<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-561-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Possible influence of atmospheric circulations on winter haze pollution in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, northern China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Possible influence of atmospheric circulations on winter haze pollution}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z.~Zhang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
          <email>zzy_ahgeo@163.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          <email>xlzhang@ium.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S.-J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Environmental Meteorology Forecast Center of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Chinese Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100089, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Urban Meteorology, Chinese Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100089, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 406-840, Korea</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Z. Zhang (zzy_ahgeo@163.com) and X. Zhang (xlzhang@ium.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>561</fpage><lpage>571</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Using the daily records derived from the synoptic weather stations and the
NCEP/NCAR and ERA-Interim reanalysis data, the variability of the winter haze
pollution (indicated by the mean visibility and number of hazy days) in the
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region during the period 1981 to 2015 and its
relationship with the atmospheric circulations at middle–high latitude were
analyzed in this study. The winter haze pollution in BTH had distinct
inter-annual and inter-decadal variabilities without a significant long-term
trend. According to the spatial distribution of correlation coefficients, six
atmospheric circulation indices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were defined from the
key areas in sea level pressure (SLP), zonal and meridional winds at 850 hPa
(U850, V850), geopotential height field at 500 hPa (H500), zonal wind at
200 hPa (U200), and air temperature at 200 hPa (T200), respectively. All of
the six indices have significant and stable correlations with the winter
visibility and number of hazy days in BTH. In the raw (unfiltered)
correlations, the correlation coefficients between the six indices and the
winter visibility (number of hazy days) varied from 0.57 (0.47) to 0.76 (0.6)
with an average of 0.65 (0.54); in the high-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years)
correlations, the coefficients varied from 0.62 (0.58) to 0.8 (0.69) with an
average of 0.69 (0.64). The six circulation indices together can explain
77.7 % (78.7 %) and 61.7 % (69.1 %) variances of the winter
visibility and the number of hazy days in the year-to-year (inter-annual)
variability, respectively. The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (a comprehensive
index derived from the six individual circulation indices) can cause a
shallowing of the East Asian trough at the middle troposphere and a weakening
of the Siberian high-pressure field at sea level, and is then accompanied by
a reduction (increase) of horizontal advection and vertical convection
(relative humidity) in the lowest troposphere and a reduced boundary layer
height in BTH and its neighboring areas, which are favorable for the
formation of haze pollution in BTH winter, and vice versa. The high level of
the prediction statistics and the reasonable mechanism suggested that the
winter haze pollution in BTH can be forecasted or estimated credibly based on
the optimized atmospheric circulation indices. Thus it is helpful for
government decision-making departments to take action in advance in dealing
with probably severe haze pollution in BTH indicated by the atmospheric
circulation conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region is located in northern China, with
approximately 110 million residents and 216 000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in size. With
the rapid progress of urbanization and industrial development over the past 3
decades, the BTH region has become one of China's most economically developed
regions and the third economic engine in China. Recently, the Chinese
government has been promoting the integration of the three neighboring
regions to optimize the industrial layout and improve the allocation of
resources. Undoubtedly, the BTH region is becoming more and more important in
China or even the world economy in the future. However, the rapid economic
growth and urbanization have increased the level of air pollution in recent
decades (Streets et al., 2007; Chan and Yao, 2008; Y. Wang et al., 2009;
T. Wang et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2011). Most of eastern China has frequently
suffered from severe haze or smog days in recent years, especially in the BTH
region. For example, the continuous haze pollution in January 2013 greatly
threatened human health and traffic safety (Kang et al., 2013; Wang et al.,
2013). Roughly speaking, the haze pollution can be attributed to two aspects:
pollutant emissions into the lower atmosphere from fossil fuel combustion or
construction and favorable meteorological conditions. Meteorological
conditions are controlling the occurrence of haze pollution (Wu,
2012; Zhang et al., 2013).
Specifically, weather conditions play an essential role in the daily
fluctuation of air pollutant concentrations (Z. Y. Zhang et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>At present, many studies have focused on the physical and chemical properties
of pollutants in Beijing and other cities (Feng et al., 2006; Yu et al.,
2011; Xu et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013). And studies also demonstrated the
influence of weather conditions or synoptic situations upon air pollution
(Zhao et al., 2009; Z. Y. Zhang et al., 2015). They elucidated clearly the
formation and chemical composition of air pollutants and the dominant
meteorological factors during heavy pollution in the BTH region. On the other
hand, some studies demonstrated that the haze pollution occurring in the BTH
region could be strongly affected by the local atmospheric circulations
including sea–land and mountain–valley breeze circulations and the
planetary boundary layer height (Lo et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2009; Chen et
al., 2009; Miao et al., 2015). Recently, Wang et al. (2015) suggested that
the reduction of autumn Arctic sea ice leads to anomalous atmospheric
circulation changes that favor less cyclone activity and a more stable
atmosphere, leading to more hazy days in eastern China. Moreover, Wang et
al. (2013) showed that eastern China suffered from severe haze pollution in
January 2013 that may be due to a sudden stratospheric warming over the
mid–high latitude of the Northern Hemisphere, which led to an anomalous
steady atmosphere that dominated in northern China. Thus, it is interesting
to examine whether the winter haze pollution in BTH has been influenced by
other known or unknown atmospheric circulations or teleconnections in the
mid–high latitude of the Northern Hemisphere and whether there are some
potential circulations that can be used for the forecast or evaluation of the
winter haze pollution in BTH. To date, there is no clarity on these
questions, and a few studies have been performed to explore these issues.</p>
      <p>Owing to a lack of long-term instrumental records for air pollutant
concentration, the understanding of the evolution of air pollution and their
relations to atmospheric circulations is limited. In this paper, we intend to
use the atmospheric visibility and the number of hazy days derived from the
synoptic meteorological stations to denote the evolution of haze pollution in
the BTH region since the 1980s. Many studies demonstrated that, in the
absence of certain weather conditions (e.g., rain, fog, dust and snowstorm),
the visibility is an excellent indicator of air quality because its
degradation results from light scattering and absorption by atmospheric
particles and gases that can originate from natural or anthropogenic sources
(Baumer et al., 2008; Chang et al., 2009; Sabetghadam et al., 2012; Baddock
et al., 2014), although visibility was influenced comprehensively by airborne
pollutants and meteorological parameters such as relative humidity, wind
speed, temperature, pressure and solar radiation (Wen and Yeh, 2010; Deng et
al., 2014; Q. Zhang et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The main purpose of this study is to examine the possible relations between
the atmospheric circulations and the winter haze pollution (the mean
visibility and mean number of hazy days) over the BTH region and investigate
the possible physical mechanism, which could be useful for a prediction of
the winter haze pollution and could provide a scientific support to the
government to take effective measures in advance to reduce or control the
pollutant emission in case of an anomalous circulation leading to serious
haze pollution in the region. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2
describes the data and method used. Section 3 shows major results and
discussions. The conclusion is summarized in Sect. 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Research area and station data</title>
      <p>The atmospheric visibility recorded at the 19 synoptic meteorological
stations located in the research area from 1 January 1980 to 28 February 2015
was used (Fig. 1). The visibility by human observers is recorded four times
(02:00, 08:00, 14:00 and 20:00, Beijing local time) or three times (08:00,
14:00 and 20:00, Beijing local time) per day. A good continuous monitoring
operation was maintained throughout the entire period, with the missing data
rates for the 19 stations varying from a minimum of 1.7 % to a maximum of
2.1 %, with a mean of 1.9 %. On the other hand, the distribution of
the stations is relatively uniform, indicating that the mean visibility or
hazy days are a good representative of the whole BTH region.</p>
      <p>In the present study, the days with visibility <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
relative humidity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at 14:00 (local time) were defined as hazy
days, except for the special weather phenomena that occurred at this moment
including rain, fog, dust and snow (Schichtel et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2014). The mean
number of hazy days (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mtext>NHD</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) of each winter in the BTH
region can be calculated by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mtext>NHD</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of stations (here <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the number
of hazy days in a station in each winter (December, January and February).
The mean visibility (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mtext>Vis</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of each winter in the BTH
region can be calculated by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mtext>Vis</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of stations (here <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of
valid days in winter. It should be noted that the winter in 1981 consists of
December 1980, January and February 1981, and so on.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Research area and locations of the 19 synoptic meteorological
stations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Reanalysis data</title>
      <p>The global NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data of the monthly sea level pressure (SLP),
zonal and meridional winds at 850 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (U850, V850), geopotential
height field at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (H500), zonal wind at 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (U200)
and air temperature at 200, 150, 100 and 70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (T200, T150, T100,
T70) with a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution from
January 1980 to February 2015 were used (Kalnay et al., 1996). Moreover, in
order to obtain a higher spatial resolution in the BTH region, the
ERA-Interim reanalysis data of the monthly relative humidity (RH), vertical
speed (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), zonal (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and meridional (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) winds from 1000 to
500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (16 pressure levels in total) and the boundary layer height
(BLH) with a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.125</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.125</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution
confined to the area 33–45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 110–122<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E were also
used (Dee et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Analysis method </title>
      <p>For the statistical and atmospheric circulation analyses carried out in the
study, the common statistical methods such as the composite analyses, the
least square regression and the Pearson correlation analyses with a
two-tailed Student's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test were applied in this research. A principal
component analysis (PCA) was also used to extract the principal mode of
multiple time series. Moreover, in order to reduce the possible effects of
low-frequency variation or long-term trends and to examine whether or not the
correspondence between the two time series on an inter-annual timescale is
stable, the high-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years) correlation of the high-pass
filtered time series was also tested for time series analyses (Gong and
Luterbacher, 2008; Zhang et al., 2010).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Evolution of the winter visibility and hazy days in the BTH
region</title>
      <p>The regional mean visibility and number of hazy days in winter in BTH were
presented in Fig. 2. As expected, the visibility was negatively correlated
with the number of hazy days, with raw and high-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years)
correlation coefficients between them of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
Both of them are significant at the 0.01 level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for short). More
hazy days generally denote lower mean visibility in winter due to the light
scattering and absorption effects of air pollutants (Baumer et al., 2008;
Sabetghadam et al., 2012). There are intense inter-annual fluctuations in
both the visibility and the number of hazy days over the entire period of
1981 to 2015. The decadal fluctuations can also be distinguished for both the
visibility and the number of hazy days throughout the entire period. A
significant reducing trend of visibility (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and an increasing trend
of the number of hazy days (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) dominated in the 1980s. And then, the
visibility experienced an increasing trend in the 1990s and a decreasing
trend from 2001, and the hazy days showed an anti-phase change, but none of
them are statistically significant, with the exception of the number of hazy
days trend in the 1990s (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The mean visibility maximum in the 1990s
reached 18.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (larger than the mean value of 17.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over
the entire period), and the minimum number of hazy days in the 1990s reached
20.6 (less than the mean value of 22.7 days over the entire period). However,
the long-term trends of them are not statistically significant, although weak
reducing and increasing trends can be found in the curves of winter
visibility and the number of hazy days, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Curves of the winter mean visibility and number of hazy days in BTH.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlation coefficients of visibility and hazy days and circulation
indices.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NAO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PNA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">EU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">WP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SBH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Visibility</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.61<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.39<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.71<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.36<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>hazy days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.51</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.70</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.56</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.37</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Significant at the 0.01 level. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Significant at the
0.05 level. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2 terms indicate the raw correlation and
high-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years) correlation, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Relationship between haze pollution and atmospheric circulations</title>
      <p>We first examined the correlation coefficients between the visibility and
number of hazy days and the most common atmospheric teleconnection or
oscillation indices over the mid–high latitude of the Northern Hemisphere
(see Table 1), which could affect the winter climate variability over China,
such as the Arctic Oscillation (AO), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO),
the Pacific–North American pattern (PNA), the Eurasian pattern (EU), the
Western Pacific pattern (WP) and the Siberian high (SBH) (Wallace and
Gutzler, 1981; Gong and Ho, 2002; Zhang et al., 2009). It can be seen that both of raw
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1) and high-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2) correlations show that the visibility and
number of hazy days are correlated weakly with the winter AO, NAO and PNA.
However, the visibility is highly positively correlated with EU, WP and SBH,
and the number of hazy days is highly negatively correlated with EU, WP and
SBH, most of which are significant at the 0.01 or 0.05 level.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of correlation coefficients between visibility
and SLP <bold>(a)</bold>, UV850 <bold>(b)</bold>, H500 <bold>(c)</bold> and
U200 <bold>(d)</bold> (areas significant at the 0.05 level are shaded; either
U850 or V850 significant at the 0.05 level are shaded in <bold>(b)</bold>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of correlation coefficients between visibility
and T200 <bold>(a)</bold>, T150 <bold>(b)</bold>, T100 <bold>(c)</bold> and
T70 <bold>(d)</bold> (areas significant at the 0.05 level are shaded).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>List of the definitions for the six circulation indices.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Index</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Variable</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Expression</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SLP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SLP (38–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 84–108<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) – SLP (36–52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 126–150<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 24–40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 150–184<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>850</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn>850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (55–75<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 40–110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) – <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn>850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (40–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 45–75<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>850</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mn>850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (32–64<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 104–120<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>500</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn>500</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (46–64<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 50–92<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) – <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn>500</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (28–44<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 16–28<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 28–42<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120–156<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn>200</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (42–52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 60–110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) – <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn>200</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (64–76<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 50–96<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 28–36<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120–152<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>200</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (46–66<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 146–196<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Furthermore, the general characteristics of spatial distribution of the
correlation coefficients between visibility and number of hazy days in BTH
and the major meteorological fields from surface to tropopause in the
Northern Hemisphere including SLP, U850, V850, H500, U200, T200, T150 and T70
were also examined (Figs. 3 and 4). Owning to a general anti-pattern for the
number of hazy days, only the correlation maps with visibility were analyzed
for simplicity. In SLP (Fig. 3a), a positive correlation center dominated
most of the East Asian continent, while a negative correlation center
dominated the area from northeastern Asia to the northwestern Pacific,
respectively. This spatial pattern may reflect the effects of land–sea
thermal contrast on the lower troposphere condition over the BTH region. The
pressures increasing in the East Asian continent and decreasing in area from
northeastern Asia to the northwestern Pacific suggest that they favor the
visibility increase in the BTH region in winter and vice versa. In UV850
(Fig. 3b), an anomalously anti-cyclonic and northerly pattern is predominant
over most of Siberia and eastern China. This suggests that an anomalous
northerly advection from Siberia to eastern China improves the winter
visibility in the BTH region. In H500 (Fig. 3c), there exists a “<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”
wave train pattern along Eurasia–western Pacific at the mid–high latitude,
extending from central to eastern Europe through Siberia to the northern
China–Korean peninsula–Japan–northwestern Pacific Ocean, similar to the EU
pattern (Wallace and Gutzler, 1981). This pattern implies that a deepening of
the East Asian trough and a weakening of blocking will favor the winter
visibility increase in the BTH region. In U200 (Fig. 3d), there also exists a
wave train pattern from northwestern Russia through Siberia to the
northwestern Pacific Ocean. This pattern may imply that the south (north) of
the East Asian jet stream strengthened (weakened), coinciding with the
anomalous ascending (sinking) motions that occurred in the south (north) of
the jet stream entrance at the upper troposphere, which will lead to a
strengthening northerly that appeared in the lower troposphere. Hence it is
not conducive to the accumulation of pollutants over the BTH region in
winter.</p>
      <p>Besides the lower troposphere, previous studies suggested that the anomalous
stratospheric warming over the Northern Hemisphere led to the severe haze
pollution in eastern China in January 2013 (Wang et al., 2013). Here, the
spatial distribution of the correlation coefficients between visibility and
the temperature from the upper troposphere to the lower stratosphere at
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (T200), 150 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (T150), 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (T100) and
70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (T70) were checked. Negative correlations are found from
eastern Siberia to the northern North Pacific including Alaska in T200, T150,
T100 and T70, respectively (Fig. 4), with the biggest correlation in T200
(Fig. 4a). The significantly negative correlation suggests that the warming
at 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over eastern Siberia to the northern North Pacific would
indicate a decrease in winter visibility, namely a worsening of haze
pollution in the BTH region.</p>
      <p>Based on the above analyses, we wonder whether the meteorological variables
in the significant correlation areas can be used to predict or evaluate the
variability of the winter visibility and haze pollution in the BTH region.
Thus, the six indices for atmospheric circulations or teleconnections were
defined based on the key regions shown in the previous correlation maps as
listed in Table 2. We computed the raw and high-frequency correlation
coefficients of the winter visibility and number of hazy days in BTH and the
six atmospheric circulation indices. All of the six indices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show highly positive or negative correlations with the winter
visibility and number of hazy days, with significance at the 0.01 level
(Table 3). Moreover, we note that most of the high-frequency correlations are
larger than the raw correlations, except the correlations between visibility
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This suggests that the links between the air quality in BTH and
the circulation indices are very stable from year to year. The significantly
positive or negative correlations should be a reflection of the physical
response mechanisms between them, which will be discussed in the later
section.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlation coefficients of visibility and number of hazy days and
circulation indices.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Visibility</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.73<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.76</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.62<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.59</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.61</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.68<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.80</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.62</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.62</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of hazy days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.60</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.47</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.61</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.65</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.69<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.64<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Same as Table 1.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Predictions for visibility and number of hazy days based on the
circulation indices </title>
      <p>In order to assess the prediction capability of the six circulation indices
for the winter haze pollution in BTH, the winter mean visibility and number
of hazy days were estimated by applying a multivariate regression method with
the least square estimate. The estimated curves by the fitting and the
cross-validation with a leave-one-out method were displayed in Fig. 5.
Intuitively, both of the fitting curves and the cross-validation curves are
fairly consistent with the observed winter mean visibility and number of hazy
days over the last 3 decades. The raw and high-frequency correlation
coefficients between the observed and the fitting visibility (number of hazy
days) are 0.88 (0.78) and 0.86 (0.77), respectively. All of them are
significant at the 0.01 level. The six circulation indices together can
explain 77.7 % (78.7 %) and 61.7 % (69.1 %) variances of the
winter visibility and number of hazy days over the BTH region in the
year-to-year (inter-annual) variability, respectively. A good fitting does
not mean that there must be stable relationships between the dependent
variable and explanatory variables. Thus we emphasized testing the stability
of the statistic models by means of the leave-N-out cross-validations. The
statistics for the cross-validation estimations were listed in Table 4,
including the explained variance (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the standard error (SE), and
reduction of error (RE). Previous studies suggested that RE is an extremely
rigorous verification statistic because it has no lower bound, RE <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0
indicating the skillful estimation, RE <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 indicating the reliable
estimation and RE <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 indicating a perfect estimation (Fritts, 1976;
Gong and Luterbacher, 2008; Zhang et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>The statistics for both the visibility and number of hazy days are generally
stable (no sharp increase or decrease) when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from 1 to 11 (more
than 30 % of the sample removed in regression models), although the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RE (SE) slightly decreased (increased) with the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
For the visibility, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 52.5 to 62.7 % with an
average of 57.6 %, the SE varied from 0.74 to 0.84 with an average of
0.79, the RE varied from 0.49 to 0.61 with an average of 0.55. For the number
of hazy days, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 31.1 to 41.5 % with an average of
35.2 %, the SE varied from 3.37 to 3.66 with an average of 3.54, and the
RE varied from 0.23 to 0.38 with an average of 0.30. The mild changes in
these statistics suggest that the statistic models between the given
atmospheric circulations and the haze pollution indicators are stable even in
the case of parts of sample missed. On the other hand, we noted that the
statistics for the visibility estimations are generally better than those for
the number of hazy day estimations in all tests. However, the minimum values
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RE for the number of hazy day estimations are still larger
than 30 % and 0.2, respectively. Based on these statistics, it can be
concluded that the predictions for the winter visibility and number of hazy
days in the BTH region based on the circulation indices are overall reliable
during the entire period, especially for the mean visibility. That is to say,
the winter haze pollution in BTH can be evaluated or estimated well by the
optimized atmospheric circulations.</p>
      <p>The relatively larger errors for the estimated values that referred to the
observed visibility and number of hazy days have been found since the winter
in 2009 (Fig. 5). We re-computed all the statistics for the period 1981 to
2008; the results showed that all the values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RE (SE) for
visibility and the number of hazy day predictions increased (decreased) much
more than the entire period (Table 4), suggesting that the statistic
estimation models are much more stable and reliable before 2009. Why did the
prediction efficiency of the statistic estimation models decrease relatively
in the last few years? We can discern that the estimations for the winter
mean visibility are distinctly lower (higher) than those observed in the
winters of 2009 and 2010 (2014), and vice versa for the number of hazy days.
We speculated that these phenomena can be attributed partly to the
fluctuations of pollutant emissions because the pollutant emissions over
northern China around 2008 were controlled strictly by the Chinese
government, associated with the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing (An et al.,
2007; Zhang et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2011). The decrease in pollutant
emissions led to the improvement of air quality (increasing visibility and
decreasing number of hazy days) in 2009 and 2010, although the atmospheric
conditions remained the same and did not contribute to the spread and
elimination of air pollutants. However, pollutant emissions, especially in
the areas of BTH, rebounded after the Olympic Games, with the decrease in
visibility and increase in hazy days in the BTH region around 2012 to 2014 to
some extent (Z. Y. Zhang et al., 2015). Generally, the errors between the
observed visibility (haze days) and the predicted one could be attributed to
the natural variability of atmospheric circulation and the changes in
pollutant emissions. However, the contribution rates of each factor are not
clear now; thus, further studies will be necessary to unravel these issues.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Curves of the observed and predicted winter visibility <bold>(a)</bold>
and number of hazy days <bold>(b)</bold> in the BTH region since 1981.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>List of the statistics for the leave-N-out cross-validation
estimations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period covered</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5">Visibility </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col9">Number of hazy days </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">RE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">41.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">87.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">53.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">86.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">52.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">86.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">86.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">44.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">32.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">84.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">40.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">84.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">48.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the number of samples removed in the
cross-validation regressions; only the odd numbers of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were listed for
short.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Possible mechanism of the circulations related to the winter
haze pollution</title>
      <p>In order to explore the possible mechanism and role of the investigated
circulation indices in the winter visibility and number of hazy days in the
BTH region, the links between the given large-scale atmospheric circulations
and the local meteorological conditions, which have close relations to the
haze pollution, were examined. For simplicity, a comprehensive index labeled
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was synthesized from the six individual circulation indices
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by applying a PCA method, namely the first principal
component (PC1). The high values of the explained variance (64.4 % in
PC1) indicated that the comprehensive index of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> roughly
reflects the integrated features of all six indices. Thus, we used the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of the six individual indices in the following
analysis. Generally, the positive (negative) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the
lower (higher) visibility and more (fewer) hazy days in the BTH region in
winter.</p>
      <p>First we examined the links between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the meteorological
fields of SLP and H500, respectively. Based on the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data,
Fig. 6a and b present the climatological mean of SLP and H500 in winter
averaged from 1981 to 2010, respectively. The changes in SLP and H500 in
winter in association with a 1 standard deviation positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during the winters of 1981 to 2015 are shown in Fig. 6c and d, respectively.
In the climatological mean fields, the BTH region was located in the axis of
the East Asian trough at the middle troposphere and in the ridge of the
Siberian–Mongolia high in the SLP field, which indicates that the northerly
dominated the BTH region in winter. The regression maps show that the SLP
decreased in the Siberian–Mongolia high areas and increased in the western
Pacific in the SLP, and the geopotential height decreased in most areas of
Siberia and increased in northern China to the western Pacific. These
patterns suggest that both the East Asian trough and the Siberian high weaken
with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which further implies that the winter cold
air activity will be weakened and then lead to anomalous steady atmospheric
conditions in BTH and its adjacent areas in winter. That is, the less strong
Siberian high and East Asian trough and the associated northerly winds in the
low and middle troposphere will lead to severe haze pollution (lower
visibility and more hazy days) due to the favorable meteorological conditions
for the accumulation and chemical reaction of pollutants. Anyway, we wonder
whether it is true, as we speculated. We further examined the links between
the comprehensive index of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the local meteorological
conditions that play direct roles in the formation of haze pollution,
including the wind fields (Fig. 7), relative humidity (Fig. 8) and vertical
velocity (Fig. 9) at the lowest troposphere (averaged from 1000 to
900 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with an interval of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the boundary layer
height (Fig. 10) based on the ERA-Interim reanalysis data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The climatological mean fields of SLP <bold>(a)</bold> and
H500 <bold>(b)</bold> averaged in winter 1981 to 2010, and the spatial
distribution of the regression coefficients of SLP <bold>(c)</bold> and
H500 <bold>(d)</bold> upon the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the period 1981 to 2015 (areas
significant at the 0.05 level are shaded).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 7a displays the climatological mean wind field averaged from 1000 to
900 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over winter 1981 to 2010. At the lower level, the
northwesterly winds dominated BTH, and the wind speed in Beijing, Tianjin and
the north of Hebei province was larger than that in the south of Hebei
province. Figure 7b shows the composite (positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> winters
minus negative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> winters) wind field averaged from 1000 to
900 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over winter 1981 to 2015. In the composite wind field, the
anomalous southeasterly winds dominated the BTH region instead of the
northwesterly in the climatological mean wind field, indicating that the
northwesterly weakened significantly over BTH and its neighboring areas when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased. Previous studies (Z. Y. Zhang et al., 2015)
demonstrated that the decrease in wind speed is not conducive to the
diffusion of air pollutants and easily leads to haze pollution in Beijing. It
may be true for the whole BTH region. Thus, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
will lead to a decrease in the visibility and an increase in the number of
hazy days in winter over the BTH region.</p>
      <p>As with Fig. 7, Fig. 8a and b present the climatology and composite relative
humidity averaged from the lowest troposphere, respectively. In the composite
map, all the areas of BTH are covered by the positive values, and most of
them are significant at the 0.05 level. They indicate that the winter
relative humidity was anomalously higher in the positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years
than that in the negative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years. As pointed out in the
Introduction, a high relative humidity is one of the important reasons for
visibility degradation. This is because the high relative humidity is
favorable for the accumulation and hygroscopic growth of pollutants, which
can strengthen the light scattering and absorption by atmospheric particles
and gases and then cause the visibility degradation directly (Baumer et al.,
2008; Q. Zhang et al., 2015). Thus a positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that
a decrease in visibility accompanied by the increasing number of hazy days
may occur in winter over the BTH region. Figure 9a and b present the
climatology and composite vertical speeds averaged from the lowest
troposphere, respectively. The positive (negative) values of vertical speed
in the unit of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote sinking (ascending) motion. The
climatological vertical speeds show that the downward air motions dominated
the BTH region in winter. In the composite vertical speed field, most areas
of BTH were covered by the significantly negative values, which suggested
that fewer vertical exchanges of air occurred in these areas in the positive
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> winters. In other words, the increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may
result in a weaker vertical convection and force the lowest troposphere to be
more stable. It is easy to understand that the anomalous stabilization will
lead to much haze pollution. Moreover, a similar result can be found in the
planetary boundary layer height, which was reduced significantly in most of
BTH and its adjacent areas in the positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> winters (Fig. 10).
The decreased boundary layer height will depress the air pollutants into a
narrower air column in a certain area and then lead to an increase in the
pollutants' concentration. Thus, a winter with lower visibility and more hazy
days in the BTH region would be expected in the case of the lower boundary
layer height caused by the anomalously high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In view of the responses of the local surface winds, relative humidity,
vertical motion and boundary layer to the comprehensive index of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mentioned above, the close relationships between the winter
mean visibility and number of hazy days over the BTH region and the given six
atmospheric circulations are generally feasible in the physical mechanism. It
is reasonable and reliable to estimate the winter haze pollution in the BTH
region based on the seasonal forecast fields derived from climate simulation.
Thus it will be helpful to provide scientific references for the governmental
decisions in advance about the reducing or controlling of pollutant emission
to deal with the probably severe haze pollution in the BTH region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>The climatological mean <bold>(a)</bold> and the composite <bold>(b)</bold>
wind fields averaged from 1000 to 900 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (areas significant at the
0.05 level are shaded).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 7 but for relative humidity.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 7 but for vertical speed.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>The climatological mean <bold>(a)</bold> and the composite <bold>(b)</bold>
boundary layer height (areas significant at the 0.05 level are shaded).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/561/2016/acp-16-561-2016-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Using the daily visibility and number of hazy days recorded in the 19
meteorological stations and the NCEP/NCAR and ERA-Interim reanalysis data,
the evolution of the winter haze pollution in the BTH region since 1981 and
its possible relations to atmospheric circulations were examined in this
study.</p>
      <p>The results showed that the winter mean visibility has a significant negative
correlation with the number of hazy days, and both of them show distinctly
inter-annual variability during the entire period 1981 to 2015. The
correlation coefficients between the winter haze pollution (the visibility
and number of hazy days) and the most common atmospheric circulations over
the mid–high latitude of the Northern Hemisphere were re-examined. Results
showed that the relations between the haze pollution in BTH and the winter
AO, NAO and PNA were very weak, but that they were correlated significantly
with EU, WP and SBH. Furthermore, the six new indices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
derived from the key areas in the fields of SLP, U&amp;V850, H500, U200 and
T200 were closely related to the winter haze pollution in BTH. We can
estimate the visibility and number of hazy days by using the six indices and
the fitting and leave-N-out cross-validation methods, respectively. In
general, the high level of the estimation statistics suggested that the
winter haze pollution in BTH can be estimated or predicted to a reasonable
degree based on the optimized atmospheric circulation indices. However, we
also noted that the statistic estimation models for the visibility and number
of hazy days may be influenced in part by a prominent change in the
pollutants' emission artificially. Thus, it is valuable and significant for
government decision-making departments to take action in advance in dealing
with the probably severe haze pollution in BTH indicated by the circulation
conditions, such as in controlling the pollutants' discharge.</p>
      <p>In order to investigate the link processes between the haze pollution and the
given atmospheric circulations more simply, a comprehensive index
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was synthesized from the six individual circulation indices
by applying a PCA method. The winter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase appears to cause
a shallowing of the East Asian trough at the middle troposphere and a
weakening of the Siberian high-pressure field at sea level, and is then
accompanied by a reduction (increase) of horizontal advection and vertical
convection (relative humidity) in the lowest troposphere and a reduced
boundary layer height in BTH and its neighboring areas, which are not
conducive to the spread and elimination of air pollutants, but favor the
formation of haze pollution in BTH winter. In short, the reasonable link
processes and the stable statistic relationships suggested that the
atmospheric circulation indices can be used to predict or evaluate generally
the haze pollution in BTH winter to some extent.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant
no. 8152019), the National Key Technologies R &amp; D Program of China (grant
nos. 2014BAC23B01 and 2014BAC23B00) and project PE16010 of the Korea Polar
Research Institute. X. Zhang acknowledges the financial support from project
Z141100001014013 of the Beijing Municipal Science &amp; Technology Commission.
D. Gong was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(grant no. 41321001).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: G. Carmichael</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>An, X., Zhu, T., Wang, Z., Li, C., and Wang, Y.: A modeling analysis of a heavy
air pollution episode occurred in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3103–3114, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3103-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3103-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baddock, M. C., Strong, C. L., Leys, J. F., Heidenreich, S. K., Tews, E. K.,
and McTainsh, G. H.: A visibility and total suspended dust relationship, Atmos.
Environ., 89, 329–336, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baumer, D., Vogel, B., Versick, S., Rinke, R., Mohler, O., and Schnaiter, M.:
Relationship of visibility, aerosol optical thickness and aerosol size
distribution in an ageing air mass over South-West Germany, Atmos. Environ.,
42, 989–998, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, C. K. and Yao, X.: Air pollution in mega cities in China, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1–42, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, D., Song, Y., and Liu, B.: Visibility trends in six megacities in China
1973–2007, Atmos. Res., 94, 161–167, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Zhao, C. S., Zhang, Q., Deng, Z. Z., Huang, M. Y., and Ma, X. C.:
Aircraft study of mountain chimney effect of Beijing, China, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, D08306, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010610</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol,
C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler,
M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J.,
Park, B. K., Peubey, C., Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N.,
and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the
data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Deng, J. J., Xing, Z. Y., Zhuang, B. L., and Du, K.: Comparative study on
long-term visibility trend and its affecting factors on both sides of the
Taiwan Strait, Atmos. Res., 143, 266–278, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, J. L., Hu, M., Chan, C. K., Lau, P. S., Fang, M., He, L. Y., and Tang, X.
Y.: A comparative study of the organic matter in PM2.5 from three Chinese
megacities in three different climatic zones, Atmos. Environ., 40,
3983–3994, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fritts, H. C.: Tree-Rings and Climate, Academic Press, London, 567 p., 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, C., and Zhang, M.: Emission controls versus meteorological
conditions in determining aerosol concentrations in Beijing during the 2008
Olympic Games, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12437–12451, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12437-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12437-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, D. Y. and Ho, C. H.: Siberian High and climate change over middle to high
latitude Asia, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 72, 1–9, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gong, D. Y. and Luterbacher, J.: Variability of the low-level cross-equatorial
jet of the western Indian Ocean since 1660 as derived from coral proxies,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01705, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032409" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032409</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, B., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.
C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year
reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, H. Q., Zhu, B., Su, J. F., Wang, H. L., Zhang, Q. C., and Wang, F.:
Analysis of a long-lasting haze episode in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Res., 120,
78–87, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S. H., Liu, Z. X., Li, J., Wang, Y. C., Ma, Y. J., Sheng, L., Liu,
H.P., Liang, F. M., Xin, G. J., and Wang, J. H.: Numerical simulation for the
coupling effect of local atmospheric circulations over the area of Beijing,
Tianjin and Hebei Province, Sci. China Ser. D-Earth, 52, 382–392, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lo, J. C. F., Lau, A. K. H., Fung, J. C. H., and Chen, F.: Investigation of
enhanced cross-city transport and trapping of air pollutants by coastal and
urban land-sea breeze circulations, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D14104, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006837</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Miao, Y. C., Liu, S. H., Zheng, Y. J., Wang, S., Chen, B. C., Zheng, H.,
and Zhao, J. C.: Numerical study of the effects of local atmospheric
circulations on a pollution event over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, China, J.
Environ. Sci., 30, 9–20, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Sabetghadam, S., Farhang, A. G., and Golestani, Y.: Visibility trends in Tehran
during 1958–2008, Atmos. Environ., 62, 512–520, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Schichtel, B. A., Husar, R. B., Falke, S. R., and Wilson, W. E.: Haze trends
over the United States 1980–1995, Atmos. Environ., 35, 5205–5210, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Streets, D. G., Fu, J. H. S., Jang, C. J., Hao, J., He, K. B., Tang, X. Y.,
Zhang, Y. H., Wang, Z. F., Li, Z. P., Zhang, Q., Wang, L. T., Wang, B. Y.,
and Yu, C.: Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, Atmos. Environ.,
41, 480–492, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Wallace, J. M. and Gutzler, D. S.: Teleconnections in the geopotential height
field during the Northern Hemisphere winter, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 784–812,
1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H. J., Chen, H. P., and Liu, J. P.: Arctic Sea Ice Decline Intensified
Haze Pollution in Eastern China, Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 8, 1–9,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Nie, W., Gao, J., Xue, L. K., Gao, X. M., Wang, X. F., Qiu, J., Poon, C. N.,
Meinardi, S., Blake, D., Wang, S. L., Ding, A. J., Chai, F. H., Zhang, Q. Z.,
and Wang, W. X.: Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics:
secondary pollutants and regional impact, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7603–7615, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Hao, J., McElroy, M. B., Munger, J. W., Ma, H., Chen, D., and Nielsen, C. P.:
Ozone air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics: effectiveness of emission
restrictions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5237–5251, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5237-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5237-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. S., Yao, L., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Wang, L. L., and Zhang, J. K.:
Formation of haze pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and their
control strategies, Chin. Sci. Bull., 28, 353–363, 2013 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, C. C. and Yeh, H. H.: Comparative influences of airborne pollutants and
meteorological parameters on atmospheric visibility and turbidity, Atmos.
Res., 96, 496–509, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, D.: Hazy weather research in China in the last decade: a review, Acta Sci. Circumst., 32, 257–269, 2012 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, D., Chen, H. Z., Wu, M., Liao, B. T., Wang, Y. C., Liao, X. N., Zhang,
X. L., Quan, J. N., Liu, W. D., Gu, Y., Zhao, X. J., Meng, J. P., and Sun, D.:
Comparison of three statistical methods on calculating hazy days-taking
areas around the capital for example, China Environ. Sci., 34, 545–554,
2014 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W. Z., Chen, H., Li, D. H., Zhao, F. S., and Yang, Y.: A case study of
aerosol characteristics during a haze episode over Beijing, Procedia,
Environ. Sci., 18, 404–411, 2013.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q. H., Zhang, J. P., and Xue, H. W.: The challenge of improving
visibility in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7821–7827, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Quan, J. L., Tie, X. X., Li, X., Liu, Q., Gao, Y., and Zhao, D.
L.: Effects of meteorology and secondary particle formation on visibility
during heavy haze events in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 502,
578–584, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. L., Huang, Y. B., Zhu, W. Y., and Rao, R. Z.: Aerosol characteristics
during summer haze episodes from different source regions over the coast
city of North China Plain, J. Quant. Spectrosc. R., 122,
180–193, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z. Y., Gong, D. Y., Hu, M., Guo, D., He., X. Z., and Lei, Y. N.:
Anomalous winter temperature and precipitation events in southern China, J.
Geogra. Sci., 19, 471–488, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z. Y., Gong, D. Y., He, X. Z., Lei, Y. N., and Feng, S. H.:
Statistical reconstruction of Antarctic Oscillation index based on
multi-proxies, Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 3, 283–287, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z. Y., Zhang, X. L., Gong, D. Y., Quan, W. J., Zhao, X. J., Ma, Z.
Q., and Kim, S. J.: Evolution of surface O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations and their relationships with meteorological conditions over
the last decade in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 108, 67–75, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Xu, X. F., Xu, J., Meng, W., and Pu, W. W.:
Seasonal and diurnal variations of ambient PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in urban
and rural environments in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 43, 2893–2900, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Possible influence of atmospheric circulations on winter haze pollution in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, northern China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Using the daily records derived from the synoptic weather stations and the
NCEP/NCAR and ERA-Interim reanalysis data, the variability of the winter haze
pollution (indicated by the mean visibility and number of hazy days) in the
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region during the period 1981 to 2015 and its
relationship with the atmospheric circulations at middle–high latitude were
analyzed in this study. The winter haze pollution in BTH had distinct
inter-annual and inter-decadal variabilities without a significant long-term
trend. According to the spatial distribution of correlation coefficients, six
atmospheric circulation indices (<i>I</i><sub>1</sub> to <i>I</i><sub>6</sub>) were defined from the
key areas in sea level pressure (SLP), zonal and meridional winds at 850 hPa
(U850, V850), geopotential height field at 500 hPa (H500), zonal wind at
200 hPa (U200), and air temperature at 200 hPa (T200), respectively. All of
the six indices have significant and stable correlations with the winter
visibility and number of hazy days in BTH. In the raw (unfiltered)
correlations, the correlation coefficients between the six indices and the
winter visibility (number of hazy days) varied from 0.57 (0.47) to 0.76 (0.6)
with an average of 0.65 (0.54); in the high-frequency ( &lt; 10 years)
correlations, the coefficients varied from 0.62 (0.58) to 0.8 (0.69) with an
average of 0.69 (0.64). The six circulation indices together can explain
77.7 % (78.7 %) and 61.7 % (69.1 %) variances of the winter
visibility and the number of hazy days in the year-to-year (inter-annual)
variability, respectively. The increase in <i>I</i><sub>c</sub> (a comprehensive
index derived from the six individual circulation indices) can cause a
shallowing of the East Asian trough at the middle troposphere and a weakening
of the Siberian high-pressure field at sea level, and is then accompanied by
a reduction (increase) of horizontal advection and vertical convection
(relative humidity) in the lowest troposphere and a reduced boundary layer
height in BTH and its neighboring areas, which are favorable for the
formation of haze pollution in BTH winter, and vice versa. The high level of
the prediction statistics and the reasonable mechanism suggested that the
winter haze pollution in BTH can be forecasted or estimated credibly based on
the optimized atmospheric circulation indices. Thus it is helpful for
government decision-making departments to take action in advance in dealing
with probably severe haze pollution in BTH indicated by the atmospheric
circulation conditions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
An, X., Zhu, T., Wang, Z., Li, C., and Wang, Y.: A modeling analysis of a heavy
air pollution episode occurred in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3103–3114, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3103-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-3103-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baddock, M. C., Strong, C. L., Leys, J. F., Heidenreich, S. K., Tews, E. K.,
and McTainsh, G. H.: A visibility and total suspended dust relationship, Atmos.
Environ., 89, 329–336, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baumer, D., Vogel, B., Versick, S., Rinke, R., Mohler, O., and Schnaiter, M.:
Relationship of visibility, aerosol optical thickness and aerosol size
distribution in an ageing air mass over South-West Germany, Atmos. Environ.,
42, 989–998, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, C. K. and Yao, X.: Air pollution in mega cities in China, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 1–42, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, D., Song, Y., and Liu, B.: Visibility trends in six megacities in China
1973–2007, Atmos. Res., 94, 161–167, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Zhao, C. S., Zhang, Q., Deng, Z. Z., Huang, M. Y., and Ma, X. C.:
Aircraft study of mountain chimney effect of Beijing, China, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, D08306, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010610" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD010610</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol,
C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler,
M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J.,
Park, B. K., Peubey, C., Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N.,
and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the
data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Deng, J. J., Xing, Z. Y., Zhuang, B. L., and Du, K.: Comparative study on
long-term visibility trend and its affecting factors on both sides of the
Taiwan Strait, Atmos. Res., 143, 266–278, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, J. L., Hu, M., Chan, C. K., Lau, P. S., Fang, M., He, L. Y., and Tang, X.
Y.: A comparative study of the organic matter in PM2.5 from three Chinese
megacities in three different climatic zones, Atmos. Environ., 40,
3983–3994, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fritts, H. C.: Tree-Rings and Climate, Academic Press, London, 567 p., 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, C., and Zhang, M.: Emission controls versus meteorological
conditions in determining aerosol concentrations in Beijing during the 2008
Olympic Games, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12437–12451, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12437-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-12437-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, D. Y. and Ho, C. H.: Siberian High and climate change over middle to high
latitude Asia, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 72, 1–9, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, D. Y. and Luterbacher, J.: Variability of the low-level cross-equatorial
jet of the western Indian Ocean since 1660 as derived from coral proxies,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01705, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032409" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL032409</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, B., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.
C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year
reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, H. Q., Zhu, B., Su, J. F., Wang, H. L., Zhang, Q. C., and Wang, F.:
Analysis of a long-lasting haze episode in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Res., 120,
78–87, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S. H., Liu, Z. X., Li, J., Wang, Y. C., Ma, Y. J., Sheng, L., Liu,
H.P., Liang, F. M., Xin, G. J., and Wang, J. H.: Numerical simulation for the
coupling effect of local atmospheric circulations over the area of Beijing,
Tianjin and Hebei Province, Sci. China Ser. D-Earth, 52, 382–392, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Lo, J. C. F., Lau, A. K. H., Fung, J. C. H., and Chen, F.: Investigation of
enhanced cross-city transport and trapping of air pollutants by coastal and
urban land-sea breeze circulations, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D14104, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006837" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006837</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Miao, Y. C., Liu, S. H., Zheng, Y. J., Wang, S., Chen, B. C., Zheng, H.,
and Zhao, J. C.: Numerical study of the effects of local atmospheric
circulations on a pollution event over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, China, J.
Environ. Sci., 30, 9–20, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Sabetghadam, S., Farhang, A. G., and Golestani, Y.: Visibility trends in Tehran
during 1958–2008, Atmos. Environ., 62, 512–520, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Schichtel, B. A., Husar, R. B., Falke, S. R., and Wilson, W. E.: Haze trends
over the United States 1980–1995, Atmos. Environ., 35, 5205–5210, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Streets, D. G., Fu, J. H. S., Jang, C. J., Hao, J., He, K. B., Tang, X. Y.,
Zhang, Y. H., Wang, Z. F., Li, Z. P., Zhang, Q., Wang, L. T., Wang, B. Y.,
and Yu, C.: Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, Atmos. Environ.,
41, 480–492, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Wallace, J. M. and Gutzler, D. S.: Teleconnections in the geopotential height
field during the Northern Hemisphere winter, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 784–812,
1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H. J., Chen, H. P., and Liu, J. P.: Arctic Sea Ice Decline Intensified
Haze Pollution in Eastern China, Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 8, 1–9,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, T., Nie, W., Gao, J., Xue, L. K., Gao, X. M., Wang, X. F., Qiu, J., Poon, C. N.,
Meinardi, S., Blake, D., Wang, S. L., Ding, A. J., Chai, F. H., Zhang, Q. Z.,
and Wang, W. X.: Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics:
secondary pollutants and regional impact, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7603–7615, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-7603-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Hao, J., McElroy, M. B., Munger, J. W., Ma, H., Chen, D., and Nielsen, C. P.:
Ozone air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics: effectiveness of emission
restrictions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5237–5251, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5237-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-5237-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. S., Yao, L., Liu, Z. R., Ji, D. S., Wang, L. L., and Zhang, J. K.:
Formation of haze pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and their
control strategies, Chin. Sci. Bull., 28, 353–363, 2013 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, C. C. and Yeh, H. H.: Comparative influences of airborne pollutants and
meteorological parameters on atmospheric visibility and turbidity, Atmos.
Res., 96, 496–509, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, D.: Hazy weather research in China in the last decade: a review, Acta Sci. Circumst., 32, 257–269, 2012 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, D., Chen, H. Z., Wu, M., Liao, B. T., Wang, Y. C., Liao, X. N., Zhang,
X. L., Quan, J. N., Liu, W. D., Gu, Y., Zhao, X. J., Meng, J. P., and Sun, D.:
Comparison of three statistical methods on calculating hazy days-taking
areas around the capital for example, China Environ. Sci., 34, 545–554,
2014 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, W. Z., Chen, H., Li, D. H., Zhao, F. S., and Yang, Y.: A case study of
aerosol characteristics during a haze episode over Beijing, Procedia,
Environ. Sci., 18, 404–411, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q. H., Zhang, J. P., and Xue, H. W.: The challenge of improving
visibility in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7821–7827, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-7821-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Quan, J. L., Tie, X. X., Li, X., Liu, Q., Gao, Y., and Zhao, D.
L.: Effects of meteorology and secondary particle formation on visibility
during heavy haze events in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 502,
578–584, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. L., Huang, Y. B., Zhu, W. Y., and Rao, R. Z.: Aerosol characteristics
during summer haze episodes from different source regions over the coast
city of North China Plain, J. Quant. Spectrosc. R., 122,
180–193, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z. Y., Gong, D. Y., Hu, M., Guo, D., He., X. Z., and Lei, Y. N.:
Anomalous winter temperature and precipitation events in southern China, J.
Geogra. Sci., 19, 471–488, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z. Y., Gong, D. Y., He, X. Z., Lei, Y. N., and Feng, S. H.:
Statistical reconstruction of Antarctic Oscillation index based on
multi-proxies, Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 3, 283–287, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z. Y., Zhang, X. L., Gong, D. Y., Quan, W. J., Zhao, X. J., Ma, Z.
Q., and Kim, S. J.: Evolution of surface O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub>
concentrations and their relationships with meteorological conditions over
the last decade in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 108, 67–75, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Xu, X. F., Xu, J., Meng, W., and Pu, W. W.:
Seasonal and diurnal variations of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration in urban
and rural environments in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 43, 2893–2900, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng, W., Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., and
Shi, Q. F.: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation
mechanism in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5685–5696,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
