<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-8431-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurements of non-volatile aerosols with a VTDMA and their correlations
with carbonaceous aerosols in Guangzhou, China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Measurements of non-volatile aerosols with a VTDMA}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~H.~Y.~Cheung et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cheung</surname><given-names>Heidi H. Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>Haobo</given-names></name>
          <email>hbtan@grmc.gov.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Hanbing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Fei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7950-7044</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Cheng</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-968X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Jian Z.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6165-6500</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>Chak K.</given-names></name>
          <email>chak.k.chan@cityu.edu.hk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-8771</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Division of Environment, Hong Kong University of Science
and Technology, Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, China
Meteorological Administration, Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science
and Technology, Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Hong
Kong University of Science and Technology,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong
Kong, Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Haobo Tan (hbtan@grmc.gov.cn) and Chak K. Chan
(chak.k.chan@cityu.edu.hk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>8431</fpage><lpage>8446</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Simultaneous measurements of aerosol volatility and carbonaceous matters were
conducted at a suburban site in Guangzhou, China, in February and March 2014
using a volatility tandem differential mobility analyzer (VTDMA) and an
organic carbon/elemental carbon (OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC) analyzer. Low volatility (LV)
particles, with a volatility shrink factor (VSF) at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
exceeding 0.9, contributed 5 % of number concentrations of the 40 nm
particles and 11–15 % of the 80–300 nm particles. They were composed of
non-volatile material externally mixed with volatile material, and therefore
did not evaporate significantly at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Non-volatile material
mixed internally with the volatile material was referred to as medium
volatility (MV, 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> VSF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9) and high volatility (HV, VSF
 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4) particles. The MV and HV particles contributed 57–71 % of
number concentration for the particles between 40 and 300 nm in size. The
average EC and OC concentrations measured by the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer were
3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 and 9.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
Non-volatile OC evaporating at 475 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C or above, together with EC,
contributed 67 % of the total carbon mass. In spite of the daily maximum
and minimum, the diurnal variations in the volume fractions of the volatile
material, HV, MV and LV residuals were less than 15 % for the 80–300 nm
particles. Back trajectory analysis also suggests that over 90 % of the air
masses influencing the sampling site were well aged as they were transported
at low altitudes (below 1500 m) for over 40 h before arrival. Further
comparison with the diurnal variations in the mass fractions of EC and the
non-volatile OC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that the non-volatile residuals may be
related to both EC and non-volatile OC in the afternoon, during which the
concentration of aged organics increased. A closure analysis of the total
mass of LV and MV residuals and the mass of EC or the sum of EC and
non-volatile OC was conducted. It suggests that non-volatile OC, in addition
to EC, was one of the components of the non-volatile residuals measured by
the VTDMA in this study.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Carbonaceous aerosols comprising organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon
(EC) or black carbon (BC) are one of the major light absorption constituents
and are abundant in particulate matter (PM) (Rosen et al., 1978; Hansen et
al., 1984; Japar et al., 1986; Chow et al., 1993; Horvath, 1993; Liousse et
al., 1993; Fuller et al., 1999; Putaud et al., 2010; Tao et al., 2014; Zhang
et al., 2015). In China, the worsening of visibility degradation associated
with PM has been of increasing concern in recent years. In particular,
numerous studies on air pollution were carried out in different cities in
China including the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, which is a
fast-developing economic zone (Cheng et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2007; Andreae
et al., 2008; Chan and Yao, 2008; Gnauk et al., 2008; Tan et al., 2013a). In
2007, the mass concentrations of EC and OC measured at an urban Guangzhou
(GZ) site were reported to vary from 6.8 to 9.4 and from 13.4 to
22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Yu et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Soot particles are often characterized in terms of EC and BC, depending on
whether they are measured thermally or optically (Penner and Novakov, 1996;
Lavanchy et al., 1999; Cheng et al., 2011, and references therein). Their
optical properties are distinct when they are freshly produced (Novakov et
al., 2003). After aging processes such as cloud processing, chemical
reactions and coagulation, their structure, shape, size, mixing state and
thus optical properties change (Horvath, 1993; Liousse et al., 1993; Ghazi
and Olfert, 2012). EC is typically measured by thermal methods such as the
OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer (Chow et al., 2007), whereas BC is optically measured
using instruments such as aethalometers (Hansen et al., 1984), multi-angle
absorption photometers (Petzold and Schönlinner, 2004) and particle soot
absorption photometers (Virkkula et al., 2005). However, it is not possible
to retrieve the mixing state of soot particles with these techniques. To
determine the mixing state of soot particles, a single-particle soot
photometer (Stephens et al., 2003), a soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer
(Onasch et al., 2012) and the volatility tandem differential mobility
analyzer (VTDMA) (Philippin et al., 2004) have been used.</p>
      <p>Ambient aerosols have varying volatility properties based on their chemical
compositions. VTDMA was first introduced by Rader and McMurry (1986) to study
the behavior of aerosols upon thermal treatment. A volatility shrink factor
(VSF) is defined as the ratio of the particle size after exposure to elevated
temperature to the original particle size. Later, Philippin et al. (2004)
developed a VTDMA that was capable of evaporating volatile material in
aerosols at temperatures up to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Non-volatile compounds at
300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, such as EC, non-volatile organics and sea salt, can
internally mix with (or be coated with) volatile material. Note that the
terms “volatile” and “non-volatile” are here defined based on the
operational parameters and how the aerosol behaves, when heated to
300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the VTDMA. They are different from the volatilities
defined under ambient conditions (Donahue et al., 2009; Murphy et al., 2014)
or in other measurement techniques (Twomey, 1968; Pinnick et al., 1987;
Huffman et al., 2009). The composition of these non-volatile residuals can
vary spatially and temporally. Previous studies have demonstrated a good
agreement between the mass concentration of BC and the mass concentration of
non-volatile particles that experienced size reductions of 5 to 10 % upon
heating at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the VTDMA (Frey et al., 2008). Various studies
have also used the VTDMA to estimate the mixing states of soot particles
(Philippin et al., 2004; Rose et al., 2011; Levy et al., 2014; Zhang et al.,
2016). Particles with small volatile fractions, i.e., VSF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 at
300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, are often assumed to be soot particles externally mixed with
particles with volatile material at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Particles with larger
volatile fractions, i.e., VSF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, were assumed to
represent soot particles internally mixed (coated) with the volatile material
(Cheng et al., 2006; Wehner et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>Organics also contribute to light absorption by atmospheric particles (Bond,
2001; Kirchstetter et al., 2004; Chen and Bond, 2010). Laboratory studies
have shown that organic aerosols may form low volatility oligomers after
aging for a long time (e.g., Kalberer et al., 2004). Huffman et al. (2009)
showed that highly oxygenated, aged organic aerosols exhibited similar or
lower volatility than the primary organic aerosols or the less oxygenated
particles. Recently, Häkkinen et al. (2012) compared the residual mass
derived from a volatility differential mobility particle sizer (VDMPS) at
280 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with BC measured by an aethalometer and organics measured by
an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS). It was found that the mass
fraction remaining of non-BC residuals in VDMPS measurements was positively
correlated with the mass fraction of organics in AMS measurements.</p>
      <p>In this study, simultaneous measurements of aerosols volatility and
carbonaceous matter were made at a suburban site in Guangzhou, China, during
wintertime in February and March 2014 using a VTDMA and a semi-continuous
OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer, respectively. The volatility measurements were made for
ambient aerosols ranging from 40 to 300 nm in diameter. Here residuals
remaining after heating at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the VTDMA are referred to as
non-volatile in this study. We report the average values, time series and
diurnal variations in the number and volume fractions of the volatile and
non-volatile material, as well as the OC and EC concentrations. We examine
the relationships of the non-volatile material upon heating at
300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to EC and to the non-volatile OC, based on analyses of the
diurnal patterns and mass closures of the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC and VTDMA data.
Finally, we discuss the influence of air mass origins on the volatility of
the sampled aerosols and concentrations of OC and EC based on back-trajectory
analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Measurement details</title>
      <p>The campaign took place at the China Meteorological Administration (CMA)
Atmospheric Watch Network (CAWNET) station in Panyu, Guangzhou, China, in
summer from July to September 2013 and in winter from February to March 2014.
The station is operated by the Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology
(ITMM) of the CMA. The Panyu station is located at the center of the PRD
region and on the top of Dazhengang (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>23</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn>00</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>113</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn>21</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E) with an altitude of about 150 m (Fig. S1 in the
Supplement) (Tan et al., 2013a). It is about 120 m above the city and is
surrounded by residential neighborhoods with no significant industrial
pollution sources nearby. Measurements of particle number size distributions,
volatility, and mass concentrations of EC and OC in winter were made from
6 February to 21 March 2014. Some of the measurements were not made
continuously due to maintenance work, and hence only the periods with
concurrent VTDMA and OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC measurements were analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>VTDMA measurements</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>A schematic diagram of the volatility tandem differential mobility
analyzer (VTDMA).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f01.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>We used a custom-made VTDMA based on a hygroscopic TDMA system developed in
ITMM (Tan et al., 2013b), with the humidifier between the two DMAs replaced
by a heated tube that induces evaporation of volatile material. In our VTDMA
system shown in Fig. 1, ambient aerosols were sampled by a PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inlet
and subsequently passed through a dryer at relative humidity below 20 %.
The dry aerosols were then directed through a neutralizer and entered the
first differential mobility analyzer (DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Stream 1) to produce
mono-disperse aerosols of diameter between 40 and 300 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
mono-disperse aerosols went either via path (a) or (b) in Fig. 1 after
leaving the DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In path (a), they (Stream 2) were directed to a
condensation particle counter (CPC, TSI Model 3772) to obtain particle
counts, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The particle number size distribution of the ambient
aerosols, d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was also measured by varying the
DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> voltage (SMPS scan). Afterwards, the mono-disperse aerosols were
directed via path (b) to a heated tube for volatility measurement (V-Mode)
sequentially at 25, 100 and 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The heating tube was a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
80 cm long stainless steel tube with an inner diameter of 8 mm. With a
sample flow rate of 1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the resulting residence time in the
heated section of the VTDMA was 2.4 s. The estimated aerosol velocity on the
center line was 0.33 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared to the residence time of 0.3 to
1 s in other VTDMA systems (e.g., Brooks et al., 2002; Philippin et al.,
2004; Villani et al., 2007), the residence time in our VTDMA is assumed to be
long enough for the volatile material to be effectively vaporized. After
leaving the heating tube, the flow entered a heat exchanger measuring 30 cm
in length to ensure sufficient cooling before entering DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Upon heating, volatile components of particles such as sulfate, nitrate and
volatile organics vaporize at different temperatures depending on their
volatilities. As mentioned in Sect. 1, the volatility shrink factor,
VSF, is defined as the ratio of particle diameter after heating at temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to the diameter before heating, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>VSF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The VSF indicates the size reduction of the ambient particles upon heating. The
value of VSF is always smaller than or equal to one, depending on the amount of
volatile material vaporized at the heating temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The VSF is used to
divide the particles into three groups, namely low volatility (LV), medium
volatility (MV) and high volatility (HV) particles. In this study, we focus
on the measurements made at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The VSF ranges for the LV, MV and
HV particles upon heating at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are defined as follows: above
0.9, between 0.4 and 0.9 and below 0.4, respectively (Fig. 2)  (Wehner et
al., 2004, 2009).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Examples of particle size distributions of <bold>(a)</bold> ambient
aerosols before entering DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> residuals of the
size-selected particles (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after heating at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The
distributions in <bold>(a, b)</bold> correspond to (1) and (2) in Fig. 1,
respectively. Residuals are divided into three groups – LV (blue), MV
(green) and HV (red) – based on their VSF. CV (purple) and VM (orange) are
vaporized and hence not measured as residuals. VM appears as coating for
illustration purposes only. It does not necessarily reflect the morphology of
the particles.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The size distribution, d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the remaining
particles (hereafter the residuals), was measured by DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CPC
(Fig. 2b). It can provide information of the mixing state of the sampled
aerosols. A uni-modal distribution indicates the presence of internally mixed
particles exhibiting uniform size reduction upon heating, whereas a
multi-modal distribution indicates externally mixed particles of different
composition and volatilities. In the multi-modal distribution, each mode
represents particles of similar composition and volatility. In this study,
multiple modes of LV, MV and HV were observed in the distribution after
heating. The LV particles were assumed to represent EC and non-volatile OC
externally mixed with the volatile material, while MV and HV particles were
assumed to represent EC and non-volatile OC internally mixed with volatile
material. While the volatile material in the MV and HV particles was referred
to as VM, this exists as external mixtures with the LV, MV and HV particles
were referred to as completely vaporized (CV) particles. The CV particles
evaporated completely without leaving behind any residuals at
300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Excluding particle diffusional and thermophoretic losses,
and assuming that the residual material did not evaporate to the sizes below
the detection limit of the CPC (here 10 nm), the evaporation of VM and CV
did not change the number concentrations of LV, MV and HV particles.</p>
      <p>Overall it took around 1.5 to 2 h to complete a cycle of measurements that
consisted of SMPS scans and V-Mode measurements at 25, 100 and
300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. At each temperature, the sampling time for six selected
diameters from DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (40, 80, 110, 150, 200 and 300 nm) took about half
an hour and SMPS scans were made in-between. Hereafter, notations with the
superscript prime refer to the LV, MV or HV residuals measured by DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and CPC after heating, while the corresponding ones without the prime refer
to the LV, MV or HV residuals in ambient aerosols prior to heating.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{OC\,$/$\,EC measurements}?><title>OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC measurements</title>
      <p>A semi-continuous Sunset OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer (Model 4) was used to measure
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations of organic carbon and elemental carbon,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, on an hourly basis (Turpin et
al., 1990; Birch and Cary, 1996; Wu et al., 2012). With the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC
analyzer the ACE-Asia protocol (a NIOSH-derived protocol) was adopted, in
which OC was evaporated at four set temperatures of 310, 475, 615 and
870 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with pure helium (He) as a carrier gas, whereas EC was
combusted at temperatures between 550 and 870 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C under He and 2 %
oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schauer et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2012). The OC contents
were named OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the temperature protocol of the
OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer (Table 1). The mass of EC determined at different
temperatures was grouped together in subsequent analysis.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and residence time (RT) protocol of the
semi-continuous Sunset OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer  (Wu et al., 2012).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbon fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carrier gas</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RT (s)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">He</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">310</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">475</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">615</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">870</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">He and 2 % O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">550</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">625</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">700</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">775</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">870</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>It is plausible that in the VTDMA measurements, there were volatile or
semi-volatile OC that vaporize at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C or below. This vaporized OC
is assumed to correspond to OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was vaporized at 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
although this OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC temperature was slightly higher than the
temperature of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the VTDMA. With this assumption, the
residual particles of the VTDMA at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (LV and MV residuals) are
postulated to consist of (1) OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were vaporized at
475 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and above, and (2) EC and other refractory PM components. We
have ignored the HV residuals as their contributions to the total volume of
the particles were insignificant in comparison with LV and MV residuals
(Sect. 3.1). In Sect. 3.5, we will conduct a mass closure analysis based on
the VTDMA and OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC measurements to examine this assumption.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Number fractions</title>
      <p>The number fractions of LV, MV and HV residuals (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>HV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with their sum being equal
to unity) in Stream 2 in Fig. 1 were obtained from d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by the VTDMA. However, these fractions do not
represent the actual number fractions of LV, MV and HV particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>HV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before
heating because some of the particles can evaporate completely (CV) and due
to diffusion and thermophoretic losses. The number fraction of CV (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was first obtained by considering the number fractions of
the residuals (1–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the number concentrations at a
selected diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before heating (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and after heating (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the transport efficiency of particles.</p>
      <p>In Eq. (2) we assume that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the same for LV, MV and HV particles.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for particle losses between DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and DMA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to
diffusion and thermophoretic forces (Philippin et al., 2004), and it varies
as a function of particle size and heating temperature. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at each
particle diameter and VTDMA temperature was determined in laboratory
calibrations with sodium chloride (NaCl) particles, which do not evaporate
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the temperatures used in our experiments.
The transmission efficiency of NaCl of several selected diameters in
temperatures between 50 and 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is provided in the Supplement
(Fig. S2). From the known <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and observational data obtained with the
VTDMA providing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated
from Eq. (2). Afterwards, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>HV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were obtained by renormalizing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>HV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
(1-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> so that the sum of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>HV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equaled
unity.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Volume fractions</title>
      <p>The volume fractions of LV, MV, HV residuals and CV (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>HV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at each
selected diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined as the ratios of the volume of LV, MV,
HV residuals and CV to the total volume of the mono-disperse particles before
heating. By assuming that the residuals are spherical in shape, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>HV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
calculated by
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the number concentration and mean residual
diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> LV, MV or HV residuals.</p>
      <p>For LV particles, it is assumed that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
same and hence <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the same as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
MV and HV particles, the mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to
the evaporation of volatile material. The number weighted mean residual
diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated by
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the residual diameter and number
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MV or HV at the 75 diameter bins (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of VSF, respectively.</p>
      <p>The volume fractions of the evaporated material were calculated from the
volume fractions of the residuals. The calculation for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
similar to that for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since the particle has
completely vaporized, the vaporized volume is equivalent to the volume of
the original particle. Hence, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the same as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since the sum of the total volume fraction
of CV, VM and the residuals of LV, MV, and HV equaled unity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VM</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained after the above volume fractions were
calculated. Furthermore, we also calculated the volume fraction remaining
(VFR), defined as the volume ratio of the residual to its host particle, to
aid our discussions later:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VFR</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the number concentration and mean residual
diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MV or HV after heating, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Particle size distributions of number, volume and mass
concentrations of LV, MV and HV residuals</title>
      <p>Due to the differences in the size cuts of the VTDMA and the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC
analyzer, log-normal fits extrapolated to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m were applied to the
particle number size distributions of the residuals of LV, MV and HV
(d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LV, MV or HV) to estimate the
volume and then mass concentrations of the ambient aerosols for comparison
with PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC measurements. The volume size distributions
(d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated by
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dlog</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dlog</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean residual diameter as defined in Sect. 2.2.2.</p>
      <p>Volume (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of LV, MV and HV residuals can then be calculated
by integrating the area under the fitted curves. As we only focus on LV and
MV, densities of 1.0 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Hitzenberger et
al., 1999) and 1.5 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are applied to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to obtain
mass (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of LV and MV residuals, respectively. The choice of
the densities is based on the assumption that LV and MV residuals are
dominated by soot and non-volatile OC, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Overview</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Temporal variation of number concentrations of HV, MV and LV in 40
and 300 nm particles, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, major meteorological parameters, OC and EC
concentrations, OC-to-EC ratio and particle number size distributions in the
campaign. Air mass clusters are depicted at the top and the shaded areas
indicate days with daily averaged PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations exceeding
95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The time series of meteorological conditions, particle number size
distribution, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC and EC concentrations during the campaign are
presented in Fig. 3. Overall, the campaign was under the influence of the
prevailing northerly wind with an average wind speed and temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation) of 1.73 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.95 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
14.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively. The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration was 48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A few colder periods
were observed, during which the wind speed increased and the temperature
decreased. In general, the low wind speed favored the accumulation of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the campaign OC concentrations ranged from 0.5 to
47.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of
9.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while EC concentrations ranged from
0.2 to 23.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of
3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the most volatile group
among OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analysis, accounted for one-third
of the total carbon mass (Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Average mass fractions of EC, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>On 17 February and 12 and 17 March 2014, the daily averaged PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations exceeded 95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and they were nearly twice
the daily averaged values of the other days (Fig. 3, shaded area in grey).
Results of 72 h back trajectories (Stein et al., 2015; Rolph, 2016) showed
that air masses arriving at the site on or before these 3 days mostly
originated from the continental or oceanic area close to Eastern China
(Fig. S3). The SMPS data also showed a mode near 100 nm with a high particle
number concentration (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>The temporal variation of the number concentration of MV particles having an
initial diameter of 80 nm or above tracked reasonably well with the
accumulation of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as the particles aged and became more internally
mixed (Figs. 3 and S4). Furthermore, the number concentration of MV
particles showed a size dependence in the 80–300 nm particles. There were
days, e.g., from 24 February to 10 March 2014, when the number concentration of 300 nm MV particles did not track well with PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration.
The mode of the total particle number size distribution was below 100 nm
and the number concentrations of 300 nm particles were low (Fig. 3).
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration tracked better the number concentrations of 80
to 150 nm MV particles (Figs. S4a to S4c) than those of 200 and 300 nm
MV particles (Figs. S4d and S4e).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of average number and volume fractions in VTDMA
measurements at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Diameter (nm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">300</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.153</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.174 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.097</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.188 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.081</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.167 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.074</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.153 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.070</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.141 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.065</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.255 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.097</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.198 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.052</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.165 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.055</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.163 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.178 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.081</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.214 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.097</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.314 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.097</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.513 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.089</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.515 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.098</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.530 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.105</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.523 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.116</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.497 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.125</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.051 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.113 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.040</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.132 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.041</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.140 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.041</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.146 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.044</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.148 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.047</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Volume fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.503 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.131</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.600 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.082</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.580 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.073</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.590 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.066</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.602 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.627 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.361 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.168</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.163 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.105</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.166 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.098</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.148 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.086</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.134 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.080</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.127 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.073</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.014 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.011 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.008 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.007 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.007 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.007 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.070 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.112 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.112 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.115 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.109 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.027</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.091 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.052 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.114 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.040</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.134 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.044</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.140 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.042</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.148 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.048</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.148 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.047</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The average number and volume fractions of CV, HV, MV and LV in VTDMA
measurements at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are summarized in Table 2. VM is internally
mixed with MV and HV residuals, and hence does not have a separate
contribution to number concentrations. Overall, HV and MV particles, an
indicator for aged aerosols with internally mixed non-volatile and volatile
material, accounted for 57 to 71 % of the total particle number
concentration. Non-volatile material (LV, MV and HV residuals) accounted for
15 to 26 % of the total volume of selected particles before heating. While
the CV and HV fractions were larger in the finest particles selected (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 nm), MV and LV were more abundant in larger particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 nm). As in Rose et al. (2006), fresh emissions like soot
adsorb or absorb volatile material during atmospheric processing. The smaller
particles grew faster than the larger ones because of their higher ratio of
surface area to volume. When they were heated in the VTDMA at
300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the smaller particles decreased more substantially in size,
as reflected in the higher CV and HV fractions and lower MV and LV fractions.
The higher abundance of MV and LV in the larger size particles could also be
explained by the aged particles arriving at the sampling site. Since the
sampling site is located on top of a mountain with an altitude of 150 m, the
particles were likely aged upon arrival. Non-volatile particles in the
ultrafine modes from fresh emissions can be aged with both non-volatile and
volatile material, and became larger in size. Nevertheless, the detection
limit of the downstream DMA and CPC in the VTDMA system is 10 nm. The
particles with diameters below the detection limit leads to an overestimation
of CV and an underestimation of the non-volatile residuals for the finest
particles selected (with an initial diameter of 40 nm).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Diurnal variations</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Diurnal variations in the volume fractions of (columns from left to
right) CV, VM, HV residuals, MV residuals and LV residuals in
<bold>(a)</bold> 40 nm, <bold>(b)</bold> 150 nm and <bold>(c)</bold> 300 nm particles
in February and March 2014. Diurnal variations in the volume fraction
remaining (VFR) of HV and MV particles are plotted on the right axis. Error
bars represent 1 standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 5 shows diurnal variation in the fraction of CV, HV residual, MV
residual, LV residual and VM in the total volume of particles of dry initial
diameters of 40, 150 and 300 nm. For 40 nm particles, a clear maximum and
minimum of the fraction of CV, VM and HV residuals are observed at 08:00 and
13:00, respectively. The diurnal variation of the HV and MV particles in the
40 nm particles was clearer in terms of number fraction (Fig. S5).
Furthermore, the trend of CV was opposite to those of VM, HV and MV. The
increase in CV in the 40 nm particles and to a lesser extent in LV in the
150 and 300 nm particles in the morning is consistent with traffic patterns.
Fresh emissions of volatile and non-volatile material, likely OC and EC, were
externally mixed and contributed to CV and LV, respectively. As time
progresses in a day, the highly volatile species (CV) that were freshly
emitted in the morning may evaporate and react to form less volatile
particles and become VM instead of CV (Robinson et al., 2007). Alternatively,
these CV particles could also coagulate with smaller particles to form
VM-containing particles. Less fresh emissions with more CV particles turning
into VM on MV and HV particles could explain the trend that the number and
volume fractions of CV decreased while those of MV and HV increased (Figs. 5
and S5).</p>
      <p>We also used the diurnal variations in the volume fraction remaining (VFR),
again defined as the volume ratio of the residual to its <italic>host</italic>
particle (not to the total volume of all particles), to examine the size
changes of the non-volatile residuals of HV and MV particles. The VFR of HV
did not exhibit any obvious diurnal variations, but the VFR of MV peaked
near 18:00. The VFR of the 40 nm MV particles increased after 14:00, while
those of the 150 and 300 nm MV particles increased after 15:00. Since the
VFR of HV and MV were relatively constant during the day, the increase in
the VM fraction after the morning rush hours could be attributed to the
increase in the number concentrations of the HV and MV particles instead of
changes in the amount of VM on the MV or HV residuals.</p>
      <p>The diurnal variations for particles larger than 80 nm were much less
obvious than those for 40 nm particles in this study and in others  (Rose
et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2016). In winter, the
atmosphere is more stable, resulting in a poorer dilution of aged particles
with the less polluted aerosols from higher up  (Rose et
al., 2006). When the aged pollutants were trapped near the ground, the
effect of aging of fresh emissions weakened. Therefore, although a daily
maximum and a daily minimum were still observed for particles larger than 80 nm, the variation was mostly within 15 %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Diurnal variations in the mass fractions of EC, OC, and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the sum of OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the OC-to-EC ratio,
mass fractions of OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the sum of OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
total OC in February and March 2014. Error bars represent 1 standard
deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The diurnal variations in the mass fractions of OC and EC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
provided further insights to the observations above (Fig. 6). The OC and EC
data on 12 and 17 March were excluded since they were more than 2 standard
deviations higher than those on other days. Subtle morning peaks between
06:00 and 10:00 were observed for the volume fraction of LV residuals
(Fig. 5). A similar peak was observed for the mass fraction of EC in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the morning (Fig. 6). This suggests that the LV particles may
be related to the EC from vehicle emissions in the morning. This EC was
relatively less aged and externally mixed with the other volatile material.
In the late afternoon, the LV residuals showed another peak between 17:00 and
19:00, whereas the mass fraction of EC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited a minimum at
15:00, after which it increased continuously. The continuous increase in EC
at night is likely related to the increase in heavy-duty diesel traffic
(Zhang et al., 2015), which was restricted during daytime (Bradsher, 2007).</p>
      <p>Although OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributed to about half of the total OC mass, the diurnal
variation in the mass fraction of OC in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was driven by the total
mass of OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which reached a minimum
between 05:00 and 09:00 and increased until 19:00. OC can be attributed to
both primary and secondary sources. The increased mass fraction of OC in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the OC-to-EC ratio in the afternoon suggest that the sources
of OC were less related to traffic but more to the aging and formation of
secondary organic aerosols (Turpin et al., 1990; Chow et al., 1996). These
OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> may be highly oxygenated species or oligomers
that are less volatile than primary or less oxygenated organics (Kalberer et
al., 2004; Huffman et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>It is interesting to note that the volume fraction of the LV residuals and
the VFR of MV particles at different sizes showed a dip in the afternoon
(Fig. 5, third column from the left). The VFR of 40 nm MV particles showed
a dip at 14:00, while those in 150 and 300 nm particles showed a dip at
15:00. The volume fraction of LV residuals in 150 and 300 nm particles
reached a minimum at 13:00 and 15:00, respectively. Because EC decreased
between 12:00 and 15:00, the increase in the volume fraction of LV residuals
in 150 nm particles since 13:00 and the VFR of 40 nm MV particles since
14:00 may be related to the increased presence of aged organics as well as
the EC particles that aged via coagulation and condensation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Back trajectory analyses</title>
      <p>We calculated 72 h back trajectories of air masses arriving at the sampling
site (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>23</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn>00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>113</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn>25</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> E) at 4 h intervals (at 00:00,
04:00, 08:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00 local time, UTC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8) using the PC
version of the HYSPLIT4 (Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated
Trajectory, version 4) model (Stein et al., 2015; Rolph, 2016). Archived
meteorological data from the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS)
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were employed and the receptor height was set at 500 m above
ground level (a.g.l.). The 191 back trajectories calculated were grouped into
six clusters based on their spatial distribution (Fig. 7).</p>
      <p>Overall, the sampling site was mostly affected by northwesterly and
northeasterly air masses. Clusters 1 and 3 are coastal and continental air
masses, respectively, although both originated from the northeast. Clusters
4, 5 and 6 represent continental air masses originating from the northwest.
Cluster 2 is a group of maritime air masses originating from the East China
Sea northeast or east of Guangzhou. While the air masses in cluster 6 were
transported at relatively high speeds and altitudes (over 3000 m a.g.l.),
the air masses in all the other clusters were transported at an altitude
below 1500 m a.g.l. for over 40 h before arriving at the site. As the air
masses in cluster 6 only occurred for less than 3 days and since the
corresponding VTDMA and OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC data were sometimes unavailable, cluster
6 will be excluded from the following discussion.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Mean back trajectories of the six types of air masses arriving at
the sampling site.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average number fractions of CV, HV, MV and LV in clusters 1 to 5 at
different selected diameters.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC, EC and the OC-to-EC
ratio (OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio) in the five clusters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6">Cluster </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Maritime</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col6">Continental </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Origin (to the site)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NE/E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">33.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.84 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.98 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.43 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.46 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratio</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.94 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The average PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC and EC concentrations associated with the air
masses from the northeast of Guangzhou (clusters 1, 2 and 3) were higher than
those from the northwest (clusters 4 and 5, Table 3). Days associated with
the coastal and maritime air masses were more polluted than days associated
with continental air masses for several reasons. First, South China as a
region is often affected by the high-pressure system moving eastward or
southward from the continent out to sea in winter. When the maritime or
coastal air streams entered from the southeast of the sampling site at Panyu,
the atmosphere at the sampling site became more stable with low local wind
speeds (e.g., the polluted days on 17 February and 12, 16 and 17 March,
Figs. 3 and S3). The local pollutants accumulated and the city was also
affected by pollutants from the southeastern areas of the site (e.g.,
Shenzhen, Nansha and Dongguan). Second, land–sea breeze circulation was
observed when the sampling site was under the influence of maritime air
masses from 18 to 20 March. During the day, southeasterly wind prevailed and
the wind speed was higher. In the evening, the southeasterly wind was
gradually replaced by a southwesterly or northwesterly wind and the wind
speed decreased (Fig. 3). The cycle started again in the morning when the
westerly wind was gradually replaced by southeasterly wind. Such land–sea
breeze effects can result in an effective redistribution and accumulation of
air pollutants within the PRD region (Lo et al., 2006).</p>
      <p>Furthermore, PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the northeastern parts of China can exceed
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to both enhanced emissions from coal
combustion for heating and poor dispersion during wintertime (Gu et al.,
2014). Under the influence of the prevailing northerly or northeasterly wind
in China, these pollutants were often transported to southern China and the
East China Sea (Chen et al., 2012). The pollutants might also have
accumulated when the maritime air masses spent about 2 days across Taiwan and
the coast of southern China. In contrast, continental air masses in cluster 5
moved slightly faster, and were often associated with the cold front period
during which the local wind speed and pressure increased but the temperature
decreased (Fig. 3). As the cold air masses passed through the city,
dispersion and clearance of pollutants were promoted, resulting in lower
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Tan et al., 2013a). Therefore, unlike in other
coastal cities like Hong Kong (Lee et al., 2013), in Panyu the maritime air
masses could lead to more severe pollution than the continental ones in
winter.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p>The five clusters were further analyzed to study the influence of air mass
history on aerosol volatility. The number fractions of CV, HV, MV and LV of
the six selected diameters in VTDMA measurements are regrouped based on the
clusters as shown in Fig. 8. The total number fractions of the non-volatile
residuals (sum of HV, MV and LV) were similar in all clusters. The maritime
air masses (cluster 2) had a slightly higher fraction of LV particles, while
the continental air masses originating from the northwest of the site
(clusters 4 and 5) had a higher fraction of HV particles. Although the air
masses in clusters 1 and 5 originated from further away and traveled at
relatively higher speeds than those in clusters 2, 3 and 4, all the clusters
involved transport at low altitudes (below 1500 m) for over 40 h, likely
due to the generally lower mixing heights in winter. Therefore, it is
plausible that the aerosol particles in these air masses were all well aged
upon arrival. Similar results were observed in Beijing by Wehner et
al. (2009). This could be another reason for the lack of size dependence of
the number, volume fractions and diurnal variation for the particles larger
than 80 nm. When the transported air masses mixed with the local pollutants,
the size dependence of the number fractions of different volatility groups as
well as the aging of local emissions was further reduced.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Volatility shrink factor (VSF) distribution function in different
clusters. Solid and dotted lines are the peaks fitted with log-normal
function and the ensemble distributions, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Time series of <bold>(a)</bold> particle number size distribution, <bold>(b)</bold> number
concentrations of HV, MV and LV in 40 nm particles and <bold>(c)</bold> number
concentrations of HV, MV and LV in 150 nm particles during a new particle
event day on 20 February 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Particle number size distribution of (columns from left to right)
HV, MV and LV particles <bold>(a)</bold> during a new particle formation event at 13:00,
17:00, 21:00 on 20 February and 02:00 on 21 February 2014 and <bold>(b)</bold> during non-event
days at 11:00, 16:00, 21:00 on 28 February and 02:00 on 1 March 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>A closure analysis of the total mass of LV and MV residuals from
VTDMA at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and measured mass of EC or total of EC and
OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8431/2016/acp-16-8431-2016-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We also examined the volatility shrink factor (VSF) distributions of 40, 110
and 300 nm particles upon heating at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 9). Log-normal
fittings with a three-peak solution were applied to the distributions. The
average VSF modes of the peaks were located at 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.021 (peak 1),
0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.066 (peak 2) and 0.95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.007 (peak 3), respectively.
The standard deviation of the corresponding normal distribution (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of peak 3 was the smallest among the three peaks (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1). For
the same particle size, the VSF distributions in the VSF range between 0.3
and 0.8 in cluster 5 were relatively more uni-modal than those of other
clusters (Fig. 9b and c). This suggests that the composition in cluster 5 was
more homogeneous. Cluster 1 also consisted of long-range transported air
masses, but they likely passed through areas that are more polluted and mixed
with different types of pollutants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>New particle formation</title>
      <p>Two new particle formation (NPF) events were observed in the campaign on
20 February and 13 March 2014 (Fig. 3). Since VTDMA data were not available
during the NPF event on 13 March 2014, we only focus on the NPF event on
20 February 2014 that happened after a cold front under a low PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration. On 20 February 2014, a sub-20 nm particle mode was first
observed at 12:00. This particle mode grew continuously until it reached
120 nm at 02:00 on 21 February 2014. In the VTDMA data, a sharp increase in
the number concentration of HV particles having an initial diameter of 40 nm
was observed at 17:00 on 20 February 2014 (Fig. 10). This event is likely
related to the growth of the newly formed particles when they mixed with the
volatile material accumulated via condensation or adsorption. The volatile
material that extensively condensed on the pre-existing particles could be
sulfate, ammonium and organics. They were found to be the major species
contributing to particle growth in the NPF events at different locations
(Zhang et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2011; Yue et al.,
2016). Zhang et al. (2004) observed that sulfate was always the first and the
fastest species to increase in concentration during an NPF event. They also
suggested that photochemically formed secondary organics contributed
significantly to the growth of the ultrafine particles. Recently, Yue et
al. (2016) reported that sulfate, ammonium and organics were the main
contributors to particle growth in the NPF events in Taoyuan of the PRD
region. As these particles aged further, they grew larger, as reflected in
the increase in number concentrations of larger MV particles and the increase
in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass (Fig. 10). Similar results were also observed in the study
in Beijing by Wehner et al. (2009). Furthermore, the growth of the newly
formed particles can also be observed from the number size distributions of
the HV, MV and LV particles at different times on 20 and 21 February 2014
(Fig. 11). The mode of the HV particles increased from 40 nm at 17:00 to
80 nm at 21:00 on 20 February 2014. The mode stayed at 80 nm, while the
corresponding number concentration decreased at 02:00 on 21 February 2014. In
contrast, the number concentration and diameter mode of the MV particles grew
continuously. The HV and MV particle concentrations and diameter modes
underwent much smaller changes on the non-event day of 28 February 2014
(Fig. 11).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Closure analysis for LV and MV residuals at 300\,{${}^{{\circ}}$}C, OC and
EC}?><title>Closure analysis for LV and MV residuals at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, OC and
EC</title>
      <p>The closure analysis of EC or the sum of EC, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the total mass of LV and MV residuals was conducted (Fig. 12). Good
correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9) for both EC and the sum of EC, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the total mass of LV and MV residuals were
obtained. Nonetheless, the slope for the total mass of LV and MV residuals to
the mass of EC (2.94) is more than 2 times of that for the total mass of LV
and MV residuals to the sum of EC, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.22),
indicating that EC alone cannot account for the total mass of LV and MV
residuals. Including non-volatile OC (sum of OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gave a
better mass closure with the total of LV and MV residuals. This further
supports our initial postulation that the non-volatile residuals that
remained intact upon heating at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the VTDMA may contain a
significant amount of non-volatile OC. However, the total mass of EC,
OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> did not explain all the mass of LV and MV
residuals. A possible explanation could be that the vaporizing temperatures
of some OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are close to the upper limit (310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C); hence, they
were not completely vaporized in the heated tube and remained in the
non-volatile residuals. The presence of other refractory material and the
assumption made about the density of LV and MV are two other possible
explanations.</p>
      <p>Other possible errors for the closure could be related to the different
heating environments in the VTDMA and the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer. In the
OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer, OC was measured when the samples were heated in the
presence of a non-oxidative carrier gas (He). In the VTDMA, aerosols were
heated in air that contained O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, some “OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” that
evaporated at 475 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C or above in the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer may have
been oxidized at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the VTDMA. Charring of organic matter
could also occur (Philippin et al., 2004). Further study is needed to
quantify the effect of oxygen on the oxidation of OC in the VTDMA. The
extrapolated log-normal fitting of the size distribution of non-volatile
particles can also cause errors if the mode diameter of the fitting is beyond
the VTDMA's range of measurements. While the VTDMA measured the size
distribution of particles between 10 nm and 400 nm in diameter, the
OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer took into account particles up to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in
diameter. Yu et al. (2010) reported three EC and OC modes between 400 nm and
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in ambient aerosols in Guangzhou: 400 nm, 900 nm and
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The 400 nm mode accounted for 44 to 49 % of the measured
EC, but only 17 to 20 % of the measured OC.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study presents the first VTDMA measurements in a suburban area of
Guangzhou in the Pearl River Delta region, China, during wintertime. The
non-volatile material at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in VTDMA measurements was assumed to
be EC and non-volatile OC. The LV particles, representing non-volatile
material externally mixed with the volatile material, contributed less than
20 % of the total particle number concentration at the sampling site. The
diurnal variations in the number and volume fractions of LV, MV and HV were
much less obvious in this study than in other studies (e.g., Rose et al.,
2011; Cheng et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2016), likely because of the more
stable atmosphere and poorer dilution of aged aerosols in winter. The back
trajectory analyses showed that the measured PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, EC and OC
concentrations were higher when the sampling site came under the influence of
maritime and coastal air masses originating from the east or northeast of the
site. These observations were attributed to the high-pressure system on the
continent, the prevailing northerly wind and the enhanced pollution from
northern China in winter. The long-range transport continental trajectories
were often associated with the cold front periods during which the dispersion
of pollutants was promoted. The number fractions of LV, MV and HV particles
did not show much variation among the trajectory clusters, likely because the
air masses in all the clusters were transported at low altitudes (below
1500 m) for over 40 h. They were therefore well aged upon arrival at the
site.</p>
      <p>While previous studies have indicated soot as a major component of the
non-volatile residuals at 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C measured by the VTDMA (e.g.,
Philippin et al., 2004; Frey et al., 2008), Häkkinen et al. (2012) and
this work identified non-volatile organics as another possible component. The
diurnal variations in the LV fractions and the size of the MV residuals may
be related to the variation in the abundance of both EC and non-volatile OC,
which evaporated at 475 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and above in the OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC analyzer.
The analyses of the diurnal variations in the LV fractions and the VFR of
MV particles, the latter of which reflects the change in size of the
non-volatile material in the MV particles, suggest that the increase in the
non-volatile fractions and in the size in the early afternoon may be related
to the increase in non-volatile OC in addition to the effects of coagulation
and condensation. The mass closure analysis of EC and the total mass of LV
and MV residuals also indicated that EC alone cannot account for the mass of
the non-volatile residuals. The total mass of EC and non-volatile OC gave
a better closure with the total mass of the LV and MV residuals, suggesting
that the non-volatile OC may have contributed to the non-volatile residuals
in our VTDMA measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8431-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acp-16-8431-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work is supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region, China (project no. 600413), the Natural
Science Foundation of China (grant 41375156), Special Research and
Development Fund for Research Institutes (2014EG137243), the National Key
Project of Basic Research (2011CB403403) and the National Key Project of the
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
(2016YFC0201901).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: T. Petäjä</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Schmid, O., Yang, H., Chand, D., Zhen Yu, J., Zeng, L.-M.,
and Zhang, Y.-H.: Optical properties and chemical composition of the
atmospheric aerosol in urban Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Environ., 42,
6335–6350, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.030</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Birch, M. E. and Cary, R. A.: Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring
occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
25, 221–241, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829608965393</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4075–4078,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013652</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bradsher, K.: Trucks power China's economy, at a suffocating cost,
available at: <uri>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/world/asia/08trucks.html</uri>
(last access: 10 February 2016), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brooks, B. J., Smith, M. H., Hill, M. K., and O'Dowd, C. D.:
Size-differentiated volatility analysis of internally mixed
laboratory-generated aerosol, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 555-579,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00192-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00192-6</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chan, C. K. and Yao, X.: Air pollution in mega cities in China, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1–42,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, B., Du, K., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Zhao, J., Wang, K., Zhang, F., and Xu,
L.: Emission and transport of carbonaceous aerosols in urbanized coastal
areas in China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 12,  371–378,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.08.0131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2011.08.0131</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K., Duan, F., Zheng, M., Du, Z., Ma, Y., and Tan, J.: Ambient
organic carbon to elemental carbon ratios: Influences of the measurement
methods and implications, Atmos. Environ., 45,  2060–2066,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.064</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y. F., Eichler, H., Wiedensohler, A., Heintzenberg, J., Zhang, Y. H.,
Hu, M., Herrmann, H., Zeng, L. M., Liu, S., Gnauk, T., Brüggemann, E.,
and He, L. Y.: Mixing state of elemental carbon and non-light-absorbing
aerosol components derived from in situ particle optical properties at
Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006929</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y. F., Su, H., Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Berghof, M., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Shiraiwa,
M., Gong, Y. G., Shao, M., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Y. H., Carmichael, G. R., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Size-resolved measurement of the mixing state of soot in
the megacity Beijing, China: diurnal cycle, aging and parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4477–4491, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Solomon, P. A., Magliano, K.
L., Ziman, S. D., and Richards, L. W.: PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compositions in
California's San Joaquin Valley, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 18,  105–128, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829308959588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829308959588</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lu, Z., Lowenthal, D. H., Frazier, C. A.,
Solomon, P. A., Thuillier, R. H., and Magliano, K.: Descriptive analysis of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX,
Atmos. Environ., 30, 2079–2112,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Yu, J. Z., Watson, J. G., Hang Ho, S. S., Bohannan, T. L.,
Hays, M. D., and Fung, K. K.: The application of thermal methods for
determining chemical composition of carbonaceous aerosols: A review, J.
Environ. Sci. Heal. A, 42, 1521–1541, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10934520701513365" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10934520701513365</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric organic
particulate matter: From smoke to secondary organic aerosol, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 94–106,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Frey, A., Rose, D., Wehner, B., Müller, T., Cheng, Y., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Virkkula, A.: Application of the Volatility-TDMA Technique to Determine
the Number Size Distribution and Mass Concentration of Less Volatile
Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 817–828, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820802339595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802339595</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fuller, K. A., Malm, W. C., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Effects of mixing on
extinction by carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104,
15941–15954, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998JD100069</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ghazi, R. and Olfert, J. S.: Coating Mass Dependence of Soot Aggregate
Restructuring due to Coatings of Oleic Acid and Dioctyl Sebacate, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 47, 192–200, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.741273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.741273</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gnauk, T., Müller, K., van Pinxteren, D., He, L.-Y., Niu, Y., Hu, M.,
and Herrmann, H.: Size-segregated particulate chemical composition in
Xinken, Pearl River Delta, China: OC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC and organic compounds, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 6296–6309, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.001</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gu, J., Du, S., Han, D., Hou, L., Yi, J., Xu, J., Liu, G., Han, B., Yang,
G., and Bai, Z.-P.: Major chemical compositions, possible sources, and mass
closure analysis of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Jinan, China, Air Qual. Atmos. Heal., 7,
251–262, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11869-013-0232-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11869-013-0232-9</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Häkkinen, S. A. K., Äijälä, M., Lehtipalo, K., Junninen, H., Backman, J., Virkkula, A.,
Nieminen, T., Vestenius, M., Hakola, H., Ehn, M., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., and Riipinen, I.: Long-term volatility measurements of submicron
atmospheric aerosol in Hyytiälä, Finland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10771–10786, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10771-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10771-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, A. D. A., Rosen, H., and Novakov, T.: The Aethalometer – An
Instrument for the Real-Time Measurement of Optical-Absorption by
Aerosol-Particles, Sci. Total Environ., 36, 191–196,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(84)90265-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0048-9697(84)90265-1</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hitzenberger, R., Jennings, S. G., Larson, S. M., Dillner, A., Cachier, H.,
Galambos, Z., Rouc, A., and Spain, T. G.: Intercomparison of measurement
methods for black carbon aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2823–2833,   <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00360-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00360-4</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Horvath, H.: Atmospheric light absorption – A review, Atmos. Environ., 27,
293–317,   <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90104-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(93)90104-7</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Aiken, A. C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M., DeCarlo, P. F., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements from two megacity field studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7161–7182, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7161-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7161-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Japar, S. M., Brachaczek, W. W., Gorse Jr, R. A., Norbeck, J. M., and
Pierson, W. R.: The contribution of elemental carbon to the optical
properties of rural atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 20, 1281–1289,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(86)90163-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(86)90163-0</ext-link>,
1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A.
S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., Zenobi, R., and
Baltensperger, U.: Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092185</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lavanchy, V. M. H., Gäggeler, H. W., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.:
Elemental carbon (EC) and black carbon (BC) measurements with a thermal
method and an aethalometer at the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 2759–2769,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00328-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00328-8</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Lee, B. P., Li, Y. J., Yu, J. Z., Louie, P. K. K., and Chan, C. K.: Physical
and chemical characterization of ambient aerosol by HR-ToF-AMS at a suburban
site in Hong Kong during springtime 2011, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
8625–8639,   <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50658</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Levy, M. E., Zhang, R., Zheng, J., Tan, H., Wang, Y., Molina, L. T.,
Takahama, S., Russell, L. M., and Li, G.: Measurements of submicron aerosols
at the California–Mexico border during the Cal–Mex 2010 field campaign,
Atmos. Environ., 88, 308–319, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.062</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liousse, C., Cachier, H., and Jennings, S. G.: Optical and thermal
measurements of black carbon aerosol content in different environments:
Variation of the specific attenuation cross-section, sigma (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Atmos. Environ., 27, 1203–1211,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90246-U" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(93)90246-U</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lo, J. C. F., Lau, A. K. H., Fung, J. C. H., and Chen, F.: Investigation of
enhanced cross-city transport and trapping of air pollutants by coastal and
urban land-sea breeze circulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D14104,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006837</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N., Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: A naming
convention for atmospheric organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
5825–5839, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5825-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5825-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Novakov, T., Ramanathan, V., Hansen, J. E., Kirchstetter, T. W., Sato, M.,
Sinton, J. E., and Sathaye, J. A.: Large historical changes of fossil-fuel
black carbon aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1324, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002gl016345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002gl016345</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Onasch, T. B., Trimborn, A., Fortner, E. C., Jayne, J. T., Kok, G. L.,
Williams, L. R., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Soot Particle Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer: Development, Validation, and Initial Application, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 46, 804–817,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.663948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.663948</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Penner, J. E. and Novakov, T.: Carbonaceous particles in the atmosphere: A
historical perspective to the Fifth International Conference on Carbonaceous
Particles in the Atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19373–19378,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD01175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD01175</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A. and Schönlinner, M.: Multi-angle absorption photometry – a
new method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric
black carbon, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 421–441, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Philippin, S., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Measurements of
non-volatile fractions of pollution aerosols with an eight-tube volatility
tandem differential mobility analyzer (VTDMA-8), J. Aerosol Sci., 35,
185–203,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Pinnick, R., Jennings, S., and Fernandez, G.: Volatility of aerosols in the
arid southwestern United States, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 562–576, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Putaud, J. P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W.,
Cyrys, J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H. C., Harrison, R.
M., Herrmann, H., Hitzenberger, R., Hüglin, C., Jones, A. M.,
Kasper-Giebl, A., Kiss, G., Kousa, A., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Löschau, G.,
Maenhaut, W., Molnar, A., Moreno, T., Pekkanen, J., Perrino, C., Pitz, M.,
Puxbaum, H., Querol, X., Rodriguez, S., Salma, I., Schwarz, J., Smolik, J.,
Schneider, J., Spindler, G., ten Brink, H., Tursic, J., Viana, M.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Raes, F.: A European aerosol phenomenology – 3:
Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural,
urban, and kerbside sites across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1308–1320,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Rader, D. J. and McMurry, P. H.: Application of the tandem differential
mobility analyzer to studies of droplet growth or evaporation, J. Aerosol
Sci., 17, 771–787,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(86)90031-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(86)90031-5</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>,  2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Rolph, G. D.: Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem
(READY) Website, available at: <uri>http://www.ready.noaa.gov</uri> (last access: 18 February 2016), NOAA Air Resources
Laboratory, College Park, MD., 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Wehner, B., Ketzel, M., Engler, C., Voigtländer, J., Tuch, T., and Wiedensohler, A.: Atmospheric number
size distributions of soot particles and estimation of emission factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1021–1031, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1021-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1021-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A.,
Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol
chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2817–2836, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Rosen, H., Hansen, A. D. A., Gundel, L., and Novakov, T.: Identification of
the optically absorbing component in urban aerosols, Appl. Optics, 17,
3859–3861,   <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.17.003859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.17.003859</ext-link>,
1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Schauer, J. J., Mader, B. T., Deminter, J. T., Heidemann, G., Bae, M. S.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Cary, R. A., Smith, D., Huebert, B. J.,
Bertram, T., Howell, S., Kline, J. T., Quinn, P., Bates, T., Turpin, B.,
Lim, H. J., Yu, J. Z., Yang, H., and Keywood, M. D.: ACE-Asia
intercomparison of a thermal-optical method for the determination of
particle-phase organic and elemental carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37,
993–1001,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es020622f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es020622f</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Smith, J. N., Dunn, M. J., VanReken, T. M., Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M. R.,
McMurry, P. H., and Huey, L. G.: Chemical composition of atmospheric
nanoparticles formed from nucleation in Tecamac, Mexico: Evidence for an
important role for organic species in nanoparticle growth, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L04808, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032523</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Stephens, M., Turner, N., and Sandberg, J.: Particle identification by
laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity, Appl. Optics, 42,
3726–3736, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.42.003726</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Tan, H. B., Yin, Y., Gu, X. S., Li, F., Chan, P. W., Xu, H. B., Deng, X. J.,
and Wan, Q. L.: An observational study of the hygroscopic properties of
aerosols over the Pearl River Delta region, Atmos. Environ., 77, 817–826,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.049</ext-link>,
2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Tan, H. B., Xu, H. B., Wan, Q. L., Li, F., Deng, X. J., Chan, P. W., Xia,
D., and Yin, Y.: Design and Application of an Unattended Multifunctional
H-TDMA System, J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 30, 1136–1148,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1</ext-link>,
2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K., Zhang, R., Lin, Z., Zhang, Z., Lin, M., Cao, J.,
Liu, S., and Wang, G.: Impact of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical compositions on aerosol
light scattering in Guangzhou – the largest megacity in South China,
Atmos. Res., 135–136, 48–58,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. J., Cary, R. A., and Huntzicker, J. J.: An In Situ, Time-Resolved
Analyzer for Aerosol Organic and Elemental Carbon, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
12, 161–171,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829008959336</ext-link>,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Twomey, S.: On the composition of cloud nuclei in the northeastern United
States, J. Rech. Atmos, 3, 281–285,
1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Villani, P., Picard, D., Marchand, N., and Laj, P.: Design and Validation
of a 6-Volatility Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (VTDMA), Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 41, 898–906, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820701534593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701534593</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Virkkula, A., Ahlquist, N. C., Covert, D. S., Arnott, W. P., Sheridan, P.
J., Quinn, P. K., and Coffman, D. J.: Modification, Calibration and a Field
Test of an Instrument for Measuring Light Absorption by Particles, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 39, 68–83,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868290901963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290901963</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Wehner, B., Philippin, S., Wiedensohler, A., Scheer, V., and Vogt, R.:
Variability of non-volatile fractions of atmospheric aerosol particles with
traffic influence, Atmos. Environ., 38, 6081–6090,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.015</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wehner, B., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Achtert, P., Birmili, W., Nowak, A.,
Wiedensohler, A., Garland, R. M., Pöschl, U., Hu, M., and Zhu, T.:
Mixing state of nonvolatile aerosol particle fractions and comparison with
light absorption in the polluted Beijing region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D00G17, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010923</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Ng, W. M., Huang, J. X., Wu, D., and Yu, J. Z.: Determination of
Elemental and Organic Carbon in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Pearl River Delta Region:
Inter-Instrument (Sunset vs. DRI Model 2001 Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer)
and Inter-Protocol Comparisons (IMPROVE vs. ACE-Asia Protocol), Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 46, 610–621,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.649313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.649313</ext-link>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wu, D., Bi, X. Y., Deng, X. J., Li, F., Tan, H. B., Liao, G. L., and Huang,
J.: Effect of atmospheric haze on the deterioration of visibility over the
Pearl River Delta, Acta Meteorol. Sin., 21, 215–223, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Wu, C., Wu, D., and Yu, J. Z.: Size distributions of elemental carbon and its contribution to light
extinction in urban and rural locations in the pearl river delta region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5107–5119, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5107-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5107-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Yue, D. L., Zhong, L. J., Zhang, T., Shen, J., Yuan, L., Ye, S. Q., and  Zhou, Y.,: Particle Growth and Variation of Cloud Condensation Nucleus
Activity on Polluted Days with New Particle Formation: A Case Study for
Regional Air Pollution in the PRD Region, China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 16,
323–335, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.06.0381" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2015.06.0381</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Stanier, C. O., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R.,
Pandis, S. N., and Jimenez, J. L.: Insights into the Chemistry of New
Particle Formation and Growth Events in Pittsburgh Based on Aerosol Mass
Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4797–4809,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es035417u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es035417u</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, S. L., Ma, N., Kecorius, S., Wang, P. C., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B.,
Größ, J., Wu, Z. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: Mixing state of
atmospheric particles over the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., 125, Part
A, 152–164,  <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.053</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Li, G., Yang, W., Huang, Z., Zhang, Z., Huang, X.,
Deng, W., Liu, T., Huang, Z., and Zhang, Z.: Emission factors of fine
particles, carbonaceous aerosols and traces gases from road vehicles: Recent
tests in an urban tunnel in the Pearl River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ.,
122, 876–884,   <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.024</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, X. Y., Sun, J. Y., Lin, W. L., Gong, S. L., Shen, X.
J., and Yang, S.: Characterization of new particle and secondary aerosol
formation during summertime in Beijing, China, Tellus B, 63, 382–394,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v63i3.16221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v63i3.16221</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurements of non-volatile aerosols with a VTDMA and their correlations
with carbonaceous aerosols in Guangzhou, China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Simultaneous measurements of aerosol volatility and carbonaceous matters were
conducted at a suburban site in Guangzhou, China, in February and March 2014
using a volatility tandem differential mobility analyzer (VTDMA) and an
organic carbon/elemental carbon (OC ∕ EC) analyzer. Low volatility (LV)
particles, with a volatility shrink factor (VSF) at 300 °C
exceeding 0.9, contributed 5 % of number concentrations of the 40 nm
particles and 11–15 % of the 80–300 nm particles. They were composed of
non-volatile material externally mixed with volatile material, and therefore
did not evaporate significantly at 300 °C. Non-volatile material
mixed internally with the volatile material was referred to as medium
volatility (MV, 0.4  &lt;  VSF  &lt;  0.9) and high volatility (HV, VSF
  &lt;  0.4) particles. The MV and HV particles contributed 57–71 % of
number concentration for the particles between 40 and 300 nm in size. The
average EC and OC concentrations measured by the OC ∕ EC analyzer were
3.4 ± 3.0 and 9.0 ± 6.0 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively.
Non-volatile OC evaporating at 475 °C or above, together with EC,
contributed 67 % of the total carbon mass. In spite of the daily maximum
and minimum, the diurnal variations in the volume fractions of the volatile
material, HV, MV and LV residuals were less than 15 % for the 80–300 nm
particles. Back trajectory analysis also suggests that over 90 % of the air
masses influencing the sampling site were well aged as they were transported
at low altitudes (below 1500 m) for over 40 h before arrival. Further
comparison with the diurnal variations in the mass fractions of EC and the
non-volatile OC in PM<sub>2.5</sub> suggests that the non-volatile residuals may be
related to both EC and non-volatile OC in the afternoon, during which the
concentration of aged organics increased. A closure analysis of the total
mass of LV and MV residuals and the mass of EC or the sum of EC and
non-volatile OC was conducted. It suggests that non-volatile OC, in addition
to EC, was one of the components of the non-volatile residuals measured by
the VTDMA in this study.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O., Schmid, O., Yang, H., Chand, D., Zhen Yu, J., Zeng, L.-M.,
and Zhang, Y.-H.: Optical properties and chemical composition of the
atmospheric aerosol in urban Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Environ., 42,
6335–6350, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.030" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.030</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Birch, M. E. and Cary, R. A.: Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring
occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
25, 221–241, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965393" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786829608965393</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4075–4078,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GL013652</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bradsher, K.: Trucks power China's economy, at a suffocating cost,
available at: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/world/asia/08trucks.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/world/asia/08trucks.html</a>
(last access: 10 February 2016), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brooks, B. J., Smith, M. H., Hill, M. K., and O'Dowd, C. D.:
Size-differentiated volatility analysis of internally mixed
laboratory-generated aerosol, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 555-579,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00192-6" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00192-6</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chan, C. K. and Yao, X.: Air pollution in mega cities in China, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1–42,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, B., Du, K., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Zhao, J., Wang, K., Zhang, F., and Xu,
L.: Emission and transport of carbonaceous aerosols in urbanized coastal
areas in China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 12,  371–378,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.08.0131" target="_blank">doi:10.4209/aaqr.2011.08.0131</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K., Duan, F., Zheng, M., Du, Z., Ma, Y., and Tan, J.: Ambient
organic carbon to elemental carbon ratios: Influences of the measurement
methods and implications, Atmos. Environ., 45,  2060–2066,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.064" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.064</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y. F., Eichler, H., Wiedensohler, A., Heintzenberg, J., Zhang, Y. H.,
Hu, M., Herrmann, H., Zeng, L. M., Liu, S., Gnauk, T., Brüggemann, E.,
and He, L. Y.: Mixing state of elemental carbon and non-light-absorbing
aerosol components derived from in situ particle optical properties at
Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20204,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006929" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006929</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y. F., Su, H., Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Berghof, M., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Shiraiwa,
M., Gong, Y. G., Shao, M., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Y. H., Carmichael, G. R., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Size-resolved measurement of the mixing state of soot in
the megacity Beijing, China: diurnal cycle, aging and parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4477–4491, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Solomon, P. A., Magliano, K.
L., Ziman, S. D., and Richards, L. W.: PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> compositions in
California's San Joaquin Valley, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 18,  105–128, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829308959588" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786829308959588</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lu, Z., Lowenthal, D. H., Frazier, C. A.,
Solomon, P. A., Thuillier, R. H., and Magliano, K.: Descriptive analysis of
PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX,
Atmos. Environ., 30, 2079–2112,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/1352-2310(95)00402-5</a>,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Yu, J. Z., Watson, J. G., Hang Ho, S. S., Bohannan, T. L.,
Hays, M. D., and Fung, K. K.: The application of thermal methods for
determining chemical composition of carbonaceous aerosols: A review, J.
Environ. Sci. Heal. A, 42, 1521–1541, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10934520701513365" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/10934520701513365</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric organic
particulate matter: From smoke to secondary organic aerosol, Atmos.
Environ., 43, 94–106,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Frey, A., Rose, D., Wehner, B., Müller, T., Cheng, Y., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Virkkula, A.: Application of the Volatility-TDMA Technique to Determine
the Number Size Distribution and Mass Concentration of Less Volatile
Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 817–828, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820802339595" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786820802339595</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fuller, K. A., Malm, W. C., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Effects of mixing on
extinction by carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104,
15941–15954, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100069" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1998JD100069</a>,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ghazi, R. and Olfert, J. S.: Coating Mass Dependence of Soot Aggregate
Restructuring due to Coatings of Oleic Acid and Dioctyl Sebacate, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 47, 192–200, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.741273" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786826.2012.741273</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gnauk, T., Müller, K., van Pinxteren, D., He, L.-Y., Niu, Y., Hu, M.,
and Herrmann, H.: Size-segregated particulate chemical composition in
Xinken, Pearl River Delta, China: OC ∕ EC and organic compounds, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 6296–6309, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.001</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gu, J., Du, S., Han, D., Hou, L., Yi, J., Xu, J., Liu, G., Han, B., Yang,
G., and Bai, Z.-P.: Major chemical compositions, possible sources, and mass
closure analysis of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Jinan, China, Air Qual. Atmos. Heal., 7,
251–262, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11869-013-0232-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11869-013-0232-9</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Häkkinen, S. A. K., Äijälä, M., Lehtipalo, K., Junninen, H., Backman, J., Virkkula, A.,
Nieminen, T., Vestenius, M., Hakola, H., Ehn, M., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., and Riipinen, I.: Long-term volatility measurements of submicron
atmospheric aerosol in Hyytiälä, Finland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10771–10786, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10771-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10771-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, A. D. A., Rosen, H., and Novakov, T.: The Aethalometer – An
Instrument for the Real-Time Measurement of Optical-Absorption by
Aerosol-Particles, Sci. Total Environ., 36, 191–196,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(84)90265-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0048-9697(84)90265-1</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hitzenberger, R., Jennings, S. G., Larson, S. M., Dillner, A., Cachier, H.,
Galambos, Z., Rouc, A., and Spain, T. G.: Intercomparison of measurement
methods for black carbon aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2823–2833,   <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00360-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00360-4</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Horvath, H.: Atmospheric light absorption – A review, Atmos. Environ., 27,
293–317,   <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90104-7" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0960-1686(93)90104-7</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Aiken, A. C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M., DeCarlo, P. F., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements from two megacity field studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7161–7182, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7161-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-7161-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Japar, S. M., Brachaczek, W. W., Gorse Jr, R. A., Norbeck, J. M., and
Pierson, W. R.: The contribution of elemental carbon to the optical
properties of rural atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 20, 1281–1289,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(86)90163-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0004-6981(86)90163-0</a>,
1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A.
S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., Zenobi, R., and
Baltensperger, U.: Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1092185</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the
spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic
carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D21208,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD004999</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lavanchy, V. M. H., Gäggeler, H. W., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.:
Elemental carbon (EC) and black carbon (BC) measurements with a thermal
method and an aethalometer at the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 2759–2769,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00328-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00328-8</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Lee, B. P., Li, Y. J., Yu, J. Z., Louie, P. K. K., and Chan, C. K.: Physical
and chemical characterization of ambient aerosol by HR-ToF-AMS at a suburban
site in Hong Kong during springtime 2011, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
8625–8639,   <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50658" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50658</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Levy, M. E., Zhang, R., Zheng, J., Tan, H., Wang, Y., Molina, L. T.,
Takahama, S., Russell, L. M., and Li, G.: Measurements of submicron aerosols
at the California–Mexico border during the Cal–Mex 2010 field campaign,
Atmos. Environ., 88, 308–319, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.062" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.062</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liousse, C., Cachier, H., and Jennings, S. G.: Optical and thermal
measurements of black carbon aerosol content in different environments:
Variation of the specific attenuation cross-section, sigma (<i>σ</i>),
Atmos. Environ., 27, 1203–1211,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90246-U" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0960-1686(93)90246-U</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lo, J. C. F., Lau, A. K. H., Fung, J. C. H., and Chen, F.: Investigation of
enhanced cross-city transport and trapping of air pollutants by coastal and
urban land-sea breeze circulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D14104,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006837" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006837</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, B. N., Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: A naming
convention for atmospheric organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
5825–5839, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5825-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-5825-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Novakov, T., Ramanathan, V., Hansen, J. E., Kirchstetter, T. W., Sato, M.,
Sinton, J. E., and Sathaye, J. A.: Large historical changes of fossil-fuel
black carbon aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1324, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002gl016345" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002gl016345</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Onasch, T. B., Trimborn, A., Fortner, E. C., Jayne, J. T., Kok, G. L.,
Williams, L. R., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Soot Particle Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer: Development, Validation, and Initial Application, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 46, 804–817,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.663948" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786826.2012.663948</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Penner, J. E. and Novakov, T.: Carbonaceous particles in the atmosphere: A
historical perspective to the Fifth International Conference on Carbonaceous
Particles in the Atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19373–19378,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD01175" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/96JD01175</a>,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A. and Schönlinner, M.: Multi-angle absorption photometry – a
new method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric
black carbon, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 421–441, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Philippin, S., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Measurements of
non-volatile fractions of pollution aerosols with an eight-tube volatility
tandem differential mobility analyzer (VTDMA-8), J. Aerosol Sci., 35,
185–203,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Pinnick, R., Jennings, S., and Fernandez, G.: Volatility of aerosols in the
arid southwestern United States, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 562–576, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Putaud, J. P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W.,
Cyrys, J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H. C., Harrison, R.
M., Herrmann, H., Hitzenberger, R., Hüglin, C., Jones, A. M.,
Kasper-Giebl, A., Kiss, G., Kousa, A., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Löschau, G.,
Maenhaut, W., Molnar, A., Moreno, T., Pekkanen, J., Perrino, C., Pitz, M.,
Puxbaum, H., Querol, X., Rodriguez, S., Salma, I., Schwarz, J., Smolik, J.,
Schneider, J., Spindler, G., ten Brink, H., Tursic, J., Viana, M.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Raes, F.: A European aerosol phenomenology – 3:
Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural,
urban, and kerbside sites across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1308–1320,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Rader, D. J. and McMurry, P. H.: Application of the tandem differential
mobility analyzer to studies of droplet growth or evaporation, J. Aerosol
Sci., 17, 771–787,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(86)90031-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0021-8502(86)90031-5</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1262, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1133061</a>,  2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Rolph, G. D.: Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem
(READY) Website, available at: <a href="http://www.ready.noaa.gov" target="_blank">http://www.ready.noaa.gov</a> (last access: 18 February 2016), NOAA Air Resources
Laboratory, College Park, MD., 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Rose, D., Wehner, B., Ketzel, M., Engler, C., Voigtländer, J., Tuch, T., and Wiedensohler, A.: Atmospheric number
size distributions of soot particles and estimation of emission factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1021–1031, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1021-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-1021-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A.,
Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol
chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2817–2836, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Rosen, H., Hansen, A. D. A., Gundel, L., and Novakov, T.: Identification of
the optically absorbing component in urban aerosols, Appl. Optics, 17,
3859–3861,   <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.17.003859" target="_blank">doi:10.1364/AO.17.003859</a>,
1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Schauer, J. J., Mader, B. T., Deminter, J. T., Heidemann, G., Bae, M. S.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Flagan, R. C., Cary, R. A., Smith, D., Huebert, B. J.,
Bertram, T., Howell, S., Kline, J. T., Quinn, P., Bates, T., Turpin, B.,
Lim, H. J., Yu, J. Z., Yang, H., and Keywood, M. D.: ACE-Asia
intercomparison of a thermal-optical method for the determination of
particle-phase organic and elemental carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37,
993–1001,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es020622f" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es020622f</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Smith, J. N., Dunn, M. J., VanReken, T. M., Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M. R.,
McMurry, P. H., and Huey, L. G.: Chemical composition of atmospheric
nanoparticles formed from nucleation in Tecamac, Mexico: Evidence for an
important role for organic species in nanoparticle growth, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L04808, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032523" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL032523</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling
System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Stephens, M., Turner, N., and Sandberg, J.: Particle identification by
laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity, Appl. Optics, 42,
3726–3736, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726" target="_blank">doi:10.1364/AO.42.003726</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Tan, H. B., Yin, Y., Gu, X. S., Li, F., Chan, P. W., Xu, H. B., Deng, X. J.,
and Wan, Q. L.: An observational study of the hygroscopic properties of
aerosols over the Pearl River Delta region, Atmos. Environ., 77, 817–826,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.049" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.049</a>,
2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Tan, H. B., Xu, H. B., Wan, Q. L., Li, F., Deng, X. J., Chan, P. W., Xia,
D., and Yin, Y.: Design and Application of an Unattended Multifunctional
H-TDMA System, J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 30, 1136–1148,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1</a>,
2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K., Zhang, R., Lin, Z., Zhang, Z., Lin, M., Cao, J.,
Liu, S., and Wang, G.: Impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical compositions on aerosol
light scattering in Guangzhou – the largest megacity in South China,
Atmos. Res., 135–136, 48–58,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Turpin, B. J., Cary, R. A., and Huntzicker, J. J.: An In Situ, Time-Resolved
Analyzer for Aerosol Organic and Elemental Carbon, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
12, 161–171,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959336" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786829008959336</a>,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Twomey, S.: On the composition of cloud nuclei in the northeastern United
States, J. Rech. Atmos, 3, 281–285,
1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Villani, P., Picard, D., Marchand, N., and Laj, P.: Design and Validation
of a 6-Volatility Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (VTDMA), Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 41, 898–906, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820701534593" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786820701534593</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Virkkula, A., Ahlquist, N. C., Covert, D. S., Arnott, W. P., Sheridan, P.
J., Quinn, P. K., and Coffman, D. J.: Modification, Calibration and a Field
Test of an Instrument for Measuring Light Absorption by Particles, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 39, 68–83,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868290901963" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868290901963</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Wehner, B., Philippin, S., Wiedensohler, A., Scheer, V., and Vogt, R.:
Variability of non-volatile fractions of atmospheric aerosol particles with
traffic influence, Atmos. Environ., 38, 6081–6090,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.015" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.015</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wehner, B., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Achtert, P., Birmili, W., Nowak, A.,
Wiedensohler, A., Garland, R. M., Pöschl, U., Hu, M., and Zhu, T.:
Mixing state of nonvolatile aerosol particle fractions and comparison with
light absorption in the polluted Beijing region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D00G17, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010923" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD010923</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Ng, W. M., Huang, J. X., Wu, D., and Yu, J. Z.: Determination of
Elemental and Organic Carbon in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the Pearl River Delta Region:
Inter-Instrument (Sunset vs. DRI Model 2001 Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer)
and Inter-Protocol Comparisons (IMPROVE vs. ACE-Asia Protocol), Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 46, 610–621,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.649313" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786826.2011.649313</a>,
2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wu, D., Bi, X. Y., Deng, X. J., Li, F., Tan, H. B., Liao, G. L., and Huang,
J.: Effect of atmospheric haze on the deterioration of visibility over the
Pearl River Delta, Acta Meteorol. Sin., 21, 215–223, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Wu, C., Wu, D., and Yu, J. Z.: Size distributions of elemental carbon and its contribution to light
extinction in urban and rural locations in the pearl river delta region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5107–5119, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5107-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-5107-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Yue, D. L., Zhong, L. J., Zhang, T., Shen, J., Yuan, L., Ye, S. Q., and  Zhou, Y.,: Particle Growth and Variation of Cloud Condensation Nucleus
Activity on Polluted Days with New Particle Formation: A Case Study for
Regional Air Pollution in the PRD Region, China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 16,
323–335, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.06.0381" target="_blank">doi:10.4209/aaqr.2015.06.0381</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Stanier, C. O., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R.,
Pandis, S. N., and Jimenez, J. L.: Insights into the Chemistry of New
Particle Formation and Growth Events in Pittsburgh Based on Aerosol Mass
Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4797–4809,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es035417u" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es035417u</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, S. L., Ma, N., Kecorius, S., Wang, P. C., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B.,
Größ, J., Wu, Z. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: Mixing state of
atmospheric particles over the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., 125, Part
A, 152–164,  <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.053" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.053</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Li, G., Yang, W., Huang, Z., Zhang, Z., Huang, X.,
Deng, W., Liu, T., Huang, Z., and Zhang, Z.: Emission factors of fine
particles, carbonaceous aerosols and traces gases from road vehicles: Recent
tests in an urban tunnel in the Pearl River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ.,
122, 876–884,   <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.024" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.024</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, X. Y., Sun, J. Y., Lin, W. L., Gong, S. L., Shen, X.
J., and Yang, S.: Characterization of new particle and secondary aerosol
formation during summertime in Beijing, China, Tellus B, 63, 382–394,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v63i3.16221" target="_blank">doi:10.3402/tellusb.v63i3.16221</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
