<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-9591-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Tracking city CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from space using a high-resolution inverse
modelling approach: a case study for Berlin, Germany</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Tracking city CO${}_{{2}}$ emissions from space}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~Pillai et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Pillai</surname><given-names>Dhanyalekshmi</given-names></name>
          <email>kdhanya@bgc-jena.mpg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8934-2140</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Buchwitz</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-1837</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Gerbig</surname><given-names>Christoph</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1112-8603</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Koch</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Reuter</surname><given-names>Maximilian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-3895</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bovensmann</surname><given-names>Heinrich</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-4108</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Marshall</surname><given-names>Julia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2648-128X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Burrows</surname><given-names>John P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-8130</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dhanyalekshmi Pillai (kdhanya@bgc-jena.mpg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>9591</fpage><lpage>9610</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Currently, 52 % of the world's population resides in urban areas and as a
consequence, approximately 70 % of fossil fuel emissions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
arise from cities. This fact, in combination with large uncertainties
associated with quantifying urban emissions due to lack of appropriate
measurements, makes it crucial to obtain new measurements useful to identify
and quantify urban emissions. This is required, for example, for the
assessment of emission mitigation strategies and their effectiveness. Here,
we investigate the potential of a satellite mission like Carbon Monitoring
Satellite (CarbonSat) which was proposed to the European Space Agency (ESA)
to retrieve the city emissions globally, taking into account a realistic
description of the expected retrieval errors, the spatiotemporal distribution
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, and atmospheric transport. To achieve this, we use (i) a
high-resolution modelling framework consisting of the Weather Research
Forecasting model with a greenhouse gas module (WRF-GHG), which is used to
simulate the atmospheric observations of column-averaged CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dry air
mole fractions (XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (ii) a Bayesian inversion method to derive
anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and their errors from the CarbonSat
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations. We focus our analysis on Berlin, Germany using
CarbonSat's cloud-free overpasses for 1 reference year. The dense (wide
swath) CarbonSat simulated observations with high spatial resolution
(approximately 2 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km) permits one to map the city CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission plume with a peak enhancement of typically 0.8–1.35 ppm relative
to the background. By performing a Bayesian inversion, it is shown that the
random error (RE) of the retrieved Berlin CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission for a single
overpass is typically less than 8–10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (about
15–20 % of the total city emission). The range of systematic errors
(SEs) of the retrieved fluxes due to various sources of error (measurement,
modelling, and inventories) is also quantified. Depending on the assumptions
made, the SE is less than about 6–10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for most
cases. We find that in particular systematic modelling-related errors can be
quite high during the summer months due to substantial XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations
caused by biogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes at and around the target region. When
making the extreme worst-case assumption that biospheric XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations
cannot be modelled at all (which is overly pessimistic), the SE of the
retrieved emission is found to be larger than 10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
about half of the sufficiently cloud-free overpasses, and for some of the
overpasses we found that SE may even be on the order of magnitude of the
anthropogenic emission. This indicates that biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations
cannot be neglected but must be considered during forward and/or inverse
modelling. Overall, we conclude that a satellite mission such as CarbonSat
has high potential to obtain city-scale CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions as needed to
enhance our current understanding of anthropogenic carbon fluxes, and that
CarbonSat-like satellites should be an important component of a future global
carbon emission monitoring system.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>One of the main objectives of any climate policy initiative is to limit
atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions resulting from anthropogenic activity
to a level that minimizes adverse modification of the climate system. An
essential component in attaining this goal is the accurate quantification of
emissions at national and state levels in order to independently verify the
implemented climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. In the
context of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, cities are significant contributors of emissions,
giving rise to approximately 70 % of the total anthropogenic emissions
(Canadell et al., 2010). However, there exist
large uncertainties associated with quantifying urban emissions. This makes
it difficult to assess the efficacy of any emission management schemes at
urban scales.</p>
      <p>While mitigation efforts are being taken in some cities around the globe,
they lack objective, observation-based methods to verify their outcomes
(Pacala et al., 2010). Some observation-based attempts have
been made with a focus on deriving city-scale emissions in a variety of
urban environments (Bergeron and Strachan, 2011; Levin et al., 2011; Mays et al., 2009; Wang et al.,
2010; Zimnoch et al., 2010). However, none of these approaches is able to
account for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from urban areas with the accuracy required
for verification, nor are they easily adaptable to other locations. As a
result, our current emission estimates are purely based on inventories
(bottom-up approach), which have large uncertainties due to many unresolved
processes related to spatial and temporal heterogeneity of emission fluxes
and local transport phenomena (Van Amstel et
al., 1999; Gregg et al., 2008; Marland, 2008; White et al., 2011). Recent
revelations about the inaccuracy of the knowledge of motor vehicle emissions
emphasize this point.</p>
      <p>The reporting of the emissions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is currently determined by
national and regional agreements and legislation. This is an evolving topic
for policy makers. For example, there exists an emission inventory which
accounts for total annual US emissions between 1990 and 2014 (EPA, 2016).
In the European Union, the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas
emissions are performed and regulated under the Commission Regulation (EU)
no. 601/2012 (European Commission, 2012). Similarly, the UK government has
announced, under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors'
Report) Regulations 2013, that companies are required to report their annual
greenhouse gas emissions in their directors' report (see
<uri>http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1970/pdfs/uksi_20131970_en.pdf</uri>). There is also a guideline for national
greenhouse inventories prepared by a task force of the IPCC (IPCC, 2006).
Following the agreement of the UNFCCC COP21 in Paris in 2015, it is likely that
new guidelines for reporting the emissions of greenhouse gases will be
required.</p>
      <p>The uncertainties, i.e. the sum of systematic and stochastic error, in the
national average of annual fossil fuel CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the United
States is estimated to be 2–5 % (EPA, 2016). The corresponding values
for countries without well-developed energy sector statistics are even
higher, giving rise to uncertainties of about 10–20 % at the national
level (Gregg et al., 2008). When disaggregating these national emissions at
fine scales (e.g. city scale) based on conventional accounting methods, the
associated uncertainties are expected to be significantly higher compared to
those of national averages (Oda and Maksyutov, 2011). Hence, reliable emission
estimates are not often available at a scale relevant for urban emissions and
the associated uncertainties. This is problematic in terms of judging the
effectiveness of emission reduction schemes or designing new management
strategies for emission trading. Furthermore, uncertainties in emission
estimates impose important limitations on regional carbon budget estimations
derived by most atmospheric inverse frameworks (top-down approach), in which
anthropogenic emission fluxes are assumed to be well known (Corbin et al.,
2010; Göckede et al., 2010; Gurney et al., 2002, 2005).</p>
      <p>In order to assess accurately the contribution of a city or other emission
hotspot to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or other GHG emission, accurate knowledge of the
surface fluxes at high spatial and temporal resolutions is needed. Ideally,
the accuracy of the estimated flux needs to be high for unambiguous
attribution of source strength. The uncertainty of these estimations is
required to be reduced to the extent that is feasible. In ESA (2015) it is
noted (see their Sect. 4.1.2) that accuracies better than 10 % would be
useful for providing important additional information for cities where
inventories exist, and accuracies better than 20 % would contribute
knowledge for cities where inventories do not exist.</p>
      <p>The key limitations to constrain emission fluxes at urban scales via inverse
modelling are the unavailability of direct, continuous, and high-frequency
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements representing CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement in urban
domains, as well as the inability of current inverse modelling systems to
capture the fine-scale variability caused by the atmospheric transport and
emission processes at a scale relevant for urban emissions (e.g. Bréon et
al., 2015). An assessment study based on ground-based measurements indicated
potential drawbacks of using CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> surface measurements for emission
verification, and strongly recommended the use of sufficiently accurate
column-averaged CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dry air mole fractions, denoted as XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
measured from the ground and/or space as the best approach to detect and
quantify emissions and emission trends from urban regions (McKain et al.,
2012). An effective observation-based scheme is able to disentangle
anthropogenic emissions from CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes originating from
biosphere–atmosphere exchange.</p>
      <p>Despite its importance, none of the existing satellites has been specifically
designed and focused on observing XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban scales. However, the
first attempt to detect and quantify anthropogenic urban area CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from space was initiated with the launch of SCIAMACHY onboard
ENVISAT (2002–2012) (Burrows et al., 1995; Bovensmann et al., 1999), which
had a variety of atmospheric trace gas targets and applications. This has
been followed by TANSO onboard GOSAT (launched in 2009) (Kuze et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>Analysis of SCIAMACHY XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals revealed that regionally elevated
atmospheric XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over highly populated regions correlates well with
anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in terms of relative emission increase per
year (Schneising et al., 2008, 2013). However, these analyses are limited to
large and intense emission regions, owing to the coarse spatial resolution
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 km) of the SCIAMACHY measurements. Reuter et
al. (2014) also presents results related to anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
for large areas using an assessment of SCIAMACHY XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrievals.</p>
      <p>By using GOSAT observations, Kort et al. (2013) reported significant
enhancements of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over megacities (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm for Los
Angeles and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm for Mumbai), and argued that these
enhancements can be exploited to track anthropogenic emission trends over
megacities. However, constraining fossil fuel CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions by using
GOSAT XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals is limited by the sparseness of the GOSAT data
(Keppel-Aleks et al., 2013). Another satellite mission, OCO-2, has been
launched in 2014, with the aim of measuring global XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the
precision, resolution, and coverage needed to characterize CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources
and sinks at regional scales (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 km) (Crisp et al., 2004). In
additional to these, there have been some recent attempts to utilize
ground-based measurements of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to constrain emissions from cities
such as Los Angeles (Wong et al., 2015) and Berlin (Hase et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>In an effort to overcome these limitations and to achieve XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
observations with the precision and accuracy, spatiotemporal coverage,
resolution, and sensitivity to near-surface concentration variations that are
required to derive emissions at urban scales, a satellite mission was
proposed to the European Space Agency (ESA): Carbon Monitoring Satellite
(CarbonSat) (Bovensmann et al., 2010). CarbonSat aimed to measure XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and XCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at a high spatial resolution (approximately 2 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km),
with good spatial coverage via continuous imaging across a wide swath. The
goal swath width for the proposed CarbonSat mission was 500 km, but smaller
swath widths were also considered to limit cost (ESA, 2015).</p>
      <p>In this study, we investigated two potential measurement swath widths:
500 km (goal requirement) and 240 km (breakthrough requirement). As a
result of its relatively wide swath and high spatial resolution, CarbonSat is
designed to disentangle natural and anthropogenic sources of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from localized sources, such as cities, power plants, methane seeps,
and landfills, by utilizing its unique greenhouse gas imaging capability
achieved by its high spatiotemporal coverage and resolution. More details on
the mission and the current instrument concept are given in Buchwitz et
al. (2013a) and in ESA (2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>The Berlin-centred WRF-GHG model domain in Lambert conformal conic
projection used in the study. The red rectangle represents the target region
(100 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km) described in the Sect. 3.2 and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sign
indicates the central location of Berlin. The colour bar indicates the
terrain height in metres.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The goal of the present study is to assess the capability of an instrument like
CarbonSat to quantify emission patterns of moderate to strong localized
sources, taking into account a realistic description of the retrieval errors
as given in Buchwitz et al. (2013a), the spatiotemporal distributions of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, and atmospheric transport. Here, we present results
focusing on Berlin (Germany), a large city but not a megacity.
According to the classification of Globalization and World Cities (GaWC) for
the year 2012 (<uri>http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/gawcworlds.html</uri>), Berlin is
categorized as a beta-level city that provides a moderate economic
contribution to the world economy. Berlin is located in the northeast of
Germany (see Fig. 1) and is relatively isolated, i.e. it is not a part of a
large agglomeration of several cities. This permits us to clearly identify
the anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission plume of Berlin from a single CarbonSat
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> image. We use a high-resolution modelling framework, comprising
the Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model combined with a greenhouse gas
module (WRF-GHG, Beck et al., 2011) and the Vegetation Photosynthesis
Respiration Model (VPRM) to simulate CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios for a domain
centred on Berlin. An analysis is carried out for CarbonSat's cloud-free
overpasses for 1 reference year by applying a simple Bayesian inversion
scheme to estimate the emission budget with associated uncertainty. A
preliminary analysis using a least-squares-fitting algorithm was reported in
Buchwitz et al. (2013b), but here we present a more detailed analysis, which
differs from the previous study as follows: the present study (1) uses
high-resolution model simulations for each cloud-free CarbonSat overpass over
Berlin for the simulated year 2008, (2) prescribes the updated emission
inventory including hourly variations, (3) utilizes a Bayesian inversion
approach, and (4) examines more scenarios to extend the error analysis study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>WRF-GHG inverse modelling system</title>
      <p>A high-resolution inverse modelling system, utilizing atmospheric XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements at high spatial and temporal resolution, is used to retrieve the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions at an urban scale. It comprises two components: the
WRF-GHG model linking atmospheric transport and the fluxes to realistically
represent the distribution of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios, and a
Bayesian inversion technique to optimize the fluxes. One primary objective is
to quantify the uncertainties in the retrieved anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission fluxes resulting from typical and reasonable estimates of the
systematic and random error of the XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements for an instrument
like CarbonSat for the spatial resolution of 2 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km and the
uncertainty in a priori knowledge of the surface flux of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
this, we used WRF-GHG forward simulations as the true representation of
the atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and the associated fluxes as the
true fluxes to be retrieved. Hence, the deviation in the retrieved fluxes
(via inverse optimization) relative to the true fluxes is caused by the
CarbonSat simulated observation errors and the modelling errors (including the
use of different emission inventories) depending on different scenarios
analysed. Each component of the inverse modelling system is described in the
following.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>WRF-GHG forward model simulations</title>
      <p>The present study uses the WRF-GHG (version WRFv3.4) forward simulations of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at high spatial (10 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km) and
temporal (1 h) resolutions for all of CarbonSat's overpasses over Berlin in
the year 2008. The WRF-GHG modelling system has already been used in several
regional studies and has shown remarkable performance in capturing fine-scale
spatial variability of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios (e.g. Ahmadov et al., 2007,
2009; Pillai et al., 2010, 2011, 2012). The model domain describes a region
(spatial extent of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 900 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 900 km) centred over Berlin
(Fig. 1) and the simulations use 41 vertical levels (the thickness of the
lowest layer is about 18 m and the model top is 1.0 hPa). Simulations are
conducted separately for each day for a period of 30 h, including a
meteorological spinup time of 6 h starting at 18:00 UTC the previous day.</p>
      <p>The initial and lateral boundary conditions of the meteorological variables,
the sea surface temperature (SST), and the soil initialization fields for each
run are prescribed from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather
Forecasts (ECMWF) model analysis data (<uri>http://www.ecmwf.int</uri>) with a
spatial resolution of about 25 km and 6-hourly temporal intervals. As
initial atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fields and the lateral boundary concentrations,
simulations use global CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration simulations by the atmospheric
tracer transport model TM3 with a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 19 vertical levels, and a temporal resolution of 3 h
(Heimann and Körner, 2003). TM3 simulations used for this study are
generated by a forward transport simulation of fluxes that have been
optimized using a global network of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observing stations
(Rödenbeck, 2005). Biospheric fluxes within the regional domain are
calculated online in WRF-GHG with a diagnostic biospheric model, the
Vegetation and Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM), utilizing remote
sensing products and meteorological data at high temporal and spatial
resolutions (Mahadevan et al., 2008). To obtain more realistic estimates of
biospheric fluxes, a set of parameters in the VPRM, specific for each
vegetation class, has been optimized against eddy flux observations obtained
during the CarboEurope IP experiment at various sites (21 measurement sites)
under different vegetation types within Europe (Pillai et al., 2012).
Regional oceanic fluxes are neglected here since their contribution is
insignificant in the context of the present study.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Fossil fuel emission fluxes</title>
      <p>The anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission fluxes are based on the EDGAR (Emission
Database for Global Atmospheric Research, version 4.1, year 2008) global
inventory with a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
EDGAR is an annually varying database, but we apply time factors in order to
provide hourly emissions. The time factors for seasonal, daily, and diurnal
variations are based on the step-function time profiles published on the
former EDGAR website:
<uri>http://themasites.pbl.nl/images/temporal-variation-TROTREP_POET_doc_v2_tcm61-47632.xls</uri>
(see Kretschmer et al., 2014; Steinbach et al., 2011, for further details).
WRF-GHG simulations using these EDGAR emissions are treated as the real
distribution of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (hereafter referred to as “true
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conc.”), and the associated EDGAR fluxes as true fluxes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annual averages of fossil fuel combustion emission fluxes at
10 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km, zoomed over the Berlin region: <bold>(a)</bold> EDGAR
emissions, <bold>(b)</bold> IER emissions, and <bold>(c)</bold> the difference
between EDGAR and IER emissions (EDGAR <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IER). All units are in
Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per grid cell.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In order to examine the impact of the spatiotemporal distribution of fossil
fuel emission structures on atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and to quantify the
associated uncertainties in the optimized fluxes, we use different emission
data as the prior emissions, namely those compiled by the Institut für
Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER inventory), University
of Stuttgart, (<uri>http://carboeurope.ier.uni-stuttgart.de</uri>) for the year
2000, at spatiotemporal resolutions of 10 km and 1 h. Temporal
variations in the IER inventory include traffic rush hours, difference in
power demand between weekdays and weekends, domestic heating, and air
conditioning (Pregger et al., 2007). While utilizing the IER year 2000
database to represent the simulation year (2008), we apply scaling factors in
a manner similar to that in Pillai et al. (2011) to preserve the temporal
emission pattern differences between weekdays and weekends. Simulations using
the IER database are used as the current knowledge about the atmospheric
concentration for the inverse optimization described in Sect. 4.3.</p>
      <p>Both these emission fluxes are regridded to WRF-GHG's 10 km Lambert
conformal conic projection grid, conserving the total mass of emissions.
These hourly fluxes are added separately to the first model layer, and
transported separately as tagged tracers. Figure 2 shows a spatial map of the
averaged EDGAR and IER emission fluxes as well as their differences for the
Berlin region. Strong emissions associated with the city can be seen well in
both inventories. In general, both emission inventories show good consistency
in terms of spatial emission structures; however, significant differences in
emission intensities (magnitude) between the inventories, especially for
large cities and power plants, are common (e.g. Fig. 2c). These differences
are larger for emissions resulting from power plants than for those from
cities (not shown). Figure 3 shows the temporal variability of urban-scale
emission fluxes in hourly, weekly, and monthly averaged timescales for a
region around Berlin (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km). For Berlin
emissions, considerable differences in temporal variations are found between
both inventories, with maximum values of 22.5, 18.5, and
24.0 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for hourly, weekly, and monthly averaged
timescales, respectively. As compared to the IER inventory, the EDGAR
inventory shows consistently larger emissions for Berlin; however, this is
not the case for some other cities in Europe. Based on available sources of
information, it is difficult to conclude which inventory is more accurate.
The seasonal variability exhibited by EDGAR Berlin emissions is substantially
larger than that of the IER inventory. Larger emissions are seen in the EDGAR
inventory in winter months, with values approximately a factor of 1.5 higher
than those in summer months. This results from the increased demand of
domestic heating in winter. In terms of the seasonal variability of the
Berlin city emissions, the IER inventory shows a relatively small difference
in winter–summer emission patterns (temporal) as compared to EDGAR, and
shows overall larger emissions in winter. Both inventories show lower
emissions during weekends, consistent with the reduced demand of
transportation and power consumption. The hourly averaged Berlin emissions
provided by both inventories display peak values during 07:00–09:00 LT
(local time) and 17:00–19:00 LT, reflecting morning and evening rush hours
in terms of city traffic. Interestingly, the IER Berlin emissions show
delayed morning rush hours on weekends, with a maximum value around
11:00 LT.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Temporal variability of EDGAR and IER emission fluxes, aggregated
over the target region around Berlin (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km)
averaged for different timescales for the year 2008: <bold>(a)</bold> monthly,
<bold>(b)</bold> weekly, and <bold>(c, d)</bold> hourly. Panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows the values
representing only weekends, while <bold>(c)</bold> represents all days of the
week. Hours are in UTC (local time CET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> UTC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The significant difference between these inventories in both temporal and
spatial scales implies that our current knowledge of urban-scale emissions is
inadequate, even for central Europe, which is relatively well characterized
in terms of emissions compared to many other parts of the world. Note that a
part of these emission differences is likely due to the different data
compilation years of the IER and EDGAR inventories. This knowledge gap is
also important in inverse-modelling-based estimations of the source-sink
distribution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in which fossil fuel fluxes are generally assumed
to be known. How critical the effect of this assumption is depends on the
impact of these differences in emissions (emission uncertainties) on modelled
atmospheric mixing ratios, as well as on the transport errors that are
included in the model–data mismatch error in the inverse modelling framework.
The impact of emission uncertainties is further discussed in Sect. 4.1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Inverse optimization technique</title>
      <p>The inverse optimization utilizes observational constraints to adjust a
subset of parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> out of model parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
surface flux model <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to obtain a modelled
concentration consistent with the observations. Hence, the anthropogenic
atmospheric concentration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (column-averaged dry air mole fraction)
at different locations and times can be represented as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>error</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Here, the matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> links the atmospheric concentration to a vector
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> whose dimension is equal to the total
number of surface flux elements, multiplied by total time steps. The vector
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the background column-averaged dry air mole fraction,
i.e. the concentration due to the advection of upstream tracer
concentrations. For the inversion, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
assumed to be linearly dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and is expressed as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a vector of daily scaling factors of surface
fluxes, and the matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the surface flux field
over the model domain.</p>
      <p>A linear model is obtained by combining Eqs. (1) and (2):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>error</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the measurement vector <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained by linearizing the model with a reference
state <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Eq. 1).</p>
      <p>The Jacobian matrix that represents the sensitivity of the observations
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the state vector <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The state vector and the Jacobian matrix are further described in Sect. 3.2.
A priori knowledge of the surface fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, along
with their uncertainties is incorporated in the Bayesian formulation. The
term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>error</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to follow the Gaussian
distribution described by the error covariance matrices of the measurements,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the prior estimate, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
posterior estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained by minimizing the cost
function, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is given as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Analytically solving for the minimum of Eq. (6) gives the optimal estimate of
the state vector of the scaling factors <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the
associated error covariance matrix of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, termed as the
posterior uncertainty, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These are
expressed as follows (Rodgers, 2000):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Bayesian inversion of CarbonSat measurements</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Pseudo observations</title>
      <p>The inversion utilizes a 1-year data set of CarbonSat simulated observations
at a spatial resolution of 2 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km, generated using the
WRF-GHG forward model (10 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km) as described in Sect. 2.1,
and CarbonSat's retrieval error (2 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km), estimated using an
error parameterization scheme based on the measurement characteristics as
described in Buchwitz et al. (2013a). The error parameterization scheme,
described in detail in Buchwitz et al. (2013a), is based on six parameters
consisting of solar zenith angle (SZA) and scattering-related parameters such
as albedo in the near-infrared (NIR) and the first shortwave-infrared
(SWIR-1) bands, cirrus optical depth (COD), cirrus top height (CTH), and
aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm. We use the Level 2 error data set
(L2e files), described in Buchwitz et al. (2013a), that contains the random
and systematic errors of CarbonSat's XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals based on the error
parameterization scheme. CarbonSat is assumed to follow an orbit similar to
NASA's Terra satellite (<uri>www.nasa.gov/terra/</uri>), but with an equator
crossing time of 11:30 LT. Hence, for specifying the CarbonSat's
geolocation, the L2e files utilize the geolocation provided in the Terra
Level 1 data set for the year 2008, but modified to consider the difference
in equator crossing time. This data set contains fields such as geodetic
coordinates, ground elevation, solar and satellite zenith angles, etc.
determined using the spacecraft attitude and orbit, a digital elevation
model, and information derived from various other data sets such as the
Filled Land Surface Albedo Product, generated from MOD43B3
(<uri>http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/ALBEDO/</uri>) at a spatial resolution of
1 min (2 km at equator and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km at the poles), which is used to
account for surface albedo. The cirrus parameters are represented using a
spatiotemporally smoothed (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3 months) data
set of COD and CTH, originally derived from CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with
Orthogonal Polarization) onboard CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared
Pathfinder Satellite Observations, Winker et al., 2009). Global aerosol data
products from the GEMS project (<uri>http://gems.ecmwf.int/</uri>) at a
spatiotemporal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>1.125</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>1.125</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 12 h
are used to account for aerosols (AOD). This data set is based on the
assimilation of MODIS data and we use the AOD at 550 nm. As described in
Buchwitz et al. (2013a), the L2e data set only contains those CarbonSat
simulated observations which are approximately cloud-free as determined using
a cloud mask obtained from MODIS Terra (using the MODIS cloud cover data
product (MOD35) at a spatial resolution of about 1 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km). As
the remaining ground pixels may still suffer from cloud contamination (e.g.
due to too-high amounts of thin cirrus) or other disturbances, a quality
filtering scheme is applied which is based on retrieved (e.g. COD and AOD)
and known quantities (e.g. SZA). The quality filtering scheme is described in
Buchwitz et al. (2013a) and we use here only those ground pixels which are
considered good according to this scheme.</p>
      <p>Initially, we have identified all the potentially useful Berlin overpasses,
i.e. overpasses where at least some CarbonSat simulated observations are
present over Berlin and its surroundings for a given CarbonSat orbit. We found
that the maximum number of observations is obtained during the summer months
due to most favourable observation conditions (less clouds for extended time
periods and regions, high SZA, etc.). In total, there are 41 days (orbits)
of potentially useful overpasses over Berlin for the year 2008 for a swath
width of 500 km. Note that the number of overpasses is smaller in the
figures shown later. This is because of an additional quality filtering
procedure applied after the inverse optimization that is based on retrieved
random errors, as explained later.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Definition of the state vector and Jacobian matrix</title>
      <p>In the present study, the state vector has two elements. The first element
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the scalable parameter of the emission flux) corresponds to
the scaling factor of emission fluxes for a trimmed model domain, i.e. a
region around Berlin (spatial extent of approximately
100 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km,) hereafter referred to as the target region (TR).
The other element is a constant, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the entire
scene per overpass to account for variations of the background XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Eq. 4) and to treat the background variations independently of the city
emissions, as done in Buchwitz et al. (2013b). The temporal resolution of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to be daily, assuming no spatial variations within the
target region. The prior value of this scaling factor
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to unity.</p>
      <p>The Jacobian matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relates the measurement vector <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to
the state vector <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and has elements that represent the
response in mixing ratios to the emission fluxes (see Eq. 5). The dimension
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the numbers of
elements in the state vector and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations.
Since we do not have an adjoint model, these sensitivity functions are
derived by perturbing each element of the emission flux field
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over the target region by small increments and applying
the forward model (WRF-GHG) to obtain the resulting perturbed concentration
field <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the target region. Hence,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TR</mml:mtext></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>perturbed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TR</mml:mtext></mml:munder><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Φ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The posterior estimate of the scaling factor, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, is derived by
minimizing the cost function, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as given in Eq. (7).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement on 24 June 2008 at 10:00 UTC
(local time: 12:00 CEST). Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the true XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement (using
EDGAR emissions), and <bold>(b)</bold> XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement when using IER
emissions. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the discrepancy in XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement
due to the difference between EDGAR and IER emission inventories. All units
are given in ppm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Error covariance matrices</title>
      <p>Bayesian inversion utilizes error covariance matrices to account for the
measurement error and the prior flux error variances and covariances. The
measurement error covariance matrix, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is constructed by
specifying the XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> random errors (single-measurement precision) derived
using the error parameterization scheme described in Sect. 3.1. Note that the
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> random error is primarily determined by the instrument
signal-to-noise performance (but also to some extent by the retrieval
algorithm; see Buchwitz et al., 2013a) and is typically about 1.2 ppm (for
the assumed threshold requirement signal-to-noise ratio performance
assumption used by Buchwitz et al., 2013a) except for some especially
unfavourable conditions such as low albedo and high SZA scenarios. Transport
model uncertainty is neglected here since the objective of current study is
to quantify the uncertainty in the retrieved fluxes due to CarbonSat's
retrieval errors only.</p>
      <p>The prior flux uncertainty, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is set uniformly to
40 % of the total emission over the target region to ensure that the
difference between the true and prior fluxes is appropriately considered. We
consider the fact that the increased variability of emissions at the high
resolution (as it is used in this study) leads to increased uncertainty due
to the lack of information about the emission processes at the required
spatial and temporal resolutions. The magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is specified here based on the approximate difference between the IER and the
EDGAR inventories over the target region.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Results: estimation of anthropogenic XCO${}_{{2}}$
enhancement and retrieved flux uncertainty over Berlin}?><title>Results: estimation of anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
enhancement and retrieved flux uncertainty over Berlin</title>
      <p>In this study, we use anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement, which is defined
as the enhancement in XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting from local anthropogenic emissions
relative to the background concentration. The tagged tracer option in
WRF-GHG stores XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement resulting from EDGAR emissions
separately, and we use this field to represent anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
enhancement. The uncertainty in the retrieved emission attributed by
CarbonSat's retrieval error is a function of the anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
enhancement over Berlin, the number of potential observations in and around
Berlin, and the retrieval uncertainty (random and systematic components). In
this manner, we take into account the influence of these parameters to
achieve a robust estimation of the retrieved surface emission uncertainty or
error.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Local anthropogenic XCO${}_{{2}}$ enhancement}?><title>Local anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement</title>
      <p>The XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements resulting from anthropogenic emissions over
Berlin are estimated in order to assess whether these emission enhancements
are detectable by an instrument having the performance of CarbonSat, i.e. to
assess whether the resulting plumes are statistically significant and
robust, thereby enabling the changes or trends in anthropogenic emission
over the cities.</p>
      <p>Figure 4 shows the true anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement on a
reference day (24 June 2008), the anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement based
on the IER inventory, and the difference in XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement due to the
difference in emission inventories. From Figs. 2a and 4a, it can be concluded
that, given the availability of a satellite instrument which is able to
precisely detect the associated XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio enhancements ranging
from 0.80 to 1.35 ppm at a high spatial resolution and adequate spatial
coverage, anthropogenic emissions from a city the size of Berlin and
other localized emission sources can be estimated from space with sufficient
accuracy. It should be noted that the magnitude of detectable anthropogenic
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements is likely to be underestimated in our study because
the true fields of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations are simulated at a 10 km spatial
resolution instead of CarbonSat's resolution
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km).</p>
      <p>It is noteworthy that the spatial and temporal difference in EDGAR and IER
emission inventories gives rise to a notable XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio
difference between 0.4 and 1.0 ppm. For Berlin, this is about 40 % of the
total true XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement. It should be noted that surface
concentrations show larger relative differences than the column dry mole
fraction for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) because of their higher sensitivity to the
change in surface fluxes. Hence, this result indicates the importance of
characterizing emission uncertainties, even for the region where fossil
emissions are often considered to be well quantified in comparison to
the biospheric carbon balance. Neglecting this uncertainty term would lead
to significant biases in the net carbon exchange estimations, particularly
when assimilating concentration measurements closer to emission sources such
as cities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Anthropogenic flux over the target region based on
<bold>(a)</bold> EDGAR inventory, and <bold>(b)</bold> IER inventory for all of
CarbonSat's useful overpasses corresponding to 500 km swath width for
the year 2008.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Overview of different scenarios (SCE) which are used to investigate
the systematic errors of the retrieved emissions. The absolute mean and
standard deviations are estimated for two swath widths (SW-500: 500 km and
SW-240: 240 km) for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses and are expressed in both
Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and in percent. Err-L, Err-H, and Err-B indicate
errors attributed to CarbonSat measurement, high-resolution, aerosol-related
errors, and biogenic modelling errors, respectively. Err-Emi indicates whether
the inversion experiment uses different prior emission fluxes (see Sect. 4.3).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SCE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Err-L</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Err-H</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Err-B</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Err-Emi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Prior</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">True</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SE (SW-500)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">SE (SW-500)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">SE (SW-240)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">SE (SW-240)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>23.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>23.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>24.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>25.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>23.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>14.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>24.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>15.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>15.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>16.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>18.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>16.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>18.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>24.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>24.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">✓</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EDGAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>17.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>17.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>29.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Uncertainty of the retrieved Berlin emissions</title>
      <p>In this section, we show the results obtained by inverting CarbonSat
simulated observations over the target region, taking into account different
sources of possible errors including CarbonSat measurement errors and
modelling errors. Inversions are performed separately for each potentially
useful CarbonSat overpass (see above) to derive the total emission flux and
its error over the target region. Note that those fluxes retrieved or seen
from CarbonSat XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements can vary significantly from one
overpass to the next, i.e. within weeks, because the time elapsed to
transport the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plume to where it is observed by CarbonSat and thus
changes in XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, vary with wind speed and strong temporal variations in
emissions (see also Fig. 3). Figure 5 shows an overview of prior fluxes used
for these inversions.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Precision (random errors (RE)) of the retrieved emission fluxes
obtained by the inverse optimization using 1 year of CarbonSat simulated
observations. Results of two different swath widths (SWs) – 500 km (grey)
and 240 km (red) – are shown. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
indicated with magenta-bordered bars for visualizing the reduction in
uncertainty. The top and bottom panels show RE in Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
in percent, respectively. An overview of the statistical distribution of RE,
separately for 500 km (grey) and 240 km (red) swath widths, is given inside
the panel. The overall mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation is given outside the
respective panels. The lower and upper limits of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis (days of the
year) is restricted accordingly as there are no good CarbonSat simulated
observation during winter months. The arrow marker in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis indicates
a particular day (24 June 2008) shown in Figs. 4, 7, and 8.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The systematic errors (SEs) of the retrieved emission fluxes, which are
specific for each source of errors or combination of errors, is determined
separately by defining six scenarios, represented by S01 through S06
(Table 1). These scenarios are described in the following subsections, while
additional scenarios S07–S11 are presented and discussed separately in
Sect. 4.3. Note that the distance from the centre of the target region to one
of its boundaries is roughly 50 km, which corresponds to a time of
approximately 3 h for air parcels travelling with a velocity of
4.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This means that the observed local CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission plume
is not only determined by the emission at the time of the overpass but also
during a time interval of several hours before the time of the overpass. This
is taken into account when modelling the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission plume. For the
inversion, it is assumed that the time dependence of the emissions in the
time period of up to several hours (3–6 h) before the overpass is at least
reasonably well known except for the scenarios S07–S11. As noted earlier,
the true XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations in this study are based on 10 km spatial
resolution instead of 2 km in CarbonSat simulated observations. For the
inversion results, we assume negligible representation error arising from
these spatial-scale mismatches. Based on meteorological conditions, the
representation error introduced by decreasing the horizontal resolution from
2 to 10 km can be approximately 0.5 ppm on average for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations at the surface (Tolk et al., 2008). However, it is expected
that the representation error for XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between these horizontal scales
will be much lower than that for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the surface (see
Pillai et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Before analysing SE for the different scenarios, we first present the random
error (RE) of the retrieved emission. RE is caused by the measurement noise,
i.e. by the random part of the measurement error; hence, it is independent of
the above-mentioned SE scenarios. In the optimal case, the instrument noise
is determined by the shot noise of the detector arrays. In practice, there
are additional sources of noise such as read out noise, digitization noise,
etc. Figure 6 shows the random errors of the retrieved emissions over the
target region, obtained by inverting the entire 1-year data set of
simulated CarbonSat XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals. As explained above, we have
investigated two different swath widths, 500 and 240 km. The results are
shown only for the days where the number of CarbonSat simulated observations
around the target region is sufficiently dense (covering the emission plume
and its surroundings) to obtain a retrieved emission random error of less
than 25 %, i.e. we use the a posteriori random error of the retrieved
emission as a quality criterion (as also done in Buchwitz et al., 2013b).
Applying this additional quality criterion has further reduced the number of
potential overpasses for the 500 km swath width. This number, labelled as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses, is 27 for a swath width of 500 km and 17 for a
swath width of 240 km. The value obtained here for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses
is expected to be typical for other cities with similar cloud coverage and
latitude. As can be seen in Fig. 6, decreasing the swath width not only
reduces the number of useful overpasses but also increases the RE of the
retrieved fluxes for some overpasses. The RE of the retrieved emission (from
a single overpass) is usually found to be less than 20 % (approximately
10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the emission fluxes for both swath widths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> systematic error over the target region on 24 June 2008,
assuming a CarbonSat swath width of 500 km. The six scenarios (S01–S06) are
shown with a label inside the respective panel. For S01, S02, and S04, these
errors are estimated using the error parameterization scheme of Buchwitz et
al. (2013a). The other scenarios additionally utilize biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
variability in the target region (simulated by WRF-GHG) to derive XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
systematic errors. Note that different colour scales are used for S02 and S03.
All units are given in ppm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Impact of CarbonSat measurement errors (scenario S01)</title>
      <p>Here, we focus on scenario S01, and estimate the uncertainty in the
retrieved emission fluxes caused exclusively by CarbonSat measurement
errors. For this, we assume that the XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in the target
region is dominated by the anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission and that there is
negligible XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability due to biogenic fluxes over the target
region, or that this biogenic component can be modelled well, and thus can be
subtracted from the observations without introducing any modelling-related
errors.</p>
      <p>The systematic measurement error of the CarbonSat simulated observations over
the target region for a typical day (24 June 2008) for S01 is shown in
Fig. 7a. This is estimated using the error parameterization scheme of
Buchwitz et al. (2013a), as shortly described in Sect. 3.1. The mean
systematic measurement error over the target region is about 0.25 ppm for
this day. For the scenario S01, the observed anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by
CarbonSat is thus the sum of this measurement error (Fig. 7a) and the
true anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 8a shows the observed anthropogenic
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement for S01 over the target region during the overpass on
24 June 2008. For the comparison, the corresponding true anthropogenic
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement, i.e. without any source of errors, is shown in
Fig. 8g. The true emission plume, originating almost from the centre of
the target region, can be clearly seen with a maximum value of about
0.90 ppm. As can be seen, the observed CarbonSat XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern (Fig. 8a)
differs from the true XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern (Fig. 8g) by the measurement
errors (Fig. 7a); hence, the retrieved emission via inversion typically
differs from the true emission that results in a systematic error of
the retrieved emission. The extent of this systematic error depends on how
well the systematic measurement error correlates with the true XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
pattern.</p>
      <p>Figure 9 shows the systematic errors of the retrieved emissions for CarbonSat
overpasses over the target region obtained by inverting the entire 1-year
data set of simulated CarbonSat XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals for the scenario S01.
Shown are the results for swath widths of 500 and 240 km for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
useful overpasses (days). Overall, the absolute magnitude of the systematic
errors of the retrieved emissions for both swath widths for the scenario S01
is found to be less than 10 % for most of the overpasses (about 75 %
of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses for the year 2008), which corresponds to about
5.3 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the 500 km swath width in S01, the mean
and standard deviation of the SE for all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and
2.8 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (6.1 %), respectively (see also Table 1). In
general, we find that the two different swath widths have a negligible impact
on the daily SE of the retrieved emissions, although decreasing the swath
width reduces the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Observed anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement over the target region
during a CarbonSat overpass on 24 June 2008 (swath width: 500 km). Different
panels show anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement, while considering XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
systematic errors for different scenarios as shown in Fig. 8. The true
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (fossil fuel (FF)) enhancement (i.e. without any uncertainties) is
given in the bottom panel <bold>(g)</bold> for comparison. Note that an offset,
labelled inside each panel, is subtracted from the anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
enhancement to better visualize the details (for the figure only). All units
are ppm.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Systematic errors of the retrieved emission fluxes for S01,
obtained by the inverse optimization using 1 year of CarbonSat simulated
observations. Results of two different swath widths (SW) – 500 km (grey)
and 240 km (red) – are shown. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show SE in
Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and in percent, respectively. An overview of the
statistical distribution of SE, separately for 500 km (grey) and 240 km
(red) swath widths, is given inside the panel. The overall
mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation is given outside the respective panels.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Impact of CarbonSat measurement errors with worst-case aerosol-related biases (scenarios S02 and S04)</title>
      <p>Note that in the previous section we have used the CarbonSat systematic
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval errors as provided by the error parameterization scheme
described in Buchwitz et al. (2013a). However, as explained in Buchwitz et
al. (2013b), this scheme may underestimate aerosol-related biases if the
spatially (not aggregated) high-resolution CarbonSat simulated observations
are used for applications like the one used here. The reason is that
aerosol-related retrieval biases have been computed using quite smooth model
aerosol input data sets, which might not be sufficient to represent the
aerosol plume over Berlin.</p>
      <p>To consider this, an additional error term has been defined which is
referred to as “high-resolution aerosol error” in this paper. In this
subsection, we present results for scenario S02, where the measurement error
used for S01 described in the previous section has been replaced by the
high-resolution aerosol error contribution to the systematic measurement
error. We also present results for scenario S04, where the measurement error
is the sum of the S01 and S02 errors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 9, but for S02, quantifying the impact of the
worst-case assumption used for aerosol-related biases.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The method of computing the high-resolution aerosol error is described in
detail in Buchwitz et al. (2013b). Here, we describe it briefly as follows. A
local AOD enhancement has been computed by scaling the observed anthropogenic
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial pattern, i.e. the AOD enhancement is assumed to be
perfectly correlated with the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission plume of interest (see
Figs. 7b and 8b). To quantify the urban aerosol enhancement over a region
around two power plants in Germany and to study their impact on emission
estimates, Krings et al. (2011) followed the above criteria and used an AOD
scaling factor of 0.05 per 1 % (4 ppm) of local <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>XCO2. As
compared to their study, we have used a much higher scaling factor of 0.2,
i.e. the AOD change, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AOD at 550 nm is 0.2 per 4 ppm of local
anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Overall, these are worst-case assumptions
that are supposed to result in upper limits of systematic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> errors
due to aerosols and resulting errors of the retrieved emissions. For a more
detailed discussion, see Buchwitz et al. (2013b).</p>
      <p>The resulting SEs of the retrieved emissions for scenario S02 are found to be
negative, indicating systematic underestimation of retrieved emissions (see
Fig. 10). As can be seen, the absolute magnitudes of errors are slightly
higher than those for S01. The mean and standard deviation of SE for S02,
considering all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses and the 500 km swath width, are
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and
2.1 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (3.4 %), respectively.</p>
      <p>Another scenario, S04, investigates the impact of both high-resolution
aerosol-related errors (used for S02) and the default CarbonSat
measurement errors (used for S01) on retrieving anthropogenic emissions.
Inversions are performed by utilizing these two sources of error, i.e. the
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> systematic error for S04 is the sum of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> systematic error
specified in S01 and S02 (see Figs. 8d and 9d). As expected, the SEs of the
retrieved emission for S04 is found to be higher than those of S01 and S02,
and their values are close to the linear sum of systematic emission errors
for S01 and S02 (see Table 1). As already explained, the definition of S04
likely represents the possible worst-case measurement scenario in particular
with respect to aerosol-related errors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 9, but for S03, quantifying the impact of the
worst-case modelling-related errors by assuming that biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
variations cannot be modelled at all.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Impact of biospheric modelling error (S03, S05, S06)</title>
      <p>In this section, we explore the impact of modelling error on retrieving Berlin
city emissions. In the last two sections, it is assumed that the spatial
variability introduced by the biogenic component of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the target
region is well known or sufficiently small that it can be ignored. However,
in reality, there are notable perturbations caused by the spatial variability
of biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the target region that cannot be ignored. As an
example, Fig. 7c illustrates the biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in the target
region during a CarbonSat overpass. Most critical in terms of this
uncertainty is how well the biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern is correlated with the
anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern. In this case, the uncertainty in the
retrieved emissions depends on how accurately the biogenic fluxes can be
modelled, as well as the associated transport model uncertainty in simulating
the biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern. Note that we assume negligible transport
uncertainty for the anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern in order to distinguish
the retrieved emission errors due only to the biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern. In
order to account for this modelling-related error, we consider scenario S03.
In S03, we assume an extreme case where biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot be modelled
at all; hence, biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is treated as the perturbation seen in
the measurement vector (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the inversion system (see Figs. 8c and
9c). However, it should be noted that, in reality, biospheric modelling
uncertainty is not expected to be as high as this assumption. A simple
biosphere model such as VPRM used in this study could capture 50–65 % of
the biospheric flux variability in most of the cases (squared correlation
coefficient (VPRM vs. observations), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.65).</p>
      <p>The systematic errors of the retrieved emissions for S03 are found to be
significantly higher compared to the errors for the above-mentioned scenarios
than those for S01 and S02 (see Fig. 11). It is noteworthy that this uncertainty
is not related to CarbonSat measurement errors, but arises due to the
inability of the model to simulate the biospheric contribution. Hence, this
uncertainty should be treated as a model-related error. Due to the extreme
assumption of modelling error in S03, the uncertainty values reported in this
section have to be considered as the extreme upper limits of the possible
total uncertainties in the retrieved fluxes due to biogenic modelling error.
Despite this, the SE of the retrieved emission for S03 is within the range of
20–25 % (10–15 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for most of the scenes
although we assumed the largest uncertainty in modelling biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The reason for this is that the spatial biospheric XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern in the
target region that disturbs the inverse system typically differs from the
anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern in many of the good CarbonSat overpasses,
enabling these two sources/sinks (anthropogenic and biogenic) to be
disentangled reasonably well for cities like Berlin.</p>
      <p>Additionally, we define other scenarios, S05 and S06, to investigate the
impact of the biogenic modelling errors in combination with other error
sources, such as CarbonSat measurement errors and high-resolution aerosol-related errors. Systematic error estimations for these scenarios are
summarized in Table 1 and these results suggest that a dominant part of the
retrieved emission error is caused by the unknown biogenic variability.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Similar to Fig. 9, but for the inversion experiment S09 using IER (a
priori) and EDGAR (true) emission fluxes.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/9591/2016/acp-16-9591-2016-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Inversion experiment using different prior emission fluxes
(S07–S11)</title>
      <p>The inversion results presented so far have not taken into account the impact
of imperfect knowledge of the spatial pattern of emission fluxes and the
different time dependences of the emissions; hence, the inverse optimization
adjusts only the amplitude of the emission plume corresponding to the
anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission in the target region. Although the error
arising from these unknown spatial emission structures is not directly
related to CarbonSat measurement errors, we attempt to perform an experiment
using two different flux inventories, with one of the flux inventories
representing the prior fluxes and the other representing the true fluxes. The
experiment is designed with an inversion setup, which is essentially the
same as that described in Sect. 3.3, but with the following exception. Here,
the prior emission fluxes are prescribed from the IER emission inventory
(Fig. 2b); hence, the modelled anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is based on IER emission
fluxes (see Fig. 4b and Sect. 2.1.1). Similar to the sections above, the
EDGAR emission inventory is considered to have the true fluxes and the
measurement vector (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which corresponds to CarbonSat simulated
observations, is based on the EDGAR emission inventory, as described in
Sect. 3.1. The retrieved posterior fluxes of this inversion optimization are
compared with true fluxes to estimate the retrieved posterior flux errors
and to assess how well inversion studies can benefit from CarbonSat
measurements in the case of discrepancy between true and prior fluxes in
terms of spatial patterns of distribution.</p>
      <p>Similar to the above section, systematic errors of the retrieved fluxes are
estimated specifically for each source of errors or combination of errors by
defining scenarios S07 through S11 (see Table 1). It should be noted that the
IER and EDGAR fluxes are not entirely different in terms of temporal
variations, though the magnitude of the emissions in the target region is
notably different (see Fig. 5). However, there exists a dissimilarity of
approximately 70 % of the spatial patterns between these two inventories
(based on the correlation of spatial variability between two inventories,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the target region.</p>
      <p>For most of the overpasses, the random errors of the retrieved emission
fluxes over the target region (single overpass) are found to be less than
20 % (approximately 10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the emission fluxes
for both swath widths (not shown). These values are comparable to those shown
in Fig. 6, indicating the potential of CarbonSat simulated observations to
retrieve surface fluxes, even when uncertainties in the spatial pattern of
the prior emission fluxes are present. Figure 12 shows the SE of the
retrieved emissions estimated for the scenario S09, where CarbonSat
measurement errors and high-resolution errors are considered in addition to
the uncertainty in the spatial pattern of the prior fluxes. For both swath
widths, the estimated SE for S09 is found to be less than
10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in many instances (for about 85 % of useful
overpasses). Systematic errors for other scenarios are summarized in Table 1.
Depending on the error sources, the inversion experiment shows that the mean
and standard deviation of SE, considering all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> useful overpasses and the
500 km swath width, ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10.8 and 6.9 to
11.1 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Furthermore, the systematic
errors of the retrieved emission fluxes for both swath widths are found to be
lower than the difference between the prior fluxes and the true fluxes
except for a very few cases, providing confidence in the inverse results
although only a simple inverse optimization methodology is used.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>In this section, we discuss the merits of instruments like CarbonSat for
retrieving emission fluxes and its potential in disentangling anthropogenic
and biogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes over cities like Berlin. Caveats related to the
simple inversion approach used here are discussed.</p>
      <p>For the study of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, it is necessary to assess whether local
anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements are large enough to be detected by
using the retrieved XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data products from the satellite-borne
instrument, taking into account the measurement noise. Our analysis shows
that anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements around Berlin are well above the
retrieval biases for most of the overpasses and the number of potential
observations, after filtering out the contaminated pixels, is large enough
to minimize the random error component (not shown). Given the availability
of such a dense sampling coverage with similar retrieval biases, one can be
confident in utilizing CarbonSat's observations for retrieving city emission
trends or absolute emission fluxes via appropriate inverse modelling.</p>
      <p>In a real scenario, the question arises whether it is possible to clearly
separate local anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements from CarbonSat's total
column measurements, which are in addition influenced by biospheric sources
or sinks. Moreover, in order to isolate the XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement caused by
local sources (such as city emissions), it is necessary to specify the
background signal, representing the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column without any influence
of local fluxes. These additional biospheric and background influences can be
ignored if the target city is well isolated from other strong urban sources
and/or active biospheric regions as well as has negligible local biospheric
activity. However, only a few cities or urban areas meet the above criteria,
and a typical European city, in general, has considerable local or nearby
biogenic influences. Under these conditions, it is necessary to disentangle
biogenic, anthropogenic and background contributions from CarbonSat's
observations. To assess the relative contribution of biogenic and
anthropogenic sources, one can utilize additional co-emitted tracers such as
CO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Newman et al., 2013; Silva et al., 2013; Berezin et al.,
2013; Reuter et al., 2014). In the time frame of a potential CarbonSat
mission, Sentinel-5 will be providing data on CO and tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Ingmann et al., 2012), which, when combined with CarbonSat data, are expected
to provide information for the attribution of air masses originating from
fossil fuel combustion. Depending on the extent of the variability and the
possible uncertainties, we can also rely on the biospheric and global model
simulations to differentiate different source-sink contributions.</p>
      <p>By assuming that the biospheric patterns are accurately modelled and that
these biogenic signals can be subtracted from the measurement vector to
isolate the anthropogenic contribution of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, our simple inversion
system is constructed such that it takes into account the impact of CarbonSat
sampling errors on the retrieved city emissions over Berlin. The
applicability of our results to a scenario where these assumptions are not
valid needs to be examined, but the current setup is not well suited for
this purpose since we have not taken into account additional state vectors
for biospheric contributions. On the other hand, the current setup allows us
to investigate the extremely pessimistic scenario where we assume that we
cannot model the biospheric contribution at all (see Sect. 4.2.3).</p>
      <p>When using observations at CarbonSat's 2 km spatial resolution, as mentioned
in Sect. 4.1, it is likely that the magnitude and variability of local
anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement would be higher than our estimation that
is based on simulations at 10 km spatial resolution. One of the main
advantages of CarbonSat's resolution is its ability to provide a large number
of cloud-free observations and this study identified the potential
observations over Berlin by utilizing CarbonSat's 2 km spatial resolution.</p>
      <p>Although we utilize high-resolution forward simulations, at present our
inversion system uses only one scaling factor for the entire target region
for each useful overpass. This means that the current setup cannot provide
posterior estimates for each pixel or emission sector within the target
region. In other words, the flexibility to capture the true spatial
variation of fluxes is more limited in our simple inversion system than in
pixel- or parameter-wise inversions. Using this simple inversion system may
thus overestimate the retrieved flux uncertainty. While interpreting our
results, one should keep in mind that we do not specify other important
sources of errors in the inversion system, such as transport error. As
previously noted, the main focus of this study is to estimate the retrieved
flux uncertainties that are caused only by CarbonSat's measurement errors.
However, these transport-related errors, which provide proper weight to the
observations depending on the capability of the transport model, need to be
taken into account when estimating the total flux uncertainty via inverse
modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p>In the present study, we examine the potential of a satellite mission like
CarbonSat for improving the current knowledge on the surface–atmosphere
exchange of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. A significant contribution by the CarbonSat
GHG observations will be the ability to retrieve the
emissions of localized (moderate to strong CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
sources such as cities, power plants, methane seeps, etc., as a result of its
unique sampling capability at high spatial resolution (approximately
2 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km) with a good spatial coverage using a much wider swath.
To demonstrate this, we have investigated the error on the retrieved fluxes
using synthetic data which are similar to that expected from CarbonSat. We
have simulated emissions from a medium-size city (in terms economic
contribution and trade) and assessed the capability to retrieve anthropogenic
emission fluxes for the city and its surrounding region (Berlin-centred
target region investigated here: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km) from
CarbonSat simulated observations. The results show that these potential
space-based, top-down flux estimates have high accuracy; hence, this study
contributes to the definition of achievable targets for emission fluxes at
the city scale.</p>
      <p>The study utilizes a Bayesian inversion approach based on the WRF-GHG
modelling system at a high spatial resolution to optimize anthropogenic
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for the target region using CarbonSat simulated
observations for a time period of 1 year. The inverse system is designed in
such a way that one can quantify the random and systematic errors of the
retrieved anthropogenic emission fluxes for a given set of XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurement and modelling errors. The CarbonSat measurement errors are
estimated using the error parameterization scheme of Buchwitz et al. (2013a),
which takes into account different sources of uncertainties, including
scattering-related errors. Based on the EDGAR emission inventory, the local
anthropogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement over Berlin is found to be approximately
0.80–1.35 ppm. The latter is similar to the detectable limit of single
CarbonSat ground pixels. However, typically there will be several hundred
observations available per overpass, sampling the emission plume and its
surrounding. The impact of CarbonSat measurement errors on the retrieved
emissions is assessed for two swath widths (240 and 500 km). By performing a
Bayesian inversion based on 1 year of CarbonSat simulated observations, we
show that the random error of the retrieved Berlin CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions is
typically less than 15–20 % of the total city emissions. In other words,
the CarbonSat measurements can be utilized in atmospheric top-down approaches
to quantify emissions of medium-sized cities such as Berlin with a precision
better than 8–10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In order to quantify the SE of the retrieved fluxes, we
use different scenarios in terms of various sources of systematic error in
the inversion system. For scenario S01, we use CarbonSat's default
XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> systematic errors (retrieval biases) from Buchwitz et al. (2013a),
and assume no biogenic XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> modelling error. For S01, we find that SE is
in the range of 3–6 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for most of the cases
(40–80 % of the good overpasses as identified by the quality
filtering procedure), indicating a high potential of utilizing CarbonSat's
measurements to retrieve city emissions. Based on the analysis using a
1-year period of CarbonSat simulated observations, we show that narrowing
the swath width (from 500 to 240 km) decreases the total number of useful
overpasses, as expected, but we do not find any significant difference
between the single-overpass SEs estimated for the two swath widths
investigated here.</p>
      <p>As explained in Buchwitz et al. (2013b), the default XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> systematic
errors only reflect aerosol-related biases at quite low spatial resolution.
On the spatial scale of the city of Berlin, aerosol-related biases may be
larger. To consider this, we use the worst-case measurement scenario as
used by Buchwitz et al. (2013b), in which we assume that the aerosol-related
biases may be perfectly correlated with the signal of interest, which is the
city CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission plume in combination with a high amount of aerosols in
the plume. For this, we define a scenario S04 and refer to this as a high-resolution
aerosol error in this paper. The estimated emission
uncertainty for this scenario (S04) is found to be higher than that of S01,
with a mean and standard deviation of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
3.8 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p>The above-mentioned results, however, are mostly dominated by the assumption
that there is a negligible influence of biospheric fluxes that perturb the
emission plume over the target region, or that these biospheric contributions
can be modelled very well. By further investigating the extreme case in which
the biospheric contribution is assumed to be totally unknown and treated as
perturbation in the inversion system (scenario S03), we find that the
single-overpass SE of the retrieved emission is significantly increased to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation).
Nevertheless, the magnitude of the uncertainty is not overwhelmingly large
over the target region, despite the worst-case assumption used here. It
should be kept in mind that the above-mentioned uncertainty is not directly
related to the performance of CarbonSat measurements, but more towards the
model's inability in simulating the biospheric contribution well. Hence, for
the effective utilization of these measurements, the noises induced from
other sources have to be taken into account, which requires careful design of
the inverse optimization methodology using transport models at high
resolution, enabling them to handle the information contained in those
measurements. On comparing the results from different scenarios, we show that
the systematic error of the retrieved fluxes depends largely on the accuracy
of the CarbonSat simulated observations and more importantly on the modelling-related errors.</p>
      <p>Further investigation by designing a synthetic inversion experiment is
motivated by the possible impact of spatial structural variability of the
emission fluxes, which is not considered in the above-mentioned inversions.
We acknowledge that our current inversion setup is too simple to examine how
suitable CarbonSat measurements are for this purpose, as we use only one
scaling factor for the entire target region. Nevertheless, we find promising
results from this experiment in which the modelled and true XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations are based on two distinct emission inventories (IER and EDGAR)
differing in spatiotemporal patterns. By showing that the systemic error of
the retrieved fluxes is lower than the difference between the prior fluxes
and the true fluxes in most of the cases, the results from the inversion
experiment build confidence in our uncertainty estimations and ensure that
the optimization is done correctly. The random error of the retrieved
emissions for a single overpass is estimated to be less than
10 Mt CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for both swath widths. Hence, it is expected that
given the availability of the high-resolution CarbonSat simulated
observations, it is likely to deduce the structural patterns of the emission
fluxes. Based on the above analysis, however, no firm conclusion can be made
regarding the magnitude of the retrieved flux uncertainty when prior fluxes
significantly deviate from true fluxes in representing the structural
variations of emissions. For this purpose, a more sophisticated inverse
methodology involving additional extended state vectors and calculation of
the response function of the elements of the state vector (adjoint
calculation) is required. Since we use the same transport model to generate
the (pseudo) observations and the influence functions, the inversion results
shown here may be slightly optimistic. Although it is not within the scope of
this study, the transport-related errors are expected to be non-negligible
and should be properly addressed in the inverse modelling applications of
satellite data.</p>
      <p>Using the dense CarbonSat measurements in an inverse modelling framework at
high resolution is expected to improve the inference of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes by
disentangling different sources of variations. But to what extent one can
differentiate regional contributions from different sources should be
investigated in further detail.</p>
      <p>Overall, the present study demonstrates that an instrument like CarbonSat
has high potential to provide important information on city CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions when exploiting the atmospheric XCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations using a
high-resolution inverse modelling system. Utilizing these measurements
together with in situ, airborne, and other satellite measurements is expected
to provide more detailed and reliable information on natural and
anthropogenic fluxes, facilitating the monitoring of future climate
mitigation strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The L4 eddy covariance data set has been accessed from <uri>http://www.europe-fluxdata.eu/</uri>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank all principle investigators involved in the eddy covariance
measurements and all scientists involved in the L4 eddy covariance data set.
We would also like to thank François-Marie Bréon for his helpful
suggestions and careful review. This study has received funding from ESA
(projects LOGOFLUX-I and LOGOFLUX-II) and the State and the University of
Bremen.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this
open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by the Max Planck
Society.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: T. Butler<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Koerner, S., Neininger, B., Dolman,
A. J., and Sarrat, C.: Mesoscale covariance of transport and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes:
Evidence from observations and simulations using the WRF-VPRM coupled
atmospherebiosphere model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22107,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21029/22007JD008552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21029/22007JD008552</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Körner, S., Rödenbeck, C.,
Bousquet, P., and Ramonet, M.: Comparing high resolution WRF-VPRM simulations
and two global CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transport models with coastal tower measurements of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Biogeosciences, 6, 807–817, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-807-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-807-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Amstel, A. Van, Olivier, J. and Janssen, L.: Analysis of differences between
national inventories and an Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric
Research (EDGAR), Environ. Sci. Policy, 2, 275–293,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Beck, V., Koch, T., Kretschmer, R., Marshall, J., Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C.,
Pillai, D., and Heimann, M.: The WRF Greenhouse Gas Model (WRF-GHG),
Technical Report No. 25, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena,
Germany, available at: <uri>http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-systems/index.shtml</uri>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Berezin, E. V., Konovalov, I. B., Ciais, P., Richter, A., Tao, S.,
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Beekmann, M., and Schulze, E.-D.: Multiannual changes
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in China: indirect estimates derived from satellite
measurements of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9415–9438,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9415-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9415-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bergeron, O. and Strachan, I. B.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks in urban and
suburban areas of a northern mid-latitude city, Atmos. Environ., 45,
1564–1573, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.043</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noël, S.,
Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: Mission
Objectives and Measurement Modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bovensmann, H., Buchwitz, M., Burrows, J. P., Reuter, M., Krings, T.,
Gerilowski, K., Schneising, O., Heymann, J., Tretner, A., and Erzinger, J.:
A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from space and related applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3,
781–811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-781-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-781-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bréon, F. M., Broquet, G., Puygrenier, V., Chevallier, F., Xueref-Remy, I.,
Ramonet, M., Dieudonné, E., Lopez, M., Schmidt, M., Perrussel, O., and
Ciais, P.: An attempt at estimating Paris area CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from atmospheric
concentration measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1707–1724, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1707-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1707-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Pillai, D., Heymann, J., Schneising, O.,
Rozanov, V., Krings, T., Burrows, J. P., Boesch, H., Gerbig, C., Meijer, Y., and
Löscher, A.: Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat): assessment of atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval errors by error parameterization,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3477–3500, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3477-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3477-2013</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Pillai, D., Heymann, J.,
Schneising, O., Rozanov, V., Krings, T., Burrows, J. P., Boesch, H., Gerbig,
C., Meijer, Y., and Löscher, A.: Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat):
assessment of scattering related atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
errors and first results on implications for inferring city CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 6, 4769–4850,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amtd-6-4769-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amtd-6-4769-2013</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Burrows, J. P., Hölzle, E., Goede, A. P. H., Visser, H., and Fricke, W.:
SCIAMACHY-scanning imaging absorption spectrometer for atmospheric
chartography, Acta Astronaut., 35, 445–451,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(94)00278-T" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0094-5765(94)00278-T</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Dhakal, S., Dolman, H., Friedlingstein, P.,
Gurney, K. R., Held, A., Jackson, R. B., Le Quéré, C., Malone, E.
L., Ojima, D. S., Patwardhan, A., Peters, G. P., and Raupach, M. R.:
Interactions of the carbon cycle, human activity, and the climate system: a
research portfolio, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2, 301–311,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cosust.2010.08.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Corbin, K. D., Denning, A. S., and Gurney, K. R.: The space and time impacts
on U.S. regional atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from a high resolution
fossil fuel CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions inventory, Tellus B, 62, 506–511,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00480.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00480.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Crisp, D., Atlas, R. M., Breon, F. M., Brown, L. R., Burrows, J. P., Ciais,
P., Connor, B. J., Doney, S. C., Fung, I. Y., Jacob, D. J., Miller, C. E.,
O'Brien, D., Pawson, S., Randerson, J. T., Rayner, P., Salawitch, R. J.,
Sander, S. P., Sen, B., Stephens, G. L., Tans, P. P., Toon, G. C., Wennberg,
P. O., Wofsy, S. C., Yung, Y. L., Kuang, Z., Chudasama, B., Sprague, G.,
Weiss, B., Pollock, R., Kenyon, D., and Schroll, S.: The Orbiting Carbon
Observatory (OCO) mission, Adv. Sp. Res., 34, 700–709,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.062</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>EPA: Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014, Office
of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DC, available at:
<uri>https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/usinventoryreport.html</uri>, 2016</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>ESA: Report for Mission Selection: CarbonSat, ESA SP-1330/1 (2 volume
series), Noordwijk, the Netherlands, available at:
<uri>http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/EarthObservation/SP1330-1_CarbonSat.pdf</uri>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>European Commission: Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012
on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to
Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with
EEA relevance, Official Journal of the European Union L 181, 12.7.2012,
30–104, available at: <uri>http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/601/oj</uri>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Göckede, M., Michalak, A. M., Vickers, D., Turner, D. P., and Law, B. E.:
Atmospheric inverse modeling to constrain regional-scale CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets at
high spatial and temporal resolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D15113,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012257</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gregg, J. S., Andres, R. J., and Marland, G.: China: Emissions pattern of the
world leader in CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement
production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L08806, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032887</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gurney, K. R., Law, R. M., Denning, A. S., Rayner, P. J., Baker, D.,
Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y.-H., Ciais, P., Fan, S., Fung, I. Y.,
Gloor, M., Heimann, M., Higuchi, K., John, J., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S.,
Masarie, K., Peylin, P., Prather, M., Pak, B. C., Randerson, J., Sarmiento,
J., Taguchi, S., Takahashi, T., and Yuen, C.-W.: Towards robust regional
estimates of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models,
Nature, 415, 626–630, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/415626a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/415626a</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gurney, K. R., Chen, Y. H., Maki, T., Kawa, S. R., Andrews, A., and Zhu, Z.:
Sensitivity of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inversions to seasonal and interannual
variations in fossil fuel emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,
1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005373" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005373</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hase, F., Frey, M., Blumenstock, T., Groß, J., Kiel, M., Kohlhepp, R.,
Mengistu Tsidu, G., Schäfer, K., Sha, M. K., and Orphal, J.: Application
of portable FTIR spectrometers for detecting greenhouse gas emissions of the
major city Berlin, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3059–3068,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3059-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-3059-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Heimann, M. and Körner, S.: The Global Atmospheric Tracer Model TM3,
Technical Report No. 5, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena,
Germany, available at:
<uri>http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-systems/index.shtml</uri>, 2003</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ingmann, P., Veihelmann, B., Langen, J., Lamarre, D., Stark, H., and
Courrèges-Lacoste, G. B.: Requirements for the GMES Atmosphere Service
and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and -5p, Remote Sens.
Environ., 120, 58–69, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories,
the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, edited by: Eggleston, H. S.,
Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K., IGES, Japan, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Keppel-Aleks, G., Wennberg, P. O., O'Dell, C. W., and Wunch, D.: Towards
constraints on fossil fuel emissions from total column carbon dioxide,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4349–4357, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4349-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4349-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kort, E. A., Frankenberg, C., Miller, C. E., and Oda, T.: Space-based
observations of megacity carbon dioxide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L17806,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052738</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kretschmer, R., Gerbig, C., Karstens, U., Biavati, G., Vermeulen, A., Vogel, F.,
Hammer, S., and Totsche, K. U.: Impact of optimized mixing heights on simulated
regional atmospheric transport of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7149–7172,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7149-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7149-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Krings, T., Gerilowski, K., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Tretner, A., Erzinger, J.,
Heinze, D., Pflüger, U., Burrows, J. P., and Bovensmann, H.: MAMAP – a
new spectrometer system for column-averaged methane and carbon dioxide
observations from aircraft: retrieval algorithm and first inversions for
point source emission rates, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1735–1758, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1735-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1735-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kuze, A., Suto, H., Nakajima, M., and Hamazaki, T.: Thermal and near infrared
sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the
Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring, Appl.
Opt., 48, 6716–6733, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.006716" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.48.006716</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Levin, I., Hammer, S., Eichelmann, E., and Vogel, F. R.: Verification of
greenhouse gas emission reductions: the prospect of atmospheric monitoring
in polluted areas., Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 369,
1906–1924, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2010.0249</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Mahadevan, P., Wofsy, S. C., Matross, D. M., Xiao, X., Dunn, A. L., Lin, J.
C., Gerbig, C., Munger, J. W., Chow, V. Y., and Gottlieb, E. W.: A
satellite-based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM), Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB2005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002735</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Marland, G.: Uncertainties in accounting for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from fossil fuels, J.
Ind. Ecol., 12, 136–139, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00014.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00014.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Mays, K. L., Shepson, P. B., Stirm, B. H., Karion, A., Sweeney, C., and
Gurney, K. R.: Aircraft-based measurements of the carbon footprint of
Indianapolis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7816–7823,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es901326b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es901326b</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>McKain, K., Wofsy, S. C., Nehrkorn, T., Eluszkiewicz, J., Ehleringer, J. R.,
and Stephens, B. B.: Assessment of ground-based atmospheric observations for
verification of greenhouse gas emissions from an urban region, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 8423–8428, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116645109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1116645109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Newman, S., Jeong, S., Fischer, M. L., Xu, X., Haman, C. L., Lefer, B.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglueck, B., Kort, E. A., Andrews, A. E., Peischl, J.,
Gurney, K. R., Miller, C. E., and Yung, Y. L.: Diurnal tracking of anthropogenic
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in the Los Angeles basin megacity during spring 2010,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4359–4372, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4359-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4359-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Oda, T. and Maksyutov, S.: A very high-resolution (1 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 km)
global fossil fuel CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission inventory derived using a point source
database and satellite observations of nighttime lights, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 543–556, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-543-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-543-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Pacala, S. W., Breidenich, C., Brewer, P. G., Fung, I., Gunson, M. R.,
Heddle, G., Law, B., Marland, G., Paustian, K., Prather, M., Randerson, J.
T., Tans, P., Wofsy, S. C., Linn, A. M., Sturdivant, J., and Al., E.:
Verifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Methods to Support International Climate
Agreements, The National Academies Press, available at:
<uri>http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12883.html</uri>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Pillai, D., Gerbig, C., Marshall, J., Ahmadov, R., Kretschmer, R., Koch, T.,
and Karstens, U.: High resolution modeling of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over Europe: implications
for representation errors of satellite retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 83–94, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-83-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-83-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Pillai, D., Gerbig, C., Ahmadov, R., Rödenbeck, C., Kretschmer, R., Koch, T.,
Thompson, R., Neininger, B., and Lavrié, J. V.: High-resolution simulations
of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over complex terrain – representing the Ochsenkopf mountain
tall tower, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7445–7464, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7445-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7445-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Pillai, D., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Beck, V., Karstens, U., Neininger, B.,
and Heimann, M.: Comparing Lagrangian and Eulerian models for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transport – a
step towards Bayesian inverse modeling using WRF/STILT-VPRM, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 8979–8991, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8979-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8979-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Pregger, T., Scholz, Y., and Friedrich, R.: Documentation of the
anthropogenic GHG emission data for Europe provided in the frame of
CarboEurope GHG and CarboEurope IP, Final Report, University of Stuttgart,
IER – Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy,
available at: <uri>http://carboeurope.org/ceip/products/files/Pregger_IER_Final_Report_Feb2007.pdf</uri>,
2007</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Reuter, M., Buchwitz, M., Hilboll, A., Richter, A., Schneising, O., Hilker,
M., Heymann, J., Bovensmann, H., and Burrows, J. P.: Decreasing emissions of
NOx relative to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in East Asia inferred from satellite observations,
Nat. Geosci., 7, 792–795, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2257</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Rödenbeck, C.: Estimating CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks from atmospheric
mixing ratio measurements using a global inversion of atmospheric transport, available at:
<uri>http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/uploads/Publications/TechnicalReports/tech_report6.pdf</uri>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: Theory and
Practice, Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics – Vol. 2,
World Scientific, ISBN: 9814498688, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Burrows, J. P., Bovensmann, H., Reuter, M.,
Notholt, J., Macatangay, R., and Warneke, T.: Three years of greenhouse gas
column-averaged dry air mole fractions retrieved from satellite – Part 1:
Carbon dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3827–3853,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3827-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3827-2008</ext-link>, 2008. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Schneising, O., Heymann, J., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., and
Burrows, J. P.: Anthropogenic carbon dioxide source areas observed from
space: assessment of regional enhancements and trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
13, 2445–2454, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2445-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2445-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Silva, S. J., Arellano, A. F., and Worden, H. M: Toward anthropogenic
combustion emission constraints from space-based analysis of urban
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/CO sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lets., 40, 4971–4976, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Steinbach, J., Gerbig, C., Rödenbeck, C., Karstens, U., Minejima, C., and
Mukai, H.: The CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> release and Oxygen uptake from Fossil Fuel Emission
Estimate (COFFEE) dataset: effects from varying oxidative ratios, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 6855–6870, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6855-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6855-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Tolk, L. F., Meesters, A. G. C. A., Dolman, A. J., and Peters, W.: Modelling
representation errors of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios at a regional scale,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6587–6596, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6587-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6587-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Van Amstel, A., Olivier, J., and Janssen, L.: Analysis of differences between
national inventories and an Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric
Research (EDGAR), Environ. Sci. Policy, 2, 275–293,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Munger, J. W., Xu, S., McElroy, M. B., Hao, J., Nielsen, C. P., and Ma, H.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and its correlation with CO at a rural site near Beijing: implications for
combustion efficiency in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8881–8897, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8881-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8881-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
White, T., Jonas, M., Nahorski, Z. and Nilsson, S. (Eds.): Greenhouse gas
inventories: dealing with uncertainty, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands,
ISBN: 9400716699, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z.,
Hunt, W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP
data processing algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2310–2323,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Wong, K. W., Fu, D., Pongetti, T. J., Newman, S., Kort, E. A., Duren, R., Hsu, Y.-K.,
Miller, C. E., Yung, Y. L., and Sander, S. P.: Mapping CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios in Los Angeles with CLARS-FTS from Mount Wilson, California,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 241–252, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-241-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-241-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Zimnoch, M., Godlowska, J., Necki, J. M., and Rozanski, K.: Assessing surface
fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in urban environment: A reconnaissance
study in Krakow, Southern Poland, Tellus B,
62, 573–580, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00489.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00489.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Tracking city CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from space using a high-resolution inverse
modelling approach: a case study for Berlin, Germany</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Currently, 52 % of the world's population resides in urban areas and as a
consequence, approximately 70 % of fossil fuel emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>
arise from cities. This fact, in combination with large uncertainties
associated with quantifying urban emissions due to lack of appropriate
measurements, makes it crucial to obtain new measurements useful to identify
and quantify urban emissions. This is required, for example, for the
assessment of emission mitigation strategies and their effectiveness. Here,
we investigate the potential of a satellite mission like Carbon Monitoring
Satellite (CarbonSat) which was proposed to the European Space Agency (ESA)
to retrieve the city emissions globally, taking into account a realistic
description of the expected retrieval errors, the spatiotemporal distribution
of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, and atmospheric transport. To achieve this, we use (i) a
high-resolution modelling framework consisting of the Weather Research
Forecasting model with a greenhouse gas module (WRF-GHG), which is used to
simulate the atmospheric observations of column-averaged CO<sub>2</sub> dry air
mole fractions (XCO<sub>2</sub>), and (ii) a Bayesian inversion method to derive
anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and their errors from the CarbonSat
XCO<sub>2</sub> observations. We focus our analysis on Berlin, Germany using
CarbonSat's cloud-free overpasses for 1 reference year. The dense (wide
swath) CarbonSat simulated observations with high spatial resolution
(approximately 2 km  ×  2 km) permits one to map the city CO<sub>2</sub>
emission plume with a peak enhancement of typically 0.8–1.35 ppm relative
to the background. By performing a Bayesian inversion, it is shown that the
random error (RE) of the retrieved Berlin CO<sub>2</sub> emission for a single
overpass is typically less than 8–10 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup> (about
15–20 % of the total city emission). The range of systematic errors
(SEs) of the retrieved fluxes due to various sources of error (measurement,
modelling, and inventories) is also quantified. Depending on the assumptions
made, the SE is less than about 6–10 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup> for most
cases. We find that in particular systematic modelling-related errors can be
quite high during the summer months due to substantial XCO<sub>2</sub> variations
caused by biogenic CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes at and around the target region. When
making the extreme worst-case assumption that biospheric XCO<sub>2</sub> variations
cannot be modelled at all (which is overly pessimistic), the SE of the
retrieved emission is found to be larger than 10 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup> for
about half of the sufficiently cloud-free overpasses, and for some of the
overpasses we found that SE may even be on the order of magnitude of the
anthropogenic emission. This indicates that biogenic XCO<sub>2</sub> variations
cannot be neglected but must be considered during forward and/or inverse
modelling. Overall, we conclude that a satellite mission such as CarbonSat
has high potential to obtain city-scale CO<sub>2</sub> emissions as needed to
enhance our current understanding of anthropogenic carbon fluxes, and that
CarbonSat-like satellites should be an important component of a future global
carbon emission monitoring system.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Koerner, S., Neininger, B., Dolman,
A. J., and Sarrat, C.: Mesoscale covariance of transport and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes:
Evidence from observations and simulations using the WRF-VPRM coupled
atmospherebiosphere model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22107,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21029/22007JD008552" target="_blank">doi:10.21029/22007JD008552</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Körner, S., Rödenbeck, C.,
Bousquet, P., and Ramonet, M.: Comparing high resolution WRF-VPRM simulations
and two global CO<sub>2</sub> transport models with coastal tower measurements of
CO<sub>2</sub>, Biogeosciences, 6, 807–817, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-807-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-6-807-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Amstel, A. Van, Olivier, J. and Janssen, L.: Analysis of differences between
national inventories and an Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric
Research (EDGAR), Environ. Sci. Policy, 2, 275–293,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Beck, V., Koch, T., Kretschmer, R., Marshall, J., Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C.,
Pillai, D., and Heimann, M.: The WRF Greenhouse Gas Model (WRF-GHG),
Technical Report No. 25, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena,
Germany, available at: <a href="http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-systems/index.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-systems/index.shtml</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berezin, E. V., Konovalov, I. B., Ciais, P., Richter, A., Tao, S.,
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Beekmann, M., and Schulze, E.-D.: Multiannual changes
of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China: indirect estimates derived from satellite
measurements of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9415–9438,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9415-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-9415-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergeron, O. and Strachan, I. B.: CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks in urban and
suburban areas of a northern mid-latitude city, Atmos. Environ., 45,
1564–1573, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.043" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.043</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noël, S.,
Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: Mission
Objectives and Measurement Modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bovensmann, H., Buchwitz, M., Burrows, J. P., Reuter, M., Krings, T.,
Gerilowski, K., Schneising, O., Heymann, J., Tretner, A., and Erzinger, J.:
A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO<sub>2</sub>
emissions from space and related applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3,
781–811, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-781-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-3-781-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bréon, F. M., Broquet, G., Puygrenier, V., Chevallier, F., Xueref-Remy, I.,
Ramonet, M., Dieudonné, E., Lopez, M., Schmidt, M., Perrussel, O., and
Ciais, P.: An attempt at estimating Paris area CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from atmospheric
concentration measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1707–1724, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1707-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-1707-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Pillai, D., Heymann, J., Schneising, O.,
Rozanov, V., Krings, T., Burrows, J. P., Boesch, H., Gerbig, C., Meijer, Y., and
Löscher, A.: Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat): assessment of atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> retrieval errors by error parameterization,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3477–3500, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3477-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-6-3477-2013</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Pillai, D., Heymann, J.,
Schneising, O., Rozanov, V., Krings, T., Burrows, J. P., Boesch, H., Gerbig,
C., Meijer, Y., and Löscher, A.: Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat):
assessment of scattering related atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> retrieval
errors and first results on implications for inferring city CO<sub>2</sub>
emissions, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 6, 4769–4850,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amtd-6-4769-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amtd-6-4769-2013</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Burrows, J. P., Hölzle, E., Goede, A. P. H., Visser, H., and Fricke, W.:
SCIAMACHY-scanning imaging absorption spectrometer for atmospheric
chartography, Acta Astronaut., 35, 445–451,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(94)00278-T" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0094-5765(94)00278-T</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Dhakal, S., Dolman, H., Friedlingstein, P.,
Gurney, K. R., Held, A., Jackson, R. B., Le Quéré, C., Malone, E.
L., Ojima, D. S., Patwardhan, A., Peters, G. P., and Raupach, M. R.:
Interactions of the carbon cycle, human activity, and the climate system: a
research portfolio, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2, 301–311,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.08.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.08.003</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Corbin, K. D., Denning, A. S., and Gurney, K. R.: The space and time impacts
on U.S. regional atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations from a high resolution
fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> emissions inventory, Tellus B, 62, 506–511,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00480.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00480.x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Crisp, D., Atlas, R. M., Breon, F. M., Brown, L. R., Burrows, J. P., Ciais,
P., Connor, B. J., Doney, S. C., Fung, I. Y., Jacob, D. J., Miller, C. E.,
O'Brien, D., Pawson, S., Randerson, J. T., Rayner, P., Salawitch, R. J.,
Sander, S. P., Sen, B., Stephens, G. L., Tans, P. P., Toon, G. C., Wennberg,
P. O., Wofsy, S. C., Yung, Y. L., Kuang, Z., Chudasama, B., Sprague, G.,
Weiss, B., Pollock, R., Kenyon, D., and Schroll, S.: The Orbiting Carbon
Observatory (OCO) mission, Adv. Sp. Res., 34, 700–709,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.062" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.062</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
EPA: Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014, Office
of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DC, available at:
<a href="https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/usinventoryreport.html" target="_blank">https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/usinventoryreport.html</a>, 2016
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
ESA: Report for Mission Selection: CarbonSat, ESA SP-1330/1 (2 volume
series), Noordwijk, the Netherlands, available at:
<a href="http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/EarthObservation/SP1330-1_CarbonSat.pdf" target="_blank">http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/EarthObservation/SP1330-1_CarbonSat.pdf</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
European Commission: Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012
on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to
Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with
EEA relevance, Official Journal of the European Union L 181, 12.7.2012,
30–104, available at: <a href="http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/601/oj" target="_blank">http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/601/oj</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Göckede, M., Michalak, A. M., Vickers, D., Turner, D. P., and Law, B. E.:
Atmospheric inverse modeling to constrain regional-scale CO<sub>2</sub> budgets at
high spatial and temporal resolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D15113,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012257" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD012257</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gregg, J. S., Andres, R. J., and Marland, G.: China: Emissions pattern of the
world leader in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement
production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L08806, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032887" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL032887</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gurney, K. R., Law, R. M., Denning, A. S., Rayner, P. J., Baker, D.,
Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y.-H., Ciais, P., Fan, S., Fung, I. Y.,
Gloor, M., Heimann, M., Higuchi, K., John, J., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S.,
Masarie, K., Peylin, P., Prather, M., Pak, B. C., Randerson, J., Sarmiento,
J., Taguchi, S., Takahashi, T., and Yuen, C.-W.: Towards robust regional
estimates of CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models,
Nature, 415, 626–630, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/415626a" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/415626a</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gurney, K. R., Chen, Y. H., Maki, T., Kawa, S. R., Andrews, A., and Zhu, Z.:
Sensitivity of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inversions to seasonal and interannual
variations in fossil fuel emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,
1–13, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005373" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005373</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hase, F., Frey, M., Blumenstock, T., Groß, J., Kiel, M., Kohlhepp, R.,
Mengistu Tsidu, G., Schäfer, K., Sha, M. K., and Orphal, J.: Application
of portable FTIR spectrometers for detecting greenhouse gas emissions of the
major city Berlin, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3059–3068,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3059-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-8-3059-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Heimann, M. and Körner, S.: The Global Atmospheric Tracer Model TM3,
Technical Report No. 5, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena,
Germany, available at:
<a href="http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-systems/index.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgc-systems/index.shtml</a>, 2003
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ingmann, P., Veihelmann, B., Langen, J., Lamarre, D., Stark, H., and
Courrèges-Lacoste, G. B.: Requirements for the GMES Atmosphere Service
and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and -5p, Remote Sens.
Environ., 120, 58–69, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories,
the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, edited by: Eggleston, H. S.,
Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K., IGES, Japan, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Keppel-Aleks, G., Wennberg, P. O., O'Dell, C. W., and Wunch, D.: Towards
constraints on fossil fuel emissions from total column carbon dioxide,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4349–4357, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4349-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4349-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kort, E. A., Frankenberg, C., Miller, C. E., and Oda, T.: Space-based
observations of megacity carbon dioxide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L17806,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052738" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012GL052738</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kretschmer, R., Gerbig, C., Karstens, U., Biavati, G., Vermeulen, A., Vogel, F.,
Hammer, S., and Totsche, K. U.: Impact of optimized mixing heights on simulated
regional atmospheric transport of CO<sub>2</sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7149–7172,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7149-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-7149-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Krings, T., Gerilowski, K., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Tretner, A., Erzinger, J.,
Heinze, D., Pflüger, U., Burrows, J. P., and Bovensmann, H.: MAMAP – a
new spectrometer system for column-averaged methane and carbon dioxide
observations from aircraft: retrieval algorithm and first inversions for
point source emission rates, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1735–1758, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1735-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-4-1735-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kuze, A., Suto, H., Nakajima, M., and Hamazaki, T.: Thermal and near infrared
sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the
Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring, Appl.
Opt., 48, 6716–6733, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.006716" target="_blank">doi:10.1364/AO.48.006716</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Levin, I., Hammer, S., Eichelmann, E., and Vogel, F. R.: Verification of
greenhouse gas emission reductions: the prospect of atmospheric monitoring
in polluted areas., Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 369,
1906–1924, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0249" target="_blank">doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0249</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mahadevan, P., Wofsy, S. C., Matross, D. M., Xiao, X., Dunn, A. L., Lin, J.
C., Gerbig, C., Munger, J. W., Chow, V. Y., and Gottlieb, E. W.: A
satellite-based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub>
exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM), Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB2005, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002735" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GB002735</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Marland, G.: Uncertainties in accounting for CO<sub>2</sub> from fossil fuels, J.
Ind. Ecol., 12, 136–139, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00014.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00014.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Mays, K. L., Shepson, P. B., Stirm, B. H., Karion, A., Sweeney, C., and
Gurney, K. R.: Aircraft-based measurements of the carbon footprint of
Indianapolis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7816–7823,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es901326b" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es901326b</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
McKain, K., Wofsy, S. C., Nehrkorn, T., Eluszkiewicz, J., Ehleringer, J. R.,
and Stephens, B. B.: Assessment of ground-based atmospheric observations for
verification of greenhouse gas emissions from an urban region, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 8423–8428, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116645109" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1116645109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Newman, S., Jeong, S., Fischer, M. L., Xu, X., Haman, C. L., Lefer, B.,
Alvarez, S., Rappenglueck, B., Kort, E. A., Andrews, A. E., Peischl, J.,
Gurney, K. R., Miller, C. E., and Yung, Y. L.: Diurnal tracking of anthropogenic
CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the Los Angeles basin megacity during spring 2010,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4359–4372, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4359-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-4359-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Oda, T. and Maksyutov, S.: A very high-resolution (1 km × 1 km)
global fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> emission inventory derived using a point source
database and satellite observations of nighttime lights, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 543–556, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-543-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-543-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Pacala, S. W., Breidenich, C., Brewer, P. G., Fung, I., Gunson, M. R.,
Heddle, G., Law, B., Marland, G., Paustian, K., Prather, M., Randerson, J.
T., Tans, P., Wofsy, S. C., Linn, A. M., Sturdivant, J., and Al., E.:
Verifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Methods to Support International Climate
Agreements, The National Academies Press, available at:
<a href="http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12883.html" target="_blank">http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12883.html</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Pillai, D., Gerbig, C., Marshall, J., Ahmadov, R., Kretschmer, R., Koch, T.,
and Karstens, U.: High resolution modeling of CO<sub>2</sub> over Europe: implications
for representation errors of satellite retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 83–94, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-83-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-83-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Pillai, D., Gerbig, C., Ahmadov, R., Rödenbeck, C., Kretschmer, R., Koch, T.,
Thompson, R., Neininger, B., and Lavrié, J. V.: High-resolution simulations
of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> over complex terrain – representing the Ochsenkopf mountain
tall tower, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7445–7464, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7445-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-7445-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Pillai, D., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Beck, V., Karstens, U., Neininger, B.,
and Heimann, M.: Comparing Lagrangian and Eulerian models for CO<sub>2</sub> transport – a
step towards Bayesian inverse modeling using WRF/STILT-VPRM, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 8979–8991, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8979-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-8979-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pregger, T., Scholz, Y., and Friedrich, R.: Documentation of the
anthropogenic GHG emission data for Europe provided in the frame of
CarboEurope GHG and CarboEurope IP, Final Report, University of Stuttgart,
IER – Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy,
available at: <a href="http://carboeurope.org/ceip/products/files/Pregger_IER_Final_Report_Feb2007.pdf" target="_blank">http://carboeurope.org/ceip/products/files/Pregger_IER_Final_Report_Feb2007.pdf</a>,
2007
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Reuter, M., Buchwitz, M., Hilboll, A., Richter, A., Schneising, O., Hilker,
M., Heymann, J., Bovensmann, H., and Burrows, J. P.: Decreasing emissions of
NOx relative to CO<sub>2</sub> in East Asia inferred from satellite observations,
Nat. Geosci., 7, 792–795, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2257" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo2257</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Rödenbeck, C.: Estimating CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks from atmospheric
mixing ratio measurements using a global inversion of atmospheric transport, available at:
<a href="http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/uploads/Publications/TechnicalReports/tech_report6.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/uploads/Publications/TechnicalReports/tech_report6.pdf</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: Theory and
Practice, Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics – Vol. 2,
World Scientific, ISBN: 9814498688, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Burrows, J. P., Bovensmann, H., Reuter, M.,
Notholt, J., Macatangay, R., and Warneke, T.: Three years of greenhouse gas
column-averaged dry air mole fractions retrieved from satellite – Part 1:
Carbon dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3827–3853,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3827-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-3827-2008</a>, 2008. 
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Schneising, O., Heymann, J., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., and
Burrows, J. P.: Anthropogenic carbon dioxide source areas observed from
space: assessment of regional enhancements and trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
13, 2445–2454, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2445-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-2445-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Silva, S. J., Arellano, A. F., and Worden, H. M: Toward anthropogenic
combustion emission constraints from space-based analysis of urban
CO<sub>2</sub>/CO sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lets., 40, 4971–4976, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Steinbach, J., Gerbig, C., Rödenbeck, C., Karstens, U., Minejima, C., and
Mukai, H.: The CO<sub>2</sub> release and Oxygen uptake from Fossil Fuel Emission
Estimate (COFFEE) dataset: effects from varying oxidative ratios, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 11, 6855–6870, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6855-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-6855-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Tolk, L. F., Meesters, A. G. C. A., Dolman, A. J., and Peters, W.: Modelling
representation errors of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> mixing ratios at a regional scale,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6587–6596, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6587-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-6587-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Van Amstel, A., Olivier, J., and Janssen, L.: Analysis of differences between
national inventories and an Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric
Research (EDGAR), Environ. Sci. Policy, 2, 275–293,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00019-2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Munger, J. W., Xu, S., McElroy, M. B., Hao, J., Nielsen, C. P., and Ma, H.: CO<sub>2</sub>
and its correlation with CO at a rural site near Beijing: implications for
combustion efficiency in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8881–8897, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8881-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-8881-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
White, T., Jonas, M., Nahorski, Z. and Nilsson, S. (Eds.): Greenhouse gas
inventories: dealing with uncertainty, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands,
ISBN: 9400716699, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z.,
Hunt, W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP
data processing algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2310–2323,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, K. W., Fu, D., Pongetti, T. J., Newman, S., Kort, E. A., Duren, R., Hsu, Y.-K.,
Miller, C. E., Yung, Y. L., and Sander, S. P.: Mapping CH<sub>4</sub> : CO<sub>2</sub>
ratios in Los Angeles with CLARS-FTS from Mount Wilson, California,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 241–252, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-241-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-241-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Zimnoch, M., Godlowska, J., Necki, J. M., and Rozanski, K.: Assessing surface
fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> in urban environment: A reconnaissance
study in Krakow, Southern Poland, Tellus B,
62, 573–580, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00489.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00489.x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
