<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-8281-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Eddy covariance measurements of the net turbulent methane flux in the city
centre – results of 2-year campaign in Łódź, Poland</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Eddy covariance measurements of the net turbulent methane flux}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W.~Pawlak and K.~Fortuniak}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pawlak</surname><given-names>Włodzimierz</given-names></name>
          <email>wpawlak@uni.lodz.pl</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fortuniak</surname><given-names>Krzysztof</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Meteorology and Climatology, University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Włodzimierz Pawlak (wpawlak@uni.lodz.pl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>8281</fpage><lpage>8294</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>3</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>To investigate temporal variability of methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) fluxes
in an urban environment, air–surface exchange fluxes of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
continuously measured using eddy covariance techniques at a city-centre site
in Łódź, Poland, from July 2013 to August 2015. In the immediate
vicinity of the measurement site, potential methane sources include vehicle
traffic, dense sewerage infrastructure and natural gas networks. Sensible and
latent heat fluxes have also been measured since 2000 and carbon dioxide
fluxes since 2007 at this site. Upward CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes dominated during the
measurement period, indicating that the city centre is a net source of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
to the troposphere. The highest monthly fluxes were observed in winter (2.0
to 2.7 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the lowest in
summer (0.8 to 1.0 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Fluxes on
working days were around 6 % higher than on weekends. The cumulative flux
indicates that the city centre emitted a net quantity of nearly 18 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014. Stable values of the
FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in months (minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, maximum
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the lack of a clear annual course suggest comparable
magnitude of both fluxes.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The temporal and spatial variability of greenhouse gas fluxes in the
atmosphere is currently one of the most widely discussed climatological
problems in the scientific community. Methane, despite its trace presence in
the air (ca. 1.8 ppm; Hartman et al., 2013), plays an important role in the
environment. It participates in the global carbon cycle and is one of the
greenhouse gases whose concentration in the atmosphere affects the radiation
balance of the earth's surface. An increase in the concentration of methane
contributes to an enhancement of the greenhouse effect (Ciais et al., 2013).
Therefore, emissions of this gas into the atmosphere should be carefully
monitored.</p>
      <p>Methane is produced during the process of methanogenesis under anaerobic
conditions, from the decay of organic plant debris in water. The most
important source of methane in the world is wetlands (Shurpali and
Verma, 1998; Rinne et al., 2007; Baldocchi et al.,
2012; Hatalaa et al., 2012), but paddy fields (Miyata et al., 2000), cattle
farms (Laubach and Kelliher, 2005; Dengel et al., 2011; Hartmann et al.,
2013; Nicolini et al., 2013) and emissions from the soil are all important
sources (Smeets et al., 2009; Denmead et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2013).
Moreover, emissions of methane accompany forest fires and grass vegetation.
The effect of the combustion of natural gas (which contains at least 80 %
methane) is mainly water vapour and carbon dioxide. The combustion of fossil
fuels is, however, predominantly incomplete and is therefore an important
factor causing anthropogenic methane emissions. This happens in the case of
combustion of both natural gas and hydrocarbons contained in petrol and other
fuels (Nam et al., 2004; Nakagawa et al.,
2005; Wennberg et al., 2012). Another important source of methane in
urbanized areas is leakage from urban gas pipelines (Lowry, et al., 2001;
Gioli et al., 2012; Wennberg et al., 2012; Phillips et al., 2013). Methane
may also be emitted during the anaerobic respiration of bacteria in urban
soils (Bogner and Matthews, 2003) and in the decomposition of solid waste and
wastewater in sewage systems and at landfill sites (Bogner and Matthews,
2003; Laurila et al., 2005; Lohila et al., 2007; Wennberg et al., 2012; Jha
et al., 2008). In contrast, methane is removed
from the air by consumption by soil bacteria (Goldman et al., 1995; Kaye et
al., 2004; Groffman et al., 2006; Groffman and Pouyat, 2009). Methane is
involved in some of the reactions leading to photochemical smog formation
(Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). The disintegration of methane also results from
its reacting with the hydroxyl group in the atmosphere (Whalen, 2005). Annual
global emissions of methane into the atmosphere have been estimated as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5000 Tg. Emissions from landfills and waste (87–94 Tg) or fossil
fuels (85–105 Tg) are 2–3 times lower than estimated emission from
wetlands (177–284 Tg) (Ciais et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Research into the methane content in the air is now a priority because the
literature indicates that cities could be a significant source of this gas
(Elliot et al., 2000; Gioli et al., 2012; O'Shea et al., 2014; Nicolini et
al., 2013; Phillips et al., 2013; Christen, 2014; Kumar and Sharma, 2014;
Morin et al., 2014). The measurements of changes in methane concentration
have been carried out for decades (Ciais et al., 2013; Hartmann et al.,
2013). However, the analysis of its flux in urban areas is extremely rare. In
recent years, there have been approximately 500 stations measuring the fluxes
of carbon dioxide (CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) around the world of which approximately 20 are
located in cities and only a few are able to measure methane flux (Nordbo et
al., 2012; Oliphant, 2012; Christen, 2014; Helfter et al., 2016). It can be
concluded that the measurement of methane flux in cities is in its infancy
and challenges like the need for long-term measurements (beyond a month) and
the relationship between methane fluxes and land use are yet to be overcome.</p>
      <p>The development of the theory and measurement techniques of turbulent
exchange of mass, energy and momentum fluxes has been progressing for decades
(Stull, 1988; Lee et al., 2005; Foken, 2008; Aubinet et al.,
2012). Historical measurements of methane flux
have been severely limited due to the lack of suitable sensors, which have
only recently become available (Pattey et al., 2006; Hendriks et al., 2008;
Eugster and Pluss, 2010; Dengel et al., 2011; Detto et al., 2011; Sakabe et
al., 2012). At present, one of the most widely used instruments is the LI7700
Open Path CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Analyser (Burba and Anderson, 2010; McDermitt et al.,
2011), which uses eddy covariance as a measurement technique (Aubinet et al.,
2012). Worldwide, there are only a few long-term, continuous measurement
stations measuring turbulent fluxes of water vapour and carbon dioxide in
urban areas (Christen, 2014; Helfter et al., 2016). For methane flux in urban
areas, such data are probably at the implementation phase because previous
studies focused on areas which are the largest source of methane, i.e.
natural wetlands (Shurpali and Verma, 1998; Rinne
et al., 2007; Baldocchi et al., 2012; Hatalaa et al., 2012; Aubinet et al.,
2012), agricultural land (paddy fields, Miyata
et al., 2000) or forests (Smeets et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2013). The
chamber method, widely used in rural areas, has only a limited relevance in
the city. This method makes it possible to take measurements of methane
emissions from specific areas like urban lawns (Baciu et al., 2008); however,
it cannot be used in larger urban areas. A variety of techniques have
recently been applied to provide independent estimates of urban methane
emissions such as airborne observations (O'Shea et al., 2014; Mays et al., 2009), Fourier transform spectrometry (Wunch et
al., 2009) or isotopic source apportionment studies (Lowry et al., 2001).
Moriizumi et al. (1996) suggested the
occurrence of covariability of radon <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn concentration and methane flux, which they estimated to be 20 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
Poland, the issue of exchange of greenhouse gases in an urban area has also
been studied in Kraków, where, based on the measurements of methane
concentrations and the height of the atmospheric boundary layer, the average
monthly nocturnal flux of methane has been estimated to be 0.8 to
3 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kuc et al., 2003; Zimnoch et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>The aim of this study is to analyse the temporal variability of the
turbulent flux of methane (FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on a long-term series of
measurements recorded for over 2 years in the centre of Łódź
(July 2013 to August 2015). The diurnal variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
analysed and monthly values of the flux were determined. An assessment of
the cumulative annual exchange of methane between urban Łódź and
the troposphere was completed to determine whether it was an equally
efficient source of methane to the troposphere as  carbon dioxide. The
measurement results were compared to the variability of selected
meteorological elements. As the methane emissions in the city are determined
mainly by anthropogenic factors, the value of fluxes on weekdays and at
weekends were compared. No comparison was made to the fluxes estimated using
specific inventory methods because of a lack of data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The western part of the centre of Łódź (top). Solid white
lines indicate the source area with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 50, 75 and 90 %, calculated
for the turbulent fluxes measured at 10:00 to 14:00 during unstable
stratification (all available data from the period July 2013–August 2015).
The dashed red lines represent  250, 500, 750 and 1000 m distances from
the measurement point. The white circle indicates liquid petroleum gas station and the blue rectangle
indicates area of road tunnel construction. Bottom figures show spatial
distribution of gas network (bottom left) and sewage system (bottom right) in
the neighbourhood of the measurement site (white dots). Schemes are based on
data from Geodesy Center of Łódź (<uri>www.mapa.lodz.pl</uri>). Photo
source: <uri>www.google.com</uri>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Measurement site and instrumentation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study area and site location</title>
      <p>Łódź is one of the largest cities in Poland. The area of the city
is about 295 square kilometres (km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and its population is estimated at
706 000 residents. The city is located in central Poland on relatively flat
terrain which slopes south-westwards. Its altitude varies from 280 to 160 m
above mean sea level. The most densely built-up city-centre area covers
80 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the altitude difference in this part of the city does not
exceed 60 m. In the immediate vicinity of Łódź, there are no
large bodies of water, rivers or orographic obstacles impacting the climate
of the city that are worthy of investigation. Another factor making it easier
to take measurements of turbulent fluxes of mass and energy in
Łódź is that the city does not have a standard central sector of
tall buildings towering over an urban canopy layer, unlike other large cities in Poland.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>A FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement site in Łódź (left) and
instrumentation (middle). The right figure shows the frequency of measured
1 h blocks of raw data in relation to the RSSI (Received Signal Strength
Indicator) of Li7700 methane open-path analyser. Data recorded only in the
case RSSI &gt; 20 % were taken into account.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The measurements of turbulent fluxes of methane are conducted in the western
part of the city centre (51<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>28<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) as shown
in Fig. 1. This part of the city has the highest population density, reaching 17.2 thousand people per km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The station for measurements of
fluxes of mass, energy and momentum has been operating in the western part of
Łódź since 2000 (Offerle et al., 2006a, b; Pawlak et al., 2011;
Fortuniak et al., 2013; Fortuniak and Pawlak, 2015), but methane fluxes have been studied since July 2013. The
measurement set is mounted on top of a mast at a height of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m
(Fig. 2, left) which, given the average height of buildings of 11 m, enables
the assumption that the measurements are taken above the blending height in
the inertial sub-layer (Fig. 2). The source area of turbulent fluxes was
estimated (Fig. 1) for data collected during unstable stratification
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) around midday
(10.00–14.00 UTC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1), following the method of
Schmid (1994), and ranged from 250 to 750 m away from the measurement station
(Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>The percentage of artificial surface coverage from buildings, pavements,
streets and squares in this part of the city is 62 %. The remaining part
of the area is covered in vegetation of which only 10 % is trees (Kłysik,
1998). The vegetation is distributed unevenly in the form of lawns and trees
growing along street canyons. In the immediate vicinity of the measurement
location, 3- to 5-storey buildings dominate, ranging from 15 to 20 m in height. Most of the buildings have flat roofs covered with black tar paper
or sheet metal. The trees growing in the area are mostly deciduous and their
height usually does not exceed the height of the buildings. This results in a
well-formed roof surface with an average height of 11 m. The density of
built-up areas north and east of the measurement point, compared to the
southern and western sectors, is 10–20 % greater (Fig. 1). The
displacement height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated at 7.7 m. According to the
classification by Stewart and Oke (2012), the local climate zone can be
described as “compact low rise”. The roughness coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated
for the neutral stratification surrounding the measurement point was 2.5 m
on average. More information on the city's structure and the local climate
conditions can be found in Kłysik (1996), Kłysik and Fortuniak (1999),
Fortuniak et al. (2006, 2013), Offerle (2006a, b), Pawlak et al. (2011)
and Zieliński et al. (2013). The gas distribution network and sewerage
system around the flux tower are shown in Fig. 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Instrumentation and data processing</title>
      <p>Measurements of turbulent fluxes of methane were carried out using a standard
measurement set consisting of the ultrasonic anemometer R.M. Young
model 81000 (R.M. Young, Traverse City, Michigan, USA) and a fast-response
methane concentration sensor with an open-measurement-path LI7700 (LI-COR,
Lincoln, Nebraska, USA). The measurements were carried out with a precision
of 0.001 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1 ppb respectively. As the final calculation of
methane flux also requires values of sensible heat and water vapour fluxes in
the place of observation (LI-7700 Open Path CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Analyzer, 2011), the
measurement set also included a sensor measuring the concentrations of water
vapour and carbon dioxide. This was a LI7500 infrared CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
open-path analyser (LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The whole measurement system was attached approximately 1 m below the top of
the mast (Fig. 2, middle). The LI7500 head was placed on the horizontal arm
on the south-eastern side of the mast at a distance of about 60 cm from the
mast. The ultrasonic anemometer was then installed at a distance of 20 cm.
The LI7700 methane sensor was installed on an additional arm, 30 cm lower,
so that the centre of its measurement path, which is about 4 times longer
than the paths of LI7500 and ultrasonic anemometer, was at a similar level.
Previous studies have shown that the influence of a mast of diameter 0.15 m
is negligible and does not generate flow distortion (Fortuniak et al.,
2013).</p>
      <p>All the aforementioned sensors sampled with a frequency of 10 Hz.
Immediately before starting the measurements in July 2013, the sensor for
measuring H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mole fractions was calibrated (the zero and
span values were set). The methane concentration analyser was installed
directly after purchase, so the zero and span had been set by the
manufacturer. The two sensors and the ultrasonic anemometer were cleaned
approximately once a month. This was pertinent to the methane sensor because
its mirrors proved to be highly susceptible to grime (air impurities, bird
droppings, atmospheric deposits, drying raindrops or melting snowflakes).
The manufacturer equipped the instrument with a mirror heating and
condensation anti-freezing system and a cleaning system. Using a pump, this
applied cleaning liquid to the lower mirror. However, in practice and
particularly in autumn and winter this was insufficient, particularly on days
with humidity of up to 100 % when the signal strength dropped by several
tens of percent in just a few hours. According to the manufacturer of the
instrument, if the signal strength Relative Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI)
is less than 10 %, this means that the measurement path is blocked by
external factors. However, it was decided to tighten this criterion. In
order to calculate the fluxes, the methane mole fraction values observed at
RSSI &gt; 20 % were chosen. Of these, the RSSI exceeded 70 % in
only 8 % of cases (Fig. 2, right), while observations at 20 &lt; RSSI &lt; 70 % had a much greater share. Most often and in 20 % of
cases the signal strength was between 30 and 40 % (Fig. 2, right).</p>
      <p>The 10 Hz fluctuation data for the vertical wind velocity and the
concentrations of water vapour and methane were recorded by a CR21X
data logger (Campbell Scientific, Logan, Utah, USA) so that all parameters
could be recorded at the same time. The measurement station was also
equipped with sensors recording the general weather conditions (air
temperature and humidity, atmospheric pressure, wind direction and velocity,
radiation balance components, precipitation). These data were recorded every
10 min by a CR10 data logger (Campbell Scientific, Logan, Utah, USA) and
were archived together with the 10 Hz data on a PC.</p>
      <p>The FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined directly from the definition as the covariance
of the vertical wind velocity fluctuations and the methane concentration
fluctuations in the air (Lee et al., 2005; Foken, 2008; Burba and Anderson,
2010; Aubinet et al., 2012):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FCH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters are, respectively, the
fluctuations of vertical wind velocity and the concentration of methane in
the air, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are their
averaged values. A positive flux means the turbulent transport of methane
into the troposphere; a negative flux is its uptake by the urban surface.
Block averaging of 1 h was used as an averaging period. Since the
measurements were carried out at a considerable height, a shorter averaging
period could lead to underestimating the fluxes (Pawlak et al., 2011). During
the calculations, all necessary procedures and corrections were applied. Any
data with non-real values were rejected, the spike detection procedure was
performed (Vickers and Mahrt, 1997), the double rotation of the wind
coordinate system was applied (Kaimal and Finnigan, 1994) and the impact of
separation of the sensors was eliminated by maximizing the covariance in the
interval <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 s. Furthermore, sonic temperature was corrected for humidity
in the air (Schotanus et al., 1983) and the WPL correction was added (Webb et
al., 1980). According to LI7700 manufacturer's recommendations, the
correction terms related to air density fluctuations affecting both the
spectroscopic response and the mass density retrieval were applied (LI-7700
Open Path CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Analyzer, 2011).</p>
      <p>A detailed control of the quality of the calculated fluxes was also carried
out, which focused primarily on the assessment of data stationarity. The most
commonly used Foken's test (Foken and Wichura, 1996) is not always fit for
this
purpose. Therefore two other tests were used as proposed by Mahrt (1998) and
Dutaur et al. (1999) and modified by Affre et al. (2000). During the data
quality assessment, a very strict criterion was adopted to classify the data
as suitable for further analysis when three tests confirmed that
stationarity was met. A milder criterion, indicating good data quality when at
least one test suggested stationarity, did not meet the expectations. This
criterion accepted data with unrealistically high positive values and a
substantial number of fluxes with high negative values whose existence
cannot be explained. However, the restrictive evaluation of the data reduced
the amount of data suitable for further analysis by 23.8 %. Uncertainty
regarding their quality was kept to a minimum. Approximately 10 % of the
data were not registered due to problems with power supply in autumn 2013,
and 29.8 % of the recorded data were rejected because the measurements had
been taken in weather conditions which made it impossible for the LI7700
sensor to measure the concentration of methane properly. This was a result
of such factors as precipitation and atmospheric deposits, saturation of air
with water vapour and impurities. This problem occurred particularly in
autumn and winter (Table 1) when frequent cleaning of the sensor placed on
the mast was impossible. As a result, the percentage of acceptable data was
36.4 % as shown in Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Data capture of 1 h values recorded for FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the centre
of Łódź in the period July 2013–August 2015.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spring MAM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer JJA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">47.4 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Autumn SON</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Winter DJF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31.1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">July 2013–August 2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.4 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Climate background</title>
      <p>The climate of central Poland is a typical transitional climate of moderate
latitudes. It is characterized by marine air masses flowing from the west
and by continental air from the east. The mean monthly air temperature in
the study period varied from 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in winter (January 2014) to
22.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in summer (August 2015). The study period was considered
to be hot with heat waves occurring and the winters were relatively warm
with mean temperatures in 2014 and 2015 of 2.7 and
2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C respectively. The average temperature in 2014 was
10.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The total precipitation in the same year was 584 mm, with
a greater amount of precipitation of 360 mm (61.6 % of the annual total)
recorded in the warm half of the year. The maximum solar radiation was
observed in July (688 MJ month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014 and 697 MJ month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2015) while the minimum occurred in the
winter months when they fell below 80 MJ month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
monthly radiation balance totals were almost 400 MJ month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in July, while in the winter months they became negative and reached even
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>56 MJ month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (December 2013). The average wind speed in
the period was 3.1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with slightly higher values in
winter (3.4 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and lower values in the summer (2.8 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average). The study area of the city is dominated
by air flow from the west (Fortuniak et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>During the measurement period, atmospheric instability or neutral conditions
prevailed in the city centre. Stable air stratification was observed in the
centre of Łódź in only 7.6 % of cases (from 2.9 % in winter to
10.4 % in summer). The frequency of neutral and unstable stratification
was similar and was 46.0 and 46.4 % respectively. Unstable conditions
prevailed in summer (51.6 % of cases), while neutral conditions were
observed in 61.7 % of cases in winter. In the diurnal cycle, stable
stratification was also a rarity. In the daytime (10:00 to 14:00),
this type of stratification was observed in only 0.3 % of cases on average
throughout the year, while at night the condition <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0 was
met by 15.0 % of the data. Other types of atmospheric stability appeared
in the daytime in 19.7 % (neutral) and in 80 % (unstable) of cases. At
night, neutral conditions prevailed (67.0 % of cases), while unstable
conditions were observed in 18.0 % of cases on average throughout the
year.</p>
      <p>Clear annual and diurnal cycles characterized the fluxes of energy and mass.
Both the sensible heat flux <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the latent heat flux <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
largest in summer (about 190 and 120–150 MJ month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively). The Bowen ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was typically urban (i.e. greater than 1 and up to 2.25
in May 2015). The annual variability of carbon dioxide flux (FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
also marked by an annual cycle. The maximum values occurred in winter when
anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions,  a result of burning fossil fuels for
vehicle traffic and domestic heating, were the largest. The typical values
exceeded 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and had a
maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In summer, the consumption of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by urban vegetation
and the
lack of domestic house heating contribute to a decrease in the intensity of
net exchange. The minimum values of FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>One-hour means of air temperature, 1 h net turbulent FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
flux (approved by three stationarity tests), and mean and median of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured in the period July 2013–August 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Annual variability of FCH${}_{{4}}$}?><title>Annual variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>The 2-year measurements of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed a number of characteristics
of the exchange of methane in the city–troposphere system. Irrespective of
the season, mainly positive values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed (Fig. 3). On
average, the percentage of positive values over the study period was
93.7 %, which was slightly greater in the cold season (94.6 %) than in
the warm season (93.2 %). This means that regardless of the season the
centre of Łódź is a source of methane to the atmosphere. In
addition, the time variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a clear annual cycle
with a maximum in the cold season and a minimum in the warm season (Fig. 3).
The highest recorded values exceeded 100 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and were observed in November, December, January and February. The
least intense exchange of methane was observed from May to September, when
FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was rarely greater than 50 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The exception was the summer of 2013 when the recorded values of
FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were close to winter values in July and August. However, only
average values were elevated, while the median values are similar to those
of July and August 2014 and 2015. It can be assumed that in the summer of
2013 additional sources of methane were present which could be the result of
damages to the gas network. It is likely that this occurred south-east of
the station, where the deep excavations associated with the construction of a
tunnel for one of the main streets of the city centre were completed (Fig. 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Monthly values of mean, median and standard deviation values of
FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the centre of Łódź in the period
July 2013–August 2015 (all fluxes in nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">J</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">F</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">M</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">M</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">J</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">J</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">O</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">D</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">22.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">29.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">39.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">38.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">35.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">45.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Median</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">18.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">22.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">26.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">26.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">38.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">27.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">35.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">56.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">43.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">39.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">35.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">20.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">19.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">43.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">47.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Median</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">18.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">20.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">34.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">38.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">42.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">15.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">11.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">20.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">31.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">39.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Median</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">47.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">20.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">14.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>It seems that the annual cycle of turbulent methane exchange should be
attributed to the anthropogenic origin of this gas in the centre of the
city. In the cold season, there is an increase in methane emissions
associated with the combustion of fossil fuels, which results from the
increased discharge of motor vehicle exhaust gas (Heeb et al., 2003;
Nakagawa et al., 2005). Another important factor is the increased natural
gas consumption in winter, its leakage from distribution networks and its
use in domestic gas burners. Methane is also produced by heating ovens
(Ciais et al., 2013). The absence of inventory data makes it difficult to
verify these dependencies for Łódź. However, the increased values
of the flux of methane are clearly visible where there are rapid drops in
air temperature i.e. in late October or late November and December 2014
(Fig. 3). A pronounced annual cycle can also be seen in the temporal
variability of the mean monthly values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3, Table 2). The
highest monthly averages of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were recorded in January and February
2014 when the average exchange exceeded 60 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the same months of 2015, the FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values were lower and slightly exceeded 50 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was a consequence of winter 2014/2015
being warmer than 2013/2014. The mean monthly values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer
rarely exceeded 20 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The median
values in the warm half of the year were very similar to the average values.
In the cold season, the median was lower due to the sporadically occurring
elevated levels of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Regardless of the measurements, some
differences in the time variability of methane flux in transitional seasons
can also be observed. In late winter and early spring, a rapid drop in
FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by approximately 30 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
can be observed, while FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> starts to increase at the end of summer and
slowly continues until winter. The cold half of the year is also
characterized by a greater variability of the fluxes of methane (Table 2).
In the summer months, the standard deviation of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> did not exceed 20 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas during the winter
months it was more than 2 times greater. An exception is the
aforementioned summer of 2013.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Mean diurnal variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in the period
July 2013–August 2015 (top left figure) and for months. Thin and thick black
lines indicate, respectively, variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and three-element running
average of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thin vertical lines indicate standard deviation of
FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Diurnal variability of FCH${}_{{4}}$}?><title>Diurnal variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Figure 4 shows the average daily flux of methane in the centre of Łódź calculated for the entire study period (top graph) and for the
successive months of the year (middle and bottom graphs). The average daily
variability in the successive months confirms the above described annual
variability; i.e. higher values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred in the cold season.
Furthermore, the average daily variability, regardless of month and time of
day, is always positive. This means that the emissions of methane dominate
over its uptake by the urban surface. The daily pattern, averaged for the
entire measurement period, shows a clear diurnal cycle with two maxima and
two minima. The maximum values occurred in the morning (07:00–08:00 UTC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1) and in the evening (19:00–20.00 UTC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1). During the maxima, the
values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reached almost 40 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas during the noon hours and at night they
dropped to 26–28 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Such a daily pattern suggests
that the average flux of methane can be divided into two components. One has
an approximately constant value of up to 26–28 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and its source may be the sewerage system and
the natural gas distribution system. In the morning and in the afternoon,
additional sources of methane (vehicle traffic, combustion of natural gas,
leaks from gas network associated with the increasing gas consumption) are
activated, increasing the flux by 10–12 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, it should be noted that due to the lack of inventory
data the above considerations are only hypothetical.</p>
      <p>In the warm half of the year (May–October), the average daily variability
was low and from April to September it ranged between 10 and 40 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In May, June and July it was
difficult to see clear maxima during a 24 h period. In August, September
and October there was a maximum in the morning. In the cold half of the year
(November–April), the average daily variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
characterized by distinctly higher values from 20 to 90 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this period, the double daily maximum was
easier to identify and in November, December, January and February the
afternoon peak seemed to be greater than in the mornings. In March and
April, the maximum values were comparable. The presence of two maxima in
the variability of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the cold season could be explained by the
increased consumption of natural gas, the combustion of fossil fuels in the
morning and afternoon hours from cooking and domestic heating, and the
diurnal variability of motor vehicle traffic, which can cause road congestion
in winter. In the warmer seasons and particularly during the holiday
periods, motor vehicle traffic become less intense and the city's
inhabitants stop heating their homes. In the cold season, FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
also characterized by greater variability throughout the day. The standard
deviation of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in this season can reach 50 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
while in the warm season it rarely exceeds 20 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Monthly and annual exchange of FCH${}_{{4}}$}?><title>Monthly and annual exchange of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Based on the average daily patterns of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for each month
(the sum of the average hourly FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> multiplied by the number of days in
the month), the exchange of methane in the successive months of the study
period was determined (Fig. 5). The highest values occurred in winter; in January and February 2014 they exceeded 2.5 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The summer values were more than 2 times
lower and dropped to 0.7–0.8 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Autumn of 2013 was characterized by elevated values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. A
comparison between the monthly exchange of methane and the mean monthly air
temperature reveals a clear link between these parameters (coefficient of
determination <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.731; Fig. 5, bottom right). Thus, the anthropogenic
sources of methane gain intensity at low air temperatures, which can be seen
by comparing the results of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements in winter 2013/14 and
2014/15 (Fig. 5). In the first case, an increase of the monthly values of
the flux was recorded starting from November, with a maximum in January and
then a decrease until April–May. Between November 2013 and January 2014, the
exchange almost doubled (from 1.36 to 2.67 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The next winter, the monthly exchange of methane between
November and March differed little, and FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from November 2014
to January 2015 only by ca. 0.27 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The differences were associated with thermal contrasts during
the two winters. In winter 2014/2015, the monthly average temperature
remained at 2.2–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, while in the previous winter season the
mean January temperature dropped to 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The greater activity
of the anthropogenic sources of methane in the centre of the city is also
confirmed by the measurements of methane concentrations (Fig. 5, bottom
left). The high winter values of the flux of methane are accompanied by
higher concentrations of the gas in the air and seasonal changes in OH
concentration.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Monthly totals of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (top) in relation to mean monthly
CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (bottom left) and mean monthly air temperature (bottom
right) in the period July 2013–August 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Based on the data on the exchange of methane in Łódź obtained
between January 2014 and August 2015, an attempt was made to assess the
cumulative annual exchange of this gas in the centre of Łódź
between the city centre and the atmosphere (Fig. 6). To date, there have
been no standard methods for filling gaps in the long-term data series of
turbulent fluxes of methane in urbanized areas. Difficulties with their
development arise primarily from the fact that the continuous measurements
of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in cities are still rare. Furthermore, as in the case of carbon
dioxide fluxes, data on anthropogenic sources of the gas and the parameters
of natural processes (e.g. air temperature) may be useful for the data gap-filling procedures (Aubinet et al., 2012). The annual exchange of methane in
the city centre was therefore estimated using two simple methods. Firstly,
on the basis of the average daily patterns of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the monthly
exchange in the successive months was determined and then the accumulation
was made (Fig. 6, solid step plots). Secondly, the gaps were filled in a
series of 1 h values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in two ways. When a data gap was not
longer than 3 h, interpolation was used, while for longer gaps data were
inserted from the average daily pattern in the respective month for the
respective hour. Both methods yielded very similar results (the difference
was approximately 1 %), although it is obvious that the cumulative fluxes
obtained in this manner should be regarded as an approximation. Therefore it
can be stated that the annual exchange of methane in the centre of Łódź in 2014 was equal to about 17.6 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6).
The graph shows the impact of the annual variability of methane flux: the
cumulative flux grows fastest in the cold half of the year. Due to the
differences in the exchange of methane described in Sect. 3.4, with
reference to changes in air temperature in the study period, the cumulative
exchange in the period January–August 2015 was calculated in a similar
manner. The relatively warmer beginning of 2015 caused the exchange to be
less intense and the cumulative flux of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in August 2015 was by
9.2 % lower than in 2015.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Cumulative fluxes of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the period January–December 2014
(light blue lines) and January–August 2015 (dark blue lines). Dotted and
solid lines indicate cumulative annual FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated, respectively, on
the basis of all 1 h data and on the basis of integrated mean daily
courses of consecutive months.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Weekly differences of FCH${}_{{4}}$}?><title>Weekly differences of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Since fluxes of methane in the city are associated with anthropogenic
sources, a weekly cycle of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> should be expected that is similar to
that seen for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange (Pawlak et al., 2011). Based the on 1 h
data for FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recorded in the period July 2013 to August 2015, an
average daily flux of 44.3 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was
determined (Fig. 7). Having taken only working days for the calculation
(Monday to Friday), it was found that the exchange was higher, i.e. 45.2 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the average daily
exchange of methane during weekends (Saturday and Sunday) amounted to 42.3 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and was therefore lower by
4.5 %. These results suggest that in the study period
anthropogenic sources of methane are likely to be, on average, less at weekends compared
to working days. It should be emphasized that on Saturday, the average flux
was lower by 6.9 % in comparison with working days, while on Sunday it was
lower by 12 %. The difference is a result of significantly lower peak on
Sunday morning, which can be attributed to less intensive human activity on
Sunday morning and lower traffic load in comparison to the same time of day
on Saturday. Similar results were observed in summer and winter, when the
average daily exchange on working days was higher by 1.6 % (summer) and
1.9 % (winter) compared with the average for the whole week. The average
daily exchange at weekends was lower by 4.0 and 4.7 % respectively. An
exception is the transitional seasons when the average daily exchange of
methane on working days was comparable (spring, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 %) or slightly lower
(autumn, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6 %) than the average for the entire week (Fig. 7). However, the average daily exchange during the weekend turned out to be
higher and amounted to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6 % (spring) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8 % (autumn). Without
the inventory data, it is difficult to explain why the fluxes vary,
particularly in the case of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes where higher values are observed
on working days as compared to weekends throughout the year (Pawlak et al.,
2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Mean daily values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the period July 2013–June 2015
calculated for study period and seasons. Red, black and blue bars indicate mean daily exchange during, respectively, working days (Monday to Friday),
weeks (Monday to Sunday) and weekends (Saturday and Sunday).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mean FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for all data (left), cold (middle) and
warm period (right) in relation to wind direction in the period
July 2013–August 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Methane fluxes and wind direction</title>
      <p>As mentioned in Sect. 2.1, the centre of Łódź is the most
densely built-up area of the city. The measurement point is located in an
area of uniform building density while, as mentioned in Sect. 2.1, this
density is slightly greater to the east and north of the station. An
analysis of the average value of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on the wind direction
confirms, at least in part, the impact of building density on the value of
methane turbulent exchange (Fig. 8). The fluxes of methane recorded during
airflow from the north, and especially from the south-east, were by far the
largest in the study period and reached 35–45 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8, left). However, it is difficult to be
confident in the direct relationship between urban design and FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
because of the increased values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the south-western sector
(approximately 40 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Such a
relationship cannot be ruled out, but the local point sources of methane
may play an important role even though they are difficult to identify. In
the case of the south-western sector, the liquid petroleum gas station
located approximately 800 m from the measurement station may be such a
source. It lies approximately 200 m to the west of the large intersection
where traffic load is usually larger than the surrounding streets.
Significantly lower values of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (less than 20 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) observed with airflow from the south and west
may be due to the presence of large urban parks (Fig. 1). Heavy traffic does
not run through these streets and the density of the gas network and sewage
system is also significantly smaller in comparison with other sectors (Fig. 1).
The distribution of average FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on the wind direction,
calculated for the cold half of the year (Fig. 8, middle), suggests that in
this season local anthropogenic methane sources were more intense. The
relationship between FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the wind direction was much the same
throughout the study period, while the average values of fluxes were higher
and amounted to 55–70 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Therefore, the sources could be clusters of houses with leaks from gas
installations or vehicles at nearby intersections which are heavily jammed
in the cold half of the year. In summer, the average fluxes of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
significantly lower (less than 30 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8, right) regardless of the wind direction. The contrast
between the sectors was not clear. An exception is the clearly visible
elevated value of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, associated with the airflow from the
south-western sector.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>Methane fluxes in relation to carbon dioxide fluxes</title>
      <p>During more than 2 years of measurements in Łódź, both FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured and therefore the question about temporal
covariability of both fluxes can be addressed, and, consequently, whether
the exchange of methane can be estimated based on the knowledge of the flux
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average daily variability (Fig. 9, left) and the average
monthly variability (Fig. 9, middle) of the value of methane flux were
compared to the fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the figure indicates, such
covariability exists and bigger fluxes of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are accompanied by larger
fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Unfortunately, the low coefficients of determination
(0.57 and 0.56) mean FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot be used as a proxy for FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
centre of Łódź. An even weaker relationship was observed between
the average daily patterns of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9, right).
Although the two fluxes have a characteristic pattern with two maxima in a
24 h period, the coefficient of determination is only 0.25. We therefore
conclude that FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data cannot be used to facilitate gap filling of
FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data in the centre of Łódź.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mean daily (left), monthly (middle) and hourly FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes
against FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the period July 2013–June 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Monthly FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (up) and mean diurnal courses
of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the period July 2013–August 2015 and for
seasons.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/8281/2016/acp-16-8281-2016-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The comparison of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes allow analysis of the
relative contribution of each of the fluxes to total emissions to atmosphere.
The average value of the FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in 2013–2015 was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10, top). Rather stable values of the ratio in months
(minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the lack of
a clear annual course suggest rather comparable magnitude of both fluxes.
However, a clear diurnal course in the ratio has been observed (Fig. 10,
bottom) with reduced values in the day and elevated values at night. On
average, over the study period and in the transitional seasons, the daily
variation of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was similar. Between the hours of 09:00
and 17:00 FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately constant of the order 2.5
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At night, these values grow to about 5–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be explained by relatively constant methane emissions
related to leaks from pipelines and reduced emission of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
the result of minimum of traffic load. In winter, the average daily
variability of the FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio can be characterized by
slightly higher values during the day (about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
significantly higher at night, reaching <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the hours
of 02:00 and 06:00 (Fig. 10, bottom). The causes again are clear: a minimum
traffic load giving reduced fluxes of FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but also increased methane
leaks from pipelines associated with higher gas consumption for heating of
the surrounding buildings. The exception was the daily course
FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the summer, which is reversed. The minimum (of the
order of 3–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was observed at night and the maximum (more
than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) around noon (Fig. 10, bottom). Elevated values of
the ratio during the day are the result of photosynthesis reducing FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>The measurements of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> carried out in the centre of Łódź
for more than 2 years provided information on the time variability of methane
exchange between the urban surface and the atmosphere. The measurement
results showed that, as in the case of other greenhouse gases, i.e. water
vapour (Offerle et al., 2006a, b) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pawlak et al., 2011), the
centre of Łódź is a source of methane to the atmosphere. Another
feature indicating the similarity in the time variability of greenhouse gases
is the annual cycle of the exchange of methane in the system: city
centre/atmosphere, which seems to result from an annual cycle of
anthropogenic methane emissions. Other characteristics such as diurnal
variability, and notably weekly variability, are not as pronounced as for
FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pawlak et al., 2011). The annual exchange of methane in terms of
pure carbon in the centre of Łódź was estimated at
13.2 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which, compared to the exchange of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated in Łódź at 2.93 kg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
does not seem too large. At the same time, it must be noted that the centre
of Łódź is a source of methane comparable in intensity to the most
productive natural areas, i.e. wetlands. The annual exchange of methane in
Łódź was estimated to be 17.6 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while at
the same time (2014) the exchange in the wetlands of the Biebrza National
Park (north-eastern Poland) was approximately 18 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fortuniak et al., 2016). Comparable values of the annual exchange of methane
were also observed at other stations located in wetlands: approximately
16.5 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Finland; Rinne et al., 2007) or
14.0–18.5 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sweden; Nilsson et al., 2008).</p>
      <p>Unfortunately, the possibility of comparing the results obtained with those from
other cities is limited at this time. The only longer-term measurements of
methane flux were performed in Florence (March–May 2011; Gioli et al., 2012)
and in London (3-year campaign; Helfter et al., 2016). The mean values of the
methane fluxes obtained in these cities were higher than in Łódź.
In Florence, the average methane exchange in the spring of 2011 was estimated
to be 135 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Łódź
in the same season was 4 times lower and equal to
31 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, a comparison of the obtained
results of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements with inventory research does not
necessarily yield a positive outcome (Gioli et al., 2012). In London, the
average exchange was also several times higher than that observed in
Łódź (142 and 32 nmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively). The
results of this type, however, allow only a very general comparison and the
limited sampling period prevents analysis. For example, the mean variability
of daily FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Florence in spring was characterized by one maximum
during the day, while two maxima were observed in Łódź for the
same period: morning and evening. The measurements in Florence showed no
correlation between FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Gioli et
al., 2012), while in Łódź a strong relationship occurs
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). It is also impossible to compare the annual exchange and, in
the absence of measurements in other cities, it is difficult to determine the
relationship between the intensity of annual methane exchange and a parameter
characterizing the study area of the city in general. In the case of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
flux, a clear relationship between the annual FCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the percentage of
artificial surfaces in the vicinity of the measurement point (Nordbo et al.,
2012; Oliphant, 2012) was observed. Based on the existing measurements, it is
difficult to attempt to seek a similar dependence for the flux of methane
since only in London a relationship between FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and population has been
found (Helfter et al., 2016). There are also several published results of
urban methane emissions obtained using eddy covariance techniques such as
using alkanes (Los Angeles, Peischl et al.,
2013), aircraft measurements (Indianapolis, Mays et al., 2009) or a
ground-based Fourier transform spectrometer (Los Angeles, Wunch et al.,
2009). All of them report the existence of FCH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes higher than those measured
in Łódź.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data set is available to the community and can be accessed by request to
the corresponding author.</p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{0.3cm}}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Funding for this research was provided by National Centre of Science under
project 2011/01/D/ST10/07419.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: L. Zhang</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{0.5cm}}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Affre, C., Lopez, A., Carrara, A., Druilhet, A., and Fontan, J.: The analysis
of energy and ozone flux data from the LANDES experiment, Atmos. Environ.,
34, 803–821, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance. A Practical Guide
to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London,
New York, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baciu, C., Etiope, G., Cuna, S., and Spulber, L.: Methane seepage in an
urban development area (Bacau, Romania): origin, extent, and hazard,
Geofluids, 8, 311–320, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baldocchi, D., Detto, M., Sonnentag, O., Verfaillie, J., The, Y. A., Silver,
W., and Kelly, N. M.: The challenges of measuring methane fluxes and
concentrations over a peatland pasture, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 153, 177–187,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bogner, J. and Matthews, E.: Global methane emissions from landfills: new
methodology and annual estimates 1980–1996, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17,
1065, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GB001913</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Burba, G. and Anderson, T.: A Brief Practical Guide to Eddy Covariance Flux
Measurements: Principles and Workflow Examples for Scientific and Industrial
Applications, LI-COR Biosciences, Hardbound and Softbound Editions, Lincoln,
USA, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Christen, A.: Atmospheric measurement techniques to quantify greenhouse gas
emissions from cities, Urban Climate, 10, 241–260, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le
Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and
Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex V., and Midgley P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and
New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dengel, S., Levy, P. E., Grace, J., Jones, S. K., and Skiba, U. M.: Methane
emissions from sheep pasture, measured with an open-path eddy covariance
system, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 3524–3533, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Denmead, O. T., Macdonald, B. C. T., Bryant, G., Naylor, T., Wilson, S.,
Griffith, D. W. T., Wang, W. J., Salter, B., White, I., and Moody, P. W.:
Emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from Australian sugarcane soils, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 150, 748–756, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Detto, M., Verfailli, J., Anderson, F., Xu, L., and Baldocchi, D.: Comparing
laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes
using the eddy covariance method, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1312–1324,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dutaur, L., Cieslik, S., Carrara, A., and Lopez, A.: The detection of
nonstationarity in the determination of deposition fluxes. Proceedings of
EUROTRAC Symposium '98, vol. 2., WIT Press, Southampton, UK, 171–176, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Elliott, S., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., Bossert, J. E., Chow, J., Colina,
J. A., Dubey, M. K., Duce, R. A., Edgerton, S., Gaffney, J., Gupta, M.,
Guzman, F., Matson, P. A., McNair, L. A., Ortiz, E., Riley, W., Rowland, F.
S., Ruiz, M. E., Russell, A. G., Smith, F. A., Sosa, G., Streit, G., and
Watson, J.: Mexico City and the biogeochemistry of global urbanization,
Environ. Sci. Policy, 3, 145–156, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Eugster, W. and Pluss, P.: A fault-tolerant eddy covariance system for
measuring CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 841–851, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Foken, T.: Micrometeorology, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surfacebased flux
measurements. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 78, 83–105, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fortuniak, K. and Pawlak, W.: Selected Spectral Characteristics of Turbulence
over an Urbanized Area in the Centre of Łódź, Poland, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 154, 137–156, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9966-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-014-9966-7</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fortuniak, K., Kłysik, K., and Wibig, J.: Urban-rural contrasts of
meteorological parameters in Łódź, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 84,
91–101, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fortuniak, K., Pawlak, W., and Siedlecki, M.: Integral turbulence statistics
over a central european city centre, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 146, 257–276,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fortuniak, K., Pawlak, W., Bednorz, L., Grygoruk, M., Siedlecki, M.,
Zieliński, M.: The methane and carbon dioxide fluxes on a temperate mire
in Central Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., in review, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gioli, B., Toscano. P., Lugato, E., Matese, A., Miglietta, F., Zaldei, A.,
and Vaccari, F. P.: Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes and source partitioning
in urban areas: The case study of Florence, Italy, Environ. Pollut., 164,
125–131, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Goldman, M. B., Groffman, P. M., Pouyat, R. V., McDonnell, M. J., and
Pickett, S. A.: CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake and availability in forest soils along an
urban to rural gradient, Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 281–286, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Groffman, P. M. and Pouyat, R. V.: Methane uptake in urban forests and lawns,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 5229–5235, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Groffman, P. M., Pouyat, R., Cadenasso, M. L., Zipperer, W. C., Szlavecz, K.,
Yesilonis, I. D., Band, L. E., and Brush, G. S.: Land use context and natural
soil controls on plant community composition and soil nitrogen and carbon
dynamics in urban and rural forests, Forest Ecol. Manag., 236, 177–192,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, D. L., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Rusticucci, M., Alexander, L. V.,
Brönnimann, S., Charabi, Y., Dentener, F. J., Dlugokencky, E. J.,
Easterling, D. R., Kaplan, A., Soden, B. J., Thorne, P. W., Wild, M., and
Zhai, P. M.: Observations: Atmosphere and Surface, in: Climate Change 2013:
The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited
by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hatalaa, J. A., Detto, M., Sonnentag, O., Devereld, S. J., Verfaillie, J.,
and Baldocchi, D.: Greenhouse gas (CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) fluxes from
drained and flooded agricultural peatlands in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 150, 1–18, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Heeb, N. V., Forss, A. M., Saxer, C. J., and Wilhelm, P.: Methane, benzene
and alkyl benzene cold start emission data of gasoline-driven passenger cars
representing the vehicle technology of the last two decades, Atmos. Environ.,
37, 5185–5195, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Helfter, C., Tremper, A. H., Halios, C. H., Kotthaus, S., Bjorkegren, A.,
Grimmond, C. S. B., Barlow, J. F., and Nemitz, E.: Spatial and temporal
variability of urban fluxes of methane, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide
above London, UK, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2016-216</ext-link>, in
review, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hendriks, D. M. D., Dolman, A. J., van der Molen, M. K., and van Huissteden,
J.: A compact and stable eddy covariance set-up for methane measurements
using off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
431–443, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-431-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-431-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jha, A. K., Sharma, C., Singh, N., Ramesh, R., Purvaja, R., and Gupta, P.
K.: Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management in Indian
mega-cities: A case study of Chennai landfill sites, Chemosphere, 71,
750–758, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their
Structure and Measurement, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kaye, J. P., Burke, I. C., Mosier, A. R., and Guerschman, J. P.: Methane and
nitrous oxide fluxes from urban soils to the atmosphere, Ecol. Appl., 14,
975–981, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kłysik, K.: Spatial and seasonal distribution of anthropogenic heat
emissions in Lodz, Poland, Atmos. Environ., 30, 3397–3404, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kłysik, K.: The characteristics of urban areas in Łódź from a
climatological point of view. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia
Geographica Physica, 3, 173–185, 1998 (in Polish).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kłysik, K. and Fortuniak, K.: Temporal and spatial characteristics of the
urban heat island of Łódź, Poland, Atmos. Environ., 33,
3885–3895, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kuc, T., Rozanski, K., Zimnoch, M., Necki, J. M., and Korus, A.:
Anthropogenic emissions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in an urban environment,
Appl. Energ., 75, 193–203, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, A. and Sharma, M. P.: GHG emission and carbon sequestration potential
from MSW of Indian metro cities, Urban Climate, 8, 30–41, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Laubach, J. and Kelliher, F. M.: Methane emissions from dairy cows: Comparing
open-path laser measurements to profile-based techniques, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 135, 340–345, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Laurila, T., Tuovinen, J.-P., Lohila, A., Hatakka, J., Aurela, M., Thum, T.,
Pihlatie, M., Rinne, J., and Vesala, T.: Measuring methane emissions from a
landfill using a cost-effective micrometeorological method, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 32, L19808, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023462" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023462</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, X., Massman, W., and Law., B.: Handbook of Micrometeorology – A Guide
for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, Boston, London, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>LI-7700 Open Path CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Analyzer: Instruction Manual, Li-cor Biosciences,
available at: <uri>www.licor.com</uri> (last access: 30 June 2016), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lohila, A., Laurila, T., Tuovinen, J.-P., Aurela, M., Hatakka, J., Thum, T.,
Pihlatie, M., Rinne, J., and Vesala, T.: Micrometeorological Measurements of
Methane and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes at a Municipal Landfill, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 41, 2717–2722, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lowry, D., Holmes, C. W., Rata, N. D., O'Brien, P., and Nisbet, E. G.: London
methane emissions: use of diurnal changes in concentration and d13C to
identify urban sources and verify inventories, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
7427–7448, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mahrt, L.: Flux sampling errors for aircraft and towers, J. Atmos.Ocean.
Tech., 15, 416–429, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mays, E. L., Shepson, P. B., Stirm, B. H., Karion, A., Sweeney, C., and
Gurney, K. R.: Aircraft-Based Measurements of the Carbon Footprint of
Indianapolis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7816–7823, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
McDermitt, D., Burba, G., Xu, L., Anderson, T., Komissarov, A., Riensche, B.,
Schedlbauer, J., Starr, G., Zona, D., Oechel, W., Oberbauer, S., and
Hastings, S.: A new low-power, open-path instrument for measuring methane
flux by eddy covariance, Appl. Phys. B, 102, 391–405, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Miyata, A., Leuning, R., Denmead, O. T., Kim, J., and Harazono, Y.: Carbon
dioxide and methane fluxes from an intermittently flooded paddy field, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 102, 287–303, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Morin, T. H., Bohrera, G., Naor-Azrielia, L., Mesia, S., Kennya, W. T.,
Mitsch, W. J., and Schäfer, K. V. R.: The seasonal and diurnal dynamics
of methane flux at a created urban wetland, Ecol. Eng., 72, 74–83, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Moriizumi, J., Nagamine, K., Iida, T., and Ikebe, Y.: Estimation of areal flux
of atmospheric methane in an urban area of Nagoya, Japan, inferred from
atmospheric radon-222 data, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1543–1549, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Nakagawa, F., Tsunogai, U., Komatsu, D. D., Yamada, K., Yoshida, N.,
Moriizumi, J., Nagamine, K., Iida, T., and Ikebe, Y.: Automobile exhaust as a
source of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C- and D-enriched atmospheric methane in urban areas, Org.
Geochem., 36, 727–738, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nam, E. K., Jensen, T. E., and Walligton T. J.: Methane emissions from
vehicles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2005–2010, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Nicolini, G., Castaldi, S., Fratini, G., and Valentini, R.: A literature
overview of micrometeorological CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O flux measurements in
terrestrial ecosystems, Atmos. Environ., 81, 311–319, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Nilsson, M. S., Sagerfors, J., Buffam, I., Laudon, H., Eriksson, T., Grelle,
A., Klemedtsson, L., Weslien, P., and Lindroth, A.: Contemporary carbon
accumulation in a boreal oligotrophic minerogenic mire – a significant sink
after accounting for all C-fluxes, Glob. Change Biol., 14, 2317–2332, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Nordbo, A., Järvi, L., Haapanala, S., Wood, C. R., and Vesala, T.:
Fraction of natural area as main predictor of net CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from
cities, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20802, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053087</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Offerle, B., Grimmond, C. S. B., Fortuniak, K., Kłysik, K., and Oke, T.
R.: Temporal variations in heat fluxes over a central European city centre,
Theor. Appl. Climatol., 84, 103–115, 2006a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Offerle, B., Grimmond, C. S. B., Fortuniak, K., and Pawlak, W.: Intra-urban
differences of surface energy fluxes in a central European city, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 45, 125–136, 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Oliphant, A. J.: Terrestrial Ecosystem-Atmosphere Exchange of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Water
and Energy from FLUXNET; Review and Meta-Analysis of a Global in-situ
Observatory, Geography Compass, 6, 689–705, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>O'Shea, S. J., Allen, G., Fleming, Z. L., Bauguitte, S. J.-B., Percival, C.
J., Gallagher, M. W., Lee, J., Helfter, C., and Nemitz, E.: Area fluxes of
carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide derived from airborne
measurements around Greater London: A case study during summer 2012, J.
Geophys. Res., 119, 4940–4952, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021269</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Pattey, E., Strachan, I. B., Desjardins, R. L., Edwards, G. C., Dow, D., and
MacPherson, J. I.: Application of a tunable diode laser to the measurement
of CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes from field to landscape scale using several
micrometeorological techniques, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 136, 222–236, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pawlak, W., Fortuniak, K., and Siedlecki, M.: Carbon dioxide flux in the
centre of Łódź, Poland – analysis of a 2-year eddy covariance
measurement data set, Int. J. Climatol., 31, 232–243, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Brioude, J., Aikin, K. C., Andrews, A. E.,
Atlas, E., Blake, D., Daube, B. C., De Gouw, J. A., Dlugokencky, E., Frost,
G. J., Gentner, D. R., Gilman, J. B., Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A.,
Holloway, J. S., Kofler, J., Kuster, W. C., Lang, P. M., Novelli, P. C.,
Santoni, G. W., Trainer, M., Wofsy, S. C., and Parrish, D. D.: Quantifying
sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California,
J. Geophys. Res., 118, 4974–4990, 2013</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, N. G., Ackley, R., Crosson, E. R., Downd, A., Hutyra, L. R.,
Brondfield, M., Karr, J. D., Zhao, K., and Jackson, R. B.: Mapping urban
pipeline leaks: Methane leaks across Boston, Environ. Pollut., 173, 1–4,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Rinne, J., Riutta, T., Pihlatie, M., Aurela, M., Haapanala, S., Tuovinen,
J.-P., Tuittila, E.-S., and Vesala, T.: Annual cycle of methane emission from
a boreal fen measured by the eddy covariance technique, Tellus B, 59,
449–457, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sakabe, A., Hamotani, K., Kosugi, Y., Ueyama, M., Takahashi, K., Kanazawa,
A., and Itoh, M.: Measurement of methane flux over an evergreen coniferous
forest canopy using a relaxed eddy accumulation system with tuneable diode
laser spectroscopy detection, Theor. Appl. Clim. 109, 39–49, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, H. P.: Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 67, 293–318, 1994.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Schotanus, P., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., and DeBruin, H. A. R.: Temperature
measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture
fluctuations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 26, 81–93, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, second ed., Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, New
Jersey, USA, pp. 1232, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Shurpali, N. J. and Verma, S. B.: Micrometeorological measurements of methane
flux in a Minnesota peatland during two growing season, Biogeochemistry, 40,
1–15, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Smeets, C. J. P. P., Holzinger, R., Vigano, I., Goldstein, A. H., and
Röckmann, T.: Eddy covariance methane measurements at a Ponderosa pine
plantation in California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8365–8375,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8365-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8365-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, I. D. and Oke, T. R.: Local climate zones for urban temperature
studies, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1879–1900, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Kluwer Acad.
Publ., Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Vickers, D. and Mahrt, L.: Quality control and flux sampling problems for
tower and aircraft data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 14, 512–526, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J. M., Murphy, J. G., Geddes, J. A., Winsborough, C. L., Basiliko, N.,
and Thomas, S. C.: Methane fluxes measured by eddy covariance and static
chamber techniques at a temperate forest in central Ontario, Canada,
Biogeosciences, 10, 4371–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4371-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-4371-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I., and Leuning, R.: Correction of flux measurements
for density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 106, 85–100, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wennberg, P. O., Mui, W., Wunch, D., Kort, E. A., Blake, D. R., Atlas, E. L.,
Santoni, G. W., Wofsy, S. C., Diskin, G. S., Jeong, S., and Fischer, M. L.:
On the sources of methane to the Los Angeles atmosphere, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 9282–9289, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Whalen, S. C.: Biogeochemistry of methane exchange between natural wetlands
and atmosphere, Environ. Eng. Sci., 22, 73–94, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Toon, G. C., Keppel-Aleks, G., and Yavin, Y. G.:
Emissions of greenhouse gases from a North American megacity, Geophys. Res
Lett., 36, L15810, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL039825</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zieliński. M., Fortuniak, K., Pawlak, W., and Siedlecki, M.: Turbulent
sensible heat flux in Łódź, Central Poland, obtained from
scintillometer and eddy covariance measurements, Meteorol. Z., 22, 603–613,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zimnoch, M., Godlowska, J., Necki, J. M., and Różański, K.:
Assesing surface fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in urban environment: a
reconnaissance study in Krakow, Southern Poland, Tellus B, 62, 573–580,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Eddy covariance measurements of the net turbulent methane flux in the city
centre – results of 2-year campaign in Łódź, Poland</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">To investigate temporal variability of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) fluxes
in an urban environment, air–surface exchange fluxes of CH<sub>4</sub> were
continuously measured using eddy covariance techniques at a city-centre site
in Łódź, Poland, from July 2013 to August 2015. In the immediate
vicinity of the measurement site, potential methane sources include vehicle
traffic, dense sewerage infrastructure and natural gas networks. Sensible and
latent heat fluxes have also been measured since 2000 and carbon dioxide
fluxes since 2007 at this site. Upward CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes dominated during the
measurement period, indicating that the city centre is a net source of CH<sub>4</sub>
to the troposphere. The highest monthly fluxes were observed in winter (2.0
to 2.7 g m<sup>−2</sup> month<sup>−1</sup>) and the lowest in
summer (0.8 to 1.0 g m<sup>−2</sup> month<sup>−1</sup>). Fluxes on
working days were around 6 % higher than on weekends. The cumulative flux
indicates that the city centre emitted a net quantity of nearly 18 g m<sup>−2</sup> of CH<sub>4</sub> in 2014. Stable values of the
FCO<sub>2</sub>∕ FCH<sub>4</sub> ratio in months (minimum 2.41 × 10<sup>−3</sup>, maximum
5.3 × 10<sup>−3</sup>) and the lack of a clear annual course suggest comparable
magnitude of both fluxes.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Affre, C., Lopez, A., Carrara, A., Druilhet, A., and Fontan, J.: The analysis
of energy and ozone flux data from the LANDES experiment, Atmos. Environ.,
34, 803–821, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance. A Practical Guide
to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London,
New York, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baciu, C., Etiope, G., Cuna, S., and Spulber, L.: Methane seepage in an
urban development area (Bacau, Romania): origin, extent, and hazard,
Geofluids, 8, 311–320, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baldocchi, D., Detto, M., Sonnentag, O., Verfaillie, J., The, Y. A., Silver,
W., and Kelly, N. M.: The challenges of measuring methane fluxes and
concentrations over a peatland pasture, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 153, 177–187,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bogner, J. and Matthews, E.: Global methane emissions from landfills: new
methodology and annual estimates 1980–1996, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17,
1065, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001913" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002GB001913</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Burba, G. and Anderson, T.: A Brief Practical Guide to Eddy Covariance Flux
Measurements: Principles and Workflow Examples for Scientific and Industrial
Applications, LI-COR Biosciences, Hardbound and Softbound Editions, Lincoln,
USA, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Christen, A.: Atmospheric measurement techniques to quantify greenhouse gas
emissions from cities, Urban Climate, 10, 241–260, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le
Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and
Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex V., and Midgley P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and
New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dengel, S., Levy, P. E., Grace, J., Jones, S. K., and Skiba, U. M.: Methane
emissions from sheep pasture, measured with an open-path eddy covariance
system, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 3524–3533, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Denmead, O. T., Macdonald, B. C. T., Bryant, G., Naylor, T., Wilson, S.,
Griffith, D. W. T., Wang, W. J., Salter, B., White, I., and Moody, P. W.:
Emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from Australian sugarcane soils, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 150, 748–756, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Detto, M., Verfailli, J., Anderson, F., Xu, L., and Baldocchi, D.: Comparing
laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes
using the eddy covariance method, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1312–1324,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dutaur, L., Cieslik, S., Carrara, A., and Lopez, A.: The detection of
nonstationarity in the determination of deposition fluxes. Proceedings of
EUROTRAC Symposium '98, vol. 2., WIT Press, Southampton, UK, 171–176, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Elliott, S., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., Bossert, J. E., Chow, J., Colina,
J. A., Dubey, M. K., Duce, R. A., Edgerton, S., Gaffney, J., Gupta, M.,
Guzman, F., Matson, P. A., McNair, L. A., Ortiz, E., Riley, W., Rowland, F.
S., Ruiz, M. E., Russell, A. G., Smith, F. A., Sosa, G., Streit, G., and
Watson, J.: Mexico City and the biogeochemistry of global urbanization,
Environ. Sci. Policy, 3, 145–156, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Eugster, W. and Pluss, P.: A fault-tolerant eddy covariance system for
measuring CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 841–851, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Foken, T.: Micrometeorology, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surfacebased flux
measurements. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 78, 83–105, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fortuniak, K. and Pawlak, W.: Selected Spectral Characteristics of Turbulence
over an Urbanized Area in the Centre of Łódź, Poland, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 154, 137–156, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9966-7" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10546-014-9966-7</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fortuniak, K., Kłysik, K., and Wibig, J.: Urban-rural contrasts of
meteorological parameters in Łódź, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 84,
91–101, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fortuniak, K., Pawlak, W., and Siedlecki, M.: Integral turbulence statistics
over a central european city centre, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 146, 257–276,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fortuniak, K., Pawlak, W., Bednorz, L., Grygoruk, M., Siedlecki, M.,
Zieliński, M.: The methane and carbon dioxide fluxes on a temperate mire
in Central Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., in review, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gioli, B., Toscano. P., Lugato, E., Matese, A., Miglietta, F., Zaldei, A.,
and Vaccari, F. P.: Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes and source partitioning
in urban areas: The case study of Florence, Italy, Environ. Pollut., 164,
125–131, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Goldman, M. B., Groffman, P. M., Pouyat, R. V., McDonnell, M. J., and
Pickett, S. A.: CH<sub>4</sub> uptake and availability in forest soils along an
urban to rural gradient, Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 281–286, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Groffman, P. M. and Pouyat, R. V.: Methane uptake in urban forests and lawns,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 5229–5235, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Groffman, P. M., Pouyat, R., Cadenasso, M. L., Zipperer, W. C., Szlavecz, K.,
Yesilonis, I. D., Band, L. E., and Brush, G. S.: Land use context and natural
soil controls on plant community composition and soil nitrogen and carbon
dynamics in urban and rural forests, Forest Ecol. Manag., 236, 177–192,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, D. L., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Rusticucci, M., Alexander, L. V.,
Brönnimann, S., Charabi, Y., Dentener, F. J., Dlugokencky, E. J.,
Easterling, D. R., Kaplan, A., Soden, B. J., Thorne, P. W., Wild, M., and
Zhai, P. M.: Observations: Atmosphere and Surface, in: Climate Change 2013:
The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited
by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hatalaa, J. A., Detto, M., Sonnentag, O., Devereld, S. J., Verfaillie, J.,
and Baldocchi, D.: Greenhouse gas (CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O) fluxes from
drained and flooded agricultural peatlands in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 150, 1–18, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Heeb, N. V., Forss, A. M., Saxer, C. J., and Wilhelm, P.: Methane, benzene
and alkyl benzene cold start emission data of gasoline-driven passenger cars
representing the vehicle technology of the last two decades, Atmos. Environ.,
37, 5185–5195, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Helfter, C., Tremper, A. H., Halios, C. H., Kotthaus, S., Bjorkegren, A.,
Grimmond, C. S. B., Barlow, J. F., and Nemitz, E.: Spatial and temporal
variability of urban fluxes of methane, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide
above London, UK, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-216" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-2016-216</a>, in
review, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hendriks, D. M. D., Dolman, A. J., van der Molen, M. K., and van Huissteden,
J.: A compact and stable eddy covariance set-up for methane measurements
using off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
431–443, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-431-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-431-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jha, A. K., Sharma, C., Singh, N., Ramesh, R., Purvaja, R., and Gupta, P.
K.: Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management in Indian
mega-cities: A case study of Chennai landfill sites, Chemosphere, 71,
750–758, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their
Structure and Measurement, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kaye, J. P., Burke, I. C., Mosier, A. R., and Guerschman, J. P.: Methane and
nitrous oxide fluxes from urban soils to the atmosphere, Ecol. Appl., 14,
975–981, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kłysik, K.: Spatial and seasonal distribution of anthropogenic heat
emissions in Lodz, Poland, Atmos. Environ., 30, 3397–3404, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kłysik, K.: The characteristics of urban areas in Łódź from a
climatological point of view. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia
Geographica Physica, 3, 173–185, 1998 (in Polish).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kłysik, K. and Fortuniak, K.: Temporal and spatial characteristics of the
urban heat island of Łódź, Poland, Atmos. Environ., 33,
3885–3895, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kuc, T., Rozanski, K., Zimnoch, M., Necki, J. M., and Korus, A.:
Anthropogenic emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> in an urban environment,
Appl. Energ., 75, 193–203, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, A. and Sharma, M. P.: GHG emission and carbon sequestration potential
from MSW of Indian metro cities, Urban Climate, 8, 30–41, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Laubach, J. and Kelliher, F. M.: Methane emissions from dairy cows: Comparing
open-path laser measurements to profile-based techniques, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 135, 340–345, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Laurila, T., Tuovinen, J.-P., Lohila, A., Hatakka, J., Aurela, M., Thum, T.,
Pihlatie, M., Rinne, J., and Vesala, T.: Measuring methane emissions from a
landfill using a cost-effective micrometeorological method, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 32, L19808, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023462" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005GL023462</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, X., Massman, W., and Law., B.: Handbook of Micrometeorology – A Guide
for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, Boston, London, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
LI-7700 Open Path CH<sub>4</sub> Analyzer: Instruction Manual, Li-cor Biosciences,
available at: <a href="www.licor.com" target="_blank">www.licor.com</a> (last access: 30 June 2016), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lohila, A., Laurila, T., Tuovinen, J.-P., Aurela, M., Hatakka, J., Thum, T.,
Pihlatie, M., Rinne, J., and Vesala, T.: Micrometeorological Measurements of
Methane and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes at a Municipal Landfill, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 41, 2717–2722, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lowry, D., Holmes, C. W., Rata, N. D., O'Brien, P., and Nisbet, E. G.: London
methane emissions: use of diurnal changes in concentration and d13C to
identify urban sources and verify inventories, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
7427–7448, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mahrt, L.: Flux sampling errors for aircraft and towers, J. Atmos.Ocean.
Tech., 15, 416–429, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mays, E. L., Shepson, P. B., Stirm, B. H., Karion, A., Sweeney, C., and
Gurney, K. R.: Aircraft-Based Measurements of the Carbon Footprint of
Indianapolis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7816–7823, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
McDermitt, D., Burba, G., Xu, L., Anderson, T., Komissarov, A., Riensche, B.,
Schedlbauer, J., Starr, G., Zona, D., Oechel, W., Oberbauer, S., and
Hastings, S.: A new low-power, open-path instrument for measuring methane
flux by eddy covariance, Appl. Phys. B, 102, 391–405, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Miyata, A., Leuning, R., Denmead, O. T., Kim, J., and Harazono, Y.: Carbon
dioxide and methane fluxes from an intermittently flooded paddy field, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 102, 287–303, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Morin, T. H., Bohrera, G., Naor-Azrielia, L., Mesia, S., Kennya, W. T.,
Mitsch, W. J., and Schäfer, K. V. R.: The seasonal and diurnal dynamics
of methane flux at a created urban wetland, Ecol. Eng., 72, 74–83, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Moriizumi, J., Nagamine, K., Iida, T., and Ikebe, Y.: Estimation of areal flux
of atmospheric methane in an urban area of Nagoya, Japan, inferred from
atmospheric radon-222 data, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1543–1549, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Nakagawa, F., Tsunogai, U., Komatsu, D. D., Yamada, K., Yoshida, N.,
Moriizumi, J., Nagamine, K., Iida, T., and Ikebe, Y.: Automobile exhaust as a
source of <sup>13</sup>C- and D-enriched atmospheric methane in urban areas, Org.
Geochem., 36, 727–738, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nam, E. K., Jensen, T. E., and Walligton T. J.: Methane emissions from
vehicles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2005–2010, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Nicolini, G., Castaldi, S., Fratini, G., and Valentini, R.: A literature
overview of micrometeorological CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O flux measurements in
terrestrial ecosystems, Atmos. Environ., 81, 311–319, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Nilsson, M. S., Sagerfors, J., Buffam, I., Laudon, H., Eriksson, T., Grelle,
A., Klemedtsson, L., Weslien, P., and Lindroth, A.: Contemporary carbon
accumulation in a boreal oligotrophic minerogenic mire – a significant sink
after accounting for all C-fluxes, Glob. Change Biol., 14, 2317–2332, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nordbo, A., Järvi, L., Haapanala, S., Wood, C. R., and Vesala, T.:
Fraction of natural area as main predictor of net CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from
cities, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20802, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053087" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012GL053087</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Offerle, B., Grimmond, C. S. B., Fortuniak, K., Kłysik, K., and Oke, T.
R.: Temporal variations in heat fluxes over a central European city centre,
Theor. Appl. Climatol., 84, 103–115, 2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Offerle, B., Grimmond, C. S. B., Fortuniak, K., and Pawlak, W.: Intra-urban
differences of surface energy fluxes in a central European city, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 45, 125–136, 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Oliphant, A. J.: Terrestrial Ecosystem-Atmosphere Exchange of CO<sub>2</sub>, Water
and Energy from FLUXNET; Review and Meta-Analysis of a Global in-situ
Observatory, Geography Compass, 6, 689–705, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
O'Shea, S. J., Allen, G., Fleming, Z. L., Bauguitte, S. J.-B., Percival, C.
J., Gallagher, M. W., Lee, J., Helfter, C., and Nemitz, E.: Area fluxes of
carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide derived from airborne
measurements around Greater London: A case study during summer 2012, J.
Geophys. Res., 119, 4940–4952, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021269" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013JD021269</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Pattey, E., Strachan, I. B., Desjardins, R. L., Edwards, G. C., Dow, D., and
MacPherson, J. I.: Application of a tunable diode laser to the measurement
of CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes from field to landscape scale using several
micrometeorological techniques, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 136, 222–236, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pawlak, W., Fortuniak, K., and Siedlecki, M.: Carbon dioxide flux in the
centre of Łódź, Poland – analysis of a 2-year eddy covariance
measurement data set, Int. J. Climatol., 31, 232–243, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Brioude, J., Aikin, K. C., Andrews, A. E.,
Atlas, E., Blake, D., Daube, B. C., De Gouw, J. A., Dlugokencky, E., Frost,
G. J., Gentner, D. R., Gilman, J. B., Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A.,
Holloway, J. S., Kofler, J., Kuster, W. C., Lang, P. M., Novelli, P. C.,
Santoni, G. W., Trainer, M., Wofsy, S. C., and Parrish, D. D.: Quantifying
sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California,
J. Geophys. Res., 118, 4974–4990, 2013
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, N. G., Ackley, R., Crosson, E. R., Downd, A., Hutyra, L. R.,
Brondfield, M., Karr, J. D., Zhao, K., and Jackson, R. B.: Mapping urban
pipeline leaks: Methane leaks across Boston, Environ. Pollut., 173, 1–4,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Rinne, J., Riutta, T., Pihlatie, M., Aurela, M., Haapanala, S., Tuovinen,
J.-P., Tuittila, E.-S., and Vesala, T.: Annual cycle of methane emission from
a boreal fen measured by the eddy covariance technique, Tellus B, 59,
449–457, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sakabe, A., Hamotani, K., Kosugi, Y., Ueyama, M., Takahashi, K., Kanazawa,
A., and Itoh, M.: Measurement of methane flux over an evergreen coniferous
forest canopy using a relaxed eddy accumulation system with tuneable diode
laser spectroscopy detection, Theor. Appl. Clim. 109, 39–49, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, H. P.: Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 67, 293–318, 1994.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Schotanus, P., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., and DeBruin, H. A. R.: Temperature
measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture
fluctuations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 26, 81–93, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, second ed., Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, New
Jersey, USA, pp. 1232, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Shurpali, N. J. and Verma, S. B.: Micrometeorological measurements of methane
flux in a Minnesota peatland during two growing season, Biogeochemistry, 40,
1–15, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Smeets, C. J. P. P., Holzinger, R., Vigano, I., Goldstein, A. H., and
Röckmann, T.: Eddy covariance methane measurements at a Ponderosa pine
plantation in California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8365–8375,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8365-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-8365-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, I. D. and Oke, T. R.: Local climate zones for urban temperature
studies, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1879–1900, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Kluwer Acad.
Publ., Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Vickers, D. and Mahrt, L.: Quality control and flux sampling problems for
tower and aircraft data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 14, 512–526, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J. M., Murphy, J. G., Geddes, J. A., Winsborough, C. L., Basiliko, N.,
and Thomas, S. C.: Methane fluxes measured by eddy covariance and static
chamber techniques at a temperate forest in central Ontario, Canada,
Biogeosciences, 10, 4371–4382, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4371-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-4371-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I., and Leuning, R.: Correction of flux measurements
for density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 106, 85–100, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wennberg, P. O., Mui, W., Wunch, D., Kort, E. A., Blake, D. R., Atlas, E. L.,
Santoni, G. W., Wofsy, S. C., Diskin, G. S., Jeong, S., and Fischer, M. L.:
On the sources of methane to the Los Angeles atmosphere, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 46, 9282–9289, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Whalen, S. C.: Biogeochemistry of methane exchange between natural wetlands
and atmosphere, Environ. Eng. Sci., 22, 73–94, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Toon, G. C., Keppel-Aleks, G., and Yavin, Y. G.:
Emissions of greenhouse gases from a North American megacity, Geophys. Res
Lett., 36, L15810, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039825" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GL039825</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zieliński. M., Fortuniak, K., Pawlak, W., and Siedlecki, M.: Turbulent
sensible heat flux in Łódź, Central Poland, obtained from
scintillometer and eddy covariance measurements, Meteorol. Z., 22, 603–613,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zimnoch, M., Godlowska, J., Necki, J. M., and Różański, K.:
Assesing surface fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> in urban environment: a
reconnaissance study in Krakow, Southern Poland, Tellus B, 62, 573–580,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
