<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-17-10405-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Characterizing source fingerprints and ageing processes in
laboratory-generated secondary organic aerosols using proton-nuclear
magnetic resonance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR) analysis<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> and HPLC HULIS determination</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Characterizing source fingerprints and ageing processes}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{N.~Zanca et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Zanca</surname><given-names>Nicola</given-names></name>
          <email>n.zanca@consorzioproambiente.it</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Lambe</surname><given-names>Andrew T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3031-701X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Massoli</surname><given-names>Paola</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Paglione</surname><given-names>Marco</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4423-2570</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Croasdale</surname><given-names>David R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Parmar</surname><given-names>Yatish</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Tagliavini</surname><given-names>Emilio</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gilardoni</surname><given-names>Stefania</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-5571</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Decesari</surname><given-names>Stefano</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6486-3786</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC) of the National
Research Council of Italy (CNR),<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Bologna, 40129, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA 01821, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Chemistry Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, University of Bologna,
Bologna, 40126, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Proambiente S.c.r.l., Bologna, 40129, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nicola Zanca (n.zanca@consorzioproambiente.it)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>17</issue>
      <fpage>10405</fpage><lpage>10421</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The study of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in laboratory settings has
greatly increased our knowledge of the diverse chemical processes and
environmental conditions responsible for the formation of particulate matter
starting from biogenic and anthropogenic volatile compounds. However,
characteristics of the different experimental setups and the way they impact
the composition and the timescale of formation of SOA are still subject to
debate. In this study, SOA samples were generated using a potential aerosol
mass (PAM) oxidation flow reactor using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, naphthalene and
isoprene as precursors. The PAM reactor facilitated exploration of SOA
composition over atmospherically relevant photochemical ageing timescales
that are unattainable in environmental chambers. The SOA samples were
analyzed using two state-of-the-art analytical techniques for SOA
characterization – proton nuclear magnetic resonance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR)
spectroscopy and HPLC determination of humic-like substances (HULIS). Results
were compared with previous Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS)
measurements. The combined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR, HPLC, and AMS datasets show that the
composition of the studied SOA systems tend to converge to highly oxidized
organic compounds upon prolonged OH exposures. Further, our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
findings show that only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA acquires spectroscopic features
comparable to those of ambient OA when exposed to at least
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec OH cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s OH exposure, or
multiple days of equivalent atmospheric OH oxidation. Over multiple days of
equivalent OH exposure, the formation of HULIS is observed in both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA and in naphthalene SOA (maximum yields: 16 and 30 %,
respectively, of total analyzed water-soluble organic carbon, WSOC), providing evidence
of the formation of humic-like polycarboxylic acids in unseeded SOA.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Organic aerosol (OA) constitutes a large proportion of ambient particulate
matter, affecting the Earth's radiation balance, cloud formation and human
health (Hallquist et al., 2009). Understanding and simulating the
concentration and composition of OA particles is one of the major challenges
of modern atmospheric chemistry. In the mid-2000s the discovery that
oxidized organic compounds dominate in concentration compared to that of
primary organic compounds outside urban areas (Zhang et al., 2007; Jimenez et
al., 2009), together with the understanding that the ambient organic aerosol
concentrations were systematically underpredicted by existing chemical
transport models (Heald et al., 2005), led to a reevaluation of the treatment
of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation processes in chemistry and
climate models. Since the model–measurement gap is mostly overcome by
subjecting the particles to “oxidative ageing”, understanding the nature of
ageing processes has become a primary objective of new generation SOA
studies. Experimental findings showing the existence of highly oxidized SOA
molecular tracers with a high oxygen-to-carbon (O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C) ratio (Szmigielski
et al., 2007) and molecular structures that are chemically distinct from
first-
and second-generation oxidation products of the same precursors (Jenkin et al.,
2000) have provided indirect confirmation of still unknown chemical processes
forming highly oxidized, low-volatility compounds.</p>
      <p>The first formulations of SOA ageing into models were based on the chemistry
of saturated hydrocarbon oxidation by OH, for which a step-by-step process
with a slow, progressive increase in the oxidation state, along with a
decrease in volatility, can be proposed (Robinson et al., 2007). The
duration of such processes clearly exceeds the residence time of SOA in
traditional environmental chamber experiments with equivalent atmospheric
ageing times of less than 1 day. These limitations led to the emergence of
oxidation flow reactors that are capable of higher integrated oxidant
exposures, including the potential aerosol mass (PAM) oxidation flow reactor
(Kang et al., 2007; Lambe et al., 2011) and related techniques (Hall IV et
al., 2013; Keller and Burtscher, 2012; Slowik et al., 2012). Recent studies
suggest that flow-reactor-generated SOA particles have similar composition
to SOA generated in chambers (Lambe et al., 2015; Bruns et al., 2015).
Modeling work further suggests that flow reactors simulate tropospheric
oxidation reactions with minimal experimental artifacts (Li et al., 2015;
Peng et al., 2015, 2016). Recent applications of oxidation flow reactors in
field measurements showed that the maximum yields of SOA were attained at
approximately 2–3 days of equivalent atmospheric OH oxidation; at higher
photochemical age, SOA yields decrease substantially (Tkacik et al., 2014;
Ortega et al., 2016; Palm et al., 2016). Such observations demonstrate the
influence of fragmentation reactions in which oxidation leads to C–C bond
cleavage with the production of highly volatile products (Kroll et al.,
2009; Chacon-Madrid and Donahue 2011; Lambe et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>The idea of a slow, multi-generation SOA ageing was recently challenged by
recent findings from reaction chamber experiments employing modern chemical
ionization mass spectrometric methods. For example, it was found that
oxidized gaseous compounds with O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C &gt; 0.7 form readily
upon VOC oxidation (Ehn et al., 2012, 2014; Krechmer et al., 2015; Rissanen
et al., 2014) and that even the chemical tracers of “aged” SOA can be in
fact produced among second-generation oxidation products (Müller et al.,
2012). The quantification of highly oxidized SOA compounds in reaction
chambers is challenging because of significant vapor and particle wall losses
(Matsunaga and Ziemann, 2010; Zhang et al., 2014; Krechmer et al., 2016; Ye
et al., 2016), but these findings suggest that SOA ageing can be much faster
than previously thought (Hodzic et al., 2016). As a result of the diverse
implementations of SOA schemes in models, the quantification of SOA
production and concentration in the atmosphere is still highly uncertain: a
recent intercomparison between 20 state-of-the-art global models showed that
the estimated SOA annual production rates differ by 1 order of magnitude
(Tsigaridis et al., 2014). These results call for more experimental
observations for constraining the existing SOA parameterizations.</p>
      <p>The present study focuses on laboratory production of SOA from three
different precursors using a PAM reactor. The novel feature of this work is
our application of two offline analytical techniques that provide valuable
insight in regards to SOA composition yet are rarely employed for SOA
characterization. The first technique, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectroscopy, is a
universal technique in organic chemistry. It has been used to confirm the
molecular structures of many SOA tracers (Finessi et al., 2014) or for
following SOA reaction products in aqueous solution (Yu et al., 2011). The
few examples of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectroscopy on SOA complex mixtures (Cavalli et
al., 2006; Baltensperger et al., 2008; Bones et al., 2010; White et al., 2014)
indicate that the technique can be very specific for distinguishing different
biogenic and anthropogenic SOA systems. The present study is among the first
applications of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectroscopy to SOA samples produced from the OH
oxidation of biogenic and anthropogenic SOA in the laboratory. The
acquisition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR fingerprints for fresh and aged biogenic and anthropogenic
SOA can also be useful for interpreting factor analysis results obtained on a
timeline of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of ambient aerosol extracts (e.g., Paglione et al.,
2014a). The second technique is an HPLC setup for the determination of
humic-like substances (HULIS). HULIS have been observed in ambient organic
aerosol for nearly two decades (Havers et al., 1998; Limbeck et al., 2003),
but their formation pathways aside from production in biomass burning plumes
remain unclear (Graber and Rudich, 2006). It is well known that
high-molecular-weight oxygenated organic compounds readily form by
heterogeneous reactions (Limbeck et al., 2003) or by gas-to-particle
conversion (Kalberer et al., 2006), but there is little evidence for their
identification with HULIS in ambient aerosols (especially if we base the
definition on the chromatographic behavior, as in Baduel et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>Here we focus on SOA systems generated from three distinct precursors:
isoprene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and naphthalene. Naphthalene is used as proxy for
anthropogenic aromatic intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene is the most studied biogenic monoterpene due to its global
importance as a biogenic SOA precursor (e.g., Pye et al., 2010), while
isoprene is the most abundant biogenic VOC, accounting for 44 % of global
emissions (Guenter et al., 1995). The discovery of isoprene SOA is relatively
recent (Claeys et al. 2004). In the presence of acidic wet aerosols, SOA
originates from the heterogeneous uptake of isoprene epoxides (“IEPOX
channel”; Lin et al., 2012). Since aerosol water and acidity are primarily
determined by anthropogenic mineral acids, the formation of SOA from isoprene
appears to be very much controlled by anthropogenic emissions. On the other
hand, recent experiments conducted at very low nitrogen oxide (NO)
concentrations, and in the absence of seed aerosols, have showed that SOA can
still form from isoprene (“non-IEPOX” SOA; Krechmer et al., 2015). Such
aerosols are more representative of the preindustrial world and their
characterization is of paramount importance for understanding the climate
radiative forcing of SOA at the global scale. Our results, obtained in the
PAM reactors in the absence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, are representative for non-IEPOX isoprene
SOA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>PAM oxidation flow reactor</title>
      <p>The PAM oxidation flow reactor is a horizontal 13 L glass cylindrical
chamber that is 46 cm long <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 cm ID. Carrier gas flows of
8.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were used, with
8.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of flow pulled through the reactor and 0.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
of excess flow removed prior to the reactor. Other experimental details are
fully described in Lambe et al. (2011). In this study, the PAM reactor was
connected to a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), an Aerodyne
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS), and a filter holder equipped
with 47 mm (prebaked) quartz-fiber filters. SOA concentrations calculated
from SMPS and/or AMS measurements averaged over filter collection times
provided an estimate of the organic matter loading on the filters.</p>
      <p>During the first set of experiments involving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and
naphthalene as SOA precursors, by varying the concentrations of OH inside the
PAM reactor, SOA with a different oxidation state could be obtained. For
instance, the OH exposure varied from
2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s to
2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
experiments and the resulting SOA oxidation degree – traced by the “f44”
parameter (i.e., the fraction of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 signal with respect to the
total OA) – increased from 0.05 to 0.24. A total of five <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
and five naphthalene SOA samples were obtained (collection time between 3 and
20 h), with integrated OH exposures varying between 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s, corresponding to a
photochemical age of 1.5 to 15 days assuming a 24 h average OH concentration
of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mao et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>During the second set of experiments, isoprene SOA samples were generated in
the reactor (Table 2). Due to the lower yields of SOA produced by isoprene
oxidation, samples were collected at OH exposure of approximately
8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s (corresponding to a photochemical
age of 6 days) at which the maximum SOA yield is obtained (Lambe et al.,
2015). The collection time was varied between 2 and 18 h.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>PAM experimental conditions for naphthalene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
SOA ageing studies.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oxidation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PAM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OH exposure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Collection</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">OM on filter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">level</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">lamp</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Time (h)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AMS OM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">based on AMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">voltage</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(RIE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(V)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(RIE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pin#1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">384</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pin#2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">151.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">221</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pin#3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">129</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pin#5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pin#6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">161</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Naphthalene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nap#1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">277</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nap#2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">174</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nap#3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low (f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.084)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nap#4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">127</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nap#5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.074)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">246</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blanks</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blk#1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blk#2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blk#3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>PAM experimental conditions for isoprene SOA ageing studies.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oxidation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PAM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OH exposure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Collection</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">OM on filter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">level</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">lamp</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Time (h)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AMS OM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">based on AMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">voltage</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(RIE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(V)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(RIE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Isoprene</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iso#1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.046)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">409</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">651</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iso#2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N.A.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">575</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">700</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iso#3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.039)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">678</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">656</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iso#4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.037)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">551</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">684</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iso#5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.040)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">685</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4959</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iso#6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.066)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">767</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1280</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iso#7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Med <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(f44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.059)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">593</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">986</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blanks</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blk#1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blk#2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blk#3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>To compare SOA formation processes occurring in oxidation flow reactors and
in the atmosphere, two primary assumptions are required. First, we assume the
kinetics of laboratory processes occurring at higher oxidant concentrations
and shorter exposure times can be extrapolated to atmospheric processes
occurring at lower oxidant concentrations and longer residence times. Second,
we assume that the extent of nucleation or phase partitioning of SOA is not
limited by the shorter residence time in flow reactors. The first assumption
is supported by Renbaum and Smith (2011), Bahreini et al. (2012), and Lambe
et al. (2015). The second assumption may introduce uncertainty depending on
the particle surface area available to promote condensation and the mass
accommodation coefficient of the oxidized vapors (Lambe et al., 2015;
Shantanu et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Extraction and offline sample characterization</title>
      <p>Each filter was extracted with 5 mL of deionized ultra-pure water (Milli-Q)
in a mechanical shaker for 1 h and the water extract was filtered on PTFE
membranes (pore size: 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in order to remove suspended
particles. The water extracts were dried by rotary evaporator and were then
re-dissolved in 2.15 mL of D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O: 0.65 mL for proton-nuclear magnetic
resonance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR) characterization (Decesari et al., 2000), and 1.5 mL
for HPLC analysis and total organic carbon (TOC) analysis (Mancinelli et al.,
2007). Tests of extraction using methanol instead of water were carried out
on three isoprene SOA samples. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of methanol extracts
were completely consistent with those obtained for the other three analyzed
in deuterated water (Fig. S2 in the Supplement), indicating that there were
no specific classes of water-insoluble compounds in the isoprene SOA under
the conditions used in this study. The following discussion will focus on the
water-soluble fraction for which spectroscopic and chromatographic data were
obtained for all three SOA systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{1}}$H-NMR spectroscopy}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectroscopy</title>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra were acquired at 600 MHz with a Varian
600 spectrometer in a 5 mm probe with 0.65 mL of each sample re-dissolved
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Sodium
3-trimethylsilyl-(2,2,3,3-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) propionate
(TSP-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used as the referred
internal standard. A buffer of potassium deuterated formate/formic acid
(pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8) was used in the second series of experiments (isoprene SOA)
to stabilize the chemical shift of hydrogen atoms in acyl functional groups,
while the extracts obtained during the first experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
and naphthalene) were analyzed unbuffered. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectroscopy of
low-concentration samples in protic solvents provides the speciation of
hydrogen atoms bound to carbon atoms (H-C). On the basis of the range of
frequency shifts (the chemical shift, in ppm) in which the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR resonances
occur, they can be attributed to different H-C-containing functional groups
(Paglione et al., 2014a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA as a function of
increasing photochemical age in the potential aerosol mass (PAM) oxidation
flow reactor. The sharp singlet at 0 ppm represents the internal standard
(TSP-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the broad peak at 4.8 ppm is the – partly instrumentally
suppressed – hydrogen deuterium oxygen (HDO) peak. The sharp
singlets between 0.9 and 2.2 ppm in the fresh SOA samples (Pin#5 and
Pin#6) are genuine bands of the samples and were identified as methyl
groups of pinic and pinonic acid.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>HPLC-UV-TOC method</title>
      <p>HULIS were determined using the ion exchange chromatographic method described
by Mancinelli et al. (2007). A HPLC system (Agilent model 1100) with gradient
elution was used. The subsequent elution of chemical compounds bearing zero,
one, two or more than two ionized groups per molecule (mainly carboxylate
ions at pH 7) is monitored by a UV detector at 260 nm. Downstream of the
detector, a fraction collector is programmed to sample separately “neutral
compounds” (NCs), “monocarboxylic acids” (MAs), “dicarboxylic acids” (DAs),
and “polycarboxylic acids” (PAs) or HULIS. The amount of WSOC recovered in
each fraction is determined offline by TOC analysis using an Analytik-Jena
multi-analyzer N/C (model 2100). The HPLC column and chromatographic
conditions used in this study were the same as in Mancinelli et al. (2007).
Further information on the nature of the chemical classes separated by the
HPLC method based on elution tests of standard compounds, including
discussion of possible misclassification, is reported by Decesari et
al. (2005).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of naphthalene SOA as a function of increasing
photochemical age in the PAM reactor. The sharp singlet at 0 ppm
represents the internal standard (TSP-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the broad peak at 4.8 ppm is the – partly instrumentally
suppressed – HDO peak.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{1}}$H-NMR results}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{1}}$H-NMR fingerprints of fresh and aged $\alpha$-pinene SOA}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR fingerprints of fresh and aged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA</title>
      <p>Figure 1 shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA with
increasing photochemical age. The first spectrum corresponding to a “low”
SOA oxidation level is similar to reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of
environmental chamber-generated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis (Cavalli et al.,
2006). However, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR fingerprint of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA evolves
rapidly with further oxidation steps. A clear, progressive disappearance of
first-generation oxidation products (pinic and pinonic acid) with an
increasing O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio can be observed. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra
corresponding to a “medium” SOA oxidation level, the resonance at 0.83 ppm
of chemical shift, arising from one of the two gem-methyls of pinonic acid,
accounts for only 0.3 % of the total integral of the spectrum, while it
represented 2–3 % in the fresh SOA samples. This indicates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA composition evolves rapidly towards more highly oxidized
molecular structures, with little resemblance to first-generation oxidation
products. At “medium” and “high” oxidation levels, the unsubstituted
alkyl groups of the SOA mixture give rise to a broad Gaussian band between
1.1 and 1.8 ppm of chemical shift with a maximum at 1.4–1.5 ppm. The
middle point position showing a slight deshielding with respect to a purely
alkylic chain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3 ppm for fatty acids) indicates the presence of
electronegative groups (such as oxygen atoms) in beta or gamma position with
respect to these alkyl groups. The band between 1.9 and 3 ppm, attributable
to C–H groups of acyl groups (HC-C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O), also shows a transition towards
structures containing more deshielded H atoms. In all cases, the most
conspicuous band in this spectral region is found at 2.2–2.3 ppm of
chemical shift, which corresponds to acetyl and acyl groups of aliphatic
compounds with a low O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio, like pinonic acid
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-(C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O)-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly a
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical). Such a band persists in all SOA samples, but an
additional band between 2.5 and 2.9 ppm is observed in the two samples with
the highest O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio, indicating that the aliphatic groups become more
and more substituted by electronegative groups: the keto and carboxylic
groups become spaced by no more than two methylene (or methyns) groups
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O)-CH-CH-(C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a generic substituent).
Finally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR resonances in the third important aliphatic region
of alkoxy
groups (CH-O), between 3.3 and 4.2 ppm of chemical shift, are always
relatively small, with peak intensity at intermediate photochemical age. SOA
species that contribute to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR resonance in this region may be
correlated with semivolatile, highly functionalized species that contribute
to maximum SOA yields observed at intermediate OH exposures (Lambe et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>Overall, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR fingerprint of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA is highly dependent on
photochemical age, with a sharp change already at medium ageing. The most
oxidized samples show spectral features that have lost any clear similarity
with those of SOA sampled in reaction chambers experiments without ageing
(Cavalli et al., 2006).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectrum of isoprene SOA generated in the
PAM reactor at an OH exposure of
8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s.
The bottom trace shows the same spectrum with enlarged the broad background
bands. Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> show the methyltetrols resonances
between 3.4 and 3.9 ppm and 1.12–1.13 ppm, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{1}}$H-NMR fingerprints of fresh and aged naphthalene SOA}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR fingerprints of fresh and aged naphthalene SOA</title>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of naphthalene SOA samples with an increasing
O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio are presented in Fig. 2. The extract of the least-oxidized
sample (on the top) shows broad resonances between 0 and 3 ppm probably due
to the effect of colloidal hydrophobic material in solution. Despite such an
artifact, all spectra of fresh and moderately aged SOA show clear signals
from aromatic structures (region at chemical shift from 6.5 to 8.5 ppm) and
alkenes (approximately between 5 and 7 ppm). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of
naphthalene SOA are very different than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of SOA produced
from the OH oxidation of one-ring aromatic VOCs (Baltensperger et al., 2008),
which have mostly aliphatic groups originating from ring opening reactions.
Our data are in agreement with molecular speciation studies (Lee and Lane
2009), indicating that naphthalene is oxidized to form one- or two-ring
aromatic compounds such as naphthol, as well as substituted benzoquinones,
cinnamic acid, and phthalic acid (Chhabra et al., 2015). The chemical shift
range of the main aromatic band, between 7.4 and 8.1 ppm, indicates that
aromatic rings are substituted prevalently by electron-withdrawing groups,
such as carbonyl and carboxyls. At moderate ageing states, a small band at
6.9–7.1 ppm indicates the formation of phenolic structures. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
spectra of fresh naphthalene SOA show several singlets in the aromatic
region, indicating a diversity of individual compounds occurring in
relatively high concentrations, while moderately aged SOA show mainly the two
singlets of phthalic acid. All spectra contain signals at lower chemical
shifts with respect to the aromatics, mainly between 3.5 and 6.0 ppm (with
the interference of the partly suppressed peak of water in the middle):
several functional groups can give rise to these bands, including
alkoxyls, peroxides, esters,
hemiacetals and acetals, and vinyls.</p>
      <p>The spectrum of the most aged sample (NAPTH 1), which is also the one with
the lowest SOA concentration, shows an interference from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA
in the aliphatic region. This feature is likely due to experimental setting
contamination from a previous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA experiment. Despite the
low naphthalene SOA concentration, a broad aromatic band between 6.5 and
8.5 ppm and the same signals found between 3.5 and 6.0 ppm seen in the
samples with a medium O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio are still visible in this most aged
naphthalene SOA spectrum. However, the band from oxygenated functional groups
between 3 and 4.5 ppm becomes relatively more intense with respect to
aromatics compared to SOA samples of smaller ageing state. Compared to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR fingerprint of naphthalene SOA appears
less sensitive to variations in the OH exposure between the low and the
medium level of exposure. More substantial changes can be found for the most
oxidized sample, which are only partly visible due the low signal-to-noise
ratio of the spectrum.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{1}}$H-NMR fingerprints of non-IEPOX isoprene SOA}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR fingerprints of non-IEPOX isoprene SOA</title>
      <p>The samples of isoprene SOA were obtained from the same OH exposure
(corresponding approximately to a “medium” exposure in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
and naphthalene experiments) and differed only for collection time and sample
quantity loaded on the filter. The isoprene SOA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra profiles
were all very similar (an example is provided in Fig. 3). The comparison with
literature data (Budisulistiorini et al., 2015) led to the unambiguous
identification of 2-methyltetrols, clearly responsible for the two singlets
at 1.12 ppm (methylic H atoms of methylerythritol) and 1.13 ppm (methylic H
atoms of methylthreitol) and for a series of multiplets between 3.4 and
3.9 ppm. Methylerythritol is more abundant (60 % of the sum of the two,
as an average between two samples extracted in water and three extracted in
methanol) than methylthreitol. The spectra show the occurrence of only two
diastereomers among the possible four ones (González et al., 2011),
indicating that the formation of methyltetrols is stereoselective, as already
proposed by Cash et al. (2016) on the basis of a theoretical analysis of the
IEPOX chemistry, and in contrast with the conclusions of González et
al. (2011), claiming that methyltetrols are produced in laboratory conditions
only in racemic mixtures. The two methyltetrols account for 65 % of the
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR signal, the rest being characterized by broad background
signal with very few sharp resonances, indicating that the isoprene SOA
samples are composed mainly of methyltetrols together with a significant
amount of mass composed of a very complex mixture of products. The unresolved
background resonances are located below the peaks of the methyltetrols,
suggesting that the complex mixtures (which can include also oligomeric
species) encompass molecular species (or monomers) similar to methyltetrols
(at least in their C–H backbone). However, the range of chemical shifts of
the background bands characterize molecular species with more electronegative
groups (leading to more deshielded H atoms) than methyltetrols: the band of
methylic protons extends to 1.7 ppm (with respect to 1.12–1.13 of
methyltetrols) and the band of alkoxy groups (HC-O) extends to 4.3 ppm. The results of Liu et al. (2016),
indicating that non-IEPOX isoprene SOA includes peroxide equivalents of
methyltetrols, are in agreement with these findings. However, Riva et
al. (2016) reported only peroxides for non-IEPOX SOA in unseeded experiments
and no methyltetrols. It is possible that peroxides decomposed to tetrols in
our filter samples during collection downstream the PAM or afterwards during
storing. The actual stability of isoprene hydroperoxides in the aerosol
itself is largely uncertain; therefore the discrepancy between the findings
presented in this study and the results of Riva et al. (2016) cannot be
clarified at this stage. In addition, neither Liu et al. (2016) nor Riva et
al. (2016) reported the presence of carboxylic or keto groups, while our data
clearly indicate that these (and/or other acyl groups) are found in the
unresolved mixtures of non-IEPOX isoprene SOA and are responsible for the
signal band between 2.0 and 2.6 ppm. Still, this band is much less intense
than that of alkoxyls, which is
opposite to what observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, where acyls are by far
the main oxygenated aliphatic functional group. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
spectroscopy provides a distinct fingerprint for isoprene and monoterpene
SOA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>HPLC chromatograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA water extracts.
Chromatographic features are grouped into neutral, mono-/dicarboxylic acid,
and polycarboxylic acid classes based on their affinity for the column
phase. Sample identifications are provided in Table 1.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>HPLC results</title>
      <p>The HPLC analysis of fresh <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA extracts shows the presence
of compounds unretained by ion-exchange columns (neutral compounds) or weakly
retained (mono- and diacids) with a small contribution from compounds having
a high retention factor (polyacids, PA, or HULIS), in agreement with previous
results obtained from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA samples generated in environmental
chamber experiments (unpublished data). It should be noted, however, that the
chromatographic analysis of SOA compounds in water extracts generally does
not allow for recovery of high-molecular-weight organic oligomers susceptible to
hydrolysis reactions (e.g., polyacetals; Kroll and Seinfeld, 2008). The HULIS
determined by our method are essentially only the non-hydrolyzable ones,
stable in aqueous solutions. The HULIS content increases only moderately with
ageing, while the yield/fraction of diacids increases significantly with
respect to monoacids and neutral/basic compounds (Fig. 4). With increasing
photochemical age, the total organic carbon (TOC) mass fractions of
monoacids, diacids and HULIS increase from 20 to 34 % and 7 to
16 %, respectively, whereas the mass fraction of neutral compounds
decreases from 19 to 9 % (Fig. S3). These results are in qualitative
agreement with the known chemistry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, in which mono-
and dicarboxylic acids are the most characteristic condensable first-generation
products (Jenkin et al., 2000; Jaoui and Kamens, 2001), while tricarboxylic
acids such as 3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid or pinyl-diaterpenyl
ester (Szmigielski et al., 2007; Yasmeen et al., 2010) are present in lesser
amounts and can contribute the observed concentrations of HULIS in this
study.</p>
      <p>The HPLC fractionation of naphthalene SOA (Fig. 5) shows that fresh samples
are characterized by a mixture of neutral compounds and mono- and diacids,
completely consistent with the molecular compositions reported in the
literature (Lee and Lane, 2009). However, a net increase in acidic compounds
with photochemical age can be clearly observed. However, the HULIS content,
initially small, increases substantially and progressively with ageing. With
increasing photochemical age, the TOC mass fraction of mono- and diacids
decreases from 33 to 18 % and from 34 to 33 %, respectively, while the
fraction of PA/HULIS increases from 11 to 30 % (Fig. S4). This is the
first evidence of HULIS formation (determined with the ion-exchange method)
in laboratory-generated SOA. The formation of polyacidic molecules with three
or more carboxylic groups implies the opening of the second aromatic ring in
the naphthalene precursor backbone, and/or oligomerization reactions. In both
cases, products of such oxidation reactions cannot be explained by current
naphthalene SOA molecular speciation studies (e.g., Kautzman et al., 2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>HPLC chromatograms of naphthalene SOA water extracts.
Chromatographic features are grouped into neutral, mono-/dicarboxylic acid,
and polycarboxylic acid classes based on their affinity for the column
phase. Sample identifications are provided in Table 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>HPLC chromatograms of isoprene SOA water extracts. Chromatographic
features are grouped into neutral, mono-/dicarboxylic acid, and
polycarboxylic acid classes based on their affinity for the column phase.
Sample identifications are provided in Table 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Pearson correlation coefficient between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of
PAM-generated SOA and ambient PEGASOS WSOC.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Finally, the HPLC analysis of isoprene SOA shows that neutral
compounds (NCs) were dominant in all sample extracts (Fig. 6). NCs accounted
for 59 % of the TOC content of the sum of the HPLC fractions. The second
most abundant fraction (34 %) is the monoacids, while diacids accounted
for a much smaller fraction of TOC, and polyacids were almost absent (ca.
1 % of the TOC). The dominance of NCs is consistent with the high yield
methyltetrols and their analogues (see Sect. 3.1.3). Assuming that the
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR functional groups approximately reflects their
carbon content, methyltetrols (accounting for 65 % of the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
signal) can account for the whole of the HPLC neutral compounds and, as a
corollary, the complex mixtures of products detected by unresolved bands by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectroscopy correspond to the mono- and diacids in HPLC. As
already noted in the previous section, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR analysis indeed shows
the occurrence of acyl groups which indicate/support the presence of
carboxylic acids. We cannot exclude, however, possible misclassification of
some neutral compounds into the monoacid fraction, as already observed for
some dicarbonyls (Decesari et al., 2005). It is worthwhile to clarify that
the definition of chemical classes is based uniquely on the retention factor
on the anion exchange and is therefore sensitive to chromatographic secondary
interactions and to chromatographic conditions. Such (unwanted) effects can
explain the difference in speciation between samples Pin#2 and Pin#3,
both obtained at medium oxidation state (Fig. S3). Pin#3 was injected at
significantly higher concentrations than the other samples (about 3 times
than Pin#2), which can have caused the elution of some acidic compounds
along with the unretained NC fraction. The results of HPLC analysis of this
particular sample are therefore excluded from the following discussion.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Distribution of HPLC fractions (total recovered TOC
content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 %) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA <bold>(a)</bold>, naphthalene
<bold>(b)</bold>, and for ambient OA sampled in Cabauw, Netherlands
<bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Correlation plot between the AMS f44 of SOA and the HULIS fraction
of HPLC-eluted WSOC.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/10405/2017/acp-17-10405-2017-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>In this section, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR and HPLC results obtained for the isoprene,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and naphthalene SOA systems are compared with ambient OA
samples. First, we investigated the similarity between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
spectral profiles of SOA with those “typical” of ambient
non-biomass-burning WSOC. For this purpose we used one sample of
PM1 collected during the 2012 PEGASOS field campaign (Sandrini et al.,
2016) in the rural Po Valley (Italy) which can be considered representative
for a continental rural “near-city” site (according to the criteria of
Putaud et al., 2010). A second PM1 sample was collected at a rural site in
the State of Rondônia (Brazil) during the 2002 SMOCC field campaign, and,
more precisely, during the early rainy season, when local biomass burning
sources had largely ceased and the organic composition of submicron particles
was dominated by biogenic emissions (Decesari et al. 2006; Tagliavini et al.,
2006). The ambient WSOC and laboratory SOA spectra were binned to 400 points
in order to remove the variability in chemical shifts due to, for example,
different pH conditions during the analyses of the samples. Figure 7 shows
the correlation between the SOA spectra and the reference spectra of ambient
WSOC: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA and naphthalene SOA spectra were compared to
the Po Valley WSOC sample, while the isoprene SOA spectra were compared to
the Amazonian sample. There is good correlation
(0.62 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.92) between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, at all oxidation levels, with the spectrum of the Po
Valley PM1 sample. This finding is in line with modeling results and previous
experimental findings indicating that the organic composition in northern
Italy in the summertime is dominated by biogenic SOA (Bessagnet et al., 2008;
Gilardoni et al., 2011). A moderate positive correlation was also found
between the spectra of isoprene SOA and of the PM1 sample from rural Brazil
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.54). It should be noted that the relative humidity at this
pasture site is variable during the day and very high overnight during the
rainy season, based on the meteorological data presented by Betts et
al. (2009). Therefore, biogenic aerosols are expected to include also
isoprene SOA forming through the IEPOX route (Hu et al., 2015), which is not
accounted for by our laboratory experiments. Finally, the naphthalene SOA
spectra exhibit zero or negative correlations with the Po Valley WSOC
spectrum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02). This result is
somewhat expected if we consider that ambient water-soluble aerosols are
characterized by acyl functional groups
(HC-C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O) in higher
concentrations with respect to alkoxy groups (HC-O) and by a smaller
aromatic content (Decesari et al., 2007), with a functional group pattern
that is well reproduced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA and not by naphthalene SOA.
Clearly, naphthalene SOA <italic>alone</italic>, with a hydrogen-to-carbon
(H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C) ratio less than 0.9 due to relatively high aromatic content
(Lambe et al. 2011, 2015), does not mimic ambient OA <italic>bulk</italic>
composition. It should be noted, however, that naphthalene and other
polyaromatic hydrocarbons are co-emitted with many other anthropogenic IVOCs
and VOCs, including aliphatic compounds in the real atmosphere; therefore the
contribution of naphthalene SOA could be simply masked by the contribution of
aliphatic IVOC SOA in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of ambient WSOC. When limiting
the correlation analysis of Fig. 7 to the aromatic and vinyl region of the
spectra (&gt; 6 ppm), Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficients of 0.49 to 0.58 are
found between the naphthalene SOA and the ambient WSOC spectra, while small
values (between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 and 0.4) are found for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and
isoprene SOA. This result suggests that SOA produced from naphthalene or
similar precursors, including many other ring-retaining oxidation products
(Sect. 3.1.2), can explain the presence of aromatic moieties in ambient
water-soluble aerosols in areas not affected by biomass burning emissions.</p>
      <p>When considering the full spectral range, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA most closely mimic the functional group distributions of the
ambient WSOC sample obtained in PEGASOS (Fig. S1). Interestingly, similarity
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA and Po Valley WSOC
increases with increasing photochemical age. For the most oxidized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA samples, the functional group composition, characterized by
polysubstituted aliphatic compounds rich of acyls (carboxylic or keto
groups), overlaps well with that of ambient WSOC. A good fit between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA and ambient WSOC mass spectral features is already achieved at
medium oxidation conditions, in agreement with the results of Lambe et
al. (2011), showing that the correlation between the AMS spectra of
PAM-generated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA with the spectra of ambient oxygenated OA
(OOA)
increases up to an exposure of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
OH molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s and remains rather stable afterwards. These
results suggest that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR-traced ageing processes reflect the same
chemical mechanisms already studied using high-resolution AMS techniques.
However, the correlation coefficients shown in Fig. 7 for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene vs. ambient WSOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 to 0.84) are
smaller than those between the HR-ToF-AMS spectra of PAM-generated SOA vs.
ambient OOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 to 0.9) (Fig. 9 in Lambe et al., 2011).
Apparently, the AMS features of ambient OA are more easily reproduced by PAM
experiments than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR composition, or, in other words, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
spectroscopy exhibits a greater selectivity for the OA components than AMS.
Specifically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR spectroscopy was able to resolve significant
changes in composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA with photochemical ageing in
great detail, especially at an OH exposure of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec OH cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s equivalent to
multiple days of atmospheric ageing. It should be noted, finally, that a
comparison of the AMS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR techniques with respect to their ability
to trace chemical ageing in laboratory SOA and ambient oxidized aerosols is
challenged by the incomplete overlap between the classes of organic compounds
contributing to OOA and to WSOC (Xu et al., 2017).</p>
      <p>A comparison of fresh and aged SOA with ambient WSOC samples with respect to
the HPLC fraction distributions is reported in Fig. 8. The distribution of
neutral vs. acidic classes of compounds in ambient WSOC refers to the average
of the samples collected at the rural background station of Cabauw in the
Netherlands (Paglione et al., 2014b). The station is located downwind from
anthropogenic sources and biogenic emissions (terpenes from deciduous
forests) over a large sector of northwest Europe (Henne et al., 2010). The
HULIS contribution in these samples varied between 15 and 20 %, in line
with previous results obtained in the Po Valley (Mancinelli et al., 2007),
but lower than in biomass burning aerosol samples (Decesari et al., 2006).
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA generated in the PAM reactor at high photochemical
age and the fresh naphthalene SOA are characterized by a HULIS amount similar
to that of Cabauw samples, while the polyacidic content of aged naphthalene
SOA is higher than in the ambient samples. In the real atmosphere,
naphthalene is co-emitted with many other reactive VOC and IVOC with
potentially very diverse HULIS formation yields; therefore, the results
presented in Fig. 8 do not necessarily mean that the chemical composition of
ambient OA in Cabauw is better described by the monoterpene chemistry rather
than by anthropogenic IVOC oxidation. On the other hand, these results
demonstrate that laboratory experiments of SOA formation can generate complex
mixtures of products with the same chromatographic properties of HULIS
provided a sufficient extent of photochemical ageing using the PAM reactor or
related techniques. The HULIS fraction of WSOC is in fact proportional to the
AMS f44 for SOA (integrated over the filter sampling times) (Fig. 9)
irrespective of precursor type. Therefore, the formation of polycarboxylic
acids determined by the HPLC technique follows the same positive trend in
concentrations of the AMS proxy for C(O)OH groups with increasing OH
exposure. This is in contrast with the numerous observations of rapid
formation of SOA oligomers during reaction chamber experiments (Kalberer et
al., 2006; Reemtsma et al., 2006), indicating that oligomers do not account
for chromatographically defined HULIS. A survey of the laboratory studies on
the formation of humic material in secondary aerosol shows that evidence for
the formation of polycarboxylic acids comes from the reaction of phenolic
compounds in the presence of particulate water (Hoffer et al., 2004), while
little is known for unseeded, dry gas-to-particle formation experiments. With
the exception of the very preliminary data reported by Baltensperger et
al. (2008), our results – to our best knowledge – are the first showing the
occurrence of HULIS sensu stricto in monoterpene and aromatic
hydrocarbon SOA, and these HULIS are clearly shown to be a product of
photochemical ageing.</p>
      <p>In conclusion, we observed that OA ageing reactions in the PAM reactor
produces water-soluble compounds of high complexity but with spectroscopic
and chromatographic properties that converge towards those characteristic of
ambient OA. Specifically, a good correlation between ambient HPLC/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR
samples and aged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA was observed in respect to HULIS
content and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR functional group distribution, while aged aromatic IVOC SOA
shows clear potential for HULIS formation. The isoprene SOA samples do not
show compositional features with a clear overlap with those of ambient WSOC
obtained in the Cabauw and Po Valley samples that are representative of
continental polluted atmospheres, but they should serve as useful reference
spectra for future studies/environments impacted by non-IEPOX isoprene SOA.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>All spectroscopic (NMR) and chromatographic data are available upon request from the first author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10405-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10405-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Andrew T. Lambe and Paola Massoli acknowledge support by the Atmospheric
Chemistry Program of the US National Science Foundation under grants
AGS-1536939, AGS-1537446 and by the US Office of Science (BER), Department of
Energy (Atmospheric Systems Research), under grants DE-SC0006980 and
DE-SC0011935. We thank Manjula Canagaratna (ARI), Douglas Worsnop (ARI),
Timothy Onasch (BC/ARI) and Paul Davidovits (BC) for helpful discussions.
Stefano Decesari, Stefania Gilardoni, Marco Paglione and Nicola Zanca
acknowledge funding from the European FP7 project BACCHUS (grant agreement
no. 49 990 603445). Fabio Moretti, formerly at the Department of Chemistry of
the University of Bologna, and Andrea Mazzanti and Alessandra Petroli of the
Department of Industrial Chemistry of the University of Bologna are also
greatly acknowledged for support with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR analyses. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: James B. Burkholder<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by:
two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Baduel, C., Voisin, D., and Jaffrezo, J. L.: Comparison of analytical methods
for Humic Like Substances (HULIS) measurements in atmospheric particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5949–5962, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5949-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5949-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Brock, C. A., de Gouw, J. A., McKeen, S.
A., Williams, L. R., Daumit, K. E., Lambe, A. T., Massoli, P., Canagaratna,
M. R., Ahmadov, R., Carrasquillo, A. J., Cross, E. S., Ervens, B., Holloway,
J. S., Hunter, J. F., Onasch, T. B., Pollack, I. B., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson,
T. B., Warneke, C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Kroll, J. H.: Mass
Spectral Analysis of Organic Aerosol Formed Downwind of the Deepwater Horizon
Oil Spill: Field Studies and Laboratory Confirmations, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 8025–8034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301691k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es301691k</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Duplissy, J., Gaeggeler, K.,
Metzger, A., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Reinnig, C., Schott,
M., Warnke, J., Hoffmann, T., Klatzer, B., Puxbaum, H., Geiser, M., Savi, M.,
Lang, D., Kalberer, M., and Geiser, T.: Combined determination of the
chemical composition and of health effects of secondary organic aerosols: the
POLYSOA project, J. Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv., 21, 145–154, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Curci, G., Hodzic, A., Guillaume, B., Liousse, C.,
Moukhtar, S., Pun, B., Seigneur, C., and Schulz, M.: Regional modeling of
carbonaceous aerosols over Europe – focus on secondary organic aerosols, J.
Atmos. Chem., 61, 175–202, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Betts, A. K., Fisch, G., von Randow, C., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Cohen, J. C.
P., da Silva, R., and Fitzjarrald, D. R.: The Amazonian boundary layer and
mesoscale circulations, in: Amazonia and Global Change,
American Geophysical Union, ISBN: 9780875904764, 163–181, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bones, D. L., Henricksen, D. K., Mang, S. A., Gonsior, M., Bateman, A. P.,
Nguyen, T. B., Cooper, W. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Appearance of strong
absorbers and fluorophores in limonene-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> secondary organic aerosol due
to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – mediated chemical aging over long time scales, J. Geophys.
Res., 115, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012864</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bruns, E. A., El Haddad, I., Keller, A., Klein, F., Kumar, N. K., Pieber, S.
M., Corbin, J. C., Slowik, J. G., Brune, W. H., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Inter-comparison of laboratory smog chamber and
flow reactor systems on organic aerosol yield and composition, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 8, 2315–2332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2315-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2315-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y.
J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A.,
Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic
emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the
2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee
ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cash, J. M., Heal, M. R., Langford, B., and Drewer, J.: A review of
stereochemical implications in the generation of secondary organic aerosol
from isoprene oxidation, Environ. Sci., 18, 1369–1380, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cavalli, F., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Emblico, L., Mircea, M., Jensen,
N. R., and Fuzzi, S.: Size-segregated aerosol chemical composition at a
boreal site in southern Finland, during the QUEST project, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 6, 993–1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-993-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-993-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chacon-Madrid, H. J. and Donahue, N. M.: Fragmentation vs. functionalization:
chemical aging and organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
10553–10563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10553-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10553-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chhabra, P. S., Lambe, A. T., Canagaratna, M. R., Stark, H., Jayne, J. T.,
Onasch, T. B., Davidovits, P., Kimmel, J. R., and Worsnop, D. R.: Application
of high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometry
measurements to estimate volatility distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and
naphthalene oxidation products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1–18,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092805" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092805</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi S., and Tagliavini, E.: Characterization
of water-soluble organic compounds in atmospheric aerosol: A new approach, J.
Geophys. Res., 105, 1481–1489, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Decesari, S., Moretti, F., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., and Tagliavini, E.:
Comment on “On the use of anion exchange chromatography for the
characterization of water soluble organic carbon” by H. Chang et al.,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 1–3,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023826</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Mircea, M., Emblico, L., Cavalli,
F., Maenhaut, W., Chi, X., Schkolnik, G., Falkovich, A., Rudich, Y., Claeys,
M., Pashynska, V., Vas, G., Kourtchev, I., Vermeylen, R., Hoffer, A.,
Andreae, M. O., Tagliavini, E., Moretti, F., and Artaxo, P.: Characterization
of the organic composition of aerosols from Rondônia, Brazil, during the
LBA-SMOCC 2002 experiment and its representation through model compounds,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 375–402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-375-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-375-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Mircea, M., Cavalli, F., Fuzzi, S., Moretti, F., Tagliavini,
E., and Facchini, M. C.: Source Attribution of Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol
by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
2479–2484, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Kleist, E., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Lönn, G.,
Schobesberger, S., Dal Maso, M., Trimborn, A., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R.,
Wahner, A., Wildt, J., and Mentel, Th. F.: Gas phase formation of extremely
oxidized pinene reaction products in chamber and ambient air, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 5113–5127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Finessi, E., Lidster, R. T., Whiting, F., Elliott, T., Alfarra, M. R.,
McFiggans, G. B., and Hamilton, J. F.: Improving the quantification of
secondary organic aerosol using a microflow reactor coupled to HPLC-MS and
NMR to manufacture ad hoc calibration standards, Anal. Chem., 86,
11238–11245, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gilardoni, S., Vignati, E., Cavalli, F., Putaud, J. P., Larsen, B. R., Karl,
M., Stenström, K., Genberg, J., Henne, S., and Dentener, F.: Better
constraints on sources of carbonaceous aerosols using a combined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C –
macro tracer analysis in a European rural background site, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 5685–5700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5685-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5685-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
González, N. J. D., Borg-Karlson, A.-K., Pettersson Redeby, J.,
Nozière, B., Krejci, R., Peib, Y., Dommen, J., and Prévôt, A. S.
H.: New method for resolving the enantiomeric composition of 2-methyltetrols
in atmospheric organic aerosols, J. Chromatogr. A, 1218, 9288–9294, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A
comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
8873–8892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JD02950</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hall IV, W. A., Pennington, M. R., and Johnston, M. V.: Molecular
transformations accompanying the aging of laboratory secondary organic
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2230–2237, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Havers, N., Burba, P., Lambertm, J., and Klockow, D.: Spectroscopic
characterization of humic-like substances in airborne particulate matter, J.
Atmos. Chem., 29, 45–54, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Russell, L. M., Huebert, B. J.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Liao, H., and Weber, R. J.: A large organic aerosol source
in the free troposphere missing from current models, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, L18809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023831</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Henne, S., Brunner, D., Folini, D., Solberg, S., Klausen, J., and Buchmann,
B.: Assessment of parameters describing representativeness of air quality
in-situ measurement sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3561–3581,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3561-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3561-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hodzic, A., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jo, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L.,
Madronich, S., and Park, R. J.: Rethinking the global secondary organic
aerosol (SOA) budget: stronger production, faster removal, shorter lifetime,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7917–7941, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Kiss, G., Blazso, M., and Gelencsér, A.: Chemical
characterization of humic-like substances (HULIS) formed from a lignin-type
precursor in model cloud water, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31,
L06115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018962</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes,
P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S.,
McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M.,
Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D.,
Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss,
A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A.,
Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a
real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol
(IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 11807–11833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jaoui, M. and Kamens, R. M.: Mass balance of gaseous and particulate products
analysis from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene/NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/air in the presence of natural
sunlight, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12541–12558, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Jathar, S. H., Friedman, B., Galang, A. A., Link, M. F., Brophy, P., Volckens, J.,
Eluri, S., and Farmer, D. K.: Linking Load, Fuel, and Emission Controls to
Photochemical Production of Secondary Organic Aerosol from a Diesel Engine,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 1377–1386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04602" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04602</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Shallcross, D. E., and Harvey, J. N.: Development and
application of a possible mechanism for the generation of cis-pinic acid from
the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos. Environ., 34,
2837–2850, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kalberer, M., Sax, M., and Samburova, V.: Molecular size evolution of
oligomers in organic aerosols collected in urban atmospheres and generated in
a smog chamber, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5917–5922, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kang, E., Root, M. J., Toohey, D. W., and Brune, W. H.: Introducing the
concept of Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5727–5744,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kautzman, K. E., Surratt, J. D., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P.,
Chhabra, P. S., Dalleska, N. F., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Chemical composition of gas- and aerosol-phase products from the
photooxidation of naphthalene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 913–934, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Keller, A. and Burtscher, H.: A continuous photo-oxidation flow reactor for
a defined measurement of the SOA formation potential of wood burning
emissions, J. Aerosol Sci., 49, 9–20, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Krechmer, J. E., Coggon, M. M., Massoli, P., Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D.,
Hu, W., Day, D. A., Tyndall, G. S., Henze, D. K., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Nowak,
J. B., Kimmel, J. R., Mauldin, R. L., Stark, H., Jayne, J. T., Sipilä,
M., Junninen, H., Clair, J. M. St., Zhang, X., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L.,
Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., Keutsch, F. N., Wennberg, P. O., Seinfeld, J.
H., Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Formation of Low
Volatility Organic Compounds and Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene
Hydroxyhydroperoxide Low-NO Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 49,
10330–10339, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Krechmer, J. E., Pagonis, D., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Quantification of Gas-Wall Partitioning in Teflon Environmental Chambers
Using Rapid Bursts of Low-Volatility Oxidized Species Generated in Situ,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5757–5765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b00606</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Smith, J. D., Che, D. L., Kessler, S. H., Worsnop, D. R., and
Wilson, K. R.: Measurement of fragmentation and functionalization pathways in
the heterogeneous oxidation of oxidized organic aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8005–8014, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Slowik, J. G., Wong, J. P. S.,
Abbatt, J. P. D., Brune, W. H., Ng, N. L., Wright, J. P., Croasdale, D. R.,
Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Characterization of
aerosol photooxidation flow reactors: heterogeneous oxidation, secondary
organic aerosol formation and cloud condensation nuclei activity
measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 445–461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-445-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-445-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P., Martin, A. T.,
Franklin, J. P., Massoli, P., Kroll, J. H., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H.,
Wornsop, D. R., and Davidovits, P.: Transitions from functionalization to
fragmentation reactions of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) generated from the
laboratory OH oxidation of alkane precursors, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
5430–5437, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Chhabra, P. S., Onasch, T. B., Brune, W. H., Hunter, J. F.,
Kroll, J. H., Cummings, M. J., Brogan, J. F., Parmar, Y., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kolb, C. E., and Davidovits, P.: Effect of oxidant concentration, exposure
time, and seed particles on secondary organic aerosol chemical composition
and yield, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3063–3075, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. Y. and Lane, D. A.: Unique products from the reaction of naphthalene
with the hydroxyl radical, Atmos. Environ., 43, 4886–4893, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Li, R., Palm, B. B., Ortega, A. M., Hlywiak, J., Hu, W., Peng, Z., Day, D.
A., Knote, C., Brune, W. H., de Gouw, J. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling
the Radical Chemistry in an Oxidation Flow Reactor: Radical Formation and
Recycling, Sensitivities, and the OH Exposure Estimation Equation, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 119, 4418–4432, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Limbeck, A., Kulmala, M., and Puxbaum, H.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere via heterogeneous reaction of gaseous isoprene on
acidic particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017738</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, Z., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H., Budisulistiorini, S. H.,
Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S.,
Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene Epoxydiols as
Precursors to Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation: Acid-Catalyzed Reactive
Uptake Studies with Authentic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
250–258, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., D'Ambro, E. L., Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zaveri, R. A.,
Rivera-Rios, J. C., Keutsch, F. N., Iyer, S., Kurten, T., Zhang, Z., Gold,
A., Surratt, J. D., Shilling, J. E., and Thornton, J. A.: Efficient Isoprene
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from a Non-IEPOX Pathway, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 9872–9880, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Mancinelli, V., Rinaldi, M., Finessi, E., Emblico, L., Mircea, M., Fuzzi, S.,
Facchini, M. C., and Decesari, S.: An anion-exchange high-performance liquid
chromatography method coupled to total organic carbon determination for the
analysis of water-soluble organic aerosols, J. Chrom., 1149, 385–389, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Ren, X., Brune, W. H., Olson, J. R., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A.,
Huey, L. G., Cohen, R. C., Heikes, B., Singh, H. B., Blake, D. R., Sachse, G.
W., Diskin, G. S., Hall, S. R., and Shetter, R. E.: Airborne measurement of
OH reactivity during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 163–173,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-163-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-163-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Matsunaga, A. and Ziemann, P. J., Gas-Wall Partitioning of Organic Compounds
in a Teflon Film Chamber and Potential Effects on Reaction Product and
Aerosol Yield Measurements, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 44, 881–892, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Müller, L., Reinnig, M.-C., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., Mentel, T. F.,
Donahue, N. M., and Hoffmann, T.: Formation of
3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid via gas phase oxidation of pinonic
acid – a mass spectrometric study of SOA aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
1483–1496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1483-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1483-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Peng, Z., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Day, D. A., Li,
R., Cubison, M. J., Brune, W. H., Graus, M., Warneke, C., Gilman, J. B.,
Kuster, W. C., Gouw, J. de, Gutiérrez-Montes, C., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Real-time measurements of secondary organic aerosol formation and aging from
ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in the Los Angeles area, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 7411–7433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7411-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7411-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Paglione, M., Saarikoski, S., Carbone, S., Hillamo, R., Facchini, M. C.,
Finessi, E., Giulianelli, L., Carbone, C., Fuzzi, S., Moretti, F.,
Tagliavini, E., Swietlicki, E., Stenström, K. E., Prévôt, A. S.
H., Massoli, P., Canaragatna, M., Worsnop, D., and Decesari, S.: Primary and
secondary biomass burning aerosols determined by proton nuclear magnetic
resonance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H-NMR) spectroscopy during the 2008 EUCAARI campaign in the
Po Valley (Italy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5089–5110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5089-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5089-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Paglione, M., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mensah, A. A., Finessi, E., Giulianelli,
L., Sandrini, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Schlag, P., Piazzalunga, A.,
Tagliavini, E., Henzing, J. S., and Decesari, S.: Identification of
humic-like substances (HULIS) in oxygenated organic aerosols using NMR and
AMS factor analyses and liquid chromatographic techniques, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 25–45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-25-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-25-2014</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Kaser, L., Jud,
W., Karl, T., Hansel, A., Hunter, J. F., Cross, E. S., Kroll, J. H., Peng,
Z., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: In situ secondary organic aerosol
formation from ambient pine forest air using an oxidation flow reactor,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2943–2970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Stark, H., Li, R., Lee-Taylor, J., Palm, B. B., Brune,
W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical chemistry in oxidation flow
reactors with low-pressure mercury lamps systematically examined by modeling,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4863–4890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Stark, H., Li, R.,
Tsigaridis, K., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Non-OH chemistry in
oxidation flow reactors for the study of atmospheric chemistry systematically
examined by modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4283–4305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Putaud, J.-P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W., Cyrys,
J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H. C., Harrison, R. M.,
Herrmann, H., Hitzenberger, R., and Hüglin, C.: A European aerosol
phenomenology – 3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate
matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe, Atmos.
Environ., 44, 1308–1320, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Chan, A. W. H., Barkley, M. P., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global
modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11261–11276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Reemtsma, T., These, A., Venkatachari, P., Xia, X., Hopke, P. K., Springer,
A., and Linscheid, M.: Identification of fulvic acids and sulfated and
nitrated analogues in atmospheric aerosol by electrospray ionization Fourier
transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 78,
8299–8304, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Renbaum, L. H. and Smith, G. D.: Artifacts in measuring aerosol uptake
kinetics: the roles of time, concentration and adsorption, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 6881–6693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Rissanen, M. P., Kurtén, T., Sipilä, M., Thornton, J. A.,
Kangasluoma, J., Sarnela, N., Junninen, H., Jørgensen, S., Schallhart, S.,
Kajos, M. K., Taipale, R., Springer, M., Mentel, T. F., Ruuskanen, T.,
Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Ehn, M. J.: The
formation of highly oxidized multifunctional products in the ozonolysis of
cyclohexene, Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 15596–15606, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Riva, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., D'Ambro, E. L.,
Zhang, X., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Thornton, J. A., Canagaratna, M. R., and
Surratt, J. D.: Chemical characterization of secondary organic aerosol from
oxidation of isoprene hydroxyhydroperoxides, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
9889–9899, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sandrini, S., Pinxteren D. V., Giulianelli. L., Herrmann, H., Poulain, L.,
Facchini, M. C., Gilardoni, S., Rinaldi, M., Paglione, M., Turpin, B. J.,
Pollini, F., Bucci, S., Zanca, N., and Decesari, S.: Size-resolved aerosol
composition at an urban and a rural site in the Po Valley in summertime:
implications for secondary aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
10879–10897,<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10879-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10879-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Slowik, J. G., Wong, J. P. S., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Real-time, controlled
OH-initiated oxidation of biogenic secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9775–9790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9775-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9775-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Szmigielski, R., Surratt, J. D., Gomez-Gonzalez, Y., Van der Veken, P.,
Kourtchev, I., Vermeylen, R., Blockhuys, F., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E.,
Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Edney, E. O., Seinfeld, J. H., Maenhaut,
W., and Claeys, M.: 3-Methyl-1,2,3-Butanetricarboxylic Acid: An Atmospheric
Tracer for Terpene Secondary Organic Aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L24811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031338" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl031338</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Tagliavini, T., Moretti, F., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., and
Maenhaut, W.: Functional group analysis by H NMR/chemical derivatization for
the characterization of organic aerosol from the SMOCC field campaign, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 1003–1019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1003-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1003-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Tkacik, D. S., Lambe, A. T., Jathar, S.,Li, X.,Presto, A. A., Zhao, Y.,
Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., Jayne, J. T., Croteau, P. L., and Robinson, A.
L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from in-use motor vehicle emissions
using a Potential Aerosol Mass reactor, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11235–11242, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Tsigaridis, K., Daskalakis, N., Kanakidou, M., Adams, P. J., Artaxo, P.,
Bahadur, R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Benedetti, A.,
Bergman, T., Berntsen, T. K., Beukes, J. P., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin,
M., Curci, G., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Gong, S. L., Hodzic,
A., Hoyle, C. R., Iversen, T., Jathar, S., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, J. W.,
Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D., Kokkola, H., Lee, Y. H., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo,
G., Ma, X., Mann, G. W., Mihalopoulos, N., Morcrette, J.-J., Müller,
J.-F., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ng, N. L., O'Donnell, D., Penner, J.
E., Pozzoli, L., Pringle, K. J., Russell, L. M., Schulz, M., Sciare, J.,
Seland, Ø., Shindell, D. T., Sillman, S., Skeie, R. B., Spracklen, D.,
Stavrakou, T., Steenrod, S. D., Takemura, T., Tiitta, P., Tilmes, S., Tost,
H., van Noije, T., van Zyl, P. G., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Wang, Z., Wang,
Z., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.: The
AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845–10895, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>White, S. J., Jamie, I. M., and Angove, D. E.: Chemical characterisation of
semi-volatile and aerosol compounds from the photooxidation of toluene and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ., 83, 237–244, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Chemical characterization of
water-soluble organic aerosol in contrasting rural and urban environments in
the southeastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 78–88, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Yasmeen, F., Vermeylen, R., Szmigielski, R., Iinuma, Y., Böge, O.,
Herrmann, H., Maenhaut, W., and Claeys, M.: Terpenylic acid and related
compounds: precursors for dimers in secondary organic aerosol from the
ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9383–9392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9383-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9383-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, P., Ding, X., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Robinson, E. S., and Donahue, N.
M.: Vapor wall loss of semi-volatile organic compounds in a Teflon chamber,
Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 50, 822–834, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in Aqueous Ammonium Sulfate Solutions: Products,
Kinetics and Hydration Effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029979</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman, M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in
laboratory chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, P. N. A. S.,
111, 5802–5807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1404727111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Characterizing source fingerprints and ageing processes in laboratory-generated secondary organic aerosols using proton-nuclear magnetic resonance (<sup>1</sup>H-NMR) analysis and HPLC HULIS determination</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The study of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in laboratory settings has
greatly increased our knowledge of the diverse chemical processes and
environmental conditions responsible for the formation of particulate matter
starting from biogenic and anthropogenic volatile compounds. However,
characteristics of the different experimental setups and the way they impact
the composition and the timescale of formation of SOA are still subject to
debate. In this study, SOA samples were generated using a potential aerosol
mass (PAM) oxidation flow reactor using <i>α</i>-pinene, naphthalene and
isoprene as precursors. The PAM reactor facilitated exploration of SOA
composition over atmospherically relevant photochemical ageing timescales
that are unattainable in environmental chambers. The SOA samples were
analyzed using two state-of-the-art analytical techniques for SOA
characterization – proton nuclear magnetic resonance (<sup>1</sup>H-NMR)
spectroscopy and HPLC determination of humic-like substances (HULIS). Results
were compared with previous Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS)
measurements. The combined <sup>1</sup>H-NMR, HPLC, and AMS datasets show that the
composition of the studied SOA systems tend to converge to highly oxidized
organic compounds upon prolonged OH exposures. Further, our <sup>1</sup>H-NMR
findings show that only <i>α</i>-pinene SOA acquires spectroscopic features
comparable to those of ambient OA when exposed to at least
1  ×  10<sup>12</sup> molec OH cm<sup>−3</sup>  ×  s OH exposure, or
multiple days of equivalent atmospheric OH oxidation. Over multiple days of
equivalent OH exposure, the formation of HULIS is observed in both <i>α</i>-pinene SOA and in naphthalene SOA (maximum yields: 16 and 30 %,
respectively, of total analyzed water-soluble organic carbon, WSOC), providing evidence
of the formation of humic-like polycarboxylic acids in unseeded SOA.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Baduel, C., Voisin, D., and Jaffrezo, J. L.: Comparison of analytical methods
for Humic Like Substances (HULIS) measurements in atmospheric particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5949–5962, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5949-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5949-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Brock, C. A., de Gouw, J. A., McKeen, S.
A., Williams, L. R., Daumit, K. E., Lambe, A. T., Massoli, P., Canagaratna,
M. R., Ahmadov, R., Carrasquillo, A. J., Cross, E. S., Ervens, B., Holloway,
J. S., Hunter, J. F., Onasch, T. B., Pollack, I. B., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson,
T. B., Warneke, C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Kroll, J. H.: Mass
Spectral Analysis of Organic Aerosol Formed Downwind of the Deepwater Horizon
Oil Spill: Field Studies and Laboratory Confirmations, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 8025–8034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301691k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es301691k</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Duplissy, J., Gaeggeler, K.,
Metzger, A., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Reinnig, C., Schott,
M., Warnke, J., Hoffmann, T., Klatzer, B., Puxbaum, H., Geiser, M., Savi, M.,
Lang, D., Kalberer, M., and Geiser, T.: Combined determination of the
chemical composition and of health effects of secondary organic aerosols: the
POLYSOA project, J. Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv., 21, 145–154, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Curci, G., Hodzic, A., Guillaume, B., Liousse, C.,
Moukhtar, S., Pun, B., Seigneur, C., and Schulz, M.: Regional modeling of
carbonaceous aerosols over Europe – focus on secondary organic aerosols, J.
Atmos. Chem., 61, 175–202, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Betts, A. K., Fisch, G., von Randow, C., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Cohen, J. C.
P., da Silva, R., and Fitzjarrald, D. R.: The Amazonian boundary layer and
mesoscale circulations, in: Amazonia and Global Change,
American Geophysical Union, ISBN: 9780875904764, 163–181, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bones, D. L., Henricksen, D. K., Mang, S. A., Gonsior, M., Bateman, A. P.,
Nguyen, T. B., Cooper, W. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Appearance of strong
absorbers and fluorophores in limonene-O<sub>3</sub> secondary organic aerosol due
to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> – mediated chemical aging over long time scales, J. Geophys.
Res., 115, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012864" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012864</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bruns, E. A., El Haddad, I., Keller, A., Klein, F., Kumar, N. K., Pieber, S.
M., Corbin, J. C., Slowik, J. G., Brune, W. H., Baltensperger, U., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: Inter-comparison of laboratory smog chamber and
flow reactor systems on organic aerosol yield and composition, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 8, 2315–2332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2315-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2315-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y.
J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A.,
Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z.,
Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic
emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the
2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee
ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cash, J. M., Heal, M. R., Langford, B., and Drewer, J.: A review of
stereochemical implications in the generation of secondary organic aerosol
from isoprene oxidation, Environ. Sci., 18, 1369–1380, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cavalli, F., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Emblico, L., Mircea, M., Jensen,
N. R., and Fuzzi, S.: Size-segregated aerosol chemical composition at a
boreal site in southern Finland, during the QUEST project, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 6, 993–1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-993-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-993-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chacon-Madrid, H. J. and Donahue, N. M.: Fragmentation vs. functionalization:
chemical aging and organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
10553–10563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10553-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10553-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chhabra, P. S., Lambe, A. T., Canagaratna, M. R., Stark, H., Jayne, J. T.,
Onasch, T. B., Davidovits, P., Kimmel, J. R., and Worsnop, D. R.: Application
of high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometry
measurements to estimate volatility distributions of <i>α</i>-pinene and
naphthalene oxidation products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1–18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092805" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092805</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi S., and Tagliavini, E.: Characterization
of water-soluble organic compounds in atmospheric aerosol: A new approach, J.
Geophys. Res., 105, 1481–1489, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Moretti, F., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., and Tagliavini, E.:
Comment on “On the use of anion exchange chromatography for the
characterization of water soluble organic carbon” by H. Chang et al.,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 1–3,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023826</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Mircea, M., Emblico, L., Cavalli,
F., Maenhaut, W., Chi, X., Schkolnik, G., Falkovich, A., Rudich, Y., Claeys,
M., Pashynska, V., Vas, G., Kourtchev, I., Vermeylen, R., Hoffer, A.,
Andreae, M. O., Tagliavini, E., Moretti, F., and Artaxo, P.: Characterization
of the organic composition of aerosols from Rondônia, Brazil, during the
LBA-SMOCC 2002 experiment and its representation through model compounds,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 375–402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-375-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-375-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Mircea, M., Cavalli, F., Fuzzi, S., Moretti, F., Tagliavini,
E., and Facchini, M. C.: Source Attribution of Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol
by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
2479–2484, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Kleist, E., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Lönn, G.,
Schobesberger, S., Dal Maso, M., Trimborn, A., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R.,
Wahner, A., Wildt, J., and Mentel, Th. F.: Gas phase formation of extremely
oxidized pinene reaction products in chamber and ambient air, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 5113–5127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Finessi, E., Lidster, R. T., Whiting, F., Elliott, T., Alfarra, M. R.,
McFiggans, G. B., and Hamilton, J. F.: Improving the quantification of
secondary organic aerosol using a microflow reactor coupled to HPLC-MS and
NMR to manufacture ad hoc calibration standards, Anal. Chem., 86,
11238–11245, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gilardoni, S., Vignati, E., Cavalli, F., Putaud, J. P., Larsen, B. R., Karl,
M., Stenström, K., Genberg, J., Henne, S., and Dentener, F.: Better
constraints on sources of carbonaceous aerosols using a combined <sup>14</sup>C –
macro tracer analysis in a European rural background site, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 5685–5700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5685-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5685-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
González, N. J. D., Borg-Karlson, A.-K., Pettersson Redeby, J.,
Nozière, B., Krejci, R., Peib, Y., Dommen, J., and Prévôt, A. S.
H.: New method for resolving the enantiomeric composition of 2-methyltetrols
in atmospheric organic aerosols, J. Chromatogr. A, 1218, 9288–9294, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A
comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
8873–8892, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02950</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hall IV, W. A., Pennington, M. R., and Johnston, M. V.: Molecular
transformations accompanying the aging of laboratory secondary organic
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2230–2237, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Havers, N., Burba, P., Lambertm, J., and Klockow, D.: Spectroscopic
characterization of humic-like substances in airborne particulate matter, J.
Atmos. Chem., 29, 45–54, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Russell, L. M., Huebert, B. J.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Liao, H., and Weber, R. J.: A large organic aerosol source
in the free troposphere missing from current models, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, L18809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023831" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023831</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Henne, S., Brunner, D., Folini, D., Solberg, S., Klausen, J., and Buchmann,
B.: Assessment of parameters describing representativeness of air quality
in-situ measurement sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3561–3581,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3561-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3561-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hodzic, A., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jo, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L.,
Madronich, S., and Park, R. J.: Rethinking the global secondary organic
aerosol (SOA) budget: stronger production, faster removal, shorter lifetime,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7917–7941, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Kiss, G., Blazso, M., and Gelencsér, A.: Chemical
characterization of humic-like substances (HULIS) formed from a lignin-type
precursor in model cloud water, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31,
L06115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018962</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes,
P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S.,
McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M.,
Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D.,
Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss,
A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A.,
Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D.,
Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a
real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol
(IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
15, 11807–11833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoui, M. and Kamens, R. M.: Mass balance of gaseous and particulate products
analysis from <i>α</i>-pinene/NO<sub><i>X</i></sub>/air in the presence of natural
sunlight, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12541–12558, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jathar, S. H., Friedman, B., Galang, A. A., Link, M. F., Brophy, P., Volckens, J.,
Eluri, S., and Farmer, D. K.: Linking Load, Fuel, and Emission Controls to
Photochemical Production of Secondary Organic Aerosol from a Diesel Engine,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 1377–1386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04602" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04602</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkin, M. E., Shallcross, D. E., and Harvey, J. N.: Development and
application of a possible mechanism for the generation of cis-pinic acid from
the ozonolysis of <i>α</i>- and <i>β</i>-pinene, Atmos. Environ., 34,
2837–2850, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kalberer, M., Sax, M., and Samburova, V.: Molecular size evolution of
oligomers in organic aerosols collected in urban atmospheres and generated in
a smog chamber, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5917–5922, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, E., Root, M. J., Toohey, D. W., and Brune, W. H.: Introducing the
concept of Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5727–5744,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kautzman, K. E., Surratt, J. D., Chan, M. N., Chan, A. W. H., Hersey, S. P.,
Chhabra, P. S., Dalleska, N. F., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Chemical composition of gas- and aerosol-phase products from the
photooxidation of naphthalene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 913–934, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Keller, A. and Burtscher, H.: A continuous photo-oxidation flow reactor for
a defined measurement of the SOA formation potential of wood burning
emissions, J. Aerosol Sci., 49, 9–20, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Krechmer, J. E., Coggon, M. M., Massoli, P., Nguyen, T. B., Crounse, J. D.,
Hu, W., Day, D. A., Tyndall, G. S., Henze, D. K., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Nowak,
J. B., Kimmel, J. R., Mauldin, R. L., Stark, H., Jayne, J. T., Sipilä,
M., Junninen, H., Clair, J. M. St., Zhang, X., Feiner, P. A., Zhang, L.,
Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., Keutsch, F. N., Wennberg, P. O., Seinfeld, J.
H., Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Formation of Low
Volatility Organic Compounds and Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene
Hydroxyhydroperoxide Low-NO Oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 49,
10330–10339, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Krechmer, J. E., Pagonis, D., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Quantification of Gas-Wall Partitioning in Teflon Environmental Chambers
Using Rapid Bursts of Low-Volatility Oxidized Species Generated in Situ,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5757–5765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00606</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Smith, J. D., Che, D. L., Kessler, S. H., Worsnop, D. R., and
Wilson, K. R.: Measurement of fragmentation and functionalization pathways in
the heterogeneous oxidation of oxidized organic aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8005–8014, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Slowik, J. G., Wong, J. P. S.,
Abbatt, J. P. D., Brune, W. H., Ng, N. L., Wright, J. P., Croasdale, D. R.,
Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Characterization of
aerosol photooxidation flow reactors: heterogeneous oxidation, secondary
organic aerosol formation and cloud condensation nuclei activity
measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 445–461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-445-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-445-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P., Martin, A. T.,
Franklin, J. P., Massoli, P., Kroll, J. H., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H.,
Wornsop, D. R., and Davidovits, P.: Transitions from functionalization to
fragmentation reactions of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) generated from the
laboratory OH oxidation of alkane precursors, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
5430–5437, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Chhabra, P. S., Onasch, T. B., Brune, W. H., Hunter, J. F.,
Kroll, J. H., Cummings, M. J., Brogan, J. F., Parmar, Y., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kolb, C. E., and Davidovits, P.: Effect of oxidant concentration, exposure
time, and seed particles on secondary organic aerosol chemical composition
and yield, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3063–3075, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3063-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. Y. and Lane, D. A.: Unique products from the reaction of naphthalene
with the hydroxyl radical, Atmos. Environ., 43, 4886–4893, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Li, R., Palm, B. B., Ortega, A. M., Hlywiak, J., Hu, W., Peng, Z., Day, D.
A., Knote, C., Brune, W. H., de Gouw, J. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling
the Radical Chemistry in an Oxidation Flow Reactor: Radical Formation and
Recycling, Sensitivities, and the OH Exposure Estimation Equation, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 119, 4418–4432, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Limbeck, A., Kulmala, M., and Puxbaum, H.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in the atmosphere via heterogeneous reaction of gaseous isoprene on
acidic particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017738</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, Z., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H., Budisulistiorini, S. H.,
Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S.,
Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene Epoxydiols as
Precursors to Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation: Acid-Catalyzed Reactive
Uptake Studies with Authentic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
250–258, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., D'Ambro, E. L., Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zaveri, R. A.,
Rivera-Rios, J. C., Keutsch, F. N., Iyer, S., Kurten, T., Zhang, Z., Gold,
A., Surratt, J. D., Shilling, J. E., and Thornton, J. A.: Efficient Isoprene
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from a Non-IEPOX Pathway, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 50, 9872–9880, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Mancinelli, V., Rinaldi, M., Finessi, E., Emblico, L., Mircea, M., Fuzzi, S.,
Facchini, M. C., and Decesari, S.: An anion-exchange high-performance liquid
chromatography method coupled to total organic carbon determination for the
analysis of water-soluble organic aerosols, J. Chrom., 1149, 385–389, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, J., Ren, X., Brune, W. H., Olson, J. R., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A.,
Huey, L. G., Cohen, R. C., Heikes, B., Singh, H. B., Blake, D. R., Sachse, G.
W., Diskin, G. S., Hall, S. R., and Shetter, R. E.: Airborne measurement of
OH reactivity during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 163–173,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-163-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-163-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Matsunaga, A. and Ziemann, P. J., Gas-Wall Partitioning of Organic Compounds
in a Teflon Film Chamber and Potential Effects on Reaction Product and
Aerosol Yield Measurements, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 44, 881–892, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, L., Reinnig, M.-C., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., Mentel, T. F.,
Donahue, N. M., and Hoffmann, T.: Formation of
3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid via gas phase oxidation of pinonic
acid – a mass spectrometric study of SOA aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
1483–1496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1483-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1483-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Peng, Z., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Day, D. A., Li,
R., Cubison, M. J., Brune, W. H., Graus, M., Warneke, C., Gilman, J. B.,
Kuster, W. C., Gouw, J. de, Gutiérrez-Montes, C., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Real-time measurements of secondary organic aerosol formation and aging from
ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in the Los Angeles area, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 7411–7433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7411-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7411-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Paglione, M., Saarikoski, S., Carbone, S., Hillamo, R., Facchini, M. C.,
Finessi, E., Giulianelli, L., Carbone, C., Fuzzi, S., Moretti, F.,
Tagliavini, E., Swietlicki, E., Stenström, K. E., Prévôt, A. S.
H., Massoli, P., Canaragatna, M., Worsnop, D., and Decesari, S.: Primary and
secondary biomass burning aerosols determined by proton nuclear magnetic
resonance (<sup>1</sup>H-NMR) spectroscopy during the 2008 EUCAARI campaign in the
Po Valley (Italy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5089–5110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5089-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5089-2014</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Paglione, M., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Mensah, A. A., Finessi, E., Giulianelli,
L., Sandrini, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Schlag, P., Piazzalunga, A.,
Tagliavini, E., Henzing, J. S., and Decesari, S.: Identification of
humic-like substances (HULIS) in oxygenated organic aerosols using NMR and
AMS factor analyses and liquid chromatographic techniques, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 25–45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-25-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-25-2014</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Palm, B. B., Campuzano-Jost, P., Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Kaser, L., Jud,
W., Karl, T., Hansel, A., Hunter, J. F., Cross, E. S., Kroll, J. H., Peng,
Z., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: In situ secondary organic aerosol
formation from ambient pine forest air using an oxidation flow reactor,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2943–2970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2943-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Stark, H., Li, R., Lee-Taylor, J., Palm, B. B., Brune,
W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radical chemistry in oxidation flow
reactors with low-pressure mercury lamps systematically examined by modeling,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4863–4890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4863-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Palm, B. B., Hu, W., Stark, H., Li, R.,
Tsigaridis, K., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Non-OH chemistry in
oxidation flow reactors for the study of atmospheric chemistry systematically
examined by modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4283–4305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Putaud, J.-P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W., Cyrys,
J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H. C., Harrison, R. M.,
Herrmann, H., Hitzenberger, R., and Hüglin, C.: A European aerosol
phenomenology – 3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate
matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe, Atmos.
Environ., 44, 1308–1320, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T., Chan, A. W. H., Barkley, M. P., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global
modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and
NO<sub>3</sub>), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11261–11276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Reemtsma, T., These, A., Venkatachari, P., Xia, X., Hopke, P. K., Springer,
A., and Linscheid, M.: Identification of fulvic acids and sulfated and
nitrated analogues in atmospheric aerosol by electrospray ionization Fourier
transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 78,
8299–8304, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Renbaum, L. H. and Smith, G. D.: Artifacts in measuring aerosol uptake
kinetics: the roles of time, concentration and adsorption, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 6881–6693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6881-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Rissanen, M. P., Kurtén, T., Sipilä, M., Thornton, J. A.,
Kangasluoma, J., Sarnela, N., Junninen, H., Jørgensen, S., Schallhart, S.,
Kajos, M. K., Taipale, R., Springer, M., Mentel, T. F., Ruuskanen, T.,
Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Ehn, M. J.: The
formation of highly oxidized multifunctional products in the ozonolysis of
cyclohexene, Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 15596–15606, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Riva, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., D'Ambro, E. L.,
Zhang, X., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Thornton, J. A., Canagaratna, M. R., and
Surratt, J. D.: Chemical characterization of secondary organic aerosol from
oxidation of isoprene hydroxyhydroperoxides, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
9889–9899, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Sandrini, S., Pinxteren D. V., Giulianelli. L., Herrmann, H., Poulain, L.,
Facchini, M. C., Gilardoni, S., Rinaldi, M., Paglione, M., Turpin, B. J.,
Pollini, F., Bucci, S., Zanca, N., and Decesari, S.: Size-resolved aerosol
composition at an urban and a rural site in the Po Valley in summertime:
implications for secondary aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
10879–10897,<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10879-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10879-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Slowik, J. G., Wong, J. P. S., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Real-time, controlled
OH-initiated oxidation of biogenic secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 9775–9790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9775-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9775-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Szmigielski, R., Surratt, J. D., Gomez-Gonzalez, Y., Van der Veken, P.,
Kourtchev, I., Vermeylen, R., Blockhuys, F., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E.,
Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Edney, E. O., Seinfeld, J. H., Maenhaut,
W., and Claeys, M.: 3-Methyl-1,2,3-Butanetricarboxylic Acid: An Atmospheric
Tracer for Terpene Secondary Organic Aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
L24811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031338" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031338</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tagliavini, T., Moretti, F., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., and
Maenhaut, W.: Functional group analysis by H NMR/chemical derivatization for
the characterization of organic aerosol from the SMOCC field campaign, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 1003–1019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1003-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1003-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Tkacik, D. S., Lambe, A. T., Jathar, S.,Li, X.,Presto, A. A., Zhao, Y.,
Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., Jayne, J. T., Croteau, P. L., and Robinson, A.
L.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from in-use motor vehicle emissions
using a Potential Aerosol Mass reactor, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
11235–11242, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Tsigaridis, K., Daskalakis, N., Kanakidou, M., Adams, P. J., Artaxo, P.,
Bahadur, R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Benedetti, A.,
Bergman, T., Berntsen, T. K., Beukes, J. P., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin,
M., Curci, G., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Gong, S. L., Hodzic,
A., Hoyle, C. R., Iversen, T., Jathar, S., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, J. W.,
Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D., Kokkola, H., Lee, Y. H., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo,
G., Ma, X., Mann, G. W., Mihalopoulos, N., Morcrette, J.-J., Müller,
J.-F., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ng, N. L., O'Donnell, D., Penner, J.
E., Pozzoli, L., Pringle, K. J., Russell, L. M., Schulz, M., Sciare, J.,
Seland, Ø., Shindell, D. T., Sillman, S., Skeie, R. B., Spracklen, D.,
Stavrakou, T., Steenrod, S. D., Takemura, T., Tiitta, P., Tilmes, S., Tost,
H., van Noije, T., van Zyl, P. G., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Wang, Z., Wang,
Z., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.: The
AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845–10895, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
White, S. J., Jamie, I. M., and Angove, D. E.: Chemical characterisation of
semi-volatile and aerosol compounds from the photooxidation of toluene and
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos. Environ., 83, 237–244, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Chemical characterization of
water-soluble organic aerosol in contrasting rural and urban environments in
the southeastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 78–88, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Yasmeen, F., Vermeylen, R., Szmigielski, R., Iinuma, Y., Böge, O.,
Herrmann, H., Maenhaut, W., and Claeys, M.: Terpenylic acid and related
compounds: precursors for dimers in secondary organic aerosol from the
ozonolysis of <i>α</i>- and <i>β</i>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9383–9392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9383-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9383-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, P., Ding, X., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Robinson, E. S., and Donahue, N.
M.: Vapor wall loss of semi-volatile organic compounds in a Teflon chamber,
Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 50, 822–834, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in Aqueous Ammonium Sulfate Solutions: Products,
Kinetics and Hydration Effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029979</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Cappa, C. D., Jathar, S. H., McVay, R. C., Ensberg, J. J.,
Kleeman, M. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Influence of vapor wall loss in
laboratory chambers on yields of secondary organic aerosol, P. N. A. S.,
111, 5802–5807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404727111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
