F.: On the relationship between the strength of the
Brewer-Dobson circulation and the age of stratospheric air, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L17807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026867" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026867</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Baumgardner, D., Kok, G., and Raga, G.: Warming of the Arctic lower
stratosphere by light absorbing particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018883</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bigg, E. K.: Stratospheric Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 910–917, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bigg, E. K., Ono, A., and Thompson, W. J.: Aerosols at altitudes between 20
and 37 km, Tellus, 22, 550–563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1970.tb00522.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1970.tb00522.x</ext-link>,
1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Blake, D. F. and Kato, K.: Latitudinal distribution of black carbon soot in
the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
7195–7202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD03118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JD03118</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blanchard, M. B., Brownlee, D. E., Bunch, T. E., Hodge, P. W., and Kyte, F.
T.: Meteoroid ablation spheres from deep-sea sediments, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett., 46, 178–190, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Nelson, S. M., Woo, J.-H., and
Klimont, Z.: A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon
emissions from combustion, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D14203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003697</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bunch, T. E. and Olsen, E.: Distribution and significance of chromium in
meteorites, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 39, 911–927,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(75)90037-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(75)90037-X</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., and Pósfai, M.:
Are black carbon and soot the same?, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-24821-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acpd-12-24821-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Carn, S. A., Froyd, K. D., Anderson, B. E., Wennberg, P., Crounse, J.,
Spencer, K., Dibb, J. E., Krotkov, N. A., Browell, E. V., Hair, J. W.,
Diskin, G., Sachse, G., and Vay, S. A.: In situ measurements of tropospheric
volcanic plumes in Ecuador and Colombia during TC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, D00J24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014718</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Carrillo-Sánchez, J. D., Nesvorný, D., Pokorný, P., Janches, D.,
and Plane, J. M. C.: Sources of cosmic dust in the Earth's atmosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11979–11986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071697</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Kreidenweis, S. M., McInnes, L. M., Rogers, D. C., and DeMott, P.
J.: Single particle analyses of ice nucleating aerosols in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1391–1394,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y, Shah, N., Huggins, F. E., Huffman, G. P., Linak, W. P., and Miller,
C. A.: Investigation of primary fine particulate matter from coal combustion
by computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy, Fuel. Process. Technol.,
85, 743–761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.017</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Shah, N., Huggins, F. E., and Huffman, G. P.: Transmission electron
microscopy investigation of ultrafine coal fly ash particles, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 39, 1144–1151, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Chuan, R. L. and Woods, D. C.: The appearance of carbon aerosol particles in
the lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 11, 553–556, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cofer III, W. R., Purgold, G. C., Winstead, E. L., and Edahl, R. A.: Space
shuttle exhausted aluminum oxide: A measured particle size distribution, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 17371–17376, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Corbett, J. J. and Koehler, H. W.: Updated emissions from ocean shipping, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4650, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003751</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., and Murphy, D. M.: Ablation, flux, and
atmospheric implications of meteors inferred from stratospheric aerosol,
Science, 291, 1772–1775, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Ross, M. N.: Composition
of individual particles in the wakes of an Athena II rocket and the space
shuttle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015991" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015991</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M.
A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the Dominant
Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Della Corte, V., Rietmeijer, F. J. M., Rotundi, A., Ferrari, M., and
Palumbo, P.: Meteoric CaO and carbon smoke particles collected in the upper
stratosphere from an unanticipated source, Tellus B, 65, 20174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20174</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Diessel, C. F. K., Brothers, R. N., and Black, P. M.: Coalification and
graphitization in high-pressure schists in New Caledonia, Contrib. Mineral.
Petrol., 68, 63–78, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Ebert, M., Weigel, R., Kandler, K., Günther, G., Molleker, S., Grooß,
J.-U., Vogel, B., Weinbruch, S., and Borrmann, S.: Chemical analysis of
refractory stratospheric aerosol particles collected within the arctic vortex
and inside polar stratospheric clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8405–8421,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Fahey, D. W., Keim, E. R., Boering, K. A., Brock, C. A., Wilson, J. C.,
Jonsson, H., Anthony, S., Hanisco, T. F., Wennberg, P., Miake-Lye, R. C.,
Salawitch, R., Louisnard, N., Woodbridge, E. L., Gao, R. S., Donnelly, S.,
Wamsley, R. C., Del Negro, L. A., Solomon, S., Daube, B. C., Wofsy, S. C.,
Webster, C. R., May, R. D., Kelly, K. K., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R.,
and Chan, K. R.: Emission measurements of the Concorde supersonic aircraft in
the lower stratosphere, Science, 270, 70–74,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5233.70" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.270.5233.70</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Fahey, D. W., Gao, R. S., Carslaw, K. S., Kettleborough, J., Popp, P. J.,
Northway, M. J., Holecek, J. C., Ciciora, S. C., McLaughlin, R. J., Thompson,
T. L., Winkler, R. H., Baumgardner, D. G., Gandrud, B., Wennberg, P. O.,
Dhaniyala, S., McKinney, K., Peter, T., Salawitch, R. H., Bui, T. P., Elkins,
J. W., Webster, C. R., Atlas, E. L., Jost, H., Wilson, J. C., Herman, R. L.,
Kleinböhl, A., and von König, M.: The detection of large HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
particles in the winter Arctic stratosphere, Science, 291, 1026–1031, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Floss, C., El Goresy, A., Zinner, E., Kransel, G., Rammensee, W., and Palme,
H.: Elemental and isotopic fractionations produced through evaporation of the
Allende CV chondrilte: Implications for the origin of HAL-type hibonite
inclusions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 60, 1975–1997, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Fromm, M., Alfred, J., Hoppel, K., Hornstein, ., Bevilacqua, R., Shettle, E.,
Servranckx, R., Li, Z., and Stocks, B.: Observations of boreal forest fire
smoke in the stratosphere by POAM III, SAGE II, and lidar in 1998, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 27, 1407–1410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL011200</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Fromm, M., Tupper, A., Rosenfeld, D., Servranckx, R., and McRae, R.: Violent
pyro-convective storm devastates Australia's capital and pollutes the
stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025161" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025161</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Fromm, M. D. and Servranckx, R.: Transport of forest fire smoke above the
tropopause by supercell convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1542,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016820" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016820</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gaffney, J. S. and Marley, N. A.: The impacts of combustion emissions on air
quality and climate – From coal to biofuels and beyond, Atmos. Environ., 42,
23–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.016</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Garvie, L. A. J.: Extraterrestrial carbon nanospheres, Carbon, 44, 158–160,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.08.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.carbon.2005.08.028</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Garvie, L. A. J. and Buseck, P. R.: Nanosized carbon-rich grains in
carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 224, 431–439,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.024</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Garvie, L. A. J., Baumgardner, G., and Buseck, P. R.: Scanning electron
microscopical and cross sectional analysis of extraterrestrial carbonaceous
nanoglobules, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 43, 899–903,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01088.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01088.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Gómez-Martín, J. C., Bones, D. L., Carrillo-Sánchez, J. D.,
James, A. D., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., B. Fegley, J., and Plane, J. M.
C.: Novel experimental simulations of the atmospheric injection of meteoric
metals, Astrophys. J., 836, 212, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Greenblatt, J. B., Jost, H.-J., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R., Hurst, D.
F., Elkins, J. W., Schauffler, S. M., Atlas, E. L., Herman, R. L., Webster,,
C. R., Bui, T. B., Moore, F. L., Ray, E. A., Oltmans, S., Vömel, H.,
Blavier, J.-F., Sen, B., Stachnik, R. A., Toon, G. C., Engel, A.,
Müller, M., Schmidt, U., Bremer, H., Pierce, R. B., Sinnhuber, B.-M.,
Chipperfield, M., and Lefèvre, F.: Tracer-based determination of vortex
descent in the 1999/2000 Arctic winter, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8279,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000937" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000937</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Harris, P. J. F.: Carbonaceous contaminants on support films for transmission
electron microscopy, Carbon, 39, 909–913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/nn9001598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/nn9001598</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Harris, P. J. F., Vis, R. D., and Heymann, D.: Fullerene-like carbon
nanostructures in the Allende meteorite, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 183,
355–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00277-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00277-6</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Helsel, D. R.: Statistics for Censored Environmental Data Using
Minitab<sup>®</sup> and R, John Wiley &amp; Sons,
Hoboken, New Jersey, 324 pp., 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Holton, J. R., Hayes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B.,
and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-Troposphere exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33,
403–439, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hunten, D. M., Turco, R. P., and Toon, O. W.: Smoke and dust particles of
meteoric origin in the mesosphere and stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 37,
1342–1357, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Itaya, T.: Carbonaceous material in politic schists of the Sanbagawa
metamorphic belt in central Shikoku, Japan. Lithos., 14, 215–224, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Jost, H.-J., Loewenstein, M., Greenblatt, J. B., Podolske, J.R., Bui, T. P.,
Hurst, D. F., Elkins, J. W., Herman, R. L., Webster, C. R., Schauffler, S.
M., Atlas, E. L., Newman, P. A., Lait, L. R., and Wofsy, S. C.: Mixing events
revealed by anomalous tracer relationships in the Arctic vortex during winter
1999/2000, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4795,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002380</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Jost, H.-J., Drdla, K., Stohl, A., Pfister, L., Loewenstein, M., Lopez, J.
P., Hudson, P. K., Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Fromm, M., Bui, T. P.,
Dea-Day, J., Gerbig, C., Mahoney, M. J., Richard, E. C., Spichtinger, N.,
Vellovic Pittman, J., Weinstock., E. M., Wilson, J. C., and Xueref, I.:
In-situ observations of mid-latitude forest fire plumes deep in the
stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L11101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL019253</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Junge, C. E.: Sulfur in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 3975–3976,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ068i013p03975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JZ068i013p03975</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Junge, C. E. and Manson, J. E.: Stratospheric aerosol studies, J. Geophys.
Res., 66, 2163–2182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i007p02163" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JZ066i007p02163</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E., Changnon, C. W., and Manson, J. E., Stratospheric aerosols, J.
Meteorol., 18, 81–108, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Kis, V. K., Pósfai, M., and Lábár, J. L.: Nanostructure of
atmospheric soot particles, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5533–5542,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.012</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Kocbach, A., Johansen, B. V., Schwarze, P. E., and Namork, E.: Analytical
electron microscopy of combustion particles: a comparison of vehicle exhaust
and residential wood smoke, Sci. Total Environ., 346,231–243,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.025</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Kojima, T., Buseck, P. R., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., and Mahoney, M. J.:
Aerosol particles from tropical convective systems: Cloud tops and cirrus
anvils, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D12201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004504" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004504</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Kojima, T., Buseck, P. R., and Reeves, J. M.: Aerosol particles from tropical
convective systems: 2. Cloud bases, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D09203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005173</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T.,
Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R.,
Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E.,
Antuña-Marrero, J.-C., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J.,
Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke,
D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger,
L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol – Observations,
processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015RG000511</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Lauer, A., Eyring, V., Hendricks, J., Jöckel, P., and Lohmann, U.: Global
model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and
the radiation budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5061–5079,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Lee, L.: NADA: Nondetects And Data Analysis for environmental data. R package
version 1.5-6, available at:
<uri>https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NADA</uri> (last access: March 2017), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Li, W. and Shao, L.: Transmission electron microscopy study of aerosol
particles from the brown hazes in northern China, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D09302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011285</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Song, C., Song, J., Lv, G., Dong, S., and Zaho, Z.: Evolution of the
nanostructure, fractal dimension and size of in-cylinder soot during diesel
combustion process, Combust. Flame, 158, 1624–1630,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.006</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Liati, A., Brem, B. T., Durdina, L., Vögtli, M., Dasilva, Y. A. R.,
Eggenschwiler, P. D., and Wang, J.: Electron microscopic study of soot
particulate matter emissions from aircraft turbine engines, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 48, 10975–10983, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es501809b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es501809b</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Lieke, K. I., Rosenørn, T., Pedersen, J., Larsson, D., Kling, J.,
Fuglsang, K., and Bilde, M.: Micro-and Nanostructural Characteristics of
Particles Before and After an Exhaust Gas Recirculation System Scrubber,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 47, 1038–1046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.813012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.813012</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Manney, G. L. and Sabutis, J. L.: Development of the polar vortex in the
1999-2000 Arctic winter stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 2589–2592,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Martinsson, B. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Carn, S. A., Hermann, M., Heue,
K.-P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Influence of the 2008 Kasatochi
volcanic eruption on sulfurous and carbonaceous aerosol constituents in the
lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12813,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL038735</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Andersson, S. M., Weigelt, A., Hermann, M.,
Assmann, D., Voigtländer, J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., van Velthoven, P.
J. F., and Zahn, A.: Comparison between CARIBIC Aerosol Samples Analysed by
Accelerator-Based Methods and Optical Particle Counter Measurements, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 7, 2581–2596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2581-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-2581-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Matrajt, G., Messenger, S., Brownlee, D., and Joswiak, D.: Diverse forms of
primordial organic matter identified in interplanetary dust particles,
Meteorit. Plant. Sci., 47, 525–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01310.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01310.x</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Mattis, I., Siefert, P., Müller, D., Tesche, M., Hiebsch, A., Kanitz, T.,
Schmidt, J., Finger, F., Wandinger, U., and Ansmann, A.: Volcanic aerosol
layers observed with multiwavelength Raman lidar over central Europe in
2008–2009, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L04, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013472" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013472</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Mazaheri, M., Bostrom, T. E., Johnson, G. R., and Morawska, L.: Composition
and morphology of particle emissions from in-use aircraft during takeoff and
landing, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5235–5242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es3046058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es3046058</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Mills, M. J., Toon, O. B., Vaida, V., Hintze, P. E., Kjaergaard, H. G.,
Schofield, D. P., and Robinson, T. W.: Photolysis of sulfuric acid vapor by
visible light as a source of the polar stratospheric CN layer, J. Geophys.
Res., 100, D08201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005519" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005519</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Mossop, S. C.: Stratospheric Particles at 20 km, Science, 4891, 325–326,
1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Mossop, S. C.: Stratospheric particles at 20 km altitude, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 29, 201–207, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Murrell, M. T., Davis, P. A., Nishiizumi, K., and Millard, H. T.: Deep-sea
spherules from Pacific clay: Mass distribution and influx rate, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 44, 2067–2074, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Mahoney, M. J.: In Situ Measurements of
Organics, Meteoritic Material, Mercury, and Other Elements in Aerosols at 5
to 19 Kilometers, Science, 282, 1664–1669,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5394.1664" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.282.5394.1664</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Hudson, P. K., Thomson, D. S., Wilson, J. C.,
Kojima, T., and Buseck, P. R.: Particle Generation and Resuspension in
Aircraft Inlets when Flying in Clouds, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 401–409,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Hudson, P. K., and Thomson, D. S.: Carbonaceous
material in aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and tropopause
region, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D04203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007297" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007297</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Froyd, K. D., Schwarz, J. P., and Wilson, J. C.: Observations
of the chemical composition of stratospheric aerosol particles, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 140, 1269–1278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2213</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Newman, P. A., Wilson, J. C., Ross, M. N., Brock, C. A., Sheridan, P. J.,
Schoeberl, M. R., Lait, L. R., Bui, T. P., Loewenstein, M., and Podolske, J.
R.: Chance encounter with a stratospheric kerosene rocket plume from Russia
over California, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 959–962, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011972" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL011972</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Newman, P. A., Harris, N. R. P., Adriani, A., Amanatidis, G. T., Anderson,
J. G., Braathen, G. O., Brune, W. H., Carslaw, K. S., Craig, M. S., DeCola,
P. L., Guirlet, M., Hipskind, R. S., Kurylo, M. J., Küllman, H., Larsen,
N., Mégie, G. J., Pommereau, J.-P., Poole, L. R., Schoeberl, M. R.,
Stroh, F., Toon, O. B., Trepte, C. R., and Van Roozendael, M.: An overview
of the SOLVE/THESEO 2000 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8259,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001303</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, H. N., Martinsson, B. G., Wagner, J. B., Carlemalm, E., Ebert, M.,
Weinbruch, S., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Heintzenberg, J., Hermann, M.,
Schuck, T., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Chemical composition and
morphology of individual aerosol particles from a CARIBIC flight at 10 km
altitude between 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D23209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009956</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>NOAA: Volcano Events, available at:
<uri>https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/results?type_15=Like&amp;query_15=&amp;op_30=eq&amp;v_30=&amp;ge_23=&amp;le_23=&amp;op_29=eq&amp;v_29=&amp;type_16=Like&amp;query_16=&amp;le_17=&amp;ge_18=&amp;le_18=&amp;ge_17=&amp;op_20=eq&amp;v_20=&amp;ge_7=&amp;le_7=&amp;bt_24=&amp;st_24=&amp;type_25=EXACT&amp;query_25=None+Selected&amp;bt_26=&amp;st_26=&amp;type_27=EXACT&amp;query_27=None+Selected&amp;type_12=Exact&amp;query_12=&amp;type_11=Exact&amp;query_11=&amp;t=102557&amp;s=50&amp;d=50</uri>,
last access: January 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Palme, H. and Jones, A.: Solar system abundances of the elements, in:
Meteorites, Comets, and Planets, edited by: Davis, A. M., Treatise on
Geochemistry Vol. 1, 41–61, Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Papike, J. J. (Ed.): Planetary materials, 36, Mineralogical Society of Amer.,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Pesquera, A. and Velasco, F.: Metamorphism of the Paleozoic Cinco Villas
massif (Basque Pyrenees): illite crystallinity and graphitization degree,
Mineral. Mag., 52, 615–625, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Peter, T.: Microphysics and heterogeneous chemistry of polar stratospheric
clouds, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 48, 785–822,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.785</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Peter, T. and Grooß, J. U.: Polar Stratospheric Clouds and Sulfate
Aerosol Particles: Microphysics, Denitrification and Heterogeneous Chemistry,
chap. 4, RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Döpelheuer, A., Brock, C. A., and Schröder, F.: In situ
observations and model calculations of black carbon emission by aircraft at
cruise altitude, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22171–22181,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900460</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U.,
Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting “black
carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Plane, J. M. C.: Cosmic dust in the earth's atmosphere, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41,
6507–6518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35132c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35132c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Popovitcheva, O. B., Persiantseva, N. M., Trukhin, M. E., Rulev, G. B.,
Shonija, N. K., Buriko, Y. Y., Starik, A. M., Demirdjian, B., Ferry, D., and
Suzanne, J.: Experimental characterization of aircraft combustor soot:
Microstructure, surface area, porosity and water adsorption, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 19, 4421–4426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B004345L" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B004345L</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Popovicheva, O., Kireeva, E., Persiantseva, N., Timofeev, M., Bladt, H.,
Ivleva, N. P., Niessner, R., and Moldanová, J.: Microscopic
characterization of individual particles from multicomponent ship exhaust, J.
Environ. Monit., 14, 3101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30338h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2em30338h</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Pósfai, M., Simonics, R., Li, J., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.:
Individual aerosol particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 1.
Compositions and size distributions of carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 8483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002291</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Pósfai, M., Gelencsér, A., Simonics, R., Arató, K., Li, J.,
Hobbs, R. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls: Particles from
biomass and biofuel burning, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06213,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004169</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Pueschel, R. F., Blake, D. F., Snetsinger, K. G., Hansen, A. D. A., Verma,
S., and Kato, K.: Black carbon (soot) aerosol in the lower stratosphere and
upper troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1659–1662,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL01801" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92GL01801</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Pueschel, R. F., Boering, K. A., Verma, S., Howard, S. D., Ferry, G. V.,
Goodman, J., Allen, D. A., and Hamill, P.: Soot aerosol in the lower
stratosphere: Pole-to-pole variability and contributions by aircraft, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 13113–13118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD03061</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Rasband, W. S.: ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
Maryland, USA, available at: <uri>http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/</uri> (last access: March 2017),
1997–2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, version 3.3.0,
available at: <uri>https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (last access: March 2017), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Renard, J.-B., Brogniez, C., Berthet, G., Bourgeois, Q., Gaubicher, B.,
Chartier, M., Balois, J.-Y., Verwaerde, C., Auriol, F., Francois, P.,
Daugeron, D., and Engrand, C.: Vertical distribution of the different types
of aerosols in the stratosphere: Detection of solid particles and analysis
of their spatial variability, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D21303,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010150</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Rosen, J. M.: The Boiling Point of Stratospheric Aerosols, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 10, 1044–1046, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Ross, M. N. and Sheaffer, P. M.: Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine
emissions, Earth's Future, 2, 177–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013EF000160</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Saunders, R. W., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Benz, S., Wagner, R., Saathoff,
H., Connolly, P. J., Burgess, R., Murray, B. J., Gallagher, M., Wills, R.,
and Plane, J. M. C.: An aerosol chamber investigation of the heterogeneous
ice nucleating potential of refractory nanoparticles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
1227–1247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1227-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1227-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Saunders, R. W., Dhomse, S., Tian, W. S., Chipperfield, M. P., and Plane, J. M. C.: Interactions of
meteoric smoke particles with sulphuric acid in the Earth's stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4387–4398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4387-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4387-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kalesse, H., Rautenhaus,
M., Lichtenstern, M., Schlager, H., Ancellet, G., Arnold, F., Gerding, M.,
Mattis, I., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol layers from the 2008
eruptions of Mount Okmok and Mount Kasatochi: In situ upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere measurements of sulfate and organics over Europe, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D00L07, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013628</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007076</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Sheridan, P. J., Brock, C. A., and Wilson, J. C.: Aerosol particles in the
upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Elemental composition and
morphology of individual particles in northern midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 21, 2587–2590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94GL01387</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Siddaway, J. M. and Petelina, S. V.: Transport and evolution of the 2009
Australian Black Saturday bushfire smoke in the lower stratosphere observed
by OSIRIS and Odin, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D06203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015162" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015162</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Siebert, J., Timmis, C., Vaughan, G., and Fricke, K. H.: A strange cloud in
the Arctic summer stratosphere 1998 above Esrange (68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), Sweden,
Ann. Geophys., 18, 505–509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-0505-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00585-000-0505-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Smekens, A., Godoi, R. H. M., Berghmans, P., and van Grieken, R.:
Characterisation of soot emitted by domestic heating, aircraft and cars
using diesel or biodiesel, J. Atmos. Chem., 52, 45–62,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-6903-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-005-6903-7</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,
Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999RG900008</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Song, J., Alam, M., and Boehman, A. L.: Characterization of diesel and
biodiesel soot, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 49, 767, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, D. J.: Principles and Practice of Variable Pressure/Environmental
Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-ESEM), John Wiley and Sons, Ltd,
Publication, 221 pp., 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Strand, L. D., Bowyer, J. M., Varsi, G., Laue, E. G., and Gauldin, R.:
Characterization of Particulates in the Exhaust Plume of Large
Solid-Propellant Rockets, J. Spacecraft Rockets, 18, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Strawa, A. W., Drdla, K., Ferry, G. V., Verma, S., Pueschel, P. F., Yasuda,
M., Salawitch, R. J., Gao, R. S., Howard, S. D., Bui, P. T., Loewenstein, M.,
Elkins, J. W., Perkins, K., and Cohen, R.: Carbonaceous aerosol (soot)
measured in the lower stratosphere during POLARIS and its role in
stratospheric photochemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26753–26766,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900453</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Testa Jr., J. P., Stephens, J. R., Berg, W. W., Cahill, T. A., Onaka, T.,
Nakada, Y., Arnold, J. R., Fong, N., and Sperry, P. D.: Collection of
microparticles at high balloon altitudes in the stratosphere, Earth Planet.
Sci. Lett., 98, 287–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(90)90031-R" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(90)90031-R</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Thornberry, T., Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., Anderson, B. E.,
Thornhill, K. L., and Winstead, E. L.: Persistence of organic carbon in
heated aerosol residuals measured during Tropical Composition Cloud and
Climate Coupling (TC4), J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J02, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012721</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Torvela, T., Tissari, J., Sippula, O., Kaivosoja, T., Leskinen, J.,
Virén, A., Lähde, A., and Jokiniemi, J.: Effect of wood combustion
conditions on the morphology of freshly emitted fine particles, Atmos.
Environ., 87, 65–76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.028</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Tumolva, L., Park, J.-Y., Kim, J.-S., Miller, A. L., Chow, J. C., Watson, J.
G., and Park, K.: Morphological and elemental classification of freshly
emitted soot particles and atmospheric ultrafine particles using TEM/EDS,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 202–215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903518907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820903518907</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Turco, R. P., Toon, O. B., Hamill, P., and Whitten, R. C.: Effects of
Meteoric Debris on Stratospheric Aerosols and Gases, J. Geophys. Res., 86,
1113–1128, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Twohy, C. H. and Gandrud, B. W.: Electron microscope analysis of residual
particles from aircraft contrails, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 1359–1362,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03162" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GL03162</ext-link>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Vander Wal, R. L., Bryg, V. M., and Hays, M. D.: Fingerprinting soot (towards
source identification): physical structure and chemical composition, J.
Aerosol Sci., 41, 108–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.08.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.08.008</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J.-P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J. P., Bourassa, A., Peolon, J.,
Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and
Vargas, F.: Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the
stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L12807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047563</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Schlager, H., Luo, B. P., Dörnbrack, A., Roiger, A., Stock, P.,
Curtius, J., Vössing, H., Borrmann, S., Davies, S., Konopka, P., Schiller,
C., Shur, G., and Peter, T.: Nitric Acid Trihydrate (NAT) formation at low
NAT supersaturation in Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
5, 1371–1380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1371-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1371-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Weigel, R., Volk, C. M., Kandler, K., Hösen, E., Günther, G., Vogel, B.,
Grooß, J.-U., Khaykin, S., Belyaev, G. V., and Borrmann, S.: Enhancements
of the refractory submicron aerosol fraction in the Arctic polar vortex:
feature or exception?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12319–12342,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Weinbruch, S., Benker, N., Kandler, K., Ebert, M., Ellingsen, D. G.,
Berlinger, B., and Thomassen, Y.: Morphology, chemical composition and
nanostructure of single carbon-rich particles studied by transmission
electron microscopy: source apportionment in workroom air of aluminium
smelters, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 408, 1151–1158,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9217-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-015-9217-x</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Wentzel, M., Gorzawski, H., Naumann, K.-H., Saathoff, H., and Weinbruch, S.:
Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization of
soot aerosols, Aerosol Sci., 34, 1347–1370,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson J. C., Blackshear E. D., and Hyun J. H.: The Function and Response of
an Improved Stratospheric Condensation Nucleus Counter, J. Geophys. Res., 88,
6781–6785, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, J. C., Lee, S.-H., Reeves, J. M., Brock, C. A., Jonsson, H. H.,
Lafleur, B. G., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J., Atlas, E., Boering, K., Toon,
G., Fahey, D., Bui, T. P., Diskin, G., and Moore, F.: Steady-state aerosol
distributions in the extra-tropical, lower stratosphere and the processes
that maintain them, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6617–6626,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6617-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6617-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Zolensky, M. E. and Mackinnon, I. D. R.: Accurate stratospheric particle size
distributions from a flat plate collection surface, J. Geophys. Res., 90,
5801–5808, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Zolensky, M. E., McKay, D. S., and Kaczor, L. A.: A Tenfold Increase in the
Abundance of Large Solid Particles in the Stratosphere, as Measured Over the
Period 1976-1984, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 1047–1056,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD01p01047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD094iD01p01047</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Sub-micrometer refractory carbonaceous particles in the polar stratosphere</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Eleven particle samples collected in the polar
stratosphere during SOLVE (SAGE III Ozone loss and validation experiment)
from January until March 2000 were characterized in detail by
high-resolution transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM/SEM)
combined with energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis. A total of 4202
particles (TEM  =  3872; SEM  =  330) were analyzed from these samples, which were
collected mostly inside the polar vortex in the altitude range between 17.3
and 19.9 km. Particles that were volatile in the microscope beams contained
ammonium sulfates and hydrogen sulfates and dominated the samples. Some
particles with diameters ranging from 20 to 830 nm were refractory in the
electron beams. Carbonaceous particles containing additional elements to C
and O comprised from 72 to 100 % of the refractory particles. The rest
were internal mixtures of these materials with sulfates. The median number
mixing ratio of the refractory particles, expressed in units of particles
per milligram of air, was 1.1 (mg air)<sup>−1</sup> and varied between 0.65 and
2.3 (mg air)<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p class="p">Most of the refractory carbonaceous particles are completely amorphous, a
few of the particles are partly ordered with a graphene sheet separation
distance of 0.37 ± 0.06 nm (mean value ± standard deviation).
Carbon and oxygen are the only detected major elements with an atomic O∕C
ratio of 0.11 ± 0.07. Minor elements observed include Si, S, Fe, Cr
and Ni with the following atomic ratios relative to C: Si∕C: 0.010 ± 0.011; S∕C:
0.0007 ± 0.0015; Fe∕C: 0.0052 ± 0.0074; Cr∕C: 0.0012 ± 0.0017; Ni∕C: 0.0006 ± 0.0011 (all mean values ± standard deviation).</p><p class="p">High-resolution element distribution images reveal that the minor elements
are distributed within the carbonaceous matrix; i.e., heterogeneous
inclusions are not observed. No difference in size, nanostructure and
elemental composition was found between particles collected inside and
outside the polar vortex.</p><p class="p">Based on chemistry and nanostructure, aircraft exhaust, volcanic emissions
and biomass burning can certainly be excluded as sources. The same is true
for the less probable but globally important sources: wood burning, coal
burning, diesel engines and ship emissions.</p><p class="p">Recondensed organic matter and extraterrestrial particles, potentially
originating from ablation and fragmentation, remain as possible sources of
the refractory carbonaceous particles studied. However, additional work is
required in order to identify the sources unequivocally.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, S. M., Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Rauthe-Schöch, A., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.:
Composition and evolution of volcanic aerosol from eruptions of Kasatochi,
Sarychev and Eyjafjallajökull in 2008–2010 based on CARIBIC observations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1781–1796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aoki, T. and Akai, J.: Carbon materials in Antarctic and nonAntarctic
carbonaceous chondrites: high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, J.
Miner. Petrol. Sci., 103, 173–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2465/jmps.070301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2465/jmps.070301</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arnold, F., Curtius, J., Spreng, S., and Deshler, T.: Stratospheric aerosol
sulfuric acid: First direct in situ measurements using a novel balloon-based
mass spectrometer apparatus, J. Atmos. Chem., 30, 3–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006067511568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006067511568</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Austin, J. and Li, F.: On the relationship between the strength of the
Brewer-Dobson circulation and the age of stratospheric air, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L17807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026867" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026867</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Baumgardner, D., Kok, G., and Raga, G.: Warming of the Arctic lower
stratosphere by light absorbing particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018883" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018883</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bigg, E. K.: Stratospheric Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 910–917, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bigg, E. K., Ono, A., and Thompson, W. J.: Aerosols at altitudes between 20
and 37 km, Tellus, 22, 550–563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1970.tb00522.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1970.tb00522.x</a>,
1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Blake, D. F. and Kato, K.: Latitudinal distribution of black carbon soot in
the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
7195–7202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD03118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD03118</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blanchard, M. B., Brownlee, D. E., Bunch, T. E., Hodge, P. W., and Kyte, F.
T.: Meteoroid ablation spheres from deep-sea sediments, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett., 46, 178–190, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Nelson, S. M., Woo, J.-H., and
Klimont, Z.: A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon
emissions from combustion, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D14203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003697</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bunch, T. E. and Olsen, E.: Distribution and significance of chromium in
meteorites, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 39, 911–927,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(75)90037-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(75)90037-X</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., and Pósfai, M.:
Are black carbon and soot the same?, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-24821-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-24821-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Carn, S. A., Froyd, K. D., Anderson, B. E., Wennberg, P., Crounse, J.,
Spencer, K., Dibb, J. E., Krotkov, N. A., Browell, E. V., Hair, J. W.,
Diskin, G., Sachse, G., and Vay, S. A.: In situ measurements of tropospheric
volcanic plumes in Ecuador and Colombia during TC<sup>4</sup>, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, D00J24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014718" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014718</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Carrillo-Sánchez, J. D., Nesvorný, D., Pokorný, P., Janches, D.,
and Plane, J. M. C.: Sources of cosmic dust in the Earth's atmosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11979–11986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071697</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Kreidenweis, S. M., McInnes, L. M., Rogers, D. C., and DeMott, P.
J.: Single particle analyses of ice nucleating aerosols in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1391–1394,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y, Shah, N., Huggins, F. E., Huffman, G. P., Linak, W. P., and Miller,
C. A.: Investigation of primary fine particulate matter from coal combustion
by computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy, Fuel. Process. Technol.,
85, 743–761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.017</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Shah, N., Huggins, F. E., and Huffman, G. P.: Transmission electron
microscopy investigation of ultrafine coal fly ash particles, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 39, 1144–1151, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Chuan, R. L. and Woods, D. C.: The appearance of carbon aerosol particles in
the lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 11, 553–556, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cofer III, W. R., Purgold, G. C., Winstead, E. L., and Edahl, R. A.: Space
shuttle exhausted aluminum oxide: A measured particle size distribution, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 17371–17376, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Corbett, J. J. and Koehler, H. W.: Updated emissions from ocean shipping, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4650, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003751</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., and Murphy, D. M.: Ablation, flux, and
atmospheric implications of meteors inferred from stratospheric aerosol,
Science, 291, 1772–1775, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Ross, M. N.: Composition
of individual particles in the wakes of an Athena II rocket and the space
shuttle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015991" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015991</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M.
A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the Dominant
Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Della Corte, V., Rietmeijer, F. J. M., Rotundi, A., Ferrari, M., and
Palumbo, P.: Meteoric CaO and carbon smoke particles collected in the upper
stratosphere from an unanticipated source, Tellus B, 65, 20174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20174</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Diessel, C. F. K., Brothers, R. N., and Black, P. M.: Coalification and
graphitization in high-pressure schists in New Caledonia, Contrib. Mineral.
Petrol., 68, 63–78, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Ebert, M., Weigel, R., Kandler, K., Günther, G., Molleker, S., Grooß,
J.-U., Vogel, B., Weinbruch, S., and Borrmann, S.: Chemical analysis of
refractory stratospheric aerosol particles collected within the arctic vortex
and inside polar stratospheric clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8405–8421,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8405-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fahey, D. W., Keim, E. R., Boering, K. A., Brock, C. A., Wilson, J. C.,
Jonsson, H., Anthony, S., Hanisco, T. F., Wennberg, P., Miake-Lye, R. C.,
Salawitch, R., Louisnard, N., Woodbridge, E. L., Gao, R. S., Donnelly, S.,
Wamsley, R. C., Del Negro, L. A., Solomon, S., Daube, B. C., Wofsy, S. C.,
Webster, C. R., May, R. D., Kelly, K. K., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R.,
and Chan, K. R.: Emission measurements of the Concorde supersonic aircraft in
the lower stratosphere, Science, 270, 70–74,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5233.70" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5233.70</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Fahey, D. W., Gao, R. S., Carslaw, K. S., Kettleborough, J., Popp, P. J.,
Northway, M. J., Holecek, J. C., Ciciora, S. C., McLaughlin, R. J., Thompson,
T. L., Winkler, R. H., Baumgardner, D. G., Gandrud, B., Wennberg, P. O.,
Dhaniyala, S., McKinney, K., Peter, T., Salawitch, R. H., Bui, T. P., Elkins,
J. W., Webster, C. R., Atlas, E. L., Jost, H., Wilson, J. C., Herman, R. L.,
Kleinböhl, A., and von König, M.: The detection of large HNO<sub>3</sub>
particles in the winter Arctic stratosphere, Science, 291, 1026–1031, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Floss, C., El Goresy, A., Zinner, E., Kransel, G., Rammensee, W., and Palme,
H.: Elemental and isotopic fractionations produced through evaporation of the
Allende CV chondrilte: Implications for the origin of HAL-type hibonite
inclusions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 60, 1975–1997, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Fromm, M., Alfred, J., Hoppel, K., Hornstein, ., Bevilacqua, R., Shettle, E.,
Servranckx, R., Li, Z., and Stocks, B.: Observations of boreal forest fire
smoke in the stratosphere by POAM III, SAGE II, and lidar in 1998, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 27, 1407–1410, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011200" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011200</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Fromm, M., Tupper, A., Rosenfeld, D., Servranckx, R., and McRae, R.: Violent
pyro-convective storm devastates Australia's capital and pollutes the
stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05815, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025161" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025161</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fromm, M. D. and Servranckx, R.: Transport of forest fire smoke above the
tropopause by supercell convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016820" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016820</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Gaffney, J. S. and Marley, N. A.: The impacts of combustion emissions on air
quality and climate – From coal to biofuels and beyond, Atmos. Environ., 42,
23–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.016</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Garvie, L. A. J.: Extraterrestrial carbon nanospheres, Carbon, 44, 158–160,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.08.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.08.028</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Garvie, L. A. J. and Buseck, P. R.: Nanosized carbon-rich grains in
carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 224, 431–439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.024</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Garvie, L. A. J., Baumgardner, G., and Buseck, P. R.: Scanning electron
microscopical and cross sectional analysis of extraterrestrial carbonaceous
nanoglobules, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 43, 899–903,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01088.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01088.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Gómez-Martín, J. C., Bones, D. L., Carrillo-Sánchez, J. D.,
James, A. D., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., B. Fegley, J., and Plane, J. M.
C.: Novel experimental simulations of the atmospheric injection of meteoric
metals, Astrophys. J., 836, 212, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Greenblatt, J. B., Jost, H.-J., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J. R., Hurst, D.
F., Elkins, J. W., Schauffler, S. M., Atlas, E. L., Herman, R. L., Webster,,
C. R., Bui, T. B., Moore, F. L., Ray, E. A., Oltmans, S., Vömel, H.,
Blavier, J.-F., Sen, B., Stachnik, R. A., Toon, G. C., Engel, A.,
Müller, M., Schmidt, U., Bremer, H., Pierce, R. B., Sinnhuber, B.-M.,
Chipperfield, M., and Lefèvre, F.: Tracer-based determination of vortex
descent in the 1999/2000 Arctic winter, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8279,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000937" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000937</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, P. J. F.: Carbonaceous contaminants on support films for transmission
electron microscopy, Carbon, 39, 909–913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/nn9001598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/nn9001598</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, P. J. F., Vis, R. D., and Heymann, D.: Fullerene-like carbon
nanostructures in the Allende meteorite, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 183,
355–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00277-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00277-6</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Helsel, D. R.: Statistics for Censored Environmental Data Using
Minitab<span style="position:relative; bottom:0.5em; " class="text">®</span> and R, John Wiley &amp; Sons,
Hoboken, New Jersey, 324 pp., 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Holton, J. R., Hayes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B.,
and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-Troposphere exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33,
403–439, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hunten, D. M., Turco, R. P., and Toon, O. W.: Smoke and dust particles of
meteoric origin in the mesosphere and stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 37,
1342–1357, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Itaya, T.: Carbonaceous material in politic schists of the Sanbagawa
metamorphic belt in central Shikoku, Japan. Lithos., 14, 215–224, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jost, H.-J., Loewenstein, M., Greenblatt, J. B., Podolske, J.R., Bui, T. P.,
Hurst, D. F., Elkins, J. W., Herman, R. L., Webster, C. R., Schauffler, S.
M., Atlas, E. L., Newman, P. A., Lait, L. R., and Wofsy, S. C.: Mixing events
revealed by anomalous tracer relationships in the Arctic vortex during winter
1999/2000, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4795,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002380" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002380</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Jost, H.-J., Drdla, K., Stohl, A., Pfister, L., Loewenstein, M., Lopez, J.
P., Hudson, P. K., Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Fromm, M., Bui, T. P.,
Dea-Day, J., Gerbig, C., Mahoney, M. J., Richard, E. C., Spichtinger, N.,
Vellovic Pittman, J., Weinstock., E. M., Wilson, J. C., and Xueref, I.:
In-situ observations of mid-latitude forest fire plumes deep in the
stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L11101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019253" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019253</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E.: Sulfur in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 3975–3976,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ068i013p03975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ068i013p03975</a>, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E. and Manson, J. E.: Stratospheric aerosol studies, J. Geophys.
Res., 66, 2163–2182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i007p02163" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i007p02163</a>, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Junge, C. E., Changnon, C. W., and Manson, J. E., Stratospheric aerosols, J.
Meteorol., 18, 81–108, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kis, V. K., Pósfai, M., and Lábár, J. L.: Nanostructure of
atmospheric soot particles, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5533–5542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.012</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kocbach, A., Johansen, B. V., Schwarze, P. E., and Namork, E.: Analytical
electron microscopy of combustion particles: a comparison of vehicle exhaust
and residential wood smoke, Sci. Total Environ., 346,231–243,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.025</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Kojima, T., Buseck, P. R., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., and Mahoney, M. J.:
Aerosol particles from tropical convective systems: Cloud tops and cirrus
anvils, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D12201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004504" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004504</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Kojima, T., Buseck, P. R., and Reeves, J. M.: Aerosol particles from tropical
convective systems: 2. Cloud bases, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D09203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005173</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T.,
Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R.,
Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E.,
Antuña-Marrero, J.-C., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J.,
Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke,
D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger,
L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol – Observations,
processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lauer, A., Eyring, V., Hendricks, J., Jöckel, P., and Lohmann, U.: Global
model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and
the radiation budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5061–5079,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5061-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, L.: NADA: Nondetects And Data Analysis for environmental data. R package
version 1.5-6, available at:
<a href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NADA" target="_blank">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NADA</a> (last access: March 2017), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Li, W. and Shao, L.: Transmission electron microscopy study of aerosol
particles from the brown hazes in northern China, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D09302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011285</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Song, C., Song, J., Lv, G., Dong, S., and Zaho, Z.: Evolution of the
nanostructure, fractal dimension and size of in-cylinder soot during diesel
combustion process, Combust. Flame, 158, 1624–1630,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.006</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Liati, A., Brem, B. T., Durdina, L., Vögtli, M., Dasilva, Y. A. R.,
Eggenschwiler, P. D., and Wang, J.: Electron microscopic study of soot
particulate matter emissions from aircraft turbine engines, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 48, 10975–10983, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es501809b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es501809b</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Lieke, K. I., Rosenørn, T., Pedersen, J., Larsson, D., Kling, J.,
Fuglsang, K., and Bilde, M.: Micro-and Nanostructural Characteristics of
Particles Before and After an Exhaust Gas Recirculation System Scrubber,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 47, 1038–1046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.813012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.813012</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Manney, G. L. and Sabutis, J. L.: Development of the polar vortex in the
1999-2000 Arctic winter stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 2589–2592,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Carn, S. A., Hermann, M., Heue,
K.-P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Influence of the 2008 Kasatochi
volcanic eruption on sulfurous and carbonaceous aerosol constituents in the
lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12813,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038735</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Andersson, S. M., Weigelt, A., Hermann, M.,
Assmann, D., Voigtländer, J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., van Velthoven, P.
J. F., and Zahn, A.: Comparison between CARIBIC Aerosol Samples Analysed by
Accelerator-Based Methods and Optical Particle Counter Measurements, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 7, 2581–2596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2581-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2581-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Matrajt, G., Messenger, S., Brownlee, D., and Joswiak, D.: Diverse forms of
primordial organic matter identified in interplanetary dust particles,
Meteorit. Plant. Sci., 47, 525–549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01310.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01310.x</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Mattis, I., Siefert, P., Müller, D., Tesche, M., Hiebsch, A., Kanitz, T.,
Schmidt, J., Finger, F., Wandinger, U., and Ansmann, A.: Volcanic aerosol
layers observed with multiwavelength Raman lidar over central Europe in
2008–2009, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L04, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013472" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013472</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Mazaheri, M., Bostrom, T. E., Johnson, G. R., and Morawska, L.: Composition
and morphology of particle emissions from in-use aircraft during takeoff and
landing, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5235–5242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es3046058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es3046058</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Mills, M. J., Toon, O. B., Vaida, V., Hintze, P. E., Kjaergaard, H. G.,
Schofield, D. P., and Robinson, T. W.: Photolysis of sulfuric acid vapor by
visible light as a source of the polar stratospheric CN layer, J. Geophys.
Res., 100, D08201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005519" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005519</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Mossop, S. C.: Stratospheric Particles at 20 km, Science, 4891, 325–326,
1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Mossop, S. C.: Stratospheric particles at 20 km altitude, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 29, 201–207, 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Murrell, M. T., Davis, P. A., Nishiizumi, K., and Millard, H. T.: Deep-sea
spherules from Pacific clay: Mass distribution and influx rate, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 44, 2067–2074, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Mahoney, M. J.: In Situ Measurements of
Organics, Meteoritic Material, Mercury, and Other Elements in Aerosols at 5
to 19 Kilometers, Science, 282, 1664–1669,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5394.1664" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5394.1664</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Hudson, P. K., Thomson, D. S., Wilson, J. C.,
Kojima, T., and Buseck, P. R.: Particle Generation and Resuspension in
Aircraft Inlets when Flying in Clouds, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 401–409,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Hudson, P. K., and Thomson, D. S.: Carbonaceous
material in aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and tropopause
region, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D04203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007297" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007297</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Froyd, K. D., Schwarz, J. P., and Wilson, J. C.: Observations
of the chemical composition of stratospheric aerosol particles, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 140, 1269–1278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2213</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Newman, P. A., Wilson, J. C., Ross, M. N., Brock, C. A., Sheridan, P. J.,
Schoeberl, M. R., Lait, L. R., Bui, T. P., Loewenstein, M., and Podolske, J.
R.: Chance encounter with a stratospheric kerosene rocket plume from Russia
over California, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 959–962, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011972" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011972</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Newman, P. A., Harris, N. R. P., Adriani, A., Amanatidis, G. T., Anderson,
J. G., Braathen, G. O., Brune, W. H., Carslaw, K. S., Craig, M. S., DeCola,
P. L., Guirlet, M., Hipskind, R. S., Kurylo, M. J., Küllman, H., Larsen,
N., Mégie, G. J., Pommereau, J.-P., Poole, L. R., Schoeberl, M. R.,
Stroh, F., Toon, O. B., Trepte, C. R., and Van Roozendael, M.: An overview
of the SOLVE/THESEO 2000 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8259,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001303" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001303</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, H. N., Martinsson, B. G., Wagner, J. B., Carlemalm, E., Ebert, M.,
Weinbruch, S., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Heintzenberg, J., Hermann, M.,
Schuck, T., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Chemical composition and
morphology of individual aerosol particles from a CARIBIC flight at 10 km
altitude between 50° N and 30° S, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D23209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009956" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009956</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
NOAA: Volcano Events, available at:
<a href="https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/results?type_15=Like&amp;query_15=&amp;op_30=eq&amp;v_30=&amp;ge_23=&amp;le_23=&amp;op_29=eq&amp;v_29=&amp;type_16=Like&amp;query_16=&amp;le_17=&amp;ge_18=&amp;le_18=&amp;ge_17=&amp;op_20=eq&amp;v_20=&amp;ge_7=&amp;le_7=&amp;bt_24=&amp;st_24=&amp;type_25=EXACT&amp;query_25=None+Selected&amp;bt_26=&amp;st_26=&amp;type_27=EXACT&amp;query_27=None+Selected&amp;type_12=Exact&amp;query_12=&amp;type_11=Exact&amp;query_11=&amp;t=102557&amp;s=50&amp;d=50" target="_blank">https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/results?type_15=Like&amp;query_15=&amp;op_30=eq&amp;v_30=&amp;ge_23=&amp;le_23=&amp;op_29=eq&amp;v_29=&amp;type_16=Like&amp;query_16=&amp;le_17=&amp;ge_18=&amp;le_18=&amp;ge_17=&amp;op_20=eq&amp;v_20=&amp;ge_7=&amp;le_7=&amp;bt_24=&amp;st_24=&amp;type_25=EXACT&amp;query_25=None+Selected&amp;bt_26=&amp;st_26=&amp;type_27=EXACT&amp;query_27=None+Selected&amp;type_12=Exact&amp;query_12=&amp;type_11=Exact&amp;query_11=&amp;t=102557&amp;s=50&amp;d=50</a>,
last access: January 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Palme, H. and Jones, A.: Solar system abundances of the elements, in:
Meteorites, Comets, and Planets, edited by: Davis, A. M., Treatise on
Geochemistry Vol. 1, 41–61, Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Papike, J. J. (Ed.): Planetary materials, 36, Mineralogical Society of Amer.,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Pesquera, A. and Velasco, F.: Metamorphism of the Paleozoic Cinco Villas
massif (Basque Pyrenees): illite crystallinity and graphitization degree,
Mineral. Mag., 52, 615–625, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Peter, T.: Microphysics and heterogeneous chemistry of polar stratospheric
clouds, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 48, 785–822,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.785</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Peter, T. and Grooß, J. U.: Polar Stratospheric Clouds and Sulfate
Aerosol Particles: Microphysics, Denitrification and Heterogeneous Chemistry,
chap. 4, RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A., Döpelheuer, A., Brock, C. A., and Schröder, F.: In situ
observations and model calculations of black carbon emission by aircraft at
cruise altitude, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22171–22181,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900460</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U.,
Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting “black
carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Plane, J. M. C.: Cosmic dust in the earth's atmosphere, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41,
6507–6518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35132c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35132c</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Popovitcheva, O. B., Persiantseva, N. M., Trukhin, M. E., Rulev, G. B.,
Shonija, N. K., Buriko, Y. Y., Starik, A. M., Demirdjian, B., Ferry, D., and
Suzanne, J.: Experimental characterization of aircraft combustor soot:
Microstructure, surface area, porosity and water adsorption, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 19, 4421–4426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B004345L" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B004345L</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Popovicheva, O., Kireeva, E., Persiantseva, N., Timofeev, M., Bladt, H.,
Ivleva, N. P., Niessner, R., and Moldanová, J.: Microscopic
characterization of individual particles from multicomponent ship exhaust, J.
Environ. Monit., 14, 3101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30338h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30338h</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Pósfai, M., Simonics, R., Li, J., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.:
Individual aerosol particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 1.
Compositions and size distributions of carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 8483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002291" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002291</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Pósfai, M., Gelencsér, A., Simonics, R., Arató, K., Li, J.,
Hobbs, R. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls: Particles from
biomass and biofuel burning, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06213,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004169</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Pueschel, R. F., Blake, D. F., Snetsinger, K. G., Hansen, A. D. A., Verma,
S., and Kato, K.: Black carbon (soot) aerosol in the lower stratosphere and
upper troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1659–1662,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL01801" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL01801</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Pueschel, R. F., Boering, K. A., Verma, S., Howard, S. D., Ferry, G. V.,
Goodman, J., Allen, D. A., and Hamill, P.: Soot aerosol in the lower
stratosphere: Pole-to-pole variability and contributions by aircraft, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 13113–13118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03061</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Rasband, W. S.: ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
Maryland, USA, available at: <a href="http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/" target="_blank">http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/</a> (last access: March 2017),
1997–2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, version 3.3.0,
available at: <a href="https://www.R-project.org/" target="_blank">https://www.R-project.org/</a> (last access: March 2017), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Renard, J.-B., Brogniez, C., Berthet, G., Bourgeois, Q., Gaubicher, B.,
Chartier, M., Balois, J.-Y., Verwaerde, C., Auriol, F., Francois, P.,
Daugeron, D., and Engrand, C.: Vertical distribution of the different types
of aerosols in the stratosphere: Detection of solid particles and analysis
of their spatial variability, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D21303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010150</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Rosen, J. M.: The Boiling Point of Stratospheric Aerosols, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 10, 1044–1046, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Ross, M. N. and Sheaffer, P. M.: Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine
emissions, Earth's Future, 2, 177–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000160</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Saunders, R. W., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Benz, S., Wagner, R., Saathoff,
H., Connolly, P. J., Burgess, R., Murray, B. J., Gallagher, M., Wills, R.,
and Plane, J. M. C.: An aerosol chamber investigation of the heterogeneous
ice nucleating potential of refractory nanoparticles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
1227–1247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1227-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1227-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Saunders, R. W., Dhomse, S., Tian, W. S., Chipperfield, M. P., and Plane, J. M. C.: Interactions of
meteoric smoke particles with sulphuric acid in the Earth's stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4387–4398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4387-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4387-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kalesse, H., Rautenhaus,
M., Lichtenstern, M., Schlager, H., Ancellet, G., Arnold, F., Gerding, M.,
Mattis, I., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol layers from the 2008
eruptions of Mount Okmok and Mount Kasatochi: In situ upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere measurements of sulfate and organics over Europe, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D00L07, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013628" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013628</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Sheridan, P. J., Brock, C. A., and Wilson, J. C.: Aerosol particles in the
upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Elemental composition and
morphology of individual particles in northern midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 21, 2587–2590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01387" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01387</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Siddaway, J. M. and Petelina, S. V.: Transport and evolution of the 2009
Australian Black Saturday bushfire smoke in the lower stratosphere observed
by OSIRIS and Odin, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D06203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015162" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015162</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Siebert, J., Timmis, C., Vaughan, G., and Fricke, K. H.: A strange cloud in
the Arctic summer stratosphere 1998 above Esrange (68° N), Sweden,
Ann. Geophys., 18, 505–509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-0505-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-0505-0</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Smekens, A., Godoi, R. H. M., Berghmans, P., and van Grieken, R.:
Characterisation of soot emitted by domestic heating, aircraft and cars
using diesel or biodiesel, J. Atmos. Chem., 52, 45–62,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-6903-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-6903-7</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,
Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Song, J., Alam, M., and Boehman, A. L.: Characterization of diesel and
biodiesel soot, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 49, 767, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, D. J.: Principles and Practice of Variable Pressure/Environmental
Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-ESEM), John Wiley and Sons, Ltd,
Publication, 221 pp., 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Strand, L. D., Bowyer, J. M., Varsi, G., Laue, E. G., and Gauldin, R.:
Characterization of Particulates in the Exhaust Plume of Large
Solid-Propellant Rockets, J. Spacecraft Rockets, 18, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Strawa, A. W., Drdla, K., Ferry, G. V., Verma, S., Pueschel, P. F., Yasuda,
M., Salawitch, R. J., Gao, R. S., Howard, S. D., Bui, P. T., Loewenstein, M.,
Elkins, J. W., Perkins, K., and Cohen, R.: Carbonaceous aerosol (soot)
measured in the lower stratosphere during POLARIS and its role in
stratospheric photochemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26753–26766,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900453</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Testa Jr., J. P., Stephens, J. R., Berg, W. W., Cahill, T. A., Onaka, T.,
Nakada, Y., Arnold, J. R., Fong, N., and Sperry, P. D.: Collection of
microparticles at high balloon altitudes in the stratosphere, Earth Planet.
Sci. Lett., 98, 287–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(90)90031-R" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(90)90031-R</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Thornberry, T., Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., Anderson, B. E.,
Thornhill, K. L., and Winstead, E. L.: Persistence of organic carbon in
heated aerosol residuals measured during Tropical Composition Cloud and
Climate Coupling (TC4), J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J02, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012721</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Torvela, T., Tissari, J., Sippula, O., Kaivosoja, T., Leskinen, J.,
Virén, A., Lähde, A., and Jokiniemi, J.: Effect of wood combustion
conditions on the morphology of freshly emitted fine particles, Atmos.
Environ., 87, 65–76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.028</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Tumolva, L., Park, J.-Y., Kim, J.-S., Miller, A. L., Chow, J. C., Watson, J.
G., and Park, K.: Morphological and elemental classification of freshly
emitted soot particles and atmospheric ultrafine particles using TEM/EDS,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 202–215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903518907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903518907</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Turco, R. P., Toon, O. B., Hamill, P., and Whitten, R. C.: Effects of
Meteoric Debris on Stratospheric Aerosols and Gases, J. Geophys. Res., 86,
1113–1128, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Twohy, C. H. and Gandrud, B. W.: Electron microscope analysis of residual
particles from aircraft contrails, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 1359–1362,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03162" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03162</a>, 1998.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Vander Wal, R. L., Bryg, V. M., and Hays, M. D.: Fingerprinting soot (towards
source identification): physical structure and chemical composition, J.
Aerosol Sci., 41, 108–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.08.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.08.008</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Vernier, J.-P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J. P., Bourassa, A., Peolon, J.,
Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and
Vargas, F.: Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the
stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L12807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Schlager, H., Luo, B. P., Dörnbrack, A., Roiger, A., Stock, P.,
Curtius, J., Vössing, H., Borrmann, S., Davies, S., Konopka, P., Schiller,
C., Shur, G., and Peter, T.: Nitric Acid Trihydrate (NAT) formation at low
NAT supersaturation in Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
5, 1371–1380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1371-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1371-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Weigel, R., Volk, C. M., Kandler, K., Hösen, E., Günther, G., Vogel, B.,
Grooß, J.-U., Khaykin, S., Belyaev, G. V., and Borrmann, S.: Enhancements
of the refractory submicron aerosol fraction in the Arctic polar vortex:
feature or exception?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12319–12342,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12319-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Weinbruch, S., Benker, N., Kandler, K., Ebert, M., Ellingsen, D. G.,
Berlinger, B., and Thomassen, Y.: Morphology, chemical composition and
nanostructure of single carbon-rich particles studied by transmission
electron microscopy: source apportionment in workroom air of aluminium
smelters, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 408, 1151–1158,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9217-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9217-x</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Wentzel, M., Gorzawski, H., Naumann, K.-H., Saathoff, H., and Weinbruch, S.:
Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization of
soot aerosols, Aerosol Sci., 34, 1347–1370,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson J. C., Blackshear E. D., and Hyun J. H.: The Function and Response of
an Improved Stratospheric Condensation Nucleus Counter, J. Geophys. Res., 88,
6781–6785, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, J. C., Lee, S.-H., Reeves, J. M., Brock, C. A., Jonsson, H. H.,
Lafleur, B. G., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J., Atlas, E., Boering, K., Toon,
G., Fahey, D., Bui, T. P., Diskin, G., and Moore, F.: Steady-state aerosol
distributions in the extra-tropical, lower stratosphere and the processes
that maintain them, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6617–6626,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6617-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6617-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Zolensky, M. E. and Mackinnon, I. D. R.: Accurate stratospheric particle size
distributions from a flat plate collection surface, J. Geophys. Res., 90,
5801–5808, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Zolensky, M. E., McKay, D. S., and Kaczor, L. A.: A Tenfold Increase in the
Abundance of Large Solid Particles in the Stratosphere, as Measured Over the
Period 1976-1984, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 1047–1056,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD01p01047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD01p01047</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
