<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-5243-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Future vegetation–climate interactions in Eastern Siberia: an assessment of
the competing effects of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and secondary<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> organic aerosols</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Future vegetation--climate interactions in Eastern Siberia}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Arneth et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Arneth</surname><given-names>Almut</given-names></name>
          <email>almut.arneth@kit.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-0822</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Makkonen</surname><given-names>Risto</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-3393</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Olin</surname><given-names>Stefan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Paasonen</surname><given-names>Pauli</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-9590</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Holst</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kajos</surname><given-names>Maija K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kulmala</surname><given-names>Markku</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Maximov</surname><given-names>Trofim</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>Paul A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff5">
          <name><surname>Schurgers</surname><given-names>Guy</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2189-1995</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and
Climate Research/Atmospheric Environmental Research, Garmisch Partenkirchen,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014
Helsinki, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund
University, Sölvegatan 12, 22362 Lund, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Plant Ecological Physiology and Biochemistry Lab.,
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS, 41, Lenin ave,
Yakutsk 677980, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University
of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Almut Arneth (almut.arneth@kit.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5243</fpage><lpage>5262</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Disproportional warming in the northern high latitudes and large carbon
stocks in boreal and (sub)arctic ecosystems have raised concerns as to
whether substantial positive climate feedbacks from biogeochemical process
responses should be expected. Such feedbacks occur when increasing
temperatures lead, for example, to a net release of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, temperature-enhanced emissions of biogenic volatile organic
compounds (BVOCs) have been shown to contribute to the growth of secondary
organic aerosol (SOA), which is known to have a negative radiative climate
effect. Combining measurements in Eastern Siberia with model-based estimates
of vegetation and permafrost dynamics, BVOC emissions, and aerosol growth, we
assess here possible future changes in ecosystem CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> balance and
BVOC–SOA interactions and discuss these changes in terms of possible climate
effects. Globally, the effects of changes in Siberian ecosystem CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
balance and SOA formation are small, but when concentrating on Siberia and
the Northern Hemisphere the negative forcing from changed aerosol direct and
indirect effects become notable – even though the associated temperature
response would not necessarily follow a similar spatial pattern. While our
analysis does not include other important processes that are of relevance for
the climate system, the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BVOC–SOA interplay serves as an example
for the complexity of the interactions between emissions and vegetation
dynamics that underlie individual terrestrial
processes and highlights the
importance of addressing ecosystem–climate feedbacks in consistent,
process-based model frameworks.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Warming effects on ecosystem carbon cycling in northern ecosystems (Serreze
et al., 2000; Tarnocai et al., 2009) and the potential for large
climate feedbacks from losses of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from these carbon-dense
systems have been widely discussed (Khvorostyanov et al., 2008; Schuur et
al., 2009; Arneth et al., 2010). Other biogeochemical processes can also lead
to feedbacks, in particular through emissions of biogenic volatile organic
compounds (BVOCs) that are important precursors for tropospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
formation, affect methane lifetime, and also act as precursors for secondary
organic aerosol (SOA). These latter interactions with SOA have a cooling
effect (Arneth et al., 2010; Makkonen et al., 2012b; Paasonen et al., 2013).
Condensation of monoterpenes (MTs), a group of BVOCs with large source strength
from coniferous vegetation, on pre-existing particles increases the observed
particle mass, as well as the number of particles large enough to act as
cloud condensation nuclei (CCN; equivalent to particles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ca. 100 nm) at
boreal forest sites (Tunved et al., 2006). For present-day conditions,
Spracklen et al. (2008a) estimated a radiative cooling of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.7 W per m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of boreal forest area from the BVOC–SOA interplay.</p>
      <p>How future changes in MT emissions affect SOA growth and climate is very
uncertain. This is partially because of the lack of process understanding of
the various steps of aerosol formation and growth and interactions with
cloud formation (Hallquist et al., 2009; Carslaw et al., 2010), and partially
because the issue of how spatial patterns of changing emissions of
atmospherically rapidly reactive substances translate into a changing
patterns of radiative forcing, and then into a surface temperature change,
has not yet been resolved (Shindell et al., 2008; Fiore et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>The Russian boreal forest represents the largest continuous conifer region in
the world. About one-third of this forested area (ca.
730 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ha) is dominated by larch (Shvidenko et al., 2007),
in particular by the <italic>Larix gmelinii</italic> and <italic>L. cajanderii</italic>
forests growing east of the Yenisei River on permafrost soils. Despite its
vast expanse, the first seasonal measurements of MT emissions from Eastern
Siberian larch have only recently been published (Kajos et al., 2013). Leaf
MT emission capacities are highly species dependent; thus any model estimate
of MT emissions from boreal larch forests that relies solely on generic BVOC
emission parameterizations obtained from other conifer species will give
inaccurate emission and related SOA aerosol number concentrations for this region (Spracklen et
al., 2008a, b). We therefore provide here a first assessment of MT emission
rates from the Eastern Siberian larch biome, combining measured emission
capacities with a process-based dynamic vegetation model and quantitatively
linking MT emissions and SOA formation. We use the observations and process
models to assess climate change effects on future vegetation composition,
BVOC emissions, and the concentration of particles of CCN size. We discuss
how the climate impact of future SOA levels from changes in BVOC emissions
across Eastern Siberia compares with changes in the regional CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
balance. The chief goal of the study is not to provide a full surface climate
feedback quantification (for which today's global coupled modelling tools are
insufficient) but rather to highlight the number of potentially opposing
processes that need to be covered when doing so.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Site description, BVOC and aerosol measurements</title>
      <p>Leaf BVOC emissions fluxes, above-canopy monoterpene concentration, and
aerosol particle size and number concentration were measured during the
growing season 2009 at the research station Spasskaya Pad, located ca. 40 km
to the northeast of Yakutsk (62<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18.4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
129<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>07.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and centred in the Eastern Siberian larch biome
(Kobak et al., 1996; Tchebakova et al., 2006). In the northern direction, no
major pollution sources exist within hundreds of kilometres, the nearest mining areas
are concentrated to the south and west of Yakutsk. The predominant air flow
to the site is either from southern (via Yakutsk) or northern locations.
Forest fires contribute to aerosol load in summer.</p>
      <p>An eddy covariance tower for measurements of forest–atmosphere exchange of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, water vapour, and sensible heat was established at Spasskaya Pad in
the late 1990s (Ohta et al., 2001; Dolman et al., 2004) in a <italic>L. cajanderii</italic> forest growing on permafrost soil with an understory vegetation
consisting of ericaceous shrubs. The forest has an average age of ca.
185 years and canopy height is little less than 20 m. Maximum one-sided
larch leaf area index (LAI) in summer is around 2 (Ohta et al., 2001; Takeshi et
al., 2008). In 2009, leaf samples for BVOC analyses were taken, accessing the
upper part of the canopy from a scaffolding tower located within a few hundred
metres of the eddy flux tower (Kajos et al., 2013). Using a custom-made
Teflon branch chamber, air filtered of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was sampled onto
Tenax-TA/Carbopack-B cartridges with a flow rate of 220 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A
total of 5–12 samples were taken during the day from two trees on
south-facing branches approximately 2 m below the tree top. The cartridge
samples were stored at 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C during the campaigns, transported
afterwards to Helsinki and thermally desorbed and analysed using a thermal
desorption instrument (Perkin-Elmer TurboMatrix 650, Waltham, USA) attached
to a gas chromatograph (Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600, Waltham, USA). For details
on chamber, adsorbents, and laboratory measurements, see Haapanala et
al. (2009), Ruuskanen et al. (2007), and Hakola et al. (2006).</p>
      <p>Monoterpene concentrations and forest–atmosphere exchange fluxes were
measured with a high-sensitivity quadrupole proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS; Ionicon, Innsbruck,
Austria) located in a hut at the foot of the eddy covariance tower. Sample
air was drawn through a heated PFA tube using a 20 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> flow from
the inlet located at 30.3 m above ground. While reporting here on
monoterpenes only, a range of masses, corresponding to BVOCs (e.g. isoprene,
methanol, acetaldehyde), were sampled sequentially, with typical dwell times
of 0.5 s and scanning sequences of around 4 s. Measurement set-up, disjunct
eddy covariance flux calculations, and quality control followed Holst et
al. (2010). It was not possible to import a gas calibration standard to
Spasskaya Pad due to security and customs restrictions, and thus the PTR-MS
could not be calibrated on-site. However, the instrument had been calibrated
before and after the field campaign using a gas standard mixture from Ionimed
(Innsbruck, Austria) using the same detector and instrument settings as
during the field campaigns.</p>
      <p>Aerosol particles were continuously monitored with a scanning mobility
particle sizer (SMPS) located at the foot of the eddy covariance tower,
connected to a differential mobility analyser (DMA, medium Hauke type,
custom built; for size segregation of aerosol particles) in front of a
condensation particle counter (CPC, model 3010, TSI Inc., USA; for determining the
number of the size segregated particles). The system was identical to the one
described and evaluated in Svenningsson et al. (2008). Scans across the size
range of 6–600 nm were completed every 5 min. The SMPS data were used to
determine occasions of aerosol particle nucleation. The growth rates (GRs) were
calculated from log-normal modes fitted to the measured particle size
distribution following Hussein et al. (2005). The time evolution of the
diameters at which the fitted modes peaked was inspected visually, and the
GR was determined with linear least squares fitting to these peak
diameters whenever a continuous increase in diameter was observed. In this
analysis we calculated GRs for particles from 25 to 160 nm.</p>
      <p>The source rate for condensing vapour (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was determined by calculating the concentration of condensable vapour needed
to produce the observed GR (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Nieminen et
al., 2010, 2014) and the condensation sink from the particle size distribution (CS,
s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Kulmala et al., 2001). In steady state the sources and sinks for
the condensing vapour are equal, and thus we determined the source rate as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Overview of modelled processes and model-specific features. For
further details see text.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="79.667717pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="99.584646pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="65.441339pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="96.73937pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="96.73937pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Process</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Input</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Input source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Resolution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Configuration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Specific features</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BVOC emissions</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LPJ-GUESS, dynamic global vegetation model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Air temperature, precipitation, short-wave radiation (monthly, interpolated to daily), atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (annual).</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ECHAM historical (20th century) and RCP 8.5 (21st century), interpolated to CRU climate, following Ahlström et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>horizontal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">As in Arneth et al. (2007a) and Schurgerst et al. (2009b)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">BNS plant functional type adopted for larch-specific parameters (see text). Inhibition of BVOC emissions by atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be switched on and off.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ecosystem dynamics<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>and carbon cycle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">As in Miller and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Smith (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Including permafrost<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>module</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol number concentration and size distribution: black carbon, organic carbon, dust, sea salt, and sulfate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM5.5-HAM2, global climate model coupled with aerosol microphysics</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Emissions of BVOCs, from wildfire, anthropogenic sources, dust, and sea salt</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Climate generated as part of simulation nudged to ERA-40; BVOCs from LPJ-GUESS; as in Makkonen et al. (2012a); dust/sea salt modelled interactively, anthropogenic and wildfire emissions fixed to present day (Stier et al., 2005; Makkonen et al., 2012a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">T63 spectral resolution, 31 vertical hybrid sigma levels</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">As in Makkonen et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2012a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SOA module includes formation of extremely low-volatility organic compounds from MT oxidation (Jokinen et al., 2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total particle and cloud concentration nuclei<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>concentration, radiative effects</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">As above</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">As in Lohmann et<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>al. (2007)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Aerosol concentrations are interactively coupled to the cloud-microphysics scheme, calculation of aerosol direct and indirect effect</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Simulated changes in net primary productivity, BVOC emissions, and C
pool size in vegetation and soils. Unless stated otherwise, values are for
the simulated Siberian domain (76–164<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 46–71<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and
represent an area of 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. NPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(given as a reference value) is global vegetation net primary productivity
(Pg C a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. BVOCs are in Tg C a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C fluxes in
Pg C a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; C pools are in PgC. Simulations for monoterpene emissions for
the boreal needleleaf summergreen (BNS) plant functional type compared three
cases (indicated as different subscripts for “Total_MT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>BNS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>”),
using maximum (9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and minimum
(1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in
Spasskaya Pad (see text) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>gC g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
as a weighted average from all observations at the Spasskaya Pad location.
For BVOCs, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition was switched on and off (Arneth et al.,
2007b).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="142.26378pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1981–2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2031–2050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2081–2100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="left">Carbon in circumpolar permafrost region: </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">109 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">106 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Litter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">68 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">44 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil (0 to 2 m depth)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">454 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">392 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">255 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">644 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">567 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">377 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="left">C pools in permafrost area of study domain: </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Litter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil (0 to 2 m depth)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">216 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">187 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">140 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">297 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">259 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">198 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="left">C pools in entire Siberian study domain: </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Litter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil (0 to 2 m depth)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">219 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">221 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">223 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">305 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">320 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">342 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="left">BVOCs, with CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition: </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_iso</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNE, MT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BINE, MT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNS, MT_1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNS, MT_6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNS, MT_9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_MT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BNS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mn>1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_MT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BNS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mn>6.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.68 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_MT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BNS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mn>9.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.86 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="left">BVOCs, no CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition: </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_iso</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNE, MT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.99 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BINE, MT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNS, MT_1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNS, MT_6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BNS, MT_9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_MT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BNS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mn>1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.92 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.04 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_MT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BNS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mn>6.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total_MT<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BNS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mn>9.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>Abbreviations: NPP is net primary productivity;
BNE is boreal needleleaf evergreen PFT, shade tolerant;
BINE is boreal needleleaf evergreen PFT, intermediate shade-tolerant;
BNS is boreal needleleaf summergreen PFT (“larch”), shade intolerant,
continentality index as in Sitch et al. (2003);
iso is isoprene; MT is monoterpene.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Modelling of dynamic vegetation processes, permafrost, and BVOC
emissions</title>
      <p>We applied the dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) LPJ-GUESS (Smith et
al., 2001; Sitch et al., 2003), including algorithms to compute canopy BVOC
emission following Niinemets et al. (1999), Arneth et al. (2007b), and Schurgers
et al. (2009a) and permafrost as adopted from Wania et al. (2009) (Table 1).
LPJ-GUESS simulates global and regional dynamics and composition of
vegetation in response to changes in climate and atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration. Physiological processes like photosynthesis, autotrophic, and
heterotrophic respiration are calculated explicitly; a set of carbon
allocation rules determines plant growth. Plant establishment, growth,
mortality, and decomposition, as well as their response to resource availability
(light, water), modulate seasonal and successional population dynamics arising
from a carbon allocation trade-off (Smith et al., 2001). Fire disturbance is
included in the model (Thonicke et al., 2001). Similar to other DGVMs, a
number of plant functional types (PFTs) are specified to represent the larger
global vegetation units (Sitch et al., 2003).</p>
      <p>BVOC emissions models, whether these are linked to DGVMs or to a prescribed
vegetation map, all rely on using emission potentials (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leaf emissions
at standardized environmental conditions) or some derivatives in their
algorithms. In LPJ-GUESS, production and emissions of leaf and canopy
isoprene and monoterpenes are linked to their photosynthetic production,
specifically the electron transport rate, and the requirements for energy and
redox equivalents to produce a unit of isoprene from triose phosphates
(Niinemets et al., 1999; Arneth et al., 2007b; Schurgers et al., 2009a). A
specified fraction of absorbed electrons used for isoprene (monoterpene)
production (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provides the link to PFT-specific <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Arneth
et al., 2007a); in case of monoterpenes emitted from storage, an additional
correction is applied to account for their light-dependent production (taking
place over parts of the day) and temperature-driven emissions (taking place
the entire day) (Schurgers et al., 2009a). Half of the produced monoterpenes
were stored, whereas the other half was emitted directly (Schurgers et al.,
2009a). Values for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were similar to
the global parameterization for most of the model's PFTs (Schurgers et al.,
2009a), with the exception of boreal needle-leaf summergreen (BNS) “larch”
PFT (see results).</p>
      <p>Contrasting the stimulation of BVOC emissions in a warmer and more productive
environment, higher CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations have been shown to inhibit leaf
isoprene production. Even though the underlying metabolic mechanism is not
yet fully understood, this effect has been observed in a number of studies
(for an overview see Fig. 6 in Arneth et al., 2011). Due to limited
experimental evidence, whether or not a similar response occurs in
monoterpene producing species cannot yet be confirmed, especially in species
that emit from storage. The model is set up to test this hypothesis. Arneth
et al. (2007a) proposed an empirical function for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition, based
on the ratio of leaf internal CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at a standard
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level (taken as 370 ppm) and at the given atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels of the simulation year (both calculated for
non-water-stressed conditions); the relationships have been shown since to fit
an updated compilation of observations well (Arneth et al., 2011). The
algorithm that describes the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition of BVOC emission can either
be enabled or disabled in the model (Arneth et al., 2007a) and simulations
results thus compared (see Fig. A1, Appendix; Table 2).</p>
      <p>LPJ-GUESS was recently expanded with a permafrost module following Wania et
al. (2009; Miller and Smith, 2012) in which a numerical solution of the heat
diffusion equation was introduced. The soil column in LPJ-GUESS now consists
of a snow layer of variable thickness, a litter layer of fixed thickness
(5 cm), and a soil column of depth 2 m (with sublayers of thickness 0.1 m)
from which plants can extract non-frozen water above the wilting point. A
“padding” column of depth 48 m (with thicker sublayers) is also present
beneath these three layers to aid in the accurate simulation of temperatures
in the overlying compartments (Wania et al., 2009). Soil temperatures
throughout the soil column are calculated daily, in addition to change in response to
changing surface air temperature and precipitation input and the
insulating effects of the snow layer and phase changes in the soil's water.</p>
      <p>Here we run the model with 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution, using climate and
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as driving variables as described in the literature
(Smith et al., 2001). Values describing growth and survival of the BNS
(larch) PFT were adopted from previous
studies (Sitch et al., 2003; Hickler et al., 2012; Miller and Smith, 2012),
but with the degree-day cumulative temperature requirements on a 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
basis (GDD5) to attain full leaf cover reduced from 200 to 100 (Moser et al.,
2012). Minimum GDD5 to allow establishment was set to 350 resulting in
establishment of seedlings in very cold locations. Soil thermal conductivity
was 2 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The model was spun up for 500 years to 1900
values using CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration from the year 1900 and repeating
de-trended climate from 1901 to 1930 from CRU (Mitchell and Jones, 2005).
Historical (20th century) simulations used observed CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
and based on variable CRU climate. Simulations for the 21st century were
based on ECHAM climate, using RCP 8.5 emissions (Riahi et al., 2007). The
model requires daily radiation, precipitation, and maximum and minimum air
temperatures as input (Arneth et al., 2007b). Climate output from ECHAM was interpolated to the CRU half-degree grid, and monthly values interpolated to
daily ones (see Ahlström et al., 2012, and references therein). These
daily fields were then bias corrected using the years 1961–1990 as reference
period, as in Ahlström et al. (2012). CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition of BVOC
emissions were switched on and off in separate simulations to assess the
sensitivity of our results to this process. Totals across Siberia were
calculated for a grid box that ranged from 46 to 71<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 76 to
164<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. Simulated changes in total carbon uptake or losses were
translated into radiative forcing following (IPCC, 2007), assuming a 50 %
uptake in oceans in case of a net loss to the atmosphere (Sitch et al.,
2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Modelling aerosols and CCN</title>
      <p>To model the effect of BVOCs on CCN concentrations, we use the global
aerosol–climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2 (Zhang et al., 2012). ECHAM5.5-HAM2
includes the aerosol components of black carbon, organic carbon, dust, sea
salt, and sulfate (Table 1) and describes the aerosol size distribution with
seven log-normal modes. The microphysics module M7 (Vignati et al., 2004)
includes nucleation, coagulation, and condensation. In this study, we use the
ECHAM5.5-HAM2 version with activation type as described in Makkonen et
al. (2012a, b). For simulating secondary organic aerosol, we use the recently
developed SOA module (Jokinen et al., 2015). The SOA module explicitly
accounts for gas-phase formation of extremely low-volatility organic
compounds (ELVOCs) from monoterpene oxidation. The module implements a hybrid
mechanism for SOA formation: ELVOCs are assumed to condense to the aerosol
population according to the Fuchs-corrected condensation sink, while
semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) are partitioned according to organic
aerosol mass. While simulated ELVOCs are able to partition more effectively
to nucleation and Aitken mode, hence providing growth for nucleated particles
to CCN size, SVOCs primarily add organic mass to accumulation and coarse
aerosol modes. A total SOA yield of 15 % from monoterpenes is assumed
(Dentener et al., 2006). While similar assumption on total SOA yield is
applied by most aerosol–climate models, the simulated SOA is likely to be
underestimated (e.g. Tsigaridis et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>ECHAM5.5-HAM2 was run with different BVOC emission scenarios that were
simulated for the years 2000 and 2100 off line with LPJ-GUES (see previous
section). The model uses T63 spectral resolution with 31 vertical hybrid
sigma levels. The simulations apply present-day oxidant fields as in Stier et
al. (2005). All simulations are initiated with a 6-month spin-up, followed by
5 years of simulation for analysis. The model climate is nudged towards
ERA-40 reanalysis year 2000 meteorology, an approach that is widely used in
aerosol–climate assessments (K. Zhang et al., 2014). Present-day wildfire
and anthropogenic aerosol and precursor emissions are applied for all
simulations (Dentener et al., 2006). One of the foci here
is a BVOC, comparing present-day and
future BVOC emissions (choosing a conservative estimate of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(leaf) h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; see results section for
further details on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>*) but keeping other emissions constant (oxidant fields
and nudging meteorology are same for both 2000 and 2100). The emissions of
dust and sea salt are modelled interactively (Zhang et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>The analysis of model results includes total particle
number concentrations and CCN at 1 %
supersaturation (CCN(1 %)), since it reflects the changes in Aitken mode
concentrations and local changes in precursor emissions. While “realistic”
supersaturations are generally lower, choosing CCN(1.0 %) concentration
provides the upper limit for CCN concentrations. The simulations are also
used to assess the radiative effects of SOA. In the simulations, the aerosol
concentrations are interactively coupled to the cloud-microphysics scheme
(Lohmann et al., 2007) and to the direct aerosol radiative calculation. The
aerosol indirect effect is evaluated as a change in cloud radiative forcing
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CRF). The direct aerosol effect accounts only for clear-sky
short-wave forcing (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CSDRF). The radiative effects are calculated as
differences from two time-averaged 5-year simulations as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CRF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CRF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BVOC</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CRF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BVOC</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2000</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CSDRF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CSDRF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BVOC</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CSDRF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BVOC</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2000</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Subscripts “2000” and “2100” denote that BVOC emissions from this year
were used, while other model conditions were based on present-day values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Simulated maximum summer monthly leaf area index (LAI; <bold>a, b</bold>) and
July emissions of monoterpenes (<bold>c, d</bold>; mgC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
Eastern Siberian larch. The latter were calculated applying emission factors
of 6.2, obtained from the measurements at Spasskaya Pad. <bold>(e, f)</bold> Maximum permafrost thaw depth (August), shown here as the circumpolar map
for comparison with Tarnocai et al. (2009).
Values are averages for a simulation 1981–2000 <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and for
2081–2100 <bold>(b, d, f)</bold>, applying climate and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
from ECHAM-RCP8.5. Emissions in <bold>(c, d)</bold> do not account for direct
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition (see also Fig. A1).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/5243/2016/acp-16-5243-2016-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Present-day expanse of larch forest and BVOC emissions</title>
      <p>LPJ-GUESS reproduces the present-day circumpolar permafrost distribution
(Fig. 1; shown as circumpolar map for comparison with Tarnocai et al., 2009)
and, with the exception of the Kamchatka peninsula, simulates also the
expanse of the larch-dominated forests in Eastern Siberia (Fig. 1; Miller and
Smith, 2012; Wagner, 1997). Maximum LAI calculated by the
model for the Spasskaya Pad forest (62<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18.4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
129<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>07.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 220 m a.s.l.), where the BVOC measurements
were obtained, was 2.0 (averaged over years 1981–2000; not shown) and is in
good agreement with the measured values during that period (1.6; Takeshi et
al., 2008). Total present-day modelled soil C pools over the top 2 m in
Eastern Siberia are 216 Gt C and, for circumpolar soils summed
for latitudes above 40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 454 Gt C (Table 2). Recent estimates of C stored
in northern latitude soils affected by permafrost were 191, 495, and
1024 Gt C in the 0–30, 0–100, and 0–300 cm soil layer respectively, based on
extrapolating observations stored in the Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon
Database (Tarnocai et al., 2009). These numbers indicate that the values
calculated with LPJ-GUESS are lower than observation-based ones, most likely
underestimating C density in particular in the soil layers below a few tenths
of centimetres.</p>
      <p>Kajos et al. (2013) measured for the first time MT <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <italic>L. cajanderii</italic>. Their measurements, taken over an entire growing season at
Spasskaya Pad, suggested values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranging from
1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(leaf) h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the lower end to
9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(leaf) h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the upper. Applying a
weighted measured-average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(leaf) h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in LPJ-GUESS led to average
summer daily monoterpene emissions of 2.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8, 1 standard deviation,
June) mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 2.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8,
July) mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the grid location representing the
Spasskaya Pad site, for the same year of measurements as reported in Kajos et
al. (2013). These values are within 25 and 10 % of measured values
(3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, June;
2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, July), even though the modelled
day-to-day variation was smaller, which is expected when applying
grid-averaged climate as model input. By comparison, for a boreal Scots pine
forest in southern Finland the average June and July monoterpene emissions
were somewhat larger than the values for larch (3.8 and
5.1 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively; Rantala et al., 2015). For a
Larix kaempferi-dominated temperate forest in Japan, Mochizuki et al. (2014)
extrapolated, based on their measurements, summertime maxima of ca.
10 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Across the Siberian larch biome, applying
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increased simulated total present-day
MT emissions from 0.11 TgCa<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (as in Schurgers et al., 2009a) to
0.21 TgCa<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or to 0.42 TgCa<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used
(Table 2). The observed range in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the calculated range in total
emissions across Siberia, might reflect variability in tree microclimate or
genetic variability or might have been induced by (undetected) mechanic or
biotic stress during the time of measurements (Staudt et al., 2001; Bäck
et al., 2012; Kajos et al., 2013). While our data are insufficient to make a
finite suggestion of <italic>L. cajanderi</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the measurements provide
evidence for potentially substantially higher MT emissions from Siberian
larch than previous estimates.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Particle growth rates obtained from particle number size
distribution (<bold>a</bold>, example from 10 June 2009). The colours indicate
the measured concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of particles with different diameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nm) over the course of a
day, small circles are mean diameters of concentration modes fitted for each
measurement, and the temporal change of these diameters is represented with
black lines from which the growth rate is calculated.
Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the calculated volumetric source rates of condensing
vapours (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 10 min resolution) as a
function of air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) for all identified growth periods
(one data point is obtained for each fitted growth rate, e.g. from
<bold>(a)</bold> three data points would have been extracted); data are separated
by levels of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR).
<bold>(c)</bold> Monoterpene concentrations (half-hourly data) measured above the
canopy vs. temperature measured at the same level (data separated by PAR, the
data points overlapping with determined growth rate in <bold>b</bold> are
indicated by encircled symbols), and relationship between volumetric source
rate of condensing vapours and monoterpene concentration (<bold>d</bold>; data
separated by particle diameter). Data points in <bold>(d)</bold> correspond
directly to encircled symbols in <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/5243/2016/acp-16-5243-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Present-day aerosols and links to BVOCs</title>
      <p>New particle formation events (Fig. 2a) were observed regularly at Spasskaya
Pad. The calculated volumetric source rates of condensing vapours (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
product of vapour concentration required for the observed particle
growth rate and particle loss rate (Kulmala
et al., 2005), increased exponentially with temperature (Fig. 2b). MT
concentrations increased with temperature as well, with a slope relatively
similar to that found for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship (Fig. 2c).
Consequently, a positive relationship emerged between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and MT
concentration (Fig. 2d), which supports previous field and laboratory
evidence that MTs and their oxidation products are a main precursor to the
observed particle formation and growth.</p>
      <p>Figure 2d shows the connection between the BVOC concentration and the
formation rate of vapours causing the growth of the aerosol particles. Even
though the monoterpene concentrations were measured above and the aerosol
growth rates below the canopy, the observed
correlation indicates that BVOC concentration is an important contributor to
the regional aerosol growth and supports the theory that the condensation of
organic vapour is largely responsible for the formation of secondary organic
aerosol (Hallquist et al., 2009; Carslaw et al., 2010). Substantial
within-canopy chemical reactions would be expected to worsen the
relationship. The correlation depicted in Fig. 2d is determined in particular
by the formation of secondary organic aerosol on pre-existing aerosol
particles, whereas the nucleation rate of new aerosol particles seems not to
be dominated by the landscape-scale emissions and surface concentrations of
BVOCs. For instance, most nucleation events in a Scots pine dominated
landscape in Finland have been found in spring, when measured monoterpene
concentrations in the near-surface were about one-tenth of the summertime
maximum (ca. 60 ppt, vs. up to 500 ppt; Haapanala et al., 2007; Lappalainen
et al., 2009). In our study, we found MT concentrations of similar
magnitude to these.</p>
      <p>In contrast to temperature and BVOC concentrations, levels of radiation,
which can be considered a surrogate for the concentration of the OH radical
(OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), did not affect <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2b), even though OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has
been considered an important player in aerosol formation. Rohrer and
Berresheim (2006) showed a strong correlation between solar ultraviolet
radiation and OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the Hohenpeissenberg site in
Germany. Furthermore, Hens et al. (2014) demonstrated that the daytime
OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in (especially) boreal forest depend on solar
radiation, both above and below the canopy. Hence, the poor relation between
the source rate of condensing vapour and orders-of-magnitude variation in
levels of radiation (Fig. 2b) indicates that OH-radical concentration did not
have a major impact on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This agrees with the findings by Ehn et
al. (2014) that ozone instead of OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is an important, if not the
main, atmospheric agent oxidizing organic vapours into a chemical form that
condenses on particle surfaces. Since the relative variation in ozone
concentrations is much smaller than in BVOC (or OH) concentrations (Hens et
al., 2014), the similarity in the dependencies of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and MT concentration
and temperature (Fig. 2b and c) is in favour of a more significant role of
ozone than of OH in the formation of condensable vapours. In general, our
results indicate that factors and processes besides the concentrations of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> seem to limit aerosol production in unpolluted
environments (Kulmala et al., 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Future carbon pools, vegetation distribution, and BVOC emissions in
Siberia</title>
      <p>In a warmer environment with higher atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, the
simulations indicated a drastically reduced area of permafrost in Siberia
(Fig. 1). Total net primary productivity in the simulated domain increased
from an annual average of 3.5 to 5.9 PgC a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end of the 21st
century. An overall C loss of 100 PgC assumed to be in the form of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(since the model does not yet include a dynamic surface hydrology which would
be necessary to assess changing methane emissions) at the end of the 21st
century, compared to present-day conditions, was calculated from the
shrinking Siberian areas of permafrost (Table 2). However, warming and higher
levels of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> led also to increasing LAI and to
larch-dominated areas showing the expected north and north-eastwards shift
(Fig. 1) compared to present-day climate (Miller and Smith, 2012). The carbon
uptake in expanding vegetation into permafrost-free areas, combined with
enhanced productivity across the simulation domain overcompensates for the
losses from C pools in permafrost areas (Table 2).</p>
      <p>Without CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition of BVOC emissions future MT emissions were, as
expected, notably enhanced: directly as a result of warmer leaves, but
augmented by the future higher LAI of larch and evergreen conifers (Fig. 1d;
Table 2, Fig. A1). Since the emissions scale with the emission factors
applied, the proportional increase between present-day and future climate
conditions is independent of the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Whether or not leaf MT
emissions are inhibited by increasing atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels to a similar
degree to what was found for isoprene is difficult to assess from today's
limited number of studies (e.g. Niinemets et al., 2010, and references
therein). We included both simulation results in Table 2 since similarities
in the leaf metabolic pathways of isoprene and MT production suggest such an
inhibition, but possibly this effect does not become apparent in plant
species where produced MTs are stored unless the storage pools become
measurably depleted by the reduced production. By contrast, species emitting
MTs in an “isoprene-like” fashion immediately after production should more
directly reflect CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition. Evergreen conifers typically emit most
MTs from storage pools, although recent experiments have shown that some
light-dependent emissions also contribute to total emission fluxes.
Accordingly, based on the leaf-level measurements, larch could follow a
hybrid pattern between emission after production and from storage (Kajos et
al., 2013). Without accounting for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition, MT emissions across
the model domain more than doubled (Fig. 1; Table 2) by 2100, as a
consequence of higher emissions per leaf area due to warmer temperatures and
of the larger emitting leaf area in response to higher photosynthesis. With
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition included, simulated changes were negligible, similar to
what was shown in previous BVOC simulations with the model (Arneth et al.,
2007a, 2008).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Boreal vegetation has been shown to respond to the recent decades' warming
and increasing atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels with a prolonged growing season
and higher maximum LAI, similar to patterns in our simulations (Piao et al.,
2006). The calculated enhanced biomass growth is in line with experimental
evidence of higher C in plant biomass in warming plots at tundra field sites
(Elmendorf et al., 2012; Sistla et al., 2013). In Siberian mountain regions,
an upward movement of vegetation zones has been recorded already (Soja et
al., 2007), while the analysis of evergreen coniferous undergrowth abundance
and age shows spread of evergreen species, especially <italic>Pinus siberia</italic>,
into Siberian larch forest (Kharuk et al., 2007). These observations thus
support the modelled shift in vegetation zones and the change in vegetation type
composition and productivity. Likewise, other models with dynamic vegetation
also have shown a strong expansion of broadleaved forests at the southern
edge of the Siberian region in response to warming (Shuman et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Warming and thawing of permafrost soils is being observed at global
monitoring network sites, including in Russia (Romanovsky et al., 2010).
Estimates of carbon losses from northern wetland and permafrost soils in
response to 21st century warming range from a few tens to a few hundreds Pg C,
depending on whether processes linked to microbial heat production,
thermokarst formation, and surface hydrology, winter snow cover insulation,
dynamic vegetation, C–N interactions, or fire are considered (Khvorostyanov
et al., 2008; Schuur et al., 2009; Arneth et al., 2010; Koven et al., 2011;
Schneider von Deimling et al., 2012). For instance, a modelled range of
0.07–0.23 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> forcing associated with a 33–114 Pg CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C loss
from permafrost regions was found for a simulation study that was based on
the RCP 8.5 climate and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scenarios, but excluding full treatment of
vegetation dynamics (Schneider von Deimling et al., 2012). In a recent
literature review, Schaefer et al. (2014) found a range from cumulative 46 to
435 CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> equivalents (accounting for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or
120 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 GtC by 2100, in response to different future warming scenarios
and modelling approaches. In our simulation, the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C loss from the
decreasing Siberian permafrost region would be equivalent to a 0.13
additional W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> forcing in 2100 (see methods). Likely, this number is
too low since the model does not include thermokarst processes, which can
facilitate rapid thaw (Schaefer et al., 2014, and references therein). The
modelled carbon loss was offset when taking into account vegetation dynamics
and processes across the entire Siberian study domain (Table 2), including a
shift in PFT composition, and enhanced productivity especially in the
southern regions, such that the overall carbon uptake including enhanced net
primary productivity and expanding woody vegetation resulted in a small
negative (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect.</p>
      <p>LPJ-GUESS is a second-generation DGVM (Fisher et al., 2010) and includes
plant demography, such that forest successional dynamics and competition for
water and light between individual age cohorts are treated explicitly (Smith
et al., 2001). The forest growth dynamics thus differentiate between early
successional, short-lived species that invest in rapid growth and
shade-tolerant trees with resource allocation aimed towards longer-lived
growth strategies. As a result, the model's PFTs can be mapped to tree
species when required information for model parameterization is available.
The process-based treatment of resource competition such as for light and
water has been shown to lead to a realistic growth response and distribution
under present-day climate conditions (Arneth et al., 2008; Schurgers er al.,
2009b), which should also hold in future and past climates (Miller et al.,
2008; Schurgers et al., 2009b). This feature also provides a distinct
advantage when applying the necessary BVOC emission capacities that are based
on species (rather than functional-type) average values (Arneth et al., 2008;
Schurgers et al., 2009b; Niinemets et al., 2010). In earlier simulations
(Schurgers et al., 2009a), a generic emission potential of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>(leaf) h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was adopted for the BNS PFT
based on a recommendation in Guenther et al. (1995), which at that time did
not include observations from any larch species. Here we demonstrate not only
that a range of measured larch <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Table 2) introduces large
uncertainty in total MT emissions from Siberia but also that it is
fundamental to apply dynamic vegetation growth response (rather than static
maps) for BVOC emissions estimates in changing environments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annual average boundary-layer CCN (1.0 %) concentration
(cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Siberia with present-day anthropogenic and BVOCs (for BNS:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions (left panel), and changes in CCN (1.0 %; right panel)
concentration due to increase in BVOC emission between years 2000 and 2100
(simulations with CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition off). Areas with statistical
significant changes in CCN are indicated by dots. The statistical analysis
is based on monthly average CCN concentrations from 5 years of simulated
data, and statistical significance of the CCN anomaly is evaluated using a
two-sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, without assuming equal variance between the two
populations.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/5243/2016/acp-16-5243-2016-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Monoterpene compounds can be emitted either directly following their
synthesis in the chloroplast, in an “isoprene-like” fashion, or from
storage pools, resulting in an emission pattern that is independent of light
availability. The observed emissions of monoterpenes by larch possibly
reflect a hybrid pattern between emission directly after synthesis in the
chloroplast and emission from storage pools, as has also been found for other
coniferous species (Schurgers et al., 2009a). The needle-level measurements
by Kajos et al. (2013) on larch indicated a combined light and temperature
response, even though a robust differentiation to a temperature-only model
was not possible due to the limited sample size. An earlier study by
Ruuskanen et al. (2007) on a 5-year-old <italic>L. sibirica</italic> tree indicated a
better performance of the temperature-only emission model for monoterpene
species compared to the light and temperature approach.</p>
      <p>Multiple interacting processes could alter monoterpene emissions in the future.
Irrespective of the relative roles of light vs. temperature dependence, a
change in MT concentrations and hence partial pressure of MT in stored pools,
for instance in response to long-term warming, would affect emission
capacities. Changes in measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>* when investigated over the course of a
growing season have been reported and could be related to a changing
production rate (Niinemets et al., 2010). Likewise, observed profiles of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within tree canopies appear related to not only changes in leaf
area-to-weight ratios along the canopy light and temperature gradients but
also to varying production rates (Niinemets et al., 2010). Emission
capacities in <italic>Q. ilex </italic>leaves adapted to warm growth environment were
notably enhanced (Staudt et al., 2003), but the experimental basis for an
acclimation response of BVOC emissions to temperature remains remarkably poor
(Penuelas and Staudt, 2010) and is indicative of the general lack of global
modelling studies accounting for possibly acclimation of process responses to
environmental changes (Arneth et al., 2012). In our simulations we aim to
provide a range of a possible plastic BVOC–CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> responses by switching the
direct CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition on and off for both isoprene and monoterpene, but
we do not account for other acclimation processes.</p>
      <p>The assessment of climate effects of changes in the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C balance vs.
those of BVOC–SOA interactions is challenging, since the translation of
regional changes in emissions of atmospherically reactive species into
related radiative forcing and then into a response in the climate system is
highly nonlinear and poorly understood (Shindell et al., 2008; Fiore et al.,
2012). Based on a synthesis of measured aerosol number
number concentrations and size distribution combined
with boundary-layer growth modelling, Paasonen et al. (2013) estimated a
growing-season indirect radiative cloud albedo feedback of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Siberian larch region. The
observation-based indirect feedback factors exceeded direct ones by roughly
an order of magnitude (Paasonen et al., 2013), but a simple extrapolation
based on the region's growing season temperature increases of ca. 5.5 K
simulated at the end of the 21st century in our study with the ECHAM GCM does
not account for the important nonlinearities in the system. Present-day CCN
(1.0 %) concentrations over Siberia were estimated to vary from extremely
low values of less than 50 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to a few
hundred per cc in the southern part of Siberian domain (Fig. 3). In order to
put measurements and model simulations into context, simulated CCN
concentrations (at the Spasskaya Pad location) were evaluated against
observations during May–August, using particle diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 nm as proxy for CCN, since CCN at different supersaturations were
unavailable in the observations. The model reproduces the observed
May–August average CCN concentration and CCN maximum location in July (not
shown), but the seasonal variation was overestimated in the simulations.
ECHAM-HAM indicates a transition from very clean spring aerosol population of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to high July concentrations ranging from 800 to
1200 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Yakutsk region. By contrast, observations show only
moderate monthly CCN variability from 550 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in May to 750 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in July. While the simulated low spring concentrations likely reflect
unaccounted-for anthropogenic emissions, the simulated high summer
concentrations result from strong wildfire emissions in the region in the
applied emission inventory (see below).</p>
      <p>Whether or not BVOCs can increase the availability of CCN depends on the
availability of sub-CCN-sized particles (O'Donnell et al., 2011). In the
future, a scenario of decreasing anthropogenic emissions could lead to a strong
decrease in calculated atmospheric SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and also in
particle nucleation (Makkonen et al., 2012a). In the model experiments
anthropogenic primary emissions are introduced as 60 nm particles; hence
condensation of sulfuric acid and organic vapours is generally needed in
order to grow these particles to CCN sizes. However, the modelled primary
particle emissions are dominated by wildfires, which are assumed to inject
large particles with 150 nm diameter. SOA formation only partly enhances the
survival of small particles by providing additional growth (Makkonen et al.,
2012a), but partly also suppresses it by increasing the coagulation sink for
small particles (Fig. A2, lower left panel; see also O'Donnell et al., 2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Relative increase in SOA mass, simulated by ECHAM5-HAM in different
aerosol size modes due to BVOC emissions increase from the year 2000 to 2100.
The areas are averaged over Siberia, and the BVOC emissions for years 2000 to
2100 (example is for<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn> 1.9</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>). Areas were separated by wildfire
emissions (using an emission limit of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
the Siberian domain, accumulation mode includes over 85 % of organic
aerosol, and the absolute changes in SOA are also dominated by accumulation
mode. However, the SOA condensation increase until year 2100 is essential for
nucleation and Aitken mode growth.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/5243/2016/acp-16-5243-2016-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The assumption of unchanging oxidant fields induces some uncertainty for
future simulations and inconsistency with present-day simulations with
varying biogenic emissions, since both anthropogenic and biogenic emissions
are likely to modify the atmospheric oxidative capacity. Nudging towards
reanalysis meteorology establishes evaluation of BVOC–aerosol coupling with
unchanged meteorological fields but restricts the model in terms of
aerosol–climate feedbacks, since e.g. nudging future climate simulations
with present-day meteorological winds is based on the assumption that
wind direction and speed, etc., are not changing.</p>
      <p>When only BVOC emissions were changed between the present day and levels
simulated for climate in 2100, the relatively higher emission of BVOCs leads
to substantially increased aerosol growth rates over a large part of the
Siberian domain. This was the case even though we chose the conservative
estimate based on the low measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, GR is not the only factor
determining levels of CCN. Increased aerosol mass due to increased SOA
formation led also to an increase in the condensation sink and eventually to
even decreased particle formation rates in some regions (Fig. A2, lower right
panel). These competing effects of increased growth and increased sink are
essential for quantifying the importance of the cloud albedo forcing
feedback. We can also show that the patterns of changes in CCN in response to
future BVOC emissions are additionally affected by changes in the aerosol
background, which strongly influences the indirect aerosol effect of SOA.</p>
      <p>In large parts of Siberia, the simulated BVOC oxidation products condense on
CCN-sized aerosols already present from wildfires. When simulation results
were separated into regions of low and high wildfire emissions (Fig. 4),
areas of low wildfire activity had a relatively large increase in SOA
formation (60 %) in nucleation mode (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 nm). The
relative increases in SOA formation in Aitken, accumulation, and coarse modes
were 50, 31, and 40 % respectively. However, the distribution of BVOC
oxidation products was rather different in areas of high wildfire activity:
the condensation of SOA depends on surface area and organic mass of the
population, both of which are shifted towards larger modes in
wildfire-intensive areas. SOA formation in coarse mode was more than doubled,
while SOA in nucleation mode decreased by 30 % due to a decrease in
nucleation rates and increase in vapour sink in large aerosol modes.</p>
      <p>It is clear that the effect of increased BVOC emission on particle population
has distinct effects depending on existing background aerosol distribution.
Moreover, CCN at 1.0 % supersaturation was used even though “realistic”
supersaturations are generally lower. The CCN(1.0 %) concentration
therefore provides an upper limit for CCN concentration. In the aerosol
model, neither the simulated CCN(1.0 %) nor CCN(0.2 %) corresponds
clearly to either Aitken or accumulation modes. CCN at 0.2 % would
reflect larger aerosols, and hence the changes in CCN(0.2 %) would be
less sensitive to aerosol and precursor sources (see corresponding Fig. A3).
Averaged over Siberian areas of low wildfire activity, the median (mean)
increase of CCN(0.2 %) was calculated to be 1 % (7 %) due to BVOC
emissions changes from present-day levels to the end of the 21st century,
while areas of high wildfire emission lead to median (mean) increase of
0.3 % (0.5 %).</p>
      <p>Even though the Siberian MT emissions more than double until 2100 (Table 2),
the increasing wildfire emissions and decreasing new particle formation due
to reductions in anthropogenic SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> largely offset the effect of
increased BVOC emissions on CCN concentration. In wildfire plumes, the
simulated CCN concentrations were high even without BVOC-induced growth of
smaller particles. The radiative effect due to BVOC emission change between
ca. 2000 and ca. 2100 was estimated from ECHAM-HAM simulations averaged over
5 years. The increase in BVOC emissions leading to additional secondary
organic aerosol induces a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> change in direct clear-sky
aerosol forcing over the Siberian domain at the end of the 21st century.
Furthermore, the increase in CCN concentrations leads to a strengthening of
the cloud radiative effect by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 3). These changes in
radiative fluxes only take into account the changing BVOC emission, and the
potential concurrent changes in anthropogenic and wildfire emissions might
decrease the simulated radiative effect of biogenic SOA (Carslaw et al.,
2013).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Simulated changes in radiative effects due to change in BVOC
emission between years 2000 and 2100, averaged over Siberian domain,
Northern Hemisphere, and globally. CRF is cloud radiative forcing; CSDRF is
direct aerosol effect, which accounts only for clear-sky short-wave forcing.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CRF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CSDRF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Siberia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Northern Hemisphere</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Implications, limitations, and future progress</title>
      <p>Up to now, studies that investigate the role of terrestrial vegetation
dynamics and carbon cycle in the climate system typically account solely for
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, while studies that look at BVOC–climate interactions often ignore
other processes, especially interactions with vegetation dynamics or the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of ecosystems. However, for understanding the full range of
interactions between atmospheric composition, climate change, and terrestrial
processes we need a much more integrative perspective. Our analysis seeks to
provide an example of how to quantify a number of climatically relevant
ecosystem processes in the large Eastern Siberian region in a consistent
observational and modelling framework that accounts for the multiple
interactions between emissions, vegetation, and soils. It poses a challenge
to combine effects of well-mixed greenhouse gases and locally constrained,
short-lived substances. On a global scale, the opposing estimates in
radiative effects from ecosystem–CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and BVOC–SOA interactions are
minuscule but it is to be expected that some of the forcing effects from SOA
could lead to a notable change in regional temperatures. Clearly our numbers
are uncertain, but they pinpoint the necessity for assessing
surface–atmosphere exchange processes comprehensively in climate feedback
analyses.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>While doing so, we are aware of the fact that a number of additional
processes are not included in our analysis. For instance, it remains to be
investigated whether a similar picture would emerge when additional feedback
mechanisms are taken into consideration, e.g. SOA formation from isoprene
(Henze and Seinfeld, 2006) or effects of atmospheric water vapour on reaction
rates and aerosol loads, or that some of the SOA might like to partition more
to the gas phase in a warmer climate. Likewise, neither the albedo effect of
northwards migrating vegetation (Betts, 2000; W. Zhang et al., 2014), nor
changes in the hydrology (which affect CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O vs. CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluxes), nor changes in C–N interactions (Zaehle et al., 2010) are
considered here, which would require a coupled Earth system model that
combines a broad range of dynamically varying ecosystem processes with full
treatment of air chemistry and aerosol interactions. Quantifying the full
range of terrestrial climate feedbacks, either globally or regionally, with
consistent model frameworks that account for the manifold interactions is not
yet possible with today's modelling tools.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title/>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Present-day (top: 1981–2000) and end of 21st century (bottom:
2081–2100) total monoterpene (left) and isoprene (right) emissions for the
month July (mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Future simulations show results
with CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition switched on and off; for present-day conditions the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> effect on BVOCs is marginal as the values are close to the
standardized concentration of 370 ppm, and therefore only the patterns
without CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> effect are shown.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=270.301181pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/5243/2016/acp-16-5243-2016-f05.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Relative change between years 2000 and 2100 (%) nucleation
rate <bold>(a)</bold>, growth rate <bold>(b)</bold>, condensation sink <bold>(c)</bold>,
and formation rate of 3 nm particles in response to altered BVOC emissions
(see methods).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/5243/2016/acp-16-5243-2016-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Relative change in summer average (June–July–August, averaged over
5 years) CCN(0.2 %) concentration in response to altered BVOC
emissions (see methods). Dotted areas denote regions where summer wildfire
emission exceeds 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 4).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/5243/2016/acp-16-5243-2016-f07.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>A. Arneth acknowledges support from the Swedish Research Council VR, the
Helmholtz Association ATMO Programme, and its Initiative and Networking Fund.
The study was also supported by the Finnish Academy, grant 132100. The EU FP7
Bacchus project (grant agreement 603445) is acknowledged for financial
support. P. A. Miller acknowledges support from the VR Linnaeus Centre of
Excellence LUCCI, and R. Makkonen acknowledges support from the Nordic Centre
of Excellence CRAICC. This study is a contribution to the Strategic Research
Area MERGE.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> The article processing charges for
this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by a Research
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: A. Ding</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ahlström, A., Schurgers, G., Arneth, A., and Smith, B.: Robustness and
uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to cmip5 climate change
projections, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 044008,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Arneth, A., Miller, P. A., Scholze, M., Hickler, T., Schurgers, G., Smith,
B., and Prentice, I. C.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition of global terrestrial isoprene
emissions: Potential implications for atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L18813, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030615</ext-link>, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Arneth, A., Niinemets, Ü., Pressley, S., Bäck, J., Hari, P., Karl,
T., Noe, S., Prentice, I. C., Serça, D., Hickler, T., Wolf, A., and
Smith, B.: Process-based estimates of terrestrial ecosystem isoprene
emissions: incorporating the effects of a direct CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-isoprene interaction,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 31–53, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-31-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-31-2007</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Arneth, A., Schurgers, G., Hickler, T., and Miller, P. A.: Effects of species
composition, land surface cover, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and climate on
isoprene emissions from European forests, Plant Biol., 10, 150–162,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-965247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1055/s-2007-965247</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Arneth, A., Harrison, S. P., Zaehle, S., Tsigaridis, K., Menon, S., Bartlein,
P. J., Feichter, J., Korhola, A., Kulmala, M., O'Donnell, D., Schurgers, G.,
Sorvari, S., and Vesala, T.: Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the
climate system, Nat. Geosci., 3, 525–532, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1905" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1905</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Arneth, A., Schurgers, G., Lathiere, J., Duhl, T., Beerling, D. J., Hewitt,
C. N., Martin, M., and Guenther, A.: Global terrestrial isoprene emission
models: sensitivity to variability in climate and vegetation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8037–8052, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8037-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8037-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Arneth, A., Mercado, L., Kattge, J., and Booth, B. B. B.: Future challenges
of representing land-processes in studies on land-atmosphere interactions,
Biogeosciences, 9, 3587–3599, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3587-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-3587-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bäck, J., Aalto, J., Henriksson, M., Hakola, H., He, Q., and Boy, M.:
Chemodiversity of a Scots pine stand and implications for terpene air
concentrations, Biogeosciences, 9, 689–702, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-689-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-689-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Betts, R. A.: Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by
decreases in surface albedo, Nature, 408, 187–190, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L.,
Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and
feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A.,
Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre, L.
A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty
in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12674</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S.,
Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E.,
Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.:
Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750
prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Dolman, A. J., Maximov, T. C., Moors, E. J., Maximov, A. P., Elbers, J. A.,
Kononov, A. V., Waterloo, M. J., and van der Molen, M. K.: Net ecosystem
exchange of carbon dioxide and water of far eastern Siberian Larch (Larix
cajanderii) on permafrost, Biogeosciences, 1, 133–146,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-1-133-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-1-133-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I.,
Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres,
S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma,
J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T.,
Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and
Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol,
Nature, 506, 476–479, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Elmendorf, S. C., Henry, G. H. R., Hollister, R. D., Bjork, R. G.,
Boulanger-Lapointe, N., Cooper, E. J., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Day, T. A.,
Dorrepaal, E., Elumeeva, T. G., Gill, M., Gould, W. A., Harte, J., Hik, D.
S., Hofgaard, A., Johnson, D. R., Johnstone, J. F., Jonsdottir, I. S.,
Jorgenson, J. C., Klanderud, K., Klein, J. A., Koh, S., Kudo, G., Lara, M.,
Levesque, E., Magnusson, B., May, J. L., Mercado-Diaz, J. A., Michelsen, A.,
Molau, U., Myers-Smith, I. H., Oberbauer, S. F., Onipchenko, V. G., Rixen,
C., Schmidt, N. M., Shaver, G. R., Spasojevic, M. J., Porhallsdottir, P. E.,
Tolvanen, A., Troxler, T., Tweedie, C. E., Villareal, S., Wahren, C. H.,
Walker, X., Webber, P. J., Welker, J. M., and Wipf, S.: Plot-scale evidence
of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming, Nat. Clim.
Change, 2, 453–457, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1465</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Fisher, R., McDowell, N., Purves, D., Moorcroft, P., Sitch, S., Cox, P.,
Huntingford, C., Meir, P., and Woodward, F. I.: Assessing uncertainties in a
second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale
limitations, New Phytol., 187, 666–681,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03340.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03340.x</ext-link>, 2010</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Naik, V., Spracklen, D. V., Steiner, A., Unger, N., Prather,
M., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsoren,
S., Eyring, V., Folberth, G. A., Ginoux, P., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B.,
Lamarque, J.-F., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., O'Connor, F. M., Righi, M.,
Rumbold, S. T., Shindell, D. T., Skeie, R. B., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Takemura,
T., and Zeng, G.: Global air quality and climate, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41,
6663–6683, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35095e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35095e</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., McKay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmermann, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
8873–8892, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Haapanala, S., Rinne, J., Hakola, H., Hellén, H., Laakso, L., Lihavainen,
H., Janson, R., O'Dowd, C., and Kulmala, M.: Boundary layer concentrations
and landscape scale emissions of volatile organic compounds in early spring,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1869–1878, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1869-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1869-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Haapanala, S., Ekberg, A., Hakola, H., Tarvainen, V., Rinne, J., Hellén,
H., and Arneth, A.: Mountain birch – potentially large source of
sesquiterpenes into high latitude atmosphere, Biogeosciences, 6, 2709–2718,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2709-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-2709-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hakola, H., Tarvainen, V., Bäck, J., Ranta, H., Bonn, B., Rinne, J., and
Kulmala, M.: Seasonal variation of mono- and sesquiterpene emission rates of
Scots pine, Biogeosciences, 3, 93–101, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-93-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-3-93-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hens, K., Novelli, A., Martinez, M., Auld, J., Axinte, R., Bohn, B., Fischer,
H., Keronen, P., Kubistin, D., Nölscher, A. C., Oswald, R., Paasonen, P.,
Petäjä, T., Regelin, E., Sander, R., Sinha, V., Sipilä, M.,
Taraborrelli, D., Tatum Ernest, C., Williams, J., Lelieveld, J., and Harder,
H.: Observation and modelling of HO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in a boreal forest, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 8723–8747, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8723-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8723-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Henze, D. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global secondary organic aerosol from isoprene
oxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09812, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL025976</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hickler, T., Vohland, K., Feehan, J., Miller, P. A., Smith, B., Costa, L.,
Giesecke, T., Fronzek, S., Carter, T. R., Cramer, W., Kuhn, I., and Sykes, M.
T.: Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural
vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation
model, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 21, 50–63,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Holst, T., Arneth, A., Hayward, S., Ekberg, A., Mastepanov, M.,
Jackowicz-Korczynski, M., Friborg, T., Crill, P. M., and Bäckstrand, K.:
BVOC ecosystem flux measurements at a high latitude wetland site, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 1617–1634, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1617-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1617-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Koponen, I. K., Paatero, P.,
Aalto, P. P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Evaluation of an automatic
algorithm for fitting the particle number size distributions, Boreal Environ.
Res., 10, 337–355, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for
Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Junninen, H.,
Paasonen, P., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Guenther, A., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Sipilä, M.: Production of extremely
low-volatile organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and
atmospheric implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 7123–7128,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1423977112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kajos, M. K., Hakola, H., Holst, T., Nieminen, T., Tarvainen, V., Maximov,
T., Petäjä, T., Arneth, A., and Rinne, J.: Terpenoid emissions from
fully grown east Siberian <italic>Larix cajanderi</italic> trees, Biogeosciences, 10,
4705–4719, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4705-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-4705-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kharuk, V., Ranson, K., and Dvinskaya, M.: Evidence of Evergreen Conifer
Invasion into Larch Dominated Forests During Recent Decades in Central
Siberia, Eurasian Journal of Forest Research, 10, 163–171, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Khvorostyanov, D. V., Ciais, P., Krinner, G., and Zimov, S. A.: Vulnerability
of east Siberia's frozen carbon stores to future warming, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L10703, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033639" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033639</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kobak, K. I., Turchinovich, I. Y., Kondrasheva, N. Y., Schulze, E. D.,
Schulze, W., Koch, H., and Vygodskaya, N. N.: Vulnerability and adaptation of
the larch forest in eastern Siberia to climate change, Water Air Soil Poll.,
92, 119–127, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Koven, C. D., Ringeval, B., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Cadule, P.,
Khvorostyanov, D., Krinner, G., and Tarnocai, C.: Permafrost carbon-climate
feedbacks accelerate global warming, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
14769–14774, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103910108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1103910108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Dal Maso, M., Makela, J. M., Pirjola, L., Vakeva, M., Aalto, P.,
Miikkulainen, P., Hameri, K., and O'Dowd, C. D.: On the formation, growth and
composition of nucleation mode particles, Tellus B, 53, 479–490,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Mönkkönen, P., Koponen, I. K., Dal
Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kerminen, V.-M.: On the
growth of nucleation mode particles: source rates of condensable vapor in
polluted and clean environments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 409–416,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-409-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-409-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lappalainen, H. K., Sevanto, S., Bäck, J., Ruuskanen, T. M., Kolari, P.,
Taipale, R., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., and Hari, P.: Day-time concentrations of
biogenic volatile organic compounds in a boreal forest canopy and their
relation to environmental and biological factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
5447–5459, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5447-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5447-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U., Stier, P., Hoose, C., Ferrachat, S., Kloster, S., Roeckner, E.,
and Zhang, J.: Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global
climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3425–3446,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Guenther, A.,
and Kulmala, M.: BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global
aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10077–10096,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Hari, P., and
Kulmala, M.: Air pollution control and decreasing new particle formation lead
to strong climate warming, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1515–1524,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Miller, P. A. and Smith, B.: Modelling tundra vegetation response to recent
arctic warming, Ambio, 41, 281–291, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0306-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13280-012-0306-1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Miller, P. A., Giesecke, T., Hickler, T., Bradshaw, R. H. W., Smith, B.,
Seppä, H., Valdes, P. J., and Sykes, M. T.: Exploring climatic and biotic
controls on Holocene vegetation change in Fennoscandia, J. Ecol., 96,
247–259, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01342.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01342.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D.: An improved method of constructing a
database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution
grids, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 693–712, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mochizuki, T., Tani, A., Takahashi, Y., Saigusa, N., and Ueyama, M.:
Long-term measurement of terpenoid flux above a Larix kaempferi forest using
a relaxed eddy accumulation method, Atmos. Environ., 83, 53–61, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Moser, L., Fonti, P., Büntgen, U., Esper, J., Luterbacher, J., Franzen,
J., and Frank, D.: Timing and duration of European larch growing season along
altitudinal gradients in the Swiss Alps, Tree Physiol., 30, 225–233,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpp108</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Nieminen, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kulmala, M.: Sub-10 nm particle growth
by vapor condensation – effects of vapor molecule size and particle thermal
speed, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9773–9779, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nieminen, T., Asmi, A., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Keronen, P., Petaja, T.,
Kulmala, M., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Trends in atmospheric new-particle
formation: 16 years of observations in a boreal-forest environment, Boreal
Environ. Res., 19, 191–214, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Niinemets, U., Tenhunen, J. D., Harley, P. C., and Steinbrecher, R.: A model
of isoprene emission based on energetic requirements for isoprene synthesis
and leaf photosynthetic properties for <italic>Liquidambar</italic> and
<italic>Quercus</italic>, Plant Cell Environ., 22, 1319–1335, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Niinemets, Ü., Monson, R. K., Arneth, A., Ciccioli, P., Kesselmeier, J.,
Kuhn, U., Noe, S. M., Peñuelas, J., and Staudt, M.: The leaf-level
emission factor of volatile isoprenoids: caveats, model algorithms, response
shapes and scaling, Biogeosciences, 7, 1809–1832,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1809-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-1809-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>O'Donnell, D., Tsigaridis, K., and Feichter, J.: Estimating the direct and
indirect effects of secondary organic aerosols using ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8635–8659, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8635-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8635-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Ohta, T., Hiyama, T., Tanaka, H., Kuwada, T., Maximov, T. C., Ohata, T., and
Fukushima, Y.: Seasonal variation in the energy and water exchanges above and
below a larch forest in eastern Siberia, Hydrol. Process., 15, 1459–1476,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Paasonen, P., Asmi, A., Petaja, T., Kajos, M. K., Aijala, M., Junninen, H.,
Holst, T., Abbatt, J. P. D., Arneth, A., Birmili, W., van der Gon, H. D.,
Hamed, A., Hoffer, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Richard Leaitch, W.,
Plass-Dulmer, C., Pryor, S. C., Raisanen, P., Swietlicki, E., Wiedensohler,
A., Worsnop, D. R., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: Warming-induced
increase in aerosol number concentration likely to moderate climate change,
Nat. Geosci., 6, 438–442, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1800" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1800</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Penuelas, J. and Staudt, M.: Bvocs and global change, Trends Plant Sci., 15,
133–144, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.005</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Piao, S., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Zhou, L., and Chen, A.: Effect of
climate and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes on the greening of the Northern Hemisphere over
the past two decades, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23402,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl028205</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Rantala, P., Aalto, J., Taipale, R., Ruuskanen, T. M., and Rinne, J.: Annual
cycle of volatile organic compound exchange between a boreal pine forest and
the atmosphere, Biogeosciences, 12, 5753–5770, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5753-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-5753-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Riahi, K., Gruebler, A., and Nakicenovic, N.: Scenarios of long-term
socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization,
Technol. Forecast. Soc., 74, 887–935, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rohrer, F. and Berresheim, H.: Strong correlation between levels of
tropospheric hydroxyl radicals and solar ultraviolet radiation, Nature, 442,
184–187, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Romanovsky, V. E., Drozdov, D. S., Oberman, N. G., Malkova, G. V., Kholodov,
A. L., Marchenko, S. S., Moskalenko, N. G., Sergeev, D. O., Ukraintseva, N.
G., Abramov, A. A., Gilichinsky, D. A., and Vasiliev, A. A.: Thermal state of
permafrost in russia, Permafrost Periglac., 21, 136–155,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.683</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Ruuskanen, T. M., Kajos, M. K., Hellén, H., Hakola, H., Tarvainen, V.,
and Rinne, J.: Volatile organic compound emissions from Siberian larch,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 5807–5812, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.036</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Schaefer, K., Lantuit, H., Romanovsky, V. E., Schuur, E. A. G., and Witt, R.:
The impact of the permafrost carbon feedback on global climate, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 085003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/085003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/085003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Schneider von Deimling, T., Meinshausen, M., Levermann, A., Huber, V.,
Frieler, K., Lawrence, D. M., and Brovkin, V.: Estimating the near-surface
permafrost-carbon feedback on global warming, Biogeosciences, 9, 649–665,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-649-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-649-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Schurgers, G., Arneth, A., Holzinger, R., and Goldstein, A. H.: Process-based
modelling of biogenic monoterpene emissions combining production and release
from storage, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3409–3423, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3409-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3409-2009</ext-link>,
2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schurgers, G., Hickler, T., Miller, P. A., and Arneth, A.: European emissions
of isoprene and monoterpenes from the Last Glacial Maximum to present,
Biogeosciences, 6, 2779–2797, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2779-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-2779-2009</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A. G., Vogel, J. G., Crummer, K. G., Lee, H., Sickman, J. O., and
Osterkamp, T. E.: The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net
carbon exchange from tundra, Nature, 459, 556–559, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08031</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Serreze, M. C., Walsh, J. E., Chapin, F. S., Osterkamp, T., Dyurgerov, M.,
Romanovsky, V., Oechel, W. C., Morison, J., Zhang, T., and Barry, R. G.:
Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude
environment, Climatc Change, 46, 159–207, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Shindell, D. T., Levy, H., Schwarzkopf, M. D., Horowitz, L. W., Lamarque, J.
F., and Faluvegi, G.: Multimodel projections of climate change from
short-lived emissions due to human activities, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,
D11109, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009152</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Shuman, J. K., Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, E. I., Soja, A. J., Shugart, H.
H., Ershov, D., and Holcomb, K.: Forest forecasting with vegetation models
across russia, Can. J. Forest Res., 45, 175–184, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/cjfr-2014-0138</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Shvidenko, A., Schepaschenko, D., McCallum, I., and Nilsson, S.: Russian
Forests and Forestry, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
and the Russian Academy of Science, Laxenburg, Austria, available at:
<uri>http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/FOR/forest_cdrom/english/for_fund_en.html</uri>
(last access: 15 April 2016), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sistla, S. A., Moore, J. C., Simpson, R. T., Gough, L., Shaver, G. R., and
Schimel, J. P.: Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing
net soil carbon storage, Nature, 497, 615–618, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12129" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12129</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W.,
Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., Thonicke, K., and
Venevsky, S.: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and
terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Glob.
Change Biol., 9, 161–185, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., and Huntingford, C.: Indirect
radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon
sink, Nature, 448, 791–794, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06059</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., and Sykes, M. T.: Representation of vegetation
dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two
contrasting approaches within European climate space, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.,
10, 621–637, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Soja, A. J., Tchebakova, N. M., French, N. H. F., Flannigan, M. D., Shugart,
H. H., Stocks, B. J., Sukhinin, A. I., Parfenova, E. I., Chapin Iii, F. S.,
and Stackhouse, J. P. W.: Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions
versus current observations, Global Planet. Change, 56, 274–296,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.028</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Bonn, B., and Carslaw, K.: Boreal forests, aerosols and the
impacts on clouds and climate, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 366, 4613–4626,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2008.0201</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Sihto, S.-L.,
Riipinen, I., Merikanto, J., Mann, G. W., Chipperfield, M. P., Wiedensohler,
A., Birmili, W., and Lihavainen, H.: Contribution of particle formation to
global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35,
L06808, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL033038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL033038</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Staudt, M., Mandl, N., Joffre, R., and Rambal, S.: Intraspecific variability
of monoterpene composition emitted by quercus ilex leaves, Can. J. Forest
Res., 31, 174–180, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x00-153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/x00-153</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Staudt, M., Joffre, R., and Rambal, S.: How growth conditions affect the
capacity of <italic>quercus ilex</italic> leaves to emit monoterpenes, New Phytol.,
158, 61–73, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J.,
Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O.,
Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Svenningsson, B., Arneth, A., Hayward, S., Holst, T., Massling, A.,
Swietlicki, E., Hirsikko, A., Junninen, H., Riipinen, I., Vana, M., dal Maso,
M., Hussein, T., and Kulmala, A. E.: Aerosol particle formation events and
analysis of high growth rates observed above a subarctic wetland–forest
mosaic, Tellus B, 58, 353–364, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00351.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00351.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Takeshi, O., Maximov, T. C., Dolman, A. J., Nakai, T., van der Molen, M. K.,
Kononov, A. V., Maximov, A. P., Hiyama, T., Iijima, Y., Moors, E. J., Tanaka,
H., Toba, T., and Yabuki, H.: Interannual variation of water balance and
summer evapotranspiration in an eastern Siberian larch forest over a 7-year
period (1998–2006), Agr. Forest Meteorol., 48, 1940–1953, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G.,
and Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar
permafrost region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, Gb2023,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gb003327</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Tchebakova, N. M., Rehfeldt, G. E., and Parfenova, E. I.: Impacts of climate
change on the distribution of <italic>Larix spp.</italic> and <italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> and their climatypes in Siberia, Mitigation and Adaptation
Strategies for Global Change, 11, 861–882, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9019-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11027-005-9019-0</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., and Cramer, W.: The role of fire
disturbance for global vegetation dynamics. Coupling fire into a Dynamic
Global Vegetation Model, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 10, 661–678, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Tunved, P., Hansson, H. C., Kerminen, V. M., Strom, J., Maso, M. D.,
Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Aalto, P. P., Komppula, M., and Kulmala, M.:
High natural aerosol loading over boreal forests, Science, 312, 261–263,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1123052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1123052</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Tsigaridis, K., Daskalakis, N., Kanakidou, M., Adams, P. J., Artaxo, P.,
Bahadur, R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Benedetti, A.,
Bergman, T., Berntsen, T. K., Beukes, J. P., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin,
M., Curci, G., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Gong, S. L., Hodzic,
A., Hoyle, C. R., Iversen, T., Jathar, S., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, J. W.,
Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D., Kokkola, H., Lee, Y. H., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo,
G., Ma, X., Mann, G. W., Mihalopoulos, N., Morcrette, J.-J., Müller,
J.-F., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ng, N. L., O'Donnell, D., Penner, J.
E., Pozzoli, L., Pringle, K. J., Russell, L. M., Schulz, M., Sciare, J.,
Seland, Ø., Shindell, D. T., Sillman, S., Skeie, R. B., Spracklen, D.,
Stavrakou, T., Steenrod, S. D., Takemura, T., Tiitta, P., Tilmes, S., Tost,
H., van Noije, T., van Zyl, P. G., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Wang, Z., Wang,
Z., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.: The
AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845–10895, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Vignati, E., Wilson, J., and Stier, P.: M7: An efficient size-resolved
aerosol microphysics module for large-scale aerosol transport models, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D22202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004485</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, V.: Analysis of a Russian landscape map and landscape classification
for use in computer-aided forestry research, International Institute for
Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Wania, R., Ross, I., and Prentice, I. C.: Integrating peatlands and
permafrost into a dynamic global vegetation model: I. Evaluation and
sensitivity of physical land surface processes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23,
GB3014, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003412" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003412</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zaehle, S., Friedlingstein, P., and Friend, A. D.: Terrestrial nitrogen
feedbacks may accelerate future climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L01401, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL041345</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., O'Donnell, D., Kazil, J., Stier, P., Kinne, S., Lohmann, U.,
Ferrachat, S., Croft, B., Quaas, J., Wan, H., Rast, S., and Feichter, J.: The
global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to
improvements in process representations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8911–8949,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Wan, H., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Kooperman, G. J., Ma, P.-L., Rasch,
P. J., Neubauer, D., and Lohmann, U.: Technical Note: On the use of nudging
for aerosol-climate model intercomparison studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
8631–8645, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8631-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8631-2014</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, W., Jansson, C., Miller, P. A., Smith, B., and Samuelsson, P.:
Biogeophysical feedbacks enhance the Arctic terrestrial carbon sink in
regional Earth system dynamics, Biogeosciences, 11, 5503–5519,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5503-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-5503-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Future vegetation–climate interactions in Eastern Siberia: an assessment of
the competing effects of CO<sub>2</sub> and secondary organic aerosols</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Disproportional warming in the northern high latitudes and large carbon
stocks in boreal and (sub)arctic ecosystems have raised concerns as to
whether substantial positive climate feedbacks from biogeochemical process
responses should be expected. Such feedbacks occur when increasing
temperatures lead, for example, to a net release of CO<sub>2</sub> or CH<sub>4</sub>.
However, temperature-enhanced emissions of biogenic volatile organic
compounds (BVOCs) have been shown to contribute to the growth of secondary
organic aerosol (SOA), which is known to have a negative radiative climate
effect. Combining measurements in Eastern Siberia with model-based estimates
of vegetation and permafrost dynamics, BVOC emissions, and aerosol growth, we
assess here possible future changes in ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> balance and
BVOC–SOA interactions and discuss these changes in terms of possible climate
effects. Globally, the effects of changes in Siberian ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub>
balance and SOA formation are small, but when concentrating on Siberia and
the Northern Hemisphere the negative forcing from changed aerosol direct and
indirect effects become notable – even though the associated temperature
response would not necessarily follow a similar spatial pattern. While our
analysis does not include other important processes that are of relevance for
the climate system, the CO<sub>2</sub> and BVOC–SOA interplay serves as an example
for the complexity of the interactions between emissions and vegetation
dynamics that underlie individual terrestrial
processes and highlights the
importance of addressing ecosystem–climate feedbacks in consistent,
process-based model frameworks.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ahlström, A., Schurgers, G., Arneth, A., and Smith, B.: Robustness and
uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to cmip5 climate change
projections, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 044008,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044008" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arneth, A., Miller, P. A., Scholze, M., Hickler, T., Schurgers, G., Smith,
B., and Prentice, I. C.: CO<sub>2</sub> inhibition of global terrestrial isoprene
emissions: Potential implications for atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L18813, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030615" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL030615</a>, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Arneth, A., Niinemets, Ü., Pressley, S., Bäck, J., Hari, P., Karl,
T., Noe, S., Prentice, I. C., Serça, D., Hickler, T., Wolf, A., and
Smith, B.: Process-based estimates of terrestrial ecosystem isoprene
emissions: incorporating the effects of a direct CO<sub>2</sub>-isoprene interaction,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 31–53, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-31-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-31-2007</a>, 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arneth, A., Schurgers, G., Hickler, T., and Miller, P. A.: Effects of species
composition, land surface cover, CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and climate on
isoprene emissions from European forests, Plant Biol., 10, 150–162,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-965247" target="_blank">doi:10.1055/s-2007-965247</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arneth, A., Harrison, S. P., Zaehle, S., Tsigaridis, K., Menon, S., Bartlein,
P. J., Feichter, J., Korhola, A., Kulmala, M., O'Donnell, D., Schurgers, G.,
Sorvari, S., and Vesala, T.: Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the
climate system, Nat. Geosci., 3, 525–532, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1905" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo1905</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Arneth, A., Schurgers, G., Lathiere, J., Duhl, T., Beerling, D. J., Hewitt,
C. N., Martin, M., and Guenther, A.: Global terrestrial isoprene emission
models: sensitivity to variability in climate and vegetation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8037–8052, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8037-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-8037-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Arneth, A., Mercado, L., Kattge, J., and Booth, B. B. B.: Future challenges
of representing land-processes in studies on land-atmosphere interactions,
Biogeosciences, 9, 3587–3599, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3587-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-3587-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bäck, J., Aalto, J., Henriksson, M., Hakola, H., He, Q., and Boy, M.:
Chemodiversity of a Scots pine stand and implications for terpene air
concentrations, Biogeosciences, 9, 689–702, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-689-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-689-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Betts, R. A.: Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by
decreases in surface albedo, Nature, 408, 187–190, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L.,
Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and
feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A.,
Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre, L.
A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty
in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12674" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature12674</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S.,
Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., Marelli, L., Penner, J. E.,
Putaud, J.-P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., van der Werf, G. R., and Wilson, J.:
Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750
prescribed data-sets for AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4321–4344,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dolman, A. J., Maximov, T. C., Moors, E. J., Maximov, A. P., Elbers, J. A.,
Kononov, A. V., Waterloo, M. J., and van der Molen, M. K.: Net ecosystem
exchange of carbon dioxide and water of far eastern Siberian Larch (Larix
cajanderii) on permafrost, Biogeosciences, 1, 133–146,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-1-133-2004" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-1-133-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I.,
Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres,
S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma,
J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S.,
Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T.,
Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and
Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol,
Nature, 506, 476–479, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature13032</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Elmendorf, S. C., Henry, G. H. R., Hollister, R. D., Bjork, R. G.,
Boulanger-Lapointe, N., Cooper, E. J., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Day, T. A.,
Dorrepaal, E., Elumeeva, T. G., Gill, M., Gould, W. A., Harte, J., Hik, D.
S., Hofgaard, A., Johnson, D. R., Johnstone, J. F., Jonsdottir, I. S.,
Jorgenson, J. C., Klanderud, K., Klein, J. A., Koh, S., Kudo, G., Lara, M.,
Levesque, E., Magnusson, B., May, J. L., Mercado-Diaz, J. A., Michelsen, A.,
Molau, U., Myers-Smith, I. H., Oberbauer, S. F., Onipchenko, V. G., Rixen,
C., Schmidt, N. M., Shaver, G. R., Spasojevic, M. J., Porhallsdottir, P. E.,
Tolvanen, A., Troxler, T., Tweedie, C. E., Villareal, S., Wahren, C. H.,
Walker, X., Webber, P. J., Welker, J. M., and Wipf, S.: Plot-scale evidence
of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming, Nat. Clim.
Change, 2, 453–457, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1465" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nclimate1465</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fisher, R., McDowell, N., Purves, D., Moorcroft, P., Sitch, S., Cox, P.,
Huntingford, C., Meir, P., and Woodward, F. I.: Assessing uncertainties in a
second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale
limitations, New Phytol., 187, 666–681,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03340.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03340.x</a>, 2010
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fiore, A. M., Naik, V., Spracklen, D. V., Steiner, A., Unger, N., Prather,
M., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsoren,
S., Eyring, V., Folberth, G. A., Ginoux, P., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B.,
Lamarque, J.-F., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., O'Connor, F. M., Righi, M.,
Rumbold, S. T., Shindell, D. T., Skeie, R. B., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Takemura,
T., and Zeng, G.: Global air quality and climate, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41,
6663–6683, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35095e" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c2cs35095e</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., McKay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmermann, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
8873–8892, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Haapanala, S., Rinne, J., Hakola, H., Hellén, H., Laakso, L., Lihavainen,
H., Janson, R., O'Dowd, C., and Kulmala, M.: Boundary layer concentrations
and landscape scale emissions of volatile organic compounds in early spring,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1869–1878, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1869-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-1869-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Haapanala, S., Ekberg, A., Hakola, H., Tarvainen, V., Rinne, J., Hellén,
H., and Arneth, A.: Mountain birch – potentially large source of
sesquiterpenes into high latitude atmosphere, Biogeosciences, 6, 2709–2718,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2709-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-6-2709-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D.,
Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H.,
Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M.
E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel,
Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D.,
Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of
secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
9, 5155–5236, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hakola, H., Tarvainen, V., Bäck, J., Ranta, H., Bonn, B., Rinne, J., and
Kulmala, M.: Seasonal variation of mono- and sesquiterpene emission rates of
Scots pine, Biogeosciences, 3, 93–101, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-93-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-3-93-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hens, K., Novelli, A., Martinez, M., Auld, J., Axinte, R., Bohn, B., Fischer,
H., Keronen, P., Kubistin, D., Nölscher, A. C., Oswald, R., Paasonen, P.,
Petäjä, T., Regelin, E., Sander, R., Sinha, V., Sipilä, M.,
Taraborrelli, D., Tatum Ernest, C., Williams, J., Lelieveld, J., and Harder,
H.: Observation and modelling of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radicals in a boreal forest, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 14, 8723–8747, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8723-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-8723-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Henze, D. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global secondary organic aerosol from isoprene
oxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09812, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025976" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL025976</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hickler, T., Vohland, K., Feehan, J., Miller, P. A., Smith, B., Costa, L.,
Giesecke, T., Fronzek, S., Carter, T. R., Cramer, W., Kuhn, I., and Sykes, M.
T.: Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural
vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation
model, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 21, 50–63,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Holst, T., Arneth, A., Hayward, S., Ekberg, A., Mastepanov, M.,
Jackowicz-Korczynski, M., Friborg, T., Crill, P. M., and Bäckstrand, K.:
BVOC ecosystem flux measurements at a high latitude wetland site, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 1617–1634, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1617-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-1617-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Koponen, I. K., Paatero, P.,
Aalto, P. P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Evaluation of an automatic
algorithm for fitting the particle number size distributions, Boreal Environ.
Res., 10, 337–355, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for
Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Junninen, H.,
Paasonen, P., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Guenther, A., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Sipilä, M.: Production of extremely
low-volatile organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and
atmospheric implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 7123–7128,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1423977112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kajos, M. K., Hakola, H., Holst, T., Nieminen, T., Tarvainen, V., Maximov,
T., Petäjä, T., Arneth, A., and Rinne, J.: Terpenoid emissions from
fully grown east Siberian <i>Larix cajanderi</i> trees, Biogeosciences, 10,
4705–4719, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4705-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-4705-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kharuk, V., Ranson, K., and Dvinskaya, M.: Evidence of Evergreen Conifer
Invasion into Larch Dominated Forests During Recent Decades in Central
Siberia, Eurasian Journal of Forest Research, 10, 163–171, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Khvorostyanov, D. V., Ciais, P., Krinner, G., and Zimov, S. A.: Vulnerability
of east Siberia's frozen carbon stores to future warming, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L10703, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033639" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GL033639</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kobak, K. I., Turchinovich, I. Y., Kondrasheva, N. Y., Schulze, E. D.,
Schulze, W., Koch, H., and Vygodskaya, N. N.: Vulnerability and adaptation of
the larch forest in eastern Siberia to climate change, Water Air Soil Poll.,
92, 119–127, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Koven, C. D., Ringeval, B., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Cadule, P.,
Khvorostyanov, D., Krinner, G., and Tarnocai, C.: Permafrost carbon-climate
feedbacks accelerate global warming, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
14769–14774, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103910108" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1103910108</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Dal Maso, M., Makela, J. M., Pirjola, L., Vakeva, M., Aalto, P.,
Miikkulainen, P., Hameri, K., and O'Dowd, C. D.: On the formation, growth and
composition of nucleation mode particles, Tellus B, 53, 479–490,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530411.x</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Mönkkönen, P., Koponen, I. K., Dal
Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kerminen, V.-M.: On the
growth of nucleation mode particles: source rates of condensable vapor in
polluted and clean environments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 409–416,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-409-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-5-409-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lappalainen, H. K., Sevanto, S., Bäck, J., Ruuskanen, T. M., Kolari, P.,
Taipale, R., Rinne, J., Kulmala, M., and Hari, P.: Day-time concentrations of
biogenic volatile organic compounds in a boreal forest canopy and their
relation to environmental and biological factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
5447–5459, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5447-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-5447-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U., Stier, P., Hoose, C., Ferrachat, S., Kloster, S., Roeckner, E.,
and Zhang, J.: Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global
climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3425–3446,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Guenther, A.,
and Kulmala, M.: BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global
aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10077–10096,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Hari, P., and
Kulmala, M.: Air pollution control and decreasing new particle formation lead
to strong climate warming, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1515–1524,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, P. A. and Smith, B.: Modelling tundra vegetation response to recent
arctic warming, Ambio, 41, 281–291, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0306-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0306-1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, P. A., Giesecke, T., Hickler, T., Bradshaw, R. H. W., Smith, B.,
Seppä, H., Valdes, P. J., and Sykes, M. T.: Exploring climatic and biotic
controls on Holocene vegetation change in Fennoscandia, J. Ecol., 96,
247–259, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01342.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01342.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D.: An improved method of constructing a
database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution
grids, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 693–712, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mochizuki, T., Tani, A., Takahashi, Y., Saigusa, N., and Ueyama, M.:
Long-term measurement of terpenoid flux above a Larix kaempferi forest using
a relaxed eddy accumulation method, Atmos. Environ., 83, 53–61, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Moser, L., Fonti, P., Büntgen, U., Esper, J., Luterbacher, J., Franzen,
J., and Frank, D.: Timing and duration of European larch growing season along
altitudinal gradients in the Swiss Alps, Tree Physiol., 30, 225–233,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp108" target="_blank">doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp108</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Nieminen, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kulmala, M.: Sub-10 nm particle growth
by vapor condensation – effects of vapor molecule size and particle thermal
speed, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9773–9779, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nieminen, T., Asmi, A., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Keronen, P., Petaja, T.,
Kulmala, M., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Trends in atmospheric new-particle
formation: 16 years of observations in a boreal-forest environment, Boreal
Environ. Res., 19, 191–214, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Niinemets, U., Tenhunen, J. D., Harley, P. C., and Steinbrecher, R.: A model
of isoprene emission based on energetic requirements for isoprene synthesis
and leaf photosynthetic properties for <i>Liquidambar</i> and
<i>Quercus</i>, Plant Cell Environ., 22, 1319–1335, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Niinemets, Ü., Monson, R. K., Arneth, A., Ciccioli, P., Kesselmeier, J.,
Kuhn, U., Noe, S. M., Peñuelas, J., and Staudt, M.: The leaf-level
emission factor of volatile isoprenoids: caveats, model algorithms, response
shapes and scaling, Biogeosciences, 7, 1809–1832,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1809-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-7-1809-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
O'Donnell, D., Tsigaridis, K., and Feichter, J.: Estimating the direct and
indirect effects of secondary organic aerosols using ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8635–8659, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8635-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-8635-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Ohta, T., Hiyama, T., Tanaka, H., Kuwada, T., Maximov, T. C., Ohata, T., and
Fukushima, Y.: Seasonal variation in the energy and water exchanges above and
below a larch forest in eastern Siberia, Hydrol. Process., 15, 1459–1476,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Paasonen, P., Asmi, A., Petaja, T., Kajos, M. K., Aijala, M., Junninen, H.,
Holst, T., Abbatt, J. P. D., Arneth, A., Birmili, W., van der Gon, H. D.,
Hamed, A., Hoffer, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Richard Leaitch, W.,
Plass-Dulmer, C., Pryor, S. C., Raisanen, P., Swietlicki, E., Wiedensohler,
A., Worsnop, D. R., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: Warming-induced
increase in aerosol number concentration likely to moderate climate change,
Nat. Geosci., 6, 438–442, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1800" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo1800</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Penuelas, J. and Staudt, M.: Bvocs and global change, Trends Plant Sci., 15,
133–144, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.005</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Piao, S., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Zhou, L., and Chen, A.: Effect of
climate and CO<sub>2</sub> changes on the greening of the Northern Hemisphere over
the past two decades, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23402,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028205" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006gl028205</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rantala, P., Aalto, J., Taipale, R., Ruuskanen, T. M., and Rinne, J.: Annual
cycle of volatile organic compound exchange between a boreal pine forest and
the atmosphere, Biogeosciences, 12, 5753–5770, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5753-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-12-5753-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Riahi, K., Gruebler, A., and Nakicenovic, N.: Scenarios of long-term
socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization,
Technol. Forecast. Soc., 74, 887–935, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rohrer, F. and Berresheim, H.: Strong correlation between levels of
tropospheric hydroxyl radicals and solar ultraviolet radiation, Nature, 442,
184–187, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Romanovsky, V. E., Drozdov, D. S., Oberman, N. G., Malkova, G. V., Kholodov,
A. L., Marchenko, S. S., Moskalenko, N. G., Sergeev, D. O., Ukraintseva, N.
G., Abramov, A. A., Gilichinsky, D. A., and Vasiliev, A. A.: Thermal state of
permafrost in russia, Permafrost Periglac., 21, 136–155,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.683" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/ppp.683</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ruuskanen, T. M., Kajos, M. K., Hellén, H., Hakola, H., Tarvainen, V.,
and Rinne, J.: Volatile organic compound emissions from Siberian larch,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 5807–5812, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.036" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.036</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Schaefer, K., Lantuit, H., Romanovsky, V. E., Schuur, E. A. G., and Witt, R.:
The impact of the permafrost carbon feedback on global climate, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 085003, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/085003" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/085003</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider von Deimling, T., Meinshausen, M., Levermann, A., Huber, V.,
Frieler, K., Lawrence, D. M., and Brovkin, V.: Estimating the near-surface
permafrost-carbon feedback on global warming, Biogeosciences, 9, 649–665,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-649-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-649-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schurgers, G., Arneth, A., Holzinger, R., and Goldstein, A. H.: Process-based
modelling of biogenic monoterpene emissions combining production and release
from storage, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3409–3423, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3409-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-3409-2009</a>,
2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Schurgers, G., Hickler, T., Miller, P. A., and Arneth, A.: European emissions
of isoprene and monoterpenes from the Last Glacial Maximum to present,
Biogeosciences, 6, 2779–2797, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2779-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-6-2779-2009</a>, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Schuur, E. A. G., Vogel, J. G., Crummer, K. G., Lee, H., Sickman, J. O., and
Osterkamp, T. E.: The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net
carbon exchange from tundra, Nature, 459, 556–559, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08031" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature08031</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Serreze, M. C., Walsh, J. E., Chapin, F. S., Osterkamp, T., Dyurgerov, M.,
Romanovsky, V., Oechel, W. C., Morison, J., Zhang, T., and Barry, R. G.:
Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude
environment, Climatc Change, 46, 159–207, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Shindell, D. T., Levy, H., Schwarzkopf, M. D., Horowitz, L. W., Lamarque, J.
F., and Faluvegi, G.: Multimodel projections of climate change from
short-lived emissions due to human activities, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,
D11109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009152" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009152</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Shuman, J. K., Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, E. I., Soja, A. J., Shugart, H.
H., Ershov, D., and Holcomb, K.: Forest forecasting with vegetation models
across russia, Can. J. Forest Res., 45, 175–184, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0138" target="_blank">doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0138</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Shvidenko, A., Schepaschenko, D., McCallum, I., and Nilsson, S.: Russian
Forests and Forestry, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
and the Russian Academy of Science, Laxenburg, Austria, available at:
<a href="http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/FOR/forest_cdrom/english/for_fund_en.html" target="_blank">http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/FOR/forest_cdrom/english/for_fund_en.html</a>
(last access: 15 April 2016), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Sistla, S. A., Moore, J. C., Simpson, R. T., Gough, L., Shaver, G. R., and
Schimel, J. P.: Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing
net soil carbon storage, Nature, 497, 615–618, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12129" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature12129</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W.,
Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., Thonicke, K., and
Venevsky, S.: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and
terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Glob.
Change Biol., 9, 161–185, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., and Huntingford, C.: Indirect
radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon
sink, Nature, 448, 791–794, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06059" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature06059</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., and Sykes, M. T.: Representation of vegetation
dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two
contrasting approaches within European climate space, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.,
10, 621–637, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Soja, A. J., Tchebakova, N. M., French, N. H. F., Flannigan, M. D., Shugart,
H. H., Stocks, B. J., Sukhinin, A. I., Parfenova, E. I., Chapin Iii, F. S.,
and Stackhouse, J. P. W.: Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions
versus current observations, Global Planet. Change, 56, 274–296,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.028" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.028</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Spracklen, D. V., Bonn, B., and Carslaw, K.: Boreal forests, aerosols and the
impacts on clouds and climate, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 366, 4613–4626,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0201" target="_blank">doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0201</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Sihto, S.-L.,
Riipinen, I., Merikanto, J., Mann, G. W., Chipperfield, M. P., Wiedensohler,
A., Birmili, W., and Lihavainen, H.: Contribution of particle formation to
global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35,
L06808, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL033038" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL033038</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Staudt, M., Mandl, N., Joffre, R., and Rambal, S.: Intraspecific variability
of monoterpene composition emitted by quercus ilex leaves, Can. J. Forest
Res., 31, 174–180, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x00-153" target="_blank">doi:10.1139/x00-153</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Staudt, M., Joffre, R., and Rambal, S.: How growth conditions affect the
capacity of <i>quercus ilex</i> leaves to emit monoterpenes, New Phytol.,
158, 61–73, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J.,
Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O.,
Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Svenningsson, B., Arneth, A., Hayward, S., Holst, T., Massling, A.,
Swietlicki, E., Hirsikko, A., Junninen, H., Riipinen, I., Vana, M., dal Maso,
M., Hussein, T., and Kulmala, A. E.: Aerosol particle formation events and
analysis of high growth rates observed above a subarctic wetland–forest
mosaic, Tellus B, 58, 353–364, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00351.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00351.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Takeshi, O., Maximov, T. C., Dolman, A. J., Nakai, T., van der Molen, M. K.,
Kononov, A. V., Maximov, A. P., Hiyama, T., Iijima, Y., Moors, E. J., Tanaka,
H., Toba, T., and Yabuki, H.: Interannual variation of water balance and
summer evapotranspiration in an eastern Siberian larch forest over a 7-year
period (1998–2006), Agr. Forest Meteorol., 48, 1940–1953, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G.,
and Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar
permafrost region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, Gb2023,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003327" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008gb003327</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Tchebakova, N. M., Rehfeldt, G. E., and Parfenova, E. I.: Impacts of climate
change on the distribution of <i>Larix spp.</i> and <i>Pinus
sylvestris</i> and their climatypes in Siberia, Mitigation and Adaptation
Strategies for Global Change, 11, 861–882, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9019-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11027-005-9019-0</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., and Cramer, W.: The role of fire
disturbance for global vegetation dynamics. Coupling fire into a Dynamic
Global Vegetation Model, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 10, 661–678, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Tunved, P., Hansson, H. C., Kerminen, V. M., Strom, J., Maso, M. D.,
Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Aalto, P. P., Komppula, M., and Kulmala, M.:
High natural aerosol loading over boreal forests, Science, 312, 261–263,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1123052" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1123052</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tsigaridis, K., Daskalakis, N., Kanakidou, M., Adams, P. J., Artaxo, P.,
Bahadur, R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Benedetti, A.,
Bergman, T., Berntsen, T. K., Beukes, J. P., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin,
M., Curci, G., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Gong, S. L., Hodzic,
A., Hoyle, C. R., Iversen, T., Jathar, S., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, J. W.,
Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D., Kokkola, H., Lee, Y. H., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo,
G., Ma, X., Mann, G. W., Mihalopoulos, N., Morcrette, J.-J., Müller,
J.-F., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ng, N. L., O'Donnell, D., Penner, J.
E., Pozzoli, L., Pringle, K. J., Russell, L. M., Schulz, M., Sciare, J.,
Seland, Ø., Shindell, D. T., Sillman, S., Skeie, R. B., Spracklen, D.,
Stavrakou, T., Steenrod, S. D., Takemura, T., Tiitta, P., Tilmes, S., Tost,
H., van Noije, T., van Zyl, P. G., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Wang, Z., Wang,
Z., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.: The
AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845–10895, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Vignati, E., Wilson, J., and Stier, P.: M7: An efficient size-resolved
aerosol microphysics module for large-scale aerosol transport models, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D22202, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004485" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD004485</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, V.: Analysis of a Russian landscape map and landscape classification
for use in computer-aided forestry research, International Institute for
Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wania, R., Ross, I., and Prentice, I. C.: Integrating peatlands and
permafrost into a dynamic global vegetation model: I. Evaluation and
sensitivity of physical land surface processes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23,
GB3014, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003412" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GB003412</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zaehle, S., Friedlingstein, P., and Friend, A. D.: Terrestrial nitrogen
feedbacks may accelerate future climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L01401, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041345" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GL041345</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., O'Donnell, D., Kazil, J., Stier, P., Kinne, S., Lohmann, U.,
Ferrachat, S., Croft, B., Quaas, J., Wan, H., Rast, S., and Feichter, J.: The
global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to
improvements in process representations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8911–8949,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., Wan, H., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Kooperman, G. J., Ma, P.-L., Rasch,
P. J., Neubauer, D., and Lohmann, U.: Technical Note: On the use of nudging
for aerosol-climate model intercomparison studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
8631–8645, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8631-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-8631-2014</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, W., Jansson, C., Miller, P. A., Smith, B., and Samuelsson, P.:
Biogeophysical feedbacks enhance the Arctic terrestrial carbon sink in
regional Earth system dynamics, Biogeosciences, 11, 5503–5519,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5503-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-11-5503-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
