<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-4641-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Using beryllium-7 to assess cross-tropopause transport in<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> global models</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Using beryllium-7 to assess cross-tropopause transport in global models}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Liu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Hongyu</given-names></name>
          <email>hongyu.liu-1@nasa.gov</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-6383</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff9">
          <name><surname>Considine</surname><given-names>David B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Horowitz</surname><given-names>Larry W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Crawford</surname><given-names>James H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Rodriguez</surname><given-names>Jose M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Strahan</surname><given-names>Susan E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-4577</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff6">
          <name><surname>Damon</surname><given-names>Megan R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Steenrod</surname><given-names>Stephen D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Xiaojing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff6">
          <name><surname>Kouatchou</surname><given-names>Jules</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8 aff10">
          <name><surname>Carouge</surname><given-names>Claire</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Yantosca</surname><given-names>Robert M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-1870</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>NOAA Geophysical Fluid and Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>a</label><institution>now at: NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C., USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>b</label><institution>now at: ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hongyu Liu (hongyu.liu-1@nasa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>4641</fpage><lpage>4659</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>We use the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) modeling framework to
assess the utility of cosmogenic beryllium-7 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be), a natural aerosol
tracer, for evaluating cross-tropopause transport in global models. The GMI
chemical transport model (CTM) was used to simulate atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
distributions using four different meteorological data sets (GEOS1-STRAT
DAS, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, fvGCM, and GEOS4-DAS), featuring significantly different
stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) characteristics. The simulations
were compared with the upper troposphere and/or lower stratosphere (UT/LS)
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be climatology constructed from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 years of aircraft
and balloon data, as well as climatological records of surface
concentrations and deposition fluxes. Comparison of the fraction of surface
air of stratospheric origin estimated from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations with
observationally derived estimates indicates excessive cross-tropopause
transport at mid-latitudes in simulations using GEOS1-STRAT and at high
latitudes using GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> meteorological data. These simulations also
overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes at mid-latitudes (GEOS1-STRAT) and
at high latitudes (GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. We show that excessive
cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be corresponds to overestimated
stratospheric contribution to tropospheric ozone. Our perspectives on STE in
these meteorological fields based on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations are consistent
with previous modeling studies of tropospheric ozone using the same
meteorological fields. We conclude that the observational constraints for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be total deposition fluxes can be used routinely
as a first-order assessment of cross-tropopause transport in global models.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) of air masses and chemical species
occurs at small, synoptic and global scales. It is typically associated with
the occurrences of tropopause folding and cutoff cyclones and, more
importantly, the global circulation of the atmosphere (Holton et al., 1995).
While stratosphere-to-troposphere transport removes many chemical species
from the stratosphere, it represents a significant source of ozone and other
reactive species for the tropospheric chemical system (Stohl et al., 2003).
Ozone is an important greenhouse gas, especially in the upper troposphere. It
is a harmful pollutant near the surface where stratospheric ozone intrusions
may make significant contributions (e.g., Lin et al., 2012, 2015; Langford et
al., 2015). It is also the main precursor of
hydroxyl radicals (OH) and thus plays an essential role in the oxidizing
capacity of the troposphere. In a warmer climate, the stratosphere may
increase its contribution to tropospheric ozone levels due to a stronger
residual circulation (Collins et al., 2003).
Quantitative understanding and prediction of anthropogenic (vs. natural)
perturbations to tropospheric ozone require the use of global 3-D models;
correctly representing the STE flux in these models is therefore critical.
However, current models show large (30 %) uncertainty in predicted STE
fluxes of ozone (Stevenson et al., 2006). Here we use the Global Modeling
Initiative (GMI) modeling framework (Douglass et al., 1999; Rotman et al.,
2001) to assess the utility of the aerosol tracer beryllium-7 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be) for
evaluating cross-tropopause transport in global models.</p>
      <p>Beryllium-7 has a half-life of 53.3 days and is produced by cosmic ray
spallation reactions in the stratosphere and upper troposphere. After
production, it attaches immediately to ubiquitous submicron aerosols in the
ambient air. The fate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be then becomes that of those aerosols, which
move with the air until scavenged by precipitation or deposited to the
surface. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is a useful aerosol tracer for testing wet deposition
processes in a global 3-D model and is often used in conjunction with the
terrigenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb aerosol tracer, as wet deposition is its principal
sink and its sources are relatively well known (e.g., Brost et al., 1991;
Koch et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2001). On the other hand, because of its
source at high altitudes and the large concentration vertical gradient,
simulation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be tests the model's capability to describe
stratosphere-to-troposphere transport and subsidence in the troposphere
(e.g., Liu et al., 2001; Allen et al., 2003).</p>
      <p>Beryllium-7 has long been recognized as a tracer of downward transport from
the stratosphere to the troposphere (e.g., Husain et al., 1977; Viezee and
Singh, 1980; Sanak et al., 1985; Dibb et al., 1992, 1994; Rehfeld and
Heimann, 1995). Husain et al. (1977) reported that pulses of high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations were often associated with air masses of stratospheric origin,
as indicated by large potential vorticity. Viezee and Singh (1980) showed
that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations over North America show strong positive
correlations with the occurrence of tropopause folding events over several
latitude belts. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be has also been combined with other radionuclides
(e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr) as an indicator of transport of stratospheric
air to the troposphere (Raisbeck et al., 1981; Rehfeld and Heimann, 1995;
Koch and Rind, 1998; Dibb et al., 1994; Jordan et al., 2003; Zanis et al.,
2003; Heikkilä et al., 2008a, b). Dutkiewicz and Husain (1985, hereafter
referred to as DH85) analyzed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr concentrations measured
simultaneously in samples from NASA's Global Atmospheric Sampling Program
(GASP) and showed that on an annual basis the stratosphere contributed
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentration at the northern
mid-latitude surface (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % during late spring but only 10 %
during fall).</p>
      <p>Beryllium-7 is also a useful tracer for vertical mixing and subsidence in the
troposphere. Feely et al. (1989) examined the factors that contribute to
seasonal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in surface air. They found
that the influences of variations both in the STE rate and in the
tropospheric vertical mixing rate are evident in concentrations at most sites
in mid-latitudes. Convective transport carries surface air upward and brings
down the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at higher altitudes to the surface layer. This is also
reflected by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb ratio that peaks at the surface in
summer when convective activity is at its maximum (Koch et al., 1996). On the
other hand, despite the UT/LS source of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and the continental surface
source of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn (precursor of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations have
been reported to be positively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb concentrations,
reflecting mixing of subsiding middle- and upper-tropospheric air with
continental lower-tropospheric air (Li et al., 2002; Dibb, 2007).</p>
      <p>A number of observational studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be to infer the contribution of ozone-rich stratospheric air to ozone
concentrations at ground level (e.g., Husain et al., 1977; Tsutsumi et al.,
1998; Helmig et al., 2007) and in the free troposphere (e.g., Johnson and
Viezee, 1981; Prospero et al., 1995; Graustein and Turekian, 1996; Kritz et
al., 1991; Dibb et al., 2003). These studies are usually based on the
correlations between concurrent measurements of ozone and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (as well
as other tracers such as water vapor and calculated potential vorticity),
with positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be-ozone correlations indicating the presence of the
upper-tropospheric or stratospheric air. For instance, Helmig et al. (2007)
showed a year-round correlation of ozone with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at Summit, Greenland
and concluded that surface-layer photochemical ozone production does not
appear to have a noticeable influence on surface ozone levels. However, it
is important to note that under some circumstances the observed positive
correlations of surface ozone with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be may simply reflect the common
vertical trends of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and ozone and does not necessarily
indicate the influence of stratospheric air (Li et al., 2002). Recent global
modeling studies showed the models' capability to reproduce the observed
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be-ozone relationships, providing useful constraints on the
stratospheric (vs. photochemical) contribution to tropospheric ozone in
the model (Li et al., 2002; Allen et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2004).</p>
      <p>Though correct representation of STE is essential for simulating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be,
ozone and other trace species in the troposphere (e.g., Riese et al., 2012),
large variations exist among models. Stevenson et al. (2006) reported the
average STE flux of ozone from 26 models of 552 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 168 Tg year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Observation-based estimates of STE fluxes of ozone into the troposphere are
typically in the range of 400–600 Tg year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Murphy and Fahey, 1994).
Some global models are able to produce STE fluxes of ozone in this range
(e.g., Olsen et al., 2004; Hsu et al., 2005; Hsu and Prather, 2009; Lin et
al., 2012; Young et al., 2013; Škerlak et al., 2014). For those models
with too fast (or rarely, too slow) cross-tropopause transport of ozone, one
way to overcome the difficulty is to use the Synoz (synthetic ozone) method
(McLinden et al., 2000). The Synoz method involves constraining the global
mean cross-tropopause ozone flux to match a prescribed value consistent with
observations (e.g., Bey et al., 2001). But this method yields an unrealistic
stratospheric ozone field and therefore does not allow for on-line
calculations of total ozone columns and photolysis rates and/or heating rates
(McLinden et al., 2000). By contrast, the other simple model for
stratospheric ozone (linearized ozone or Linoz) developed by McLinden et
al. (2000) enables these on-line calculations
by linearizing the ozone tendency about the local ozone mixing ratio,
temperature, and the overhead column ozone density. Linoz is computationally
efficient and can be readily incorporated in climate models for long-term
integrations. Nevertheless, using Linoz (or full stratospheric chemistry) in
global CTMs or chemistry-climate models that focus on the troposphere
requires a realistic model representation of net cross-tropopause total mass
fluxes. In this context, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be tracer simulations may provide a simple way
of evaluating cross-tropopause transport in these models.</p>
      <p>The intermodel differences in the estimated intensity and frequency of STE
have been attributed to different meteorological fields used to drive the
models as well as different transport algorithms and chemistry processes
(Cristofanelli et al., 2003). The GMI modeling framework facilitates the
reduction of uncertainties of this kind. It is a modular CTM with the
ability to incorporate different inputs and components (e.g., meteorological
fields, emission inventories, chemical and microphysical mechanisms, and
numerical schemes) that represent the different approaches of current
models. One of the distinct features of the GMI CTM is the ability to be
driven by different meteorological data sets (e.g., Douglass et al., 1999;
Considine et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2007) while maintaining the same
algorithms for transport, deposition, emission, chemistry and other
pertinent processes. This allows us to isolate the uncertainties in the
model simulations due to differences in the meteorological data sets alone.
The number of factors that may contribute to differences in the simulations
is thus reduced, as we previously showed using the GMI simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb radionuclide tracers (Considine et al., 2005).</p>
      <p>In this paper, we present simulations of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be distributions
with the GMI CTM driven by four different meteorological data sets,
including output from GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, fvGCM, and GEOS4-DAS, each
featuring significantly different STE characteristics. The reader is
referred to Table 1 for a list of acronyms of models and their driving
meteorological data sets. We use here not only the meteorological fields
that are well known to have reasonably good representations of STE (e.g.,
fvGCM), but also those with poor representations (e.g., GEOS1-STRAT). The
variability in simulated STE allows us to examine and assess the utility of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be for evaluating STE in these (and other) global meteorological
fields. We will illustrate the consequences of incorrect STE in terms of the
simulation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and show that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations
and deposition fluxes may be used routinely as a first-order assessment for
cross-tropopause transport in global models. We will discuss how the
constraints on STE from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be are consistent with previous modeling
studies of tropospheric ozone using the same meteorological fields.</p>
      <p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives a brief
description of the GMI model, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be source and cross-tropopause flux, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and ozone observational data sets used for evaluating the model.
Section 3 evaluates model results with UT/LS and surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be data.
Section 4 assesses cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in different
meteorological fields. Section 5 compares the results with previous modeling
studies. Section 6 discusses the implications for the impact of STE on
tropospheric ozone, followed by the summary and conclusions in Sect. 7.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Acronyms of the model and driving meteorological data sets.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Model/Data Set </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Acronym </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">GMI CTM </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4">Global Modeling Initiative Chemical Transport Model </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GEOS1-STRAT DAS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Goddard Earth Observing System Data Assimilation System – version 1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">in support of the Stratospheric Tracers of Atmospheric Transport mission</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Goddard Institute for Space Studies General Circulation Model – version II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">fvGCM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) finite-volume GCM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GEOS4-DAS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GEOS Data Assimilation System – version 4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model and data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>GMI CTM</title>
      <p>The GMI (<uri>http://gmi.gsfc.nasa.gov</uri>) CTM is a global 3-D
composition model that includes a full treatment of both stratospheric and
tropospheric photochemical and physical processes. It uses a 114-species
chemical mechanism that combines the stratospheric mechanism of Douglass et
al. (2004) with the tropospheric mechanism of Bey et al. (2001). The
chemical mechanism includes both stratospheric and tropospheric
heterogeneous reactions. Tropospheric aerosol (sulfate, dust, sea salt,
organic carbon, and black carbon) fields are taken from the Goddard
Chemistry, Aerosol, Radiation and Transport model (GOCART). Details of the
model are described in Duncan et al. (2007, 2008), Strahan et al. (2007),
and Considine et al. (2008). There is also a tropospheric version of the
model that includes only tropospheric chemistry processes and uses the Synoz
(synthetic ozone) scheme (McLinden et al., 2000) to ensure a given value for
the total flux of ozone into the troposphere. The latter adopts a
cross-tropopause ozone flux of about 530–590 Tg year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Stevenson et al.,
2006). In this study, we simulate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be using the GMI CTM without
chemistry, similar to the Considine et al. (2005) study that simulated the
radionuclides <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb. We use both the full-chemistry CTM
and the tropospheric version of the model for ozone simulations.</p>
      <p>The simulations presented in this paper differ only in the meteorological
data used to drive the model. The four input meteorological data sets are
from (1) the Goddard Space Flight Center Data Assimilation Office (now Global
Modeling and Assimilation Office or GMAO) GEOS1-STRAT data assimilation
system (GEOS1-STRAT DAS, March 1997–February 1998), (2) GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM (Rind
and Lerner, 1996), (3) the GMAO finite-volume GCM (fvGCM), and (4) GEOS4-DAS
(February 2004–January 2005). The GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM data set is used for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations only. The two GCM data sets are intended to represent
not any particular year but the contemporary climatological state of the
Earth's atmosphere. Note that these data sets do not reflect the
state of the art, especially the first two. However, the
choices are purposely made in order to see how a meteorological input with a
poor representation of cross-tropopause transport affects the simulated
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be. Vertical levels, top pressure, near-tropopause
resolution, and bottom layer depth for each data set are listed in Table 2.
The simulations presented here use a degraded horizontal resolution
(4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for computational expediency. Degraded
horizontal resolution slightly increases cross-tropopause transport (Liu et
al., 2001). Nevertheless, our objective is to assess cross-tropopause
transport in meteorological data sets at the resolution used to drive the
model, not necessarily at the original or finer resolution.</p>
      <p>The model uses the flux form semi-Lagrangian advection scheme (FFSL) of Lin
and Rood (1996) and a convective transport algorithm adapted from the
CONVTRAN routine in the NCAR CCM3 physics package. The wet deposition scheme
is that of Liu et al. (2001) and includes scavenging in wet convective
updrafts, and first-order rainout and washout from both convective anvils
and large-scale precipitation. The gravitational settling effect of cloud
ice particles included in Liu et al. (2001) is not considered here. Dry
deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be aerosols is computed using the resistance-in-series
approach. The model tracks the bulk <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be aerosol mass. For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
simulations, each simulation was run for 6 years, recycling the
meteorological data for each year of the simulation; we use the sixth year
output for analysis. For ozone simulations, the model was spun up for 10 years to remove the effect of initial conditions. Interannual variability in
STE of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is not shown in this paper. However, model simulations
driven by multi-year outputs from fvGCM (1994–1998) indicate that such
interannual variability is much smaller than the differences due to using
different meteorological data sets and does not affect the conclusions of
this study.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Characteristics of meteorological data sets used to drive the GMI
CTM.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data Set</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Top pressure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Vertical</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Interface pressure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Near-tropopause</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Bottom layer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Update</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">of levels</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(hPa)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coordinate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(hPa)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">resolution (km)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">depth (hPa, m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">period (h)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GEOS1-STRAT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.13 hPa, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.002</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8–2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24.46 hPa, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fvGCM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42 (55<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 (0.01<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.89 hPa, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 130 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GEOS4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42 (55<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 (0.01<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.89 hPa, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 130 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The hybrid vertical coordinate
consists of sigma (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) levels
below the interface pressure and constant pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) levels above.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The total number of vertical levels and top level pressure in
the original meteorological data set.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>The GMI CTM has been used previously to study the sensitivities of model
simulations to different sets of meteorological input. Douglass et al. (1999) used chemical tracers in the GMI framework to assess three
meteorological data sets, i.e., the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM2),
GEOS1-STRAT, and GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM. They concluded that overall, CCM2 provides the
best representation of the stratosphere. Considine et al. (2005) used the
GMI model to simulate the radionuclides <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb using
three different sets of meteorological inputs (GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
CCM3) to characterize the variability occurring in their simulations.
Overall no simulation was found to be superior to the others when compared
with the climatological observations of these radionuclides. The role played
by convective transport and scavenging was found to differ substantially
among the three meteorological data sets. Liu et al. (2007) analyzed and
quantified the differences and uncertainties in GMI aerosol simulations
solely due to different meteorological fields (GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, and
fvGCM). They suggested that the differences in the precipitation, convective
mass flux, and horizontal advection from the three meteorological data sets
explain much of the large discrepancies in the model-calculated aerosol
concentrations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Annual mean total precipitation (mm day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the surface in
the GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, fvGCM, and GEOS4-DAS meteorological data sets and
in the observational data set from the Global Precipitation Climatology
Project (GPCP, 1979–2009). Also shown is the annual zonal mean precipitation
(bottom right panel).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Comparison of cloud and precipitation fields between meteorological data
sets</title>
      <p>Clouds and precipitation play a critical role in the transport and scavenging
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be aerosols and thus in determining the lifetime, burden, and
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the troposphere. Figures 1 and 2 compare the
annual surface total precipitation and convective mass fluxes in the
GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS meteorological data sets,
respectively, following Liu et al. (2007). Also shown in Fig. 1 is the
satellite climatology of surface total precipitation (1979–2009) from the
Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) (Adler, 2003). The global mean precipitation rates are 1.9, 2.2, 2.6, 2.3
and 2.2 mm day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, fvGCM, GEOS4-DAS and
GPCP, respectively, with lightest precipitation in GEOS1-STRAT and heaviest
in fvGCM. Compared to GPCP, GEOS1-STRAT and GEOS4-DAS significantly
underestimate the precipitation in the mid-latitude storm track regions,
while GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS largely overestimate the observations
in the tropics or subtropics. GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM also underestimates the
precipitation south of 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and north of 40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. There are
significant differences in the convective mass fluxes among the four
meteorological data sets (Fig. 2). Consistent with the precipitation,
GEOS1-STRAT shows the weakest convection except in the tropical middle and
upper troposphere, whereas fvGCM features the strongest convection in the
boundary layer at 30–60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The effects of the above differences in
convection and precipitation between meteorological data sets on the results
of this study will be examined through model sensitivity experiments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Annual zonal mean convective mass fluxes (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
the GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, fvGCM, and GEOS4-DAS meteorological data sets.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{7}}$Be source}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be source</title>
      <p>There is a large discrepancy in the published estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
production rates (Lal and Peters, 1967, referred to as LP67 hereafter;
O'Brien et al., 1991; Masarik and Reedy, 1995; Masarik and Beer, 1999;
Usoskin and Kovaltsov, 2008). Global mean column production rates over an
average solar cycle range from 0.035 atoms cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Masarik and
Beer, 1999), 0.063 atoms cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (O'Brien et al., 1991), to
0.081 atoms cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (LP67). The Masarik and Beer (1999)
production function is smaller than other estimates by a factor of 2 or more.
It may have underestimated the rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production and slightly
overestimated changes in the production rate due to variations in geomagnetic
and solar magnetic field strength (Koch et al., 2006; Field et al., 2006). We
use in the model the LP67 source for 1958 (solar maximum year) since it leads
to the best simulation of aircraft <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observations in the stratosphere
where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations are mainly determined by a balance between
production and radioactive decay (Koch et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2001). Koch
et al. (1996) previously found that the O'Brien et al. (1991) source yields model <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations near
the surface and in the stratosphere that are much lower than observed. The
rates of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production reported more recently by Usoskin and
Kovaltsov (2008) broadly agree with those of LP67 with slightly (about
25 %) lower global production rate and will be tested in a separate model
study. The LP67 source is represented as a function of latitude and altitude
(pressure) and does not vary with season (see Fig. 1 of Koch et al., 1996).
About 2/3 of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is generated in the stratosphere and 1/3 in
the troposphere. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production rate correlates inversely with solar
activity. At higher solar activity, cosmic rays are deflected away from the
solar system and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production rate is thus lower.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Constraint on stratospheric contribution to ${}^{{7}}$Be at the
surface}?><title>Constraint on stratospheric contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at the
surface</title>
      <p>Cross-tropopause transport is important for simulating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the
troposphere. A useful constraint on the stratospheric contribution to
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is DH85's analysis of the observed
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio in the stratosphere and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr
concentrations at the surface. The presence of fissiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr in the
troposphere is due entirely to downward transport from the stratosphere,
except for a few weeks right after a nuclear detonation. Both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr are associated with submicron particles; their fates during
transport from the stratosphere are expected to be similar (no differential
removal is expected). The stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be component in surface air can
therefore be determined as the product of the stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio and the surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr concentration
(DH85). By this procedure, DH85 showed that annually 23–27 % (or about
25 % on average) of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in surface air at northern mid-latitudes
is of stratospheric origin. To use this constraint, we diagnose stratospheric
contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in the troposphere by transporting
separately in the model the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be produced in the stratosphere, as we
previously applied in GEOS-Chem with GEOS1-DAS meteorological data (Liu et
al., 2001). Since wet deposition removes both the stratospheric and
tropospheric components of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at the same rate within each model
gridbox, the diagnosed stratospheric fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in
the troposphere does not significantly depend on the rate of wet removal.</p>
      <p>In the stratosphere, the production of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (source) is balanced by
radioactive decay and net STE fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be into the troposphere
(sinks), i.e.,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">source</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>decay </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">STE</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Since the timescale for downward transport from the stratosphere to
troposphere (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–2 years) is much longer than that for
radioactive decay (half-life 53.3 days), the radioactive decay term is much
larger than the STE flux term. Nevertheless, the STE term would become more
important for a model atmosphere where STE is too fast. For the simulation
of tropospheric (not stratospheric) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, the stratospheric influx to
the troposphere may be adjusted by artificially scaling down (in the case of
excessive STE) or up (in the case of too slow STE) the stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be source. The extent to which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be cross-tropopause transport is
excessive or too slow in the model can be indicated by a scaling factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is defined as the ratio of model to observed STE fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be.
We derive the scaling factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows.</p>
      <p>According to the DH85 constraint, we have for the observations
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the left-hand side denotes the ratio of the tropospheric
([<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to stratospheric ([<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) component of
annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in ground air at NH mid-latitudes. On
the other hand, we have for a global model
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
<italic>model</italic> tropospheric and stratospheric components of annual mean
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in surface air at NH mid-latitudes, respectively, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the corresponding fraction of surface air of stratospheric origin in
the model. If the model reasonably represents the vertical transport and wet
scavenging processes in the troposphere, we have
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Combining Eqs. (2)–(4), we obtain the scaling factor
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          We will discuss the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the assumptions with respect
to convective transport and scavenging processes in Sect. 4. The validity
of Eq. (5) will also be evaluated with actual model calculations in
that section. Unless otherwise specified, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be cross-tropopause fluxes
in the model calculations presented in this paper are not adjusted. However,
we will use the scaling factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as one of the metrics for comparing the STE
characteristics of different meteorological data sets.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{7}}$Be and ozone observational data}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and ozone observational data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{7}}$ Be}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Be</title>
      <p>We estimate an average solar year value
simply by averaging the long-term records of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observations multiplied
by 0.72 to correct to the 1958 solar maximum source (Koch et al., 1996). The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition flux observations are from the compilation of Koch et
al. (1996) and there are about 25 northern mid-latitude sites with available
long-term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observations. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be surface concentration
observations are from the data archive of the US Department of Energy (DOE)
Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML, now part of the Department of
Homeland Security) Surface Air Sampling Program (SASP) which began in the
1980s. We also use the long-term climatological data of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations in the UT/LS constructed from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 years of aircraft and
balloon observations. Between the late 1950s and the early 1980s, EML
collected tropospheric and stratospheric aircraft and balloon measurements of
numerous radionuclides as part of the DOE High Altitude Sampling Program
(HASP). The data were compiled into a database in 1997 by R. Leifer and
N. Chan of EML (Leifer and Chan, 1997), called
RAdioNuclide DAtaBase (RANDAB). The reader is referred to Considine et
al. (2005) for a brief description of the RANDAB database. This database is
available at the Oak Ridge National laboratory's Carbon Dioxide Information
Analysis Center (<uri>http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ndps/db1019.html</uri>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <title>Ozone</title>
      <p>We use tropospheric ozone column (TOC) determined with the tropospheric ozone
residual method by subtracting measurements of MLS stratospheric column ozone
(SCO) from OMI total column ozone (Ziemke et al., 2006;
<uri>http://acdb-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/cloud_slice</uri>) or using the
TOMS and Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV) combination (Fishman et al.,
2003; <uri>http://science.larc.nasa.gov/TOR</uri>). The OMI/MLS TOCs are from
October 2004 to July 2008, and the TOMS/SBUV TOCs are from 1979 to 2005. We
use climatological monthly average ozone profiles from 23 ozonesonde stations
as constructed by Considine et al. (2008), based on Logan (1999) and Thompson
et al. (2003). The ozonesonde data record is from 1985–2000 for
extratropical stations, and from all available data prior to 2005 for
tropical stations. The number of sondes at each station is adequate for
defining monthly means used to evaluate the accuracy of the model results
(Considine et al., 2008). Surface ozone data are taken from Logan (1999).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Model evaluation with UT/LS and surface ${}^{{7}}$Be data}?><title>Model evaluation with UT/LS and surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be data</title>
      <p>In this section, we present model results of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations driven by
four meteorological archives and evaluate them against long-term measurements
at the surface and in the UT/LS. Figure 3 shows the annual zonal mean
concentrations (in units of millibequerel per standard cubic meter or
mBq SCM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the four radionuclide simulations using GMI
CTM. All four simulations overall show a similar pattern of tropospheric
distribution. The highest concentrations are seen in the dry subsiding
subtropics. Lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in surface air are found in the
Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes owing to scavenging by frequent large-scale
precipitation (Fig. 1). Low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations are also associated with
ITCZ, which is characterized by strong convergence and convective
precipitation. It appears, however, that among all four simulations the
GEOS1-STRAT simulation gives the highest concentrations in the subtropics and
the GISS simulation shows the highest concentrations in the high latitudes.
This is partly attributed to the differences in the latitudinal distribution
of total precipitations in these meteorological archives (Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Annual zonal mean mixing ratios (mBq SCM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as a
function of latitude and pressure (altitude), as simulated by the standard
GMI CTM. The white lines indicate the annual average thermal tropopause
height.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=204.859843pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 4 compares four <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations in the upper troposphere and/or lower
stratosphere (UT/LS) with climatological distributions constructed from the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be data contained in the RANDAB database, following Considine et
al. (2005) who previously made a similar comparison for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb. Model
output are sampled at the months, longitudes, latitudes, and altitudes of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observations. Figure 4a compares the meridional distribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be measurements made in the 12–16 km altitude range with the four GMI
simulations. Figure 4b shows the same comparison, but for the 16–20 km
altitude range. The 12–16 km (about 200–100 hPa) range lies within the
upper troposphere in the tropics and the lower stratosphere at mid to high
latitudes. The 16–20 km (about 100–50 hPa) range lies within the
stratosphere at all latitudes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Observed and simulated latitudinal distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the
<bold>(a)</bold> 12–16 km and <bold>(b)</bold> 16–20 km regions. Observed data
from the EML RANDAB database are averaged into 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> bins, following
Considine et al. (2005). Error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 times the standard error
of the averages. Model results are sampled at observation locations on a
monthly basis. Also shown as dashed lines are model zonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations to show the global representativeness of the averages
constructed from sampling the simulations at the observation locations.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>At 12–16 km (Fig. 4a), the observations indicate comparatively low tropical
upper tropospheric values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 mBq SCM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with increasing
trends toward high latitudes. The distribution is nearly symmetric about the
equator, with more observations available in NH high latitudes. This
latitudinal distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations reflects a larger
production of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the lower stratosphere at high latitudes and
precipitation scavenging associated with deep convection in the tropics. All
four simulations capture the observations at 12–16 km reasonably well. The
differences between the four simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations are comparable
or smaller than the error limits.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>At 16–20 km (Fig. 4b), the observations show a tropical minimum of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 mBq SCM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with increasing concentrations toward high
latitudes in both hemispheres. In the tropics and the SH, the four <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
simulations indicate small differences. In the NH, the four <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
simulations reveal large differences and bracket the observations. In
particular, the GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation gives the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations among the four simulations and is lower than the observations.
This appears to be due to excessive cross-tropopause transport in
GEOS1-STRAT, as further discussed below. On the other hand, as we will also
discuss later, the fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS meteorological fields have reasonable
cross-tropopause transport. In the latter case, stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations are primarily determined by a balance between production and
radioactive decay in the stratosphere. Therefore the slightly overestimated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at 16–20 km suggests a slightly overestimated global production
rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the LP67 source. The Usoskin and Kovaltsov (2008) source,
which is about 25 % lower than the LP67 source, would probably yield
better agreements with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observations in the lower stratosphere.</p>
      <p>Figure 5a compares the simulated and observed annual average concentrations
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be near the surface as a function of latitude. Observed data are
from the EML SASP database and are averaged into 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude bins.
Observations from sites with elevation higher than 500 m are not included
because of uncertainties involved in sampling coarse-resolution models at
high elevation sites. Model results are sampled at observation locations on a
monthly basis. Figure 5b
shows the annual zonal mean surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in the model to
indicate the global representativeness of the averages over the sampling
sites. The observations indicate concentration maxima in the subtropics
associated with subsidence and minima in the tropics. The tropical minimum
reflects rapid scavenging within the ITCZ. Low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations are
also observed at mid-latitudes due to efficient scavenging in the
mid-latitude storm tracks. Latitudinal trends (i.e., minima and maxima) of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations are well simulated with all meteorological fields
except GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The GMI/GISS simulation shows too high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations at high latitudes; this is because of the well-known excessive
cross-tropopause transport at high latitudes in the GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> meteorological
fields (e.g., Koch and Rind, 1998; McLinden et al., 2000; Shindell et al.,
2003). The overall positive biases in all simulations are partly due to our
correction of the long-term records of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observations (by a factor of
0.72) to the 1958 solar maximum source (Sect. 2.5). We find that without this
correction, the biases would be significantly reduced.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Observed and simulated latitudinal distributions of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations (mBq SCM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) near the surface. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
cross-tropopause fluxes were not adjusted for the GMI/GEOS1-STRAT and
GMI/GISS simulations (see Sect. 3). Observed data from the EML Surface Air
Sampling Program (SASP) database are averaged into 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> bins. Those
sites with elevation higher than 500 m are not included. Error bars
represent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 times the standard error of the averages. Model results are
sampled at observation locations and month. <bold>(b)</bold> GMI simulated annual
zonal mean concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (mBq SCM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) near the surface.
<bold>(c)</bold> Observed (black) and GMI simulated (color) annual mean total
deposition fluxes (Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (at 25 sites) as a
function of latitude. The data from individual sites are averaged over
4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude bins. The model is sampled at observation locations.
<bold>(d)</bold> GMI simulated annual zonal mean total deposition fluxes
(Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 5c compares the model-simulated annual mean total deposition fluxes of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be at 25 northern mid-latitude sites from which long-term records of
observations are available. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition flux observations are
from the compilation of Koch et al. (1996), previously used in Liu et
al. (2001). The data from individual sites are averaged over 4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude bins. The model is sampled at observation locations. Figure 5d shows
the annual zonal mean total deposition fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the model to
indicate the global representativeness of the sites. The observations show a
maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2100 Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the subtropics
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and the fluxes fall off with increasing latitude.
The four <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations show large discrepancies especially in the
subtropics (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). Overall, the GMI/fvGCM simulation agrees
better with the magnitude of the observed fluxes while the GMI/GEOS4
simulation yields better latitudinal trends. GMI/GEOS4 simulates best the
observations at the latitudes of 45–60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, but
overestimates the observations by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % at
20–40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The GMI/GISS simulation overestimates the
observations at higher latitudes (45–60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) by a factor
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2. The GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation overestimates the observed
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes at subtropical latitudes by up to a factor of 2.5
(30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). As with the above model-observation comparison of surface
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations, the overall positive biases in model total
deposition fluxes would be lower without the correction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
observations (by a factor of 0.72) to the 1958 solar maximum source (Sect. 2.5). However, we will show in the next section that these overestimated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes are largely due to model excessive
cross-tropopause transport, especially with the GEOS1-STRAT and GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
meteorological fields.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Assessment of cross-tropopause transport of ${}^{{7}}$Be in different
meteorological archives}?><title>Assessment of cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in different
meteorological archives</title>
      <p>The above results indicate different levels of success with four
meteorological fields in reproducing long-term records of surface and UT/LS
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations as well as total deposition fluxes. In this section,
we quantify the contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be produced in the stratosphere to
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations and deposition fluxes, followed by an
assessment of cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the meteorological
fields used.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Stratospheric fraction (%) of annual zonal mean
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in the model simulations as a function of
latitude and pressure. The white lines indicate thermal tropopause height.
<bold>(b)</bold> Stratospheric fraction of annual zonal mean surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations (solid lines) and that of annual zonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be total
deposition fluxes (dashed lines) in the model simulations as a function of
latitude.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f06.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 6a shows the stratospheric fraction (%) of annual zonal mean
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations (i.e., fraction of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
produced in the stratosphere) in the model simulations as a function of
latitude and pressure. The fractions of significantly less than 100 % in
the lower stratosphere in all four simulations reflect mainly the seasonal
movement of the tropopause. With GEOS1-STRAT, stratospheric contribution to
lower-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations maximizes at 25–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
(35–45 %) and 25–40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (30–35 %). The tropical middle and
upper troposphere show the minimum in stratospheric impact (&lt; 30 %). With GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the stratospheric contribution to lower-tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations peaks (30–40 %) at southern high latitudes and
remains nearly constant (30–35 %) north of 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N while it is
quite small (&lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–20 %) in the tropical middle and
upper troposphere. The strong gradients in the subtropics suggest that the
tropics are strongly isolated from the mid-latitudes in the GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
meteorological field. fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS show a similar pattern of
stratospheric influence on the troposphere; both indicate maximum
contribution from stratosphere near 30–35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %) and 25–30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20–25 %) in the lower
troposphere. However, GEOS4-DAS shows larger contributions from the
stratosphere to the troposphere (especially the free troposphere) than fvGCM
does by a few percent, consistent with the overestimated deposition fluxes
at 20–40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N by GEOS4-DAS (Fig. 5c). The area of
minimal stratospheric influence in the tropics is also narrower in
GEOS4-DAS.</p>
      <p>Figure 6b shows the stratospheric fraction (%) of annual zonal mean
surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations and that of annual zonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be total
deposition fluxes (Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the model simulations as a
function of latitude. With all meteorological fields except GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, maximum
stratospheric contribution to total deposition fluxes (vs. surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations) is shifted toward higher latitudes, reflecting scavenging by
frequent mid-latitude precipitation and the dry subsidence in the subtropics.
Stratospheric fractions of surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations at NH mid-latitude
are about 38 % (GEOS1-STRAT), 33 % (GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 23-24 % (fvGCM
and GEOS4-DAS). As discussed in Sect. 2.4, the observed
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr ratio suggests that 23–27 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in
surface air at northern mid-latitudes is of stratospheric origin (DH85).
According to this constraint, cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and
subsequent transport to the surface in the GEOS1-STRAT and GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
meteorological fields is excessive. On the other hand, it should be noted
that the fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS simulations show results remarkably consistent
with the DH85 constraint, suggesting that stratospheric influences on surface
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in these two meteorological fields are reasonable.
However, DH85 did not provide constraints on latitudinal variation of
stratospheric influence on surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be. Of the four meteorological
fields, GEOS1-STRAT, fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS show very similar latitudinal
distribution of stratospheric influence at the surface (i.e., peak in the
subtropics and valley in the tropics or polar regions). By contrast, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
shows the largest impact of the stratosphere at high latitudes.</p>
      <p>Similarly, as shown above, the model overestimates the long-term records of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition flux observations at mid-latitudes (and subtropics) with
GEOS1-STRAT and at high latitudes with GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5c). Interestingly,
the fvGCM (and to a lesser extent GEOS4-DAS) simulation yields <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
deposition fluxes close to the observations. This suggests that the DH85
constraint and observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes are two complementary
constraints on cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be. We therefore use the
DH85 constraint to assess the cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the
meteorological fields.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 6, except that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be cross-tropopause fluxes have
been adjusted for GMI/GEOS1-STRAT and GMI/GISS.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f07.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annual average global budget of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the model troposphere.
The GMI model was driven by the GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, fvGCM, and GEOS4-DAS
meteorological data sets, respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS1-STRAT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GISS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">fvGCM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GEOS4-DAS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Burden, g </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.95 (3.86)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.00 (3.64)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Residence time, days<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31 (29)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31 (30)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Sources, g day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22 (0.18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18 (0.17)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">STE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08 (0.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05 (0.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">troposphere</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14 (0.14)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13 (0.13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Sinks, g day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22 (0.18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18 (0.17)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">dry deposition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01 (0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01 (0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">wet deposition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15 (0.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12 (0.11)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">radioactive decay</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06 (0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05 (0.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Against deposition only. The tropopause was
determined in the model using a criterion of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lapse
rate as defined by World Meteorological Organization. The diagnosed
tropopause model layer was
included as part of the troposphere.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The numbers in the brackets indicate the values when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
cross-tropopause fluxes were adjusted for GMI/GEOS1-STRAT and GMI/GISS. See
text for details.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Using the approach described in Sect. 2.4 (i.e., reduced cross-tropopause
transport flux by artificially scaling down the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
source in the simulation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be), we determine the scaling
factors for GEOS1-STRAT and GISS to be 1.92 and 1.35, respectively. With the
adjustment of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be cross-tropopause fluxes for GEOS1-STRAT and GISS, the
model calculated stratospheric fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations in
surface air at NH mid-latitudes is indeed close to 25 % (i.e., agree with
the DH85 constraint) (Fig. 7), thus supporting the validity of Eq. (5). With the adjustment, some simulations also simulate better surface
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations and total deposition fluxes at the subtropics
(GEOS1-STRAT) and at high latitudes (GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 8 vs. Fig. 5). The
improvement is clearer for total deposition fluxes than for surface
concentrations. As discussed below, on a global scale total deposition
fluxes are sensitive to STE fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be into the troposphere, while
surface concentrations are principally dependent on the overall wet removal
rate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 5, except that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be cross-tropopause fluxes have
been adjusted for GMI/GEOS1-STRAT and GMI/GISS.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f08.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Table 3 shows the annual average global budgets of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in
the four GMI simulations. With an adjustment of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be cross-tropopause
fluxes, the global burdens and residence times of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in
GMI/GEOS1-STRAT and GMI/GISS are reduced. In GMI/GEOS1-STRAT the source and
sink terms become much closer to that in fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS. A reduction of
global <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be STE fluxes of 0.04 g day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> results in a decrease of total
deposition fluxes of 0.03 g day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and radioactive decay of 0.01 g day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In GMI/GISS the changes in the budget terms are relatively small
due to the smaller adjustment of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be cross-tropopause fluxes.
Nevertheless, a reduction of global <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be STE fluxes of 0.01 g day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
results in a decrease of total deposition fluxes of 0.01 g day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These
calculations indicate that globally the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be total deposition fluxes are
sensitive to STE fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be into the troposphere.</p>
      <p>The model calculated stratospheric fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the troposphere
may be sensitive to the model diagnosed location of the tropopause, for which
there is some uncertainty. For instance, Stajner et al. (2008) used four
different definitions of the tropopause on the basis of temperature lapse
rate (World Meteorological Organization or WMO definition), potential
vorticity (PV), and isentropic surfaces or ozone surfaces. They found that
the WMO tropopause was about 0.7–1 km (in the northern mid-latitude) or
0.5–1 km (in the tropics) higher than the ozone or PV determined tropopause.
We examine the sensitivity of model diagnosed stratospheric fraction of
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations to the location of tropopause (not
shown) by lowering tropopause height by one model level (approximately 1.2, 1.7, 1.1, and 1.1 km for GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, fvGCM and
GEOS4-DAS, respectively). Results indicate that stratospheric fractions of
surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations increase by 5–10 %, thus requiring larger
adjustments of cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the meteorological
fields in order to meet the DH85 constraint. This also suggests that using
the DH85 constraint requires relatively high vertical resolution near
tropopause in the model.</p>
      <p>While the model diagnosed stratospheric fraction of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations is mainly determined by the STE processes in the UT/LS, it
may also be sensitive to precipitation scavenging and convective transport
in the troposphere. Figure 9 shows the latitude-pressure cross sections of
the differences in the stratospheric fraction (%) of annual zonal mean
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations between the standard simulation and a
simulation where precipitation scavenging is turned off. Also shown are the
corresponding differences near the surface. The stratospheric fraction of
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is found to be only weakly dependent on precipitation
scavenging, with &lt; 5 % change in most of the troposphere and
&lt; 2.5 % change near the mid-latitude surface. Figure 10 shows a
similar plot, except that convective transport and scavenging are turned off
in the sensitivity simulation. Similarly, the stratospheric fraction of
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is not sensitive to convective transport and
scavenging processes, with &lt; 1 % changes near the mid-latitude
surface.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 6a, b, except for the differences in the stratospheric
fraction (%) of zonal mean atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations between the
standard simulation and a simulation where wet scavenging is turned off.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f09.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Comparison with previous modeling studies</title>
      <p>In this section we compare the GMI CTM results for cross-tropopause
transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be with previous modeling studies based on the same or
similar meteorological fields.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 6a, b, except for the differences in the stratospheric
fraction (%) of zonal mean atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations between the
standard simulation and a simulation where convective transport and
scavenging are turned off.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f10.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Liu et al. (2001) found that STE flux of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be was overestimated with the
GEOS1-STRAT fields in the GEOS-Chem model, consistent with this study using
GMI CTM. However, Liu et al. (2001) found that the reduction required to
match the DH85 constraint is a factor of 3.5 for the GEOS1-STRAT archive
with 4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution, compared
to a factor of 1.92 in the present study. The larger reduction in the former
reflects the inclusion of ice particle gravitational settling effect, which
results in increased transport from the upper to lower troposphere, as well
as the inclusion of the diagnosed tropopause model layer as part of the
stratosphere (vs. the troposphere). Interestingly, when specifying ozone
concentrations in the lower stratosphere (70 hPa) and letting the model
(GEOS-Chem) transport this ozone as an inert tracer into the troposphere,
Bey et al. (2001) found a similar overestimate in an ozone simulation with
the GEOS-1 data, as diagnosed by the simulation of tropospheric ozone
concentrations at high latitudes in winter where transport from the
stratosphere is a major source. This indicates that the simulation's
deficiency in cross-tropopause transport as diagnosed using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be tracers
has similar consequences for cross-tropopause transport of ozone.</p>
      <p>Koch and Rind (1998) used a 31-layer version of the GISS GCM to simulate
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and used tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as
indicator of STE. Based on limited observations, they suggested that leakage
into the troposphere is somewhat excessive in the model, particularly at high
latitudes. Using the GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GCM, McLinden et al. (2000) found that a large
fraction of the cross-tropopause transport of ozone occurs at the poles which
is inconsistent with the current understanding of stratosphere–troposphere
exchange, despite the fact that the global stratosphere–troposphere exchange fluxes of
ozone compare well with their best estimate of
475 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 Tg year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on measurements and tracer-tracer
correlation. Shindell et al. (2003) presented an updated version of the
GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> climate model which still overestimates ozone in the middle
troposphere at high latitudes, likely reflecting deficiencies in the model's
downward transport of stratospheric air. Our conclusions about
cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in this work are consistent
with these previous studies. Overestimated STE fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as
diagnosed in GMI/GISS based on the DH85 constraint simply reflect the
incorrect latitudinal distribution of cross-tropopause transport, that is,
too fast STE at higher latitudes and too slow STE at lower latitudes. The
DH85 constraint was only applicable and applied for NH mid-latitude surface
and thus does not provide constraint on the model global STE flux of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
if the latitudinal distribution of STE is incorrect.</p>
      <p>The large-scale stratospheric transport (Brewer–Dobson circulation) in fvGCM
has been shown to be realistic (Douglass et al., 2003) and mean age of
stratospheric air is similar to observations (Strahan and Douglass, 2004;
Douglass et al., 2008; Strahan et al., 2009). This suggests credible
cross-tropopause transport of mass and ozone in fvGCM because the large-scale
exchange between the stratosphere and troposphere is largely tied to the
Brewer–Dobson circulation through the overworld wave driving (Holton et al.,
1995; Olsen et al., 2004). Based on this finding, the meteorological data
from fvGCM were used to drive GMI CTM by several authors to study tropospheric
ozone. Considine et al. (2008) evaluated near-tropopause ozone distributions
with ozonesonde data. Terao et al. (2008) examined the role of variability in
the input of stratospheric ozone on the interannual variability of
tropospheric ozone in the northern extratropics. Liang et al. (2009)
investigated the impact of stratosphere-to-troposphere transport on
tropospheric ozone and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry over the Arctic. By contrast,
GEOS4-DAS tends to have too strong a residual circulation, and the age of
air is too young compared to observations (Schoeberl et al., 2003;
Schoeberl, 2004; Douglass et al., 2008). A GMI CTM simulation driven with the
GEOS4-DAS meteorological fields showed the model's inadequacy in simulating
upper-tropospheric ozone (Liang et al., 2009). These findings are consistent
with what we illustrated in this study from a perspective of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
tracers. That is, GEOS4-DAS features a larger impact of STE on the troposphere
(especially UT) than fvGCM does, while the latter has more credible
cross-tropopause transport as constrained by observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition
fluxes (Fig. 5c) and the DH85 criterion (Fig. 6).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Implications for cross-tropopause transport of ozone</title>
      <p>In this section we discuss the implications of different characteristics of
cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be for stratospheric influence on
tropospheric ozone in different meteorological fields. At the time of this
study, the GMI full-chemistry model can be driven with GEOS1-STRAT, fvGCM
and GEOS4-DAS, but not GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> meteorological fields. This allows us to
examine any potential relationship between the cross-tropopause transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and ozone when these fields are used to drive the model.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Ozonesonde, surface and satellite observations provide useful constraints on
the stratospheric contribution to tropospheric ozone (e.g., Rind et al.,
2007; Lin et al., 2012). Figure 11 shows comparisons of model tropospheric
ozone profiles with annual mean ozonesonde observations for a range of
latitudes (Considine et al., 2008). These results are typical of other
stations at similar latitudes. The GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation produces
excessive ozone throughout the troposphere at all latitudes except in the
tropics while the GMI/fvGCM and GMI/GEOS4-DAS simulations are generally in
agreement with the observations (with slightly overpredicted ozone in the
mid-latitude upper troposphere). The GEOS1-STRAT simulation has the largest
overestimate of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring. We also compared model surface ozone
concentrations with the Logan (1999) surface ozone data set (not shown).
Among the three GMI simulations, the GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation shows the
largest errors in surface ozone concentrations during winter and spring when
stratospheric contribution is at its peak. These are in line with the
relative magnitudes of cross-tropopause transport efficiencies of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in
the three meteorological fields (i.e., too fast STE in GEOS1-STRAT),
discussed in previous sections. Indeed, the tropospheric version of the
GMI/GEOS1-STRAT model with constrained STE flux of ozone using the Synoz
approach (about 579 Tg year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) simulates ozonesonde observations of
tropospheric ozone reasonably well (dotted line, Fig. 11).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Comparisons of GMI simulated tropospheric ozone profiles (color
lines) with ozonesonde observations (black line) for a range of latitudes.
Values are annual averages. Solid color lines indicate the GMI simulations.
Also shown as dotted lines are tropospheric ozone profiles as simulated by
the GMI tropospheric model driven by the GEOS1-STRAT meteorological field.
The horizontal gray line indicates the approximate location of tropopause
(i.e., the pressure level corresponding to 100 ppbv ozone concentrations in
the ozonesonde observations).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f11.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 12 shows GMI simulated annual zonal mean tropospheric ozone column
(TOC), in Dobson Units, compared with observed climatologies from TOMS/SBUV
(1979–2005; Fishman et al., 2003) and OMI/MLS (October 2004–July 2008;
Ziemke et al., 2006). The WMO definition of thermal tropopause is used to
calculate the model TOC. While the GMI/fvGCM and GMI/GEOS4-DAS simulations
are similar and overestimate TOC by up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 DU, the
GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation overestimates TOC by as much as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 DU. The excessive O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation with maxima
at 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S suggests downward
transport of ozone from the stratosphere is too fast. The tropospheric
version of the GMI/GEOS1-STRAT model with constrained STE flux of ozone
provides a much better simulation of global TOCs (red dashed line, Fig. 12), which are comparable to those from GMI/fvGCM and GMI/GEOS4-DAS
simulations. However, model TOCs are still <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–14 DU larger
than satellite observations in the subtropics and mid-latitudes. Previously,
Ziemke et al. (2006) considered uncertainties in both model and observations
and subjectively interpreted model-OMI/MLS TOC differences of 10 DU and
higher as being significant. As Stajner et al. (2008) noted, a low extratropical
tropopause used by Ziemke et al. (2006) may have played an important role in
the underestimation of OMI/MLS TOC. Yang et al. (2010) also found that their
OMI/MLS potential vorticity mapped TOCs are smaller than ozonesonde TOCs by
5.9 DU with a standard deviation of the differences of 8.4 DU. On the other
hand, the GMI/fvGCM simulation tends to overestimate ozone just below the
tropopause at mid-latitudes (Fig. 11); these biases do not appear to be
due to excessive stratospheric influence (Considine et al., 2008). Current
global models also tend to overpredict surface ozone during summer and early
fall over the eastern US and Japan (Fiore et al., 2009). Therefore the
simulated TOCs are very likely biased high.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>GMI simulated annual zonal mean tropospheric ozone column (TOC in
Dobson Units) compared with observed tropospheric ozone residuals from
TOMS/SBUV (1979–2005 average) and OMI/MLS (October 2004–July 2008 average).
Also shown is the annual zonal mean TOC simulated by the tropospheric version
of the GMI model.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=216.240945pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f12.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Latitudinal variations of annual zonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
overestimate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be) and tropospheric ozone column overestimate
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TOC) as simulated by GMI/GEOS1-STRAT. Error bars represent
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 times the standard error of the averages. <bold>(b)</bold> The correlation
between the global distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TOC. The
lines of best fit are calculated using the reduced-major-axis (RMA) method
(Hirsch and Gilroy, 1984). See text for details.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/16/4641/2016/acp-16-4641-2016-f13.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>We further examine the relationship between the cross-tropopause transport
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and ozone with the GEOS1-STRAT meteorological fields, in which
case STE is known to be too fast. Figure 13a shows the latitudinal
variations of annual zonal mean tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be column overestimate
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be) and TOC overestimate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TOC) in the
GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is obtained by subtraction of
the STE-flux-adjusted simulation (Sect. 2.4) from the standard simulation.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TOC is obtained by subtracting the GMI tropospheric model
simulation (with STE flux of ozone about 579 Tg year<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the GMI
full-chemistry model simulation. Figure 13b shows the correlation between
the global distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TOC. The lines of
best fit are calculated using the reduced-major-axis (RMA) method (Hirsch
and Gilroy, 1984). Standard errors for the intercept and the slope are
computed as described by Miller and Kahn (1962). Overall, the location of
overestimated ozone follows that of overestimated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, with both maxima
near 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The strong correlation
between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TOC implies that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is a good
indicator of cross-tropopause transport of ozone. These support our
conclusion that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be is a useful utility for assessing cross-tropopause
transport of ozone in global models.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>We have assessed the ability of the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI)
chemical transport model (CTM) using different meteorological data sets to
simulate the atmospheric distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, a natural aerosol tracer
originating from the upper troposphere and/or lower stratosphere and removed from
the troposphere primarily by wet deposition. The model was driven by four
meteorological data sets (GEOS1-STRAT, GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, fvGCM, GEOS4-DAS) which
feature significantly different cross-tropopause transport characteristics.
The GMI modeling framework was configured such that the variability between
the simulations mainly reflects the use of different meteorological data.
Our goal was to assess the utility of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as a tracer of
cross-tropopause transport in global models and develop a methodology to
exploit such a utility. We have also discussed the implications of excessive
cross-tropopause transport as revealed by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations for the
modeling of tropospheric ozone.</p>
      <p>We evaluated the four simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be with RANDAB, a unique database
of upper atmosphere radionuclide climatological observations compiled by the
DOE (now DHS) Environmental Measurement Laboratory, as well as long-term
measurements at the surface. Model simulations capture the UT/LS observations
with respect to latitudes. The GMI/GEOS1-STRAT simulation shows the lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations among the four simulations in the lower stratosphere,
and underestimates the observations. This reflects the well-known highly
overestimated cross-tropopause transport in GEOS1-STRAT DAS. At the surface,
GMI/GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reproduces the observed latitudinal trends of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
concentrations, but shows too high concentrations at high latitudes. The
GMI/fvGCM simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes are the closest to the
observations, while the GMI/GEOS1-STRAT overestimates the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
deposition fluxes at subtropical latitudes by up to a factor of 2.5
(30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and the GMI/GISS simulations at high latitudes
(45–60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) are a factor of 2 too high. We were able to show that
the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes offer a strong constraint on
stratosphere-to-troposphere transport in global models.</p>
      <p>We examined the observational constraint from Dutkiewicz and Husain (1985)
(DH85) on the stratospheric contribution to tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be using the
GMI modeling framework. DH85 analyzed the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr
ratio, which suggests that 23–27 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in surface air at
northern mid-latitudes is of stratospheric origin. This constraint offers a
sensitive test of cross-tropopause transport in global models. Comparison of
the fraction of surface air of stratospheric origin estimated from the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations with the DH85 constraint indicates excessive
cross-tropopause transport at mid-latitudes with the GEOS1-STRAT
meteorological fields and at high latitudes with the GISS II<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fields.
Interestingly, these simulations also overestimate observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
deposition fluxes at middle and high latitudes, respectively. With a
correction to cross-tropopause flux, the model simulates better surface
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentrations and total deposition fluxes. By contrast, the fvGCM
meteorological data yield the most reasonable cross-tropopause transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be according to the DH85 constraint, consistent with the fact that the
GMI/fvGCM simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes are closest to the
observations. These results illustrate that the GMI framework is very useful
for characterizing and helping to reduce uncertainties in the processes such as
cross-tropopause transport in the meteorological fields that are used to
drive chemical transport models. Note that since wet deposition removes both
the stratospheric and tropospheric components of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
nondiscriminatively, the model diagnosed fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be of
stratospheric origin does not significantly depend on the rate of wet
removal.</p>
      <p>The model diagnosed stratospheric fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in surface air is
sensitive to the diagnosed location of tropopause, in particular when the
model vertical resolution is relatively coarse (&gt; 1–1.5 km) near
the tropopause region. This suggests that stratospheric fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
is a more useful diagnostic when the model has sufficient vertical resolution
(&lt; 1–1.5 km) so that the tropopause can be well defined. We used the
WMO definition of thermal tropopause and include the diagnosed tropopause
model layer as part of the troposphere (vs. the stratosphere). As such
our assessment of cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the four
meteorological data sets in the GMI CTM is consistent with previous modeling
studies of stratospheric influence on tropospheric ozone.</p>
      <p>Incorrect cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be implies misrepresented
downward influx of stratospheric ozone to the troposphere in a model. We
demonstrated this by examining the relationship between the cross-tropopause
transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and ozone as simulated by GMI CTM driven with
GEOS1-STRAT, fvGCM and GEOS4-DAS meteorological fields. We found that
excessive cross-tropopause transport of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be corresponds to
overestimated stratospheric contribution to tropospheric ozone, as
constrained by ozonesonde, surface and satellite observations.</p>
      <p>In summary, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulation, which is computationally cheap and
technically simple, in combination with the DH85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be observational
constraint and observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be deposition fluxes may be used routinely to
assess cross-tropopause transport in global models. We recommend separate
transport of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be produced in the stratosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be-strat) to
evaluate the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be-strat to total <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (i.e., beryllium-7
produced in both the stratosphere and the troposphere) in surface air against
the DH85 constraint. This can serve as a first-order assessment of
cross-tropopause transport in the meteorological fields. With improved
estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be production rates as well as their year-to-year
variations, model multi-year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be simulations together with long-term
observations would provide useful constraints on the interannual variability
of STE. While this study uses <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be alone, future modeling work will
include using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, a more sensitive indicator of STE
(Rehfeld and Heimann, 1995; Koch and Rind, 1998; Jordan et al., 2003).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>A description of the data sets used in this paper and their availability
can be found in Sect. 2.5.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the NASA Modeling, Analysis and Prediction (MAP)
program, the Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program (ACMAP),
and the Atmospheric Composition Campaign Data Analysis and Modeling (ACCDAM)
program. We thank Bryan Duncan for his contribution to the GMI model
development, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. The GMI
core team at NASA GSFC is acknowledged for programming support. NASA Center
for Computational Sciences (NCCS) provided supercomputing resources. The
GEOS-Chem model is managed by the Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Group at
Harvard University with support from ACMAP and MAP.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: J.-U. Grooß</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, R. F.: The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP)
monthly precipitation analysis (1979–Present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4,
1147–1167, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Allen, D. J., Dibb, J. E., Ridley, B., Pickering, K. E., and Talbot, R. W.:
An estimate of the stratospheric contribution to springtime tropospheric
ozone maxima using TOPSE measurements and beryllium-7 simulations, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8355, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001428</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B., Fiore, A.
M., Li, Q., Liu, H., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M.: Global modeling of
tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and
evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23096, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Brost, R. A., Feichter, J., and Heimann, M.: Three-dimensional simulation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 22423–22445, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G., Garnier, B., Johnson, C. E., and Sanderson,
M. G., and Stevenson, D. S.: Effect of stratosphere-troposphere exchange on
the future tropospheric ozone trend, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8528,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002617" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002617</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Considine, D. B., Bergmann, D. J., and Liu, H.: Sensitivity of Global
Modeling Initiative chemistry and transport model simulations of radon-222
and lead-210 to input meteorological data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3389–3406,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3389-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3389-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Considine, D. B., Logan, J. A., and Olsen, M. A.: Evaluation of
near-tropopause ozone distributions in the Global Modeling Initiative
combined stratosphere/troposphere model with ozonesonde data, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 2365–2385, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cristofanelli, P., Bonasoni, P., Collins, W., Feichter, J., Forster, C.,
James, P., Kentarchos, A., Kubik, P. W., Land, C., Meloen, J., Roelofs, G.
J., Siegmund, P., Sprenger, M., Schnabel, C., Stohl, A., Tobler, L., Tositti,
L., Trickl, T., and Zanis, P.: Stratosphere-to-troposphere transport: A model
and method evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8525, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002600</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dibb, J. E.: Vertical mixing above Summit, Greenland: Insights into seasonal
and high frequency variability from the radionuclide tracers Be-7 and Pb-210,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 5020–5030, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dibb, J. E., Talbot, R. W., and Gregory, G. L.: Beryllium-7 and lead-210 in
the western hemisphere Arctic atmosphere: Observations from three recent
aircraft-based sampling programs, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 16709–16715, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dibb, J. E., Meeker, L. D., Finkel, R. C., Southon, J. R., Caffee, M. W., and
Barrie, L. A.: Estimation of stratospheric input to the Arctic troposphere:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in aerosols at Alert, Canada, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
12855–12864, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Dibb, J. E., Talbot, R. W., Scheuer, E., Seid, G., DeBell, L., Lefer, B., and
Ridley, B.: Stratospheric influence on the northern North American free
troposphere during TOPSE: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be as a stratospheric tracer, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 8363, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001347" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001347</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Douglass, A. R., Prather, M. J., Hall, T. M., Strahan, S. E., Rasch, P. J.,
Sparling, L. C., Coy, L., and Rodriguez, J. M.: Choosing meteorological input
for the Global Modeling Initiative assessment of high-speed aircraft, J.
Geophys. Res., 104, 27545–27564, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Douglass, A. R., Schoeberl, M. R., Rood, R. B., and Pawson, S.: Evaluation of
transport in the lower tropical stratosphere in a global chemistry and
transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4259, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002696" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002696</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Douglass, A. R., Stolarski, R. S., Strahan, S. E., and Connell, P. S.:
Radicals and reservoirs in the GMI chemistry and transport model: Comparison
to measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D16302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004632" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004632</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Douglass, A. R., Stolarski, R. S., Schoeberl, M. R., Jackman, C. H., Gupta,
M. L., Newman, P. A., Nielsen, J. E., and Fleming, E. L.: Relationship of
loss, mean age of air and the distribution of CFCs to stratospheric
circulation and implications for atmospheric lifetimes, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D14309, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009575</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., Strahan, S. E., Yoshida, Y., Steenrod, S. D., and Livesey, N.:
Model study of the cross-tropopause transport of biomass burning pollution,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3713–3736, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3713-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3713-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., West, J. J., Yoshida, Y., Fiore, A. M., and Ziemke, J. R.: The
influence of European pollution on ozone in the Near East and northern
Africa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2267–2283, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2267-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2267-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Dutkiewicz, V. A. and Husain, L.: Stratospheric and tropospheric components
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in surface air, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5783–5788, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Feely, H. W., Larsen, R. J., and Sanderson, C. G.: Factors that cause
seasonal variations in beryllium-7 concentrations in surface air, J. Environ.
Radioactiv., 9, 223–249, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Field, C. V., Schmidt, G. A., Koch, D., and Salyk, C.: Modeling production
and climate-related impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentration in ice cores, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, D15107, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006410" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006410</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Dentener, F. J., Wild, O., Cuvelier, C., Schultz, M. G., Hess,
P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., Doherty, R. M., Horowitz, L. W., MacKenzie, I.
A., Sanderson, M. G., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Szopa, S., Van
Dingenen, R., Zeng, G., Atherton, C., Bergmann, D., Bey, I., Carmichael, G.,
Collins, W. J., Duncan, B. N., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Gauss, M., Gong,
S., Hauglustaine, D., Holloway, T., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jacob, D. J., Jonson,
J. E., Kaminski, J. W., Keating, T. J., Lupu, A., Marmer, E., Montanaro, V.,
Park, R. J., Pitari, G., Pringle, K. J., Pyle, J. A., Schroeder, S., Vivanco,
M. G., Wind, P., Wojcik, G., Wu, S., and Zuber, A.: Multimodel estimates of
intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D04301, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010816</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Fishman, J., Wozniak, A. E., and Creilson, J. K.: Global distribution of
tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements using the empirically
corrected tropospheric ozone residual technique: Identification of the
regional aspects of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 893–907,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-893-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-893-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Graustein, W. C. and Turekian, K. K.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb indicate an
upper troposphere source for elevated ozone in the summertime subtropical
free troposphere of the eastern North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23,
539–542, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Alfimov, V.: Beryllium-10 and beryllium-7 in
precipitation in Dubendorf (440 m) and at Jungfraujoch (3580 m),
Switzerland (1998–2005), J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11104,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009160</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Modeling cosmogenic
radionuclides <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be during the Maunder Minimum using the
ECHAM5-HAM General Circulation Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2797–2809,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Helmig, D., Oltmans, S. J., Morse, T. O., and Dibb, J. E.: What is causing
high ozone at Summit, Greenland? Atmos. Environ., 41, 5031–5043, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hirsch, R. M. and Gilroy, E. J.: Methods of fitting a straight line to data:
Examples in water resources, Water Resour. Bull., 20, 705–711, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Holton, J. R., Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B.,
and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-Troposphere Exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33,
403–439, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hsu, J. and Prather, M. J.: Stratospheric variability and tropospheric ozone,
J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06102, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010942" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010942</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hsu, J., Prather, M. J., and Wild, O.: Diagnosing the
stratosphere-to-troposphere flux of ozone in a chemistry transport model, J.
Geophys. Res., 110, D19305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006045</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Husain, L., Coffey, P. E., Meyers, R. E., and Cederwall, R. T.: Ozone
transport from stratosphere to troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 4, 363–365,
1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, W. B. and Viezee, W.: Stratospheric ozone in the lower troposphere
– I. Presentation and interpretation of aircraft measurements, Atmos.
Environ., 15, 1309–1323, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jordan, C. E., Dibb, J. E., and Finkel, R. C.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
tracer of atmospheric transport and stratosphere-troposphere exchange, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4234, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002395</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, D. M. and Rind, D.: Beryllium-10/beryllium-7 as a tracer of
stratospheric transport, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 3907–3917, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Koch, D. M., Jacob, D. J., and Graustein, W. C.: Vertical transport of
tropospheric aerosols as indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb in a chemical
tracer model, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 18651–18666, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Koch, D., Schmidt, G. A., and Field, C. V.: Sulfur, sea salt, and
radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06206,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005550</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kritz, M. A., Rosner, S. W., Danielsen, E. F., and Selkirk, S. B.: Air mass
origins and troposphere-to-stratosphere exchanges associated with
mid-latitude cyclogenesis and tropopause folding inferred from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 17405–17414, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lal, D. and Peters, B.: Cosmic ray produced radioactivity on the Earth, in:
Handuch der Physik, 46/2, edited by: Sitte, K., Springer-Verlag, New York,
USA, 551–612, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Langford, A. O., Senff, C. J., Alvarez II, R. J., Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R.,
Holloway, J. S., Lin, M. Y., Marchbanks, R. D., Pierce, R. B., Sandberg, S.
P., Weickmann, A. M., and Williams, E. J.: An overview of the 2013 Las Vegas
Ozone Study (LVOS): Impact of stratospheric intrusions and long-range
transport on surface air quality. Atmos. Environ., 109, 305–322,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.040</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Leifer, R. and Chan, N.: The Environmental Measurements Laboratory's
Stratospheric Radionuclide (RANDAB) and Trace Gas (TRACDAB) Databases,
available at: <uri>http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ndps/db1019.html</uri> (last access:
12 April 2016), 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q., Jacob, D. J., Fairlie, T. D., Liu, H., Martin, R. V., and Yantosca,
R. M.: Stratospheric vs. pollution influences on ozone at Bermuda:
Reconciling past analyses, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4611,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002138</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Liang, Q., Douglass, A. R., Duncan, B. N., Stolarski, R. S., and Witte, J.
C.: The governing processes and timescales of stratosphere-to-troposphere
transport and its contribution to ozone in the Arctic troposphere, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 3011–3025, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3011-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3011-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Cooper, O. R., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O.,
Levy II, H., Johnson, B. J., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., and Senff, C. J.:
Springtime high surface ozone events over the western United States:
Quantifying the role of stratospheric intrusions, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D00V22, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018151</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J.,
Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.: Climate variability modulates western U.S.
ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nature
Communications, 6, 7105, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms8105</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, S. J. and Rood, R. B.: Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian
transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., and Yantosca, R. M.: Constraints from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be on wet deposition and transport in a global
three-dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological
fields, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12109–12128, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Jacob, D. J., Dibb, J. E., Fiore, A. M., and Yantosca, R. M.:
Constraints on the sources of tropospheric ozone from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be-O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> correlations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07306,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003988" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003988</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Das, B., Bergmann, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Strahan, S.,
Wang, M., and Feng, Y.: Uncertainties in global aerosol simulations:
Assessment using three meteorological data sets, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D11212, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008216</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, J. A.: An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere:
Recommendations for testing 3-D models, and development of a gridded
climatology for tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16115–16149,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Masarik, J. and Beer, J.: Simulation of particle fluxes and cosmogenic
nuclide production in the Earth's atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104,
12099–12111, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Masarik, J. and Reedy, R. C.: Terrestrialcosmogenic-nuclide production
systematic calculated from numerical simulations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.
136, 381–395, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
McLinden, C. A., Olsen, S. C., Hannegan, B., Wild, O., and Prather, M. J.:
Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models: A simple chemistry and the
cross-tropopause flux, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14653–14665, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, R. L. and Kahn, J. S.: Statistical analysis in the geological
sciences, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 204–210, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M. and Fahey, D. W.: An estimate of the flux of stratospheric
reactive nitrogen and ozone into the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
5325–5332, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
O'Brien, K., De La Zerda Lerner, A., Shea, M. A., and Smart, D. F.: The
production of cosmogenic isotopes in the Earth's atmosphere and their
inventories, in: The Sun in Time, Univ. of Ariz. Press, Tucson, USA,
317–342, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Olsen, M. A., Schoeberl, M. R., and Douglass, A. R.:
Stratosphere-troposphere exchange of mass and ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D24114, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005186</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M., Schmitt, R., Curvas, E., Savoie, D. L., Graustein, W. C.,
Turekian, K. K., Volz-Thomas, A., Diaz, A., Oltmans, S. J., and Levy II, H.:
Temporal variability of summer-time ozone and aerosols in the free
troposphere over the eastern North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22,
2925–2928, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Raisbeck, G. M., Yiou, F., Fruneau, M., Loiseaux, J. M., Lieuvin, M., and
Ravel, J. C.: Cosmogenic Be-10/Be-7 as a probe for atmospheric transport
processes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 1015–1018, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Rehfeld, S. and Heimann, M.: Three dimensional atmospheric transport
simulation of the radioactive tracers <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr, J. Gephys. Res., 100, 26141–26161, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Riese, M., Ploeger, F., Rap, A., Vogel, B., Konopka, P., Dameris, M., and
Forster, P.: Impact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS
composition and related radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16305,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017751</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Rind, D. and Lerner, J.: Use of on-line tracers as a diagnostic tool in
general circulation model development: 1. Horizontal and vertical transport
in the troposphere, J. Geophy. Res., 101, 12667–12683,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD00551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD00551</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Rind, D., Lerner, J., Jonas, J., and McLinden, C.: Effects of resolution and
model physics on tracer transports in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space
Studies general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09315,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007476" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007476</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rotman, D. A., Tannahill, J. R., Kinnison, D. E., Connell, P. S., Bergmann,
D., Proctor, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Lin, S. J., Rood, R. B., Prather, M. J.,
Rasch, P. J., Considine, D. B., Ramaroson, R., and Kawa, S. R.: Global
Modeling Initiative assessment model: Model description, integration, and
testing of the transport shell, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1669–1691, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sanak, J., Lambert, G., and Ardouin, B.: Measurements of
stratosphere-troposphere exchange in Antarctica by using short-lived
cosmonuclides, Tellus B, 37, 109–115, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Schoeberl, M. R.: Extratropical stratosphere-troposphere mass exchange, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D13303, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004525</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., Zhu, Z., and Pawson, S.: A comparison of
the lower stratospheric age spectra derived from a general circulation model
and two data assimilation systems, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4113,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002652</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., and Bell, N.: Preindustrial-to-present-day
radiative forcing by tropospheric ozone from improved simulations with the
GISS chemistry-climate GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1675–1702,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1675-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1675-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M., and Wernli, H.: A global climatology of
stratosphere–troposphere exchange using the ERA-Interim data set from 1979
to 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 913–937, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-913-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-913-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Stajner, I., Wargan, K., Pawson, S., Hayashi, H., Chang, L.-P., Hudman, R.
C., Froidevaux, L., Livesey, N., Levelt, P. F., Thompson, A. M., Tarasick,
D. W., Stubi, R., Andersen, S. B., Yela, M., Konig-Langlo, G., Schmidlin, F.
J., and Witte, J. C.: Assimilated ozone from EOS-Aura: Evaluation of the
tropopause region and tropospheric columns, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16S32,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008863" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008863</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Stevenson, D. S., Dentener, F. J., Schultz, M. G., Ellingsen, K., van Noije,
T. P. C., Wild, O., Zeng, G., Amann, M., Atherton, C. S., Bell, N., Bergmann,
D. J., Bey, I., Butler, T., Cofala, J., Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G.,
Doherty, R. M., Drevet, J., Eskes, H. J., Fiore, A. M., Gauss, M.,
Hauglustaine, D. A., Horowitz, L. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Krol, M. C.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lawrence, M. G., Montanaro, V., Müller, J.-F., Pitari,
G., Prather, M. J., Pyle, J. A., Rast, S., Rodriguez, J. M., Sanderson, M.
G., Savage, N. H., Shindell, D. T., Strahan, S. E., Sudo, K., and Szopa, S.:
Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric
ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D08301, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006338" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006338</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Bonasoni, P., Cristofanelli, P., Collins, W., Feichter, J., Frank,
A., Forster, C., Gerasopoulos, E., Gäggeler, H., James, P., Kentarchos,
T., Kromp-Kolb, H., Krüger, B., Land, C., Meloen, J., Papayannis, A.,
Priller, A., Seibert, P., Sprenger, M., Roelofs, G. J., Scheel, H. E.,
Schnabel, C., Siegmund, P., Tobler, L., Trickl, T., Wernli, H., Wirth, V.,
Zanis, P., and Zerefos, C.: Stratosphere-troposphere exchange: A review, and
what we have learnt from STACCATO, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8516,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002490</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Strahan, S. E. and Douglass, A. R.: Evaluating the credibility of transport
processes in simulations of ozone recovery using the Global Modeling
Initiative three-dimensional model, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D05110,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004238" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004238</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Strahan, S. E., Duncan, B. N., and Hoor, P.: Observationally derived
transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to
the GMI chemistry and transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Strahan, S. E., Schoeberl, M. R., and Steenrod, S. D.: The impact of tropical
recirculation on polar composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2471–2480,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2471-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2471-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Terao, Y., Logan, J. A., Douglass, A. R., and Stolarski, R. S.: Contribution
of stratospheric ozone to the interannual variability of tropospheric ozone
in the northern extratropics, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18309,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009854" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009854</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, A. M., Witte, J. C., McPeters, R. D., Oltmans, S. J., Schmidlin, F.
J., Logan, J. A., Fujiwara, M., Kirchhoff, V. W. J. H., Posny, F., Coetzee,
G. J. R., Hoegger, B., Kawakami, S., Ogawa, T., Johnson, B. J., Vömel,
H., and Labow, G.: Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ)
1998–2000 tropical ozone climatology – 1. Comparison with Total Ozone
Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) and groundbased measurements, J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 8238, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000967" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000967</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Tsutsumi, Y., Igarashi, Y., Zaizen, Y., and Makino, Y.: Case studies of
tropospheric ozone events observed at the summit of Mount Fuju, J. Geophys.
Res., 103, 16935–16951, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Usoskin, I. G. and Kovaltsov, G. A.: Production of cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
isotope in the atmosphere: Full 3-D modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12107,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009725</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Viezee, W. and Singh, H. B.: The distribution of beryllium-7 in the
troposphere: Implications on stratosphere/tropospheric air exchange, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 7, 805–808, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Q., Cunnold, D. M., Choi, Y., Wang, Y., Nam, J., Wang, H.-J.,
Froidevaux, L., Thompson, A. M., and Bhartia, P. K.: A study of tropospheric
ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a
global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D08302,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012616</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Young, P. J., Archibald, A. T., Bowman, K. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V.,
Stevenson, D. S., Tilmes, S., Voulgarakis, A., Wild, O., Bergmann, D.,
Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty,
R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H.,
MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T.,
Skeie, R. B., Shindell, D. T., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng,
G.: Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from
the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP),
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2063–2090, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zanis, P., Gerasopoulos, E., Priller, A., Schnabel, C., Stohl, A., Zerefos,
C., Gäggeler, H. W., Tobler, L., Kubik, P. W., Kanter, H. J., Scheel, H.
E., Luterbacher, J., and Berger, M.: An estimate of the impact of
stratosphere-to-troposphere transport (STT) on the lower free tropospheric
ozone over the Alps using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be measurements, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 8520, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002604" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002604</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., Duncan, B. N., Froidevaux, L., Bhartia, P. K.,
Levelt, P. F., and Waters, J. W.: Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura
OMI and MLS: Evaluation of measurements and comparison with the Global
Modeling Initiative's Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res., 111,
D19303, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007089</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Using beryllium-7 to assess cross-tropopause transport in global models</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">We use the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) modeling framework to
assess the utility of cosmogenic beryllium-7 (<sup>7</sup>Be), a natural aerosol
tracer, for evaluating cross-tropopause transport in global models. The GMI
chemical transport model (CTM) was used to simulate atmospheric <sup>7</sup>Be
distributions using four different meteorological data sets (GEOS1-STRAT
DAS, GISS II′ GCM, fvGCM, and GEOS4-DAS), featuring significantly different
stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) characteristics. The simulations
were compared with the upper troposphere and/or lower stratosphere (UT/LS)
<sup>7</sup>Be climatology constructed from  ∼  25 years of aircraft
and balloon data, as well as climatological records of surface
concentrations and deposition fluxes. Comparison of the fraction of surface
air of stratospheric origin estimated from the <sup>7</sup>Be simulations with
observationally derived estimates indicates excessive cross-tropopause
transport at mid-latitudes in simulations using GEOS1-STRAT and at high
latitudes using GISS II′ meteorological data. These simulations also
overestimate <sup>7</sup>Be deposition fluxes at mid-latitudes (GEOS1-STRAT) and
at high latitudes (GISS II′), respectively. We show that excessive
cross-tropopause transport of <sup>7</sup>Be corresponds to overestimated
stratospheric contribution to tropospheric ozone. Our perspectives on STE in
these meteorological fields based on <sup>7</sup>Be simulations are consistent
with previous modeling studies of tropospheric ozone using the same
meteorological fields. We conclude that the observational constraints for
<sup>7</sup>Be and observed <sup>7</sup>Be total deposition fluxes can be used routinely
as a first-order assessment of cross-tropopause transport in global models.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, R. F.: The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP)
monthly precipitation analysis (1979–Present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4,
1147–1167, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, D. J., Dibb, J. E., Ridley, B., Pickering, K. E., and Talbot, R. W.:
An estimate of the stratospheric contribution to springtime tropospheric
ozone maxima using TOPSE measurements and beryllium-7 simulations, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8355, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001428" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001JD001428</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B., Fiore, A.
M., Li, Q., Liu, H., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M.: Global modeling of
tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and
evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23096, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Brost, R. A., Feichter, J., and Heimann, M.: Three-dimensional simulation of
<sup>7</sup>Be in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 22423–22445, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G., Garnier, B., Johnson, C. E., and Sanderson,
M. G., and Stevenson, D. S.: Effect of stratosphere-troposphere exchange on
the future tropospheric ozone trend, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8528,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002617" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002617</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Considine, D. B., Bergmann, D. J., and Liu, H.: Sensitivity of Global
Modeling Initiative chemistry and transport model simulations of radon-222
and lead-210 to input meteorological data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3389–3406,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3389-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-5-3389-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Considine, D. B., Logan, J. A., and Olsen, M. A.: Evaluation of
near-tropopause ozone distributions in the Global Modeling Initiative
combined stratosphere/troposphere model with ozonesonde data, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 8, 2365–2385, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cristofanelli, P., Bonasoni, P., Collins, W., Feichter, J., Forster, C.,
James, P., Kentarchos, A., Kubik, P. W., Land, C., Meloen, J., Roelofs, G.
J., Siegmund, P., Sprenger, M., Schnabel, C., Stohl, A., Tobler, L., Tositti,
L., Trickl, T., and Zanis, P.: Stratosphere-to-troposphere transport: A model
and method evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8525, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002600" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002600</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dibb, J. E.: Vertical mixing above Summit, Greenland: Insights into seasonal
and high frequency variability from the radionuclide tracers Be-7 and Pb-210,
Atmos. Environ., 41, 5020–5030, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dibb, J. E., Talbot, R. W., and Gregory, G. L.: Beryllium-7 and lead-210 in
the western hemisphere Arctic atmosphere: Observations from three recent
aircraft-based sampling programs, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 16709–16715, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dibb, J. E., Meeker, L. D., Finkel, R. C., Southon, J. R., Caffee, M. W., and
Barrie, L. A.: Estimation of stratospheric input to the Arctic troposphere:
<sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>10</sup>Be in aerosols at Alert, Canada, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
12855–12864, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dibb, J. E., Talbot, R. W., Scheuer, E., Seid, G., DeBell, L., Lefer, B., and
Ridley, B.: Stratospheric influence on the northern North American free
troposphere during TOPSE: <sup>7</sup>Be as a stratospheric tracer, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 8363, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001347" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001JD001347</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Douglass, A. R., Prather, M. J., Hall, T. M., Strahan, S. E., Rasch, P. J.,
Sparling, L. C., Coy, L., and Rodriguez, J. M.: Choosing meteorological input
for the Global Modeling Initiative assessment of high-speed aircraft, J.
Geophys. Res., 104, 27545–27564, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Douglass, A. R., Schoeberl, M. R., Rood, R. B., and Pawson, S.: Evaluation of
transport in the lower tropical stratosphere in a global chemistry and
transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4259, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002696" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002696</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Douglass, A. R., Stolarski, R. S., Strahan, S. E., and Connell, P. S.:
Radicals and reservoirs in the GMI chemistry and transport model: Comparison
to measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D16302, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004632" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD004632</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Douglass, A. R., Stolarski, R. S., Schoeberl, M. R., Jackman, C. H., Gupta,
M. L., Newman, P. A., Nielsen, J. E., and Fleming, E. L.: Relationship of
loss, mean age of air and the distribution of CFCs to stratospheric
circulation and implications for atmospheric lifetimes, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D14309, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009575" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009575</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Duncan, B. N., Strahan, S. E., Yoshida, Y., Steenrod, S. D., and Livesey, N.:
Model study of the cross-tropopause transport of biomass burning pollution,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3713–3736, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3713-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-3713-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Duncan, B. N., West, J. J., Yoshida, Y., Fiore, A. M., and Ziemke, J. R.: The
influence of European pollution on ozone in the Near East and northern
Africa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2267–2283, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2267-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2267-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dutkiewicz, V. A. and Husain, L.: Stratospheric and tropospheric components
of <sup>7</sup>Be in surface air, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5783–5788, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Feely, H. W., Larsen, R. J., and Sanderson, C. G.: Factors that cause
seasonal variations in beryllium-7 concentrations in surface air, J. Environ.
Radioactiv., 9, 223–249, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Field, C. V., Schmidt, G. A., Koch, D., and Salyk, C.: Modeling production
and climate-related impacts on <sup>10</sup>Be concentration in ice cores, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, D15107, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006410" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006410</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Fiore, A. M., Dentener, F. J., Wild, O., Cuvelier, C., Schultz, M. G., Hess,
P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., Doherty, R. M., Horowitz, L. W., MacKenzie, I.
A., Sanderson, M. G., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Szopa, S., Van
Dingenen, R., Zeng, G., Atherton, C., Bergmann, D., Bey, I., Carmichael, G.,
Collins, W. J., Duncan, B. N., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Gauss, M., Gong,
S., Hauglustaine, D., Holloway, T., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jacob, D. J., Jonson,
J. E., Kaminski, J. W., Keating, T. J., Lupu, A., Marmer, E., Montanaro, V.,
Park, R. J., Pitari, G., Pringle, K. J., Pyle, J. A., Schroeder, S., Vivanco,
M. G., Wind, P., Wojcik, G., Wu, S., and Zuber, A.: Multimodel estimates of
intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D04301, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010816" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD010816</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fishman, J., Wozniak, A. E., and Creilson, J. K.: Global distribution of
tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements using the empirically
corrected tropospheric ozone residual technique: Identification of the
regional aspects of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 893–907,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-893-2003" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-3-893-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Graustein, W. C. and Turekian, K. K.: <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>210</sup>Pb indicate an
upper troposphere source for elevated ozone in the summertime subtropical
free troposphere of the eastern North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23,
539–542, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Alfimov, V.: Beryllium-10 and beryllium-7 in
precipitation in Dubendorf (440 m) and at Jungfraujoch (3580 m),
Switzerland (1998–2005), J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11104,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009160" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009160</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Heikkilä, U., Beer, J., and Feichter, J.: Modeling cosmogenic
radionuclides <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>7</sup>Be during the Maunder Minimum using the
ECHAM5-HAM General Circulation Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2797–2809,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Helmig, D., Oltmans, S. J., Morse, T. O., and Dibb, J. E.: What is causing
high ozone at Summit, Greenland? Atmos. Environ., 41, 5031–5043, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hirsch, R. M. and Gilroy, E. J.: Methods of fitting a straight line to data:
Examples in water resources, Water Resour. Bull., 20, 705–711, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Holton, J. R., Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B.,
and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-Troposphere Exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33,
403–439, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, J. and Prather, M. J.: Stratospheric variability and tropospheric ozone,
J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010942" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD010942</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, J., Prather, M. J., and Wild, O.: Diagnosing the
stratosphere-to-troposphere flux of ozone in a chemistry transport model, J.
Geophys. Res., 110, D19305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006045" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006045</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Husain, L., Coffey, P. E., Meyers, R. E., and Cederwall, R. T.: Ozone
transport from stratosphere to troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 4, 363–365,
1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, W. B. and Viezee, W.: Stratospheric ozone in the lower troposphere
– I. Presentation and interpretation of aircraft measurements, Atmos.
Environ., 15, 1309–1323, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jordan, C. E., Dibb, J. E., and Finkel, R. C.: <sup>10</sup>Be ∕ <sup>7</sup>Be
tracer of atmospheric transport and stratosphere-troposphere exchange, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4234, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002395" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002395</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, D. M. and Rind, D.: Beryllium-10/beryllium-7 as a tracer of
stratospheric transport, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 3907–3917, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, D. M., Jacob, D. J., and Graustein, W. C.: Vertical transport of
tropospheric aerosols as indicated by <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>210</sup>Pb in a chemical
tracer model, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 18651–18666, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, D., Schmidt, G. A., and Field, C. V.: Sulfur, sea salt, and
radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06206,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005550" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005550</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kritz, M. A., Rosner, S. W., Danielsen, E. F., and Selkirk, S. B.: Air mass
origins and troposphere-to-stratosphere exchanges associated with
mid-latitude cyclogenesis and tropopause folding inferred from <sup>7</sup>Be
measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 17405–17414, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lal, D. and Peters, B.: Cosmic ray produced radioactivity on the Earth, in:
Handuch der Physik, 46/2, edited by: Sitte, K., Springer-Verlag, New York,
USA, 551–612, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Langford, A. O., Senff, C. J., Alvarez II, R. J., Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R.,
Holloway, J. S., Lin, M. Y., Marchbanks, R. D., Pierce, R. B., Sandberg, S.
P., Weickmann, A. M., and Williams, E. J.: An overview of the 2013 Las Vegas
Ozone Study (LVOS): Impact of stratospheric intrusions and long-range
transport on surface air quality. Atmos. Environ., 109, 305–322,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.040" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.040</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Leifer, R. and Chan, N.: The Environmental Measurements Laboratory's
Stratospheric Radionuclide (RANDAB) and Trace Gas (TRACDAB) Databases,
available at: <a href="http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ndps/db1019.html" target="_blank">http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ndps/db1019.html</a> (last access:
12 April 2016), 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Q., Jacob, D. J., Fairlie, T. D., Liu, H., Martin, R. V., and Yantosca,
R. M.: Stratospheric vs. pollution influences on ozone at Bermuda:
Reconciling past analyses, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4611,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002138" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002138</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, Q., Douglass, A. R., Duncan, B. N., Stolarski, R. S., and Witte, J.
C.: The governing processes and timescales of stratosphere-to-troposphere
transport and its contribution to ozone in the Arctic troposphere, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 9, 3011–3025, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3011-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-3011-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Cooper, O. R., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O.,
Levy II, H., Johnson, B. J., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., and Senff, C. J.:
Springtime high surface ozone events over the western United States:
Quantifying the role of stratospheric intrusions, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D00V22, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018151" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012JD018151</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J.,
Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.: Climate variability modulates western U.S.
ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nature
Communications, 6, 7105, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ncomms8105</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, S. J. and Rood, R. B.: Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian
transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, H., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., and Yantosca, R. M.: Constraints from
<sup>210</sup>Pb and <sup>7</sup>Be on wet deposition and transport in a global
three-dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological
fields, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12109–12128, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, H., Jacob, D. J., Dibb, J. E., Fiore, A. M., and Yantosca, R. M.:
Constraints on the sources of tropospheric ozone from
<sup>210</sup>Pb-<sup>7</sup>Be-O<sub>3</sub> correlations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07306,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003988" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD003988</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Das, B., Bergmann, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Strahan, S.,
Wang, M., and Feng, Y.: Uncertainties in global aerosol simulations:
Assessment using three meteorological data sets, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D11212, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008216" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD008216</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, J. A.: An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere:
Recommendations for testing 3-D models, and development of a gridded
climatology for tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16115–16149,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Masarik, J. and Beer, J.: Simulation of particle fluxes and cosmogenic
nuclide production in the Earth's atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104,
12099–12111, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Masarik, J. and Reedy, R. C.: Terrestrialcosmogenic-nuclide production
systematic calculated from numerical simulations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.
136, 381–395, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
McLinden, C. A., Olsen, S. C., Hannegan, B., Wild, O., and Prather, M. J.:
Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models: A simple chemistry and the
cross-tropopause flux, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14653–14665, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, R. L. and Kahn, J. S.: Statistical analysis in the geological
sciences, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 204–210, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M. and Fahey, D. W.: An estimate of the flux of stratospheric
reactive nitrogen and ozone into the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
5325–5332, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
O'Brien, K., De La Zerda Lerner, A., Shea, M. A., and Smart, D. F.: The
production of cosmogenic isotopes in the Earth's atmosphere and their
inventories, in: The Sun in Time, Univ. of Ariz. Press, Tucson, USA,
317–342, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Olsen, M. A., Schoeberl, M. R., and Douglass, A. R.:
Stratosphere-troposphere exchange of mass and ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D24114, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005186" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005186</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M., Schmitt, R., Curvas, E., Savoie, D. L., Graustein, W. C.,
Turekian, K. K., Volz-Thomas, A., Diaz, A., Oltmans, S. J., and Levy II, H.:
Temporal variability of summer-time ozone and aerosols in the free
troposphere over the eastern North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22,
2925–2928, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Raisbeck, G. M., Yiou, F., Fruneau, M., Loiseaux, J. M., Lieuvin, M., and
Ravel, J. C.: Cosmogenic Be-10/Be-7 as a probe for atmospheric transport
processes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 1015–1018, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Rehfeld, S. and Heimann, M.: Three dimensional atmospheric transport
simulation of the radioactive tracers <sup>210</sup>Pb, <sup>7</sup>Be, <sup>10</sup>Be, and
<sup>90</sup>Sr, J. Gephys. Res., 100, 26141–26161, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Riese, M., Ploeger, F., Rap, A., Vogel, B., Konopka, P., Dameris, M., and
Forster, P.: Impact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS
composition and related radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16305,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012JD017751</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Rind, D. and Lerner, J.: Use of on-line tracers as a diagnostic tool in
general circulation model development: 1. Horizontal and vertical transport
in the troposphere, J. Geophy. Res., 101, 12667–12683,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD00551" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/96JD00551</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Rind, D., Lerner, J., Jonas, J., and McLinden, C.: Effects of resolution and
model physics on tracer transports in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space
Studies general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09315,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007476" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007476</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rotman, D. A., Tannahill, J. R., Kinnison, D. E., Connell, P. S., Bergmann,
D., Proctor, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Lin, S. J., Rood, R. B., Prather, M. J.,
Rasch, P. J., Considine, D. B., Ramaroson, R., and Kawa, S. R.: Global
Modeling Initiative assessment model: Model description, integration, and
testing of the transport shell, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1669–1691, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sanak, J., Lambert, G., and Ardouin, B.: Measurements of
stratosphere-troposphere exchange in Antarctica by using short-lived
cosmonuclides, Tellus B, 37, 109–115, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Schoeberl, M. R.: Extratropical stratosphere-troposphere mass exchange, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D13303, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004525" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD004525</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., Zhu, Z., and Pawson, S.: A comparison of
the lower stratospheric age spectra derived from a general circulation model
and two data assimilation systems, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4113,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002652" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002652</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., and Bell, N.: Preindustrial-to-present-day
radiative forcing by tropospheric ozone from improved simulations with the
GISS chemistry-climate GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1675–1702,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1675-2003" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-3-1675-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M., and Wernli, H.: A global climatology of
stratosphere–troposphere exchange using the ERA-Interim data set from 1979
to 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 913–937, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-913-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-913-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Stajner, I., Wargan, K., Pawson, S., Hayashi, H., Chang, L.-P., Hudman, R.
C., Froidevaux, L., Livesey, N., Levelt, P. F., Thompson, A. M., Tarasick,
D. W., Stubi, R., Andersen, S. B., Yela, M., Konig-Langlo, G., Schmidlin, F.
J., and Witte, J. C.: Assimilated ozone from EOS-Aura: Evaluation of the
tropopause region and tropospheric columns, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16S32,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008863" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008863</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, D. S., Dentener, F. J., Schultz, M. G., Ellingsen, K., van Noije,
T. P. C., Wild, O., Zeng, G., Amann, M., Atherton, C. S., Bell, N., Bergmann,
D. J., Bey, I., Butler, T., Cofala, J., Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G.,
Doherty, R. M., Drevet, J., Eskes, H. J., Fiore, A. M., Gauss, M.,
Hauglustaine, D. A., Horowitz, L. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Krol, M. C.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lawrence, M. G., Montanaro, V., Müller, J.-F., Pitari,
G., Prather, M. J., Pyle, J. A., Rast, S., Rodriguez, J. M., Sanderson, M.
G., Savage, N. H., Shindell, D. T., Strahan, S. E., Sudo, K., and Szopa, S.:
Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric
ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D08301, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006338" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JD006338</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Bonasoni, P., Cristofanelli, P., Collins, W., Feichter, J., Frank,
A., Forster, C., Gerasopoulos, E., Gäggeler, H., James, P., Kentarchos,
T., Kromp-Kolb, H., Krüger, B., Land, C., Meloen, J., Papayannis, A.,
Priller, A., Seibert, P., Sprenger, M., Roelofs, G. J., Scheel, H. E.,
Schnabel, C., Siegmund, P., Tobler, L., Trickl, T., Wernli, H., Wirth, V.,
Zanis, P., and Zerefos, C.: Stratosphere-troposphere exchange: A review, and
what we have learnt from STACCATO, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8516,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002490" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002490</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Strahan, S. E. and Douglass, A. R.: Evaluating the credibility of transport
processes in simulations of ozone recovery using the Global Modeling
Initiative three-dimensional model, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D05110,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004238" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD004238</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Strahan, S. E., Duncan, B. N., and Hoor, P.: Observationally derived
transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to
the GMI chemistry and transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Strahan, S. E., Schoeberl, M. R., and Steenrod, S. D.: The impact of tropical
recirculation on polar composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2471–2480,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2471-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-2471-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Terao, Y., Logan, J. A., Douglass, A. R., and Stolarski, R. S.: Contribution
of stratospheric ozone to the interannual variability of tropospheric ozone
in the northern extratropics, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18309,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009854" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD009854</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, A. M., Witte, J. C., McPeters, R. D., Oltmans, S. J., Schmidlin, F.
J., Logan, J. A., Fujiwara, M., Kirchhoff, V. W. J. H., Posny, F., Coetzee,
G. J. R., Hoegger, B., Kawakami, S., Ogawa, T., Johnson, B. J., Vömel,
H., and Labow, G.: Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ)
1998–2000 tropical ozone climatology – 1. Comparison with Total Ozone
Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) and groundbased measurements, J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 8238, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000967" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001JD000967</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Tsutsumi, Y., Igarashi, Y., Zaizen, Y., and Makino, Y.: Case studies of
tropospheric ozone events observed at the summit of Mount Fuju, J. Geophys.
Res., 103, 16935–16951, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Usoskin, I. G. and Kovaltsov, G. A.: Production of cosmogenic <sup>7</sup>Be
isotope in the atmosphere: Full 3-D modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D12107,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009725" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD009725</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Viezee, W. and Singh, H. B.: The distribution of beryllium-7 in the
troposphere: Implications on stratosphere/tropospheric air exchange, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 7, 805–808, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Q., Cunnold, D. M., Choi, Y., Wang, Y., Nam, J., Wang, H.-J.,
Froidevaux, L., Thompson, A. M., and Bhartia, P. K.: A study of tropospheric
ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a
global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D08302,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012616" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD012616</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Young, P. J., Archibald, A. T., Bowman, K. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V.,
Stevenson, D. S., Tilmes, S., Voulgarakis, A., Wild, O., Bergmann, D.,
Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty,
R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H.,
MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T.,
Skeie, R. B., Shindell, D. T., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng,
G.: Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from
the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP),
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2063–2090, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zanis, P., Gerasopoulos, E., Priller, A., Schnabel, C., Stohl, A., Zerefos,
C., Gäggeler, H. W., Tobler, L., Kubik, P. W., Kanter, H. J., Scheel, H.
E., Luterbacher, J., and Berger, M.: An estimate of the impact of
stratosphere-to-troposphere transport (STT) on the lower free tropospheric
ozone over the Alps using <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>7</sup>Be measurements, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 8520, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002604" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JD002604</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., Duncan, B. N., Froidevaux, L., Bhartia, P. K.,
Levelt, P. F., and Waters, J. W.: Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura
OMI and MLS: Evaluation of measurements and comparison with the Global
Modeling Initiative's Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res., 111,
D19303, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007089</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
