<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Size-resolved aerosol and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) properties in the
remote marine South China Sea – Part 1: Observations and source
classification</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Size-resolved aerosol and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) properties }?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~A.~Atwood et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Atwood</surname><given-names>Samuel A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9291-2362</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Reid</surname><given-names>Jeffrey S.</given-names></name>
          <email>jeffrey.reid@nrlmry.navy.mil</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kreidenweis</surname><given-names>Sonia M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-2914</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Blake</surname><given-names>Donald R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Jonsson</surname><given-names>Haflidi H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Lagrosas</surname><given-names>Nofel D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-4717</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Xian</surname><given-names>Peng</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-8045</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Reid</surname><given-names>Elizabeth A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Sessions</surname><given-names>Walter R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-4894</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Simpas</surname><given-names>James B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9894-1797</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Ft.
Collins, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Meteorology, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Manila Observatory, Manila, Philippines</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>CSC Inc. at Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Space Sciences Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
WI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jeffrey S. Reid (jeffrey.reid@nrlmry.navy.mil)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1105</fpage><lpage>1123</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Ship-based measurements of aerosol and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) properties are presented for 2 weeks of observations in
remote marine regions of the South China Sea/East Sea during the
southwestern monsoon (SWM) season. Smoke from extensive biomass burning
throughout the Maritime Continent advected into this region during the SWM,
where it was mixed with anthropogenic continental pollution and emissions
from heavy shipping activities. Eight aerosol types were identified using a
k-means cluster analysis with data from a size-resolved CCN characterization
system. Interpretation of the clusters was supplemented by additional
onboard aerosol and meteorological measurements, satellite, and model
products for the region. A typical bimodal marine boundary layer background
aerosol population was identified and observed mixing with accumulation mode
aerosol from other sources, primarily smoke from fires in Borneo and
Sumatra. Hygroscopicity was assessed using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter and was
found to average 0.40 for samples dominated by aged accumulation mode
smoke; 0.65 for accumulation mode marine aerosol; 0.60 in an anthropogenic
aerosol plume; and 0.22 during a short period that was characterized by
elevated levels of volatile organic compounds not associated with biomass
burning impacts. As a special subset of the background marine aerosol, clean
air masses substantially scrubbed of particles were observed following heavy
precipitation or the passage of squall lines, with changes in observed
aerosol properties occurring on the order of minutes. Average CN number
concentrations, size distributions, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are reported for
each population type, along with CCN number concentrations for particles
that activated at supersaturations between 0.14  and 0.85 %.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>In the Southeast Asian Maritime Continent (MC) and South China Sea/East Sea
(SCS) aerosol particles are expected to play an important role modulating
cloud development, precipitation, and radiative properties that affect heat
transfer through the atmosphere
(Reid et al., 2013).
Assessment of aerosol properties important to understanding such processes
in remote marine segments of this region has proven difficult. Extensive
cloud cover confounds remote sensing and leads to a clear-sky bias in
observations
(Feng
and Christopher, 2013; Reid et al., 2013). Aerosol monitoring has largely
been confined to urban centers that are often dominated by local emissions,
while in situ sampling in remote areas has been limited in duration and
scope
(Irwin
et al., 2011; Robinson et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2014; Reid et al., 2015).
Airborne measurements have provided some representation of aerosol over
wider regions and at various levels
(Hewitt
et al., 2010; Robinson et al., 2012), but additional questions regarding the
representativeness of such point measurements across larger timescales
remain. Similarly, the impact of various aerosol sources on surface
properties and concentrations in remote marine regions, and their
relationship to expected transport pathways and the few remotely sensed
column measurements that exist, is not well understood. Thus, over these
remote ocean regions the aerosol optical and physical properties, their
variability in time and space, and the processes controlling aerosol
life cycle have not been well constrained. This uncertainty in the aerosol
environment itself comes in addition to uncertainty about its impacts on
meteorological processes. Aerosol concentration has been found to relate to
cloud development, cloud microphysics, and precipitation formation in the
region (Yu
et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013), while smoke may affect
cloud droplet size distributions and the onset of precipitation, similar to
processes observed in other tropical regions impacted by biomass burning
(Rosenfeld, 1999; Andreae
et al., 2004). Improved knowledge of the aerosol environment and
aerosol–cloud–climate relationships in the Southeast Asian region has
therefore been identified as important regionally, and in regards to links
with global climate and large-scale aerosol budgets
(Reid et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>During the May through October southwestern monsoon (SWM) season, burning
throughout the MC typically reaches its greatest extent between August and
early October as precipitation associated with the Intertropical Convergence
Zone (ITCZ) shifts north into Indochina (Reid et
al., 2012). The resulting heavy smoke mixes with urban, industrial, marine,
and shipping emissions in an exceedingly complex aerosol mixture
(Balasubramanian et al., 2003; Atwood et al., 2013; Reid et al., 2013). During this period,
aerosol particles from surface sources are generally advected by low-level
mean winds throughout the SCS, where they are scavenged by precipitation or
eventually removed in the monsoonal trough east of the Philippines
(Reid et al., 2012, 2015; Wang et al., 2013; Xian et al., 2013). As a result, the
region of the SCS and Sulu Sea to the north and east of Borneo has been
predicted to be a receptor for much of these biomass burning and pollution
emissions from the greater MC during periods when air masses enter more
convective phases of the SWM
(Reid et al., 2012; Xian et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Remote marine aerosol and its impact on atmospheric processes have been
studied in a number of ocean regions
(Hoppel et al., 1986; Russell et al., 1994; Jensen et al., 1996; Brechtel et al.,
1998; Murphy et al., 1998; Bates et al., 2000; Petters et al., 2006; Quinn
et al., 2006). These studies identified a background submicron marine
aerosol that is composed of two distinct modes in the number distribution,
due to processing by non-precipitating clouds
(Hoppel
et al., 1986, 1994; Hudson et al., 2015). Bates et al. (2000) linked the differences in the
average size distributions of background marine aerosol in two remote marine
regions to regional meteorology, including differences in aerosol residence
time and cloud processing. Increased wind speeds lead to increased flux of
sea salt particles into the atmosphere, contributing submicron particles as
small as 40 nm in diameter
(O'Dowd and Leeuw, 2007; Russell et al., 2010; de Leeuw et al., 2011; Bates et al.,
2012; Modini et al., 2015). Non-sea-salt-sulfate and organic matter from
marine sources also comprise large fractions of the submicron aerosol mass
loading in clean and background marine air masses
(Murphy et al., 1998; Cavalli et al., 2004). As air masses from more terrestrial or
anthropogenically influenced regions advect over remote marine regions,
submicron size distributions and chemical compositions often diverge from
background conditions
(Bates et al., 2000; Quinn et al., 2006). More recent studies have further
quantified the role of various processes in shaping the marine aerosol
population, including primary and secondary production, aging, and mixing
with non-marine sources
(Allan et al., 2009; Russell et al., 2010; de Leeuw et al., 2011; Bates et al.,
2012; Prather et al., 2013; Frossard et al., 2014; Modini et al., 2015). In
particular, the contribution of dissolved organic components in the sea
surface microlayer to aerosol produced by bubble breaking has been noted,
with increasing organic enrichment as size decreases
(Russell et al., 2010; Bates et al., 2012; Prather et al., 2013; Quinn et al., 2014).
Additional studies into the source-dependent composition of marine aerosol
have indicated non-marine sources can be important contributors to aerosol
in marine regions. Shank et al. (2012) found evidence of biomass burning
and combustion impacts on remote marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosol,
including in nominally clean marine conditions. These authors also
noted the limited importance of organic components in particulate matter in
a tropical Pacific location, as compared to other regions where organics
were a more important fraction of the submicron aerosol. Frossard et al. (2014) found
influences on aerosol organic matter from shipping and mixing with
non-marine sources in 63 % of observations across five ocean regions.
Modini et al. (2015)
evaluated the contribution of primary marine aerosol to cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) number concentrations and found that it accounted for less
than 10 % of CCN active at 0.9 % supersaturation during low-wind
conditions, with increasing importance (up to 58 % of CCN) at higher wind
speeds and lower environmental supersaturations. Taken as a whole, recent
understanding of marine aerosol indicates that the background marine aerosol
and primary marine emissions can be complex and play an important role in
cloud, radiative, and precipitation processes, and that other sources of
aerosol contribute to number and mass concentrations, even in relatively
clean and/or remote regions.</p>
      <p>Two research cruises were conducted in the remote MBL
of the SCS and Sulu Sea during the 2011 and 2012 SWM seasons to
perform in situ aerosol and meteorological measurements, and to investigate
marine aerosol and its impacts on clouds, precipitation, and climate as it
reflects the complex set of sources in the region
(Reid et al., 2015, 2016). In this paper, we present observations of aerosol and
CCN characteristics during the second cruise, along with their relationship
to aerosol source type, air mass, and meteorological phenomena. These
measurements represent the first in situ observations of size-resolved CCN
properties in the area and fill a gap in knowledge needed to assess
aerosol–cloud–precipitation relationships in the data-poor remote marine SCS
region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods and cruise description</title>
      <p>The SCS research cruises occurred during the month of September in both 2011
and 2012, and took place aboard the 35 m, 186 t M/Y <italic>Vasco</italic>,
operated out of Manila by Cosmix Underwater Research Ltd. A thorough
description of the vessel and instrumentation for the 2011 and 2012 cruises
can be found in Reid et al. (2015, 2016), respectively. Here we
are concerned with the 2012 cruise, which departed Manila on 4 September
from Navotas, Manila Bay, and returned on 29 September. The sampling
strategy for these cruises involved moving between various anchorages in the
SCS and Sulu Sea around the Palawan archipelago. Sampling occurred
throughout the cruise, but aerosol measurements were shut down or
invalidated and removed from the dataset during periods when representative
sampling could not be achieved (i.e., measured relative wind not from over
the ship bow, leading to potential self-sampling; see
Reid et al. (2016) for more details).
Remaining periods of self-sampling of ship emissions were identified by
anomalous size distributions and high particle number concentrations, and
were removed from the data set before analysis. The size-resolved CCN system
(Petters et al., 2009) that provided
the bulk of the measurements reported here had a computer failure that, once
fixed, limited reliable measurements to primarily the last 2 weeks of the
cruise; hence we focus here on data from 14 to 26 September 2012. This period
included several transits along the east side of Palawan Island, stationary
measurements at an anchorage between Palawan and Borneo (7.86<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E),
and two anchorages at Tubbataha Reef in the middle of the Sulu Sea (8.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
119.26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Aerosol measurements</title>
      <p>A DMT passive cavity aerosol spectrometer probe (PCASP) X2 configured in an
aviation pod with heated inlet was mounted at the <italic>Vasco</italic> top mast
approximately 10 m above the water surface to provide optical measurements
of dry-particle size distributions between approximately 125 nm and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Additional aerosol instrumentation was located in a forward
locker, below and slightly behind the aerosol inlet. Sampled air was fed to
the locker via a 3 cm diameter, 4 m long inlet located next to the PCASP.
Although the inlet was not aspirated, several high-flow-rate nephelometers
sampling from the inlet ensured low residence time in the sample line.
Further details and additional instrumentation are discussed in Reid et al. (2016). A size-resolved CCN system sampled
air from the inlet just inside the instrument locker with an approximately 2 m,
0.635 cm diameter copper tube. A URG cyclone with an approximate 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m 50 % size cut was used to remove the largest particles from
this CCN sampling line, including coarse-mode sea salt, to minimize wear and
corrosion on downstream components. The sample was then dried using a
Perma Pure poly-tube Nafion dryer with low-pressure sheath air to relative humidity (RH) values
below 30 %, as verified by occasional in-line checks using a handheld
Extech hygro-thermometer.</p>
      <p>Approximately 1.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was drawn through the
size-resolved CCN system, which was comprised of an X-ray neutralizer (TSI Model
3087) and a TSI 3080 electrostatic classifier with a long differential mobility analyzer (DMA) column (TSI
Model 3081) for quasi-monodisperse particle sizing, preceded by a 0.071 cm
orifice (0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m 50 % cut point diameter) impactor. The DMA was
operated with a sheath flow rate of 5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and sample
flow rate of 1.1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The sample flow was then split between a TSI 3782
water-based condensation particle counter (CPC) with a flow rate of 0.6 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a
DMT cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNc) with a flow rate of 0.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Flow rates used to calculate number concentrations were calibrated using a
Gilibrator (Models 800285 &amp; 800286) system, with in-line measurements
conducted prior to each CCNc supersaturation calibration session as noted
below.</p>
      <p>The size-resolved CCN system measured CN and CCN (activated particles at a
CCNc set point supersaturation) concentrations in each of 30
quasi-monodisperse size bins between 17  and 500 nm. The CCNc was
operated at five temperature gradient settings and calibrated using ammonium
sulfate (following the methods described by Petters et al., 2009) to measure the corresponding
maximum environmental supersaturation within the CCNc column. The scan of
all 30 size bins at each supersaturation took approximately 15 min,
while a complete measurement over all five supersaturation settings took
approximately 2 h due to pauses between settings while column
temperatures stabilized. The measured CN and CCN particle counts were
inverted using the methodology of Petters et al. (2009). The inversion yielded the dry
ambient aerosol size distribution over the measured range
(d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dlog<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) and the
equivalent distribution of CCN particles activated at each supersaturation
(dCCN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dlog<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The activated fraction spectrum was then
calculated as the fraction of total particles that formed droplets (CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CN)
at each diameter. Each activated fraction spectrum was then fit using a
three-parameter fit similar to the approach of Rose et al. (2010).
The diameter at which 50 % of particles in the fit had activated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to calculate the associated hygroscopicity parameter,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Petters and Kreidenweis,
2007). Full calibration of the CCN system flow rates and supersaturations
took 2 to 5 h to complete and was therefore conducted four times
throughout the study on 15, 20, 27, and 29 September to limit measurement
downtime. Each calibration session involved running a calibration scan at
each CCNc temperature gradient setting (with two full scans conducted at
each setting on 27 September), yielding a total of five calibrations per setting
throughout the cruise. Calibrated supersaturation set points and their
respective standard deviations were 0.14 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01, 0.38 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01, 0.52 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01, 0.71 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02, and 0.85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03,
with no significant trend or calibration drift noted during
the cruise. The measured range of 0.14 to 0.85 % supersaturation was
selected based on values that could both be reliably measured by the CCNc
instrument and represented supersaturations expected in the region where
aerosol effects may be relevant, ranging from marine stratocumulus with peak
supersaturations often below 0.2 % to highly convective clouds with
supersaturations above 1 %
(Reutter
et al., 2009; Ward et al., 2010; Tao et al., 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> <italic>Vasco</italic> cruise locations (squares) and 72 h,
500 m HYSPLIT back-trajectories; MODIS fire detections (dots) from Terra and
Aqua are included for each day (color coded) during the sampling period.
<bold>(b)</bold> PCASP reconstructed accumulation mode (125–800 nm) mass
concentration (assumed density 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NAAPS-estimated smoke and sulfate mass concentration along the <italic>Vasco</italic>
ship track.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1105/2017/acp-17-1105-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time lines of measured and derived variables during the <italic>Vasco</italic>
2012 cruise. In all figures, background colors correspond to aerosol type
classification from the cluster analysis, as indicated in the legend in panel
<bold>(a)</bold>. <bold>(a)</bold> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dlog<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra from the CCN
system measurements with black dots at best-fit modal median diameters;
<bold>(b)</bold> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>dlog<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra derived from the PCASP
measurements; <bold>(c)</bold> total number concentrations measured by the CCN
system (blue; shaded below for contrast) and the PCASP (red), with 60 min
boxcar average smoothing; gas canister grab sample concentrations for carbon
monoxide, benzene, and toluene are shown on the right axis with colored
numbers indicating points above the upper scale extent; <bold>(d)</bold> wind
speed and disdrometer rain rate from the <italic>Vasco</italic> weather tower.
<bold>(e, f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter (red) and CCN concentrations (blue) for
0.14 and 0.38 % supersaturation settings (corresponding approximately to
accumulation and Aitken modes, respectively), with total activated particle
number fraction (CCN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>SS % </mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>Total</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bars in grey.
Error bars on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data points indicate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values associated
with 25 %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>75 % activated fraction curve fits.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1105/2017/acp-17-1105-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>As the SCS environment tended to have relatively few particles smaller than
50 nm, only the measurements at the 0.14 and 0.38 % supersaturation
settings had complete activation curves that spanned the measured particle
diameter range. For the higher supersaturation settings, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
diameter tended to occur at small diameters with low CN and CCN
concentrations, thereby increasing uncertainty in the associated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values. As a result, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were only reported for the 0.14
and 0.38 % supersaturation settings. In addition, rather than
continuously running a full 2 h scan across all supersaturation
settings, individual scans (approximately 15 min) were run more often
for the 0.14 and 0.38 % settings to take advantage of this outcome.
The range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured for the particles active at
supersaturations of 0.14 and 0.38 % was typically between about 0.3
and 0.8, although the full range was between 0.2 and 1.1 (Fig. 2e, f).
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameters for these hygroscopicity values spanned approximately
96 to 150 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range: 0.8–0.2) for the 0.14 % supersaturation
setting, and 45 to 80 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range: 1.1–0.2) for the 0.38 %
setting. The hygroscopicity measurements were therefore more indicative of
accumulation mode hygroscopicity during the 0.14 % scans and Aitken mode
hygroscopicity during those at 0.38 %. Additionally, particles outside
these size ranges were not well quantified by these measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Ancillary measurements and products</title>
      <p>Additional measurements of aerosol composition were used to validate
identified source types impacting the measurements throughout the cruise. A
series of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> filters were collected by 5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> MiniVol Tactical Air
Samplers with sampling periods that varied between 1 and 2.5
days, and were analyzed for elemental concentrations by gravimetric, X-ray fluorescence (XRF),
and ion chromatography methods, and organic and black carbon concentrations
by the thermal-optical methods  (Reid et
al., 2016). Trace gas concentrations were measured intermittently throughout
the cruise by whole-air gas samples for gas chromatography analysis, as
discussed further in Reid et al. (2016).</p>
      <p>A suite of weather-monitoring instruments was located on a 3 m bow mast to
provide coincident meteorological measurements throughout the study. From
this suite, wind speed and wind direction measurements from a Campbell sonic
anemometer were used to identify gust front passage. An OTT Parsivel
disdrometer was utilized to measure precipitation, from which only the rain
rate measurements were used in this analysis.</p>
      <p>Several remote-sensing and model products were used to characterize the
wider SCS atmospheric environment and to identify potential aerosol sources.
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) visible and infrared
(IR) products were used to identify convection and squall
line propagation across the SCS. The MODIS Collection 6 MOD08 Level 3 daily
aerosol optical depth (AOD) products were utilized for AOD measurements in the
region, though cloud cover obscured measurements throughout much of the
study. MODIS active fire hot spot analysis and the Fire Locating and Modeling of Burning
Emissions (FLAMBE) smoke flux product
from Terra and Aqua were used to identify the locations and times during
which fires were burning in the MC (Giglio
et al., 2003; Reid et al., 2009; Hyer et al., 2013). Simulations from
the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System
(NOGAPS) model were used to represent surface and 700 hPa winds,
interpolated to 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution and averaged over the study
period, to provide an estimate of typical aerosol transport pathways
(Hogan and Rosmond, 1991; Xian et al., 2013). Finally, the Navy Aerosol Analysis
and Prediction System (NAAPS) was used to predict smoke and sulfate aerosol
mass concentrations at the surface along the <italic>Vasco</italic> ship track
(Lynch et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p>The NOAA Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT)
Version 4.9 model  (Draxler, 1999; Draxler
and Hess, 1997, 1998) was used to generate daily 72 h back-trajectories
(spawned at 0 Z, 8 AM local) from the <italic>Vasco</italic> location with arrival
heights of 500 m to indicate likely marine boundary layer transport patterns.
The Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS1) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HYSPLIT meteorological dataset was
used to drive the model. Trajectory paths were found to be largely
influenced by synoptic-scale changes in the regional meteorological state of
the atmosphere, with no substantial differences due to arrival time of day.
Arrival heights between 100  and 3000 m were examined. Trajectories with
arrival heights below 1000 m were generally consistent and representative of
boundary layer transport
(Atwood
et al., 2013; Xian et al., 2013), while higher heights tended to be
increasingly influenced by free-tropospheric transport pathways with a more
westerly component. As such, 500 m was selected to be representative of
general shifts in synoptic-scale boundary layer transport pathways, though
more complex vertical interactions and mixing from aloft are a potential
influence in the region  (Atwood et
al., 2013). Trajectory lengths of 72 h were found to be sufficient to
demonstrate general transport path differences between ocean-dominated
regions of the central portion of the SCS and more terrestrially influenced
regions that passed closer to Borneo and Sumatra.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Aerosol population type classification</title>
      <p>The d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dlog<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry-particle size distributions obtained every 15 min
from the CCN system were first normalized by the particle number
concentration summed over all bins. Each of these normalized size
distributions was then parameterized by fitting a lognormal mixture
distribution using an algorithm based on Hussein et al. (2005).
This algorithm fit each distribution to one, two, or three lognormal modes,
each defined by three lognormal distribution parameters (median diameter,
geometric standard deviation, and fractional number concentration). Two
modes were identified as the best fit for 690 of 731 data points in this
dataset. In order to have a common point of comparison for classification
purposes, the two-mode fit was used for all data points, yielding a
parameterized Aitken and accumulation mode for each 15 min data point.
Data points for which the fitting algorithm selected an additional third
mode are noted in the clustering results in Sect. 3 and Supplement Fig. S1.</p>
      <p>Parameters associated with each data point were then used to cluster the
data points into groups based on similar observed aerosol properties.
Cluster analyses have long been used to group observed aerosol size
distributions into clusters of generally similar size distributions
(Tunved et al., 2004), which
can then be associated with various sources or atmospheric processes that
shaped them
(Charron
et al., 2008; Beddows et al., 2009; Wegner et al., 2012). Similar cluster
analyses have been utilized to classify aerosol types based on particle
chemistry
(Frossard et
al., 2014), with Frossard et al. (2014) identifying
clusters in marine aerosol observations associated with marine and
non-marine aerosol types. As pointed out by those authors, the clustering
approach can be superior to algorithms using simpler criteria to distinguish
“clean” from “polluted” conditions, as more variables and a measure of
similarity between data points are used to find the underlying population
types. In this study normalized size distribution parameters were combined
with total number concentration and particle composition information via
hygroscopicity measurements to serve as input variables for the cluster
analysis (parameters given in Table 1). As hygroscopicity data were
available for at most one mode (during the 0.14  or 0.38 %
supersaturation scans), Aitken and accumulation mode hygroscopicities were
treated as missing for data points without this information. In order to
account for missing data and adjust all clustering variables to the same
scale, each variable was first standardized to a mean of 0 and standard
deviation of 1, with missing data points imputed to a value of 0 (the
mean value). As a result, the clustering distance function was insensitive
to missing data but still included information on hygroscopicity when
available.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Aerosol population type parameters used for clustering and the
resulting average values (standard deviations in parentheses) for each
identified population.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="20">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="19" colname="col19" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="20" colname="col20" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Population type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Total number </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col11" align="center" colsep="1">Aitken mode </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col13" nameend="col20" align="center">Accumulation mode </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">concentration </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Median </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Geometric </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center">Number </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center" colsep="1">Kappa </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col13" nameend="col14" align="center">Median </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col15" nameend="col16" align="center">Geometric </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col17" nameend="col18" align="center">Number </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col19" nameend="col20" align="center">Kappa </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">(nm) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">SD </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center">fraction </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center" colsep="1">  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col13" nameend="col14" align="center">(nm) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col15" nameend="col16" align="center">SD </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col17" nameend="col18" align="center">fraction </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col19" nameend="col20" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1: Back. marine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">510</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(181)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(7)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(0.17)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">162</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.11)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2: Precipitation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">361</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(164)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(5)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">115</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(27)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.14)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3: Smoke</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2280</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(606)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.17)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(0.25)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">199</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.03)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4: Mixed marine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">975</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(271)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(0.23)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">184</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(17)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.10)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5: Organic event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">277</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(30)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">221</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.03)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6: Ultrafine event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">577</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(158)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.16)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">174</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(19)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.07)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.09)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7: Transit</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">976</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(384)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(0.16)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">209</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(42)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.21)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.08)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8: Port</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4890</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(2550)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(22)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.37)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(0.18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(–)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(0.22)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(0.18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>A hierarchical cluster analysis was first conducted using the
<italic>cluster.AgglomerativeClustering</italic> class of the Python scikit-learn
package  (Pedregosa et al., 2011) using the Ward linkage
to help ascertain the number of clusters that can be found in the dataset.
Each step in this process involved merging two data points or clusters into
a new cluster based on those points with the shortest distance between
normalized input measurements (Karl Pearson Euclidian distance function;
Wilks, 2011). A dendrogram and associated measure of the distance between
merged clusters for each subsequent clustering step was used to identify
potential numbers of clusters appropriate for the dataset. The distance
between merged clusters increases at steps that merge substantially
different clusters (Wilks, 2011), in this case
indicating 5, 8, 9, and 12 clusters as potentially appropriate for this data
set.</p>
      <p>A nonhierarchical k-means cluster analysis was then conducted for each of
these four potential cluster numbers using the scikit-learn
<italic>cluster.KMeans</italic> class to refine the cluster members. The appropriate
number of clusters was selected based on the k-means result with the least
number of clusters that maintained physically distinct and temporally
consistent aerosol populations for the associated clusters. In particular,
as the time stamp of a data point was not included in the cluster analysis,
clusters with smaller numbers of data points were considered distinct if
they all occurred during a narrow time frame that could be associated with a
transient atmospheric phenomenon. The time frames of all clusters were then
compared against other aerosol and meteorological observations to ensure
they were physically meaningful. The result was a set of eight identified
aerosol population types with associated time periods corresponding to the
15 min CCN system data points. Finally, size distribution and
hygroscopicity measurements were averaged for all time periods associated
with each population type.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Overview of study</title>
      <p>The daily positions of the <italic>Vasco</italic> during the 2 weeks in
September 2012 that comprise this study are shown in Fig. 1a, together with HYSPLIT
72 h back-trajectories initiated within the MBL. Several extended periods
at the same anchorage are noted by the range of dates spent at these
locations. The daily fire hot spots are also indicated in this figure.
Average NOGAPS surface winds in the boundary layer were from the southwest,
often advecting air parcels from near Borneo, while lower free-tropospheric
winds, such as those at 700 hPa, were more westerly due to the generally
veering structure of the lower atmosphere in the SCS
(Reid et al., 2016). Fires detected by
MODIS occurred throughout much of Borneo and southern Sumatra during the
study, with surface-level trajectories near the start and near the end of
the study period passing close to active fires, whereas those during the
middle period remained primarily over open ocean. Results from the NAAPS
model, along with limited satellite AOD measurements not obscured by clouds
during this period, confirmed this general smoke transport pathway.
Accumulation mode aerosol mass concentration estimates (Fig. 1b) were
initially generated from the PCASP measurements using a density of 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Levin
et al., 2010), assumed to be representative of a combination of smoldering
peat and agricultural fire emissions typical in the MC
(Reid et al., 2012)
that constituted the largest plumes observed during the study
(Reid et al., 2016). Coincident model
estimates generated by NAAPS along the ship track indicated generally
similar results, with the highest mass concentrations occurring early and
late in the measurement period, in general agreement with times during which
back-trajectories passed over terrestrial sources and active fires. Air
parcels advecting into the SCS and Sulu Sea during this period that
originated from areas further to the north and west were cleaner than those
from other sectors due to fewer emission sources and more precipitation
along the trajectories. Changes in the observed particle concentrations also
occurred on timescales shorter than these weekly large-scale variations, as
shown in the aerosol observation time lines in Fig. 2a–c. Many of these
higher-frequency fluctuations were associated with squall line passages and
heavy local precipitation, as discussed further below. The time line of
d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>dlog<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size distributions, as measured by the CCN system and shown in
Fig. 2a, indicates that most of the particle number concentration fell
within the 17–500 nm measurement range, except possibly during the
highest-concentration periods. A more extensive comparison of model and
satellite measurement in situ observations is discussed in Reid et al. (2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Aerosol population type classification and properties</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Parameterized variable values for Aitken and accumulation modes
(median diameter, geometric standard deviation, modal fraction) at each of
the 15 min data points during the study, along with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for
data points at CCNc supersaturation set points of 0.38 % (Aitken mode) and
0.14 % (accumulation mode). Each data point is colored according to the
cluster type to which it was classified.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1105/2017/acp-17-1105-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Normalized d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>dlog<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particle size distributions for
each spectrum within identified aerosol population types (grey), the
associated average bin values with error bars at 95 % confidence interval
(colored step lines; 1.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>96</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  bin standard deviation), and best-fit
lognormal modes (colored curves) with bimodal fit (black). The average
particle number concentrations of data points within each population type are
listed.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1105/2017/acp-17-1105-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The cluster analysis was first conducted to investigate potential aerosol
population types in the dataset, followed by physical interpretation of the
results against cluster aerosol properties, coincident measurements, and
meteorological conditions. The parameter values input to the cluster
analysis are shown for each data point and variable in Fig. 3, and colored
by cluster number for the results of the eight-cluster k-means analysis. The
average value and intra-cluster standard deviation for each cluster
parameter and cluster are given in Table 1. Normalized size distributions
for each of these eight aerosol populations are shown in Fig. 4; the
average CN and CCN number concentrations and hygroscopicities are given in
Table 2. Equivalent normalized volume distributions are shown in
Supplement Fig. S2. The cluster number associated with each measurement
is similarly shown as the background color in Fig. 2 and marker color in
Fig. 5. The aerosol properties, meteorological conditions, and likely
transport pathways associated with data points in each cluster were then
used to provide a physical interpretation of the results and identify each
population type on the basis of its likely sources as discussed below.
Clusters 1–4 were the most commonly found (representing 85 % of the total
observations, Table 2), while clusters 5–8 represented special cases,
generally of short duration, that could be identified by specific locations
or sampling conditions.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Average values (standard deviations in  parentheses) for
identified aerosol population types. Shown are number of CCN system data
points classified as each type, total number concentrations for the PCASP
(125 nm–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and CCN system (17–500 nm), CCN number concentrations
and activated fractions for each CCNc supersaturation set point, and
measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the accumulation mode (0.14 % SS) and
Aitken mode (0.38 % SS) set points.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="22">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="19" colname="col19" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="20" colname="col20" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="21" colname="col21" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="22" colname="col22" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Population type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. meas.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">PCASP </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">CCN system </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col15" align="center">0.14 % SS </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col17" nameend="col22" align="center">0.38 % SS </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">number </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">number </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center">CCN </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col12" nameend="col13" align="center">act. frac. </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col14" nameend="col15" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col17" nameend="col18" align="center">CCN </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col19" nameend="col20" align="center">act. frac. </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col21" nameend="col22" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(No.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col12" nameend="col13" align="center">(–) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col14" nameend="col15" align="center">(–) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col17" nameend="col18" align="center">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col19" nameend="col20" align="center">(–) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col21" nameend="col22" align="center">(–) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1: Back. marine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">214</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">231</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(111)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">510</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(181)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">213</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(101)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">320</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(148)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.17)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2: Precipitation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">142</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(79)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">361</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(164)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(58)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.14)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">243</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(135)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.11)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3: Smoke</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(273)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2280</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(606)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1720</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(388)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">2340</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(480)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.25)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4: Mixed marine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">294</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">689</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(295)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">975</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(271)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">591</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(201)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">827</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(270)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.07)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.23)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5: Organic event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">151</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(19)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">277</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(30)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">144</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.03)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6: Ultrafine event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">163</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(58)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">577</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(158)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(45)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">361</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(172)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.10)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7: Transit</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">311</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(44)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">976</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(384)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">363</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(87)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">772</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(263)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.16)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8: Port</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">671</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(210)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4890</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(2550)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">251</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">1126</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(–)*</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All types</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">731</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">503</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(455)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">851</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(677)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">450</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(388)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.16)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(0.14)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">675</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">(516)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20">(0.17)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22">(0.21)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Population type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col7" align="center">0.53 % SS </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col9" nameend="col12" align="center">0.71 % SS </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col14" nameend="col17" align="center">0.85 % SS </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">CCN </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">act. frac. </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col9" nameend="col10" align="center">CCN </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col11" nameend="col12" align="center">act. frac. </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col14" nameend="col15" align="center">CCN </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col16" nameend="col17" align="center">act. frac. </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">(–) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col9" nameend="col10" align="center">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col11" nameend="col12" align="center">(–) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col14" nameend="col15" align="center">(no. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col16" nameend="col17" align="center">(–) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1: Back. marine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">416</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(194)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">444</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(239)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">480</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(210)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2: Precipitation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">352</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(175)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">265</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(82)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.09)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">228</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(100)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3: Smoke</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(359)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2080</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(396)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(523)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4: Mixed marine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">861</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(247)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">876</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(244)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.06)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">893</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(271)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5: Organic event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">182</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">268</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(56)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.14)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">257</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(24)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.07)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6: Ultrafine event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">373</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(168)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">439</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(163)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.07)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">473</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(147)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7: Transit</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">832</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(423)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">877</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(370)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">878</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(195)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8: Port</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3936</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1742</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(289)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.22)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2080</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(–)*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All types</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">698</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(555)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">724</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(512)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(0.13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">723</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(502)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">(0.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col20"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col21"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col22"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>* Only one data point. Note that port measurements fluctuated as the <italic>Vasco</italic> entered port.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Number concentrations of coarse-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) measured by the PCASP as functions of local surface wind speed
measured by the onboard <italic>Vasco</italic> weather station. Each point was
averaged over the same approximately 15 min time period as for the CCN
system measurements and is colored by the aerosol type as described in the
text.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/1105/2017/acp-17-1105-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Background marine: data points associated with this cluster occurred
throughout the study, typically following rain in the vicinity of the
<italic>Vasco</italic> or transport from areas further removed from terrestrial
regions. In addition, this type was observed following shortly after periods
associated with each of the other identified clusters, often appearing as a
transition between other types (Fig. 2). The measured properties of this
population type were similar to the background marine aerosol reported in
many prior studies (Hoppel
et al., 1994; Jensen et al., 1996; Brechtel et al., 1998; O'Dowd et al.,
1997; Heintzenberg et al., 2004; Allan et al., 2009; Good et al., 2010).
The population featured a bimodal size distribution with a Hoppel minimum
near 90 nm. The inner quartile range (IQR: middle 50 % of observations
between the 25–75 % percentiles) of number concentrations ranged
from 382 to 623 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with on average 42 % of the total number
concentration residing in the accumulation mode as specified by the bimodal
fit. Modal hygroscopicities were found to average 0.65 for the accumulation
mode and 0.46 for the smaller Aitken mode, while activated fractions were
generally moderate across the range of measured supersaturations as compared
to other identified population types (Table 1). Each of these findings
further reinforced the classification of this cluster as a typical
background marine aerosol.</p>
      <p>Precipitation: this distribution was found during periods immediately
following extensive precipitation at or near the <italic>Vasco</italic> (Fig. 2d).
Air masses had been substantially scrubbed of particles, and accumulation
mode particles had been preferentially removed. While the number
concentrations of large-mode particles were lower than those in the
background marine periods, the number concentrations of smaller particles,
particularly those below 40–50 nm, were comparable to the background marine
type. The longest contiguous period of this type occurred on 14 September
immediately following the passage of a squall line observed in the satellite
visible and IR products (not shown) that left a clean air mass with fewer
than 200 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in the 17–500 nm range in its wake. Number
concentrations tended to be lower than the background marine type with an
IQR: from 227 to 441 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hygroscopicities were similarly lower than
the background marine population with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.54 and 0.34 for
the accumulation and Aitken modes, respectively. Total CCN concentrations
across all supersaturations were found to be lower than in background marine
air masses due to the combination of fewer total particles, generally
smaller particle sizes, and lower hygroscopicities.</p>
      <p>Smoke: data points associated with this aerosol type occurred primarily in
two events on 14  and 25–26 September, during which back-trajectories were
at their furthest south, near burning regions in Borneo (Fig. 1a).
Normalized size distributions indicated that particles were largely
concentrated in a single accumulation mode with a tail of smaller particles.
This type was associated with the highest total particle number and
estimated submicron mass concentrations observed during the cruise, with the
exception of measurements taken in the urban plume of Puerto Princesa. The
standard deviations in the normalized size distribution parameters for the
dominant accumulation mode in this population (Fig. 4, Table 1) were
small, even while number concentration varied widely (IQR: 1802 to 2780 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 81 % accumulation modal fraction). Accumulation mode
hygroscopicities were lower than either the background marine or
precipitation types, with average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.40. Aitken mode
hygroscopicities showed the opposite behavior from the first two population
types with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.54, though the measured
uncertainties (Fig. 2e and f) and standard deviations were considerably
higher than for the accumulation mode (0.25 and 0.03, respectively).
Interestingly, activated fractions were highest among all population types
across the full range of measured supersaturations, owing to the large
number fraction of particles in the accumulation mode, while CCN
concentrations were the highest of all types (except those measured in port)
due primarily to the larger total particle number concentration in these
smoke plumes.</p>
      <p>Accumulation mode lognormal median diameters around 200 nm with a tail of
smaller particles, elevated concentrations of carbon monoxide and benzene,
and potassium in filter samples during this period
(Reid et al., 2016, and Fig. 2c) were all
consistent with expectations for aged biomass burning smoke
(Yokelson et al., 2008; Akagi et al., 2011; Reid et al., 2015; Sakamoto et al., 2015).
Additional examination and attribution of this event to biomass burning in
Sumatra and Borneo are discussed further in Reid et al. (2016). Finally, while smoke is considered
the dominant aerosol source during these periods, anthropogenic pollution
may still have been co-emitted along the transport path and contributed to
measured results.</p>
      <p>Mixed marine: this population was characterized by periods during which the
background marine type mixed with other sources of aerosol. Most of the data
points associated with this type had transport pathways and biomass burning
sources similar to those for the smoke population type, but with number
concentrations and size distribution parameters between those of the
background marine and smoke types (IQR: 782 to 1160 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 68 %
accumulation modal fraction), indicating there was insufficient smoke for it
to dominate the properties of the marine background. Accumulation and Aitken
mode hygroscopicities of 0.48 and 0.54, along with activated fractions and
CCN concentrations, were similarly indicative of mixing between smoke and
background marine sources.</p>
      <p>While periods of smoke mixing with a background marine air mass appeared to
constitute the majority of data points in this cluster, several other
periods point to other phenomena of interest being included in this type,
perhaps indicating this cluster was relatively more complex than other
population types. Short-lived intrusions (2 to 5 h) of accumulation
mode particles were regularly observed in both the CCN system and PCASP
datasets (e.g., 18–23 Z on 22, 23, and 24 September), after which the size
distributions quickly returned to background marine conditions. These
excursions were largely constrained to the pre-dawn hours (sunrise occurs
around 22 Z), when the boundary layer was thinnest and when precipitation was
occurring in the vicinity of the <italic>Vasco</italic>. Several prior studies have
shown that smoke and anthropogenic pollution aerosol within the wider MC
region can be lofted into and transported in the lower free troposphere (Tosca
et al., 2011; Robinson et al., 2012; Zender et al., 2012; Campbell et al.,
2013; Atwood et al., 2013). The influence of a free-tropospheric aerosol
layer as a source of MBL aerosol and CCN has been identified in other remote
oceanic regions as well
(Clarke
et al., 2013). One possible explanation for these events (and possibly for
the observed organic and ultrafine events that were characterized by
increases in gas phase volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as noted in the next clusters) is therefore that
aerosol may have been mixed down into the MBL from a layer aloft, perhaps on
the edge of rain shafts. Alternatively, they may also be due to intermittent
plumes of aerosol that survived stochastic precipitation removal events
along a boundary layer transport pathway or human terrestrial activities in
the pre-dawn hours. In addition, air masses influenced by anthropogenic
pollution may have been included in this cluster as well, but without
sufficiently different impacts on aerosol parameters to result in a distinct
cluster.</p>
      <p>Organic event: an approximately 4 h period starting at 1 Z on 23 September
had measured particle concentrations between 200 and 325 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, but with
significantly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.001) larger median diameters than either the
precipitation or background marine types (Fig. 3). Both Aitken and
accumulation mode particles had among the lowest hygroscopicities measured
during the cruise, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values around 0.2. During this event
measured concentrations of numerous VOCs were much higher than in gas
canisters collected approximately 6 h before and after it, with no
associated increase in carbon monoxide
(Reid et al., 2016; Fig. 2c). The
particles had lower hygroscopicities and larger sizes than the background
marine particles observed just before this event. While the source of this
event is uncertain, Robinson et al. (2012) found
occasional organic aerosol above the boundary layer they attributed to
biogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation during an airborne
campaign in the outflow regions of Borneo, while Irwin et al. (2011) reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values between 0.05 and 0.37 in a terrestrial, biogenically dominated MC
environment. Such a source would be consistent with the observed population,
perhaps due to growth of a background marine population by condensation of
organics, although we lack the ancillary data needed to establish this.</p>
      <p>Ultrafine event: this cluster was associated with an approximately 20 h
period on 17–18 September, which included the highest concentration of particles
below about 30 nm observed throughout the study (Fig. 2a) and coincided
with a period of elevated VOC measurements at the start of this event
(Fig. 2c). A filter during this period showed very low potassium
concentrations, while benzene was among the lowest values measured during
the study, indicating that biomass burning was not the likely source for
this event. Anthropogenic, shipping, and marine and terrestrial biogenic
emissions are known sources of such compounds; isoprene, a common biogenic
VOC, was not observed during this event, and a brief period of elevated
dimethyl sulfide, associated with marine emissions from phytoplankton, was
observed shortly before – but not during – this event
(Reid et al., 2016).</p>
      <p>A tri-modal best fit was indicated by the Hussein et al. (2005)
algorithm for a number of these data points (Fig. 2a and Supplement Fig. S1).
The period had an overall IQR of 482 to 661 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
generally higher ultrafine number concentrations than other periods with
similar total concentrations. The accumulation mode was similar in both size
and hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.65) to the accumulation mode of the
background marine type, while the smaller Aitken mode showed larger modal
fractions and overall number concentrations, and slightly higher
hygroscopicities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.50) than the background marine
measurements. However, we note that the 0.38 % supersaturation
hygroscopicity measurement would likely not have been sensitive to these
below 30 nm particles and therefore was likely not representative of this
smallest third mode. Additionally, while total number concentration was
slightly higher than the background marine population, measured CCN
concentrations and activated fractions were generally lower, indicating many
of the additional particles would not be expected to influence CCN
concentrations until higher environmental supersaturations were reached.
While not enough information is available to verify the nature of
differences between ultrafine particles in these types, the results are
consistent with an influx of smaller particles and VOCs into a background
marine air mass, and they were sufficiently distinct to be identified as a
coherent period by the unsupervised k-means analysis.</p>
      <p>Transit: this type was associated with measurements taken during a transit
away from the port of Puerto Princesa, a city with a population of over
200 000. During this period light, westerly winds advected anthropogenic
pollution out over the Sulu Sea and along the path of the <italic>Vasco</italic>,
allowing for sampling of the urban plume as it diluted and mixed with
aerosol from other sources. Size distributions were dominated by an Aitken
mode with a number median diameter around 80–90 nm, unique in measurements
from this study, mixed with an accumulation mode with a smaller modal
fraction than other types. The population had an IQR of 738 to 1029 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the generally decreasing number concentrations were
consistent with an urban plume diluting and mixing with other aerosol
populations. Modal hygroscopicity values of 0.58 and 0.62 for the
accumulation and Aitken modes, respectively, were closer than those of most of
the other population types and consistent with high levels of sulfate
aerosol in typical urban plumes.</p>
      <p>Port: this type was assigned to the measurements taken during a short period
in the port of Puerto Princesa. Local anthropogenic emissions were dominant
during this period, with number concentrations that fluctuated between 4000
and 10 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Ultrafine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm)
dominated number concentrations during this period, although large number
concentrations of accumulation mode particles with diameters between 100 and
300 nm were also observed. As measurements were fluctuating rapidly and only
one CCN scan at each supersaturation setting could be completed before
instrumentation was shut down, hygroscopicity results were inconclusive and
uncertain. This type is considered separate from the other types as it was
not measured in a remote marine area away from the immediate influence of a
nearby terrestrial source.</p>
      <p>Finally, throughout the study coarse-mode particles with diameters larger
than about 800 nm were consistently observed in the PCASP volume
distributions (Fig. 2b). Concentrations of particles in this size range
increased with increasing wind speed (Fig. 5), consistent with generation
of sea spray aerosol due to bubble breaking and wave action
(O'Dowd and Leeuw, 2007). While the total number
concentration of coarse particles is small compared to typical CCN
concentrations (Fig. 2e, f), in the cleanest conditions we measured they
represented non-trivial fractions of CCN active at 0.14 and 0.38 %
supersaturations. The large diameter of these particles makes them likely to
activate at very low supersaturations, and they are present in more than
sufficient number concentration to impact the microphysical structure and
processes in stratocumulus clouds by serving as “giant CCN”
(Feingold et al., 1999).</p>
      <p>No significant relationship between wind speed and fine-mode aerosol
population type was noted. However, particles in the coarse-mode range are
not measured or accounted for in our cluster analysis (CCN system range:
17–500 nm), while submicron aerosol was often dominated by aerosol from
other sources. Modini et al. (2015)
utilized a dedicated size distribution fitting analysis that included
size-resolved observations of particles above 500 nm to examine primary submicron
marine aerosol production. They found a primary mode with a median diameter
around 200 nm and tail that extended to sizes well above 500 nm, with number
concentrations of 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during a period of low wind speeds
that increased to 71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as winds increased. Concentrations
differences of around 50–60 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to wind speed changes may not have
resulted in large enough changes to concentrations or size distributions to
alter the clustering of the observed population types, which often included
number concentrations that were larger by an order of magnitude or more.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Based on this classification of the SCS remote marine boundary layer aerosol
environment, a conceptual picture emerges as to the nature and sources of
particles encountered during the <italic>Vasco</italic> 2012 cruise. A bimodal
marine aerosol background was present with number concentrations usually
between about 300 and 700 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a Hoppel minimum around 90 nm.
Primary emissions via sea spray supply submicron particles consisting of a
mixture of sea salt and organic components, with emitted particle diameters
as small as 40 nm
(Clarke et al., 2006; Keene et al., 2007; O'Dowd and Leeuw, 2007; Prather et al.,
2013; Quinn et al., 2014). However, even in remote marine environments
transported anthropogenic and combustion aerosol may still be an important
or even dominant source of small particles
(Shank et al., 2012). The background marine population identified in this study is
therefore considered a background state across the remote SCS that is likely
comprised of a mixture of primary marine emissions along with particles
derived from anthropogenic, biomass burning, and terrestrial and marine
biogenic sources throughout the region  (Frossard et
al., 2014). Departures from the typical range of background marine
characteristics and number concentrations occurred under large influxes of
aerosol from other sources, such as smoke from biomass burning regions,
anthropogenic pollution from population centers or shipping, or when
convection and precipitation removed much of the ambient particulate matter
and created relatively clean air masses.</p>
      <p>During the SWM when large amounts of biomass burning aerosol were being
advected into the SCS, a population of aged accumulation mode smoke
particles was periodically injected into the MBL, where it mixed with
existing particles. When total particle concentrations were above roughly
1500 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3), the smoke particles dominated the background
marine particles and had characteristic size distribution parameters and
hygroscopicities that remained roughly constant regardless of further
increases in the concentration of biomass burning particles. In situations
when smoke concentrations were insufficient to dominate the background
marine aerosol population, smoke mixed with the background marine
population, yielding size distribution and hygroscopicity parameters in
between the two types. While the background marine type was earlier noted to
be impacted to some extent by background anthropogenic or terrestrial
aerosol similar to impacts noted for the mixed marine type, the latter was
characterized by mixing with a separate, distinct aerosol population, but at
levels that were insufficient to dominate the background aerosol properties.</p>
      <p>Precipitation removal of particles that had been advected into the region or
ventilation by cleaner air masses when transport pathways changed returned
the environment near the surface to its background marine state. However,
when extensive precipitation occurred, accumulation mode particles were
removed by wet deposition to a greater extent than Aitken mode particles,
leading to lower overall surface number concentrations that were dominated
by smaller particles, as evidenced by the emergence of a distinct
precipitation population type from the cluster analysis. Based on the two
<italic>Vasco</italic> cruises, the cleanest periods were encountered in cold pools
following the passage of squall lines with number concentrations as low as
100 to 150 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. During these periods, increased number concentrations
of coarse-mode aerosol were regularly observed (Fig. 5; CN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that constituted a potentially important additional
source of total CCN not measured by the CCN system (0.14 % SS: 44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 0.38 % SS: 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly at low
supersaturations where they would be expected to activate first.</p>
      <p>In addition to these findings, several observed phenomena during the 2012
study were similar to those from the 2011 cruise
(Reid et al., 2015). In particular, rapid changes in aerosol properties and source
type were noted in the wake of squall lines that left clean air masses in
their wake, while longer-period fluctuations on the order of days occurred
as impacts from anthropogenic and smoke transport mixed with cleaner
background marine and precipitation-impacted air masses. As both studies
were conducted in the remote marine SCS during the biomass burning season
and saw similar meteorological phenomena modulating the aerosol populations,
the more detailed aerosol property results of the 2012 cruise may be
representative of the general nature of changes in SCS remote marine aerosol
during the SWM season. Future work in the region to compare surface
properties with model results and satellite retrievals will be ultimately
required to fully validate these findings.</p>
      <p>While the cluster analysis assigned each data point to a single cluster, in
reality these first four clusters could be better described as a spectrum
due to the variable impacts of mixing or meteorological processes, rather
than as distinct or mutually exclusive population types. As is evident in
Fig. 3, overlap between these four clusters occurred in the parameter
space for all nine of the measured variables used in the cluster model.</p>
      <p>Deviations from this general picture arose when influxes of other aerosol
types occurred. The additional population types each mapped out generally
distinct areas in one or more of the parameters, leading to their
identification by the cluster model. That such clusters corresponded to
temporally distinct periods with physical and meteorological relevance
ultimately justified the use of the cluster model to classify aerosol
population types and assign rough population boundaries to the parameter
space.</p>
      <p>While the spectrum of mixing between population types is relevant to the
identification of impacts from various sources, additional consideration of
these aerosol types against measurements in other regions is also warranted.
Fresh sea spray particles, dominated by sodium chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.28), are expected to have the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, although
co-emitted organic species and replacement of chlorine by uptake of acidic
gases can potentially reduce hygroscopicities. Additionally, the increasing
organic fractions at smaller sizes reported in sea spray aerosol
(Keene et al., 2007; Prather et al., 2013; Quinn et al., 2014; Forestieri et al.,
2016) lead to decreased hygroscopicities as particle size decreases.
Reported hygroscopicities for aerosol in marine regions vary, with Good et
al.. (2010) reporting CCN-derived
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values above 1 for some background or marine-dominated MBL air
masses, consistent with pure-sodium-chloride-dominated sea salt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values. Prather et al. (2013) generated
aerosol using sea water with varying organic concentrations and associated
marine biological activity, and reported CCN activation diameters at 0.2 %
supersaturation that correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values above 1 during periods
of low organic concentration, which then dropped to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as low
as 0.1 as organic concentration was increased. In addition, they found more
organic enrichment and lower associated hygroscopicities in smaller
particles. Quinn et al. (2014) explored
the relationship between organic aerosol content, particle size, and
particle hygroscopicity in primary marine aerosol generated in several ocean
regions. They found a similar enrichment of average aerosol organic volume
fraction with decreasing particle size (40 to 100 nm dry diameter: 0.8 to 0.4 organic
volume fraction, respectively) that corresponded with decreased
hygroscopicities (40 nm: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.4; 100 nm: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.8) and was
consistent in various ocean regions and largely independent of biological
activity as indicated by chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. Such findings are consistent
with the lower Aitken mode hygroscopicities found in the background marine
populations observed in this dataset, as well as the additional decreases in
hygroscopicity noted in the precipitation population that had been further
scrubbed of larger accumulation mode particles. Our findings of background
and precipitation-impacted marine aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values generally between
0.2 and 0.6 for the Aitken mode and 0.4 and 1.0 for the accumulation mode
are therefore consistent with reported hygroscopicities of background marine
aerosol that had been enriched by organic components. The presence of
organics explains the noted lower hygroscopicities, as compared to what
would be expected from pure sea salt aerosol, in population types that were
otherwise expected to be dominated by background marine aerosol.</p>
      <p>Aged biomass burning aerosol has often been found to have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
below 0.2  (Andreae and Rosenfeld, 2008; Petters et al., 2009; Engelhart et al., 2012), below
the smoke population type average of approximately 0.4 in the accumulation
mode during this study. However, high concentrations of both SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
sulfate aerosol (ammonium sulfate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.61) from numerous sources
have been observed in the MC
(Robinson et al., 2011; Reid et al., 2013). During this study, multi-day filter
samples showed average sulfate concentrations between approximately 0.8 and
3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the <italic>Vasco</italic>, potentially increasing during
periods of smoke impacts due to burning of sulfur-rich peat in the region
(Reid et al., 2016). The potential peat source or mixing with other sources of sulfate may explain the
higher-than-typical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed for aged biomass burning aerosol in the MC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study reports ship-based measurements of aerosol size distributions and
CCN properties conducted as part of the first extensive in situ aerosol
measurement campaign in remote marine regions of the South China Sea/East
Sea during the important southwestern monsoon and biomass burning season.
Analysis of approximately 2 weeks of measurements found aerosol
characteristics consistent with those from a previous pilot study in the
region during the same season, indicating that descriptions of aerosol
population types and the associated meteorological and transport phenomena
that modulate changes and mixing between these populations may be
representative of the wider remote marine SCS during the SWM season.</p>
      <p>Eight aerosol population types were identified in the dataset that were
associated with various impacts from background marine particles, smoke, and
anthropogenic sources, as well as precipitation impacts and shorter lived
events linked to influxes of VOCs or ultrafine particles. Efforts to measure
or model the impact of aerosol on cloud development or atmospheric optical
properties often rely on proper characterization of aerosol microphysics
associated with impacts from various aerosol sources. As such, we provided
population type average values and standard deviations for aerosol size
distribution and hygroscopicity properties needed to model aerosol
hygroscopic growth in humid environments or cloud development. Future work
with this dataset will investigate the impact of the identified aerosol
population types on CCN properties including supersaturation-dependent CCN
concentration needed to model development of different types of clouds.
Reutter et al. (2009)
identified specific regimes of cloud development where aerosol number
concentration was important using a cloud parcel model, while Ward et al. (2010) found such results may be
further complicated by aerosol size and hygroscopic properties. Inclusion of
both population type average properties and the range that they vary across
into such a model may help constrain when various properties of the aerosol
are relevant to cloud development in the SCS. Additionally, differences in
aerosol population type are expected to be relevant to studies of radiative
transfer, optical propagation through the atmosphere, and satellite
retrievals in subsaturated marine environments where differences in
particle number concentration, size, hygroscopicity, index of refraction,
and relative humidity all affect the interaction of radiation with particles in
complex ways.</p>
      <p>Lastly, while specific observed aerosol population types were identified in
this dataset, additional open questions remain regarding the relative
importance of various sources and transport pathways of aerosol into remote
MBL air masses and their impact on aerosol populations. Since the
surface-based observations provide only a portion of the observations needed
to construct a true aerosol budget for the MBL, the degree to which MBL
aerosol may be impacted by mixing down from a reservoir aloft was not clear.
Future airborne aerosol campaigns in the region may be useful to shed light
on this important topic.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>NASA MODIS AOD data were obtained from the NASA LAADS ftp site: <uri>ftp://ladsweb.nascom.nasa.gov/</uri>.
Navy NAAPS aerosol reanalysis and meteorology data are available at the US GODAE server: <uri>http://www.usgodae.org/</uri>.
<italic>Vasco</italic> ship and additional data are available through correspondence with Jeffrey Reid: jeffrey.reid@nrlmry.navy.mil.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Funding for this research cruise and analysis was
provided from a number of sources. <italic>Vasco</italic> ship time procurement was provided
by the NRL 6.1 Base Program via an Office of Naval Research (ONR) Global grant to the Manila
Observatory. Core funding for this effort was from Office of Naval Research
322 under award number N00014-16-1-2040 and the Naval Research Enterprise
Internship Program (NREIP). Funding for NRL scientist participation was
provided by the NRL Base Program and ONR 35. This material is based upon
research supported by the Office of Naval Research under award number
N00014-16-1-2040 and by the Colorado State University Center for
Geosciences/Atmospheric Research (CG/AR). We are most grateful to the <italic>Vasco</italic>
ship management and crew, operated by Cosmix Underwater Research Ltd
(especially Luc Heymans and Annabelle du Parc), the Manila Observatory senior management
(especially Antonia Loyzaga and Fr. Daniel McNamara), and the US State Department/Embassy
in Manila (especially Maria Theresa Villa and Dovas Saulys). We would also
like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their
insightful comments and helpful suggestions.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: L. M. Russell
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S.,
Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and
domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 4039-4072, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Topping, D. O., Good, N., Irwin, M., Flynn, M., Williams, P. I., Coe, H., Baker, A. R., Martino, M., Niedermeier, N., Wiedensohler, A., Lehmann, S., Müller,
K., Herrmann, H., and McFiggans, G.: Composition and properties of
atmospheric particles in the eastern Atlantic and impacts on gas phase uptake rates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9299–9314, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9299-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9299-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation
interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P.,
Longo, K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking Rain Clouds over the Amazon,
Science, 303, 1337–1342, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092779" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092779</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Atwood, S. A., Reid, J. S., Kreidenweis, S. M., Yu, L. E., Salinas, S. V.,
Chew, B. N., and Balasubramanian, R.: Analysis of source regions for smoke
events in Singapore for the 2009 El Nino burning season, Atmos. Environ., 78,
219–230, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.047</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Balasubramanian, R., Qian, W.-B., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., and Fuzzi,
S.: Comprehensive characterization of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols in Singapore, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4523, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002517</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Covert, D. S., Coffman, D. J., Johnson, J.
E., and Wiedensohler, A.: Aerosol physical properties and processes in the
lower marine boundary layer: a comparison of shipboard sub-micron data from
ACE-1 and ACE-2, Tellus B, 52, 258–272,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2000.00021.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.2000.00021.x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Hakala, J.,
Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Covert, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Li, S.-M.,
Hayden, K. L., Nuaaman, I., McLaren, R., Massoli, P., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Keene, W. C.: Measurements of
ocean derived aerosol off the coast of California, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
117, D00V15, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017588</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Beddows, D. C. S., Dall'Osto, M., and Harrison, R. M.: Cluster Analysis of
Rural, Urban, and Curbside Atmospheric Particle Size Data, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 4694–4700, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es803121t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es803121t</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Brechtel, F. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Swan, H. B.: Air mass
characteristics, aerosol particle number concentrations, and number size
distributions at Macquarie Island during the First Aerosol Characterization
Experiment (ACE 1), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16351–16367,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97JD03014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD03014</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Campbell, J. R., Reid, J. S., Westphal, D. L., Zhang, J., Tackett, J. L.,
Chew, B. N., Welton, E. J., Shimizu, A., Sugimoto, N., Aoki, K., and Winker,
D. M.: Characterizing the vertical profile of aerosol particle extinction and
linear depolarization over Southeast Asia and the Maritime Continent: The
2007–2009 view from CALIOP, Atmos. Res., 122, 520–543,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.007</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cavalli, F., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Mircea, M., Emblico, L., Fuzzi,
S., Ceburnis, D., Yoon, Y. J., O'Dowd, C. D., Putaud, J.-P., and Dell'Acqua,
A.: Advances in characterization of size-resolved organic matter in marine
aerosol over the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D24215,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005137</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Charron, A., Birmili, W., and Harrison, R. M.: Fingerprinting particle
origins according to their size distribution at a UK rural site, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D07202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008562</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D., Owens, S. R., and Zhou, J.: An ultrafine sea-salt flux from
breaking waves: Implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote
marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D06202,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006565" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006565</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Simpson, R. M. C., Hudson, J. G., Howell, S. G.,
Brekhovskikh, V. L., Campos, T., Kapustin, V. N., and Zhou, J.: Free
troposphere as a major source of CCN for the equatorial pacific boundary
layer: long-range transport and teleconnections, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7511–7529, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7511-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7511-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E.
R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Production flux of sea spray
aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, RG2001, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010RG000349</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R.: HYSPLIT4 user's guide. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL ARL-230, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD., 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: Description of the HYSPLIT4 modeling system,
available at: <uri>http://warn.arl.noaa.gov/documents/reports/arl-224.pdf</uri>
(Accessed 14 April 2015), 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4
modelling system for trajectories, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Engelhart, G. J., Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Robinson, A. L., and
Pandis, S. N.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged
biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7285–7293,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Feingold, G., Cotton, W. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Davis, J. T.: The Impact
of Giant Cloud Condensation Nuclei on Drizzle Formation in Stratocumulus:
Implications for Cloud Radiative Properties, J. Atmospheric Sci., 56,
4100–4117, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Feng, N. and Christopher, S. A.: Satellite and surface-based remote sensing
of Southeast Asian aerosols and their radiative effects, Atmos. Res., 122,
544–554, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.02.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.02.018</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Forestieri, S. D., Cornwell, G. C., Helgestad, T. M., Moore, K. A., Lee, C.,
Novak, G. A., Sultana, C. M., Wang, X., Bertram, T. H., Prather, K. A., and
Cappa, C. D.: Linking variations in sea spray aerosol particle hygroscopicity
to composition during two microcosm experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
9003–9018, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9003-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-9003-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Burrows, S. M., Elliott, S. M., Bates, T.
S. and Quinn, P. K.: Sources and composition of submicron organic mass in
marine aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
2014JD021913, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021913</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Giglio, L., Descloitres, J., Justice, C. O., and Kaufman, Y. J.: An Enhanced
Contextual Fire Detection Algorithm for MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 87,
273–282, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00184-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00184-6</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Good, N., Topping, D. O., Allan, J. D., Flynn, M., Fuentes, E., Irwin, M.,
Williams, P. I., Coe, H., and McFiggans, G.: Consistency between
parameterisations of aerosol hygroscopicity and CCN activity during the
RHaMBLe discovery cruise, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3189–3203,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3189-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3189-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Heintzenberg, J., Birmili, W., Wiedensohler, A., Nowak, A., and Tuch, T.:
Structure, variability and persistence of the submicrometre marine aerosol,
Tellus B, 56, 357–367, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00115.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00115.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hewitt, C. N., Lee, J. D., MacKenzie, A. R., Barkley, M. P., Carslaw, N.,
Carver, G. D., Chappell, N. A., Coe, H., Collier, C., Commane, R., Davies,
F., Davison, B., DiCarlo, P., Di Marco, C. F., Dorsey, J. R., Edwards, P. M.,
Evans, M. J., Fowler, D., Furneaux, K. L., Gallagher, M., Guenther, A.,
Heard, D. E., Helfter, C., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T., Irwin, M., Jones, C.,
Karunaharan, A., Langford, B., Lewis, A. C., Lim, S. F., MacDonald, S. M.,
Mahajan, A. S., Malpass, S., McFiggans, G., Mills, G., Misztal, P., Moller,
S., Monks, P. S., Nemitz, E., Nicolas-Perea, V., Oetjen, H., Oram, D. E.,
Palmer, P. I., Phillips, G. J., Pike, R., Plane, J. M. C., Pugh, T., Pyle, J.
A., Reeves, C. E., Robinson, N. H., Stewart, D., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K.,
and Yin, X.: Overview: oxidant and particle photochemical processes above a
south-east Asian tropical rainforest (the OP3 project): introduction,
rationale, location characteristics and tools, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
169–199, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-169-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-169-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hogan, T. F. and Rosmond, T. E.: The Description of the Navy Operational
Global Atmospheric Prediction System's Spectral Forecast Model, Mon. Weather
Rev., 119, 1786–1815, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., and Larson, R. E.: Effect of nonprecipitating
clouds on the aerosol size distribution in the marine boundary layer,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 125–128, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/GL013i002p00125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL013i002p00125</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., Fitzgerald, J. W., and Larson, R. E.: Marine
boundary layer measurements of new particle formation and the effects
nonprecipitating clouds have on aerosol size distribution, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 99, 14443–14459, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JD00797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JD00797</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hudson, J. G., Noble, S., and Tabor, S.: Cloud supersaturations from CCN
spectra Hoppel minima, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2014JD022669,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022669</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Koponen, I. K., Paatero, P.,
Aalto, P. P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Evaluation of an automatic
algorithm for fitting the particle number size distributions, Boreal Environ.
Res., 10, 337–355, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hyer, E. J., Reid, J. S., Prins, E. M., Hoffman, J. P., Schmidt, C. C.,
Miettinen, J. I., and Giglio, L.: Patterns of fire activity over Indonesia
and Malaysia from polar and geostationary satellite observations, Atmos.
Res., 122, 504–519, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Irwin, M., Robinson, N., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., and McFiggans, G.:
Size-resolved aerosol water uptake and cloud condensation nuclei measurements
as measured above a Southeast Asian rainforest during OP3, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 11157–11174, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11157-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11157-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, T. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., Kim, Y., Sievering, H., and Pszenny, A.:
Aerosol distributions in the North Atlantic marine boundary layer during
Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment/Marine Aerosol and Gas Exchange,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 4455–4467, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JD00506" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD00506</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Keene, W. C., Maring, H., Maben, J. R., Kieber, D. J., Pszenny, A. A. P.,
Dahl, E. E., Izaguirre, M. A., Davis, A. J., Long, M. S., Zhou, X., Smoydzin,
L., and Sander, R.: Chemical and physical characteristics of nascent aerosols
produced by bursting bubbles at a model air-sea interface, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D21202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008464" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008464</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Levin, E. J. T., McMeeking, G. R., Carrico, C. M., Mack, L. E., Kreidenweis,
S. M., Wold, C. E., Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Hao, W. M., Collett,
J. L., and Malm, W. C.: Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties measured
during Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 115, D18210, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013601</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lin, N.-H., Sayer, A. M., Wang, S.-H., Loftus, A. M., Hsiao, T.-C., Sheu,
G.-R., Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S.-C., and Chantara, S.: Interactions between
biomass-burning aerosols and clouds over Southeast Asia: Current status,
challenges, and perspectives, Environ. Pollut., 195, 292–307,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.036</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lynch, P., Reid, J. S., Westphal, D. L., Zhang, J., Hogan, T. F., Hyer, E.
J., Curtis, C. A., Hegg, D. A., Shi, Y., Campbell, J. R., Rubin, J. I.,
Sessions, W. R., Turk, F. J., and Walker, A. L.: An 11-year global gridded
aerosol optical thickness reanalysis (v1.0) for atmospheric and climate
sciences, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1489–1522, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1489-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1489-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Modini, R. L., Frossard, A. A., Ahlm, L., Russell, L. M., Corrigan, C. E.,
Roberts, G. C., Hawkins, L. N., Schroder, J. C., Bertram, A. K., Zhao, R.,
Lee, A. K. Y., Abbatt, J. P. D., Lin, J., Nenes, A., Wang, Z.,
Wonaschütz, A., Sorooshian, A., Noone, K. J., Jonsson, H., Seinfeld, J.
H., Toom-Sauntry, D., Macdonald, A. M., and Leaitch, W. R.: Primary marine
aerosol-cloud interactions off the coast of California, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 2014JD022963, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022963</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Anderson, J. R., Quinn, P. K., McInnes, L. M., Brechtel, F.
J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Pósfai, M., Thomson, D. S.,
and Buseck, P. R.: Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in
the Southern Ocean marine boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/32138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/32138</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D. and de Leeuw, G.: Marine aerosol production: a review of the
current knowledge, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365, 1753–1774,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2007.2043</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Smith, M. H., Consterdine, I. E., and Lowe, J. A.: Marine
aerosol, sea-salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: a short review, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 73–80, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00106-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00106-9</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel,
O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J.,
Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, É.:
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12,
2825–2830, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of
hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Stevens, B., Vali, G., Faloona, I., and
Russell, L. M.: Accumulation mode aerosol, pockets of open cells, and
particle nucleation in the remote subtropical Pacific marine boundary layer,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D02206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005694" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005694</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prenni, A. J., DeMott,
P. J., Collett, J. L., and Moosmüller, H.: Cloud condensation nucleation
activity of biomass burning aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D22205,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Prather, K. A., Bertram, T. H., Grassian, V. H., Deane, G. B., Stokes, M.
D., DeMott, P. J., Aluwihare, L. I., Palenik, B. P., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J.
H., Moffet, R. C., Molina, M. J., Cappa, C. D., Geiger, F. M., Roberts, G.
C., Russell, L. M., Ault, A. P., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Corrigan,
C. E., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Ebben, C. J., Forestieri, S. D., Guasco, T.
L., Hersey, S. P., Kim, M. J., Lambert, W. F., Modini, R. L., Mui, W.,
Pedler, B. E., Ruppel, M. J., Ryder, O. S., Schoepp, N. G., Sullivan, R. C.,
and Zhao, D.: Bringing the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical
complexity of sea spray aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300262110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1300262110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Coffman, D., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D.,
Baynard, T., de Gouw, J. A., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C., Williams, E.,
Roberts, J. M., Lerner, B., Stohl, A., Pettersson, A., and Lovejoy, E. R.:
Impacts of sources and aging on submicrometer aerosol properties in the
marine boundary layer across the Gulf of Maine, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111,
D23S36, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007582</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Schulz, K. S., Coffman, D. J., Frossard, A. A.,
Russell, L. M., Keene, W. C., and Kieber, D. J.: Contribution of sea surface
carbon pool to organic matter enrichment in sea spray aerosol, Nat. Geosci.,
7, 228–232, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2092</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Hyer, E. J., Prins, E. M., Westphal, D. L., Zhang, J., Wang,
J., Christopher, S. A., Curtis, C. A., Schmidt, C. C., Eleuterio, D. P.,
Richardson, K. A., and Hoffman, J. P.: Global Monitoring and Forecasting of
Biomass-Burning Smoke: Description of and Lessons From the Fire Locating and
Modeling of Burning Emissions (FLAMBE) Program, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth
Obs. Remote Sens., 2, 144–162, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2027443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2027443</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Xian, P., Hyer, E. J., Flatau, M. K., Ramirez, E. M., Turk, F.
J., Sampson, C. R., Zhang, C., Fukada, E. M., and Maloney, E. D.: Multi-scale
meteorological conceptual analysis of observed active fire hotspot activity
and smoke optical depth in the Maritime Continent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
2117–2147, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2117-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2117-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Hyer, E. J., Johnson, R. S., Holben, B. N., Yokelson, R. J.,
Zhang, J., Campbell, J. R., Christopher, S. A., Di Girolamo, L., Giglio, L.,
Holz, R. E., Kearney, C., Miettinen, J., Reid, E. A., Turk, F. J., Wang, J.,
Xian, P., Zhao, G., Balasubramanian, R., Chew, B. N., Janjai, S., Lagrosas,
N., Lestari, P., Lin, N.-H., Mahmud, M., Nguyen, A. X., Norris, B., Oanh, N.
T. K., Oo, M., Salinas, S. V., Welton, E. J., and Liew, S. C.: Observing and
understanding the Southeast Asian aerosol system by remote sensing: An
initial review and analysis for the Seven Southeast Asian Studies (7SEAS)
program, Atmos. Res., 122, 403–468, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.005</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Lagrosas, N. D., Jonsson, H. H., Reid, E. A., Sessions, W. R.,
Simpas, J. B., Uy, S. N., Boyd, T. J., Atwood, S. A., Blake, D. R., Campbell,
J. R., Cliff, S. S., Holben, B. N., Holz, R. E., Hyer, E. J., Lynch, P.,
Meinardi, S., Posselt, D. J., Richardson, K. A., Salinas, S. V., Smirnov, A.,
Wang, Q., Yu, L., and Zhang, J.: Observations of the temporal variability in
aerosol properties and their relationships to meteorology in the summer
monsoonal South China Sea/East Sea: the scale-dependent role of monsoonal
flows, the Madden–Julian Oscillation, tropical cyclones, squall lines and
cold pools, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1745–1768, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1745-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1745-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Xian, P., Holben, B. N., Hyer, E. J., Reid, E. A., Salinas, S.
V., Zhang, J., Campbell, J. R., Chew, B. N., Holz, R. E., Kuciauskas, A. P.,
Lagrosas, N., Posselt, D. J., Sampson, C. R., Walker, A. L., Welton, E. J.,
and Zhang, C.: Aerosol meteorology of the Maritime Continent for the 2012
7SEAS southwest monsoon intensive study – Part 1: regional-scale phenomena,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14041–14056, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14041-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14041-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Reutter, P., Su, H., Trentmann, J., Simmel, M., Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S.,
Wernli, H., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Aerosol- and updraft-limited
regimes of cloud droplet formation: influence of particle number, size and
hygroscopicity on the activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 7067–7080, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7067-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7067-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, N. H., Newton, H. M., Allan, J. D., Irwin, M., Hamilton, J. F.,
Flynn, M., Bower, K. N., Williams, P. I., Mills, G., Reeves, C. E.,
McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Source attribution of Bornean air masses by back
trajectory analysis during the OP3 project, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
9605–9630, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9605-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9605-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, N. H., Allan, J. D., Trembath, J. A., Rosenberg, P. D., Allen, G.,
and Coe, H.: The lofting of Western Pacific regional aerosol by island
thermodynamics as observed around Borneo, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5963–5983,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5963-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5963-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China
– Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D.: TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest
fires inhibiting rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3105–3108,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999GL006066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL006066</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Pandis, S. N., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Aerosol production and
growth in the marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99,
20989–21003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JD01932" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JD01932</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Hawkins, L. N., Frossard, A. A., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T.
S.: Carbohydrate-like composition of submicron atmospheric particles and
their production from ocean bubble bursting, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
6652–6657, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908905107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0908905107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Sakamoto, K. M., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Taylor, J. W., Duck, T. J., and
Pierce, J. R.: Aged boreal biomass-burning aerosol size distributions from
BORTAS 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1633–1646,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Shank, L. M., Howell, S., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Brekhovskikh, V.,
Kapustin, V., McNaughton, C., Campos, T., and Wood, R.: Organic matter and
non-refractory aerosol over the remote Southeast Pacific: oceanic and
combustion sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 557–576,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-557-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-557-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tao, W.-K., Chen, J.-P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of aerosols
on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2001,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011RG000369</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Tosca, M. G., Randerson, J. T., Zender, C. S., Nelson, D. L., Diner, D.
J., and Logan, J. A.: Dynamics of fire plumes and smoke clouds associated
with peat and deforestation fires in Indonesia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116,
D08207, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015148</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Tunved, P., Ström, J., and Hansson, H.-C.: An investigation of processes
controlling the evolution of the boundary layer aerosol size distribution
properties at the Swedish background station Aspvreten, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
4, 2581–2592, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2581-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2581-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Ge, C., Yang, Z., Hyer, E. J., Reid, J. S., Chew, B.-N., Mahmud,
M., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, M.: Mesoscale modeling of smoke transport over the
Southeast Asian Maritime Continent: Interplay of sea breeze, trade wind,
typhoon, and topography, Atmos. Res., 122, 486–503,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.009</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Ward, D. S., Eidhammer, T., Cotton, W. R., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: The role
of the particle size distribution in assessing aerosol composition effects on
simulated droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5435–5447,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5435-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5435-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Wegner, T., Hussein, T., Hämeri, K., Vesala, T., Kulmala, M., and Weber,
S.: Properties of aerosol signature size distributions in the urban
environment as derived by cluster analysis, Atmos. Environ., 61, 350–360,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.048</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Academic
Press, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Xian, P., Reid, J. S., Atwood, S. A., Johnson, R. S., Hyer, E. J., Westphal,
D. L., and Sessions, W.: Smoke aerosol transport patterns over the Maritime
Continent, Atmos. Res., 122, 469–485, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.006</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Yokelson, R. J., Christian, T. J., Karl, T. G., and Guenther, A.: The
tropical forest and fire emissions experiment: laboratory fire measurements
and synthesis of campaign data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3509–3527,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Yu, F., Wang, Z., Luo, G., and Turco, R.: Ion-mediated nucleation as an
important global source of tropospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
2537–2554, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2537-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2537-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, T., Remer, L. A., Pickering, K. E., and Yu, H.: Observational evidence
of aerosol enhancement of lightning activity and convective invigoration,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04701, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046052</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zender, C. S., Krolewski, A. G., Tosca, M. G., and Randerson, J. T.: Tropical
biomass burning smoke plume size, shape, reflectance, and age based on
2001–2009 MISR imagery of Borneo, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3437–3454,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3437-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3437-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Size-resolved aerosol and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) properties in the remote marine South China Sea – Part 1: Observations and source classification</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Ship-based measurements of aerosol and cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN) properties are presented for 2 weeks of observations in
remote marine regions of the South China Sea/East Sea during the
southwestern monsoon (SWM) season. Smoke from extensive biomass burning
throughout the Maritime Continent advected into this region during the SWM,
where it was mixed with anthropogenic continental pollution and emissions
from heavy shipping activities. Eight aerosol types were identified using a
k-means cluster analysis with data from a size-resolved CCN characterization
system. Interpretation of the clusters was supplemented by additional
onboard aerosol and meteorological measurements, satellite, and model
products for the region. A typical bimodal marine boundary layer background
aerosol population was identified and observed mixing with accumulation mode
aerosol from other sources, primarily smoke from fires in Borneo and
Sumatra. Hygroscopicity was assessed using the <i>κ</i> parameter and was
found to average 0.40 for samples dominated by aged accumulation mode
smoke; 0.65 for accumulation mode marine aerosol; 0.60 in an anthropogenic
aerosol plume; and 0.22 during a short period that was characterized by
elevated levels of volatile organic compounds not associated with biomass
burning impacts. As a special subset of the background marine aerosol, clean
air masses substantially scrubbed of particles were observed following heavy
precipitation or the passage of squall lines, with changes in observed
aerosol properties occurring on the order of minutes. Average CN number
concentrations, size distributions, and <i>κ</i> values are reported for
each population type, along with CCN number concentrations for particles
that activated at supersaturations between 0.14  and 0.85 %.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S.,
Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and
domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 4039-4072, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, J. D., Topping, D. O., Good, N., Irwin, M., Flynn, M., Williams, P. I., Coe, H., Baker, A. R., Martino, M., Niedermeier, N., Wiedensohler, A., Lehmann, S., Müller,
K., Herrmann, H., and McFiggans, G.: Composition and properties of
atmospheric particles in the eastern Atlantic and impacts on gas phase uptake rates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9299–9314, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9299-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-9299-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation
interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P.,
Longo, K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking Rain Clouds over the Amazon,
Science, 303, 1337–1342, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092779" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1092779</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Atwood, S. A., Reid, J. S., Kreidenweis, S. M., Yu, L. E., Salinas, S. V.,
Chew, B. N., and Balasubramanian, R.: Analysis of source regions for smoke
events in Singapore for the 2009 El Nino burning season, Atmos. Environ., 78,
219–230, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.047" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.047</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Balasubramanian, R., Qian, W.-B., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., and Fuzzi,
S.: Comprehensive characterization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> aerosols in Singapore, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4523, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002517" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002517</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Covert, D. S., Coffman, D. J., Johnson, J.
E., and Wiedensohler, A.: Aerosol physical properties and processes in the
lower marine boundary layer: a comparison of shipboard sub-micron data from
ACE-1 and ACE-2, Tellus B, 52, 258–272,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2000.00021.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.2000.00021.x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Hakala, J.,
Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Covert, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Li, S.-M.,
Hayden, K. L., Nuaaman, I., McLaren, R., Massoli, P., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Keene, W. C.: Measurements of
ocean derived aerosol off the coast of California, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
117, D00V15, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017588" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012JD017588</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Beddows, D. C. S., Dall'Osto, M., and Harrison, R. M.: Cluster Analysis of
Rural, Urban, and Curbside Atmospheric Particle Size Data, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 43, 4694–4700, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es803121t" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es803121t</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Brechtel, F. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Swan, H. B.: Air mass
characteristics, aerosol particle number concentrations, and number size
distributions at Macquarie Island during the First Aerosol Characterization
Experiment (ACE 1), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16351–16367,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97JD03014" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/97JD03014</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Campbell, J. R., Reid, J. S., Westphal, D. L., Zhang, J., Tackett, J. L.,
Chew, B. N., Welton, E. J., Shimizu, A., Sugimoto, N., Aoki, K., and Winker,
D. M.: Characterizing the vertical profile of aerosol particle extinction and
linear depolarization over Southeast Asia and the Maritime Continent: The
2007–2009 view from CALIOP, Atmos. Res., 122, 520–543,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.007</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cavalli, F., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Mircea, M., Emblico, L., Fuzzi,
S., Ceburnis, D., Yoon, Y. J., O'Dowd, C. D., Putaud, J.-P., and Dell'Acqua,
A.: Advances in characterization of size-resolved organic matter in marine
aerosol over the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D24215,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005137" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005137</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Charron, A., Birmili, W., and Harrison, R. M.: Fingerprinting particle
origins according to their size distribution at a UK rural site, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D07202, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008562" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008562</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D., Owens, S. R., and Zhou, J.: An ultrafine sea-salt flux from
breaking waves: Implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote
marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D06202,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006565" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006565</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Simpson, R. M. C., Hudson, J. G., Howell, S. G.,
Brekhovskikh, V. L., Campos, T., Kapustin, V. N., and Zhou, J.: Free
troposphere as a major source of CCN for the equatorial pacific boundary
layer: long-range transport and teleconnections, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
7511–7529, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7511-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-7511-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E.
R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Production flux of sea spray
aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, RG2001, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010RG000349</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R.: HYSPLIT4 user's guide. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL ARL-230, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD., 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: Description of the HYSPLIT4 modeling system,
available at: <a href="http://warn.arl.noaa.gov/documents/reports/arl-224.pdf" target="_blank">http://warn.arl.noaa.gov/documents/reports/arl-224.pdf</a>
(Accessed 14 April 2015), 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4
modelling system for trajectories, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Engelhart, G. J., Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Robinson, A. L., and
Pandis, S. N.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged
biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7285–7293,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Feingold, G., Cotton, W. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Davis, J. T.: The Impact
of Giant Cloud Condensation Nuclei on Drizzle Formation in Stratocumulus:
Implications for Cloud Radiative Properties, J. Atmospheric Sci., 56,
4100–4117, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Feng, N. and Christopher, S. A.: Satellite and surface-based remote sensing
of Southeast Asian aerosols and their radiative effects, Atmos. Res., 122,
544–554, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.02.018" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.02.018</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Forestieri, S. D., Cornwell, G. C., Helgestad, T. M., Moore, K. A., Lee, C.,
Novak, G. A., Sultana, C. M., Wang, X., Bertram, T. H., Prather, K. A., and
Cappa, C. D.: Linking variations in sea spray aerosol particle hygroscopicity
to composition during two microcosm experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
9003–9018, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9003-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-9003-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Burrows, S. M., Elliott, S. M., Bates, T.
S. and Quinn, P. K.: Sources and composition of submicron organic mass in
marine aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
2014JD021913, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021913" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JD021913</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Giglio, L., Descloitres, J., Justice, C. O., and Kaufman, Y. J.: An Enhanced
Contextual Fire Detection Algorithm for MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 87,
273–282, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00184-6" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00184-6</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Good, N., Topping, D. O., Allan, J. D., Flynn, M., Fuentes, E., Irwin, M.,
Williams, P. I., Coe, H., and McFiggans, G.: Consistency between
parameterisations of aerosol hygroscopicity and CCN activity during the
RHaMBLe discovery cruise, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3189–3203,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3189-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-3189-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Heintzenberg, J., Birmili, W., Wiedensohler, A., Nowak, A., and Tuch, T.:
Structure, variability and persistence of the submicrometre marine aerosol,
Tellus B, 56, 357–367, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00115.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00115.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hewitt, C. N., Lee, J. D., MacKenzie, A. R., Barkley, M. P., Carslaw, N.,
Carver, G. D., Chappell, N. A., Coe, H., Collier, C., Commane, R., Davies,
F., Davison, B., DiCarlo, P., Di Marco, C. F., Dorsey, J. R., Edwards, P. M.,
Evans, M. J., Fowler, D., Furneaux, K. L., Gallagher, M., Guenther, A.,
Heard, D. E., Helfter, C., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T., Irwin, M., Jones, C.,
Karunaharan, A., Langford, B., Lewis, A. C., Lim, S. F., MacDonald, S. M.,
Mahajan, A. S., Malpass, S., McFiggans, G., Mills, G., Misztal, P., Moller,
S., Monks, P. S., Nemitz, E., Nicolas-Perea, V., Oetjen, H., Oram, D. E.,
Palmer, P. I., Phillips, G. J., Pike, R., Plane, J. M. C., Pugh, T., Pyle, J.
A., Reeves, C. E., Robinson, N. H., Stewart, D., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K.,
and Yin, X.: Overview: oxidant and particle photochemical processes above a
south-east Asian tropical rainforest (the OP3 project): introduction,
rationale, location characteristics and tools, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
169–199, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-169-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-169-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hogan, T. F. and Rosmond, T. E.: The Description of the Navy Operational
Global Atmospheric Prediction System's Spectral Forecast Model, Mon. Weather
Rev., 119, 1786–1815, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., and Larson, R. E.: Effect of nonprecipitating
clouds on the aerosol size distribution in the marine boundary layer,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 125–128, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/GL013i002p00125" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/GL013i002p00125</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., Fitzgerald, J. W., and Larson, R. E.: Marine
boundary layer measurements of new particle formation and the effects
nonprecipitating clouds have on aerosol size distribution, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 99, 14443–14459, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JD00797" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/94JD00797</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hudson, J. G., Noble, S., and Tabor, S.: Cloud supersaturations from CCN
spectra Hoppel minima, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2014JD022669,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022669" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JD022669</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Koponen, I. K., Paatero, P.,
Aalto, P. P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Evaluation of an automatic
algorithm for fitting the particle number size distributions, Boreal Environ.
Res., 10, 337–355, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hyer, E. J., Reid, J. S., Prins, E. M., Hoffman, J. P., Schmidt, C. C.,
Miettinen, J. I., and Giglio, L.: Patterns of fire activity over Indonesia
and Malaysia from polar and geostationary satellite observations, Atmos.
Res., 122, 504–519, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.011" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.011</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Irwin, M., Robinson, N., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., and McFiggans, G.:
Size-resolved aerosol water uptake and cloud condensation nuclei measurements
as measured above a Southeast Asian rainforest during OP3, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 11157–11174, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11157-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-11157-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Jensen, T. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., Kim, Y., Sievering, H., and Pszenny, A.:
Aerosol distributions in the North Atlantic marine boundary layer during
Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment/Marine Aerosol and Gas Exchange,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 4455–4467, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JD00506" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/95JD00506</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Keene, W. C., Maring, H., Maben, J. R., Kieber, D. J., Pszenny, A. A. P.,
Dahl, E. E., Izaguirre, M. A., Davis, A. J., Long, M. S., Zhou, X., Smoydzin,
L., and Sander, R.: Chemical and physical characteristics of nascent aerosols
produced by bursting bubbles at a model air-sea interface, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D21202, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008464" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008464</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Levin, E. J. T., McMeeking, G. R., Carrico, C. M., Mack, L. E., Kreidenweis,
S. M., Wold, C. E., Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Hao, W. M., Collett,
J. L., and Malm, W. C.: Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties measured
during Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 115, D18210, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013601" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD013601</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lin, N.-H., Sayer, A. M., Wang, S.-H., Loftus, A. M., Hsiao, T.-C., Sheu,
G.-R., Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S.-C., and Chantara, S.: Interactions between
biomass-burning aerosols and clouds over Southeast Asia: Current status,
challenges, and perspectives, Environ. Pollut., 195, 292–307,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.036" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.036</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lynch, P., Reid, J. S., Westphal, D. L., Zhang, J., Hogan, T. F., Hyer, E.
J., Curtis, C. A., Hegg, D. A., Shi, Y., Campbell, J. R., Rubin, J. I.,
Sessions, W. R., Turk, F. J., and Walker, A. L.: An 11-year global gridded
aerosol optical thickness reanalysis (v1.0) for atmospheric and climate
sciences, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1489–1522, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1489-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1489-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Modini, R. L., Frossard, A. A., Ahlm, L., Russell, L. M., Corrigan, C. E.,
Roberts, G. C., Hawkins, L. N., Schroder, J. C., Bertram, A. K., Zhao, R.,
Lee, A. K. Y., Abbatt, J. P. D., Lin, J., Nenes, A., Wang, Z.,
Wonaschütz, A., Sorooshian, A., Noone, K. J., Jonsson, H., Seinfeld, J.
H., Toom-Sauntry, D., Macdonald, A. M., and Leaitch, W. R.: Primary marine
aerosol-cloud interactions off the coast of California, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 2014JD022963, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022963" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JD022963</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Anderson, J. R., Quinn, P. K., McInnes, L. M., Brechtel, F.
J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Pósfai, M., Thomson, D. S.,
and Buseck, P. R.: Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in
the Southern Ocean marine boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/32138" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/32138</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D. and de Leeuw, G.: Marine aerosol production: a review of the
current knowledge, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 365, 1753–1774,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2043" target="_blank">doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2043</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Smith, M. H., Consterdine, I. E., and Lowe, J. A.: Marine
aerosol, sea-salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: a short review, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 73–80, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00106-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00106-9</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel,
O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J.,
Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, É.:
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12,
2825–2830, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of
hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Stevens, B., Vali, G., Faloona, I., and
Russell, L. M.: Accumulation mode aerosol, pockets of open cells, and
particle nucleation in the remote subtropical Pacific marine boundary layer,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D02206, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005694" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005694</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prenni, A. J., DeMott,
P. J., Collett, J. L., and Moosmüller, H.: Cloud condensation nucleation
activity of biomass burning aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D22205,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012353" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD012353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Prather, K. A., Bertram, T. H., Grassian, V. H., Deane, G. B., Stokes, M.
D., DeMott, P. J., Aluwihare, L. I., Palenik, B. P., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J.
H., Moffet, R. C., Molina, M. J., Cappa, C. D., Geiger, F. M., Roberts, G.
C., Russell, L. M., Ault, A. P., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Corrigan,
C. E., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Ebben, C. J., Forestieri, S. D., Guasco, T.
L., Hersey, S. P., Kim, M. J., Lambert, W. F., Modini, R. L., Mui, W.,
Pedler, B. E., Ruppel, M. J., Ryder, O. S., Schoepp, N. G., Sullivan, R. C.,
and Zhao, D.: Bringing the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical
complexity of sea spray aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300262110" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1300262110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Coffman, D., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D.,
Baynard, T., de Gouw, J. A., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C., Williams, E.,
Roberts, J. M., Lerner, B., Stohl, A., Pettersson, A., and Lovejoy, E. R.:
Impacts of sources and aging on submicrometer aerosol properties in the
marine boundary layer across the Gulf of Maine, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111,
D23S36, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007582" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007582</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Schulz, K. S., Coffman, D. J., Frossard, A. A.,
Russell, L. M., Keene, W. C., and Kieber, D. J.: Contribution of sea surface
carbon pool to organic matter enrichment in sea spray aerosol, Nat. Geosci.,
7, 228–232, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2092" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo2092</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Hyer, E. J., Prins, E. M., Westphal, D. L., Zhang, J., Wang,
J., Christopher, S. A., Curtis, C. A., Schmidt, C. C., Eleuterio, D. P.,
Richardson, K. A., and Hoffman, J. P.: Global Monitoring and Forecasting of
Biomass-Burning Smoke: Description of and Lessons From the Fire Locating and
Modeling of Burning Emissions (FLAMBE) Program, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth
Obs. Remote Sens., 2, 144–162, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2027443" target="_blank">doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2027443</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, J. S., Xian, P., Hyer, E. J., Flatau, M. K., Ramirez, E. M., Turk, F.
J., Sampson, C. R., Zhang, C., Fukada, E. M., and Maloney, E. D.: Multi-scale
meteorological conceptual analysis of observed active fire hotspot activity
and smoke optical depth in the Maritime Continent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
2117–2147, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2117-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-2117-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Hyer, E. J., Johnson, R. S., Holben, B. N., Yokelson, R. J.,
Zhang, J., Campbell, J. R., Christopher, S. A., Di Girolamo, L., Giglio, L.,
Holz, R. E., Kearney, C., Miettinen, J., Reid, E. A., Turk, F. J., Wang, J.,
Xian, P., Zhao, G., Balasubramanian, R., Chew, B. N., Janjai, S., Lagrosas,
N., Lestari, P., Lin, N.-H., Mahmud, M., Nguyen, A. X., Norris, B., Oanh, N.
T. K., Oo, M., Salinas, S. V., Welton, E. J., and Liew, S. C.: Observing and
understanding the Southeast Asian aerosol system by remote sensing: An
initial review and analysis for the Seven Southeast Asian Studies (7SEAS)
program, Atmos. Res., 122, 403–468, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.005</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, J. S., Lagrosas, N. D., Jonsson, H. H., Reid, E. A., Sessions, W. R.,
Simpas, J. B., Uy, S. N., Boyd, T. J., Atwood, S. A., Blake, D. R., Campbell,
J. R., Cliff, S. S., Holben, B. N., Holz, R. E., Hyer, E. J., Lynch, P.,
Meinardi, S., Posselt, D. J., Richardson, K. A., Salinas, S. V., Smirnov, A.,
Wang, Q., Yu, L., and Zhang, J.: Observations of the temporal variability in
aerosol properties and their relationships to meteorology in the summer
monsoonal South China Sea/East Sea: the scale-dependent role of monsoonal
flows, the Madden–Julian Oscillation, tropical cyclones, squall lines and
cold pools, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1745–1768, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1745-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1745-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, J. S., Xian, P., Holben, B. N., Hyer, E. J., Reid, E. A., Salinas, S.
V., Zhang, J., Campbell, J. R., Chew, B. N., Holz, R. E., Kuciauskas, A. P.,
Lagrosas, N., Posselt, D. J., Sampson, C. R., Walker, A. L., Welton, E. J.,
and Zhang, C.: Aerosol meteorology of the Maritime Continent for the 2012
7SEAS southwest monsoon intensive study – Part 1: regional-scale phenomena,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14041–14056, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14041-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-16-14041-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Reutter, P., Su, H., Trentmann, J., Simmel, M., Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S.,
Wernli, H., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Aerosol- and updraft-limited
regimes of cloud droplet formation: influence of particle number, size and
hygroscopicity on the activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 7067–7080, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7067-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-7067-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, N. H., Newton, H. M., Allan, J. D., Irwin, M., Hamilton, J. F.,
Flynn, M., Bower, K. N., Williams, P. I., Mills, G., Reeves, C. E.,
McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Source attribution of Bornean air masses by back
trajectory analysis during the OP3 project, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
9605–9630, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9605-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-9605-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, N. H., Allan, J. D., Trembath, J. A., Rosenberg, P. D., Allen, G.,
and Coe, H.: The lofting of Western Pacific regional aerosol by island
thermodynamics as observed around Borneo, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5963–5983,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5963-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-5963-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China
– Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D.: TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest
fires inhibiting rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3105–3108,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999GL006066" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1999GL006066</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Pandis, S. N., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Aerosol production and
growth in the marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99,
20989–21003, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JD01932" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/94JD01932</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Hawkins, L. N., Frossard, A. A., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T.
S.: Carbohydrate-like composition of submicron atmospheric particles and
their production from ocean bubble bursting, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
6652–6657, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908905107" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0908905107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sakamoto, K. M., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Taylor, J. W., Duck, T. J., and
Pierce, J. R.: Aged boreal biomass-burning aerosol size distributions from
BORTAS 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1633–1646,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1633-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Shank, L. M., Howell, S., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Brekhovskikh, V.,
Kapustin, V., McNaughton, C., Campos, T., and Wood, R.: Organic matter and
non-refractory aerosol over the remote Southeast Pacific: oceanic and
combustion sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 557–576,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-557-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-557-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tao, W.-K., Chen, J.-P., Li, Z., Wang, C., and Zhang, C.: Impact of aerosols
on convective clouds and precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2001,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000369" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011RG000369</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Tosca, M. G., Randerson, J. T., Zender, C. S., Nelson, D. L., Diner, D.
J., and Logan, J. A.: Dynamics of fire plumes and smoke clouds associated
with peat and deforestation fires in Indonesia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116,
D08207, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015148" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JD015148</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tunved, P., Ström, J., and Hansson, H.-C.: An investigation of processes
controlling the evolution of the boundary layer aerosol size distribution
properties at the Swedish background station Aspvreten, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
4, 2581–2592, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2581-2004" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-4-2581-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Ge, C., Yang, Z., Hyer, E. J., Reid, J. S., Chew, B.-N., Mahmud,
M., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, M.: Mesoscale modeling of smoke transport over the
Southeast Asian Maritime Continent: Interplay of sea breeze, trade wind,
typhoon, and topography, Atmos. Res., 122, 486–503,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.009</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, D. S., Eidhammer, T., Cotton, W. R., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: The role
of the particle size distribution in assessing aerosol composition effects on
simulated droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5435–5447,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5435-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-5435-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Wegner, T., Hussein, T., Hämeri, K., Vesala, T., Kulmala, M., and Weber,
S.: Properties of aerosol signature size distributions in the urban
environment as derived by cluster analysis, Atmos. Environ., 61, 350–360,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.048" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.048</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Academic
Press, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Xian, P., Reid, J. S., Atwood, S. A., Johnson, R. S., Hyer, E. J., Westphal,
D. L., and Sessions, W.: Smoke aerosol transport patterns over the Maritime
Continent, Atmos. Res., 122, 469–485, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.006</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yokelson, R. J., Christian, T. J., Karl, T. G., and Guenther, A.: The
tropical forest and fire emissions experiment: laboratory fire measurements
and synthesis of campaign data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3509–3527,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-3509-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, F., Wang, Z., Luo, G., and Turco, R.: Ion-mediated nucleation as an
important global source of tropospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
2537–2554, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2537-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2537-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, T., Remer, L. A., Pickering, K. E., and Yu, H.: Observational evidence
of aerosol enhancement of lightning activity and convective invigoration,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04701, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046052" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GL046052</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zender, C. S., Krolewski, A. G., Tosca, M. G., and Randerson, J. T.: Tropical
biomass burning smoke plume size, shape, reflectance, and age based on
2001–2009 MISR imagery of Borneo, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3437–3454,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3437-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-3437-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
